Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSW5240301_Supplement-EZ Form_20240620 SUPPLEMENT-EZ COVER PAGE FORMS LOADED PROJECT INFORMATION — „ — 1 Project Name w s � Juniper Ridge Subdivision 2 Project Area(ac) 44 3 Coastal Wetland Area(ac) 0 4 Surface Water Area(ac) 2.6 5 Is this project High or Low Density? Low 6 Does this project use an off-site SCM? No _COMPLIANCE WITH 02H.1003(4) 7 Width of vegetated setbacks provided(feet) 8 Will the vegetated setback remain vegetated? Yes 9 If BUA is proposed in the setback,does it meet NCAC 02H.1003(4)(c-d)? N/A 10 Is streambank stabilization proposed on this project? No NUMBER AND TYPE OF SCMs: 11 Infiltration System 0 r 12 Bioretention Cell 0 13 Wet Pond 0 14 Stormwater Wetland 0 15 Permeable Pavement 0 16 Sand Filter 0 17 Rainwater Harvesting(RWH) 0 18 Green Roof 0 19 Level Spreader-Filter Strip(LS-FS) 0 9i 20 Disconnected Impervious Surface(DIS) 0 { 21 Treatment Swale 0 22 Dry Pond 0 23 StormFilter 0 ' 24 Silva Cell 0 25 Bayfilter 0 26 Filterra 0 FORMS LOADED DESIGNER CERTIFICATION 27 Name and Title: Nicholas S.Rightmyer,PE 28 Organization: Joyner Keeny,PLLC 29 Street address: 1051 N.Winstead Avenue 30 City,State,Zip: Rocky Mount NC 27804 31 Phone number(s): 252 977-3124 ( 32 Email: nrightmyer(joynerkeeny.com Certification Statement: I certify,under penalty of law that this Supplement-EZ form and all supporting information were prepared under my direction or supervision;that the information provided in the form is,to the best of my knowledge and belief,true,accurate,and complete;and that the engineering plans,specifications, operation and maintenance agreements and other supporting information are consistent with the information provided here. Designer 0111111111//// \\`��H CAROB/''% • SEAL 9t'•• _ Signature of Desig =Z ' 036243 ••FGINE •19, ��\ 5(..- I' `SSCOTTRG\` ? - 20Zy ///&�71110 Date DRAINAGE AREAS 1 Is this a high density project? No 2 If so,number of drainage areas/SCMs 0 3 Does this project have low density areas? Yes 4 If so,number of low density drainage areas 2 Is all/part of this project subject to previous rule 5 versions? No FORMS LOADED DRAINAGE AREA INFORMATION Entire Site LD 7 LD 2 4 Type of SCM Roadway Ditches Roadway Ditches Roadway Ditches 5 Total drainage area(sq ft) 2,496,978 _ 703,926 1,793,052 _ 6 Onsite drainage area(sq ft) 2,030,657 571,112 1,459,545 7 Offsite drainage area(sq ft) 466,321 132,814 333,507 8 Total BUA in project(sq ft) 397954 sf 124227 sf 273728 sf New BUA on subdivided lots(subject to permitting) 9 (sq ft) 336000 sf 109658 sf 226343 sf New BUA not on subdivided lots(subject to 10 permitting)(sf) 61954 sf 14569 sf 47385 sf 11 Offsite BUA(sq ft) N/A N/A N/A 12 Breakdown of new BUA not on subdivided lots: -Parking(sq ft) N/A N/A N/A -Sidewalk(sq ft) N/A N/A N/A -Roof(sq ft) N/A N/A N/A -Roadway(sq ft) 61954 sf 14569 sf 47385 sf -Future(sq ft) N/A N/A N/A -Other,please specify in the comment box below(sq ft) N/A N/A N/A New infiltrating permeable pavement on 13 subdivided lots(sq ft) N/A N/A N/A New infiltrating permeable pavement not on 14 subdivided lots(sq ft) N/A N/A N/A Existing BUA that will remain(not subject to 15 permitting)(sq ft) N/A N/A N/A 16 Existing BUA that is already permitted(sq ft) N/A N/A N/A 17 Existing BUA that will be removed(sq ft) N/A N/A N/A 18 Percent BUA 20% 22% 19% 19 Design storm(inches) 5.3 in 5.3 in 5.3 in 20 Design volume of SCM(cu ft) N/A N/A N/A 21 Calculation method for design volume Rational Rational Rational ADDITIONAL INFORMATION _ Please use this space to provide any additional information about the 22 drainage area(s): #9=#of lots*max permissable/lot(7000sf) Fraction of lots in each DA=Lot area in DA/Total Lot Area (See attached table) LOW DENSITY DESIGN REQUIREMENTS FOR LOW DENSITY PROJECTS FROM 02H.1003 410 1 Is project below density thresholds set forth in the applicable stormwater rule? Yes 2 Does project maximize dispersed flow and minimize channelization of flow? Yes 3 Has the use of piping been minimized per.1003(2)(c)? I Yes 4 Side slopes of the vegetated conveyances(H:V) I 4:1 5 Maximum velocity in the vegetated conveyances during the 10-year storm? 4.75 6 Are curb outlet swales proposed? No 7 Maximum longitudinal slope of curb outlet swale(s)(%) 8 Bottom width of curb outlet swale(s)(feet) I 9 Maximum side slope of curb outlet swale(s)(H:V) 10 Minimum length of curb outlet swale(s)(feet) 11 Are treatment swales used instead of curb outlet swales? 12 Is stormwater released at the edge of the setback as dispersed flow? N/A 13 Have stormwater outlets been designed to prevent downslope erosion? Yes 14 Are variations to rule.1003 proposed? No ADDITIONAL INFORMATION _ 15 Please use this space to provide any additional information about this low density project: #12:The vegetated setback is not within the state permit area. Drainage Pervious Swale Area BUA area C Q Slope V.,, V,,t„i Flow depth # (acl (ac) (ac) (cfs) (%) (fps) (fps) (ft) 1 4.47 0.00 0.03 0.40 12.53 0.50 5.00 1.68 2.30 2 7.34 0.00 0.13 0.40 20.58 1.00 5.00 2.83 2.30 3 0.44 0.00 0.06 0.40 1.23 0.30 5.00 0.37 2.30 4 0.24 0.00 0.06 0.40 0.67 0.50 5.00 0.32 1.50 5 0.42 0.00 0.09 0.40 1.18 0.50 5.00 0.47 1.50 6 1.73 0.00 0.10 0.40 4.85 1.25 5.00 1.59 1.50 7 0.44 0.00 0.03 0.40 1.23 1.30 5.00 0.76 1.50 8 1.57 0.00 0.18 0.40 4.40 1.30 5.00 1.54 1.50 9 0.51 0.00 0.09 0.40 1.43 2.20 5.00 1.06 1.50 10 0.19 0.00 0.03 0.40 0.53 1.50 5.00 0.48 1.50 11 15.36 0.00 0.04 0.40 43.07 2.10 5.00 4.75 2.00 12 0.56 0.00 0.02 0.40 1.57 2.10 5.00 1.10 1.50 13 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.40 0.08 0.30 5.00 0.05 2.00 14 0.55 0.00 0.07 0.40 1.54 0.20 5.00 0.35 3.00 15 16 17