310165_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20240606

ivision of Water Resources
Facility Number - ( 7s-7 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: ef 7Routine
Hance Inspection Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: )Ljol in Region:
Farm Name: J r
h7..(� � <.� Owner Email:
Owner Name: , lnrt��:.. C"Gt,VY\1, �� Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: CU art S l7u�W i C Integrator:
Certified Operator: �, Ut �U`C Certification Number: { as
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity 1'op.
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow
W an to Feeder Non-Layer Dairy Calf
eeder to Finish O i Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
Other
Discharees and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes FFIK'� ❑ NA 0 NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(if yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes Q o ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes to ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 511212020 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection &Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NF
a. If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NI:
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structur 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: —"l
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): a o
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes I❑,Adf ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes Q-lo ❑ NA ❑ N I?
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NF,
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ N I,.
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes gJND. ❑NA ❑ NF,
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes Quo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes i,)o ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes ED-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes to ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes �lo ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes [ o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records& Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes `FTJ C No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes [j,M) ❑ NA ❑ NF.
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes Q o ❑ NA ❑NE
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis [:]Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ®-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? [:] Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 511212020 Continued

Facility Number: jDate of inspection: (01
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes � 0 ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No []NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes [-t'o ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? /
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes ❑'NO ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes 0 o ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge, freeboard problems,over-application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes Eg4o ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes [3 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes Ef No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
1
Reviewer/Inspector Name: //1 Phone: 9
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: J Date: LQ l Id-q
Page 3 of 3 511212020