310226_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20231019

'- TDivision of Water Resources
Facility Number O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
Type of Visit: Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: JO'koutine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access // '. //
Date of Visit: tt� Arrival Time:? Departure Time: County: i n Region: W /
((��y� Farm Name:— Ij�EACI
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Onsite Representative: I I 1 �J�1Gn. rl Itr / / lllz
Certified Operator: w(II( Wt I` -1 FAt),-Av w ,
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop.
to Finish
to Feeder
r to Finish
v to Wean
vto Feedei
vto Finish
Other
Latitude:
Owner Email:
Phone:
Phone:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Design Current
Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
La er
Non -La er
Design Current
Dry Poultry Capacity Pop.
La ers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
1011Y-16
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
❑ Yes [9"&o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑Yes ❑ o ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Ye No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 511212020 Continued

Facilit Number: cZ Date of Inspection:
-a
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
NA ❑ NE
❑No ❑NA ❑NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
oil_
Ho
H
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes IFIX
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
Cr
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,
notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes do ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need [—]Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 24 ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
❑ Yes
[2'No
❑ Yes
No
❑ Yes
[ Ko
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes A ❑ NE
❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
[]Yes Q�W
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes 50
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes o
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Weather
Code
❑ Rainfall []Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes ©�510
❑ NA
❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes E�4
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 511212020 Continued

Facility Number: Date of Inspection: C
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes C144o ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes J ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
❑ Yes
DU>Q,— ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
E31 A
❑ NE
[—]Yes
o
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes D4<0 ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes L.Ep❑ NA ❑ NE
[—]Yes ❑>d� ❑ NA ❑ NE
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes Quit' ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes I ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ - No Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
� t SDuel/11� '�' A t k- %-wl I W 1614t)0.11
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone: " m/ ay 069Kq
Date: % r7 / �
511212020