310305_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20240618

ivision of Water Resources
Facility Number - ?O.f O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
Type of Visit: Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review p Structure Evaluation p Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: G-/ Arrival Time:® Departure Time: (JD County: D&A�QIGV) Region: �lJ I
Farm Name: d' rairm Owner Email: �"--
Owner Name: J t� Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: Certification Number
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Rws 51 -'s0 �-_)
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder I jNon-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish 7,04- Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 1jNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ StrUCtUre ❑ Application Field ❑ Other: T
a. Was the conveyance man-made" ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA 0 NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DW R) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation'? ❑ Yes V] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes LA No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 511212020 Continued

Facility Number: - f Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection&Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? [—] Yes Qa?No ❑ NA ❑ NF
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? [:] Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NI:
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: a
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in): (�
Observed Freeboard(in): 3337
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes W No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes [�j No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes [Z No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes M No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks) YV
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes [)j No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [� No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes � No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes 4 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes [X No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records& Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes P0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes,check ❑ Yes [� No ❑ NA ❑ NI:
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
1. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes,check the appropriate box below. Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes W No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
Page 2 of 3 511212020 Con inried

Facility Number: - 30 jr I Date of Inspection: a- /8,2
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes [�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes Z No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No 0 NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes W No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes W No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge, freeboard problems,over-application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes N No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes Pg No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
bfi S'- £ Z� G, bs l.0f Sr90 3:&k Z S
0.7 ( 0,164
6• Z -23 0, �9 o,-7-7 OV-0 CSder- n0 0V&_ cepbCelt, ,
Z - (-23 US— 1 ,07 rp4&J
1� •zs-2Z I. 11 c�, µ3
VpC14e' NC"4r( e + U+ Ii—Z'4w)
Cwls�rwro/\ Dc,� 2-o2-I ,
SI cyl� s�„,� p u 2oZ,
Reviewer/Inspector Name: /'(�!/ ���; Phone: 110—Mc-7Z-15 -
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: �� jp
Page 3 of 3 511212020