NCG210186_Inspection Report_20240409

u+��o
e wnm
GOY COOPER
Governor
ELIZABETH S.BISER ,
Secretary
WILLIAM E.TOBY VINSON,JR NORTH CAROLINA
Interim Director Envftnmenwil Quaflry
April 9, 2024
H W Culp Lumber Company
Attn: Amy Shelton
PO Box 235
New London, North Carolina 28127
Subject: Stormwater Inspection Report
NPDES Coverage Number NCG210186
Stanly County, North Carolina
Dear Ms. Shelton:
Enclosed please find a copy of the Compliance Inspection Report for the inspection conducted at the H W
Culp Lumber Company located at 491 Old Highway 52 on March 13, 2024. The report should be self-
explanatory, however, should you have any questions concerning these reports, please do not hesitate to
contact Joshawa Billiot at [phone] or by email at [e-mail].
CrAIV
Sincerely,Ducu fineed by:
4 802B02438...
Jerry W. Eplin, PE
Regional Engineer
Land Quality Section
JAB/jwe
Enclosure: Inspection Report
cc: Stormwater Laserfiche, NCG20186
MRO-Land Quality Section, Stormwater Files
H W Culp Lumber Company, ATTN: Michael Sasser, 491 Old Hwy 52, New London, North
Carolina 28127
Jr North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Energy,Mineral,and Land Resources
t r —V D QI) Mooresville Regional Office 1610 East Center Avenue,Suite 301]Mooresville,North Carolina 28115
704-235-2100

Compliance Inspection Report
Permit:NCG210186 Effective: 06/01/23 Expiration: 05/31/28 Owner: H W Culp Lumber Company
SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: H W Culp Lumber Company
County: Stanly Old Hwy 52 N
Region: Mooresville
New London NC 26127
Contact Person:David L Richbourg Title: Plant Manager Phone: [phone]
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications: SWNC,
Primary ORC: Certification: Phone:
Secondary ORC(s):
On-Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Inspection Date: 0 3/1 312 0 2 4 Entry Time 09:OOAM Exit Time: 10:15AM
Primary Inspector:Joshawa Billiot Phone: [phone]
Secondary Inspector(s):
Lily C Kay
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: Timber Products Stormwater Discharge CDC
Facility Status: E Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Question Areas:
Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Page 1 of 3

Permit: NCG210186 Owner-Facility:H W Culp Lumber Company
Inspection Date: 0 3/1 3120 2 4 Inspection Type:Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
On March 13, 2024, a full compliance inspection for this facility was completed by Joshawa Billiot and Lily Kay in response
to a representative outfall request. Michael Sasser, the site environmental manager, was present during the inspection.The
facility requests that outfalls 002 and 003 may be represented by outfall 001. However, the discharge from outfall 001
consists of stormwater that has discharged from other on-site outfalls that has mixed with the water of the stream that is
piped underground through the facility. It is recommended not to take a representative outfall sample from the underground
stream outlet (outfall 001) and instead take a representative outfall sample directly from outfall 002 (35.450653,
-80.227345).Additionally, analytical monitoring has not been required for or conducted for the facility since 2018. Analytical
monitoring should be conducted from all outfalls.
The ROS request will be re-evaluated after receipt of the referenced analytical monitoring. Please send the required
documentation to [e-mail].
Page 2 of 3

Permit: NCG210186 Owner-Facility:H W Culp Lumber Company
Inspection Date: 03/13/2024 Inspection Type :Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Yes No NA NE
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan? E ❑ ❑ ❑
#Does the Plan include a General Location(USGS)map? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
#Does the Plan include a"Narrative Description of Practices'? N ❑ ❑ ❑
#Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
#Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years? ❑ ❑ ❑
#Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices? ❑ ❑ ❑
#Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
#Does the Plan include a BMP summary? N ❑ ❑ ❑
#Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
#Does the facility provide and document Employee Training? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
#Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
#Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program? E ❑ ❑ ❑
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: See summary for more information.
Qualitative Monitoring Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment:
Analytical Monitoring Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring? ❑ E ❑ ❑
#Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
Comment: See summary for more information.
Permit and Outfalls Yes No NA NE
#Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site? E ❑ ❑ ❑
#Were all outfalls observed during the inspection? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
#If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
#Has the facility evaluated all illicit(non stormwater)discharges? ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: See summary for more information.
Page 3 of 3