20240745 Ver 1_McLean Street_PERMIT PACKET_20240528

urisdictional Determination Reauest
US Army Corps
of Engineers.
Wilmington District
This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (JD) from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
via mail, electronic mail, or facsimile. Requests should be sent to the appropriate project
manager of the county in which the property is located. A current list of project managers by
assigned counties can be found on-line at:
http: //www. saw. usace. army. mil/Missions/RegulatoryPermitProgram/Contact/CounlyLocator. aspx
by calling 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below. Once your
request is received you will be contacted by a Corps project manager.
ASHEVILLE & CHARLOTTE REGULATORY
FIELD OFFICES
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
INSTRUCTIONS:
WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
General Number: [phone]
FaxNumber: [phone]
WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
General Number: 910-251-4633
Fax Number: [phone]
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E, F and G.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part H.
NOTE ON PART D — PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that
all JD requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to
proceed with the determination, which may include inspection of the property when
necessary. This form must be signed by the current property owner(s) or the owner(s)
authorized agent to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D - NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for
JD requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
projects will be conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD
may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of
1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in
USDA programs, you should also request a certified wetland determination from the local
office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
Version: May 2017 Page 1

Jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: McLean Street
City, State:
Godwin, NC
County: Cumberland
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): 0593-65-7760
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: Adam Carter, Wetland Solutions LLC
Mailing Address: PO BOX 244
Bunnlevel NC 28323
Telephone Number: 910 890 2779
Electronic Mail Address: [e-mail]
Select one:
❑ I am the current property owner.
❑ I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultanti
❑ Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
❑ Other, please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION
Name: SUSAN TART PROPERTY LLC
Mailing Address: 126 N. E N N I S ST
FUQUAY-VARINA, NC 27526
Telephone Number: 919-602-2351
Electronic Mail Address: [e-mail]
' Must provide completed Agent Authorization Form/Letter.
2 Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request (copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record).
Version: May 2017 Page 2

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION',4
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
Samuel Adam Carter
Print Name
Capacity: ❑ Owner ✓❑ Authorized Agents
5/24/2024
Date
�G��YLGG� .c9Gx�
Signature
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
✓❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
❑✓ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
process.
❑✓ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
I✓❑� A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
�J I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
❑ I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
❑ Other:
s For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/iJSACE protocols, skip to Part E.
4 If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
s Must provide agent authorization form/letter signed by owner(s).
Version: May 2017 Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F. JURISDICTIONAL DETERNIINATION (JD) TYPE (Select One)
❑✓ I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) provides an indication that there may
be "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United States"on a property.
PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all
waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional "waters of
the United States". PJDs cannot be appealed (33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is
"preliminary" in the sense that an approved JD can be requested at any time. PJDs do
not expire.
❑ I am requesting that the Corps provide an approved JD for the property identified herein.
An Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) is a determination that
jurisdictional "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United
States" are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of
waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or
Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved JDs are sufficient as the basis for permit
decisions. AJDs are appealable (33 C.F.R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be
posted on the Corps website. A landowner, permit applicant, or other "affected
party" (33 C.F.R. 331.2) who receives an AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years
(subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter 05-
02).
❑ I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information
to inform my decision.
G. ALL REQUESTS
Map of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the
review area.
✓� Size of Property or Review Area 30.33 acres.
❑✓ The property boundary (or review area boundary) is clearly physically marked on the site.
Version: May 2017 Page 4

Jurisdictional Determination Request
H. REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS
Project Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude: 35.222092
Longitude: 78.675731
A legible delineation map depicting the aquatic resources and the property/review area.
Delineation maps must be no larger than 11x17 and should contain the following: (Corps
signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been
reviewed and approved).6
■ North Arrow
■ Graphical Scale
■ Boundary of Review Area
■ Date
■ Location of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Form or tributary
assessment reach.
For Approved Jurisdictional Determinations:
Jurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404
wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features.
Jurisdictional non -wetland features (i.e. tidal/navigable waters, tributaries,
impoundments) should be labeled as Non -Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water, relatively permanent water, pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear
length of each of these features as appropriate.
Isolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non -
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non -Jurisdictional. Please
include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non jurisdictional (i.e.
"Isolated", "No Significant Nexus", or "Upland Feature"). Please include the acreage
or linear length of these features as appropriate.
For Preliminary Jurisdictional Determinations:
Wetland and non -wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404,
Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be
identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non -wetland Waters of
the United States, wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and
linear length of these features as appropriate.
Completed Wetland Determination Data Forms for appropriate region
(at least one wetland and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type)
6 Please refer to the guidance document titled "Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations" to ensure that the
supplied map meets the necessary mapping standards. http://www.saw.usace.army.niil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-
Pro gram/Jurisdiction/
Version: May 2017 Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F4Completed appropriate Jurisdictional Determination form
• PJDs, please complete a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form' and include the
Aquatic Resource Table
• AJDs, please complete an Approved Jurisdictional Determination Forma
F4 Vicinity Map
zAerial Photograph
z USGS Topographic Map
vJ Soil Survey Map
Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
0 Landscape Photos (if taken)
NCSAM and/or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets
❑ NC Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms
Other Assessment Forms
www.saw.usace.army.mil/Portals/59/docs/regulatorv/regdocs/JD/RGL_08-02_App A Prelim _JD_Form fillable.pdf
B Please see http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatoa-Permit-Program/Juiisdiction/
Principal Purpose: The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine
whether there are any aquatic resources within the project area subject to federaljurisdictionunder the regulatory
authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local
government agencies, and the public, and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by federal
law. Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the
approved jurisdictional determination (AJD), which will be made available to the public on the District's website
and on the Headquarters USAGE website.
Disclosure: Submission of requested information is voluntary; however, if information is not provided, the
request for an AJD cannot be evaluated nor can an AJD be issued.
Version: May 2017 Page 6

US Army Corps
of Engineers.
Wilmington District Survey Standards for lurisdictional Determinations
Please note that the approval and signature of survey plats will only be done in association with
an Approved Jurisdictional Determination. The Corps accepts both electronic and hardcopy
plats for signature, however this will be at the discretion of the project manager. If a hard copy
is submitted, the Corps requires that all hard -copy submittals include at least one original Plat
(to scale) that is no larger than 11"xl7". Submitted plats must be legible, including labeling (the
use of match lines for larger tracts are encouraged). Additional copies of a plat, including those
larger than 11"xl7", may also be submitted for Corps signature as needed. Prior to final
production of a plat, the Wilmington District recommends that the surveyor electronically
submit a draft of the survey to the Corps project manager for review.
PLATS SUBNHTTED FOR APPROVAL
Must be signed and sealed by a licensed professional land surveyor
Must be to scale (all maps must include an accurate graphic scale and verbal
scale)
❑ Must include a North Arrow, Scale(s), Title, Property Information
❑ Must clearly depict surveyed property or project boundaries
❑ Must clearly identify the known surveyed point(s) used as reference (e.g.
property corner, USGS monument)
F1Jurisdictional wetlands depicted on the survey should:
• Be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404 wetlands, wetlands, etc.
• Include acreage (or square footage) of wetland polygons
• Identify each wetland polygon using an alphanumeric system
❑ Jurisdictional non -wetland waters (non -wetland tidal/navigable waters,
tributaries, impoundments, ditches, etc.) depicted on the survey should:
• Be labeled as Non -Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water, relatively permanent waters (RPW), pond, etc.
• Mark the centerline of linear waters (tributaries), with
approximate widths to the Ordinary High Water Mark
(OHMW) OR a surveyed OHWM boundary of the tributary.
• List the linear footage of linear features and area (using
approximate widths)
Mark the extent of OHMW for non -linear waters such as lakes,
ponds, etc.
• List the acreage of non -linear features
Identify each feature using an alphanumeric system
Version: May 2017 Page 1

Isolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non -
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as non jurisdictional. Please
include the acreage and/or linear length of these features as appropriate.
❑ Must include a legible Waters of the United States (wetlands and other
waters) Delineation Table of distances and bearings/metes and bounds/GPS
coordinates of all surveyed delineation points
Must ensure that all depicted wetlands or other waters intersect or tie -to
surveyed project/property boundaries
CERTIFICATION LANGUAGE
❑ Plats submitted for Corps approval should include the following Certification language
when the entire actual Jurisdictional Boundary is depicted:
"This certifies that this copy of this plat accurately depicts the boundary of the jurisdiction
of the Section 404 of the Clean Water Act as determined by the undersigned on this date.
Unless there is change in the law or our published regulations, this determination of Section
404 jurisdiction may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from this date. The
undersigned completed this determination utilizing the appropriate Regional Supplement to
the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual, 33 C.F.R. part 328
and other U.S. Army Corps of Engineers guidance."
Regulatory Official:
Title:
Date:
USACE Action ID No.:
Version: May 2017 Page 2

❑ Plats submitted for Corps approval should include the following Certification language
when uplands mawpresent within a depicted Jurisdictional Boundary
"This certifies that this copy of this plat identifies all areas of waters of the United States
regulated pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act as determined by the
undersigned on this date. Unless there is change in the law or our published regulations,
this determination of Section 404 jurisdiction may be relied upon for a period not to exceed
five years from this date. The undersigned completed this determination utilizing the
appropriate Regional Supplement to the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands
Delineation Manual, 33 C.F.R. part 328 and other U.S. Army Corps of Engineers guidance."
Regulatory Official:
Title:
Date:
USACE Action ID No.:
GPS SURVEYS
For surveys prepared using a Global Positioning System (GPS), the survey must include all of
the above, as well as:
_71 VvJ be at sub -meter accuracy at each survey point.
include an accuracy verification. One of more of the known points (property
corner, monument) shall be located with the GPS and cross referenced with the
existing traditional property survey (metes and bounds).
V_J include a brief description of the GPS equipment utilized.
Version: May 2017 Page 3

PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: #CURRENT DATE TRADITIONAL#
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Adam Carter, Wetland Solutions, LLC PO Box 244
Bunnlevel, NC 28323
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: Wilmington, #FOLDER NAME#,
#FOLDER DA NUMBER#
PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: McLean Street
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County/parish/borough: Cumberland City: Godwin
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat.: 35.2216720 Long.:-78.6759720
Universal Transverse Mercator: 17N
Name of nearest waterbody: UT to Cape Fear River (Class: WS-V)
D. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES INREVIEWAREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site
Number
Latitude (decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal degrees)
Estimated amount of
aquatic resources in
review area (acreage
and linear feet, if
applicable
Type of aquatic
resources (i.e.,
wetland vs. non-
wetland waters)
Geographic authority to
which the aquatic resource
"may be" subject (i.e.,
Section 404 or Section
10/404
Wl
35.222825
-78.674978
0.76 acre
Wetland
Section 404

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in the
review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option to request
and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an informed decision after
having discussed the various types of JDs and their characteristics and circumstances when
they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide
General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre- construction
notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or other general permit,
and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the activity, the permit applicant is
hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization
based on a PJD, which does not make an official determination of jurisdictional aquatic
resources; (2) the applicant has the option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and
conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could
possibly result in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions;
(3) the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can accept
a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that
permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary;
(5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without
requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a
permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking any activity in
reliance on any form of Corps permit authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that
all aquatic resources in the review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as
jurisdictional, and waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial
compliance or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court;
and (7) whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed
as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms and
conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively appealed
pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it becomes appropriate to
make an official determination whether geographic jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources
in the review area, or to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area, the Corps will provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is
practicable. This PJD finds that there "may be" waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be"
navigable waters of the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in
the review area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources below where
indicated for all checked items:
❑ Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map:
® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
® U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: 24K, Wade Quad
® Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: SSURGO 20220121
® National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: USFWS 20231023
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
® FEMA/FIRM maps: FIRM Panel: 3720058200
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
® Photographs: ®Aerial (Name & Date): NC CGIA 1/29/2021
or ❑other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily been
verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional
determinations.
2/1 /2024
Signature and date of Regulatory Signature and date of person
staff member completing PJD requesting PJD (REQUIRED,
unless obtaining the signature
is impracticable) t
i Districts may establish timeframes for requester to return signed PJD forms. If the requester does not respond within the
established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is necessary prior to finalizing
an action.

NETT
p Y
!pry.
l_ V
Dunn
117-
ILI
82
_ - _• r Ltd
1
' ..
F•1
1 .
Swamp
Star
o
Godwin
�Q Qy
J "A
y� Ow Ln
e
� m
'mar rhs Rives Rp
-
n
Amin pa
�r
Falcon
1
J41C
' oaf ti�
r,�
6�` r
��e•�� -`
�,
c
4
9
y
I ec
co
.• tr�I
A yrq Ra
Wade
1v
Project —Location
National Geographic, Esri, Garmin, HERE, UNEI
L METI, NRCAN, GEBCO, NOAA, increment P Corp.
Project Name- McLean Street N
Location- Godwin, Cumberland County, NC
° PIN- 0593-65-7760 Figure- 1
P.O. Box 244
0 1 2 3 4 5 Miles Feb 1, 2024 Bunnlevel, NC 28323 1 1 1 1 1 1

Project NaME
11,91imi I 'I
VMS-

0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 Feet a
I I I I I I = McLean Street Parcel - 30.33 acres
topyngm:ko zu i a ivauonai k�eograpnic aociety, i-cuoed
Project Name: McLean Street N
- Location: Godwin, Cumberland County, NC
PIN- 0593-65-7760 Figure- 3
P.O. Box244 USGS 7.5-Minute Topo; Wade Quadrangle Feb 1, 2024
Bunnlevel, NC 28323

r.
r
i
f
e
ExA
ExA
Gr
i
NGB '
e
t
NoB y
NoB
C►o ��. •.. .+. �.*
r
ExA a,
�3; 1
NC DEQ 24k Hydrology Data
McLean Street Parcel — 30.33 acres
Soil Map Units
Co—Coxville loam
f.r C ExA—Exum loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes
i'
0 250 500 750 1,000 Feet Gr—Grantham loam
I I I I I NoB—Norfolk loamy sand, 2 to 6 percent slopes
Souf-
Project Name- McLean Street N
Location- Godwin, Cumberland County, NC Figure. 4
PIN- 0593-65-7760
P.O. Box244 NRCS Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) Feb 1, 2024
Bunnlevel, NC 28323

PUBHx
a
- . R
�'-
•Y ALIV'
n
0 250 500 750 1,000 Feet
r IF.. - 7
h J
McLean Street Parcel - 30.33 acres
`; Wetland Type (Cowardin)
Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland
Freshwater Pond
Riverine
+ Source: Esri, Maxar, cy�naUi���:ar�apniicstana�une un�iuseur�.rn�rn�un�i,�y
Project Name: McLean Street N
-� Location: Godwin, Cumberland County, NC Figure- 55 PIN: 0593-65-7760
P.O. Box 244 USFWS National Wetland Inventory (20231023) Feb 1, 2024
Bunnlevel, NC 28323

3720058400 1 3720150400
3720058200 / 1 3720150200
• McLean Street Parcel — 30.33 acres
• FIRM Panel
Flood Zone
E 0.2 PCT ANNUAL CHANCE (500-year)
•
0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 Feet AE (100-year)
I I I I I I F_ I X (Low risk)
Source: Esri,
Project Name: McLean Street N
- Location: Godwin, Cumberland County, NC
PIN- 0593-65-7760 Figure- 6
P.O. Box 244 NC Flood Risk Information System Feb 1, 2024
Bunnlevel, NC 28323

USDA United States
Department of
Agriculture
N RCS
Natural
Resources
Conservation
Service
A product of the National
Cooperative Soil Survey,
a joint effort of the United
States Department of
Agriculture and other
Federal agencies, State
agencies including the
Agricultural Experiment
Stations, and local
participants
Custom Soil Resource
Report for
Cumberland
County, North
Carolina
McLean Street
June 29, 2022

Preface
Soil surveys contain information that affects land use planning in survey areas.
They highlight soil limitations that affect various land uses and provide information
about the properties of the soils in the survey areas. Soil surveys are designed for
many different users, including farmers, ranchers, foresters, agronomists, urban
planners, community officials, engineers, developers, builders, and home buyers.
Also, conservationists, teachers, students, and specialists in recreation, waste
disposal, and pollution control can use the surveys to help them understand,
protect, or enhance the environment.
Various land use regulations of Federal, State, and local governments may impose
special restrictions on land use or land treatment. Soil surveys identify soil
properties that are used in making various land use or land treatment decisions.
The information is intended to help the land users identify and reduce the effects of
soil limitations on various land uses. The landowner or user is responsible for
identifying and complying with existing laws and regulations.
Although soil survey information can be used for general farm, local, and wider area
planning, onsite investigation is needed to supplement this information in some
cases. Examples include soil quality assessments (http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/
portal/nres/main/soils/health/) and certain conservation and engineering
applications. For more detailed information, contact your local USDA Service Center
(https:Hoffices.sc.egov.usda.gov/locator/app?agency=nres) or your NRCS State Soil
Scientist (http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/soils/contactus/?
cid=nres142p2_053951).
Great differences in soil properties can occur within short distances. Some soils are
seasonally wet or subject to flooding. Some are too unstable to be used as a
foundation for buildings or roads. Clayey or wet soils are poorly suited to use as
septic tank absorption fields. A high water table makes a soil poorly suited to
basements or underground installations.
The National Cooperative Soil Survey is a joint effort of the United States
Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the
Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources
Conservation Service (NRCS) has leadership for the Federal part of the National
Cooperative Soil Survey.
Information about soils is updated periodically. Updated information is available
through the NRCS Web Soil Survey, the site for official soil survey information.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its
programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability,
and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion,
sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a
part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not
all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require

alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print,
audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at [phone] (voice
and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of
Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or
call [phone] (voice) or [phone] (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity
provider and employer.

Contents
Preface....................................................................................................................
2
How Soil Surveys Are Made..................................................................................5
SoilMap..................................................................................................................
8
SoilMap................................................................................................................9
Legend................................................................................................................10
MapUnit Legend................................................................................................
11
MapUnit Descriptions.........................................................................................11
Cumberland County, North Carolina...............................................................13
Co—Coxville loam.......................................................................................13
ExA—Exum loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes.....................................................14
Gr—Grantham loam....................................................................................15
NoB—Norfolk loamy sand, 2 to 6 percent slopes........................................17
References............................................................................................................19

How Soil Surveys Are Made
Soil surveys are made to provide information about the soils and miscellaneous
areas in a specific area. They include a description of the soils and miscellaneous
areas and their location on the landscape and tables that show soil properties and
limitations affecting various uses. Soil scientists observed the steepness, length,
and shape of the slopes; the general pattern of drainage; the kinds of crops and
native plants; and the kinds of bedrock. They observed and described many soil
profiles. A soil profile is the sequence of natural layers, or horizons, in a soil. The
profile extends from the surface down into the unconsolidated material in which the
soil formed or from the surface down to bedrock. The unconsolidated material is
devoid of roots and other living organisms and has not been changed by other
biological activity.
Currently, soils are mapped according to the boundaries of major land resource
areas (MLRAs). MLRAs are geographically associated land resource units that
share common characteristics related to physiography, geology, climate, water
resources, soils, biological resources, and land uses (USDA, 2006). Soil survey
areas typically consist of parts of one or more MLRA.
The soils and miscellaneous areas in a survey area occur in an orderly pattern that
is related to the geology, landforms, relief, climate, and natural vegetation of the
area. Each kind of soil and miscellaneous area is associated with a particular kind
of landform or with a segment of the landform. By observing the soils and
miscellaneous areas in the survey area and relating their position to specific
segments of the landform, a soil scientist develops a concept, or model, of how they
were formed. Thus, during mapping, this model enables the soil scientist to predict
with a considerable degree of accuracy the kind of soil or miscellaneous area at a
specific location on the landscape.
Commonly, individual soils on the landscape merge into one another as their
characteristics gradually change. To construct an accurate soil map, however, soil
scientists must determine the boundaries between the soils. They can observe only
a limited number of soil profiles. Nevertheless, these observations, supplemented
by an understanding of the soil -vegetation -landscape relationship, are sufficient to
verify predictions of the kinds of soil in an area and to determine the boundaries.
Soil scientists recorded the characteristics of the soil profiles that they studied. They
noted soil color, texture, size and shape of soil aggregates, kind and amount of rock
fragments, distribution of plant roots, reaction, and other features that enable them
to identify soils. After describing the soils in the survey area and determining their
properties, the soil scientists assigned the soils to taxonomic classes (units).
Taxonomic classes are concepts. Each taxonomic class has a set of soil
characteristics with precisely defined limits. The classes are used as a basis for
comparison to classify soils systematically. Soil taxonomy, the system of taxonomic
classification used in the United States, is based mainly on the kind and character
of soil properties and the arrangement of horizons within the profile. After the soil

Custom Soil Resource Report
scientists classified and named the soils in the survey area, they compared the
individual soils with similar soils in the same taxonomic class in other areas so that
they could confirm data and assemble additional data based on experience and
research.
The objective of soil mapping is not to delineate pure map unit components; the
objective is to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that
have similar use and management requirements. Each map unit is defined by a
unique combination of soil components and/or miscellaneous areas in predictable
proportions. Some components may be highly contrasting to the other components
of the map unit. The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way
diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The delineation of such
landforms and landform segments on the map provides sufficient information for the
development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, onsite
investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas.
Soil scientists make many field observations in the process of producing a soil map.
The frequency of observation is dependent upon several factors, including scale of
mapping, intensity of mapping, design of map units, complexity of the landscape,
and experience of the soil scientist. Observations are made to test and refine the
soil -landscape model and predictions and to verify the classification of the soils at
specific locations. Once the soil -landscape model is refined, a significantly smaller
number of measurements of individual soil properties are made and recorded.
These measurements may include field measurements, such as those for color,
depth to bedrock, and texture, and laboratory measurements, such as those for
content of sand, silt, clay, salt, and other components. Properties of each soil
typically vary from one point to another across the landscape.
Observations for map unit components are aggregated to develop ranges of
characteristics for the components. The aggregated values are presented. Direct
measurements do not exist for every property presented for every map unit
component. Values for some properties are estimated from combinations of other
properties.
While a soil survey is in progress, samples of some of the soils in the area generally
are collected for laboratory analyses and for engineering tests. Soil scientists
interpret the data from these analyses and tests as well as the field -observed
characteristics and the soil properties to determine the expected behavior of the
soils under different uses. Interpretations for all of the soils are field tested through
observation of the soils in different uses and under different levels of management.
Some interpretations are modified to fit local conditions, and some new
interpretations are developed to meet local needs. Data are assembled from other
sources, such as research information, production records, and field experience of
specialists. For example, data on crop yields under defined levels of management
are assembled from farm records and from field or plot experiments on the same
kinds of soil.
Predictions about soil behavior are based not only on soil properties but also on
such variables as climate and biological activity. Soil conditions are predictable over
long periods of time, but they are not predictable from year to year. For example,
soil scientists can predict with a fairly high degree of accuracy that a given soil will
have a high water table within certain depths in most years, but they cannot predict
that a high water table will always be at a specific level in the soil on a specific date.
After soil scientists located and identified the significant natural bodies of soil in the
survey area, they drew the boundaries of these bodies on aerial photographs and

Custom Soil Resource Report
identified each as a specific map unit. Aerial photographs show trees, buildings,
fields, roads, and rivers, all of which help in locating boundaries accurately.

Soil Map
The soil map section includes the soil map for the defined area of interest, a list of
soil map units on the map and extent of each map unit, and cartographic symbols
displayed on the map. Also presented are various metadata about data used to
produce the map, and a description of each soil map unit.

a
711240
35° 13' 29" N
0
n
35° 13' 4" N
711240 711330 711420 711510 711600
in
o Map Scale: 1:3,720 if printed on A portrait (8.5" x 11") sheet.
` Meters
N 0 50 100 200 300
AFeet
0 150 300 600 900
Map projection: Web Mercator Comer coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 17N WGS84
9
Custom Soil Resource Report
Soil Map
711330 711420 711510 711600
711690
711690
711780
35° 13' 29" N
I
35° 13'4" N
711780
o
a

N '0 N
oU)
N
N
_
U
N
7 y
(6 p N
i y y
N� N
O
N
a)
O
a) O
`O
(6
U T O 70
O_
U
2 O U O
92
O
m
00
3
a) O .O
_6
N
U y N
2
0 0
N
E
N
y E
N '6 U) '6
��-.,
C
U)
O
N
O E
O-
U
U N
O
C
N '6
U
N
Z
E
N
N
O_ M
N
N N N a
U
U
E
N
U
N O
N U)
O
O_ N
N
N
O_ 7
O
U
L
N
O
O
.j C
7 0
L
N
U)
E N y
N
a) C7
O t Q N
Z
O
O
Qr
2i
.N
D O) 0
O_
C d
0 U) N O
Q
Z
2i
'6
>
L E O
2i y
E
U W
N (p O O N
C N
(6
N O O
�y
Q
O
V N N
L
U)
C U) O
C
N
N
0 O a
O
O
N
O
E
LL
T
N
>
N
L O O N
- C N
7 U
0 O
_
>+ N '� U
O U O
"�"
E O
_6 (`")
O N
N
O
�
E%
� N
Z
N
-0
C -0 L
O
O
N
O
L U) N O
7 tl) U O tl)
O
'6
N O
y
m
O
N N E,
-0 O N
N O
N
(6
Q
U
N
E U
�
3 J>
(n U) O_ 'O O
C
N-
a)
3 i
U
Q
y
O
(6
E
a-
O_ 6 O O
N
N
N
Z E
Q 2 Q U
N CL O
Utl)
N N
N
(6
N
a)
0 N O
'E
U)
O
O)=
E C R U)
>+
(6 (6
t N N jp
O) (6
(6
N O
(Op
E
0 0) N�
a)
O 'O
O tl)
O_ N U)
N U (6 (6 7
,tl) -O
N Q
U) N
._
T
O '6 (p 0_
U)
O
U
C (0 E o
a) N E rn
0 0
3 (n
U °?
"" 3 C N N
U .O
Q N
'E
o
L O N E
Q m
y
.30
C
E N .�
N '6 y
N E
0= (6
O C
E m� U
O a
O p U 0 ""
'6
O>
O O
a)
(6 W
'6
O-0 o
T L,
") O
E
N
� C (6
Q N
N 7
(n y
O
C) U '6
y U C
CL N
7 >+
U N
E O
O
O)
O .Q N C
L N
O 'N C O U
N N
O 9 O
m O n� U
Q 'O
L 46
0 7
O N
(6 Lf)
C O O L
W E- U U)
d E
U> U
Q m
H O
U U
U-
N
H U U)
Q
y
d y
R O
(i U
R
L
L
Q
Q
>.
00
0
0
L
d
Q
0
CL m E
O
m 0
y
O
m a
0
CL O
U U
Z
>
° 0
N L_ y
O U U
�
o
°
a)
R m
U
3) .a Q
0
R
N
R
O
C
p
O
Z
< a
LU
R 4
R
5 R
fVn
�
F
m
LU
J
y
a
a
p
y
o
o
)
w
o
a
0
a
y
N
y
Q
E �,
R
y
Q
a
o
a
U
C
>
C C a)
> >
Q Q
w
3 R
3 y
O >
>
2O`
w o
o LU_
Q
`o
o
o
a R
R
R R y C)
LL 3
3
o T
-O
w >
= FL
O
o
y
Q
0
(n
0 0 o
(n (n o m
o R
m U
o
U c7 c7
m > R E
J J
Mn a)
a
O m
m U)
R a)
U) U)
a
in U)
O
U)
w
a
�
R
■
x
p
,�y, pq20!
q�
y0.
Q
y
0
r

Custom Soil Resource Report
Map Unit Legend
Map Unit Symbol
Map Unit Name
Acres in AOI
Percent of AOI
Co
Coxville loam
5.2
17.1 %
ExA
Exum loam, 0 to 2 percent
slopes
3.7
12.2%
Gr
Grantham loam
7.2
23.6%
NoB
Norfolk loamy sand, 2 to 6
percent slopes
14.3
47.0%
Totals for Area of Interest
30.3
100.0%
Map Unit Descriptions
The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the
soils or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions, along
with the maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit.
A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more
major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named
according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic
class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils. On the
landscape, however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the
characteristic variability of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some
observed properties may extend beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class.
Areas of soils of a single taxonomic class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without
including areas of other taxonomic classes. Consequently, every map unit is made
up of the soils or miscellaneous areas for which it is named and some minor
components that belong to taxonomic classes other than those of the major soils.
Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the
map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called
noncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a
particular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties
and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different
management. These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components. They
generally are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the
scale used. Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas
are identified by a special symbol on the maps. If included in the database for a
given area, the contrasting minor components are identified in the map unit
descriptions along with some characteristics of each. A few areas of minor
components may not have been observed, and consequently they are not
mentioned in the descriptions, especially where the pattern was so complex that it
was impractical to make enough observations to identify all the soils and
miscellaneous areas on the landscape.
The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the
usefulness or accuracy of the data. The objective of mapping is not to delineate
pure taxonomic classes but rather to separate the landscape into landforms or
11

Custom Soil Resource Report
landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. The
delineation of such segments on the map provides sufficient information for the
development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, however,
onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous
areas.
An identifying symbol precedes the map unit name in the map unit descriptions.
Each description includes general facts about the unit and gives important soil
properties and qualities.
Soils that have profiles that are almost alike make up a soil series. Except for
differences in texture of the surface layer, all the soils of a series have major
horizons that are similar in composition, thickness, and arrangement.
Soils of one series can differ in texture of the surface layer, slope, stoniness,
salinity, degree of erosion, and other characteristics that affect their use. On the
basis of such differences, a soil series is divided into soil phases. Most of the areas
shown on the detailed soil maps are phases of soil series. The name of a soil phase
commonly indicates a feature that affects use or management. For example, Alpha
silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is a phase of the Alpha series.
Some map units are made up of two or more major soils or miscellaneous areas.
These map units are complexes, associations, or undifferentiated groups.
A complex consists of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas in such an intricate
pattern or in such small areas that they cannot be shown separately on the maps.
The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar
in all areas. Alpha -Beta complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, is an example.
An association is made up of two or more geographically associated soils or
miscellaneous areas that are shown as one unit on the maps. Because of present
or anticipated uses of the map units in the survey area, it was not considered
practical or necessary to map the soils or miscellaneous areas separately. The
pattern and relative proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat
similar. Alpha -Beta association, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
An undifferentiated group is made up of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas
that could be mapped individually but are mapped as one unit because similar
interpretations can be made for use and management. The pattern and proportion
of the soils or miscellaneous areas in a mapped area are not uniform. An area can
be made up of only one of the major soils or miscellaneous areas, or it can be made
up of all of them. Alpha and Beta soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
Some surveys include miscellaneous areas. Such areas have little or no soil
material and support little or no vegetation. Rock outcrop is an example.
12

Custom Soil Resource Report
Cumberland County, North Carolina
Co—Coxville loam
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol. w6zn
Elevation: 80 to 330 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 38 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost -free period: 210 to 265 days
Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance
Map Unit Composition
Coxville, drained, and similar soils: 85 percent
Coxville, undrained, and similar soils: 10 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Coxville, Drained
Setting
Landform: Depressions, carolina bays
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit
Down -slope shape: Concave
Across -slope shape: Concave
Parent material: Clayey marine deposits
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 9 inches: loam
Eg - 9 to 11 inches: loam
Btg - 11 to 72 inches: sandy clay
Cg - 72 to 80 inches: sandy clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Poorly drained
Runoff class: Low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high (0.20
to 0.57 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 0 to 12 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 7.6 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3w
Hydrologic Soil Group: C/D
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Description of Coxville, Undrained
Setting
Landform: Depressions, carolina bays
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit
Down -slope shape: Concave
13

Custom Soil Resource Report
Across -slope shape: Concave
Parent material: Clayey marine deposits
Typical profile
A - 0 to 9 inches: loam
Eg - 9 to 11 inches: loam
Btg - 11 to 72 inches: sandy clay
Cg - 72 to 80 inches: sandy clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Poorly drained
Runoff class: Low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high (0.20
to 0.57 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 0 to 12 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 7.6 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4w
Hydrologic Soil Group: C/D
Hydric soil rating: Yes
ExA—Exum loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol. w705
Elevation: 80 to 330 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 38 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost -free period: 210 to 265 days
Farmland classification: All areas are prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Exum and similar soils: 80 percent
Minor components: 5 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Exum
Setting
Landform: Flats on marine terraces, broad interstream divides on marine terraces
Down -slope shape: Concave
Across -slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Loamy and silty marine deposits
14

Custom Soil Resource Report
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 8 inches: silt loam
E - 8 to 12 inches: silt loam
Bt - 12 to 70 inches: clay loam
C - 70 to 100 inches: loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Moderately well drained
Runoff class: Low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high (0.20
to 0.57 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 24 to 36 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: High (about 10.8 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2w
Hydrologic Soil Group: C
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Grantham, undrained
Percent of map unit. 5 percent
Landform: Broad interstream divides on depressions, broad interstream divides on
flats
Down -slope shape: Concave
Across -slope shape: Concave, linear
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Gr—Grantham loam
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: w70p
Elevation: 80 to 330 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 38 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost -free period: 210 to 265 days
Farmland classification: Prime farmland if drained
Map Unit Composition
Grantham, drained, and similar soils: 80 percent
Grantham, undrained, and similar soils: 10 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
15

Custom Soil Resource Report
Description of Grantham, Drained
Setting
Landform: Broad interstream divides on depressions, broad interstream divides on
flats
Down -slope shape: Concave
Across -slope shape: Concave, linear
Parent material: Loamy and silty marine deposits
Typical profile
A - 0 to 6 inches: loam
Eg - 6 to 11 inches: loam
Btg - 11 to 77 inches: loam
Cg - 77 to 110 inches: loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Poorly drained
Runoff class: Low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high (0.20
to 0.57 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 0 to 12 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: High (about 10.7 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3w
Hydrologic Soil Group: C/D
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Description of Grantham, Undrained
Setting
Landform: Broad interstream divides on depressions, broad interstream divides on
flats
Down -slope shape: Concave
Across -slope shape: Concave, linear
Parent material: Loamy and silty marine deposits
Typical profile
A - 0 to 6 inches: loam
Eg - 6 to 11 inches: loam
Btg - 11 to 77 inches: loam
Cg - 77 to 110 inches: loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Poorly drained
Runoff class: Low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high (0.20
to 0.57 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 0 to 12 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
it.

Custom Soil Resource Report
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: High (about 10.7 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 6w
Hydrologic Soil Group: C/D
Hydric soil rating: Yes
NoB—Norfolk loamy sand, 2 to 6 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol. 2v75y
Elevation: 30 to 450 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 38 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost -free period: 200 to 280 days
Farmland classification: All areas are prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Norfolk and similar soils: 83 percent
Minor components: 17 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Norfolk
Setting
Landform: Broad interstream divides on marine terraces, flats on marine terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional): Talf
Down -slope shape: Convex, linear
Across -slope shape: Convex, linear
Parent material: Loamy marine deposits
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 8 inches: loamy sand
E - 8 to 14 inches: loamy sand
Bt - 14 to 65 inches: sandy clay loam
BC - 65 to 80 inches: sandy clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 2 to 6 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 40 to 72 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 6.9 inches)
17

Custom Soil Resource Report
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2e
Hydrologic Soil Group: A
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Wagram
Percent of map unit: 10 percent
Landform: Broad interstream divides on marine terraces, ridges on marine
terraces
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit, shoulder
Landform position (three-dimensional): Riser, rise
Down -slope shape: Convex, linear
Across -slope shape: Convex
Hydric soil rating: No
Goldsboro
Percent of map unit: 7 percent
Landform: Flats on marine terraces, broad interstream divides on marine terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional): Talf
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: No
18

References
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO).
2004. Standard specifications for transportation materials and methods of sampling
and testing. 24th edition.
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2005. Standard classification of
soils for engineering purposes. ASTM Standard D2487-00.
Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of
wetlands and deep -water habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service FWS/OBS-79/31.
Federal Register. July 13, 1994. Changes in hydric soils of the United States.
Federal Register. September 18, 2002. Hydric soils of the United States.
Hurt, G.W., and L.M. Vasilas, editors. Version 6.0, 2006. Field indicators of hydric
soils in the United States.
National Research Council. 1995. Wetlands: Characteristics and boundaries.
Soil Survey Division Staff. 1993. Soil survey manual. Soil Conservation Service.
U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 18. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/
n res/d eta i I/n ati o n a I/s o i Is/?cid = n res 142 p2_0 54262
Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for
making and interpreting soil surveys. 2nd edition. Natural Resources Conservation
Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436. http://
www. nres. usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?cid=nres142p2_053577
Soil Survey Staff. 2010. Keys to soil taxonomy. 11th edition. U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. http://
www. nres. usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?cid=nres142p2_053580
Tiner, R.W., Jr. 1985. Wetlands of Delaware. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and
Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Wetlands
Section.
United States Army Corps of Engineers, Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of
Engineers wetlands delineation manual. Waterways Experiment Station Technical
Report Y-87-1.
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National forestry manual. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/soils/
home/?cid=nres142p2_053374
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National range and pasture handbook. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/
detail/national/landuse/rangepastu re/?cid=stelprdb1043084
19

Custom Soil Resource Report
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National soil survey handbook, title 430-VI. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/
n res/d eta i I/so i Is/scie ntists/?cid=n res 142 p2_054242
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
2006. Land resource regions and major land resource areas of the United States,
the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook
296. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?
cid = n res 142 p2_05 3624
United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1961. Land
capability classification. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 210. http:H
www.nrcs.usda.gov/lnternet/FSE—DOCUMENTS/nrcsl 42p2_052290. pdf
20

DocuSign Envelope ID: 95BABE65-A78C-43DB-B88F-49B05B57D2EF
9
S L TiQP L
Agent Authorization Letter
March 19, 2024
Owner Information
Owner Name : susan Tart Property, LLC
Mailing Address: 126 N Ennis st.
City, State, Zip: Fuquay-vari na, NC 27526
Phone#: [phone]
Property Description
PIN: 0593-65-7760
Project: Mclean Street
Address: McLean Street, Godwin NC
County: Cumberland
I Zachary Angle as owner/agent of the above referenced
property, authorize the US Army Corps of Engineers and NCDWR to enter the subject property
for the purpose of a jurisdictional determination.
I also authorize Mr. Adam Carter of Wetland Solutions, LLC to act in my behalf as my agent in
processing applications for wetland certification and/or permits.
DocuSigned by:
F
� O—ka ,e, Managing Member 3/19/2024
114JJ5EB8C89D6894CC...
Signature Title Date
Wetland Solutions, LLC PO Box 244 Bunnlevel, NC 28323
[phone]
[e-mail]
www.WetlandNC.com

United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
3916 Sunset Ridge Rd
Raleigh, NC 27607
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
In Reply Refer To:
Project Code: 2024-0094121
Project Name: McLean Street
e x
hSai k 4YYFJiYJft
+cfln7i�
i�
05/22/2024 15:41:28 UTC
Subject: List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project
location or may be affected by your proposed project
To Whom It May Concern:
The enclosed species list identifies threatened, endangered, proposed and candidate species, as
well as proposed and final designated critical habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your
proposed project and/or may be affected by your proposed project. The species list fulfills the
requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the
Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). If your project area
contains suitable habitat for any of the federally -listed species on this species list, the proposed
action has the potential to adversely affect those species. If suitable habitat is present, surveys
should be conducted to determine the species' presence or absence within the project area. The
use of this species list and/or North Carolina Natural Heritage program data should not be
substituted for actual field surveys.
New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of
species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Please feel free to
contact us if you need more current information or assistance regarding the potential impacts to
federally proposed, listed, and candidate species and federally designated and proposed critical
habitat. Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the
Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be
completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be
completed by visiting the IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and
implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be requested
through the IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the enclosed list.
The purpose of the Act is to provide a means whereby threatened and endangered species and the
ecosystems upon which they depend may be conserved. Under sections 7(a)(1) and 7(a)(2) of the
Act and its implementing regulations (50 CFR 402 et seq.), Federal agencies are required to
utilize their authorities to carry out programs for the conservation of threatened and endangered

Project code: 2024-0094121
05/22/2024 15:41:28 UTC
species and to determine whether projects may affect threatened and endangered species and/or
designated critical habitat.
A Biological Assessment is required for construction projects (or other undertakings having
similar physical impacts) that are major Federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the
human environment as defined in the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)
(c)). For projects other than major construction activities, the Service suggests that a biological
evaluation similar to a Biological Assessment be prepared to determine whether the project may
affect listed or proposed species and/or designated or proposed critical habitat. Recommended
contents of a Biological Assessment are described at 50 CFR 402.12.
If a Federal agency determines, based on the Biological Assessment or biological evaluation, that
listed species and/or designated critical habitat may be affected by the proposed project, the
agency is required to consult with the Service pursuant to 50 CFR 402. In addition, the Service
recommends that candidate species, proposed species and proposed critical habitat be addressed
within the consultation. More information on the regulations and procedures for section 7
consultation, including the role of permit or license applicants, can be found in the "Endangered
Species Consultation Handbook" at:
https://www.fws. gov/sites/defaultlfiles/documents/endangered-species-consultation-
handbook.pdf
Migratory Birds: In addition to responsibilities to protect threatened and endangered species
under the Endangered Species Act (ESA), there are additional responsibilities under the
Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGEPA) to
protect native birds from project -related impacts. Any activity, intentional or unintentional,
resulting in take of migratory birds, including eagles, is prohibited unless otherwise permitted by
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)). For more
information regarding these Acts, see https://www.fws.gov/program/migratory-bird-permit/what-
we-do.
The MBTA has no provision for allowing take of migratory birds that may be unintentionally
killed or injured by otherwise lawful activities. It is the responsibility of the project proponent to
comply with these Acts by identifying potential impacts to migratory birds and eagles within
applicable NEPA documents (when there is a federal nexus) or a Bird/Eagle Conservation Plan
(when there is no federal nexus). Proponents should implement conservation measures to avoid
or minimize the production of project -related stressors or minimize the exposure of birds and
their resources to the project -related stressors. For more information on avian stressors and
recommended conservation measures, see https://www.fws.gov/library/collections/threats-birds.
In addition to MBTA and BGEPA, Executive Order 13186: Responsibilities of Federal Agencies
to Protect Migratory Birds, obligates all Federal agencies that engage in or authorize activities
that might affect migratory birds, to minimize those effects and encourage conservation measures
that will improve bird populations. Executive Order 13186 provides for the protection of both
migratory birds and migratory bird habitat. For information regarding the implementation of
Executive Order 13186, please visit https://www.fws.gov/partner/council-conservation-
migratory-birds.
2of12

Project code: 2024-0094121
05/22/2024 15:41:28 UTC
We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages
Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project
planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Code in the header of
this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project that you submit
to our office.
Attachment(s):
• Official Species List
• USFWS National Wildlife Refuges and Fish Hatcheries
• Bald & Golden Eagles
• Migratory Birds
OFFICIAL SPECIES LIST
This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the
requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether
any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed
action".
This species list is provided by:
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
3916 Sunset Ridge Rd
Raleigh, NC 27607
[phone]
3of12

Project code: 2024-0094121 05/22/2024 15:41:28 UTC
PROJECT SUMMARY
Project Code: 2024-0094121
Project Name: McLean Street
Project Type: Residential Construction
Project Description: Proposed residential development
Project Location:
The approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https:
www. google.com/maps/(a)35.2214277,-78.6762348865488,14z
e'
r t�
f"rr
.,� Ca a dheri h
Counties: Cumberland County, North Carolina
4of12

Project code: 2024-0094121 05/22/2024 15:41:28 UTC
ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT SPECIES
There is a total of 9 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list.
Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include
species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species
list because a project could affect downstream species. Note that 1 of these species should be
considered only under certain conditions.
IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA
Fisheriesi, as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the
Department of Commerce.
See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially
within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office
if you have questions.
NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an
office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of
Commerce.
5of12

Project code: 2024-0094121
05/22/2024 15:41:28 UTC
MAMMALS
NAME
STATUS
Tricolored Bat Perimyotis subflavus Proposed
No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Endangered
This species only needs to be considered under the following conditions:
• This species only needs to be considered if the project includes wind turbine operations.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/10515
NAME STATUS
Red -cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/7614
REPTILES
NAME STATUS
American Alligator Alligator mississippiensis Similarity of
No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Appearance
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/776 (Threatened)
CLAMS
NAME STATUS
Atlantic Pigtoe Fusconaia masoni Threatened
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5164
INSECTS
NAME STATUS
Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus Candidate
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9743
FLOWERING PLANTS
NAME STATUS
American Chaffseed Schwalbea americana Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1286
Michaux's Sumac Rhus michauxii Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5217
6of12

Project code: 2024-0094121 05/22/2024 15:41:28 UTC
NAME STATUS
Pondberry Lindera melissi folia Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1279
Rough -leaved Loosestrife Lysimachia asperulaefolia Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2747
CRITICAL HABITATS
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S
JURISDICTION.
YOU ARE STILL REQUIRED TO DETERMINE IF YOUR PROJECT(S) MAY HAVE EFFECTS ON ALL
ABOVE LISTED SPECIES.
USFWS NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE LANDS
AND FISH HATCHERIES
Any activity proposed on lands managed by the National Wildlife Refuge system must undergo a
'Compatibility Determination' conducted by the Refuge. Please contact the individual Refuges to
discuss any questions or concerns.
THERE ARE NO REFUGE LANDS OR FISH HATCHERIES WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA.
BALD & GOLDEN EAGLES
Bald and golden eagles are protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Actl and the
Migratory Bird Treaty Act2.
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to bald or
golden eagles, or their habitats3, should follow appropriate regulations and consider
implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described in the links below. Specifically,
please review the "Supplemental Information on Migratory Birds and Eagles".
1. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
2. The Migratory Birds Treat. Act of 1918.
3. 50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)
There are likely bald eagles present in your project area. For additional information on bald
eagles, refer to Bald Eagle Nesting and Sensitivity to Human Activity
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures
to reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, see the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE
7of12

Project code: 2024-0094121
05/22/2024 15:41:28 UTC
SUMMARY below to see when these birds are most likely to be present and breeding in your
project area.
NAME
BREEDING SEASON
Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus Breeds Sep 1 to
This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, but warrants attention Jul 31
because of the Eagle Act or for potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain
types of development or activities.
https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1626
PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE SUMMARY
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be
present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project
activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read "Supplemental
Information on Migratory Birds and Eagles", specifically the FAQ section titled "Proper
Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before using or attempting to interpret
this report.
Probability of Presence (■)
Green bars; the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your project
overlaps during that week of the year.
Breeding Season( )
Yellow bars; liberal estimate of the timeframe inside which the bird breeds across its entire
range.
Survey Effort (1)
Vertical black lines; the number of surveys performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s)
your project area overlaps.
No Data (—)
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
■ probability of presence breeding season I survey effort — no data
SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Bald Eagle lhom gill 111111111111111161 — — — —
on�� IIII IIII IIII
Non -BCC
Vulnerable
Additional information can be found using the following links:
• Eagle Management https://www.fws.gov/program/eagle-management
bOr1Z

Project code: 2024-0094121
05/22/2024 15:41:28 UTC
• Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds https://www.fws.gov/library
collections/avoiding-and-minimizing-incidental-take-migratory-birds
• Nationwide conservation measures for birds https://www.fws.gov/sites/default/files/
documents/nationwide-standard-conservation-measures.pdf
• Supplemental Information for Migratory Birds and Eagles in IPaC https://www.fws.gov/
media/supplemental-information-mi ratory-birds-and-bald-and-golden-ea les-may-occur-
project-action
MIGRATORY BIRDS
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act1 and the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Act2.
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to
migratory birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and consider
implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described in the links below. Specifically,
please review the "Supplemental Information on Migratory Birds and Eagles".
1. The Migratory Birds Treat. Act of 1918.
2. The Bald and Golden Eap-le Protection Act of 1940.
3. 50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures
to reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, see the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE
SUMMARY below to see when these birds are most likely to be present and breeding in your
project area.
NAME
BREEDING
SEASON
Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus Breeds Sep 1 to
This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, but warrants attention Jul 31
because of the Eagle Act or for potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types
of development or activities.
https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1626
Brown -headed Nuthatch Sitta pusilla Breeds Mar 1
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions to Jul 15
(BCRs) in the continental USA
https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9427
Chimney Swift Chaetura pelagica Breeds Mar 15
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA to Aug 25
and Alaska.
https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9406
9of12

Project code: 2024-0094121
05/22/2024 15:41:28 UTC
NAME
BREEDING
SEASON
Prairie Warbler Setophaga discolor Breeds May 1
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA to Jul 31
and Alaska.
https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9513
Prothonotary Warbler Protonotaria citrea Breeds Apr 1 to
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA Jul 31
and Alaska.
https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9439
Southeastern American Kestrel Falco sparverius paulus Breeds Apr 1 to
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions Aug 31
(BCRs) in the continental USA
https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/4076
PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE SUMMARY
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be
present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project
activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read "Supplemental
Information on Migratory Birds and Eagles", specifically the FAQ section titled "Proper
Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before using or attempting to interpret
this report.
Probability of Presence (■)
Green bars; the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your project
overlaps during that week of the year.
Breeding Season( )
Yellow bars; liberal estimate of the timeframe inside which the bird breeds across its entire
range.
Survey Effort (1)
Vertical black lines; the number of surveys performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s)
your project area overlaps.
No Data (—)
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
■ probability of presence breeding season I survey effort — no data
SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
10 of 12

Project code: 2024-0094121
05/22/2024 15:41:28 UTC
Bald Eagle
a ll IIII 111�
----
Non-BC
IIII IIII IIII ----
Vulnerable
atBCRed —
— — — -----�+ dill IIII lill III, - - - -
BCC
Chimney Swift
BCC Rangewide
--- ---- -III
IN
lill
lill
lill
lill
(CON)
Prairie Warbler
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Prothonotary
Warbler
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Southeastern
American Kestrel
BCC -BCR
---+
IIIIIIIIIIIIIF
I---------------
Additional information can be found using the following links:
• Eagle Management https://www.fws.gov/program/eagle-management
• Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds https://www.fws.gov/library
collections/avoiding-and-minimizing-incidental-take-migratory-birds
• Nationwide conservation measures for birds https://www.fws.gov/sites/default/files/
documents/nationwide-standard-conservation-measures.pdf
• Supplemental Information for Migratory Birds and Eagles in IPaC https://www.fws.gov/
media/SUDDlemental-information-mip-ratorv-birds-and-bald-and-p-olden-eap-les-mav-occur-
project-action
11 of 12

Project code: 2024-0094121
05/22/2024 15:41:28 UTC
IPAC USER CONTACT INFORMATION
Agency:
Private Entity
Name:
Wesley Johnson
Address:
816 Merry Street
City:
Dunn
State:
NC
Zip:
28334
Email
[e-mail]
Phone:
9197560411
LEAD AGENCY CONTACT INFORMATION
Lead Agency: Army Corps of Engineers
12 of 12

5/22/24, 11:33 AM
Property Summary
Tax Year: 2024
REID 0593657760000 PIN
OWASHBURN
Location RD Property
Address Description
Print Property Info
0593-65-7760 SUSAN TART
Property Owner PROPERTY LLC
LTS 92-103, 122-124 EDGERTON Owner's Mailing 126 N. ENNIS ST
&ADJ 29.95 FUQUAY-VARINANC
Address 27526
Administrative Data
Transfer Information
Plat Book & Page
Deed Date
Old Map #
Deed Book
Market Area
4085
Deed Page
Township
NONE
Revenue Stamps
Planning Jurisdiction
COUNTY
Package Sale Date
City
GODWIN
Package Sale Price
Fire District
Land Sale Date
Spec District
RECREATION
Land Sale Price
Land Class
F100-RURAL
History REID 1
Improvement Summary
History REID 2
Total Buildings
Acreage
31.3
Total Units
Permit Date
Total Living Area
Permit #
Total Gross Leasable Area
Photograph
Building Summary
1 /3/2023
011646
00860
8/22/2022
$135,000
No Photo Found
Property Value
Total Appraised Land Value
$225,571
Total Appraised Building Value
Total Appraised Misc
Improvements Value
Total Cost Value
$225,571
Total Appraised Value -valued By
$225,571
Cost
Other Exemptions
Exemption Desc
Use Value Deferred
Historic Value Deferred
Total Deferred Value
Total Taxable Value
$225,571
https://taxpwa.co.cumberland.nc.us/camapwa/PrintPRC.aspx?PARCELPK=139027 1 /2

5/22/24, 11:33 AM
Misc Improvements Summary
Card Unit Base
# Quantity Measure Type Price
No Data
Total Misc Improvements Value Assessed:
Land Summary
Print Property Info
Size Adj Eff Phys Depr Econ Depr Funct Depr Common Interest Value
Factor Year (% Bad) (% Bad) (% Bad) (% Good)
Land Class: F100-RURAL Deeded Acres: 30.33
Zoning Soil Class Description Size Rate
R6 2096-RURAL-ACREAGE 22.57 BY THE ACRE PRICE $13,500
R6 2300-SWAMP-WASTE 8.73 BY THE ACRE PRICE $300
Total Land Value Assessed: $225,571
Ownership History
Owner Name Deed Type
Current SUSAN TART PROPERTY LLC Ordinance Annex
1 Back SUSAN TART PROPERTY LLC WD-WARRANTY DEED
2 Back MCLAMB, RICKY WILLARD TRUSTEE WD-WARRANTY DEED
3 Back MCLAMB, MARGILE BAREFOOT DE -DEED
Notes Summary
Building Card
No Data
Date
Calculated Acres: 30.33
Size Adj. Factor Land Adjustment Land Value
0.357 $222,952
$2,619
% Ownership Stamps Sale Price Book Page Deed Date
100
0
011646
00860
1 /3/2023
100
810
$135,000 011554
00036
8/22/2022
100
0
011456
00888
4/26/2022
100
0
000893
00341
7/1/1984
Line
Notes
https://taxpwa.co.cumberland.nc.us/camapwa/PrintPRC.aspx?PARCELPK=139027 2/2

L'
0
Pa�pl�7aornS -_
J
uj
m
r �
d
N
V
C
S
Q
0
LV
m
p7S w
o
a
P
� ll a4�r18

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/site: McLean Street
Applicant/owner: Zach Angle
Investigator(s): Adam Carter
city/county: Cumberland/ County Sampling Date: 3/5/2024
State: NC Sampling Point: All
Section, Township, Range: Godwin
Hillslo e Convex °
Landform {hillslope, terrace, etc.}: p Local relief {concave, convex. none]: Slope (/o}: 2 �u
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) LRRP Lat_ 35.221926 Long:-78.675884 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Gr—Grantham loam NWl classification: Upland Forest
Are climatic/ hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes FT] No = (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly d istu rbed =kre "Normal Circumstances° present? Yes ✓= No
Are Vegetation= Soil = or Hydrology naturally problematic?=(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transacts, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes= No ✓0 Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes= No
within a Wetland? YesQ No. ✓Q
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes= No FTI
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators minimum of two re uirec
Primary indicators minimum of one is
requiredcheck all that apply)
=Surface Soil Cracks (136)
=Surface Water (Al)
=Aquatic Fauna (B13)
=Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
=High Water Table (A2)
=Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
=Drainage Patterns (B10)
=Saturation (A3)
=Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
=Mass Trim Lines (1316)
=Water Marks (81 )
=Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
=Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
=Sediment Deposits (132)
=Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
=Crayfish Burrows (C8)
=Drift Deposits (133)
=Recent Iran Reduction in Tilled Sails (C6)
=Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
=Algal Mat or Crust {B4}
=Thin Muck Surface {C7}
=Geomorphic Position (D2)
= Iron Deposits (135)
=Other (Explain in Remarks)
=Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
=FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
r, Water -Stained Leaves (Bg)
r--ISphagnum moss (138) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes = No = Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes 0 No= Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes r1 No 0 Depth (inches): Wetiand Hydrology Present? Yes = No I�
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
rks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2-0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: Al
wee Rtmfiim (plrt ci,. 25ft x 25ft
1 Sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua)
2 Loblolly Pine (Pinus taeda)
3 Water Oak (Quercus nigra)
4 Willow Oak (Quercus phellos)
5.,-
6. -
Absolute
1 % Cover
10%
20%
Dominant Indicator
_�per6es7 St_ atus✓
Yes FAC+
Yes FAC
5% _
No FAC
5%
No FACW
50% of total cover: 20
S_aDlino Stratum (Plot size: 25ft x 25ft
1 American Holly (Ilex opaca)
2 Sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua)
3 Loblolly Pine (Pin us taeda)
4. Red Cedar (Juniperus virginiana)
5 Water Oak (Quercus nigra)
6 -
40 = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 8
3% No FAC
5% Yac FAC:+
I v io Yes r-Au
2% No FACU
2% No FAC
22 - = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 11
20%
of total cover:
4.4
Shrub Stratum (Pict size: 25ft x 25ft )
1 Chinese Privet (Ligustrum sinese)
10%
Yes
FAC
2 Horse -sugar, Sweetleaf (Symplocos tinctoria)
2%
No
FAC
3 Highbush blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum)
1 %
No
FACW
4 Red Cedar (Juniperus virginiana)
2%
NO
FACU
5.-
-
6.
15
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 7.5
20%
of total cover:
3
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 25ft x 25ft )
1 Morning Glory (Ipomoea purpurea)
1 %
Yes
UPL
2 Wiregrass, Pinelawn Three Awn (Aristida stricta)
1 %
Yes
FAC-
3. Microstegium vimineum
2%
No
FAC
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species 9
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 9 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of
MultiolyL] L
OBL species
x 1 =
0
FACW species
x 2 =
0
FAC species
x 3 =
0
FACU species
x 4 =
0
UPL species
x 5 =
0
Column Totals: 0
(A)
0 (B)
Prevalence Index = B(A= NaN
H drophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
✓ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is :53.0'
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH)
Sapling — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub —Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
6. - - Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
7 _ _ herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 ft (1 m) in height.
9._-
10.- -
11.- -
50% of total cover: 2
Woody Vin gratum (Plot size: 25ft x 25ft )
1. Cat Greenbrier (Smilax glauca)
2. Grape (Vitis spp.)
3 Roundleaf Greenbrier (Smilax rotundafolia)
4 Poison Ivy (Toxicodendron radicans)
5 Yellow Jasmine (Gelsemium sempervirens)
50% of total cover: 3.5
4 = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 0.8
1% No
FAC
1 % No
FACV�i
1 % No
FAC
2% Yes
FAC
2% Yes
FAC
7 = Total Cover
_ 20% of total cover:
1.4
Woody vine — All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? YesYl No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: Al
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type Co-P-_
Texture Remarks
0-3 10YR 4/4
3-15 10YR
15-24 10YR
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
(Al)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑
❑
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
Thin Dark Surface (39) (LRR S, T, U)
❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
HHistosol
❑
❑
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
❑
Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
❑
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
❑
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(M LRA 15313)
❑
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
❑
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑
❑_
❑
❑
Redox Depressions (F8) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Marl (F10) (LRR U) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_
❑
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
❑
❑
❑
❑
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present,
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic.
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150113)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
❑
Stripped Matrix (S6)
0
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
0
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth
Hydric Soil Present? Yes❑ No❑
(inches):
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/site: McLean
Applicant/owner: Zach Angle
Investigator(s): Adam Cater
City/County. Godwin/ Cumberland
State: NC
Section, Township, Range: Godwin
_ Sampling Date. 3/5/2024
_ Sampling Point: All
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Valley Local relief [concave, convex, none]: Concave Slope (%): l
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) LRRP Lat_ 35.222089 Long:-78.675757 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map unit Name: NoB—Norfolk loamy sand, 2 to 6 percent slopes NWl classification: Headwater wetland
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical far this time of year? Yes FT] No = (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly d istu rbed=kre "Normal Circumstances° present? Yes ✓= No
Are Vegetation= Soil = or Hydrology naturally problematic?=(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transacts, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes= No 0 Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes= No.= within a Wetland? YesQ No.=
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes= No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two requirec
Primary Indicators minimum of one is
requiredcheck all that apply)
=Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
=Surface Water (Al)
=Aquatic Fauna (B13)
=Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
=High Water Table (A2)
=Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
=Drainage Patterns (131 D)
✓=Saturation (A3)
=Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1 )
=Mass Trim Lines (B16)
=Water Marks (81)
=Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
=Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
=Sediment Deposits (132)
=Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
=Crayfish Burrows (C8)
=drift Deposits (B3)
=Recent Iran Reduction in Tilled Sails (C6)
=Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
=Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
= Thin Muck Surface (C7)
=Geomorphic Position (D2)
= Iron Deposits (B5)
=Other (Explain in Remarks)
=Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (87)
=FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
77-1 Water -Stained Leaves (Bg)
r,Sphagnum moss (138) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes = No = Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes 0 No= Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes r1 No = Depth (inches): 6inch Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes = No=
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
rks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: Al
wee Rtmfiim (plrt ci,. 25ft x 25ft
1 Longleaf Pine (Pinus palustris)
2 Water Oak (Quercus nigra)
3 Willow Oak (Quercus phellos)
4. Red Maple (Ater rubrum)
5 Tulip Poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera)
6. -
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
1 % Cover
Sneriec7 _status✓
3%%
No FACU
4%
No FAC
10% _
YAS FACW
15%
Yes FAC/rd
8%
Yes FACLd
50% of total cover: 20
S_aDlino Stratum (Plot size: 25ft x 25ft
1 Loblolly Pine (Pinus taeda)
2 Red Maple (Ater rubrum)
3 Tulip Poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera)
4 Water Oak (Quercus nigra)
5.
6 -
40 = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 8
1%
No
FAC
10%
Yes
FAC/Fd
5%
Yes
FACT.
3%
No
FAC
19 - = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 9.5
20% of total cover:
3.8
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 25ft x 25ft )
1 Chinese Privet (Ligustrum sinese)
5%
Yes
FAC
2 Highbush blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum)
3%
No
FACW
3 Sweet Pepperbush (Clethra alnifolia)
8%
Yes
FACW
4 Wax Myrtle (Morelia cerifera)
5%
Yes
FACW
5 Red Bay (Persea borbonia)
3%
No
FACW
6.
24
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 12
20% of total cover:
4.8
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 25ft x 25ft )
1 Sensitive Fern (Onoclea sensibilis)
2%
Yes
FACW
2 Rush (Juncus spp.)
2%
Yes
FACV�
3. False nettle (Boehmeria cylindrica)
4%
Yes
FAC1/i�i
4..-
-
5. -
-
6.
-
8. -
-
10.-
-
11.-
-
50% of total cover: 4
Woody Vjaaaratum (Plot size: 25ft x 25ft )
1. Laurel -leaved Greenbrier, Bamboo Vine (Smilax lauirfolia)
2. Poison Ivy (Toxicodendron radicans)
3 Grape (Vitis spp.)
4. Roundleaf Greenbrier (Smilax rotundafolia)
5 Yellow Jasmine (Gelsemium sempervirens)
50% of total cover: 4.5
O = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 1 .6
1 % No
FACV,
3% Yes
FAC
1 % No
FACVj
1% No
FAC
3% Yes
FAC
9 = Total Cover
_ 20% of total cover:
1.8
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species 13
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 13 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100 (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of
Multi2111L
OBL species
x 1 =
0
FACW species
x 2 =
0
FAC species
x 3 =
0
FACU species
x 4 =
0
UPL species
x 5 =
0
Column Totals: 0
(A)
0 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A= NaN
H drophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
✓ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is :53.0'
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub —Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine — All woody vines, regardless of height
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? YesYl No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: Al
r or confirm the absence
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Co-P-_ Texture Remarks
0-4 10YR4/2 LS
4-15 10YR5/1 97% 10YR6/6 3% C M LS
15-24 10YR6/1 90% 10YR6/6 10% C M LS
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
(Al) ❑
Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) ❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Thin Dark Surface (39) (LRR S, T, U) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
HHistosol
❑
❑
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
❑
Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
❑
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) ❑
Redox Dark Surface (F6) (M LRA 15313)
❑
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) EI
Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) ❑
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) ❑_
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) ❑
Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑
Redox Depressions (F8) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Marl (F10) (LRR U) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_
❑
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) ❑
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S) ❑
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present,
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150113)
✓ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) 0 Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
0 Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Hydric Soil Present? Yesm No❑
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0