The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20160134 Ver 1_401 Application_20160211Carpenter,Kristi From: Bryan, Roger D Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2016 10:52 AM To: Beckwith, Loretta A SAW; Chambers, Marla J; Barnett, Kevin; Carpenter,Kristi; Andrew Henderson (andrew_henderson@fws.gov) Cc: DeWit, Benjamin J; Medlin, Christopher D Subject: Bridge 100117 Buncombe Permit Application Attachments: Bridge 100117 Buncombe Permit Application.pdf; Bridge 100117 Buncombe Plans.pdf; Bridge 100117 Buncombe PJD Form.pdf; Bridge 100117 Buncombe SMP.pdf; Bridge 100117 Buncombe photos.docx Follow Up Flag: Flag Status: Follow up Flagged I have attached a permit application and plans for a bridge to bridge project in Buncombe County. I have also attached the PJD Form for the Corps file. Please email me if you need any additional information. Thanks Roger D. Bryan Division Environmental Program Supervisor II Division 13 Department of Transportation 828 251 6171 office 828 337 5234 mobile rdbryan@ncdot.gov 55 Orange Street PO Box 3279 Asheville, NC 28802-3279 �M i �M � .� � Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties. Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties. Corps Submittal Cover Sheet Please provide the following info: 1. Project Name: Bridge 1001 ]7 SR 2776 2. Name of Property Owner/Applicant: NC DOT 3. Name of Consultant/Agent: *Agcnt authorization nccds to be attached. 4. Related/Previous Action ID number(s): 5. Site Address: N/A 6. Subdivision Name: 7. City: _Bat Cave 8. Cowity: Buncombe 9. Lat: 35.56945 Long: -82.29736 (Decimal Degrees Please ) 10. Quadrangle Name: Black Mountain 11. Waterway: Broad River 12. Watershed: Broad 13. Requested Action: X Nationwide Permit # 3 General Permit # Jurisdictional Detern�ination Request Pre-Application Request 1 he following inYormation will be completed by Corps oFfice: AID: Prepare File Folder Assign number in ORM Begin Date Authorization: Section 10 Section 404 Project Description/ Nature of Activity/ Project Purpose: Site/Waters Name: Keywords: Transportation February 1 I, 2016 Ms. Lori Beckwith US Army Corps of Engineers 151 Patton Avenue, Room 208 Asheville, NC 28801-5006 Subject: Nationwide Permit#3 Bridge 1001 17, SR 2776 Chestnut Hill Road State ProjectNo. UBP.13.R.109 Buncombe County, NC Dear Ms. Beckwith: PAT McCRORY covenear NICHOLAS J. TENNYSON Secretmy I have enclosed a set of plans, a PCN application for NWP #3, and a vicinity map relative to the proposed bridge replacement project on SR 2776 Chestnut Hill Road, Buncombe County, NC. We propose to replace the existing 18'6" timber bridge with 40' single span bridge. Pennanent iropacts for bank stabilization will affect 44 linear feet of the Broad River. Temporary impacts for an onsite detour and construction access will total 46 linear feet. Three 42" pipes will be installed in the Broad River for the onsite detour. The river is approximately 15 feet wide with a predominately gravel and cobble substrate. Broad River is classified as Class C, Tout. Existing channel morphology will be maintained upstream and downstream of the bridge. Riparian vegetation will be reestablished along disturbed areas associated with the project. Stormwater will be diverted through grass-lined ditches or vegetated buffers prior to entering streams. This project may impact potentially suitable northern long-eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis) (NLEB) suinmer roosting habitat. Therefore, a may affect, not likely to adversely affect is requested for the NLEB. Minor tree clearing will be performed for the project. The existing bridge is constructed of timber abutments and beams. The crown to bed measurement (distance from travel surface to streambed) is 6 feet Clearance between the bottom of the bridge and the streatn surface is approximately 4 feet. A su�vey of the bridge did not reveal any evidence of usage by bats. No effect on the remaining Buncombe County list of federally protected species (threatened or endangered) or designated critical habitat will occur. Andrew Henderson of US Fish 1nd Wildlife Service is copied on the application for review. �Nothing Compares�.,. Sla�eo(NonhCuolina I DepartmemofTranspotlalion � DivisionThineen 55 Orenge S[reel I PO Box?2]9 I Asheville, NC 28802d279 82825161]I T Ms. Lori Beckwith Page —2 Bridge 1001 17, Buncombe County �ebrua�y 1 I, 2016 As a pa�t of the 401 Certification process, the project was processed through the DOT Programmatic Agreement for Minor Project as required by Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 and GS 121-12(a). No Historic Resources will be affected. By copy of this letter, we request Marla Chambers, North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission Western Region Coordinator, to comment directly to the Corps concerning the permit request. By copy of this letter, we are asking the Area Roadside Field Operations Engineer, to comment on the above project. Broad River is classified as Class C, Trout. The project will not require a trout buffer variance. By copy of this letter, I am forwarding one electronic copy of the application package to Kristi Lynn Carpenter, NC Division of Water Resources, Transportation Permitting Unit with cc to Kevin Barnett, NC DWR Asheville Regional Office for review and comment. Please charge the application fee of $240.00 to WBS element # 17BP.13.R.109. Please forward comments directly to the Corps with copy to Division 13 Environmental Officer. Your earliest consideration for this request would be greatly appreciated. If you have any questions or information needs, please contact me at (828) 251-6171. Sincerely, ��- �. Q,�' Roge D. Bryan Division 13 Enviromneutal Officer Hnclosures cc: J.J. Swain, Jr., P.E. Chris Medlin, P.E. Ben DeWit, CPESC Kevin Barnett Marla Chambers Andrew Henderson �' ��`ars��,��'�� i Y �, � dvo �i4 � f f 3( j��4 � ;,� � > � -=�..;`� OS �qr A 7Fy C�� ...,. C�. _ � _' c . Office Use Only: Corps action ID no. DWQ project no. Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008 Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form A. Applicant Information 1. Processing 1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps: X Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit 1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 3 or General Permit (GP) number: 1 c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? X Yes ❑ No 1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply): X 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit ❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization 1 e. Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for DWQ 401 For the record only for Corps Permit: because written approval is not required? Certification: ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes X No 1 f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation � Yes X No of impacts? If so, altach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program. 1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h ❑ Yes X No below. 1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ❑ Yes X No 2. Project Information 2a. Name of project: Bridge 100117, SR 2776 2b. County: Buncombe 2c. Nearest municipality / town: Bat Cave 2d. Subdivision name: N/A 2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state ��gp 13.R.109 project no: 3. Owner Information 3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: North Carolina Department of Transportation 3b. Deed Book and Page No. N/A 3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if N/A applicable): 3d. Streetaddress: N/A 3e. City, state, zip: N/A 3f. Telephone no.: N/A 3g. Fax no.: N/A 3h. Email address: N/A Page 1 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 4. Applicant Information (if different from owner) 4a. Applicant is: North Carolina Department of Transportation 4b. Name: J.J. Swain, Jr., P.E., Division Engineer 4c. Business name N.C. Department of Transportation (if applicable): 4d. Street address: 55 Orange Street, P.O. Box 3279 4e. City, state, zip: Asheville, NC 28802 4f. Telephone no.: 828-251-6171 4g. Fax no.: 825-251-6394 4h. Email address: rdbrvan(c�ncdot qov 5. AgenUConsultant Information (if applicable) 5a. Name: N/A 5b. Business name N�A (if applicable): 5c. Streetaddress: N/A 5d. City, state, zip: N/A 5e. Telephone no.: N/A 5f. Fax no.: N/A Sg. Email address: N/A Page 2 of 10 B. Project Information and Prior Project History 1. Property Identification 1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): N/A 1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 35.56945° N Longitude: - 8229736° W 1c. Propertysize: 0.1 acres 2. Surface Waters 2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to groad River proposed project: 2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: C, Trout 2c. River basin: Broad 3. Project Description 3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: Existing bridge on SR 2776 surrounded by low density residential area, pasture and forest. 3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0 3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 100 3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: Replace existing 18'6" bridge with a single span 40' bridge at the existing location. 3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The bridge to bridge project will result permanent impacts for bank stabilization (44') and temporary impacts (46') for an onsite detour and construction access. Three 42" pipes will be installed for the onsite detour. Equipment used will include excavator, crane, and trucks. 4. Jurisdictional Determinations 4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property / � Yes X No ❑ Unknown project (including all prior phases) in the past? Comments: 4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made? ❑ Preliminary ❑ Final 4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company: Name (if known): N/A Other: N/A 4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation. 5. Project History 5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for � Yes X No ❑ Unknown this project (including all prior phases) in the past? 5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions. 6. Future Project Plans 6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes X No 6b. If yes, explain. Page 3 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version Proposed Impacts Inventory 1. Impacts Summary 1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply): ❑ Wetlands X Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction 2. Wetland Impacts If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted. 2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f. Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction number — Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ — non-404, other) (acres) Tem orar T W1 ❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ WZ � P� T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ W3 ❑ P Q T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ Wq � P� T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ W5 ❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ W6 ❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ 2g. Total wetland impacts 2h. Comments: 3. Stream Impacts If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this question for all stream sites impacted. 3a. 3 b. 3c. 3 d. 3e. 3f. 3g. Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type ofjurisdiction Average Impact number - (PER) or (Corps - 404, 10 stream length Permanent (P) or intermittent DWQ — non-404, W�dth (linear Temporary (T) (INT)? other) (feet) feet) S1 ❑ P X T Onsite Detour Broad River X PER X Corps 15 37 Pipes ❑ INT ❑ DWQ Construction X PER X Cor s S1 ❑ P X T Access Broad River � INT � pN/Q 15 9 S2 X P � T Bank Stabilization Broad River OPINT ❑ DWQ 15 44 S2 ❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ S3 � P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ S5 ❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ 3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 90 3i. Comments: 46 feet of temporary impacts and 44 feet of permanent impacts Page 4 of 10 4. Open Water Impacts If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of the U.S. then individuall list all o en water im acts below. 4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e. Open water Name of waterbody impact number — (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres) Permanent (P) or Tem orar T 01 ❑P❑T 02 ❑P❑T 03 ❑P�T 04 ❑P❑T 4f. Total open water impacts 4g. Comments: 5. Pond or Lake Construction If ond or lake construction ro osed, then com lete the chart below. Sa. 5b. 5c. Sd. 5e. Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland Pond ID Proposed use or purpose (acres) number of pond Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded P1 P2 5f. Total 5g. Comments: 5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no: 5i. Expected pond surface area (acres): 5j. Size of pond watershed (acres): 5k. Method of construction: 6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ) If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts below. If an im acts re uire miti ation, then ou MUST fill out Section D of this form. 6a. ❑ Neuse ❑ Tar-Pamlico ❑ Other: Project is in which protected basin? ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman 6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g. Buffer impact number — Reason Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact Permanent (P) or for Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet) Tem orar T im act re uired? 61 ❑P❑T ❑Yes ❑ No 62 ❑P❑T ❑Yes ❑ No 63 ❑P❑T ❑Yes ❑ No 6h. Total buffer impacts 6i. Comments: Page 5 of 10 D. Impact Justification and Mitigation 1. Avoidance and Minimization 1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project. Replacement of bridge with longer span bridge with floodplain area. 1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques. N/A 2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State 2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for ❑ Yes X No impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? 2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ❑ DWQ ❑ Corps ❑ Mitigation bank 2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this � pa ment to in-lieu fee ro ram project? Y p 9 ❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation 3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank 3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: 3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity 3c. Comments: 4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program 4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ❑ Yes 4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet 4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold 4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet 4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres 4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres 4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres 4h. Comments: 5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan 5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan. Page 6 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ 6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires ❑ Yes X No buffer mitigation? 6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the amount of mitigation required. 6c. 6d. 6e. Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation (square feet) (square feet) Zone 1 3(2 for Catawba) Zone 2 1.5 6f. Total buffer mitigation required: 6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank, permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund). 6h. Comments: Page 7 of 10 E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ) 1. Diffuse Flow Plan 1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified � Yes X No within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules? 1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why. Comments: ❑ Yes ❑ No 2. Stormwater Mana ement Plan 2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? N/A 2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? X Yes ❑ No 2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: 2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan: The project will use BMP's to the Maximum Extent Practicable (MEP) in compliance with NCDOT's NPDES Permit No. 000250 Post Construction Stormwater Program ❑ Certified Local Government 2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? X DWQ Stormwater Program ❑ DWQ 401 Unit 3. Certified local Government Stormwater Review 3a. In which local governmenYs jurisdiction is this project? N/A ❑ Phase II 3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ❑ NSW apply (check all that apply): ❑ USMP ❑ Water Supply Watershed X Other: N/A 3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been N/A attached? 4. DWQ Stormwater Pro ram Review ❑ Coastal counties ❑ HQW 4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply � ORW (check all that apply): ❑ Session Law 2006-246 X Other: N/A 4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been attached? N/A 5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review 5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements7 N/A Sb. Have all of the 401 Unit submiltal requirements been met? N/A Page S of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Versian F. Supplementary Information 1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement) 1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the � Yes ❑ No use of public (federal/state) land? 1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ❑ Yes � No (North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? 1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.) ❑ Yes ❑ No Comments: 2. Violations (DWQ Requirement) 2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surtace Water or Wetland Standards, ❑ Yes � No or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 26 .0200)? 2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ❑ Yes � No 2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s): 3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement) 3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in � Yes � No additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? 3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description. 4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement) 4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility. N/A Page 9 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement) 5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or � yes ❑ No habitat? 5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act � Yes � No impacts? ❑ Raleigh 5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. ❑ Asheville 5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat? Field survey of the project area and evaluation of current distribution data. 6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement) 6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ❑ Yes � No 6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat? Current Maps/Database 7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement) 7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation � Yes � No status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in North Carolina history and archaeology)? 7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources? Current Maps/Database 8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement) 8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? � Yes ❑ No 8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: Project will not impact water passage or flood zone beyond existing conditions 8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? Current FEMA Maps Roger D. Bryan 2/11/2016 �� .� ApplicanUAgenPs Printed Name ApplicanUA�Ps Signature Date (A9ent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided. Page 10 of 10 •� �y- �.2 a � ...- r,�1 •n,�..,, .ir�.1. ��k . Y\' .Sa ��'f. �'iil7 •.�� '��'' �� H��Y,' � • 9A�*R�".' .�c'AyTa .. �i,"`v' y.de �" -5 ' ;^� :'. � , .. . ...a n.�.�� ' z . �e' , � K � ti� �� +.-� � " � ' � _ � � � � � 1 � 2: 1... / �� ; ��. +�C '?16t -, µ' . .o� ♦ '� ��a 4 �� k w i : � ��+ �'�' �iF i , `' � %�i�� •�h ` � � � `r` ` � �.*.,nr s �= �s i,,. e 4 .. - �.+.�..�{'� .�a. �e. �'�".�s'C,3..,��"' -:,.� ��* .. �, ,.... �.,�,�'e��e��S.Y::'�'?tSS�i',f[:..:,.. .� . ,� .� r3�2.e�i.u#��_':_' � Figure 1. Bridge 100117, Broad River (above and below), Buncombe County, NC. �:� ��- �� 4� :.; , �� ,tri `r ' :,x.+ � . � .:.��., . :�e. . � .�;. .,._ . I 't -- � 't(I , �� 4 � � i (y'q, �Y � l � . � ♦ +�� B 11 1.ti4 � i i�.�� . ..ti �'i i'� ` ` ' . � `'` .. �!+ i . � � � � !' � i ° �i ! .. ._ ... ...._. �_,^`1:....T�. , ' . ' . � . i : �.` _. � : ~i�� ."1 �- . �� _«.i�•�: �=` __ ��+:iAa.::,:Y,`d. ":�9'�'� � o f., ytg,_'<_ ,ry h�.. ft .. �1�.... / �y-'-5P( ♦ � Figure 2. Bridge 100117 Structure and abutments of existing bridge, Buncombe Caunty, NC. � —.� �;rr _ . _ - � : -�- --� Y _ �r � _ .�a � � � - _ Y- ,��,� "�",�`�-� :� � � - � - �L 4 . ,,.f �� yy � � _ F _ __, �� j � `_ ��; .� ,•�: '-' � y':� - � �� _ �� = �: �:, � - "� �� y '- > �, ` �_ � ,,,' �:� , �: <�, . �`~e. a:�. �. ;_ , � °: i i � s 4! {q ��'� '�� ' ,V � --, � .. �y � �'4a_�\+„ � Y� �'� '�1 s 5�� i t...3� � T _ ... �� ;.�.�GM��ti � .ti' r'��`� � ". f� _ ;,_ f�' Figure 1. Bridge 100117, Broad River (above and below), Buncombe County, NC. �� h r R �' �� . t! �� !.,[� �� z` � � i � h i ti � '�'�.'� ��Y�' <°t� � � "� �� y. ; 4} . '! t r � . ■�� a! i �_./� ' '• I , ��• � ��i�� c .'4� F � I ' �F "��yni� �9 "� ' bt t� '� ^ �''tr � ,.� �-,�� L �6 �e�. � . ` 'a ��6 "�T�:,u�<:,��• y�� 1 \ �1' (V i/ Y:� J -li� .• � � �� ' � � � �: - ' . ti ti f,-., N� � `a�' +j .�,��" � ��, y' � �` "� � �;r .�i � ��`y �� t, �+ .��.� j.,�f ��.�� t�� , �.. � i1 n � ` ,.�' •.� 4`� .','°�� ,' :' r� � . �.d �� i :r'.i,�, .,' k sw, C��, K �+rr.u.`.—�. ■�. �. r,�,�! � � � ..i.',��i�y7K�/�t �`-� !.,.� u� � �_ ' 1 - . r.-: —_ r _.. �. _. �.�H ' - �j ...__- ` — a _ — .�� .' ` _ � _' --- -__ . �'_� � � � T ,�� -_ � � �' �� r�' '� . T �-.;, � _ . � �. ;: ' , _ H �r ` � _�-+ � �hy� '' ~� • �. . �'�.Y Y�I � " � iv +i ��::� -� '� 9 _.� � �.�s , ...h; . f{ ��7 � �� ' _ �l '. f. i �s.-_�. ..'. ��y + � �'Vf._ A- � _ � �� 4f5� -y,l �.� �.. �i � r. � -r ��,: � �T ��;. . t# ;r � �,�� V' �f � .� ��y �� ',�' � ';`�,w�` •+ k �� \_, �.. 5 � . � �' � r_ --� . , .. �, �,,;� , � •-.-P„�w ;,� �� a -�; '�i +a, � � � � . - � �:. -;..= �. w ,�,�_ r � � K� �� 'r . A� �� W.'L�-� � , '.� � � ��j f: �!� ��',�:�f �J � \'R.'« r-. ti?��.:. 1�y,�- 't;'� • � .. ��F. -. ii.-. .... . . . '?i' . � �V!''�,. 8ri. � • �, :.a- �r .x� � .I'� �$'^�l ��' S i� ' I �r Figure 2. Bridge 100117 Structure and abutments of existing bridge, Buncombe County, NC. ATTACHMENT A PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM BACKGROUNDINFORMATION A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD): B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PRELIMINARY JD: NC Department of Transportation, 55 Orange Sireet, P.O. Box 3279 Asheville, NC 28802 C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Bridge replacement wi�h bridge for Britlge 100117, SR 2776, Buncombe County, NC (USE THE ATTACHED TABLE TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE WATERBODIES AT DIFFERENT SITES) State: NC COUnty/pa�ish/bOrOugh: B�ncombe Clty: BalCave Center coordinates of site (IaUlong in degree decimal format): Lat. 3s.sssas °N; Long. -az.zsias °W. Universal Transverse Mercator: Name of nearest waterbody: e�oaa R��e� Identify (estimate) amount of waters in the review area: Non-wetland waters: ioo linear feet: 15 width (ft) and/or acres. Cowardin Class: ��e��e $trea�p F�OW: Perennial Wetlands: NiA acres. Cowardin Class: Name of any water bodies on the site that have been identified as Section 10 waters: Tidal: Non-Tidal: E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY): � Office (Desk) Determination. Date: � Field Determination. Date(s): zi5izo�s SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for preliminary JD (check all that apply - checked items should be included in case file and, where checked and requested, appropriately reference sources below): � Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the ❑ Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the app icanUconsultant. Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report. Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. ❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps: ❑ Corps navigable waters' study: ❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: � USGS NHD data � USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps �✓ U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: � Z4000, eia�k M��. ❑ USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: ❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: ❑ State/Local wetland inventory map(s): ❑ FEMA/FIRM maps: � 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (Nationa� Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929) ❑ Photographs: ❑ Aerial (Name & Date): or � �ther �Name & �ate�.Photosofsireamwi�hinpermitapplication,2/11/201fi � Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter: � Other information (please specify): 2 1. The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional waters of the United States on the subject site, and the permit applicant or other affected party who requested this preliminary JD is hereby advised of his or her option to request and obtain an approved jurisdictional determination (JD) for that site. Nevertheless, the permit applicant or other person who requested this preliminary JD has declined to exercise the option to obtain an approved JD in this instance and at this time. 2. In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre-construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non-reporting NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an approved JD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware of the following: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization based on a preliminary JD, which does not make an official determination of jurisdictional waters; (2) that the applicant has the option to request an approved JD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an approved JD could possibly result in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) that the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) that the applicant can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5) that undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting an approved JD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the preliminary JD, but that either form of JD will be processed as soon as is practicable; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit authorization based on a preliminary JD constitutes agreement that all wetlands and other water bodies on the site affected in any way by that activity are jurisdictional waters of the United States, and precludes any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether the applicant elects to use either an approved JD or a preliminary JD, that JD will be processed as soon as is practicable. Further, an approved JD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331, and that in any administrative appeal, jurisdictional issues can be raised (see 33 C.F.R. 331.5(a)(2)). If, during that administrative appeal, it becomes necessary to make an official determination whether CWA jurisdiction exists over a site, or to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional waters on the site, the Corps will provide an approved JD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This preliminary JD finds that there "may be" waters of the United States on the subject project site, and identifies all aquatic features on the site that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information: IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not Signature and date of Regulatory Project Manager (REQUIRED) . l� 2 /( zol� Sig ture and ate of person requesting preliminary JD (REQUIRED, unless obtaining the signature is impracticable) � M O V � � � V � � O V � � � �o pp N 0 � Q N Z Z ��I� �� I�� I� �� B U1�lCOMBE CO U1�TY LOCATI0111: BRIDGE 1110.100117 OVER BROAD RIVER 0111 SR 2776 (CHEST11lUT HILL RD.) TYPE OF WORK GRADI11tG, DRAZ11lAGE, PAVING, RESURFACING A111D STRUCTURES WETLAI�D A1�D STREAM IMPACTS BRIDGE 1110.100117 BEGIN BRIDGE -L- POC STA. 13 + 09.02 BEGI1� PRO ECT -L- STA.12 + OS.00 tiG��9¢. ��1,�G BEGIN DETOUR —v�i— rv�. .�ir�. ivrt.�i.ii �� a i� 0 ro END BRIDGE -L- POC STA. 13 + 51.2 7 E11tD PRO ECT —L— STA. l4 + 70.00 ��i �:� ,� �� SR 2776 -�_ NC 9 CHESTNUT HILL RD. END DETOUR -DET- POC STA. 12 + 62.47 i is si 4�� ,��;T�FE� ;N�� PERMIT DRAWI11tG SHEET I OF 4 �N��A�i[�]L]E7f°]E ]�L.�N� OO NOT I�SE FOR RPW ACQU[SIT[ON 1PF31ELdl�b:�IAIE�� 1LANS DO NOT lr9M. FOR COTi9TRl'CTION GRAPHIC SCALES DESIGN DATA PROJECT LENGTH RUMMEL, KLEPPER & KAHL, LLP HYDRAULICS R� � 900 RIDGEFIEL� �RIVE SUITE 350 CONTRACTOR : ENGINEER RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27609 340 VPD NC LICENSE NO. F-0712 20 � 2� 40 A�T = LENGTH ROADWAY PROJECT 100777........ 0.042 mi t-888-52t-4ass oe 9i9-8�8-9560 �IOqp T = b%* LENGTH STRUCTURE PROJECT 700117....... 0.008 mi F'pR apQ�" 0� � Q,�9�� PLANS V= 35 MPH TOTAL LENGTH PROJECT 100777 ............... 0.050 mi DIVISI0111 OF HIGHWAYS /�y A1 R � * TTST = 3% ��/y [�M, r.E. � a ZO O ?O QO y, p 2012 STRNDARD SPF.CIFICATIONS • T �1I V 1 1, SIGNATURE: '�" ° DUAL = 3/o B. Keith Skinner, P.E. [�}��g}{�� noAnWAY D � FUNC CLASS = MINOR RIGHT OF WAY DATE: rno�ecr ENcrNEEn ' •=��-��. ��•r=�h�� 1ejY DESIGAi PROFILE (HORIZONTAL) COLLECTOR APRIL 16, 2013 Brandon Mcinnis P.E. ENGINEER ��'�p � �Qo�a,� 4 O 4 $ PROJECT DESIGN ENGINEER ��/ SUB REGIONAL TIER LETTING DATE: APRIL 16, 2013 NCDOT CONTACT: Virginia Mabry r.E. PROFILE (VERTICAL) yrz�ox,rr rno�Ecrs UNIT MANAGER SIGNATURE: � rNu arriuv� � BEGIN APPROACH SLAB -L- POC STAl3+5/.35 END APPROACH SLAB � -L- POC STA./2+gg.23 � -L- POC STA.13+6232 Q NPE III � TYPE III GRAU 350 TL-2 GRPU 350 Tl a:l O �"1 o � � o� N � � � 30' � TYPE m TMPE 111 OUf-O(Jf j GRAU 350 TL-2 G�U g50 T��2 ENO SBG STA13+74.00 BEGIN BRIDGE -L- POC STA.13+09.03 SKETCH SHOWING ROADWAY IN RELATION TO PROPOSED STRUCTURE " VARIES FROM 3'-9" TO 4'-1" n O O CV � � N Z M � � Q Z � BE�IN PROJECT -L- POC Sta.l2 -L- PCC Sto. //+92.33 -DET - PC Sta.10+00.00 -L- POC Sta.11+77.5/ -L- PC Sta. ll+/4.10 -L- POT Sta. 10+50.00 ^�a STREAM IMPACTS Lengih Area Type Temporary 4 H. 11 sf Work o a fo iretall�rip rap ��P�faprandnre Cee exisi�ng �� and remove xisitn9 botmeni. abotment olon mfhe5stream. Permanent 40 fi. lgg sf Install rip rap along banks ther insrallad 6 nks andPremovo and re xistin9 abotmeni. of existmr�Pabutmenf alon ihe sfre� ove e 7o i stall remp orora pipes which Temporary 37 H. 340 sf 3� 42" Temporary Pipes will be used to Ilow for o BANK STABILIZATION SEE DETAIL B SPECIAL CUT DITCH SEE DETAIL D� TOE PROTECTION SEE DETAIL A DIV13B - BRIDGE 100117 - BUNCOMBE COUNTYI � SPECIAL CUT DITCH /e� -P�� SEE DETAIL C PUE� PV� � /'U / -L- PCC St . +17.1 E 2T SCL\ B RIP RAP W/ /'Uf � `�� 7 SY GEO FAB �� R FPu e R e I I F W � � � �-----�"`°w � - , ,�,� ., , � RC�III GRAU 350 TLe� �� R'ia CLASS II RIP RAP PLACE TO SHOULDER POINT (TYP.) / F ��TB 2GjENo sec srai3+�4.c � � c -DET- e E �� j;�,�J DENOTES IMPACTS IN '11J'�� SURFACE WATER TS �� DENOI' . r�� = - �nne,4r:� � / �� / -- -� �Q1 c �SPECIAL CUT DITCH SEE DETAIL C BANK STABILIZATION -DET- PRC Sfa.12+28.24 �'EE DETAIL B tem o detoor oround mnstrudion. Permanent 4 h. 12 s{ Instoll rip rap bonk For installotion of proposed IMMEDIATELY STABILIZE FILL SLOPES OF TEMPORARY siabilizotion. rip rop bank stabilizofion. DETOUR WITH MATTING TO PREVENT SEDIMENTATION. Temporary 5 N. 15 sf Work ar fo sfoll rip rop For constr�cf on acc s fo �nsfall bank stab I zai on. r p raP bank stab Lzat on . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' - - - - . BL"l EL = 2.697.43' MILLIN� LlMlrS: -L- 10+83.03 (l1.46'R7'J -L- SrA.12+05.00 TO 12+59.0 l6 --- -- -- • GPS MONUMENT -L- STA.l4+0/.00 TO 14+70.00 2,700 _ � -- - BEGIN GR.aoE - L- ' EL = 2,692.54 Pl= 12+35.00 �ZIRIDGE ST.�o 13+3C�o19 -L- � - _ L- STAJ2+05.0 � B _ . . . �� _ �� 0 � -_,_ -- ' CORi�� LAB �- _ ___ VC = 409L27' Pl = 12+80.00 �� S<<t W 10 5° � '� �_ K = 5/ ELE\/e 26°7,4' . ;- - - _ � - - � � V = 42mph EL = 2.689.00' BEGIN B� IDGE , � �, � � � � � � � � � � �'. `�- VC - 50' -L- STA;13+09.02 : K= 27 - i i i i i `` �-14.2q94% '� , V = 25mph END BRIDGE 2,690 - - - -- - i ` --__ ��15�3,g�� ' -L- STA./3f5/.27 PI = 14+20.00 EXISTlN6 / �568jo%-,__ ��`\ �� EL = 2.684.58' -- _ � VC = 60' � pUF - \ l5 f00 FND PROJECT -L- POC Sta.14+70.00 -DET - PT Sto. l3+ -L - POC Sta. l5 +l: -L- F /6 Q GROUND - - _ � � - � _ �'�3�/537i K = 60 END GRADE ^ NOTEs: BE6/ � SPEC.T UT DITCH �-, -_ i ^_ V= 44mph PROPOSED EL =S 2.682.5/( � 1. BROAD RIVER IS IN THE BROAD RIVER BASIN, �, WHICH HAS NO BUFFER ZONES AT THIS LOCATION. � � 3 2. CLEARING AND GRUBBING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE � PERFORMED TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD II � MODIFIED WITH CLEARING EXTENDING 5' BEYOND THE TOE � OF SLOPE WITH NO GRUBBING. ��b .� � 3. PROPOSED BRIDGE SHALL HAVE NO DECK DRAINS . E � 4. USE NATNE ROCK EXCAVATED FROM THE CONSTRUCTION c WHENEVER POSSIBLE FOR THE RIP RAP BANK STABILIZATION. � ��i EXISTING BRIDGE �IM. = ONE SPAN. 1@18'-6", 90 DEG. SKEW, � TIMBER F�OOR ON TIMBER JOISTS- PROPOSED BRIDGE DIM. = ONE SPAN, 1@40'-0", 105 DEG. s SKEW, 21" CORED SLAB UNITS. �� n.. � (3)-42" TEMPORARY PIPES WILL BE UTILIZED TO ALLOW FOR A � TEMPORARY DETOUR AROUND CONSTRUCTION. CLASS II RIPRAP WILL BE PLACED AROUND THE PIPES WITH WITH AN 8" � ro AGGREGATE BASE COURSE ON TOP. o-o m L � �'�" � � N' T ' 12 +�� ELEV. 2685.87 STA.13+45 L� ELEV. 268/.80 13+00 ,'__'"' . +) 2.6400i sra i3 DITCH ELEV. � O/YHUC I PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO. /00//7 4 l7BP.l3.R.109 RNJ SHEET NO. ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS ENGINEER ENGINEER PERMIT DRAWI11lG SHEET 2 OF 4 � 1 � � i ,;�.�� . ' ��-PERMANENT SURFACE I ' �� WATER IMPACTS / � � ., / SCALE r'-io' �: � 2,700 BRIOGE HYDRAULIC DATA STR •l00/l7 Sla.13+30J9 -L- DESIGN FREOUENCY = 25 YRS DESIGN DISCHARGE = 550 CFS DESIGN HW ELEVATION = 2685d FT l00 YEAR DISCHARGE = B00 CFS l00 YEAR FREQUENCY = l00 YRS l00 YEAR MN ELEVATION = 2686.52 FT OVER70PPlN� FREOUENCY= 50 YRS OVERTOPPING DISCHARGE = 700 CFS OVERTOPPING ELEVATION = 26862 FT NORMAL WATER SURFACE ELEV = 2680.7 FT DA7E OF SURVEY = ll/20/20/3 14+00 2,690 r� � \ � �� 2,680 I ��-_ I \ �� L � PLANS PREPARED BY : R�C �C RUMMEL, KLEPPER 8 KAHL, LLP 900 RIDGEFIELD DRIVE SUITE 350 RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27609-3960 NC LICENSE NO. F-0112 • �919� 878-9560 � rNu arriuv� � BEGIN APPROACH SLAB -L- POC STAl3+5/.35 END APPROACH SLAB � -L- POC STA./2+gg.23 � -L- POC STA.13+6232 Q NPE III � TYPE III GRAU 350 TL-2 GRPU 350 Tl 8� � � o �� N � � � 30� � TYPE III TMPE 111 OUf-O(Jf j GRAU 350 TL-2 G�U g50 T��2 ENO SBG STA13+74.00 BEGIN BRIDGE -L- POC STA.13+09.03 SKETCH SHOWING ROADWAY IN RELATION TO PROPOSED STRUCTURE " VARIES FROM 3'-9" TO 4'-1" � BE�IN PROJECT -L- POC Sto.l2 -L- PCC Sto. //+9233 -DET - PC Sta.10+00.00 -L- POC Sta.11+77.5/ � //// �� -L- PC Sta. ll+l4.10 � , -L- POT Sta. 10+50.00 \ „'l' STREAM IMPACTS Lengih Area Type Temporary 4 H. 11 sf Work orea fo retall r p rap and remove xsin9 abotmeni Permanent 40 fi. lg8 sf I stall rip rap along banks and re xstin9 ab�tmeni. m 1 ng the stream � - �f rip P °movo ks and re I � � BANK STABILIZATION SEE DETAIL B SPECIAL CUT DITCH SEE DETAIL D� J``' e '� --- � �E � � � � ��/ / i, . / — — — _-- F � TOE PROTECTION SEE DETAIL A DIV13B - BRIDGE 100117 - BUNCOMBE COUNTYI ' � SPECIAL CUT DITCH e� �� PU� SEE DETAIL C PUE� PV� ' /'U E / -L- PCC St . +17.1 2 T S CL \ B RIP RAP W/ /'Uf � `�� 7 SY GEO FAB R I� �� F R � W F � L L-----, "'�w e - �, ,� . , � RC�III GRAU 350 TL-2�'�°""�« � � ��► � F �\TB 2GI ENo sec srai3+�4.c � � --_ c -DET- e E —�_i� / / � BANK STABILIZATION I DETAII B CLASS II i RIP RAP � � � � W� PLACE TO SHOULDER POINT (TYP.) �� `��' / / /�,� \ �'. �j;�,�J DENOTES IMPACTS IN '11J'�� SURFACE WATER TS" ..; � DENOiES i^_n: RO IMPACIS IN .�� lU i� vu i i�� i.� — i — FpVF E� _ � / �� i _ — � — — �R1 c LSPECIAL CUT DITCH SEE DETAIL C - PRC Sla. I2+28.24 Temporary 37 H. 340 sf 3� 42" Temporary Pipes will be used to allow }or o tem o detoor oround mnstrudion. Permanent 4 h. 12 s{ Instoll rip rap bonk For installotion of proposed IMMEDIATELY STABILIZE FILL SLOPES OF TEMPORARY siabilizotion. rip rop bank stabilizofion. DETOUR WITH MATTING TO PREVENT SEDIMENTATION. Temporary 5 N. 15 sf Work ar fo sfoll rip rop For constr�cf on acc s fo �nsfall bank stab I zai on. r p raP bank stab Lzat on . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ��r�T BL"l EL = 2.697.43' MILLIN� LlMlrS: -L- 10+83.03 (l1.46'R7'J -L- SrA.12+05.00 TO 12+59.0 2,700 /6 -.- .- .. GPS MONUMENT -L- STA.l4+0/.00 TO 14+70.00 — -- - BEGIN GRADE � � ' � � - � ��EL =�2,69254 � Pl= 12+35.00 � � .RIDGE ST.�o 13+3C�o19 -L- _ `___ �0-... ��_ _ �� B� ' -- ' CORi�� LAB �— _ VC = 40' EKrW = 105° � EL - 2.69L27' , , '� �_ K= 5/ EL- 12.689.00' LE\/e = 26°7,4' '- -_ _. _� ' V- 42m h _ BEGIN B� _ — — � � - P _ IDGE _ �, � � �, � � � � I � � � �'. `�— VC = 50' -L- STA;13+09.02 �' �-l4. K = 27 ' � � � � � , 24gg� V = 25mph ' END BRIDGE 2,690 i '- _ ��15�3,g�� ' -L- STA./3f5/.27 PI = 14+20.00 EXISTlN6 / �568jo%-,__ ��`\ �� EL = 2.684.58' -- _ � VC = 60' Q GROUND - - _ � — � � _ �-J3�/537i K = 60 ^ NOTEs: BE6/ � SPEC.� UT DITCH � -, �_ i ^_ V= 44mph PROPOSc u I t L= L.btiL.Sl P�/F \ l5 f00 -L- POC Sta.14+70.00 -DET - PT Sta. l3+ -L- POC Sta.l5+l: -L- f PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO. /00//7 4 l7BP.l3.R.109 RNJ SHEET NO. ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS ENGINEER ENGINEER PERMIT DRAWI11lG SHEET 3 OF 4 ui -� � 1. BROAD RIVER IS IN THE BROAD RIVER BASIN, �, WHICH HAS NO BUFFER ZONES AT THIS LOCATION. � 3 2. CLEARING AND GRUBBING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE � PERFORMED TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD II � MODIFIED WITH CLEARING EXTENDING 5' BEYOND THE TOE � OF SLOPE WITH NO GRUBBING. ��b .� � 3. PROPOSED BRIDGE SHALL HAVE NO DECK DRAINS . E � 4. USE NATNE ROCK EXCAVATED FROM THE CONSTRUCTION c WHENEVER POSSIBLE FOR THE RIP RAP BANK STABILIZATION. � ��i EXISTING BRIDGE �IM. = ONE SPAN. 1@18'-6", 90 DEG. SKEW, � TIMBER F�OOR ON TIMBER JOISTS- PROPOSED BRIDGE DIM. = ONE SPAN, 1@40'-0", 105 DEG. s SKEW, 21" CORED SLAB UNITS. �� n.. � (3)-42" TEMPORARY PIPES WILL BE UTILIZED TO ALLOW FOR A � TEMPORARY DETOUR AROUND CONSTRUCTION. CLASS II RIPRAP WILL BE PLACED AROUND THE PIPES WITH WITH AN 8" � ro AGGREGATE BASE COURSE ON TOP. o-o m L � �'�" � � N' T ' 12 +�� I — — — — _ ��__ r_ } +) 2.6400% ELEV.2685.87 END 5 sra i3 BEGIN SPEC.CUT DITCH ELEV.� STA.13+45 LT ELEV. 268/.80 13+00 14+00 vrrHuc i ��-PERMANENT SURFACE WATER IMPACTS / SCALE ��—�Q� �: � 2,700 BRIOGE HYDRAULIC DATA STR •l00/l7 Sla.13+30J9 -L- DESIGN FREOUENCY = 25 YRS DESIGN DISCHARGE = 550 CFS DESIGN HW ELEVATION - 2685d FT l00 YEAR DISCHARGE = B00 CFS l00 YEAR FREQUENCY = l00 YRS l00 YEAR MN ELEVATION = 2686.52 FT OVER70PPlN� FREOUENCY= 50 YRS OVERTOPPING DISCHARGE = 700 CFS OVERTOPPING ELEVATION = 26862 FT NORMAL WATER SURFACE ELEV = 2680.7 FT DA7E OF SURVEY = ll/20/20/3 2,690 r� � \ � �� 2,680 I ��—_ I \ �� L � PLANS PREPARED BY : R�C �C RUMMEL, KLEPPER 8 KAHL, LLP 900 RIDGEFIELD DRIVE SUITE 350 RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27609-3960 NC LICENSE NO. F-0112 • �919� 878-9560 WETLAND PERMIT IMPACT SUMMARY WETLAND IMPACTS SURFACE WATER IMPACTS Hand Existing Existing Permanent Temp. Excavation Mechanized Clearing Permanent Temp. Channel Channel Natural Site Station Structure Fillln Fillln in Clearing in SW SW Impacts Impacts Stream No. (From/To) Size / Type Wetlands Wetlands Wetlands i� Wetlands Wetlands impacts impacts Permanent Temp. Design (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (tt) (ft) (ft) 13+09 to 13+51 'Bridge < 0.01 < 0.01 40 4 13+03 to 13+33 RT. '"Temporary Pipes < 0.01 37 13+38 to 13+41 LT. `""Bank Stabilization < 0.01 < 0.01 4 5 TOTALS': < 0.01 < 0.01 44 46 0 'Rounded totals are sum of actual impacts NOTES: *Permanent surface water impacts due to removal of existing abutment and installation of rip rap along the proposed banks. Temporary surface water impacts due to construction access to remove existing abutment and install proposed rip rap along banks. "Temporary surface water impacts include the installation of (3) - 42" temporary pipes that serve the onsite detour during construction. ""Permanent surface water impacts include the rip rap for bank stabilization. Temporary surface water impacts due to construction access to install bank stabilization. � /.wo' � I�II�;hWc1y North Carolina Department of Transportation 51vYtYlWilf�1" �� ,,,,,,,�,,, Highway Stormwater Program \=� STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN �`"'�� (Version 2.03; Released October 2015) FOR NCDOT PROJECTS WBS Element: 17BP.13.R.109 TIP No.: County(ies): Buncombe Page 1 of 1 General Project Information WBS Element: 17BP.13.R.109 TIP Number: Project Type: Bridge Replacement Date: 11/2/2015 NCDOT Contact: Marc Shown, PE Contractor / Designer: RK&K Engineers - Jonathan M. W hittington, PE Address: 1590 Mail Service Center Address: g00 Ridgefield Drive Raleigh, NC 27699-1590 Suite 350 Ralei h, NC 27609 Phone: 919-707-6751 Phone: 919-878-9560 Email: mshown ncdot. ov Email: 'whittin ton rkk.com Cit ITown: Black Mountain Count ies : Buncombe River Basin s: Broad CAMA County? No Wetlands within Project Limits? No Pro'ect Description Pro'ect Len th lin. miles or feet : 265 feet Surrounding Land Use: Rural, Woods Proposed Pro'ect Existin Site Pro'ect Built-Upon Area ac. 02 ac. 0.1 ac. Typical Cross Section Description: Two 10'-0" lanes with 4' paved shoulder. Two 10'-0" lanes with 2' grassed shoulder. Annual Avg Daily Traffic (veh/hr/day): Desi n/Future: 340 Year: 2005 Existin : 340 Year: 2005 General Project Narrative: This project replaces existing BR #100117: 1@18'-6" timber span, 20'-4" wide out to out. The proposed bridge will be a single span, 1@40'-0" cored slab, with spill through (Description of Minimization of Water abutments and 30' wide out to out (27'-6" clear roadway). No deck drains will be required. Runoff from the bridge will be captured and discharged onto a Class II rip rap Quality Impacts) stabilized bank. There is an increase in the impervious area of the project of 0.05 AC, however there is no significant increase in the discharge from the roadway runoff. Waterbody Information Surface Water Body (1): Broad River NCDWR Stream Index No.: 9-(1) NCDWR Surface Water Classification for Water Body Primary Classification: Class C Supplemental Classification: Trout Waters (Tr) Other Stream Classification: None Impairments: None Aquatic T&E Species? No Comments: NRTR Stream ID: Buffer Rules in Effect: N/A Project Includes Bridge Spanning Water Body? Yes Deck Drains Discharge Over Buffer? N/A Dissipator Pads Provided in Buffer? N/A Deck Drains Discharge Over Water Body? No (If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) (If yes, describe in the General Project Narrative; if no, justify in the (If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) General Project Narrative)