20160145 Ver 1_Updated Final PCN_20160217

Strickland, Bev
From: Deborah Shirley <[e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2016 3:09 PM
To: Strickland, Bev
Subject: RE: Sterling Phase 20160145
Attachments: Updated Final PCN -Sterling Ph2_02-16-16.pdf
=11
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
919-846-5900 (office)
919-673-8793 (mobile)
www `)arad�;( .com
THINK I3I'I'ORE YOU P INT
From: Strickland, Bev [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2016 2:51 PM
To: Deborah Shirley
Subject: Sterling Phase 20160145
Ms. Debbie,
Can you please send me an electronic copy of the above project?
Thanks
Beveimlly Stimiiiclki and
L aseimfiiiche Adirnhktiratoir
Division of Water Resources
Department of Environmental Quality
919-707-8789 Office
Physical: Suite 1219G, 512 N Salisbury, Raleigh, NC 27604
Mailing: Mail Service Center 1617, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Bev.:Str.i_ckland. i7cda i7r:gnv
Email correspondence to ;arae/ from this ;-ack1ress is , r bled to the
North G amfn a Public blic Rcr;ords Law and rrr;ry be discfrrsed to third p artrc, .
1

Environmental Consultants,
8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Suiie IM, Raleigh, NC 27615 • Phone. (919) g36-5rN10
sandec.com
To: US Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
Attn: Eric Alsmeyer
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
From: Deborah Edwards Shirley
Soil & Environmental Consultants. PA
Re: Sterling -Phase 2
Durham County, NC
Februaryl2, 2016
S&EC Project #5818.W5
NC DWR, 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
Attn: Karen Higgins
Archdale Building — 9`" Floor
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27604
On behalf of the applicant, AF -Four Seasons, LLC (Attn: Craig A. Briner) please find attached a complete
application and supplemental information requesting written concurrence from the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers and the N. C. Division of Water Resources that the activities proposed below may proceed
under Nationwide Permits 14 & 29 and Water Quality Certifications 3886 & 3890. Please contact me at
[phone] if you have any questions or require additional information.
PROJECT SUMMARY
Pro ect Name
Sterling -Phase 2
Pro ect T
Residential Development
Owner / Applicant
AF -Four Seasons. LLC
County
Durham
Nearest Town
Durham
Waterbody Name
UT to Stirrup Iron Creek
Basin
Neuse Basin
Index Number & Classification
27-334-2 & C, NSW
IMPACT SUMMARY
Stream Impact (acres):
0.07
Welland Impact (acres):
0
Open Water Impact (acres):
0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres)
0.07
Total Stream Impact (linear feet):
183
Total Riparian Buffer Impacts (square feet):
Zone 1. 10,583; Zone 2: 6,906
Attachments:
Pre -construction Notification (PCN) Application Form
Agent Authorization Form
USGS Topographic Map & NRCS Soil Survey Map
NCDWR Buffer Determination letter-NBRRO 01-021
Cover sheet & Existing Conditions-SWA & SW -2
Proposed Conditions -SW -3
Impact sheets SW-5-SW8
DWR ONLY:
Stormwater Impact Analysis & Addendum
Post Development Drainage Area Map
City of Durham Approval
DWR App Fee $570

Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Page 1 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
® Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 14 & 29 or General Permit (GP) number: N/A
tc.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
® Yes
❑ No
td.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification - Express ® Riparian Buffer Authorization
1e.
Is this notification solely for the record _Fe
because written approval is not required?ication
record only for DWQ 401
Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ®No
tf.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
❑ Yes
® No
1g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes. answer 1 h
below
❑ Yes
®No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
® No
2.
Project Information
2a
Name of project:
Sterling -Phase 2
2b.
County:
Durham
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Durham
2d.
Subdivision name:
Sterling
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
N/A
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
AF -Four Seasons, LLC
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
D.B.7381, Pg, 682
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
Craig A Briner
3d.
Street address:
1330 Sunday Drive, Ste. 105
3e.
City, state, zip:
Raleigh. NC 27607
3f,
Telephone no.:
919-861-2929
3g.
Fax no.:
N/A
3h.
Email address:
N/A
Page 1 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a.
Applicant is:
❑ Agent ® Other, specify: Owner is applicant-please copy Agent on
correspondence
4b.
Name:
Craig A. Griner
4c.
Business name
(if applicable):
AF-Four Seasons, LLC
4d.
Street address:
1330 Sunday Drive, Ste. 105
4e.
City, state, zip:
Raleigh, NC 27607
4f.
Telephone no.:
919-861-2929
4g.
Fax no.:
N/A
4h.
Email address:
N/A
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name:
Deborah Edwards Shirley
5b.
Business name
(if applicable):
Soil 8 Environmental Consultants. PA
5c.
Street address:
8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 104
5d.
City, state, zip:
Raleigh, NC 27615
5e.
Telephone no.:
919-846-5900
5f.
Fax no.:
919-846-9467
5g.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 12

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
la. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
Parcel ID: 0748-02-90-1473, 0747-02-89-4618 8 0747-
01-99-2657
1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): IMPACT AREA 81
Latitude: 35.8911 Longitude: - 78.8340
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1c. Property size:
t 54.05
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
UT to Stirrup Iron Creek 27-33-4-2
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water.
C; NSW
2c. River basin:
Neuse: Hydrologic Unit Code 03020201
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application: Existing conditions consist of a wooded property with a Duke power line bisecting and jurisdictional stream
adjacent to the southeastern property boundary. The general land use in the vicinity of the project is mixed residential,
industrial and wooded land.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
There are no jurisdictional wetlands within the property boundaries.
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
Approximately 2,178 linear feet
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the proposed project is to provide access and utilities to the site and construct a single family residential
development.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The overall project consists of the remaining construction of single-family residential subdivision (i.e. phase 2) including
lots, utilities and stormwater BMP's. Proposed impacts include one road crossing and one sanitary sewer crossing, both
crossing a perennial stream. Equipment typically used for earthwork and construction such as backhoes, bulldozers,
excavators, graders, pavers etc. will be used.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
El Preliminary ❑Final
Comments: JD Request package has been submitted by
Steven Ball
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency/Consultant Company: Soil 8 Environmental
Consultants, PA
Name (if known): Steven Ball
Other.
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
USACE-site visit conducted with Eric Alsmeyer on April 29 2015 to verify jurisdictional areas onsite; NCDWR-Neuse
Buffer confirmation site visit on January 24, 2001, existing buffer determination letter non -expiring (NBRRO 01-021).
Page 3 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Yes E) No ❑ Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
As per project engineer, no stream/wetland impacts were required for Phase 1.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
N/A
Page 4 of 12

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
la. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ® Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b,
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Welland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number -
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ - non -404, other)
(acres)
Temporary T
W1 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
0
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ - non -404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
S1 (#1) ® P ❑ T
Road Crossing:
UT to Stirrup Iron
® PER
® Corps
18
103
Culvert
Creek
❑ INT
El DWQ
S2 (#i) [_1P ® T
Road Crossing:
Temporary
UT to Stirrup Iron
®PER
®Corps
18
11
Construction
Creek
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
Road Crossing
S3 (#1) ® P ❑ T
Dissipater-
UT to Stirrup Iron
® PER
® Corps
18
38
Permanent, No
Creek
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
Permanent Loss
S4 (#2) ❑ P ® T
Sanitary Sewer.
UT to Stirrup Iron
® PER
® Corps
14
31
Open -cut
Creek
El INT
[:1 DWQ
S5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
183
3i. Comments: Temporary stream impacts will be brought back to pre -construction stream bed elevations and the stream
banks stabilized.
Page 5 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes. ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U S. then individ ally list all open water impacts below.
4a.
4b.
4c.
4d.
4e.
Open water impact
Name of
number —
waterbody
Type of impact
Walerbody type
Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
(if applicable)
Temporary T
01 ❑P❑T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If and or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
5b.
5c.
5d.
5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland
Pond ID
Proposed use or purpose of
(acres)
number
pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No It yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
Page 6 of 12

6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
® Neuse El Tar -Pamlico El Other:
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b.
6c
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer impact
number —
Reason for impact
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Temporary T
required?
81 (#1) ❑ P ❑ T
Road Crossing
UT to Stirrup Iron
Creek
® Yes
No
8.743
5.658
B2 (#2) ❑ P ❑ T
Sanitary Sewer
UT to Stirrup Iron
Creek
® Yes
No
1,840
1.248
63❑P❑T
❑Yes
❑ No
B4❑P❑T
El Yes
❑ No
B5❑P❑T
El Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
10,583
6,906
6i. Comments:
Page 7 of 12

D.
Impact Justification and Mitigation
1.
Avoidance and Minimization
la.
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
S&EC completed a wetland delineation and Neuse River Butler evaluation for the entire property in order to identify
natural resources so that impacts could be avoided & minimized to the maximum extent practicable. Impact Area 1 is a
proposed road crossing to a perennial stream. Proposed impacts include 103 linear feet of permanent stream. 11 linear
feet of temporary stream, 38 linear feet of permanent -no permanent loss stream (i.e. energy dissipater) and associated
riparian buffer impacts. Headwalls and have been utilized to minimize stream and riparian buffer impacts, This impact is
necessary to access the property, Impact Area 2 is a proposed sanitary sewer crossing to a perennial stream. Proposed
impacts include 31 linear feet of temporary stream and associated riparian buffer impacts. This impact is necessary to
provide sanitary sewer to the proposed development. All temporary impacts to streams will be brought back to original
elevations and stream banks stabilized.
Furthermore. the applicant is aware of the regional conditions associated with the Nationwide Permits 29. With respect to
residential developments (NWP 29 -Regional Conditions section 4.0) the applicant does not anticipate any impacts to
streams or wetlands associated with stormwater facilities, there are no impact associated with single-family recreation
facilities, the permanent stream fill required by the road will utilize a NWP 14, the stream classification for this project is C,
NSW (i.e. not Outstanding Resource Waters, High Quality Waters. Coastal Wetlands or welland adjacent to these waters)
and riprap stabilization is not anticipated. The applicant is also aware of the regional conditions associated with the
Nationwide Permit 14, The applicant is not proposing to create any upland for this project: the proposed stream crossing
is strictly an upland to upland crossing. The stream classification for this project is C: Nutrient Sensitive Waters (NSW)
(i.e. not Outstanding Resource Waters or High Quality Waters).
tb.
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques. As per
the project engineer: During construction, an erosion and sediment control plan will be utilized to minimize impacts and
avoid any additional impacts to waters/buffers. Devices that may be utilized include, silt fence, diversion berms and
sediment basins.
2.
Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
❑ Yes ® No
Proposed permanent impacts are < 150 linear feet of stream,
therefore the applicant is not proposing compensatory
2a.
Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
mitigation in the form of mitigation payment but by minimizing
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
impacts. If however, after the review of this application the
USACE/NCDWR determines compensatory mitigation is
required in the form of a payment, the applicant will utilize a
private mitigation bank or the NC Division of Mitigation
Services.
2b.
if yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c.
If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
❑Payment to in -lieu fee program
project?
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3.
Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a.
Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b.
Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
Page 8 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in4ieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
0linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
❑ warm ❑ cool []cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWO only):
0 square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
0 acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
0 acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
0 acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWO
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ®No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 9 of 12

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
® Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why. Comments: Project
engineer has designed level spreaders and bio-retenlion cells for stormwater
®Yes ❑ No
treatment and diffuse flow. Once approved by the City, the Applicant will provide a
copy of the plan and Approval to the DWR for their riles.
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
40.64%
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
® Yes ❑ No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
Per the project engineer. The slormwater management plan (SMP) was submitted to the City of Durham in 2010 and it is
Approved. The project engineer designed the stormwater facilities to meet Durham's
requirements, and have been
designed per the NCDENR Stormwater BMP manual. We have included the Stormwater Impact Analysis (SIA) and the
Addendum to the original SIA, along with drainage area maps and the Cover Sheet with the Approval Stamp signature
and date of 08-20-2010.
fied Local Government
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
Stormwater Program
F
401 Unit
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
City of Durham
® Phase II
3b.
Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
® NSW
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
® Yes ❑ No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HOW
4a.
Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 10 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
la.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes ® No
use of public (federal/state) land?
tb.
If you answered "yes' to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
tc.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
Stale Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.)
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500). Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards.
❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b.
Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ® No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes ®No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no." provide a short narrative description.
We have reviewed the "Draft Internal Policy. Cumulative impacts and the 401 Water Quality Certification and Isolated
Wetlands Programs"document prepared by the NC Division of Water Quality on April 10. 2004, version 2.1. The draft
states that many private developments are unlikely to cause cumulative impacts, including projects such as urban in -fill,
most residential subdivisions and small commercial developments as well as agricultural and silvicultural operations. The
Sterling -Phase 2 project is a residential development. The property is within the City of Durham's, therefore the adjacent
properties that have potential for development will have the following regulations to protect downstream waters: 1) the
Neuse River Basin Riparian Buller Protection regulations. these regulations require limited development within the
riparian buffer areas. in addition to "diffuse flow" requirements and could require Best Management Practices that control
nitrogen if diffuse flow cannot be achieved, 2) the Phase 11 NPDES Stormwater Permit Program, this program includes
permitting requirements for Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4s) in addition to post -construction slormwater
management requirements. We anticipate that the DWR will advise us if any additional information is needed.
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a.
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Wastewater will be discharged into the existing 30" Durham County public sanitary sewer outfall that runs along the
stream, south of the property.
Page 11 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5.
Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a.
Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ® No
habitat?
5b.
Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ®No
impacts?
El Raleigh
5c.
If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Asheville
5d.
What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat? The NC -Natural Heritage Programs Data Explorer Map was used to search for elemental occurrences of
federally protected species listed within 1 mile of the project boundaries. It was determined based on the search that
there are no elemental occurrences that are listed as federally Threatened/Endangered within 1 mile of the project
boundaries.
References: North Carolina Natural Heritage Program Data Explorer Search [October 2. 2015]. Department of
Environment and Natural Resources, Office of Land and Water Stewardship, Raleigh, NC. http:/Avww.ncnhp org/
6.
Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a.
Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b.
What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
The NOAA Habitat Conservalion/Habitat Protection. National Marine Fish Service: Essential Fish Habitat Mapper website
was referenced. No Essential Fish Habitat was identified near the project.
7.
Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a.
Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tnbal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes (E No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b.
What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
Records checks at the State Historic Preservation Office or the Office of State Archeology were not performed. No
structures were observed during the wetland delineation, or within the property shown on the online NC State Historic
Preservation Office HPOWEB GIS Service web search.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a.
Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year Floodplain?
® Yes ❑ No
8b.
If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: Per the project engineer: The proposed crossing is within the
FEMA floodplain and with the backwater from the lake below this crossing, we have a no -rise situation, so the
project is meeting FEMA requirements.
8c.
What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? NC Floodplain Mapping Program
http://fns. nc. oov/rris/HOME. aspx
Deborah E. Shirley
(
February 12,
2016
Applicant/Agent's Signature
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter fromV a pplicant
is provided.)
Dale
Page 12 of 12

Environmental Consultants,
RAI^_ F.0, nr Nrw Rmd, 5uiu 104, Rakg{h, NC 27615
rvhir<.C.
PROPERTY OWNER CERTIFICATION / AGENT AUTHORIZATION
Project Name/Description: ' /w S&EC Project N Si//f
Date:
The Department of the Army
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
Attn: f 1rL. A/�r Field Office, J/a.)�(r
I, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property/properties identified
herein, do authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
(Corps) and Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA (S&EC) staff, as my agent, to enter upon the
property herein described for the purpose of conducting on-site investigations and issuing a
determination associated with Waters of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction under Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. This
document also authorizes S&EC, as my agent, to act on my behalf and take all actions
necessary for the processing, issuance and acceptance of a permit or certification and any and
all associated standard and special conditions.This notification supersedes any previous
correspondence conceming the agent for this project.
NOTICE: This authorization, for liability and professional courtesy reasons, is valid only for
government officials to enter the property when accompanied by S&EC staff. You should call
S&EC to arrange a site meeting prior to visiting the site.
PARCEL INFORMATION
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): 07°/Q- OZ O • / ' c,7 7• oat • pf•',�/�' U7y7 dI �! 2657
Site Address: T122 Cbm /id
City, County, State: DWA Ale,
Property Owner (pleaseprint Date
C
Property
We hereby certify the above Information submitted in this application is true and accurate to
the best of our knowledge.

5818. W3
Project Manager:
SB
5cale:
1 ° = 1,000'
Date:
03/12/15
Le
/ilN
U5G5 Map
Sterling Phax 2
Durham County, NC
5ource: 2013 U5G5 Southeast
Durham Quadrangle
0
RN
O
Evaluatbn Areas
y'
ca,
N
500 1,000 1,500 2,000
Feet

MIB
Mfe
0
F
P%fed Number: Mar TfW: N
5818.W3
Project Manager: Sod Survey Map o soo 1111== t•eoo 2.000
5B 5terlmg Pha5e 2 Feet
5cak: Durham County, NC
I " = 1 ,000'
Date: 5oiru' Durham County Sal �� environmental Consultants, PA
03/12/15 Survey Sheet 40

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
Michael F. Easley, ss, Secrets
�ID�(�
William G. (Bill) Rotas, Secreta
January 24, 2001 JAN 3 0 Z'J01
Todd Preuninger
S & E C. Inc.
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, N. C, 27614
Dear Mr. Preunmger
MENR
rvr w�.,p Nauwu. Faau.,wcea
Subject: Neuse Rive; Basin Riparian Buffer Rules
NBRRO 0 1 -021
Page Rd. Site
S & E C Project # 00 5818
Wake County
The information that was received by the Raleigh Regional Office on January 21, 2001 has been reviewed.
The map and other information was provided to allow a determination to be made as to whether or not the
site would require compliance with the Neusc Buffer Rulc. This project is referenced by the Raleigh
Regional Office as NBRRO 01-021.
The features represented on the Wake County Soil Survey and the USGS S.E Durham Quadrangle
(topographic) naps were evaluated to determine their subjectivity to the Neuse Buffer Rule. Eight features
depicted on the naps were reviewed. On January 24, 2001 1 completed a site visit and determined that
features A.B,C.D,F and H arc ephemeral futures and therefore arc Dot subject to protection under the Neusc
Riva Basin Nutnent Sensitive Watcrs Management Strategy. Protection and Maintenance of Existing
Riparian Areas, Administrative Code 'I 15A:02B.0233 (NCAC 0233) Feature G, below point NBR-10, and
feature G, below point NBR-12. are sabfeet to the Neuse Buffer Rule
This letter only addresses the applicability of the Neuse Buffer Rules on this specific site. Thank you for
your attention to this matter and if this Office can be of any assistance or if you have additional questions,
please do not hesitate to contact us.
Sincerely,
Matt Flynn vv
Frimonmental Specialist
cc r RRO/John Dorney
C ncusbuffl .021 doe
1929 Mail Servke Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1626 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity AMrmative Action Employer 5064 recycled/10% poet-consurnar paper

S&
EC

Site
S&
EC

r
=Va
c
Pif
t
MN Go
C U
t r
MlcJrW
J scrcMID C,8
i�� I Tl �- �/V /l i� � �•'sH
•
j �•
Soil & Environmental Consultants, Int
11010 Raven Ridge Rd • Raleigh, NC 27614
[phone] • [phone]
Web Page www SandEC corn
Protect 8-
Sule:
00.58181'
=13N
m1.:
11wM
-
Figure 2 - Soil Survey
Page Rd Site
Tillett Development Company
Proles
Mgr.: SC
—
Durham County, NC
j �•
Soil & Environmental Consultants, Int
11010 Raven Ridge Rd • Raleigh, NC 27614
[phone] • [phone]
Web Page www SandEC corn

CASE IS
F� SAG
Af.T 7.2D1'.
r u M NOTED
MC W
SWl
<STREA WACIS>
PIN: 070-01.99.2637 PIN: 0748-02-9&1473 PIN: D747-02-09-4618
PID: 213246 PR): 138092
PID: 158035
•
)
< NEUSE BASIN - STREAM/BUFFER
IMPACT MAPS >
STERLING -PHASE
2
ti r.
HORVATH
ASSOC I A T E S
7
PAGE ROAD/CHIN PAGE ROAD DURHAM, INC
d.YY•GMWYMLN
•
IMMIA .MII011p
VICINITY MAP
"N
TvI.c.w..wl•d
I/Y•IwIOnIG•1—YO
•
1i/Y/Ytlt
DwEIVpHbO/wPMENI SUMMARY ?MASE
q'
•
(•'%flora. In+nq
fYaIYVfY)K
Y440 V•�dn.Y
lfdO••Ml•K.
YNe•d
O Z
SUMMARY OF
IMPACTS
•nYw 1.'M(•
n�gntl
OWNER J DEVELOPER
,.,>,,. P9RAMYfOI•IFRGIRM•d14JfY
w
.,�"'
."'°". '"
C7 CV �
AF -FOUR SEASONS LLC
W
IMPACT AREA 1:
IMPACT AREA 2:
"'°"w'
r„
•
Z
1330 SUNDAY DRIVE SUITE 105
�os•n
e.K.....eo
�•
•
RALEIGH,
°+`� •��
N.C. 27607
BLN•Bf CMwntf MACE
RAVOR7AfONYGRfAC6
.�..�ww–
•11»
ai Q U O
19191 861-2929
my
w1.1
1� q
' awe"•^s°
w = Q Z
E-MAIL-. CBRINERaGREENHAWKCORP.COM
•� o...r �o%m�.o
•�.wi wowr rowwnc
"•.. "^�"'.
''
•
•dW KUd
0 f
•
DfS/Ml@9Pf6Gp
fdlAM carte MACry
wK vdn
n
ENGINEER/LAND PLANNER
•�Iw•
w
,. •nee.o. i••.eddF w.Fd•.p
vrw.s�r.mmrvm.a
u:Ydi.dlim�w�r.uwwde..Yc.Yrr
Mid
a O
HORVATH ASSOCIATES. PA
•wY •In•O•f•Mlfldl YddWW
�1. •A.f.dd•Ad
Y•ndOfY.mpl �Jr.mp
�.
.d..•d�K.
16 CONSULTANT PLACE. SLITE 201
TOTAL:
•�•Id dMa
•Awd M•IWOR O -
w1rn
wfn
,
DURHAM. N C 27707
vK ww�rew
Y.wrn
,
P. 191914964990
FEpAi[NTaIAKe. MACS
3FgA4 MAYtRM/LT
ndrue�vc
'
F 19'9) 490$953
M1Y
.•w
.cpm ,=tl.•u `ci
+uwi�r.iie.Ww..nvrn•
.0 vcn
rr o«.\ ,�•wlKa
w..m w....c.m .w.c,n.v
i.•••
nr.I r..K..., . ..\ •.rv.rw
e+no7aelN.fl�49norva+nossociales.comv
� Y•m
\f ••SIT I•C4%wY.CW4y yf
COVER SHEET
p�nesyVe Vdw.-.......e•
.1YIW
ITAVp/4tCw VIfl MK9
ft{NY.LNI.W'UMN`ttR.OM
�OirlldYdl.s
1WVV...•
,.l b•10C
I uV Yr��wGwWI+Vd•G\IW
piy�V MYA'
•
.r•r1awOW� tlil.tlfl
0.a1'.u., .,u Y.Ieq Ki
aV Y, In..p
III �rMn�Nu1
wMu•
Os9 Vf�
MVnIIMYMR
WwY1r.rM
H)UOFDRAW IN
SWI COVER SHEEP
v.•
,�: rYY.r.:.
SW2 D(ISTING CONDITIONS
—cvrd\wv—ra+wofa_
SW3 PROPOSED CONDITIONS
. r•vn.or•uwva
»+Kr �..-. vcr•+••wn
v-mvn.a
\-nvn�aM
SW4 IMPACTS PLAN 6 PROFILE
dnYEdld�WE}!•f�
wwdl dwwdw
v.•uYvdK+
cad®mwnm
wr•vmy
APPROVAL STAMP
CASE IS
F� SAG
Af.T 7.2D1'.
r u M NOTED
MC W
SWl
<STREA WACIS>

fill 11\\\\\\\N,
( \1
\ y�
o* y\N`-�/
\ \ \ \ \ !
�'��
/!ll
I/\�1 1111 I i III1( \\�/�//�/ \\\�
111
I �\
// / If�lll \\ /i/�/�\\\
l\ I 1 1 �/ 1 1 1\\\ \�N N, \
16
%�����\\��
1 /
EX' BLDG ; ( \\ \���\�\�\
\ // \\l I`\III (I I I /\ I G�.rC•
�i�
s n•\ _mss \\ —Fill,-- —iii l \\ \ \\� /
II 111 \\�\\�
N.
-- � •;// II III II ////////, / ! //
N. / / // �\ ( I
/ II(11I�IIIIlli11111\\\ki ��� \�i
I R
1\ 1 I1Il\ \
\ \ \ 1 1(t \ \
\
vq,\\\\\�\\\�\ \\`� //iii\�\x /
�\ \Fill,\\
I 111 �`,���� �// i- ��• � _
PIN: 0747-1 PIN: 0748-02-961473 PIN: 570<Y1 -09-x618
PID: 21324/6 PD: 159094 PID; 15M
op... 11111//11 \_U�111Vi
V�—�>'�� ////�III/III�IJ11, ry
IF
//�/ Illl l
\\\\\�.
`r\\\ J — HORVATH
`�_ ( / AS 3011 A 1 ES
1 \\ s--�\
\
lIk
111 �; _„
Fill,
AiMol
o z
CV O
v/ill
!/" I�ut
Uj
Ill (L
Fil
Fill, ;
EXISTING
j \((/ / // �1( — \ CONDITIONS
r
� JII /
—, l
A, / —! r' r
VF
\ I Xref C:\
\ \N, j
IMPACT AREA \ _ �� !/ _-.. 4��ti ;����.. ,;j
Si DETAILS 5,6
/Ail,
A-F'SP�q,� .• NI�,I
As worm
R °FpR'' 7% ., l // II I l \' 1- £XISTINGGONDITIONS, �= / Jll�l /!�/ 13W
__✓..J kE KING LEAR LN SW2
<s,IEA�,PwAcrs>

A
.I
IMPACT AREA
SW4, DETAILS 5;
WN
r- I I L11
/ r l I I I OrJ 9U
f
� Tr ra
�lJ
C_"�
IV
VM1:;.ff•Ml w
r
AM1
r
WN
.\
aliffin
7 R;:
VIM
M151!oma, ✓ .
�'
I4 N
N
• , it
Li
c7
p
_
W q,
a
J �, r
''; \a4 SF �, . an.
PIN. 0747-0'-99.2657 PIN: 0748.02-90-1473 PIN: 0747.0249.1618
PID. 213246 PID: 159092 PID: 158033
o t, / 1111111 1\a>�;
,1
'
HORVATH
A S 5 0 C I A T E S
r/r� 11111\,\\11111( ����r!///�f'-�, ���11�\� ,...A•.,..�.n
1 \\ • •O•f..Qe. gYeO
1511Al.1.1 1
� F1 \ --. ,� r ZONE I IMPACT
ZONE 21MPACT
/ / I \\\//��//1/
'STREAM IMPACT: p z
TEMPORARY
TREAMIMPA W
// /J % ��/// H
C/) �
A, /(x��i-///
a o
L �J J L -J �j \ \\ ` PROPOSED
CONDITIONS
r- I I L11
/ r l I I I OrJ 9U
�lJ
C_"�
,
VM1:;.ff•Ml w
%�-
ACAUBURDR
jj
spy.•
\
La
d
.\
aliffin
7 R;:
VIM
M151!oma, ✓ .
�'
I4 N
N
• , it
Li
c7
p
_
W q,
a
J �, r
''; \a4 SF �, . an.
PIN. 0747-0'-99.2657 PIN: 0748.02-90-1473 PIN: 0747.0249.1618
PID. 213246 PID: 159092 PID: 158033
o t, / 1111111 1\a>�;
,1
'
HORVATH
A S 5 0 C I A T E S
r/r� 11111\,\\11111( ����r!///�f'-�, ���11�\� ,...A•.,..�.n
1 \\ • •O•f..Qe. gYeO
1511Al.1.1 1
� F1 \ --. ,� r ZONE I IMPACT
ZONE 21MPACT
/ / I \\\//��//1/
'STREAM IMPACT: p z
TEMPORARY
TREAMIMPA W
// /J % ��/// H
C/) �
A, /(x��i-///
a o
L �J J L -J �j \ \\ ` PROPOSED
CONDITIONS
e1 � 947 - �SQf6P
rl
r -. . E41Ef•IC > N
PROPOSED CONDITIONS a
b $W3 woe ram V•
Ey
• .k.4E•(`�' RING LEAK LN
r- I I L11
/ r l I I I OrJ 9U
�lJ
C_"�
,
VM1:;.ff•Ml w
%�-
ACAUBURDR
jj
spy.•
\
e1 � 947 - �SQf6P
rl
r -. . E41Ef•IC > N
PROPOSED CONDITIONS a
b $W3 woe ram V•
Ey
• .k.4E•(`�' RING LEAK LN
e,
' FA . SAG
eH X.y 7.2715
AS WORD
M '3w
SW3
<$'REAM IWACIS'
VM1:;.ff•Ml w
e,
' FA . SAG
eH X.y 7.2715
AS WORD
M '3w
SW3
<$'REAM IWACIS'

,,.` � % Ty ir'e ..fir ri'���^""C

340
330
320
-0+50 0+00 0+50 1+00 1+50 2+00 2+50
CULVERT CROSSING PROFILE
SCALE: I "=40':H: 4'V
• HORVATH
' A S S O C I A i E S
aw. wn.c••aw nw
• .•Nplb •.nlq.lf)
• w•w.n nm min
wN•NuocA roww nv
• ma..n• ms..im
STERLING
PHASE 2
PAGEROAD
DURHAM
NORTH CAROLINA
CULVERT
CROSSING
PROFILE
• 0210,2016
AS SHOWN
CIA/L
-
s4U
CROWN PA
KWAY
Station=
+31.84
Slav
333.66
GUARD
All.
GUARD RAIL
PROP
SED GRADE
4FT BUCK VINYL COII
TED
BLACK VINYL COATE
CHAIN LINK FENCE AL
NG
HAIN LINK FENCE ALOIO
G
LENGTH OF HEAD
ALL
L
NGTH OF HEADWALL
0
T
P OF HEADWALL (UP)
U
e
ev=330.0
TOP OF HEADWALL
DN)
elev=
28.1
16'DIWI
330
100 Y
FLOOD FUTURE
EL.
.44
152 LF
B' Du
'le kw S/S
40.55%
100 YR FLOOD
95 L
io
1
MV Concrete Box CuN
ci
00.9
211 X 24" TF
ICK CUSS I RIPRAP
ON STRE
AMBED AND BANKSaaF
Q TO TOP OF RANK
ITL X 24'
HICK CLASS 1 RIPRAP
RIPRAP SHALL BE f
USH WITH GROUND
ADJACENT
EXTEND T
TOP OF BANK
RIPRAP SH
kU. BE FLUSH WITH GRC
LIND
ADJACENT
EXIST GRADE
N
EXIST GRADE
f
c'
INVERT UPSTREAM=
14.2
INVERT DOWNSTREA
=313.3
DATUM ELEV
310
M
O
N
O Na
M
(O
00
a
1G
ric�+}�
LG
ri
-0+50 0+00 0+50 1+00 1+50 2+00 2+50
CULVERT CROSSING PROFILE
SCALE: I "=40':H: 4'V
• HORVATH
' A S S O C I A i E S
aw. wn.c••aw nw
• .•Nplb •.nlq.lf)
• w•w.n nm min
wN•NuocA roww nv
• ma..n• ms..im
STERLING
PHASE 2
PAGEROAD
DURHAM
NORTH CAROLINA
CULVERT
CROSSING
PROFILE
• 0210,2016
AS SHOWN
CIA/L

0 20 40 80
SCALE: I' = 40'
ANITARY SEWER CROSSING PLAN
SCALE: 1"=40'
D
• HORVATH
A SS OC i A 1 ES
STERLING
PHASE 2
• PAGEROAD
DURHAM
NORTH CAROLINA
SEWER
CROSSING
PLAN
• �' 02-10-2o16
• K. AS SHOWN
-VW/

4+00 4+50 5+00 5+50 6+00 6+50 7+00
ANITARY SEWER CROSSING PROFILE
SCALE: I"=40':H; 4'V
• HORVATH
' ASS OC IA I ES
• ucwa•fw.f.0 wl a�
a�.w ..or1•c.ru•u Ya
• rm.ai.o r.n •owa
• WfuM NM. a!!LLa
Milfw0001 M1NIfID Y6
• Ilpy.wO fpl }.fib
STERLING
PHASE 2
PAGEROAD
DURHAM
NORTH CAROLINA
J[YYLK
CROSSING
PROFILE
• I I
I I
' I I
• I I
. I I
• •� 02.10016
• cu AS SHOWN
. we•np�
• SW8