510029_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20240220

U Division of Water Resources
0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
(') Other Avencv
0 Technical Assistance
0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Imo.. Departure Time: z ; County: JAel If Region.
Farm Name: D ►tlr�l /e,CA '.J'!�'� F R1A Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address: 117 f 4 9- P25 c1 �9 WC-c ip
Facility Contact: t N ! ✓�� Title: Phone: q (1 - 7.3 9 - 3 fi t{
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Swine
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
Layer
Non -Layer
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
j.%g 0
Z 410
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
rou
Pullets
Poults
Design Current
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
.Non-Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 2fNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes EfNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
[—]Yes Vo
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
❑ Yes ONo
[:]NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes Y1,1❑
NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes Noo
❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 511212020 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of Inspection: 7 -
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes EjNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ENo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: 01
�
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): r
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes
eNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
E]"No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
[�J/No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
�o
[] NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
EJ'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
ETNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into
Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved
Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
jrNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
[2-14
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land app]ication?
❑ Yes
0No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
ET-N'o
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
EI/No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ YesFj_No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. [] Yes 41 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis [:]Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes Ej No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? [:]Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 511212020 Continued

Facili Number: $' I - 2- Date of Inspection: �. - z 2 z
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes EJ'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
2b. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
Comments (refer to question ft Explain any YES answers and/or anv additional recommei
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as nee(
kirp /t % IA( L 0
r�
S1'S _ /-jl- ztl
titj'A 5 ► L /�'�� �� ' - 7-3
le-3
LS *'- ZY01 �o317
Reviewer/Inspector Name: V/zLr
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
❑ Yes
dNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
dNo
[] NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
[�fNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes � o
❑ Yes �o
❑ Yes WNNo
or any other
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Phone: 9 l 9 - 7?l .-
Date: °L - 2-0 — -t-, i
511212020