20072081 Ver 1_401 Application_20071207

(~ .
To: N.C. Division of Water Quality
401 Oversight/ Express Permits Unit
Attn: Cyndi Karoly & Lia Myott
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604-2260
From: Kevin Martin
176 Juniper Trail
Franklinton, NC 27525
Re: Request for Buffer Approval (NO Application Fee Required)
Access Path to Pier at
176 Juniper Trail - Beechwood Hills North Subdivision
Franklinton, Franklin County, NC
December 10, 2007
Hand Delivered
0 7- 2 0 8 1
Please find attached a complete application and supplemental information requesting Riparian
Buffer Authorization. Please contact me at [phone] if you have any questions or require
additional information.
PROJECT SUMMARY
Pro ect Name 176 Juni er Trail
Pro~ect T e _
Pier Access Path for Sin le Famil Lot
Owner / A licant Kevin Martin
Count Franklin
Nearest Town Franklinton
Waterbod Name Bill s Creek

Basin /Sub-basin _ _
~~,,,~ (9
Index Number _
28-20

Class _
WS-IV;NSW
IMPACT SUMMARY
Total Riparian Buffer Impacts (square feet): 250
Attachments:
Pre-construction Notification (PCN) Application Form
Figure 1, USGS Site Vicinity Map
Figure 2, Soil Survey Vicinity Map
Figure 3 County GIS Vicinity Map
Pier Plan & Detail Showing Buffer Impacts (2 Sheets)
Overall Lot Site Plan
Map of Beechwood Hills Subdivision
+,'~ , P
u;
L'.-~ 1 ~ 2~~7
'~t:T.:'~Ml~;= `t°'D tr?n~sd!R'.9T~p 9RAPlCH

~ ;~
Office Use Only: Form Version March U5
~~-208 ~
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
I.
II.
Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
^ Section 404 Permit ® Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
^ Section 10 Permit ^ Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
^ 401 Water Quality Certification ^ Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested
None
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ^
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ^
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ^
~'rtr s ccir ~ ~~~'
1. Owner/Applicant Information ~~ ~.;~
Name: Kevin Martin L`~.(, ~ ~~ ~'J%7
Mailing Address: 176 Juniper Trail
Franklinton, NC 27525 ~^ rx ~ ~~ r, ~~ t ~~~'~,~,~,~
Applicant Information
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: None
E-mail Address: kmartinta'~.sandec.com
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: N/A
Company Affiliation:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number:
E-mail Address:
Fax Number:
Page 1 of 9

•~ r
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: 176 Juniper Trail Access path to Pier
2. T.LP. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): N/A
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 1866-64-7989
4. Location
County: Franklin Nearest Town: Franklinton
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Beechwood Hills North
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.):
The property is bordered to the east by Billys Creek with Juniper Trail providing
access from the west From Raleigh take Capital Blvd./ US-1 N. Continue to follow
US-1 N to Highway 56 East at Franklinton. Turn right on to Hwy 56 East toward
Louisburg then in downtown Franklinton (about 0.4 miles) turn left on Main Street
~HWY 1-A North) Follow Main St north thru town (0.5 miles) and turn right on
Pearce St (there is an old white block building where you turn and you will
immediately cross a railroad track) then take the next left on to Winston street (it is
only 100' from the RR Track to Winston St). Take Winston St. about 0.5 miles, then
turn right on Beechwood rd and go about 0.5 miles then bear left onto Autumn Dr
after you pass thru a security pate. Take Autumn drive to the end (about 0.4 miles)
and turn left on Juniper Trail Take Juniper for 0.3 miles and bear left onto the
driveway of 176 Juniper Trail the driveway is about 0.3 miles long. The pier site is
on the lake behind the house Call 919-270-7941 if you need to schedule a site visit.
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 36.1257°N. 78.4353°W
6. Property size (acres)
+/- 14.5 acres
Page 2 of 9

~' r
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: Billys Creek (WS-IV;NSW); 28-20
8. River Basin: Tar-Pamlico
(Note -this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: The site has been a single family lot since 1998 ;prior to
development, the site was forest land. Land use in the vicinity of this site is a mix of
residential development and forestland.
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The
previously approved project consisted of the construction of a low density housing
development that included the approval of infrastructure roads and dam
construction.
This application is requesting the construction of a pier for the individual homeowner
at 176 Juniper Trail. Pilings will be installed by hand. The path area was cleared
prior to the effective date of the TAR-PAM buffer rules and has been maintained
since then with the future intention of an access way to a pier. The proposed access
path to the pier through the buffers avoids the large trees that remained after the
initial clearing, therefore large equipment will not be needed within the riparian
areas.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The purpose of the proposed work is to
provide water access for the homeowner in an existing home to the previously
approved lake.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.LP. project, along with
construction schedules..
On 4/13/98, I received an Approval of a 401 Water Quality Certification for construction
of the lake and road crossing(DWQ WQC #970695). On 7/28/97, I also received a 404
Nationwide 26 Permit Verification, (Action ID#199700992) for the lake and a road
crossina.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
No future permit requests are anticipated for this lot.
Page 3 of 9

VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: There are no proposed impacts to
Lurisdictional waters within this application request.
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
Wetland Impact Type of Wetland Located within Distance to Area of
Site Number Type of Impact (e.g., forested, marsh, 100-year Nearest Impact

(indicate on map)
herbaceous, bog, etc.) Floodplain Stream (acres)
(yes/no) (linear feet)
N/A None N/A N/A N/A 0
Total Wetland Impact (acres) 0
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: The lot contains
no wetlands only waters of the state (streams and a lake)
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X width, then divide by 43,560.
Stream Impact
Perennial or Average Impact Area of
Number Stream Name Type of Impact Stream Width Length Impact

(indicate on map) Intermittent?
Before Impact
(linear feet)
(acres)
N/A N/A None N/A N/A 0 0
Page 4 of 9

Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 0 0
Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Open Water Impact
Name of Waterbody Type of Waterbody Area of
Site Number
(if applicable) Type of Impact (lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay, Impact
(indicate on map) ocean, etc.) (acres)
N/A N/A None N/A 0
Total Open Water Impact (acres) 0
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project:
Stream Impact (acres): 0
Wetland Impact (acres): 0
Open Water Impact (acres): 0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 0
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? Yes X No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
N/A
8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ^ uplands ^ stream ^ wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): N/A
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond: N/A
Size of watershed draining to pond: N/A Expected pond surface area: N/A
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts. The applicant is proposing to
Page 5 of 9

construct all pier posts by hand in the lake to avoid additional temporary impacts of the
riparian buffers No new vegetation will be removed for the access path, the proposed
path area is within an area that was cleared for that purpose prior to the buffer rules and
has been maintained since clearing in 1999.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
httn: /Ih2 o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strnlgide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
Because no impacts are proposed to jurisdictional areas, no stream or wetland
mitigation is proposed. Additionally the riparian buffer impacts proposed are
considered "allowable" therefore no riparian buffer mitigation is proposed, please
see section X.3 for details.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
Page 6 of 9

w
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): N/A
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): 0
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount ofNon-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ^ No
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether aNEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ^ No ^
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ^ No ^
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ® No ^
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
INDIVIDUAL LOT PIER Access Path
Zone* Impact
(s uare feet) Multiplier Required
Mitigation
1 150 3 0
2 100 1.5 0
Page 7 of 9

Total 250 0
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration /Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260. Riparian buffer impacts proposed are to
activities defined as Water dependent structures and are considered an "allowable"
use within the NCAC 02B .0259(6): Table of uses, therefore mitigation is not
required. In fact, in the Catawba and the proposed Randleman Rule revisions a
request for approval is not even required for impervious access trails (the activity is
exempt). Unfortunately, access trails were not gaddressed in the TAR PAM Buffer
rules.
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
Stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level. The lot is over 14 acres and there is one
single family home on it with a driveway so the impervious surface coverage is well
below 20%, actually it is in the range of 3 to 5%.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility. The
existing home is connected to an existing county approved septic system.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ^ No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ^ No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ^ No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwctlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description: I have
reviewed the "DRAFT Internal Policy, Cumulative impacts and the 401 Water Quality
Certification and Isolated Wetland Programs" document prepared by the NC Division of
Water Quality on October 3, 2002, version 1.6. The proposed project does not require a
401 Water Quality Certification or Isolated Wetlands Permit therefore according to the
Page 8 of 9

NCDWQ Draft Internal Policy, a qualitative or quantitative impact analysis should not be
required.
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
10. 2007
Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 9 of 9

TopoZone -USGS Franklinton (NC) Topo Map
»,
Page 1 of 1
0 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.2 1.5 km - la
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 4.3 1 mi
~

~~ • USGS Franklinton (NC) Quadrangle
Projection is UTM Zone 17 NAD83 Datum pt=_~,r}~~~
i;-1, =p~
http://www.topozone.com/print.asp?lat=36.11438&lon=-78.44771 &size= l&u=5&layer=D... 12/4/2007

Soil Map-Franklin County, North Carolina
(176 Jumiprt Trail Pier) ~
S~
N Meters
A 0 350 700 1,400 2,100
Feet
0 1,500 3,000 6,000 9,000 ~~ ~
(;53.-~~ Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 2.0 ~ ~ ~ 12/4/2007
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 3

GoMAPS -Franklin County NC Public Access
__~ _
t __ ;..I III , i 4 '7 ;} I ~ i I ,~~ .' I - --- -- - ~_._..-
_._ __ .,
_..__
-~__.
;,~ _ - - I
,r,
~ t `f ~_ . I
5, ..
i i i - --~ 1
-.-,
~ tFSf~lLt,~ iiH ~ ~ _ __ -_ ~_.,_ U=. F•: ~C3Ff=5 ~ L(°;
,:.
t
_ I _~--~' --3_~1..1.~ ~ --t'-a- 1 - e ~. _ _ _ _ _ - 1__.:_t-,i.._L_l~L_i~F__~~'~~---
..~..__---- 1
_ .._..._
t
',' x 1 ( 1 _ _- , t I I
_ ~ i ~ ~~ t,. L _ ~ _. a, _
I ~ ~_,ii~t, ,I - ~_ ~ ~~ i i ,
~ ~ -.
.~ /~ _
1
1 p_ ~. - ~ ~ ~_~ ~
.,
a
~_ ~ - _ a ~'~ ~-~
~{ ,
_.~__..._.._ -- .~~_-3___~ { ~ _ - ~ J ~ -
~Ti~ ~ I 11 ~-~ F _ _ -,. I ~-
- ~ ~ ~i -
,~ .
~, ~ ~ ~ ~ _
$) Lj: 3
~ ~. Z ~ ~ 1 ~jf_= .~ ~ ~ _ ~ ~~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ I' - X11
:_ ,,~
7 4
~ 11 ~ r~~~ t, _~ I ~
r
***WARNING: THIS IS NOT A SURVEY!***
This map is prepared for the inventory of real property found within this jurisdiction, and is compiled from
recorded deeds. plats, and other public records and data. Users of this map are hereby notified that the
aforementioned public primary information sources should be consulted for verification of the information
contained on this map. The County and mapping company assume no legal responsibility for the information
contained on this map.

RC1AD5 LEGEND
PARCELS
C ITY LIMrf S
BUNN
CENTERVILLE
FRANMCLIN7ON
LflUISHURG
W/~l(E FflRES7
YQUNGSVILLE
COUNTYLINE
Tuesday, December 4 ?007
N
F;9.3

-~ ~ _ .

1
I
N'T S I I
I I
/ /
/ /
s-o
f MPgrV, ~ ~~5 ~ ~et'
path to home ~'
Length of acess way I
wilt vary depend~ng~upon
shoreline co d~t~ons
1 ~( 2x6 Decking
~ry~ '` ~`i PT
Wood Pile below S~aCE
Lire
p f e 8 ± ~ ~.' LAKE
i ~/ -''
PLAN VIEW I of 2

;~IAL
~.
M~f
mwcr 2
tuLLlES alca PARINfRS. uc
O.B. 1JN, PG 587
Pw/ le6s-6s-ute
~~

nuao ~ +[- e
5
• 1t1)D.t 2. r~q .
it/c ~`
b` ~ ~J.
~ v ~~\
~ ~" ~ ~c ~
` ~6
„s °~ ~ ~ yti
iwG Ks N/f
"'~ TRACT 3-B
GARLAND G. t fA1TN Y. M/0CN15
D.B. 1151, PG. 81
Ir a.~a v.a Vw/ 1866-54-9717
nur~ IInE
N/f
TRACT 2
ORItES CRCEt[ VAR iNERS. UC
O.B. t}N, PC. 587
V1N/ 1866-66-1218

.-r q
~\
4
~~
WeU
16'
V{CIN{TY MAP
LECENO:
EIP - E7oS TNG RON Ppf
CPtc - EIa51RIG PK NAIL
NIP - NETT RON PIPE SEi
R/t/ - RtCItT Of MAV
CAN - CABLE iv Wx
f! - EEECIRtC eox
TEl - TEIEP-tONE PEDESTAL
P- - IOMER POLE
ONl - pYERNEAO IINf
LP - LN?/T POLE
ti N/E
~ MuIAY TROPYANN
5
1, P6. 61
Pa/ t866-75-5}I}

Iva~T N
0
a
C
$O
8
t
~~
/ /
~/
/
/ N/C
MLUAY IROPYANN
I' O.B. ti9t, PO. 81
w Vw/ 1866-7S-S}/}
i q
N 86'~1~ 1 E
~[r
M~1101r~R
fLn1 Li/KL
TRACT 3-C
fOTLA~ AREA - 14.767 AC.
i.A~'~`~'- n n o~
~t"vAeaS2R ~~~~ LAKE
4-\
~ ul'-~-
N
i
~ ~ - ~
~ ~ ~ _ _ ..,~ f N~
TRACT 1-C
MINIMUM BUILOWC SE1HAd(5
N~ FRONr 30'
AMON t CATNr w 1ROVYANN REAR 25'
O.B. It91, PO. 87 SIDE 10•
PW/ 1866-71-)980
e
-4
S 78.,E b
w Site Plan For
,.1j_ M ,t01; ~ ~ ,KEVIN Cpp.II MARTIN
/ / t7c
/ ' ~ / / LESLIE W. MARTIN
/ ~ ~ ~ OWNER: KEVIN C. do LESUE W. MAR TI
~ REF: B.M. 2004, PAGE 37
REF: 0.8. 951, PG. 380
REF: D.B. 1344, PG. 587
/ FRANKLINTON TOWNSHIP
R / FRANKLIN COUNTY, NORTH CAROIIN~
., /
/ 100 SO 0 100 200
/ SCALE ]" = 16']'

+ `„ _ 5

Lake Elevation
i
7 -
f 2' ----~
~~
J

~ar~es
,Fls Rea.
! l
.. (~" PT Wood Pile
ake bottom
VIEW F Ro !~ S ~Eo ~E
Maximum projection,
measured from the
IakP
' t Length of access way may vary
~---- $- ~ ~~-~-L-depending upon actual
Mons
god Pile
LU hG VVLLV~~~
SOU`~~I END VIEW/FRAMING
2 of 2

~~.. ~, ~
~O _~
r
~~
--~o ~Q r c~e Aso n
07-20$1
~~~ ~, p +~.{'
i~

BEECHWOOD HILLS SUBDIVISION INCLUDING BEECHWOOD HIL S NORTH) -, ~'~„_. _
.-
`
j FRANKLINTON TOWNSHIP !~ ---_-.___
"-.~` ~ ._
;
I
BEECHWOOD HILLS ~ FRANKLINTON, NORTH CAROLINA

_
~,1 f

_
~ SUBDIVISION ~
_
~~' 1
_ ~~~ S~A~ i ~~ ~r I 1 -
OAK FO~EST~ I
~~- -

-
LOT OWNER ~ ~
I ~ ~
i l ~
SUBDIVISION
JE 1 i
to GORMALY ~ - ~
-
~ -

I 18
1 D TAYLOR
ZETTS 1 l ~.~

^
~ ~-, ~

. _
:. ~ -_ - - [ i I ---
.6 rwenrc i .._

I
i
2
2A
JAMES
OYSTER
i I
~
'
7 '~ j
/ K ~' X Po~~wtitill~x~1
: ,~~ss E~S~~tM y~ i
Q ~ ~ -~- _} . r }-r ~-
~
26 WEIGER I
~ ~ ® ~
i G i ~ ~~
- 3A WHITT
_r-
-"J Q a 0

Q / i I I i f

~ ~ i

3B
WILKERSON
~ ~ I
/ ~ I ~ i
_v .__._~
3C BERGSMA ~,~, ____ __.`__._.
4A
4B JONES
SELF
aD

~ Ic
{{{ = _
'... ~
4C
5A DIXON
MARSHALL ,,,
-
~, ! - '(B p U N ~ ~
o
~
~` I

' 5B BASINGER , p e ol
~ sy I
I
5C COOK l NIA s_ - ~ ~
iD

I 6A S. SCHMIDT ~ roo?-- _ ~~
e~ ~ O o

~. 6B
6C DRAUGHN
VANDENBOUT
~~~~~ A ~~
o~~o9N`_~-~ j' 7C
~ a
I ~
7A VANDENBOUT ~ _---- I o
~ 7B CLIFTON ~-- °'~~~ tB i ~
r 7C
7D KENNEDY
LEACH I `1 I }
I ~
~ 7p
Q
~ °
~ ~ ~
I
t Te ~A
/
II `----
I.
I
1
- -- BB COLEMAN I '
~ ~~ 0
,; BC GIANI ----~"
I ~ .

~'

~-~

e~

~o~s t

TAB; I
SUBDIVISION i
-,.._
``
® ~ \
~'
_
GRAPHIC SCALE
9A SHARMA . ZB
~
'
`
~ '
~~` 98
9C WOMACK
SHELL ~ ~ ~
-- ~ ~ ~~
~ ~ ~ n _ ~ ~ ~'
v~'
o ~
~~ ~ --,~ NNi KING _
~ T~
~
~ ~ - ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~
~-
8 _~
~ BEECHWOOD HILLS NORTH
TRACT ~ OWNER '
/ ~ ' i ~
t,~ ~
9~ ~ , 0 3C ~~~ 800 0 800 1600

~
1C
BLAND
~ ~
~ '
- ~
~-~ 3A CASHWELL ~ l ___---
r- 1

.. ~
~-'
~ W ~
~, 38
,~ HUDGINS
MAR I -
'T.
~ ( r ? _ ~
SB
o
~
~ ~~ `
a Z

3 .r
i

3E

TROPMAN
W
~
~' ~ j t
t
)/
t
NOTES

.
~ j
t
es

-, 3F A. TROPMAN ~ ~
~
~ '
O (1) ALL LAND NORTH OF ORIGINAL BEECHWOOD HILLS SUBDIVISION
BOUNDARY LINE CONSTITUTES BEECHWOOD HILLS NORTH
I N9 Nor saD ~
( .
' ~
~ O .
~ 1 - ` NNE NW NUMB
~ ~ ERED ~ ~ 9A ~ (2) ae =LOT NUMBER
i ~
I
eEECr9wooo Raw
~ O
~ se ~ ~
4c
®=TRACT NUMBER
5
° i ~ '

w
~
I
`
I
O
~ I /
t ~
'
(3) LOTS AS NUMBERED IN BEECHWOOD HILLS ARE THOSE USED BY
THE FRANKLIN COUNTY TAX SUPERVISOR ~
. , .
'
~ 1 ea O
~" i
' ~~• I
I ~,._,: "\
>~
Q ~e (4) =CURRENT LIMITS OF BEECHWOOD HILLS.
___ ~ BD

a,

~~ ~

eE
_~ ~ JANUARY 2007
, MAP CONSTRUCTED BY:
- ( 7
i _~' ~-_~1
I I
-
,__ I i
~ l_-~ _.,..y ~ 4A
_-
-I
~
F -
l
Soil & Environmental Consultants
PA

__ __ I
t ~
' i ~ 1
f I
i
' ,
I1U1014rm Npd Tm,L CnrvLG 21A1/ . )
Wd9e IafeyA, ~ PM1ive: 6191 NE~S500 ~ Mac (919 896.9167
.. l~
__.....
~~
j _.~ 1
~ ~

1 _.1 ~ tom"'.-
t l ~ I ~I

, E_ .~._I _....... '
.... ~
' asrr.Sadf:C.mm