310185_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20240619

Division of Water Resources
Facility Number - (�,f 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: Hance Inspection Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit7owm
utine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: /© Departure Time: 2 Q County: P liv) Region: W �tJ
Farm Name: ;(n 02,L4 S , J Owner Email:
Owner Name: B&4 ,KWJA �1�t/(,Utit4 G Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish La er Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder Non-La er Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish '7odleZSn Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish I Layers jBeef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layer Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets 113eef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
FT_ Other
Discharees and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes M No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2.Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 511212020 Continued

Facilit �+jmber: - # jDate of Inspection: /V
Waste Collection &Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes [XNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes [:] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): 3 2
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ N E
(i.e., large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a [:] Yes V0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes X No ❑ NA ❑ N E
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes V No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes [g No ❑ NA ❑ NF
maintenance or improvement?
1 1. Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes P No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes (� No ❑ NA ❑NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes 5� No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes 4 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes [X] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes [7) No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records& Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes [)a No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes 14 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design [:]maps [:] Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. P Yes ❑No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections [:]Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
Page 2 of 3 511212020 Continued

Facility :umber: 3 I - g,s Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [Z No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes [R)No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes E�q No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No [9l NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes [P No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes M No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. Lpd
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes [)�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NNE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes lNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
W Iq 9o0a -or 60 ok� be i c,,J a Ma)<e Sfcle
SSap�)(cd �cv�6 -&q 4iv, 4rj► Ar P64MPA!, ems
act 1 t aa /10 Gt,s". ' U)f}
S r a9ve, D;k,c wtA ckioai stir oirus4 h Corte
Reviewer/Inspector Name: /'(id / Qj�tll,�pf Phone: q10. -N�' ` ZK
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: r�i /k Zp2
Page 3 of 3 511212020