WQ0007798_GW Monitoring_20081224

�-o
GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT
Toastmaster, Inc. - Ingraham Time Products Facility
December 2008 Groundwater
Monitoring Report
Toastmaster, Inc.
Ingraham Time Products Facility
Laurinburg, North Carolina
Permit No. WQ0007798
December 24, 2008
ERM NC, PC
1130 Situs Court, Suite 240
Raleigh, NC 27606
[phone]
JAN 0 7 2009
OR-FAYEIfEVILLE REGIONALOFRCE
RECEIVED / DENR,' Clda
Aquiferprnf.-.;.,- c.,,,FIon
JAN 05 2009

GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT
Toastmaster, Inc. - Ingraham Time Products Facility
December 2008 Groundwater
Monitoring Report
Toastmaster, Inc.
Ingraham Time Products Facility
Laurinburg, North Carolina
Permit No. WQ00O7798
December 24, 2008
Chris Cuomo, P.E.
Project Manager
t
Rick Tarravechia, P.G.
Principal -in -Charge
ERM NC, PC .
1130 Situs Court, Suite 240
Raleigh, NC 27609
[phone]
I

TABLE OF CONTENTS
LIST OF FIGURES
LIST OF TABLES
LIST OF APPENDICES
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 SCOPE OF WORK
1.2 REPORT ORGANIZATION
2.0 BACKGROUND INFORMATION
2.1 STTELOCATION
2.2 SPTEHISTORY& PREVIOUS INVESTIGATIONS
2.3 GEOLOGY& HYDROGEOLOGY
3.0 METHODOLOGY
3.1 GROUNDWATER ELEVATIONMEASUREMENTS
3.2 SAMPLE COLLECTION
4.0 GROUNDWATER MONITORING RESULTS
4.1 GROUNDWATER ELEVATIONSAND FLOW
4.2 VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUND ANALYSES
4.3 QUALITYASSURANCEIQUALITYCONTROL
5.0 DISCUSSIONAND CONCLUSIONS
i
1
1
2
2
2
5
6
6
6
7
7
7
8
9

LIST OF FIGURES
1 Site Location Map
2 Monitor Well Locations
3 Groundwater Contour Map
4 Groundwater Analytical Residts
LIST OF TABLES
1 Monitor Well Constniction Data
2 Groundwater Field Parameters
3 Groundwater Elevation Summary - November 2008
4 Groundwater Analytical Summary - November 2008
5 Historical Groundwater Analytical Summary
6 VOC Concentration Graphs vs. Time
LIST OF APPENDICES
A GROUNDWATER QUALITY MONITORING: COMPLIANCE REPORT
FORMS
B LABORATORY ANALYTICAL DATA SHEETS
ii

1.0 INTRODUCTION
This report presents the results of the November 2008 groundwater
monitoring event conducted at the Toastmaster, Inc., Ingraham Time
Products facility located at 17160 Plant Road in Laurinburg, North
Carolina. Groundwater at the site has been affected by volatile organic
compounds (VOCs). The site's remedial approach for the existing plume
of VOC affected groundwater consists of a series of recovery wells
through which VOC-impacted groundwater is extracted and transferred
to an above -ground treatment system. The treated groundwater is then re-
introduced to the surficial aquifer via an infiltration gallery. The
groundwater extraction and treatment system operates under Non -
Discharge Permit No. WQ0007798, originally issued by NCDENR on
January 26,1998. An updated permit was re -issued on February 15, 2005,
and has an expiration date of January 31, 2010. A requirement of the
permit is semi-annual monitoring of seven monitor wells at the site. This
report presents the results of the second of two semi-annual sampling
events conducted during 2008.
1.1 SCOPE OF WORK
Seven on -site monitor wells were sampled on November 13, 2008 by ERM
NC, PC (ERM) of Charlotte, North Carolina. The scope of work for this
project included:1) measurement of depth to water in seven groundwater
monitor wells (MW-3, 5, 6, 9,10,11, and 14) and the subsequent
calculation of groundwater elevations in these same wells; and 2)
collection and analysis of groundwater samples from the above -
referenced wells. The groundwater samples were analyzed for VOCs
using EPA Method 8260B, nitrates by method 353.2, nitrites by method
354.1, sulfates by method 9056, total iron by method 6010B, and ferrous.
iron by method 3500-Fe D.
1.2 REPORT ORGANIZATION
The remainder of this report is divided into five sections. Section 2.0
provides background information, previous environmental investigations,
and the site geology. Section 3.0 outlines field methodologies utilized
during this sampling event. Section 4.0 presents the results of the field
investigation and Section 5.0 provides a discussion and conclusion.
ERM 1 T:\Projects\N-Z\Toastmaster

2.0 BACKGROUND INFORMATION
2.1 SITE LOCATION
The Toastmaster facility is located at 17160 Plant Road in Laurinburg
(Scotland County), North Carolina. Figure 1 presents a site location map.
A detailed site map is included as Figure 2. The facility is situated
approximately a quarter mile northwest of the intersection of US401 and
US15/US501. The surrounding property land uses are primarily mixed
commercial and industrial. The 50-acre property contains a single
building, which is approximately 220,000 square feet in size.
2.2 SITE HISTORY & PREVIOUS INVESTIGATIONS
The following section presents a summary of historical site activities and
previous investigations. These details were obtained through a review of
historical reports, discussions with facility and corporate personnel, and
historical correspondence.
The Toastmaster facility was originally developed in 1959 as Ingraham
Time Products clock manufacturing facility. The following provides a
summary of previous site ownership:
1959-1968
Ingraham Company
1968-1980
McGraw Edison Company
1980-1983
Toastmaster, Inc.
1983-1990
Magic Chef, Inc.
1990-Present
Toastmaster, Inc.
The Toastmaster facility ceased operations in 2002. Between 2002 and
2004, the site was operated as a warehouse. During 2004, all on -site
operations ceased. Manufacturing operations formerly conducted on -site
during the lifespan of the facility included the manufacture, assembly, and
packaging of electrical clocks and timers, waffle bakers, and sandwich
toasters. Operations associated with manufacturing included the
following:
• Plastic molding: where resins are molded into parts using machinery
which heats and shapes the resin into the desired form,
sans - 1 T.\Projects\N-Z\Toastmaster

• Tooling operations: including stamping machines and drill presses,
• Silk screening: where ink is applied to the clock faces,
• Chromium and nickel electroplating: Electroplating operations were
formerly conducted in association with the manufacture of metal clock
parts,
• Wood cutting and sanding operations: where wood blanks are formed, cut
to size, and sanded, and
• Spray and dipping operations: including three dry filter paint booths and
one dip tank which are used to apply finishings to the clock bodies.
An on -site wastewater treatment plant was constructed during initial site
development in 1959. The wastewater treatment plant was used to treat
plating wastewater formerly generated at the plant .Chromium and
nickel electroplating wastewaters were treated to precipitate metals after
hexavalent chromium had been reduced to trivalent chromium. The
wastewater treatment plant included two large concrete settling tanks.
Supernatant from the settling process was routed to a large unlined
surface impoundment. Settled solids were spread in an unlined drying
bed. Supernatant from the drying beds was collected and added to the
effluent from the settling tank in the unlined surface impoundment
Liquid from the unlined surface impoundment was discharged to Irvin
Creek until 1980 when the discharge was re-routed to the sanitary sewer
system. The wastewater treatment operations were discontinued in 1984,
and the treatment plant underwent a RCRA closure. At that time,
Toastmaster voluntarily installed monitor wells to confirm the absence of
groundwater contamination. The monitor wells were sampled by both
the state agency and Toastmaster. According to the Environmental Audit
Report prepared by Water and Air Research, Inc. in 1990, no chromium,
cadmium or cyanide has been detected in the groundwater samples
collected from the wastewater treatment plant area. However, lead,
nickel, and zinc have been detected at concentrations substantially above
background levels.
ERM . 3 T.\Projmt \N-Z\Toazh Wr

A trichloroethene (TCE) recovery stillwas operated at the site by
Toastmaster from the late 1960s until the early 1990s. A fire pit where the
local fire department would practice extinguishing fires was also located
behind the building. TCE was identified in groundwater at the site in the
early 1990s.
A Site Characterization Report (SCR) was prepared by Groundwater
Technology in 1991 to define the lateral and vertical extent of TCE
contamination identified in groundwater at the site. Results of the SCR
suggested the presence of TCE and associated daughter compounds in the
vicinity of the facility and extending to the south and southwest. Three
potential source areas were identified, including:1) the area along the
northwestern side of the plant; 2) an area to the southwest of the plant in
the vicinity of the now removed waste treatment system; and 3) the area
to the.extreme south of the site where the removed waste treatment
system was relocated. TCE concentrations in groundwater at that time
ranged from 25 to 12;000 parts per billion (ppb).
No significant areas of affected soil were identified during the SCR. Nine
soil samples were collected from seven locations across the site during the
SCR. Soils were tested for TCE only using EPA Method 8010: No TCE
was detected in any of the soil samples collected. Additionally, no free
product has been detected in groundwater at the site.
As mentioned is Section 1.0, a groundwater treatment system is currently
in operation to address the TCE affected groundwater at the site. The
system operates under Non -Discharge Permit No. WQ0007798, which has
an expiration date of January 31, 2010. The treatment system includes
three recovery wells which discharge to an aeration tank and carbon
filtration system for effluent treatment. At the time of the system design,
treated groundwater could not be discharged to the municipal wastewater
treatment plant. Consequently, a 500-foot long infiltration gallery was
constructed along the northwest portion of the site to accept the effluent
discharge. Fourteen groundwater monitor wells exist at the site. In
accordance with the permit, seven of these wells (MW-3, 5, 6, 9,10,11, and
14) are sampled two times a year to monitor TCE concentrations at the
site.
ERM 4 T:\Projects\N-Z\To tm ter

A Corrective Action Plan (CAP), prepared by Richard Catlin and
Associates, was approved by the North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR) on July 2,1993. The CAP
focused on mitigation of TCE in the three potential source areas identified
in the SCR. The overall site remediation strategy consisted of the
installation of three groundwater recovery wells. Based on the lack of
detected TCE in soils, the proposed site remedy focused on the recovery
and treatment of TCE affected groundwater.
2.3 GEOLOGY & HYDROGEOLOGY
The Laurinburg area lies in the Flatwoods section of the Middendorf
Formation. Drainage is accomplished through large, sluggish streams and
swampy flood plains. The Middendorf is underlain by the Cretaceous age
Blackwoods Formation, which primarily consists of alternating clay and
fine-grained sand layers. Surficial soils consist of fine- to medium -grained
sandy clay mixtures.
The geology beneath the site is characterized by alternating clay and sand
layers and is mapped as being underlain by several aquifers. Two
significant zones of low permeability have been identified at the site.
The upper aquifer, with a reported maximum thickness of 30 feet, is
known as the Surficial Sand Aquifer. The lower aquifer is known as the
Cretaceous Sand Aquifer. The first is present at a depth of approximately
15 feet below ground surface and appears to thin out towards the south
end of the site. The second begins at a depth of approximately 45 to 50
feet below ground surface. During sampling conducted as part of the
CSR, groundwater was encountered between 12 and 17 feet below the
ground surface. Shallow groundwater velocity at the site was estimated
to be 22.1 feet per year, with a general flow direction of south-southwest.
ERM 0 T.\Projects\N.Z\Toastmaster

3.0 METHODOLOGY
3.1 GROUNDWATER ELEVATION MEASUREMENTS
Water level measurements were obtained in each sampled monitor well
using an electronic water level meter. These measurements were used to
establish the depth to groundwater in order to calculate groundwater
elevations and the hydraulic gradient across the site.
3.2 SAMPLE COLLECTION
Seven monitor wells were sampled during the November monitoring
event for VOCs, sulfate, nitrite, nitrate, total iron, and ferrous iron.
Purging was accomplished using low -flow sampling procedures with a
submersible stainless -steel pump, flow controller, and dedicated
polyethylene tubing. A single well, MW-6, was purged using a dedicated
submersible pump without a flow controller, since an apparent bend in
the well casing prevents the insertion of the slightly larger stainless steel
pump. This well was purged until parameters stabilized (indicating a
connection with the aquifer) and then was sampled with a new disposable
bailer. Each remaining monitor well was purged until field parameters
stabilized or until at least three well bore volumes were extracted.
Field measurements were collected for temperature, dissolved oxygen
(DO), pH, oxidation reduction potential (ORP), specific conductance, and
turbidity. Well construction details are presented in Table 1. A summary
of field parameter measurements is presented as Table 2. Following
purging, samples were collected in laboratory -provided containers. The
samples were placed in chilled, insulated, shipping containers and
delivered under the appropriate chain -of -custody protocol to Shealy
Environmental Services, Inc., a North Carolina -certified laboratory,
located in West Columbia, South Carolina. The collected samples were
analyzed for VOCs, nitrate, nitrite, sulfate, total iron, and ferrous iron.
After sampling each well, the water quality meter (Horiba U-22) and
stainless -steel pump were properly decontaminated. Groundwater
Quality Monitoring Compliance Report Forms (GW-59 and GW-59A) are
included as Appendix A.
earn G T.\Projects\N-Z\Toe hl ter

4.0 GROUNDWATER MONITORING RESULTS
Groundwater elevations and depths to water are presented in Table 3. A
groundwater elevation contour map is presented as Figure 3.
4.1 GROUNDWATER ELEVATIONS AND FLOW
Depth to groundwater in the sampled monitor wells ranged from 9.50 feet
below top of casing (BTOC) in MW-5 to 15.26 feet BTOC in MW-9. The
top of casing elevations have historically been measured to an arbitrary
datum of 100 feet. Based on this arbitrary datum, calculated groundwater
elevations ranged from 100.18 in MW-6 to 110.28 feet MW-5.
Groundwater flow in the surficial aquifer is to the south-southwest under
an approximate hydraulic gradient of 0.0089, as measured between
monitor wells MW-5 and MW-6 (see Figure 3). The groundwater flow
direction is consistent with historical observations.
4.2 VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUND ANALYSES
Groundwater analytical results for the current monitoring event are
presented in Table 4 and illustrated on Figure 4. A historical summary of
VOC data is presented as Table 5. A concentration versus time graph for
TCE is presented as Table6. Laboratory analytical data sheets are
presented in Appendix B. The following presents a summary of VOCs
detected at each monitor wells that was sampled:
MW-3/Duplicate
• TCE: .180/180 µg/L
• cis-1,2-DCE: 40/40 µg/L
MW-5
• TCE: 5.2 µg/L
• Chloroform 0.89 µg/L
MW-6
• TCE: 59 µg/L
• cis-1,2-DCE: 14 µg/L
ERM 7 T.\Projects\N-Z\Tmtn ter

MW-9
• TCE: 22 µg/L
• cis-1,2-DCE: 2.2 µg/L
MW-10
• TCE: 6.4 µg/L
• cis-1,2-DCE: 2.1 µg/L
MW-11
• TCE: 32 µg/L
• cis-1,2-DCE: 1.6 µg/L
MW-14
• TCE: 39 µg/L
• cis-1,2-DCE: 3.0 µg/L
• ' 1,1-DCE: 0.55 µg/L
4.3 QUALITYASSU ANCE/QUALITYCONTROL
A blind duplicate sample was collected at monitor well MW-3 during the
November 2008 monitoring event (see Table 4). The sample was
identified as Duplicate. Both of the samples (MW-3 and Duplicate) were
submitted to Shealy Environmental Services, Inc., of West Columbia,
South Carolina. The duplicate sample results correlate well:180 and 180
µg/L TCE and 40 and 40 µg/L cis-1,2-DCE, indicating that the data are
reproducible.
A trip blank was analyzed for VOCs. No analytes were detected within
the trip blank.
ERM 8 T.\Projects\N-Z\Toastmaster

5.0 DISCUSSIONAND CONCLUSIONS
Groundwater samples collected at the site during November 2008
detected four VOCs (TCE, cis-1,2-DCE,1,1-DCE, and chloroform). Of
these detected VOCs, only TCE exceeded its North Carolina groundwater
standard of 2.8 µg/L. Chloroform was only detected in one well (MW-5)
at a concentration of 0.89 µg/L, which is below the North Carolina 2L
groundwater quality standard (70 µg/L). 1,1-DCE was also detected in
one well (MW-14) at a concentration of 0.55 µg/L, which is below the 2L
groundwater quality standard of 7 µg/L. Cis-1,2-DCE was detected in 6
of 7 wells, but not in excess of the corresponding NC 21, groundwater
standard (70 µg/L).
Groundwater flow directions and hydraulic gradients during the
November 2008 monitoring event were generally correlative with
previous monitoring events conducted at the site. Field parameter values,
including pH, specific conductance, ORP, and temperature are also
correlative with past sampling events and are within realistic ranges for
the area.
TCE was detected in all seven monitor wells above the North Carolina
groundwater standard of 2.8 µg/L. The highest concentration of TCE was
detected in MW-3 (180,µg/L), which is located at the southeast corner of
the property (one of the suspected source areas). This concentration is
slightly lower than the concentration detected in MW-3 during the May
2007 sampling event (216 µg/L).
Six of seven monitor wells sampled detected the degradation product cis-
1,2-DCE. In addition, the highest levels of cis-1,2-DCE correspond with
the wells reporting the highest TCE concentrations (MW-3 and MW-6).
The presence of 1,2 cis-DCE in these and other site monitor wells suggests
that biotic reductive dechlorination of TCE is occurring throughout the
affected area.
Based on the continued presence of VOC concentrations above the North
Carolina groundwater standards, continued groundwater monitoring of
the seven monitor wells is warranted. Per the requirements of Non -
Discharge Permit No. WQ0007798, the next groundwater monitoring
event is tentatively scheduled for May 2009.
ERM 9 T:\Projects\N-Z\Toastmaster

Figures

79•Z890• 79'2 V 79'2r3P 79'27'0' 79.29M' 79•1613'
639000 6-I0e00 691000 612000 693000
% 4 w
b
Yl
' peT Hill
t �/KK'a ffii s
`�,
gv
nt .ram \%4 ��^-1�\ 1 A�.%�7�� ��,t���t•t �\��� ^ ��`����
p Y s a�ul \\ muU
$ , . m ,`' . it i G' •. �j tT,
$ At^
I +1 f tt! +Irk �� •' ✓ �, '., ti un • 'h
d k c rt .+,fix
+J. rOgrl. �... � � •Ma di n 0. {f' ala� �� 11.1� yi �- I <�t v ��'m` p
Z �:..,_.,.,•� ,v X;' I[elg + ` ii�\'� ::'•'�i R1, tZ "' 8
win
1 ` , �:_a.iF) '' '— -yam � ✓ � l�
�•` a qri� u}
v - St m • 1 1� t\
F 1 i y t _ r3x % '• ��F t 1
08tL
` p i •w � all > ti i`` x .^� . ..��i . 1.
639000 650000 641000 697000 M3000 '
79'2=1 79.260• 79'2730' 79.270' 79.26'JV 79.26V
w
I'.'[fi1009mb '
Ymu W Tm..wm W mb NM: M1:i.Ybs inrtf l
E2M NC, PC FIGURE
'�� f' - 8000 Corporate Center Drive Site Topographic Map
Suite 200 Toastmaster, Inc. 1
E12M Charlotte, NC 28226 Laurinburg, North Carolina

r\
7
n
MW-
RW-3 ® FORMER INGRAHAM
TIME PRODUCTS
FACILITY
MW-13
MW-9
®.
LEGEND
® Monitor/Recovery Well
ERM NC, PC
8000 Corporate Center Drive
ka e 200
ERM Charlootttt
Chare, NC 28226 .
WASTEWATER
TREATMENT
FACILITY
MW-10
® MW-11
�MW-1
MW-2
RW-1
MW-4 ® i
i
MW-6
Site Map (adapted from Richard Catlin &
Associates,1993)
Toastmaster, Inc.
Laurinburg, North Carolina
MW-12
0 40 80 120
FIGURE
2

107
(106.81) `RC-1
105
103
MW-9
(101.89)
101
MW-13
VW-7
LEGEND
® Monitor/Recovery Well
101 — Groundwater Contour Elevation based
on an arbitrary datum of 100 feet
ERM NC, PC
. 8000 Corporate Center Drive
ERM suite 200
Charlotte, NC 28226
MW-10
(,00.s7) a
�11
,soh
Nip
MW-
11%
RW-1 ���� -MW-3
MW-4 ® (1oo.8s)
i
MW-6
(100.18)
MW-12
0 40 80 120
FIGURE
Groundwater Contour Map - November 2008 I
Toastmaster, Inc. 3
Laurinburg, North Carolina

is
/M n
® MW-11
RC-1---__
TCE 39 5 \ TCE 32
cis-1,2-DCE 3.0 2
RW-2\ \ I :.........: I
MW-13 \�\ kMW-1
MW-2 .
RW-1 �) � -MW-3
MW-4 ® I
MW-9
® TCE 22 TCE 59
cis-1,2-DCE 2.2 cis-1,2-DCE 14 j)/1W-6
MW-12
LEGEND
® Monitor/Recovery Well
Anal a (NC 2L Std)
TCE (2.8 ug/L)
cis-1,2-DCE (70 ug/L)
1,1-DCE (7 u9/L)
Chloroform (70 ug/L)
kaERM NC, PC
8000 Corporate Center Drive
ERM Suite 200
Charlotte, NC 28226
MW-10
® TCE 6.4
cis-1,2-DCE 2.1
0 40 80 120
FIGURE
Groundwater Analytical Summary - November 2008 I
Toastmaster, Inc. 4
Laurinburg, North Carolina

Tables

TABLE 1
MONITOR WELL CONSTRUCTION DATA
TOASTMASTER, INC.
INGRAHAM TIME PRODUCTS FACILITY
LAURINBURG, NORTH CAROLINA
-W
MW-3
112.34
NA
24.84
2
NA
MW-5
119.78
NA
27.49
2
NA
MW-6
112.94
NA
37.89
NA
NA
MW-9
117.15
25
27.47
2
7-25
MW-10
110.83
25
26.80
4
6-25
117.57
25
23.15
4
6-27
IA
119.03
30
31.72
4
6-30
Notes:
TOC = top of casing
antsl = above mean sea level
bgs = below ground surface
NA = not available
TAProjects N to Z%ToastrassterNToastmaster - Raleigh\JonuaTy 2009 Annual ReporATabl"Wable I - Monitor Well Construction Data,xis

TABLE 2
NATURAL ATTENUATION AND FIELD MEASUREMENT PARAMETERS
TOASTMASTER, INC.
INGRAHAM TIME PRODUCTS FACILITY
LAURINBURG, NORTH CAROLINA
NOVEMBER 2008
S ID
-
' r f t Tem
Date Sample"de C) ' pg4.
�, gi . at ri
Cen'duettvt
os/c qt)
I{lt
,`��
(? ITT s
ORP i3F
r dr'4
-...(mtlltvolts),,
: to O
jp It)
x {ttF ,
p
k �'' 9
rtte. -;,S'ulfa,�tee{oe
a M,.
ahJrdlo
n
�'Parani ers'm /L ;. � +
�' `
s2 ron Total Iron
) -
MW-3
ll/13108
18.18
4.56
252
72
241
4.89
1.0
ND <0.02)
48
ND (<0.05)
0.13
MW-5
11/13/08
20.55
3.83
70
999+
354
6.07
0.68
ND (<0.02)
9.1
ND <0.05)
6.9
MW-6
11/13/08
19.66
4.00
265
25
244
3.25
0.32
0.02
48
ND (<0.05)
<0.1
MW-9
11/13/08
17.92
4.15
85
242
119
4.34
0.23
ND <0.02
9
3.7
9.2
MW-10
11/13/08
17.78
4.20
95
25
33
1.44
ND (<0.02)
ND <0.02
20
2.7
3.0
MW-11
11/13/08
18.72
3.92
54
14
234
6.01
0.093
ND (<0.02)
8.7
ND (<0.05)
ND <0.10
MW-14
11/13/08
17.76
5.02
214
303
-103
0.84
ND (<0.20)
ND (<0.02)
24
5.4
7
General Criteria for
Natural Attenuation
>20
5 to 9
--
--
<-100'
<0.5
< 1
---
<20
>1
---
Notes:
Water chemistryparameters were taken in thefield after each well bore volume
Data to this table represent the observed parameter values at completion of well development/purge.
Bold data indicate positive conditions for natural attenuation processes
ORP = Oxidation Reduction potential
DO = Dissolved Oxygen
ND - Not Detected above practical quantitation limits
• Indicates likely reductive pathway
T:%Projects N to Z\Toastmasteffoastmaster- Raleighl,lanuary 2009 Annual RepoMTables%Table 2 - Groundwater Field Parameters.xis

TABLE 3
GROUNDWATER ELEVATIONS SUMMARY
TOASTMASTER, INC.
INGRAHAM TIME PRODUCTS FACILITY
LAURINBURG, NORTH CAROLINA
PAGE 1 OF 2
Well No.
Top of Casing
Elevation (feet)'
112.34
Well No.
Top of Casing
Elevation (Feet)*
119.78
Well No.
Top of Casing
Elevation (feet)-
112.94
Well No.
Top of Casing
Elevation (feet)•
117.15
MW-3
Dales:
MW-5
Dates:
MW-6
Dates:
MW-9
-
Dates:
Water
Depth
(Ft BTOC)
Water
Elevation
(Ft.)
Water
Depth
(Ft. BTOC)
Water
Elevation
(Ft.)
Water
Depth
(Ft. B'fl)C)
Water
Elevation
(Ft.)
Water
Depth
(Ft BTOC)
Water
Elevation
(Ft.)
11/17/06
11.33
101.01
11/17/06
8.21
111.57
11/17/06
13.15
99.79
11/17/06
15.23
101.92
5/3/07
10.16
102.18
5/3/07 -
8.72
111.06
513107
11.57
101.37
5/3/07
10.64
106.51
5/14/08
10.65
101.69
5/14108
8.21
111.57
5114109
11.93
101.01
5114109
14.66
102.49
11/13/08
11.45
100.89
11/13/08
9.50
110.28
11/13/08
12.76
100.18
11/13/08
15.26
101.89
Ft BTOC - Feet below top of casing
• Top of Casing measured to an arbitrary datum of 100.00 feet.
gArickkoalACAMWelevations Table9.xls

TABLE 3
GROUNDWATER ELEVATIONS SUMMARY
TOASTMASTER, INC. .
INGRAHAM TIME PRODUCTS FACILITY
LAURINBURG, NORTH CAROLINA
PAGE 2 OF 2
Well No.
Top of Casing
Elevation (feet)*
110.83
Well No.
Top of Casing
Elevation (feet)*
117.57
Well No.
Top of Casing
Elevation (feet)"
119.03
MW-10
Dates:
MW-11
Dates:
MW-14
Dates:
Water
Depth
(Ft. BTOC)
Water
Elevation
(Ft.)
Water
Depth
(Ft. BTOC)
Water
Elevation
(Ft.)
7(F
r
[Elevfion
11/17/06.
11.34
99.49
HAWN
•9.87
107.70
11/17/06
12.18
106.85
513107
8.31
102.52
5/3/07
10.64
106.93
5/3/07
10.92
108.11
5/14/08
8.56
102.27
5114109
9.95
107.62
5/14/08 '
10.97
108.06
11/13/08
9.96
100.97
11/13/08
11.60
105.97
11/13/08
12.22
106.81
Ft BTOC = Feet below top of casing
• Top of Casing measured to an arbitrary datum of 100.00 feet.

TABLE 4
GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL SUMMARY
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
TOASTMASTER, INC.
INGRAHAM TIME PRODUCTS FACILITY
LAURINBURG, NORTH CAROLINA
NOVEMBER 2008
.x. '.,��,`�
EIr,,.qta
x `nalvte
Lai
`°.'
Imw3 �u hcate 0t" 5tiw+✓1�'1,1 6 L`MVR=9 "MV09ki " H 1'1 - M 1 °a
TCE
2.8
ug/L
180 180
5.2
'59 22 6.4
32
39
Cis-1,2-DCE
70
u /L
40 40
ND
14 2.2 2.1
1.6
3.0
1,1-DCE
7
u /L
ND ND
ND
ND. ND ND
ND
0.55
Chloroform
70
u /L
ND ND
0.89
ND ND ND
ND
ND
Notes:
TCE = trichloroethene
DCE = dichloroethene
ND = Not Detected above practical quantitation limit
ug/1= micrograms per liter
NC 2L Std = North Carolina 2L ground water quality standard
"Duplicate" is a duplicate sample of MW-3
Detections in excess of the respective NC 2L standard are shown in bold
Samples collected November 13, 2008
T:\Projects N to 2\Toastrnaster\Toastamter - Raleigh\January 2009 Annual Report\Tables\Table 4 - Groundwater Analytical Sumrnary.As

TABLE 5
HISTORICAL ANALYTICAL SUMMARY
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
TOASTMASTER, INC.
INGRAHAM TIME PRODUCTS FACILITY
LAURINBURG, NORTH CAROLINA
PAGE 1 of 2
ig b,
1®i AgT CtiN
r
: i}/i* x
DE P1 C19�PIL):
PiCE.e;
QIYGA7iT,CdMP©TINDS
TC �7"1 DGiza
$Y DPA a
R1
" olet DCE t t ` dtofocm:
2/25/2005
ND
87.6
ND
ND
ND
5/18/2005
ND
74.8
ND
ND
ND
11/9/2005
ND
77.1
ND
ND
ND
5/25/2006
ND
101
ND
ND
ND
M 3
11/17/2006
ND
116
ND
ND
ND
5/3/2007
ND
216
ND
ND
ND
11/30/2007
ND
155
ND
ND
ND
5/14/2008
1 0.73
180
1 ND
24
ND
11/13/2008
ND
180
ND
40
ND
2/2512005
ND
5.94
ND
ND
ND
5/18/2005
ND
10.4
ND
ND
ND
11/9/2005
ND
6.28
ND
ND
ND
5/25/2006
ND
6.59
ND
ND
ND
A 5
11/17/2006
ND
7.2
ND
ND
ND
5/3/2007
ND
5.5
ND
ND
ND
11/30/2007
ND
8.3
ND
ND
ND
5/14/2008
ND
4.5
ND
ND
1.7
11/13/2008
ND
5.2
ND
ND
0.89
2/25/2005
ND
145
ND
21.1
ND
5/18/2005
ND
214
ND
ND
ND
11/9/2005
ND
184
ND
ND
ND
5/25/2006
ND
193
ND
ND
ND
MW 6
11/17/2006
ND
181
ND
ND
ND
5/3/2007
ND
58.3
ND
ND
ND
11/30/2007
ND
173
ND
ND
ND
5/14/2008
ND
56
ND
17
ND
11/13/2008
ND
59
ND
14
ND
2/25/2005
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
5/18/2005
ND
4.57
ND
ND
ND
11/9/2005
ND
3.2
ND
ND
ND
5/25/2006
ND
24.5
ND
ND
ND
Nm-9
ll/17/2006
ND
6.2
ND
ND
ND
5/3/2007
ND
65.5
ND
ND
ND
11/30/2007
ND
1.76
ND
ND
ND
5/14/2008
ND
21
ND
3.0
ND
11/13/2008
ND
22
ND
2.2
ND

TABLE 5
HISTORICAL ANALYTICAL SUMMARY
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
TOASTMASTER, INC.
INGRAHAM TIME PRODUCTS FACILITY
LAURINBURG, NORTH CAROLINA
PAGE 2 of 2
:R��TfON
s aDAlI'Ei�s'�`�
��C1~;
T1 2? Ground�xateY $tandar is +
ON 0
2/25/2005
ND
17.6
ND
4.21
ND
5/18/2005
ND
11.3
ND
1.62
ND
11/9/2005
ND
72.1
ND
ND
ND
AM-10
5/25/2006
ND
4.82
ND"
ND
ND
11/17/2006
ND
1290
ND
456
ND
5/3/2007
ND
6.73
ND
ND
ND
11/30/2007
ND
231
ND
ND
ND
5/14/2008
0.99
12
ND
2.5
ND
11/13/2008
ND
6.4
ND
2.1
ND
2/25/2005
ND
316
ND
ND
ND
5/18/2005
ND
396
ND
ND
ND
11/9/2005
ND
294
ND
ND
ND
5/25/2006
ND
163
ND
ND
ND
MW-I1
11/17/2006
ND
76.2
ND
ND
ND
5/3/2007
ND
46.5
ND
ND
ND
11/30/2007
ND
126
1 ND
ND
ND
5/14/2008
ND
30
ND
1.7
ND
11/13/2008
ND
32
ND
1.6
ND
2/25/2005
ND
3.94
ND
ND
ND
5/18/2005
ND
4.68
ND
ND
ND
11/9/2005
ND
19.5
ND
4.28
ND
5/25/2006
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
MW-14
11/17/2006
ND
76.2
ND
ND
ND
5/3/2007
ND
6.69
ND
ND
ND
11/30/2007
ND
17
ND
ND
ND
5/14/2008
ND
16
ND
1.6
ND
11/13/2008
ND
39
0.55
3.0
ND
11/17/2006
NC GW STD
0.71
2.8
7
70
70
Notes:
PCE= tetrachloroethene,TCE= trichloroethene,DCE= dichloroethene, VOC= volatile organic compound,
ND = Not Detected (below quantization limits), ug/I = micrograms per liter, M W = monitor well,
NC OW STD = North Carolina ground water standard, NA = not available

TABLE 6
GRAPHS OF TCE AND cis-1,2-DCE CONCENTRATIONS VS. TIME
TOASTMASTER, INC.
INGRAHAM TIME PRODUCTS FACILITY
LAURINBURG, NORTH CAROLINA
Page 1 of 2
Well MW 3 -TCE
200
100
0
u g 9 g 9
3
so Well MW 3 - cis 1,2-DCE
40
30
20
--
10
p
4 4 4 4 9 4
Well MW 5 - TCE
20
5
4
3
2
1
p
Well'MW 5 - cis 1,2-DCE
15
10
--
5-
0
E z £ z 2 2 i
Well MW 6 -TCE
250
Well MW 6 - cis 1,2-DCE
200
40
30
150
20
100
so
a
10
'
0
i. 9. a
tpo
7s
a so
�
25
0
Well MW 9 -TCE
10
e -
s
m
4
2
p
Well MW 9 -cis 1,2-DCE
—
—
—
f

TABLE 6
GRAPHS OF TCE AND cis-1,2-DCE CONCENTRATIONS VS. TIME
TOASTMASTER, INC.
INGRAHAM TIME PRODUCTS FACILITY
LAURMURG, NORTH CAROLINA
Page 2 of 2
Well MW 10 - TCE
00
600
400
300
200
100
0
Well MW 10 - cis 1,2-13CE
600
450
460
350
300
250
--
-_
200
150
Ll
100
L-6-
50
0
f Z 3 2 F Z P 2
Well MW 11 -TCE
400
10Well MW 11 -cis 1,2-DCE
320
8
240
6
`d
160
4
80
2-
0
a pp ss
R
SO
60 -
40
20
0
$
�.
Well MW 14 -TCE
10Well
e
6
4
2
0 4
s
MW 14 - cis 1,2-DCE
b g
'a 3 a 3
q
z s

Appendix A
Groundwater Quality
Monitoring Compliance Report
Forms .

G`Jb'-59A COMPLIANCE REPORT FORM Permit # WQ0007798
(Suhmit one mde umnitaringpMod with GIV 59 f'am .)
1
Enter date monitoring results were due. (12-31-08) Will this monitoring report (GIN-59 and GW-59A)
YES
NO
be submitted after the established due date?
Was any required information missing on the GW-59 report forms?
YES
NO
2
IF the answer to question 1 or 2 is "YES" list in the space provided below the well identification number(s) and
explain the problems encountered in obtaining the required information.
3
Are any of the monitor wells in need of repair or maintenance (damaged casing, unlocked or missing cap, missing
YES
NO
identification plate, area overgrown, etc.)?Ijthe answer is "Yes", contact the Regional Offrcefor guidance.
Are any monitored constituents equal to or above the established standards?
YES
NO
4
If the answer to question 4 is "NO" skip to section B.
If the answer to question 4 is 'NES"list the affected wells individually with constituent(s) and concentration(s)
exceeding standards in the space provided below.,
5
For the constituents identified in question 4 above, have standards been exceeded previously for the
YES
NO
same constituent(s) In the same well(s) In the last two years? N/A
If the answer to question 5 is "NO" skip to section B.
If the answer to question 5 is 'YES", list in the space provided below, each well with constituents) exceeding
standards, concentration(s) reported, and sample collection date for each occurrence (for the last two years).
6
Are the monitoring wells listed in section 5 located at or beyond the review boundary? N/A
YES
NO
If the answer is "YES", a groundwater quality problem may be occurring. CONTACT THE REGIONAL
OFFICE IMMEDIATELY FOR GUIDANCE. If the answer is "NO" monitoring wells may be improperly
located; contact the Regional Office.
7
Is the permlttee Implementing previously approved actions required by the Division involving this
YES
NO
groundwater quality problem? N/A
If the answer to question 7 is 'YES", describe those actions in the space provided below.
if the answer to question 7 is "NO", contact the Regional Office within 90 days, an evaluation may be
required to determine the impact the waste disposal system is having at the review and compliance
boundaries surrounding this facility, Failure to do so may subject the permittee to a Notice of Violation
Fines and/or penalties.
g
The persomcompleting'this;portion (GW 59A} of Ef!e monttorng:report should s,grr below and,."submd this
foim,;with GW 59 forms,fot �equtredtveells to the address provided at the`top of ihe-rurrenf GW-'S9 form
1 hereby icknovi(edge that the above Jnformation Vitas evaluatetl and the infonnabon submitted4V thJs
report (Compliance Report GW-59A) is true and complete to y knowledge
best of fn-77
-the
Signature of Permittee (or Authorized Agent) Date
GW-59A I V8/2003

SUBMIT FORM ON YFI I OW PAPER ONLY
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT& NATURAL RESOURCES
GROUNDWATER QUALITY MONITORING:
DIVISION OF WATERQUALITY-INFORMATION PROCESSING UNIT
COMPLIANCE REPORT FORM
a
1617 MAIL SERVICE CENTER; RALEIGH, NC27699-1617 Phone:[phone]
FACILITY IN FORMATION Please print Clearly or Type
PERMIT Number: Expiration Date:
Facility Name: Toastmaster, Inc. - Ingraham Facility
Non -Discharge WQ0007798 UIC
NPDES Other
Permit Name (if different):
Facility Address: Plant Road
TYPE OF PERMITTED OPERATION BEING MONITORED
❑ Lagoon ❑ Remediation: Infiltration Gallery
(5tre81) NC 28352 County Scotland
icny) (state) 0p)
❑ Spray Field ❑ Remediation:
Contact Person: Lisa Carstarphen
Telephone#: [phone]
❑ Rotary Distributor ❑ Land Application of Sludge
Well Location/Site Name: Lat 34o47'56.6" Long 79o2747.3"
No. of wells to be sampled:
7
❑ Water Source Heat Pump ❑ Other:
(from Pemul
SAMPLING INFORMATION
If WELL
WELL ID NUMBER (from Permit): MW-31 MW-3 DUP
Date sample collected:
11-13-2008
FIELD ANALYSES:
WAS
Well Depth: 24.84 ft.
Well Diameter:
2 in.
pH 4.56 units Temp. 18.18 eC
DRY at
Depth to Water Level: 11.45 ft. below measuring point
Screened Interval:
NM ft. to NM ft. Spec. Cond. 252 µMhos
time of
sampling,
Measuring Point is NM ft. above land surface
Relative M.P. Elevation:
112.34 ft,
Odor NM
check
Volume of water pumped/bailed before sampling: 1.5 gallons
Appearance NM
here: ❑
Samples for metals were collected unfiltered: ❑ YES ❑ NO
and field acidified: ❑
YES ❑ NO
LABORATORY INFORMATION
Date sample analyzed: 11/14-21/2008
LaboratoryName: Shealy Environmental Services, Inc. Certification No. 329
PARAMETERS NOTE: Values should reflect dissolved and colloidal concentrations.
COD NA mg/l
Nitrite (NO2) as N
<0.02 mg/I
Pb - Lead NA mgn
Coliform: MF Fecal NA /100ml
Nitrate (NO3) as N
1.0 mg/I
Zn - Zinc NA mg/l
Coliform: MF Total NA /100m1 Phosphorus: Total as P
NA mg/I
(Note: Use MPN method for highly turbid samples)
Orthophosphate
NA mg/I
Other (Specify Compounds and Concentration Units):
Dissolved Solids: Total NA mg/I
Al - Aluminum
NA mg/I
cis-1,2-DCE: 40 ug/L
pH (when analyzed) NA units
Be - Barium
NA mg/l
TICE: 180 ug/L
TOC NA mg/I
Ca - Calcium
NA mg/l
Chloride NA mg/l
Cd- Cadmium
NA mg/I
Arsenic NA mg/I
Chromium: Total
NA mg/l
Grease and Oils NA mg/l
Cu - Copper
NA mgn
ORGANICS: (by GC, GC/MS, HPLC)
Phenol NA mg/l
Fe - Iron
0.13/ND mg/l
(Specify test and method #. ATTACH LAB REPORT.)
Sulfate 48 mg/I
Hg - Mercury
NA mg/I
Report Attached? ❑ Yes (1) ❑ No (0)
Specific Conductance NA µMhos
K - Potassium
NA mg/I
VOC , method # 8260B
Total Ammonia NA mg/l
Mg - Magnesium
NA mg/l
Nitrate/Nitrite method # 353.2/354.1
(Ammonia Nitrogen; NH3as N;Amnwnla Nitrogen, Total)
Mn- Manganese
NAa l
Sulfate ,method #9056
TKN as N NA mg/I
Ni - Nickel
NA nr ll
Iron/Ferrous Iron method # 6010B/3500-Fe D
GW-59 Rev. 1/2007

SUBMIT FORM ON YELLQW PAPER ONLY
NDWATER QUALITY MONITORING:
TY INFORMATION tneese runt usany, or type
Name: Toastmaster, Inc. - Ingraham Facility
Name (if different): `
Address: Plant Road
sv��l NC County Scotland
act Person: Lisa Carstarphen Telephone#:[phone] I
Location/Site Name: Lat 34047'56.6" Long 79o27'47.3" No, of wells to be sampled: 7
' gram Permit)
PLING INFORMATION =
L ID NUMBER (from Permit): MW-5 _ Date sample collected: 11/13/2008
Depth: 27.49 ft. Well Diameter: 2 in.
T to Water Level: 9.50 ft. below measuring point Screened Interval NM ft. to NM ft.
luring Point is NM. ft. above land surface Relative M.P. Elevation:. 119.78 ft,
ne of water pumpedibailed before sampling: 1.08 gallons
sample
COD NA mg/I
Coliform: MF Fecal NA /100ml
Coliform:.MFTotal NAmoom1
(Note: Use MPN method for highly turbid samples)
Dissolved Solids: Total - NA mg/I
pH (when analyzed). NA units
TOC
Chloride
Arsenic
NA mg/l
NA mg/I
NA mg/I
Grease and Oils
NA mg/I
Phenol
NA mgA
Sulfate
9.1.mg/l.
Specific Conductance
NA µMhos
Total Ammonia
NA mg/I
(Ammnnie Nitrogen; NH3 as N: Ammonle
Nitrogen, Total)
TKN as N NA
Number:
;harge W00007798
Expiration Date:
UIC
Other
UNIT
'PE OF PERMITTED OPERATION BEING MONITORED
❑ Lagoon ❑ Remediation: Infiltration Gallery
❑ Spray Field ❑ Remediation:
❑ RotaryDistributor ❑ Land Application of Sludge
❑ Water Source Heat Pump ❑ Other:
FIELD ANALYSES:'
pH 3.83 units
Spec. Cord.
Odor NM
Appearance NM
Laboratory Name: Shealy. Environmental Services, Inc.
Tidal concentrations. -
Nitrite (NO2) as N <0.02 mgA Pb- Lead
Nitrate (NO3) as N 0.68mg/I Zn - Zinc
Phosphorus: Total as P
NA mg/I
Orthophosphate
NA mg/I
AI - Aluminum
NA mgll
Be - Barium
_ NA nr l
Ca - Calcium _.
NA mgll
Cd - Cadmium
NA mg/I
Chromium: Total
NA mg/l
Cu - Copper
NA mgA
Fe - Iron
6.9/ND mg/l
Hg - Mercury
NA mg/I
K- Potassium
NAni
Mg - Magnesium
NA mg/I
Mn- Manganese
NA mgA
Ni - Nickel
NA mg/I
Temp. 20.55 eC DRY at
70 Whos time of
Certification No. 329
NA mg/I
NA mg/I
Other (Specify Compounds and Concentration Units):
Chloroform 0.89 ug/L .
TCE , 5.2 ug/L
ORGANICS: (by GC, GC/MS, HPLC)
(Specify test and method #. ATTACH LAB REPORT.)
Report Attached?
❑ Yes (1) ❑ No (0)
VOC
method # 8260B
Nitrate/Nitrite
method # 353.2/354.1
Sulfate
method # 9056.
Iron/Ferrous Iron
method # 601OB/3500-Fe D
For Remediation Systems Only (Attach Lab Reports): Influent Total VOCs: mg/L Effluent Total VOCs: mg/L VOC Removal%
Michael Pressley
Permittee (or Authorized Agent) Name and Tige - Please print or type Signature of Permittee (or Authorized F
GW-59 Rev. 112007

SUBMIT FORM ON YEI i OW PAPER ONLY
EPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT B NATURAL RESOURCES
GROUNDWATER QUALITY MONITORING:
IVISION OF WATER QUALITYdNFORMATION PROCESSING UNIT
COMPLIANCE REPORT FORM
617MAIL SERVICE CENTER, RALEIGH.NC27699.1617 Phone:[phone]
FACILITY INFORMATION - Please Pilaf Clearly or Type
PERMIT Number: Expiration Date:
Facility Name: Toastmaster, Inc. - Ingraham Facility
Non -Discharge WQ0007798 UIC
NPDES Other _
Permit Name.(if different): - _.
Facility Address: Plant Road
TYPE OF PERMITTED OPERATION: BEING MONITORED
❑ Lagoon ❑ Remediation: Infiltration Gallery
(Street) NC 28352 - County Scotland
(city) (lam) (zle)
❑ Spray Field ❑ Remediation:
Contact Person: Lisa Carstarphen
Telephone#:[phone]
❑ Rotary Distributor Land Application of Sludge
Well Location/Site Name: Let 34047'56.6" Long 79o27'47.3" No. of wells to be sampled: 7
❑ Water Source Heat Pump ❑ Other:
-
from Permit
SAMPLING INFORMATION
-
If WELL
WELL ID NUMBER(from,Permit): MW-6 ..
Date sample collected: 11/13/2008
FIELD ANALYSES:
WAS
Well Depth: 37.89ft.
Well Diameter: NM in.
pH 4.00 units Temp. 19;66 eC
DRY at
Depth to Water Level: 12.76 ft. below measuring point
Screened Interval: NM ft.
to NM
ft. Spec. Cond. 265 µMhos
time of
Measuring Point is NM ft. above land surface
Relative M.P. Elevation: 112.94ft.
Odor NM_
sampling,check
Volume of water pumped/bailed before sampling:
10 gallons
Appearance NM
here: ❑
Samples for metals were collected unfiltered: DYES
❑ NO and field acidified: ❑YES
❑ NO
'
LABORATORY INFORMATION
Date sample analyzed: 11114-21/2008 _
Laboratory Name: Shealy Environmental Services, Inc. Certification No. 329
PARAMETERS NOTE: Values should reflect dissolved and colloidal concentrations.
-
COD NA mg/I
Nitrite (NO.) as N
0.02 mg/I
Pb - Lead NA mg/l
Coliform: MF Fecal NA /100ml
Nitrate (NO3) as N
0.32 mg/I
Zn - Zinc NA mg/I _
Coliform: MF Total NA moom1
Phosphorus: Total as P
NA mg/I
(Nots:'Use MPN method for highly turbid samples)
Orthophosphate
NA.mg/1
Other (Specify Compounds and Concentration Units):
Dissolved Solids: Total .NA mg/I
AI -Aluminum
NA mgA
cis-1,2-DCE 14ug/L
pH (when analyzed) NA units
Be - Barium
NA mgA
TICE 59 ug/L.
TOC NA mg/I
Ca - Calcium
NA mgA
_
Chloride NA mg/I
Cd - Cadmium
NA mg/I
Arsenic NA mg/I
Chromium: Total
NA mg/I
'
Grease and Oils NA mgA
Cu - Copper
NA mgA
ORGANICS: (by GC, GC/MS, HPLC)
Phenol _ NA mg/I
Fe - Iron
ND mgA
(Specify test and method #. ATTACH LAB REPORT.),
Sulfate 48 mg/l
Hg - Mercury
NA mgA
Report Attached? ® Yes (1) ❑ No (0)
' Specific Conductance NA µMhos
K —.Potassium
NA mg/1
VOC , method # 8260B
Total Ammonia NA mg/I,
Mg - Magnesium
NA mg/I
Nitrate/Nitrite method # 353.2/354.1
(AmmonmPOmgen;NHsasNtAmmoolaNitrogen. Totel)
Mn- Manganese
NA mgA
Sulfate method# 9056
TKN as N NA mg/I
Ni - Nickel
NA mgA
Iron/Ferrous Iron method # 601 OB/3500-Fe D
For Remediation Systems Only (Attach Lab Reports): Influent Total VOCs:- mg/L Effluent Total VOCs: mg/L VOC Removal%
Michael Pressley
Permittee (or Authorized Agent) Name and Tide_- Please print or type - Signature of Permittee (or Authorized Agent) (Date)
GW-59 Rev. 1/2007

UNLY
111aaMIJ EPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT &'NATURAL RESOURCES
GROUNDWATER QUALITY MONITORING: IVISION'OF WATER QUALITY -INFORMATION PROCESSING UNIT
COMPLIANCE REPORT FORM 617MAIL SERVICE CENTER. RALEIGH.NC276994617 Phonoif9191733-3221
Name: Toastmaster, Inc. - IngrahamFacility
Name (if different):
Address: Plant Road
(sire.) NC 28352 County Scotland
act Person: Lisa Carstarphen Telephone#:[phone]
Location/Site Name: Let 34o47'56.6" Long 79o27'47.3" No. of wells to be sampled:
L ID NUMBER (from Permit): -MW-9
Depth: 27.47 ft,
1 to Water Level: 15.26 ft. below measuring point
uring Point is NM ft. above land surface
ne of water pumped/bailed before sampling:
sample
COD _
NA mg/I
Coliform: MF Fecal
NA /100ml
Coliform: MF Total
NA /100m1
(Note: Use MPN method for highly turtld samples)
Dissolved Solids: Total
NA mgn
pH (when analyzed) _. _
NA units
TOC
NA mg/I
Chloride
NA mg/I
Arsenic
NA.mg/I
Grease and Oils
NAmg/l,
Phenol
NA mg/1
Sulfate
9 mg/I
Specific Conductance .
NA µMhos
Total Ammonia
NA mg/I
•(Ammonia Nitrogen; 1,11-13as N;Ammonie Nitrogen, Total)
TKN as N NA
Date sample collected: 11/13/2008
Well Diameter: 2 in. -
Screened Interval: 7 ft. to 25 ft.
Relative M.P. Elevation: 117.15 ft,
2.9 gallons
Number: Expiration Date:
harge WQ0007798 UIC_
Other
'PE OF PERMITTED OPERATION BEING MONITORED
❑ Lagoon ❑ Remediation:.Infiltration Gallery
❑ Spray Field ❑ Remediation:
❑ Rotary Distributor ❑ Land Application of Sludge
❑ Water Source Heat Pump ❑ Other:
FIELD ANALYSES: WAS
pH 4.15 units Temp. 17.92 iOc DRY at
Spec. Cond. 11.2 µMhos time of
Odor NM samplin
check
Appearance NM here: ,r
Laboratory Name: Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.
colloidal concentrations.
Nitrite (NO2) as N <0.02 mg/1 Pb - Lead
Nitrate (NO3) as N 0.23 mg"
Certification No. 329'
NA mg/I
Zn - Zinc PIA m9/1
Phosphorus: Total as P
NA mgll
Orthophosphate
NA mg/I Other (Specify Compounds and Concentration Units):
AI - Aluminum
- NA mgn cis-1,2-DCE 2.2 ug/L
Be,- Barium
NA mg/I TICE - 22 ug/L
Ca- Calcium
NA mall
Cd - Cadmium ..
NA mg/1
Chromium: Total
NA mg/I
Cu - Copper
_ NA mg/I
Fe - Iron
9.2/3.7 mg/I.
Hg - Mercury
NA mg/I
K- Potassium
NA mg/1
Mg -Magnesium.
NA mg4
Mn - Manganese
_ NA n l
Ni -Nickel
NA mg/I
ORGANICS: (by GC, GC/MS, HPLC)
(Specify test and method #. ATTACH LAB REPORT.)
Report Attached?
® Yes (1) ❑ No (0)
VOC
method # 8260B
Nitrate/Nitrite
method # 353.2/354.1
Sulfate
method # 9056
Iron/Ferrous Iron
method # 6010B/3500-Fe'D
For Kernerllation systems Only (Attach Lab Reports): Intluent Total VOOs: mg/L Effluent Total VOIDS: mg/L VOC Removal%
Michael Pressley_ -� 12/22I2008
Permittee (or Authorized Agent) Name and Tige - Please print or type Signature of Fermittee (or Authorized Agent) (Date)
GW-59 Rev. 1/2007

SUBMIT FORM. ON YELLOW PAPER ONLY
EPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT 3 NATURAL RESOURCES
GROUNDWATER QUALITY MONITORING:
7MVISION
OFWATER QUALITY -INFORMATION PROCESSING UNIT
COMPLIANCE REPORT FORM- -
617 MAIL SERVICE CENTER, RALEIGH, NC 276994617 Phone: [phone]
FACILITY INFORMATION Please Print Clearly or
Type
IERMIT
Number: Expiration Date:
Facility Name: Toastmaster, Inc. - Ingraham .Facility
on -Discharge WQ0007798 UIC
- - -- -OtherFacility
Permit Name(ifdifferent): - -_ - --�.. — -PDES
Address: Plant Road
YPE OF PERMITTED OPERATIONBEING MONITORED
❑ Lagoon ❑ Remediation: Infiltration Gallery
(si NC County Scotland
(City) (sti (zip)
❑Spray Field El Remediation: '
Contact Person: Lisa Carstarphen
Telephone#; 954-883-1025
❑ Rotary Distributor ❑ Land Application of Sludge
Well Location/Site Name: Lat 3401 Long 79o27'47.3"
No. of wells to be sampled: 7.2/2.4
❑ Water Source Heat Pump ❑ Other:
fmm P-,
'
SAMPLING INFORMATION
-
- - -
If WELL
WELL ID NUMBER (from Permit): MW-10
Date sample collected:
11/13/2008
FIELD ANALYSES:
WAS
Well Depth: 26.8ft..
Well Diameter:
4 in.
pH 4.20 units Temp. 17.78 eC
DRY of
Depth to Waler.Level: 9.86 ft. below measuring point
Screened Interval:
ft. to
ff. Spec. Cond. 95 µMhos
time of
Measuring Point is NM ft. above land surface
Relative M.P. Elevation:
_6 _L
110.83 ft.
Odor NM 'check
sampling,
Volume of water pumped/balled before sampling: 1.0 gallons
_
Appearance NM
here: ❑
Samples for metals were collected unfiltered: OYES ❑ NO
and field acidified: ❑ YES ❑ NO
LABORATORY INFORMATION
Date sample analyzed: 11/14-21/2008
Laboratory Name: _Shealy Environmental Services, Inc. Certification No. 329
PARAMETERS NOTE: Values should reflect dissolved and colloidal concentrations.
COD NA mg/I
Nitrite (NO.) as N
ND mg/I
Pb- Lead NA mg/I"
Coliform: MF Fecal NA 1100mI.
Nitrate (NO3) as N
ND mgll
Zn -Zinc NA mg/I -
Colifonn: MF Total NA /100m1 Phosphorus: Total as
NA mg/I
(Note: Use MPN method for highly turbid samples)
Orthophosphate
NAmg/I
Other (Specify Compounds and Concentration Units):
Dissolved Solids: Total NA mg/1
AI - Aluminum
NA mg/I
cis-1,2-DCE _ 2.1 ug/L
pH (when analyzed) NA units
Be - Barium
NA mg/I
TICE 6.4 ug/L
TOG NA mg/I -
Ca - Calcium
NA mg/I
Chloride NA mg4
Cd - Cadmium
NA mg/l
Arsenic NA mg/I
Chromium: Total
NA mg/I
Grease and Oils NA mg/l
Cu-. Copper
NA mg/I
ORGANICS: (by GC, GC/MS, HPLC)
Phenol NA mg4
Fe - Iron
3.0/2.7 mg/I
(Specify test and method #. ATTACH LAB REPORT.) '
Sulfate - 20. mg/I
Hg - Mercury
NA mg/I
Report Attached? ® Yes (1) ❑ No (0) -
Specific Conductance NA µMhos
K - Potassium
NA-mg/I
VOC , method # 8260B
Total Ammonia _ NA mg/I
Mg - Magnesium
NA mg4
Nitrate/Nitrite method # 353.2/354.1
(Ammonia Nitrogen; NH,.. N;Ammerlla Nitrogen, Total)
Mn- Manganese
NA mg/I
Sulfate ,method# 9056
TKN as N NA mg/I
Ni - Nickel
NA mg4
Iron/Ferrous Iron method # 6010B/3500FeD
For Remediation Systems Only (Attach Lab Reports): Influent Total VOCs: mg/L Effluent Total VOCs: mg/L VOC Removal%
.Michael Pressley I
_ l� &��-aii 12/22/2008
Peneirae(orAuthonzed Agent) Name and Title -Please print or type Signature of Permittee(or Authorized Agent) - - (Dale)
GW-59 Rev. 112007

SUBMIT FORM ON VFI I OW PAPER ONLY
NDWATER QUALITY MONITORING:
LIANCE REPORT FORM
Name: Toastmaster, Inc. - Ingraham Facility
Name (if different):
Address: Plant Road
(Svaap NC
(z,P)
county Scotland
act Person: Lisa Carstarphen Telephone#:[phone]
Location/Site Name: Lat 34o47'56.6" Long 79o27'47.3" No. of wells to be sampled: 7
LID NUMBER (from Permit): MW-11
Depth: - 23.15 ft.
i to Water Level: 11.60 ft. below measuring point
uring Point is NM ft. above land surface
ne of water pumped/bailed before sampling: 1.32
sample
COD
NA mg/I
Coliform: MF Fecal
NA /100ml
Coliform: MF Total
NA /10omi
(Not.: Use MPN method for highly t.rbld samples)
Dissolved Solids: Total
NA mg/I
pH (when analyzed)
NA units
TOG
NA mg/I
Chloride
NA mg/I
Arsenic
NA mg/I
Grease and Oils
NA mg/1
Phenol
NA ni
Sulfate
8.7 ni
Specific Conductance
NA µMhos
Total Ammonia
NA mg/I
(Ammonia Nitrogen; NHr as N; Ar monia Nitrogen, Total)
TKN as N NA mg/I
Date sample collected: 11/13/2008
Well Diameter: 4 in.
Screened Interval: 6 ft. to
Relative M.P. Elevation: 117.57 ft.
TENT OF ENVIRONMENT S NATURAL RESOURCES
OF WATER QUALITY -INFORMATION PROCESSING UNIT
MAIL SERVICE
Number:
:harge WQ0007798
I. NC 27699.1617 Phone:
Expiration Date: _
UIC
Other
733-3221
'PE OF PERMITTED OPERATION BEING MONITORED
❑ Lagoon ❑ Remediation: Infiltration Gallery
❑ Spray Field ❑ Remediation:
❑ Rotary Distributor ❑ Land Application of Sludge
❑ Water Source Heat Pump ❑
FIELD ANALYSES:
pH 3.92 units Temp. 18.72 "C DRY at
25 ft. Spec. Cond. 54 µMhos time of
samplin
Odor NM chart,
Appearance NM
Laboratory Name: Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.
colloidal concentrations.
Nitrite (NO2) as N ND mg/I Pb - Lead
Certification No. 329
NA mg/l
Nitrate (NO3) as N 0.093 mg" Zn - Zinc NA mg/I
Phosphorus: Total as P NA mg/I
Orthophosphate NA mg/I Other (Specify Compounds and Concentration Units):
Al -Aluminum NA mg/I cis-1,2-DCE 1.6 ug/L
Be - Barium NA mg/I TICE 32 ug/L
Ca - Calcium NA
Cd - Cadmium
NA al
Chromium: Total
NA mg/I
Cu - Copper
NA mg/I
Fe - Iron
ND/ND mg/I
Hg - Mercury
NA mg/l
K - Potassium
NA mg/I
Mg - Magnesium
NA mg/I
Mn - Manganese
NA mg/I
Ni- Nickel
mg/I
ORGANICS: (by GC, GC/MS, HPLC)
(Specify test and method M ATTACH LAB REPORT.)
Report Attached?
® Yes (1) ❑ No (0)
VOC
, method # 8260B
Nitrate/Nitrite
, method # 353.2/354.1
Sulfate
, method # 9056
Iron/Ferrous Iron
method # 6010B/3500Fe D
For Remediation Systems Only • •
1 certify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, the Information submitted In this report is true, accurate; and complete, and that the laboratory analytical data was produced using approved methodsof analysis by a
DWO-cenifiedlaboratory. I am aware that there are si nficant nenalties'for submittin false information, includinp the ssibili of fines and im risonment for knowino violations.
Michael Pressley
11:
Permittee (or Authorized Agent) Name and Tifle - Please print or type Signature of Perm iftee (or Authorized Agent)
r.
GW-59 Rev. 11

SUBMIT FORM ON YELLOW PAPER ONLY
EPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT& NATURAL RESOURCES
GROUNDWATER QUALITY MONITORING:
IVISION OF WATER QUALITY-INFORMATIONPROCESSING UNIT
COMPLIANCE REPORT FORM
617 MAIL SERVICE CENTER, RALEIGH, NC 27699.1617 Phone: [phone]
FACILITY INFORMATION !lease Print Clearly or
Type
PERMIT Number: Expiration Date:. .
Facility Name: Toastmaster, Inc. - Ingraham Facility
Non -Discharge W00007798 UIC
NPDES" Other '
Permit Name (if different): .
Facility Address: Plant Road
TYPE OF PERMITTED OPERATION BEING MONITORED
❑ Lagoon ❑ Remediation: Infiltration Gallery
Ist,W) NC County Scotland
(City) (stum) tap)
•
El Spray Field ❑Remediation:
Contact Person: Lisa Carstarphen
Telephone#:[phone]
❑ Rotary Distributor ❑ Land Application of Sludge
Well Location/Site Name: Let 34047'56.6" Long 79o2747.3"
No. of wells to be sampled: 7
❑ Water Source Heat Pump ❑ Other:
(from Permit
SAMPLING INFORMATION -
If WELL
WELL ID NUMBER (from Permit): MW-14
_
Date sample`collected: 11/13/2008.
FIELD ANALYSES:
WAS
Well Depth: 31.72 ft.
Well Diameter:. 4 in.
_
pH 5.02 units Temp. 17.76 "C
DRY at
Depth to Water Level: 12.22 ft. below measuring point
Screened Interval: 6 ft.
to 25
ft. Spec. Cond. 17.8 µMhos
time
MeasuringPoint is NM ft. above land surface
119.03
Relative M.P. Elevation: ft.
Odor NM
li
sampling,
check .
Volume of water pumpedlbailed before sampling: 1.37 gallons
_ _
Appearance NM
here:❑
Samples for metals were collected unfiltered: DYES ❑ NO
- and field acidified: ElYES
❑ NO
LABORATORY INFORMATION
Date sample analyzed: 11/14-21/2008
-
LaboratoryName: Shealy Environmental Services, Inc. Certification No. 329
PARAMETERS NOTE: Values should reflect dissolved and colloidal concentrations.
_
COD. NA mg/I
Nitrite (NO2) as N
ND mg/I
Pb-'Lead NA mg/I
Coliform: MF Fecal NA A00ml
Nitrate (NO3) as N
ND mgA
Zn - Zinc NA. mg/I
Coliform: MF Total NA /100m1 Phosphorus: Total as P
NA mg/I
(Note: use MPN memod for highly tumid samples)
Orthophosphate-
NA mg/I
Other (Specify Compounds and Concentration Units):
Dissolved Solids: Total NA mg/l
Al -Aluminum
NA mg/l
CIS-1,2-DCE 3 ug/L
pH (when analyzed) = NA units
Ba - Barium
NA mg/l
TICE 39 ug/L
TOC NA ni
Ca -Calcium
NA mgA
1,1-DCE 0.55 ug/L
Chloride NA mgll
Cd - Cadmium
NA mg/l
Arsenic NA mg/I
Chromium: Total
NA mg/I
Grease and Oils NA ri
Cu - Copper
NA mg/I
ORGANICS`. (by GC, GC/MS, HPLC)
Phenol NA ni
Fe - Iron
7/5.4 mg/I
(Specify test and method #. ATTACH LAB REPORT.)
Sulfate 24 mg/I
Hg - Mercury
NA mg/I
Report Attached? ® Yes (1) ❑ No (0)
Specific Conductance NA µMhos
K- Potassium
NA mgA
VOC ,method '# 8260E .
Total Ammonia NA mg/I
Mg - Magnesium
NA mg/l
Nitrate/Nitrite method # 353.2/354.1 -
(Ammonia Nitrogen; NHaaa N; A=onla Nitrogen, Total)
Mn - Manganese
NA mg/I
Sulfate method # 9065
TKN as N NA mgA
Ni - Nickel
NA mg/l
Iron/Ferrous Iron method # 601 OB/350OFe D
For Remediation Systems Only (Attach Lab Reports): Influent Total VOCs: mg/L Effluent Total VOCs: mg/L VOC Removal%
Michael Pressley % r� 1-
Pennittee (or Authorized Agent) Name and Title -Please print or type Signature of Perri
GW-59 Rev. 112007 `

Appendix B
Laboratory Analytical Data
Sheets - Ground Water

SHEALY ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
Report of Analysis
ERM-Southeast, Inc
8000 Corporate Center Drive
Suite 200
Charlotte, NC 28226
Attention: Michael Pressley
Project Name: Toastmaster
Project Number:0084651
Lot Number:JK14063
Date Completed:11/2512008
Michael Casalena
Project Manager
}E� 11t FCCago'
o� a. yo
w1
L�_�1r�6A.. i
U
This report shall not be reproduced, except in its entirety, without the written approval of Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.
The following non -paginated documents are considered part of this report: Chain of Custody Record and Sample Receipt Checklist.
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc. Page: 1 of 27
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 (803) 791-970D Fax [phone] v .shealylab.ocm Level 1 Repon v2.1

SHEALY ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
SC DHEC No: 32010 NELAC No: E87653 NC DEHNR No: 329
Case Narrative
ERM-Southeast, Inc
Lot Nuintier: JK14063
This Report of Analysis contains the analytical results) for the sample(s) listed on the Sample Summary following this Case Narrative. The sample
receiving date is documented In the header information associated with each sample.
Sample receipt, sample analysis, and data review have been performed in accordance with the most current approved NELAC standards, the
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc. ("Shealy") Quality Assurance Management Plan (CAMP), standard operating procedures (SOPS), and Shealy
policies. Any exceptions to the NELAC standards, the CAMP, SOPS or policies are qualified on the results page or discussed below.
If you have any questions regarding this report please contact the Shealy Project Manager listed on the cover page.
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc. - Page: 2 of 27
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] mmv.shealylab.cum Level Report v2.1

SHEALY ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
Sample Summary
ERM-Southeast, Inc
Lot Number: JK14063
Sample Number
Sample ID
Matrix
Date Sampled
Date Received
001
MW-3
Aqueous
11113/20081725
11/14/2008
002.
MW-5
Aqueous
11/13120081115
11/14/2008
003
MW-6
Aqueous
11/13/20081625
11/14/2008
004
MW-9
Aqueous
11/13/20081415
11/14/2008
005
MW-10
Aqueous
11/13/20081225
11/14/2008
006
MW-11
Aqueous
11/13120081520
11/14/2008
007
MW-14
Aqueous
11/13/20081315
11/14/2008
008
DUPLICATE
Aqueous
11/13/2008
11/14/2008
009
TRIP BLANK
Aqueous
11/14/2008 1525
11/14/2008
(9 samples)
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc. Page: 3 of'27
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] vmnv.shealylab.com Level 1 Report v2.1

SHEALY ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
Executive Summary
ERM-Southeast, Inc
Lot Number: JK14063
Sample Sample ID
Matrix
Parameter
Method
Result Q
Units
Page
001
MW-3
Aqueous
Ferric Iron (calculation)
SM3500/6010
0.12
mg/L
5
001
MW-3
Aqueous
Nitrate -N
353.2
1.0
mg/L
5 '
001
MW-3
Aqueous
Sulfate
9056
48
mg/L
5
001
MW-3
Aqueous
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
8260B
40
ug/L
6
001
MW-3
Aqueous
Trichloroethene
8260E
180
ug/L
6
001
MW-3
Aqueous
Iron
6010B
0.13
mg/L
7
002
MW-5
Aqueous
Ferric Iron (calculation)
SM350016010
6.9
mg/L
8
002
MW-5
Aqueous
Nitrate -N
353.2
0:68
mg1L
8
002
MW-5
Aqueous
Sulfate
9056
9.1
mg/L
8
002
MW-5
Aqueous
Chloroform
8260B
0.89
ug/L
9
002
MW-5
Aqueous
Trichloroethene
8260E
5.2
ug/L
9
002
MW-5
Aqueous
Iron
6010B
6.9
mg/L
10
003
MW-6
Aqueous
Nitrate -N
353.2
0.32
mg/L
11
003
MW-6
Aqueous
Nitrite - N
353.2 REV 2
0.020
mg/L
11
003
MW-6
Aqueous
Sulfate
9056
48
mg/L
11
003
MW-6 -
Aqueous
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
8260B
14
ug/L
12
003
MW-6
Aqueous
Trichloroethene
8260B
59
ug/L
12
004
MW-9
Aqueous
Ferric Iron (calculation)
SM350016010
5.5
mg/L
14
004
MW-9
Aqueous
Ferrous Iron
SM 3500-Fe D
3.7
mg/L
14
004
MW-9
Aqueous
Nitrate -N
353.2
0.23
mg/L
14
004
MW-9
Aqueous
Sulfate
9056
9.0
mg/L
14
004
MW-9
Aqueous
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
8260E
2.2
uglL
15
004
MW-9
Aqueous
Trichloroethene
8260B
22
ug/L
15
004
MW-9
Aqueous
Iron
6010B
9.2
mglL
16
005
MW-10
Aqueous
Ferric Iron (calculation)
SM350016010
0.33
mg/L
17
005
MW-10
Aqueous
Ferrous Iron
SM 3500-Fe D
2.7
mg/L
17
005
MW-10
Aqueous
Sulfate
9056
20
mg/L
17
005
MW-10
Aqueous
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
8260B
2.1
ug/L
18
005
MW-10
Aqueous
Trichloroethene
8260B
6.4
ug/L
18
005
MW-10
Aqueous
Iron
6010B
3.0
mg/L
19
006
MW-11
Aqueous
Nitrate -N
353.2
0.093
mg/L
20
006
MW-11
Aqueous
Sulfate
9056
8.7
mg/L
20
006
MW-11
Aqueous
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
8260B
1.6
ug/L
21
006
MW-11
Aqueous
Trichloroethene
8260B
32
ug/L
21
007
MW-14
Aqueous
Ferric Iron (calculation)
SM350016010
1.6
mg/L
23
007
MW-14
Aqueous
Ferrous Iron
SM 3500-Fe D
5.4
mg/L
23
007
•MW-14
Aqueous
Sulfate
9056
24
mg/L
23
007
MW-14
Aqueous
1,1-Dichloroethene
8260B
0.55
ug/L
24
007
MW-14
Aqueous
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
8260B
3.0
ug/L
24
007
MW-14
Aqueous
Trichloroethene
8260B
39
ug/L
24
007
MW-14
Aqueous
Iron
6010B
7.0
mg/L
25
008
DUPLICATE
Aqueous
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
8260B
40
ug/L
26
008
DUPLICATE
Aqueous
Trichloroethene
8260B
180
ug/L
26
(43 detections)
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc. Page: 4 of 27
106 Vantage Paint Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.shealylab.com Level 1 Report v2.1

Inorganic non-metals
Client: ERM-Southeast, Inc Laboratory ID: JK14063-001
Description: hill Matrix: Aqueous
Dale Sampled:11/13120081725
Date Received: 1111412008
Run Prep Method
Analytical Method
Dilution
Analysis Date Analyst
Prep Date
Batch
1
(Ferric Iron )
1
11/18/2008 1502 MNM
1
(Ferrous Iron) SM
1
11/14/2008 2343 PMM
90189
1
(Nitrate - N) 353.2
1
11/15/2008 1040 RLM
90048
1 (Nitrite
- N) 353.2 REV 2
1
11/15/2008 1040 RLM
90045
1
(Sulfate) 9056
1
11/21/2008 1521 DAS
90485
CAS Analytical
Parameter
Number Method
Result Q
PQL
Units
Run
Ferric Iron (calculation)
SM350016010B
0.12
0.10
mglL
1
Ferrous Iron
SM 3500-Fe D
ND
0.050
mg/L
1
Nitrate - N
353.2
1.0
0.020
mglL
1
Nitrite - N
353.2 REV 2
ND
0.020
mg/L
1
Sulfate
9056
48
1.0
mglL
1
PQL= Practical quantitation limit B= Detected in the method blank E= Quanta0on of compound exceeded the calibration range
ND= Not detected at or above the PQL J=Estimated result <PQL and_I MDL P=The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40%
Where applicable, all soil sample analysis are reported on a dry weight basis unless flagged wim avv. N= Recovery is out of criteria
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc. Page: 5 of 27
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.shealylab.com Level 1 Report v2.1

Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS
Client: ERM-Southeast, Inc Laboratory ID: JK14063-001
Description: MW-3 Matrix: Aqueous
Date Sampled:1111312008 1725
Date Received: 1111412008
Run Prep Method Analytical Method
Dilution Analysis Date
Analyst
Prep Date
Batch
1 50309 8260B
1 11/18/2008 1701
DLB
90194
CAS Analytical
Parameter
Number Method
Result Q
PQL
Units
Run
Bromodichloromethane
75-27-4
8260B
ND
0.50
ug/L
1
Bromoform
75-25-2
8260D
ND
0.50
ug/L
1
Bromomethane (Methyl bromide)
74-83-9 -
8260B
ND
0.50
ug/L
1
Carbon tetrachloride
56-23-5
8260B
ND
0.50
ug/L
1
Chlorobenzene
108-90-7
8260E
ND
0.50
uglL
1
Chloroethane
75-00-3
8260B
ND
0.50
ug/L
1
Chloroform
67-66-3
8260B
ND
0.50
ug/L
1
Chloromethane (Methyl chloride)
74-87-3
8260E
ND
0.50
ug/L
1
Dibromochloromethane
124-48-1
8260E
ND
0.50
ug/L
1
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)
106-93-4
8260B
ND
0.50
ug/L
1
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
541-73-1
8260B
ND
0.56
ug/L,
1
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
95-50-1
8260E
ND
0.50
ug/L
1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
106-46-7
8260B
ND
0.50
ug/L
1
1,1-Dichloroethane
75-34-3
8260B
ND
0.50
ug/L
1
1,2-Dichloroethane
107-06-2
8260B
ND
0.50
ug/L
1
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
156-60-5
8260B
ND
0.50
ug/L
1
1,1-Dichloroethene
75-35-4
8260B
ND
0.50
ug/L
1
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
156.59.2
8260B
40
0.50
uglL
1
1,2-Dichloropropane
78-87-5
8260B
ND
0.50
ug/L
1
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
10061-02-6
8260B
ND
0.50
ug/L
1
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
10061-01-5
8260B
ND
0.50,
ug/L
1
Methylene chloride
75-09-2
8260B
ND
0.50
ug/L
1
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
79-34-5
8260B
ND
0.50
ug/L
1
Tetrachloroethene
127-18-4
8260E
ND
0.50
ug/L
1
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
71-55-6
82608
ND
0.50
ug/L
1
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
79-00-5
8260B
ND
0.50
ug/L
1
Trichloroethane
79-01-6
8260E
180
0.50
ug/L
1
Trichlorof Lioromethane
75-69-4
8260B
ND
0.50
ug/L
1
Vinyl chloride
75-01-4
8260B
ND
0.50
uglL
1
Run 1 Acceptance
Surrogate Q
% Recovery Limits
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
110 52-138
Bromofluorobenzene
104 70-147
Toluene-d8
104 76-125
PCL= Practical quanlitatian limit a= Detected M the method blank E=Duantitation of compound exceeded the calibration range
ND= Not detected at or above the PGL J=Estimated result <PGL and _>MDL P= The RPD between lwo GC columns exceeds 40%
Vvhere applicable, all soil sample analysis are reported on a dry weight basis unless flagged with a"W N= Recovery is out of coterie
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc. Page: 6 of 27
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.shealylab.com Level Report v2.1

ICP-AES
Client: ERM-Southeast, Inc Laboratory ID: JK14063.001
Description: MW-3 Matrix: Aqueous
Date Sampled:1 111312008 1725
Date Received: 1111412008
Run Prep Method Analytical Method Dilution Analysis Date Analyst Prep Date Batch
1 3005A 6010E 1 11/18120081502 MNM 11/14/20082025 90012
CAS Analytical
Parameter Number Method Result Q PQL Units Run
Iron 7439-89-6 6010B 0.13 0.10 mglL 1
PQL= Practical quantitation limit B= Detected in the method blank E= Quanbtaton of compound exceeded me caliballon range
ND= Not detected at or above the PQL J=Estimated result <PQL and MDL P= The RPD between two GD columns exceeds 40%
Mena appriwble, all soil sample analysis are reported on a dry weight basis unless flagged with a "W' N = Recovery Is out of crileda
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc. Page: 7 of 27
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] v .shealylab.com Level 1 Roped v21

Inorganic non-metals
Client: ERM-Southeast, Inc Laboratory ID: JK14063.002
Description: MW-5 Matrix: Aqueous
Date Sampled:11113120081115
Date Received: 1111412008
Run Prep Method
Analytical Method
Dilution
Analysis Date Analyst
Prep Date
Batch
1
(Ferric Iron )
1
11120/2008 1334 MNM
1
(Ferrous Iron) SM
1
11/14/2008 2343 PMM
90189
1
(Nitrate - N) 353.2
1
11/1512008 1041 RLM
90048
1 (Nitrite
- N) 353.2 REV 2
1
11/15/2008 1041 RLM
90045
1
(Sulfate) 9056
1
11/21/2008 1543 DAS
90485
CAS Analytical
Parameter
Number Method
Result Q
PQL
Units
Run
Ferric Iron (calculation)
SM350016010B
6.9
0.10
nri
1
Ferrous Iron
SM 3500-Fe D
ND
0.050
mg/L
1
Nitrate -N
353.2
0.68
0.020
mglL
1
Nitrite - N
353.2 REV 2
NO
0.020
mg/L
1
Sulfate
9056
9.1
1.0
mglL
1
PCL = Practical quantitabon limit a = Detected In the method blank E = Quantitation of compound exceeded the calibration range
ND= Not detected at or above We PQL J=Estimated result<PCL and MDL P= The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40%
Where applicable, all soil sample analysis are reported on a dry weight basis unless flagged with a N= Recovery is out of criteria
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc Page: 8 of 27
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 (803) 791-970o Fax [phone] wwvv.shealylab.com Level i Report v2.1

Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS
Client: ERM-Southeast, Inc Laboratory ID: JK14063-002
Description: MW-5 Matrix: Aqueous
Date Sampled:11I13120081115
Date Received: 1111412008
Run Prep Method Analytical Method Dilution Analysis Date Analyst Prep Date Batch
1 5030B 8260B 1 11118/2008 1722 DLB 90194
CAS
Analytical
Parameter
Number
Method
Result Q
PQL
Units
Run
Bromodichloromelhane
75-27-4
8260B
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
Bromoform
75-25-2
8260B
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
Bromomethane (Methyl bromide)
74-83-9
8260B
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
Carbon tetrachloride
56-23-5
8260B
NO
0.50
ug1L
1
Chlorobenzene
108-90-7
8260E
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
Chloroelhane
75-00-3
8260B
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
Chloroform
67-66-3
8260B
0.89
0.50
uglL
1
Chloromethane (Methyl chloride)
74-87-3
8260B
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
Dibromochloromethane
124-48-1
8260E
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)
106-93-4
8260B
NO
0.50
ug1L
1
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
541-73-1
8260B
NO
0.50
uglL
1
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
95-50-1
8260B
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
106-46-7
8260B
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
1,1-Dichloroethane
75-34-3
8260B
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
1,2-Dichloroethane
107-06-2
826013
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
156-60-5
8260E
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
1,1-Dichloroethene
75-35-4
8260B
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
156-59-2
8260B
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
1,2-Dichloropropane
78-67-5
8260B
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
10061-02-6
8260E
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
10061-01-5
8260B
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
Methylene chloride
75-09-2
8260B
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
79-34-5
8260B
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
Tetrachloroelhene
127-18-4
8260B
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
71-55-6
8260B
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
79-00-5
8260B
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
Trichloroethene
79.01-6
8260B
5.2
0.50
uglL
1
Tdchlorofluoromethane
75-69-4
8260E
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
Vinyl chloride
75-01-4
8260E
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
Run 1
Acceptance
Surrogate
9
Q % Recovery
Limits
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
110
52-138
Bromofluorobenzene
104
70-147
Toluene-d8
103
76-125
PCL = Practical quanfitation limit S = Detected in the method blank E = Duantitabon of compound exceeded the calibration range -
ND=NatdetectedatorabovethePDL J=Estimated result <PCL and >Not. P= The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40%
Where applicable, all soil sample analysis are reponed on a dry weight basis unless flagged with a N= Recovery is out of aitena
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc. Page: 9 of 27
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.shealylab.com Level Report v2.1

ICP-AES
Client: ERM-Southeast, Inc Laboratory ID: JK14063-002
Description: MW-5 Matrix: Aqueous
Date Sampled:1111312008 1115
Date Received: 1111412008
Run Prep Method Analytical Method Dilution Analysis Date Analyst Prep Date Batch
2 3005A 6010E 1 11/20120081334 MNM 90267
CAS Analytical
Parameter Number Method Result Q PQL Units Run
Iron 7439.89-6 6010B 6.9 0.10 mgfL 2
PQL= Practical quantitation limit B = Detected In the method blank E = Q,mrttatian of compound exceeded the calibration range
No Not detected at or above the POL J= Estimated result< PQL and> MDL P= The RPD between two GC mlumns exceeds 40%
Where applicable, all soil sample analysis are reported on a dry weight basis unless Bagged with a'W' N = Recovery is out of enters
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc. Page: 10 of 27
IDB Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] wvw.shealylaocom Level l Reponv2.1

Inorganic non-metals
Client: ERM-Southeast, Inc Laboratory ID: JK14063-003
Description: MW-6 Matrix: Aqueous
Date Sampled:11/13/2008 1625
Dale Received: 1111412008
'Run
Prep Method Analytical Method
Dilution
Analysis Date
Analyst Prep Date
Batch
1
(Ferric Iron )
1
11/1812008 1508
MNM
..
1
(Ferrous Iron) SM
1
11/14/2008 2343
PMM
90189 "
1
(Nitrate - N) 353.2
1
11/15/2008 1042
RLM
90048
1 •
(Nitrite - N) 353.2 REV
1
11/15/2008 1042
FILM
90045
1
(Sulfate) 9056
1
11/2112008 1606
DAS
90485
CAS Analytical
Parameter
Number Method
Result Q
PQL
Units
Run
Ferric Iron (calculation)
SM3500/6010B
ND
0.10
mglL
1
Ferrous Iron
SM 3500-Fe D
ND
0.050
mglL
1
Nitrate -N
353.2
0.32
0.020
mglL
1
Nitrite - N
353.2 REV 2
0.020
0.020
mglL
1
Sulfate
9056
48
1.0
mglL
1.
= Practical Quandtatlon limit B = Detected in ma method blank E = Cuantitation of compound exceeded the calibration range
Not detected at or above the Put. J = Estimated result <PDL and >MDL P= The RPD between No GC columns exceeds 40%
applicable, all soil sample analysis are reported on a dry weight basis unless flagged with a "W N = Recovery Is out of cReda
"nonmental Services, Inc, Page: 11 of 27
e Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] w .shealylab.com Level I Reponv2.1

Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS
Client: ERM-Southeast, Inc Laboratory ID: JK14063.003
Description: MW-6 'Matrix: Aqueous
Date Sampled:11/13/2008 1625
Date Received:[[/1412008
Run Prep Method Analytical Method Dilution Analysis Date Analyst Prep Date Batch
1 5030B 8260E 1 11/18/2008 1744 DLB 90194
Parameter
CAS Analytical
Number Method
Result Q
'
PQL
Units
Run
Bromodichloromelhane
75-27-4
8260B
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
Bromofonn
75-25-2
82608
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
Bromomethane (Methyl bromide)
74-83-9
8260B
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
Carbon tetrachloride
56-23-5
8260B
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
Chlorobenzene -
108-90-7
8260B
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
Chloroethane
75-00-3
8260B
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
Chloroform
67-66-3
8260B
ND
0.50
ug/L
1
Chloromelhane (Methyl chloride)
74-87-3
8260B
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
Dibromochloromelhane
124-48-1
8260B
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)
106-93-4
8260E
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
541-73-1
8260B
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
95-50-1
8260B
ND
0.60
ug/L
1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
106-46-7
8260E
ND
0.50
ug/L
1
1,1-Dichloroethane
75-34-3
8260B
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
1,2-Dichloroethane
107-06-2
8260B
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
156-60-5
82608
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
1,1-Dichloroethene
75-35-4
8260B
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
156-59-2
8260B
14
0.50
ug1L
1
1,2-Dichloropropane
78-87-5
8260B
ND
0.50
ug/L
1
Vans-1.3-Dichloropropene
10061-02-6
8260B
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
10061-01-5
8260E
ND
0.50
ug/L
1
Methylene chloride
75-09-2
8260B
ND
0.50
ug/L
1
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroelhane
79-34-5
8260B
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
Telrachloroethene
127-18-4
8260B
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
71-55-6
8260B
ND -
0.50
ug/L
1
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
79-00-5
8260B
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
Trichloroethene
79-01-6
8260E
59
0.50
uglL
1
Trichlcrofluoromethane
75-69-4
8260B
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
Vinyl chloride
75-01-4
8260B
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
Run 1 Acceptance
Surrogate
Q /, Recovery Limits
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
111 52-138
Bromofluorobenzene
107 70-147
Toluene-d8
103 76-125
PGL= Practice[ quamitaron limit 9= Detached in the method blank E= ouantitation of compound exceeded the calibration range
ND= Not detected at Or above the PGL J= Estimated result< PGL and >Mot. P= The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40%
Where applicable, all soJ sample analysis are reported on a dry weight basis unless flagged with a N= Recovery IS Out of cmena
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc. Page: 12 of 27
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.shealylab.com Level Report v2.1

ICP-AES
Client: ERM-Southeast, Inc Laboratory ID: JK14063.003
Description: MW-6 Matrix: Aqueous
Date Sampled:1 111312008 1625
Date Received: 11114/2008
Run Prep Method
Analytical Method Dilution Analysis Date Analyst
Prep Date
Batch
1 3005A
6010B 1 11/18/2008 1508 MNM
11/14/2008 2025
90012
CAS Analytical
Parameter
Number Method
Result Q
PQL Units Run
Iron
7439-89-6 6010B
ND
0.10 mg/L 1
PQL= Practical quantitation limit 6= Detected in the method blank E= Quantitation of compound exceeded the calibration range
ND= Not detected at or above the PQL J=Estimated result<POL and >MDL P= The RPD between Me GC columns exceeds 40%
Where applicable, all soil sample analysis are reported on a dry weight basis unless flagged with a "W N = Recovery Is cut of cnteda
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc. Page: 13 of 27
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] w .shealylab.com Level I Report v21

Inorganic non-metals
Client: ERM.Southeast, Inc Laboratory ID: JK14063-004
Description: MW-9 Matrix: Aqueous
Date Sampled:11/1312008 1415
Date Received: 11/1412008
Run
Prep Method Analytical Method
Dilution
Analysis Date
Analyst Prep Date
Batch
1
(Ferric Iron )
1
11/2012008 1340
MNM
1
(Ferrous Iron) SM
2
11/14/2008 2343
PMM
90189
1
(Nitrate - N) 353.2
1
11/15/2008 1043
FILM
90048
1
(Nitrite - N) 353.2 REV 2
1
11/15/2008 1043
FILM
90045
1
(Sulfate) 9056
1
11/21/2008 1628
DAS
90485
CAS Analytical
Parameter
Number Method
Result Q
PQL
Units
Run
Ferric Iron (calculation)
SM350016010B
5.5
0.10
mglL
1
Ferrous Iron
SM 3500-Fe D
3.7
0.10
mg/L.
1
Nitrate -N
353.2
0.23
0.020
mg/L
1
Nitrite - N
353.2 REV 2
ND
0.020
mgfL
1
Sulfate
9D56
9.0
1.0
mg1L
1
PQL = Practical guarb etlon limit B = Defected in the method blank E = Guantitation of ocmpound exceeded the calibration range
NO= Not detected at or above the PQL J=Estimated result <PQL and_MDL P= The RPD between Me GC columns exceeds 40%
Where applicable, all soli sample analysis are reported on a dry weight basis unless gagged with a"W N= Recovery is out of criteria
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc. Page: 14 of 27
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] vnvw.shealylab.Wm Level 1 Report v21

Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS
Client: ERM-Southeast, Inc Laboratory ID: JK14063-004
Description: MW-9 Matrix: Aqueous
Date Sampled:1111312008 1415
Date Received: 11/14/2008
Run Prep Method Analytical Method Dilution Analysis Date Analyst Prep Date Batch
1 50308 8260B 1 11/18/2008 1805 DLB 90194
CAS
Analytical
Parameter
Number
Method
Result Q
PQL
Units
Run
Bromodichloromethane
75-27-4
8260B
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
Bromoform
75-25-2
8260B
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
Bromomethane (Methyl bromide)
74-83-9
8260B
NO
0.50
ug/L
1 '
Carbon tetrachloride
56-23-5
8260B
ND
0.50
ug/L
1
Chlorobenzene
108-90-7
8260B
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
Chloroethane
75-00-3
8260B
ND
0.50
ug/L
1
Chloroform
67-66-3
8260B
ND
0.50
ug/L
1
Chloromelhane (Methyl chloride)
74-87-3
8260B
ND
0.50
ug/L
1
Dibromochloromethane
124-48-1
8260B
ND
0.50
ug/L
1
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)
- 106-93-4
8260E
NO
0.50
uglL
1
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
541-73-1
' 8260B
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
95-50-1
8260B
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
106-46-7
8260B
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
1,1-Dichloroelhane
75-34-3
82608
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
1,2-Dichloroelhane
107-06-2
8260B
ND
0.50
ug/L
1
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
156-60-5
8260E
ND
0.50
ug/L
1
1,1-Dichloroethene
75-35-4
8260B
ND
0.50
ug/L
1
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
156-59-2
8260E
2.2
0.50
ug/L
1
1,2-Dichloropropane
78-87-5
8260B
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
10061-02-6
8260B
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
10061-01-5
8260E
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
Methylene chloride
75-09-2
82608
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
79-34-5
8260B
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
Tetrachloroethene
127-18-4
8260B
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
71-55-6
8260E
ND
0.50
ug/L
1
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
79-00-5
8260B
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
Trichloroethene
79-01-6
8260B
22
0.50
ug1L
1
Tdchlorofluoromethane
75-69-4
8260E
ND
0.50
ug/L
1
Vinyl chloride
75-01-4
8260E
ND
0.50
ug/L
1
Run 1
Acceptance
Surrogate
Q % Recovery
Limits
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
112
52-138
Bromofluorobenzene
104
70-147
Toluene-d8
102
76-125
PQL= Practical quantitation limit B= Detached in the method blank E=Quamtafion of compound exceeded the calibration range
ND= Not detected at or above the PQL J=Estimated! result <PQL and _>MDL P=The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40%
vision, applicable, all soil sample analysis are reported on a dry weight basis unless flagged win a "W' N = Recovery is out of emeda
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc. Page: 15 of 27
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.shealylab.ccm Level Report v2.1

ICP-AES
Client: ERM-Southeast, Inc Laboratory ID: JK14063.004
Description: MW-9 Matrix: Aqueous
Date Sampled:1111312008 1415
Date Received: 11114/2008
Run Prep Method Analytical Method Dilution Analysis Date Analyst Prep Date Batch
2 3005A 6010E 1 11120120081340 MNM 90267
CAS Analytical
Parameter Number Method Result Q PQL Units Run
Iron 7439.89.6 6010B 9.2 0.10 mglL 2
PQL= Practical quantilation limit B= Detected in the method blank E= Quan6tabon of compound exceeded the calibration range
ND= Not detected at or above the PQL J= Estimated result <POL and >MOL P=The RPD between We GC columns exceeds 40%
Mere applicable, all soil sample analysis are reported on a dry weight basis unless flagged with a RM N = Recovery, is out of cruise
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc. Page: 16 of 27
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] viww.shealylab.com Level s Report v2.1

Inorganic non-metals
Client: ERM-Southeast, Inc Laboratory ID: JK14063.005
Description: IIAW-10 Matrix: Aqueous
Date Sampled:1 Ill 312008 1225
Date Received: 1111412008
Run Prep Method
Analytical Method
Dilution
Analysis Date Analyst
Prep Date
Batch
1
(Ferric Iron )
1
11/1812008 1513 MNM
1
(Ferrous Iron) SM
1
11/14/2008 2343 PMM
90189
1
(Nitrate - N) 353.2
1
11/15/2008 1044 RLM
90048
'
1 (Nitrite - N) 353.2 REV 2
1
11/15/2008 1044 RLM
90045
1
(Sulfate) 9056
1
11/2112008 1651 DAS
90485
CAS Analytical
Parameter
Number Method
Result Q
PQL
Units
Run
Ferric Iron (calculation)
SM350016010B
0.33
0.10
mglL
1
Ferrous Iron
SM 3500-Fe D
2.7
0.050
mg/L
1
Nitrate -N
353.2
ND
0.020
mg/L
1
Nitrite - N
353.2 REV 2
ND
0.020
ni
1
Sulfate
9056
20
1.0
mg/L
1
PQL= Practical quarntation limit B= Detected in the method blank E= Quantotien of compound exceeded the calibration range
ND= Not detected at or above the PQL J=Estimated result <PQL and_MDL P=The RPD behveen two GC columns exceeds 40%
Where applicable, all soft sample analysis are reported on a dry weight basis unless flagged with a'W N= Recovery is out of crioda
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc. Page: 17 of 27
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.shealylab.wm Level 1 Report v2.1

volaule vr9anic %�ompounus
Lneiy)n]
Client: ERM-Southeast, Inc Laboratory ID: JK14063-005
Description: MW-10 Matrix: Aqueous
Date Sampled:1111312008 1225
Date Received: 1111412008
Run Prep Method Analytical Method Dilution Analysis Date Analyst Prep Date Batch
1 5030B 8260E 1 11118/20081827 DLB 90194
Parameter
CAS
Number
Analytical
Method
Result Q
PQL
Units
Run
Bromodichloromelhane
75-27-4
8260B
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
Bromoform
75-25-2
8260B
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
Bromomelhane (Methyl bromide)
74-83-9
8260B
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
Carbon tetrachloride
56-23-5
8260B
ND
0.50
ug/L
1
Chlorobenzene
108-90-7
82608
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
Chloroethane
75-00-3
8260B
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
Chloroform
67-66-3
8260B
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
Chloromethane (Methyl chloride)
74-87-3
8260B
ND
0.50
ug/L
1
Dibromochloromethane
124-48-1
8260B
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)
106-93-4
8260B
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
541-73-1
8260E
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
95-50-1
8260B
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
106-46-7
8260E
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
1,1-Dichloroethane
75-34-3
8260B
ND
0.50
ug/L
1
1,2-Dichloroethane
107-06-2
8260E
ND
0.50
ug/L
1
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
156-60-5
8260B
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
1,1-Dichloroethene
75-35-4
8260E
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
156.59-2
8260B
2.1
0.50
ug/L
1
1,2-Dichloropropane
78-87-5
8260B
ND
0.50
ug/L
1
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
10061-02-6
8260B
ND
0.50
ug/L
1
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
10061-01-5
8260B
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
Methylene chloride
75-09-2
8260B
ND
0.50
ug/L
1
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
79-34-5
8260B
NO
0.50
uglL
1
Tetrachloroethene
127-18-4
8260B
NO
0.50
ug1L
1
1,1,1-Trichloroelhane
71-55-6
8260B
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
1,1,2-Tichloroethane
79-00-5
8260B
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
Trichloroethene
79-01-6
8260B
6.4
0.50
uglL
1
Trichlorofluoromethane
75-69-4
8260B
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
Vinyl chloride
75-01-4
8260B
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
Run 1 Acceptance
Surrogate
Q % Recovery Limits
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
112 52-138
Bromofluorobenzene
106 70-147
Toluene-d8
101 76-125
PDL = Practical quantitation limit B = Detected in the method blank E = DuantitaGon of compound exceeded the calibration range
ND= Not detected at or above the PDL J= Estimated result< PCL and_> M DL P= The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40%
Where applicable, all soil sample analysis are reported on a dry weight basis unless flagged with a"W' N= Recovery is out of criteria
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc. Page: 18 of 27
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.shealylab.com Level 1 Repodv2.1

ICP-AES
Client: ERM-Southeast, Inc Laboratory ID: JK14063-005
Description: MW-10 Matrix: Aqueous
Date Sampled:1111312008 1225
Date Received: 11/1412008
Run Prep Method Analytical Method Dilution Analysis Date Analyst Prep Date Batch
1 3005A 6010B 1 11118/2008 1513 MINIM 11114/2008 2025 90012
CAS Analytical
Parameter Number Method Result Q PQL Units Run
Iron 7439-89.6 60108 3.0 0.10 mglL 1
PDL= Practical quantitation limit e= Detected in the method blank E= Duantitation of compound exceeded the calibration range
ND= Not detected at or above the PDL J= Estimated result, PCL and, M DL P= The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40%
Where applicable, all soil sample analysis are reported on a dry weight basis unless nagged with a'W' N= Recovery is out of criteria
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc. Page: 19 of 2.7
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.shealylab.com Level 1 Report v2.1

Inorganic non-metals
Client: ERM-Southeast, Inc Laboratory ID: JK14063-006
Description: MW-11 Matrix: Aqueous
Date Sampled:1111312008 1520
Date Received: 11/14/2008
Run Prep Method
Analytical Method
Dilution
Analysis Date Analyst
Prep Date
Batch
1
(Ferric Iron )
1
11/18/2008 1525 MNM
1
(Ferrous Iron) SM
1
11/14/2008 2343 PMM
90189
1
(Nitrate - N) 353.2
1
11/15/2008 1045 RLM
90048
1
(Nitrite - N) 353.2 REV 2
1
11/15/2008 1045 RLM
90045
1
(Sulfate) 9056
1
11/2112008 1713 DAS
90485
CAS Analytical
Parameter
Number Method
Result Q
PQL
Units
Run
Ferric Iron (calculation)
SM350016010B
ND
0.10
mglL
1
Ferrous Iron
SM 3500-Fe D
ND
0.050
mglL
1
Nitrate - N
353.2
0.093
0.020
mgfL
1
Nitrite - N
353.2 REV 2
ND
0.020
mg/L
1
Sulfate
9056
8.7
1.0
mglL
1
PDL= Practical quantitation limit a= Detected in the method blank E= Duantitabon of compound exceeded the calibration range
ND= Not detected at or above the PDL J= Estimated result< PDL and _>Mot. P= The RPD between We GC columns exceeds 40%
Where applicable, all soil sample analysis are reported on a dry weight basis unless flagged with a "W N = Recovery is out of omens
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc. Page: 20 of 27
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] w .shealylab.com Level 1 Report v21

Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS
Client: ERM-Southeast, Inc Laboratory ID: JK14063-006
Description: MW-11 Matrix: Aqueous
Date Sampled:1111312008 1520
Date Received:1111412008
Run Prep Method Analytical Method Dilution Analysis Date Analyst Prep Date Batch
1 5030B 8260E 1 11118/2008 1848 DLB 90194
CAS
Analytical
Parameter
Number
Method
Result Q
PQL
Units
Run
Bromodichloromelhane
75-27-4
8260E
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
Bromoform
75-25-2
82608
ND
0.50
ug/L
1
Bromomethane (Methyl bromide)
74-83-9
8260B
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
Carbon tetrachloride
56-23-5
8260B
NO
0.50
ug/L
9
Chlorobenzene
108-90-7
8260E
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
Chloroethane
75-00-3
8260B
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
Chloroform
67-66-3
8260B
ND
0.50
ug/L
1
Chloromethane (Methyl chloride)
74-87-3
8260B
NO
0.50 -
ug/L
1
Dibromochloromelhane
124-48-1
8260B
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)
106-93-4
82608
.ND
0.50
ug/L
1
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
541-73-1
8260B
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
95-50-1
8260B
ND
0.50
ug/L
1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
106-46-7
8260B
ND
0.50
ug/L
1
1,1-Dichloroethane
75-34-3
8260B
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
1,2-Dichloroethane
107-06-2
8260B
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
trans-1,2-Dichloroelhene
156-60-5
8260E
ND
0.50
uglL
1
1,1-Dichloroelhene
75-35-4
8260B
ND
0.50
ug/L
1
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
156-59.2
8260B
1.6
0.50
uglL
1
1,2-Dichloropropane
78-87-5
8260B
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
Vans-1,3-Dichloropropene
10061-02-6
8260B
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
10061-01-5
8260E
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
Methylene chloride
75-09-2
8260B
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
79-34-5
8260B
ND
0.50
ug/L
1
Tetrachloroethene
127-18-4
8260B
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
71-55-6
8260B
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
79-00-5
8260B
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
Trichloroethene
79-01-6
8260B
32
0.50
ug/L
1
Trichlorofluoromethane
75-69-4
8260B
ND
0.50
uglL
1
Vinyl chloride
75-01-4
8260B
ND
0.50
ug/L
1
Run 1
Acceptance
Surrogate
9
Q % Recovery
Limits
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
115
52-138
Bromofluorobenzene
106
70-147
Toluene-d8
104
76-125
POL= Practcal quantitation limit B= Detected in the method blank E= Ouantlatian of compound exceeded the calibrator, hangs
ND= Not detected at or above the POL J=Estimated result <POL and >>MDL P= The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40%
More applicable, all soil sample analysis are reported on a dry weight basis unless flagged with a"W N= Recovery is out of Walla
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc. Page: 21 of 27
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] v .shealylab.com Level 1 Repodv .1

ICP-AES
Client: ERM-Southeast, Inc Laboratory ID: JK14063-006
Description: MW-11 Matrix: Aqueous
Date Sampled:1911312008 1520
Dale Received: 1111412008
Run Prep Method Analytical Method Dilution Analysis Date Analyst Prep Date Batch
1 3005A 6010B 1 11/18/2008 1525 MINIM 11/14/2008 2025 90012
CAS
Analytical
Parameter Number
Method Result Q
PQL
Units Run
Iron 7439-89-6
60108 ND
0.10
mg/L 1
PDL= Practical quantdon limit B= Detected in the method blank E=Duan@abon of compound exceeded the calibration range
ND= Not detected at or above the PGL J= Estimated result 4 PDL and> MDL P= The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40%
More applicable, all sail sample analysis ere reported on a dry weight basis unless gagged with a "W N = Recovery is out of criteria
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc. Page: 22 of 27
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.shealylab.com Level Report vZ1

Inorganic non-metals
Client: ERM-Southeast, Inc Laboratory ID: JK14063.007
Description: MW-14 Matrix: Aqueous
Dale Sampled:1111312008 1315
Dale Received: 11/1412008 '
Run Prep Method
Analytical Method
Dilution
Analysis Date Analyst
Prep Date
Batch
1
(Ferric Iran )
1
11/18/2008 1530 MNM
1
(Ferrous Iron) SM
5
11/14/2008 2343 PMM
90189
1
(Nitrate - N) 353.2
1
11/15/2008 1046 RLM
90048
1 (Nitrite - N) 353.2 REV 2
1
11/15/2008 1046 RLM
90045
1
(Sulfate) 9056
1
11/21/2008 1843 DAS
90485
CAS . Analytical
Parameter
Number Method
Result Q
PQL
Units
Run
Ferric Iron (calculation)
SM350016010B
1.6
0.10
mg/L
1
Ferrous Iron
SM 3500-Fe D
5.4
0.25
mg/L
1
Nitrate -N
363.2
ND
0.020
mg/L
1
Nitrite - N
353.2 REV 2
ND
0.020
mg/L
1
Sulfate
9056
24
1.0
mg/L
1
PQL= Practical quantanion limit 8= Detected in the method blank E= Quantitaticn of compound exceeded the calibration range
ND= Not detected at or above the PQL J=Estimated result <PQL and >MDL P= The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40%
More applicable, all soil sample analysis are reported on a dry weight basis unless flagged with a "W' N = Recovery is cut of crude
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc. Page: 23 of 27
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] wwvy.shealylab.com Level 1 Report v2.1

Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS
Client: ERM-Southeast, Inc Laboratory ID: JK14063.007
Description: MW-14 Matrix: Aqueous
Date Sampled:1111312008 1315
Date Received: 11114/2008
Run Prep Method Analytical Method Dilution Analysis Date Analyst Prep Date Batch
1 5030B 8260E 1 11/18120081909 DLB 90194
•
CAS
Analytical
Parameter
Number
Method
Result Q
PQL
Units
Run
Bromodichloromethane
75-27-4
8260B
ND
0.50
ug/L
1
Bromoform
75-25-2
8260B
ND
0.50
uglL
1
Bromomethane (Methyl bromide)
74-83-9
8260B
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
Carbon tetrachloride
56-23-5
8260B
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
Chlorobenzene
108-90-7
8260B
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
Chloroelhane
75-00-3
8260B
ND
0.50
ug/L
1
Chloroform
67-66-3
8260B
ND
0.50
ug/L
1
Chloromethane (Methyl chloride)
74-87-3
8260B
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
Dibromochloromethane
124-48-1
8260E
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)
106-93-4
8260B
ND
0.50
ug/L
1
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
541-73-1
8260B
ND
0.50
ug/L
1
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
95-50-1
8260B
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
1,4-1)ichlorobenzene
106-46-7
8260B
ND
0.50
ug/L
1
1,1-Dichloroethane
75-34-3
8260B
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
1,2-Dichloroethane
107-06-2
8260E
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
156-60-5
8260B
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
1,1-Dichloroethene
75-35-4
8260E
0.55
0.50
ug1L
1
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
156-59-2
8260E
3.0
0.50
uglL
1
1,2-Dichloropropane
78-87-5
8260B
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
10061-02-6
8260E
ND
0.50
ug/L
1
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
10061-01-5
8260E
ND
0.50
ug/L
1
Methylene chloride
75-09-2
8260B
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
. 79-34-5
8260E
ND
0.50
ug/L
1
Tetrachloroethene
127-18-4
8260E
ND
0.50
ug/L
1
1,1,1-Tdchloroethane
71-55-6
8260B
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
1,1,2-Tdchloroethane
79-00-5
8260B
NO
0.50
uglL
1
Trichloroethene
79-01-6
8260B
39
0.50
ug/L
1
Trichloro0uoromethane
75-69-4
8260B
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
Vinyl chloride
75-01-4
8260B
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
Run 1
Acceptance
Surrogate
9
Q % Recovery
Limits
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
112
52-138
Bromofluorobenzene
106
70-147
Toluene-d8
102
76-125
PQL = Practical quantitalion limit B = Detected in the mehmtl blank E = Quantization or compound exceeded the calibration range
ND= Not detected at or above the PDL J=Estimated result <PQL and, MDL P= The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40%
Where applicable, all soil sample analysis are teponed on a dry weight basis unless gagged with a'W N = Recovery is out of cabana
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc. Page: 24 of 27
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.shealylab.com Level 1 Reponv2.1

ICP-AES
Client: ERM-Southeast, Inc Laboratory ID: JK14063.007
Description: MWA4 Matrix: Aqueous
Date Sampled:11/1312008 1315
Date Received: 11/14/2008
Run Prep Method
Analytical Method Dilution Analysis Date Analyst
Prep Date
Batch
1 3005A
6010E 1 11/18/20081530 MNM
11/14/20082025
90012
CAS Analytical
Parameter
Number Method
Result Q
PQL Units Run
Iron
7439.89.6 6010B
7.0.
0.10 mg1L 1
PQL= Practical quanlitalion limit B= Detected in the method blank E= QuarMation of compound exceeded the cahlarmon range
No= Not detected at or above Me PGL J= Estimated result< PQL and MDL P= The RPD between we GC columns exceeds 40%
Mere applicable, all soil sample analysis are reported on a dry weight basis unless flagged with a -W' N = Recovery is out of Were
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc. Page: 25 of 27
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.shealylab.com Level 1 Report v2.1

Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS
Client: ERMSoutheast, Inc Laboratory ID: JK14063-008
Description: DUPLICATE Matrix: Aqueous
Date Sampled:1Ill 312008
Date Received: 1111412008
Run Prep Method Analytical Method Dilution Analysis Date Analyst Prep Date Batch
1 5030B 8260B 1 11/18/20081930 DLB 90194
Parameter
CAS Analytical
Number Method
Result Q
PQL
Units
Run
Bromodichloromethane
75-27-4
8260E
ND
0.50
ug/L
1
Bromoform
75-25-2
8260B
ND
0.50
ug/L
1
Bromomethane (Methyl bromide)
74-83-9
8260B
ND
0.50
ug/L
1
Carbon tetrachloride
56-23-5
8260B
ND
0.50
ug/L
1
Chlorobenzene
108-90-7
8260E
ND
0.50
ug/L
1
Chloroelhane
75-00-3
8260B
ND
0.50
ug/L
1
Chloroform
67-66-3
8260B
ND
0.50
ug/L
1
Chloromethane (Methyl chloride)
74-37-3
8260B
ND
0.50
uglL
1
. Dibromochloromelhane
124-48-1
8260B
ND
0.60
uglL
1
1,2-Dibmmoethane (EDB)
106-93-4
8260B
ND
0.50
uglL
1
1,3-Dichlorobenzene -
541-73-1
8260B
ND
0.50
uglL
1
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
95-50-1
8260B
ND
0.50
uglL
1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
106-46-7
82608
ND
0.50
ug/L
1
1,1-Dichloroethane
75-34-3
8260B
ND
0.50
uglL
1
1,2-Dichloroethane
107-06-2
8260B
ND
0.50
ug/L
1
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
156-60-5
8260E
ND
0.50
ug/L
1
1,1-Dichloroelhene
75-35-4
8260B
ND
0.50
ug/L
1
cis4,2-Dichloroethene
156.59.2
8260B
40
0.50
ugli-
1
1,2-Dichloropropane
78-87-5
8260B
ND
0.50
uglL
1
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
10061-02-6
8260B
ND
0.50
ug/L
1
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
10061-01-5
8260B
ND
0.50
ug/L
1
Methylene chloride
75-09-2
8260B
ND
0.50
ug/L
1
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
79-34-5
8260B
ND
0.50
uglL
1
Tehachloroethene
127-18-4
8260E
ND
0.50
ug/L
1
1,1,1-Tichloroethane
71-55-6
8260B
ND
0.50
uglL
1
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
79-00-5
8260B
ND
0.50
ug/L
1
Trichloroethene
79-01-6
8260B
180
0.50
ug/L
1
Tdchlorofluoromethane
75-69-4
8260B
ND
0.50
uglL
1
Vinyl chloride
75-01-4
8260B
ND
0.60
ug/L
1
Run 1 Acceptance
Surrogate
Q % Recovery Limits
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
113 52-138
Bromofluorebenzene
106 70-147
Toluene-d8
103 76-125
POL= Practical quanti[ation limit B= Detected in the method blank E= Guantitation of compound exceeded the calibration range
N D = Not detected at or above the POL J= Estimated result< POL and >MDL P= The RPO between two GC columns exceeds 40%
Where applicable, all soil sample analysis are reported on a dry weight basis unless fagged with a N= Recovery is out of criteria
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc. Page: 26 of 27
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] vnvw.shealylab.cam Level 1 Report v2.1

Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS
Client: ERM-Southeast, Inc Laboratory ID: JK14063-009
Description: TRIP BLANK Matrix: Aqueous
Date Sampled:1111412008 1525
Date Received: 1111412008
Run Prep Method Analytical Method
Dilution Analysis Date
Analyst
Prep Date
Batch
1 5030B 8260B
1 11/18/2008 1639
DLB
90194
CAS Analytical
-
Parameter
Number Method
Result - Q
PCIL
Units
Run
Bromodichloromelhane
75-27-4
8260B
NO
0.50
uglL
1
Bromoform
75-25-2
8260B
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
Bromomelhane (Methyl bromide)
74-83-9
8260B
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
Carbon tetrachloride
56-23-5
8260B
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
Chlorobenzene
108-90-7
8260B
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
Chloroethane
75-00-3
8260B
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
Chloroform
67-66-3
8260B
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
Chloromethane (Methyl chloride)
74-87-3
8260B
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
Dibromochloromethane
124-48-1
8260B
NO
0.60
ug/L
1
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)
106-93-4
8260E
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
541-73-1
8260B
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
95-50-1
8260B
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
106-46-7
8260E
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
1,1-Dichloroethane
75-34-3
8260B
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
1,2-Dichloroethane
107-06-2
8260E
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
Vans-1,2-Dichloroethene
156-60-5
8260B
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
1,1-Dichloroethene
75-35-4
8260B
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
156-59-2
8260D
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
1,2-Dichloropropane
78-87-5
8260B
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
10061-02-6
8260E
NO
0.50
ug1L
1
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
10061-01-5
82603
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
Methylene chloride
75-09-2
8260E
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
79-34-5
8260B
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
Tetrachloroethene
127-18-4
8260B
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
71-55-6
8260B
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
79-00-5
8260B
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
Trichloroethene
79-01-6
8260B
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
Trichlorofluoromethane
75-69-4
8260B
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
Vinyl chloride
75-01 4
8260E
NO
0.50
ug/L
1
Runt Acceptance
Surrogate q
% Recovery Limits
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
110 52-138
Bromofluorobenzene
103 70-147
Toluene-d8
103 76-125
POL = Practical cluan@ation limit 8 = Detected in the method blank E = Guantitation of compound exceeded the calibration range
ND= Not detected at or above the POL J= Estimated result c POL and _>MDL P= The RPO between two GC columns exceeds 40%
Mere applicable, all soil sample analysis are reported on a dry weight basis unless flagged with a'W N= Recovery is out of cdleria
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc. Page: 27 of 27
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.shealylab.com Level 1 Reponv2.1

s
3
f�1,11-N SHEAL:Y ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
1�,} 5 .[106Van:ago puinl Dnve
Chain of Custody Record Wesi'Cotumhia,. South Car011na 29172
'v" Telophono No. (609) 791.97DO fax No: [phone]
Number 75209
1�
9A'a:i is Na. E-Mv
0- Ain,
1 o
no:Vass
'S.scya'er
s`� e'u:':a
f
K_ IGir1�
I4:}b.'1 Nn
CR}•
GEfRF+�Gaf1T`
s,�.a
-
In CcOs
:$2Z�o
Arurys't (A.rracl tisldmo!a ycara ra nttoedJ
l
=: • 1,m'
W- 0
�
Lc;fb.
-
V✓� �.7
a&a&
ffmi
'>: o! :aiitiNG
B. Pmur:atitl ryGa
Svml3 rDlva q.'.vn
Daft
JiL I
,'CnfehnYlurnsNi eaw?ewYde cmNunvfsn am P.,YJ
i - fc
4 ? 9
/
R•uwU: L_abr llA
w-3
1 17
I
+5
xX
X
X
mw - 5
11=is
.
15
MW-15
16
xxxxXX
Mw—
1 •15
I
.15
AXAX
X
X
-
f273
1
16
X
XXX
x
'XXXXXx
w-
15
XXXXX
77z)?
31,AAI1Z,
Z�tb kusrtl fa'��u!-ifrtry - -
$1um:in 6.3rx.'vr
Nam-AXsvy:ei&re h,
.
f 7.b>Hrean7 17.fGmrrvdb nswrwr ❑Aue;:n -'Un,r ..
I"a=u V6icl 'j r%�nby:jb
rv;k: s:'cn`vm+ar�,u•rYir�:aro �rea'ic..
iimratp.�rtl.rmp f?uf�ivpn (fYtir lvn gyrr�wdrcy�r.•n"'!n•F�µ+eare77AT.7
� Req:n%enrdvG{ },:µrrJj•)
�
I Siiv r,1 rl r7�^:(.�mJ119
1 R 49 :nF
D&V
'mq
LN YAY
LWb' i
T'w
6J
. Y-P
a nam v'a
aW-Mru
�/
.
CAXr vrS•
L19 D�[O.YLY
Raaau'a.^aiicu lUsol �. hu knF•i�A
R<a ,vr Tcap
, 10
AJSififHUllDAE l'1H17b.R Ya;.lY.t+RsnmM wYK�t'+rivV xr'th SanmSitgl; A:.S'1: F4zKCCur.; Cr.}•ryr
M
CVuilalf:wwrD]r: FgD-0r? G'ies.N Lhtfa.Cbi�-fL
T
Z
n

She -A, I',viromnrn:al Smnas, Inc.
pnn�men; Kcmb:r F-.iD-Ois
Rc'"'M h;mn6_r E
?ze�a'I
Replaces Da[::99�??:; S
Effectiv: Dar,: DS 29:0
Sample Receipt Ciiecklisl(SRC:)
Client 14 Cooler Inspected byid te: F! ( f ii. 16 Ur 4: .)". I EI D r�
N9eans of receipt: Q"'SESI ❑ Client ❑ UPS ❑ FedEx ❑ Airbumc cep ❑ Othc:
Yc4 ❑
No NA
I. Wcrcclisrndyseals resent onthecooler?
Yes
No NP.
3. if cus[odV seals were PTCSCnl. •::err Ihry inlaeL and unhroken?
Cooler M.-tcmperature upon muuipl 1.7 'C I C aC i 'C
Method. EKTemperatuj� Blank ❑ Against Bottles 1
Method ofcoolant: • [,.j ICI Ice ❑ Blue Ice ❑ Dry [ce ❑ None
If response is No for Yes for I4.:5. 16). an ex lanatienlicsohniun nu!st lie provided.
Yes ❑
No ❑
\A l(
i
3. rf temperature of any cooler exceeded 6.0'C, was PMjccL Mutmgcr notified?
PM notiticd by SRC, phone; note (circic one), outer: . (For
coolers received via commercial courier. PMs we to be notified inintediateh'.
Yzs ❑
\u
N:\
±
4, fs rile commercial courier-i aaeking slip attached to this farm?
Yes
❑
, No
l NA
]
5. Were ropercu;todvorocedures(relir, ui:hedireccived) followed?
Yes
❑
\u
❑
NA
❑
1 6. Were smn le lDs listed? '
Fes
,o
❑
NA
?- Was collection da(c & time listed?
Yes
0
No
❑
NA
3- Were (ells In be performed listed on :1r_ COC or was quote Tprovided?
No
NA
❑.
9. Did all samples arrive in the proper C(pn[ailiers fnr each test?
_Yes
Yes
No
I dA
❑
; 0. llid all container label informstibn (ID, date. time) azee with COM
❑
l NA
_ 1, Did all containers arrive in eood condition (uobroken. lids oil, etc.)?
Yes
Na
N4
❑
:. Was adequate. le voiumaavailable?
Fes
❑
Nu
'
E4
I NA
-". Were all samples received within ii the, hoidin_t fine or-4 hours, whichever
❑ - came; first?
14. Were any samples container missing?
N'A
lhv NA
I <i ! N.\
❑ IJ. \Pere rhere an •excess samples utv )istc5 nn COC^
lb. \Vere'nuhblcs ^resent-"pA-size" rYi'or C+mm in diameter) in any VOA
❑ v:als'i
L'Ne
❑
Y_s ❑
Np
I NA ❑I''y
I?. \\'crud) metzls+OKGMENL'ntaricnt Sam lea receiver- at a nl I of <=�
Yea
No
NA IN
IS. \\'ere all C}'Anlde alld'O[ snlhne ampiCs reCClcCd aI aytl i?"
19. \\'ere all appli ibleN'113; T1CN'cyanide phc ohBN.4:ccsl•'pC3.Le v
(<0 _ut:.'L) and toxicity (<O.Imr U samples free of residual chlorine?
Yes ❑ No ❑
NA ❑u
Yes ❑ 'No ❑
[
20, Wcrc collection temaeratures da.:umentt�d on the COC fxNC snnttiles7 1
_NA
Sample Prewrvation (Nlust be c ptmpleted for any samples) incol. ectly prescn�ed or wish hcadspace.)
Samplefs) were received incorrectly preserved -and were adjusted
accordingly in sample receiving. with (H-SO4,HNO_j,HCl,NaQlD with die SR E(number)
Sam 1e(s'I Lvem'received with buL•bles = 6 mm a diameter.
Srnnple(s} z�•ere received wi'h'fRC?0.2 mg+L for NH3"
TFV;cv:tnidr.'BNA% ..strPCf3Jhero.
Toxicity sau:ple(s) were received a'itlt FFC = 0. i me'L and were
analyzed hV method 3305.
Corrective Action taken, if necrcxarv:
Was client notified: Yes ❑ No ❑
S Sl cololoyee: _- _
Ctimmcnts-
Did client respond:
Datu of response:
Ye's ❑ No ❑
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] w .shealylab.ccm Level 1 Report v2.1