NC0024201_Permit renewal application_20111231

October 5, 2011
Dear Mr. Brown:
Sincerely,
cc:
Beverly Eaves Perdue
Governor
Dee Freeman
Secretary
Subject: Receipt of permit renewal application
NPDES Permit NC0024201
Roanoke Rapids WWTP
Halifax County’
1517 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1517
Location: 512 N. Salisbury St Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone [phone] \ FAX [phone] Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748
Internet ww.ncwaterquality org
An Equal OpportunityAffirmative Action Employer
»
Dina Sprinkle
Point Source Branch
R DANIELEY BROWN PE
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
ROANOKE RAPIDS SANITARY DISTRICT
PO BOX 308
ROANOKE RAPIDS NC 27870
If you have any additional questions concerning renewal of the subject permit, please contact Gil Vinzani at
[phone].
CENTRAL FILES
Raleigh Regional Office/Surface Water Protection
NPDES Unit
^07}
....
ocr.
North CarolinaNaturally
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
* Coleen H. Sullins
Director
The NPDES Unit received your permit renewal application on October 4, 2011. A member of the NPDES
Unit will review your application. They will contact you if additional information is required to complete your
permit renewal. You should expect to receive a draft permit approximately 30-45 days before your existing permit
expires.
Roanoke Rapids Sanitary District
September 30. 2011
RE:
Dear Ms. Sprinkle,
Renewal ofNPDES Permit Number NC0024201
Roanoke River Waste Treatment Plant
P.O. Box 308
1000 Jackson Street
Roanoke Rapids, NC 27870
[phone]
Fax: [phone]
w^'w.rrsd.o.rg
RRSD respectfully requests that the following issues be addressed in this permit renewal:
• We request that Footnote 1 remain in the permit unaltered.
• We are in the process of identifying a new downstream sampling location. Our
current downstream sampling location is at U.S. 158 crossing the Roanoke River.
Traffic has increased significantly on U.S. 158, and we are concerned for the safety of
our staff. Our intention is to send a letter to the Division in the next few weeks that
will outline the reason for our request. We will identify the location of the proposed
and current downstream sampling locations in this correspondence.
• We request that Footnote 2 - Monthly average effluent CBOD§ and TSS
concentrations shall not exceed 15% of the respective influent value (i.e., 85%
removal is required.) - be removed from the permit. We believe that the additional
percentage removal limitation is not warranted as the facility continuously meets the
monthly and weekly average permit limit.
If Footnote 2 is not removed, we request that the language be modified to make an
exception for low influent suspended solids and CBOD events. Our facility has difficulty­
meeting this percent removal requirement when influent suspended solids and CBOD
concentrations are extremely low. Thus, we request that Footnote 2 be modified, as
follows: Monthly average effluent CBOD5 and TSS concentrations shall not exceed. 15%
The Roanoke Rapids Sanitary District (RRSD) is permitted to discharge treated effluent
to the Roanoke River. The permit expires on March 31, 2012. Tire enclosed application is
for ren ewal of the referenced permit. In accordance with the requirements of North
Carolina G.S. 143.215.1(c), we are submitting one signed original and two copies of the
completed application package. The application package includes the following:
1. Completed permit application form, EPA Form 2 A, with figures.
2. Attachment A: Priority Pollutant Scan Analyses (five scans).
3. Attachment B: Second Species Toxicity Tests (four tests).
4. Attachment C: Biosolids Management Description.
"i “ff r
/A
Ms. Dina Sprinkle
NC DENR, Division of Water Quality, NPDES Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27699-1617
2/Month1/Week11.1%0726.5
25"6 1/Week3/Week4.2%1.06
2/Month1/Week24.9%3.9115.7
1/Month0.0120.009
1/Month0.0720.058Zinc
o
o
o
o
<u cn
2 o>
E
5
O)S* C O)
O E
4.9
Parameter_______
Dissolved Oxygen (June,
_Julyx August, September)
Dissolved Oxygen
(October through May)__
" Temperature (June, July,
August, September)___
Temperature
(October through May)__
’Copper
25
30‘
6.7
"184
3.50
“f3.8
T84
2.03
OXKSS
“1,88
3.T0_
0.69
29.4%
0.21%
53_8%
22.4%
37.5%
28%
61%
5/week
5/week
5/week _
1/mpnJh
1/month
Data reported
from Long Term
Monitoring Plan
Data reported
from Long Term
Monitoring Plan
2/week...............
3/week ...........
~1/week___
1/quarter_____
i/quarter
c o
§s
Q
cts
T5
E
12 __co
0.37
CBO_D _ _
TSS
Ammonia
total Phosphorus
cu
O)
2 a>>*•£
E £
a
?! o a>
^_Q=.
o c
o .2
E 13 o •£
O rc
O >
7.6%
The monitoring data indicates that our discharge is routinely in compliance with pennit
limits. The coefficient of variation is less than 40% for all of our samples except for
ammonia. The low coefficient of variation indicates nominal variability in our effluent.
Our conclusions from the MBR analysis are as follows:
We request a reduction in the frequency of upstream and downstream stream
sampling events for dissolved oxygen and temperature from 3/week to 1/week
in June, July, August, and September. We also request a reduction in the
upstream and downstream sampling events from October through May to be
reduced from 1/week to 2/roonth.
Reduce the CBOD? monitoring frequency from daily sampling to 2/week.
Reduce the TSS monitoring frequency from daily sampling to 3/week
Reduce the ammonia monitoring frequency from daily sampling to 1/week.
o
E
0>
*!
E S'-?
<5 ill E
^2
go § O <D
Q-‘c Q-
1/Week
Table 1: Summary of Monitoring Burden Reduction Analysis
** s
E
0) a.
>»
It
ofthB respective influent value (U., 85% removal is required). This requirement shall he
waived if influent TSS concentrations are less than 150 mg/l and/or influent CBOD is less
than 100 mg/l.
. Wc request an increase in the Total Residual Chlorine permit limit from 28 pg/L to 50
u.g/L pursuant to the DWQ Point Source Branch correspondence dated May 1, 2008.
• We request a reduction in monitoring frequency for several parameters. We
performed a Monitoring Burden Reduction (MBR) analysis on our effluent
monitoring data for the last two years as recommended in tire EPA Guide for
Performance Based Reductions of NPDHS Permit Monitoring Frequencies (April
1996). A summary of these results is presented in Table I.
on RRSD Effluent Monitoring Data
>» u E
V
3
♦s ofs*
E i E
5 o>“ ^.e-e
>2 S
t E B* 3 ° J-
cj 5 S
3/Week
o
o
o
o
Attachments
cc:
We very much appreciate the time and effort of the NPDES Unit to consider our requests
for this permit renewal. Please do not hesitate to call myself (252-537-9137) or Mary
Sadler with Hazen and Sawyer (919-755-8560) if you have any questions.
Gregg-Camp. ORC RRSD Wastewater Treatment Plant
Jeff Poupart. DWQ, Point Source Branch Chief
Tom Belnick. DWQ, NPDES Unit Supervisor
Maty Sadler. Hazen and Sawyer
File
A copy of the permit Fact Sheet.
Documentation for any methodology, data, and assumptions used in any
permit modification, including Reasonable Potential Analyses, if applicable.
A copy of any comments that are received from the public regarding this
permit renewal, if applicable.
Reduce the total nitrogen and total phosphorous monitoring frequency from
monthly sampling to once per quarter.
Remove the monthly effluent composite sampling for copper and zinc. Our
Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR) data shows negligible amounts of these
pollutants in our effluent. These monitoring frequencies were originally
required in the former NPDES permit allowing a discharge to Chockoyotte
Creek. The results of these metals tests will continue to be transferred from
our Long Term Monitoring Plan and reported on our DMR quarterly and
monthly during Year 5 of the Long Term Monitoring Plan, as required.
Reduce the chronic toxicity sampling (Cer io daphnia) from quarterly to
annually. We have been conducting chronic toxicity testing since April 1993.
All of our toxicity tests have passed, including the second species testing with
Fathead Minnow.
• We request the following information as part o f the draft permit preparation:
o
o
We would like to offer a final consideration regarding the timing of our draft NPDES
pennit. We understand that there are several outstanding technical issues that the
Division is in the process of resolving, e.g. language revisions to permit standard
conditions, the proposed EPA impaired -water status for mercury over the entire state of
North Carolina, the North Carolina Water Quality Association's (NCQWA) request for
reduced sampling and monitoring, and the issues associated with the Triennial Review.
We would like to request that these technical issues be resolved prior to our draft permit
being issued. We would continue to operate under our current permit until such time a
draft NPDES is prepared by the Division and the final permit is issued.
Sincerely,
Roanoke Rapids Sanitary District
R. Danieley Brown, P.E.
Chief Executive Officer
BASIC APPLICATION INFORMATION
Roanoke River Waste Treatment Plant Facility Name
Mailing Address 135 Aqueduct Road
Weldon, North Carolina 27890
A. Gregg CampContact Person
uOCTOperator in Responsible ChargeTitle 0 ^1—
[phone]Telephone Number
135 Aqueduct RoadFacility Address
Weldon, North Carolina 27890 (not P.O. Box)
A.2. Applicant Information. If the applicant is different from the above, provide the following:
Roanoke Rapids Sanitary District Applicant Name
1000 Jackson Street. PO Box 308 Mailing Address
Roanoke Rapids. North Carolina 27870
R. Danieley BrownContact Person
Chief Executive OfficerTitle
[phone]Telephone Number
Is the applicant the owner or operator (or both) of the treatment works?
El operator
NPDES NC00242Q1 Other Stormwater Permit - General NCG110000
UIC Other Land Application Permit WQ0001989
RCRA Other Collection System Permit WQCSQ0027
PSD
municipalities and areas served by the facility. Provide the name and population of each
Name Population Served Type of Collection System Ownership
Roanoke Rapids 17.000 Separate Sanitary District
Gaston 1,650 Separate Sanitary District
Halifax & Northampton County 336 Separate County
Total population served 18,986
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces ERA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.Page 2 of 22
RIVER BASIN:
Roanoke
NC DENR
Raleigh Re^onal Office
_________•______
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Standard Renewal
Indicate whether correspondence regarding this permit should be directed to the facility or the applicant.
facility E applicant
- --------------------------------#______________
FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Roanoke River WWTP, NC0024201
El owner

PART A. BASIC APPLICATION INFORMATION FOR ALL APPLICANTS:
All treatment works must complete questions A.1 through A.8 of this Basic Application Information Packet
A.1. Facility Information.
E C E 0 W E [r^-------1-
. 0ENR-WATFR QUALITY
TOINT SOURCE BfVWCH
A.3. Existing Environmental Permits. Provide the permit number of any existing environmental permits that have been issued to the treatment works
(include state-issued permits).
A.4. Collection System Information. Provide information on r _..J---------------- - U1C 11Q111C ailu (JU(JU,ailuII
entity and, if known, provide information on the type of collection system (combined vs. separate) and its ownership (municipal, private, etc.).
A.5. Indian Country.
Is the treatment works located in Indian Country?a.
Yes 3 No
b.
Yes E3 No
A.6.
Design flow rate 8.34a.mgd
Two Years Ago Last Year This Year
b.Annual average daily flow rate 4.1 MGD 4,1 MGD 3.2 MGD
Maximum daily flow ratec.13.7 MGD 4.1 MGD 12.9 MGD
A.7. Collection System. Indicate the type(s) of collection system(s) used by the treatment plant. Check all that apply. Also estimate the percent
contribution (by miles) of each.
0 Separate sanitary sewer 100 %
Combined storm and sanitary sewer N/A %
A.8. Discharges and Other Disposal Methods.
Does the treatment works discharge effluent to waters of the U.S.?S Yesa. No
If yes, list how many of each of the following types of discharge points the treatment works uses:
i.Discharges of treated effluent 1
ii.Discharges of untreated or partially treated effluent 0
iii.Combined sewer overflow points 0
iv.Constructed emergency overflows (prior to the headworks)0
Other N/Av.0
b.
that do not have outlets for discharge to waters of the U.S.?0 No
If yes, provide the following for each surface impoundment:
Location:N/A
N/A mgd
Does the treatment works land-apply treated wastewater?c. Yes 0 No
If yes, provide lhe following for each land application site:
Location:N/A
Number of acres:0
0 mgd
Is land application intermittent?
d.
Yes 0 No
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces ERA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.Page 3 of 22
Does the treatment works discharge or transport treated or untreated wastewater to another
treatment works?
Annual average daily volume applied to site:
continuous or
Annual average daily volume discharge to surface impoundment(s)
Is discharge continuous or intermittent?
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Standard Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Roanoke
__________________•
FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Roanoke River WWTP, NC0024201
Does the treatment works discharge effluent to basins, ponds, or other surface impoundments
“ - Yes
Does the treatment works discharge to a receiving water that is either in Indian Country or that is upstream from (and eventually flows
through) Indian Country?
Flow. Indicate the design flow rate of the treatment plant (i.e., the wastewater flow rate that the plant was built to handle). Also provide the
average daily flow rate and maximum daily flow rate for each of the last three years. Each year's data must be based on a 12-month time period
with the 12 month of “this year" occurring no more than three months prior to this application submittal.
N/A
If transport is by a party other than the applicant, provide:
Transporter Name N/A
Mailing Address N/A
N/A
Contact Person N/A
Title N/A
Telephone Number N/A
For each treatment works that receives this discharge, provide the following:
Name N/A
Mailing Address N/A
N/A
Contact Person N/A
Title N/A
Telephone Number N/A
If known, provide the NPDES permit number of the treatment works that receives this discharge N/A
Provide the average daily flow rate from the treatment works into the receiving facility.N/A mgd
e.
Yes El No
Description of method (including location and size of site(s) if applicable):
N/A
N/A
intermittent?or
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.Page 4 of 22
Annual daily volume disposed by this method:
Is disposal through this method continuous
Does the treatment works discharge or dispose of its wastewater in a manner not included
in A.8. through A.8.d above (e.g., underground percolation, well injection):
If yes, provide the following for each disposal method:
__________•_______
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Standard Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Roanoke
FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Roanoke River WWTP, NC0024201
If yes, describe the mean(s) by which the wastewater from the treatment works is discharged or transported to the other treatment works
(e.g., tank truck, pipe).
WASTEWATER DISCHARGES:
A.9. Description of Outfall.
Outfall number 001a.
b.Location
(State)
Distance from shore (if applicable)c.N/A ft.
d.Depth below surface (if applicable)N/A ft.
Average daily flow ratee.3.8 mgd
f.Does this outfall have either an intermittent or a periodic discharge? Yes 0 No (gotoA.9.g.)
If yes, provide the following information:
Number f times per year discharge occurs:N/A
Average duration of each discharge:N/A
Average flow per discharge:N/A mgd
Months in which discharge occurs:N/A
Is outfall equipped with a diffuser?g- Yes 0 No
A.10. Description of Receiving Waters.
Name of receiving watera.Roanoke River
b.Name of watershed (if known)Roanoke River and Tributaries
United States Soil Conservation Service 14-digit watershed code (if known):03010107070010
Name of State Management/River Basin (if known): Roanoke River Basinc.
United States Geological Survey 8-digit hydrologic cataloging unit code (if known):03010107
d.Critical low flow of receiving stream (if applicable) 1172 cfs (7Q10)
acute cfs chronic cfs
Total hardness of receiving stream at critical low flow (if applicable): unknowne.mg/l of CaCO3
ERA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces ERA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.Page 5 of 22
27890
(Zip Code)
RIVER BASIN:
Roanoke
_____________
FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Roanoke River WWTP, NC0024201
_________
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Standard Renewal
Weldon_____________
(City or town, if applicable)
Halifax
(County)
36° 26' 13"
(Latitude)
77° 36' 37"
(Longitude)
If you answered lYes” to question A.8.a, complete questions A.9 through A.12 once for each outfall (including bypass points) through
which effluent is discharged. Do not include information on combined sewer overflows in this section. If you answered “No” to question
AJTa, go to Part B, "Additional Application Information for Applicants with a Design Flow Greater than or Equal to 0.1 mgd.”
RIVER BASIN:
Roanoke
A.11. Description of Treatment
a.
□ Advanced Describe:
b.
Design BODS removal or Design CBOD5 removal 90 %
Design SS removal 90 %
Design P removal N/A %
Design N removal N/A %
Other N/A N/A %
What type of disinfection is used for the effluent from this outfall? If disinfection varies by season, please describe:c.
Sodium Hypochlorite
If disinfection is by chlorination is dechlorination used for this outfall?El Yes □ No
Does the treatment plant have post aeration?□ Yes 0 No
minimum, effluent testing data must be based on at least three samples and must be no more than four and one-half years apart.
Outfall number:001
MAXIMUM DAILY VALUE AVERAGE DAILY VALUEPARAMETER
Value Units Value Units
pH (Minimum)6.9 s.u.
pH (Maximum)6.5 s.u.
Flow Rate 5.66 MGD 3.76 MGD 5
Temperature (Winter)13.95 °C 11.9 °C 4
26.9 °C 25.5 °C 5
AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE
POLLUTANT ML/MDL
Cone.Units Cone.Units
CONVENTIONAL AND NON CONVENTIONAL COMPOUNDS
BODS
CBOD5 6.8 Mg/I 5.6 Mg/I 5 SM5210B 2 mg/l
FECAL COLIFORM 60 16 5 SM9222D 1/100ml
TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS (TSS)27.4 Mg/I 11.4 Mg/I 5 SM2540 2.5 mg/l
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.Page 6 of 22
END OF PART A.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Standard Renewal
Colon!
es/100
ml
Number of
Samples
ANALYTICAL
METHOD
BIOCHEMICAL OXYGEN
DEMAND (Report one)
FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Roanoke River WWTP, NC0024201
Colonies
/100ml
Temperature (Summer)
* For pH please report a minimum and a maximum daily value
MAXIMUM DAILY
DISCHARGE
Number of Samples
What level of treatment are provided? Check all that apply.
S Primary S Secondary
□ Other.
Indicate the following removal rates (as applicable):
A.12. Effluent Testing Information. All Applicants that discharge to waters of the US must provide effluent testing data for the following
parameters. Provide the indicated effluent testing required by the permitting authority for each outfall through which effluent is
discharged. Do not include information on combined sewer overflows in this section. All information reported must be based on data
collected through analysis conducted using 40 CFR Part 136 methods. In addition, this data must comply with QA/QC requirements of
40 CFR Part 136 and other appropriate QA/QC requirements for standard methods for analytes not addressed by 40 CFR Part 136. At a
BASIC APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART B.
B.1.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
B.3.
B.4.
N/A
N/AMailing Address:
N/A
N/ATelephone Number:
N/AResponsibilities of Contractor:
B.5.
b.
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces ERA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.Page 7 of 22
contractor? Yes
If yes, list the name, address,
pages if necessary).
Name:
___ft__
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Standard Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Roanoke
List the outfall number (assigned in question A.9) for each outfall that is covered by this implementation schedule.
N/A
_______ft____
FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Roanoke River WWTP, NC0024201
gpd
Briefly explain any steps underway or planned to minimize inflow and infiltration.
The District continues SSES for I & I in the collection system; Collection System Master Plan has been developed; Sub­
Basin, A & B have been rehabbed; Belmont Area SSES in progress; Comprehensive SSES for Basin I budgeted.
Indicate whether the planned improvements or implementation schedule are required by local, State, or Federal agencies. N/A
Yes No
Scheduled improvements and Schedules of Implementation. Provide information on any uncompleted implementation schedule or
uncompleted plans for improvements that will affect the wastewater treatment, effluent quality, or design capacity of the treatment works. If the
treatment works has several different implementation schedules or is planning several improvements, submit separate responses to question B.5
for each. (If none, go to question B.6.)
a.
ADDITIONAL APPLICATION INFORMATION FOR APPLICANTS WITH A DESIGN FLOW GREATER THAN OR
EQUAL TO 0.1 MGD (100,000 gallons per day).
All applicants with a design flow rate £ 0.1 mgd must answer questions B.1 through B.6. All others go to Part C (Certification).
Inflow and Infiltration. Estimate the average number of gallons per day that flow into the treatment works from inflow and/or infiltration.
1,410,000
Operation/Maintenance Performed by Contractor(s).
Are any operational or maintenance aspects (re^ted t0 wastewater treatment and effluent quality) of the treatment works the responsibility of a
telephone number, and status of each contractor and describe the contractor’s responsibilities (attach additional
B.2. Topographic Map. Attach to this application a topographic map of the area extending at least one mile beyond facility property boundaries. This
map must show the outline of the facility and the following information. (You may submit more than one map if one map does not show the entire
area.) See Attached Figure
a. The area surrounding the treatment plant, including all unit processes.
The major pipes or other structures through which wastewater enters the treatment works and the pipes or other structures through which
treated wastewater is discharged from the treatment plant. Include outfalls from bypass piping, if applicable.
Each well where wastewater from the treatment plant is injected underground.
Wells, springs, other surface water bodies, and drinking water wells that are: 1) within ’/« mile of the property boundaries of the treatment
works, and 2) listed in public record or otherwise known to the applicant.
Any areas where the sewage sludge produced by the treatment works is stored, treated, or disposed.
If the treatment works receives waste that is classified as hazardous under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) by truck, rail,
or special pipe, show on the map where the hazardous waste enters the treatment works and where it is treated, stored, and/or disposed.
Process Flow Diagram or Schematic. Provide a diagram showing the processes of the treatment plant, including all bypass piping and all
backup power sources or redunancy in the system. Also provide a water balance showing all treatment units, including disinfection (e.g.,
chlorination and dechlorination). The water balance must show daily average flow rates at influent and discharge points and approximate daily flow
rates between treatment units. Include a brief narrative description of the diagram. See Attached Figure
c.
d.
Schedule Actual Completion
Implementation Stage MM/DD/YYYY MM/DD/YYYY
- Begin Construction ///I
- End Construction /I /I
- Begin Discharge I I //
- Attain Operational Level /I I
e.□ Yes □ No
B.6.
Outfall Number: 001
AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE
POLLUTANT MUMDL
Cone.Units Cone.Units
3.76 Mg/I 1.9 Mg/I 5 SM4500F O.lmg/I
<15 Ug/I <11.4 Ug/I 5 HACK 10014 <10ug/l
DISSOLVED OXYGEN 5.9 Mg/I 5.12 Mg/I 5 SM4500-OG NA
8.99 Mg/I 4.16 Mg/i 5 ERA 351.1 0.2mg/l
15.9 Mg/I 12.7 Mg/I 5 ERA 353.2 0.1mg/l
OIL and GREASE <5 Mg/I <5 Mg/I 5 ERA1664A 5mg/l
PHOSPHORUS (Total)4.08 Mg/I 2.16 Mg/I 5 ERA 200.7 0.02mg/l
391 Mg/I 280.8 Mg/I 5 SM2540C 10mg/l
OTHER NA
ERA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces ERA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.Page 8 of 22
J
TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS
(TDS)
TOTAL KJELDAHL
NITROGEN (TKN)
NITRATE PLUS NITRITE
NITROGEN
CHLORINE (TOTAL
RESIDUAL, TRC)
END OF PART B.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
MAXIMUM DAILY
DISCHARGE
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Standard Renewal
Number of
Samples
ANALYTICAL
METHOD
RIVER BASIN:
Roanoke
FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Roanoke River WWTP, NC0024201
If the answer to B.5.b is "Yes," briefly describe, including
N/A
CONVENTIONAL AND NON CONVENTIONAL COMPOUNDS
AMMONIA (as N)
new maximum daily inflow rate (if applicable).
Provide dates imposed by any compliance schedule or any actual dates of completion for the implementation steps listed below, as
applicable, -or improvements planned independently of local, State, or Federal agencies, indicate planned or actual completion dates as
applicable. Indicate dates as accurately as possible.
N/A
2 __
Have appropriate permits/clearances concerning other Federal/State requirements been obtained?
Describe briefly: N/A
EFFLUENT TESTING DATA (GREATER THAN 0.1 MGD ONLY).
Applicants that discharge to waters of the US must provide effluent testing data for the following parameters. Provide the indicated
effluent testing required by the permitting authority for each outfall through which effluent is discharged. Do not Include information
on combine sewer overflows in this section. All Information reported must be based on data collected through analysis conducted
• Parl 136 methods- ln addition, this data must comply with QA/QC requirements of 40 CFR Part 136 and other appropriate
QA/QC requirements for standard methods for analytes not addressed by 40 CFR Part 136. At a minimum effluent testing data must be
based on at least three pollutant scans and must be no more than four and on-half years old.
BASIC APPLICATION INFORMATION
PARTC. CERTIFICATION
ALL APPLICANTS MUST COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING CERTIFICATION.
Name and official title
Signature
Telephone number [phone]
Date signed
works or identify appropriate permitting requirements.
SEND COMPLETED FORMS TO:
27699-1617
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.Page 9 of 22
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Standard Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Roanoke
_____e>
FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Roanoke River WWTP, NC0024201
NCDENR/ DWQ
Attn: NPDES Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina
R. Danieley Brown, Chief Executive Officer, Roanoke Rapids Sanitary District
21; 2oi I_____________________________
Upon request of the permitting authority, you must submit any other information necessary to assure wastewater treatment practices at the treatment
AH applicants must complete the Certification Section. Refer to Instructions to determine who is an officer for the purposes of this
certification. All applicants must complete all applicable sections of Form 2A, as explained in the Application Overview. Indicate below which
parts of Form 2A you have completed and are submitting. By signing this certification statement, applicants confirm that they have reviewed
Form 2A and have completed all sections that apply to the facility for which this application is submitted.
Indicate which parts of Form 2A you have completed and are submitting:
El Basic Application Information packet Supplemental Application Information packet:
El Part D (Expanded Effluent Testing Data)
EJ Part E (Toxicity Testing: Biomonitoring Data)
El Part F (Industrial User Discharges and RCRA/CERCLA Wastes)
□ Part G (Combined Sewer Systems)
I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system
designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who
manage the system or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information is. to the best of my knowledge and belief true
accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment
RIVER BASIN:
Roanoke River WWTP. NC0024201 Standard Renewal Roanoke
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART D. EXPANDED EFFLUENT TESTING DATA
Refer to the directions on the cover page to determine whether this section applies to the treatment works.
The five required Priority Pollutant Scans are Attachment A to this NPDES Permit Application.
Outfall number:001 (Complete once for each outfall discharging effluent to waters of the United States.)
MAXIMUM DAILY DISCHARGE AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE
POLLUTANT ML/MDL
Cone.Units Mass Units Cone.Units Mass Units
METALS (TOTAL RECOVERABLE). CYANIDE, PHENOLS, AND HARDNESS.
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
CHROMIUM
COPPER
LEAD
MERCURY
NICKEL
SELENIUM
SILVER
THALLIUM
ZINC
CYANIDE
HARDNESS (as CaCO3)
Use this space (or a separate sheet) to provide information on other metals requested by the permit writer
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev 1-99). Replaces ERA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.Page 10 of 22
FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
____________•)__________
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
TOTAL PHENOLIC
COMPOUNDS
Number
of
Samples
ANALYTICAL
METHOD
Effluent Testing: 1.0 mgd and Pretreatment Works. If the treatment works has a design flow greater than or equal to 1 0 mgd or it has (or is required
to have) a pretreatment program, or is otherwise required by the permitting authority to provide the data, then provide effluent testing data for the following
pollutants. Provide the indicated effluent testing information and any other information required by the permitting authority for each outfall through which
effluent is discharged. Do not include information on combined sewer overflows in this section. All information reported must be based on data collected
through analyses conducted using 40 CFR Part 136 methods. In addition, these data must comply with QA/QC requirements of 40 CFR Part 136 and
other appropriate QA/QC requirements for standard methods for analytes not addressed by 40 CFR Part 136. Indicate in the blank rows provided below
any data you may have on pollutants not specifically listed in this form. At a minimum, effluent testing data must be based on at least three pollutant
scans and must be no more than four and one-half years old.
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:RIVER BASIN:
Roanoke River WWTP, NC0024201 Standard Renewal Roanoke
Outfall number: 001
AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE
POLLUTANT ML/MDLCone.Units Mass Units Cone.Units Mass Units
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
ACROLEIN
ACRYLONITRILE
BENZENE
BROMOFORM
CHLOROBENZENE
CHLOROETHANE
CHLOROFORM
1,1-DICHLOROETHANE
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
ETHYLBENZENE
METHYL BROMIDE
METHYL CHLORIDE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
TOLUENE
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22 Page 11 of 22
___________________
FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
(Complete once for each outfall discharging effluent to waters of the United States.)
MAXIMUM DAILY DISCHARGE
Number
of
Samples
ANALYTICAL
METHOD
TETRACHLORO­
ETHYLENE
1,1,2.2-TETRA-
CHLOROETHANE
TRANS-1.2-DICHLORO-
ETHYLENE
DICHLOROBROMO­
METHANE
1,1-DICHLORO-
ETHYLENE
1,3-DICHLORO-
PROPYLENE
2-CHLOROETHYLVINYL
ETHER
CARBON
TETRACHLORIDE
CHLORODIBROMO­
METHANE
FACILITY NAME AND f’ERMIT NUMBER:PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:RIVER BASIN:
Roanoke River WWTP, NC0024201 Standard Renewal Roanoke
Outfall number: 001 (Complete once for each outfall discharging effluent to waters of the United States.)
MAXIMUM DAILY DISCHARGE AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE
POLLUTANT ML/MDLCone.Units Mass Units Cone.Units Mass Units
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
VINYL CHLORIDE
Use this space (or a separate sheet) to provide information on other volatile organic compounds requested by the permit writer
ACID-EXTRACTABLE COMPOUNDS
P-CHLORO-M-CRESOL
2-CHLOROPHENOL
2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL
2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
4,6-DINITRO-O-CRESOL
2,4-DINITROPHENOL
2-NITROPHENOL
4-NITROPHENOL
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
PHENOL
Use this space (or a separate sheet) to provide information on other acid-extractable compounds requested by the permit writer
BASE-NEUTRAL COMPOUNDS
ACENAPHTHENE
ACENAPHTHYLENE
ANTHRACENE
BENZIDINE
BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE
BENZO(A)PYRENE
Page 12 of 22EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22
Number
of
Samples
ANALYTICAL
METHOD
2,4.6-
TRICHLOROPHENOL
1.1.1-
TRICHLOROETHANE
1,1,2-
TRICHLOROETHANE
FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:RIVER BASIN:
Roanoke River WWTP, NC0024201 Standard Renewal Roanoke
Outfall number: 001
AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE
POLLUTANT ML/MDLCone.Units Mass Units Cone.Units Mass Units
BENZO(GHI)PERYLENE
CHRYSENE
DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE
DI-N-OCTYL PHTHALATE
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE
1.4-DICHLOROBENZENE
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
2,4-DINITROTOLUENE
2.6-DINITROTOLUENE
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev 1-99) Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.Page 13 of 22
Number
of
Samples
1,2-DIPHENYL-
HYDRAZINE
2-CHLORO-
NAPHTHALENE
BENZO(K)
FLUORANTHENE
ANALYTICAL
METHOD
DIBENZO(A.H)
ANTHRACENE
3,3-DICHLORO-
BENZIDINE
4-CHLORPHENYL
PHENYL ETHER
4-BROMOPHENYL
PHENYL ETHER
BIS (2-ETHYLHEXYL)
PHTHALATE
BUTYL BENZYL
PHTHALATE
BIS (2-CHLOROISO-
PROPYL) ETHER
BIS (2-CHLOROETHOXY)
METHANE
BIS (2-CHLOROETHYL)-
ETHER
3,4 BENZO­
FLUORANTHENE
----- (Complete once for each outfall discharging effluent to waters of the United States.)
MAXIMUM DAILY DISCHARGE
FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:RIVER BASIN:
Roanoke River WWTP, NC0024201 Standard Renewal Roanoke
Outfall number: 001
MAXIMUM DAILY DISCHARGE
POLLUTANT ML/MDLCone.Units Mass Units Cone.Units Mass Units
FLUORANTHENE
FLUORENE
HEXACHLOROBENZENE
HEXACHLOROETHANE
ISOPHORONE
NAPHTHALENE
NITROBENZENE
PHENANTHRENE
PYRENE
Use this space (or a separate sheet) to provide information on other base-neutral compounds requested by the permit wnter
Use this space (or a separate sheet) to provide information on other pollutants (e g , pesticides) requested by the permit wnter
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22 Page 14 of 22
1.2.4-
TRICHLOROBENZENE
(Complete once for each outfall discharging effluent to waters of the United States.)
AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE
END OF PART D.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
Number
of
Samples
ANALYTICAL
METHOD
N-NITROSODI-
METHYLAMINE
N-NITROSODI-
PHENYLAMINE
N-NITROSODI-N-
PROPYLAMINE
INDENO(1,2,3-CD)
PYRENE
HEXACHLORO­
BUTADIENE
HEXACHLOROCYCLO-
PENTADIENE
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART E. TOXICITY TESTING DATA
E.1.Required Tests.
Test number: Test number: Test number:
Test Species & test method number
Age at initiation of test
Outfall number
Dates sample collected
Date test started
Duration
Manual title
Edition number and year of publication
Page number(s)
Give the sample collection method(s) used. For multiple grab samples, indicate the number of grab samples used.c.
24-Hour composite
Grab
d.Indicate where the sample was taken in relation to disinfection. (Check all that apply for each
Before disinfection
After disinfection
After dechlorination
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.Page 15 of 22
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Standard Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Roanoke
FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Roanoke River WWTP, NC0024201
Indicate the number of whole effluent toxicity tests conducted in the past four and one-half years.
chronic acute
required to have one under 40 CFR Part 403); or 3) POTWs required by the permitting authority to submit data for these parameters.
’ thes® retUl,S f™81 indude <luarter1y testin9 for a 12-month period within the past 1 year using multiple species (minimum of two
Show no aOnnrhAriTh|U tS froT/four.t®s,f. Performed at least annually in the four and one-half years prior to the application, provided the results
’ 10 a^jtion. submit the results of any other whole effluent toxicity tests from the past four and one-half years. If a whole effluent toxicity test
t^dtyr^luct^on evaluate 30(1 006 hal cted revealed toxicity' Provide anY information on the cause of the toxicity or any results of a
• If you have already submitted any of the information requested in Part E, you need not submit it again. Rather, provide the information
requested in question E.4 for previously submitted information. If EPA methods were not used, report the reasons for using alternate methods,
it test summaries are available that contain all of the information requested below, they may be submitted in place of Part E.
comptete Onit°rin9 d3ta 'S reqUired’ d° nOt comPlete Par1 E Refer to the Application Overview for directions on which other sections of the form to
• Quarterly Ceriodaphnia WET results are on file with the Division.
• Four second species toxicity tests are submitted as Attachment B to this NPDES Permit
Application.
E.2. Individual Test Data. Complete the following chart for each whole effluent toxicity test conducted in the last four and one-half years Allow one
column per test (where each species constitutes a test). Copy this page if more than three tests are being reported.
a. Test information.
b Give toxicity test methods followed.
RIVER BASIN:
Roanoke
Test number:Test number:Test number:
Describe the point in the treatment process at which the sample was collected.e.
Sample was collected:
f. For each test, include whether the test was intended to assess chronic toxicity, acute toxicity, or both
Chronic toxicity
Acute toxicity
g. Provide the type of test performed.
Static
Static-renewal
Flow-through
Source of dilution water. If laboratory water, specify type; if receiving water, specify source.h.
Laboratory water
Receiving water
i. Type of dilution water. If salt water, specify "natural" or type of artificial sea salts or brine used.
Fresh water
Salt water
Give the percentage effluent used for all concentrations in the test series.j-
k. Parameters measured during the test. (State whether parameter meets test method specifications)
pH
Salinity
Temperature
Ammonia
Dissolved oxygen
I.Test Results.
Acute:
%%%
LCso
%95% C.l.% %
Control percent survival %% %
Other (describe)
ERA Form 3510-2A (Rev 1-99). Replaces ERA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22 Page 16 of 22
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Standard Renewal
FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Roanoke River WWTP, NC0024201
Percent survival in 100%
effluent
RIVER BASIN:
Roanoke
Chronic:
NOEC %%%
%%%
Control percent survival %%%
Other (describe)
m. Quality Control/Quality Assurance.
Is reference toxicant data available?
//////
Other (describe)
E.3. Toxicity Reduction Evaluation. Is the treatment works involved in a Toxicity Reduction Evaluation?
Yes No If yes, describe:
//Date submitted:(MM/DD/YYYY)
Summary of results (see instructions)
ERA Form 3510-2A (Rev 1-99). Replaces ERA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22 Page 17 of 22
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Standard Renewal
FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Roanoke River WWTP, NC0024201
E.4. Summary of Submitted Biomonitoring Test Information. If you have submitted biomonitonng test information, or information regarding the
cause of toxicity, within the past four and one-half years, provide the dates the information was submitted to the permitting authority and a summary
of the results.
Was reference toxicant test within
acceptable bounds?
END OF PART E.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE.
What date was reference toxicant test
run (MM/DD/YYYY)?
IC25
FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:RIVER BASIN:
Roanoke River WWTP, NC0024201 Standard Renewal Roanoke
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART F. INDUSTRIAL USER DISCHARGES AND RCRA/CERCLA WASTES
GENERAL INFORMATION:
F.1.Pretreatment program. Does the treatment works have, or is subject to, an approved pretreatment program?
S Yes No
Number of non-categorical SIUs. a.
Number of CIUs.1b.
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
F.3.
Kennametal, Inc. Name:
100 Kennametal Road Mailing Address:
Weldon, NC 27890
Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.F.4.
Machine tool accessory manufacturing
F.5.
Principal product(s):Tungsten carbide and ceramic cutting tool inserts
Tungsten carbide and ceramic powdersRaw material(s):
Flow Rate.F.6.
a.
intermittent)continuous or X C
b.
intermittent)continuous or N/Agpd(N/AN/A
Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:F.7.
NoEl YesLocal limitsa.
El Yes NoCategorical pretreatment standardsb.
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
Page 18 of 22EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
All treatment works receiving discharges from significant industrial users or which receive RCRA.CERCLA, or other remedial wastes must
complete part F.
F.2. Number of Significant Industrial Users (SIUs) and Categorical Industrial Users (CIUs). Provide the number of each of the following types of
industrial users that discharge to the treatment works.
7147 gpd
Non-process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non-process wastewater flow discharged into the collection system
in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
Significant Industrial User information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU s
discharge.
Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater discharge into the collection system in gallons per
day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
Supply the following information for each SIU. If more than one SIU discharges to the treatment works, copy questions F.3 through F.8 and
provide the information requested for each SIU.
F.8.
N/A

RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE RECEIVED BY TRUCK, RAIL, OR DEDICATED PIPELINE:
RCRA Waste. Does the treatment works receive or has it in the past three years received RCRA hazardous waste by truck, rail or dedicated pipe?F.9.
S No (go to F. 12)□ Yes
Waste transport. Method by which RCRA waste is received (check all that apply): N/AF.10.
□ Dedicated Pipe□ Rail□ Truck
UnitsAmount
N/AN/AN/A
N/A N/A
N/AN/A
S No
F.13.
N/A
N/A

F.15. Waste Treatment
Is this waste treated (or will be treated) prior to entering the treatment works?a.
0 No□ Yes
If yes, descnbe the treatment (provide information about the removal efficiency):
N/A
b.
□ Intermittent□ Continuous
N/A
Page 19 of 22EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Roanoke River WWTP, NC0024201
END OF PART F.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharge by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e g.,
upsets, interference) at the treatment works in the past three years?
□ Yes 0 No If yes, describe each episode.
Is the discharge (or will the discharge be) continuous or intermittent?
If intermittent, describe discharge schedule.
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Standard Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Roanoke
□ Yes (complete F.13 through F.15.)
Waste Origin. Describe the site and type of facility at which the CERCLA/RCRA/or other remedial waste originates (or is excepted to origniate in
the next five years).

F.14. Pollutants. List the hazardous constituents that are received (or are expected to be received). Include data on volume and concentration, if
known. (Attach additional sheets if necessary.)
CERCLA (SUPERFUND) WASTEWATER, RCRA REMEDIATION/CORRECTIVE ACTION
WASTEWATER, AND OTHER REMEDIAL ACTIVITY WASTEWATER:
F.12. Remediation Waste. Does the treatment works currently (or has it been notified that it will) receive waste from remedial activities?
F.11. Waste Description. Give EPA hazardous waste number and amount (volume or mass, specify units).
EPA Hazardous Waste Number
RIVER BASIN:
Roanoke
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART F. INDUSTRIAL USER DISCHARGES AND RCRA/CERCLA WASTES
GENERAL INFORMATION:
Pretreatment program. Does the treatment works have, or is subject to, an approved pretreatment program?F.1.
□ No□ Yes
F.2.
Number of non-categorical SIUs. a.
1Number of CIUs.b.
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
F.3.
Reser's Fine Foods Name:
11251 Hwy 903 Mailing Address:
Halifax. NC 27839
Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.F.4.
Food processing
F.5.
Cold salads, baked beans, meal saladsPrincipal product(s):
Potatoes, pastas, cabbage, salad dressings Raw material(s):
Flow Rate.F.S.
a.
intermittent)continuous or
b.
intermittent)N/A(N/A continuous or9PdN/A
Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:F.7.
E] Yes □ NoLocal limitsa.
□ Yes 13 NoCategorical pretreatment standardsb.
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?

Page 18 of 22EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev 1-99) Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22
FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Roanoke River WWTP, NC0024201
All treatment works receiving discharges from significant Industrial users or which receive RCRA.CERCLA, or other remedial wastes must
complete part F.
Number of Significant Industrial Users (SIUs) and Categorical Industrial Users (CIUs). Provide the number of each of the following types of
industrial users that discharge to the treatment works.
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Standard Renewal
123 752 gpd (X
Non-process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non-process wastewater flow discharged into the collection system
in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
one SIU discharges to the treatment works, copy questions F.S through F.S and
Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU’s
discharge
Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater discharge into the collection system in gallons per
day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
Supply the following information for each SIU. If more than
provide the information requested for each SIU.
F.8.
N/A

RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE RECEIVED BY TRUCK, RAIL, OR DEDICATED PIPELINE:
RCRA Waste. Does the treatment works receive or has it in the past three years received RCRA hazardous waste by truck, rail or dedicated pipe?F.9.
S No (go to F. 12) Yes
F.10. Waste transport Method by which RCRA waste is received (check all that apply): N/A
Dedicated Pipe Rail Truck
UnitsAmount
N/AN/AN/A
N/AN/A N/A
N/AN/AN/A
No
N/A
F.14.
N/A

F.15. Waste Treatment
Is this waste ireated (or will be treated) prior to entering the treatment works?a.
El No Yes
If yes. describe the treatment (provide information about the removal efficiency):
N/A
b.
Continuous
N/A
Page 19 of 22EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Roanoke River WWTP, NC0024201
END OF PART F.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE

Pollutants. List the hazardous constituents that are received (or are expected to be received). Include data on volume and concentration, if
known. (Attach additional sheets if necessary.)
Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharge by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e g.,
upsets, interference) at the treatment works in the past three years?
Yes No If yes, describe each episode.
Is the discharge (or will the discharge be) continuous or intermittent?
Intermittent If intermittent, describe discharge schedule.
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Standard Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Roanoke
Yes (complete F.13 through F.15.)
F.13. Waste Origin. Describe the site and type of facility at which the CERCLA/RCRA/or other remedial waste originates (or is excepted to origniate in
the next five years)
CERCLA (SUPERFUND) WASTEWATER, RCRA REMEDIATION/CORRECTIVE ACTION
WASTEWATER, AND OTHER REMEDIAL ACTIVITY WASTEWATER:
F.12. Remediation Waste. Does the treatment works currently (or has it been notified that it will) receive waste from remedial activities?
F.11. Waste Description. Give EPA hazardous waste number and amount (volume or mass, specify units).
EPA Hazardous Waste Number
FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:RIVER BASIN:
Roanoke River WWTP. NC0024201 Roanoke
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART F. INDUSTRIAL USER DISCHARGES AND RCRA/CERCLA WASTES
GENERAL INFORMATION:
Pretreatmont program. Does the treatment works have, or is subject to, an approved pretreatment program?F.l.
NoE Yes
Number of non-categorical SIUs.2 a.
Number of CIUs.b.
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
F.3.
Rosemary Power Station Name:
120 West 12'n Street Mailing Address:
Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.F.4.
Power generation
F.5.
Principal product(s):Electricity
Natural gas. No 2 fuel oil, and waterRaw material(s):
F.6.Flow Rate.
a.
intermittent)continuous or X 18765 C
b.
intermittent)continuous or N/Agpd(N/AN/A
Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:F.7.
0 Yes NoLocal limitsa.
Yes 0 NoCategorical pretreatment standardsb.
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
Page 18 of 22EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Standard Renewal
All treatment works receiving discharges from significant Industrial users or which receive RCRA.CERCLA, or other remedial wastes must
complete part F.
F.2. Number of Significant Industrial Users (SIUs) and Categorical Industrial Users (CIUs). Provide the number of each of the following types of
industrial users that discharge to the treatment works.
gpd
Non-process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non-process wastewater flow discharged into the collection system
in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU’s
discharge.
Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater discharge into the collection system in gallons per
day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
Supply the following Information for each SIU. If more than one SIU discharge* to the treatment works, copy question* F.3 through F.8 and
provide the Information requested for each SIU.
Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
Roanoke Rapids, NC 27870
F.8.
N/A

F.10.
F.11.
Units
N/A
N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
N/A
a.
b.
If intermittent, describe discharge schedule.
N/A
L
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev 1-99).Rep.’aces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22
Page 19 of 22
RIVER BASIN:
Roanoke
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Standard Renewal
waste is received (check all that apply). N/A
Dedicated Pipe
lous waste number and amount (volume or mass, specify units).
Amount
F.15. Waste Treatment
IS this waste treated (or will be treated) prior to entering the treatment works?
Yes (3 No
If yes. describe the treatment (provide information about the removal efficiency):
N/A
Yes S No (go to F 12) a2a,d0US was,e b* fell or dedicated pipe?
Waste transport Method by which RCRA
Truck Q Raj|
Waste Description. Give EPA hazard.
EPA Hazardous Waste Number
N/A
TTO THE —
or contributed to any problems (e g.,
Is the discharge (or will the discharge be) continuous or intermittent?
Continuous Q intermittent
FACILITY NAME AND PERwFFMUMBER:
Roanoke River WWTP, NC0024201
hy «» SIU- Has the SIU caused
Yes ra No i*
If yes, describe each episode.
sen notified that it will) receive waste from remedial activities?

known. (Attach additional sheet^neiTsarJ1)31 reCe,Ved (or are expected to be received). Include data on volume and concentration, if
N/A
F.iz ^emodlatlon WastoTDoesIhekeatrnentwork7currentiy^orhas^tb&
Yes (complete F.13 through F.15.) No
N/A
G.1.
c.
species potentially affected by CSOs.
G.2.
e.
a.
b.Location
(City or town, if applicable)
(Zip Code)
(County)
(State)
(Latitude)
(Longitude)
c.
ft.
d.
ft.e.
! J CSC frequency
b.
hours (□ actual or approx.)

Page 20 of 22
---------------------- -------------events (□ actual or approx.)
Give the average duration per CSO event.
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Standard Renewal
c.
d.
RIVER BASIN:
Roanoke
a.
b.
Give the number of CSO events in the last year
FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER: ~ ------
Roanoke River WWTP. NC0024201
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
A Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces ERA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22
System Map. Provide
a.
b.
Distance from shore (if applicable)
Depth below surface (if applicable)
Which of the following were monitored during the last year7r this CSO?
□ Rainfall q CSO pollutant concentrations
CSO flow volume D Receiving water quality
f- How many storm events were monitored during the last year?
G.4. CSO Events. N/A
p A RTG. COMBIN E D S E WE RSYSTEMs --------------------- --------=--------------- -- ----------------------
— -----------
outstanding natural r^X watered CS°S (e 9 ' beaCheS’ drinkin9 water supplies, shellfish beds, sensitive aquatic ecosystems, and
Waters that support threatened and endangered
Includes the rollawing ^XX^N/A8'^maP PraVided* “ 3 Separa,e *•*<>■ «W> “mbined sewer collection system that
Location of major sewer trunk lines, both combined and separate sanitary
Locations of points where separate sanitary sewers feed into the combined sewer system
Locations of in-line and off-line storage structures.
Locations of flow-regulating devices.
Locations of pump stations.
OUTFALLS?
G.3. Description of Outfall. N/A ---------- ------------------------------------------------------- ------
Outfall number
c.
d.
G.5.Description of Receiving Waters. N/A
Name of receiving water:a.
b.
c.
Page 21 of 22
RIVER BASIN:
Roanoke
_____»
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Standard Renewal
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces ERA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER: ’
Roanoke River WWTP. NC0024201
Give the average volume per OSO event.
—------------------million gallons (□ actual or approx.)
Give the minimum rainfall that caused a OSO event in the last year
----------Inches of rainfall
Name of watershed/river/stream system:
United State Soil Conservation Service 14-digit watershed code (if known):
Name of State Management/River Basin.
United States Geological Survey Miglt hydrologic cataloging unit code (if known):
G.6. CSO Operations. N/A
“e
Attached Figures
Topographic Map
Plant Site Plan
Plant Flow Schematic
Process Narrative
Attachments
Attachment A:
Attachment B:
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information
Priority Pollutant Scan Analysis
Second Species Toxicity Test Results
Attachment C: Biosolids Program Description
A )
Add,t,onal information, if proved, wiil appear on the foiiowmg pages.
Attached Figures
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information
-J
Roanoke Rapids Sanitary District - NC0024201
Not to Scale
USGS Quad Name: Weldon
Receiving Stream: Roanoke River
Stream Class: C
Subbasin: Roanoke - 030208
Lat: 36°26’10”
Long: 77°36’04”
Facility
Location
I ?
,Weldoii,
Outfall 001
stow as
Mft OUIfKl
3
siuoct
SUTfUMIW
ORMWl oaiew mtw kos
suFWurmi SIHRMTMIo o
LEGEND
PLAN I HOiV SCHEMATIC
>«>W O-IWOH
WIPWHEHT CftWCH
&ARCADIS
DGtSTEO SLUDGE
OaSTFD SIUKE
VM41A
OAR SCWfN
AERAION
TANKS
ROANOKE RAPIDS SANITARY DISTRICT
WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
□OCKOYOTTE
CREEK OVTFAll
CMRSiOl
«JX
DMSSJON TO
ROANOKE OVfPflOW TO
ROANOKE RMH
2 FR UART
AHAEROEC
DCrSTERS
PHttiARv
ClAWfRS
:rcklwg
MTEW
■US PUMP
swot
EML
CLARTfRS
ClSCEiARGl TO
RfJANW’ RfVER
GMT
CHAMBERS
1 SaCOMJARY
AMAERCW
DCESTER
DfSCMRGE TO
ROANOKE fMR
J s n
h
h
1 «
I
ftooo
“’.IIP SIATKW
1 “WS
PITER
Kcscjunx
?JUP SIAIOH
3 PVUPS
m< iifiufnT
w surw
< .•".'UPS
I
S1A911ZATCN
FACILITY
| KlUEW EOUMIZATION [
CIILCRNAIIQN/ | '
iXCHOftWiON |
•AS SRAWTr |
THICKENERS I
WAS
HJMP STATON
’ POURS
I PPiMAffr SLUDGE I
I PUMP STATION |
Wri.UEMT
PUMP STATION
4 PIMPS
UHU (WCAIVIi I
MOEMHC I
Q oasrfu
SWWWAMI
i
O ORAJMtt FROM
DWNC BEDS
•>
Process Narrative
The solids handling process description is provided in Attachment C.
Influent flow enters the Roanoke River Waste Treatment Plant via two outfalls: the Chockoyotte
Creek Outfall and the Roanoke River Outfall. Both outfalls combine in a collection box prior to
mechamcal screening and grit removal. Influent flow may be routed to influent equalization
when necessary. The influent wastewater is lifted via an influent pump station to primary
clarifiers. Primary clarified effluent gravity flows to trickling filters. Trickling filter effluent is
pumped to aeration basins for further secondary treatment. The mixed liquor then flows to
final clarifiers. Clarified effluent is then chlorinated and dechlorinated. Effluent flow is
measured prior to discharge to the Roanoke River. An effluent flood pump station is used to
pump to the Roanoke River when flow by gravity may not be achieved.
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information
Attachment A: Priority Pollutant Scan
Analysis
Scan
Sanitary District
Page 1
_1
1
<50
<3
50
3
Permit No. _NC002
Outfall__001
Sample
Result
Month _July.
Year _2007
Quantitation
Level Units of
Measurement
1
1
1
1
"T
i
i
i
i
T~
T"
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
T
i
i
i
T~
T~
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Sample
Type
Composite
Grab
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Grab
Grab
EPA 624
EPA 624
EPA 624
EPA 624
EPA 624
EPA 624
EPA 624
EPA 624
EPA 624
EPA 624
EPA 624
EPA 624
EPA 624
EPA 624
Analytical
Method
~EPA 350,2~
EPA 360,2
EPA 300,0
~EPA 351,3 '
EPA 365,3 '
EPA 160,1
EPA 130,2 ~
EPA 330,5
EPA 1664
ug/L
ug/L
llg/E
ug/L
ug/l
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
mg/L
m8/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg CaCO3/L
mg/L
mg/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/1
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
Number of
samples
1
1 ~
1
1
1
1 ~
1
1
1
100
100
5.0
5,0
5,0
5,0
5.0
10
10
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
0.2
2
2
2
10
0.0005
5
3
5
50
2
5
5
0.20
n/a
0,300
1.00
0.250
10
1
15
5
3,76
4,2
12,281
8,99
1,61
218
48
<15
<5
<100
<100
<5,0
2,4
<5.0
<5,0
3
<10
<10
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
<0,2
<2
<2
11
<10
0.0165
<5
<3
<5
<50
53
7
10
Parameter
Ammonia (as N)
Dissolved oxygen
Nitrate/Nitrite ~
Total Kjeldahl nitrogen
Total Phosphorus
Total dissolved solids
Hardness
Chlorine (total residual, TRC)
Oil and grease
Metals (total recoverable).
Antimony
Arsenic
^B)i
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium
[Copper
Lead
Mercury ~
Nickel "
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Zinc
Cyanide
Total phenolic compounds
Volatile organic compounds
Acrolein ~
Acrylonitrile
Benzene
Bromoform
Carbon tetrachloride ’
Chlorobenzene
Chlorodibromomethane
Chloroethane
2-chloroethylvinyl ether
Chloroform
Dichlorobromome thane
1.1- dichloroethane
1.2- dichloroethane
Trans-1,2-dichloroethylene
Form - DMR- PPA-1
_____
cyanide and total phenols '
~EPA 200,7 |
EPA 206,2 ’
EPA 200,7
~EPA 200,7 ~
EPA 200,7 ~
EPA 200,7
EPA 200,7 ~
EPA 1631E~
EPA 200,7 ~
EPA 270.2 ~
EPA 200,7 ~
EPA 200,7 ~
EPA 200.7 ~
EPA 335,2 ~
EPA 420,1 ~
Faculty Name: Roanoke Rapids _uuuyu,stnct 0Rc
Date of sampling: 07/10/2007 —A-Gregg Camp___
Analytical Laboratory: Microbac Labs / Southern Testing Divis^nCTRL^S^^p4884-
_______ 8 division olRL#7624 and RRSD-WWTP NC70
Annual Monitoring and Pofl^ c
Scan
!
Parameter Sample
Result
Month_July.
Year 2007
Number of
samples
Units of
Measurement
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 624
EPA 624
EPA 624
EPA 624
EPA 624
EPA 624
EPA 624
EPA 624~
EPA 624
' EPA 624 ~
EPA 624
EPA 624
EPA 624
EPA 624
10
10
10
50
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
20
10
10
10
50
50
10
50
50
10
10
<20
<10
<10
<10
<50
<50
<10
<50
<50
<10
<10
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/l
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
____1
____1
____1
____1_
____1
____1
____1
___1_
___1
___1
___1_
___1_
1
___1
___1_
1
___1
Page 2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
T"
i~
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
T~
i
5,0
5.0
10
5.0
10
10
10
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
10
<10
<10
<10
<50
<10
<10
1.7/<1.6*
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
3.7/2.2*
<10
<10
<10
<10
<5.0
<5,0
<10
<5.0
<10
<10
<10
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
<5,0
<10
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
Sample
_____ _____________Type
Volatile organic compounds (Cont.)
1.1- dichloroethylene
1.2- dichloropropane
1.3- dichloropropylene
Ethylbenzene
Methyl bromide
Methyl chloride
Methylene chloride
1,1,2,2-tetrachloroeth an e
Tetrachloroethylene
Toluene
1.1.1- trichloroethane
1.1.2- trichloroethane
Trichloroethylene
Vinyl chloride
Acid-extractable compounds
P-chloro-m-creso
2-chlorophenol
2.4- dichlorophenol
2.4- dimethylphenol
4.6- dinitro-o-cresol
2.4- dinitrophenol
2-nitrophenol
4-nitrophenol
Pentachlorophenol
Phenol
2.4.6- trichlor op he no 1
Base-neutral compounds
Acenaphthene
Acenaphthylene
Anthracene
Benzidine
Benzo(a)anthracene
Be nzo(a) pyrene
3,4 benzofluoranthene
Benzo(ghi)perylene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Bis (2-chloroethoxy) methane
Bis (2-chloroethyl) ether
Bis (2-chloroisopropyl) ether
Bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
4-bromophenyl phenyl ether
Butyl benzyl phthalate
2-chloronaphthalene
4-chlorophenyl phenyl ether
” Form - DMR- PPA-1
Quantitation I
Level
a/
Permit No. _NC0024201_
Outfall 001
Analytical
Method
Parameter
Form - DMR- PPA-1 Signature Page 3
Permit No. _NC002
Outfall 001
Quantitation
Level
Sample
Result
Number of
samples
Sample
Type
Month July.
Year,2007_____
Units of
Measurement
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
> EPA 625
» EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
_ EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
__ EPA 625
__ EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
__ EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
__ EPA 625 ~~
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
analyzed by the
The sample
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
50
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
lo
10
10
To
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/l
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
<10
<10
2.1/<1,1*
<10
<10
<10
<10
<50
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
contract laboratory'
was i
Both sets of data have been reported where differing sample data
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
~T
~T
i
i
i
i
i
T"
i
T~
~T~
T"
T"
T~
T"
T~
i
T~
T"
i
T
______F~
on 7/18/07. The Laboratory
re-analyzed on 7/ 19/07, out of holding
i resulted.
__I
Base-neutral compounds (cont.)
Chrysene
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Di-n-octyl phthalate
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1.2- dichlorobenzene
1.3- dichlorobenzene
1.4- dichlorobenzene
3.3- dichlorobenzidine
Diethyl phthalate
Dimethyl phthalate
2.4- dinitrotoluene
2,6-dinitro toluene
1,2-diphenylhyd razine
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Hexachlorobenzene
Hexachlorobutadiene
Hexachlorocyclo-pentad i en e
Hexachloroethane
Indeno( 1,2,3-cd)pyrene
Isophorone
Naphthalene
Nitrobenzene
N-nitrosodi-n-propylamine
N-nitrosodimethylamine
N-nitrosodiphenylamine
Phenanthrene
Pyrene
1,2,4,-trichlorobenzene
*Semi-volatile organics compounds were
Control Sample (LCS) failed to meet the QC limits,
but with passing QC.
Authorized Representative name
certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction
and supervision m accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly
gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons that
manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information the
mformation submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate and complete I am
aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the
possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations.
Annual Monitoring and Pol^^ t Scan
Analytical I
Method
Parameter
1
1
1
Grab
Form - DMR- PPA-1
Page 1
Permit No. _NC002
Outfall _001_.
Analytical
Method
Sample
Result
Number of
samples
Quantitation
Level
Month _October_
Year__2008
Units of
Measurement
1
7
i
7
7
7
SM 4500
SM 4500
EPA 300.0
SM 4500
EPA 365,3
SM 2540C
SM2340C
SM 4500
_______________________EPA 1664A
Metals (total recoverable), cyanide and total phenols
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Grab
Grab
Sample
Type
Composite
Grab
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
EPA 624
EPA 624
EPA 624
EPA 624
EPA 624
EPA 624
" EPA 624
EPA 624
EPA 624
EPA 624
EPA 624
EPA 624
EPA 624
EPA 624
SM 3113B
SM 3113B
EPA 200.7
EPA 200.7
EPA 200.7
EPA 200,7
EPA 200.7
EPA 1631E
EPA 200.7
SM 3113B
EPA 200.7
EPA 279.2
EPA 200.7
SM 4500
EPA 420.1
0.25
0.6
0.2
2
2
2
10
0.0005
5
0.6
5
0.2
2
5
5
0.20
N/A
1.3
1.00
0.2
10
2.0
13.5
5
14,9
3.46
1.44
256
46
<13.5
<5
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg CaCO3/L
ug/1
mg/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
Ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
Ug/L
Ug/L
ug/L
ug/l
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/1
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
1
1
1
T
1
T
1
1
T
i
7"
i
i
7"
i
"7
"7
1
i
1
i
i
i
T
T~
i
7"
i
i
100
100
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
10
10
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
1.61
5.7
Ammonia (as N)
Dissolved oxygen
Nitrate/Nitrite
Total Kjeldahl nitrogen
Total Phosphorus
Total dissolved solids
Hardness
Chlorine (total residual, TRC)
Oil and grease
<100
<100
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
1.1
<10
<10
2.6
2.3
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
<0.25
0.9
<0.2
<2
2
11
<10
0.0173
<5
1.1
<5
0.25
39
<5
<5
Antimony
Arsenic
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Zinc
Cyanide
Total phenolic compounds
Volatile organic compounds
Acrolein
Acrylonitrile
Benzene
Bromoform
Carbon tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chlorodibromomethane
Chloroethane
2-chloroethylvinyl ether
Chloroform
Dichlorobromomethane
1,1 -dichloroethane
1,2-dichloroe thane
Trans-1,2-dichloroethylene
Annual Monitoring and Pol^^ ; Scan
Facility Name: Roanoke Rapids Sanitary District OrC: _a Gregg Camp.
Date of sampling: 10/14/08 Phone: ____252-536-4884____
Analytical Laboratory: Microbac Labs / Southern Testing Division STRL#7624 and RRSD-WWTP NC 70
compounds
Form - OMR- PPA-1
Page 2
Permit No. _NCOO
Outfall _001_
Analytical
Method
Quantitation
Level
Sample
Result
Number of
samples
Units of
Measurement
Sample
Type
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
10
10
10
50
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
To~
20
10
10
10
50
50
10
50
50
10
10
5.0
5.0
10
5.0
10
10
10
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
10
<20
<10
<10
<10
<50
<50
<10
<50
<50
<10
<10
<5.0
<5.0
<10
<5.0
<10
<10
<10
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
<10
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
1
1
1
1
1
T
i
"T"
1
T"
i
T"
7"
i
T~
T~
1
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
T
i
i
i
1
1
1
i
i
i
i
T
T
i
i
T~
i
<10
<10
<10
<50
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
4.9
<10
<10
<10
<10
EPA 624 |—
EPA 624 ~~
EPA 624
EPA 624 ~
EPA 624 ~
EPA 624 ~~
EPA 624 ~
EPA 624
EPA 624
EPA 624
EPA 624
EPA 624
EPA 624
EPA 624
Parameter
Volatile organic compounds (Cont.)
1 ■ 1 -dichloroethylene
1.2- dichloropropane
1 >3-dichloropropylene
Ethylbenzene
Methyl bromide
Methyl chloride
Methylene chloride
1.1.2.2- tetrachloroethane
Tetrachloroethylene
Toluene
1,1,1 -trichloroethane
1.1.2- trichloroethane
Trichloroethylene
Vinyl chloride
Acid-extractable
P-chloro-m-creso
2-chlorophenol
2.4- dichlorophenol
2.4- dimethylphenol
4.6- dinitro-o-cresol
2.4- dinitrophenol
2-nitrophenol
4-nitrophenol
Pentachlorophenol
Phenol
2.4.6- trichlorophenol
Base-neutral compounds
Acenaphthene
Acenaphthylene
Anthracene
Benzidine
Benzo(a)anthracene
Benzo(a) pyrene
3,4 benzofluoranthene
Benzo(ghi)perylene
Bcnzo(k)fluoranthene
Bis (2-chloroethoxy) methane
Bis (2-chloroethyl) ether
Bis (2-chloroisopropyl) ether
Bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
4-bromophenyl phenyl ether
Butyl benzyl phthalate
2 chloronaphthalene
4-chlorophenyl phenyl ether
Scan
Month _October_
_______ Year 2008.
Signature
Form - DMR- PPA-1
Page 3
Permit No. _NC00 J
Outfall 001
Quantitation
Level
Sample
Result Number of
samples
Sample
Type
Analytical
Method
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
EPA 625
EPA 625 ~
EPA 625 ~~
EPA 625 ~
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625 ’
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
__10
~__10
__10
__10_
10
10
10
50
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10__
10
10__
10__
10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<50
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
1.2
<10
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
Ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
___1
___1_
1
__1_
__1
__1
__1
__1_
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
i:
i
i
i
i
_i
1
1
1
i
a?
Parameter |
Base-neutral compounds (cont.)
Chrysene
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Di-n-octyl phthalate ~
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene ~
1.2- dichlorobenzene
1.3- dichlorobenzene
1.4- dichloro benzene
3.3- dichlorobenzidine
Diethyl phthalate
Dimethyl phthalate
2.4- dinitrotoluene
2,6-dinitrotoluene
1,2-diphenylhydrazine
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Hexachlorobenzene
Hexachlorobutadiene
Hexachlorocyclo-pentadiene
Hexachloroethane
Indeno( 1,2,3-cd)pyrene
Isophorone
Naphthalene
Nitrobenzene
N-nitrosodi-n-pr o py 1 a m i n e
N-nitrosodimethylamine
N-nitrosodiphenyla mine
Phenanthrene
Pyrene
1.2,4,-trichlorobenzene '
gather and evaluate the information subnX Xd qUaliried PCrSOnnel ProPerlv
Authorized Representative name
Annual Monitoring and Po^l Scan
Month .October__
Year __2008
Units of
Measurement
: ScanAnnual Monitoring and Poll
[Trans-1,2-dichloroethyle n e Grab EPA 624 5 <5 ug/1 1
Form - DMR- PPA-1
Page 1
Month_January_____
Year____2009____
Sample
Result
1
T
T
i
T
T
T
T
T
T~
F
EPA 624
EPA 624
EPA 624
EPA 624
EPA 624
EPA 624
"EPA 624
~EPA 624
EPA 624
EPA 624
EPA 624
EPA 624
EPA 624
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Grab
Grab
SM 3113B
SM 3113B
EPA 200.7
EPA 200.7
EPA 200.7
EPA 200,7
EPA 200.7
EPA 163 IE
EPA 200.7
SM 3113B
EPA 200.7
EPA 279.2
EPA 200.7
SM 4500
EPA 420.1
20
10
1
2
5
2
10
0.0005
10
10
50
50
2
5
5
100
100
5
5
5
5
5
10
10
5
5
5
5
0.2
N/A
1.3
0.5
0.2
10
2
11.5
5
and RRSD-WWTP NC70
Units of
Measurement
mg/l
mg/l
mg/1
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
ug/1
mg/l
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
Ug/1
Number of
samples
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
T
T
T
T
T
i
T
i
i
T~
T"
T~
i
Parameter
Ammonia (as N)
Dissolved oxygen
Nitrate/Nitrite
Total Kjeldahl nitrogen
Total Phosphorus
Total dissolved solids
Hardness
Chlorine (total residual, TRC)
Oil and grease
Analytical
Method
~SM 4500~
SM 4500
EPA 300.0
SM 4500 ~
EPA 365.3
SM 2540C
SM 2340C
HACH 10014|
' EPA 1664A
<20
<10
<1
<2
<5
8.5
<10
0.00656
<10
<10
<50
<50
39
<5
<5
0.46
5.4
12
<0.5
1.26
391
62
<11.5
<5
ORC _A. Gregg Camp______
Phone [phone]___
Microbac Labs/Southern Testing Division STRL#9752
Sample
Type
Composite
Grab
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Grab
________________Grab
Metals (total recoverable), cyanide and total phennlw
Antimony
Arsenic ~
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Zinc
Cyanide
Total phenolic compounds
Volatile organic compounds
Acrolein
Acrylonitrile
Benzene
Bromoform
Carbon tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chlorodibromomethane
Chloroethane
2-chloroethylvinyl ether
Chloroform
Dichlorobromomethane
1,1 -dichloroethane
1,2-dichloroe thane
<100
<100
<5
<5
<5
<5
<5
<10
<10
<5
<5
<5
<5
Facility Name _Roanoke Rapids Sanitary District
Date of sampling: 1/13/2009
Analytical Laboratory_
W)
Permit No. _NC002420I_
Outfall__001__
antitation
Level
Annual Monitoring and Pol^^^ t
Scan
Parameter
1
_____1
Page 2
Month__January_____
Year_____2009_____
Analytical
Method
Quantitation
Level
Sample
Result
Number of
samples
Units of
Measurement --------------- -------
EPA 624
EPA 624
EPA 624
EPA 624
EPA 624
EPA 624
EPA 624
EPA 624
EPA 624
EPA 624
EPA 624
EPA 624
EPA 624
EPA 624
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/I
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
Ug/1
1
~T
1
1
1
T
T
T
i
i
i
i
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
10
10
10
50
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
20
10
10
10
50
10
10
50
50
10
10
5
5
5
5
10
10
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
10
<10
<10
<10
<50
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
1.9
<10
<10
<10
<10
<20
<10
<10
<10
<50
<10
<10
<50
<50
<10
<10
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
Ug/1
ug/1
Ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
Ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
Ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
Ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
1
2?
1
~T
T
1
T
T
T
T~
T~
T~
T~
T"r~
1
T
T
T
1
T
T
T
T
T~
<5
<5
<5
<5
<10
<10
<10
<5
<5
<5
<5
<5
<5
<10
Permit No. _NC002^^1_
Outfall 00 I_
Sample
___ ________________Type
Volatile organic compounds (Cont.)
1,1 -dichloroe thy len e
1.2- dichloropropane
1.3- dichloropropylene
Ethylbenzene
Methyl bromide
Methyl chloride
Methylene chloride '
1.1.2.2- tetrachloroethane
Tetrachloroethylene
Toluene
1,1,1 -trichloroethane
1.1.2- trichloroe than e
T richloroethylene
Vinyl chloride
Acid-extractable compounds
P-chloro-m-creso
2-chlorophenol
2.4- dichlorophenol
2.4- dimethylphenol
4.6- dinitro-o-cresol
2.4- dinitrophenol
2-nitrophenol
4-nitrophenol
Pentachlorophenol
Phenol
2.4.6- trichlorophenol
Base-neutral compounds
Acenaphthene
Acenaphthylene
Anthracene
Benzidine
Benzo(a)anthracene
Benzo(a)pyrene
3,4 benzofluoranthene
Benzo(ghi)perylene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Bis (2-chloroethoxy) methane
Bis (2-chloroethyl) ether
Bis (2-chloroisopropyl) ether
Bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
4-bromophenyl phenyl ether
Butyl benzyl phthalate
2-chloronaphth a le n e
4-chlorophenyl phenyl ether
Form - DMR- PPA-1
ScanAnnual Monitoring and Poll
Parameter
Signature
Form - DMR- PPA-1 Date
Page 3
Quantitation
Level
Sample
Result
Units of
Measurement
Number of
samples
Analytical
Method
Month__January
Year______2009
Sample
Type
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
EPA 625
EPA 625
P EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
50
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
Toi
10
10
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
Ug/1
__1
1
F r
:i
:i
i
i
~T
~T
~T~
i
i
T~
~T~
i
i
i
T~
T~
T
T
T
T
T
1
~
I
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<50
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
1.2
<10
Permit No. _NC0024^^
Outfall___001_
Base-neutral compounds (cont.)
Chrysene
Di-n-butyl phthalate ~
Di-n-octyl phthalate ~
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene ~
1.2- dichloro benzene
1.3- dichlorobenzene —
1.4- dichlorobenzene
3.3- dichlorobenzid ine
Diethyl phthalate
Dimethyl phthalate
2.4- dinitrotoluene
2,6-dinitrotoluene
1,2-diphenylhydrazine
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Hexachlorobenzene
Hexachlorobutadiene
Hexachlorocyclo-pentadiene
Hexachloroethane
Indeno( 1,2,3-cd)pyrene
Isophorone
Naphthalene
Nitrobenzene
N-nitrosodi-n - propylamine
N-nitrosodimethylamine
N-nitrosodiphenylamine
Phenanthrene
Pyrene
11,2,4,-trichlorobenzene
Authorized Representative name
mformanon submxtted is , to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate and complete I am
aware hat there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the
possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations.
Form - DMR- PPA-1
Page 1
Permit No. _NCOO
Outfall 001_
units oi
Measurement
Month __June_
Year___2010.
VUUDLiLation —;
Level
oainpie
Result
EPA 200.8
' SM3113B'
EPA 200.8~
SM3U3B
SM3113B
EPA 200,8
SM3113B
EPA 1631
EPA 200.8
SM3113B
SM3113B
EPA 200,8
SM3113B
SM4500CN
EPA420.1
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
oampie
Type
Composite
Grab
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Grab
Grab
EPA 624
EPA 624
EPA 624
EPA 624
EPA 624
EPA 624
EPA 624
EPA 624
EPA 624
EPA 624
EPA 624
EPA 624
EPA 624
EPA 624
snuiyiicai
Method
~SM4500NH3'
SM4500-QG~
EPA 300
SM4500N-org
~SM4500PF~
SM2540C
SM2340C
Hack 10014
EPA 1664
0.01
0.01
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.002
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
b.ooi
0.006
0.002
0.001
0.002
0.002
0.01
0.001
0.0005
0.01
0.002
0.001
0.005
0.01
0.005
0.001
<0.01
<0.01
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.002
<0.002
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
mg/l
mg/1
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
ng/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
ug/1
mg/l
uinoer oi
samples
i
i
i
i
i
i
ir
i
i
“T
i
i
1
i
T
i
T
T
T“
T~
T"
i-
i
i
i
"T
i
i
i
T"
i
i
i
T“
i
T~
i
o.i
NA
0.02/0.03
0.01
0.05
5
1
7
5
<0.006
<0.002
<0.001
<0.002
<0.002
0.01
<0.001
0.0398
<0.010
<0.002
<0.001
<0.005
0.045
<0.005
<0.0100
3.45
5.9
8.27
6.51
2.4
247
56.2
<7
<5.0
Parameter
Ammonia (as N)
Dissolved oxygen
Nitrate/Nitrite
Total Kjeldahl nitrogen
Total Phosphorus
Total dissolved solids
Hardness
Chlorine (total residual, TRC)
Oil and grease
Metals (total recover^bUTcyanlde and total phenes'
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Grab
Grab
Antimony
Arsenic
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Zinc '
Cyanide
Total phenolic compounds
Volatile organic compounds
Acrolein
Acrylonitrile
Benzene
Bromoform
Carbon tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chlorodi bromomethane
Chloroethane
2-chloroethylvinyl ether
Chloroform
Dichlorobromomethane
1.1- dichloroethane
1.2- dichloroe thane
Trans-1,2-dichloroethylene
Facility Name .Roanoke Rapids Sanitary District ORC A e
Date of sampling April 15, 2010 - ■ Gregg Camp----
Ana^cal laboratory _Microbac'^7^93 and RRSDTOncvo252’536'4884
Parameter
Form - DMR- PPA-1
Page 2
Permit No. _NC002
Outfall___001__
Analytical
Method
Quantitation
Level
Sample
Result
Month __June_
Year___2010.
Units of
Measurement
Number of
samples
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 624
EPA 624
EPA 624
EPA 624
EPA 624
EPA 624
EPA 624
EPA 624
EPA 624
EPA 624
EPA 624
EPA 624
EPA 624
EPA 624
0.0098
0.0098
0.0098
0.049
0.0098
0.0098
0.0098
0.0098
0.0098
0.0098
0.0098
"0.0098
0.0098
0.0098
0.0098
0.0098
0.0098
0.02
0.0098
0.0098
0.098
0.049
0.049
0.0098
0.049
0.049
0.0098
0.0098
0.001
0.001
0.002
0.001
0.002
0.002
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.002
<0.001
<0.001
<0.002
<0.001
<0.002
<0.002
<0.002
<0.001
<0.001
0.0046
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.002
mg/1
mg/l
mg/1
mg/I
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
1
1
1
T
1
T
T
i
i
T
T
T
i
T
i
i
T
i
i
i
i
T
i
i
i
F
i
i
1
i
i
i
i
i
T
T
T
i
i
T“
<0.0098
<0.0098
<0.0098
<0.049
<0.0098
<0.0098
<0.0098
<0.0098
<0.0098
”<0.0098
<0.0098
<0.0098
<0.0098
<0.0098
<0.0098
<0.0098
<0.0098
<0.02
<0.0098
<0.0098
<0.0098
—<0.049
<0.049
<0.0098
<0.049
~<0.049
<0.0098
<0.0098
Sample
_________________Type
Volatile organic compounds (Cont.)
1,1 -dichloroethylen e
1.2- dichloropropane
1 >3-dichloropropylene
Ethylbenzene
Methyl bromide
Methyl chloride
Methylene chloride
1.1.2.2- tetrachloroethane
Tetrachloroethylene
Toluene
1,1,1 -trichloroethane
1.1.2- trichloroe thane
Trichloroethylene
Vinyl chloride
Acid-extractable compounds
P-chloro-m-creso
2-chlorophenol
2.4- dichloroph enol
2.4- dimethylphenol
4.6- dinitro-o-cresol
2.4- dinitroph enol
2-nitrophenol
4-nitrophenol
Pentachlorophenol
Phenol
2.4.6- trichlorophenol
Base-neutral compounds
Acenaphthene
Acenaphthylene
Anthracene
Benzidine
Benzo(a)anthracene
Benzo(a)pyrene
3,4 benzofluoranthene
Benzo(ghi)perylene
Benzo(k)fluoran thene
Bis (2-chloroethoxy) methane
Bis (2-chloroethyl) ether
Bis (2-chloroisopropyl) ether
Bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
4-bromophenyl phenyl ether
Butyl benzyl phthalate
2-chloronaphthalene
4-chlorophenyl phenyl ether
annual monitoring ana rouutant scan
Annual monitoring ana ro at scan
■
Signature
Form - DMR- PPA-1
Page 3
*
Permit No. _NCOO
Outfall___001__
Analytical
Method
Quantitation
Level
Sample
Result Number of
samples
Sample
Type Units of
Measurement
Month __June_
Year___2010.
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625 "
EPA 625
0.0098
0.0098
0.0098
0.0098
0.0098
0.0098
0.0098
0.049
0.0098
0.0098
0.0098
0.0098
0.0098
0.0098
0.0098
0.0098
0.0098
0.0098
0.0098
0.0098
0.0098
0.0098
0.0098
0.0098
0.0098
0.0098
0.0098
0.0098
0.0098
<0.0098
<0.0098
<0.0098
<0.0098
<0.0098
<0.0098
<0.0098
<0.049
<0.0098
I <0.0098 ~
<0.0098
<0.0098
<0.0098
<0.0098
<0.0098
<0.0098
<0.0098
<0.0098
<0.0098
<0.0098
<0.0098
<0.0098
<0.0098 "
<0.0098 ~
<0.0098
<0.0098
<0.0098
<0.0098
<0.0098
mg/l
___mg/1
mg/1
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
_2.
1
__1_
__1_
1
1
1
1
1
__1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
~T
i
_i
i
~i
i:
i'
_i
i
~i
i
T
[Parameter
Base-neutral compounds (cont.)
Chrysene T
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Di-n-octyl phthalate r
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1.2- dichlorobenzene
1.3- dichlorobenzene
1.4- dichlorobenzene ~
3.3- dichlorobenzidine
Diethyl phthalate
Dimethyl phthalate
2.4- dinitrotoluene
2,6-dinitrotoluene ~
1,2-diphenylhydrazine ~
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Hexachlorobenzene
Hexachlorobutadiene
Hexachlorocyclo-pent adiene
Hexachloroethane
Indeno( 1,2,3-cd)pyrene
Isophorone
Naphthalene
Nitrobenzene
N-nitrosodi-n-propylamine
N-nitrosodimethylamine
N-nitrosodiphenylamine
Phenanthrene
Pyrene
11,2,4,-trichlorobenzene
Authorized Representative name
Annual Monitoring and Poll Scan
Parameter
0.2 1
4.4 1
0.1 1
1
1
1
1 1
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Form - DMR- PPA-1
Page 1
0.025
0.010
Antimony
Arsenic
Composite
Composite
Grab
Grab
4,08
292
15.9
T.32
1
I
0.1
NA
10
T
<0.025
<0.010
Permit No. _NC0024
Outfall___001______
ORC _A. Gregg Camp____
Phone _252-536-4884
NC 165 and RRSD WWTP NC 70
Analytical
Method
Quantitation
Level
Sample
Result
Units of
Measurement
Number of
samples
Facility Name _Roanoke Rapids Sanitaiy District.
Date of sampling _July 17, 2011_
Analytical Laboratory _Meritech, Inc.
Sample
Type
Month__July
Year 2011
1
T
EPA 350.1
SM4500Q G
EPA 353.2~
EPA 351,1
EPA 200,7
SM 2540C
SM 2340B
HACK10014
______________________EPA 1664A
Metals (total recoverable), cyanide and total phenols
EPA 200.7
EPA 200.7
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Grab
Grab
Composite
Grab
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
EPA 624
EPA 624
EPA 624
EPA 624
EPA 624
EPA 624
EPA 624
EPA 624
EPA 624
EPA 624
EPA 624
EPA 624
EPA 624
EPA 624
EPA 200,7
EPA 200.7
EPA 200.7~
EPA 200.7
EPA 200.7
EPA1631
EPA 200,7
EPA 200,7
EPA 200,7
EPA 200,7~
EPA 200.7
EPA 335.4
EPA 420.1
<50,0
<10.0
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
<5.00
<5.00
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
0.005
0.002
0.005
0.010
0.010
0.001
0.010
0.010
0.005
0.020
0.010
0.005
0.010
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/l
mg/1
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
ug/1
mg/l
1
1
T
T
i
T
i
T
T
i
T
T
i
F
i
T
T
T
i
T
T
T
i
F
F
i
F
Acrylonitrile
Benzene
Bromoform
Carbon tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chlorodibromomethane
Chloroethane
2-chloroethylvinyl ether
Chloroform
Dichlorobromomcthane
1.1- dichloroethane
1.2- dichloroe thane
[Trans-1,2-dichloroethylene
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Zinc
Cyanide
Total phenolic compounds
Volatile organic compounds
Acrolein
Ammonia (as N)
Dissolved oxygen
Nitrate/Nitrite
Total Kjeldahl nitrogen
Total Phosphorus
Total dissolved solids
Hardness
Chlorine (total residual, TRC)
Oil and grease
0.2
0.02
10
<0.005
<0.002
<0.005
0.010
<0.010
0.00467
<0.010
<0.010
<0.005
<0.020
0.029
<0.005
0.017
60.8
<10
<5.0
<50.0
<10.0
<1.00
3.79
<1.00
<1.00
5.73
<5.00
<5.00
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
ug/1
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
mg/l
Parameter
Form - DMR- PPA-1
Page 2
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Analytical
Method
Sample
Result
Units of
Measurement
Month__July
Year____2011
Number of
samples
Quantitation
Level
EPA 624
EPA 624
' EPA 624
EPA 624
EPA 624
EPA 624
EPA 624
EPA 624
EPA 624
EPA 624
EPA 624
EPA 624
EPA 624
EPA 624
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
~ EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
~ EPA 625
EPA 625
~ EPA 625
' EPA 625
EPA 625
’ EPA 625
' EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
' EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
<5.00
<5.00
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
<5.00
<10
<10
<10
<10
<50
<50
<10
<50
<50
<10
<10
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
1
~T
^7
1
T
1
T
T
T
T
T
T
T~ r
1
1
T
7
1
1
7
7
7
i
T~
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
7
i
i
i
T
F
i
<10
<10
<10
<50
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<50
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
<5.00
<5.00
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
<1.00
<5.00
<10
<10
<10
<10
<50
<50
<10
<50
<50
<10
<10
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
Permit No. _NC0024^^__
Outfall 001
Annual Monitoring and Poll]^^ t Scan
Sample
__ Type
Volatile organic compounds (Cont.)
1,1 -dichloroethylene
1.2- dichloropropane
1.3- dichloropropylene
Ethylbenzene
Methyl bromide
Methyl chloride
Methylene chloride
1.1.2.2- tetrachloroeth a ne
Tetrachloroethylene
Toluene
1,1,1 -trichloroethane
1.1.2- trichloroe thane
Trichloroethy le n e
Vinyl chloride
Acid-extractable compounds
P-chloro-m-creso
2-chlorophenol
2.4- dichlorophenol
2.4- dimethyl phenol
4.6- dinitro-o-cresol
2.4- dinitrophenol
2-nitrophenol
4-nitrophenol
Pentachlorophenol
Phenol
2.4.6- trichlorophenol
Base-neutral compounds
Acenaphthene
Acenaphthylene
Anthracene
Benzidine
Benzo(a)anthracene
Benzo(a)pyrene
3,4 benzofluoranthene
Benzo(ghi)perylene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Bis (2-chloroethoxy) methane
Bis (2-chloroethyl) ether
Bis (2-chloroisopropyl) ether
Bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
4-bromophenyl phenyl ether
Butyl benzyl phthalate
2-chloronaphthalene
Parameter
j
am
Signature
Date
Form - DMR- PPA-1
Page 3
EPA 625
Analytical
Method
<10
Sample
Result
1
Number of
samples
<10
Quantitation
Level
Grab
Sample
Type
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
Grab
I EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
_ EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
~ EPA 625
~ EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
EPA 625
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<50
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<50
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/I
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/I
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
1
1
__1_
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
~T~
~T~
1
~T~
1
T~
T"
1
T“
1
T“
1
1
~1
1
7
i
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<50
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<50
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
Base-neutral compounds (cont.)
Chrysene
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Di-n-octyl phthalate
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1.2- dichlorobenzene ~
1.3- dichlorobenzene
1.4- dichloro benzene
3.3- dichloro benzidine
Diethyl phthalate
Dimethyl phthalate
2.4- dinitrotoluene
2,6-dinitrotolu ene
1,2-diphenylhyd razin e
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Hexachlorobenzene
Hexachlorobutadiene
Hexachlorocyclo-pentadiene
Hexachloroethane
Indeno( 1,2,3-cd)pyrene
Isophorone
Naphthalene
Nitrobenzene
N-nitrosodi-n-propylamine
N-nitrosodimethylamine ~~
N-nitrosodiphenylamine
Phenanthrene
Pyrene
1.2,4,-trichlorobenzene
Permit No. _NC0024^^
Outfall 001
4-chlorophenyl phenyl ether
Annual Monitoring and Poll^fe| : Scan
Authorized Representative name
I certify under penalty of taw that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction
anage the system, or those persons directly responsibel for gathering the information, the
mformatron subm.tted is , to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate and complete I
War?‘h ' an! SI8nlficant penalties for submitting false information, including the
possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations.
Month_July
Year____2011
~ ug/1
Units of ]
Measurement
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information
Attachment B: Second Species Toxicity
Test Results
Effluent Toxicity R Form-Chronic Fathead Minnow Mui Date:8/2/2011ncentration Test
Facility: Roanoke Rapids Sanitary District NPDES # NCOO 24201 Pipe #: County: Halifax
Comments |Laboratory: Meritech, Inc.
x
Signature of Operator in Responsible Charge
x
Signature of Laboratory Supervisor
MAIL ORIGINAL TO:
Test Initiation Date/Time 7/19/2011 3’55 PM Avg Wt/Surv. ControlF ]0.595 Test Organisms
% Survival[97.5
Avg Wt (mg)[0.581 Hatch Date:7/18/11
% Survival[97.5 Hatch Time:3:00 PM
Avg Wt (mg)[ 0.552
% Survival[J95.0
Avg Wt (mg)[ 0.583
1.1 % Survivalf 92.5
Avg Wt (mg)[ 0.551
[2.2 % Survival[97.5
Avg Wt (mg)[0.533
% Survivalf J97.5
Avg Wt (mg)[0.562
-
n\A/(~> Pnrm AT.H f1/riA\
1
7/18/2011
Water Quality Data
Control
pH (SU) Init/Fin
DO (mg/L) Init/Fin
Temp (C) Init/Fin
Sample
Collection Start Date
Grab
Composite (Duration)
Hardness (mg/L)
Alkalinity (mg/L)
Conductivity (umhos/cm)
Chlorine(mg/L)
Temp at Receipt (’C)
| 4.4 | Surviving #
Original #
Wt/original (mg)
| 0.275 | Surviving #
Original #
Wt/original (mg)
| 0.55 | Surviving#
Original #
Wt/original (mg)
High Concentration
pH (SU) Init/Fin
DO (mg/L) Init/Fin
Temp (C) Init/Fin
1 Surviving #
Original #
Wt/original (mg)
1 Surviving #
Original #
Wt/original (mg)
r Cultured In-House
P Outside Supplier
Dilution H2O Batch #
Hardness (mg/L)
Alkalinity (mg/L)
Conductivity (umhos/cm)
Normal
Hom. Var.
NOEC
LOEC
ChV
Method
Environmental Sciences Branch
Division of Water Quality
NC DENR
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1621
0
7 91 / 8 06
7 24 / 7 20
25.8 / 24 3
0
8.18 / 8.17
7 17 / 7 40
25.8 / 24 3
9
10
0.511
10
10
0.545
9
10
0.510
9
10
0.575
9
10
0.610
560
48
58
220
561
46
59
216
1
8 24 / 7 76
7 45 / 6 82
25 8 / 24 2
1
8.33 / 7 94
7 49 / 7 03
25 8 / 24 2
2
7/20/2011
10
10
0.560
10
10
0.540
9
10
0.572
10
10
0.594
9
10
0.596
2
10
10
0 594
2
8 23 / 8.08
7 55 / 7 20
24 3 / 24 3
2
8.16 / 8 04
7 39 / 7 35
24 3 / 24 3
9
10
0.528
10
10
0.538
10
10
0.539
10
10
0.487
10
10
0.588
3
10
10
0.576
10
10
0.616
10
10
0.542
9
10
0.584
10
10
0.571
4
9
10
0.524
Survival
Critical
10
10
10
10
10
5
8.23 / 7.97~
7 46 / 7.30
25.6 / 24.3
Calculated
18
16
14
18
18
6
8.21 / 7 84
7 57 / 7.04
25 6 / 24 4
559
48
58
217
1
10
10
0.629
3
7/21/2011
10
10
0.516
Stats
Cone.
0.275
0 55
1.1
2.2
4.4
4
8.34 / 7.91~
7 65 / 7.20
24 7 / 24 3
6
8.17 / 784
7.58 / 7,17
25 6 / 24 4
% Eff. Repl.
[Control | Sun/iving #
Original #
Wt/original (mg)
23.9
54
81
405
<0.1
1.7
24.7
52
77
626
<0.1
1.6
24.1
59
76
567
<0.1
1 8
4
8.23 / 7.89'
7 55 / 7.24
Survival
FB
FP
44
>4.4
>4 4
Steel's
Growth
Fl*
Fk
4 4
>4.4
>4,4
Dunnet's
Growth
Critical Calculated
2.41 1.0971
2.41 -0.0662
2.41 1.1160
2.41 1 8159
2.41 0.6999
5
8 20 / 7 96
7.54 / 7 36
25.6 / 24 3
3
8.23 / 8.11
7 62 / 7 42
25 0 / 24 5 [ 24 7 / 24 3
Overall Result
ChV [ >4 4
Day
3
8.30 / 8.02
7.39 / 7 34
25 0 / 24 5
Date:4/29/2011
NPDES # NCOO 24201 Pipe #: County:
CommentslLaboratory: Meritech, Inc.
x
Signature of Operator in Responsible Charge
x
Signature of Laboratory Supervisor
MAIL ORIGINAL TO:
Avg Wt/Surv. Control[Test Initiation Date/Time 3:10 PM 0.636 Test Organisms4/19/2011
% Survival [100.0
Avg Wt (mg)[Hatch Date:4/18/110.636
% Survival [Hatch Time: 3:00 pm CT100.0
Avg Wt (mg)[0.648
% Survival[100.0
Avg Wt (mg)[0.671
% Survival [100.01.1
JAvg Wt (mg)[0.670
% Survival [95.0
Avg Wt (mg)[j0.649
% Survival[100.0[4.4
JAvg Wt (mg)[0.665
DWQ Form AT-5 (1/04)
1
4/18/2011
r Cultured In-House
Outside Supplier
Water Quality Data
Control
pH (SU) Init/Fin
DO (mg/L) Init/Fin
Temp (C) Init/Fin
| 0.275 | Surviving #
Original #
Wt/original (mg)
| 0.55 I Surviving #
Original #
Wt/original (mg)
2.2 | Surviving #
Original #
Wt/original (mg)
High Concentration
pH (SU) Init/Fin
DO (mg/L) Init/Fin
Temp (C) Init/Fin
1 | Surviving #
Original #
Wt/original (mg)
1 Surviving #
Original #
Wt/original (mg)
Sample
Collection Start Date
Grab
Composite (Duration)
Hardness (mg/L)
Alkalinity (mg/L)
Conductivity (umhos/cm)
Chlorine(mg/L)
Temp, at Receipt (’C)
Dilution H2O Batch#
Hardness (mg/L)
Alkalinity (mg/L)
Conductivity (umhos/cm)
% Eff. Repl.
[Control | Surviving #
Original #
Wt/original (mg)
Environmental Sciences Branch
Division of Water Quality
NC DENR
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1621
Normal
Hom. Var.
NOEC
LOEC
ChV
Method
540
48"
59
221
10
10
0.658
10
10
0.638
10
10
0.685
8
10
0.545
10
10
0.666
1
10
10
0.594
541
46
57
224
1
8.22 / 7.81
7.50 / 6 75
25.7 / 24.2
1
8.16 / 7.78
7.42 / 6.50
25 7 / 24 2
2
4/20/2011
10
10
0.617
10
10
0.647
10
10
0.710
10
10
0.671
10
10
0.616
2
10
10
0.665
543
48
60
230
2
8.25 / 7.97
7.57 / 7.10
25.8 / 24.3
2
8.17 / 7 99
7 47 / 7 20
25 8 / 24 3
10
10
0.580
10
10
0.652
10
10
0.622
10
10
0.720
10
10
0.706
3
10
10
0.627
10
10
0.747
10
10
0.663
10
10
0.659
10
10
0.673
10
10
0.736
Survival
Critical
10
10
10
10
10
Calculated
_ 18
18
18
16
18
6
8.24 / 8.18
7.40 / 7 25
25.5 / 24 5
6
8 22 / 8.12
7 36 / 7.18
25.5 / 24 5
Calculated
-0.3249
-0 9543
-0.9272
-0.3519
-0.7986
0
8.16 / 8.07
7.38 / 7.37
25.8 / 24.2
0
8.06 / 7 99
7 45 / 7.25
25 8 / 24 2
542
48
58
218
3
4/21/2011
4
10
10
0.657
4
8.29 / 7.88
7.33 / 6.97
24.7 / 24.3
5
8.29 / 8.01
7 44 / 7.10
24 9 / 24.2
23 8
48
20
388
<0.1
0.5
23 8
50
79
491
<0.1
0.6
23.7
50
91
498
<0.1
1.1 Stats
Cone.
0.275
0.55
1.1
2.2
4.4
Effluent Toxicity Rep^^Form-Chronic Fathead Minnow Multi-(j|^pentration Test
Facility: Roanoke Rapids Sanitary District
Growth
Critical
2.41
2.41
2.41
2.41
2.41
Growth
Fl
Fl
4.4
>4.4
>4.4
Dunnet's
Survival
Fl
Fl
4.4
>4 4
>4 4
Steel's
3
8.24 / 8.14
7 47 / 7.19
24 3 / 24 2
5
8 14 / 7 98
7 35 / 6 99
24 9 / 24 2
4
8.28 / 7.89
7 31 / 6 98
24 7 / 24 3
Overall Result
ChV | >4 4
Day
3 ~
8.26 / 8.17
7.48 / 7 21
24.3 / 24.2
Date: 1/28/2011
NPDES# NC00 24201 Pipe # County:
Comments|Laboratory: Meritech, Inc.
x
Signature of Operator in Responsible Charge
x
Signature of Laboratory Supervisor
MAIL ORIGINAL TO:
Avg Wt/Surv. Control^Test Initiation Date/Time 2:50 PM1/18/2011 0.619 Test Organisms
% Survival[100.0
Avg Wt (mg)r 0.619 Hatch Date:1/17/11
% Survival[100.0 Hatch Time: 3:00 pm CT
Avg Wt (mg)[0.632
% Survivalf 100.0
Avg Wt (mg)[0.631
% Survival[1.1 100.0
Avg Wt (mg)[0.591
% Survival[100.0
Avg Wt (mg)[ 0.606
% Survival F 97.54.4
Avg Wt (mg)r 0.607
Day
DWO Form AT-.5 /1/04)
1
1/17/2011
Water Quality Data
Control
pH (SU) Init/Fin
DO (mg/L) Init/Fin
Temp (C) Init/Fin
Sample
Collection Start Date
Grab
Composite (Duration)
Hardness (mg/L)
Alkalinity (mg/L)
Conductivity (umhos/cm)
Chlorine(mg/L)
Temp, at Receipt (°C)
[ 2 2 | Surviving#
Original #
Wt/original (mg)
| 0.275 | Surviving#
Original #
Wt/original (mg)
| 0.55 I Surviving #
Original #
Wt/original (mg)
High Concentration
pH (SU) Init/Fin
DO (mg/L) Init/Fin
Temp (C) Init/Fin
1 Surviving #
Original #
Wt/original (mg)
1 | Surviving #
Original #
Wt/original (mg)
F Cultured In-House
F Outside Supplier
Dilution H2O Batch #
Hardness (mg/L)
Alkalinity (mg/L)
Conductivity (umhos/cm)
Environmental Sciences Branch
Division of Water Quality
NC DENR
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1621
Normal
Hom. Var.
NOEC
LOEC
ChV
Method
523
48
60
225
10
10
0 621
10
10
0.648
10
10
0.642
10
10
0.692
10
10
0.586
1
10
10
0.607
524
48
62
232
525
48
58
227
10
10
0.620
10
10
0.610
10
10
0 607
10
10
0.652
2
10
10
0.627
10
10
0.698
2
8.13 / 8 11
7.71 / 7.60
24.7 / 24 4
2
8.05 / 8.09
7.63 / 7 60
24 7 / 24.4
3
1/20/2011
9
10
0.614
10
10
0.543
10
10
0 562
10
10
0.623
10
10
0.634
3
10
10
0.617
10
10
0.560
10
10
0.584
10
10
0.588
10
10
0 559
10
10
0.620
4
8.23 / 7.75
7.75 / 6.60
24.5 / 24 2
4
8.18 / 7 76
7.79 / 6.40
24 5 / 24 2
Survival
Critical
10
10
10
10
10
5
8.22 / 8 12
7 58 / 7.56
24.3 / 24 2
5
8.30 / 8.05
7.63 / 7.60
24 3 / 24 2
Calculated
18
18
18
18
16
6
8 20 / 7 85
7 90 / 7.15
24 6 / 24 2
6
8.21 / 7.85
7 90 / 7.17
24.6 / 24 2
Critical
2.41
2.41
241
2.41
2.41
0
8 23 / 7 96
7 59 / 7 29
24 6 / 24 3
0
8.23 / 8.08
7 65 / 7 47
24 6 / 24 3
1
8.24 / 7.84'
7 55 / 7,32
24 9 / 24 3
1
8.15 / 782
7.51 / 7 10
24 9 / 24 3
2
1/19/2011
3
8.26 / 7 68
7.82 / 6.05
24 2 / 24.3
4
10
10
0.623
Stats
Cone.
0.275
0.55
1.1
2.2
4 4
% Eff. Repl.
[Control | Surviving #
Original #
Wt/original (mg)
23.1
44
22
374
<0.1
0.2
24.1
50
45
380
<0.1
0.3
23.9
58
72
412
<0.1
0.3
Effluent Toxicity Rei^^Form-Chronic Fathead Minnow Multi-]
Facility: Roanoke Rapids Sanitary District
Growth
Calculated
-0.4780
-0.4264
0 9771
0.4441
0 4264
Survival
Fl
Fl
4 4
>4 4
>4 4
Steel's
Growth
Fl
Fl
4 4
>4.4
>4.4
Dunnet's
^centration Test
3
8.23 / 7 74
7 81 / 7.51
24 2 / 24 3
Overall Result
ChV | >4 4
Effluent Toxicity Re,Date: 10/22/2010
Facility: Roanoke Rapids Sanitary District NPDES # NC00 24201 Pipe # County:
Laboratory: Meritech, Inc.Comments!
x
Signature of Operator in Responsible Charge cX
Signature of Laboratory Supervisor
MAIL ORIGINAL TO:
Test Initiation Date/Time Avg Wt/Surv. Controlf10/12/2010 4.00 PM 0.537 Test Organisms
% Survival[97 5
Avg Wt (mg)[0.524 Hatch Date:10/11/10
% Survival[100.0 Hatch Time: 3:00 pm CT
Avg Wt (mgjF 0 552
% Survival[100.0
Avg Wt (mg)[0.535
% SurvivalF1.1 97.5
Avg Wt (mgH 0.518
% SurvivalF 100.0
Avg Wt (mg)[0.540
% SurvivalF4.4 97.5
Avg Wt (mg)[0.534
Day
J
DWQ FormAT-5 (1/04)
1
10/11/2010
F Cultured In-House
Outside Supplier
Water Quality Data
Control
pH (SU) Imt/Fin
DO (mg/L) Init/Fin
Temp (C) Init/Fin
Dilution H2O Batch #
Hardness (mg/L)
Alkalinity (mg/L)
Conductivity (umhos/cm)
Sample
Collection Start Date
Grab
Composite (Duration)
Hardness (mg/L)
Alkalinity (mg/L)
Conductivity (umhos/cm)
Chlorine(mg/L)
Temp, at Receipt (“C)
| 0.275 | Surviving #
Original #
Wt/original (mg)
| 0.55 | Surviving #
Original #
Wt/original (mg)
High Concentration
pH (SU) Init/Fin
DO (mg/L) Init/Fin
Temp (C) Init/Fin
1 Surviving #
Original #
Wt/original (mg)
1 Surviving #
Original #
Wt/original (mg)
2.2 | Surviving #
Original #
Wt/original (mg)
Normal
Hom. Var.
NOEC
LOEC
ChV
Method
Environmental Sciences Branch
Division of Water Quality
NC DENR
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1621
% Eff. Repl.
[Control | Surviving #
Original #
Wt/original (mg)
495
48
62
212
0
8.22 / 8.13
7.36 / 7.32
25 7 / 25 4
0
8.14 / 8.12
7.30 / 7 28
25 7 / 25 4
10
10
0.551
10
10
0.548
10
10
0.523
10
10
0.509
10
10
0.545
1
8.29 / 8.04
7.45 / 7 41
25 5 / 25.1
2
10/12/2010
10
10
0.562
10
10
0.498
10
10
0.545
10
10
0 577
2
10
10
0.516
2
8.26 / 8.17
7 55 / 7 48
25 0 / 24 4
3
10/14/2010
10
10
0.560
10
10
0.570
9
10
0.486
10
10
0.562
10
10
0.542
3
10
10
0.554
3
8.23 / 8.14
7 58 / 7.33
24.1 / 25.0
9
10
0.463
10
10
0.544
10
10
0.517
10
10
0.546
10
10
0 545
4
10
10
0 547
Survival
Critical
10
10
10
10
10
5
8 25 / 8.01
7 77 / 7 56
25 2 / 24 1
Calculated
20
20
18
20
18
6
8 18 / 7 80'
7 67 / 6 83
24.3 / 24 5
6
8.20 / 7.87
7.69 / 6.93
24 3 / 24 5
1
9
10
0 477
496
48
66
216
497
40
54
216
1
8 26 / 8 07
7 45 / 7 40
25 5 / 25 1
24 7
44
41
397
<0.1
1 0
10
10
0.521
498
48
54
208
2
8 23 / 8 19
7 57 / 7 54
25 0 / 24 4
Stats
Cone.
0.275
0.55
1.1
2.2
4.4
4
8.26 / 8 15
7 55 I 7 56
24 7 / 25 0
4
8.28 / 8.14
7.66 / 7.60
24 7 / 25.0
5
8 28 / 8.03
7 77 / 7 50
25.2 I 24 1
24.1
44
25
360
<0 1
0.1
23.7
'44
■79
■444
<0.1
1.2 Growth
Critical Calculated
2.41 -1.3018
2.41 -0 4981
T41 0 2604
2.41 I -0.7471
2 41 -0 4755
Growth
Fl
Fl
4 4
M4
>4 4
Dunnet's
Survival
ri n
4 4
>44
>4 4
Steel's
3
8.30 / 8 22
7 60 / 7 43
24 1 / 25.0
^Form-Chronic Fathead Minnow Multi^j^centration Test
Overall Result
ChV | >4 4
Attachment C: Biosolids Program Description
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information
ATTACHMENT C
Roanoke Rapids Sanitary District
At present, the District has permitted approximately 3,100 acres of private
farmland of which 91 acres of self owned land for residual application.
Approximately 2,600,000 gallons of ~5% solids is applied to an estimated 226
acres per year. Soil pH is adjusted to achieve a soil pH as specified by permit
conditions.
Synagro Southeast, Inc. manages Land application of residuals. The Roanoke
Rapids Sanitary District holds the land application permit and provides a
licensed ORC and back-up ORC as required. Synagro Southeast, Inc. provides
transport and application equipment and personnel. District personnel perform
all treatment of residuals.
Pathogen and VAR reduction for Waste Activated Sludge (WAS) is
accomplished by lime stabilization, mixing, and a holding system to maintain
proper pH control. Primary solids are treated through three anaerobic digesters
with solids either stored for liquid application or dried on drying beds. Storage
(holding) of treated solids is provided by an above ground 1.0 million gallon
(MG) tank and backed-up by two retrofitted clarifiers adding 0.375 MG each to
provide a total of 1.75 MG storage in an emergency.
Biosolids Program
Roanoke Rapids Sanitary District
NPDES Permit No. NC0024201
Land Application Permit No. WQ0001989
The District utilizes final alkaline stabilization of waste activated sludge and
anaerobic digested primary sludge in order to meet pathogen and vector
reduction requirements. The alkaline stabilization process and anaerobic
digested primary sludge meets all requirements for pathogen and vector
attraction reduction (VAR) for Class B biosolids.
R. Danieley Bro(vn, P.E.
Chief Executive Officer
Subject:
Dear Mr. Camp,
Sincerely,
cc: RRO files
Beverly Eaves Perdue
Governor
Raleigh Regional Office
1628 Mail Service Center
Vicki Webb
Environmental Specialist
Phone [phone]
FAX [phone]
Dee Freeman
Secretary
The aquatic toxicity test using 24-hr composite samples of effluent discharged from Roanoke Rapids
WWTP has been completed. Roanoke Rapids WWTP has an effluent discharge permitted that is 8.34
million gallons per day (MGD) entering Roanoke River (7Q10 of 1172 CFS). Whole effluent samples
were collected on March 15 and March 17 by Vicki Webb and Tom Ascenzo for use in a chronic
Ceriodaphnia dubia pass-fail toxicity test. The test using these samples resulted in a pass. Toxicity test
information follows.
Whole effluent toxicity test results
Roanoke Rapids WWTP
NPDES Permit # NC0024201/001
Halifax County
North Carolina Division of Water Quality Raleigh Regional Office Surface Water Protection
Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org 1628 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1628
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
Mr. Gregg Camp
135 Aqueduct Rd.
Weldon, NC 27890
Test Type
Test Concentrations
Test Result
Control Survival
Control Mean Reproduction
Test Treatment Survival
Treatment Mean Reproduction
First Sample pH
First Sample Conductivity
First Sample Total Residual Chlorine
Second Sample pl 1
Second Sample Conductivity
Second Sample Total Residual Chlorine
3-Brood Ceriodaphnia dubia chronic pass fail
1.1%
Pass
100%
22.4 neonates
92%
23.6 neonates
7.11 SU
409 micromhos/cm
<0.10 ing/L
7.08 SU
429 micromhos/cm
<0.10 me/L
OneNorthCarolina
— Naturally
Customer Service
877-623-6748
If you have any questions concerning the toxicity sampling or results, please contact me either by phone
at [phone] or email at [e-mail].
HCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins
Director
May 13,2011
EPA
NPDES
NC0024201
INI66I
Permit Effective DateEntry Time/Date
07/07/0111/03/1409:00 AM
Roanoke Rapids WWTP
Permit Expiration DateExit Time/Date135 Aqueduct Rd
12/03/3111/03/14Weldon NC 27890 03:00 PM
Other Facility Data
Name, Address of Responsible Official/Title/Phone and Fax Number
Camp,P0 Box 308 Roanoke Rapids NC 27870//252-536-4884/Gregg
Section C: Areas Evaluated During Inspection (Check only those areas evaluated)
Other
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
(See attachment summary)
Agency/Office/Phone and Fax NumbersName(s) and Signature(s) of Inspector(s)
RRO WQ///Vicki Webb
RRO WQ//919 791-4200/tom ascenzo
Page #1
3l
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Washington, D C. 20460
yr/mo/day
11/03/14
Contacted
No
Date
Form Approved.
OMB No. 2040-0057
Approval expires 8-31-98
Name(s) of Onsite Representative(s)/Titles(s)/Phone and Fax Number(s)
///
Inspection Work Days
671 I 69
77 7
EPA Form 3560^3 (Rev 9-94) Previous editions are obsolete.
QA
72Ld
Facility Self-Monitoring Evaluation Rating
70U
J11
Fac Type
20U
____________________________________________Section B: Facility Data______
Name and Location of Facility Inspected (For Industrial Users discharging to POTW, also include
POTW name and NPDES permit Number)
Inspector
19QJ
Inspection Type
18UIJ1712l
Transaction Code
1 w 2 111
Remarks
21l I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
73l I I74
-----Reserved---------------------
75| I I I I I I I 80
Bl71 u
Water Compliance Inspection Report
Section A: National Data System Coding (i.e., PCS)
' / Agency/Officp/Phone anti Fax Numbers DateSignature of Management Q A Reviewer
Permit: NC0024201
Inspection Date: 03/14/2011
Yes No NA NEOther
Comment:Tox test ran the week of March 14, 2011. Facility passed
3Page #
Owner - Facility: Roanoke Rapids WWTP
Inspection Type: Bioassay Compliance