NC0024201_Historical information_20011231

Roanoke Rapid,s Sanitary District
Fax [phone](252) 537-91371000 Jackson Street Roanoke Rapids, NC 27870P. O. Box 308
November 29, 2001
DEC - 6 2001
RE:
Dear Mr. Goodrich:
3.
d'my dxumentsVpIs perrnttansmrna leaer revised dx
Renewal of NPDES Permit Number NC0024201
Roanoke Rapids Sanitary District WWTP
Halifax County
Mr. David A. Goodrich, Supervisor
NPDES Unit
NCDENR/Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Page
1/3
The Roanoke Rapids Sanitary District is permitted to discharge 8.34 MGD of treated effluent at the
mouth of Chockoyotte Creek at the Roanoke River under NPDES Permit No. NC0024201, which expires
on May 31, 2002. This application is for renewal of the current permit. In accordance with the
requirements of NC G.S. 143.215.1(c) we are submitting the following:
Permit Application Highlights
Prior to renewal of this permit in 1997, the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) had historically
established permit limits for this facility based on the 7Q10 of the Roanoke River. The facility
discharges into Chockoyotte Creek, at its confluence with the Roanoke River. When DWQ issued the
draft permit for this facility in June 1997, a change in DWQ’s permitting strategy caused the Sanitary
District to file a Petition for a Contested Case Hearing in the matter, in July 1997. At issue was a
change in the instream waste concentration (IWC) required to be used in the quarterly pass/fail
chronic whole effluent toxicity tests. A negotiated settlement agreement reached in December 1997
provided for an IWC of 39% for the chronic whole effluent toxicity tests, which became effective
February 1, 1999. The settlement agreement did not impact the permitting strategy for conventional
pollutants and toxicants, and limits for those parameters remained established based on the 7Q10 of
the Roanoke Riv sr.
O DEC - 6 2001
DENR-WATER QUALITY
_ PQINT SOURCE BRANCH
1. Completed and signed permit application, EPA Form 2A, in triplicate (Attachment A);
2. Complete reports of expanded effluent test results for three scans of the last 4 % years (Attachment
B);
Complete reports of whole effluent toxicity test results for the last 4 x/i years (Attachment C);
4. Complete reports of remediation waste test results for two years (Attachment D); and
5. A narrative description of the biosolids program (Attachment E).
1
Other Issues
1.
dlmy dxunenls'rpdes penrifitraraniKal Mer rwseddx
Given the proximity of the facility’s discharge to the Roanoke River and the facility’s record of passing
the chronic whole effluent toxicity tests at the lower IWC, the Sanitary District respectfully requests that:
2. The IWC percentage of 39% for quarterly pass/fail chronic whole effluent toxicity tests is
maintained.
2. The Roanoke Rapids Sanitary District believes it ifv the State of North Carolina’s intention that
the exclusion from sampling during extreme weather and hazardous conditions promulgated
Part D of EPA Form 2A requests data on volatile organic compounds, acid-extractable compounds,
and base-neutral compounds. This is data that would typically be generated if a facility were
required to conduct Priority Pollutant Scans on the effluent. Although RRSD is not required by the
current NPDES permit to conduct these scans; we have continued to maintain this monitoring and
rather than enter this complex data on the form, we believe it is much more appropriate to provide
you with copies of the expanded effluent test data lab reports and are included as Attachment B.
1. Our current permit requires instream monitoring for dissolved oxygen and temperature. During
this period we have recorded consistent results without any anomalies being observed, therefore
we are requesting this permit requirement be written out of our permit renewal, understanding
this may be revisited on our next renewal. Should this request by denied, we request language in
the permit that specifically incorporates the provisions of 15A NCAC 2B.0505(c\4) into the
permit. This rule provides that stream sampling may be discontinued when flow conditions or
extreme weather conditions could result in injury or death of the persons collecting the samples
and includes requirements for reporting.
Page
2/3
3. Since our last permit renewal the District has accelerated our commitment to preventing sanitary
sewer overflows. In this regard we have placed a diesel operated 12” pump in the vicinity of our
influent collection box with a piped discharge to our abandoned primary clarifiers. These tank were
previously utilized for residuals holding and will remain available as secondary storage for biosolids
and primarily for influent flow equalization.
2. Part E of EPA Form 2A requests toxicity testing data. The data required is the same as that provided
by our laboratory when they conduct the tests. Rather than enter this complex data on the form, we
believe it is much more appropriate to provide you with copies of the full toxicity test lab reports.
These are included in Attachment C.
Other Requests for Permit Renewal
We would appreciate DWQ’s consideration of these additional requests for this permit renewal:
1. Permit limits for conventional pollutants and toxicants for this facility remain based on the 7Q10 of
the Roanoke River, as this is the current permitting strategy.
4.
5.
Should additional information be required, please contact me.
Enclosures
dVny (tomerttsVpdes pennCtransmrttai letter nMseddx
Very truly yours,
Roanoke Rapids Sanitary District
Copies: Gregg Camp, RRSD
Francine Durso, ARC ADIS
NPDES Unit File-2
File
Please provide documentation of methodology, data, and assumptions used in any Reasonable
Potential Analysis that may be conducted.
We request a copy of any comments that DWQ may receive from the public regarding this
permit renewal.
“Influent and effluent sampling events may be discontinued at such times as extreme
weather conditions or other hazardous conditions (such as local flooding, high winds,
hurricanes, tornadoes, electrical storms, etc.) exist which will result in substantial risk of
injury or death to persons collecting samples. In such cases, on each day that sampling
is discontinued, written justification for tie discontinuance shall be specified in the
monitoring report for the month in which the event occurred. Sampling shall be
resumed at the first opportunity after the risk period has ceased.”
Page:
3/3
R. Danieley Bro/n, PE
Chief Executive Officer
3. Please provide us with a copy of the Fact Sheet prepared as part of the draft permit development
as soon as it is available.
under 15A NCAC 2B.0505(c)(4) includes influent and effluent sampling in addition to
receiving stream sampling activities. We request the following language be included as a
Special Condition in the NPDES permit:
I
ATTACHMENT A
PART A
PERMIT APPLICATION, EPA FORM 2A
11/29/01
ROANOKE RAPDIS SANITARY DISTRICT, NC0024201
ROANOKE RIVER BASIN
A ;
____
BASIC APPLICATION INFORMATION:
A.
B.
C.Certification. All applicants must complete Part C (Certification)
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION:
D.
1.
2.
3.
E.
1.
2
3.
F.
1.
2.
a
b.
c.
G.
ALL APPLICANTS MUST COMPLETE PART C (CERTIFICATION)
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information
Basic Application Information for all Applicants. All applicants must complete questions A.1 through A.8 A treatment works
that discharges effluent to surface waters of the United States must also answer questions A.9 through A. 12.
Additional Application Information for Applicants with a Design Flow > 0.1 mgd. All treatment works that have design flows
greater than or equal to 0.1 million gallons per day must complete questions B. 1 through B.6.
FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Roanoke Rapids Sanitary District, NC0024201
MDnPQCl
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Standard Renewal
FORM
2A
NPDES
Toxicity Testing Data. A treatment works that meets one or more of the following criteria must complete Part E (Toxicity Testing
Data):
Has a design flow rate greater than or equal to 1 mgd,
■ Is required to have a pretreatment program (or has one in place), or
Is otherwise required by the permitting authority to submit results of toxicity testing.
Industrial User Discharges and RCRA/CERCLA Wastes. A treatment works that accepts process wastewater from any
significant industrial users (SIUs) or receives RCRA or CERCLA wastes must complete Part F (Industrial User Discharges
and RCRA/CERCLA Wastes). SIUs are defined as:
All industrial users subject to Categorical Pretreatment Standards under 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 403.6 and
40 CFR Chapter I, Subchapter N (see instructions), and
Any other industrial user that:
Discharges an average of 25,000 gallons per day or more of process wastewater to the treatment works (with certain
exclusions); or
Contributes a process waste stream that makes up 5 percent or more of the average dry weather hydraulic or organic
capacity of the treatment plant; or
Is designated as an SIU by the control authority
Combined Sewer Systems. A treatment works that has a combined sewer system must complete Part G (Combined Sewer
Systems).
, ..V
NPDES FORM 2AAPPL.CAT.ON OVERViEW
APPLICATION OVERVIEW " KlM
Expanded Effluent Testing Data. A treatment works that discharges effluent to surface waters of the United States and meets
one or more of the following criteria must complete Part D (Expanded Effluent Testing Data):
Has a design flow rate greater than or equal to 1 mgd,
Is required to have a pretreatment program (or has one in place), or
Is otherwise required by the permitting authority to provide the information
RIVER BASIN:
Roanoke
Form 2A has been developed in a modular format and consists of a “Basic Application Information” packet
and a “Supplemental Application Information” packet. The Basic Application Information packet is divided
into two parts. All applicants must complete Parts A and C. Applicants with a design flow greater than or
equal to 0.1 mgd must also complete Part B. Some applicants must also complete the Supplemental
Application Information packet. The following items explain which parts of Form 2A you must complete.
..
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information
PERMIT action requested-
Standard Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Roanoke
FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Roanoke Rapids Sanitary District, NC0024201
BASIC APPLICATION INFORMATION_______________________
PART A. BASIC APPLICATION INFORMATION FOR ALL APPLICANTS:
All treatment works must complete questions A.1 through A.8 of this Basic Application Information Packet
Facility Information.A.l.
Facility Name

Roanoke Rapids Sanitary District Wastewater Treatment Plant
Mailing Address 1000 Jackson Street, P.O. Box 308
Roanoke Rapids, North Carolina 27870
Contact Person R. Danieley Brown, PE
Title CEO
Telephone Number [phone]
Facility Address 135 Aqueduct Road
(not P.O. Box)Weldon, North Carolina 27890
A.2. Applicant Information. If the applicant is different from the above, provide the following:
Applicant Name Same as above
Mailing Address
Contact Person
Title
Telephone Number L 1
Is the applicant the owner or operator (or both) of the treatment works?
owner £3 operator
Indicate whether correspondence regarding this permit should be directed to the facility or the applicant.
□ facility E applicant
NPDES NC0024201 PSD
UIC Other Land Application Permit WQ0001989
RCRA Other
Name Population Served Type of Collection System Ownership
Town of Gaston 1346 Sanitary Sewer District
City of Roanoke Rapids 19,856 Sanitary Sewer District
Unincorporated areas 586 Sanitary Sewer District
Total population served 21,788
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information
A.3. Existing Environmental Permits. Provide the permit number of any existing environmental permits that have been issued to the treatment works
(include state-issued permits).
A.4. Collection System Information. Provide information on municipalities and areas served by the facility. Provide the name and population of each
entity and, if known, provide information on the type of collection system (combined vs. separate) and its ownership (municipal, private, etc.).
A.5. Indian Country.
Is the treatment works located in Indian Country?a.
Yes No
b.
Yes 13 No
A.6.
Design flow rate 8.34 mgda
Two Years Ago Last Year This Year
b.Annual average daily flow rate 5.08 5.47 4.97
Maximum daily flow rate 11c.9.1 13
A.7.
I3 Separate sanitary sewer 100 %
Combined storm and sanitary sewer %
A.8. Discharges and Other Disposal Methods.
Does the treatment works discharge effluent to waters of the U.S.?3 Yes Noa.
If yes, list how many of each of the following types of discharge points the treatment works uses:
i.Discharges of treated effluent 1
ii.Discharges of untreated or partially treated effluent 0
iii.Combined sewer overflow points 0
Constructed emergency overflows (prior to the headworks)iv.0
Other N/A 0
b.
[3 No
If yes, provide the following for each surface impoundment:
Location:
N/A mgd
Does the treatment works land-apply treated wastewater? Yes El Noc.
If yes, provide the following for each land application site:
Location:N/A
Number of acres:N/A
N/A mgd
intermittent?
d.
Yes E No
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information
Does the treatment works discharge to a receiving water that is either in Indian Country or that is upstream from (and eventually flows
through) Indian Country?
Annual average daily volume applied to site:
Is land application continuous or
Does the treatment works discharge or transport treated or unseated wastewater to another
treatment works?
Annual average daily volume discharge to surface impoundment(s)
Is discharge continuous or intermittent?
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Standard Renewal
RIVER 3ASIN:
Roanoke
FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Roanoke Rapids Sanitary District, NC0024201
Does the treatment works discharge effluent to basins, ponds, or other surface impoundments
that do not have outlets for discharge to waters of the U.S.? Yes
Flow. Indicate the design flow rate of the treatment plant (i.e., the wastewater flow rate that the plant was built to handle). Also provide the
average daily flow rate and maximum daily flow rate for each of the last three years. Each year's data must be based on a 12-month time period
with the 12lh month of “this year” occurring no more than three months prior to this application submittal.
Collection System. Indicate the type(s) of collection sytem(s) used by the treatment plant. Check all that apply. Also estimate the percent
contribution (by miles) of each.
N/A
If transport is by a party other than the applicant, provide:
Transporter Name N/A
Mailing Address N/A
Contact Person N/A
Title N/A
Telephone Number N/A
For each treatment works that receives this discharge, provide the following:
Name N/A
Mailing Address N/A
Contact Person N/A
Title N/A
Telephone Number N/A
If known, provide the NPDES permit number of the treatment works that receives this discharge N/A
Provide the average daily flow rate from the treatment works into the receiving facility.N/A mgd
e.
□ Yes H No
If yes, provide the following for each disposal method:
Description of method (including location and size of site(s) if applicable):
N/A
Annual daily volume disposed by this method:N/A
Is disposal through this method □ continuous □ intermittent?or
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information
If yes. describe the mean(s) by which the wastewater from the treatment works is discharged or transported to the other treatment works
(e.g., tank truck, pipe).
Does the treatment works discharge or dispose of its wastewater in a manner not included
in A.8. through A.8.d above (e.g., underground percolation, well injection):
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Standard Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Roanoke
FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Roanoke Rapids Sanitary District WWTP,
NC0024201
WASTEWATER DISCHARGES:
A.9. Description of Outfall.
Outfall number 001a.
b.Location
Distance from shore (if applicable)N/A ft.c.
d.Depth below surface (if applicable)ft.N/A
Average daily flow rate 4.97 (year-to-date)mgd
f.Does this outfall have either an intermittent or a periodic discharge?□ Yes No (gotoA.9.g.)
If yes, provide the following information:
Number f times per year discharge occurs:N/A
Average duration of each discharge:N/A
Average flow per discharge:N/A mgd
Months in which discharge occurs:N/A
Is outfall equipped with a diffuser?□ Yes Nog-
A.10. Description of Receiving Waters.
Name of receiving water Chockoyotte Creek at its confluence with the Roanoke Rivera.
b.Name of watershed (if known)unknown
United States Soil Conservation Service 14-digit watershed code (if known):unknown
Name of State Management/River Basin (if known)Roanoke River Basinc.
United States Geological Survey 8-digit hydrologic cataloging unit code (if known):unknown
d.Critical low flow of receiving stream (if applicable)
see cover letter cfs chronic.see cover letter cfsacute
Total hardness of receiving stream at critical low flow (if applicable): unknown mg/l of CaCOse.
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information
.27890
(Zip Code)
If you answered “Yes” to question A.8.a, complete questions A.9 through A.12 once for each outfall (including bypass points) through
which effluent is discharged. Do not include information on combined sewer overflows in this section. If you answered “No” to question
A.8.a, go to Part B, “Additional Application Information for Applicants with a Design Flow Greater than or Equal to 0.1 mgd.”
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Standard Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Roanoke
facility name and permi r number:
Roanoke Rapids Sanitary District WWTP,
NC0024201
Weldon______________
(City or town, if applicable)
Halifax
(County)
NC
(State)
77O36'34''
(Longitude)
se^e'io"
(Latitude)
A.11. Description of Treatment
a.
b
Design BODS removal or Design CBOD5 removal 90 %
Design SS removal 90 %
Design P removal N/A %
Design N removal N/A %
Other N/A N/A %
What type of disinfection is used for the effluent from this outfall? If disinfection varies by season, please describe:c
Chlorination
If disinfection is by chlorination is de-chlorination used for this outfall?Yes No
Does the treatment plant have post aeration? Yes I3 No
Outfall number.001
5.7 s.u.
—8.4 s.u.
Flow Rate 13 5.3 continuous
Temperature (Winter)19 12.2 121
28 24.8 130
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/ABODS
CBOD5 >53.6 mg/L 9.9 mg/L 497 SM5210B 2.0 mg/L
FECAL COLIFORM >22.00 SM9222Dcol/IOOml <7 497 1/100mlcoilOOni
TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS (TSS)220 mg/L 19.9 SM2540 1 mg/Lmg/L 694
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information
What level of treatment are provided? Check all that apply.
K Primary Secondary
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Standard Renewal
BIOCHEMICAL OXYGEN
DEMAND (Report one)
FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Roanoke Rapids Sanitary District WWTP,
NC0024201
RIVER BASIN:
Roanoke
. ______
Value
■
_______
Number of ME™OD «L™DL
Samp.es
MAXIMUM DAILY AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARCF I
DISCHARGE AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE ANALYTICAL
Cone. Units
°C
MAXIMUM DAILY VALUE
a^uhits-^
°C
mgd
°C
mgd
°C
lue
A.12. Effluent Testing Information. All Applicants that discharge to waters of the US must provide effluent testing data for the following
parameters. Provide the indicated effluent testing required by the permitting authority for each outfall through which effluents
discharged. Do not include information on combined sewer overflows in this section. All information reported must be based on data
collected through analysis conducted using 40 CFR Part 136 methods. In addition, this data must comply with QA/QC requirements of
40 CFR Part 136 and other appropriate QA/QC requirements for standard methods for analytes not addressed by 40 CFR Part 136. At a
minimum, effluent testing data must be based on at least three samples and must be no more than four and one-half years apart.
Temperature (Summer)
* For pH please report a minimum and a maximum daily value
......
POLLUTANT _ DtSCHA*GE
-V Cone. Ut
_ _____ ~ -________________
CONVENTIONAL AND NON CONVENTlONA£COMPOUNDS
N/A
Units
AVERAGE DAILY VALUE
■ ................................................................................................ ■ ■ ■ ■■■ - ■ • ■■
Unite | Number of Samples
tizziIhhIhhhhh
—
pH (Minimum)
pH (Maximum)
Advanced Other. Describe:
Indicate the following removal rates (as applicable):
BASIC APPLICATION INFORMATION
B.1.
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
B.3. Process Flow Diagram or Schematic. Provide a diagram showing the processes of the treatment plant, including all bypass piping and all
B.4.
N/AName:
N/AMailing Address:
N/A
Telephone Number:N/A
N/AResponsibilities of Contractor:
a.
b.
V
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Standard Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Roanoke
gpd
Briefly explain any steps underway or planned to minimize inflow and infiltration.
Rehabilitation of the Chockoyotte Creek sanitary sewer outfall______
r ACiUTY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Roanoke Rapids Sanitary District WWTP,
NC0024201
Indicate whether the planned improvements or implementation schedule are required by local, State, or Federal agencies.
Yes No
Operation/Maintenance Performed by Contractors).
Are any operational or maintenance aspects (related to wastewater treatment and effluent quality) of the treatment works the responsibility of a
contractor? Yes No
If yes, list the name, address, telephone number, and status of each contractor and describe the contractor’s responsibilities (attach additional
pages if necessary)
B.2. Topographic Map. Attach to this application a topographic map of the area extending at least one mile beyond facility property boundaries. This
map must show the outline of the facility and the following information. (You may submit more than one map if one map does not show the entire
area.)
The area surrounding the treatment plant, including all unit processes.
The major pipes or other structures through which wastewater enters the treatment works and the pipes or other structures through which
treated wastewater is discharged from the treatment plant. Include outfalls from bypass piping, if applicable.
Each well where wastewater from the treatment plant is injected underground.
Wells, springs, other surface water bodies, and drinking water wells that are: 1) within ’/< mile of the property boundaries of the treatment
works, and 2) listed in public record or otherwise known to the applicant.
Any areas where the sewage sludge produced by the treatment works is stored, treated, or disposed.
If the treatment works receives waste that is classified as hazardous under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) by truck, rail
or special pipe, show on the map where the hazardous waste enters the treatment works and where it is treated, stored, and/or disposed.
backup power sources or redundancy in the system. Also provide a water balance showing all treatment units, including disinfection (e.g.,
chlorination and de-chlorination). The water balance must show daily average flow rates at influent and discharge points and approximate daily
flow rates between treatment units. Include a brief narrative description of the diagram.
B.5. Scheduled improvements and Schedules of Implementation. Provide information on any uncompleted implementation schedule or
uncompleted plans for improvements that will affect the wastewater treatment, effluent quality, or design capacity of the treatment works. If the
treatment works has several different implementation schedules or is planning several improvements, submit separate responses to question B.5
for each. (If none, go to question B.6.)
List the outfall number (assigned in question A.9) for each outfall that is covered by this implementation schedule.
N/A
PART B. ADDITIONAL APPLICATION INFORMATION FOR APPLICANTS WITH A DESIGN FLOW GREATER THAN OR
_______EQUAL TO 0.1 MGD (100,000 gallons per day).
All applicants with a design flow rate> 0.1 mgd must answer questions B.1 through B.6. All others go to Part C (Certification).
Inflow and Infiltration. Estimate the average number of gallons per day that flow into the treatment works from inflow and/or infiltration.
Unknown
d.Provide dates imposed by any compliance schedule or any actual dates of completion for the implementation steps listed below, as
Schedule Actual Completion
Implementation Stage MM/DD/YYYY MM/DD/YYYY
- Begin Construction //I I
- End Construction I I I I
- Begin Discharge /I I I
I I //
e.□ Yes □ No
Outfall Number: 001
Units
AMMONIA (as N)14.8 2.57 mg/L 495 SM4500F 0.5 mg/L
24 pg/L <6.2 pg/L 496 EPA 330.2 6gg/l
DISSOLVED OXYGEN 7.7 mg/L 5.9 mg/L 497 SM4500-OG N/A
38.8 mg/L 9.08 mg/L 24 EPA 351.3 N/A
18.2 mg/L 5.67 mg/L 23 EPA 300.0 N/A
OIL and GREASE N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
PHOSPHORUS (Total)1.82 mg/L 0.75 mg/L 24 EPA 365.3 N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information
Number of
Samples
TOTAL KJELDAHL
NITROGEN (TKN)
TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS
(TDS)
CHLORINE (TOTAL
RESIDUAL, TRC)
NITRATE PLUS NITRITE
NITROGEN
MAXIMUM DAILY
DISCHARGE
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Standard Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Roanoke
FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Roanoke Rapids Sanitary District WWTP,
NC0024201
If the answer to B.5.b is “Yes,” briefly describe, including new maximum daily inflow rate (if applicable).
N/A
OTHER
S- END OF PART B
REPERTOTHBAPPUCAT.ONOVB^WIPA^
<~
AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE
Cone. Units
_
POLLUTANT
_____________--______ _
CONVENTIONAL AND NON CONVENTIONAL COMPOUNDS
mg/L
B.6. EFFLUENT TESTING DATA (GREATER THAN 0.1 MGD ONLY).
Applicants that discharge to waters of the US must provide effluent testing data for the following parameters. Provide the indicated
effluent testing required by the permitting authority for each outfall through which effluent Is discharged. Do not include information
on combine sewer overflows in this section. All information reported must be based on data collected through analysis conducted
using 40 CFR Part 136 methods. In addition, this data must comply with QA/QC requirements of 40 CFR Part 136 and other appropriate
QA/QC requirements for standard methods for analytes not addressed by 40 CFR Part 136. At a minimum effluent testing data must be
based on at least three pollutant scans and must be no more than four and on-half years old.
___
■
Cone.
- Attain Operational Level
Have appropriate permits/clearances concerning other Federal/State requirements been obtained?
Describe briefly: N/A ___________________________________
applicable. For improvements planned independently of local, State, or Federal agencies, indicate planned or actual completion dates, as
applicable. Indicate dates as accurately as possible.
BASIC APPLICATION INFORMATION a
PARTC. CERTIFICATION
ALL APPLICANTS MUST COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING CERTIFICATION.
Name and official title
Signature
Telephone number
o /Date signed
SEND COMPLETED FORMS TO:
27699-1617
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Standard Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Roanoke
NCDENR/ DWQ
Attn: NPDES Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina
FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Roanoke Rapids Sanitary District WWTP,
NC0024201
Indicate which parts of Form 2A you have completed and are submitting:
(3 Basic Application Information packet Supplemental Application Information packet:
Part D (Expanded Effluent Testing Data)
S Part E (Toxicity Testing: Biomonitoring Data)
S Part F (Industrial User Discharges and RCRA/CERCLA Wastes)
□ Part G (Combined Sewer Systems)
R. Danieley Brown, CEO Roanoke Rapids Sanitary District
[phone]
Upon request of the permitting authority, you must submit any other information necessary to assure wastewater treatment practices at the treatment
works or identify appropriate permitting requirements.
_
I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system
designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who
manage the system or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information is. to the best of my knowledge and belief, true,
accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment
for knowing violations.
All applicants must complete the Certification Section. Refer to instructions to determine who is an officer for the purposes of this
certification. All applicants must complete all applicable sections of Form 2A, as explained in the Application Overview. Indicate below which
parts of Form 2A you have completed and are submitting. By signing this certification statement, applicants confirm that they have reviewed
Form 2A and have completed all sections that apply to the facility for which this application is submitted.
NFLUENT EOUAUZATON
| BLOWERS |
AIR
METERING
CHOCXOYOTTE CREEK
FLOOO
3 PUMPS
ORflNG BEDS
PRIMARY SLUDGE
J
SUPERNATANT
I
LAND APPUCAT1On|
L ©
UPERNATANT^IUPERNATANTr ©o
LEGEND
PLANT FLOW SCHEMATIC
NORMAL OPERATION
-----INTERMITTENT OPERATION
0ARCADIS
I
I
L,
J
I
I
J
II
MANUAL
BAR SCREENCHOJIOYOTTE
CRHX OUTFALL
DIVERSION
BOX MECHANICAL
BAR SCREEN
PRMARY SLUDGE
PUMP STATION
GRIT
CHAMBERS
WAS GRAMTY
THICKENERS
WAS DRUM
THICKENER
RAS PUMP
STATION
FINAL
OAR1AERS
ROANOKE RAPIDS SANITARY DISTRICT
WASTEWATER TREATMENT PI ANT
DISCHARGE TO—1
CHOCXOYOTTE CREEK
DIVERSION TO
CHOCXOYOTTE CREEX
OVERFLOW TO------
CHOCXOYOTTE CREEK
WAS
PUMP STATION
2 PUMPS
2 PRMARY
ANAEROBIC
DIGESTERS
1 SECONDARY
ANAEROBIC
DIGESTER
FILTER
RECIRCULATION
PUMP STATION
3 PUMPS
TRICKLING
ALTERS
FLTER EFFLUENT
PUMP STATION
4 PUMPS
SLUDGE
HOLDING
TANKS
DISCHARGE TO
!
I
I
i ___
PUMP STATION
I
I
X
r
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
I
I
(T) DIGESTER-------- I
SUPERNATANT |
(2) DRAINAGE FROM-----1
SULFURIC ACD FOR
pH ADJUSTMENT—,
n Ihl
Ui CKORNATION/
DECHLORINATION
DIGESTED SLUDGE
DIGESTED SLUDGE
I
I
I
I
I
I
|
PRIMARY
CLARIFIERS
MLUENT
PUMP STATION
4 PUMPS
“I
faVER OUTFALL
T
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
IL_
AERATION
TANKSI
SLUDGE DRYING KDs]-—
>—-1
I T
UME
-------► STABUZADON
FACUTY
RltfER BASIN:
Roanoke
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART D. EXPANDED EFFLUENT TESTING DATA
■■ '■ ■
Refer to the directions on the cover page to determine whether this section applies to the treatment works.
Outfall number:001
AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE
POLLUTANT
Cone.Units Mass Units Cone.Units Mass Units
METALS (TOTAL RECOVERABLE), CYANIDE, PHENOLS, AND HARDNESS.
ANTIMONY N/A N/A N/AN/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
ARSENIC <5 <0.2pg/L Ib/day <5 pg/L <0.2 Ib/day ERA 206.211
BERYLLIUM N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
CADMIUM 3 ng/L 0.11 •Ib/daV <2 <0.08 Ib/day ERA 200.7pg/L 11
CHROMIUM 11 0.4pg/L lb/day 3.7 0.15pg/L Ib/day 11 ERA 200.7
COPPER 23 pg/L 1.0 Ib/day 13.4 0.6 Ib/daypg/L 11 ERA 200.7
LEAD 4 0.2pg/L Ib/day 2.1 0.09pg/L Ib/day 11 ERA 239.2
MERCURY <0.2 <0.01pg/L Ib/day <0.2 pg/L <0.01 Ib/day ERA 245.111
NICKEL 6 0.3pg/L Ib/day 3.8 0.16pg/L Ib/day 11 ERA 200.7
SELENIUM 76 2.9pg/L Ib/day 10 0.4pg/L Ib/day 11 ERA 270.2
SILVER N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
THALLIUM N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
ZINC 200 7pg/L Ib/day 100 pg/L 4 Ib/day 11 ERA 200.7
CYANIDE N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
HARDNESS (as CaCO3)N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/AN/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information
TOTAL PHENOLIC
COMPOUNDS
PERMIT ACTION REQUES lED:
Standard Renewal
Number
of
Samples
ANALYTICAL
METHOD
FACILITY NAMe AND FERhrii I Nlin/lBER:
Roanoke Rapids Sanitary District, NC0024201
ML/MDL
Use this space (or a separate sheet) to provide information on other metals requested by the permit writer
N/A
(Complete once for each outfall discharging effluent to waters of the United States.)
MAXIMUM DAILY DISCHARGE
Effluent Testing: 1.0 mgd and Pretreatment Works. If the treatment works has a design flow greater than or equal to 1.0 mgd or it has (or is required
to have) a pretreatment program, or is otherwise required by the permitting authority to provide the data, then provide effluent testing data for the followinc
pollutants. Provide the indicated effluent testing information and any other information required by the permitting authority for each outfall through which ~
effluent is discharged. Do not include information on combined sewer overflows in this section. All information reported must be based on data collected
through analyses conducted using 40 CFR Part 136 methods. In addition, these data must comply with QA/QC requirements of 40 CFR Part 136 and
other appropriate QA/QC requirements for standard methods for analytes not addressed by 40 CFR Part 136. Indicate in the blank rows provided below
any data you may have on pollutants not specifically listed in this form. At a minimum, effluent testing data must be based on at least three pollutant
scans and must be no more than four and one-half years old.
FACiLiTY NAME AND PERMiT NUMBER:PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:RIVER BASIN'
Roanoke Rapids Sanitary District, NC0024201 Standard Renewal Roanoke
Outfall number: 001
POLLUTANT MUMDL
Mass Units Cone.Units
ACROLEIN
ACRYLONITRILE
BENZENE
BROMOFORM
CHLOROBENZENE
CHLOROETHANE
CHLOROFORM
1,1-DICHLOROETHANE
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
ETHYLBENZENE
METHYL BROMIDE
METHYL CHLORIDE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
TOLUENF
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information
[(P/ease see Attachment Bj|
CARBON
TETRACHLORIDE
TRANS-1.2-DICHLORO-
ETHYLENE
CHLORODIBROMO­
METHANE
2-CHLOROETHYLVINYL
ETHER
DICHLOROBROMO­
METHANE
TETRACHLORO­
ETHYLENE
1,1-DICHLORO-
ETHYLENE
1.3-DICHLORO-
PROPYLENE
1,1,2,2-TETRA-
CHLOROETHANE
(Complete once for each outfall discharging effluent to waters of the United States.)
MAXIMUM DAILY DISCHARGE
——
Cone. Units
_______ _ _
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
METHOD
______
AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE
Number ANALYTICAL
of
Samples
Units Mass
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:RIVER BASIN:
Standard Renewal Roanoke
Outfall number 001
MAXIMUM DAILY DISCHARGE
POLLUTANT
Cone.Units Mass Units Units Mass Units
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
VINYL CHLORIDE
Use this space (or a separate sheet) to provide information on other volatile organic compounds requested by the permit writer
ACID-EXTRACTABLE COMPOUNDS
P-CHLORO-M-CRESOL
2-CHLOROPHENOL
2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL
2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
4,6-DINITRO-O-CRESOL
2,4-DINITROPHENOL
2-NITROPHENOL
4-NITROPHENOL
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
PHENOL
Use this space (or a separate sheet) to provide information on other acid-extractable compounds requested by the permit writer
BASE-NEUTRAL COMPOUNDS
ACENAPHTHENE
ACENAPHTHYLENE
ANTHRACENE
BENZIDINE
BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE
A
BENZO(A)PYRENE
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information
|(P/ease see Attachment B)|
\(Please see Attachment B)|
2,4,6-
TRICHLOROPHENOL
1.1.2-
TRICHLOROETHANE
1.1.1-
TRICHLOROETHANE
FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Roanoke Rapids Sanitary District, NC0024201
ML/MDLCone.
ANALYTICAL
METHOD
(Complete once for each outfall discharging effluent to waters of the United States.)
AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE ____' ' _______________
Number
of
Samples
RIVER BASIN:
Roanoke
Outfall number: 001
MAXIMUM DAILY DISCHARGE
POLLUTANT
Cone.UnitsUnits MassMassUnitsCone.Units
BENZO(GHI)PERYLENE
CHRYSENE
DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE
DI-N-OCTYL PHTHALATE
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
2,4-DINITROTOLUENE
2,6-DINITROTOLUENE
S
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Standard Renewal
facility name and permit number:
Roanoke Rapids Sanitary District, NC0024201
4-BROMOPHENYL
PHENYL ETHER
3,4 BENZO­
FLUORANTHENE
ANALYTICAL
METHOD
DIBENZO(A,H)
ANTHRACENE
2-CHLORO-
NAPHTHALENE
4-CHLORPHENYL
PHENYL ETHER
3,3-DICHLORO-
BENZIDINE
BIS (2-CHLOROETHOXY)
METHANE
BIS (2-CHLOROETHYL)-
ETHER
BIS (2-CHLOROISO-
PROPYL) ETHER
BIS (2-ETHYLHEXYL)
PHTHALATE
BUTYL BENZYL
PHTHALATE
1,2-DIPHENYL-
HYDRAZINE
BENZO(K)
FLUORANTHENE
MUMDL
-
(Complete once for each outfall discharging effluent to waters of the United States.)
AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE I
Number
of
Samples
RiVER BASIN:
Roanoke
Outfall number: 001
POLLUTANT
Units UnitsMass Mass Units
FLUORANTHENE
FLUORENE
HEXACHLOROBENZENE
HEXACHLOROETHANE
ISOPHORONE
NAPHTHALENE
NITROBENZENE
PHENANTHRENE
PYRENE
Use this space (or a separate sheet) to provide information on other base-neutral compounds requested by the permit writer
Use this space (or a separate sheet) to provide information on other pollutants (e.g., pesticides) requested by the permit writer
S
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Standard Renewal
FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Roanoke Rapids Sanitary District, NC0024201
N-NITROSODI-
METHYLAMINE
HEXACHLOROCYCLO-
PENTADIENE
HEXACHLORO­
BUTADIENE
INDENO(1,2,3-CD)
PYRENE
N-NITROSODI-N-
PROPYLAMINE
N-NITROSODI-
PHENYLAMINE
1.2.4-
TRICHLOROBENZENE
AVERAGE DAILY DISCHARGE
Number
of
Samples
1 "J
(Complete once for each outfall discharging effluent to waters of the United States.)
MAXIMUM DAILY DISCHARGE
Units Cone.Cone.
END OF PART D.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE 1) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
-
ATTACHMENT B
PARTD
EXPANDED EFFLUENT TESTING DATA
s
11/29/01
ROANOKE RAPDIS SANITARY DISTRICT, NC0024201
ROANOKE RIVER BASIN
K snr
REPORT OF ANALYSIS
LAB SAMPLE NO.(s): G7633-001-002 of:Date Received:4/17/98002
Sample(s) of : WASTEWATER 5/28/98Date Reported:
27870
Marked EFF COMP 4/17/98A:B: EFF GRAB 4/17/98
C:D:
Lab Sample No.=A:C:D :
I ICAT.NO.ANALYSES UNITS
ATTACHED ATTACHED
DEG C
Comments
Laboratory Contact For Above Report
M.
No.
( lu-inicul and Micr(>hi<ilogic;il Analyses: Envintiuiuiital ■ tndiisiria! Ilv^iene ■V-iroilu'inkal - l-’iKids • I'luiriiiacvnliculs
Analyst(s):
Samp Admin:
EO-030/
030G
NAM
ORG
ADD
CSZ
Name
Title:
sample Submission:
Time: Miles:
G7633-
002
6.7
23.1
919-536-4884
919-537-9136
Telephone
FAX
PO/Job No.
G7633- B:
001
C-O-C:
RUSH :
: Debbie Collins
Customer Service Specialist
NC ANNUAL POLLUTANT ANALYSIS
MONITORING (APAM)
EW-034.2:pH (FIELD)
EW-052.1:TEMPERATURE (FIELD)
GREG CAMP
ROANOKE RAPIDS SANITARY DISTRICT
PO BOX 308
ROANOKE RAPIDS NC
-SUBMISSION INFO-
Containers:
Pickup:
Reviewed and/'App
.es BC7 Cox^I 11, B . S .
ager, Environmental Dept.
Southern Testing & Research Laboratories, Inc.
3X09 Airport Drive • Wilson. NC 27X96 • [phone] • I'as: [phone] • un.STRI ahs.nnn
o X tiai bJ® 1
Page 1 of 9
Year:
County:
typical:Yes No
Southern Testing & Research Labs, Inc.
II. Sampling:
24 hr composite for main sample I grab sample for purgeable fraction
Instructions
Sampling
1 - Take a 24-hour composite sample from the final effluent during mid-week (Wednesday through Friday). Collect a grab sample for the volatile
organic fraction when collection of the 24-hour composite sample Is completed. Follow any other sampling Instructions provided by the laboratory
performing the analysis.
2 • Indicate In the space provided at the top of this page whether a corresponding sample for toxicity testing was taken.
3 ■ Make note of any unusual wastewater treatment operating conditions occurring on the day of sampling in the space provided on the form.
The purpose of this document and the accompanying memo Is to standardize the sampling, analysis and reporting procedures to be used
for the Annual Pollutant Analysis Monitoring (APAM) Requirement as described In the permit.
NPDES Permit No:
Facility Name:
Person(s) Collecting Samples:
Status of facility wastewater treatment operation on day of sampling:
If no, explain briefly:
Analytical Laboratory:___
Date Sampled: (composite sample)
Sampling begun (date, time)'_
Sampling finished (date, tlme):_
Discharge (Pipe) No:
_____________ Class:.
Corresponding sample taken for toxicity testing:
Ht 17 Yes
11.17 ____ No
Date and time sampled (grab sample): H ~ I U '
. p. —
| I. Facility Information:
Analysis
4 • Analyze the effluent for pollutants listed on the APAM form, Including those to be Identified and approximately quantified under the 10
significant peaks rule, using appropriate EPA-approved methods for each of the analytic fractions. Other analytical methods can be substituted
only with prior, written approval of the Director of the Division of Environmental Management (DEM). Read and distribute to the laboratory
performing the analysis the accompanying memo (Tedder, October 1990) clarifying analytical requirements.
5 - Identify chemicals to be analyzed for according to the 10 significant peaks rule (as described In item 2 of the Annual Pollutant Analysis
Monitoring Requirement In the permit) using a GC/MS library search. Tentative Identification Is alf that Is required; confirmation by standard
injection Is not necessary. Estimate the concentration of each based on an Internal standard having the closest retention time.
Reporting
6 - Quantitation Limit Targets that should be met are listed on this Revised APAM Reporting Form A. Report the use of any higher quantita­
tion limit and an explanation as to why the listed quantitation limit target could not be met. Examples of acceptable reasons for not meeting
a quantitation limit target could be high background concentrations In a sample, or the necessity for sample fraction dilution to bring a chemical
to within a quantifiable concentration. List any quantitation limit dlffertent (whether higher or lower) from the target In the column provided
for this purpose.
7 • If a chemical is found to be below the quantitation limit, report the concentration detected as less than (or '< *) the quantitation limit
in the appropriate space. Provide a concentration estimate for chemicals detected In concentrations greater than the detection limit and less
than the quantitation limit. Enter the detection limit In parentheses beside the estimate. Chemicals detected In concentrations above the quan­
titation limits must be quantified. Quantitation limit and detection limit are defined in the accompanying memo (Tedder, October 1990). Enter
the total number of peaks detected In each analytic fraction In the appropriate space on this Revised APAM Form A. Report all concentrations
In units of micrograms per liter (ug/1) and metals as total recoverable metal. If no peaks to be Identified under the 10 significant peaks rule
are observed, enter "none" In the space provided for "other" compounds In each appropriate analytic fraction section. Provide the concentra­
tion estimate and retention time for "unknowns" as well as for "significant peaks" for which a structural assignment can be made.
8 • If "significant peaks" are found, provide probable molecular weight, library match probability, retention time, Identification basis, and
MS scan number for each. In addition, list Internal standards and their retention times.
9 • In the section labeled "Organic Analytical Information" (p. 9), Include for each organic fraction the method, extraction technique, GC
operating conditions, and surrogate recovery. Report the size of the GC/MS library being utilized In the appropriate space.
10 - Use copies of this Annual Pollutant Analysis Monitoring Revised Form A to report the results of the analysis. Both the analytical laboratory
representative and the facility operator In responsible charge should sign completed forms (last page).
11 Mail two completed copies of the form (and the laboratory report, If submitted to the facility on a different form) to: ATTN: Centra! Files,
Division ol Environmental Management, NC DEHNR, P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, NC 27611. Mall the APAM form separately from Discharge Monitoring
Reports.
Annual Pollutant Analysis Monitoring Requirement
Reporting Form A
(Revised June 1990)
[A]Purgeable
Compound Units:ug/L
* If different from quantitation limit target
Comments ND = Not Detected
( hciiiical and Microhiolo^ical Analyses: l-.mironnicnial • Indnslrial lli^iem* • Xurochcnikal ■ I <i<xl\ • I’harniacriilicaK
1.1- Dichloroethene
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
1.2- Dichloropropane
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
trans-1,SDichloropropene
Ethylbenzene
Methylene chloride
1,1,2,2Tetrachloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
1.1.1- Trichloroethane
1.1.2- Trichloroethane
Trichloroethene
Trichiorofluoromethane
Vinyl Chloride
100
100
5
5
5
10
5
6
10
10
5
10
5
5
5
5
5
6
■5
5
8
5
7
5
6
5
5
5
10
10
20
20
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
2.0
0.5
0.5
2.0
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
2.0
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
EPA Method:
Concentration
Detected
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Acrolein
Acrylonitrile
Benzene
Bromodichloromethane
Bromoform
Bromomethane
Carbon tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
2-Chloroethylvinyl ether
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Dibromochloromethane
1.1- Dichloroethane
1.2- Dichloroethane
%Recovered
95
95
104
GC/MS
Confirmation
Surrogate Recoveries:Compound
:4-Bromofluorobenzene
:Toluene-d8
:Dibromofluoromethane
Sample No.: G7633-002
Page 1 of 7
624
Southern Testing & Research Laboratories, Inc.
3<S(I9 Airport I)ri\e • Wilson, \( ’ 27X96 • (2521 237-4 175 • I a\: ( 2521 237-934 I • u u u.S I R l.ahs.com
(Volatile Organic) Fraction,
Quantitation Quantitation
Limit Target Limit *
v- o . ° J
F A I R V
O
dn k
3809 Airport Drive • Wilson. NC 27896 • [phone]
[B]Acid Extractable Fraction,
Units:ug/1Compound
If different from quantitation limit target★
Comments ND = Not Detected
Chemical and Mkrohiologkal Analyses: Environmenlal • Industrial Ihsiiene • Vtirnchemkal • Eoods • I’harmaceulicals
Surrogate Recoveries:Compound
:Phenol-d6
:2 -Fluorophenol
: 2,4,6-Tribromophenol
Quantitation
Limit Target
10
10
10
10
50
50
10
50
50
10
10
6 . 5
6.5
6.5
6.5
13
13
6.5
13
13
6.5
6.5
Concentration
Detected
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Sample No.: G7633-001
Page 2 of 7
%Recovered
75
71
141
GC/MS
Confirmation
Southern Testing & Research Laboratories, Inc.
l-ax: [phone] • uwu.STRI.alis.ann
Quantitation
Limit *
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
2-Chlorophenol
2.4- Dichlorophenol
2.4- Dimethylphenol
2.4- Dinitrophenol
2-Methyl4,6dinitrophenol
2-Nitrophenol
4-Nitrophenol
Pentachlorophenol
Phenol
2,4, 6-Trichlorophenol
EPA Method: 625
fffcn mA > c*'
3S09 Airporl Drive • \\ ilson. N(- 27896 •
[C]Base Neutral Fraction,
Units:ug/LCompound
* If different from quantitation limit target
Benzo
Benzo
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
Di-n-octyl phthalate
1,2-Diphenylhydrazine
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Hexachlorobenzene
Hexachlorobutadiene
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
Hexachloroethane
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
Isophorone
Naphthalene
Nitrobenzene
N-nitrosodimethylamine
N-nitrosodi-n-propylamine
N-nitrosodiphenylamine
Acenaphthene
Acenaphthylene
Anthracene
Benzidine
(a) anthracene
(a) pyrene
Benzo
Benzo
Benzo
EPA Method:
Quantitation
Limit Target
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
1.0
10
10
20
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
50
10
10
6.5
6.5
6.5
6.5
6.5
6.5
6.5
6.5
6.5
6.5
6.5
6.5
6.5
6.5
6.5
6.5
6.5
6.5
6.5
6.5
6.5
6.5
Concentration
Detected
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
GC/MS
Confirmation
° J
6-^
B B
(b) fluoranthene
(ghi) perylene
(k) fluoranthene
Bis2-chloroethoxy methane
Bis2-chloroethyl ether
Bis2-chloroisopropylether
Bis2-ethylhexyl phthalate
4 -Bromophenylphenylether
Butylbenzylphthalate
2-Chloronaphthalene
4-Chlorophenylphenylether
Chrysene
Dibenzo (a,h) anthracene
1.2- Dichlorobenzene
1.3- Dichlorobenzene
1.4- Dichlorobenzene
3.3- Dichlorobenzidine
Diethyl phthalate
Dimethyl phthalate
Di-n-butyl phthalate
2.4- Dinitrotoluene
6.5
6.5
6.5
6.5
6.5
6.5
12
6.5
6.5
6.5
6.5
6.5
6.5
6.5
6.5
6.5
6.5
6.5
6.5
6.5
6.5
F A I R
625
Quantitation
Limit *
[phone]
( hiniicul and Microbiological Miahse.s: lunironmenlal • Industrial • Xurochcmical • bonds • I’harmaci iilicals
Southern Testing & Research Laboratories, Inc.
l-ax: 12521 237-934 I • uuu.STRI absa out
Sample No.: G7633-001
Page 3 of 7
7
[C] Base Neutral Fraction continued
Units:ug/LCompound
( hemical and Microbiological Analyses: Iub inmmcntal • Induslrial Hygiene • Agrochemical • l-’oods • Pharmaceutical'.
Surrogate Recoveries:Compound
:Nitrobenzene-d5
:Terphenyl-dl4
:2-Fluorobiphenyl
Quantitation
Limit Target
Concentration
Detected
ND
ND
ND
Phenanthrene : 10
Pyrene : 10
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene : 10
* If different from quantitation limit
6.5
6.5
6.5
target
%Recovered
100
66
63
GC/MS
Confirmation
O
0/ o
Quantitation
Limit *
Sample No.: G7633-001
Page 4 of
Comments: ND = Not Detected
: Detection Limit for Bis2-ethylhexyl phthalate elevated due to
: laboratory background.
Southern Testing & Research Laboratories, Inc.
3809 Airport Drive • Wilson. NC 27896 • [phone] • llix: [phone] • uuuXI Rl7ibs.com
(a)
Compound
Compound
(c)
Compound
NA = Not Applicable
Chemical and Microbiological Analyses: Eib ironinc-ntal • Indtislrial Hygiene • Agrochemical • Eoods • l,harinaceulicaK
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
' 10
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
4 -Hydroxy- 3 -hexanone
4-Penten-2-ol
Unknown
2-Hexanone
Tetradecanoic Acid
4-Nonene,2-methyl-(Z)
4-(Trifluoromethylsulpho
1-Heneicosyl pomate
228
140
240
340
116
86
NA
100
9.4
7.3
6.7
6.6
20.1
13.7
13.3
8.5
Sample No.:G7633-01-02
Page 5 of 7
88
86
93
97
86
94
NA
94
Library Match
Probability
(%)
Library Match
Probability
(%)
Library Match
Probability
(%)
(b) Other Acid Extractables (up to 10 highest peaks)
Probable Estimated
Molecular Concentration
Weight (ug/L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Comments:
Southern Testing & Research Laboratories, Inc.
3809 Airport Drive • Wilson. NC 27X96 • [phone] • I'ax: (2521 237-9341 • «uu.STRl’ahs.con)
Other Purgeables (up to 10 highest peaks)
Probable Estimated
Molecular Concentration
Weight (ug/L)
Other Base/Neutral Extractables (up to 10 highest peaks)
Probable Estimated
Molecular Concentration
Weight (ug/L)
1 : No extraneous peaks
k'o
■
A
p AIR Y
Units:ug/LCompound
Units:ug/LCompound
Herbicides,[E]
Units:ug/LCompound
2
( lu'inic;il and Xlicrobiohi^ical \nalvscs: I'.m iromncnlal • I ndnslrial I h nicne • \”r<n licinical • I ihkIs • I'harinacrnlii aK
Demeton
Parathion (ethyl)
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.1
0.05
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.02
0.1
0.1
0.7
0.06
0.2
0.05
2.5
0.6
12
2
2
0.2
0.2
Concentration
Detected
Concentration
Detected
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Sample No.: G7633-001
Page 6 of 7
Confirmation
: Dual
GC/MS:Column
Confirmation
Dual Column
Confirmation
: Dual
GC/MS:Column
ND
ND
NT)
0.8 :
0.5 :
0.2 :
2.4 :
0.5 :
0.5 :
0.5 :
0.5 :
0.5 :
1.0 :
1.. 0 :
EPA Method:
Quantitation
Limit Target
2,- 4-D
Si/vex
2,4,5-T
Southern Testing & Research Laboratories, Inc.
3809 Airport Drive • Wilson. NC 27896 • [phone] • l ax: 12521 237-9341 • uuh.STRI.abs.cooi
Aldrin
alpha-BHC
Beta-BHC
Delta-BHC
Gamma-BHC (Lindane)
Chlordane
4,4'-DDD
4,4'-DDE
4,4'-DDT
Dieldrin
Endosulfan I (alpha)
Endusulfan II (beta)
Endosulfan Sulfate
Endrin
Endrin aldehyde
Heptachlor
Heptachlor Epoxide
Methoxychlor
Mirex
Toxaphene
PCB 1016
PCB 1221
PCB 1232
PCB 1242
PCB 1248
PCB 1254
PCB 1260
2.)Organophosphorus Pesticides,
EPA Method: 8150B
Quantitation
Limit Target
Quantitation
Limit *
8140
Quantitation
Limit *
» If different from quantitation limit target
Comments: ND = Not Detected
[D] Organochlorine/Organophosphorus Pesticides and PCB's
1. )Organochlorine Pesticides/PCB's, EPA Method: 8081
Quantitation Quantitation Concentration
Limit Target Limit* Detected
p A I R Y
Units: ug/LCompound
2
3 ND
0.2
2 . ) Other Inorganics
Units:ug/LCompound
* If different from quantitation limit target
Comments .ND Not Detected
Chemkal und Microbuilogical Analyses: Em ironnuntal ■ Industrial Hygiene • Agrodicinical • I ouds • I’liarniaceulicals
Barium
Chloride
Cyanide
Fluoride
Lead
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Zinc
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Quantitation
Limit Target
Quantitation
Limit Target
500
1000
20
100
10
0.2
10
5
5
10
50
50
10
25
2
5
2
Quantitation
Limit *
Quantitation
Limit *
10
5,000
5
300
5
5
0.3
5
3
10
40
Concentration
Detected
Concentration
Detected
26
602,000
ND
1,180
4,790
ND
ND
ND
ND
[F]
1- )
3
193
Metals and Other Inorganics
Metals
Southern Testing & Research Laboratories, Inc.
3X09 Airport Drive • Wilson. NC 27X96 • [phone] • I a\: 12521 237-934i|u » ».STRI .;il>sAlllll
Sample No.:G7633-01-02
Page 7 of 7
ND
ND
ND
57
J L
A p A. I R V
Organic Analytical Information:
Page 9 of 9
Organic Fraction Method Extraction
Batch Continuous
Purgeable 624
Acid Extractable 625 X
Base/Neutral Extractable X625
Example: Add Extractable 625 X ds • phenol 50
GC/MS Library size (number of reference spectra):49,500+ NBS Library
1
V
Recovery
%
4-BFB
Tolueae-d8
DBFmethane
Phenol-d6
2-Fluorophenol
Surrogates (Spikes)
Compound
..Nitrobenz-d5
2-Flbiphenyl
rerphenyld-14
/oo
GC Operating Conditions
_____Column Description_____
Length X ID, Film Thickness,
Column Type, Carrier Gas & Flow
Rate, Temperature Program
75aixO. 53nun, 3.0um film,
08624,116, IQpsig, 35C(8
min) , lOC/min, 200C(6min)
30mx0.32inm, 0.25um film
SE54,He,12psig, 40C('2
30m x 0.25mm, 0.25um, DB-5,
He, 30 cm/sec, 40*0 (4 mln) -
270*0,10*/mln
75"
__________________ -____7 /
nin),13C/min.300C(2min) 2,4,6,-TB Phenol /^/
30mx0.32mm, O.25um film.
SE54,He,12psig, 40C(2
min),LOC/min,300C(2min)
2. Other purgeables (up to 10 highest peaks)STRL Sample # J7616-002 Page 3 of 9
Scan NumberCompound CAS Number*"RT
No extraneous peaks detected.
‘Chemical Abstracts Service Registry Number
Complete only If non-targeted compounds are present:
Internal Standard
Probable
Molecular
• Weight
Retention
Time
(Min)
Identification Basis
(Check all that apply)
Manual
Interpretation
J
I
Estimated
Concentration
O^g/L)
Retention
Time (RT)
(Min)Library
Match
Library Match
Probability
(%)
STRL Sample # J7616-001 Pag*" 4 of 9
Compound
(^g/L)Yes No
34452
* If different from quantitation limit target
i II
(^g/L)
io
(^g/L)
<10.0
Quantitation
Umlt Target
Concentration
Detected
STORE!
Number Quantitation
Limit*
GC/MS
Confirmation?
34586
34601
34606
34616
34657
34591
34646
39032
34694
34621
10
To
10
To
<10.0
<10.0
<10.0
<10.0
<10.0
<10.0
<10.0
<10.0
<10.0
<10.0
1. Pollutants to analyzed for:
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
2-Chlorophenol
2.4- Dichlorophenol
2.4- Dimethylphenol
2.4- Dinitrophenol
2-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol
2-Nitrophenol
4-Nitrophenol
Pentachlorophenol
Phenol
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
10
W
■ . 10
50
50
To
50
50
W
10
B. Acid Extractable Fraction, EPA Method 625
Number of chemicals detected in Fraction 0
Fraction STORE! Number 45582
2. Other extractables (up to 10 highest peaks)STRL Sample # J7616-001 Page 5 of 9
Scan Number CAS Number*Compound RT
14 - Pentadecenoic Acid 240 47.8 89 17.4 X 17351-34-71788
Tetradecanoic Acid 228 X33.9 89 16.0 1616 544-63-8
Octadecanoic Acid 284 88 X8817.6 57-11-41810
♦
J
’’ChemicarAbstracts Service Registry Number
Complete only If non-targeted compounds are present:
Internal Standard
1,4-Dichlorobenene-d4 5.34
Napthalene-d8 7.75
Acenapthene-dlO 11.3
Phenanthrene-dlO 14.3
Chrysene-d12 19.7
Perylene-d12 22.5
Probable
Molecular
Weight
Retention
Time
(Min)
Retention
Time (RT)
(Min)
Library
Match
Identification Basis
(Check all that apply)
Manual
Interpretation
-I
I -
Library Match
Probability
(%)
Estimated
Concentration
(pg/L)
-i
i
STKL Sample # J7616-001 Page 6 of 9
0
Compound
No
3405
<10
<10
10 <10
<10
34521 10
34242
39100 10 <10
<10
<10
10 <10
34641 10 <10
<10
<10
10
34336 10 <10
10 <10
34626 <10
34596 <10
34403 10 <10
34408 10 <10
34696 10 <10
34447 <10
34438 <10
10 <10
10 <10
34461 10 <10
A3446910 <10
34551 10 <10
I
34200
34220
39120
10
To
50
10
^0
10
(pg/L)
<10
Quantitation Limit
Target
(pg/L)
io
Concentration
Detected
Quantitation
Limit*
(pg/U
GC/MS
Confirmation?
Yes
34428
34433
34381
39700
34391
34386
34396
34341
39110
34611
34346
34376
34320
34556
34536
34566
34571
34631
34636
34292'
34581
34526
34247
34230
34278
34273
34283
10
To
10
20
10
To
To
To
To
To
TT
io
To
io
To
io
To
io
To
io
To
To
To
io
To
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<TT
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
STORET
Number
1. Pollutants to be analyzed for:
Acenaphthene
Acenaphthylene
Anthracene
Benzidine
Benzo (a) anthracene
Benzo (a) pyrene
Benzo (b) fluoranthene
Benzo (ghi) perylene
Benzo (k) fluoranthene
Bis(2-chloroethoxy) methane
Bis(2-chloroethyl) ether
Bis(2-chloroisopropyl) ether
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether
Butyl benzyl phthalate
2-Chloronaphthalene
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether
Chrysene
Dibenzo (a.h) anthracene
1.2- Dichlorobenzene
1.3- Dichlorobenzene
1.4- Dichlorobenzene
3.3- Dichlorobenzidine
Diethyl phthalate
Dimethyl phthalate
Di-n-butyl phthalate
2.4- Dinitrotoluene
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
Di-n-octyl phthalate
1,2-Diphenylhydrazine
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Hexachlorobenzene
Hexachlorobutadiene
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
Hexachloroethane
lndeno(1,2,3-cd) pyrene
Isophorone
Naphthalene
Nitrobenzene
N-nitrosodimethylamine
N-nitroso-di-n-propylamine
N-nitrosodiphenylamine
Phenanthrene
Pyrene
1.2.4- Trichlorobenzene
*lf different from quantitation limit target
<10
<10
<10
TTo
<10
<10
C. Base/Neutral Fraction, EPA Method 625
Number of chemicals detected in Fraction
Fraction STORET Number 45583
2. Other base,'neutrals (up to 10 highest peaks)STRL Sample #J7616-001 Page 7 of 9
Scan Number CAS Number*Compound RT
152 38.4 78 21.3 X 2379 16135 - 36 - 7
4-
‘Chemical Abstracts Service Registry Number
Complete only If non-targeted compounds are present:
Internal Standard
1,4- Dichlorobenzene - d4 5.53
Napthalene - d8 8.32
Acenapthene - dIO 12.5
Phenanthrene - dIO 16.0
Chrysene - d12 22.5
Perylene - di2 25.8
Probable
Molecular
Weight
Retention
Time
(Min)
Retention
Time (RT)
(Min)
Library
Match
Identification Basis
(Check all that apply)
Manual
Interpretation
Estimated
Concentration
(^g/L)
3 - Pyridinecarboxylic Acid.
4 - amino methyl ester
Library Match
Probability
(%)
STRL Sample # J76i6-ooi Pnge 0 o< 9
Compound
O^g/L)O'g/L)Yes No
Aldrin39330 0.05 <0.05
39337 0.05 <0.05
39338 0.05 <0.05
34259 0.1 0.05 <0.05
39340 0.05 <0.05
39350 0.2'<0.2
39310 0.1 0.05 <0.05
39320 .0.1 0.05 <0.05
39300 0.1 0.05 <0.05
39380 0.02 <0.02
34361 0.1 <0.1
34356 0.1 0.05 <0.05
34351 0.7 0.05 <0.05
39390 0.06 0.05 <0.05
34366 0.2 0.05 <0.05
39410 0.05 <0.05
39420 0.8 <0.05
39480 0.5 <0.2
39755 0.2 0.05 <0.05
39400 2.4 1.4 <1.4
34671 0.5 <0.5
39488 0.5 <0.5
39492 0.5 <0.5
39496 0.5 <0.5
39500 0.5 <0.5
39504 1 0.5 <0.5
1 0.5 <0.5
8140
39560 2.5 0.8 <0.8
39540 0.6 0.2 <0.2
0
Compound
(A'g/L)(^g/L)! No(pg/U Yes
2,4-D 12 0.7 <0.7
Silvex39045 2 0.7 <0.7
2,4,5-T 2 0.7 <0.7
0.05
1. Pollutants to be analyzed for:
39730
Quantitation
Limit Target
Quantitation
Limit Target
Quantitation
Limit*
Concentration
Detected
Concentration
Detected
Confirmation?
Dual Column
(Mg/Q
8081
Quantitation
Limit*
i
STORET
Number
STORET
Number
I
No Yes
Toxaphene
PCB 1016
PCS 1221
PCB 1232
PCB 1242
PCB 1248
PCB 1254
PCB 1260
1. Pollutants to be analyzed for:
Organochlorine Pesticioes/PCB's: EPA Method
39508
Organophosphorus Pesticides: EPA Method
Demeton
Parathion (ethyl)
alpha-BHC
Beta-BHC
Delta-BHC
Gamma-BHC (Lindane)
Chlordane
414’-DDD
4,4'-DDE
4,4,-DDT
Dieldrin
Endosulfan I (alpha)
Endosulfan II (beta)
Endosulfan sulfate
Endrin
Endrin aldehyde
Heptachlor
Heptachlor epoxide
Methoxychlor
Mirex
39740
•If different from quantitation limit target.
D. Organochlorine/Organophosohorus Pesticides and PCB's
Number of chemicals detected in Fraction 0
Fraction STORET Number 00188
Confirmation?
Dual Column GC/MS
E. Herbicides, EPA Method 8150
Number of chemicals detected in Fraction
Fraction STORET Number 00148
Method
Batch Continuous
Purgeable 75m x 0.53mm ID x 3pm film DB 624,110
624
Acid Extractable
625
X 300*0, 2.0 min 69
Base/Neutral Extractable 113
625 X
Example: Acid Extractable 625 x d5-phenol 50
11
Compound
01104
01097 50 5 <5
01002 10 5 <5
01012 25 0.5 0.7
01027 2 3
01034 5 2 3
01042 2 10 21
01051 10 3 <3
71900 0.2-2.0
01067 10 5 <5
01147 5 3 <3
01077 5 <5
01092 10 50 150
01007 500 10 21
00940 1000 10
00720 20 5
00951 100 100 7,590
Signed: Date:
344,000
- 5
Page 9 of 9
Suirogates (Spikes)
26
66
——<-----------------------------------------
Organic Analytical Information:
Organic Fraction
Selenium
Silver
O^g/L)
30
(A/g/i)
543
STRL Sample # J7616-001-002
Extraction
Quantitation
Limit Target
(pg/L)
50
Quantitation
Limit*
Concentration
Detected
STORE!
Number
Compound I Recovery
%
He @ 19psi, 34°C , 8.0 min. 10*C /mm
200*0 0 min 20°C/min 230*0 2 min
30m x 0.32mm ID x 0.25pm film SE-54,
He @ 12psi, 40*0, 2.0 min. 12°C/min
Zinc
2. Other Inorganics:
Barium
Chloride
1. Pollutants to be analyzed for:
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Mercury
Nickel
GC Operation Conditions
Column Description
Length X ID, Film Thickness,
Column Type, Carrier Gas &
Flow Rate, Temperature
Program
100
’89’
~92
’94
Date
/ 7*—
30m x 0.32mm ID x 0.25pm film SE-54.
He @ 12psi, 40*C. 2.0 mm, 10°C/mm
300*C, 2.0 min
30m x 0.25 min/0.25pm. DB-5, He @
30cm/sec, 40°C (4mm) 270*0, 10*C/min
GC/MS Library size (number of reference spectra): 49,500 NBS Library
F. Metals and Other Chemicals
Number of Metals and Other Chemicals (as listed below) detected in Sample
Fraction STORE! Number 78240
Cyanide
Fluoride
•If different from quantitation limit target.
Analytical Laboratory RepVesentativa Dqbpfe Collins Environmental Dept. Manager
Facility Operator in Responsible Charge (ORC): I certify that this report is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge.
Dibromofluoro­
methane
Toluene-d8
4-BFB
Phenol-d6
2-Fluorophenol
2.4.6 |
Tribromoph onol
Nitrobeozeno-dS
Terphenyl-d14
2-Fluorobiphenyl
Southern iesting & Research Laboratories, Inc.
A I R
ofREPORT ANALYSIS
NC 27890
P.0. :
CAT No.ANALYSES UNITSPQLRESULT
APAM-Priority PollutantsEO-030 SEE APAM FORM
COMMENTS:
Laboratory Contact(s):Reviewed and Approved by:
Page 1 of 2 05/09/101 14:27(EDH:V2R08.2)K7866R.183
Microbac
Chemical and Microbiological Analyses: Environmental • Agrochemical • Foods - Pharmaceuticals
Another Company
O-
tn
10:00
12:55
Matrix:
Classification:
Jef/emy Brown
Environmental Manager
WASTEWATER
ENV
Gregg Camp
Roanoke Rapids Sanitary District
135 Aqueduct Rd
Weldon
SAMPLE No.: K7866-001
Date Reported: 05/09/01
3809 Airport Drive, Wilson, NC 27896 • 252-237-4175 • FAX: [phone]
www.SouthernTesting.corn • E-mail: [e-mail]
Client Sample ID:
Marks: Eff Comp
Collected: 04/10/01
Received: 04/10/01
Phone:[phone] X
Fax: [phone]
5y
Southern Testing Inc.
fA I B
ofREPORT ANALYSIS
NC 27890
P.O. :
CAT No.ANALYSES PQL RESULT UNITS
APAM-Priority PollutantsEO-030G SEE APAM FORM
COMMENTS:
Laboratory Contact(s):Reviewed and Approved by:
Page 2 of 2 05/09/101 14:27(EDH:V2R08.2)K7866R.183
Microbac
Chemical and Microbiological Analyses: Environmental • Agrochemical • Foods • Pharmaceuticals
Another Company
Gregg Camp
Roanoke Rapids Sanitary District
135 Aqueduct Rd
Weldon
11:30
12:55
Matrix:
Classification:
WASTEWATER
ENV
Jetzemy B^owd
Environmental Manager
3809 Airport Drive, Wilson, NC 27896 • 252-237-4175 • FAX: [phone]
wwvv.SouthernTesting.com • E-mail: [e-mail]
Client Sample ID:
Marks: Eff Grab
Collected: 04/10/01
Received: 04/10/01
SAMPLE No.: K7866-002
Date Reported: 05/09/01
Phone: [phone] X
Fax: [phone]
& Research Laboratories,
I. Facility Information:
Year:
Class: County:
typical: Yes No
Southern Testing & Research Laboratories, Inc.
II. Sampling:
24 hr composite Tor main sample / grab sample for purgeable fraction
11:30 AM
Instructions
STRL Sample #K7866-001-002
Page 1 of 9
04/09/01
04/10/01
Annual Pollutant Analysis Monitoring Requirement
Reporting Form A
(Revised June 1990)
NPDES Permit No: Discharge (Pipe) No:
Facility Name: Roanoke Rapids Sanitary District
Person(s) Collecting Samples: Joe Poythress
Status of facility wastewater treatment operation on day of sampling:
If no, explain briefly:.
Analytical Laboratory:
The purpose of this document and the accompanying memo is to standardize the sampling, analysis and reporting procedures to be used
for the Annual Pollutant Analysis Monitoring (APAM) Requirement as described in the permit.
Sampling
1 - Take a 24-hour composite sample from the final effluent during mid-week (Wednesday through Friday). Collect a grab sample for the
volatile organic fraction when collection of the 24-hour composite sample is completed. Follow any other sampling instructions provided by
the laboratory performing the analysis.
2 - Indicate in the space provided at the top of this page whether a corresponding sample for toxicity testing was taken.
3 - Make note of any unusual wastewater treatment operating conditions occurring on the day of sampling in the space provided on the
form.
8 - If “significant peaks” are found, provide probable molecular weight, library match probability, retention time, identification basis, and MS
scan number for each. In addition, list internal standards and their retention times.
9 - In the section labeled “Organic Analytical Information" (p. 9), include for each organic fraction the method, extraction technique, GC
operating conditions, and surrogate recovery. Report the size of the GC/MS library being utilized in the appropriate space.
10 - Use copies of this Annual Pollutant Analysis Monitoring Revised Form A to report the results of the analysis. Both the analytical
laboratory representative and the facility operator in responsible charge should sign completed forms (last page).
11 - Mail two completed copies of the form (and the laboratory report, if submitted to the facility on a different form) to: ATTN: Central Files.
Division of Environmental Management, NC DEHNR, P.O. Box 27687. Raleigh. NC 27611. Mail the APAM form separately from Discharge
Monitoring Reports.
7 - If a chemical is found to be below the quantitation limit, report the concentration detected as less than (or ■<’) the quantitation limit in
the appropriate space. Provide a concentration estimate for chemicals detected in concentrations greater than the detection limit and less
than the quantitation limit. Enter the detection limit in parentheses beside the estimate. Chemicals detected in concentrations above the
quantitation limits must be quantified. Quantitation limit and detection limit are defined in the accompanying memo (Tedder, October 1990).
Enter the total number of peaks detected in each analytic fraction in the appropriate space on this Revised APAM Form A. Report all
concentrations in units of micrograms per liter (pg/L) and metals as total recoverable metal. If no peaks to be identified under the 10
significant peaks rule are observed, enter “none" in the space provided for “other" compounds in each appropriate analytic fraction section.
Provide the concentration estimate and retention time for “unknowns" as well as for “significant peaks" for which a structural assignment can
be made.
Analysis
4 - Analyze the effluent for pollutants listed on the APAM form, including those to be identified and approximately quantified under the 10
significant peaks rule, using appropriate EPA-approved methods for each of the analytic fractions. Other analytical methods can be
substituted only with prior, written approval of the Director of the Division of Environmental Management (DEM). Read and distribute to the
laboratory performing the analysis the accompanying memo (Tedder, October 1990) clarifying analytical requirements.
♦
5 - Identify chemicals to be analyzed for according to the 10 significant peaks rule (as described in item 2 of the Annual Pollutant Analysis
Monitoring Requirement in the permit) using a GC/MS library search. Tentative identification is all that is required; confirmation by standard
injection is not necessary. Estimate the concentration of each based on an internal standard having the closest retention time.
Reporting
6 - Quantitation Limit Targets that should be met are listed on this Revised APAM Reporting Form A. Report the use of any higher
quantitation limit and an explanation as to why the listed quantitation limit target could not be met. Examples of acceptable reasons for not
meeting a quantitation limit target could be high background concentrations in a sample, or the necessity for sample fraction dilution to bring
a chemical to within a quantifiable concentration. List any quantitation limit different (whether higher or lower) from the target in the column
provided for this purpose.
Date Sampled: (composite sample)
Sampling begun (date, time): _
Sampling finished (date, time):_
Date and time sampled (grab sample): 04/10/01
Corresponding sample taken for toxicity testing:
10:0Q AM X Yes
10:00 AM No
STRL Sample K7866-002 Page 2 of 9624.
Compound
Yes No
34030 5 0.5 <0.5
32101 0.5 <0.5
32104 0.5 <0.5
34413 10 0.5 <0.5
32102 5-0.5 <0.5
34301 6 0.5 <0.5
34311 10 0.5 <0.5
5.0 <5.0
<6.0
10 <0.5
5 0.5 <0.5
34496 5 0.5 <0.5
34531 5 0.5 <0.5
34501 5 0.5 <0.5+34546 5 0.5 <0.5
34541 6 0.5 <0.5
0.5 <0.5
<0.5
34371 <0.5
34423 2.0
7
<0.5
f5
34511 5
39180 5
4-34488 10 0.5 <0.5
J-------- 39175 10 0.5 <0.5
I I
WL)
10
0.5
34210
34215
<2.0
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
WL)
Too
Too
10
T
5
5 0.5
(15
6.0
0.5
5
34704
34699
34010
34506
Quantitation
Limit Target
Concentration
Detected
Quantitation
Limit*
(pg/L)
<10
<0.5
STORE!
Number
GC/MS
Confirmation?
34516
34475
34576
32106
5
6
8
5
0.5
(15
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
1. Pollutants to be analyzed for:
Acrolein
Acrylonitrile
Benzene
Bromodichloromethane
Bromoform
. Bromomethane
Carbon tetrachloride
T Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether
^Chloroform
Chloromethane
Ybibromochloromethane
! 1,1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethane
1.1- Dichloroethylene
trans-1,2-bichloroethylene
1.2- Dichloropropane
i cis 1,3-Dichloropropene
i trans 1,3-Dichioropropene
Ethylbenzene
Methylene chloride
1.1.2.2- Tetrachloroethane
T etrachloroethylene
Toluene
1,1,1 -Trichloroethane
1, i ,2-T richloroethane
Trichloroethylene
T richlorofiuromethane
I Vinyl Chloride
34418
32105
‘If different from quantitation limit target
analyK chloroform elevated due t0 triP blank failure. Acrolein analyzed outside of holding time on 5/01/01 due to QC failure during initial
A. Purgeable (Volatile Organic) Fraction, EPA Method_
Number of chemicals detected in Fraction__0
Fraction STORE! Number 84085

2. Other purgeables (up to 10 highest peaks)STRL Sample #K7866-002 Page 3 of 9
Scan Number CAS Number’Compound RT
4
No extraneous peaks detected.
I.
‘Chemical Abstracts Service Registry Number
Complete only if non-targeted compounds are present:
Internal Standard
i
Probable
Molecula
r Weight
Estimated
Concentratio
n (//g/L)
Retention
Time
(Min)
Manual
Interpretatio
n
Librar
y
Match
Retentio
nTime
Identification Basis
(Check all that apply)
Library
Match
Probability
♦ (%)
STRL Sample #K7866-001 Page 4 of 9
Compound
Yes No
34452
4-
* If different from quantitation limit target
(pg/L)
io
Quantitation
Limit Target
Quantitation
Limit*
Gug/L)
5.3
Concentration
Detected
STORET
Number
(z/g/L)
<5.3
GC/MS
Confirmation?
B. Acid Extractable Fraction, ERA Method
Number of chemicals detected in Fraction
Fraction STORE I Number 45582
34586
34601
34606
34616
34657
34591
34646
39032
34694
34621
1. Pollutants to analyzed for:
4-ChToro-3-methylphenol
2-Chiorophenol
2.4- Dichlorophenol
2.4- Dimethylphenoi
2.4- Dinitrophenol
2-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol
2-Nitrophenol
4-Nitrophertol
Pentachlorophenol
1 Phenol
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
625
0
10
10'
10
50
50
10
50
50
To
To
<5.3
<5.3
<5.3
<5.3
<5.3
<5.3
<5.3
<5.3
<8T
<5.3
5.3
5.3
5?3
5.3
5.3
5.3
T.3
5.3
8TT
5.3“
2. Other extractables (up to 10 highest peaks)STRL Sample # 7866-001 Page 5 of 9
Scan Number CAS Number*Compound RT
Ethanol, 1-(2-Butoxyethoxy)-162 110 98.7 8.22 X 746 54446-78-5
nOctadecanoic Acid 284 55.4 95.9 17.87 •X 1904 57-11-4
Tetradecanoic Acid 228 41.0 93.6 16.23 X X 1708 544-63-8
Unknown Alkane 37.5 24.26 2671
14-Pentadecenoic acid 240 24.8 86.6 17.68 X 1882 17351-34-7
Cyclohexane, 1 -(1,5-Dimethylhexyl)-280 14.8 84.4 25.93 X 2871 56009-20-2
Benzenamine, N,4-dimethyl-121 12.5 81.7 13.86 X 1423 623-08-5
9-Hexadecenoic acid 254 96.010.5 16.04 X 1685 2091-29-4
Ethanol, 2-(2-Butoxyethoxy)-,204 9.9 97.3 10.33 X 1000 127-17-4
287 8.2 97.7 12.51 X 1261 120-40-1
XhemicarAUstracls Service Registry Number
Complete only if non-targeted compounds are present:
Internal Standard
1.4-Dichlorobenzene-d4 5.59
Naphthalene-d8 8.01
Acenaphthene-d10 11.58
Phenanthrene-d10 14.56
Chrysene-d12 20.04
Perylene-d12 22.78
Probable
Molecular
Weight
Retention
Time
(Min)
Retention
Time (RT)
(Min)
Library
Match
Identification Basis
(Check all that apply)
Manual
Interpretation
Estimated
Concentration
(pg/D
Library Match
Probability
(%)
I----------------------------------------------------
Dodecanamide, N, N-Bis (2-Hydroxy
Page 6 of 9STRL Sample #K7866-001
0
Compound
4-i
t
GC/MS
Confirmation?
Yes No
STORE!
Number
1. Pollutants to be analyzed for:
‘3405-
34200
34220
39120"
34526
34247
34230"
3452 f
34242
34273"
34283"
39100“
34636"
34292
134581"
34641
34320
34556”
34536”
“34566”
34577
"34637
"34336"
34347
39110"
3467T
34626
34596
34346”
””34376
34387
39700”
34391
34386"
34396""
34463 ’
34408"
34696”
— 34477""
34437
34428“
34433
34461
34469
34551
Quantitation
Limit*
Q/g/L) '
"5.0
5.0
5.0
'”"5.6
76
576 "
"5.0
"sT-
" "To
” 5.0
5.0
”"57
5.0
5.6
5.0
To
5".O
77
5.0”
To
5.0"
57”
5.6"
57
57
37
37
5.6
57
57
37
37
37"
3.7
37
5.0
37
37
37
37
5.0
57
5.0
5.6
5.0
I C. Base/Neutral Fraction, ERA Method 625
Number of chemicals detected in Fraction
Fraction STORE! Number 45583
Acenaphthene
Acenaphthylene
Anthracene
Benzidine
! Benzo (a) anthracene
Benzo (a) pyrene
i Benzo (b) fluoranthene
, Benzo (ghi) perylene
Benzo (k) fluoranthene
Bis(2-chloroethoxy) methane
Bis(2-chloroethyl) ether
Bis(2-chforoisopropyl) ether
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
i 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether
• Butyl benzyl phthalate
2-ChloronaphthaTene
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether
I Chrysene
Dibenzo (a,h) anthracene
1.2- Dichlorobenzene
; 1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1.4- Dichlorobenzene
3.3- Dichlorobenzidine
Diethyl phthalate
i Dimethyl phthalate
Di-n-butyl phthalate
• 2,4-Dinitrotoluene
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
■ Di-n-octyl phthalate
; 1,2-Diphenylhydrazine
Fluoranthene ’
Fluorene
Hexachlorobenzene
: Hexachlorobutadiene
HexachlorocyclopentadienT”
! Hexachloroethane
lndeno(1’,2t3-cd) pyrene
Isophorone
i Naphthalene
Nitrobenzene
N-nitrosodimethylamine
N-nitroso-di-n-propylamine
N-nitrosodiphenylamine
Phenanthrene
Pyrene
1.2.4- T richlorobenzene
’If different from quantitation limit target
Quantitation
Limit Target
Jpg/L)
To
”" 10
■ 10
50
10
" To
i*7"
“ To" ”
“To “
io'-
10
"To
io
To
io
io
"To
i7“
io
"7o"“
"To “
“T7~
~2‘0
"" id
”TT
” To" “
i7”
io”'
" T7 “
—1"7“
To'
To “
" io
“To
■“ T o “
” T7 "
“To"
”“10
”T7
“To
“ 10 "
To
To
To
io
"T7"
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
<36
<7o
<5T0"
<3.7
<3.7
<5.0
<5.7
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
Concentration
Detected
^41
<5.0
" <37”“
<5.0
757"
<5.0
<5.7
<3.7
"'"<3 o'"
“757
<57
<5.0
<3.7
<10
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
” 776“
<5.6
“ <5.0
<5.0
T5."6'“
“757“
“”<57"
<5.0
<5.0
<37
<36
<3o
< 36
<5.0
2. Other base/r.eutrals (up to 10 highest peaks)STRL Sample #K7866-001 Page 7 of 9
r *1
Scan Number CAS Number*Compound RT
218 1,270 87.3 9.49 X 935
Ethanol, 2(2-Butoxyethoxy)-, Acetate 204 156 99.4 11.88 X 1222 124-17-4
Ethanol, 2-Butoxy-118 113 98.6 4.52 X 338 111-76-2
Butane, 1,1-Oxybis (2,1-Ethanediylox 218 24.0 87.9 10.40 X 1044 112-73-2
9-Octadecenoic Acid (Z)-282 20.5 95.0 20.66 X 2275 112-80-1
Octadecanoic Acid 284 20.4 95.5 20.84 X 2297 57-11-4
2453*18.6 22.14 X
254 10.9 94.9 18.69 X 2039 2091-29-4
592 6.5 96.0 28.28 X 3189 40710-42-7
194 5.4 89.0 12.56 X 1303 55759-91-6
Complete only if non-targeted compounds are present:
Internal Standard
1,4-Dichlorobenzene-d4 6.24
Naphthalene-d8 9.08
Acenaphthene-d10 13.33
Phenanthrene-dlO
Chrysene-d12 23.44
Perylene-d12 26.72
----------------------- ----------------------------
Butane, 1,1-Oxybis (2,1-Ethanediylox
Probable
Molecular
Weight
Retention
Time
(Min)
Retention
Time (RT)
(Min)
Library
Match
Identification Basis
(Check all that apply)
Manual
Interpretation
Estimated
Concentration
(pg/L)
Unknown
9-Hexadecenoic Acid
1- HentetracoiKanol
2- Propenal, 3-(2,2,6-Trimethyl-7-Oxy
‘Chemical Abstracts-Service Registry Number
Library Match
Probability
(%)
16.89
- -I
♦ 112-73-2
STRL Sample #7866-001 Page 8 of 9
Compound
G^g/L)(pg/L)Yes No Yes No
39330 Aldrin 0.05 <0.05
39337 0.05 <0.05
0.05 <0.0539338
34259 0.1 0.05 <0.05
39340 0.05 <0.05
39350 <0.2
39310 0.05 <0.05
39320 0.1 0.05 <0.05
+39300 0.1 0.05 <0.05
39380 0.02 <0.02
x
34361 0.1 0.05 <0.05
34356 0.1 0.05 <0.05
34351 0.7 0.05 <0.05
0.05 <0.05
0.05 <0.05
39410 0.05 <0.05
39420 0.05 <0.05
39480 0.05 <0.05
39755 0.05 <0.05 x
39400 1.5
34671 0.5
39488 PCB 1221 0.5 <0.5
39492 0.5 <0.5
39496 <0.5
0.5
1 0.5 <0.5
8141A
2.5 0.2 <0.2
39540 Parathion (ethyl)0.6 0.2 <0.2
0
Compound
(Ag/L)NoYes
39045 Silvex 2 <2
—4
—4
39390
34366
0.2 •
OTf
<1.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
(pg/L)
<1F
39500
39504
0.06
^0.2
0.8
0.5
(pg/L)
12
4,4’-DDD
4,4’-DDE
4,4'-DDT
Dieldrin
, 0.2
Z4
0.5
0.5“
T~
1. Pollutants to be analyzed for:
39730 ~ 2’,4T)
Toxaphene
PCB 1016
1. Pollutants to be analyzed for:
Organochlorine Pesticides/PCB’s: EPA Method
Quantitation
Limit Target
Quantitation
Limit Target
(Ag/L)
8081 A
Quantitation
Limit*
Concentration
Detected
Confirmation?
Dual Column
STORET
Number
STORET
Number
Quantitation
Limit*
Endosulfan I (alpha)
' Endosulfan II (beta)
Endosulfan sulfate
Endrin
Endrin aldehyde
Heptachlor
Heptachlor epoxide
Methoxychlor
Mirex
alpha-BHC
’ Beta-BHC
Delta-BHC
Gamma-BHO (Lindane)
Chlordane
39740 : 2,4,5-T_______________
‘If different from quantitation limit target.
Concentration
Detected
PCB 1232
PCB 1242
PCBT248
PCB 1254
39508 PCB 1260
Organophosphorus Pesticides: EPA Method
39560 Demeton
£ j <2
Aldrin and Endrin aldehyde results are estimated due to poor spike recovery
Aldrin and Endrin aldehyde results are estimated due to poor spike recovery (41% and 15%, respectively from a 0.4 ug/L
spike).
E. Herbicides, EPA Method 8151A
Number of chemicals detected in Fraction
Fraction STORET Number 00148
Confirmation?
i Dual Column GC/MS
D. Organochlorine/Organophosphorus Pesticides and PCB’s ,
Number of chemicals detected in Fraction 0
Fraction STORET Number 00188
Batch Continuous Compound
Purgeable 60m x 0.25mm ID x 1.4um film DB-VRX 105
624
Acid Extractable
625 X
1011
Base/Neutral Extractable
625 X
Example: Acid Extractable
625 x d5-phenol 50
7
Compound

<54
<5

5
<5
25
500
Environmental Dept. Manager
Date: 5 - /0^Q/
Date:
10
5000
5
2
5
3
(pg/L)
737
1000 To
100
23
322,000
<5
2,630
00940
00720
6695?
*lf different from quantitation limFtargT
Organic Analytical Information:
ii . _
Organic Fraction Method
Quantitation
Limit Target
w
50
T6~
’ 76
25
r_____
10
0.2
To”
5
5 "
10
Quantitation
Limit*
(pg/L)
10
”5 ~
Ts
Concentration
Detected
65
60
74
STORE!
Number
101
101
71
64
01097
01002
01012
01027
01034
01042
01051
71900
01067
01147
01077
01092 : Ziric~~
2. Other Inorganics:
01007 Barium
Thioride
[ Cyanide
Fluoride
<0.2
<5
Recovery
%
Dibromofluoro­
methane
Toluene-d8
4-BFB
Phenol-d6
2-Fluorophenol
2.4.6-
Tribromophenol
Nitrobenzene-d5
Terphenyl-d14
2-Fluorobiphenyl
<0.5
<2
5
13
<3
<5
79
lSTRL 'Sample #K7866-001-002
Extraction GC Operation Conditions
Column Description
Length X ID, Film Thickness,
Column Type, Carrier Gas &
Flow Rate, Temperature
Program
Page 9 of 9
Surrogates (Spikes)
1. Pollutants to be analyzed for:
01104 ' Aluminum
Antimony
pArsenic
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Analytical Labonetory Representative: Jeremy Brown,
Signed:_
Facility Opeilsnor in Responsible Charge (ORC):
I certify that this report is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge.
Signed:___________________________________________________
He @12.5psi, 35OC . 4.0 min. 10°C /min
240°C 4.0 min
1 30m x 0.32mm ID x 0.25z/m film EC-5.
He @ 12psi. 40°C, 2.0 min. 12°C/min
300°C. 6 min
30m x 0.32mm ID x 0.25pm film EC-5,
He @ 12psi. 40'C, 2.0 min. lO’C/min
I 300°C, 7 min
30m x 0.25 min/0.25/xn, DB-5, He @
30cm/sec, 40°C (4mm) 270°C,
j lO’C/min
GC/MS Library size (number of reference spectra): 49,500 NBS Library
F. Metals and Other Chemicals
Number of Metals and Other Chemicals (as listed below) detected in Sample
Fraction STORE! Number 78240
. . r r
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART E. TOXICITY TESTING DATA
E.2.
Test number: Test number: Test number:
Test Species & test method number
Age at initiation of test
Outfall number
Dates sample collected
Date test started
Duration
b. Give toxicity test methods followed.
Manual title
Edition number and year of publication
Page number(s)
Give the sample collection method(s) used. For multiple grab samples, indicate the number of grab samples used.c.
24-Hour composite
Grab
d.Indicate where the sample was taken in relation to disinfection. (Check all that apply for each.
Before disinfection
After disinfection
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information
\(Please See Attachment Q|
[(Please See Attachment C)|
Individual Test Data. Complete the following chart for each whole effluent toxicity test conducted in the last four and onfealf years. Allow one
column per test (where each species constitutes a test). Copy this pagefimore than three tests are being reported.
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Standard Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Roanoke
FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER.
Roanoke Rapids Sanitary District, NC0024201
Indicate the number of whole effluent toxicity tests conducted in the past four and ondialf years
chronic acute
a. Test information.
POTWs meeting one or more of the following criteria must provide the results of whole effluent toxicity tests for acute or chronic toxicity for each of the
facility's discharge points: 1) POTWs with a design flow rate greater than or equal to 1.0 mgd; 2) POTWs with a pretreatment program (or those that are
required to have one under 40 CFR Part 403): or 3) POTWs required by the permitting authority to submit data for these parameters.
• At a minimum, these results must include quarterly testing for a 12-month period within the past 1 year using multiple species (minimum of two
species), or the results from four tests performed at least annually in the four and ondialf years prior to the application, provided the results
show no appreciable toxicity, and testing for acute and/or chronic toxicity, depending on the range of receiving water dilution. Do not include
information on combined sewer overflows in this section. All information reported must be based on data collected through analysis conducted
using 40 CFR Part 136 methods. In addition, this data must comply with QA/QC requirements of 40 CFR Part 136 and other appropriate QA/QC
requirements for standard methods for analytes not addressed by 40 CFR Part 136.
• In addition, submit the results ofany other whole effluent toxicity tests from the past four and one-half years. If a whole effluent toxicity test
conducted during the past four and one-half years revealed toxicity, provide any information on the cause of the toxicity or any results of a
toxicity reduction evaluation, if one was conducted.
• If you have already submitted any of the information requested in Part E, you need not submit it again. Rather, provide the information
requested in question E.4 for previously submitted information. If EPA methods were not used, report the reasons for using alternate methods
If test summaries are available that contain all of the information requested below, they may be submitted in place of Part E.
If no biomonitoring data is required, do not complete Part E. Refer to the Application Overview for directions on which other sections of the form to
complete.
E.1. Required Tests.
After dechlorination
I
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information
Test number:Test number:Test number:
Describe the point in the treatment process at which the sample was collected.e.
Sample was collected.
Chronic toxicity
Acute toxicity
g. Provide the type of test performed.
Static
Static-renewal
Flow-through
h.
Laboratory water
Receiving water
i.Type of dilution water. If salt water, specify “natural” or type of artificial sea salts or brine used.
Fresh water
Salt water
j-Give the percentage effluent used for all concentrations in the test series.
k. Parameters measured during the test. (State whether parameter meets test method specifications)
pH
Salinity
Temperature
Ammonia
Dissolved oxygen
I.Test Results.
Acute:
%%%
LCso
95% C.l.%%%
Control percent survival %%%
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information
_____________________________________________
f. For each test, include whether the test was intended to assess chronic toxicity, acute toxicity, or both
FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Roanoke Rapids Sanitary District, NC0024201
Percent survival in 100%
effluent
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Standard Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Roanoke
Source of dilution water. If laboratory water, specify type; if receiving water, specify source.
Other (describe)
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information
Chronic:
NOEC %%%
IC25 %%%
Control percent survival %%%
Other (describe)
m. Quality Control/Quality Assurance.
Is reference toxicant data available?
/// ///
Other (describe)
E.3. Toxicity Reduction Evaluation. Is the treatment works involved in a Toxicity Reduction Evaluation?
Yes No If yes, describe:
I IDate submitted:(MM/DD/YYYY)
Summary of results: (see instructions)
1
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information
Was reference toxicant test within
acceptable bounds?
FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Roanoke Rapids Sanitary District, NC0024201
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Standard Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Roanoke
What date was reference toxicant test
run (MM/DD/YYYY)?
E.4. Summary of Submitted Biomonitoring Test Information. If you have submitted biomonitoring test information, or information regarding the
cause of toxicity, within the past four and one-h^lf years, provide the dates the information was submitted to the permitting authority and a summary
of the results.
END OF PART E.v .
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PAGE !) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
_________________________OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE, f .f
ATTACHMENT C
PARTE
TOXICITY TESTING BOMONITORING DATA
I
11/29/01
ROANOKE RAPDIS SANITARY DISTRICT, NC0024201
ROANOKE RIVER BASIN
Effluent Toxin?ty Report FPrm - Chronic Pess/Fail end Acute LC50 Dete: 05/05/97
Facility: ROANOKE RAPIDS SD NPDES#: NC0024201 Pipe#:County: HALIFAX
Laboratory Performing Test: BURLINGTON RESEARCH, INC.
Conrnents:
of Operator in Responsible Charge
* PASSED: -4.12X Reduction *
Work Order: 7D523-004
MAIL ORIGINAL TO:
CONTROL ORGANISMS 3 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 128
X Mortality Avg .Reprod.
34# Young Produced 26 33 33 35 33 34 28 33 32 29 38
Adult (L)ive (D)ead L L L L L L L L L L L L
3 4 5 7 8 96 10 11 12
PASS FAIL
# Young Produced 34 32 28 30 34 34 40 40 42 37 26 27 X
Check One
Adult (Dive (D)ead L L L L L L L LLL L L
1st sample 1st sample 2nd sample
PH
7.69 7.50 7.54 7.89 7.81 7.84Control
Treatment 2 7.31 7.50 7.45 7.85 7.84 7.83
1st
Grab DurationComp.
Sample 1 25 hrsX
Sample 2 24 hrsX
Hardness(mg/l)49
8.38.4 8.2 8.0 8.2
Spec. Cond.(gmhos)1243107989
8.3Treatment 2 8.3 8.4 8.1 8.2
Chlorine(mg/l)<.05 <.05
LC50/Acute Toxicity Test Sample temp, at receiptCO 2.02.6
(Mortality expressed as X, containing replicates)
X X X X X XXX X X Concentration
X XXXXXXXX X
start/end
Control
pH D.O.
Duratio<i(hrb):
Copied from DEM form AT-1 (3/87) rev. 11/95 (DUBIA ver. 4.32)
$
Organism Tested: Ceriodaphnia dubie
s
t
a
t
1st sample
North Carolina Ceriodaphnia
Chronic Pass/Fail Reproduction Toxicity Test
Environmental Sciences Branch
Div. of Environmental Management
li.C. Dept, of EHNR
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607-6445
Chronic Test Results
• Calculated t = -0.739
Tabular t = 2.508
X Reduction = -4.12
High
Cone.
I
Note: Please
Complete This
Section Also
D
I
L
U
T
Method of Determination
Movlnfl Average Probit
Spearman Karber Other
s
t
a
r
t
2nd sample
e
n
d
0.00
Treatment 2
Control CV
10.072X
33.67
Treatment 2
32.33
Control
S
A
M
P
2nd
P/F
S
A
M
P
e
n
d
e
n
d
0.00
Control
LC50 - X
95X Confidence Limits
X -- X
Mortali ty
start/end
D.O.
Control
X control orgs
producing 3rd
brood
100X
X
Signature
x___ _____________________
Signature of Laboratory Supervisor
Effluent X: 1.3X
TREATMENT 2 ORGANISMS 1 2
1 2
Complete This For Either Test
Test Start Date: 04/23/97
Collection (Start) Date
Sample 1: 04/21/97 Sample 2: 04/24/97
Sample Type/Duration
Date: 07/30/97toxicity Report Form - Chronic Pass/tai' Acute LC50
County: HALIFAXNPDES#: HC0024201 Pipe#:AOAHOKE RAPIDS SD
Coaroents:
gnat
* PASSED: 0.00X Reduction *iture of Laboratory SupervisorSi
MAIL ORIGINAL TO:
10 11 1296 7 8453CONTROL ORGANISMS
Avg.Reprod.X Mortali ty
35 3035313227342834332328# Young Produced
LLLLLLAdult (Dive (D)ead L L LLLL
10 11 129678534
FAILPASS
293232303133273433 30
2930# Young Produced
Check One
LLL LLAdult (Dive (D)ead L L LLLLL
Conplete This For Either Test1st sanple 1st sample 2nd sample
7.577.507.597.517.597.49Control
7.67 7.377.61 7.56 7.61Treatment 2 7.42 1st
Durat i onGrabComp.
23 hrsSample 1 X
23 hrsSample 2 X
42Hardness(mg/l)
8.18.48.08.48.18.9 7731131214Spec. Cond.(gmhos)
8.4 6.3 8.18.08.18.9Treatment 2 <.05<.05Chlorine(mg/l)
2.02.9Sample tenp. at receipt(’C)LC50/Acute Toxicity Test
(Mortality expressed as X, combining replicates)
ConcentrationXXXXXXXXXX
X XXXXXXXXX start/end
Control
0.0.PH
Duration(hrs): Ceriodaphnia dubiaOrganism Tested:
from DEM form AT-1 (3/87) rev. 11/95 (DUBIA ver. 4.32)
D
I
L
U
T
North Carolina Ceriodaphnia
Chronic Pass/Fail Reproduction Toxicity Test Chronic Test Results
Calculated t =
Tabular t =
X Reduction =
High
Cone.
|
Note: Please
Complete This
Section Also
S
A
M
P
2nd
P/F
LC50 « X
95X Confidence Limits
X -%
s
t
a
r
t
1st sample
e
n
d
s
t
a
r
t
1st sample
s
t
a
r
t
2nd sample
0.00
Control
30.83
Treatment 2
S
A
M
P
e
n
d
0.00
Treatment 2
Control CV
12.122X
30.83
Control
e
n
d
Mortali ty
start/end
X control orgs
producing 3rd
brood
100X
0.0.
Control
/ Work Order: 7G419-001 Environmental Sciences Branch
Djv. of Environmental Management
N.C. Dept, of EHNR
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607-6445
e of Operator in Responsible Charge
Method of Determination
Moving Average Probit
Spearman Karber Other
1 2
Effluent X: 1.3X
TREATMENT 2 ORGANISMS 1 2
Test Start Date: 07/23/97
Collection (Start) Date
Sample 1: 07/21/97 Sample 2: 07/24/97
Sample Type/Duration
jry Performing Test: BURLINGTON RESEARCH, INC.
Date: ’.1/13/97Chronic Pass/Fail ana Acute lC5Gyfluent Toxicity Report Form -
County: HALIFAXNPDES#: NC0024201 Pipe#:
Coaments:
* PASSED: 10.72% Reduction *X
of Laboratory Supervisor
Work Order: 7J670-001
MAIL ORIGINAL TO:
10 11 1295643CONTROL ORGANISMS
Avg.Reprod.% Mortality
303031343432313635344034# Young Produced
L LLLLLLLLLAdult (L)ive (D)ead LL
10 11 12985342 FAILPASS
X292528313132263238 322133H Young Produced
Check One
L LLLLLLLLLLAdult (L)ive (D)ead L
2nd sample1st sample1st sample
PH 7.327.577.937.807.557.61Control
Sample Type/Duration7.998.078.047.637.597.69Treatment 2
DurationGrabComp.
24 hrsXSample 1
24 hrsXSample 2
45Hardness(mg/l)
8.28.88.48.56.38.9 30501677106Spec. Cond.(gmhos)
8.38.58.48.68.28.5Treatment 2 0.15<.05Chlorine(mg/l)
2.30.9Sample temp, at receipt(’C)LC50/Acute Toxicity Test
%, combining replicates)
Concentration%%%%%%%%%%
%%%%%%%%%%
Control
D.O.PH

Duration(hrs): Ceriodaphnia dubiaOrganism Tested:
s
t
a
r
t
1st sample
s
t
a
r
t
2nd sample
High
Cone.
0
I
L
U
T
S
A
M
P
2nd
P/F
S
A
M
P
Effluent %: 1.3%
TREATMENT 2 ORGANISMS 1
0.00
Treatment 2
0.00
Control
•Chronic Test Results
Calculated t = 2.359
Tabular t = 2.508
% Reduction = 10.72
29.83
Treatment 2
33.42
Control
LC50 = ________
95% Confidence Limits
% -- X
__ —
e
n
d
s
t
a
r
t
1st sample
e
n
d
e
n
d
Control CV
8.603%
I
Note: Please
Complete This
Section Also
____
start/end
/Facility: ROANOKE RAPIDS SD
Laboratory Performing Test: BURLINGTON RESEARCH, INC.
Mortality
start/end
0.0.
Control
Complete This For Either Test
Test Start Date: 10/29/97
Collection (Start) Date
% control orgs
producing 3rd
brood
100%
Environmental Sciences Branch
Div. of Environmental Management
N.C. Dept, of EHNR
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607-6445
1 2
(Mortality expressed as
Sanple 1: 10/27/97 Sample 2: 10/30/97
1st
North Carolina Ceriodaphnia
Chronic Pass/Fail Reproduction Toxicity Test
Copied from DEM form AT-1 (3/87) rev. 11/95 (DUBIA ver. 4.32)
Method of Determination
Moving Average Probit —
Spearman Karber Other
X__________________________________ ____
Signature of Operator in Responsible Charge
______________________-
Si^Kature of Laboratory Supervisor
6 7
7 8
,(u»nt Toxicity Report form - Chronic Pass/Fail and Acute LC50 Date: 03/30/98
ncliiry! ROANOKE RAPIDS SD MPDESw: WCOOciPOl Pipeff:County: liAtlFAX
Cocwents:
x
• PASSED: -16.29X Reduction •
Um k Order: 8C408-001
MAIL ORIGINAL TO:
10 11 1259CONTROL ORGANISMS
% Mortali ty Avg.Reprod.
23 10 23 1607251120 22 24 22 18
LAdult (L)ive (D)ead L L L L L L L L L L L
10 11 127356894
PASS FAIL
23 14 25 21 21 X18212323 20 26a Young Produced 22
Check One
L L L LAdult (l)lve (0)eed L L LLLLLL
1st safiple 2nd sample1st sample
pH
7.42 6.947.40 6.727.31 7.56Control
6.69 7.077.40 7.47 7.37 6.80Treatment 2
1st
DurationGrab Comp.s
24 hrsSemple 1 X
24 hrsSample 2 X
sample
46Hardness(mo/I)
8.2 8.18.48.9 8.4 8.0
4701797Spec. Cond.(unfios)89
8.0 8.18.2 8.18.4Treatment 2 8.8
<.05<.05Chlorlne(mg/l)
1.5 1.4Sample temp, at recelpt(’C)LC50/Acute Toxicity Test
(Mortality expressed as X, combining replicates)
ConcentrationXXXXXXXXXy.
x xxxxxxXXX
start/end
Control
0.0.pH
Duratlon(hrs): Cerlodaphnta dubla
s
t
a
r
t
2nd aample
North Carolina Ceriodaphnla
Chronic Pass/Fall Reproduction Toxicity Test
Method of Determination
Moving Average Probit
Spearman Karber Other
a
r
t
1st
Environmental Sciences Branch
Div. of Environmental Management
N.C. Dept, of EHNR
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Ratfclgh, North Carolina 27607-6445
Chronic Test Results
Calculated t ■ -1.515
Tabular t - 2.508
X.Reduction ■ -16.29
High
Cone.
I
Note: Please
Complete This
Section Also
D
I
L
U
T
2nd
P/F
S
A
M
P
0.00
Treatment 2
Control CV
33.025X
0.00
Control
18.42
Control
S
A
M
P
LCSO = X
95X Confidence Limits
X -- X
e
n
d
s
t
a
r
t
1st sample
e
n
d
21.42
Treatment 2
e
n
d
Mortali ty
start/end
0.0.
Control
X control orgs
producing 3rd
brood
92X
x
S'Q'unure of Operator In Responsible Charge

Signature of Laboratory Supervisor
Effluent X: 1.3X
TREATMENT 2 ORGANISMS 1 2
Complete This For Either Test
Test Start Date: 03/18/98
Collection (Start) Date
Sample. 1: 03/16/98 Sample 2: 03/19/98
Sample Type/Duratlon
ti Young Produced
| Organism Tested:
r-pied from DEM form AT-1 (3/87) rev. 11/95 (DUBIA ver, 4.32)
12 3 4
laboratory Performing Test: BURLINGTON RESEARCH, INC.
6 7 8
February 3, 1998
Dear Ms. Robeson:
1302 Belmont Street • Burlington, NC 27215-6935 • Tel. [phone] • Fax [phone]
BURLINGTON
RESEARCH
Ms. Kristie Robeson
NC Division of Environmental Management
Environmental Services Branch
Annatic Survey and Tollcotogy Unit
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
Re: Roanoke Rapids Sanitary District (NC0024201)
January 21, 1998 Toxicity test
^vir u
Aquftlic 0lo£«3y Testing
Aquatic Toxicity Reduction Evaluations
Chemical Product Environment Assessments
NPOES Testing
Reporting 4 Data Handling Services
Sincerely^.
BURLINGTON RESEARCH, INC.
A/Cx--- t '
/John C. Baummer ID
Biomonltortng Laboratory Manager
cc. Roanoke Rapids Sanitary District
I am writing this letter to Inform you that Roanoke Rapids Sanitary District will not submit
their Pass/Fall chronic toxldty test on time for the month of January. Tlte reason for the
toteiSumteenleeeheinMtaI’teWj1-
1998. I regret any Inconvenience this has caused you. If you have any questions please call
me 910-570-4661 ext. 289.
March 4, 1998
Dear Ms. Robeson:
Sincerely,
1302 Belmont Street • Burlington, NC 27215-6935 • Tel. [phone] • Fax [phone]
BURLINGTON
RESEARCH
Re: Roanoke Rapids Sanitary District (NC0024201)
February 18, 1998 Toxicity test
3 -
Ms. Kristie Robeson
NC Division of Environmental Management
Environmental Services Branch
Aquatic Survey and Toxicology Unit
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
WlrT
Aquatic Bioassay Testing M
Aquatic Toxicity Reduction Evaluations
Chemical Product Environment Assessments
NPDES Testing
Reporting i Data Handling Services
co. Ben Cox - Southern Testing
BURLINGTON RESEARCH, INC.
C. Baummer HI
Biomonitoring Laboratory Manager
I am writing this letter to inform you that Roanoke Rapids not submit their Pass/Fail chronic
toxicity test on time for the month of February. The reason for the delay is that the chronic
test result was invalid because there was more than 20% male organisms in the effluent
treatment. Burlington Research initiated this test February 18, 1998 and terminated the test
on February 22, 1998. The samples for this test were collected 2/16-17/98 and 2/19-20/98 for
the first and second samples, respectively. The test has been rescheduled for March 18, 1998.
I regret any inconvenience this has caused you. If you have any questions please call me
910-570-4661 ext. 289.
Effluent Toxicity Report Form - Chronic Pass/Fail and Acute LC5O 'Date: 02/21/00
Facility: ROANOKE RAPIDS SD NPDES#: NC0024201 Pipe#:County: HALIFAX
Laboratory Performing lest: BURLINGTON RESEARCH, INC.
Comments:
* PASSED: -57.60% Reduction *
Work Order: 0A659-001
MAIL ORIGINAL TO:
3 4 5 6 7 8 9CONTROL ORGANISMS 10 11 12
% Mortality Avg.Reprod.
# Young Produced 20 19 26 14 4 23 21 15 13 19 21 22
Adult (Dive (D)ead L L L L L L L L L L L L
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
PASS FAIL
# Young Produced 30 26 25 31 31 27 26 31 29 35 29 22 X
Check One
Adult (L)ive (D)ead L L L L L L L L L L L L
1st sample 1st sample 2nd sample
pH
Control 7.21 7.22 7.38 7.49 7.48 7.20
Treatment 2 7.89 7.27 7.35 7.33 7.31 7.17
1st
Grab DurationComp.
Sample 1 24 hrsX
Sample 2 24 hrsX
Hardness(mg/l)41
8.2 7.8 8.3 8.4 8.6 8.5
Spec. Cond.(/xmhos)54692 897
Treatment 2 8.6 7.7 8.2 8.2 8.4 8.6
Chlorine(mg/l)<.05 <.05
LC50/Acute Toxicity Test Sample temp, at receipt(’C)1.4 2.7
(Mortality expressed as %, combining replicates)
X %X X X X X X X X Concentration
X X X X X X X X X X
start/end
Control
PH D.O.
Organism Tested:Ceriodaphnia dubia Duration(hrs):
Copied from nuo form AT-1 (3/87) rev. 11/95 (DUBIA ver. 4.41)
s
t
a
r
t
1st sample
North Carolina Ceriodaphnia
Chronic Pass/Fail Reproduction Toxicity Test
Method of Determination
Moving Average Probit
Spearman Karber Other
Chronic Test Results
Calculated t = -5.310
Tabular t = 2.508
X Reduction = -57.60
I
Note: Please
Complete This
Section Also
D
I
L
U
T
2nd
P/F
s
t
a
r
t
1st sample
e
n
d
s
t
a
r
t
2nd sample
Environmental Sciences Branch
• Div. of Water Quality
N.C. DENR
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
S
A
M
P
S
A
M
P
e
n
d
e
n
d
0.00
Treatment 2
Control CV
32.284X
0.00
Control
28.50
Treatment 2
18.08
Control
LC50 = X
95X Confidence Limits
X --X High
Cone.
Mortality
start/end
D.O.
Control
% control orgs
producing 3rd
brood
83X
X_________________________________
Signature,of Operator in Responsible Charge
X_______zv (, <•<?;'' S /y
Signature of Laboratory Supervisor
Effluent X: 39X
TREATMENT 2 ORGANISMS 1 2
1 2
Complete This For Either Test
Test Start Date: 01/29/00
Collection (Start) Date
Sample 1: 01/27/00 Sanple 2: 01/31/00
Sample Type/Duration
Effluent Toxicity Report Form • Chronic Pass/Fail and Acute LC50 Date: 04/27/00
NPOES#: MC0024201 Pipe#:County: HALIFAXFacility: ROANOKE RAPIDS SO
laboratory Performing Test: BURLINGTON RESEARCH, INC.
Conrnents:
of Operator in Responsible Charge
* PASSED: -21.43% Reduction *
Work Order: 00296-001
MAIL ORIGINAL TO:
10.11 129567834CONTROL ORGANISMS
Avg.Reprod.% Mortality
2416 22 302525202123261618U Young Produced
L L LLLL LAdult (Dive (D)ead L LLLL'
10 11 129567 83412
PASS
X293126271932252825252630# Young Produced
L L LLLLL L
LAdult (Dive (D)ead LLL
2nd sample1st sample1st sample
6.80 6.787.38 7.106.98 6.97Control
04/13/00
7.1$. 7.296.87 7.047.20 7.17Treatment 2
1st
DurationGrabComp.
.74 hrsSample 1 X
23.5 hrsSample 2 X
40Hardness(mg/l)
8.28.18.7 8.88.58.4
1952 294098Spec. Cond.(gmhos)
8.08.7 8.78.5 8.6Treatment 2 8.3 <.050.05Chlorine(mg/l)
1.33.VSample temp, at receipt(’C)LC50/Acute Toxicity Test
(Mortality expressed as %, combining replicates)
Concentration%XXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXX
start/end
Control
D.O.pH
Duration(hrs): Ceriodaphnia dubiaOrganism Tested:
Copied frari DWQ fonr. AT-1 (3/87) rev. 11/95 (DUBIA ver. 4.41)
s
t
a
r
t
1st sample
s
t
a
r
t
1st sample
Complete This For Either Test
Test Start Date: 04/12/00
Collection (Start) Date
Sample 1: 04/10/00 Sample 2:
Sample Type/Duration
High
Cone.
I
Note: Please
Complete This
Section Also
D
1
L
U
T
2nd
P/F
North Carolina Ceriodaphnia
Chronic Pass/Fail Reproduction Toxicity Test
Effluent X: 39X
TREATMENT 2 ORGANISMS
Environmental Sciences Branch
• Div. of Water Quality
N.C. DENR
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
0.00
Treatment 2
Control CV
19.027%
Chronic Test Results
Calculated t » -3.011
Tabular t = 2.508
X Reduction » -21.43
22.17
Control
S
A
M
P
S
A
M
P
|lC50 = X
' 95X Confidence Limits
X -- X
e
n
d
e
n
d
s
t
a
r
t
2nd sample
e
n
d
0.00
Control
26.92
Treatment 2
FAIL
Check One
Mortality
start/end
X control orgs
producing 3rd
brood
100X
D.O.
Control
X__________________________
Signature of Operator in Res.
x
Signature of Laboratory Supervisor
1 2
Method of Determination
Moving Average Probit
Spearman Karber Other
(fluent Toxicity Report Form - Chronic Prss/FrII and Acute LC50 Date: 04/?8/OA
NPDES#: NC0024201 Pipe»:‘County: HALIFAXfacility: ROANOKE RAPIDS SO
I nl^ratni •, Performing Test: BURLINGTON RESEARCH, INC.
Coowents:
x
* PASSED: 0.6SX Reduction *iRturp of Laboratory Supervisor
U-n V Order: 80298-001
MAIL ORIGINAL TO:
1CONTROL ORGANISMS
Avg.Reprod.X Mortal Ity
22292224 3129 21« Young Produced
L LLAdutt (I)ive (D)ead L L LL
10 11 129534
PASS
22 x1733252524191619252732a Young Produced
LLLLLL IAdwlt (L)Ive (O)ead L L
LLL
2nd sample1st sample
pH
7.307.25 7.42Control
7.337.35 7.Irontmont 2 1st
DurationGrabCorrp.
24 hrsSample 1 X
24 hrs
48
7.9
26501463Spec. Cond.(pmhos)107
8.3
<.05 <.05 Chlorine(mg/l)
3.02.4icSO/Acute Toxlcliy Test
ConcentrationXXXXXX XXX
X XXXXX XX
pH
Duralion(hrs):

dubi aOtqnnism Tested:
Copied from DFM foi m AY-1 (.3/87) rev. 11/95 (DURIA ver. 4.32)
s
t
a
r
Method of Determination
Moving Average Probit
Spearman Karber Other
Environmental Sciences Branch
Div. of Environmental Management
N.C. Dept, of EHNR
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607-6445
Chronic Test Result*
Calculated t • 1.113.^
High
Cone.
D
I
I
u
T
n
d
Control CV
17.134X
0.00
Control
23.67
Treatment 2
S
A
M
P
S
A
M
- P
2nd
P/F
e
n
d
e
n
d
0.00
Treatment 2
25.92
Control
FAILq
Check One
29 26 20 24 34
L L L L L
X Mortality
I start/end
North Carolina Ccriodaphnia
Chronic Poss/Fall Reproduction Toxicity Test
Sample temp, at receipted
(Mortality expressed ns X, combining replicates)
1
Car i odnphni a
n.n.
Contr ol
.X
ardness(mg/l)
X control orgs
producing 3rd
brodd
92X
IC50 =X
95X Confidence Llmits
X -- X
x
Signature of Operator in Responsible Charge
[
Note: Please
Complete This
Section Also
start/end
Controlj
D.O.
--- 1 t 9
F f fI unnt X: 1.3X
IPEAIMFNT 2 ORGANISMS 1 2
Complete This For Either Test
Test Start Date: 04/15/98
Collection (Start) Date
Sample 1: 04/13/98 Sample 2: 04/16/98
Sanple Type/Duration
6 7 8
1st sample
ITI |7.46r7.42| 17.04
481 pSS 7.44 7.35
s
t
a
r
s
t
a
r
IsLwla
la.2 8.1~1 la.9 [9.0 1 [8.2
Ir-ntment 2 8.1 8.0 8.3 8.9 8.4
Date: 07/24/98/ Report Form - Chronic Pass/Fail and Acute LC50
NPDES#: NC002A201 Pipe#:County: HALIFAXx RAPIDS SD
Conments:
of Operator in Responsible Charge
* PASSED: -2.22X Reduction ‘nboratory SuperviJorure o
jrder: 8G397
MAIL ORIGINAL TO:
11 12789104563CONTROL ORGANISMS
Avg.Reprod.X Mortali ty
15172019 19 19172221232013* Young Produced
LLLLILLIAdult (L)ive (D)ead L L LL
10 11 127 8
95634
PASS
181625122716161822 24 18 18e Young Produced
I L LLLLLLLAdult (Dive (D)ead L L L
1st sample 2nd sample
PH
7.35 7.51Control
7.51 7.45Treatment 2 1st
DurationGrabComp.
24 hrsSample 1 X
24 hrsXSample 2
sample
42Hardness(mg/l)
8.5 8.18.67.98.68.5 1124144399Spec. Cond.(/imhos)
8.5 7.88.88.78.68.2Treatment 2 <.05<.05Chlorine(mg/l)
2.01.7Sample temp, at receipt(’C)ICSO/Acute Toxicity Test
X, combining replicates)
Concentrat ionXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXX

Duration(hrs): dubiaOrganism Tested:
11/95 (DUBIA ver. 4.32)Copied from DEM form AT-1 (3/87) rev.
t
1st
s
t
a
s
t
a
e
n
d
t
2nd sample
D
I
L
U
T
North Carolina Ceriodaphnia
Chronic Pnss/Fail Reproduction Toxicity Test
Environmental Sciences Branch
Div. of Environmental Management
N.C. Dept, of EHNR
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607-6445
Chronic Test Results
Calculated t = -0.275
Tabular t = 2.508
X Reduction = -2.22
High
Cone.
S
A
M
P
2nd
P/F
S
A
H
P
e
n
d
e
n
d
I
Note: Please
Complete This
Section Also
LC50 = %
95X Confidence Limits
X --X
X control orgs
producing 3rd
brood
92X
0.00
Treatment 2
Control CV
15.277X
0.00
Control
18.75
Control
19.17
Treatment 2
start/end
3
D.O.
FAIL
Check One
D.O.
Control
Cer i odaphni a
Method of Determination
Moving Average Probit
Spearman Karber Other
Complete This For Either Test
Test Start Date: 07/15/98
Collection (Start) Date
(Mortality expressed as
I
Effluent X: 1.3X
TREATMENT 2 ORGANISMS 1 2
1 2
Sample 1: 07/13/98 Sample 2: 07/16/98
Sample Type/Duration
Mortality -------
start/end
^Control
pH
1st sample
r7.94|7.7ol |t?57|7.55
7.28 77651 7.66|7.72j
s
t
a
r
t
1st sample
forming Test: BURLINGTON RESEARCH, INC.
Chronic Pass/Fail and Acute lyCSO Date: 10/28/98,eity Report Form
NPDES#: NC0024201 Pipe#:County: HALIFAXjANOKE RAPIDS SD
Comments: * = missing organism
* PASSED: -52.62% Reduction *
Work Order: 8J337-001
MAIL ORIGINAL TO:
11 1257 8 9 10346CONTROL ORGANISMS
Avg.Reprod.% Mortali ty
17 24 14221124191820211# Young Produced 0
L L L L LAdult (L)ive (D)ead L L L L LL
9 10 11 1257823461
FAILPASS
17 11 5 X383724332738303028U Young Produced
Check One
L L LLLLLLAdult (L)ive (D)ead LLLL
2nd sample1st sample1st sample
pH
7.43 7.687.417.37 7.167.54Control
10/15/98
7.36 7.617.417.33 7.36 7.32Treatment 2
1st
Durat ionGrabComp.
24 hrsSample 1 X
24 hrsSample 2 X
sample
42Hardness(mg/I)
8.58.7 8.18.38.2 8.4
2110991940Spec. Cond.(gmhos)
8.58.58.3 8.78.5Treatment 2 8.2
<.05 <.05Chlorine(mg/l)
2.71.6Sample temp, at receipt(’C)LC50/Acute Toxicity Test
(Mortality expressed as %, combining replicates)
Concent rat ion%% %%%%%7.7.7
7.%7.%X %X %X 7,
st art/end
Control
D.O.PH
Durat ion(hrs): Ceriodaphnia dubiaOrganism Tested:
Copied from DEM form AT -1 (3/87) rev. 11/95 (DU8IA ver. 4.32)
,ry Performing Test: BURLINGTON RESEARCH, INC.
)
s
t
a
s
t
a
t
1st sample
t
2nd sample
D
I
L
U
T
North Carolina Ceriodaphnia
Chronic Pass/F.il Reproduction Toxicity Test
Environmental Sciences Branch
Div. of Environmental Management
N.C. Dept, of EHNR
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607-6445
Chronic Test Results
Calculated t = -2.436
Tabular t = 2.518
X Reduction = -52.62
H i gh
Cone.
I
Note: Please
Complete This
Sect ion Also
Effluent X: 1.3%
TREATMENT 2 ORGANISMS
e
n
d
Control CV
38.743%
0.00
Control
17.36
Control
S
A
M
P
2nd
P/F
S
A
M
P
LC50 = %
95% Confidence Limits
% - - %
s
t
a
r
t
1st
e
n
d
0.00
Treatment 2
26.50
Treatment 2
e
n
d
Mortali ty
start/end
D.O.
Control
% control orgs
producing 3rd
brood
82%
Complete This For Either Test
Test Start Date: 10/14/98
Collection (Start) Date
Sample 1: 10/12/98 Sample 2:
Sample Type/Ouration
signature of Operator in Responsible Charge
/ I S/gnature of Laboratory Supervisor
1 2
Method of Determination
Moving Average Probit
Spearman Karber Other
Date: 01/25/99Effluent Toxicity Report Form - Chronic Pass/Fail and Acut.e LC50
NPDES#: NC0024201 Pipe#:County: HALIFAXFacility: ROANOKE RAPIDS SD
laboratory Performing Test: BURIINGTON RESEARCH, INC.
Comments:
* PASSED: -3.23% Reduction *
Work Order: 9A296-001
MAIL ORIGINAL TO:
10 11 1278 93456CONTROL ORGANISMS
Avg.Reprod.% Mortality
26 28 2427 32 31 301726152628# Young Produced
L L L.L LAdult (Dive (D)ead L L LLL L L
10 11 129784563
FAILPASS
X2628 33263129 14 21 28 25 3227# Young Produced
Check One
L L L LLL LAdult (Dive (D)ead LLLL L
1st sample 1st sample 2nd sample
PH
7.19 7.107.48 6.647.00 7.64Control
01/14/99
7.16 7.087.53 7.857.82 7.58Treatment 2
1st
DurationGrabComp.
24 hrsSample 1 X
24 hrsSample 2 X
sampIesample
43Hardness(mg/l)
8.48.48.68.7 8.87.9
2120 234088Spec. Cond.(gmhos)
8.5 8.38.58.48.7Treatment 2 8.8
<.05<.05Chlorine(mg/l)
2.61.5Sample temp, at receipt(°C)LC50/Acute Toxicity Test
(Mortality expressed as %, combining replicates)
Concentration%%X %XXXXXX
X XXXXXXXXX
start/end
Control
D.O.PH
Durat ion(hrs): Ceriodaphnia dubiaOrganism Tested:
Copied from DEM form AT-1 (3/87) rev. 11/95 (DUBIA ver. 4.32)
t
1st
s
t
a
t
1st
s
t
a
e
n
d
s
t
a
r
t
2nd sample
North Carolina Ceriodaphnia
Chronic Pass/Fail Reproduction Toxicity Test
High
Cone.
D
I
L
U
T
2nd
P/F
e
n
d
Environmental Sciences Branch
Div. of Environmental Management
• N.C. Dept, of EHNR
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607-6445
Control CV
19.933X
0.00
Control
Chronic Test Results
Calculated t =
Tabular t =
X Reduction = -3.23
I
Note: Please
Complete This
Section Also
S
A
M
P
S
A
M
P
LC50 =X
95X Confidence Limits
X -- X
,0.00
Treatment 2
26.67
Treatment 2
25.83
Control
e
n
d
Mortali ty
start/end
X control orgs
producing 3rd
brood
100X
D.O.
Control
x_____________________:_______
Sigrytture of Operator in Responsible Charge
x _ / //5 _____
^(gnature of Laboratory Supervisor
Complete This For Either Test
Test Start Date: 01/13/99
Collection (Start) Date
Sample 1: 01/11/99 Sample 2:
Sample Type/Duration
1 2
Effluent X: 1.3X
TREATMENT 2 ORGANISMS 1 2
Method of Determination
Moving Average Probit
Spearman Karber Other
Effluent Toxicity Report Form - Chronic Pass/Fail and Acute LC50 Date: 04/28/99
Facility: ROANOKE RAPIDS SD NPDES#: NC0024201 Pipe#:County: HALIFAX
Comments: di I water = mipl
* PASSED: -18.83X Reduction *
Work Order: 90253-001
MAIL ORIGINAL TO:
CONTROL ORGANISMS 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
X Mortality Avg.Reprod.it Young Produced 17 28 25 21 21 18 16 3 26 7 22 19
Adult (L)ive (D)ead L L L D L L L D L L L L
1* 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
PASS FAIL
# Young Produced 21 23 28 18 23 27 15 22 23 13 23 29 X
Check One
Adult (Dive (D)ead L L L L L L L L L L L L
1st sample 1st sample 2nd sample
pH
Control 6.95 7.69 7.69 7.56 7.85 7.73
Treatment 2 7.40 7.64 7.73 7.55 7.51 7.60
1st
Grab Comp.Duration
Sample 1 X 24 hrs
Sample 2 X 24 hrs
sample
Hardness(mg/I)43
8.0 8.4 8.2 8.2 8.0 8.2
Spec. Good, (/xmhos)97 1960 2190Treatment 2 8.3 8.4 8.5 8.1 8.2 8.1
Chlorine(mg/l)<.05 <.05
LC50/Acute Toxicity Test Sample temp, at receipt(’C)1.5 1.0
X, combining replicates)
X X X X X X X X X X Concentration
X X X X X X X X X X
start/end
Control
PH D.O.
Organism Tested:Ceriodaphnia dubia Duration(hrs):
Method of Determination
Moving Average Probit
Spearman Karber Other
s
t
a
r
t
2nd sample
Mortali ty
start/end
Chronic Test Results
Calculated t = -1.375
Tabular t = 2.508
X Reduction = -18.83
High
Cone.
|
Note: Please
Complete This
Section Also
D
I
L
U
T
2nd
P/Fs
t
a
r
t
1st
e
n
d
Environmental Sciences Branch
Div. of Environmental Management
N.C. Dept, of EHNR
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607-6445
0.00
Treatment 2
Control CV
39.574X
16.67
Control
22.08
Treatment 2
S
A
M
P
S
A
M
P
LC50 = %
95X Confidence Limits
% " X
e
n
d
e
n
d
18.58
Control
North Carolina Ceriodaphnia
Chronic Pass/Fail Reproduction Toxicity Test
D.O.
Control
s
t
a
r
t
1st sample
(Mortality expressed as
Effluent X:\1.3X 7
TREATMENT 2 WBAtflSMS
1 2
Laboratory Performing Test: BURLINGTON RESEARCH, INC.
Complete This For Either Test
Test Start Date: 04/14/99
Collection (Start) Date
Sample 1: 04/12/99 Sanple 2: 04/15/99
Sample Type/Duration
X control orgs
producing 3rd
brood
83X
Sign^/ure of Operator in Responsible Charge
x __________
S/gnature of Laboratory Supervisor
Copied from DEM form Af-'i (3/87) rev. 11/95 (DUBIA ver. 4.32)
1
Effluent Toxicity Report Form - Chronic Pass/Fail and Acute LC50 Date: 04/30/99
Facility- ROANOKE RAPIDS SO NPDES#: NC0024201 Pipe#:County: HALIFAX
Comments: di I water = mipl
‘ PASSED: -35.63% Reduction *
Work Order: 90736-001
MAIL ORIGINAL TO:
1 2 3 5 6 7CONTROL ORGANISMS 4 8 9 10 11 12
% Mortali ty Avg.Reprod.
# Young Produced 22 7 17 15 21 17 17 12 1016 8 12
Adult (L)ive (D)ead L L L LL L L L L L D L
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
PASS FAIL
# Young Produced 15 23 18 16 18 28 26 10 20 26 20 16 X
Check One
Adult (Dive (D)ead L L L L L L L D L L L L
1st sample 2nd sample1st sample
PH
Control 7.48 7.35 7.82 7.32 7.43 7.04
Treatment 2 7.70 7.25 7.10 7.167.23 7.26
1st
DurationGrabComp.
Sample 1 24 hrsX
Sample 2 24 hrsX
Hardness(mg/l)40
8.3 8.2 8.2 8.2 8.0 8.6
Spec. Cond.(gmhos)87 1960 2190
Treatment 2 8.4 7.6 8.48.2 8.1 8.4
Chlorine(mg/l)<.05 <.05
LC50/Acute Toxicity Test Sample temp, at receipt(’C)1.5 1.0
(Mortality expressed as %, combining replicates)
%%%%%%%%%Concentration%
%%%%%%%%%%
start/end
Control
pH D.O.
Organism Tested:Ceriodaphnia dubia Duration(hrs):
Copied from DEM form AT-1 (3/87) rev. 11/95 (DUBIA ver. 4.32)
s
t
a
r
t
1st sample
D
I
L
U
T
North Carolina Ceriodaphnia
Chronic Pass/Fail Reproduction Toxicity Test
Environmental Sciences Branch
Div. of Environmental Management
N.C. Dept, of EHNR
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607-6445
Chronic Test Results
Calculated t = -2.509
Tabular t = 2.508
% Reduction = -35.63
High
Cone.
I
Note: Please
Complete This
Section Also
S
A
M
P
2nd
P/F
s
t
a
r
t
1st sample
s
t
a
r
t
2nd sample
e
n
d
Control CV
32.944%
14.50
Control
S
A
M
P
LC50 = %
95% Confidence Limits
% - - %
e
n
d
e
n
d
8.33
Treatment 2
8.33
Control
19.67
Treatment 2
Mortali ty
start/end
D.O.
Control
% control orgs
producing 3rd
brood
92%
X
Signature of Operator in Responsible Charge
A ~ ______Signature of Laboratory Supervisor
X_
Complete This For Either Test
Test Start Date: 04/21/99
Collection (Start) Date
Sample 1: 04/12/99 Sarrple 2: 04/15/99
Sample Type/Duration
Effluent %f 39% J
TREATMENT 2^OR<rtNISMS 1 2
Laboratory Performing Test: BURLINGTON RESEARCH, INC.
Method of Determination
Moving Average Probit
Spearman Karber Other
Date: 07/29/99Effluent Toxicity fiepo-t Form - Chronic Dass/Fa;l and Acute LC5O
County: HALIFAXNPDES#: NC0024201 Pipe#:Facility: ROANOKE RAP IOS SO
INC.Laboratory Performing Test: BURLINGTON RESEARCH,
Comments: * = spilled, di I uater
x
= mi pl
X
* PASSED: 19.77% Reduction *
Work Order: 9G698-001
MAIL ORIGINAL TO:
10 11 12567 8 943CONTROL ORGANISMS
Avg.Reprod.X Mortality
13 13 252113 13
16159162114# Young Produced
L L L LLLL LAdult (L)ive (D)ead L LLL
10 11 12567 8 94
FAILPASS
X1514111410081411102111# Young Produced
Check One
L L L LLLAdult (Dive (D)ead L L LLL
2nd sample1st sample 1st sample
pH
7.60 7.557.45 7.357.05 7.15Control
07/15/99
7.33 7.497.21 7.326.87 7.12Treatment 2
1st
DurationGrabComp.
24 hrsSample 1 X
Sample 2 24 hrsX
43Hardness(mg/l)
8.4 8.58.18.48.5 8.3
2870931657Spec. Cond.(^mhos)
8.48.48.18.4Treatment 2 8.2 8.3
<.05 0.05Chlorine(mg/l)
3.71.3Sample temp, at receipt(*C)LC50/Acute Toxicity Test
(Mortality expressed as X, combining replicates) '
ConcentrationXXXXXXXXX X
XXXXXXX X X X
start/end
Control
D.O.pH
Duration(hrs): Ceriodaphnia dubiaOrganism Tested:
Copied from DEM form AT-1 (3/87) rev. 11/95 (DUBIA ver. 4.32)
s
t
a
r
t
2nd sample
D
I
L
U
T
Chronic Test Results
Calculated t = 1.841
Tabular t = 2.518
X Reduction = 19.77
I
Note: Please
Complete This
Section Also
2nd
P/F
North Carolina Ceriodaphnia
Chronic Pass/Fail Reproduction Toxicity Test
s
t
a
r
t
1st sample
e
n
d
e
n
d
Environmental Sciences Branch
Div. of Environmental Management
N.C. Dept, of EHNR
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607-6445
Control CV
28.41IX
S
A
M
P
S
A
M
P
LC50 = X
95X Confidence Limits
X -■ X
e
n
d
0.00
Treatment 2
0.00
Control
12.64
Treatment 2
15.75
Control
High
Cone.
'-Ji Ch
Mortality
start/end
D.O.
Control
s
t
a
r
t
1st sample
Complete This For Either Test
Test Start Date: 07/14/99
Collection (Start) Date
Sample 1: 07/12/99 Sample 2:
Sample Type/Duration
X control orgs
producing 3rd
brood
83X
1 2
Effluent X: 39%
TREATMENT 2 ORGANISMS 1 2 3
Signature of Operator in Responsible Charge
S/gnature of Laboratory Supervisor
Method of Determination
Moving Average Probit
Spearman Karber Other
Date: 11/05/99Chronic Pass/Fail and Acute LC50Effluc-m ToAicity Report Form -
1County: HALIFAXNPDES#: NC0024201 Pipe#:Facility: ROANOKE RAPIDS SD
Ccoroents: di I water = mipl
* PASSED: -31.02X Reduction *
Work Order: 9J575-001
MAIL ORIGINAL TO:
10 11 12978653 4CONTROL ORGANISMS
Avg.Reprod.X Mortality
153131282227292224242723# Young Produced
LLLLLLLLLAdult (Dive (D)ead L LL
10 11 1297 865432 FAILPASS
X313134332833353433353139# Young Produced
Check One
LLLLLLLLLLLAdult (L)ive (D)ead L
1st sample 2nd sample1st sample
PH 7.11 7.117.85 7.167.50 7.12Control 10/21/99
7.12 7.217.00 7.067.89 7.10Treatment 2 1st
DurationGrabComp.
24 hrsXSample 1
24 hrsXSample 2
sample 44Hardness(mg/l)
8.38.08.48.78.38.9 108833993Spec. Cond.(Mmhos)
8.38.38.38.28.18.9Treatment 2 0.90<.05Chlorine(mg/l)
2.51ASample temp, at receipt(*C)LC50/Acute Toxicity Test
X, combining replicates)
ConcentrationXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXX start/end
Control
D.O.PH
Duraf.on(hrs):
D
I
L
U
T
Effluent X: 39X
TREATMENT 2 ORGANISMS 1
s
t
a
r
t
1st sample
s
t
a
r
t
2nd sample
Chronic Test Results
Calculated t s -5.102
Tabular t = 2.508
X Reduction = -31.02
2nd
P/F
LC50 = X
95X Confidence Limits
X --X
s
t
a
r
t
1st
Conplete This For Either Test
Test Start Date: 10/20/99
Collection (Start) Date
Sample 1: 10/18/99 Sampl
Sanple Type/Duration
Control CV
18.040X
I
Note: Please
Complete This
Section Also
33.08
Treatment 2
S
A
M
P
S
A
M
P
e
n
d
e
n
d
e
n
d
0.00
Treatment 2
0.00
Control
25.25
Control
High
Cone.
Mortality
start/end
D.O.
Control
X control orgs
producing 3rd
brood
100X
Organism Tested: Ceriodap'.nia dubia
Copied from DEH form AT-1 <3/87) rev. 11/95 (DUBIA ver. 4.32)
1 2
North Carolina Ceriodaphnia
Chronic Pass/Fail Reproduction Toxicity Test
Environmental Sciences Branch
Div. of Environmental Management
N.C. Dept, of EHNR
'4401 Rpedy Creek Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607-6445
(Mortality expressed as
e 2:
X ____________________________—---- ----
Signature of Operator in Responsible Charge
X __________________ _
Signature of Laboratory Supervisor
Method of Determination
Moving Average Probit —
Spearman Karber Other
Laboratory Performing Test: BURLINGTON RESEARCH, INC.
Dear Mr, Brown:
u’-
,‘A1
4
Sincerely,
Ke<//r\
FIP-5T
1 O i ft !
leae MAIL Skrvick centbr, Raleicm, north Carolina Z7€98-1828
PHONE ■te-571-47OQ PAX »1 B-B71-47 1 8
AN lOUAL OAPORTUNITY / AFFTRNATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - SO% RECYCLEP/t O% ro»T<ON»UMIR RAM«
Mr. Kirk Stafford of the Raleigh Regional Office collected 24 hour composite
samples of the effluent wastewater at the subject facility on May 9 and May 12,2000.
The Division’s Aquatic Survey and Toxicological Unit performed a chrome
■ Ceriodaphnia duhia pass/fail toxicity test on these samples. The result of the test
indicated a FAIL which is noncompHance with the permit requirement Please note the
results in the comments section of the DMR for May 2000.
During a review of the toxicity summary for the period January 1999 through
January 2000, it was noted that the facility had 5 compliant toxicity tests and no
noncompliant tests.
Please respond in writing within 10 working days of receipt of this notification
detailing the actions taken to ensure compliance.
Kenneth Schuster, P.E.
Regional Supervisor
North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources
Subject: Notice of Violation
Bio-monitoring Inspection
Roanoke Rapids Sanitary District WWTP
NPDES Permit NC0024201
Halifax County
If you have any questions concerning this notification, please call Mr.
Stafford at 919-571-4700.
Division of Water Quality
Raleigh Regional Office
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
May 19, 2000
ytETARY
'W
13
cc: Halifax County Health Dept.
’■ Maurice Horcey-EP A
Matt Matthews Aquatic Toxicology Unit
Kirk Stafford
I Mr. Dan Brown
| Roanoke Rapids Sanitary District
P.O. Box 308
> Roanoke Rapids, NC 27870
I
1
Mr
11
I
3^
ifgliaSi|
8iHS
«
Roanoke Rapids Sanitary District
1000 Jackson Street Roanoke Rapids, NC 27870P.O, Box308
June 16,2000
Re:
Dear Mr. Schuster:
The Roanoke Rapids Sanitary District began Ceriodaphnia dubia toxicity testing in April 1993 at 1.3%. In February
Should additional information be required, please contact Mr. Gregg Camp, ORC at [phone].
cc:
VWoft rcan.'MY (OCUMENTSWRRES- 1>NctS-nrWn616 TOX NOV Rtcpo.iMidoc
1999, under new permit conditions, toxicity testing was increased to 39%. In anticipation of the increase, the District
conducted testing in excess of our present concentration. All tests since 1993 have been PASS results.
Ms. Kenneth Schuster, PE, Regional Supervisor
NCDENR
Division of Water Quality
Raleigh Regional Office
1628 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1628
Gregg Camp, ORC
Greta Glover, Pretreatment Coordinator
File
Notice of Violation/Bio-monitoring Inspection
Roanoke Rapids Sanitary District WWTP
NPDES Permit NC0024201
Halifax County
Page:
i/i
Very truly yours,
Roanoke Rapids Sanitary District
R. Dani Jey Broyfa, PE
Chief Executiva/Officer
; \^eie
h .
The Division and Toxicological Unit have been contacted for advice and direction. Outside agencies and other POTWs
have been contacted for information as well. With this continued help, internal monitoring, and pretreatment, testing
compliance will continue.
Quarterly testing was last conducted in April 2000, approximately one month before the Division’s testing. At the time
there appears to be no significant difference in any parameters, which were analyzed between the two months. Also, in
April, long term monitoring testing was conducted. This too along with pretreatment results during April and May
indicate no inconsistencies.
[phone] Fax [phone]
■ o
08/U1/0UDate:
County:HALIFAXNC0024201 Pipe#:NPDES#:
WATER TECH AND CONTROLS INC
Comments:
-0.66% Reduction "* PASSED:
07190097Work Order:
MAIL ORIGINAL TO:
-0.6610 11 1278956234CONTROL ORGANISMS 1
Avg.Reprod.% Mortality
23 24 232827172231252626# Young Produced 29
LLLLLLAdult (L)ive (D)ead L L LLL L
10 11 12967852341 FAILPASS
X3026241831312528302930# Young Produced 1
Check One
L LLLLLLAdult (L)ive (D)ead L L LDL
2nd sample1st sample1st sample
pH
7.937.897.947.96 7.89Control7.87 07/20/00
8.308.197.77 7.827.87Treatment 2 7.78 1st
DurationGrabComp .
24 hrsXSample 1
24 hrsSample 2 X
"•46Hardness(mg/1)
8.098.218.19 8.038.20 8.02 3120182901Spec. Cond.(pmhos)
7.727.847.938.148.19 8.09Treatment 2 <0.1<0.1Chlorine(mg/1)
2.40.7Sample temp, at receipt(°C):::::::::::::::LC50/Acute Toxicity Test
(Mortality expressed as %, combining replicates)
Concentration%%%%%%%%%%
%%%%%%%%%%start/end
Control
D.O.PH.
Duration (hrs) : Ceriodaphnia dubiaOrganism Tested:
4.41)11/95 (DUBIA ver.Copied from DWQ form AT-1 (3/87)rev.
Method of Determination
Moving Average
Spearman Karber
Probit
Other
Chronic Test Results
Calculated t =
Tabular t =
% Reduction
High
Cone .
D
I
L
U
T
S
A
M
P
S
A
M
P
LC5 0 = %
95% Confidence Limits
% - - %
e
n
d
e
n
d
e
n
d
8.33
Treatment 2
0.00
Control
25.08
Control
2nd
P/F
Control CV
14 .669%
25.25
Treatment 2
)
I
s
t
a
r
t
1st sample
Mortality
start/end
Environmental Sciences Branch
Div. of Water Quality
N.C. DENR
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
D.O.
Control
s
t
a
r
t
1st sample
s
t
a
r
t
2nd sample
Effluent %: 39%
TREATMENT 2 ORGANISMS
I
Note: Please
Complete This
Section Also
% control orgs
producing 3rd
•brood
100%
North Carolina Ceriodaphnia
Chronic Pass/Fail Reproduction Toxicity Test
Complete This For Either Test
Test Start Date: 07/19/00
Collection (Start) Date
Sample 1: 07/17/00 Sample 2:
Sample Type/Duration
Eff£\ent Toxicity Report Form - Chronic Pass/Fail and Acute LC50
Faci4.itA: ROANOKE RAPIDS
LaZq'i^oqy Performing Test:
__________,K1
S'^^ttSKure of Operatryr in Responsible Charge
X , _
Signature of Laboratory Supervisor
Effluent Toxicity Report Form - Chronic Pass/Fail and Acute LC50 11/14/00Date •
“aci1i ty:ROANOKE RAPIDS SANITARY DISTRT NPDEStt : NC0024201 Pipe#:County: HALIFAX
in Responsible Charge
PASSED:-4 .58% Reduceion
•erk Order-K- 3279-001
MAIL ORIGINAL TO:
TROL ORGANISMS 1 2 3 5 6 8 9 10 11 1247
I% Mortality Avg.Reprod.
Young Produced
Adult (LIive (D)ead
91 2 3 5 6 7 8 10 11 124
PASS FAIL
Young Produced
(D)eadL) ive
1st sample 1st sample . 2nd sample
>
8.04|8 . 21Cont rol
10/12/00
7.93|8.29 2nd
1st
Grab|Comp.|Duration;
c
I | 24 hrsSample 1 X
| 24 hrsISample 2 X
44 |Hardness(mg/1)
:7.94|7.90 7.92|7.98 8.01)7.68Cont ro1
Spec. Cond.(umhos)188 I 2580 2 0 9':
8.11)7.9418.02)7.89 7.96)7.30
Chlorine(mg/1)<0 1
Toxicity Test Sample temp, at receipt(.C)Acute
%l %l %l %Concentration*
%l %l %l %
start/end
|Cont rol)i
I
D .0pH
anism Tested:Cerxodaphnia dubia
ted from DWQ form AT-1 (3/87)rev.
%i
-+
%i
%i
-+
%i
Method of Determination
Moving Average _
Spearman Karber _
Probi t
Other | High
Cone .
D
I
L
U
T
2 5 50
Control
0.00
Treatment 2
e
n
d
e
n
d
e
n
d
INCt--------
Comments:
0.00
Control
C5 0 = %
95% Confidence Limits
°t - - ’ %
26 . 67
Treatment
-1.292
2 . 508
-4.58
S
A
M
P
Environmental Sciences Branch
Div. of Water Quality
N.C. DENR
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
Ef fluent %; 3 9%
TREATMENT 2 ORGANISMS
rtality expressed as %, combining replicates)
| L | L | L | L | L | L | L | L |b | L |l |l
Mortality
start/end
I27I27I30I27I29I26I28I26I26I24I22I28
Chronic Test Results
Calculated t =
Tabular t =
% Reduction =
s
t
a
r
t
1st sample
s
t
a
r
t
1st sample
s
t
a
r
t
2nd sample
Control CV
8.927%
% control orgs
producing 3rd
brood
100%
.‘.'orth Carolina Ceriodaphnia
Cnronic Pass/Fail Reproduction Toxicity Test
p. ...
1 Check One
; 0 3
I Note: Please
I Complete This
j Section Also
I25I23I20I28I26I27I24I28I26I26I26I27
Il Il Il jl Il Il Il Il |l Il |l |l
Duration(hrs 1 :
7reatment 2
.reatment 2
Complete This For Either Test
Test Start Date: 10/11/00
Collection (Start) Date
Sample 1: 10/09/00 Sample 2:
Sample Type/Duration
Signature of Operat/br
•<______ .zfe-__ _
signature or LaoOtat<e/ry Supervisor
Laboratory Performing Test: WATER TECH. AND CONTROLS,
11/95 (DUBIA ver. 4.41)
,7.92)7.801
i 7.75|8.09 I
|8.06|7.61
I 8.08)7.89
Effluent Toxicity Report- Form Chronj.c Pass/Fail and Acute LC50 01/18/01P?.te •
Facility:ROANOKE RAPIDS SANITARY DISTRT County: HALIFAX
Laboratory Performing Test;
* PASSED:-25.6'7% Reduction •
‘.-.’cr.k Order:
MAIL ORIGINAL TO:
CONTROL ORGANISMS 1 2 3 5 64 7 8 9 10 11 12
Avg.Reprod% Mortality
Young Produced
Adult (L)ive (D)ead ! L
2
1 2 3 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 124
PASS FAIL
= Young Produced
Adult (Dive (D)ead
1st sample 1st sample ,2nd sample
Control 7.62)7.717.65)7.86
01/11/01
7.91)7.987.9317.38 Treatment
1st
Grab|Comp.|Duration
| 24 hrsISample 1 X
| 24 hrsSample 2 X
46)Hardness(mg/1)
7.83)7.627.89)7.92 7.93)7.58
196 ) 1065 2530Spec. Cond.(umhos)
7.74)7.92 7.71)7.428.10)7.63
) <0.1iChlorine(mg/1)<0 1
l 0.9 J 1 . 3Sample temp, at receipt(.C)LCSO/Acute Toxicity Test
.Mortality expressed as %, combining replicates)
%i %l %l %l %l %l %l Concentration%
%l %l%l %l %l%l %l %*
start/end
|Control|
5
D 0PH
Ceriodaphma dubia Duration(hrs).
Copied from DWQ form AT-1 (3/87)11/95 (DUBIA ver.4.41)rev .
Probit
Other | High
Cone .
21.75
Cont rol
S
A
M
P
S
A
M
P
s
t
a
r
t
1st sample
INC 7--------
Comments:
0 . 00
Treatment 2
Control CV
11.452%
0 . 00
Control
27.33
Treatment
= %
Confidence Limits
% - - %
e
n
d
e
n
d
e
n
d
D
T
L
U
T
2nd
P/F
- +
%!Mortality
start/end
3 0
Control
s
t
a
r
t
2nd sample
Signature of Operator in Responsible Charge
____—_____________Laboratory Supervisor
119120,20
s
t
a
t
1st sample
Environmental Sciences Branch
Div. of Water Quality
N.C. DENR
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
Effluent %: 39%
TREATMENT 2 ORGANISMS
| L |l | L | L | L | L | L | L | L|l |l
I 30 I 30 I 28 I 30 I 26 I 29 I 30 I 28 I 30 % control orgs
producing 3rd
brood
100%
Method of Determination
Moving Average
Spearman Karber
North Carolina Ceriodaphnia
Chronic Pass/Fail Reproduction Toxicity Test
Croamsm Tested:
| 21 | 22]23|21| 18|22|26|23|26
!7.69|7.91
2 | 7 . 79 | 7.82
I Note: Please
' Complete This;
Section Also
|L |L |l IL IL IL |l IL IL
Complete This For Either Test
Test Start Date: 01/10/01
Collection (Start) Date
Sample 1: 01/08/01 Sample 2:
Sample Type/Duration
Chronic Test Results
Calculated t = -4.71?
Tabular t = 2.508
% Reduction = -25.67
Treatment 2
X_________
Signature of
|l |l |l
I 22 I 23 I 22
WATER TECH. AND CONTROLS,
NPDES#: NC0024201 Pipe#:
;Check One I
Date: 04/19/01
County: HALIFAXNPDES#: NC0024201 Pipe#:
Signature of Operat
-26.38% Reduction ** PASSED:
Work Order:
MAIL ORIGINAL TO:
-26.3810 11 1297856234CONTROL ORGANISMS 1
Avg.Reprod.% Mortality
# Young Produced
i Adult (Dive (D)ead
22
10 11 12895673124 FAILPASS
X | I
Check One|
Adult (Dive (D) ead
Complete This For Either Test1st sample
pH
Control 04/12/01
Treatment 2 1st
| 24 hrsSample 1 X
| 24 hrs)Sample 2 X
44 |Hardness(mg/1)
Treatment 2 <0 .
Sample temp, at receipt(.C)
I %l Concentration%l% |%%l %l
%l%l %l%l %%l%l start/end
IIIISpearman Karber
D.O.pH
IDuration(hrs) : Ceriodaphnia dubiaOrganism Tested:
Copied from DWQ form AT-1 (3/87)
I
+
I
LC50/Acute Toxicity Test
%, combining replicates)
Method of Determination
Moving Average Probit
Other
Chronic Test Results
Calculated t =
Tabular t =
% Reduction =
D
I
L
U
T
19.58
Control
S
A
M
P
%l
- +
%l
INCv--------
Comments:
Environmental Sciences Branch
Div. of Water Quality
N.C. DENR
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
Spec. Cond.(umhos)
Chlorine(mg/1)
Control CV
12.781%
0.00
Control
24 .75
Treatment
2nd •
P/F i
e
n
d
e
n
d
0.00
Treatment
173|1638 |1719 .
| <0.1|
S
A
M
p
i # Young Produced
e
n
d
II
%l
- +
%l
- +
%l
Grab|Comp.|Duration
---+
J
1st sample 2nd sample
II
D.O.
Control
|l |l |l |l |l |l |l |l |l |l |l |l
|31|22|28|21|25|25|28|10|31|29|23|24
Note: Please
Complete This
Section Also ■
7.82 | 7.44
7.72 | 7.36
7.80|7.75
7.85|7.68
S
t
a
r
t
1st sample
s
t
a
r
t
2nd sample
s
t
a
r
t
1st sample
8.07|7.63
7.71|8.10
8.10|8.15
7.49|7.99
8.08|8.11
7.44|7.96
Effluent %: 39%
TREATMENT 2 ORGANISMS
% control orgs
producing 3rd
brood
100%
|Control|
I High |
Cone.
, LC5 0 = %
I 95% Confidence Limits
I % --%
North Carolina Ceriodaphnia
Chronic Pass/Fail Reproduction Toxicity Test
(Mortality expressed as
Mortality
start/end
|l |l |l |l |l |l |l |l |l |l |l |l
| 22 | 20|16|21|17|20|23|21121121|IS | 18
I |7.62|7.35
I |7.76|7.25
- Effluent Toxicity Report Form - Chronic Pass/Fail and Acute LC50
I Facility: ROANOKE RAPIDS SANITARY DISTRT
I Laboratory Performing Test: WATER TECH. AND CONTROLS,
1X /)
| Signature of Operatd/ in Responsible Charge
jx _______ ___________
I Signature of Laboratory Supervisor
Test Start Date: 04/11/01
Collection (Start) Date
Sample 1: 04/09/01 Sample 2:
Sample Type/Duration
rev. 11/95 (DUBIA ver. 4.41)
I 3.5 | 1.0
<
Dear Mr. Brown:
If you have any questions concerning this notification, please call me at
919-571-4700.
Sincerely,
cc: Halifax County Health Dept.
Maurice Horcey-EPA
Matt Matthews Aquatic Toxicology Unit
1628 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1628
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
A review of the toxicity summary for the period January 2000 through January 2001
showed five compliant tests. It is noted, during this time frame, that the Division’s Aquatic
Survey and Toxicological Unit conducted a test and the results were noncompliant. A Notice of
Violation, dated May 19,2000, was issued for that test.
Mr. Dan Brown
Roanoke Rapids Sanitary District
P.O. Box 308
Roanoke Rapids, NC 27870
Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
50% recycled/10% post-consumer paper
Subject: Bio-monitoring Inspection
Roanoke Rapids Sanitary District WWTP
NPDES Permit NC0024201
Halifax County
North Carolina Department of
Environment ano Natural Resources
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
May 11,2001
Kirk Stafford.
Environmental Chemist
Mr. Kirk Stafford of the Raleigh Regional Office collected 24 hour composite samples of
the-effluent wastewater at the subject facility on May 1 and May 4, 2001. The Division’s Aquatic
Survey and Toxicological Unit performed a chronic Ceriodaphnia dubia pass/fail toxicity test on
these samples. The result of the test indicated a PASS which is compliant with the permit
requirement.
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
ana Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
Coo‘ ••
Effluent Toxicity Report Form - Chronic Pass/Fail and Acute LC50 Date; 05/09/01
NPDES#: NC0024201 Pipe#:County: HALIFAXFacility: ROANOKE RAPIDS
Laboiatoxy Performing Test: MERIIECil,
Comments:
-17.70% Reduction ’* PASSED:ry Supervisor
Work Order:
MAIL ORIGINAL TO:
10 11 1289567234CONTROL ORGANISMS 1
Avg.Reprod.% Mortality
22 25 252634252524# Young Produced 25 26 2127
L L L LLLLAdult (Dive (D)ead L L LLL
10 11 127 8
9562341 FAILPASS
X30293229313331 22 31# Young Produced 30 2734
Check One
L LLLLLLLAdult (Dive (D) ead L LLL
2nd sample1st sample1st sample
PH
8.057.987.99 8.07Control8.037.97
05/03/01
8.137.837.55 7.898.00Treatment 2 7.48 1st
DurationGrabComp .
23.0 hrsSample 1 X
24 hrsSample 2 X
Hardness(mg/1)42
7.91 7.217.67 7.477.427.55 1009 1888Spec. Cond.(/imhos)180
7.93 7.147.467.747.37Treatment 2 7.51
Chlorine(mg/1)<0.1 <0.1
2 . 0Sample temp, at receipt(°C)3 . 0LC50/Acute Toxicity Test
Concentration%%%%%%%% %
% %%%%%%%%%start/end
Control
Spearman Karber
D.O.pH
Duration (hrs) : (£)Ceriodaphnia dubiaOrganism Tested:
Copied from DWQ form AT-1 (3/87)
INC.
North Carolina Ceriodaphnia
Chronic Pass/Fail Reproduction Toxicity Test
Method of Determination
Moving Average Probit
Other High
Cone .
I
Note: Please
Complete This
Section Also
D
I
L
U
T
25.42
Control
S
A
M
P
Environmental Sciences Branch
Div. of Water Quality
N.C. DENR
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
Control CV
12.493%
0.00
Control
29.92
Treatment 2
S
A
M
P
2nd
P/F
LC5 0 = ______%
95% Confidence Limits
% -- %
e
n
d
e
n
d
0.00
Treatment 2
e
n
d
Mortality
start/end
(Mortality expressed as %, combining replicates)
%
D.O.
Control
s
t
a
r
t
1st sample
s
t
a
r
t
2nd sample
s
t
a
r
t
1st sample
Effluent %: 39.0%
TREATMENT 2 ORGANISMS
Chronic Test Results
Calculated t = -3.503
Tabular t = 2.508
% Reduction = -17.70
% control orgs
producing 3rd
brood
100%
Complete This For Either Test
Test Start Date: 05/02/01
Collection (Start) Date
Sample 1: 04/30/01
Signature of Operator in Responsible Charge
Signature of Labothtoty Supervisor
Sample 2:
Sample Type/Duration
rev. 11/95 (DUBIA ver. 4.41)
Waste Water Treatment Plant
135 Aqueduct Rd. Weldon, NC 27890 [phone] Fax [phone]
June?, 2001
Re: Toxicity testing
Yours very truly.
A. Gregg Camp. ORC
Environmental Sciences Branch
Div. of Water Quality
N.C. DENR
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh. North Carolina 27699-1621
Dear Sir:
Permit required toxicity testing is for the months January, April, July, and October, t esting of this
facility was performed by the state of North Carolina in the month of May. The Sanitary District elected to
perform parallel testing. Submined is a result of this additional testing.
MAIL ORIGINAL TO:
6- Young Produced 4 4
Avg.Reprod.
L(L)ive (D)ead LLAdultLuL ControlControl
Eflluent%Treatment - 2
121011987653421
FAILPASS
OC-oC>oDOOO0C'
Check OneD(L)ive (D)ead PpAdult
Complete This For ELttifljJflal
2nd sample1st sample1st sample
Control /ISample 27.^pH
Treatment 2
Sample 1
Sample 2
Hardness(mg/1)
7i^7-^717
7^7.51 733
Sample temp, at receipt
A
%%%%%%%%%Concentration
%%%%%%%Mortality%%
starVendstart/end
Control
Duration (hrs)Organism Tested D.O.PH
Moving Average
Spearman Kartoer
High
Cone.
Note: Please
Complete This
Section Also
e
n
d
e
n
d
e
n
d
Spec.Cond.(nmhos) I
Chlorme(mg/1)
% control onjunarra
producing 3oJ brood
LC50=%
95% Confidence Umils
%■%
t
O.' /o
-< O
X
CO
3 o
ra
Method of Determination
Probit
Other.
7^
s
t
a
r
t
1st sample
Chronic Test Results
Calculated t
Tabular t
% Reduction
|%Mortality
:omp. Duration
Stvorvl-
UIZ?
±M.
ro
£P CL
Cd _i
£.O -n x
P.m
2.-Q
iSo
' CV
[Treatment 2
Control CV
s
t
a
r
t
2nd sample
IT
5 % to s
Environmental Sciences Branch
Div. of Water Quality
N.C. DENR
1621 Mall Service Center
Pa I e I g h. North Corolino 2769Q-162 I
1-1 12
( tpAiSpknicv
DWQ form AT-1 (3/87) rev. 11/95
LC5Q/Acute Toxicity Test
(Mortality expressed as %, combining replicates)
%
s
t
a
r
t
1st sample
______ NPDES#NC
■ IAL________
’ .otk'cXe-
,ory Performing Test------
TREATMENT 2 ORGANISMS
i
s Young Produced
jure of Operator in Responsible
--------------------------------——
'nature of Labcfatory Supervisor
Control
D.O.
Treatment 2
Test Start Dale
/ /
Nnrth_Carollna Cerlodaphnla Chronic PassZFall Reproduction ToxlGlty Te^l
CONTROL ORGANISMS 1 ,2,3 4 5 • 6 ? 8 |9 -r^
CollectiQn (Start) Date
Sample 1 7 / /Qi
Sample Type/Duration
Grab
pipe # OQI County t~M11 ---------------
Comments7^r —I
cLo, tc joey z^W- rM. ry /■> fcsY
ec^Lcmtr<^b on < AT ScT<?n4- Vxrnpl: KR?__
iAscA .
Date: 08/08/01
MERITECH, INC.Performing Test:Comments:
-6.58% Reduction ** PASSED:J
Work Order:MAIL ORIGINAL TO:
10 11 12987653421CONTROL ORGANISMS
Avg.Reprod.% Mortality
252629262624292729242628
L LLLLLLLLLLL
10 11 12987653421 FAILPASS
X262731253129282926332827
Check One
LLLLLLLLLLAdult (Dive (D)ead L L
2nd sample1st sample1st sample
pH 8.387.948.257.938.157.92Control
8.598.278.357.858.087 .69Treatment 2 1st
Grab Comp.
22.7 hrsXSample 1
24 hrsXSample 2
Hardness(mg/1)42
7.687.937.607.81 21407.627.88 1235176
7.387.897.577.71 <0.17.58 <0.17.73Treatment 2
2 . 30.2Sample temp.- at receipt (°C)
Concentration%%%%%%%%%%
%%%%%%%%start/end%%
Control
D.O.pH
Duration(hrs) :
4.41)rev.
- Chronic Pass/Fail and Acute LC50
NPDES#: NC0024201 Pipe#:
High
Cone .
D
I
L
U
T
S
A
M
P
Effluent % : 39%
TREATMENT 2 ORGANISMS
I
# Young Produced
Spec. Cond.(pmhos)
Chlorine(mg/1)
0.00
Treatment 2
Control CV
6.891%
0.00
Control
28.33
Treatment 2
26.58
Control
S
A
M
P
2nd
P/F i
LC50 = __________%
95% Confidence Limits
% -- %
e
n
d
e
n
d
e
n
d
% control orgs
producing 3rd
brood
100%
’ Organism Tested:
Copied from DWQ form AT-1 (3/87)
D.O.
Control
LC50/Acute Toxicity Test
%, combining replicates)
s
t
a
r
t
1st sample
s
t
a
r
t
1st sample
s
t
a
r
t
2nd sample
# Young Produced
I------ ------------------------------
! Adult (Dive (D)ead
I______——____________
North Carolina Ceriodaphnia .
Chronic Pass/Fail Reproduction Toxicity Test
I _
Note: Please
Complete This
Section Also
X__________
Signature of
/ent Toxicity Report Form
;ity: ROANOKE RAPIDS
^oratory
> i
/ .
Mortality
start/end
(Mortality expressed as
[
Signature of Operator in Responsible Charge
-_____________Labo'ta't'tfry Supervisor
Environmental Sciences Branch
Div. of Water Quality
N.C. DENR
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
Chronic Test Results
Calculated t = - 2 .015
Tabular t = 2.508
% Reduction = -6.58
Method of Determination
Moving Average Probit
Spearman Karber Other
County: HALIFAX
Complete This For Either Test
Test Start Date: 08/01/01
Collection (Start) Date nQ/no/ni
Sample 1: 07/30/01 Sample 2: 08/02/01
Sample Type/Duration
Duration
Ceriodaphnia dubia
11/95 (DUBIA ver.
X ’
Waste Water Treatment Plant
Fax [phone]Weldon, NC 27890 [phone]
for this failure could be
the August DMR
There were two unrelated
135 Aqueduct Rd.
'o/ \
The Roanoke Rapids Sanitary District was non-compliant for July,
violations, which resulted in this status.
identified6 How^'^eZ^^
O*E *.
o
Date: 10/18/01
HALIFAXCounty:
ROANOKE RAPIDS
Comments:
-20.42% Reduction *PASSED:
Xork Order:MAIL ORIGINAL TO:
Test
10 11 1298765342CONTROL ORGANISMS
Avg.Reprod% Mortality
212126282321252526= Young Produced 202325
LLLLLLLLLLi Adult (Dive (D)ead LL
10 11 12987653421 FAILPASS
X272932= Young Produced 312630233132263124
Check Onej
L LLLLLLLLLL‘ Adult (Dive (D)ead L
2nd sample1st sample1st sample
8.057.978.048.007.987.96Control
8 . 348.138.167.908.108.00 1st
Grab Comp .
24 hrsXSample 1
24 hrsXSample 2
Hardness(mg/1)44
7.407.907.417.937.40 9497.71 173Cond.(gmhos)
7.127.517.297.867.16 <0.17.73Treatment 2
C . 41.2
LC50/Acute Toxicity Test
Concentration%%%%%%%%%%
%%%%%%start/end%%%%
Control
D.O.pH
Duration(hrs):
4.41)rev.
iI
- Chronic Pass/Fail and Acute LC50
NPDES#: NC0024201 Pipe#:
Spec .
Chlorine(mg/1)
High
Cone.
D
I
L
U
T
23.67
Control
S
A
M
P
e
n
d
Probit
Other
Control CV
10.710%
0.00
Control
e
n
d
0.00
Treatment 2
2nd
P/F
' LC50 = ______ %
95% Confidence Limits
% - - %
e
n
d
S
A
M
P
’.t Toxicity Report Form
Sample
combining replicates)
1
IT
D.O.
Control 2160
DTD
Effluent %: 39%
TREATMENT 2 ORGANISMS
s
t
a
r
t
1st sample
s
t
a
r
t
1st sample
28.50
Treatment 2
s
t
a
r
t
2nd sample
Chronic Test Results
Calculated t = -4.120
Tabular t = 2.508
% Reduction = -20.42
Organism Tested:
Copied from DWQ form AT-1 (3/87)
Method of Determination
Moving Average
Spearman Karber __
I
Note: Please
Complete This
Section Also
-.o4 in Responsible Charge’
------------of Laboratory Supervisor
•atory Performing Test:
C;
Signature of Operat
‘y_____________________
Signature
Mortality start/end
Mortality expressed as %,
North Carolina Ceriodaphnia
Chronic Pass/Fail Reproduction Toxicity
Treatment 2
temp, at receipt(°C)
MERITECH, INC.
Complete This For Either Test
Test Start"Date: 10/10/01
Collection (Start) Date nn/n/ni
Sample 1: 10/08/01 Sample 2: 10/11/01
Sample Type/Duration
Duration
Environmental Sciences Branch
Div. of Water Quality
N.C. DENR
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-16^1
% control orgs
producing 3rd
brood
100%
Ceriodaphnia dubia
11/95 (DUBIA ver.
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
F.1.
F.2.
Number of non-categorical SIUs.a 3
b Number of CIUs,0
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary.
Name:Kennametal
Mailing Address:100 Kennametal Road
Weldon, NC 27890
F.4.
Manufacturing of tool inserts
F.5.
Principal product(s):Thurston Cathode Tool Inserts
Raw material(s):N/A
F.6.Flow Rate.
17,000
b
N/A gptf (N/A continuous or N/A intermittent)
F.7.
Local limitsa
Categorical pretreatment standardsb. Yes (3 No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
i
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Standard Renewal
FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Roanoke Rapids Sanitary District, NC0024201
Pretreatment program. Does the treatment works have, or is subject to, an approved pretreatment program?
S Yes No
RIVER BASIN:
Roanoke
9Pd ( continuous or X intermittent)
Non-process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non-process wastewater flow discharged into the collection system
in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
PART F.INDUSTRIAL USER DISCHARGES AND RCRA/CERCLA WASTES
All treatment works receiving discharges from significant industrial users or which receive RCRA.CERCLA, or other remedial wastes must
complete part F.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
Number of Significant Industrial Users (SIUs) and Categorical Industrial Users (CIUs). Provide the number of each of the following types of
mdustnal users that discharge to the treatment works
Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
0 Yes No
prX^dVthhVinlfo^ationfOrmatiTd°fr 1^811/* 006 discharges to the treatrnent works, copy questions F.3 through F.8 and
Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU’s discharge.
Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater discharge into the collection system in gallons per
day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
F.8.
F.10.
F.11.
Amount Units
N/A
N/A
N/A
F.13.
Newsom Oil Company/Bottom’s Interstate Shell - Gas station located at NC Hwy 46 & I-95. Northampton County Underground Storage Tanks.
F.14. Pollutants. List the hazardous constituents that are received (or are expected to be received). Include data on volume and concentration, if
known. (Attach additional sheets if necessary.)
Lead, Benzene, Chlorobenzene, Ethyl Benzene, Toluene, Total Xylenes. MTBE, TCC - See Attachment D data reports
F.15. Waste Treatment
a.
b.
5 gpm - instantaneous release
NPDES FORM 2A Additional Information
If yes, describe the treatment (provide information about the removal efficiency):
Oil/water separator, low profile trayair strippers. High pressure granular activated carbon polishing filters, backwash system, Mycelx filters.
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Standard Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Roanoke
FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Roanoke Rapids Sanitary District, NC0024201
Is this waste treated (or will be treated) prior to entering the treatment works?
(3 Yes No
Is the discharge (or will the discharge be) continuous or intermittent?
Continuous Intermittent If intermittent, describe discharge schedule.’
END OF PART F.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW (PaGE I) TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS
OF FORM 2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharge by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e g.,
upsets, interference) at the treatment works in the past three years?
Yes 0 No If yes, describe each episode.
Does the treatment works currently (or has it been notified that it will) receive waste from remedial activities?
S Yes (complete F.13 through F.15.) No
t^aStexTfi*^*n ^SCr'^e s**e and tyP6 °f fac*lity at which the CERCLA/RCRA/or other remedial waste originates (or is excepted to origniate in
CERCLA (SUPERFUND) WASTEWATER, RCRA REMEDIATION/CORRECTIVE ACTION
WASTEWATER, AND OTHER REMEDIAL ACTIVITY WASTEWATER:
F.12. Remediation Waste.
RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE RECEIVED BY TRUCK. RAIL, OR DEDICATED PIPELINE: j'
F.9. RCRA Waste. Does the treatment works receive or has it in the past three years received RCRA hazardous waste by truck, rail or dedicated pipe?
Yes 0 No (go to F.12)
Waste transport Method by which RCRA waste is received (check all that apply):
Truck Rail Dedicated Pipe
Waste Description. Give EPA hazardous waste number and amount (volume or mass, specify units).
EPA Hazardous Waste Number
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
F.l.
F.2.
Number of non-categorica) SIUs.3a.
b.Number of CIUs.0
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional pages
as necessary
Name:Westpoint Stevens
W. 13th Street Mailing Address:
F.4.
Towel manufacturing
Principal product(s): Terry Towels
Raw material(s):N/A
F.6.Flow Rate.
1,121,000
b.
N/A continuous or N/A intermittent)
F.7.
a.
Yesb.KI NoCategorical pretreatment standards
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory9
Textile Guidelines
®r
FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Roanoke Rapids Sanitary District, NC0024201
a.Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater discharge into the collection
system in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Standard Renewal
i RIVER BASIN:
Roanoke
Pretreatment program. Does the treatment works have, or is subject to, an approved pretreatment program?
KI Yes No
gpd (X continuous or intermittent)
Non-process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non-process wastewater flow
discharged into the collection system in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or
intermittent.
F.5. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
PART F. INDUSTRIAL USER DISCHARGES AND RCRA/CERCLA WASTES
All treatment works receiving discharges from significant industrial users or which receive RCRA.CERCLA, or other remedial wastes must
complete part F.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
Number of Significant Industrial Users (SIUs) and Categorical Industrial Users (CIUs). Provide the number of each of the following types of
industrial users that discharge to the treatment works.
gpd (N/A
Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
Local limits v KI Yes No
Roanoke Rapids, NC 27870
Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Supply the following information for each SIU. If more than one SIU discharges to the treatment works, copy questions F.3 through F.8 and
provide the information requested for each SIU.
Standard Renewal
F.8.
t
| FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Roanoke Rapids Sanitary' District, NC0024201
| PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED: | RIVER BASIN:
I »Roanoke
Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharge by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed
to any problems (e.g., upsets, interference) at the treatment works in the past three years?
Yes QI No If yes, describe each episode.
Excessive suspended solids have caused solids problems at the WWTP from time to time.
F.1.
F.2.
Number of non-categorical SIUs.3c.
d.Number of CIUs.0
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
Name:Panda Rosemary Cogeneration
Mailing Address:
Roanoke Rapids, NC 27870
F.4 Industrial Processes. Describe all the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU’s discharge
Power generation, steam generation
Principal product(s): Steam & chilled water (peak load electrical generation).
Raw material(s):N/A
F.6.Flow Rate.
variable continuous or
d.
N/A (N/A continuous or N/A intermittent)
F.7.
a.
Yes IZl Nob.Categorical pretreatment standards
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and si'bcategory?
I PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Standard Renewal
Pretreatment program. Does the treatment works have, or is subject to, an approved pretreatment program?
£<] Yes No
FACILITY NAVE AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Roanoke Rapids Sanitary District, NC0024201
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
c.Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater discharge into the collection
system in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
gpd (X continuous or intermittent)
Non-process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non-process wastewater flow
discharged into the collection system in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or
intermittent.
F.5. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU’s
discharge.
I RIVER BASIN-
Roanoke
PART F. INDUSTRIAL USER DISCHARGES AND RCRA/CERCLA WASTES
All treatment works receiving discharges from significant industrial users or which receive RCRA.CERCLA, or other remedial wastes must
complete part F.
GENERAL INFORMATION: f
120 W. 12th Street
Number of Significant Industrial Users (SIUs) and Categorical Industrial Users (CIUs). Provide the number of each of the following types of
industrial users that discharge to the treatment works.
Supply the following information for each SIU. If more than one SIU discharges to the treatment works, copy questions F.3 through F.8 and
provide the information requested for each SIU.
gpd
Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
Local limits ' [X] Yes No
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works Submit additional pages
as necessary.
1
F.8.
PERMIT ACTION REQUESTED:
Standard Renewal
RIVER BASIN:
Roanoke
r ACILi i f NAMt AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Roanoke Rapids Sanitary District, NC0024201
Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharge by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed
to any problems (e.g., upsets, interference) at the treatment works in the past three years?
[J Yes No If yes, describe each episode.
ATTACHMENT D
PART F (F.12. -F.15.)
INDUSTRIAL USER DISCHARGE & RCRA/CERCLA WASTES
11/29/01
ROANOKE RAPDIS SANITARY DISTRICT, NC0024201
ROANOKE RIVER BASIN
Effluent NA NA NA NA NA <3.00
960.0 220.0 31.0
<. Effluent <1.0 <1.0 <3.00
16.0
<3.00
5,460.0 18.0
<1 <3.00
705.0 926.0 142.0 997.0 NA <3.00
<1 <1 <1 <1 <5 <3.00
NA NA NA NA NA <3.00
NA NA NA NA NA <3.00
NA NA NA NA NA <3.00
NA NA NA NA NA <3.0
495.0 955.0 <50.0 23.000295.0
<3.00<1 <1 <1 <1
15.000499.0 624.0 <10 349.0
<3.00<1 <1 <1 <1
5.000915.0 119.0 787.0
<1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <3.00
917.0 13.000139.0 775.0
<1.0 <3.00<1.0 <1.0
5.000NANANANANA
<3.00NANANANANA
<3.00<1.0 <1.0 <1.0<1.0 <1.0
<3.0038.0 42.0 9.2 19.8 440.0
<3.00<1.0 - <1.0 <1.0 <1.0<1.0
<3.0049.0 17.0 9.1 580.0
<1.0 <3.00<1.0 <1.0<1.0
<3.0016.0 6.4 8.9 500.041.0
<3.003.9 <1.0 <1.0 250.0<1.0
<3.0032.0 8.4 14.0 540.045.0
v
Page 2 of 3
TABLE V;
SYSTEM INFLUENT / EFFLUENT CHEMISTRY
BOTTOM’S INTERSTATE SHELL
GARYSBURG, NORTH CAROLINA
fl221g9 Effluent
|fj^7/00 Influent
IB#00-'
68,300.0
<1.0
1,770.0
3.7
1,930.0
2.0
Influent
<03/03/99 ^Effluent
y Influent
•^.Influent
§'•-Effluent
gM&Effluent
luent
11,800.0
<1.0
2,040.0
<1.0
2,060.0
<1.0
1,770.0
<1.0
5,600.0
<1.0
27,600.0
<1.0
1,240.0
<1.0
10.0
<l.t)
2,740.0
<1.0
2,410.0
<1.0
1,800.0
<5
17,200.0
<5
12,400.0
<1
■ 1,080.0
<1
5,630.0
<1
15,200.0
<5
^02/99;- ? Influent
^04^,| Effluent
g9Z30/9gy
E’fo-'00
y Effluent
^.Influent
f Effluent
^Influent
> Influent
Effluent
^.Effluent
Effluent
-^Effluent
• Jnfluent
■ fffiff8/00'; ’- Effluent
■ ^77j9/06^ F Influent
8 E^uent
^ftZO/OO Influent
K.
U ASSOCIATED ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTSAND ENGINEERS, INC.
t1'
gfc ...
<3.00540.014.08.432.045.0Influent <3.0007/20/00 <1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0Effluent <3.0007/20/00 <1.0<1.0<1.03.4<1.0 <3.00Effluent08/23/00 <1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0Effluent 7.808/24/00 NANANANANA <3.00Effluent10/10/00 NANANANANA 3.8Effluent10/19/00 NA. NANANANA <3.0Effluent11/21/01 NANANANANA 15.2Effluent12/21/01 2,4001,4801902,300 •9701NF1-16 <3.0Influent01/16/01 <1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0EFF1-16 10.3Effluent2,4001,0401201,800810INF1-17 <3.0Influent<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0EFF1-17 6.9Effluent01/17/01 2,400720561,500740INF1-18 <3.0Influent01/18/01 <1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0EFF1-18 11.5Effluent01/18/01 3,20014,6001802,8001300INF1-19 <3.0Influent01/19/01 <1.0<1.0<1.0<1.0EFF1-19 5.9Effluent74001/19/01 570160440INF 3.7Influent02/20/01 610<1.0<1.0<1.0EFF 4.7Effluent02/21/01 1,5001,5002802,100830INF 6.2Influent1,10003/21/01 525.78977EFF NSEffluent03/21/01 NSNSNSNSNSINF NSInfluent04/20/01 NSNSNSNSNSEFFEffluent
u 01
B = Benzene
T = Toluene Pb = Lead
E = Ethylbenzene
Page 3 of 3
<1.0
I 1,000
<1.0
X = Total Xylenes
MTBE = Methyl tert-Butyl Ether
-----and Engineers, Inc..
TABLEV:
SYSTEM INFLUENT / EFFLUENT CHEMISTRY
BOTTOM'S INTERSTATE SHELL
GARYSBURG, NORTH CAROLINA
All values are in parts per billion (ppb), Ippb = 1 ug/L
Bold values indicate levels above 15A NCAC 2L standards
NA = Not Analyzed
04/20/01 I
01/16/01 |
01/17/01
mi -1TBS
ATTACHMENT E
BIOSOLIDS PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
(
11/29/01
ROANOKE RAPDIS SANITARY DISTRICT, NC0024201
ROANOKE RIVER BASIN
Roanoke Rapids Sanitary District
1000 Jackson Street P. O. Box 308
Roanoke Rapids Sanitary District
Biosolids Program
Roanoke Rapids Sanitary District
NPDES Permit No. NC0024201
Land Application Permit No. WQ0001989
At present, the District has permitted approximately 2,300 acres of private
farmland for residual application. Approximately 8,000,000 gallons of ~4%
solids is applied to an estimated 450 acres per year. Soil pH is adjusted to
achieve a soil pH as specified by permit conditions.
The last plant addition, which provided treatment capacity, occurred in 1983;
however, several upgrades have been added since that date specifically for the
solids program. A system to thicken WAS from the 0.5% solids range to the 3-
4% solids range was accomplished by the addition of two gravity thickeners
and a drum concentrator. Pathogen reduction for WAS was accomplished by
adding a lime stabilization, mixing, and holding system to maintain proper pH
control. Primary solids are treated through three anaerobic digesters with
solids either dried on drying beds or stored for liquid application. Storage of
treated solids was provided by the addition of an above ground 1.0 MG tank
and by retrofitting two abandoned clarifiers adding 0.375 MG each to provide a
total of 1.75 MG storage.
The District utilizes final alkaline stabilization of waste activated sludge and
anaerobic digested primary sludge in order to meet pathogen and vector
reduction requirements. The alkaline stabilization process and anaerobic
digested primary sludge meets all requirements for pathogen and vector
attraction reduction for Class B biosolids.
/Jr z- X'O / \ w )o
Synagro Southeast, Inc. manages Land application of residuals. The Roanoke
Rapids Sanitary District holds the land application permit and provides a
licensed ORC and back-up ORC as required. Synagro Southeast, Inc.
provides transport and application equipment and personnel. District personnel
perform all treatment of residuals.
R. Danieley GSrown, P.E. Z '
Chief Executive Officer
Roanoke Rapids, NC 27870 [phone] Fax [phone]
STRUCTURE LEGEND
PLANT SITE PLAN
(3ARCADIS
EX ™c SL OCE Ofn C BEDS
1 -fl
&
o
ROANOKE RAPIDS SANITARY DISTRICT
WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
EXS1 K SLUX .
DR1«BEDS
AERATION TANK 1-3
QARIFERS 1 4 2
R.AS. PUPS
DtSNFECDON TANKAGE
DISMFECTION CONTROL BUIOWG
E
T a
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
a
8.
11
11
h
£ o
5I
w
78
fi o
0
Q Q.
35. GRA'ATY SUJDGE THCXENERS fl 4 f2
36. DRUM THCXENER 4 THKXENED SUDGE PUMP STATION
37. UME KX TANKS
38. VAR. TANKS
39. VAR. PUMP STATION
4a SLUDGE TRANSFER PUMP STATION
41. TANKER LOAONG STATION
42. AOD STORAGE TANK
43. OPERATIONS BUOJXNG
44. LABORATORY BULONG
45. BLOVER AND MAK1ENANCE BULDNG
46. SANITARY SEIER PUMP STATION
47. SLUDGE BED ORAM PUMPS
48. GENERATOR
49. MCC
50. MCC
51. TANKER SPILL PROTECTION
52. STORMWATER PUMP STATION
MFWENT DIVERSION BOX
MFUJENT SCREEN
GRIT SEPARATOR
MFUJENT PUMP STATION
MFLUENT VAULT
DISTRIBUTION BOX fl
PRIMARY CLAR1FER f2
PRIMARY CLARIFIER fl
TWCKUNG ALTER DISTRfiUTlON BOXES
ia TMCKUNG ALTER f2
11. TRICKUNG ALTER fl
12. ALTER EHUJENT DIVERSION BOX
11 ALTER REORCULATION PUMP STATION
14. ALTER EFFLUENT PUMP STATION
15. ------ - -
16
17.
18.
19.
2a NOT USED
21. NOT USED
22. NOT USED
21 NOT USED
24. NOT USED
25. EFFLUENT METERING FLUME
26. EFFLUENT PUMP STATION
27. EFFLUENT DISCHARGE
28. PUMPED EFFLUENT DISCHARGE
29. PRIMARY SLUDGE PtAP STATION
3a PRIMARY DIGESTERS
31. SECONDARY DIGESTER
32. DISTRIBUTION BOX
33A. SLUDGE STORAGE
31 MFLUENT EQUAUZAT10N/SL1BGE STORAGE
34. WAS. PUMP STATION
GRAVITY SLUDGE THCKENERS fl 4 f2
□
S
B
0
0
c—>
O or
H
0 -e—