Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20041246 Ver 1_Information Letter_20031114iF~~d: T1P R-~?37B dra~~~ings rc~~ic~~~ meeting] Subject: [Fwd: TIP R-2237B drawings review meeting] Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 13:15:58 -0500 From: "Marshall W. Clawson PE" <mclawson@dot.state.nc.us> Organization: North Carolina Department of Transportation To: "David S. Chang" <dchang@dot.state.nc.us> FYI Subject: TIP R-22376 drawings review meeting Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 11:32:11 -0600 From: "Thomas, John T JR SAW" <John.T.Thomas.JR@saw02.usace.army.mil> To: "'mclawson@dot.state.nc.us"' <mclawson@dot.state.nc.us> CC: "Thomas, John T JR SAW" <John.T.Thomas.JR@saw02.usace.arnly.mil> Marshall, Please reference my phone call of November 13, 2003, when I informed you that I would not be able to attend your drawings review meeting scheduled November 20, 2003, for TIP R-22376. However, I would like to provide the following comments to be included in your meeting discussions: First, I have confirmed the jurisdictional determinations conducted by your consultants Stantec. - met with Stantec on December 18, 2002, and conducted onsite inspections from one end of the project to the other. Therefore, I am familiar with the steep slopes you are having to work with for the road improvement project. I have also reviewed the plans you provided. The review shows for the exception of the relocation of a s-curve at station 324.96 the project is basically a widening of the existing road alignment. The widening will result in the replacement /extension of existing road culverts and some minor wetland fill associated with widening roadway fill slopes. Review of the s-curve realignment/relocation shows the proposed plan will impact approximately 600 linear feet of jurisdictional stream channel. The plans obviously shows the public safety need to improve the alignment of this section of US 321. However, I would request that you review your designs closely to avoid and minimize stream channel impacts as much as is practically possible. Please be reminded this project is in one of the twenty-five trout water counties of North Carolina and you should seek early review and comment form the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission with regard to potential impact to trout water habitat for your proposed road improvement project. Thanks John Thomas Raleigh Regulatory Field Office 919 876-441 ext. 25 1 of ] I l/14/2U03 2A(i PM