NC0026921_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_19950417

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Fayetteville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Andrew McCall, Regional Manager
1••
EEHN1
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
The Honorable Horace Parnell
Town of Parkton
P.O. Box 55
Parkton, NC 28371
Dear Mr. Parnell:
April 17, 1995
SUBJECT: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Town of Parkton WWTP
NPDES Permit No. NC0026921
Robeson County
1
Enclosed please find a copy of the Compliance Evaluation Inspection Report for
the inspection conducted on April 11, 1995, by Mr. D.T. Jones of this office.
This report should be self-explanatory and contains observations
recommendations.
and
If you have any questions or require additional clarification, please do not hesitate
to contact Mr. Jones or Mr. Michael Wicker, P.E., Water Quality Supervisor, at (910)
486-1541
Sincerely,
d‘Jr
D.T. Jones
Chemist
DTJ/tr
vV✓
r.
Wachovia Building, Suite 714, Fayetteville, North Carolina 28301-5043 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

United States Environmental Protection Agency
Washington, DC 20460
EPA NPDES Compliance Inspection Report
Form Approved
TOMB No. 2040-0003
(Approval Expires 7-31-85
' Section A:National Data System Coding
Transaction
1�N
II
Code
2[
I
3IN.IC
10
10 12
NPDES
16
19 12
11
111 1219.
yr/Mo/day
15
IO
14
11
11
Inspection Type Inspecir
117 18[C j 19�S
1 I
Fac
20�1
Type
I-1
IIIIII11111111111.11111111111111111J11111111
—I
Remarks
_1
—I
21
671
Reserved
I I I69
Facility Evaluation
70I4
Rating
71111
Bl
72111
QA
731
----------------Reserved
I
174 751
I I
I
I
I
I80
Section B: Facility Data
Name and Location of Facility Inspected
Town of Parkton WWTP
Entry Times/—) AM PM
Permit Effective Date
950101
I
11:00
Exit Time/Date
950411 1:00 pm
Permit Expiration Date
991231
Name(s) of On -Site Representatives)
Leonard Green (Lic. Gr. II)
Dan Webb (No. License)
Kenneth McMillan (Lic. Cert. Gr. II)
Title(s) .
"ORC" Chief Operator
Director - Public Works
Back -Up Operator
Phone No(s)
Name, Address of Responsible Official
Horace Parnell
Title
Mayor
Phone No.
. Contacted
Yes No
r' i
Section C: Areas Evaluated During Inspection
(S = Satisfactory, M = Marginal, U = Unsatisfactory, N = Not Evaluated)
S
S
S
Permit
Records/Report
Facility Site Review
S.
_NA_
S
Flow Measurement
Laboratory
Effluent/Receiving Waters
NA
NA
S
Pretreatment
Compliance Schedules
Self -Monitoring Program
NA
_S_
Operations/Mainten.
Sludge Disposal
Other:
Section D Summary of Findings/Comments (Attach additional sheets If necessary) .
1. According to the DMR reports reviewed for the period March 1994 through February 1995, the.plant's effluent was in
compliance with the NPDES Permits Limits except for an exceedence for flow in.March 1994 for which an "NOV" was issued.
There was also a violation for not monitoring temperature for the required frequency. A notice of violation was issued.
2. Portable equipment (from the Red Springs WWTP).is being used to ascertain pH, chlorine residual, and dissolved oxygen.
3. Hydrologic Laboratory of Lumberton, NC does the permit required analytical work.
4. Required logs, calibrations, and records are being adequately maintained.
5. The effluent flow meter was checked/calibrated by the D.S. Dismuke Co. of Greensboro, NC in the last 6 month period.
6. Sludge is still permitted to be applied to the Robeson County Landfill.
7. An Imhoff cone determination of a grab sample of the plant's effluent revealed a trace/liter concentration of settleable
solids. The Supernatant had a low level of suspended solids.
Name(s) and Signature(s) of Inspectors)
D. T. Jones d .
Agency/Office/Telephone
NC DEHNR/DEM/FRO [phone]
Date
hfg L 111 / 9' S
Signature of Reviewer
VA,SA.. O.
Date
't( 1B
Regulatory Office Use Only
Action Taken
Date
Compliance Status
Noncompliance
Compliance

•(continued from section D)
8. DMR reported Data and laboratory reported data were in agreement thus confirming supporting data veracity and reliability.
(Spot check -December, 1994)
9. The over-all appearance of the plant facility was neat and clean.