Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSW5240301_Supplement-EZ Form_20240703 SUPPLEMENT-EZ COVER PAGE PROJECT INFORMATION 1 Project Name _—_ Juniper Ridge Subdivision 2 Project Area(ac) I 44.11 3 Coastal Wetland Area(ac) t 0 4 Surface Water Area(ac) 2.51 5 Is this project High or Low Density? I Low 6 Does this project use an off site SCM? No COMPLIANCE WITH 02H.1003(4) 7 Width of vegetated setbacks provided(feet) t m my 30 II 8 Will the vegetated setback remain vegetated? j Yes 9 If BUA is proposed in the setback,does it meet NCAC 02H 1003(4)(c d)? I N/A 10 Is streambank stabilization proposed on this project? 1 No NUMBER AND TYPE OF SCMs „.• ;<I y -z , , 11 Infiltration System 0 12 Bioretention Cell 0 13 Wet Pond _.—. -._._. I ._;._........ .__._�._.. 0 14 Stormwater Wetland 1 0 15 Permeable Pavement 0 16 Sand Filter I 0 17 Rainwater Harvesting(RWH) i� 0 18 Green Roof _ _ ._.I 0 __ .__ ,_. 19 Level Spreader-Filter Strip(LS-FS) 4 0 q 20 Disconnected Impervious Surface(DIS) 0 21 Treatment Swale I 0 22 Dry Pond ...._._ _..—..�..a..�..,._:..,:__,____. 23 StormFilter f 0 24 Silva Cell 0 25 Bayfilter 0 26 Filterra 0 FORMS LOADED DESIGNER CERTIFICATION t. r .Ft, , ,,t z ti n .. 27 Name and Title: Nicholas S.Rightmyer,PE 28 Organization: Joyner Keeny,PLLC 29 Street address: I 1051 N.Winstead Avenue 30 City,State,Zip: t Rocky Mount NC 27804 31 Phone number(s):p Irv, (252)977-3124 32 Email: nnghtmyer@joynerkeeny.com Certification Statement I certify,under penalty of law that this Supplement-EZ form and all supporting information were prepared under my direction or supervision;that the information provided in the form is,to the best of my knowledge and belief,true,accurate,and complete;and that the engineering plans, specifications,operation and maintenance agreements and other supporting information are consistent with the information provided here. Designer ,\\\\11111111//// C)N ‹Z\-- S/�.919 signature of Designer�/ SEAL 036243 E•NGINE_-•.'; \ „,''9S SCOTI \ \ 07 ` ' - - 0_ j Seal ////ll1111111\\\` Date DRAINAGE AREAS 1 Is this a high density project? No 2 If so,number of drainage areas/SCMs 0 3 Does this project have low density areas? Yes 4 If so,number of low density drainage areas 1 1 Is all/part of this project subject to previous rule 5 versions? No CLICK TO LOAD FORM DRAINAGE AREA INFORMATION Entire Site LD 1 LD 2 4 Type of SCM Low Density Low Density Low Density 5 Total drainage area(sq ft) 1,921,256 1 570,273 1,350,983 6 Onsite drainage area(sq ft) 1,921,256 570,273 1,350,983 7 Offsite drainage area(sq ft) N/A N/A N/A 8 Total BUA in project(sq ft) 397036 sf 122304 sf 274731 sf New BUA on subdivided lots(subject to permitting) 9 (sq ft) 336000 sf 108662 sf 227338 sf New BUA not on subdivided lots(subject to 10 permitting)(sf) 61036 sf 13642 sf 47393 sf 11 Offsite BUA(sq ft) N/A N/A N/A 12 Breakdown of new BUA not on subdivided lots: -Parking(sq ft) N/A N/A N/A -Sidewalk(sq ft) N/A N/A N/A -Roof(sq ft) N/A N/A N/A -Roadway(sq ft) 61036 sf 13642 sf 47393 sf -Future(sq ft) N/A N/A N/A -Other,please specify in the comment box below(sq ft) N/A N/A N/A New infiltrating permeable pavement on 13 subdivided lots(sq ft) N/A N/A N/A New infiltrating permeable pavement not on 14 subdivided lots(sq ft) N/A N/A N/A Existing BUA that will remain(not subject to 15 permitting)(sq ft) N/A N/A N/A 16 Existing BUA that is already permitted(sq ft) N/A N/A N/A 17 Existing BUA that will be removed(sq ft) N/A N/A N/A 18 Percent BUA 21% 21% 20% 19 Design storm(inches) 5.3 in 5.3 in 5.3 in 20 Design volume of SCM(cu ft) N/A N/A N/A 21 Calculation method for design volume Rational Rational Rational ADDITIONAL INFORMATION _ Please use this space to provide any additional information about the 22 drainage area(s): #9=#of lots(48)*max permissable/lot(7000sf) BUA for each lot=%of lot in DA*7000 (See attached table) LOW DENSITY DESIGN REQUIREMENTS FOR LOW DENSITY PROJECTS FROM 02H.1003 1 Is project below density thresholds set forth in the applicable stormwater rule? Yes 2 Does project maximize dispersed flow and minimize channelization of flow? Yes 3 Has the use of piping been minimized per.1003(2)(c)? Yes 4 Side slopes of the vegetated conveyances(H:V) 3:1&4:1 5 Maximum velocity in the vegetated conveyances during the 10-year storm? 4.75 6 Are curb outlet swales proposed? No 7 Maximum longitudinal slope of curb outlet swale(s)(%) 8 Bottom width of curb outlet swale(s)(feet) 9 Maximum side slope of curb outlet swale(s)(H:V) 10 Minimum length of curb outlet swale(s)(feet) 11 Are treatment swales used instead of curb outlet swales? 12 Is stormwater released at the edge of the setback as dispersed flow? N/A 13 Have stormwater outlets been designed to prevent downslope erosion? Yes 14 Are variations to rule.1003 proposed? No ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 15 Please use this space to provide any additional information about this low density project: #12:The vegetated setback is not within the state permit area. Drainage Pervious Swale BUA Q Slope V,now Vaauai Flow depth # Area area (ac) (cfs) (%) (fps) (fps) (ft) (ac) (ac) 1 4.47 n/a n/a 0.40 13.00 0.50 5.00 1.70 1.59 2 7.51 n/a n/a 0.40 21.84 1.00 5.00 2.90 1.58 3 0.44 n/a n/a 0.40 1.28 0.30 5.00 0.38 1.06 4 0.24 n/a n/a 0.40 0.70 0.50 5.00 0.33 0.84 5 0.42 n/a n/a 0.40 1.22 0.50 5.00 0.48 0.92 6 1.73 n/a n/a 0.40 5.03 1.25 5.00 1.62 1.02 7 0.44 n/a n/a 0.40 1.28 1.30 5.00 0.78 0.74 8 1.63 n/a n/a 0.40 4.74 1.30 5.00 1.60 0.99 9 0.51 n/a n/a 0.40 1.48 2.20 5.00 1.09 0.67 10 0.19 n/a n/a 0.40 0.55 1.50 5.00 0.49 0.61 11 15.70 n/a n/a 0.40 45.66 2.10 5.00 4.86 1.53 12 0.54 n/a n/a 0.40 1.57 2.10 5.00 1.10 0.69 13 0.03 n/a n/a 0.40 0.09 0.30 5.00 0.05 0.75 14 0.55 n/a n/a 0.40 1.60 0.20 5.00 0.36 1.22 15 16 17