860030_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20240603

Division of Water Resources
Facility Number O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
Type of Visit: () Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
,' � ✓
Date of Vint: I r,. Arrival Time: Departure Time: ' G ", County: i,, Region:\
Farm Name: )/,1 �/, '�' j,yr(� Owner Email:
Owner Name: 0\Ai 4b+1��C1!`(i Phone:
Mailing Address: -Ptx 7 U° �Sl���1�11� ���e, � 1 C­1._1
Physical Address: %y1c�, 'uk,1' �a 1 �l 1 O C
Facility Contact: �� 1 'Ylt�?cuYt Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: 1?Y�t � Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: ;'� 1 1 � .>�' Longitude: t( >�` ���y` { ► °`
Lti'� ��� ►� -� �:n,t 1�G,;r,�.�t;�lr -�(� !�c-rc-h � �� �tt:rti� ►�-��ca< k�1 ?'�Y1r~�\��c���..�--�t`t;��C�i�.c,' l\�kc��
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder HNon-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish 14 c;r Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers 113eef Feeder
Boars Pullets jBeef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
Other Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 'KNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes [:] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes Iq
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes Kj No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: - . r''> Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection&Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes [:] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: 110
Spillway?: J
Designed Freeboard(in): ``°
Observed Freeboard(in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes 15a No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees,severe erosion, seepage,etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ;S,No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes E;j_No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require [:] Yes jNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes 'KNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground '��Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or l0 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): CD'ry .CC•u�o C.Lx�C j YUX, ceyl:_►1
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes 'J?I_No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes 51_�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes 2, [No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes tE�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records &Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes JZ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes r54:-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If-yes,-deck the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
fidWaste Application Weekly Freeboard Waste Analysis ❑ C1w�S -At s ❑ Bather Code
Jlainfall ocking Crop Yield jg�20 Minute Inspections Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections kludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes 4No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ® NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

V Q 3
Facility Number: - Date ofYns ection: ` 2,4.
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes -RNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes"J;Z No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes 'RNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? JYNLtvW� V'
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes \&;�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No `� NA ❑ NE
El Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other: ✓�
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes X No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes j2fNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question ft Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional
pages as
necessary).
�
�• N�117�.1.��`����-l� �CV+C�1����i� F��l..��,1� ��1.tXi L� 1n1'lJ�•L�,��/�I`' t�+`�vl —ill..
"7i. Sczl�� 2a25. u 1 V
Z j z,-; o \\an'� ,'1t��L e\ncrlt
Its, lot e'?may w(ka l�o�
32, ear (Ai\t� &W�A G�Mdl needs ku�X Wdetk
a
tv lt��l'g+ r�-CCMVdSt
312- 2-`Y 4hU-12-4
1uo: tV on Z r" \�"')�A 5 , t \,v^m t W 4
Reviewer/Inspector Name: r en_?O-Ilr-46y'(A Phone: �33-176i_qy7
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: ��/- r:�h`f� i Date:
Page 3 of 3 + ►64"' 21412015