SW4240203_Wetland Determination/Report_20240515

iv II,1 4 .. i.‘......,
PiLul
P I LOT E N V I R O N M E N T A L , I N C
July 7, 2023
Mr. Domingo Isasi
J&L Construction
3067 Waughtown Street
Winston Salem, North Carolina 27107
Reference: Wetland Delineation
Approximate 16.36-Acre Tract
Stanleyville Drive
Rural Hall, Forsyth County, North Carolina
Pilot Project 9709
Dear Mr. Isasi:
Pilot Environmental, Inc. (Pilot) is pleased to submit this report of the wetland delineation for the
approximate 16.36-acre tract located east of Stanleyville Drive in Rural Hall, Forsyth County, North
Carolina.
Background
Wetlands are defined by the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and the United
States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as "those areas that are inundated or saturated
by surface or groundwater at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and under normal
circumstances, do support a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil
conditions." In order for an area to be classified as wetland, hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils,
and wetland hydrology indicators must be present.
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) regulates the discharge of dredge and fill materials
into waters of the United States (lakes, rivers, ponds, streams, etc.), including wetlands. Waters
of the United States include the territorial seas, navigable coastal and inland lakes, rivers and
streams, intermittent streams, and wetlands. The EPA and the USACE jointly administer the
Section 404 program. Section 401 of the Clean Water Act grants each state the authority to
approve, condition, or deny any Federal permits that could result in a discharge to State waters.
Jurisdictional features include wetlands, open waters, ponds, lakes and perennial/intermittent
streams. Jurisdictional features are regulated by the USACE and North Carolina Department of
Environmental Quality -Division of Water Resources (NCDEQ-DWR). Permits are required prior
to impacting any jurisdictional feature. The type of permit required is specific to the type,
location and amount of impacts. Stormwater management plans and/or mitigation for proposed
impacts could be a requirement of the permit approval process.
PO Box 128, Kernersville, NC 27285
www.pilotenviro.com

Wetland Delineation
Pilot Project 9709
July 7,2023
The findings and conclusions in this report are our opinions based on field conditions
encountered at the time of the site visit. Changes including, but not limited to, regulations,
weather, timber/vegetation removal and usage/development of the site or nearby properties
can alter the findings and opinions presented in this report. We recommend that this report only
be used for preliminary planning purposes. Agency verifications, followed by a survey of
jurisdictional features, are required to determine the exact extent and locations of jurisdictional
features and are valid for a period of up to five years following issuance of a USACE Jurisdictional
Determination (JD) and/or NCDEQ-DWR Site Determination Letter.
Global Positioning System (GPS) location of jurisdictional features has been conducted by Pilot
personnel in the field utilizing a Trimble handheld GPS unit capable of sub-meter accuracy. Field
GPS data has been post-processed by Pilot personnel and digitally provided to the client for
assistance with preliminary planning. Pilot expresses no warranties or liabilities to accuracy of
GPS locations and/or provided GPS data.
Scope of Services
Pilot was contracted to perform a wetland delineation for the approximate 16.36-acre tract
located east of Stanleyville Drive in Rural Hall, Forsyth County, North Carolina. The site is identified
on the Forsyth County Geographic Information System (GIS) as parcel identification number (PIN)
6829-68-4171.000. The scope of services included a delineation of jurisdictional features
(streams, wetlands and other surface waters) on the site. The site boundary was not marked at
the time of our field delineation.
Literature Review
We reviewed the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Topographic Map, the U.S. Department of
Agriculture (USDA) Soil Survey of Forsyth County, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS)
National Wetland Inventory(NWI) Map and the Federal Emergency Management Agency(FEMA)
Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM).
• The USGS Topographic Map (Drawing 1) depicts an unnamed tributary to Trick-Urn Creek
along the southeastern site boundary. The map does not depict other surface waters or
wetlands on the site. Drainage swales that could contain additional surface waters or
wetlands are depicted on the site.
• The USDA Web Soil Survey of Forsyth County (Drawing 2) identifies the following mapping
units on the site: Clifford sandy loam (CfB), Codorus loam (CoA), Fairview fine sandy loam
(FaF), Fairview clay loam (FcB2 & FcD2), Pacolet clay loam (PcF2), Tomlin loam (TmB) and
Tomlin clay loam (ToC2). The Clifford series consists of well drained, moderately permeable
soils that occur on hills and interfluves. The Codorus series consists of moderately well to
somewhat poorly drained, moderately permeable soils that occur on nearly level floodplains.
The Fairview series consists of well drained, moderately permeable soils that occur on hills,
2

Wetland Delineation
Pilot Project 9709
July 7,2023
ridges and interfluves. The Pacolet series consists of well drained, moderately permeable
soils that occur on gently sloping to very steep uplands. The Tomlin series consists of well
drained, moderately permeable soils that occur on hills and ridges. The CoA soil mapping
unit is identified on the Forsyth County Hydric Soils List. The other soil mapping units are not
identified on the Forsyth County Hydric Soils List.
Pilot also reviewed the last published USDA Soil Survey of Forsyth County (Drawing 2A). The
published soil survey depicts a stream along the southeastern site boundary, generally
consistent with the USGS Topographic Map. An additional stream is depicted crossing the
northern portion of the site.
• The USFWS NWI Map (Drawing 3) depicts a riverine feature along the southeastern site
boundary, generally consistent with the USGS Topographic Map. Other surface waters or
wetlands are not depicted on the site.
• The FEMA FIRM (Drawing 4) identifies the site within Zone X, an area of minimal flood hazard
located outside designated floodplains.
Field Delineation
Pilot conducted the site visit on July 6, 2023. The site contains wooded land. Paved roads have
been constructed on the site. Ponds were not observed on the site.
Streams are located on the northeastern and southeastern portions of the site. The streams have
continuous, defined channels; evidence of ordinary high-water marks; sinuosity; riffle-pool
complexes; and contained moderate flowing water. Based on our observations and the stream
characteristics, the streams are perennial. The stream origin (northeastern stream) and
intersections with the site boundary were marked in the field with blue and white striped
surveyor tape. The streams were geo-located using a Trimble handheld GPS unit and digital
elevation modeling data.
A wetland is located adjacent to the stream on the northeastern portion of the site. The wetland
is separated from surrounding uplands by topographic, vegetation and/or soil breaks. USACE
Wetland Determination Data Forms, supporting our opinions, are included as attachments. The
wetland boundary was marked in the field with red and white striped surveyor tape and geo-
located using a Trimble handheld GPS unit.
A drainage swale extends across the northern portion of the site and is depicted as a stream on
the USDA Published Soil Survey (Drawing 2A). The feature is non-contiguous, does not contain a
well-defined channel, contains rooted vegetation and does not exhibit evidence of an ordinary
high-water mark. Soils throughout the swale are bright and appear well drained. Based on our
observations, the swale and associated features are ephemeral and should be considered non-
jurisdictional. Pilot completed a NC DWQ Stream Identification Form supporting our findings.
3

Wetland Delineation
Pilot Project 9709
July 7,2023
Drawing 5 shows the approximate locations of the streams (including our classifications),
wetland, data points and flag numbers. The locations and designations of features shown on
Drawing 5 are subject to change during agency verification(s) of the delineation.
Watershed Classification
The site is located in the Roanoke River Basin. Unnamed tributaries to Trick-Um Creek are located
on the site. The NCDEQ-DWR has classified Trick-Um Creek, the receiving waters, as Class C
waters. Consultation with the local planning authority is recommended to determine local
buffer/stormwater setback requirements for proposed development.
Agency Verification
The delineation has not been verified by the USACE. We understand that our flags will be
surveyed to determine the exact extent and locations of jurisdictional features and applicable
surface water buffers. The delineation, including locations and designations of features, is
subject to change during agency verifications.
Closing
We appreciate the opportunity to provide our services to you. Please contact us at (336) 310-
4527 if you have questions or require additional information.
Sincerely,
/ iJ7i o
Michael T. Brame, PWS David S. Brame, PWS
Principal Senior Project Manager
Attachments: Drawing 1— USGS Topographic Map
Drawing 2—Web Soil Map
Drawing 2A— Published Soil Map
Drawing 3— NWI Map
Drawing 4— FEMA FIRM
Drawing 5—Wetland Map
Wetland Determination Data Forms
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form
4

: ::'1• , .- . ,- • _ N. ,—---- , --tlrith...k4:14,44) ‹.,•) 4fP,--::_=--...„4-- ... :„Th. ‘...........44444.44,Nter* ,q , (:„,
...„.„ . : .,. ..,-„, . . ___, .....,... 1 ,,e,..„ , _•_ _,_,, ,• _, ,--,.., , . ,, , ,__L ...,,,_ _.
. • •......,c•C "
t '\ ' t - \ 4. 0' � • •
f
� I ©,,
p. 0.
. tr Elf. •, <,
(I;r_ '-- ; ..- • ' ' l':',-, .`i'..
ce. �:I•`!' t ie 'w - / _ - - - �, - • /,..e-.r ..h. P'
♦ �' �' . 5
l'`` .•'� w • ` :_}, .\ '` 4_J \• ti �� �, .� �. _ • \fit ,�t i t �l ,L 1
• ' 6 / �,.
�1 ,� •
_ ,,..! I - • - its},' l
. , !1,� ' "4,s,i lam, '• "; �r "'�� s� �,_ , j� :? `. _ . __,,e.-.� f,1/4
�r' r
*F^-ii)1 } ate• .O ;t .� r 4 ` J "� I'� r
• 1 � `1/4 Y. z - ‘` -,,"it--,- . f- r am_- --t
�, �. rig .N /1
•
31'
='1.�,� 0 _ _, ., =:fi r 7 , ' a; i , ��a / - t
Ilk
N1li
� � Q,...., 1 0- - ' , (� . , :A r•ti�l// , �� 'I ( : :1 mac.:
I r T""�J' s y \ • .�a` I (1 ,r / 2{ . 1 EJ f `7jj1al aei• �'•
)` 1 \ / )�1 11 � I'1.r f i f-'3,�•► �, +` )`10-,
)f/�1 Lam= ,
�J' :..--„,....ie."
•1 It sa► _• • r �, \y ' / `_`� r.. ..tom•} • �]y'/S�J) !(� (��ia'::
J • 1
�< "� '� � !• ,• _ !dry' - '�` /7.f `�
,,
. L
...-7-,
,,
-ate'' . .h - G,,,,, ,r /`,- ,` yJ'�� _ ✓ •e• ,f , `,. (ir
7J
1 tc."....,_i_c, ;
,..-:--irr ,-.. ...
ts., , •., ,.... ,„... ,
ke.1/4,!__)) .1- ' t•,. '
•• ',/d} '- ---.4NV,..„ " ' 1"'''' . . -- `-:'."-1'' 4 ,, , ,, ---, ..., , .. ---:-.....7 1..
y 'Zit4.,„ 4--• y: � �L iA ?- :fir' '
C .• . •'•- 40*„..i.,. ... - ; ..
--•.•-.4 w tairli(k,..n* :714---$11-1.-- ' lel -. ',.4i&IIIIL • - . 10 Alletati:..4Q J ' 1 ''' ' ' ----IA"; ' 1 ..7 .
,' t.-.
1_ ��.> Rom. . ..):.,...1;
.:r t ,�.f.. j !1 ,
, v '• ;/ fix;, , ,== . "?'• •Aie, 'Vi_
'I; (4:• : :_...'.., "!*,14' ::1 W'7".' 14%s"is1/4.'sts-,:, v ' .
tep,"
r:` 119)? .....,..v. r ......,.,_ , . _
,.. . .. rj,,, ,. ., 10 1 L.. :11 . •• .--; , ,,-
\'' \ t ' i 1 1:: )/Actti ., _IL:. ..?- .6,
' 1',f';'<^4 • , *?ilki:\---'... ' 1- 0
• .. :
. #.--3'.
. ..,.. ,,,„ .
4Nit' �i
w t •\ 7_------\--N::__.. y / , ...,,r, :71.. ti ''' - J
•
h f�: ?';% ' li: "-W 1,, • •.. r .r. �';�` • ;;{ LEGEND
� ��� a Site Boundary
II- ,•07 •,• \ r • }.. •- 1 - 0 T %t''t<.(•I!{ `I IVA J ._��,
Drawing 1 USGS Topographic Map
USGS Topographic Map \ . _ `�` Stanleyville Drive
Rurall Hall and Walkertown, ,, Approximate 16.36-Acre Tract
NC Quadrangles PILOT "". Rurall Hall, Forsyth County, NC
Scale: 1" - 2,000' PILOT ENVIRONMENTAL INC Pilot Project 9709

to- ... . , -,
J. . . .
\/......,..
,, ,.,t, .
42)
loWt.l.$0 .4, •..,:, 010. , 4.
"*4 .--1411: ;ere...! ' ' ft... ..,..
i" • •iiii: # .4i;4.'-
N ,.. or‘Ttm N.,, itt ,if . ,$1;hoilitiao,,,,, .441 40(z1.-- , . 'or ! , .
. .1.itoitiitiN,. . 4, -'
.IN 4:01 :1e.°
- am • ., 4_r
. (1 A • ' - .:..urce" •AAILQ 1.-_.
k io iv . „ , * 1,,
..• • (.• ,„.
., )111( I ' ........) / i* I -T.- , •• ' 0' - ,
' �L' .' - *mil, +� t Nt•
• f'T+i• y `TS "• h H2' C2 1 ,t
....i, •a L...*. .• 9 •',,,.'1..t
i. • 1;4. , -.t L. 4L.1 0_A - - —.1,p4or ..
•b 1. If •SIR • , ''
go
} _
*11. •fib •.yam 1 �` . _ Y;_' b, ,1L -' _
i - It II-. . if, -1 •
410;fijk t ' Ati-Z, "--A ..34.)'. , '. - '**. • .41/, ' -17 •••• .• •
` Fad ..t A 'y •
:. . •iiip le
` • f
heC3 j ' 4, c iiti, .4%,, 4 P 4 'or ,, 3i4... ,./- ,,,
--'.ty,_. .6 -4,..--,. ot, I . , 1 a tlb., r,. '.40/11( .2
' .1/i • • 4 , • % .',.. • GIB )4°1 . •i t
4 - ••T , JI *1°0 # • /
^� .,r ':� . 1 •. ;�.,i LEGEND
1 ie. �„ ► • �„'4 � r1 /. ' :1, y Site Boundary
_ Alli
•
Drawing 2 Web Soil Map
USDA Web Soil Survey Stanleyville Drive
of Forsyth County, NC -" � �, � ' '� Approximate 16.36-Acre Tract
Scale: 1" = 300' PILO Rurall Hall, Forsyth County, NC
PILOT ENVIRONMENTAL INC Pilot Project9709

rviestii) . i . ,,,,fer• s
tril
i plel (.i
i +,
/ '' .:- ..
ILLel'"11146' CC B .
1,. i
I „..40,000,-.
1
# t
i -.. . ,,. A
it .-... I
(00011
tO
.111. . i -"pef? det ,..
if 0 PE 7 ..,40.
.... 1'1 :
li.-rr iisi
_•t i10 to.pnC
B.
,2A.ii
i a-I
id m, m umr.„,
-i,
i.,
-.
r. i 1,110V•., .,41 4.r10l 4
l i.
i•..f 1
Pc•d/fc/„krw/:/„ LF./I
e
•
+ ae " 11 4i.
4 * °.
li , HIS 1 - .
'k t bLEGEND ++
• r i' Site Boundary
Drawing 2A Published Soil Map
USDA Soil Survey �� ,` Stanleyville Drive
of Forsyth County, NC +
. Approximate 16.36-Acre Tract
Published 1976 PILOT
c Rurall Hall, Forsyth County, NC
Scale: 1" = 300' PILOT ENVIRONMENTAL INC Pilot Project9709

-11 N„ t '. fib: 1•" •Tt''; • ;. i'
U fi 7. 1 > .
y • +71, 11 1 ,, i� f�� , : r i
r4' -• } 1, ^' •
arm. % ;► - 4 ' f :
e e
A -i 1 • •••‘• - '..t ••118 l• , se , ,,-- ,L,..,1:. 7 ' — - '- . .• --. 4
0 4. . .. .. t on. .t... • 015.1 •i,.. ..... .• .., •
. .
.. .s.,
,,,.. . , .."41 ...e. ,144404 o' •',
lb 4:1111°•441,,4 0 , ,".i:.'.."..t-
" f 4• ri"',41Pilh ,0 0, .1,404/, r, r4 44°4a7 4.5
.:
-. " k e...j.
4- "6 . ; 1 '
1. #.i • �_ .• • * . ,'�
A
'►.• , . ,' 4- ' *4 , ' 'VA A
%
!'� �. M • 1 •'6r3 �, '' • • -
r
Ilier V ' :
Wink
1 „0., ..t _:•,..,Irs' 11,,., ....,...i
I VI
i . 4 )111( 4' , . t ; ' OP `4:1 'F4 4 .., ,
. —w_.-64 7. .
6: '
. rt 1 y". .-• , . •
. .. 10 6 NT ..
, 4-,,, :::._L 7.1.11)16. - 4 III.
1,!, "RI f,7!j•111001 ' i • .1--TWilf : WI;1 8617 ,4;. .$ .•,
'r r
.. i Y .rr
i ` A1 ' . /
i , 'a ' ! LEGEND
y • m' I • Via% t .I'1 Site Boundary
li01414 L.:ftl` a Freshwater Emergent
• `,y '•ms, - *r , -�• ,, / - — Freshwater Forested/Shrub
• t; �r- •' •+•- 1 •r ► • Estuarine and Marine Deepwater
� �'Y r• • 't Estuarine and Marine
_ Al it • , , ' • .j Freshwater Pond
• _ Lake
'' :~ ' �/ Riverine
- V. Other
' ....Es R 4 /
-
Drawing 3 NWI Map
USFWS NWI Stanleyville Drive
Wetlands Mapper • Approximate 16.36-Acre Tract
Scale: 1 = 300 pli"o1
Rurall Hall, Forsyth County, NC
PILOT ENVIRONMENTAL.INC Pilot Project9709

iv_0,w• - - , L 4414,1E •{ . , , ,w w
. 'r rZone AE L���.. �� �`
) . • . - • . . • "• ,
.. 1-' 4`.. • 1$.1'00#: \
•
1 •e, ,,. \• •. t . .f ►r'* .' ' Zone AEID
, 1,
•Il�v s r • ii
L,� • • A {• 4 •A 4A
1 #
a"'TTT""` ,, r PANEL . T PAN
` _ohm' 3710692 00 OJ *r- fit}[ r
STUDY
eff. 172/2009 S•- • e_ '• ,L 10.9
-5 VI* • ' n
. 0". ., , , .
, _i
• *� - ' d
;t i \ liP • •10- . -
1 4x.4, 4, ),.-.
vi
s itip,... ,.
_ ifjetkAll414114:" nik.M1,, . ,... ,•. • , 11 , . Tr .4., ,,,, •"---'
;-Aut• v - .`, . ., • T '• it iR
, • •'n
•
-y !^ - ' Lam, ` , • �+' J {, ! .11 , •l`
1 '," • ..it r r, w i
I - 1 4 •
I, '•' • 1. ' ' f S
• ,...,...,..,. t r , , '4 ' I . ,. .
�' , tri,
44
T i , , ..T'e. -4 4
iiti
p. 0' .4 v ,.J
•
1• • ' • •t-
r~a .'_a!♦, 14E .e,. e. :..
te - - , , je
"°�,. PA EL • : FA N E L
4 :
• " 371'�682•900J , - .371y043900J
-li{ eff. 1/2/200' »� Y�i h, 1.• E " r %effr i1/2l2•009
tt-I i1
LEGEND t .�
Site Boundary \ - Z•-.
1° ..Annual I:_harr_e Fiucl]Hazard ' A ti
Regulator, Floo1d,vay - y .
ie Special Flood,'iay " 11%ti4 y • �•.
Area of Undeternipred Flood Hazard •,t
0.29u.Annual I:i hwric:e Flood Hazard • -- • 4
•Faaure i=onditiclro.1°,•Annual C.harlce Flood Hazard -
..h,`� `-. 5
f �e
IA.1rea riith Reduced F,rk Due toLevee Mpr; • f.T • ik-r�,
Drawing 4 FEMA FIRM
�� �' • Stanleyville Drive
National Flood Hazard Layer
- Approximate 16.36-Acre Tract
from FEMA Web Map Service PII ®1•
^� Rurall Hall, Forsyth County, NC
Scale: 1" = 1,200' PILOTENVIRONMENTAL.INC Pilot Project 9709

, i 1:Kleit'
cd
CO
f4°,4 .1.:.:/. 7...t..* '.:t iiij*,: 4
' Ifikt* O.* 10 il, 1 -- :,
hid , 'i). / '
i 'S el:- '; €1 *1\
w I
*0
% 46442141"% silk ,.1 4 .ar . , 4 , 4 ir ,_. . •
+ -w
` +4 v
'NV('. .' N - i. 11 a►."+4-+ .1 4 ''+ ^ r'
ii
1 11 DP-1 ji
. . W-.
1�' 6 /
• t WA 1-8
0.022 Ac.
44h
1�
j _ SA
a
lirila
1 E k
xi r • -
T �` • ���` r , _ SB
• w 1j' i • 'J ,�� 390 LF
t ~
;1y-• . �� - t . A . �'- ;LI- . 'S.. ..t• t �` 14- _',, it
. Rip Ear.:,. :�� :,.. .������ . 3''' �', tt-.
ell/17 g •
IV
. _. . -, , , , .i.,./4,,, tt.
. lij i $111 ma ! -"N Avi "' ‘..I 4
It 4
AP'
I ' t .. .mail 4., t„ - A w. " -
, "' ,'•o�,• } • LEGEND
s. •
�r �
1� , Site Boundary
Perennial Stream
.4 Wetland
06 THE LOCATIONS OF FEATURES SHOWN ON THIS MAP ARE PRELIMINARY. - SA1-5 Flag Number
- THEY HAVE NOT BEEN VERIFIED BY THE USACE. THIS MAP INCLUDES GPS '2
LOCATIONS OF DELINEATED FEATURES. DELINEATED BY PILOT O_N 7.6.23. DP-1 O Data Point
Drawing 5 Wetland Map
Aerial Imagery from ESRI Stanleyville Drive
and Pilot GPS Data t , - Approximate 16.36-Acre Tract
Scale: 1" = 200' PII.®T Rurall Hall, Forsyth County, NC
Date: 7.7.23 • PILOT ENVIRONMENTAL INC Pilot Project9709

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control#:0710-xxxx,Exp:Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET—Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority:AR 335-15,paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: 9709/Stanleyville Dr. City/County: Rural Hall/Forsyth Sampling Date: 7.6.23
Applicant/Owner: J&L Construction State: NC Sampling Point: DP-1
Investigator(s): Pilot Section,Township, Range: NA
Landform(hillside,terrace,etc.): Bench Local relief(concave,convex,none): Flat Slope(%): 0-1
Subregion(LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 36.211736° Long:-80.264539° Datum: wgs 84
Soil Map Unit Name: Pacolet clay loam(PcF2) NWI classification: None
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required;check all that apply) _Surface Soil Cracks(B6)
_Surface Water(Al) _True Aquatic Plants(B14) _Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8)
_High Water Table(A2) _Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) _Drainage Patterns(B10)
X Saturation(A3) _Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) _Moss Trim Lines(B16)
_Water Marks(B1) _Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
_Sediment Deposits(B2) _Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) _Crayfish Burrows(C8)
_Drift Deposits(B3) _Thin Muck Surface(C7) _Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
Algal Mat or Crust(B4) _Other(Explain in Remarks) _Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)
_Iron Deposits(B5) —Geomorphic Position(D2)
—Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) —Shallow Aquitard(D3)
X Water-Stained Leaves(B9) _Microtopographic Relief(D4)
Aquatic Fauna(B13) FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No x Depth(inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No x Depth(inches):
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 0 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge, monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG,JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont—Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: DP-1
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) %Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet:
1. Liriodendron tulipifera 15 Yes FACU Number of Dominant Species
2. Liquidambar styraciflua 10 Yes FAC That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 4 (A)
3. - Total Number of Dominant
4. _ _ _ Species Across All Strata: 7 (B)
5. Percent of Dominant Species
6. That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 57.1% (A/B)
7. _ Prevalence Index worksheet:
25 =Total Cover Total%Cover of: Multiply by:
50%of total cover: 13 20%of total cover: 5 OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ) FACW species 15 x 2= 30
1. Fraxinus pennsylvanica 10 Yes FACW FAC species 25 x 3= 75
2. Ligustrum sinense 5 Yes FACU FACU species 30 x 4= 120
3. Liriodendron tulipifera 10 Yes FACU UPL species 0 x 5= 0
4. Column Totals: 70 (A) 225 (B)
5. Prevalence Index =B/A= 3.21
6. _ _ Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7. _ _1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8. _ _ X 2-Dominance Test is>50%
9. _ 3-Prevalence Index is 53.01
25 =Total Cover 4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting
50%of total cover: 13 20%of total cover: 5 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1. Eulalia viminea 15 Yes FAC 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
2. Fraxinus pennsylvanica 5 Yes FACW be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
3. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
4. Tree-Woody plants,excluding vines,3 in.(7.6 cm)or
5. more in diameter at breast height(DBH),regardless of
6. height.
7. - Sapling/Shrub-Woody plants,excluding vines,less
8. than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9. (1 m)tall.
10. _ Herb-All herbaceous(non-woody)plants,regardless
11. of size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
20 =Total Cover Woody Vine-All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50%of total cover: 10 20%of total cover: 4 height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30
1.
2.
3.
4.
5 - Hydrophytic
=Total Cover Vegetation
50%of total cover: 20%of total cover: Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG,JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP-1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-18 10YR 4/1 90 7.5YR 4/6 10 C M Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. - 2Location: PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_Histosol(A1) Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(MLRA 147,148) _2 cm Muck(A10)(MLRA 147)
_Histic Epipedon(A2) _Thin Dark Surface(S9)(MLRA 147, 148) _Coast Prairie Redox(A16)
_Black Histic(A3) _Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(MLRA 136) (MLRA 147,148)
_Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)
_Stratified Layers(A5) X Depleted Matrix(F3) (MLRA 136,147)
_2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR N) _Redox Dark Surface(F6) _Red Parent Material(F21)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _Depleted Dark Surface(F7) (outside MLRA 127,147, 148)
_Thick Dark Surface(Al2) _Redox Depressions(F8) _Very Shallow Dark Surface(F22)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) _Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR N, _Other(Explain in Remarks)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) MLRA 136)
_Sandy Redox(S5) _Umbric Surface(F13)(MLRA 122, 136) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_Stripped Matrix(S6) _Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface(S7) Red Parent Material(F21)(MLRA 127, 147,148) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG,JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control#:0710-xxxx,Exp:Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET—Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority:AR 335-15,paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: 9709/Stanleyville Dr. City/County: Rural Hall/Forsyth Sampling Date: 7.6.23
Applicant/Owner: J&L Construction State: NC Sampling Point: DP-2
Investigator(s): Pilot Section,Township, Range: NA
Landform(hillside,terrace,etc.): Basin Local relief(concave,convex,none): Concave Slope(%): 0-1
Subregion(LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 36.211678° Long:-80.264816° Datum: wgs 84
Soil Map Unit Name: Fairview clay loam(FcD2) NWI classification: None
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required;check all that apply) _Surface Soil Cracks(B6)
_Surface Water(Al) _True Aquatic Plants(B14) _Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8)
_High Water Table(A2) _Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) _Drainage Patterns(B10)
_Saturation(A3) _Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) _Moss Trim Lines(B16)
_Water Marks(B1) _Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
_Sediment Deposits(B2) _Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) _Crayfish Burrows(C8)
_Drift Deposits(B3) _Thin Muck Surface(C7) _Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
Algal Mat or Crust(B4) _Other(Explain in Remarks) _Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)
_Iron Deposits(B5) —Geomorphic Position(D2)
_Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) —Shallow Aquitard(D3)
_Water-Stained Leaves(B9) _Microtopographic Relief(D4)
Aquatic Fauna(B13) FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth(inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth(inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth(inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge, monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG,JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont—Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: DP-2
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) %Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet:
1. Number of Dominant Species
2. That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 2 (A)
3. Total Number of Dominant
4. Species Across All Strata: 3 (B)
5. Percent of Dominant Species
6. That Are OBL, FACW,or FAC: 66.7% (A/B)
7. Prevalence Index worksheet:
=Total Cover Total%Cover of: Multiply by:
50%of total cover: 20%of total cover: OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ) FACW species 0 x 2= 0
1. Liriodendron tulipifera 20 Yes FACU FAC species 30 x 3= 90
2. Pyrus pyraster 5 Yes FAC FACU species 20 x 4= 80
3. _ UPL species 0 x 5= 0
4. Column Totals: 50 (A) 170 (B)
5. Prevalence Index =B/A= 3.40
6. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7. _1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8. X 2-Dominance Test is>50%
9. 3-Prevalence Index is 53.01
25 =Total Cover 4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting
50%of total cover: 13 20%of total cover: 5 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1. Eulalia viminea 25 Yes FAC 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
2. be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
3. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
4. Tree-Woody plants,excluding vines,3 in.(7.6 cm)or
5. more in diameter at breast height(DBH),regardless of
6. height.
7. Sapling/Shrub-Woody plants,excluding vines,less
8. than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9. (1 m)tall.
10. _ Herb-All herbaceous(non-woody)plants,regardless
11. of size,and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
25 =Total Cover Woody Vine-All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50%of total cover: 13 20%of total cover: 5 height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30
1.
2.
3.
4.
5 - Hydrophytic
=Total Cover Vegetation
50%of total cover: 20%of total cover: Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG,JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP-2
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-4 10YR 4/4 100 Loamy/Clayey
4-18 7.5YR 4/6 100 Loamy/Clayey
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. - 2Location: PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_Histosol(A1) Polyvalue Below Surface(S8)(MLRA 147,148) _2 cm Muck(A10)(MLRA 147)
_Histic Epipedon(A2) _Thin Dark Surface(S9)(MLRA 147, 148) _Coast Prairie Redox(A16)
_Black Histic(A3) _Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(MLRA 136) (MLRA 147,148)
_Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)
_Stratified Layers(A5) _Depleted Matrix(F3) (MLRA 136,147)
_2 cm Muck(A10)(LRR N) _Redox Dark Surface(F6) _Red Parent Material(F21)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _Depleted Dark Surface(F7) (outside MLRA 127,147, 148)
_Thick Dark Surface(Al2) _Redox Depressions(F8) _Very Shallow Dark Surface(F22)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) _Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR N, _Other(Explain in Remarks)
_Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) MLRA 136)
_Sandy Redox(S5) _Umbric Surface(F13)(MLRA 122, 136) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_Stripped Matrix(S6) _Piedmont Floodplain Soils(F19)(MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface(S7) Red Parent Material(F21)(MLRA 127, 147,148) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG,JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

SF - 1
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: July 6, 2023 Project/site: Stanleyville Drive Latitude: 36.211925°
Evaluator: David S. Brame County: Yadkin Longitude: -80.265782°
Total Points: Stream Determination (circle one) Other Rural Hall
Stream is at least intermittent 11 [�hemera1lntermittent Perennial e.g. Quad Name:
if>_ 19 or perennial if>_30"
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 6 ) Absent Weak Moderate Strong
1 a.Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 10 2 3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 10 2 3
3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, 0 1 2 3
ripple-pool sequence
4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 01 2 3
5.Active/relict floodplain 00 1 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches QO 1 2 3
7. Recent alluvial deposits QO 1 2 3
8. Headcuts 0 10 2 3
9. Grade control 0 0© 1 1.5
10. Natural valley 0 0.5 105
11. Second or greater order channel No=00 Yes=3
a artificial ditches are not rated;see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 1.5 ) _
12. Presence of Baseflow QO 1 2 3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 00 1 2 3
14. Leaf litter 1.5 01 0.5 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris QO 0.5 1 1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 1 1.5
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No 0 Yes= 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = 3 )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 0 1 0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 0 0
20. Macrobenthos(note diversity and abundance) 0 1 2 3
21.Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3
22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5
23. Crayfish E0.5 1 1.5
24.Amphibians 0.5 1 1.5
25.Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5
26.Wetland plants in streambed FACW=0.75; OBL= 1.5 Other C0
"perennial streams may also be identified using other methods.See p.35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch: See SF-1 on Drawing 5 for location. Collected between culvert and property boundary.
Headcut located at stream origin is off-site.

David Brame
From: Lawrence, Jennifer L CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2023 9:19 AM
To: David Brame
Subject: SAW-2023-01425 (9709 Stanleyville Drive/J&L Construction/Rural Hall - Forsyth) -
Delineation Concurrence
Attachments: SAW-2023-01425 Feature Map.pdf
Mr. Brame,
Reference is made to ORM ID SAW-2023-01425 --please reference this number on any correspondence regarding this
action.
We have reviewed the information provided by you concerning the aquatic resources, and by copy of this e-mail, are
confirming that the aquatic resources delineation has been verified by the Corps to be a sufficiently accurate and
reliable representation of the location and extent of aquatic resources within the identified review area.The location
and extent of these aquatic resources are shown in callout areas on the attached delineation map, labeled 'Drawing 5:
Wetland Map' dated 7/7/2023.
Regulatory Guidance Letter(RGL) 16-01
https://usace.contentdm.ocic.org/utils/getfile/collection/p16021co119/id/1256 provides guidance for Jurisdictional
Determinations (JD) and states "The Corps generally does not issue a JD of any type where no JD has been requested."
At this time,we are only verifying the delineation. This delineation may be relied upon for use in the permit evaluation
process, including determining compensatory mitigation. "This verification does not address nor include any
consideration for geographic jurisdiction on aquatic resources and shall not be interpreted as such. This delineation
verification is not an Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) and is not an appealable action under the Regulatory
Program Administrative Appeal Process (33 CFR Part 331)."
Jennifer Lawrence, PWS (she/her)
Regulatory Specialist, Charlotte Regulatory Field Office
U.S.Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
8430 University Executive Park Drive, Suite 615
Charlotte, NC 28262
Email: [e-mail]
Cell: [phone]
1

1 Ali 71' 1-T.e-jar4IF 4 .
• f . ; . itirlifliV - -, .I v ''' '. 41
O., ' ' .• . I 1 ij%kit It ' . 4. * 4re'.'4):.0.,Iv; eft
,. , _.,
ili, ' , • ,:"4".r r:'
. z..._"::4.• , , • p4, ,: , ,• `, , P,• ,,. .. , • , , 0.\ If.
69 : , Ad! ,,sir . g •..• •- 0
s '
-
•
it 114,
MN ; kO L: '
ik e DP-1
DP-2 O M'
i1
0- /
WA 1-8
_IN-
0.022 Ac.
! alitleil
..,,* SA
•
. 60 LF
01
41‘
. illti;
40
• . r A
r$4,4 ,4 �''It,
SB
A -? , 1-'• t i ‘ .5y0 / —1% -.I 390 LF
-
0. , .
fir. '1C '4iM' An -• . ' - f. :
i.
'' . - i $1,4 ip .- i -•\ ,, ,. . i . ''a' " , . "1
�r,, LEGEND
1� ' Site Boundary
-_ it*„ - • c • Perennial Stream
Wetland
AAa
THE LOCATIONS OF FEATURES SHOWN ON THIS MAP WERE VERIFIED BY MS.JENNIFER LAWRENCE • SA1-5 Flag Number
WITH THE USACE (SAW-2023-01425 E-MAIL CONCURRENCE DATED AUGUST 16, 2023). THIS MAP
INCLUDES GPS LOCATIONS OF DELINEATED FEATURES. DELINEATED BY PILOT ON 7.6.23. DP-1 0 Data Point
Drawing 5 Wetland Map
Aerial Imagery from ESRI "
g y �'� '�•�,.� - � Stanleyville Drive
and Pilot GPS Data Approximate 16.36-Acre Tract
Scale: 1" = 200' PILfl' Rurall Hall, Forsyth County, NC
Date: 7.7.23 PILC.T ENV IRO \ MINTAL,iNC Pilot Project 9709