20072098 Ver 1_Application_20071212

srfWto
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
~~
. ~'
~~< ~
~ . ~ .~
~'a7~1/;%` G%J
'T~t"i~,lr
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION `~~~YYY~y' `~~
MICHAEL F. EASLEY. LYNDO TIPPETT
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
DECEMBER 6, 2007
NCDENR Division of Water Quality
Brian Wrenn ~ ~ "~ 'Z ~i `i
2321 Crabtree Blvd.
Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
RE: Linear Transportation Project / SR 1506 Bridge #287 /Columbus County
State Project # 6B.202414.9
USACOE NWP#14 / NCDENR WQC 3704
Dear Mr. Wrenn:
Enclosed, please find seven (7) copies of a PCN and related documentation for a Linear
Transportation Project along SR 1506 (Bridge #287 Replacement) in ColumbusCounty. The
project will be completed in compliance with NCDENR Division of Water Quality General
Certification 3704, and, USACE Nationwide Permit #14.
This project is being submitted under the 401 Automated Payment Procedure. The State
Project Number is 6B.202414.9, the permit fee is X240.00.
A separate copy of this submission has been forwarded to Ken Averitte of the Fayetteville
Regional Office.
If you should have any questions or comments regarding this notification, please feel free to
contact me.
Sincerel ,
i~ui S°
~ i
James . Rerko, PWS
Division 6 Environmental Officer
P. O. Box 1150, Fayetteville, NC 28302-1150 -Telephone [phone] -Fax [phone]

~ys~~o~
p'
•,.,,s'
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
~ ~ ~~~~
f~
O,c , (! ~~
r~ ~ ' ~ J 2 `~ ®I
T~ F~yir ` ~Q
ND~ gN~'yA7ti Q~
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION `T0R nv ~~~ r
MICHAEL F. EASLEY W. LYNDO TIPPPcy
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
December 5, 2007
NCDENR Div. Water Quality '
Brian Wrenn
2321 Crabtree Blvd.
Suite 250 ~ ~ O
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 O
Dear Sir:
Subject: Notification for Permit -Nationwide Permit #14 / 401WQC 3704
Bridge #28? / SR 1506 / Columbus County
State Project # 6B.202414.9
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to replace Bridge #287
along SR 1506 in Robeson County. During construction, traffic will be detoured off-site using
existing secondary roads. This project was reviewed with Richard Spencer (COE) and Ken
Averitte (DWQ Fayetteville) on June 20, 2007. Since the project does not impact jurisdictional
wetlands, Mr. Spencer determined that notification to the Corps of Engineers was not necessary.
The existing bridge was built in 1955 and has a sufficiency rating of 15.9. Bridge #287 is
considered structurally deficient or functionally obsolete, and it exhibits severe deterioration of all
components. The superstructures are composed of reinforced concrete deck on timber joists.
End bents and interior bents are timber caps on timber piles. The exiting bridge is single-span
18'6" foot long and has a clear roadway width of 24 feet.
The existing bridge will be removed in accordance with the NCDOT Best Management Practices
for Bridge Demolition and Removal (BMP-BDR). The proposed bridge replacement is a Case 3
demolition project. Removal of the end bents and fill material excavated to natural ground
elevation will restore floodplain capacity. The timber components of the bridge will be removed
without dropping any components into Waters of the U. S. There is potential for small amounts of
concrete components of the bridge deck to be dropped into Waters of the U.S. during demolition.
The resulting temporary fill associated with demolition of the concrete deck is estimated to be 7.5
cubic yards.
The replacement structure for Bridge #287 will be a 49.5 LF 24'3" x 7'4" Aluminum Box Culvert
w/ headwalls. The approach roadway will maintain the existing horizontal alignment and will be
approximately the same elevation as the existing roadway. There are no deck drains proposed
P. O. Box 11 S0, Fayetteville, NC 28302-11 SO - Telephoto [phone]- Fax [phone]

over open water. NCDOT Hydraulics Unit has completed a HEC-RAS Flood Study for the UT
to the Lumber River to ensure that the proposed culvert can convey the 100-Year Flood. The
existing bridge has a 115 sq. ft opening, while the proposed aluminum box culvert will have an
effective opening of 121.8 sq. ft. The proposed 100-Year Flood Elevation will be 99.6 feet,
compared to 100.2 feet for the existing condition. Once the project is completed, the 100-Year
Flood elevation will be decreased 0.6 foot.
The UT to the Lumber River is located within the Lumber River Basin, subbasin 03-07-58, and
hydrologic unit 03040203. The North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) has
designated a best usage for the UT is C:Sw. There are currently no 303(d) impaired waters, high
quality waters (HQW) outstanding resource waters (ORW), drinking water supply waters (WS-I
and WS-II), or 3030(d) listed streams within one mile radius of the project study area.
The United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) has identified three endangered species (E)
and one threatened species due to similarity of appearance (T(S/A) in Robeson County. No
habitat was available within the project area for any of these species.
We are requesting the issuance of a Nationwide Permit #14 authorizing construction activities
associated with the replacement of Bridge #287. NCDOT will comply with all conditions of the
NCDENR DWQ 401 Water Quality Certification 3704. The project will be conducted "in the
dry" in accordance with the NCDOT BMP Manual for Construction and Maintenance Activities.
If you should have any questions, or, need additional information please contact James J. Rerko,
FWS at [phone].
incerely
7W
James .Rerko, PWS
Division 6 Environmental Officer
ATTACHIvvSEEIVTS
cc: Mike Summers
L.L. Sonny Upole, P.E.

Office Use Only: Form version March OS
20072098
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
L Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ^ Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
^ Section 10 Permit ^ Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification ^ Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP#14
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ^
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ^
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ^
II. Applicant Information
1. Ovmer/Applicant Information
Name: Greg Burns. P.E. / NCDOT /Acting Division Engineer
Mailing Address: Boa 1150
_ Fayetteville, NC 28302
Telephone Number: 910-437-2611 Fax Number: 910-486-1959
E-mail Address: gburns(a),dot.state.nc.us
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority. far the owner/applicant.)
Name: James J. Rerko. PWS
Company Affiliation: NCDOT /Division Environmental Officer
Mailing Address: Bog 1150
Favetteville, NC 28302
Telephone Number: 910.437-0208 Fax Number: 910-486-1959
E-mail Address: jjrerko~a,dot.state.nc.us
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 1 of 8

III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Bridge #287 Columbus County
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): 6B.202414.9
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIl~:
4. Location
County: Columbus Nearest Town: Boardman
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number):
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.):Travel east along US 74
from I-95. Turn onto SR 1506. Travel along, SR 1506 anarozimately %: mile to bridge.
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 34.4470 °N 78.9460 °W
6. Property size (acres): 0.1 acres
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: Lumber River
8. River Basin: Lumber River
(Note -this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/adminJmapsi.}
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: SR 1506 is a 20 foot wide secondary roadway with a miz
of residential and agricultural uses.
Updated 11/1/2005
Page Z of 8

10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: NCDOT
uronoses to realace a short wooden /concrete bridge structure with a 49.5 24'3"g7'4"
Aluminum Bog Culvert w/headwalls. The culvert will be lifted into position with a
crane. then bacldilled and the roadway saved.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: Replace a structurally deficient bridge.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.Richard Sgencer (COE) and Ken Averitte (DWQ) reviewed the
rp oiect 06/20/07
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
None
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. ff additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: A 49.5 LF 24'3"g7'4"
Aluminum Bog Culvert will be installed within the UT to the Lumber River. There will
be a 25.5 LF stream impact.
u~tea iini2oos
Page 3 of 8

2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact Type of Wetland
(e.g., forested, marsh,
herbaceous, bog, etc.) Located within
100 year
Floodplain
es/no Distance to
Nearest
Stream
linear feet) Area of
Impact
(acres)
N/A

Total Wetland Impact (acres) N/A
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property:0 acres
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acres e, multi 1 len h X width, then divide b 43,560.
Stream Impact
Number
indicate on ma
Stream Name
Type of Impact
Perennial or
Intermittent? Average
Stream Width
Before Im Cr Impact
Length
linear feet) Area of
Impact
(acres
Bridge 28? UT to Lumber
River Culvert Perennial 18 ft 49.5 0.02

Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 49.5 0.02
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Open Water Impact

Site Number
indicate on ma)
Name of Waterbody

(if applicable)

Type of Impact Type of Waterbody

(lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay,
ocean, etc.) Area of

Impact
(acres
NIA

Updated 11/1/2005
Page 4 of 8

Total Open Water Impact (acres) N/A
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project:
Stream Im act acres : 0.02
Wetland Im act (acres : N / A
O en Water Im act acres : NIA
Total Im act to Waters of the U. S. acres 0.02
Total Stream Im act linear feet : 49.5
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ^ Yes ®No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ^ uplands ^ stream
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation,
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond:
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Lnpact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.Bridge 287 is a 18.5 foot span
over an excavated drainage channel. The proaosed culvert will arovide a safer crossing for
the travelingaublic while conveying the eaaected 100 Year Flood events.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
^ wetlands
installation of
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 5 of 8

freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina (see DWQ website for most current
version.).
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
Mitigation is not required
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at htt~//www.nceep.net/panes/inlieureplace.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed,
please check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet):
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet):
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount ofNon-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested {acres):
Updated 11/1/2003
Page 6 of 8

IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federaUstate/Iocal) funds or the use of
public (federaUstate) land? Yes ® No ^
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ^ No
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ^ No ^
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's {or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all .impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse}, 1 SA NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 {Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ^ No
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
* Impact Regtured
Zone ~~,,..,,,,~ ~„~~ Multiplier *,~.~,,,,,~~~
3 (2 for Catawba)
I.5
Total
' Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration I Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260.
Updated t l/1!2005
Page 7 of 8

XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious levelAn Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan
has been developed for this aroiect and the NCDOT will utilize standard BMP's.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
N/A
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ® No ^
Is this anafter-the-fact permit application? Yes ^ No ^
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ^ No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description:
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).

ApplicantlAgent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided:)
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 8 of 8

't""'._ ~ 4 t i
~ ~Fi4 14~ ~ ,~ 4l4~i4'~'~~~i~ '~ t~
~~,',t4i ,~~ # 4'~4 i r~$~ ~~,.m.
# i4 :l
~`4 ~ # ~ 4, ~ ~ • 4i4 .~ ,4 4t
i ~ 4 ~ i,
# i , 4, ,4
t+ 44'4 i4''~ # 14' !~ 14 ~
~~ 4,4F.~i 4 ;4 141 i
~ i
4~~~i,}, 1.44,4«41~ ~ 4, ~44 '4#i
~,# ; # ~! # #, a~ L~
!
y. _ __
~ k~ 13 +~~f1 ~*il~~ ~I o
J
~.~ ~ ~
to i __ ~_
~.
t
_ - e
C _ 1
c
U
N
0
U
ti
- _~ N
Q ~
d

e~
J. ~ 0~5~
85 "
I ~'/~

~- ~
~~
~ ~
• N O
rnU
. _._ o E
z~
o
U
v
v
d' N
i r~i v
°m
~~
0
'OO J U
`•~ U~
/~~
F ~ ~' ~ t i4r 4` r 4 ~ T ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~' ~~~ 4i l~ ~ q i ~ ~.# ~. 14 I___~;T4 4 , ' - ~ , ° _ ---- - _,. ~____~~
~ 4 i4 ~' ~. ~'~ 4 I~ r '~44~ d' ; 1, ~ X4.4 i 4 4 I 4 ~ r 4
4 - 4 4 4 4 i_ 4 i
~~~, 4,444 44~ ,~ f~i4444444 44,4 !444'4 4'4y'44~1~4 4 r4 ~~f ?, f~ r+4.~
~M~4 4~~,t 1 ~ 4,414,4 44~4~~~4~~ ~ ~~ 44,,,4 ~4 14r~ l4 4 ~ ~~4~4 r4 # 4 ,4'444 '~
,~, ~~ ~ 4 ,4 ' f ~,4 ~4 ~'i , 4 r 44 !4 4~, ~~ ~ , , i t r ~; '
~4,~~ ~144r#' 14 141 'T--4444r ~'~t~' # ~~ ,4~4~4'l444r'44':414 ~4 ~i4 44 44 :} 41 ~ 44~ i44~ o
a~ .4 ~- ~ 14; 4 i~' 1 r~'?'4 ~4 44~ 4 ,4 4 r4 r 4~ 4 r li 4' ~ ~ 44 ~4 .~ t14 4, ~ N
~ ~r 4 ~4i4! 444~A X44444 ~4414r44, 141!4 ~~•4+4. I r4~~ , 4 '1 ,4~~ 4 w ~
}414,44 ~ '~4'4 r4 r~' 4t r~44~~~f4 ~~Id ~ 14a ~ 'i ~4 ~ ,'~i ` 1~
}~ii_41~` 4 i .4r~' 4 i4' '~'4 # ~' I 4 uo a~
a4~ M~'~4}r-r# ~;~'~~.~~~~~# ~' _~~4~4#r#~,~,# #~ `,#~. g ~' .~1 ~ r ~44,,04~~'44 4 ~N
o4T~,-# # r4 r i'4i. #- ~ ?' ~ ,4rt~i, 4; ,' ~,4 {14:~x' ' ~~ ~ ~1 1~~#, y #r ~•-
~ 4 1!~'s~,41~fp, *#i## ~~~I +i~'i ~:/14.4i4444 4 4 414x4 I "} ~~ ~` '--~. 4~4 : m~
~ d ~ ~ ,t 1 ;,'~~°~ # ` ~ ~~ ~ ~'~ , / 14 ~ ~ 44'4"~ ~ 4 ~ ~ ~, ~ ~ ® ~ ~ z o ~'i
i' # ~ ,4~#.t~ r~ ~ ~ ~ ~~_ ,' 4{~f $ 'mod
i ~.

~r
QR'-
-.,~
~~'~
-~ ,
:Y~
~% I-
__ • ' '.
____' i~ c ~' ~
i` ` .~ ~ O 1
/ ~ Tp t r r f
~/ ~~ 1 ~ ~ /
~ r ~
a` ~ j
~ QA~I~ ~~ ',~
~' ~
p~
Of
n
U

RECOMMENDATION
;' ~ STAl0+09
. 1 ~ 24'3" x T4" ALUM. BOX
• 80` SKEW
~\ T\
woods STA.9~
P.O.T.
~PP
^T
TO SR•~506
~gRD,NAN ` ~ ~ _- -
~~
--'1
~ ~
i i~
~'~ ~ STA 10+ 0
iD i B.O.B. (PK)
/~~~ irn i
POND i~ ~ ..HEADWALLS
REQUlREO
~ ~
WOODS

- za esr ro ---~
- ----- -~. ____ SR,1508
STA. 10+18.6

i
.yY
of*a
~~..~ '`
.....d
~. N
_. ~,, + ~ y ,a 3
s
,;~.
h ~A-
~~ ~ .A ~ ~ {$~}
`r
~~~ 'd" y. ~, I .
~' J
s~`a ~ "
~ ikN
}' ~ ~' b' tr ,y_
~;~ ~~ ~
~~ ~ ~~ ~
'~4' -, .:~ .~ ors ~,.
r
,c-
.. t _., _ -~°r , - ~ffid'. ter: ; h z°~'4 t :
.~ ,e
r~ ~~. ~
,% iS~ °~~
~•. .

,:r