20211566 Ver 2_ePCN Application_20220406

DWR
Division of Water Resources
Initial Review
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
For Nationwide Permits and Regional General Permits
(along with corresponding Water Quality Certifications)
December 6, 2021 Ver 4.2
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?*
Yes
No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
Yes No
Change only if needed.
BIMS # Assigned* Version#*
20211566 2
Is a payment required for this project?*
No payment required
Fee received
Fee needed - send electronic notification
Reviewing Office*
Mooresville Regional Office - [phone]
Information for Initial Review
la. Name of project:
77 Beltway
What amout is owed? *
$240.00
$570.00
Select Project Reviewer*
Doug Perez:eads\djperez
la. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Jackson Hendricks
1 b. Primary Contact Email:* lc. Primary Contact Phone:*
[e-mail] [phone]
Date Submitted
4/6/2022
Nearest Body of Water
Dixon Branch
Basin
Catawba
Water Classification
C
Site Coordinates
Latitude:
35.37404
A. Processing Information
Longitude:
-80.84744
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Mecklenburg
Is this a NCDMS Project
Yes No
Is this project a public transportation project? *
Yes No
la. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)

Has this PCN previously been submitted?*
Yes
No
Please provide the date of the previous submission.*
2/16/2022
1 b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
Nationwide Permit (NWP)
Regional General Permit (RGP)
Standard (IP)
lc. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
Yes No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number: 39 - Commercial/Institutional Developments
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
ld. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
Individual 401 Water Quality Certification
le. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
Yes No
lg. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
Yes No
lg. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
Yes No
1 h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
Yes No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
Yes No
B. Applicant Information
Id. Who is applying for the permit?
Owner Applicant (other than owner)
le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?*
Yes No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
see owners list in attachment
2b. Deed book and page no.:
2c. Contact Person:
2d. Address
Street Address
see owners list in attachment
Address Line 2
City
401 Water Quality Certification - Express
Riparian Buffer Authorization
State / Province / Region
Postal / Zip Code Country
2e. Telephone Number:
[phone]
2f. Fax Number:
Yes No
Yes No
2g. Email Address: *
[e-mail]

3. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
3a. Name:
Richard Horn
3b. Business Name:
SCP Acquisitions, LLC
3c. Address
Street Address
280 E 96th Street
Address Line 2
Suite 250
City
Indianapolis
Postal / Zip Code
46240
3d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
3f. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable)
4a. Name:
Jeff Harbour
4b. Business Name:
Terracon
4c. Address
Street Address
2401 Brentwood Road
Address Line 2
suite 107
City
Raleigh
Postal / Zip Code
276047
4d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
4f. Email Address: *
[e-mail]
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
State / Province / Region
IN
Country
US
3e. Fax Number:
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
US
4e. Fax Number:
1. Project Information
1b. Subdivision name:
(If appropriate)
lc. Nearest municipality / town:
Huntersville
2. Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number:
see attachment
2c. Project Address
Street Address
Address Line 2
City
Postal / Zip Code
3. Surface Waters
2b. Property size:
91
State / Province / Region
Country
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project: *
Dixon Branch

3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water: *
C
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Catawba
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.
030501011403
4. Project Description and History
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application:*
Site consists of approx. 91 acres of agriculture fields, pasture, and wooded areas. Multiple dirt roads access the site. A natural gas line easement also crosses the site. Site bound to the
east by 177. Land use in this area is primarily agriculture and wooded land with some residences and small business. The delineation maps provided also help depict the existing
conditions of the site
The initial application was withdrawn. Numbers previously assigned were:
DWR#21-1566
SAW-2020-02078
This PCN submittal is to be referenced as Version 2.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past? *
Yes No Unknown
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
1.9
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
4,074
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: *
Development of an industrial warehouse facility to provide expanded storage and logistical resource for this rapidly growing area. The location of the site adjacent to 1-77 makes this an
extremely important and efficient facility for the transportation and storage of goods. The size of the proposed warehouses will require significant grading for the buildings and access roads
for ingress and egress.
The existing gas pipeline that crosses the site poses significant constraints with regards to the construction limits and roads. The proposed impacts have been designed in such a way as
to meet the purpose and need but also demonstrate avoidance and minimization. Several redesigns have occurred and we believe the current plan meets the purpose and need of the
project and still demonstrates considerable avoidance and minimization.
41. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used: *
The nature of the project will require some impacts to wetlands and streams to meet the purpose and need of the project. These impacts have been designed in such a way to avoid and
minimize impacts as much as practicable in lieu of the purpose and need of the project. Mitigation will be provided for all wetland and stream impacts incurred for the project. Typical
equipment will be used such as graders, excavators, trucks, etc. Indirect impacts will be minimized by stringent ESC measures and detailed plans indicating the limits of disturbance and
those areas to remain undisturbed will be marked and fenced.
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
Yes No
Comments:
see attached delineation maps and USAGE concurrence
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?*
Preliminary Approved Not Verified Unknown N/A
Corps AID Number:
SAW-2020-02078
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company:
Other:
JC Weaver
Terracon
Unknown
5d. List the dates of the Corp jurisdiction determination or State determination if a determination was made by the Corps or DWR
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?*
Yes No
6b. If yes, explain.
This is a potentially phased project but future plans for the remainder of the site are unknown and could be many years away. Should future development occur, any impacts associated
with that would be requested under a Section 404 Individual Permit

Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?
None anticipated
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
la. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
Wetlands
Open Waters
2. Wetland Impacts
Streams -tributaries
Pond Construction
Buffers
2a. Site #* (?)
2a1 Reason (?)
2b. Impact type*(?)
2c. Type of W.*
2d. W. name*
2e. Forested*
2f. Type of Jurisdicition*
(?)
2g. Impact
area*
Impact 4
fill
P
Headwater Forest
W4
Yes
Both
0.040
(acres)
Impact 5
fill
P
Headwater Forest
W5
Yes
Both
0.270
(acres)
Impact 6
fill
P
Headwater Forest
W6
Yes
Both
0.050
(acres)
2g. Total Temporary Wetland Impact
0.000
2g. Total Wetland Impact
0.360
21. Comments:
Mitigation will be provided for the wetland impacts at a 2:1 ratio
3. Stream Impacts
2g. Total Permanent Wetland Impact
0.360
3a. Reason for impact (?)
3b.Impact type*
3c. Type of impact*
3d. S. name*
3e. Stream Type*
(?)
3f. Type of
Jurisdiction*
3g. S. width*
3h. Impact
length*
S1
road crossing
Permanent
Culvert
UT to Dixon Branch
Intermittent
Both
2
Average (feet)
49
(linear feet)
S2
grading
Permanent
Fill
UT to Dixon Branch
Intermittent
Both
3
Average (feet)
69
(linear feet)
S3
Grading
Permanent
Fill
UT to Dixon Branch
Intermittent
Both
2
Average (feet)
145
(linear feet)
S4
road crossing
Permanent
Culvert
UT to Dixon Branch
Perennial
Both
4
Average (feet)
195
(linear feet)
S5
road crossing
Permanent
Relocation
UT to Dixon Branch
Perennial
Both
4
Average (feet)
69
(linear feet)
3i. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
0
3i. Total permanent stream impacts:
527
3i. Total stream and ditch impacts:
527
3i. Total temporary stream impacts:
0
3j. Comments:
The S5 impact above is being listed as a permanent loss; however, 95 feet of new channel is intended to offset this loss and provide a gain of 26 feet.
This relocation is required to allow the placement of the road crossing such that it does not encroach into the gas line easement. This site constraint is
documented in the attached letter from Kimley-Horn. The new channel will be constructed using natural channel design and will provide improved habitat
and function while allowing for the crossing to placed in the only suitable location due tot he gas line. The total stream loss is 0.042 acre. The small net
gain from the new channel is +/-26 linear feet (+/- 104sf / 0.002ac).
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization

la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
The project has undergone several designs to avoid and minimize impacts while still being able to meet the projects purpose and need. The main stream
crossing impact was redesigned several times based on early comments from USACE. The early design for the crossing identified on the plans as
Impact 7/8, would have impacted 372 linear feet (0.051 ac) of stream from culverts and relocation efforts. This design was subsequently changed to the
current design, which demonstrates a significant reduction in impact to the stream. The current design and justification for this crossing is detailed in the
attached letter from Kimley Horn
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
All ESC and BMPs will be strictly installed and inspected during the construction period. Bare ground will be revegetated with native species
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
Yes No
2c. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
DWR Corps
2d. If yes, which mitigation option(s) will be used for this project?
Mitigation bank Payment to in -lieu fee program Permittee Responsible Mitigation
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
Yes No
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
(linear feet)
527 feet of impact
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWR only):
(square feet)
4c. If using stream mitigation, what is the stream temperature:
warm
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
(acres)
0.36 ac of impact
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested: 4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
(acres) (acres)
4h. Comments
We assume a 2:1 ratio for mitigation will apply
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
la. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
Yes No
What type of SCM are you providing?
Level Spreader
Vegetated Conveyance (lower SHWT)
Wetland Swale (higher SHWT)
Other SCM that removes minimum 30% nitrogen
Proposed project will not create concentrated stormwater flow through the buffer
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250? *
Yes No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
Yes No
Comments:
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?*
Yes No
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)

2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?*
Yes No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
Yes No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The project as designed can stand as a single and complete project and no additional development plans are known.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
Yes No N/A
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
Yes No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
Yes No
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Asheville
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
Yes
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
Yes No
No Unknown
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
Yes No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
Yes No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
Yes No
5i. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
Yes No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
Terracon performed an intensive habitat assessment and produced a report for the applicant. NCNHP was also contacted and their report stated that no
federal protected species are known to occur within one mile of the site. IPaCS did not identify any critical habitats in or around the site.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
Yes No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat? *
NOAA
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
Yes No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
NCSHPO revealed three previous archaeological surveys and eight recorded sites are located within 1/2 mile of the site. HPOWEB GIS revealed that
two historic resources were once located within 1/2 mile of the site but have been moved to new locations. No resources are located in the project site
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?*
Yes No
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
FEMA indicates the project site is within an area of minimal flood hazard
Miscellaneous

Please use the space below to attach all required documentation or any additional information you feel is helpful for application review. Documents should be combined into one file when
possible, with a Cover Letter, Table of Contents, and a Cover Sheet for each Section preferred.
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
77 Beltway PCN Supporting Docs.pdf 61.42MB
File must be PDF or KMZ
Comments
Signature
By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• The project proponent hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief'; and
• The project proponent hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401 certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time.
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Jeff Harbour
Signature
Date
4/6/2022

Beltway 77 Industrial Development
Huntersville, NC
DWR# 21-1566
AID# SAW-2020-02078
Table of Contents for PCN (Version 2) Supporting
Documentation
Part 1: Overall Impact Map and Detailed Permit Drawings
Part 2: Flood Boundary and Grading Plan
Part 3: Letter from Kimley Horn Regarding the Primary Stream Crossing
Part 4: Responses to NCWRC Comments
Part 5: Property Owner Info and Agent Authorizations
Part 6: NCSHPO Letter
Part 7: USACE JD
Part 8: Protected Species Report
Part 9: Current DMS Mitigation Statement of Availability

Part 1: Overall Impact Map and Detailed Permit Drawings

Proposed Condition
ul�00
o >,J z
N N A
E N c» o
0
00•NU
o
o n
7 N
N U
O 2
0 -
m w
0
E
0-
O
o ro
f
e 0
tional Ephemeral Channels
E
0
a

UJOH «< AaIW!N
AO 0,0303
zz0 ig/ L0
00099L£1.0
103fOdd NN
31IdOId
aNV NV1d 12I9A1fl3
ON 3111ASLI31 NHH
Oil 'S±HOISNI NOILOla1SNOO
ONV 1N31A1dO13A3O
JOd 031Vd3Jd
LL AV/Val38
WO
11,
liJOild ON,
apes LL-n

EIEEMEI
MI iiiiiiill
-
i� a
-—d
_t—.,.F_..,.—e
WOH(<<A(ajW N
31IdO2Id
aNV NV1d UI9A1fl3
ON 3111ASda Nf1H
O11 'S±HOISNI NOILOla1SNOO
ONV 1N31A1dO13A3O
JOd 031tld31d
LL ) VM1138
zz034da/L9
00099L£l0

3,0
SNOISIALL
1°/
A,1i3flaiSnO4
NO3 ION
UJOH(«A(aIWDI
ZZO Siva / LO
00099L£L0
103303d NN
S11111303 WV311S
9N 311335,33133Th
Oil 'S±HOISNI NOILOla1SNOO
ONV 1N31A1dO13A3O
?JOd feggIVceggld
LL ) VM1138
U
33
STRUCTED RIFFLE
U
To
0
0
C7
O
J
CHANNEL BLOCK
BOULDER TOE PROTECTION

3,0
AuIi3flalSnO4
aOi ION
MIN 0(Ica! WDI
zz9 ,5,g/10
00099L£1.0
rONOdd er
S11111303 WV311S
ON 3111A5d3r Nf1H
Oil 'S±HOISNI NOILOla1SNOO
ONV 1N31A1dO13A3O
JOi 031tld31d
LL ) VM1138
o
wU
CROSS SECTION
TEMPORARY STREAM CROSSING -MUD MAT
LJ
EROSION CONTROL MATTING
=,ron3a eve,. osass.aae=eoid,seva - voeee =nee a - 00099Lt0h0vdd,�„�,��=,wo� �.o�_a�w�,l, _£ £o Lvov LO =11d.30 IN,

3,0
5,1015,3,
PO.i3flnlSnO.1
aO I ION
UJOH(«A(aIW!N
nEl
ZZ0 31tl0 / LO
00099L£L0
S1111130 WV311S
ON 3llNSt131 Nf1H
Oil 'S±HOISNI NOILOla1SNOO
ONV 1N31A1dO13A3O
JOd 031tld31d
LL ) VM1138
N
=U
LSJ
ENERGY DISSIPATOR PUMP OUTLET
EXAMPLE OF STREAM DIVERSION OPERATION
EXAMPLE OF PUMP -AROUND OPERATION
LC
GEOTEXTILE DE\N4TER DIRT BAG GENERAL NOTES
COFFER DAM GENERAL NOTES
GEOTEXTILE DEWATERING DIRT BAG
CO3
J 8
STREAM PUMP AROUND/DIVERSION

Part 2: Flood Boundary and Grading Plan

ON 3llNSt131 Nf1H
WOH(«A(aIW!N
OHS SV
00099L£l0
J3fOtld NN
MIvaNnoe
aoold 6+006
/
lot
hits
Aqiiire
w` ',I
Oil 'S±HOISNI NOILOla1SNOO
ONV 1N31A1dO13A3O
JOd aJ VdJ d
LL ) VM1138
—
CO
•

UJOHO(aIw!N
lit%3AO
- NV -Id 30vNIv Ia
aNv ONIa` Io
ON 333NSt131 Nf1H
O11 'S±HOISNI NOIl0lalSNOO
ONV 1N3WdO13A20
JOd 031tld31d
LL ) VM1138
1"•� nini� IPi�AiyP�:11{1114 IIIIIAI!!ii��if11i11Y1nni ��. -,�w.
1 YII@YG®IR' S 'N
A
.1
N
'CS ILI
�a6
__1
ADDITIONAL NOTES

EV
EV
EV
EV
I V
IZZ@N=OZ
LOZ0Z 221 @LL01'01'40%. 3,r:s HirlOS 00,
,31,000SSV ON@ NtION-,3,121 LLOZ @
ZOZ/LZ/
3,0
00099L£1.0
10300dd NA
ti
'
ill
(
1111 1 1
0,
,
ON 3111ASLI311,1r1H
DTI 's±HeisNI NolionaisNoo
ONV 1N31A1d013A30
1()J (331VdBld
LL AV/V\1138
---rai__P.1"---'7"-"---."-:.-• . -,..,1 '
. @
-,--,
,4, tm.114712ffilifai iiiiillEterall'y --Ali
=;.,,,,,, _..,11011,111111ogilimiliiiiimptimplimpiiiiirlik . Iv4IBK2k- , ,,
/1%ji.L.........J1111 1 Htrialfif*Minr, ,
,,digotiii, \ ,
NI 4414 rill)44i
‘01rhaL. •
Tars document. togeMer wan the concepts and desrons presented here,. os instrument ar serylce. Is Intended only for Me bbebble PUIPOSe Obd [Ire, tar bIbibl, blOS prepared Reuse of ond bbbrObbl ',OW,. on thrs document wit., written outhodzation and odaptotron by lamley—Horn ond Associates. Inc shall be wbhout liabliity to lOrnieybiorn and Associates. Inc

0 3,0--
....... <°.,
i
"sl•°r.. ;fhb
°N.:. P°
+a a3xa3sn
Z V3IV
NV1d 3JvNIv Ia
4N`dJNIav Io
ON STIAS0131N0
O11 'SIHJISNI NOIl0lalSNOO
aNH1NaWdO�a/�4
JOB 03Jtld3Jd
LL)VM1138
w
3M
,a
i :.:
wens
v
�..�waa=a.a»
v
0a3 a
o N'S3d�� �3fa':°3;rywziozoa'
_
o�ssd 3�
LLN-
U
u�OH��(/�al���
ZZOZ/LZ/ l0
ro°�
00099«0
a§
ow mod==.
Wn
®■
-4d6®swa4a�""�33
.
na
go
84�3 g
3 $ viaAllti
CO
ve2
3
noo s o
111
gEE
es�
6
'z^
,/
�_� ��o�.mn
-- n e
g 0 8 0 0 0
0 H E 0 o
.,
� =�.no� as a —= a
l
pq\J\
a Me
Ma
w
I
fib?
a�
Allal
fig.
t ,� t�..
.S
aAt ‘11ilik
_
--
�-
I
% j� i
Os
,� ,s�.7d4
1
War
I--
000vaausamluovvw ��,
.� - w,
/ _,�
.z...,. ,..-,,.
ch
toq
\:
1Allem
lv,di / -�
a sa//n ��
H1
lido
., �' , li�� wr �/�
• o- a Os N ` ���\I ir
w a rn o? � ` ��$bili Pam
VI
ao- CO o ,p\\\�l
`Ill l\\\1\\�U1
`
�� J �`�1,\\I/1\l\\\IU11,\I
V 1 1\\\,
ZZ 1/11\\1\�U,\\il\\���
r ll l\l�\\111\`\�11t1��\1`\\�11
`1\\\1 \„\`\�I`
l/,,��
° o, �1�
6
r
l!
\1/ J\4T
S
j17)
tW
\�ST�
a� ✓ (
i
r
h�i"—` }
8
re 4 C\
�T
- Q'-G
%fie '�
\ i t� ,o /^ N
„ i
�h / /0Q�
/ ` i�%
i �� ♦ f•i
1
/ ram';/
Q h. �;:
P Q�/"
GZwo
phi
-
i
,�: '
AM1PfHL NE SHEE,
i f
e
7
F 'iil/�la e•�aai
i t
L �o
- :: / ,`i l
/1 1 _
,r Zl , _i ,
�� _i ���i
/�ttt---'_>>i i l f
/ g�
, /�,���.� ,i �.� '�
% /i i \ J. t'r r
i r
� ly�-\'-'.i' ice\
/ � '
/
L
mob "''6�
o
��
P
1
1
),��
��
J ll
il
��
t-.-:
f
S
W 8
Lu u)
�'i
W W,��
/
,gam
�a'.
l/Ti
,
1 �" \
art-,
�tl
/
__,i�i�.-_—
�i
�
/i�����
l vim ��
�I (
„ .,�
,
�� '-
��
t
�/ /
V
rfor
_ \
4044
1
/
i�
,
�\
\ � /_
-At
r
,.
��
il
in_
W
d ✓
-
I:NI i
ii
1 filtilrilY
oo 133. 3NnHovvw L4 'v11 1064
AREA 2A
SEE SHEET C404 FOR
CONTINUATION
q ho u�lr l
�� aVtarfaw;
' ✓
/ IIN�I�illllpllll�ll f
', II hIIII iII Igl�l `� ,�`s
I I%h� l�lpl�ry l 5 r
/ Il ill l�ljll�llj�l -�.o/ �i� � ri
Tiw
/Will/Ifi2
h
rs� r• O rl l 3\
-
;�i
„,o-
fi,z
✓\ rJ;
J
,.
'„-ate', o`
�� J ' \ le 1
I o^ V sa-
J
.�,,yr� w
mJ
�yH� Mom.

UJOHo(aIwiN
0300610
DNS S
31
'"'/Lzi 10
3,0
00099L£LO
£ `d321V
- NV1d 30vNIv Ia
aNv JNIa` Io
ON 311NSL131 Nf1H
O11 'S±HOISNI NOIl0lalSNOO
ONV 1N3WdO13A20
JOd 031tld31d
LL ) VM±138
u
s
u
®N.
zg�s� 94vi:
4 s

AEI i
� , .
`�/°` �\3:
' oN^o Pf
'••....,...•
- - . a3.31-10
b V3IV
- NV1d 30vNIv Ia
QN`d JNIav Io
311 3111A52131Nf1N
��� 'SIHJISNI NOIl�flalSNO�
0NV±N3Vdo13A30
JOd 03Jtld3Jd
LL AV/V\1138
p
u�
3o
,T,
ro',
:.�m��a
���" d am �ry��zzczo
z,33ns'" 2,'-�3 saa'
.9.. 3''''
ZZOZ/LZ/l05
3,0
U UiOH (�(/\aIWlN
n�iQ1Sr10J
09099LC L9
103rOdd NA
1CH LON
U
- -
"
'a � off' 'oar _�_
/�/�
o
w�
---
3==$3
�
-
w �. Swgw
ds� o�
g 4 =£
��
�C,
`°
Y
s
$ 1 �'
III
o v� ��
n
x
sae§e
�@c
�
.,va
a
N
2a'_�=
F
�Ifi�j'�
AM
1
g "
>�"
_
1
1 08 8899
HEEEE
a s
'
4
t
�
lid J 1 _
eOh
Ott��jz
, -
�?��_� t :2 , t t t t
,/�1 t tin
E 1 P
3 �- 1 m�
l'i�yb 1Q
@a \kV
S � �cs, ,6 -t
(y, tires ( t
J �i�/ .�
tww
_ Rro'?I'i�r'�r�ti
m
m
y
N f
O
F
w wrr1)
t
� i i \,
�
I\
rr 1i
it
, a`
.
et
i 4A'
3
\
t
,3' �,\1il\�iLV
r \ \ 11y \\ � �)„.,,,'>.„gl*‘‘L \
\ -- --;\ & ,, .
z - ,v
t t 1
list ti
it �-- -� __
_' cl�maslE_
1
_Ivard
s i �i.-� t`
`dt
- V �e 1 1i' iv.
it
�tt�1/i�tii��i,'),
t��w��tl t'',.,
tt i2 'i1/�it
�4t'13 i� a �� , t r i
v -��- "'-\�
�
Ewan
,t
/3
4o.
1 '�/
`
. ..
* 4;140 , sot.�
'
;0'44
lop
.„
v���i
t
t
I
��
Ot
,'
.tt
3;`
t L
t
n`�
,;'

Part 3: Letter from Kimley Horn Regarding the Primary Stream Crossing

Kimley>»Horn
April 5, 2022
NCDEQ
Mooresville Regional Office
Re: Beltway 77 — Industrial Development
Stream Crossing
To NCDEQ:
The initial site layout was performed to connect to existing roads and align with other proposed
developments are required by the Town of Huntersville and NCDOT. Based on the required driveway
connection points, public roadway minimum design radii dictated the required stream crossing
location. As part of the design of this new internal public road Kimley-Horn reviewed the
environmental and utility constraints in the area. Colonial Pipeline has two large gasoline pipelines
(36" and 48") adjacent to the stream throughout the site. Based on extensive coordination with
Colonial Pipeline, structures are not allowed within their 70' wide easement. In this location, the
stream naturally curves. As such, a bottomless culvert design would require a very wide culvert
section with walls or other structures encroaching within the Colonial easement. This option was
discussed but ultimately was not allowed. The current alignment utilizes a box culvert and natural
stream design, including bank grading, bio-engineering elements, native vegetation, improved
bedform diversity, and adding aquatic habitat features to minimize environmental impacts while
avoiding the adjacent easement. The box culvert is to be imbedded into the stream to allow for
aquatic life passage.
Should you have any questions regarding this, please feel free to reach out to me at [phone].
Very truly yours,
KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
aA2;La/174C----
Austin Watts, P.E.
Vice President
kimley-horn.com
200 South Tryon Street, Suite 200, Charlotte NC 28202
704-333-5131

Part 4: Responses to NCWRC Comments

Responses to NCWRC Comments Dated March 21, 2022
1. The photographs reference a farm pond in the NE portion of the project. Is that going to be
drained or is it the one that will be avoid? This feature was deemed a wetland by USACE and will
not be impacted.
2. Have you done NCWAM or NCSAM? No NCWAM or NCSAM has been performed. All mitigation
is being proposed and the standard 2:1 ratio.
3. Have you conducted T&E surveys for federally listed species? Yes, Terracon has completed a
T&E report for the site, and it is attached with this submittal
4. Further minimize impacts to wetlands and streams. The project narrative describes the multiple
avoidance and minimization measures that have occurred during project design.
5. For the relocation portion of the stream, we recommend using state-of-the-art natural channel
design. We prefer natural materials such as coir fiber rolls, biodegradable erosion -control
blankets, and vegetation instead of rip rap where practical. Use native species that occur in
Mecklenburg County Monitoring is recommended to ensure successful channel and bank
stabilization and vegetation growth; monitoring should occur once per year during the growing
season for three years or three bankfull events. Invasive species control should occur regularly,
including prior to construction if present. The relocation area has been designed according to
natural channel design methodologies and is detailed in the plans provided by Kimley-Horn
6. Furthermore, non-native plants should not be used for seeding disturbed areas. Specifically,
avoid using Bermudagrass, redtop, tall fescue, and lespedeza, which are invasive and/or non-
native. A list of native alternatives to non-native species has been attached. Alternatively, use a
grain, such as oats, wheat, or rye for temporary cover and native seed mixes for permeant
seeding. We recommend planting native, wildflower seed mixes that will create pollinator
habitat within the project boundary and plant native trees and shrubs for landscaping rather
than using turf grass. Native plants used in the project should naturally occur in Mecklenburg
County (https://authl.dpr.ncparks.gov/flora/species account.php). Using native plants will
also reduce costs and time for maintenance of landscaping. Native seed mix will be used
7. The applicant should avoid the removal of large trees. Due to the decline in many tree -roosting
bat populations, trees should not be removed during the maternity roosting season for bats
(May 15—August 15). Based on current NCNHP data, there are no occurrences of NLEB or
hibernacula within more than one mile from the site. The project is in compliance with 4(d) rule
established by USFWS.
8. Sediment and erosion control measures should be installed prior to any land clearing or
construction. The use of biodegradable and wildlife -friendly sediment and erosion control
devices is strongly recommended. Silt fencing, fiber rolls and/or other products should have
loose -weave netting that is made of natural fiber materials with movable joints between the
vertical and horizontal twines. Silt fencing that has been reinforced with plastic or metal mesh
should be avoided as it impedes the movement of terrestrial wildlife species. Silt fencing should
be maintained during construction and removed after soils have stabilized. All required ESC
measures will be used and strictly monitored and maintained during the duration of the project.

Part 5: Property Owner Info and Agent Authorizations

1-77 Beltway Site
PROPERTY OWNER INFO TABLE
TERRACON-71207484
PIN
PROPERTY OWNER
ACERAGE
PROPERTY ADDRESS
01204202
GEORGE W JR ALEXANDER / JOYCE DOUGLAS
20.39
13011 BEATTIES FORD RD HUNTERSVILLE NC 28078
01704208
GEORGE L ALEXANDER
2.146
11317 ALEXANDRIANA RD HUNTERSVILLE NC 28078
01704209
PATRICIA A MENGES
4.50
13307 BINNAWAY RD HUNTERSVILLE NC 28078
01704210
SUSAN ALEXANDER WHITE
15.56
11300 HAMBRIGHT RD HUNTERSVILLE NC 28078
01704215
JOHN MCKNITT ALEXANDER
23.54
11250 HAMBRIGHT RD HUNTERSVILLE NC 28078
01704216
JOE W GAITHER
9.85
11201 ALEXANDRIANA RD HUNTERSVILLE NC 28078
01704225
CYNTHIA A WISCH
4.253
11307 ALEXANDRIANA RD HUNTERSVILLE NC 28078
01704226
DONOVAN III MCGRADY / CARRIE W MCGRADY
2.49
11311 ALEXANDRIANA RD HUNTERSVILLE NC 28078
01704222
GEORGE W ALEXANDER / JOYCE ALEXANDER
3.653
13011 BEATTIES FORD RD HUNTERSVILLE NC 28078
01704228
CYNTHIA A WISCH
2.443
11315 ALEXANDRIANA RD HUNTERSVILLE NC 28078
01704220
CYNTHIA A WISCH
3.30
11313 ALEXANDRIANA RD HUNTERSVILLE NC 28078

Jurisdictional Dete
ination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION3'4
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
i)v_ev cAt;
Print Name SO Cf.- 0, L Pi-z•L '0
Capacity: E Owner ri Authorized Agent5
I/ (c;)
Date
E.
REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
[7 I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
I intend to construct/develop a project or perfomi activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
Ecess.
I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
IDI believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
nOther:
3 For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
5 Must provide agent authorization form/letter signed by owner(s).
Version: May 2017
Page 3

USACE/NCDWR Agent Authorization Form
Property/Site: 1-77 Beltway
Address of Site: Site access is located at 11300 Hambright Road and is located between
Alexandriana Road to Hambright Road and west of Highway 77.
24,3<7-1 7
Parcel Identification Number (PIN): See attached table. CI) 1)76'
Owner Information:
Name:
Address: )°--ic
• e, it -
t4- tR,
ord 5
11
Telephone Number: ' 740
E-mail Address:
Property Owner Certification:
1, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property/properties identified herein,
do authorize representatives of the Charlotte Office of the Asheville District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) and/ or the North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NCDWR) to enter
upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -site investigations and
issuing a determination associated with Waters of the U.S (WOTUS) subject to Federal/State
jurisdiction under Section 404 and 401 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers
and Harbors Act of 1899. Terracon, as designated by the current property owner, is the authorized
consultant to coordinate, schedule, and provide supplemental information to both agencies in
support of this verification and/or permit application.
Property Owner Signature:
Terracon Consultants Inc. 2401 Brentwood Road, Suite 107, Raleigh, NC 28208-3608
P: 919-873-2211 F: 919-873-9555 terracon.corn
Environmental 8 Facilities ri Geotectittical
Materials

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION3'4
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Ai ny Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
67/11% td/S
Print Name
Capacity: [31
//— //
Date
Signature
Owner
(71,6 690
Authorized Agent5
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
I intend to construct/develop a project or perfoiiii activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
iT I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
process.
I intend to construct/develop a project or perfoi in activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
EI believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
Other:
3 For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
5 Must provide agent authorization form/letter signed by owner(s).
Version: May 2017
Page 3

���~E��� `�
en
Property/Site: 1-77 Beftway
uthorization
For
Address ofSite: Site access iO located at11300Honnbhqht Road and is located between
Alexandriana Road to Hambriqht Road and west of Hiqhway 77.
Parcel Identification Number /P|N\: See attached table.
/�/�/)4/�`�
Owner Information:
N8[D8:
Address:
Ay7~(=, /�s(/)///�/
Telephone Number: ^7C 4/ i 6_^7 7^
Property Owner Certification:
1, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property/properties identified herein,
do authorize representatives of the Charlotte Office of the Asheville District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) and/ Or the North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NC[)VVR)k} enter
upon the propjartv herein described for the purpose of conducting on -site investigations and
issuing 3 determination associated with Waters of the U.S (VVOTU8) subject to Federal/State
`
jurisdiction under Section 404 and 401 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivera
and Harbors Act of 1899. Terracon, as designated by the current property owner, is the authorized
consultant to 000rdinate, nohedu|o, and provide supplemental information to both agencies in
support Ofthis verification and/or permit application.
Property Owner Signature:
Date: / / -^ // — -PO 0
TerracunConsultants Inc, 2401 Brentwood Road, Suite 107, Raleigx, NC 28208-3608

1-77 Beltway Site
PROPERTY OWNER INFO TABLE
TERRACON-71207484
PIN
PROPERTY OWNER
ACERAGE
PROPERTY ADDRESS
01704207
GEORGE W JR ALEXANDER / JOYCE DOUGLAS
20.39
13011 BEATTIES FORD RD HUNTERSVILLE NC 28078
01704208
GEORGE L ALEXANDER
2.146
11317 ALEXANDRIANA RD HUNTERSVILLE NC 28078
01704209
PATRICIA A MENGES
4.50
13307 BINNAWAY RD HUNTERSVILLE NC 28078
01704210
SUSAN ALEXANDER WHITE
15.56
11300 HAMBRIGHT RD HUNTERSVILLE NC 28078
01704215
JOHN MCKNITT ALEXANDER
23.54
11250 HAMBRIGHT RD HUNTERSVILLE NC 28078
01704216
JOE W GAITHER
9.85
11201 ALEXANDRIANA RD HUNTERSVILLE NC 28078
01704225
CYNTHIA A WISCH
4.253
11307 ALEXANDRIANA RD HUNTERSVILLE NC 28078
01704226
DONOVAN III MCGRADY / CARRIE W MCGRADY
2.49
11311 ALEXANDRIANA RD HUNTERSVILLE NC 28078
01704227
GEORGE W ALEXANDER / JOYCE ALEXANDER
3.653
13011 BEATTIES FORD RD HUNTERSVILLE NC 28078
01704228
CYNTHIA A WISCH
2.443
11315 ALEXANDRIANA RD HUNTERSVILLE NC 28078
01704220
CYNTHIA A WISCH
3.30
11313 ALEXANDRIANA RD HUNTERSVILLE NC 28078

L
Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION34
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
trre Ac(2a
Print Name
Capacity: Owner
\ 10117/0,1)
Dat
Signature
Authorized Agent5
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
FI intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
process.
I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
r"-- I intend to construct/develop a project or perfor in activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
Other:
3 For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
5 Must provide agent authorization formlletter signed by owner(s).
Version: May 2017
Page 3

Owner Information:
Name:
Address:
Telephone Number:
E-mail Address:
USACE/NCDWR Agent Authorization Form
Property/Site:
Address of Site:
1-77 Beltway
Site access is located at 11300 Hambright Road and is located between
Alexandriana Road to Hambright Road and west of Highway 77.
Parcel Identification Number (PIN): See attached table. PIN / 70 LIZZAI
pi-74 0 19obi'424
tfrn't- AAJ-9(eAl
Oloccoketria_
to
s" (-1771
raat.-e ralti aymo-(1' cal
Property Owner Certification:
I, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property/properties identified herein,
do authorize representatives of the Charlotte Office of the Asheville District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) and/ or the North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NCDWR) to enter
upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -site investigations and
issuing a determination associated with Waters of the U.S (WOTUS) subject to Federal/State
jurisdiction under Section 404 and 401 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers
and Harbors Act of 1899. Terracon, as designated by the current property owner, is the authorized
consultant to coordinate, schedule, and provide supplemental information to both agencies in
support of this verification and/or permit application.
Property Owner Signature:
Date:
o Uu)
Terracon Consultants Inc. 2401 Brentwood Road, Suite 107, Raleigh, NC 28208-3608
P: 919-873-2211 F: 919-873-9555 terracon.com
Environmental 8 Facilities 11 Getytechriical S Materials

1-77 Beltway Site
PROPERTY OWNER INFO TABLE
TERRACON-71207484
PIN
PROPERTY OWNER
ACERAGE
PROPERTY ADDRESS
01704207
GEORGE W JR ALEXANDER / JOYCE DOUGLAS
20.39
13011 BEATTIES FORD RD HUNTERSVILLE NC 28078
01704208
GEORGE L ALEXANDER
2.146
11317 ALEXANDRIANA RD HUNTERSVILLE NC 28078
01704209
PATRICIA A MENGES
4.50
13307 BINNAWAY RD HUNTERSVILLE NC 28078
01704210
SUSAN ALEXANDER WHITE
15.56
11300 HAMBRIGHT RD HUNTERSVILLE NC 28078
01704215
JOHN MCKNITT ALEXANDER
23.54
11250 HAMBRIGHT RD HUNTERSVILLE NC 28078
01704216
JOE W GAITHER
9.85
11201 ALEXANDRIANA RD HUNTERSVILLE NC 28078
01704225
CYNTHIA A WISCH
4.253
11307 ALEXANDRIANA RD HUNTERSVILLE NC 28078
01704226
DONOVAN III MCGRADY / CARRIE W MCGRADY
2.49
11311 ALEXANDRIANA RD HUNTERSVILLE NC 28078
01704227
GEORGE W ALEXANDER / JOYCE ALEXANDER
3.653
13011 BEATTIES FORD RD HUNTERSVILLE NC 28078
01704228
CYNTHIA A WISCH
2.443
11315 ALEXANDRIANA RD HUNTERSVILLE NC 28078
01704220
CYNTHIA A WISCH
3.30
11313 ALEXANDRIANA RD HUNTERSVILLE NC 28078

0
ct
Q.
C
A to
Property1Sae: 1-77 Beltway
ERtsgAddrasv "Srn, g,
Form
TmaaaC hoc MI@m mma Rnv15 1:07,
P..1M-8132411 F:9198738925 bmaeuxci

ctional Determination
D. PROP
RTIF1CATIONM
By signirtg below. I authorize re reseanatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 adze Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. 1, the
undcrsi am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property_
)n;if 1 Mc Nt; t ALE)-NoEg
Print Name
Capwity
© authorized Age
SON FOR JD REQUEST: (Clog.; as many as applicable)
I Mend to constmethievelop a project or perform activities on this pared toe.
deal to avoid all aquatic resources.
construcUdevelop a project or performactivities en this pared which d be
id all jurisdicticon! txpnatic resources under Craps authority.
_ -- --`construct/develop a project or perform activities onthis parcel which may.
authorization from the Corps, and the 1D WOUld be used to avoid and minimize
nara.d tojurisdictional aquatic resources and as aninitial step in a halm permitting
to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
from the Craps; this request is accompanied .ied by my permit application
ins the permitting preens.
sveiop a project or performactivities in a navigable waster of the
tot Section 10 list an/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide_
A Corps in is. fins order 8 obtain my local/state autha iation-
1 intend to contest jerisdiericm o.r r a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
otaafina that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic rice on dm parcel -
I believe that the she may be comprised entirely of dry landOther
Far
Vern= Mar
7
t snot,P03E.
atdtiowl p0ra i oat
F.fF 3

IM paUUeDS
USAC C© A Aut
Pr y I-n Beltway
Address of Site: Site access is located al 11300 Hambrig t Road end is located between
Aletdndtiene Rood to Hambriord Road end west of His way 77
Parcel Iden4Yeat n Number (PIN): See attached sole,
Humor hdortnation:
Name: G€ tL L. (L kEQ
1130 4144144n(24an1A- g
F unri-EP-SvrcLE, Jr ago?8
Ted Manlier. 7 ^ q3L - Lv .5-1,
Address RI e r r Fapi R?T nIET
Properly (Dealer Signature: -- 'n-..—eC • 0121
11-Sl-71")
Tersu.e +*« tzt. 2471 tireztosa4 iL»1,3ti2a 1237. PXgk SC =MG
P 1 F:4 cmm

di
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTWPICATION3.4
By signing below. I authorize representatives of the W ilmingon District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -
site investigations, if npoos.-.sty, and issuing a j determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Wafer Act anther Section 10 of the Rivers and harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of c....ca d of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
PIcJInrt:T ALExR-iv0£.R-
Print Name
Capacity Q Owner ©Audi A s
/l-9-zo
y
BA Corps JD is required in order obtain my iacalIstate a
1 intend to enm.— t jurisdiction ova a particular aquatic
confirm that j aisdiction doasrdoes not exist over- the aquatic rrscace on
ElI believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land
Other

1T2rracon
D ACE/NCDWR Agent Authorization Form
Property/Site:
Address of Site;
1-77 Beltway
Site access is located at 1 1300 Harnbright Road and is located between
Alexandriana Road to Hambridht Road and west of Highway 77
Parcel Identification Number (PIN): See attached table.
Owner Information:
Name:
Address:
Telephone Number:
E-mail Address:
1' 2-6 1 A L }a A d c: ¢,. rX 42-6
LIU167t,>, Lug
54� - 31{-i - I 1 u - C.
(, Cad r e -L L:Ci1urL
Property Owner Certification:
I: the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property/properties identified herein,
do authorize representatives of the Charlotte Office of the Asheville District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) arid/ or the North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NCDVVR) to enter
upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -site investigations and
issuing a determination associated with VVaters of the U.S (WOTUS) subject to Federal/State
jurisdiction under Section 404 and 401 of the Glean water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers
and Harbors Act of 1899. Terracon, as designated by the current property owner, is the authorized
consultant to coordinate, schedule, and provide supplemental information to both agencies in
support of this verification and/or permit application,
Property Owner Signature:
ji,Tc• GT, \ac tJ. Ch1T4#te- _]c
Date: k / it / it2,0
Terraaa Consultanls Inc, 2401 9renlwood Coed, Suite 107. F sleigh, NC 26208-3608
P- 919-873-2211 F: 91q-873• 555 lerracon,rnm
Environmental l! Facilities
• Geotecllnical
Materials

jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS ERTIFICATION3 4
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U,S, Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act andior Section 10 ofthe Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record ofthe property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
of Itt-1461, S rto
Print Name
Capacity: L"_I Owner ❑ Authorized Agents
Date
Signature
4-07A,.._ 6 GArrifAt...- xa 4u7rn
E. REASON FOR .ID REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
ri I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
l intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority,
I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
[process.
1 intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps: this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
I intend tc, construct/develop a project or perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
A Corps JD is required in order obtain my laeallstate authorization,
I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
Li 1 believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
DOther:
x
} For NCDOT requests Following the current NCDOT{USACH pratocuis, skip to Part Ii_
' If there are multiple parcels owned hy different parties, please provide the Following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
Most provide agent authorization form/leiter signed hy owner(s).
Version_ May 2017
Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION3,4
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
Susan Alexander White
Print Name
Capacity: ❑ Owner fl Authorized Agent'
11/07/2020
Date
Signature
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
n I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
n I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
n A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
❑ I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
n Other:
3 For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
4 If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
5 Must provide agent authorization form/letter signed by owner(s).
Version: May 2017 Page 3

lrerracon
USACE/NCDWR Agent Authorization Form
Property/Site: 1-77 Beltway
Address of Site: Site access is located at 11300 Hambright Road and is located between
Alexandriana Road to Hambright Road and west of Highway 77.
Parcel Identification Number (PIN): See attached table.
Owner Information:
Name:
Address:
Susan Alexander White
3116 Woodgreen Dr.
Raleigh N.C. 27607
Telephone Number: 919 946 2916
E-mail Address:
susanwhitel4©gmail.com
Property Owner Certification:
I, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property/properties identified herein,
do authorize representatives of the Charlotte Office of the Asheville District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) and/ or the North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NCDWR) to enter
upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -site investigations and
issuing a determination associated with Waters of the U.S (WOTUS) subject to Federal/State
jurisdiction under Section 404 and 401 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers
and Harbors Act of 1899. Terracon, as designated by the current property owner, is the authorized
consultant to coordinate, schedule, and provide supplemental information to both agencies in
support of this verification and/or permit application.
Property Owner Signature: � u
Zega
Date: 11/07/2020
Terracon Consultants Inc. 2401 Brentwood Road, Suite 107, Raleigh, NC 28208-3608
P: 919-873-2211 F: 919-873-9555 terracon.com
Environmental Facilities
Geotechnical Materials

lrerracon
USACE/NCDWR Agent Authorization Form
Property/Site: 1-77 Beltway
Address of Site: Site access is located at 11300 Hambright Road and is located between
Alexandriana Road to Hambright Road and west of Highway 77.
Parcel Identification Number (PIN): See attached table.
Owner Information:
Name: Patricia A. Menges
Address: 9724 Kincey Ave. Bldg 10 Apt 101
Huntersville NC 28078
Telephone Number: 704 502 2476
E-mail Address: pmenges5333cgmail.com
Property Owner Certification:
I, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property/properties identified herein,
do authorize representatives of the Charlotte Office of the Asheville District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) and/ or the North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NCDWR) to enter
upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -site investigations and
issuing a determination associated with Waters of the U.S (WOTUS) subject to Federal/State
jurisdiction under Section 404 and 401 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers
and Harbors Act of 1899. Terracon, as designated by the current property owner, is the authorized
consultant to coordinate, schedule, and provide supplemental information to both agencies in
support of this verification and/or permit application.
Property Owner Signature: °'G
Date: 11/06/2020
Terracon Consultants Inc. 2401 Brentwood Road, Suite 107, Raleigh, NC 28208-3608
P: 919-873-2211 F: 919-873-9555 terracon.com
Environmental Facilities
Geotechnical Materials

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION3'4
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
Patricia A. Menges
Print Name
Capacity: ❑X Owner fl Authorized Agents
11/06/2020
Date
pG .Mansrip
Signature
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
nI intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
n I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
n I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
process.
nI intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
nI intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
n A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
nI believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
n Other:
3 For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
4 If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
5 Must provide agent authorization faun/letter signed by owner(s).
Version: May 2017 Page 3

Part 6: NCSHPO Letter

North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona M. Bartos, Administrator
Governor Roy Cooper Secretary D. Reid Wilson
June 11, 2021
Terri Russ
Terracon
2401 Brentwood Road, Suite 107
Raleigh, NC 27604
[e-mail]
Re: Construct industrial warehouses, 77 Beltway Property, Alexanderana Road & I-77, Charlotte,
Mecklenburg County, ER 21-1110
Dear Ms. Russ:
Thank you for your email of April 19, 2021, regarding the above -referenced undertaking. We have
reviewed the submittal and offer the following comments.
We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no historic resources which would be affected
by the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the project as proposed.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36
CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact Renee Gledhill -Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-814-6579
or [e-mail]. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the
above referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
Ramona Bartos, Deputy
V
State Historic Preservation Officer
Location: 109 East Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 Telephone/Fax: [phone]-6898

Part 7: USACE JD

Requestor:
Address:
Telephone Number:
E-mail:
Size (acres)
Nearest Waterway
USGS HUC
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. SAW-2020-02078 County: Mecklenburg U.S.G.S. Quad: NC- Derita
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Strategic Capital Partners
Jackson Hendricks
2054 Kildaire Farm Road
Cary, NC 27518
704-773-8684
i acksonh(a,dcinsightllc.com
91 Nearest Town Huntersville
Long Creek River Basin Santee
03050101 Coordinates Latitude: 35.374049
Longitude: -80.847449
Location description: The review area is located on the south side of Hambright Road; approximately 0.5 miles east of the
intersection of Hambright Road and Mt. Holly-Huntersville Road. PINs: 01704210, 01704215, 01704207, 01704227, 01704208,
01704228, 01704225, 01704226, 01704220, 01704209, and 01704216. Reference review description shown in Jurisdictional
Determination Request package entitled "Exhibit 2, USGS Topographic Map" and dated September 2020.
Indicate Which of the Following Apply:
A. Preliminary Determination
❑ There appear to be waters, including wetlands on the above described project area/property, that may be subject to Section 404
of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403). The
waters, including wetlands have been delineated, and the delineation has been verified by the Corps to be sufficiently accurate
and reliable. The approximate boundaries of these waters are shown on the enclosed delineation map dated DATE. Therefore
this preliminary jurisdiction determination may be used in the permit evaluation process, including determining compensatory
mitigation. For purposes of computation of impacts, compensatory mitigation requirements, and other resource protection
measures, a permit decision made on the basis of a preliminary JD will treat all waters and wetlands that would be affected in any
way by the permitted activity on the site as if they are jurisdictional waters of the U.S. This preliminary determination is not an
appealable action under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process (Reference 33 CFR Part 331). However, you may
request an approved JD, which is an appealable action, by contacting the Corps district for further instruction.
❑ There appear to be waters, including wetlands on the above described project area/property, that may be subject to Section 404
of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403).
However, since the waters, including wetlands have not been properly delineated, this preliminary jurisdiction determination
may not be used in the permit evaluation process. Without a verified wetland delineation, this preliminary determination is
merely an effective presumption of CWA/RHA jurisdiction over all of the waters, including wetlands at the project area, which
is not sufficiently accurate and reliable to support an enforceable permit decision. We recommend that you have the waters,
including wetlands on your project area/property delineated. As the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland
delineation in a timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that can be verified by the Corps.
B. Approved Determination
❑ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described project area/property subject to the permit
requirements of Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403) and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
(CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for
a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
There are waters, including wetlandson the above described project area/property subject to the permit requirements of Section
404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) (33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this
determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ We recommend you have the waters, including wetlands on your project area/property delineated. As the Corps may not be
able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that
can be verified by the Corps.

SAW-2020-02078
❑ The waters, including wetlands on your project area/property have been delineated and the delineation has been verified by
the Corps. The approximate boundaries of these waters are shown on the enclosed delineation map dated DATE. We strongly
suggest you have this delineation surveyed. Upon completion, this survey should be reviewed and verified by the Corps. Once
verified, this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to CWA jurisdiction on your property which, provided
there is no change in the law or our published regulations, may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years.
❑ The waters, including wetlands have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat signed by the
Corps Regulatory Official identified below onDATE. Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this
determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described project area/property which are subject to the
permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA).
You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in Morehead City, NC, at [phone] to determine their
requirements.
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US, including wetlands, without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311). Placement of dredged or fill material, construction or
placement of structures, or work within navigable waters of the United States without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Sections 9 and/or 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (33 USC § 401 and/or 403). If you have any questions
regarding this determination and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact Bryan Roden -Reynolds at 704-510-1440 or
brvan.roden-revnolds(a,u sace.armv.mil.
C. Basis For Determination: Basis For Determination: See the approved jurisdictional determination
form dated 2/2/2021.
D. Remarks: None.
E. Attention USDA Program Participants
This delineation/determination has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps' Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the particular site
identified in this request. The delineation/determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security
Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in USDA programs, you should request
a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
F. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in B.
above)
This correspondence constitutes an approved jurisdictional determination for the above described site. If you object to this
determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331. Enclosed you will find a
Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal this determination you
must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Phillip Shannin, Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW, Room 10M15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for appeal
under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP. Should you
decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by 02/28/2021.
**It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Division Office if you do not object to the determination in this correspondence.**
RODEN Digitally signed by RODEN
E 3385574
Corps Regulatory ryOficial: REYNOLDS.BRYAN.KENNETH.1263385574 Date.
7071020210•5514_„,n0'
Date of JD: 2/2/2021 Expiration Date of JD: 12/29/2025

SAW-2020-02078
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we
continue to do so, please complete the Customer Satisfaction Survey located at
http://corpsmapu.usace.army.mil/cmapex/f?p=136:4:0
Copy furnished:
Agent: TerraCon
Patrick Korn
Address: 2701 Westport Road
Charlotte, NC 28208
Telephone Number: 704-509-1777
E-mail: Patrick.korn(a,terracon.com

APPEAL OPTIONS AND PROCESS AND
FOR APPEAL
NOTIFICATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE
REQUEST
Applicant:
Hendricks
Strategic Capital Partners Jackson
File Number: SAW-2020-02078
Date: 2/2/2021
Attached is:
See Section below
INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission)
A
PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission)
B
PERMIT DENIAL
C
x
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
D
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
E
SECTION
Additional
or the
I - The following identifies your rights and options
information may be found at or http://www.usace.army.mil/Missions/CivilWorks/RegulatoryProgramandPermits.aspx
regarding an administrative appeal
of the above decision.
Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331.
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for fmal
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request
that the permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section II of this form and return the form to the district
engineer. Your objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will
forfeit your right to appeal the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your
objections and may: (a) modify the permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your
objections, or (c) not modify the permit having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After
evaluating your objections, the district engineer will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in
Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP),
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions,
permit.
• APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit
you may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of
this form and sending the form to the division engineer.
of the date of this notice.
the permit
sign the permit document and return
you may accept the LOP and
LOP means that you accept the permit
and approved jurisdictional
(Standard or LOP) because of
Engineers Administrative Appeal
it to the district engineer for fmal
your work is authorized. Your
in its entirety, and waive all
determinations associated with the
certain terms and conditions therein,
Process by completing Section II of
the division engineer within 60 days
This form must be received by
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers
completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form
engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
Administrative Appeal Process by
must be received by the division
D: APPROVED
information.
•
•
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION:
ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept
date of this notice, means that you accept the approved
APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you
Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section
You may accept or appeal the approved JD or provide new
an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the
JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers
II of this form and sending the form to the district engineer. This form
of the date of this notice.
must be received by the division engineer within 60 days

E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps regarding the
preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved JD (which may be appealed),
by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new information for further consideration by the
Corps to reevaluate the JD.
SECTION II - REQUEST FOR APPEAL or OBJECTIONS TO AN INITIAL PROFFERED
PERMIT
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your
proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach
objections are addressed in the administrative record.)
reasons for appealing the decision or your objections to an initial
additional information to this form to clarify where your reasons or
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a
record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental
clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the
review of the administrative record,
information that the review
Corps may add new information
the location of information that
the Corps memorandum for the
officer has determined is needed to
or analyses to the record.
is already in the administrative
However, you may provide additional information to clarify
record.
POINT OF CONTACT FOR QUESTIONS OR INFORMATION:
If you have questions regarding this decision and/or the
appeal process you may contact:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division
Attn: Bryan Roden -Reynolds
Charlotte Regulatory Office
U.S Army Corps of Engineers
8430 University Executive Park Drive, Suite 615
Charlotte, North Carolina 28262
If you only have questions regarding
also contact:
Mr. Phillip Shannin, Administrative
the appeal process you may
Appeal Review Officer
South Atlantic Division
CESAD-PDO
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,
60 Forsyth Street, Room 10M15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any government
consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You will be provided a 15-day
notice of any site investigation, and will have the opportunity to participate in all site investigations.
Date:
Telephone number:
Signature of appellant or agent.
For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits send this form to:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, Attn: Bryan Roden -Reynolds, 69 Darlington Avenue, Wihnington, North
Carolina 28403
For Permit denials, Proffered Permits and Approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this form to:
Division Engineer, Commander, U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic, Attn: Mr. Phillip Shannin, Administrative
Appeal Officer, CESAD-PDO, 60 Forsyth Street, Room 10M15, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
REGULATORY PROGRAM
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM (INTERIM)
NAVIGABLE WATERS PROTECTION RULE
I. ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION
Completion Date of Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD): 2/2/2021
ORM Number: SAW-2020-02078
Associated JDs: N/A
Review Area Location': State/Territory: City: Huntersville County/Parish/Borough: Mecklenburg
Center Coordinates of Review Area: Latitude 35.374049 Longitude -80.847449
II. FINDINGS
A. Summary: Check all that apply. At least one box from the following list MUST be selected. Complete the
corresponding sections/tables and summarize data sources.
J The review area is comprised entirely of dry land (i.e., there are no waters or water features, including
wetlands, of any kind in the entire review area). Rationale: N/A or describe rational(
❑ There are "navigable waters of the United States" within Rivers and Harbors Act jurisdiction within the
review area (complete table in Section II.B).
❑x There are "waters of the United States" within Clean Water Act jurisdiction within the review area
(complete appropriate tables in Section II.C).
Cx� There are waters or water features excluded from Clean Water Act jurisdiction within the review area
(complete table in Section II.D).
B. Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 Section 10 (§ 10)2
§ 10 Name
§ 10 Size
§ 10 Criteria
Rationale for § 10 Determination
N/A
N/A
C. Clean Water Act Section 404
Territorial Seas and Traditional Navigable Waters ((a)(1) waters):3
(a)(1) Name
(a)(1) Size
(a)(1) Criteria
Rationale for (a)(1) Determination
Tributaries ((a)(2) waters):
(a)(2) Name
(a)(2) Size
(a)(2) Criteria
Rationale for (a)(2) Determination
Stream T1
1,670
linear
feet
(a)(2)
Intermittent
tributary
contributes
surface water
flow directly or
indirectly to an
(a)(1) water in a
typical year.
The flow regime was verified during the Corps
site visit on 01/07/21.
Stream T2
93
linear
feet
(a)(2) Perennial
tributary
The flow regime was verified during the Corps
site visit on 01/07/21.
Map(s)/figure(s) are attached to the AJD provided to the requestor.
'If the navigable water is not subject to the ebb and flow of the tide or included on the District's list of Rivers and Harbors Act Section 10 navigable waters list, do
NOT use this document to make the determination. The District must continue to follow the procedure outlined in 33 CFR part 329.14 to make a Rivers and Harbors
Act Section 10 navigability determination.
3 A stand-alone TNW determination is completed independently of a request for an AJD. A stand-alone TNW determination is conducted for a specific segment of river
or stream or other type of waterbody, such as a lake, where upstream or downstream limits or lake borders are established. A stand-alone TNW determination should be
completed following applicable guidance and should NOT be documented on the AJD Form.
Page 2 of 2 Forni Version 10 June 2020 updated

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
REGULATORY PROGRAM
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM (INTERIM)
NAVIGABLE WATERS PROTECTION RULE
Tributaries ((a)(2) waters):
(a)(2) Name
(a)(2) Size
(a)(2) Criteria
Rationale for (a)(2) Determination
contributes
surface water
flow directly or
indirectly to an
(a)(1) water in a
typical year.
Stream T4
(a-c)
382
linear
feet
(a)(2)
Intermittent
tributary
contributes
surface water
flow directly or
indirectly to an
(a)(1) water in a
typical year.
The flow regime was verified during the Corps
site visit on 01/07/21.
Stream T5
(a-d)
922
linear
feet
(a)(2) Perennial
tributary
contributes
surface water
flow directly or
indirectly to an
(a)(1) water in a
typical year.
The flow regime was verified during the Corps
site visit on 01/07/21.
Stream T6
(a-b)
891
linear
feet
(a)(2)
Intermittent
tributary
contributes
surface water
flow directly or
indirectly to an
(a)(1) water in a
typical year.
The flow regime was verified during the Corps
site visit on 01/07/21.
Lakes and ponds, and impoundments of jurisdictional waters ((a)(3) waters):
(a)(3) Name
(a)(3) Size
(a)(3) Criteria
Rationale for (a)(3) Determination
N/A
N/A
N/A.
N/A.
Adjacent wetlands ((a)(4) waters):
(a)(4) Name
(a)(4) Size
(a)(4) Criteria
Rationale for (a)(4) Determination
Wetland W1
0.01
acre(s)
(a)(4) Wetland
abuts an (a)(1)-
(a)(3) water.
Wetland W1 abuts perennial Stream T2
Wetland W2
0.22
acre(s)
(a)(4) Wetland
abuts an (a)(1)-
(a)(3) water.
Wetland W2 abuts Streams T2 and T1
Page 2 of 2
Form Version 10 June 2020 updated

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
REGULATORY PROGRAM
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM (INTERIM)
NAVIGABLE WATERS PROTECTION RULE
Adjacent wetlands ((a)(4) waters):
(a)(4) Name
(a)(4) Size
(a)(4) Criteria
Rationale for (a)(4) Determination
Wetland W4
0.1
acre(s)
(a)(4) Wetland
abuts an (a)(1)-
(a)(3) water.
Wetland W4 abuts intermittent Stream T4
Wetland W5
0.27
acre(s)
(a)(4) Wetland
abuts an (a)(1)-
(a)(3) water.
Wetland W5 abuts intermittent Stream T4
Wetland W6
0.05
acre(s)
(a)(4) Wetland
abuts an (a)(1)-
(a)(3) water.
Wetland W6 abuts intermittent Stream T4
Wetland W7
0.01
acre(s)
(a)(4) Wetland
abuts an (a)(1)-
(a)(3) water.
Wetland W7 abuts perennial Stream T5
Wetland W8
0.06
acre(s)
(a)(4) Wetland
abuts an (a)(1)-
(a)(3) water.
Wetland W8 abuts perennial Stream T5
Wetland W9
0.04
acre(s)
(a)(4) Wetland
abuts an (a)(1)-
(a)(3) water.
Wetland W9 abuts perennial Stream T5
Wetland
W10
0.22
acre(s)
(a)(4) Wetland
abuts an (a)(1)-
(a)(3) water.
Wetland W10 abuts perennial Stream T5
Wetland
W11
0.02
acre(s)
(a)(4) Wetland
abuts an (a)(1)-
(a)(3) water.
Wetland W11 abuts intermittent Stream T1
Wetland
W12
0.06
acre(s)
(a)(4) Wetland
abuts an (a)(1)-
(a)(3) water.
Wetland W12 abuts intermittent Stream T1
Wetland
W13
0.08
acre(s)
(a)(4) Wetland
abuts an (a)(1)-
(a)(3) water.
Wetland W13 abuts intermittent Stream T1
D. Excluded Waters or Features
Excluded waters ((b)(1) — (b)(12)):4
Exclusion Name
Exclusion Size
Exclusions
Rationale for Exclusion Determination
Stream T3 (a-b)
116
linear
feet
(b)(3) Ephemeral
feature,
including an
ephemeral
stream, swale,
gully, rill, or
pool.
The flow regime was verified during the
Corps site visit on 01/07/21.
' Some excluded waters, such as (b)(2) and (b)(4), may not be specifically identified on the AJD form unless a requestor specifically asks a Corps district to do so.
Corps districts may, in case -by -case instances, choose to identify some or all of these waters within the review area.
5 Because of the broad nature of the (b)(1) exclusion and in an effort to collect data on specific types of waters that would be covered by the (b)(1) exclusion, four sub-
categories of (b)(1) exclusions were administratively created for the purposes of the AJD Form. These four sub -categories are not new exclusions, but are simply
administrative distinctions and remain (b)(1) exclusions as defined by the NWPR.
Page 2 of 2 Form Version 10 June 2020 updated

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
REGULATORY PROGRAM
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM (INTERIM)
NAVIGABLE WATERS PROTECTION RULE
Excluded waters ((b)(1) — (b)(12)):4
Exclusion Name
Exclusion Size
Exclusions
Rationale for Exclusion Determination
Wetland W3
0.706
acre(s)
(b)(1) Non-
adjacent
wetland.
Wetland W3 only connection to downstream
jurisdictional waters in via an ephemeral
channel (non -jurisdictional)
III. SUPPORTING INFORMATION
A. Select/enter all resources that were used to aid in this determination and attach data/maps to this
document and/or references/citations in the administrative record, as appropriate.
Information submitted by, or on behalf of, the applicant/consultant: Exhibits 1-5
This information is sufficient for purposes of this AJD.
Rationale: N/A
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps: 'tle(s) and/or date(s).
❑x Photographs: Aerial and Other: Exhibits 1, 1a-1b Depiction of Aquatic Resources (Dated
September 2020) and Photographs 1-16
E Corps site visit(s) conducted on: 01/07/21
❑ Previous Jurisdictional Determinations (AJDs or PJDs): ORM Number(s) and date(s).
▪ Antecedent Precipitation Tool: provide detailed discussion in Section III.B.
▪ USDA NRCS Soil Survey: Exhibit 6, NRCS Soils (Web Soil Survey of Mecklenburg County)
▪ USFWS NWI maps: Exhibit 4, National Wetland Inventory (USFWS NWI Mapper)
▪ USGS topographic maps: Exhibit 2, USGS Topographic Map (7.5-minute quadrangle Cornelius
and Derita, NC)
Other data sources used to aid in this determination:
Data Source (select)
Name and/or date and other relevant information
USGS Sources
N/A.
USDA Sources
N/A.
NOAA Sources
N/A.
USACE Sources
N/A.
State/Local/Tribal Sources
N/A.
Other Sources
Exhibit 4, National Hydrography Dataset (Dated September 2020) and
Exhibit 5, FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps (National Flood Hazard
Layer)
B. Typical year assessment(s): The consultant (i.e., Terracon) conducted a site visit on 09/23/20. The
Antecedent Precipitation Tool (APT) was used for this date and determined the site was under drier
than normal conditions. The Corps conducted a site visit on 01/07/21. The APT was used for this
dated and determined the site was under wetter than normal conditions.
C. Additional comments to support AJD: See Section II(D) Excluded Waters or Features for further
analysis on Streams T3 (a-b) and Wetland W3.
Page 2 of 2 Form Version 10 June 2020 updated

Perennial / Intermittent Features
Non -Wetland Waters
Non -Wetland Waters
Non -Wetland Waters
Non -Wetland Waters
Non -Wetland Waters
Non -Wetland Waters
Non -Wetland Waters
Non -Wetland Waters
Non -Wetland Waters
Non -Wetland Waters
Non -Wetland Waters
Wetland Features
T1: -1670 Linear Feet I -0.304 Acres
T2: -93 Linear Feet I -0.004 Acres
T4a: -190 Linear Feet I <0.022 Acre
T4b: -128 Linear Feet I <0.015 Acre
T4c: -64 Linear Feet I <0.007 Acre
T5a: -679 Linear Feet I <0.007 Acre
T5b: -26 Linear Feet' <0.007 Acre
T5c: -72 Linear Feet I <0.007 Acre
T5d: -145 Linear Feet I <0.007 Acre
T6a: -656 Linear Feet I <0.007 Acre
T6b: -235 Linear Feet' <0.007 Acre
Wetland Waters 1:-0.01 Acres
Wetland Waters 2:-0.22 Acres
Wetland Waters 4:-0.10 Acres
Wetland Waters 5:-0.27 Acres
Wetland Waters 6:-0.05 Acres
Wetland Waters 7: <0.01 Acres
Wetland Waters 8: -0.06 Acres
Wetland Waters 9: -0.04 Acres
Wetland Waters 10: -0.22 Acres
Wetland Waters 11: -0.02 Acres
Wetland Waters 12: -0.06 Acres
Wetland Waters 13: -0.08 Acres
Excluded Features:
Wetland Waters W3: - 1045 Linear Feet I -0.706 Acres
Non -Wetland Waters T3a: -43 Linear Feet I <0.004 Acre
Non -Wetland Waters T3b: -73 Linear Feet I <0.007 Acre
Huntersville
23
Legend
Q Site Boundary Non -Wetland Waters (Stream)
® Wetland Waters Excluded Features (Ephemeral Stream)
— Excluded Features • Upland Data Point
0 Wetland Data Point
Project No.:
71207484
Date:
Jan 2021
Drawn By:
CEW
Reviewed By:
JCW
Feet
0 200 400
lrerracon
2701 Westport Road
Charlotte, NC 28208
PH. [phone]
terracon.com
DATA SOURCES:
Latest High -Resolution NC Statewide Orthoimagery, NC
OneMap Server; Site Boundary Based on Mecklenburg
County Parcel Data.
DEPICTION OF AQUATIC RESOURCES
Beltway 77
(35.374049, -80.847449)
Huntersville, Mecklenburg County, NC
Exhibit
la
E:\Projects\71207484 177BeItLine\Maps\Aq uatic Featu res

Perennial / Intermittent Features
Non -Wetland Waters T1: -1670 Linear Feet I -0.304 Acres
Non -Wetland Waters T2: -93 Linear Feet I -0.004 Acres
Non -Wetland Waters T4a: -190 Linear Feet I <0.022 Acre
Non -Wetland Waters T4b: -128 Linear Feet I <0.015 Acre
Non -Wetland Waters T4c: -64 Linear Feet I <0.007 Acre
Non -Wetland Waters T5a: -679 Linear Feet I <0.007 Acre
Non -Wetland Waters T5b: -26 Linear Feet' <0.007 Acre
Non -Wetland Waters T5c: -72 Linear Feet I <0.007 Acre
Non -Wetland Waters T5d: -145 Linear Feet I <0.007 Acre
Non -Wetland Waters T6a: -656 Linear Feet I <0.007 Acre
Non -Wetland Waters T6b: -235 Linear Feet' <0.007 Acre
Wetland Features
Wetland Waters 1:-0.01 Acres
Wetland Waters 2:-0.22 Acres
Wetland Waters 4:-0.10 Acres
Wetland Waters 5:-0.27Acres
Wetland Waters 6:-0.05 Acres
Wetland Waters 7: <0.01 Acres
Wetland Waters 8: -0.06 Acres
Wetland Waters 9: -0.04 Acres
Wetland Waters 10: -0.22 Acres
Wetland Waters 11: -0.02 Acres
Wetland Waters 12: -0.06 Acres
Wetland Waters 13: -0.08 Acres
Excluded Features:
Wetland Waters W3: - 1045 Linear Feet I -0.706 Acres
Non -Wetland Waters T3a: -43 Linear Feet I <0.004 Acre
Non -Wetland Waters T3b: -73 Linear Feet I <0.007 Acre
Legend
Q Site Boundary Non -Wetland Waters (Stream)
® Wetland Waters Excluded Features (Ephemeral Stream)
— Excluded Features • Upland Data Point
0 Wetland Data Point
Project No.:
71207484
Date:
Jan 2021
Drawn By:
CEW
Reviewed By:
JCW
Feet
0 200 400
lrerracon
2701 Westport Road Charlotte, NC 28208
PH. [phone] terracon.com
DATA SOURCES:
Latest High -Resolution NC Statewide Orthoimagery, NC
OneMap Server; Site Boundary Based on Mecklenburg
County Parcel Data.
DEPICTION OF AQUATIC RESOURCES
Beltway 77
(35.374049, -80.847449)
Huntersville, Mecklenburg County, NC
Exhibit
1b
E:\Projects\71207484 177BeItLine\Maps\AquaticFeatures Da

Part 8: Protected Species Report

Threatened & Endangered
Species Survey
77 Beltway
NW Quadrant of Alexandriana Road and 1-77
Huntersville, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
March 9, 2021
Terracon Project No. 71207484
Prepared for:
Strategic Capital Partners
C/O: Development and Construction Insight, LLC
Indianapolis, Indiana
Prepared by:
Terracon Consultants, Inc.
Charlotte, North Carolina
terra con.com
lierracon
Environmental
Facilities ft Geotechnical 9 Materials

lrerracon
March 9, 2021
Strategic Capital Partners
280 E. 96th Street, Suite 250
Indianapolis, IN 46240
Attn: Mr. Jackson Hendricks
C/O: Development and Construction Insight, LLC — Jackson Hendricks
P: [phone]
E: JacksonH©DClnsightLLC.com
RE: Threatened and Endangered Species Report
77 Beltway Project
NW Quadrant of Alexandriana Road and 1-77
Huntersville, North Carolina
Terracon Project No. 71207484
Dear Mr. Jackson:
Terracon is pleased to submit the enclosed Threatened & Endangered Species Survey report for
the above -referenced site. This assessment was performed in accordance with our Proposal No.
71207484 dated November 23, 2020.
We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you on this project. For more detailed information
on all of Terracon's services please visit our website at www.terracon.com. If there are any
questions regarding this report or if we may be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to
contact us.
Sincerely,
Terracon Consultants, Inc.
rTh
Aeaver
Project Scientist
41r—
uoc' co, PWS
rincipal/Environmental Department Manager
arK
atrick R. Korn, PWS
Natural/Cultural Resources Group Manager
Attachments
FOR
Terracon Consultants Inc. 2701 Westport Rd Charlotte, NC 28208-3608
P 704-509-1777 F 704-509-1888 terracon.com
Environmental Facilities i Geotechnical r Materials

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 Site Location 1
1.2 Existing Conditions 1
1.3 Proposed Project 2
2.0 RECORDS REVIEW 2
2.1 Federal Status Explanation 2
2.1.1 Candidate Species 2
2.1.2 Critical Habitat 3
2.2 Coordination with NCNHP 3
3.0 HABITAT ASSESSMENT 3
3.1 Riparian Forest 4
3.2 Upland Deciduous Forest 4
3.3 Upland Evergreen Forest 4
3.4 Field and Forest Margins 4
3.5 Petroleum Pipeline Right of Way (ROW) 5
3.6 Unnamed Tributaries of Dixon Branch 5
3.7 Other Waters 5
3.8 Pond 5
4.0 EFFECT DETERMINATIONS 6
4.1 Plants 6
4.2 Mammals 8
4.3 Mollusk 9
5.0 FINDINGS 9
6.0 CONCLUSIONS 10
7.0 General comments 10
8.0 references 10

APPENDICES
APPENDIX A
Exhibit 1 — Site Location Map
Exhibit 2 — Topographic Map
Exhibit 3 — United States Fish and Wildlife National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) Map
Exhibit 4 — National Hydrogrpahy Dataset (NHD)
Exhibit 5 — National Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Web Soil Survey Map
APPENDIX B
Coordination with North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP)
USFWS Information for Planning and Conservation (IPaC) Report
Mecklenburg County List of Federally Protected Species
North Carolina Division of Water Quality Stream Identification Form
APPENDIX C
Site Photographs

Threatened & Endangered Species Survey
77 Beltway Huntersville, North Carolina
March 9, 2021 Terracon Project No. 71207484
1.0 INTRODUCTION
The following report details methodology and an assessment of survey results for the threatened
and endangered species survey completed on September 4, 2020 for the project site described
below and depicted in Appendix A. This threatened and endangered species survey was
conducted within the site boundaries and immediate vicinity of the site to determine the
occurrence of, or potential for occurrence of animal and plant species recognized as threatened
or endangered within the boundaries of the referenced site. Completion of this survey was
directed by and complies with the Federal Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973.
1.1 Site Location
The Site (Exhibit 1, 2) consists of multiple tax parcels totaling approximately 91.03 acres of
agricultural and residential land located in the NW quadrant of Alexandriana Road and 1-77,
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina. The Meckelburg County GIS website identifies the site as
Parcel Nos. 01704207, 01704208, 01704209, 01704210, 01704215, 01704216, 01704225,
01704226, 01704227, 01704228, 01704220 in Huntersville, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina.
The approximate center of the review area is located at 35.374049° latitude and
-80.847449° longitude.
The project site is located within the Southern Outer Piedmont (45b) level IV Ecoregion within the
Piedmont level III Ecoregion of North Carolina. This region is made up of mostly irregular plains
and has lower elevations, less relief, and less precipitation than the adjacent ecoregions. The
soils are saprolitic and mostly red, clayey subsoils. The geology of the Outer Piedmont are mostly
gneiss, schist, and granite with some metamorphic rocks and high amounts of saprolitic material.
The potential natural vegetation of this ecoregion includes pasture and crop lands, abandoned
fields and oak -hickory -pine forest consisting of mostly white, southern red, black, and scarlet
oaks, Virginia and shortleaf pines; on more mesic sites, beech, tulip poplar, and red maple are
present.
1.2 Existing Conditions
The site consists of approximately 91.03 acres of agricultural fields, grassed areas, woods, and
multiple residences and associated outbuildings. The site is accessed by multiple dirt and gravel
roads from Alexandriana Road in the southern portion of the site and Hambright Road in the
northern portion of the site. The site is bound to the east by Interstate Highway 77 and to the west
by agricultural lands. An underground petroleum pipeline and associated Right -Of -Way (ROW)
are located within the central portion of the site traversing from the western property boundary to
the eastern property boundary. The site is located at Alexandriana Road Huntersville,
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina.
1
Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable

Threatened & Endangered Species Survey
77 Beltway Huntersville, North Carolina
March 9, 2021 Terracon Project No. 71207484
1.3 Proposed Project
The proposed project involves the development of an industrial warehouse facility and business
park. Site improvements will consist of demolition of on -site residential structures and associated
outbuildings, tree removal and grubbing, and earth moving activities associated with grade
cutting, stormwater drainage infrastructures installation, and site leveling. This project will remain
within the current foot print of development.
2.0 RECORDS REVIEW
The following federally threatened, and endangered species are listed by the United States Fish
and Wildlife Service (USFWS) North Carolina Ecological Services Field Office and as potentially
occurring within the project boundaries based on the information obtained from the Information,
Planning, and Conservation (IPaC) search engine.
Table 1: USFWS IPaC Official Species List
Group
Plants
Listed Species
Schweinitz's Sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzii)
Federal
Status
E
E
E
T
E
Michaux's Sumac (Rhus michauxii)
Smooth Coneflower (Echinacea laevigata)
Mammal
Northern long eared bat (Mysostis septentrionalis)
Mollusk
Carolina heelsplitter (Lasmigona decorate)
Source: Information, Planning, and Conservation (IPaC) Consultation Code: 04EN1000-2021-SLI-0346)
E = Endangered
T = Threatened
2.1 Federal Status Explanation
According to the ESA threatened species are those species "which are likely to become an
endangered species within the foreseeable future throughout all or a significant portion of its
range". Species listed as endangered are considered to have a higher risk of extinction and are
defined by the ESA as "any species which is in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant
portion of its range".
2.1.1 Candidate Species
According to the USFWS, Endangered Species, Threatened Species, Federal Species of
Concern, and Candidate Species of Mecklenburg County, North Carolina (included in Appendix
B), the Georgia aster (Symphyotrichum georgianum) is the only species in Mecklenburg County
2
Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable

Threatened & Endangered Species Survey
77 Beltway Huntersville, North Carolina
March 9, 2021 Terracon Project No. 71207484
which has been federally designated as a Candidate species (C). According the USFWS,
Endangered Species, Threatened Species, Federal Species of Concern, and Candidate Species
of Mecklenburg County, North Carolina (included in Appendix B) the Carolina Hemlock (Tsuga
caroliniana) is the only species in Mecklenburg County which has been federally designated as
an At -Risk Species (ARS).
Candidates are species in which the USFWS has petitioned to list but are not currently federally
protected and do not require Section 7 Consultation at this time. These species were not
evaluated or discussed further in this survey report. In the event of a Candidate species (C) being
federally listed, informal and/or formal consultation with USFWS may be required if the species,
or suitable habitat occurs on the project site or vicinity.
2.1.2 Critical Habitat
Terracon utilized the USFWS IPaC search engine to identify critical habitat that may occur on the
site. According to IPaC (Consultation Code: 04EN1000-2021-SLI-0346), there are no critical
habitats, national wildlife refuges, or fish hatcheries within the project boundaries. A copy of the
USFWS IPaC Report is included in Appendix B.
2.2 Coordination with NCNHP
Terracon contacted the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) Office for technical
assistance regarding documented occurrence of rare, threatened, or endangered species at the
site or in the vicinity of the site. Based on the response provided by NCNHP, dated February 18,
2021, a query of the NCNHP database indicates that the Tall Larkspur (Delphinium exaltatum)
was last observed in the 1800s, the Carolina Birdfoot-trefoil (Acmispon helleri) was last observed
in August 2018, and the Alabama Grape -fern (Sceptridium jenmanii) was last observed on
September 1936 within the 1-mile buffer area of the proposed project area. There are no records
for important natural communities, natural areas, and/or conservation/managed areas within the
boundaries of the proposed project area (Project Area reflects a 1-mile buffer around the project
site) table provided by NCNHP, there are no recorded element occurrences within the project site
boundaries. The letter issued by NCNHP (NCNHDE-14003) is attached in Appendix B.
3.0 HABITAT ASSESSMENT
A field survey was conducted on February 19, 2021 by Mr. JC Weaver to identify potentially
suitable habitat for federally threatened and endangered species protected by the ESA. During
the field survey, plant communities and habitats were observed and noted to determine if they
matched habitat types where the listed species have the potential to occur. The existing site
conditions are depicted in Appendix A (Exhibits 1-5) and Appendix C (Site Photographs). The
habitat classifications and associated descriptions are discussed below.
3
Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable

Threatened & Endangered Species Survey
77 Beltway Huntersville, North Carolina
March 9, 2021 Terracon Project No. 71207484
3.1 Riparian Forest
Based on plant communities, portions of the site consist of plant species associated with riparian
areas as identified during Terracon's site reconnaissance on February 19, 2021. The majority
dominate tree species observed within the riparian areas were sweetgum (Liquidambar
styraciflua), tulip (or yellow) popular (Liriodendron tulipifera), American sycamore (Platanus
occidentalis), river birch (Betula nigra), and red maple (Acer rubrum). The dominant shrub and
herb species observed was Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense), spicebush (Lindera benzoin),
elderberry (Sambucus canadensis), and Japanese stilt grass (Microstegium vimineum). Saplings
were also observed but were not considered to be a dominant species. Japanese honeysuckle
(Lonicera japonica) was the dominant woody vine observed in the riparian area.
3.2 Upland Deciduous Forest
Based on plant communities, portions of the site consist of plant species associated with upland
forests as identified during Terracon's site reconnaissance on February 19, 2021. The dominant
tree species identified within the upland areas were sweetgum (Liquidambarstyraciflua), tulip (or
yellow) popular (Liriodendron tulipifera), northern red oak (Quercus rubra), white oak (Quercus
alba), hickory species (Carya spp.), and red maple (Acer rubrum). The dominant shrub and herb
species observed was Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense), thorny olive (Elaeagnus pungens),
and wild ginger (Asarum arifolium). Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica) was the dominant
woody vine observed within upland areas.
3.3 Upland Evergreen Forest
Based on plant communities, portions of the site consist of plant species associated with upland
evergreen forests as identified during Terracon's site reconnaissance on February 19, 2021. The
dominant tree species identified within the upland areas were shortleaf pine (Pinus echinata),
lobl000y pine (Pinus taeda), sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua), tulip (or yellow) popular
(Liriodendron tulipifera), and red maple (Acer rubrum). The dominant shrub and herb species
observed was Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense), and thorny olive (Elaeagnus pungens).
Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica) was the dominant woody vine observed within upland
areas.
3.4 Field and Forest Margins
Based on plant communities, portions of the site consist of plant species associated with
transitions zones from agricultural fields to forests as identified during Terracon's site
reconnaissance on February 19, 2021. The dominant tree species identified within the upland
areas were shortleaf pine (Pinus echinata), lobl000y pine (Pinus taeda), sweetgum (Liquidambar
styraciflua), tulip (or yellow) popular (Liriodendron tulipifera), and red maple (Acer rubrum). The
dominant shrub and herb species observed was Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense), thorny olive
(Elaeagnus pungens), Japanese stilt grass (Microstegium vimineum), Sericea lespedeza
(Lespedeza cuneate), golden rod (Solidago spp.), asters (Asteraceae), grass species (Poa and
Festuca), Johnson grass (Sorghum halepense), Dallis grass (Paspalum dilatatum), pokeweed
(Phytolacca americana), bears foot (Smallanthus uvedalius), Indian grass (Sorghastrum nutan),
4
Responsive • Resourceful • Reliable

Threatened & Endangered Species Survey
77 Beltway Huntersville, North Carolina
March 9, 2021 Terracon Project No. 71207484
bur -marigold (Bidens aristosa), and blackberry (Rubus spp.). Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera
japonica) was the dominant woody vine observed within upland areas.
3.5 Petroleum Pipeline Right of Way (ROW)
Based on plant communities, portions of the site consist of plant species associated with a
maintained petroleum pipeline ROWs as identified during Terracon's site reconnaissance on
Februaruy 19, 2021. No majority dominate tree or shrub species was observed within the ROW
areas. The dominant identifiable herb species observed was Japanese stilt grass (Microstegium
vimineum), Sericea lespedeza (Lespedeza cuneate), golden rod (Solidago spp.), asters
(Asteraceae), grass species (Poa and Festuca), Johnson grass (Sorghum halepense), Dallis
grass (Paspalum dilatatum), pokeweed (Phytolacca americana), bears foot (Smallanthus
uvedalius), Indian grass (Sorghastrum nutan), bur -marigold (Bidens aristosa), and blackberry
(Rubus spp.). Removal of flower and seed heads by recent mowing activities made identification
to species level problematic. Saplings were also observed but were not considered to be a
dominant species. The dominant identifiable vine species observed was Japanese honeysuckle
(Lonicera japonica).
3.6 Unnamed Tributaries of Dixon Branch
Terracon identified four unnamed tributaries to Dixon Branch during the site reconnaissance on
February 19, 2021. These streams exhibited geomorphic features such as a strong bed and bank,
riffle and pool sequences, grade controls, and a base flow draining the topographically higher
areas of the site and eventually flowing into Dixon Branch. Terracon gauged the stream using
the Methodology for Identification on Intermittent and Perennial Streams and Their Origins
prepared by the North Carolina Division of Water Quality to characterize the streams.
3.7 Other Waters
Terracon observed two ephemeral stream channels that serve as drainage features for upland
portions of the site. These ephemeral stream complex demonstrated a visible physical connection
between the pond and the down gradient and off -site stream, but lacked sufficient
geomorphological, hydrological, and biological criteria to be graded as an intermittent or perennial
stream. Due to the lack of hydric soils, these channels also lacked the necessary soil criteria to
be defined as a wetland.
3.8 Pond
Terracon identified a pond within the central portion of the property during the site reconnaissance
on February 19, 2021. A portion of the earthen dam had been breached allowing for only partial
filling of the pond basin. The pond was located within a natural topographic crenulation and
appeared to be spring fed. This pond had a direct physical surface connection to an unnamed
tributary to Dixon Branch.
5
Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable

Threatened & Endangered Species Survey
77 Beltway Huntersville, North Carolina
March 9, 2021 Terracon Project No. 71207484
4.0 EFFECT DETERMINATIONS
The following determinations were made for each species, based on the likelihood of that species
occurring on the site, or being impacted by development of the site. These effect determinations
are listed in order of priority from lowest to highest and are based on USFWS standard language
implemented for Section 7 Consultation.
■ "No effect" — will not affect listed species
■ "Not likely to adversely affect" - effects are expected to be completely beneficial,
discountable or insignificant
■ "Likely to adversely affect" - adverse effects to listed species may occur
The following is a brief description of the federally listed threatened species located on the IPaC
Official Species List for the site. The site was surveyed for this species and its recognized habitat.
Comments are provided regarding results of the onsite survey with regard to habitat and
occurrence.
4.1 Plants
Schweinitz's Sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzii) (E)
Schweinitz's sunflower is an herbaceous perennial in the Aster family. It grows to a height of 6-
16 feet. Leaves are arranged in pairs that typically attach at 45-degree angle to the plant stem.
The leaves are thick and stiff with the upper surface coarse and rough and the underside having
soft white hairs. Flowers are composed of disk and ray floral structures produced in small yellow
clumps and blooming in August to October. Fruits consist of a dry single seed in a hard shell that
readily germinates without a dormmate period. The roots contain fleshy tubers that, reportedly,
was consumed by native peoples. Schweinitz's sunflower inhabits areas with sunny
environmental transition zones typically found in forest edges, road and powerline right of ways,
and generally sunny, periodically disturbed areas. Schweinitz's sunflower inhabits soils of various
types and on shallow, clayey soils that may contain slaty rock fragments, based on description
provided in the species recovery plan, soil mapping units where this species has been found
include Iredell, Enon, Badin, Cecil, Misenheimer, Gaston, and Zion mapping units, but this species
may also occur in areas mapped as Tatum, Cid, Secrest, Georgeville, Mecklenburg, and
Uwharrie. On February 19, 2021 Terracon evaluated the site for the presence of suitable habitat
capable of supporting the Schweinitz's sunflower. Terracon did determine that historic suitable
habitat existed within the margins of the forested and agricultural margins for the Schweinitz's
sunflower due to the open canopy and disturbed nature of these margins and within the petroleum
pipeline ROW. However, due to the historic and current use of herbicides, periodic logging, and
historical land use practices, and the lack of a documented sunflower population within a one -
mile radius of the site and the on -site soil types, Terracon determined that suitable habitat does
not exist within these areas.
6
Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable

Threatened & Endangered Species Survey
77 Beltway Huntersville, North Carolina
March 9, 2021 Terracon Project No. 71207484
Please note that the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) considers the optimal
survey window for Schweinitz's sunflower as late August — October. The final decision on
suitability of habitat, potential avoidance measures, and/or need for in -season surveys rests with
the USFWS.
Terracon's professional opinion is that a "No Effect" determination is appropriate for this species
based on the lack of suitable habitat.
Michaux's Sumac (Rhus michauxii) (E)
Michaux's sumac is a rhizomatous, densely hairy shrub, with erect stems from 1 to 3 feet in height.
Flowering usually occurs from June to July, the flowers are small, greenish yellow to white, and
grow in erect dense clusters. Fruit is produced from August to October and is a red drupe.
Michaux's sumac is found growing in sandy or rocky open woods, in association with basic soils.
This plant survives best in areas where some form of disturbance has provided an open area,
such as right of ways. Michaux's sumac is endemic to the coastal plain and piedmont of Virginia,
North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, and Florida. The largest population known is located at
Fort Pickett in Virginia, but the populations are located in the North Carolina piedmont and
sandhills. Currently, the plant is extant in the following North Carolina counties: Cumberland,
Davie, Durham, Franklin, Hoke, Mecklenburg, Moore, Nash, Richmond, Robeson, Scotland and
Wake. Terracon surveyed the site February 19, 2021 and did not observe the species or evidence
of the species. Terracon did determine that historic suitable habitat existed within the margins of
the forested and agricultural margins for the Michaux's sumac due to the open canopy and
disturbed nature of these margins and within the petroleum pipeline ROW. However, due to the
historic and current use of herbicides, periodic logging, and historical land use practices, and the
lack of a documented Michaux's sumac population within a one -mile radius of the site and the on -
site soil types, Terracon determined that suitable habitat does not exist within these areas.
Terracon's professional opinion is that a "No Effect" determination is appropriate for this species
based on the lack of suitable habitat.
Smooth Coneflower (Echinacea laevigata) (E)
Smooth coneflower is a perennial herb in the Aster family that grows up to 3.3 feet tall. The large
elliptical leaves are smooth to slightly rough in texture, may reach 8 inches in length and 3 inches
in width, and taper into long petioles toward the base. Flowering occurs from late May through
mid -July. The flower heads are usually solitary. The petals of the flower are light pink to purplish,
usually drooping, and 2 to 3 inches long. Fruit develops from late June to September. Habitat for
smooth coneflower is typically found in open woods, glades, cedar barrens, roadsides, clearcuts,
dry limestone bluffs, and power line right of ways, and usually on magnesium and calcium rich
soils associated with gabbro and diabase in North Carolina. Optimal sites are characterized by
abundant sunlight and little competition in the herbaceous layer. Natural fires, as well as large
herbivores, historically influenced the vegetation in this species' range. Many of the herbs
associated with Smooth coneflower are also sun -loving species that depend on periodic
7
Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable

Threatened & Endangered Species Survey
77 Beltway Huntersville, North Carolina
March 9, 2021 Terracon Project No. 71207484
disturbances to reduce the shade and competition of woody plants. Terracon surveyed the site
February 19, 2021 and did not observe the species or evidence of the species. Terracon did
determine that historic suitable habitat existed within the margins of the forested and agricultural
margins for the Smooth coneflower due to the open canopy and disturbed nature of these margins
and within the petroleum pipeline ROW. However, due to the historic and current use of
herbicides, periodic logging, and historical land use practices, and the lack of a documented
Smooth coneflower population within a one -mile radius of the site and the on -site soil types,
Terracon determined that suitable habitat does not exist within these areas.
Terracon's professional opinion is that a "No Effect" determination is appropriate for this species
based on the lack of suitable habitat.
4.2 Mammals
Northern Long-eared Bat (Myotis septentrionalis) (T)
The NLEB has a body length of 3 to 3.7 inches and wingspan of 9 to 10 inches. It is considered
to be a medium sized bat compared to other bat species. Their fur is medium to dark brown on
the back and tawny to pale brown on the underside. It is distinguishable by its long ears. During
the summer, NLEBs roost singly or in colonies underneath bark, in cavities or crevices of both
live and dead trees. Northern long-eared bats seem to be flexible in selecting roosts, choosing
roost trees based on suitability to retain bark or provide cavities or crevices. This bat has also
been found rarely roosting in structures, like barns and sheds. In the winder, the NLEB hibernates
in caves and mines, they use areas with constant temperatures, high humidity, and no air currents.
The active season for the Northern Long-eared Bat is from April 1 to October 31. Terracon
surveyed the site February 19, 2021 and did not observe the species or any evidence of the
species such as guano or staining. According to data provided by the USFWS Asheville
Ecological Services Field Office, confirmed hibernation and maternity sites for this species have
not been observed in Mecklenburg County.
Terracon did not observe the NLEB on the site and no known hibernacula were identified in the
vicinity of the site based on review of the IPaC and the technical assistance provided by NCNHP
and the USFWS Asheville Ecological Services Field Office. Please note that potential roost trees
(summer habitat) were observed within the riparian forest portions of the site. In accordance with
the Key to the Northern Long -Eared Bat 4(d) Rule for Federal Actions that May Affect Northern
Long -Eared Bats, tree removal activities is not prohibited unless it results from removing a known
occupied maternity roost tree or from tree removal activities within 150 feet of a known occupied
maternity roost tree from June 1 through July 31 or results from tree removal activities within 0.25
mile of a hibernaculum at any time. As a result, the Northern Long -Eared Bat 4(d) Rule may be
applied. Therefore, if the site contains suitable summer habitat for the northern long eared bat but
is not located within 150 feet from a known roost tree, the project has met the criteria for the 4(d)
rule.
8
Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable

Threatened & Endangered Species Survey
77 Beltway Huntersville, North Carolina
March 9, 2021 Terracon Project No. 71207484
Terracon's professional opinion is that the project is Exempt per the 4(d) Rule.
4.3 Mollusk
Carolina heelsplitter (Lasmigona decorate) (E)
The Carolina heelsplitter has an egg -shaped shell, the outer surface of the shell varies from
greenish brown to dark brown. The nacre (inside surface) is often pearly white to blusih white and
grades to orange in the deepest part of the shell. The largest known specimen measures 4.6
inches in length. Critical habitat for the Carolina heelsplitter requires cool, clean, well oxygenated
water, and a stable, silt free stream bottom. Typically, stable areas occur where the stream banks
are well -vegetated with trees and shrubs. The Carolina heelsplitter has a fragmented distribution
and historically has been known to exist only in several locations within the Catawba and Pee
Dee River systems in North Carolina and Catawba, Pee Dee and Savannah River systems in
South Carolina. Recent collection efforts indicate that the Carolina heelsplitter has been
extinguished from the majority of its historic range and only eleven small populations are known
to exist. According to the Carolina heelsplitter 5-year Review, published by USFWS, in the
Catawba River system, the population has been identified in Waxhaw Creek, Sixmile Creek, Gills
Creek/Cane Creek, Fishing Creek/South Fork, and Bull Run Creek. Terracon surveyed the site
February 19, 2021 and did not observe the species or evidence of the species but did observe
the required habitat. Terracon observed a perennial stream within the central portion of the site.
Terracon determined that suitable habitat was marginal for the Carolina heelsplitter due to lack of
fast -flowing well oxygenated water, the presence of turbid water, pollution from urban stormwater
runoff, and the lack of a stable, silt free stream bottom and large channels favored by the Carolina
heelsplitter.
The final decision on suitability of habitat, potential avoidance measures, and/or need for surveys
rests with the USFWS.
Terracon's professional opinion is that a "No Effect" determination is appropriate for this species
based on the lack of suitable habitat.
5.0 FINDINGS
A query of the NCNHP database indicates that there are no records for rare species, important
natural communities, natural areas, and/or conservation/managed areas within the vicinity of the
proposed project.
A query of the IPaC Official Species List indicates there are records for threatened and
endangered species that have potential habitat within the vicinity of proposed project location as
identified by the USFWS North Carolina Ecological Services Field Office and as potentially
occurring within the project boundaries based on the information obtained from the IPaC search
9
Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable

Threatened & Endangered Species Survey
77 Beltway Huntersville, North Carolina
March 9, 2021 Terracon Project No. 71207484
engine. Those species include Schweinitz's Sunflower, Michaux's Sumac, smooth coneflower,
northern long eared bat, and the Carolina Heelsplitter.
6.0 CONCLUSIONS
It is Terracon's opinion that the proposed project will have no effect on the federally threatened
and endangered species documented in the IPaC Official Species List. This opinion is based on
the specific habitat, breeding or dietary requirements, site's proximity to natural areas, the lack of
required or preferred species habitat, the historical land use for the project site, and Terracon's
observations during the field visit on February 19, 2021
7.0 GENERAL COMMENTS
This survey was performed in accordance with generally accepted practices of this profession
undertaken in similar studies at the same time and in the same geographical area. This report is
for the exclusive use of the client for the project being discussed. No warranties, either expressed
or implied, are intended or made. It should be noted that USFWS has specific survey windows
and time periods established for surveys of listed species. The findings of this survey are
constrained by the project schedule, which may not coincide with the applicable survey windows.
USFWS may require species to be reevaluated within the established surveys windows. In
conducting the limited scope of services described herein, certain sources of information and
public records were reviewed. No biological assessment can wholly eliminate uncertainty
regarding the potential for concerns in connection with a project.
8.0 REFERENCES
U.S. Fish and Wildlife, Southeast Region, Threatened and Endangered Species Website,
https://www.fws.gov/southeast/pdf/fact-sheet/schwein itzs-sunflower.pdf
Flora of the Southern and Mid -Atlantic States, 2019
http://herbarium.unc.edu/flora.htm
USDA, Plants Database;
https://plants.sc.egov.usda.gov/java/
Native Plants of the Carolinas and Georgia website,
http://www.namethatplant.net/
U.S. Fish and Wildlife, Southeast Region, Threatened and Endangered Species Website
https://www.fws.gov/midwest/endangered/mammals/nleb/
10
Responsive • Resourceful • Reliable

Threatened & Endangered Species Survey
77 Beltway Huntersville, North Carolina
March 9, 2021 Terracon Project No. 71207484
U.S. Fish and Wildlife, Southeast Region, Threatened and Endangered Species Website
https://www.fws.gov/southeast/wildlife/mussels/caroling-heelsplitter/
11
Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable

APPENDIX A
■ Exhibit 1 — Site Location Map
■ Exhibit 2 — Topographic Map
■ Exhibit 3 — USFWS NWI Map
■ Exhibit 4 — NHD Map
■ Exhibit 5 — NRCS Web Soil Survey Map

Legend
Site Boundary
Project No.:
71207484
Date:
Feb 2021
Drawn By:
KT
Reviewed By:
JCW
0 350 700
lrerracon
2701 Westport Road Charlotte, NC 28208
PH. [phone] terracon.com
Feet
1,400
DATA SOURCES:
Latest High -Resolution NC Statewide Orthoimagery, NC
OneMap Server; Site Boundary Based on Mecklenburg
County Parcel Data.
SITE LOCATION
Beltway 77
(35.374049, -80.847449)
Huntersville, Mecklenburg County, NC
Exhibit
1

pxw-odol\sdew awilloSLLI\allolle40\OZOZ\SIJ\ 0
„I . .,,e,..
, ., ,p,.•,,..,,,Lr.... r,,,., :!../. ,, c ofitto,
1,:s. .4-% - , c, 0 A
ti � . -, ark'
=.:fir �..--: �f -_' �' :,
,.
3RI, i-cubed seamless
Derita, NC); Site
anty Parcel Data.
..,
z2
x
fir"-" f T T1y
y-^�r'^
-Wickso
e.
i ce'
-34,
M1
1 Lt
,sue
•
+�' rr—% J .,, • .A4' -�` rr/1
N ,, c-; , .. ‘.......\.. ). t. ,,, u
��� � -- '�• is
;'„f•+ x-
Feet DATA SOURCES:
4,000 2011 National Geographic Society
USGS quadrangles (Corneilus
Boundary Based on Mecklenburg (
USGS Topographic Map
I- 77 Beltway
(35.374049, -80.847449)
Huntersville, Mecklenburg County, NC
ko,r�UE+ll ,x +r
o
d01•0O � -� _ . � ! ~ F. c�
ON
U
o
vt,
)'\—' Milli' ' 4
ate. i , R,
.....ir :_____„_____./.,.. ,. ___....,.----_____:: .
i'^ _ • I. -.
0
0
0
. _ l
I .. ' ) )4; .-,..f..(L.-,--
..v -. r� -
0
as
lTerra
2701 Westport Road
1 � • R1 _r//J a% . + y%1. y�
P ‘, . AL ty •
Legend
Site Bour
Project No.:
71207484
Date:
Feb 2021
Drawn By:
CEW
Reviewed By:
JCW
a
_
o• 4pgJ 1.r] 1
- - d .....--...•••, ‘ . • •
a� 7�••••
U• 7 "eMS," b r.
..
' r
•
��"
••••
Q n.¢
'�
w ,1
r f s
ai amesa „
�ai•n----..!r
:
-k f iL'\
• Z t d .: - -�`;i ---
• -•f - -e, y
l r r i if ,�-.!:!
Z

Huuiteisviiie
23
Legend
QSite Boundary
I I
Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland (PFO1A)
IM Freshwater Pond (PUBHh)
Project No.:
71207484
Date:
Feb 2021
Drawn By:
CEW
Reviewed By:
JCW
I I
Riverine (R4SBC)
Riverine (R4SBCx)
lrerracon
2701 Westport Road Charlotte, NC 28208
PH. [phone] terracon.com
DATA SOURCES:
Latest High -Resolution NC Statewide Orthoimagery, NC
OneMap Server; FWS National Wetlands Inventory Data
Set. Site Boundary Based on Mecklenburg County Parcel
Data.
National Wetlands Inventory (NWI)
I- 77 Beltway
(35.374049, -80.847449)
Huntersville, Mecklenburg County, NC
Exhibit
3

Legend
Q Site Boundary
— NHD Flowline
Project No.:
71207484
Date:
Feb 2021
Drawn By:
CEW
Reviewed By:
JCW
0 350 700
lrerracon
2701 Westport Road Charlotte, NC 28208
PH. [phone] terracon.com
Feet
1,400
DATA SOURCES:
Latest High -Resolution NC Statewide Orthoimagery, NC
OneMap Server; National Hydrography Dataset, U.S.
Geological Survey with the EPA; Site Boundary Based on
Mecklenburg County Parcel Data.
National Hydrograpahy Dataset (NHD)
I- 77 Beltway
(35.374049, -80.847449)
Huntersville, Mecklenburg County, NC
Exhibit
laps\NHD.rrixd
4

Soil Mapping Units
Cecil sandy clay loam, 2-8% slopes, moderately eroded
HeB Helena sandy loam, 2-8% slopes
MO Monacan loam, 0-2% slopes, frequently flooded
VaB Vance sandy loam, 2-8% slopes
VaD Vance sandy loam, 8-15% slopes
HuntersvlIik:
Legend
Site Boundary
= Soil Boundaries
Project No.:
71207484
Date:
Feb 2021
Drawn By:
CEW
Reviewed By:
JCW
0 350 700
lrerracon
2701 Westport Road Charlotte, NC 28208
PH. [phone] terracon.com
Feet
1,400
DATA SOURCES:
Latest High -Resolution NC Statewide Orthoimagery, NC 6
OneMap Server; NRCS digital Soil Survey of Mecklenburg .o
County, 2019.Site Boundary Based on Mecklenburg County 'P
Parcel Data.
NRCS Soils
I- 77 Beltway
(35.374049, -80.847449)
Huntersville, Mecklenburg County, NC
Exhibit
5

APPENDIX B
■ Coordination with NCNHP
■ USFWS IPaC Report
■ Mecklenburg County List of Federally Protected Species
■ USFWS Self Certification Letter for the NLEB
■ North Carolina Division of Water Quality Stream Identification Form

1 ■E■w NC DEPARTMENT OF
■ ■: Ns NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
■ ■ 11
February 18, 2021
Katie Talavera
Terracon Inc.
2401 Brentwood Road, Suite 107
Raleigh, NC 27603
RE: 177; 71207484
Dear Katie Talavera:
Roy Cooper, Governor
D. Reid Wilson, Secretary
Walter Clark
Director, Division of Land and Water Stewardship
NCNHDE-14003
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
Based on the project area mapped with your request, a query of the NCNHP database indicates that
there are no records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, and/or
conservation/managed areas within the proposed project boundary. Please note that although there
may be no documentation of natural heritage elements within the project boundary, it does not
imply or confirm their absence; the area may not have been surveyed. The results of this query
should not be substituted for field surveys where suitable habitat exists. In the event that rare
species are found within the project area, please contact the NCNHP so that we may update our
records.
The attached `Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one -mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally -listed species is found within the project area or is indicated within a one -mile radius of
the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) for
guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
https://www.fws.gov/offices/Directory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
The NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a
Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Land and Water Fund easement, or Federally -
listed species are documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact Rodney A. Butler at rodney.butlerca ncdcr.gov or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
J 121 W..JONES STREET k11LER.,H, NC 27603 - 16 1 MAIL SCILVJGE CENTER. RALEIGH. W- 2769.9
OFC 9J9.7079120 • FAX < D.7O7.7121

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
177
Project No. 71207484
February 18, 2021
NCNHDE-14003
Element Occurrences Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Taxonomic
Group
EO ID Scientific Name Common Nam Last
Observation
Date
Element Accuracy
Occurrence
Rank
Federal
Status
State
Status
Global State
Rank Rank
Vascular Plant 28787 Acmispon helleri
Carolina Birdfoot- 2010-08-24
trefoil
Vascular Plant 13743 Delphinium exaltatum Tall Larkspur 1800s
E 2-High
H i?
5-Very
Low
Special
Concern
Vulnerable
Endangered
G5T3 S3
G3 S2
Vascular Plant 33285 Sceptridium jenmanii Alabama Grape -fern 1936-09
H 5-Very
Low
Special
Concern
Vulnerable
G3G4 S2
No Natural Areas are Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Area Name
Owner
Mecklenburg County Open Space
Mecklenburg County Open Space
Mecklenburg County
Mecklenburg County
Local Government
Local Government
Mecklenburg County Open Space - Dixon Branch
Greenway
Mecklenburg County
Local Government
NC Department of Transportation Mitigation Site
NC Department of Transportation
State
NC Department of Transportation Mitigation Site
NC Department of Transportation
State
NC Department of Transportation Mitigation Site
NC Department of Transportation
State
Town of Huntersville Open Space
Town of Huntersville
Local Government
NC Department of Transportation Mitigation Site
NC Department of Transportation
State
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at https://ncnhde.natureserve.ora/help. Data query generated on February 18, 2021; source: NCNHP, Q4 January 2021.
Please resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 2 of 3

February 18, 2021
Q Project Boundary
Buffered Project Boundary
Managed Area (MAREA)
NCNHDE-14003: 177
Page 3 of 3
1:26,930
0 0.225 0.45
0 0.35 0.7
0.9 mi
11
1.4 km
Sources: Fan, HERE. Carrrrn, Intemtap, increment P Corp. CEBCO. USCS,
FAO, NPS, NRCAN, OeoBase, ION. Kedaster NI_ Ordnance Survey Esn Japan,
1 ETI, Esri China IHong Kong), ioi CpenStreeIMap contributors, and the CIS
User Coremunity

United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Asheville Ecological Services Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville, NC 28801-1082
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
http://www.fws.gov/nc-es/es/countyfr.html
In Reply Refer To:
Consultation Code: 04EN1000-2021-SLI-0346
Event Code: 04EN1000-2021-E-00784
Project Name: 77 Beltway
February 18, 2021
Subject: List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project
location or may be affected by your proposed project
To Whom It May Concern:
The attached species list identifies threatened, endangered, proposed and candidate species, as
well as proposed and final designated critical habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your
proposed project and/or may be affected by your proposed project. Although not required by
section 7, many agencies request species lists to start the informal consultation process and begin
their fulfillment of the requirements under section 7(c) of the Endangered Species Act (Act) of
1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
This list, along with other helpful resources, is also available on the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (Service) —Asheville Field Office's (AFO) website: https://www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/
cntylist/nc counties.html. The AFO website list includes "species of concern" — species that
could potentially be placed on the federal list of threatened and endangered species in the future.
Also available are:
Design and Construction Recommendations
https://www.fws.gov/asheville/htmls/project review/Recommendations.html
• Optimal Survey Times for Federally Listed Plants
https://www.fws.gov/nc-es/plant/plant survey.html
• Northern long-eared bat Guidance
https://www.fws.gov/asheville/htmls/project review/NLEB in WNC.html
• Predictive Habitat Model for Aquatic Species
https://www.fws.gov/asheville/htmls/Maxent/Maxent.html
New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of
species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could require modifications of these lists.

02/18/2021
Event Code: 04EN1000-2021-E-00784 2
Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the Act,
the accuracy of the species lists should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be
completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be
completed by visiting the ECOS-IPaC website or the AFO website (the AFO website dates each
county list with the day of the most recent update/change) at regular intervals during project
planning and implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may
be requested through the ECOS-IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the
enclosed list or by going to the AFO website.
The purpose of the Act is to provide a means whereby threatened and endangered species and the
ecosystems upon which they depend may be conserved. Under sections 7(a)(1) and 7(a)(2) of
the Act and its implementing regulations (50 CFR 402 et seq.), Federal agencies are required to
utilize their authorities to carry out programs for the conservation of threatened and endangered
species and to determine whether projects may affect threatened and endangered species and/or
designated critical habitat.
A Biological Assessment is required for construction projects (or other undertakings having
similar physical impacts) that are major Federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the
human environment as defined in the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)
(c)). For projects other than major construction activities, the Service suggests that a Biological
Evaluation similar to a Biological Assessment be prepared to determine whether the project may
affect listed or proposed species and/or designated or proposed critical habitat. Recommended
contents of a Biological Assessment are described at 50 CFR 402.12 and on our office's website
at https://www.fws.gov/asheville/htmis/project review/assessment guidance.html.
If a Federal agency (or their non-federal representative) determines, based on the Biological
Assessment or Biological Evaluation, that listed species and/or designated critical habitat may be
affected by the proposed project, the agency is required to consult with the Service pursuant to
50 CFR 402. In addition, the Service recommends that candidate species, proposed species, and
proposed critical habitat be addressed within the consultation. More information on the
regulations and procedures for section 7 consultation, including the role of permit or license
applicants, can be found in the "Endangered Species Consultation Handbook" at: http://
www.fws.gov/endangered/esa-library/pdf/TOC-GLOS.PDF.
Though the bald eagle is no longer protected under the Endangered Species Act, please be aware
that bald and golden eagles are protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (16
U.S.C. 668 et seq.), and projects affecting these species may require additional consultation (see
hops://www.fws.gov/southeast/our-services/permits/eagles/). Wind energy projects should
follow the wind energy guidelines (http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/) for minimizing impacts to
migratory birds (including bald and golden eagles) and bats.
Guidance for minimizing impacts to migratory birds for projects including communications
towers (e.g., cellular, digital television, radio, and emergency broadcast) can be found at: http://
www. fws. gov/migratorybirds/CurrentBirdlssues/Hazards/towers/towers. htm;
http://www.towerkill.com; and http://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/CurrentBirdlssues/Hazards/
towers/comtow.html.

02/18/2021
Event Code: 04EN1000-2021-E-00784 3
We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages
Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project
planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Tracking Number in
the header of this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project
that you submit to our office.
Attachment(s):
• Official Species List
• Migratory Birds
• Wetlands

02/18/2021
Event Code: 04EN1000-2021-E-00784 1
Official Species List
This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the
requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether
any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed
action".
This species list is provided by:
Asheville Ecological Services Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville, NC 28801-1082
[phone]

02/18/2021 Event Code: 04EN1000-2021-E-00784 2
Project Summary
Consultation Code: 04EN1000-2021-SLI-0346
Event Code: 04EN1000-2021-E-00784
Project Name: 77 Beltway
Project Type: LAND - CLEARING
Project Description: Development of warehouse industrial park.
Project Location:
Approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https://
www.google.com/maps/@35.371239849999995,-80.84838017969011,14z
Counties: Mecklenburg County, North Carolina

02/18/2021
Event Code: 04EN1000-2021-E-00784 3
Endangered Species Act Species
There is a total of 5 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list.
Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include
species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species
list because a project could affect downstream species.
IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA
Fisheriesl, as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the
Department of Commerce.
See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially
within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office
if you have questions.
1. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an
office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of
Commerce.
Mammals
NAME
Northern Long-eared Bat Myotis septentrionalis
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9045
Clams
NAME
STATUS
Threatened
STATUS
Carolina Heelsplitter Lasmigona decorata
There is final critical habitat for this species. The location of the critical habitat is not available.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3534
Flowering Plants
NAME
Endangered
STATUS
Michaux's Sumac Rhus michauxii
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5217
Schweinitz's Sunflower Helianthus schweinitzii
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3849
Smooth Coneflower Echinacea laevigata
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3473
Endangered
Endangered
Endangered

02/18/2021
Event Code: 04EN1000-2021-E-00784 4
Critical habitats
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S
JURISDICTION.

02/18/2021 Event Code: 04EN1000-2021-E-00784
Migratory Birds
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act1 and the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Actz.
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to
migratory birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and consider
implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described below.
1. The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918.
2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
3. 50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)
The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the USFWS
Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) list or warrant special attention in your project location.
To learn more about the levels of concern for birds on your list and how this list is generated, see
the FAQ below. This is not a list of every bird you may find in this location, nor a guarantee that
every bird on this list will be found in your project area. To see exact locations of where birders
and the general public have sighted birds in and around your project area, visit the E-bird data
mapping tool (Tip: enter your location, desired date range and a species on your list). For
projects that occur off the Atlantic Coast, additional maps and models detailing the relative
occurrence and abundance of bird species on your list are available. Links to additional
information about Atlantic Coast birds, and other important information about your migratory
bird list, including how to properly interpret and use your migratory bird report, can be found
below.
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures
to reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE
SUMMARY at the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to be present and
breeding in your project area.
NAME
Eastern Whip -poor -will Antrostomus vociferus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
and Alaska.
Golden Eagle Aquila chrysaetos
This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, but warrants attention
because of the Eagle Act or for potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types
of development or activities.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1680
BREEDING
SEASON
Breeds May 1 to
Aug 20
Breeds
elsewhere

02/18/2021
Event Code: 04EN1000-2021-E-00784 2
NAME
Prairie Warbler Dendroica discolor
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
and Alaska.
Prothonotary Warbler Protonotaria citrea
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
and Alaska.
Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
and Alaska.
Rusty Blackbird Euphagus carolinus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
and Alaska.
Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
and Alaska.
BREEDING
SEASON
Breeds May 1 to
Jul 31
Breeds Apr 1 to
Jul 31
Breeds May 10
to Sep 10
Breeds
elsewhere
Breeds May 10
to Aug 31
Probability Of Presence Summary
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be
present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project
activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read and understand the
FAQ "Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before using or attempting
to interpret this report.
Probability of Presence (■)
Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your
project overlaps during a particular week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4-week
months.) A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The survey effort (see
below) can be used to establish a level of confidence in the presence score. One can have higher
confidence in the presence score if the corresponding survey effort is also high.
How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps:
1. The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in
the week where the species was detected divided by the total number of survey events for
that week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and the Spotted Towhee
was found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in week 12 is
0.25.
2. To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of
presence is calculated. This is the probability of presence divided by the maximum
probability of presence across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability of presence
in week 20 for the Spotted Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence at week 12

02/18/2021 Event Code: 04EN1000-2021-E-00784 3
(0.25) is the maximum of any week of the year. The relative probability of presence on
week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is 0.05/0.25 = 0.2.
3. The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical
conversion so that all possible values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the
probability of presence score.
Breeding Season ( )
Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time -frame inside which the bird breeds across
its entire range. If there are no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your project
area.
Survey Effort (I)
Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of surveys
performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The number of
surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys.
No Data (—)
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
Survey Timeframe
Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant
information. The exception to this is areas off the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are based on
all years of available data, since data in these areas is currently much more sparse.
• probability of presence breeding season 1 survey effort — no data
SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Eastern Whip -poor- ""'1`1 iiii iii
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Golden Eagle
Non -BCC
Vulnerable
Prairie Warbler
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Prothonotary
Warbler
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Red-headed
Woodpecker
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
+ ++ 1 1 1 1 1 1 I +1 ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++
+ +++ ++++ ++++ +++. "" +++ ++++
��MM
+ +++ ++++ ++++ 1++1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1111
+ +++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++
+ +++ ++++
+ +++ ++++
+ +++ ++++ ++++
+ +++ ++++
+ +++ ++++

02/18/2021
Event Code: 04EN1000-2021-E-00784 4
Rusty Blackbird
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Wood Thrush
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
++++ +I++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++
+-I 11 I I I I I I I F [phone] d
+ +++ ++++ +++1 ++++ ++++
+ +++ ++++ 1+4 1 i i i l 1 1 1 1
■ ■1
Additional information can be found using the following links:
• Birds of Conservation Concern http://www.fws.gov/birds/management/managed-species/
birds-of-conservation-concern.php
• Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds http://www.fws.gov/birds/
management/project-assessment-tools-and-guidance/
conservation-measures.php
• Nationwide conservation measures for birds http://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/pdf/
management/nationwidestandardconservationmeasures.pdf
Migratory Birds FAQ
Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts
to migratory birds.
Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize
impacts to all birds at any location year round. Implementation of these measures is particularly
important when birds are most likely to occur in the project area. When birds may be breeding in
the area, identifying the locations of any active nests and avoiding their destruction is a very
helpful impact minimization measure. To see when birds are most likely to occur and be breeding
in your project area, view the Probability of Presence Summary. Additional measures or permits
may be advisable depending on the type of activity you are conducting and the type of
infrastructure or bird species present on your project site.
What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified
location?
The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern
(BCC) and other species that may warrant special attention in your project location.
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian
Knowledge Network (AKN). The AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey, banding,
and citizen science datasets and is queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as
occurring in the 10km grid cell(s) which your project intersects, and that have been identified as
warranting special attention because they are a BCC species in that area, an eagle (Eagle Act
requirements may apply), or a species that has a particular vulnerability to offshore activities or
development.
Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your
project area. It is not representative of all birds that may occur in your project area. To get a list
of all birds potentially present in your project area, please visit the AKN Phenology Tool.

02/18/2021
Event Code: 04EN1000-2021-E-00784 5
What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds
potentially occurring in my specified location?
The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data
provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). This data is derived from a growing
collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets .
Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information
becomes available. To learn more about how the probability of presence graphs are produced and
how to interpret them, go the Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me
about these graphs" link.
How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering, migrating or present year-round in my
project area?
To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding,
wintering, migrating or year-round), you may refer to the following resources: The Cornell Lab
of Ornithology All About Birds Bird Guide, or (if you are unsuccessful in locating the bird of
interest there), the Cornell Lab of Ornithology Neotropical Birds guide. If a bird on your
migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated with it, if that bird does occur in your
project area, there may be nests present at some point within the timeframe specified. If "Breeds
elsewhere" is indicated, then the bird likely does not breed in your project area.
What are the levels of concern for migratory birds?
Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern:
1. "BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) that are of concern
throughout their range anywhere within the USA (including Hawaii, the Pacific Islands,
Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands);
2. "BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation
Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA; and
3. "Non -BCC - Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on
your list either because of the Eagle Act requirements (for eagles) or (for non -eagles)
potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or activities
(e.g. offshore energy development or longline fishing).
Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made,
in particular, to avoid and minimize impacts to the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC
species of rangewide concern. For more information on conservation measures you can
implement to help avoid and minimize migratory bird impacts and requirements for eagles,
please see the FAQs for these topics.
Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects
For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species
and groups of bird species within your project area off the Atlantic Coast, please visit the
Northeast Ocean Data Portal. The Portal also offers data and information about other taxa besides
birds that may be helpful to you in your project review. Alternately, you may download the bird
model results files underlying the portal maps through the NOAA NCCOS Integrative Statistical

02/18/2021
Event Code: 04EN1000-2021-E-00784 6
Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird Distributions and Abundance on the Atlantic
Outer Continental Shelf project webpage.
Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use
throughout the year, including migration. Models relying on survey data may not include this
information. For additional information on marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study
and the nanotag studies or contact Caleb Spiegel or Pam Loring.
What if I have eagles on my list?
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid
violating the Eagle Act should such impacts occur.
Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report
The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of
birds of priority concern. To learn more about how your list is generated, and see options for
identifying what other birds may be in your project area, please see the FAQ "What does IPaC
use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location". Please be
aware this report provides the "probability of presence" of birds within the 10 km grid cell(s) that
overlap your project; not your exact project footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look
carefully at the survey effort (indicated by the black vertical bar) and for the existence of the "no
data" indicator (a red horizontal bar). A high survey effort is the key component. If the survey
effort is high, then the probability of presence score can be viewed as more dependable. In
contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar means a lack of data and, therefore, a lack of
certainty about presence of the species. This list is not perfect; it is simply a starting point for
identifying what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might
be there, and if they might be breeding (which means nests might be present). The list helps you
know what to look for to confirm presence, and helps guide you in knowing when to implement
conservation measures to avoid or minimize potential impacts from your project activities,
should presence be confirmed. To learn more about conservation measures, visit the FAQ "Tell
me about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory
birds" at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources page.

02/18/2021 Event Code: 04EN1000-2021-E-00784
Wetlands
Impacts to NWI wetlands and other aquatic habitats may be subject to regulation under Section
404 of the Clean Water Act, or other State/Federal statutes.
For more information please contact the Regulatory Program of the local U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers District.
Please note that the NWI data being shown may be out of date. We are currently working to
update our NWI data set. We recommend you verify these results with a site visit to determine
the actual extent of wetlands on site.
FRESHWATER FORESTED/SHRUB WETLAND
• PFO1A
RIVERINE
• R4SBC
• R5UBH

2/18/2021 Mecklenburg County Endangered Species, Threatened Species, and Candidate Species
Endangered Species, Threatened Species, and Candidate Species,
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
Updated: 07-17-2020
Common Name
Vertebrate:
Bald eagle
Northern long-eared bat
Invertebrate:
Carolina heelsplitter
Rusty -patched bumble bee
Vascular Plant:
Carolina Hemlock
Georgia aster
Michaux's sumac
Schweinitz's sunflower
Smooth coneflower
Nonvascular Plant:
Lichen:
Scientific name
Haliaeetus leucocephalus
Myotis septentrionalis
Lasmigona decorata
Bombus affinis
Isuga caroliniana
Symphyotrichum georgianum
Rhus michauxii
Helianthus schweinitzii
Echinacea laevigata
Federal Record Status
Status
BGPA
T
E
E
ARS
C
E
E
E
Current
Probable/Potential
Current
Historical
Historical
Current
Current
Current
Current
Definitions of Federal Status Codes:
E = endangered. A taxon "in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its range."
T = threatened. A taxon "likely to become endangered within the foreseeable future throughout all or a
significant portion of its range."
C = candidate. A taxon under consideration for official listing for which there is sufficient information to support
listing. (Formerly "Cl" candidate species.)
BGPA =Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act. See below.
ARS = At Risk Species. Species that are Petitioned, Candidates or Proposed for Listing under the Endangered
Species Act. Consultation under Section 7(a)(2) of the ESA is not required for Candidate or Proposed species;
although a Conference, as described under Section 7(a)(4) of the ESA is recommended for actions affecting
species proposed for listing.
T(S/A) = threatened due to similarity of appearance. A taxon that is threatened due to similarity of appearance
with another listed species and is listed for its protection. Taxa listed as T(S/A) are not biologically endangered
or threatened and are not subject to Section 7 consultation. See below.
EXP = experimental population. A taxon listed as experimental (either essential or nonessential). Experimental,
https://www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/cntylist/mecklenburg.html 1 /2

2/18/2021 Mecklenburg County Endangered Species, Threatened Species, and Candidate Species
nonessential populations of endangered species (e.g., red wolf) are treated as threatened species on public land,
for consultation purposes, and as species proposed for listing on private land.
P = proposed. Taxa proposed for official listing as endangered or threatened will be noted as "PE" or "PT",
respectively.
Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGPA):
In the July 9, 2007 Federal Register( 72:37346-37372), the bald eagle was declared recovered, and removed (de-
listed) from the Federal List of Threatened and Endangered wildlife. This delisting took effect August 8,2007.
After delisting, the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (Eagle Act) (16 U.S.C. 668-668d) becomes the
primary law protecting bald eagles. The Eagle Act prohibits take of bald and golden eagles and provides a
statutory definition of "take" that includes "disturb". The USFWS has developed National Bald Eagle
Management Guidelines to provide guidance to land managers, landowners, and others as to how to avoid
disturbing bald eagles. For mor information, visit http://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/baldeagle.htm
Threatened due to similarity of appearance(T(S/A)):
In the November 4, 1997 Federal Register (55822-55825), the northern population of the bog turtle (from New
York south to Maryland) was listed as T (threatened), and the southern population (from Virginia south to
Georgia) was listed as T(S/A) (threatened due to similarity of appearance). The T(S/A) designation bans the
collection and interstate and international commercial trade of bog turtles from the southern population. The
T(S/A) designation has no effect on land management activities by private landowners in North Carolina, part of
the southern population of the species. In addition to its official status as T(S/A), the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service considers the southern population of the bog turtle as a Federal species of concern due to habitat loss.
Definitions of Record Status:
Current - Based on NC Natural Heritage Program information, this taxon is considered to be extant in the
county.
Historical - Based on NC Natural Heritage Program information, this taxon is considered to be historical in the
county, meaning that all recorded occurrences are either extirpated, have not been found in recent surveys, or
have not been surveyed recently enough to be confident they are still present.
Obscure - the date and/or location of observation is uncertain.
Incidental/migrant - the species was observed outside of its normal range or habitat.
Probable/potential - the species is considered likely to occur in this county based on the proximity of known
records (in adjacent counties), the presence of potentially suitable habitat, or both.
https://www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/cntylist/mecklenburg.html 2/2

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Streams T: 1 and 5
Date: 2/19/2021
Projectlsite: 1-77 Beltway
Latitude: 35.372168
Evaluator: JC Weaver
County: Mecklenburg
Longitude: -80.84661
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent 32
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30`
Stream Determination (circle one
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennia
Other Cornelius and Derita
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 17.5)
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
la. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
O
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
O
1
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
J
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 8.5 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litterSc
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
MI
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
a
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes C 3
C. Biology (Subtotal =
6
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
M
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
1
2
2
319.
3
22. Fish
0
MO
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1 1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other 00
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Streams T: 4 and 6
Date: 2/19/2021
Projectlsite: 1-77 Beltway
Latitude: 35.372168
Evaluator: JC Weaver
County: Mecklenburg
Longitude: -80.84661
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent 27.5
if>_ 19 or perennial if>_ 30`
Stream Deter 'I • '•n (circle one)
Ephemeral 1� Perennial
P
other Cornelius and Derita
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 12.5)
Absent
Weak
Mod -rate
Strong
la. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
Ell
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
MIP3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
©
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
11
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
g
1
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
2 �
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
3
9. Grade control
0
0.
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No ko
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 4.5 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes C''J
C. Biology (Subtotal =
5.5 )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0 5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1 1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other 00
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Streams T: 2 and 3
Date: 2/19/2021
Project/site: 1-77 Beltway
Latitude: 35.372168
Evaluator: JC Weaver
County: Mecklenburg
Longitude: -80.84661
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent 15
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30`
Str etermination (circle one)
phemera Intermittent Perennial
other Cornelius and Derita
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 5 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
la. Continuity of channel bed and bank
Clr)
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
11
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
e
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
A
2
3
9. Grade control
0
m
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No 0
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 5 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
l 1 )
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
O
1
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes C''J
C. Biology (Subtotal =
5 )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
23
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
A
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
a
1
2
3
22. Fish
Vi
0 5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1 1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other 00
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

APPENDIX C
■ Ground Photographs

Project No. 71207484 rLPfaCO11
Consulting Enpineera S.Srierrusls
•
, :: ,
lr, !
Jf 1 ''
iyim ft�n 4 \` -
} )-- r. .P IYRI'�,J -ly• i,, 9 6 I' ,17, �� �f }�, `�irY� L ,g- i y ,;
r �� " fvn' �e J lL Yi l ',n �-� '� � , �" 1 I x 1 srr.
� z JF 17Fr��R@y p } 7 �.• *A ,a Al 4 �' 3� I��" As _
i _ F, ( Ya3 z , y� ;; •, � .P. 1 mil`',.. !gip i„
,i t ?ma`s �. ''P'"IS ' N j/ -an T, `:,t ",' 1 ;;;',#.7., ,�i Y L L r� 4 C '
J 111
a- J' —-�``y, \ Syr /l �`ie."ti �; _ _ - xv 4. -
Photograph 1 : View of agricultural field and upland forest margin, northern portion of the •site, facing
northeast.
, p
'ter, � �
l tli '0, Vi7,-;,--,-—'':-......-474k
'.1Veit.).‘ Ati i li'l d 1, , .i'.,;74...,:;',,,---.1!",-16i., , ,- .- —_
,,,,, , .1's qo - , -
I aHY
1/4'_v tom,',, --- ,,\,„:4.,. _, -,-,,,Iii,, , AI, ,,,,„„..,,,i, Ire.. .z., ,,, _,-.:,_5?--- , . -
�or�r P .
Y�
_---J
�S "s'ctti l[ •' t I AL * i '4� fi
Jf 1. 11
•-
w�-,
Photograph 2: View of agricultural field and upland forest margin, central portion of the site, facing
north.
77 Beltway

Project No. 71207484 rLPfaC011
Consulting Enpineera S.Sriensis,e
Y
( '' 1 l'
3j, � 1 ,
'sP,(_._. ifr .Y ( we •
s i'.+i �' y y
F+a
k y~''`s. }r „,;4„r�ry.s. ..- r�({, ft 1V Kr T� y--
...,.."-„,4.,....--,-
.r ..k 7C,or', s i:; e$'fh' f ,,I.` , 4w yr i s=Ji61
741.
_ , M` fa elf 4 1r ��. t N� y! `�J 4�,-�� a q�. , `�1t4♦ < �� �i�#``'
� fir- i 4- A?_'' '�.N y,'l"�', L •°+ y[r l` -y,7nit:h �1� sky ' V k'11. "'t'-
k ', a 7 { \ h. • r 1 •;: ', ,h ,�
W 0,tt, 4 ,h• .k. „144 � 1,.. a•y=/ `° l ,' T r" ' �t i l'r11 5�, ' �s•.
-.. . . :f .. .. a"JF'Ab.- f o i'' is , , '-.. l e `liS. t +4t ` -,'�i'G ,. -T 7'!?
,11
a Yp Y C 1+-! 14 R' P�
J L'4,4
$A* :' yy'i•'� 'T I "' I t 4 r., l,66 �'-• V � \. -
E.
Photograph 3: View of petroleum pipeline ROW and portions of the riparian forest, central portion of
the site, facing west.
y . f it
i ► ' g4. '
;1.1
i,'t•
9r ve
•
•
J i
t 6+ -'fi y a `�,f
.4 ti1 'f l� i
l _ r Ewa
' - .-• ,Ve"'-.A:0 1;'\,.1.',..--s,
,.0 r- 2 y .- `f''_irk .c.:k t1, �r l`5. ^r,.x `41'i �q— y�r \ —_
r� ~. r -"i- s t e,o.. 2 �. it r:gs, ' a l A .tee
.a. "n' r d y ! p • • e
1.
C - . � �' y�,'� 't
�t Y�w t i y b � 6 �ay ✓ A- rF ° (SC .4! # R •: • --.0!} .
•
,,,xtie
..,..7" t • . . --------tit—„
-s- :,:„:71,-,„,-"" -&.,,./.'. i. -)I-.:, „--"0:7;$- t.q-.);1; ..,".---/;";,:r,Y;t- ",:".-e
19 r # r �' . mow.
Photograph 4: View of unnamed tributary of Dixon Branch and petroleum pipeline ROW, central
portion of the site, facing east.
77 Beltway

Project No. 71207484 lrerracon
Consulting Engineers A Scientists
It Y i -\ - j Sf �tl '� �, if�z �� ! __���Y .4 / F Y•#
Et j. 1I 41%, ,I 0, 4r:1 1r,it !IA '9 , _ �°• :t 1
..ma's ? ...x- ;'
fi r
����®
� _ �
was o� x` y, . ,.
.�. --.s.ems' '�.�'t � ,.f
- elf Y I�pi=if .t# Am s.
x , 1- ;says a� l:. `-
s 4 ` y+._ "'I.`Amor irk -�
1 a t
gig :
Photograph 5: View of location of petroleum pipeline stream crossing at unnamed tributary of
Dixon Branch, within the central portion of the site, facing east.
- :Y*\ x I"
as 4 { �a r"
o- rt 14.. ; t s: ,/w 4 .., . `,-,-- , s��I g i• i+s_l_�, •,.1$ , IS`�y. '', ' °i .
'tom"y +n 1f, '.Y.1 A
._
�.,_ +'}1 is - .._x.=-+l f
Photograph 2: View of a portion of the spring fed pond within the central portion of the site,
facing northeast.
77 Beltway

Project No. 71207484 rLPfaCO11
. t
-.0 44 .
A
Li. ". -.-. 3`i'� *�' •I' �.. � ! • / �I ^'' Xis. ' Age.'
+
11
ip;
e
Photograph 7: View of agricultural field and upland evergreen forest, northern portion of the site,
facing north.
g. v 'A -r }e,t <ov. a 14, 4 • aye;-.
N i p
r :4
r f . e6"
y
__• `..e '' _ pit `�-.
- ae�r7.- - t, •:'
k ' s -�$'g „yam.
te ` �
'
1s s > 1 r R0 � ny `'T7 .M^ 3i' '1t A442. -
+4. '.4 } _ 4" a^• Y e -.v --/4 -- 1 -a ,, ,6 ;',d .._ YE ' ., 2 n
p ` 'h" "'�a - �' 9 h : '�* � i 'i �-r ,^k
a
Photograph 8: View of upland forest, northern portion of the site, facing east.
77 Beltway

Part 9: Current DMS Mitigation Statement of Availability

ROY COOPER
Governor
ELIZABETH S. BISER
Secretary
MARC RECKTENWALD
NORTH CAROLINA
Director Environmental Quality
April 5, 2022
Richard Horn
Strategic Capital Partners Acquisitions, LLC
280 E 96th Street, Suite 250
Indianapolic, IN 46240
Expiration of Acceptance: 10/5/2022
Project: 77-Beltway County: Mecklenburg
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) is willing to
accept payment for compensatory mitigation for impacts associated with the above referenced project as
indicated in the table below. Please note that this decision does not assure that participation in the DMS in -
lieu fee mitigation program will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts.
It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact permitting agencies to determine if payment to the DMS will
be approved. You must also comply with all other state, federal or local government permits, regulations or
authorizations associated with the proposed activity including G.S. § 143-214.11.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. If we have not
received a copy of the issued 404 Permit/401 Certification within this time frame, this acceptance will
expire. It is the applicant's responsibility to send copies of the permits to DMS. Once DMS receives a copy
of the permit(s) an invoice will be issued based on the required mitigation in that permit and payment must
be made prior to conducting the authorized work. The amount of the in -lieu fee to be paid by an applicant is
calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and policies listed on the DMS website.
Based on the information supplied by you in your request to use the DMS, the impacts for which you are
requesting compensatory mitigation credit are summarized in the following table. The amount of mitigation
required and assigned to DMS for this impact is determined by permitting agencies and may exceed the
impact amounts shown below.
River Basin
Impact Location
(8-digit HUC)
Impact Type
Impact Quantity
Yadkin
03040105
Riparian Wetland
0.36
Yadkin
03040105
Warm Stream
527
Upon receipt of payment, DMS will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. The
mitigation will be performed in accordance with the In -Lieu Fee Program instrument dated July 28, 2010.
Thank you for your interest in the DMS in -lieu fee mitigation program. If you have any questions or need
additional information, please contact Kelly.Williams©ncdenr.gov.
cc: Jeff Harbour, agent
aEQ:.ARfll IRA D ` /
ro1r�A of ErcAmnmBnnl WeYq \V��
Sincerely,
FOR James. B Stanfill
Asset Management Supervisor
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Mitigation Services
217 West Jones Street 11652 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1652
919.707.8976