19950991 Ver 2_More Info Received_20240523 (4)

Baker, Caroline D
From:
Mash, Lisa <[e-mail]>
Sent:
Thursday, May 23, 2024 11:20 AM
To:
Homewood, Sue
Subject:
RE: [External] RE: Vulcan Materials, Rockingham Quarry Mine Expansion Project permit
applications (SAW-2020-00807, 1995-0991 Ver 2)
Attachments:
304-408_VuIca n_FIG_8_PROPOSE D_WOTUS_IMPACTS_MAP.pdf, 304-408
-Vulcan-Rockingham-Alternative 2_Waters_Impacts.xlsx
Follow Up Flag:
Follow up
Flag Status:
Flagged
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless verified. Report suspicious emails with the Report Message
button located on your Outlook menu bar on the Home tab.
Hi Sue,
Thankyou foryour patience. Please find attached the revised Figure 8 with the flow regimes labeled for each
stream reach and the associated Waters Impacts Table.
Let me know if you need anything else.
Best,
Lisa
Lisa Mash I Senior Project Manager
Civil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
(We Moved -New Address Below)
777 Lowndes Hill Road, Building 2, Suite 100, Greenville, SC 29607
office 864.704.0274 mobile [phone]
www.cecinc.com
Senior Leadership • Integrated Services
Personal Business Relationships
This electronic communication and any attachments are intended solely for the use of the person or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain
information that is confidential, privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law, including copyright law. If you are not the intended recipient
of this message, you are prohibited from disclosing, reproducing, distributing, disseminating or otherwise using this transmission. Please promptly notify
the sender by reply electronic communication and immediately delete this message from your system.
From: Homewood, Sue <[e-mail]>
Sent: Monday, May 20, 2024 10:01 AM
To: Mash, Lisa <Imash @cecinc.com>
Subject: RE: [External] RE: Vulcan Materials, Rockingham Quarry Mine Expansion Project permit applications (SAW-
2020-00807, 1995-0991 Ver 2)
Thank you Lisa,
In the 4011 need to list intermittent stream impacts and perennial stream impacts separately (DWR can only require
mitigation for perennial streams so we have to show them separately). I appreciate that your earlier response provided

DWR stream forms to confirm intermittent stream calls and that the PJD map shows where I/P lines are, however I'm
unable to determine lengths for the intermittent and perennial stream segments of some features based on the
information you have provided. Would you please provide me with a table of all impacts that include feature/reach ID,
intermittent or perennial, and impact length. It would be very helpful if you could provide an updated Figure 8 that
identified the intermittent and perennial reaches separately.
Thanks,
Sue Homewood (she/her/hers)
401 & Buffer Permitting Branch
Division of Water Resources
[e-mail] please note my new email address
336 813 1863 mobile
919-707-3679 office
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
From: Mash, Lisa <Imash @cecinc.com>
Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2024 9:39 AM
To: Homewood, Sue <[e-mail]>; Harmon, Richard G CIV SAW <[e-mail]>
Cc: Tony Johnson - Vulcan Materials Company ([e-mail]) <[e-mail]>; Kevin Thomas
<[e-mail]>; Mower, Christy <[e-mail]>; Holz, Raymond <[e-mail]>;
Bivins, Nathan <[e-mail]>; Polizzi, Maria <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [External] RE: Vulcan Materials, Rockingham Quarry Mine Expansion Project permit applications (SAW-
2020-00807, 1995-0991 Ver 2)
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless verified. Report suspicious emails with the Report Message
button located on your Outlook menu bar on the Home tab.
Good Morning Sue,
In response to your question below, the stream lengths/impact acreages shown on the mapping associated with
the Individual Permit correlates with the AJD,
compared to the stream lengths on the mapping provided in Attachment 2 to the DWR response letter dated
2/9/24 which correlates with the PJD.
In short, the potential impacts to WOTUS within the Preferred Alternative boundary for the Proposed Action are
correctly reflected on Figure 8 (Waters Impact Map) of the IP and as documented in the Turkey Site Mitigation Plan
as follows:
Stream Impacts —4,168 LF
Wetlands Impacts —0.12 ac
Thank you for the clarification on DWR's Public Notice requirements.
Please don't hesitate to reach out with any additional questions/requests.
Thankyou foryourtime,
Lisa
Lisa Mash I Senior Project Manager

Civil & Environmental Consultants, Inc.
(We Moved -New Address Below)
777 Lowndes Hill Road, Building 2, Suite 100, Greenville, SC 29607
office 864.704.0274 mobile [phone]
www.cecinc.com
Senior Leadership Integrated Services
Personal Business Relationships
This electronic communication and any attachments are intended solely for the use of the person or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain
information that is confidential, privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law, including copyright law. If you are not the intended recipient
of this message, you are prohibited from disclosing, reproducing, distributing, disseminating or otherwise using this transmission. Please promptly notify
the sender by reply electronic communication and immediately delete this message from your system.
From: Homewood, Sue <[e-mail]>
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2024 8:00 AM
To: Mash, Lisa <Imash @cecinc.com>; Harmon, Richard G CIV SAW <[e-mail]>
Cc: Tony Johnson - Vulcan Materials Company ([e-mail]) <[e-mail]>; Kevin Thomas
<[e-mail]>; Mower, Christy <[e-mail]>; Holz, Raymond <[e-mail]>;
Bivins, Nathan <[e-mail]>; Polizzi, Maria <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [External] RE: Vulcan Materials, Rockingham Quarry Mine Expansion Project permit applications (SAW-
2020-00807, 1995-0991 Ver 2)
Lisa,
As I was finalizing my review I noted that the lengths of streams shown in the impact map provided with the
Individual Application, and the lengths of streams shown in the mapping provided as Attachment 2 in the DWR
response dated 2/9/24 are not the same. Please provide clarification as to why these stream lengths are different
for the various features and provide accurate impact amounts that are proposed for the project. Please note that
if the impact amounts increase, the mitigation plan may need to be re-evaluated.
With regard to your question about the public notice, the USACE Public Notice satisfied the DWR Public Notice
requirements. I think when there was discussion of the Mitigation Site being permitted separately we noted that DWR
would require a separate Public Notice, but since the mitigation site has been incorporated into the quarry permit that is
no longer an issue.
Thanks,
Sue Homewood (she/her/hers)
401 & Buffer Permitting Branch
Division of Water Resources
[e-mail] please note my new email address
336 813 1863 mobile
919-707-3679 office
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
From: Mash, Lisa <Imash @cecinc.com>
Sent: Wednesday, May 8, 2024 7:02 AM
To: Homewood, Sue <[e-mail]>; Harmon, Richard G CIV SAW <[e-mail]>
Cc: Tony Johnson - Vulcan Materials Company ([e-mail]) <[e-mail]>; Kevin Thomas
<[e-mail]>; Mower, Christy <[e-mail]>; Holz, Raymond <[e-mail]>;