070038_Inspection_20240529

Division of Water Resources
Facility Number - O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
Type of Visit: ® Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 40 Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: 3� Arrival Time: O Departure Time: ,'® County- Region:
Farm Name
OwnerName: _ffd"G
Mailing Address:
Physical Address: 4(,2 w 411, Q q ///
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop.
W can to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish i I �mmm�l
to Feeder
to Finish
Other
Title:
Owner Email:
Phone:
Phone: R17-32z _q9%/
Integrator: ` ye,�;7 71 5gg�
Certification Number: L
Certification Number:
Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current
Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
I :n it
\,n-I an cr
Design Current
Dry Poultry Canacitv Pon.
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Othcr
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Co��
Calf
Cow
1 Beef Brood Cow
Discharees and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Ej Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ V
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes
o
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yeso
jNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 511212020 Continued

Facility Number: Date of Ins tion• - �
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes SNo
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in): /5F / p
Observed Freeboard (in): ��T �/ 6 �/ 'Z
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
❑ Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [in No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or enviroomen I threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes 5�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application J
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes [tJ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window [:]Evidence of Wind Drift [:]Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Renuired Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1 " Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 511212020 Continued

Facili Number: d Date of Inspection: -a1 4 —a
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes E No
__]NA [_]NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes . No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey [:]Failure to develop a PDA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes [/] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
[—]Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
�No
NA
NE
❑
❑
1� No
❑ NA
❑ NE
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawinEs of facility to better explain situations (use additional Daees as necessarv).
la - 7- a 3� i•
a-/,�- a �e = a•36 a.09
-ia- P�= a.aa- •07 ,o_3
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature,
Page 3 of
��-
Phone: P4�j - %1f.5 -
Date: 7=
S111/1020