Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNCG120038_Tier III_20220527 DocuSign Envelope ID: 121A1065-FCF1-4B70-96E1-DB78D29AC513 SM ITHGARD N ER AOORESS TEL WEB 14 N,Boylan Avenue,Raleigh NC 27603 919.828.0577 www.smithgardneNnc.com May 27, 2022 Zac Lentz, P.E. Assistant Regional Engineer NCDEMLR—Winston-Salem Regional Office 450 West Hanes Mill Road, Suite 300 Winston-Salem, NC 27105 RE: Phase 2 Pond 3 Tier 3 Corrective Action Plan Davidson County Landfill Certificate of Coverage#NCG120038 General Permit#NCG120000 Dear Zac, The following is a corrective action plan prepared by Smith Gardner, Inc. (S+G) on behalf of Davidson County (the permittee) to address the Tier 3 exceedances at the Phase 2 Pond 3 (Basin) Stormwater Discharge Outfall (Outfall) at the County's landfill facility (Landfill). The Landfill is permitted to discharge stormwater under General Permit No. NCG120000 and Certificate of Coverage No. NCG120038 issued July 1, 2021. A summary of exceedances and corrective actions (both completed and proposed) are included below. Fecal Co I iform Based on the Representative Outfall Approval dated November 12, 2009 (attached), the Landfill has been implementing tiered responses for Total Suspended Solids (TSS) and Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD). As cited in the approval letter, "the Division concurs thatmore frequent monitoring for fecal coliform at this site would be ineffective'. S+G was notified on May 24th, 2022 this approval was deemed ineffective with the revised General Permit issued July 1, 2021. At this time, the Outfall is in Tier 2 status for Fecal Coliform following two (2) consecutive exceedances in the March 2022 and April 2022 monitoring periods. Within the current monitoring period a total of three (3) samples above the benchmark limit have been measured. S+G will begin implementing tiered response actions for fecal coliform moving forward. Furthermore, S+G intends to prepare a revised fecal coliform alternate source demonstration to be submitted to the Department of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources (NCDEMLR) for review. Total Suspended Solids Documentation and Inspections Sampling was conducted on April 18, 2022, the results of which were received April 27, 2022. Based on the results of this sampling, the Outfall has measured four (4) exceedances for TSS within the current permit period and is subject to Tier 3 response actions. An overview of historic sample results at Outfall within the current permit period is attached. The Outfall entered Tier 3 status for TSS following the April 2022 sampling event. S+G notified NCDEMLR of the Tier 3 exceedance on May 3, 2022. DocuSign Envelope ID: 121A1065-FCF1-4B70-96E1-DB78D29AC513 Zac Lentz, P.E. May 27, 2022 Page 2 of 3 Following receipt of sample results from the April 2022 monitoring event, an outfall inspection was conducted at the Basin and Outfall on May 5, 2022 by Steven Sink, Operations Manager of the Davidson County Landfill (attached). A subsequent inspection was conducted by Joan Smyth, P.G. of S+G on May 26, 2022. Previous Corrective Actions Following the samples collected in the third quarter of 2021 (TSS=9090 mg/L), Pond 3 was cleaned and new rip rap stone was added at the inlet and outlet structures. Additionally, No. 57 stone was added around the inlet riser to better filter discharging water. Following the March 2022 sampling event, Tier 2 corrective actions were developed and implemented at the Outfall on May 5, 2022. Corrective actions at the Outfall included installations of silt fencing around the outfall riser structure and additions of#57 stone to the upstream slope of the outlet filter berm. A summary of these actions were submitted to NCDEMLR on May 12, 2022. Since the completion of these corrective actions, no discharge events have been monitored at the Outfall. Sources of Total Suspended Solids The majority of the Basin drainage area consists of the north slope of the Phase 2 landfil I unit. This area is near final grade with stabilized intermediate cover. Runoff is conveyed to the basin via a grass lined perimeter channel with multiple drop inlets. There are currently no industrial activities within the Basin drainage area, so there are no operational activities evaluated or identified for modification. Potential identified sources of sediment into the Basin appear to be from two (2) areas of erosion within the inner berm of the Basin (Photos 1 & 2). Proposed Corrective Actions As a result, corrective actions to reduce TSS concentrations discharging from the Outfall will include stabilization (reseeding, matting, and/or rip rap) of all areas within the Basin with visible erosion or sediment accumulation. This corrective action will be implemented over a period of two (2) weeks following approval of the corrective action plan from NCDEMLR. As noted, the Outfall riser structure currently has #57 stone at the base of the riser and a newly installed perimeter of silt fencing following the March 2022 corrective actions (Photo 3). Monitoring and Inspection Future monitoring at the OutfaII wiI I continue to be conducted on a monthly basis and following significant rainfall events. In an effort to maintain good housekeeping, all sediment erosion control features, vegetated drainage areas, and stabilized erosion areas within the Basin will be inspected weekly until vegetation has been established to limit erosion and future sediment discharge from the Outfall. Cleaning of all erosion control features in the event of sediment accumulation or clogging will be implemented on an as needed basis to ensure effective sediment removal from the discharge. DocuSign Envelope ID: 121A1065-FCF1-4B70-96E1-DB78D29AC513 Zac Lentz, P.E. May 27, 2022 Page 3 of 3 If you have any questions, or require further information, please contact us at(919) 828-0577 or by email. �N CA,9 Sincerely, .% ® S� �� SMITH GARDNER,INC. SEAm DocuSigned by: DocuSigned by: ® 021 27Z 022.-''- ® a C4990A65989B4AD... 5B6631996A674D7... '��+ �+ �OB��Q� Matthew M. Jones, E.I. Pieter K. Scheer, P.E. Staff Engineer, ext. 153 Senior Engineer, ext.123 mac@smithgardnerinc.com pieter@smithgardnerinc.com Attachments: November 2009 Representative OutfalI Approval Letter Phase 2 Pond 3 Historic Stormwater Data Phase 2 Pond 3 Outfall Inspection Checklist cc: Steven Sink, Davidson County Joan A. Smyth, P.G., S+G H:\Projects\Davidson County(NC)\02 DC Compliance\03 DC NPDES\2022\04-April\Tier 3 Corrective Action Plan\DavdCo Stormwater Ph-2 SB-3 Tier 3 Action Plan.docx DocuSign Envelope ID: 121A1065-FCF1-4B70-96E1-DB78D29AC513 This page intentionally left blank. DocuSign Envelope ID: 121A1065-FCF1-4B70-96E1-DB78D29AC513 S+G ENGINEERS PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG Client Name: Site Location: Project No. Davidson County Davidson County Landfill DAVDCO-21-4 Photo No. Date: ._�'�-3a�._ X�€E•f-�� "�,,' 3"�-.,-�ti r 4' �''x=Yy"���e r <a, s t` � +x'"-c,-��5�F� 1s�;3,D„+, E - -'• r �a�$�''�fr3. �c'yF €'t� ' �� 5/26/223 Direction Photo Taken: Southeast ` Description: Area of erosion within the Phase 2 Pond 3 sediment basin. Area was identified as a source of sediment resulting in elevated TSS and will be stabilized based on proposed corrective actions. Photo No. Date: 2 5/26/22 Direction Photo Taken: South Description: Area of erosion within the Phase 2 Pond 3 sediment basin. Area was identified as a source of sediment resulting in elevated TSS and will be stabilized based on proposed corrective actions. DocuSign Envelope ID: 121A1D65-FCF1-4B70-96E1-DB78D29AC513 S+G ENGINEERS PHOTOGRAPHICLOG Client Name: Site Location: Project No. Davidson County Davidson County Landfill DAVDCO-21-4 Photo No. Date: 3 5/26/22 Direction Photo Taken: Southeast Description: Phase 2 Pond 3 outlet riser structure with #57 stone filter berm and newly installed perimeter silt fencing. DocuSign Envelope ID: 121A1065-FCF1-4B70-96E1-DB78D29AC513WYWA -A j Lv; ; NCDftEN North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Water Quality Beverly Eaves perdue Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman Governor Director Secret,ary i November 12,2009 Davidson County Integrated Solid Waste Management c/o Mr. Charles Brushwood 1242 Old US Hwy 29/70 Thomasville,NC 27360 Re: Request.for Representative Outfall Status and Tiered Response.Requirements Davidson County Solid Waste Facility NPDES Permit#NCG120038 Davidson County Dear Mr. Brushwood: The Winston-Salem Regional Office(WSRO) staff has reviewed your request that 5 of 9 stormwater discharge outfalls (SDOs) being monitored in accordance with permit#NCG120038, be given representative outfall status. Based on the information and maps provided, as well as a site visit by Jenifer Carter and myself on October 28, 2009, we are approving your request, with one modification. In accordance with 40 CFR §122.21 (g)(7), you are authorized to sample outfalls Phase 2 SB 3 (as opposed to Phase 2 SB 1, as requested), Phase 2 SB 4,Phase 1 SB 2, Phase 1 SB 4 and C&D SB 9. These outfalls will represent the other outfalls as follows: Outfall to be Monitored* Representative of: Phase 2 SB 3 Phase 2 SB 1 Phase 2 SB 4 Phase 2 SB 2 Phase 1 SB 2 _ Phase 1 SB 1 and Phase 1 SB 3 Phase 1 SB 4 C &DSB9 *Due to the formal closure of Holly Grove Landfill, monitoring of outfall HG SB 1 is no longer required to meet the Qualitative or Analytical monitoring requirements of the permit This approval is effective immediately. Please note that representative outfall status applies only to the Analytical Monitoring requirements of the permit; therefore, Qualitative Monitoring will still need to be performed at all nine (9) remaining SDOs. jgj- adto rVrewe to p �1ttd tp ert �r et f �tpr far fecI c�lfQz attod £ u Golrfrrrrerna �ral re Suitor Rur � nt , � tQ e dov u tot �Qr fr u P c�1rtp ? fir ` ' � t . erd,re ►pe:_ utrIe _ ' ll + over... Niotth.r l 'i'lc:DJv' to. ti, Fps Q' 9.ai '111, 1 301 1 ie9mo ul"Mice One _Ocartia' 58 ;A' UV1it0WJ' „VN S - l'' Jc ftr ,Ri�(�lFla i.icc7 NortKaroli.na aiit.d ?!'L Nah(rallY DocuSign Envelope ID: 121A1065-FCF(1r-41B70-96E1-DB78D29AC513 yAy Ear v N c . nsIf changes in drainage areas, BMPs, structures,processes, storage practices, or other activities occur that significantly alter the basis of this approval, representative outfall status many no longer be valid, or may need to be updated. You should either resume analytical monitoring of all SDOs, or reapply to this office for representative outfall status based on updated information. If you have any questions or comments concerning this letter,please contact Jenifer Carter at(336) 314- 1440. Sincerely, Steve W. Tedder Surface Water Regional Supervisor Winston-Salem Regional Office Division of Water Quality cc: is SWP Central Files Stormwater Permitting Unit Ms. Joan A. Smyth, P.G. (Richardson Smith Gardner&Assoc; 14 N.Boylan Ave;Raleigh,NC 27603) M'N' V) L Ln c-i i--I rl r-I c--i N N m 1 . tin no no ao � O L L L L c�i ti\0 CDvU LnLnUn 0 r, O O O O Z Z Z Z (� L U aJ NR LLL ~ J _ tiD UD d. to C O L L L L CD CD 0 0 0 U U u U Ln 0 0 LL \ vI I'. CV 0 0 E E LT) d' O O O O O Q L p .v 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U ~ { dD C10 40 OA L L L L f0 CB II ru 0 \ o -C m m p VI o O O o d, z z z z aJ v aJ v aD ao eD dD L L L L _ v u u v Z .`n `n `n O O O O v c v a) aD ao no ao Ln L L L L 7 — Q U U U U m Ln c ,,4, z O - Ln Ln Ln v) O N O O O O CL z z z z cn Ln ao aD OD u co I- Q) C6 CB fp CO N N CD Q aJ O L L L N N N O +' + N U U U U \ \ \ 00 Ln C6 \ Ln Ln cn vi m m M Q\i O O O O CD Z Z 7- Z CD C CD O a bD N L C v L L L S L L U O O }, 4-1 +-+ +1 4- 4- L c T O O O O O O O cLnD d O o LL _Q 41 N � O oz C U N N N N O O _ N N N N fV N N N a) O L > U L L H O c O z 0 — Q > > x c cn U O DocuSign Envelope ID: 121A1065-FCF1-4B70-96E1-DB78D29AC513 NPDES Stormwater Outfall Inspection Checklist Inspection Details Sample Details Facility Davidson County Landfill Sampling Period April 2022 Permit No. NCG120038 Date Sampled April 18, 2022 Outfall ID Phase 2 Pond 3 Date Results Received April 27, 2022 Outfall Tier 3 Date DEQ Notified May 3, 2022 Date/Time 5/5/22 12:00 noon Technician Steven Sink Exceedance? TSS (mg/L) 177 Yes Fecal (#/100 mL) 4,600 Yes COD (mg/L) 28.3 No TSS Outfall Inspection Yes Na ;' N/All Is there deposition of sediment at or immediately below outfall? X Is there visible erosion at or immediately below the outfall? X Is there visible erosion within the embankments of the sediment basin? X Is there visible eroded sediment entering the sediment basin? X If Yes or other evidence New Rock was installed of pollution provide Silt Fence installed along riser pipe additional details: Fecal Coliform Outfall Inspection Yes NO",,",' N/A Is there evidence of wildlife excrement surrounding the sediment basin? X Is there evidence of wildlife or wildlife present in the area of the sediment X basin? If Yes or other evidence of pollution provide additional details: Chemical Oxygen Demand Outfall Inspection Yes Na N/A Is there and discoloration of the water within the sediment basin? X Is there any foaming observed within the sediment basin? X Is there any oil sheening present on the water surface or at the X embankments of the sediment basin? Is there any windblown waste present within the sediment basin? X Is there and visible leachate or non-stormwater discharging into the X sediment basin? If Yes or other evidence of pollution provide additional details: Permit No. NCG120000 E-7. Tier Three Response: Four Benchmark Exceedances Within the Permit Term The facility will remain in Tier Three status until three consecutive samples are under the benchmark or are inside the benchmark range for all parameters. (a) If any four sampling results within the permit term for any single parameter are above the benchmark value at a sampled outfall,then the permittee shall respond in accordance with Table 5 to identify and address the source of exceedances for that parameter at that outfall. (b) The permittee shall prepare a written Action Plan and submit to the Division's Regional Office for review and approval within thirty(30) days of receipt of the fourth analytic monitoring data point that exceeds the benchmark value. At a minimum,the Action Plan shall include: i. documentation of the four benchmark exceedances, ii. an inspection report that covers the industrial activities within the drainage area of the outfall with the exceedances (including the date of the inspection and the personnel conducting the inspection), iii. an evaluation of standard operating procedures and good housekeeping procedures, iv. identification of the source(s) of exceedances, V. specific actions that will be taken to remedy the identified source(s) with a schedule for completing those actions,and vi. a monitoring plan to verify that the Action Plan has addressed the source(s). (c) The permittee shall keep the Action Plan in the SWPPP and document when each specific action was carried out and by whom. (d) The permittee shall contact the Division's Regional Office when all actions in the Action Plan are completed. (e) The Tier Three response shall be in accordance with Table 5 below. Table 5: Tier Three Response for Four Benchmark Exceedances Within the Permit Term Timeline From Receipt of Fourth Tier Three Required Response/Action Sampling Result Continuously i. Document the exceedances and each required response/action in the SWPPP in accordance with E-7(c) above. ii. Implement or continue monthly monitoring for all parameters at the subject outfall and continue until three samples in a row are below the benchmark value. Within two weeks iii. Notify the Division's Regional Office in writing of the affected outfall, four exceedance dates and values. iv. Conduct a stormwater management inspection. v. Identify and evaluate possible causes of the benchmark exceedance. Within one month vi. Prepare an Action Plan that should include specific, feasible courses of action to reduce concentrations of the parameter(s) of concern including,but not limited to, source controls, operational controls, or physical improvements and submit to the Division's Regional Office for review and approval. Upon DEQ Approval vii. Implement the approved Action Plan. Page 13 of 31 Permit No. NCG120000 Upon Completion of Approved Action Plan viii.Notify the Division's Regional Office of Action Plan completion. Page 14 of 31