SW8040509_HISTORICAL FILE_20130218

STORMWATER DIVISION CODING SHEET
POST-CONSTRUCTION PERMITS
PERMIT NO. SW8 Gy0soC:I\
DOC TYPE ❑ CURRENT PERMIT
❑ APPROVED PLANS
© HISTORICAL FILE
❑ COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION
DOC DATE ZO v. ) 0211�:
YYYYMMDD

CDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Pat McCrory Charles Wakild, P. E. John E. Skvarla, III
Governor Director Secretary
February 18, 2013
Mr. Thomas N. Tucker, Manager
Three Oak Property, LLC
1630 Military Cutoff Road
Wilmington, NC 28403
Subject: Approved Plan Revision, Name Change, and Project Extension
The Park at Three Oaks
Stormwater Permit No. SW8 040509
New Hanover County
Dear Mr. Tucker:
On February 15, 2013, the Wilmington Regional Office received a request to revise the approved plans for
Stormwater Management Permit Number SW8 040509 and change the name of the project. The revisions include
reallocating the impervious area as specified on the approved plan, and approving trees to be installed in the
infiltration basins per the calculations PE stamped on February 15, 2013. It has been determined that a formal permit
modification is not required for the proposed changes.We are forwarding you an approved copy of the revised plans
for your files. Please add the attached plans to the previously approved plan set. The project name has been
changed from Three Oaks Mixed Use Development to The Park at Three Oaks. The owner remains Three Oak
Property, LLC. On August 5, 2009, the Governor signed Session Law 2009-406, This law impacts any development
approval issued by the Division of Water Quality under Article 21 of Chapter 143 of the General Statutes,which is
current and valid at any point between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2010. The law extends the effective
period of any stormwater permit that was set to expire during this time frame up to three (3) years from its current
expiration date. On August 2, 2010,the Governor signed Session Law 2010-177,which granted an extra year for an
extension of up to four(4)years. The Division is hereby notifying you that permit SW8 040509 has been extended
on February 18, 2013, and shall be effective until May 20, 2018,which includes the extensions. For your records,
please find enclosed a copy of the updated previously issued permit showing the new project name, new expiration
date, and revised page numbers. Please be aware that all terms and conditions of the permit issued on May 20,
2004, remain in full force and effect. Please also understand that the approval of this revision to the approved plans
for the subject State Stormwater Permit is done on a case-by-case basis. Any other changes to this project must be
approved through this Office prior to construction. The issuance of this plan revision does not preclude the permittee
from complying with all other applicable statutes, rules, regulations or ordinances which may have jurisdiction over
the proposed activity,and obtaining a permit or approval prior to construction. If you have any questions concerning
this matter, please do not hesitate to call Georgette Scott or me at(910)796-7215,
i er h ,
l
Ke Johnson
vironmental Engineer
GDSlkpj: S:IWQ&Stormwater\Permits&Projec1s1200M040509 HD12013 02 permit_pr 040509
cc: Luke Menius, PE, Stroud Engineering, P.A.
Inspector, New Hanover County Building Inspections
Wilmington Regional Office
Wilmington Regional Office
127 Cardinal Dnve Extension,Wilmington,North Carolina 28405 One
Phone:[phone] FAX:[phone] DENR Assistance: 1-877 623-6748 NorthCarolina
Internet: www.ncwateiquality.org Na{urrn/y
An Fniml nnmtlnnim 1 ARumnlivn Arinn Fmnlnvar ` L K(`✓y

DWQ'USE ONLY
{� Da a Received Fee Paid(express only) Permit Number
S D
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PERMIT PLAN REVISION APPLICATION FORM
This form may be photocopied for use as an original
I. GENERAL INFORMATION
1. Stormwater Management Permit Number: SW8 040509
2. Project Name:The Park at Three Oaks
3. Permit Holder's name(specify the name of the corporation,individual,etc.):
Three Oak Property,LLC
4. Print Owner/Signing Official's name and title(person legally responsible for permit):
Thomas N.Tucker,Member
5. Mailing Address for person listed in item 2 above:
1630 Military Cutoff Road
City: Wilmington State: NC Zip: 28403 q �
Phone: ( 910 ) 256-0021 Fax: H — E Q `!Y E
Email: tntucker100®gmail.com JAN 0 8 2013
II. PLAN REVISION INFORMATION BV:
1. Summarize the plan revision proposed (attach additional pages if needed):
The 3 proposed office/retail buildings have been removed from the plan in favor of 3 apartment buildings.
Realignment of parking and sidewalks is necessary to facilitate the revision. BUA and BMPs are unchanged.
III. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
Only complete application packages will be accepted and reviewed by the Division of Water Quality(DWQ).
A complete package includes all of the items listed below. The complete application package should be
submitted to the DWQ Office that issued the permit.
1. Please indicate that you have provided the following required information by initialing in the space provided
next to each item.
Initials
_ •_.Original£a 1 copy of the Plan Revision Application Form �
• Two(2)copies of revised plans (must be revisions of original approved plan sheet(s)) ✓�
If applying for or Express review (only available in 20 coastal counties):
• Application fee of$500.00 (made payable to NCDENR)
VI. APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATION
I, (print or hype name of person listed in General Information, item 3) Thomas N. Tucker
certify that I have authorized these plan revisions.and that the information included on this plan revision
application is,t e st of my know]de,c
orrect and complete.
Signatur Date:��
Plan Revision Form Rev 13July2010 Page 1 of 1

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
STATE STORMWATER PERMIT NAME/OWNERSHIP CHANGE FORM
I. CURRENT PERMIT INFORMATION
1. Stormwater Management Permit Number: sw8 040so9
2. Project Name: Three Oaks Mixed Use Development
3. Current Permit Holder's Company Name/Organization: Three Oak Property, LLC
Thomas N. Tucker Member
4. Signing Official's Name: Title: �glro.Ue.r �
5. Mailing Address: 315 Friday Drive
State:
City: ton te: Zip:
Wilmington NC 28411 S 'O
6. Phone: 910 538-5719 Fax: (_)
II. PROPOSED PERMITTEE / OWNER / PROJECT / ADDRESS INFORMATION
This request is for: (please check all that apply)
❑ Name change of the owner (Please complete Items 1, 2 and 3 below)
Name change of project (Please complete Item 5 below)
❑ Change in ownership of the property/company (Please complete Items 1, 2, 3, and 4 below)
0 Mailing address / phone number change. (Please complete Item 4 below)
❑ Other (please explain):
1. Proposed permittee's company name/organization:
2. Proposed permittee's signing official's name:
3. Proposed permittee's title:
4. Mailing Address: 1630 Military Cutoff Road
City: Wilmington State: NC Zip: 28403
j;hone:.( 910 ) 256-0021 - Fax: (
5. New Project Name to be placed on permit: The Park at Three Oaks
Please check the appropriate box. The proposed permittee listed above is:
❑ HOA or POA (Attach documentation showing that the HOA or POA owns, controls, or has a
recorded easement for all areas that contain stormwater system features. Print name of HOA or
POA in #1 above and provide name of HOA/POA's authorized representative in #2 above)
❑ The property owner
❑ Lessee (Attach a copy of the lease agreement and complete Property Owner Information on
page 4)
❑ Purchaser (Attach a copy of the pending sales agreement. Final approval of this transfer will be
granted upon receipt of a copy of the recorded deed)
❑ Developer (Complete Property Owner Information on page 4) EEC
BAN o R
BY:
SSW N/O Change Rev24Sept2012 Page 1 of 4

III. REQUIRED ITEMS
A request to transfer a permit will not be approved by the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) unless all
of the applicable required items listed below are included with the submittal. Failure to provide the
listed items may result in processing delays or denial of the transfer.
1. This completed and signed form• (This certification must be completed and signed b_y both the
current,permit holder and the new applicant if this is a change of ownership)
2. Legal documentation of the property transfer to a new owner.
3. A copy of any recorded deed restrictions, covenants, or easements, if required by the permit.
4. The designer's certification (DWQ Engineer and Designer Certification Forms are available from
each DWQ Regional office), if required by the permit and if not already submitted to DWQ.
5. If the proposed permittee is a firm, partnership, association, institution, corporation, limited liability
company, or other corporate entity, provide documentation showing the authority of the named
representative to act on behalf of the proposed permittee.
6. The $40.00 processing fee. If this is an initial transfer from the original permittee the processing
fee is not required. Subsequent ownership transfers will require the $40.00 processing fee.
IV. CURRENT PERMITTEE'S CERTIFICATION
Please check one of the following statements and fill out the certification below that statement:
® Check here if the current permittee is only changing his/her/its name, the project name, or mailing
address, but will retain the permit. I, Thomas N. Tucker , the current
permittee, hereby notify the DWQ that I am changing my name and/or I am changing my mailing
address and/or I am changing the name of the permitted project. I further attest that this application
for a name/ownership change is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand
that if all required parts of this application are not completed or if all required supporting information
and attachments listed above are not included, this application package will be returned as
incomplete.
heck here if current permittee is transferring the property to a new owner and will n tain
owner f t� he permit.
I, the current permittee, a itting this application
for a transfer of ownbrsNp for permit # . I her otify DWQ of the sale or
other legal transfer of the stbrrawater system associated wi s permit. I have provided a copy of
the most recent permit, the designe tification fo i BMP, any recorded deed restrictions,
covenants, or easements, the DWQ approv s and/or approved as-built plans, the approved
operation and maintenance agreement, mainte a records, and the most recent DWQ
stormwater inspection report to the posed permittee na in Sections 11 and V of this form. I
further attest that this applica ' or a name/ownership change is urate and complete to the best
of my knowledge. I and nd that if all required parts of this applicatio a not completed or if all
required su�portin ormation and attachments listed above are not include s application
package will eturned as incomplete. I assign all rights and obligations as permi o the
propose rmittee named in Sections II and V of this form. I understand that this transfe
ow9pfsfiip cannot be approved by the DWQ unless and until the facility is in compliance with the
permit. /
Sign ure: � � Date:
I, 0'J-- a Notary Public for the State of
County of !i✓ do hereby certify that
personally appeared before me this the
day of W6ml6r 20J_?_ and �Na��upe 41je due execution of the
s o ii
ryoing instr oume t. Wit ss y hand and official seal, d .,OTA1 �,- tary Seal)
�CEVVIF
Nbtary Signature �m,Oj,.,o ive S - OZZ Ig ,°ueu° JI<! 0 B 1013
�'�itigNOVEA�
tow$ BY:--------
SSW N/O Change Rev24Sept2012 Page 2 of 4

V. . r PROPOSED PERMITTEE CERTIFICATION: (This section must be completed by the
.Proposed 7
tee for all transfers of ownership)
I, , hereby notify the DWQ that I have wired
through sale, lea a or legal transfer, the responsibility for operating and maintaining th permitted
stormwater mana mentsystem, and, if applicable, constructing the permitted sys . I
acknowledge and a st that I have received a copy of: (check all that apply to t ' permit)
® the most recent p rmit
the designer's certi ' ation for each BMP
❑ any recorded deed re trictions, covenants, or easements
❑ the DWQ approved plans and/or approved as-built plans
❑ the approved operation ark maintenance agreement
Bpast maintenance records fr the previous permit a (where required)
DWQ stormwater inspection re ort showing co lance within 90 days prior to this transfer
1 have reviewed the permit, approved pla Band o er documents listed above, and I will comply with
the terms and conditions of the permit and appr ved plans. I acknowledge and agree that I will
operate and maintain the system pursuant t e requirements listed in the permit and in the
operation and maintenance agreement. I f rther ttest that this application for a name/ownership
change is accurate and complete to th est of m knowledge. I understand that if all required parts
of this application are not completed�or if all require supporting information and attachments listed
above are not included, this application package will b returned as incomplete.
Signature: Date:
I, , a Notary Public for the State of
County of do hereby certify that
personally appear before me this the
ay of 20 , and acknowle a th<due xecution of the
forgoing i trument. Witness my hand and official seal,
(Notary S
N ary Signature
Additional copies of the original permit and the approved Operation and Maintenance agreement can
be obtained from the appropriate Regional Office of the Division of Water Quality.
This completed form, including all supporting documents and processing fee (if required), should be
sent to the appropriate Regional Office of the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural
Resources, Division of Water Quality, as shown on the attached map.
Please note that if the Proposed Permittee listed above is not the property owner, the property owner
must complete and sign page 4 of this document. Both the lessee/developer and the property
owner will appear on the permit as permittees.
rJOAN 0 8 2013
BY: _
SSW N/O Change Rev24Sept2012 Page 3 of 4

VI. PR PERTY OWNER CONTACT INFORMATION AND CERTIFICATION
If the Propo d Permittee listed in Sections ll and V of this form is not the Property OyVner, the
Property Ow r must provide his/her Contact Information below and sign this form:
Printed Name:
Organization:
Title within the Organ' ation:
Street Address:
City: State: Zip:
Mailing Address:
(if different m street address)
City: State: Zip:
Phone: Fax:
Email:
I certify that I own the property identifie in this ermit transfer document and have given permission
to the Proposed Permittee listed in Secti s I nd V to develop and/or, lease the property. A copy
of the lease agreement or other contract, 'ch indicates the party responsible for the construction
and/or operation and maintenance of the mwater system, has been provided with the submittal.
As the legal property owner I acknowl ge, un erstand, and agree by my signature below, that I will
appear as a permittee along with the essee/dev toper and I will therefore share responsibility for
compliance with the DWO Stormw er permit. As a property owner, it is my responsibility to notify
DWQ by submitting a completed ame/Ownership hange Form within 30 days of procuring a
developer, lessee or purchaser or the property. I un rstand that failure to operate and maintain the
stormwater treatment facility i, accordance with the pe it is a violation of NC General Statute
(NCGS) 143-215.1, and ma result in appropriate enfor ment action including the assessment of
civil penalties of up to $25 00 per day, pursuant to NCG 143-215.6.
Signature of the prope owner Date:
I, \aotary Public for the State of
County of , do hereby certify that
personally appeare before me this the
day of 20 , and acknowled the due execution of the
forgoin instrument. Witness my hand and official seal,
(Notary eat)
N ary Signature
JAN 0 8 2013
BY.-
SSW N/O Change Rev24Sept2012 . Page 4 of 4

STROUD ENGINEERING, P.A. dN44CEG3 aOC� 4GLal�]�LU7�44L�1d
102-D Cinema Drive
WILMINGTON, NC 28403
DATEZ /s 20/3 JOB NO. ��- O/C/
[phone] ATTENTION �.CQ��
TO NCD.E.,U/� RE: St-.JQ Oy oCjo I
RRln ^� Z013
�- - � 1.
WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Attached ❑ Under separate cover via the following items:
❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications
❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑
COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
❑ For approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit copies for approval
❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution
❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints
❑ For review and comment ❑
❑ FORBIDS DUE ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
REMARKS
E1
ET I bmw I - ----
BY:----- ------
COPY TO
SIGNE
If enclosures are not as noted,kindly notify us of once.

STROUD ENGINEERING, P.A.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
102-D CINEMA DRIVE
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28403
[phone]
February 15,2013
NCDENR _
Attn: Kelly Johnson
127 Cardinal Drive
Wilmington,North Carolina 28405
Re: Plan Revision for The Park at Three Oaks
Formerly Three Oaks Mixed Use Development
SW8 040509
Dear Ms. Johnson:
Please find the attached revised plans and supporting documents along with the following responses to your
comments dated January 25,2013.
1. Scaled drainage area maps are found on sheet 5. An overall drainage area map depicts the area
tributary to each of the 2 infiltration basins. It should be noted that this plan revision does not alter
these drainage areas nor does it change the total BUA within the drainage areas. The interbasin
drainage area map details the drainage patterns within the revised portion of the project. These
areas were used to develop the pipe calculations included with my submittal. Note that no portions
of the collection system downstream of the revised portion of the project required any changes,as
the overall drainage area did not change.
2. The basins have been labeled as such on the plans.
3. I have removed the`-permitted"column from the BUA breakdown table. This was included to
illustrate that there was no change in BUA from the approved plan to the current plan,but I
recognize the potential for confusion.
4. 1 have attached an engineer's certification for the two infiltration basins. With regard to the
cypress trees, I have attached calculations to substantiate that certification item#10 is met.
5. Three Oak Property,.LLC has resolved this matter. I have attached an updated annual report which
demonstrates their good standing with the Secretary of State.
Thank you for your attention to this matter. Please feel free to contact me with any additional questions or
concerns.
- - - Respectfully,
r 'VEEI
David L. Menius, P.E.
Stroud Engineering,PA FEB 15 2019
Attachments
fi1�07.r6lsg ow�2144/wpd/kelly2.wpd -
HESTRON PLAZATWO
SUITE - 102-D CINEMA DRIVE _ 151-A HWY.24
GREENVILLE,NC 27858 WILMINGTON,NC 28403 MOREHEAD CITY, NC 28557
[phone] [phone] [phone]

C �uull )"TONS
3FlsINs
INFILTRATION BASIN VOLUME/BOTTOM AREA CALCULATIONS
PROJECT: 3OAKS ENGINEER: OLM DATE: 2/14/2013
NOTES:
1)THESE CALCULATIONS ARE INTENDED TO VERIFY THE BASINS SATISFY THE REQUIRED MINIMUM TREATMENT VOLUMES.
2) REQUIRED STORAGE VOLUMES WERE CALCULATED USING THE SCHULER SIMPLE METHOD AND A 1.5"DESIGN STORM.
3) POND DIMENSIONS WERE OBTAINED FROM A SURVEY BY MICHAEL UNDERWOOD AND ASSOCITATES ON 512412005,
4)VOLUME AND AREA REDUCTIONS TO ACCOUNT FOR TREES GROWING IN EACH BASIN ARE CALCULATED BY
USING THE FOLLOWING ASSUMPTIONS OF MATURE BALD CYPRESS DIMENSIONS:
DIAMETER AT BASE: 3.5 FT RESULTING BASE AREA: 9.6 SF(CIRCLE)
DIAMETER AT STORAGE DEPTH: 2.5 FT RESULTING VOLUME: 20.7 CF(TRUNCATED CONE)
STORAGE DEPTH: 2.9 FT
BASIN 1
ASBUILT DIMENSSONS:.
EL. tee A nc. o. oe o.
19.0 0.0 5038 0 0
19.5 0.5 5616 2664 2664
20.0 1.0 6217 2958 5622
20.5 1.5 6873 3273 BB94
21.0 2.0 7546 3605 12499
21.5 2.5 8486 4008 16507
21.9 3.0 9108 0019 20026
DRAINAGE AREA: 5.47 AC
BUA: 154,550 SF
= 3.55 AC
IMPERVIOUS RATIO: 0.65
Rv: 0.634 =0.05+0.9-Impervious Ratio
REQUIRED TREATMENT VOLUME: 18.876 CF =3630'1.5 -Rv-DA
ASBUILT VOLUME: 20,026 CF
NUMBER OF TREES: 25
VOLUME REDUCTION: 517 CF
RESULTING VOLUME: 19,509 CF
PERCENT OF REQUIRED VOLUME: 103% OK
ASBUILT BOTTOM AREA: 5,038 CF
NUMBER OF TREES: 25
AREA REDUCTION: 240 CF -�-
RESULTING BOTTOM AREA: 4,798 CF
DESIGN INFILTRATION RATE: 12 IN/HR =2/3 OF REPORTED VALUE
RESULTING MIN.INFILTRATION RATE: 0.391WHR OK
BASIN 2
ASBUILT DIMENISONS: y
EL. Stage I SA I Inc.Vol. I TotalVol. I
19,0 0.0 3488 0 0 \��\�� CAROB �I
19.5 0.5 4109 1899 1899 �\ Q.Y•�gg� /,y/i
20.0 1.0 4754 2216 4115 `�O•DC 0�7.''/�
20.5 1.5 5452 2552 6667
21.0 2.0 6178 2908 9574 .•• •ate SEAL
21.5 2.5 6922 3275 12849 356TT
21.9 3.0 7669 15767 �,
DRAINAGE AREA: 4.12 AC
Qf f, t
IN
BUA: 115,514 SF2.65
tN \\
IMPERVIOUS RATIO: 0.64 AC //�7 f jT l" `�\\\
Rv: 0,629 =0.05+0.9-Impervious Ratio
REQUIRED TREATMENT VOLUME: 14.117 CF =3630 1.5"Rv'DA _
ASBUILT VOLUME: 15,767 CF
NUMBER OF TREES: 24 2I I�j Imo)
_ VOLUME REDUCTION: 496 CF /
RESULTING VOLUME: 15,271 CF
PERCENT OF REQUIRED VOLUME: 108% OK
ASBUILT BOTTOM AREA: 3,488 CF
NUMBER O AREA REDUCTION: 231 CF
RESULTING BOTTOM AREA: 3,257
DESIGN INFILTRATION RATE: 12 NFHR =2/3 OF REPORTED VALUE FEB 9 5 2013
RESULTING MIN.INFILTRATION RATE: DA31WHR OK
�v ,

Wilmington, NC 28403
[phone] ext 225
[e-mail]
From: Johnson, Kelly [mailto:kelly.p.johnson(&ncdenr.govl
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2013 10:01 AM
To: Luke Menius
Subject: RE: 3 Oaks stormwater
Let me think about this.... Do you suspect that if you took out the root ball volume/surface area that the remaining
volume/surface area/etc would be big enough? I don't know if that has been done before or not, but that was my initial
thought on how to resolve this. I will ask around to see how this has been handled before. Do you have any other
ideas?
From: Luke Menius (mailto:lmenius(a)stroudengineer.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2013 12:45 PM
To: Johnson, Kelly
Subject: FW: 3 Oaks stormwater
You can see from the responses below that the previous engineer struck out as well. This leaves us looking to you for a
determination of the fate of the trees. The county required them as part of the Special Use Permit, so they will require
that we keep them. The owner likes them because they are attractive, and I tend to agree. I commented to him
yesterday,jokingly,that he could make headlines by becoming the first land developer in history to chain himself to a
tree to keep environmentalists from cutting it down. In all seriousness, we will do whatever is needed to make sure they
are not removed. You have mentioned calculating the treatment volume reduction that mature cypress trunks would
create. It would not be difficult to come up with a number and then we could either increase the basin or decrease the
BUA accordingly. Let me know if you have any other ideas or if this is something that we need to sit down and discuss
with Georgette.
David L. Menius, P.E.
Stroud Engineering, P.A.
102-D Cinema Drive
Wilmington, NC 28403
[phone] ext 225
Imeni [e-mail]
From: John Kuske III (mailto:jkuske3(alkuske3eng.coml
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2013 2:51 PM
To: 'Luke Menius'
Cc: 'Tom Tucker'
Subject: FW: 3 Oaks stormwater
Luke,
It appears that the main files for the subject project were recently purged. My office or my former office cannot
locate the files.
I did locate the permit which I assume you have and the plans. There is a note on the stormwater plan that
states to see the landscaping plan by others for the stormwater infiltration pond landscaping.
JOHN A. KUSKE, 111, P.E.
KUSKE3 ENGINEERING, PLLC
PO BOX 4031
2

WILMINGTON, NC 28406
LICENSE NO: P-0909
PHONE: 910`471.4041
E-MAIL: [e-mail]
It is the professional opinion of Kuske3 Engineering, PLLC and Norris, Kuske&Tunstall Consulting Engineers, Inc. that
this electronic information provides design information current as of the date of its release. It shall be the responsibility of
the party receiving the data to examine it to see that it contains the necessary files and information requested. In
transferring the files in electronic media format, Kuske3 Engineering, PLLC and Norris, Kuske&Tunstall Consulting
Engineers, Inc. makes no representations as to the usability or readability of documents resulting from the use of software
application packages, operating systems, or computer hardware differing from those used by Kuske3 Engineering, PLLC
and Norris, Kuske&Tunstall Consulting Engineers, Inc. in the preparation of such data.
From: John Kuske III [mailto:]kuske3Calkuske3eng.com]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2013 2:53 PM
To: 'Luke Menius'; Tom Tucker'
Subject: RE: 3 Oaks stormwater
Gentlemen,
I hope this message finds you well.
I will pull the file and follow with you first of next week. Interesting message as I rode thru the complex a few
weeks ago to look at the Stormwater Management System and was curious over the status of the undeveloped
commercial area.
The documentation you provided tells the story and it is part of approvals received from the County and NC
DENR. I do remember discussing this matter with all parties related to the conflicting interest. However,
again, the approved documents you provided should be sufficient. We need to revisit the language in the
existing NC DENR Stormwater Permit as that is what NC DENR will hang their hat on as you know.
As stated, this matter should resolve itself but I will check to see if I have any additional documentation to
facilitate resolving the matter sooner than later. I have a good relationship with David Cox, Linda Lewis,
Georgette Scott and others and will be glad you guys anyway I can.
I will follow up with you and please tell Jimmy I said hello as well.
Thanks,
JOHN A. KUSKE, III, P.E.
KUSKE3 ENGINEERING, PLLC
PO Box 4031
WILMINGTON, NC 28406
LICENSE No: P-0909
PHONE: 910471,4041
E-MAIL: [e-mail]
It is the professional opinion of Kuske3 Engineering, PLLC and Norris, Kuske &Tunstall Consulting Engineers, Inc. that
this electronic information provides design information current as of the date of its release. It shall be the responsibility of
3

the party receiving the data to examine it to see that it contains the necessary files and information requested. In
transferring the files in electronic media format, Kuske3 Engineering, PLLC and Norris, Kuske &Tunstall Consulting
Engineers, Inc. makes no representations as to the usability or readability of documents resulting from the use of software
application packages, operating systems, or computer hardware differing from those used by Kuske3 Engineering, PLLC
and Norris, Kuske& Tunstall Consulting Engineers, Inc. in the preparation of such data.
From: Luke Menius [mailto:lmenius()stroudengineer.com]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2013 12:06 PM
To: ikuske3Ccbkuske3eng.com
Cc: 'Tom Tucker'
Subject: 3 Oaks stormwater
I am working for Tom Tucker on what was to have been the commercial portion of the Three Oaks Mixed Used
Development on Market Street. Runoff from the proposed improvements, which now consist of 3 residential buildings
in place of the originally approved commercial buildings,will to tie into the existing stormwater system for conveyance
and treatment in accordance with the NHC and NCDENR permits.
Our NCDENR permit modification request prompted a site inspection which has given rise to concern over the presence
of cypress trees in each of the two infiltration basins. NCDENR claims that these trees may need to be removed to bring
the ponds into permit compliance. Tom recalled that the trees were required by NHC as a condition of the SUP and I
was able to locate the attached document which eludes to some correspondence between you and NCDENR. A review
of the NCDENR files and discussion with current staff has yielding nothing.
It is my hope that you might have some record of NCDENR staff making an allowance for the plantings as described in
this letter and narrative. Short of that, the NHC SUP and NCDENR seem to be at odds over what is required. I believe
that, given the ponds' appearance and satisfactory performance, NCDENR will make exception but it will not be without
a lot of deliberation and delay. As such, any light you can shed on the matter would be much appreciated.
Thank you in advance for your consideration of this matter,
Luke
David L. Menius, P.E.
Stroud Engineering, P.A.
102-1) Cinema Drive
Wilmington, NC 28403
[phone] ext 225
[e-mail]
4

ctrsarMq.Q E-Piled Annual Report
men 3 -1-0-5677079
LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY
€� ANNUAL REPORT Do not data enter manually.
NAME OF LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY: Three Oak Property, LLC.
REPORT FOR THE YEAR:2011 SPATE OF INCORPORATION: NC
SECRETARY OF STATE L.L.C. ID NUMBER: 0686531
NATURE OF BUSINESS: Apartment Ownership
REGISTERED AGENT: Sweyer,Richard D.
REGISTERED OFFICI>MAILBAG ADDRESS: 1630 Military Cutoff Rd
Wilmington,NC 28403
REGISTERED OFFICE STREET ADDRESS: 1630 Mililary Cmlof l?d
Wilmington, NC 28403 New Hanover County
PRINCIPAL OFFICE TELEPHONE NUMI3F,R: [phone]
PRINCIPAL OFFICE MAILING ADDRESS: 1630 Military Cutoff
Wilnington, NC 28403
PRINCIPAL OFFICE STREF.,T ADDRESS: 1630 Military Cutoff
Wilmington, NC 28403
MANAGERS/MEMBERS/ORGANIZERS:
Name:Sweyer Investments,LLC Name: Tom 'Tucker Name: Tucker Inc
Title:Manager Title:Manager Title:Manager
Address: Address: Address:
1630 Military Cumff 1630 Military Cutoff 1630 military cutoff
Wilmington,NC 28403 Wilmington, NC 28403 Wilmington,NC 28403
Name:M&John Properties LLC
Title: Manager
Address:
1835 Midellesound Loop Rd
Wilmington,NC 27411
CERTIFICATION OF ANNUAL REPORT MUST BE COMPLETED 13Y ALL LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANIES
Sweyer Investments,LLC
02/02/2012
FORM MUST BE SIGNED BY A MANAGERIMEMBER DATE
Sweyer Investments, LLC Manager
TYPE;OR PRINT NAME TYPE OR PRINT TITLE
ANNUAL REPORT FEE: S200 MAIL TO: Secretary of State•Corporations Division•Post Office Box 29525 •Raleigh,NC 27626-0525

ogozc
New Hanover County
Planning Department
u' County Annex Building
230 Marketplace Drive,Suite 150
Wilmington, NC 28403
Dextet L Hayes P 910.798.7165
Director F 910.798.7053
August 5,2004
RECEIVED
Mr.John Kuske
902 Market Street AUG U 9 M
Wilmington,NC 28401
ANDREW AND KUX
Re: S-511, 12103
Dear Mr.Kuske:
As you are aware the New Hanover County Board of County Commissioners in regular
session on Monday August 2,2004 voted to approve your petition to revise a Special Use Permit
for 156 residential units and 21,600 square feet of neighborhood business within an existing B-2
Highway Business District.The Board of Commissioners approval is based on the conditions that
1)Wetlands vegetation and landscaping shall be planted in infiltration pond I &2 to facilitate
bioretemion,2)Interpretive signage shall be provided onsite for public educational purposes,3)
vegetated filter strips shall be provided at pond outlets,4)Wetlandplantings shall be incorporated
into pond 3 to establish a constructed wetland.
Planning Staff is preparing an Addendum to the original Special Use Order for the
Chairman to sign.A copy of the signed addendum and associated site plan will be forwarded to
You.
Also please note that all other local,state,and federal requirements may be applicable to
this projecL Prior to proceeding with any development,you must obtain all appropriate permits
from the County Building Inspections Department located in the County Annex building at 230
Marketplace Drive in Wilmington.
If you have any questions please feel free to contact me at 798-7165.
Sincerely
Bard Stewart,ASLA
Senior Planner
cc: Zoning Enforcement
Ken Shanklin
Ogden Twelve,LLC File IZI:CEIVED
JAN 3 o 2013
RY:1N 6"A1 -ro V-'-i

SITE AND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM NARRATIVE
FOR
SPECIAL USE PERMIT REVISION
PROJECT NAME:
THREE OAKS MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT
7750 MARKET STREET/US HWY. 17
NEW HANOVER COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
PROJECT OWNER:
Three Oak Property, LLC
315 Friday Drive
Wilmington, NC 28411
i �
%
June 14, 2004
Prepared by:
ANDREW& KUSKE CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC.
902 Market Street
Wilmington, North Carolina 28401
[phone]
[phone](Fax)
E-mail: [e-mail]
A& K Project No. 04022

PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
The project site is an 11.87 acre site located in New Hanover County, North Carolina at 7750 Market
Street / US Highway 17. A mixed use development is proposed with paved parking and access to
Market Street / US Highway 17. The mixed use development will include 156 2-Bedroom Apartment
.Units, a 6,000 SF 1-Story Retail Building, an 8,400 SF 2-Story Retail/Office Building and a 7,200 SF 2-
Story Retail /Office Building. Phase 1 construction will include the 156 2-Bedroom Apartments. Phase
2 construction will include the Retail Building and the two(2) Retail/Office Buildings.
Stormwater runoff from the site drains to Pages Creek. Pages Creek is classified as an SA water body.
The stormwater management system proposed for the site will consist of three (3) stomxwater ponds.
The site stormwater runoff will be treated in two (2) above ground stormwater infiltration ponds
designed to comply with the NC DENR State Stormwater Regulations for sites draining to an SA water
body. The method of stomnvater infiltration will also comply with Section 72-38 of the New Hanover
County Zoning Ordinance. A third stormwater pond will be designed to meet the New Hanover County
Stormwater Ordinance. The drainage area for the stomrwater management system includes the Phase
1 and Phase 2 onsite area and an offsite area. The offske drainage area is a portion of Market Street/
US Highway 17 within the NC DOT Right of Way.
SITE DESCRIPTION AND INFORMATION:
As mentioned above, Improvements will take place on the site as shown on the attached plans. The
majority of the site is cleared of underbrush but Is heavily wooded with trees and sandy soils. Existing
trees on the site will remain to the extent possible. Grades on the site range from 0.10% to 10.00%.
The stormwater runoff from the undeveloped site currently sheet flows to the rear of the site prior to
discharging into Pages Creek.
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM INFORMATION:
Land disturbing on the site will exceed one acre, which requires the site to comply with the NC DENR
State Stormwater Regulations. As stated above, stomnarater runoff from the site drains to Pages
Creek, which is classified by NC DENR as an SA water body. The State Stormwater Regulations for
sites draining to SA water bodies require that the first one and a half inch (1.51 volume of stormwater
runoff be stored and infiltrated In an above ground or below ground infiltration system. The one and a
half Inch (1.51 volume of stormwater runoff is required to Infiltrate within two to five days (2-6 days).
The State Stormwater Regulations require that the drainage area to an infiltration system must not
exceed five to six acres (" acres). A two-foot (2) separation must also be maintained from the
bottom of the Infiltration system to the site seasonal high groundwater table and the stormwater runoff
above the one and a half inch (1.51 volume must bypass the infiltration system. In addition, the volume
of stormwater bypassing the infiltration systems must then comply with the New Hanover County
Stormwater Ordinance prior to discharging from the site. The New Hanover County Stormwater
Ordinance requires that the post development discharge from the site shall not exceed the pre-
development discharge rate for the 2 year, 10 year, and 25 year storms.

A below ground stormwater infiltration system was originally proposed on the site to meet the State
Stormwater Regulations, the New Hanover County Stormwater Ordinance and Section 72-38 of the
New Hanover County Zoning Ordinance. Based on field data establishing the seasonal high ground
water table provided by the project owner's geotechnical consultant and the NC DENR State Soil
Scientist, it has been determined that a below ground Infiltration system is not the most suitable and
environmental friendly stormwater management system for the site. Based on the depth to the site
seasonal high groundwater table, a below ground infiltration system would require an excessive amount
of soil fill material which would drastically change the natural characteristics of the site and require
excessive removal of existing site trees and vegetation. Therefore, two (2) above ground stormwater
infiltration ponds have been designed to store and infiltrate the first one and a half inch (1.51 runoff
from two (2) drainage areas. The depth to the seasonal high groundwater table in the area of each
above ground stormwater infiltration pond is approximately elevation 17.00'. The bottom elevation of
each above ground stormwater infiltration pond cannot exceed elevation 19.00'. Therefore, elevation
19.00' governs the remaining critical site elevations such as a stormdrain pipe inverts, building finish
floor elevations, sidewalk elevations, access drive elevations and parking lot elevations. The use of an
above ground stormwater infiltration pond will require less soil fill material and less removal of existing
site trees and vegetation than a below ground infiltration system. The use of above ground stormwater
Infiltration ponds appears to be the best available option to comply with the State Stormwater
Regulations, the New Hanover County Stormwater Ordinance and Section 72-38 of the New Hanover
County Zoning Ordinance. The stormwater runoff above the one and a half inch (1.51 volume will
bypass the above ground infiltration ponds as required by the State Stormwater Regulations and flow
into Stormwater Pond No. 3. Stormwater Pond.No. 3 is designed to meet the New Hanover County
Stormwater Ordinance. The discharge from Stormwater Pond No. 3 does not exceed the site pre-
development discharge rate for the 2-year, 10-year and 25-year storms as required by the New
Hanover County Stormwater Ordinance.
As mentioned above, the site has been divided Into two (2) drainage areas as required by the State
Stormwater Regulations. Drainage Area No. 1 is 5.47 acres and drains into Stomrwater Infiltration
Pond No. 1. Drainage Area No. 1 includes a small portion of offstte area within the NC Dot Right of
Way. Drainage Area No. 2 is 4.12 acres and drains into Stomwiater Infiltration Pond No. 2.
Stormwater runoff from each drainage area above the one and a half (1.51 volume will bypass
Stormwater Infiltration Pond No. 1 and No. 2 by using an offine bypass junction box The stormwater
runoff from each offiine bypass junction box will be collected in a common storm drainpipe, which
discharges into a vegetated filter prior to flowing Into the Stornw ater Pond No. 3. The discharge from
the Stormwater Pond No. 3 will discharge into a second vegetated filter at the end of the pond outfall
pipe prior to leaving the site.
An infiltration evaluation of the site was performed by Engineering Consulting Services, Ltd. (ECS, Ltd.)
on August 22, 2003. A copy of the Infiltration Evaluation by ECS, Ltd. dated August 26, 2003 is
attached for review. The infiltration evaluation includes information on subsurface soil and groundwater
conditions at sixteen (16) hand auger boring locations. Three (3) infiltration tests were also performed
on the site. Subsurface soil conditions, groundwater conditions and infiltration rates are included in the
infiltration evaluation for each infiltration test location. The State Stormwater Regulations require a site
field visit with Vincent Lewis, NC DENR Soil Scientist prior to proceeding with the stormwater
management system design. We visited the site with Vincent Lewis on February 16, 2004 to review

and confirm the infiltration evaluation results performed by ECS, Ltd, Vincent Lewis advanced
seventeen (17) hand auger borings to review the subsurface soil and groundwater conditions. Vincent
Lewis determined the approximate seasonal high groundwater table depth at each hand auger boring
location. A copy of a letter to the project owner dated February 17, 2004 summarizing the seasonal
high groundwater table depths is attached for review.
EXCEPTIONAL DESIGN INFORMATION AND STORMWATER BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES:
Section 72-38 of the New Hanover County Zoning Ordinance requires that residential uses within
commercial districts be part of a mired-use development that is exceptionally designed. Section 72-38
also requires that the stormwater management system serving the mixed-use development include at
least one or more water quality best management practices referenced in the NC DENR Stormwater
Best Management Practices Manual. The following exceptional design components and Stormwater
Best Management Practices (BMP's) are a part of the Three Oaks Mixed Use Development project
design:
• The stormwater management system includes two (2) above ground stormwater infiltration
ponds. The above ground stormwater infiltration ponds are proposed due to the site seasonal
high groundwater table elevation. Infiltration ponds are considered as an exceptional design
component.
• Soil fill material will be required on the site due to the site seasonal high groundwater table
elevation. Site retaining walls are proposed to save existing trees and vegetation to the extent
possible where soil fill material is required. Existing trees and vegetation will be saved to the
extent possible on the entire site. Due to design constraints, grading constraints, required utility
installations and tree removal mitigation requirements, areas will be augmented with new and
landscaping as required by the Special Use Permit and the New Hanover County Landscape
Ordinance. The use of site retaining walls to save existing trees and vegetation contributes to
the exceptional project design.
• The stormwater management pipe and pond system will convey and treat a portion (0.15 acres)
of offsite Impervious area on Market Street / US Highway 17 within the NC DOT right of way,
which is not required. This could be avoided by installing additional stormdrain piping and
drainage structures. Treating oftite stomrvvater_runoff contributes to the exceptional project
design.
• The berm separating Stormwater infiltration Pond No. 1 and Stomrwater Infiltration Pond No. 2
has been located, designed and graded to save existing trees to the extent possible on the
berm. Saving existing trees on the berm contributes to the exceptional project design.
• New landscaping will be planted within Stormwater Infiltration Pond No. 1 and Stormwater
Infiltration Pond No. 2 to the extent allowed by the State Stormwater Regulations. The
landscaping within the infiltration ponds will facilitate bioretention. Conversations with the State
Indicate that grouped clusters of appropriate landscaping will be allowed. Additional landscaping
may also be planted along the perimeter berms of the stormwater infiltration ponds. The project
owner's landscape consultant has prepared a conceptual landscape plan. The landscape plan

will be finalized after the Special Use Permit revision is approved. The landscape plan will be
finalized with input from the appropriate New Hanover County Planning and Zoning Department
staff as required prior to submittal for review and approval. Installing new landscape within the
stormwater infiltration ponds and on the berms contributes to the exceptional project design.
• An interpretive sign with information describing the stormwater management system will be
installed onsite for use as a public educational device. This contributes to the exceptional
project design.
• Above ground stormwater Infiltration ponds are proposed with plantings to facilitate infiltration
and bioretention of stormwater runoff. Infiltration and bioretention are NC DENR Best
Management Practices (BMP).
• A 15' x 60' vegetated filter strip will be installed at the outlet of the stormwater bypass discharge
pipe to filter the stormwater runoff prior to flowing into Stormwater Pond No. 3. A vegetated filter
strip is a NC DENR Best Management Practice(BMP).
• A 20' x 60' vegetated filter will be installed at the outlet of Stormwater Pond No. 3 to filter the
stormwater runoff prior to leaving the site. A vegetated filter strip is a NC DENR Best
Management Practice(BMP).
• Wetland plantings may be planted along the wetted perimeter of Stormwater Pond No. 3 to the
extent feasible and to the extent allowed by the New Hanover County Stormwater Ordinance.
The wetland plantings will be shown on the landscaping plan described above. Wetlands
plantings are an NC DENR Best Management Practice(BMP).
SUMMARY OF INFORMATION ATTACHED TO THE NARRATIVE:
• A copy of the Three Oaks Mixed Use Development State Stormwater Permit No. SW8 040509,
dated May 20, 2004.
• A copy of the NC DENR State Stormwater Regulations for SA water bodies.
• A copy of Section 72-38 from the New Hanover County Zoning Ordinance.
• A copy of the Infiltration Evaluation by ECS, Ltd., dated August 26, 2003.
• A copy of a letter to the project owner dated February 17, 2004 summarizing the site field visit
with Vincent Lewis, NC DENR Soil Scientist
• A copy of the NC DENR Stormwater Best Management Practices Manual Cover and Table of
Contents.

Johnson, Kelly
From: Luke Menius [[e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2013 3:56 PM
To: Johnson, Kelly
Cc: [e-mail]
Subject: RE: SW8 040509, The Park at Three Oaks
Attachments: 30aksletterandNarrative 2004.pdf
Apparently, the trees were not mandated for stormwater treatment, at least not by the NHC Engineering department.
They were a requirement of the special use permit and there is mention of them in the attached letter and stormwater
system narrative. There is reference to some conversation with DENR staff regarding the matter. I hope it was in
writing, as details of a phone conversation 10 years ago might be getting fuzzy by now. It looks like from the permit
cover letter that Laurie Munn was the reviewer. I don't recognize the name. Is she still around?
In any case, I'd like to review the file again. Please let me know when 1 might be able to come in. Also, if you know of
anyone else who may have been privy to the 2004 tree conversation, please let me know.
David L. Menius, P.E.
Stroud Engineering, P.A.
102-1) Cinema Drive
Wilmington, NC 28403
[phone] ext 225
[e-mail]
From: Johnson, Kelly [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2013 9:35 AM
To: Luke Menius
Cc: [e-mail]
Subject: RE: SW8 040509,The Park at Three Oaks
Luke,
Let me know what you come up with. I think that there are some other questions to think about though. One of the
two infil basins was wet and the other was dry. Both were silted over. I don't know if the wet one was wet because of a
SHWT issue or because it was silted over. It seems that the trees will make maintenance hard to do in the basins, and
that the root balls will take up space that was designed into being able to hold the design volume (which is the reason
we don't permit them in infil basins). I agree that evapotranspiration is a way to remove water, but if that were the
intent why were trees not planted in the pond as well? We have not crossed the bridge of using evapotranspiration in
this way, and so I will have to think about this. It technically isn't an infiltration basin that way. That is more of a
stormwater wetland function. There may be a different way to approach it. I don't know. I am also curious about how
the basins function. Are you going to be able to certify them (sandy material over a high SHWT)with the other design
specs, or do they actually function as wetlands?
K1
From: Luke Menius [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2013 9:00 AM
To: Johnson, Kelly
Cc: tntucker100ftmail.com
Subject: RE: SW8 040509, The Park at Three Oaks
i

This project is in an area that NHC classifies as a Conservation Overlay District (COD) and is subject to requirements in
the NHC zoning ordinance that address special runoff treatment. I believe that this project was supposed to collect and
treat an extra 0.25" per the ordinance. The requirement specifies that this water is infiltrated,evapotranspirated,
irrigated, etc. but not released through the outlet structure.
I designed a project called Westhaven that is located in a COD and was permitted through DENR and NHC around the
same time as 3 Oaks. My recollection is that the NHC SW engineer at the time made a strong lobby for using
evapotranspiration to get rid of the extra runoff. While we did not go this route at Westhaven, I suspect that a similar
lobby was made at 3 Oaks. I have a request in to NHC to review their files to see if there was any concurrence from
DENR about these trees. The lack of any such correspondence in your files makes me think this may be a wild goose
chase, but stranger things have happened.
In the absence of some long lost letter from DWQ acknowledging the trees, I would request to meet with DENR staff to
make a case for keeping them. I am aware of the consequences of allowing infiltration basins to become choked up with
vegetation to the point that they cease to function, but the bottoms of the subject basin are actually sparsely vegetated
apart from the trees. It may be that the trees are shading out the weeds, cattails, etc that are typically associated with
unmaintained basins. The trees are located far enough from the berms that they pose no structural risk and they are
spaced far enough apart that maintaining the basin is still feasible. If, in fact,they were placed there to aid in runoff
reduction by providing transpiration, they are achieving this goal as well.
David L. Menius, P.E.
Stroud Engineering, P.A.
102-1) Cinema Drive
Wilmington, NC 28403
[phone] ext 225
[e-mail]
From: Johnson, Kelly [ma ilto:kelly.o.johnson(alncdenr.gov]
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2013 8:18 AM
To: Luke Menius
Subject: FW: SW8 040509, The Park at Three Oaks
Luke,
I talked to David Cox, our compliance guy, and this is a new one for us. Why would the county have required trees in an
infiltration basin? Maybe they thought it was a stormwater wetland (because it sort of looks like one)? There aren't
any trees in the bypass water pond, and it would seem like that would be the better application for them. One option
would be to modify the design to a SW wetland and keep the trees (unless the basins are just silted over and there is a
low water table with sand below the silt). I am not sure what to make of this.
KJ
From: Johnson, Kelly
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2013 2:20 PM
To: 'Luke Menius'
Subject: FW: SW8 040509,The Park at Three Oaks
Luke,
This is an odd one. One is holding water, and the other is dry but it looks like it holds water often. I don't know if that is
because of silt or if it is because of some design/install issue?
KJ
2

MC®ENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Pat McCrory Charles Wakild, P. E. John E. Skvarla, III
Governor Director Secretary
January 28, 2013
Mr. Thomas N. Tucker, Manager
Three Oak Property, LLC
315 Friday Drive
Wilmington, NC 28411
Subject: Notice of Inspection—Non Compliant
The Park at Three Oaks
Stormwater Permit No. SW8 040509
New Hanover County
Dear Mr. Tucker:
On January 28, 2013, Kelly Johnson of the Wilmington Regional Office of the Division of Water Quality(DWQ)
inspected The Park at Three Oaks in New Hanover County to determine compliance with Stormwater Management
Permit Number SW8 040509 issued on May 20, 2004. DWQ file review and site inspection revealed that the site is
not in compliance with the terms and conditions of this permit. Please find a copy of the completed form entitled
"Compliance Inspection Report"attached to this letter,which summarizes the findings of the recent inspection.
As indicated in the attached inspection report,the following deficiencies must be resolved:
1. PE Certification: Please submit a PE Certification showing that the stormwater system has been built per
the approved plans. Please certify that the collection system,grading, and BMPs have been constructed
appropriately.
2. Infiltration Basins: One of the infiltration basins is holding water. It is unclear if this is due to silt
accumulation or if the bottom elevation is inappropriately set. The other is dry but silted. Please ensure that
both infiltration basins are built and maintained properly. Please also note that trees are not allowed in
infiltration basins.
3. Other Systems: The wet pond appears to have been built per local requirements because its design is not
detailed in the State permit. A level spreader has been installed upstream of the wet pond and a"filter strip"
(which is actually a rip-rapped and grassed hole) is installed at the outflow of the pond. Please certify that
all of the permitted elements have been built correctly. Please also make sure that they are maintained.
Please inform this Office in writing before February 28, 2013,of the specific actions that will be undertaken and the
time frame that will be required to correct the deficiencies. Failure to provide the requested information, or to respond
to this letter by the due date,may initiate enforcement action including the assessment of civil penalties of up to
$25,000 per day. If a written plan of action is not submitted to this office by February 28,2013 then DWQ staff will
re-inspect the site and issue a Notice of Violation if the listed deficiencies have not been addressed.
Please be reminded that if an ownership change,or a name change or a mailing address change has occurred, it is
your responsibility to submit a completed and signed Name/Ownership Change form to the Division. Please include
the name, mailing address and phone number of the party who is now responsible for this permit.
1617 Mail Service Center,Raleigh,North Carolina 27699-1617
Location:512 N.Salisbury St.Ralegh,North Carolina 27604 One
Phone:[phone] FAX:[phone] DENR Assistance:1.877-623-6748 NorthiCarolina.
Internet wwwncwateroualitv.oro Natu aQf

Tucker
January 28, 2013
Page 2 of 2
If you have any questions, please contact Kelly Johnson at the Wilmington Regional Office,telephone number(910)
796-7331.
Sincerely,
Ke oh son
Environm Engineer
enc: Compliance Inspection Report
GDSlkpj: SAWQS1StormwateAPermits&Projects120041040509 HD12013 01 CEI_deficient 040509
cc: WiRO Stormwater File

t
Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: SW8040509 Effective: 05/20/04 Expiration: 05/20/18 Owner: Three Oak Property LLC
Project: The Park at Three Oaks
County: New Hanover 7750 Market St
Region: Wilmington
Wilmington INC 28411
Contact Person: Thomas N Tucker Title: Manager Phone: [phone]
Directions to Project:
The site is located approximately 4.6 miles north east from the intersection of US Hwy 17/Market Street and US Hwy 74 / Eastwood
Road
Type of Project: State Stormwater-Infiltration System
Drain Areas: 1 -(Pages Creek)(03-06-24)(SA;HQW)
2-
On-Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Inspection Date: 0112 8/2 01 3 Entry Time: 01:00 PM Exit Time: 02:00 PM
Primary Inspector: Kelly Johnson Phone: [phone]
Secondary Inspector(s):
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: State Stormwater
Facility Status: Q Compliant ® Not Compliant
Question Areas:
®State Stormwater
(See attachment summary)
t
Page: 1

Permit: SW8040509 Owner-Project: Three Oak Property LLC
Inspection Date: 01/28/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
File Review Yes No NA NE
Is the permit active? 1 ❑ ❑ ❑
Signed copy of the Engineer's certification is in the file? ❑ ® ❑ ❑
Signed copy of the Operation&Maintenance Agreement is in the file? ® ❑ ❑ ❑
Copy of the recorded deed restrictions is in the file? ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: PE Certification is needed. This project is not subdivided, and so deed
restrictions are not required.
Built Upon Area Yes No NA NE
Is the site BUA constructed as per the permit and approval plans? ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the drainage area as per the permit and approved plans? ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the BUA(as permitted)graded such that the runoff drains to the system? Dolls
Comment: A plan revision has been submitted of change the configuration of the BUA
(NE was selected for 1st question above). Drainage area will be confirmed by the PE
Cert. Grading will be confirmed by the PE Cert.
Operation and Maintenance Yes No NA NE
Are the SW measures being maintained and operated as per the permit requirements? ❑ M ❑ ❑
Are the SW BMP inspection and maintenance records complete and available for review or provided to DWQ ❑ ❑ ❑ 19
upon request?
Comment: There are two infiltration basins and a wet pond (for the bypass water).
One of the basins is holding water. Both basins have trees planted in them.
SW Measures Yes No NA NE
Are the SW measures constructed as per the approved plans? ® ❑ ❑ ❑
Are the inlets located per the approved plans? ® ❑ ❑ ❑
Are the outlet structures located per the approved plans? ❑ ❑ ® ❑
Comment: The footprint of the basins are similar of the permitted plan. This, and the
vegetated filter will be confirmed by the PE Cert. The infil basins do not have outlets.
The pond appears to have been built per local requirements (it is not in the State
permit).
Other WQ Issues Yes No NA NE
Is the site compliant with other water quality issues as noted during the inspection? D Q 0 Is
Comment:
Page: 2

From: Johnson, Kelly
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2013 12:33 PM
To: 'Luke Menius'
Subject: RE: SW8 040509, The Park at Three Oaks
I will try to get out there next week. Honestly though, inspections these days rely heavily on the PE Cert. We have lost
so many people, and we just have to work so much more quickly. If there is anything obvious I will put it in the report,
but if it eventually gets certified that will be the big thing because we will know that it was at least built correctly.
KJ
From: Luke Menius [mailto:lmenius(alstroudengineer.com]
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2013 10:13 AM
To: Johnson, Kelly
Subject: RE: SW8 040509, The Park at Three Oaks
It looks like this is going to fall on me to certify. Having not designed the system, I feel it is prudent to request a DENR
inspection in an effort to develop a (short) punchlist that I can go over with the owner. Let me know if I need to contact
anyone directly to get this done.
David L. Menius, P.E.
Stroud Engineering, P.A.
102-1) Cinema Drive
Wilmington, NC 28403
[phone] ext 225
[e-mail]
From: Johnson, Kelly [mailto:kelly.p.johnsonColncdenr.gov]
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2013 10:02 AM
To: Luke Menius
Subject: RE: SW8 040509, The Park at Three Oaks
Luke,
I went back through the file &didn't see it?
KJ
From: Luke Menius [mailto:lmenius(alstroudengineer.com]
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2013 9:35 AM
To: Johnson, Kelly
Subject: RE: SW8 040509, The Park at Three Oaks
I thought I saw a certification in your file. Let me know I you don't and I'll put the owner on notice. I'd prefer to let the
design engineer for the first phase handle this.
David L. Menius, P.E.
Stroud Engineering, P.A.
102-D Cinema Drive
Wilmington, NC 28403
[phone] ext 225
[e-mail]
3

From: Johnson, Kelly [mailto:kelly.pjohnsonCalncdenr.gov]
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2013 9:38 AM
To: Luke Menius
Subject: SW8 040509,The Park at Three Oaks
Luke,
Please see attached.
Have a good weekend,
KJ
*** My email has changed to kellv.o.iohnson@ncdenr.¢ov
K eLLWoh v-sovk,
Kelly Johnson
Environmental Engineer
Division of Water Quality
Stormwater Permitting
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405-3845
Office: 910.796.7331
Fax: [phone]
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be
disclosed to third parties.
4

MCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Pat McCrory Charles Wakild, P. E. John E. Skvarla, III
Governor Director Secretary
January 25, 2013
Mr. Thomas N. Tucker, Manager
Three Oak Property, LLC
315 Friday Drive
Wilmington, NC 28411
Subject: Request for Additional Information
Stormwater Project No.SW8 040509
The Park at Three Oaks
New Hanover County
Dear Mr. Tucker:
The Wilmington Regional Office received and accepted a Plan Revision for a State Stormwater Management Permit
Application for The Park at Three Oaks on January 8, 2013. A preliminary in-depth review of that information has
determined that the application is not complete. The following information is needed to continue the stormwater
review:
1. Drainage Area Map: New pipe calculations have been submitted. Please show the drainage areas on the
plans in order to show that the drainage areas will remain the same as they were permitted in 2004.
2. Infiltration Basins: The infiltration basins are currently labeled as ponds on the plans. Please revise the
plans to show that they are infiltration basins and also label"Basin 1"and "Basin 2"on the plans.
3. Impervious Summary Table: Please revise the BUA Breakdown table on the plans. It currently shows the
data permitted in 2004 as the"permitted"data. Once this plan revision is approved the data permitted will
be that in the"total"column, which will lead to confusion. Only one column will be necessary for each
infiltration basin to show the latest data that will be permitted by this plan revision.
4. Designer Certifications: Please submit designer certifications for the two infiltration basins.
5. Secretary of State: On December 12, 2012 the Secretary of State issued a Notice of Grounds for
Administrative Dissolution for Three Oak Property, LLC. This plan revision must be issued to an active LLC
that is in good standing with the SoS. Please resolve this issue with that department if you have not done
so already, and include paperwork showing that this has been resolved in your resubmittal.
Please remember that a change to one number may have a domino effect on other numbers. Please check all plans,
calculations and forms to ensure that the numbers are consistent throughout.
Please note that this request for additional information is in response to a preliminary review. The requested
information should be received in this Office prior to February 25,2013,or the application will be returned as
incomplete. The return of a project will necessitate resubmission of all required items, including the application fee.
1617 Mail Service Center,Raleigh,North Carolina 27699-1617
Location:512 N.Salisbury St.Raleigh,North Carolina 27604 �iOne
Phone:[phone] FAX:[phone] DENR Assistance:1-871823-6748 L�QTthCaroli la
Internet www„ncwaterauallN^om c /p Nahwllll

Mr. Tucker
January 25, 2013
Page 2 of 2
If you need additional time to submit the information, please mail,email or fax your request for a time extension to the
Division at the address and fax number at the bottom of this letter.The request must indicate the date by which you
expect to submit the required information. The Division is allowed 90 days from the receipt of a completed application
to issue the permit. The construction of any impervious surfaces,other than a construction entrance under an
approved Sedimentation Erosion Control Plan, is a violation of NCGS 143-215.1 and is subject to enforcement action
pursuant to NCGS 143-215.6A.
Please reference the State assigned project number on all correspondence. Any original documents that need to be
revised have been sent to the engineer or agent.All original documents must be returned or new originals must be
provided. Copies are not acceptable. If you have any questions concerning this matter please feel free to call me at
[phone] or email me at [e-mail].
Sincerel ,
Ily Johnson
Envir m I Engineer
GDS/kpj: S:IWQSIStormwaterlPermits&ProjectsQ0.0M040509 HD12013 01 addinfo 040509
cc: Luke Menius, PE
Wilmington Regional Office Stormwater File

n Completeness Review Checklist
Project Name: TRQyd& '�Of1t6 .130r 5 MykEO Use. Received Date:
Project Location: ILd`n Accepted Date:
Rule(s) �2008 Coastal �1995 Coastal Phase II (WiRO) Universal �1988 Coastal
Type of Permit: New or Mod or PR Existing Permit#(Mod o PR p yC)Spc( FTE Cert on File?
Density: HD or LD Type: Commercial or Residential FINCG:
%: ❑(%OK?) Stream Class: FTA Map [—]Offsite to SW8
Subdivided?: Subdivision or Single Lot ORW Map Exempt
Paperwork Emailed Engineer on:
MSupplement(s) (1 original per BMP) BMP Type(s): ?P. - wpnn
�O&M with correct/original signatures (1 original per BMP except LS/VFS and swales) "VnI
Application with correct/original signatures
❑Corp or LLC: Sig. Auth. per SoS or letter Note to Reviewer: C
F-1$505 (within 6mo)
Soils Report with SHWT C
Calculations (signed/sealed)
MNo obvious errors
Density includes common areas, etc
Deed Restrictions, if subdivided:
Signed & Notarized
Correct Template (Comm/Res & HD/LD) or Dec. Covenants& Rest.
Plans
❑2 Sets Details (roads, cul-de-sacs, curbs, sidewalks, BMPs, Buildings, etc)
Grading Wetlands: Delineated or No Wetlands
Vicinity Map Layout (proposed BUA dimensions)
Legend �DA Maps ❑Project Boundaries
Infiltration Wet Pond Offsite
Soils Report El Soils Report �PE Cert for Master Lot#:
SHWT: 11PP:
SHWT: Deed Rest for Master Lot# Matches Master
Bottom: BUA Permitted (Master): sf
Visited: BUA Proposed (Offsite): sf
Additional Information:
Permitted Proposed: Proposed: Proposed:
BUA(sf)
DA(sf)
PP(el)
SHWT(el)
Depth (ft)
SA(sf)

STROUD ENGINEERING, P.A. f�C44CG�3 OG� 4 ° G`]�GVi1044L°QL�
102-D Cinema Drive
WILMINGTON, NC 28403
DATE '
ATi ENTION
^[phone] J �o .,5.�✓1
TO IV L D 6-NA RE: '2 011ks
WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Attached ❑ Under separate cover via the following items:
>
❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications
❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑
COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION
60✓Cf
1 .P,A ;
• t.. ���/o�SYIe
bA , 4
c4,
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
❑ For approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit copies for approval
❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution
❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints
❑ For review and comment ❑
❑ FORBIDS DUE ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
REMARKS
IAN 0 8 2013
COPY TO
SIGNED:
If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once.

lta STROUD ENGINEERING,.RA.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
102-D CINEMA DRIVE
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28403
[phone]
January 7, 2013
NCDENR
Attn: Kelly Johnson
127 Cardinal Drive
Wilmington,North Carolina 28405
Re: Plan Revision for The Park at Three Oaks
Formerly Three Oaks Mixed Use Development
7740 Market Street
SW8 040509
Dear Ms. Johnson:
Please find the attached submittal package regarding the modified stormwater plan for the
above referenced project. The three commercial/retail buildings have been eliminated in favor of
three additional apartment buildings. The building and parking layout generally honor the originally
approved layout. There is no change to the proposed BUA, and, therefore, there are no proposed
modifications to the existing collection system or ponds.
I have also attached a name change form that reflects the new name of the project as well as
the permittee's current contact information as reported by the NC Secretary of State.
Thank you in advance for your attention to this matter. Please let me know if you have any
questions or concerns.
Respectfully,
David L. Menius, P.E.
Stroud Engineering, PA
Attachments
ECEUVE
JAN 0 8 2013
BY:
file:w:/master/pw1014/wpd/kelly.wpd
107 COMMERCE ST. HESTRON PLAZA TWO
SUITE B 102-D CINEMA DRIVE 151-A HWY.24
•GREENVILLE,NC 27858 WILMINGTON,NC 28403 MOREHEAD CITY,NC 28557
[phone] [phone] [phone]

Project: PW-1014
Engineer: DLM
-- Date: 1/5/2013
The Park at Three Oaks--Project Narrative
Introduction
The site is located at 7740 Market Street in northeastern New Hanover County. The site is currently
occupied by 156 apartment units in 8 building as well as a clubhouse and pool. The site was originally
proposed as a mixed use development with three commercial buildings located along the site's Market
Street frontage. The success of the existing apartments and lack of demand for commercial floor space has
led to the current proposal, which calls for 45 additional apartment units in three new buildings. The
proposed overall density of this straight residential project will be 17 units per acre, which is enabled by a
rezoning of the 11.87 acre property to(CD) R-10.
Roadways
The site is currently afforded full-movement access to Market Street via a single private driveway
(Amaryllis Drive) which was constructed in accordance with an NCDOT driveway permit issued for the
original mixed use development. According to the ITE Trip Generation Manual, the proposed apartments
will generate less trips than the commercial uses,therefore rendering the driveway design conservative for
the anticipated traffic. Two new drive isles will be constructed off of Amaryllis Drive to provide access to
the required parking spaces. The alignment of these drive isles and parking spaces is generally consistent
with the original plan.
Utilities
The site is afforded water and sewer by CFPUA. A 6"sewer service,2"water service, and 4" fire line are
stubbed out at each building. Meters are proposed at each water service along with backflow preventers at
all services and fire lines.
Stormwater
The Three Oaks Mixed Use Development was issued NCDENR and NHC stormwater permits which
specify a maximum built upon area for each of the two drainage areas. The ponds and collection system
were sized accordingly. The collection and treatment systems were installed per the permit, certified, and
continue to be maintained accordingly. The proposed improvements will tie to this existing collection
system. Revised plans and permit applications are being submitted along with drainage calculations for
piping internal to the new section of the project.
Erosion Control
The site drains generally from north to south, away from Market Street and Amaryllis Drive towards a low
area adjacent to proposed buildings#9 and #10. Silt fence will be used to contain sediment and delineate
the 1.8 acre limits of the disturbance. Tree protection fencing will be employed in areas adjacent to
existing trees to prevent damage to the root system. Existing curb inlets along the south side of Amaryllis
Drive will be protected with sock-type gutter guards. Proposed inlets in the interior of the site will be
protected with traditional hardware cloth and stone protection. Stone construction entrances will be used
at both driveways.
EEC(EUVE
JAN 0 8 2013
BY:�_

PIPE DESIGN CALCULATIONS
PROJECT: 3 OAKS
ENGINEER: DLM
DATE: 177/2013
STORM: 25 YEAR 5 MINUTE Tc
SOURCE: NHC SW DESIGN MANUAL RCP n: 0.013
LOCATION: AREA (ACRES) RUNOFF CHAR. O=CIA CFS PIPE DATA
Ic(IN/HR) C RUNOFF BASIN BASIN HEADWATER TAILWATER PIPE HYDRAULIC DIAMETER SIZE V FULL
FROM TO SUBTOTAL TOTAL INTENSITY COEFF. SUBTOTAL TOTAL ELEV. ELEV. LENGTH GRADE% THEO(IN IN (FPS)
CB1 CB2 0.3 0.30 8.15 0.6 1.47 1.47 30.5 29.3 80 1.50 7.97 15 6.44
CB2 CB3 0.27 0.57 8.15 0.6 1.32 2.79 29.3 28.7 43 1A0 10.27 15 6.22
CB3 C84 0.14 1 0.71 8.15 0.6 0.68 3.47 28.7 26.7 127 1.57 10.90 15 6.60
CB4 CB5 0.46 1.17 8.15 0.6 2.25 5.72 26.7 25.5 87 1.38 13.48 18 6.98
CB5 C66 0.34 1.51 8.15 0.6 1.66 7.38 25.5 24.7 83 0.96 15.87 18 5.83
CB6 EX CB 0.18 1.69 8.15 0.6 0.88 8.26 24.7 24.3 59 0.68 17.68 '18 4.89
STORM: 100 YEAR,5 MINUTE Tc
SOURCE: NHC SW DESIGN MANUAL RCP n: 0.013
LOCATION: AREA (ACRES) RUNOFF CHAR. O=CIA CFS PIPE DATA
Ic(IN/HR) C RUNOFF BASIN BASIN HEADWATER TAILWATER PIPE HYDRAULIC DIAMETER SIZE V FULL
FROM TO SUBTOTAL TOTAL INTENSITY COEFF. SUBTOTAL TOTAL ELEV. ELEV. LENGTH GRADE% THEO(IN IN (FPS)
CB1 CB2 0.3 0.30 9.60 0.6 1.73 1.73 30.5 29.3 80 1.50 8.47 15 6.44
CB2 CB3 0.27 0.57 9.60 0.6 1.56 3.28 29.3 28.7 43 1.40 10.92 15 6.22
CB3 CB4 0.14 0.71 9.60 0.6 a81 4.09 28.7 26.7 127 1.57 11.59 15 6.60
CB4 CB5 0.46 1.17 9.60 0.6 2.65 6.74 26.7 25.5 87 1.38 14.33 18 6.98
CB5 CB6 0.34 1.51 9.60 0.6 1.96 8.70 25.5 24.9 83 0.72 17.81 18 5.05
CB6 EX CB 1 0.18 1.69 1 9.60 0.6 1 1.04 9.73 24.9 24.3 59 1.02 17.42 18 5.99
`�,\\H I I I I1177j
NN
OQ•OxtSS/py -
dL SEAL V"
36677
citt
I I�Iz°13

�pA0.1H�.
9 a
State of North Carolina
Elaine F.Marshall Department of the Secretary of State Cheri L.Myers
SECRETARY OF STATE DIRECTOR OF CORPORA PIONS
December 12,2012
Three Oak Property, LLC.
Richard D. Sweyer,,Agent
1630 Military Cutoff Rd
Wilmington, NC 28403
NOTICE OF GROUNDS FOR ADMINISTRATIVE DISSOLUTION OF: Three Oak Property, LLC.
Recently,this office conducted its periodic internal review of annual reports filed in this office for Limited
Liability Companies in North Carolina. Unfortunately, the review indicates that the above referenced limited
liability company is delinquent in filing one(1)annual report(s)and consequently, is not in compliance with
the North Carolina Limited Liability Company Act.
The Secretary of State is authorized by N.C.G.S. 57C-6-03 to administratively dissolve a limited liability
company if grounds for dissolution exist. Failure to file the annual report is grounds for Administrative
Dissolution. This Notice is the first step of the dissolution process. In order to prevent administrative
dissolution, the limited liability company must file the appropriate annual report(s),or show to the
Corporation's Division of the Secretary of State within sixty(60)days from the date of this Notice that each
ground determined does not exist.
Determining Annual Reports Due
A list of your annual reports submitted to date is viewable by clicking the link to the Corporations Division
web page at www.sosnc.com. Search for your company by name and then click "File Annual Report Online".
From this page you will be able to see both, i f an annual report was submitted but not deemed in "file" status
due to an error that to date has not been corrected and determine how many annual reports are required. The
due date for filing a Limited Liability Company's annual report is April 15. One report is required for each
year beginning the year after the year of creation.
Online Filing
Utilize the above link to the entity's profile page,then click "File an Annual Report" at the top of the page and
follow the directions. The fee is$200.00 plus a $2.00 transaction fee. Please keep in mind that these filing
fees are neither retained nor spent by the Secretary of State's Office, instead they are deposited with the State
Treasurer and are expended by the General Assembly of North Carolina.
Paper Filing
You may also print a pre-populated form at the web address stated above by clicking "Print a Pre-Populated
Annual Report Form". Changes can be made on the fillable pdf prior to printing the report. Mail the report
and fees to the address at the bottom of the form. The fee is $200.00.
If you have any concerns or experience technical difficulty with the filing process,please contact our staff at
[phone] or send an email to [e-mail]
Respectfully,
The Corporations Division
PO BOX 29622 I I I I II I I I I II I III I I I I I I I I I II
RALEIGH,NORTH CAROLINA 27626-0622

Johnson, Kelly
From: Johnson, Kelly
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2013 1:18 PM
To: 'Luke Menius'
Subject: RE: 3 Oaks stormwater
Luke,
I think the best way to proceed is to show that the basin can do what it needs to do with the trees in it,and submit
whatever calculations can support that. I will find a way to write it up that X number of trees at an assumed root ball
size of X can be in the basin while still providing enough surface area for infiltration, and the required volume can
infiltrate as it is intended. This is an unusual approach, but I think given the circumstances it makes more sense to keep
the trees than to take them out if the basin can still function well enough to be certified. Please understand though that
this is a case by case decision.
Sorry for the difficulty on this one. I have to follow the procedures. It is funny though because when I went out there I
really thought that this would end up being modified to a wetland. It looks just like a wetland in this picture
Kelly
i
Y
A -
.f
From: Luke Menius [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2013 9:59 AM
To: Johnson, Kelly
Subject: RE: 3 Oaks stormwater
I can verify the volume of water displaced by the trees does not reduce the available storage volume below the required
volume. If need be, there is room to expand the basins to create more volume. My only suggestion would be to clarify
our permit conditions to state that the cypress trees(2S in the north basin, 24 in the south basin) are allowed but that
basins should be kept clear of other emergent vegetation, such as cat tails.
I did note yesterday,while counting the trees,that the basins were dry.
David L. Menius, P.E.
Stroud Engineering, P.A.
102-1) Cinema Drive
t