Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout510107_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20240508A W 5 0 Division of Water Resources Facility Number ©J - tj'7 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation Q Other Agency Type of Visit: Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance Reason for Visit: R Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Q; Departure Time: County:, AjJ Si o1-) Region: R &L9 Farm Name: A, L C f/ "'Yk 1& Owner Email: Owner Name: Phone: Mailing Address: /j Physical Address: ��� Blfi` AllnD,J A, _ s Facility Contact: 1w4—,1 S A44.,,) 1 c:/<—' Title: Phone: g'�d ���,j /poi ® �T Onsite Representative: Certified Operator: Back-up Operator: Location of Farm: Swine Integrator: Certification Number: Certification Number: Latitude: Design Current Design Current Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. L ayer Wean to Finish Wean to Feeder Feeder to Finish Z O 1 x Farrow to Wean Farrow to Feeder Farrow to Finish Gilts Boars Other Design Current Dry Poultry Canacitv Pon. Layers Non -Layers Pullets Turkeys Turkey Poults Other Longitude: Design Current Cattle Capacity Pop. Dairy Cow Dairy Calf Dairy Heifer Dry Cow .Non -Dairy Beef Stocker Beef Feeder Beef Brood Cow Discharges and Stream Impacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? []Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other: a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes YNo ❑ NA ❑ NE c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes Zjo ❑ NA ❑ NE 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ElYes o ❑ NA ❑ NE of the State other than from a discharge? Page 1 of 3 511212020 Continued Facili Number: - Date of Inspection: - _ -x Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes L?No ❑ NA ❑ NE a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier: Spillway?: Designed Freeboard (in): Observed Freeboard (in): 317 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes �NoO ❑ NE (i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) 6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes ZfNo ❑ NA ❑ NE waste management or closure plan? If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? [:]Yes Z(No ❑ NA ❑ NE 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ��No ❑ NA ❑ NE (not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes O No ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? Waste Application 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need [—]Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? 11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.) ❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil ❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area 12. Crop Type(s): 4e01i S i jt l 13. Soil Type(s) 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes Q No ❑ NA ❑ NE 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes E/No ❑ NA ❑ NE 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes 2<0 ❑ NA ❑ NE acres determination? 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes el"10 ❑ NA ❑ NE 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes eNo ❑ NA ❑ NE Required Records & Documents 19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes d�40 ❑ NA ❑ NE 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check [:]Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE the appropriate box. ❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other: 21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes eNo ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code ❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ZfNo ❑ NA ❑ NE 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes , fNo ❑ NA ❑ NE Page 2 of 3 511212020 Continued Facility Number: $' / - /Q I I I Date of Inspection: f- 11 - y 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? if yes, check ❑ Yes EIo ❑ NA ❑ NE the appropriate box(es) below. ❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? [:]Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? 0 Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE Other Issues 28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? 24. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application) 31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below ❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other: 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? 33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? 34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes ZfNo ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes 25'No ❑ Yes [5No ❑ Yes ["No ❑ Yes <o ❑ Yes [TNo ❑ Yes a No ❑NA ❑NE ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑NA ❑NE ❑NA ❑NE ❑NA ❑NE ❑ NA ❑ NE Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments. Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary). L's�I:BR�iiO.�SCx��3)- -may.�3 10fI, i7oo f SrAt 4X.0 PA SILt9G S 2- 1-3 p_ 3A 52-1 �rl115TC 1Jfi'�`�s1`s" j'ifl'Y4 l,SG j Mi, id C'IdA-Le S /'s Reviewer/Inspector Name: v &eC Phone: 1/ 9 - 79 / - � Z -5'l Reviewer/]nspector Signature: Page 3 of 3 Date: r- f1 7j� 511212020