20080915 Ver 1_401 WQC - Water Capacity and Consumptive Use_20160125

Burdette, Jennifer a
From: Stroud, Jimmie R <[e-mail]>
Sent: Monday, January 25, 2016 1:04 PM
To: Peele, Linwood; Tarver, Fred; Behm, Pamela; Burdette, Jennifer a; Zimmerman, Jay
Subject: 401 Water Quality Certification - Water Capacity and Consumptive Use Information
Attachments: 401 Water Quality Certification Requirement - Water Capacity and Consumptive Use
Information.pdf
Importance: High
Sent on behalf of Phil Fragapane:
Please see attached. A hardcopy will be mailed.
DUKE
ENERGY,
Ildll1:] I rafxul:]ane' I'l.
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC
Water Strategy & Hydro Licensing
526 S. Church Street, - EC12Y I Charlotte, NC 28202
OffiL(�, 704-382-4138 (I aL,lrnll(�, 704-382-4671

DUKE
ENERGY.
,January 25, 2016
Mr. Jay Zimmerman
N.C. Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Water Resources
1601 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1601
WATERSTRATEGY HYDRO
LICENSING AND LAKE SERVICES
Duke Energy Corporation
526 South Church Stree!
Charlotte, NC 2820 -
Mailing Address
EC12Y,P.0. Box 1006
Re: Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC
Catawba-Wateree Hydroelectric Project (FERC No. 2232-522
401 Water Quality Certification Water Capacity and Consumptive Use Information
Dear Mr. Zimmerman:
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC (Duke Energy) is providing the enclosed water use information as
required by Condition of Certification number three of the 401 Water Quality Certification issued
for the Catawba-Wateree Hydroelectric Project (Project) on November 14, 2008 and the new
license for the project was issued on November 25, 2015, which requires this information be
provided to the N.C. Department of Environmental Quality.
The enclosed information is provided in two parts, outlined as follows:.
1. Tabular listing of maximum instantaneous withdrawal capacity of intakes located on Project
reservoirs (Enclosure 1).
2. Catawba-Wateree Annual Water Use Report for the year 2014 produced for the Catawba-
Wateree Drought Management Advisory Group. This report details all aspects of water use
in the Catawba-Wateree River Basin, including water withdrawals and returns, from which
consumptive withdrawals may be estimated (Enclosure 2).
Please contact me at [phone] or via email (Mark.QakieyC duke-energy.com) if you have
any questions.
6erely,
E. Mark Oakley, Senior Proje ager
Water Strategy & Hydra Licensing
Duke Energy
Enclosures:
1. Catawba-Wateree Hydroelectric Project Water Intake Pumping Capacity Information
(Enclosure 1 )
2. Catawba-Wateree Annual Water Use Report for the Year 2014 (Enclosure 2)

Mr. Jay Zimmerman
N. C. Department of Environmental Quality
January 14, 2016
Page 2
cc: Jennifer Burdette — NCDEQ
Pam Behm — NCDEQ
Linwood Peele — NCDEQ
Fred Tarver — NCDEQ
Ed Bruce — Duke Energy
Phil Fragapane — Duke Energy
Jeff Lineberger — Duke Energy

Enclosure 1:
Catawba-Wateree Hydroelectric Project Water Intake Withdrawal Capabty Information

Catawba-Wateree Hydroelectric Project (FERC No. 2232)
Water Intake Withdrawal Capacity *
Maximum
Project Development and Water User Instantaneous
Withdrawal Capacity
(MG D)
Bridgewater Development (Lake lames)
Marion Lake Club 1.5
Rhodhiss Development (Lake Rhodhiss)
Town of Granite Falls
2.5
City of Lenoir
is
Town of Valdese
1.2
Oxford development (Lake Hickory)
Ole Stili Golf Club
< 1
City Of Hickory
32
Town of Longview
2
Lookout Shoals Development (Lookout Shoals Lake)
City of Statesville
15
Cowans Ford Development (Lake Norman)
Trump National Golf Club
1
The Pennesula Golf Club
2.16
Cowans Ford Country Club
2.16
Mallard Head Golf Club
< 1
Duke Energy (Marshall Steam Station)
1463
Duke Energy (McGuire NuciearStat ion)
2908
Charlotte Water (Lee S. Dukes WaterTreatment Plant)
108
Lincoln County
12
Town of 1VlooresviIIe
18
Mountain Island development (Mountain island Lake)
Duke Energy (Riverbend)
622.1
Charlotte Water (Vest water Treatment Plant)
334
City of Gastonia
75
City of Mount Holly
13.5
Wylie Development (Lake Wylie)
Duke Energy (Allen Steam Station)
784
Duke Energy (Catawba Nuclear Station)
231
American & Efird, Inc.
3.45
Clariant Corporation
3.9
City of Belmont
1Q
City of Rock Hill
60
River Hills Country Club
2.58
Tega Cay Golf Ciub
0.45
Fishing Creek Development (Fish)ngCreek Reservoir)
Springs Industry
30.24
Chester Metropoliton District
15
Great Falls -Dearborn Development [Great Falls Reservoir)
None
n/a
Rocky Creek -Cedar Cliff Development (Cedar Creek Re senroir)
None
n/a
Wateree Development (Lake Wateree)
Camden, SC
12
Lugoff-Elgin Water Authority
10
*The Maximum instantaneous Withdrawal Capacities listed are from the following sources Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission (FERC) and Duke Energy lake use permitting records, NCDEQ Water Withdrawal' Reports and
SC Department of Health & Environmental Control (SCDHEC) Surface Water Permitting Records

Enclosure 2
Catawba-Wateree Annual 'Water Use Report for the Year 2014

Catawba-Wateree
Annual 'Water Use
For the Year 2014
Catawba-Wateree Drought Management Advisory Group
(CW -©MAG )

This page intentionally left blank.

Duke Energy I Catawba-Wateree Annual Water Use for the Year 2074 FN
Memorandum
Technical Memorandum
uaie Friday, May 22, 2015
Projeci CW-DMAG Engineering Support
Siblect Water Use Summary Report for Calendar Year 2814
1.0 Background and Purpose
This Technical Memorandum (TM) documents the analysis and results for water use in the
Catawba—Wateree River Basin (the Basin) for calendar year 2014. The data collection and
analysis have been completed in coordination with the Catawba--Wateree Drought Management
Advisory Group (CW-DMAG). Annual water use summary reports have been prepared for every
year since 2005.
Additionally, the 18 public water supply members of the Catawba-Wateree Water Management
Group (CWWMG), consistent with the objectives of the group's 2010 Five -Year Projects
Strategic Plan, have made efforts to compile water use data on a categorical basis for the
calendar years 2005 -- 2014. The CWWMG recognizes that public water suppliers provide
water for many use categories, and in order to better understand trends observed in public
water supply water consumption, it is attempting to refine the tracking and reporting of such use
into distinct categories. For the fifth consecutive year, an evaluation of these categorical
breakdowns in water use has been included in this annual water use summary report.
2.0 2014 Annual Average Water Use
2.1 Data Gathering and Summary Procedure
CW-DMAG members are required by provisions in the Low Inflow Protocol (LIP) to provide
annual water use data by January 315' far the preceding calendar year. The data includes the
total volume of water withdrawn from and/or returned to surface waters of the Basin. These
volumes are translated into annual average water withdrawals/returns and historically have
been compared to the corresponding water use projections developed for the 2006.Catawba-
Wateree Water Supply Study (MISS). Additionally, as was previously done for the 2013 report,
the 2014 volumes have been compared to the latest water use projections established in the
CWWMG's 2014 Water Supply Master Plan (WSMP), The 2014 water use data is also
compared to actual water use data collected for the previous years 2006 - 2013 to help identify
possible trends. Tattle Al presents the comparison of these data sets.
Water use information was not gathered directly from some entities listed in Table Al Where
possible, 2014 actual water withdrawals/returns for these water users were collected from North
Carolina Division of Water Resources Local Water Supply Plans (LWSPs) or the Environmental
Protection Agency's (EPA's) Envirofacts Warehouse electronic database. Those water users
that did not report water use and could not be found through either LWSPs or the EPA database

Duke Energy I Catawba-Wateree Annual Water Use for the Year 2014 FN
Annual Average Water Use
were assigned their respective projected 2014 water use withdrawals/returns from the
CWWMG's 2014 WSMP, unless otherwise noted. In Table Al, where 2014 projected water
with drawalslreturns were used in lieu of actual demands, data is recorded in 'red' text and the
rows are not highlighted. Where water use was estimated in prior years (red text) but actual
water use data was provided for 2014 (black tent), these rows are highlighted. Actual water use
data that were reported by water users are recorded in 'black' text and the rows are highlighted
Approximately 88% of the Basin -wide water withdrawals (by volume) and 92% of the Basin -wide
water returns (by volume) were derived from actual data obtained from users for 2014.
In 2014, data was also collected from golf courses with direct withdrawals (for irrigation) from
Catawba-Wateree reservoirs. There are 7 such active golf courses in the Basin, of which all
provided 2014 withdrawal data. One golf course previously reported (Rivercrest Golf Club on
Lake Hickory) is confirmed to have closed within the past several years. It was determined that
during 2014 the direct golf course irrigation withdrawals represented approximately 1.3% of the
total net agricultural/irrigation water withdrawals in the Basin (equivalent to 0.25% of the overall
Basin net water withdrawals).
Similar to last year's report, as part of the 2014 Report, withdrawals for lakeside residential
Irrigation have been included for each reservoir„ and correspond to values published in the
CWWMG's WSMP. These assumed values are derived from Duke Energy's work with NC
State University as part of their Catawba-Wateree Residential Lakeside Irrigation Study. While
these annual daily average withdrawal values are typically small, in comparison with other
withdrawals, they have now been captured for the last two years to align with the WSMP.
However, the reporting of lakeside residential irrigation rates differ from the water use
projections included in the WSMP, as the WSMP only accounts for growth in residential
lakeside irrigation water use above the 2011 base usage rates. For documentation of actual
estimated total usage, this Annual Water Use Report documents the 2011 base year rates for
residential lakeside irrigation, as developed by Duke Energy, in coordination with NC State's
Lakeside Residential Irrigation Study, plus the projected growth in this water use category, as
published in the WSMP.
2.2 Observations and Conclusions
Table A2 summarizes 2014 actuaVestimated data and their corresponding WSS and WSMP
projections for Year 2014. This comparison is important because the WSS projections were
used for modeling of the Catawba — Wateree water supply system during the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission's (FERC) relicensing process to assess the impacts of water use on the
Basin's safe yields over a range of hydrologic conditions. Similarly, the WSMP projections have
been used for modeling of the Catawba — Wateree water supply system for development of the
CWWMG's WSMP for the Basin. Tables A3 and A4 summarizes actual and estimated data for
the years 2005 — 2014 along with WSS (Table A3) and WSMP (Table A4) projected water use
for future years for the purpose of comparing observed data to the projections An analysis of
this data results in the following observations/conclusions:
0 Comparisons to the 2008 Catawba-Wateree Water Supply Study

fluke Energy I Catawba-Wateree Annual Water Use for the Year 2014
2014 Annual Average water Use [
Actual water withdrawals and returns for 2014 are less than those projected in
the WSS for 2014. Both withdrawals and returns were lower and the departure
of actual net withdrawal (or net outflow; i.e. withdrawal minus return volume) from
the WSS projections is approximately 22%.
Overall, water withdrawals from the Basin have remained well below 2005
values. While WSS projections predicted a 17% increase from 200E to 2014,
actual water withdrawals for the basin have decreased by a little more than 20%
since 2006, While all sub -basins have seen steady or declining water
withdrawals during this time period, the majority of the reduction has been
realized in the Mountain Island Lake, Lake Wylie and Fishing Creek sub -basins.
Overall, water returns to the Basin are also well below 200E values. While the
WSS projected approximately a 17% increase in water returns from 200E to
2014, actual water returns for the Basin have decreased by almost 29% since
2006. While all sub -basins have seen steady or declining water returns, the vast
majority of the reduction continues to be realized in the Wylie and Fishing Creek
sub -basins.
The departure of actual water use from the WSS projections is likely attributable
to several continuing factors, including.
■ Over the past several years, several large industries have reduced or
ceased operations. Additionally, many industries within the Basin that are
considered "wet" industries (relying on large volumes of water for process
and manufacturing purposes) have implemented water conservation
features due to more stringent effluent limitations and/or NPDES permit
requirements that have significantly reduced their consumptive water use.
■ The economic downturn from several years ago significantly slowed
growth and development in many communities within the Basin.
• Several water utilities previously increased water rates or
instituted/modified tiered rates, which continues to encourage lower water
use by customers.
■ Efforts in recent years on behalf of public water supply utilities to promote
water conservation within the Basin appear to have been successful in
promoting water stewardship and lowering customer's consumptive water
use.
• Behavioral changes by customers to reduce water use during the 2007-
200E drought (including observance of the LIP restrictions) might continue
to have a lingering effect. Based on 2014 withdrawal and return results, it
appears the trend of lower water consumption within the Basin during
recent years is continuing
■ Development trends also appear to be driving per capita water use rates
down over the past decade. As indicated by UNC -Charlotte Urban
Institute data, residential and commercial development within the region.
especially in the Charlotte metropolitan area is on the rebound since the
economic recession in 2007-2005. However, many of the increased

Duke Energy I Catawba-Wateree Annual Water Use for the Year 2014 �"",,�rffy�
2014 Annual Average Water Use
development trends support reduced water consumption, as compared to
historical rates.
• A significant rebound in both single family and multi -family
residential units and commercial properties in Mecklenburg and
surrounding counties (Cabarrus, Union, York) are subject to
building codes which mandate and promote increased water use
efficiency, thereby reducing per capita water use rates. Low -flow
fixtures (faucets, showers, toilets and smart irrigation controllers)
are reducing per capita water use rates.
• Increased growth in Charlotte's urban cure, as compared to the
suburbs, along with population declines in rural areas indicate
many areas are trending toward development of more compact
residences, including many multi -family housing spaces. Such
development results in smaller properties, with less need for
lawn/landscape irrigation. Additionally, many urbanized areas
with apartments, condominiums or multi -tenant residences tend to
use less water on a per capita basis.
• Re -development and revitalization of urban areas is resulting in
many older properties (residential and commercial) being either
renovated or replaced with new structures, leading to replacement
of many older and inefficient water fixtures and systems with new,
water saving systems. These conversions also appear to be
contributing to the observed per capita water use reductions.
■ Comparisons to the 2014 CWWMG's Catawba-Wateree Water Supply Master Plan
Actual water withdrawals and returns for 2014 are less than those projected in
the WSMP for 2014, Both withdrawals and returns were lower and the departure
of actual net withdrawal (or net outflow) from the WSMP projections was
approximately 11 %.
Overall, water withdrawals from the Basin are slightly below 2011 values (base
year values for WSMP projections). While WSMP projections predicted a 3.5%
increase from 2011 to 2014. actual water withdrawals for the basin have
decreased by a little more than 3% since 2011
Overall, water returns to the Basin are slightly higher than 2011 values. While
the WSMP projected approximately a 4% increase in water returns from 2011 to
2014, actual water returns for the Basin have increased by just less than 3%
since 2011
The departure of actual water use from the WSMP projections is likely
attributable to slightly lower water and sewer system growth rates than originally
projected, along with per -capita water use rates which continue to remain
relatively low or may even be decreasing, as previously discussed.
Comparisons between 2013 and 2014 Actual Data
Overall. water withdrawals from the Basin increased by approximately 2%
between 2013 and 2014- Higher levels of rainfall during 2013 appear to have
reduced the water withdrawal demand {most likely water used for landscape

Ouke Energy I Catawba-Wate,ree Annual Water Use for the Year 2014
2014 Annual Average Water Use
irrigation purposes) from historical average levels and these withdrawals
projected by the INSMP. As such, normal rainfall patterns during 2014 likely
increased water consumption above the 2013 rates.
Basin -wide returns in 2014 decreased from 2013 values by a little more than 1 °Ia
likely due to less precipitation in 2014, as compared to 2013, resulting in less
sewer system inflow and infiltration.
The overall net water withdrawal experienced a 5% increase from 2013 to 2014,
which is likely attributable to above average precipitation during 2013, as
compared to relatively normal rainfall patterns in 2014.
All sub -basins experienced a slight increase or steady pattern in overall net
withdrawals from 2013 to 2014.
The water withdrawal/return reductions continue to be seen most clearly in the
middle portion of the Basin and are likely due to the large concentration of
population and industry in this area.
In addition to the tables referenced above, 'Figure Al presents actual net withdrawals by water
use type (e.g., public water systems, industrial users, power) from 2006 — 2014. Figures A2 and
A2 -A compare actual net withdrawals from 2006 — 2014 to the net withdrawals projected in both
the WSS and WSMP over the entire study periods and from 2006-2014, respectively, Figures
A2 -B, A2 -C and A2 -D depict actual net withdrawals, withdrawals and returns, respectively,
between 2005 and 2014, as compared to annual precipitation departures from normal (based on
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Charlotte region precipitation data)
It should be noted that net withdrawals trends within the Basin align very closely to precipitation
patterns, with increases in net withdrawals when rainfall is below normal and decreases in net
withdrawals when rainfall is above average.
Figure A3 compares the 2014 actual net withdrawals by water use type (e.g., public water
systems, industrial users, power and agriculture/irrigation) to the MISS and WSMP projections
for 2414. Figure A4 compares the 2014 actual net withdrawals by water use type to the
previous 2013 actual net withdrawals. These figures depict the slight increase in the actual
2014 net withdrawals from the 2013 results and departure of the actual 2014 net withdrawals
from the WSS and WSMP projections for 2014
It should be noted that Figure A4 shows a considerable increase in the industrial user category
net withdrawals from 2013 to 2014. This increase is attributed to a much larger net withdrawal
by Resolute Forest Products in 2012, as compared with previous years, due to much smaller
discharges in 2012 resulting from not releasing water from their holding pond/lagoon to comply
with NPDBS permit requirements for dissolved oxygen. As a result, when the volume of water
being held in 2012 was subsequently released in 2013, a lower annual net water withdrawal
was recognized in 2013 for this industry, as compared to 2012 and now, 2014.
Figures A5, A6 and A7 have been developed for the 2014 Report to reflect the historical water
withdrawals (Figure AS), returns (Figure A6) and net withdrawals (Figure A6) within each sub -
basin from 2006 to 2014. Each of these charts reflects relatively constant water withdrawals,
returns and net withdrawals within each sub -basin over the past nine years. The large decrease

Duke Energy I Catawba-Waleree Annual Water Use for the Year 2014
�Calegwcal Water Use FN
in withdrawals and returns between 2006 and 2007 in the Fishing Creek Reservoir sub -basin as
attributed to the closure of the Celanese Acetate industrial facility. It should be noted that
following the closure of this facility water use in the sub -basin has been relatively constant,
similar to the trend represented by the other sub -basins.
3.0 Categorical Water Use
3.1 Data Gathering and Summary Procedure
The 18 public water supply members of the CWWMG were asked to provide annual water use
for the calendar years 2006 — 2094 divided into four broad customer categories, generally fitting
the following descriptions for water use:
■ Residential —Water used by residential customers including single and multi -family
residences and apartments
• Commercial — Water used by commercial users such as restaurants, retail facilities,
carwashes. etc.
• Industrial — Water used by industrial facilities such as textile mills, technology data
centers, etc , often for industrial process purposes
■ Institutional - Water used by institutions such as schools, government buildings, jails.
etc.
Additionally, at the request of the CWWMG during the 2012 CW-DMAG Annual Meeting, the
"Wholesale" category was added to the categorical use reporting requirements to track
municipal water wholesales (water sold to other cities and towns) as a separate category and
was included in the 2012 and 2013 Reports and now again in the 2014 Report. For years prior
to 2012, this category is not included in the categorical water use summaries.
Because the intent of the categorical water use reporting is to identify water use patterns for
end-use customers, the category specific data does not include unaccounted losses,
operational use (e g., use in water treatment operations), or irrigation uses when monitored by
separate meter.
All CWWMG public water utility members supplied categorical water use data for 2014, although
complete categorical water use data were not supplied by some public water suppliers listed in
"able 61. It should be noted the Town of Long View began purchasing water as a wholesale
customer of the City Hickory in mid -2014, thereby discontinuing use of their intake and
operation of the water treatment facility. As such, their categorical use for the first half of 2014
is shown, but the remainder of their data going forward is and will be reflected as a wholesale
categorical water purchase from the City of Hickory.
Also, while some public water suppliers did not provide any data in past reporting years, others
provided partial data (e.g., missing some calendar years, combined categories such as
commercial/industrial, etc.) For these entities, the categorical breakdowns were estimated using
a variety of techniques including:

Ouke Energy I Catawba-Wateree Annual Water Use for the Year 2014 FN
Water Use
■ The use of categorical breakdown information listed in the entities' North Carolina Local
Water Supply Flans
• Revenue or customer number information provided by public water suppliers
• Use of estimates provided by public water suppliers through telephone interviews
In Table B1, estimated categorical water use data are recorded in 'red' text and are not
highlighted. Actual categorical water use data reported by water users are recorded in 'black'
text and are highlighted Approximately 95% of the historical and 100% of the 2014 categorical
water use, by volume, was derived from actual reported data. Explanations of the estimation
techniques applied for each public water supplier can be found in the footnotes of Table B1.
3.2 Observations and Conclusions
Table B2 summarizes categorical water use by sub -basin for the calendar years 2006 - 2014.
No values are provided for Lake James, Great Falls Reservoir, or Rocky Creek Reservoir
because no public water supply member of the CWWMG currently withdraws from them. An
analysis of this data leads to the following observations/conclusions:
■ As shown in Figure B1, the residential use category consumes the largest share of
public water supply, averaging approximately 57% Basin -wide in 2014. Commercial use
represents the second largest share at almost 20%, industrial use is just over 8%4, the
institutional category's share is slightly more than 5%Q and the wholesale category use is
just over 10% These values vary by sub -basin, but with only one exception (Lake
Rhodhiss), residential water use outweighs all other uses. Additionally, wholesale water
use is shown to vary widely by reservoir with large percentages used in the Rhodhiss,
Hickory and Wylie sub -basins, with considerably less wholesale water use elsewhere
■ In terms of actual volume of water use, all categories have generally been steady or
declining since 2005 Figures B2 and B2 -A present the Basin -wide water use trend by
category for all calendar years. Figures 62-B through B2 -F depict the 2006 to 2014
trend for residential, commercial, industrial, institutional and wholesale water use,
respectively Each figure depicts a decreasing trend during the study period for all
categories except institutional water use.
• As shown in Figure B3, the relative share of water use observed for each category has
remained relatively consistent since 2006, although the drop in categorical water use
between 2411 and 2012 was attributed to the new reporting requirements for the
wholesale category which now consumes a percentage of the overall water use, unlike
previous years' reporting. 'It is likely that the mandatory water restrictions implemented
under the last intense regional drought and economic recession, both of which began in
2007, were the main sources of downward pressure on all categorical water uses.
■ There has been relatively no change in industrial and institutional water use over the
past several years, as shown in Figure B2. Industrial water use has remained constant
over the past six years, indicating that, while the economy has made improvement since
the 2008 recession, industrial water use has not increased in relation to economic
growth. This may well be attributed to the stagnant growth of "wet" industry in the region
and water conservation programs that have been implemented by large industrial water
users in the Basin.

Duke Energy I Catawba-Wateree Annual Water Use for the Year 2014 ��
Catego6cal Water Use
• Both residential and wholesale water use for 2014 are almost identical to 2013 values,
as reflected in Figure 132. However, this figure also shows a continuing increase in
commercial water use from 2013 to 2014, with 2014 values more closely matching water
use rates from 2009 for this category.
■ The total categorical water use for all reporting public water suppliers accounts for
approximately 78% of annual average water withdrawals in 2014. Prior to the inclusion
of the wholesale water use reporting category, this value was approximately 70% each
year between 2006 and 2011. As stated previously, there are several water use types
not included in the categorical water use reporting which likely account for these
differences between the overall water use and categorical water use. Figure B3 depicts
the percentage of the annual basin -wide categorical water use between 2006 and 2014,
designated by category, while Figure 133-A depicts the categorical water use breakdown
for 2014.
• Figures 64 through 67 represent the individual sub -basin shares for each water use
category from 2006 to 2014. As represented in these figures, departures in categorical
water use for 2013-2014 from historical records are due, in part, to more complete data
reporting by CWWMG members for 2012-2014, a revised methodology for estimating
categorical use for public water suppliers providing incomplete categorical data that was
implemented beginning with the 2011 Report and inclusion of wholesale categorical
water use beginning in 2012. For North Carolina suppliers providing incomplete
information, the revised methodology uses the historical averages for the suppliers'
categorical water use as stated in the 2002, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2011 North
Carolina Local Water Supply Plans. For North Carolina users with only partial
categorical data stated in the Local Water Supply Plans, and for South Carolina users
without Local Water Supply Flans, the categorical use is based on the Basin -wide
historical average categorical breakdown. For each method, the average categorical
percentage of the supplier's total annual withdrawal is used to calculate the categorical
use where data is missing or incomplete.
■ Table B3 presents the relative entity withdrawal range and corresponding water use for
CWWMG members. This data highlights that in 2014, 4 of the 18 members (22%) use
greater than 15 mgd and account for almost 75% of the CWWMG water use; 4 of the 18
members (22%) use 5-15 mgd and account for almost 15% of the CWWMG water use:
and 10 of the 18 members (56%) use 0-5 mgd and account just over 10% of the
CWWMG water use.
■ Table C1 presents the 2014 monthly total withdrawals by CWWMG members, while
Figure C1 graphically depicts the CCWMG monthly withdrawals by sub -basin. Figure
C2 depicts the cumulative CWWMG member withdrawals by month, along with the
applicable peaking factor for each month's average water withdrawal, relative to the
annual average CWWMG water withdrawal for 2014.
The annual reporting requirements for CW-DMAG and CWWMG members, as well as the
subsequent data analysis efforts, provide an Important evaluation of key assumptions and
modeling input parameters that were used to support Duke Energy's relicensing efforts. To
date, nine calendar years have been captured. Water use trends have been affected by a

Duke Energy I Catawba• Wateree Annual Water Use for the Year 2014 1 ��
Categorical Water Use r
significant drought economic conditions and water use management in the Basin. It will
continue to be important to gather and analyze this data so that future attempts to manage and
model water use within the Basin can be accomplished with the correct perspective, facts, and
assumptions

Tfiis page intentionally left blank.

Duke Energy I Catawba-Wateree Annual Water Use for the Year 2014 � ^�
Attachments
J

This page infenfivnally left blank

Tnh]. 11 . C'oenwhn-AL4rr. r.. Ili... rincisr LL'iehdruwnlc - 5iummnry Sheer fin mail
P"j 1D
EV61Y
Faciloy
Sourre Wafer
21ft
AVilbdrawa
26072008
Wilbdrawa
'ifhdm o
2009
Wilhdsawa
2010
Withd—'
2011 2012 2013
ilhdraa
W'ilhd—ii YVilbdr a LVw
2015
IViihdrawat
2006 AV 55
20141%SMP
Industrial
I Amami
I Am-po
I.Amount
t.Ymount
i .Amoual
I Amaum I Amalns I Amauni
%mount
withdrawal Difference
YVilhdwwal Diffe—rr
N WS.1 Coals Am -O
Sevier Fmrshmg ?fool
North Fork Caron ba Rit or
k:aeimale
k'stimale
LANE JAMES
Industrial
N WS.1 Coals Am -O
Sevier Fmrshmg ?fool
North Fork Caron ba Rit or
I
u
u 0
NWJ41 Nea Indulin—Fumte
-
-
-
-
91 +,
,,.
di
-111
Public Wafer Supply IP%VSI
NWJ-2 Crh of Manan
Manan WTP
Buck Creek
i N
. r
l0
2O
2,0
20
., +
21
1 5
416
N WI.3 City of Manan
Mono WTP (see abosc for pmj 1
Clear Croci,-
NWJ.S Cri. or Manor
Maxim WTP Ise ubore far pr:j i
Mackra Cseck
-
-
-
Paner
NW1.5 Duke Enefgy Corporauon
Future - Nen
Lake James
-
-
-
-
-
II to
t10
01)
Ili]
041
011
AgriculhsraVirripeaian
N WJ•ii Buck Creek Trow Ilan
Bucl, Creek Trout Farm
B[rck Creek
1 3
1 3
13
t 3
1 3
1 .1
1 3
011
00
1 3
-13
" n
110
NWJ-7 Huns Creek Trout Fum1"
Homs Creek Tran Farr
Harris Creel
09
09
09
B 9
11*
110
00
00
Ila
09
419
an
Ila
NWJ-H NC Wildlife Resources Commission
Armsteong State Fish Halchen - Upper
Armsuong Creek
to X.
(IN
lox
0 1
09
0 H
011
0H
V
it N
[Oil
to N
011
NWJ-is NC WUdlife Resources Comrrussron
Amisim%Slate Fish Holchen - Loeser
Arnumg Creek
J 3
3 3
3 3
3 3
33
3 3
3 3
3 3
3 3
1111
33
It D
N WJ-111 NC Wildlife Rrsources Cmtmissron
Armslrmg Slate Fish HalChen
Bee Rock Creek
415
115
IIS
0 5
t11
0 S
02
115
05
to
t15
Ila
NWJ-11 NC Wildlife R--. es Commission
Marro Stale Fish Halcben
Cohoba Rn"
if
03
03
03
03
03
03
02
..:
-111
112
00
NW -1 Brim Aencullutarflrnkauon Demand
Vanes
Vancs
I1
IN
IH
1H
t9
14
1S
53
err
-_
33
IIII
NWJ-f 3 Moron Lake Clubs`
Golf Course Irgahon
Lake James
-
-
-
1105
016
003
Ila
0 I
Di
(to
NWl.ls NoGalrCosusersl••••Future
Future Gulf Course Imgasron
Lake .1—e5
•
-
_
_
1i i'
110
Ili)
110
1111
NWJ-I(. Basin Rcs.demral Lak—le tmew,twt"
Rcadenlial Lakeside Irrigation
Late lames
-
-
-
-
-
fill
n N
119
110
LAKE JA MFS SUB -B ASIN IOTA L FLO YV
it.,
11.8
12.4
15.0
121
11.4
111
IIA
11.8
12-5
40.8
ILS
-0.7
LAKE RIIOD111SS
Induslnal
NWR-) Ncu indusln - Fwurc
-
-
-
-
110
00
ltd
u 1
411
PWS
NWR-1 Toxin OFGranuc Faik
Granite Falls V TP
Lake Rhadhess
I r
1 3
{ 2
I I
161
12
12
1:
11
16
-116
12
.01
NWR•: Cit, of La IT
Leoar WTP
Lake Rho&un
h.I
r. 3
1 9
58
fr 1
66
57
5 1
6 5
711
-116
6.7
41 3
NWR-3 Coy of Mor,garnon
Cuau ba Rn er WTP
Cua%ba Rmer
H S
'1 41
N 4
78
82
14
15
83
H 5
94
-a 4
17
-02
NWR-# To -3r of V addcsc
Valdese WTP
Lake Ithodhrss
44
4 1
3 5
3 1
34
3 1
32
33
29
611
-36
3
-03
AZSir W NraUl m=align
00
NWR-5 NC Wildlife Resources Commission
Table Rock Slate Fish Hwchen
in5h Creek
119
00
119
00
NWR-6 Su.1n AGncultural7lmganor Demand
Vanes
Vanes
'
"
}
'
i
40
13
53
011
NWR-7 Basin Resadrntial Lakeside lmgaumnr'
Ri tdenual Lakeside Imjjuron
Lake Rhodhiss
-
-
11 II
04
04
it i1
LA KE III ODHISS SUB -BASIN TOTAL FLOW
25.1
iS_l
,L7.0
22.5
23.5
24A
235
25.3
S-i.i
21.8
4.11
2f.41
-1.0
LAKE HICKORY
]industrial
NWH-u Nea lndusln - Future
-
-
o ri
011
00
11 [1
0 ]
41 1
PWS
NWH-1 Cty aHdckor}'
Iliclon WTP
Lake Hickow
i 1.
113
127
121
T2
I`r
115
tit
1115
162
-56
157
42
NWH : Tian Of Lank'. rew't'
Lmgs rew WY'P
Lake Hickson
I1 N
117
r 5
I s
u N
u 1
0 •i
u 1
02
I f.
-1 i
O B
-01
Power
NWH-6 Duke r"'I Corporacion
Finure-Nos
Late Htckon
011
011
011
1111
0 t
tin
AomhuralflrrigaIlan
NWH-3 Basin AV. ncuhu WAmp;.Iw Demand
Varies
L'asr s
'
1 1
+
' '
1 r
6 5
-11 3
1 1
110
NW'H-1 Ri.ereseslGolf Club"
Golf Causelongation
LakeHickow
ilii
00
as
Oa
00
00
00
NWH-5 take Hrckurs Cri min Club
Golf Course lmgaltm
PooWLake
-
-
'12
110
02
112
t10
NWH•7 Netr Golf Course[s)•••-Fultue
Future CWl"Course lmeallon.
Lake Hxkon
ii
Ila
011
Ila
to 11
flip
NWH-N Basin Residcnual Lal—de Img3non''4
Residenu at Lakeside Ime au an
Lake Hickon
1 a
1 .
01)
1 5
1 5
00
LAKE HICKORY SUB -BASIN TOTAL FLOW
14.'
I5.2
15,5
14.4
14.9
Ib.t
1.3,N
13"1
t3-';
171
-1V
I I"
45

Tnh1e Al _ ('nfnwhn AVnferce Riwer Rnein Withdrnwnlc Cum mnru Ghent lin mnrl.s
Proj 16
Entity
Facility
Sim ere Water
2006
Wilhdrawalkilhdtnsra
2007
2008
Withdrawn
2009
Withdrawn
2010
W'ilhdrawa
2011 2012 2013
Withdrawn 1lithdrawa W�ilhdrawo
2015
11ifhdrawal
7006 WSS
2013 WSMP
411
411
CHI
071
1171
4L3
LAKENORMAN
I Amount
I.Amount
1 Amount
I Amount
I Amounl
t Amount 1 Amount I amnunl
1 rn Ulll
W'Ihdrmral Difference
W"ithdrawal nifferr„re
I
Indur7rial
Estimate
Estimate
LL hUUl SItUAI ] I KL
Indmintil
NWL-ii Nr1%Indusin---Fulurc
PWS
NWL-1 Can of Slatesrdle'
Power
NWL-3 Duke Env* CotpO atton
A,�nnlllura6[rri;atlon
NWL.2 Basin Aynculturalllmgauon Demand
NWL-I Basin Resldenital Lak est de lm H3Won"
Slaie6%tile WTP LoOkou Shoal, Lake
Futute � Ne % Lookou1. Shoal, Lake
Vanes Vanes
Reside sial LaAcsldc Imgulim Loukum Shoal: Lake
LOOKOUT SHOALS LAKE SUB -BASIN TOTAL FLOW
5 v
5.0
1 7
4.11
' K
I v
-
4.1
1
s
-
4.4
1 2
-
4.6
4,
-
-
3,4
)c
4.6
1_
4-4
a
-
".
4.3
.111
1
15
i;0
11.6
00
-7 a
11
-115
0!
-1.2
Ill
33
pit
11)
112
4.6
411
411
CHI
071
1171
4L3
LAKENORMAN
Indur7rial
Clmurl Budigton Indict nes
Mvocr3r111e Plant
Lake Nnrrron
11 It
11 to
to t1
110
1111
n It
0 0
It 0
It It
Oil
[Oil
00
00
NWN-o Ne• , Ind usin----Fwure
-
-
-
-
00
00
00
00
It 1
al l
PWS
NWN-I Charlotte Walet
LeeS Dul, tWTP
Lake Ngtrrem
194
2111
137
76.5
156
173
ix to
111.1
182
250
•!'i
180
U
NWN-2 Lincldn County
LlnMis Count% WTP
Lake Normal
25
1(1
'_4
:6
24
27
24
25
i M
27
11 1
10
-413
NWN-3 Towm of Moonn, ille
'm"Mv 11le WTP
Lake Norllmal
4 11
43
37
4.0
3.2
43
47
.19
5 3
911
-14
15111
417
NWN-4 Ca
Fulurc - Ne%4ST
Lake Nonn]11
IID
Ii til
710
lip
1711
00
0 0
R 0
0 0
3 a
,
011
too
Power
NWN-5 DuAr Lnerl,R, Corpvranon
Marshall Slcam Slalivn
Lake Norman
11.4
! 3 4
t3 4
] 3 7
13 y
12 2
ill 8
9 3
1 tl 3
13 1
-'_ N
13 3
.30
lWN-f Duke Encry, Cwporauon
VcGnure Nuclear Slahvn
Lake Nomrui
242
2_19
21II
244
?J4
201
21K
23 It
_._
233
-11
'_311
aPII
NWN-7 Dukr F.ncry. Cmpomw>n
Future - New
Lake Norman
11B
00
210
D0
00
lie
00
170
110
00
00
0B
66
Agncul lur•alfl rnG¢lion
NWN-Il Basin n Demand
Vanes
vanes
-
-
11,
-
114
toll
NWN-7 Tnvnp Nail mat Gal C Cl ub'
Golf Carcase. tmgauwl
Lake Nturrun
-
-
-
-
-
III
dI1
0o6.
1112
loll
11t
11t
01)
NWN-ill The Fetur+sula Goir Club
Gaff COME lmganon
Lake Norman
-
-
-
-
-
" Im
(I0.)
1:106
411,3
Ivo
111
11 t
00
NWN-I1 Cowam, Ford Golr Club
Gaff COME lmgau on
Lake Norman
011.11
002
it
011
71 it
11;1
00
N"- 12 Mellaril Bead Golf Club
Golf Course tmgalton
Lake Nor
-
-
-
-
-
to till
003
0112
002
Ifo
00
110
00
NWN-13 Elam Resldenual Lakalde IMVDclm,'
Restdenud Lakeside Imyonon
Laky Norman
-
-
-
r• a
loll
65
45
Io11
NWN•14 New Golf Course(%)--Fufwe
Future GoIrCcune lmoiabon
Lake Normal
•
-
-
-
-
00
110
00
110
00
LAKE NORMAN SUB -BASIN TOTAL FLOW
64.4
67.0
boa
64,1
LIS
S9,6
603
66,0
66.4
'19,9
-133
71..1
417
MOUNTAIN ISLAND LAKE
Industnal
14 W M -n New lnd+rdn -Future
-
-
00
tl to
u it
01
ii 1
PWS
NWM-I Charlotte Wales
Franklin told Vest WTP
Moulin Island Lake
+1".19
972
913
991
104 It
42 4
11'14
114'1
x;
119.0
-310
46 1
-719
NWM-2 Two Killers Oilma[Gastonlo-Crorertor Cwslm i o WTP
Mowrtimn is l and ial.e
486
173
1711
L63
140
173
]NO
177
1711
195
-19
1110
-0 .1
NWM-3 Cog or Mount Holh
Mount Ha01 WTP
Mountun Island Lake
2 3
24
2.7
2.6
26
25
2 s
2 5
' s
14
It l
16
00
Power
NWM-4 Duke Enugy Corpamton
Rn ebend Steen SiaLim
Mosaslaln ]sl=id Lake
l f,
19
19
us
13
117
25
-25
09
41 rI
A grimitu rue l rrigali on
NWh7.5 Bum Agneulltua /ImLanon Demand
vanes
vans%
,
nx
rI x
', x
x+11
stn
.i x
119
-115
03
114)
NWM-, Basin Rrsldmpsll Lakeside Imgauon"
Resrdmnnl LAn3de Imfaum
5i ountam Island Lake
1111
03
It 1
Oto
NWM-7 Nrw Golf Coursefs)--Fulurc
Future GolrComse Imgatmn
4luunlaan Island Lake
-
-
-
0 n
00
0 O
4111
n 0
U II
MOUNTAIN ISLAND LAKE SUB -BASIN TOTAL FLOW
122.6
119A
1117
IIIIA
1273
115.9
110.9
Iu59
1011.0
1443
-36J
I INA
-111.4

Table .1mary Sheet (in r11pd3
Pray ID
Entity
Faeilitv
Source Willer
2(1(16
Nrithdrawa
2111"
Wilhdrawa41'ilhdmwa
2008
2009
IYilhdrawa
MI)
Withdmwa
MI 2012 2013
Rithdmw�a iLilhdrawa Vkilhdrawa
2014
IV ithdrawal
1WG YYSS
2a 171Y5!11P
Induslrial
I amount
I A....1Iamuun!
I Amount
[amount
I amount I :Imounl 19mounl
Ymounl
IYtthdrawal DiRrrrnee
IYilhdrawal Biffrrence
NWY-1 Confidential InduStn
Canl"idmuod In.dusrn
Lake Wr lie
I :+
I M
1 n
Estimalr
£stimatr
LA i(£ W YLI E
Induslrial
NWY-1 Confidential InduStn
Canl"idmuod In.dusrn
Lake Wr lie
I :+
I M
1 n
I h
1 .I
n
7 !1
x
-I x
t1 a
it it
NWY-2 Clanant Corpoiallon
Mi.. HOIN Plant
Lake Mlie
0.3
al
02
"1
411
II I
11
I
_
04
413
0 [
it I;
NWY-3 Cramer liounlwn FlnrshinF LLC
Ctorrct!lfauntyn Flnishinv.
South F&I, Casa%ba Rarer
1 u
1 -1
1 .1
1 4
1
1 K
1 r
11''
1 f.
-4 6
n0
011
NWY-4 Hednch lMwncs
Laic No— Quarn
Foran Caret.
0 7
73 7
o I
.I '
' i
it N
-111
912
gill
NWY-5 Swmens Eneryn Inc 19
S7crrtcns E11cr19 Inc
L3lc W. Ire
log
ION
9 9
55
65
45
f. 4
75
x I
Ill[(
-27
72
1119
PWS
N'WY-!, Cl tr of Betmant
Mkr oal WTP
Late Wr lie
2.1
20
19
I K
19
1 N
I N
1 r
1 K
3 6
-1 8
1 K
411
NWY-7 Bessemer C1tr
1 V Tarple7 W'TP
Lon` Creek
13
1.2
1.2
1 1
1.2
09
41 K
(19
1'_
17
415
( l
111)
NWY-N Brsarrnv Cin
3 V Torplel WTP (see abnie Cor pro 1
Arrawood
-
_
-
-
-
011
-
_
_
NWY-) Can of Chemrl0e
Chemstlk WTP
lnrdonC 3.
04
07
09
04
0.9
117
07
07
07
10
413
Is
-01
NWY-Itl Tome of Dallas
Dallas WTP
South Fort. Calm, ba RIr er
'0 6
O 6
Of,
06
0 6
is f.
0 F
117
116
416
410
B 6
910
NW V- I i To%Ti of "to Shoals
High Shoals WTF
smth Fork Cath%ba Rlr er
0 1
O l
01
0.1
0 1
410
El it
00
IAO
111
-41 1
0 11
0.0
'NW V -t2 C N. of Ltecointon'
Lmcolnion WiP
South Fork Catawba Rat or
J K
4 N
i .y
50
51
4 1
34
3 1
3 1
54
-23
1 2
41:
NWY-13 CII)' of Newton
Ne goo WTP
Jacobs Fork
Z6
34
36
36
39
39
36
36
37
3 V
9 7
3 K
411
NWY-1.4 Cur of Newton
Norton lVTP (vee nbo% a for p ro7
Cir. Lake
•
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
NWY-15 To%n of Startler'
Staab+ WTP
He) le Creel.
0,1,
lor.
0 o
c1 r,
ti 0
lie
it 14
16 Is
06
-416
t10
011
Power
NWY-16 Duke EnerL Corporarlon
Alkn Sleam Plant
Lake W7 lye
r. 2
711
6 K
5.2
74
f* 1
3 C
3.1
3 9
61
-22
(.2
-2 3.
NWY-t7 Duke Enerj' Colporallm
Lincoln Comb4ulton Turbine Fae71 Nr
lUll.w Creek
1111
041
❑4t
ti Il
nn
i+1,
rtu
.1.
r1 r1
toil
4311
1.117
710
Agri culturalltrri=ation
NWY•tN Gaston Cotrim Club
Got Course lm I; at.-
Lake
'12
_
OO
(12
712
toil
NWY-21 The Pa!15Mos C -1r, Clull
Gott Course lm0 anon
Pend
-
-
-
SIO
01
tot
00
NWY-23 framer Ma mlan Counin Club
Golf Cnurae Imyat.on
Duhan Creek
011
00
t1O
0 I
Industrial
SWN-41 Neu lndu5rrr----F ulurr
-
-
-
-
-
•
00
114
5161
t1 t1
ill
-01
CWS
SWY-I Rock Hill
Clh of Ro4:k Hill %T?
Lake Wylie
152
H.1.
141
140
154
118
750
144
105
162
03
167
a13
SWY•:2 Tega Cm
•
too
0(3
1117
110
Ilii
041
0n
00
110
11 II
00
470
00
Power
SWY-3 DukeFalerjn•Corpomm
Carat%ba NuclearStauon
Lake WsIke
29n
319
32{,
311
329
325
3414
331
325
35tl
-33
322
111
SWY-4 Duke Fn"L% Corpcimon
Fui4 -Neo
Lake Wille
it 4i
O0
00
110
110
110
00
00
Ili
00
410
11 t1
tie
Agri c tit rumV I rrigation
SWYA Basin Agr7cultu7xl(Imgatim Demand
Vanes
Vanes
'1
•+ h
N Il
2.1
•J 3
-64
29
itis
SWY-6 N, a 1-13111 Cotolin,' Club
Gulf Cw me Imgauoa
Late wrlir
-
-
-
-
to (is
0 go
004
it 09
(10
0 I
Ill
110
SWY-7 Toga Cal Golf Club
GalrCourle Imganorl
Lake W%im
-
-
-
1124
014
010
V IN;
U tl
91
ill
-03
SWY•4 Basin Residential Lakeside lmgaliun'
R evdenual Lakeside lmgauon
Lake Wr he
-
-
-
"I
-
[Pit
29
217
Ott
SWY-38 Nem Golf Coursetsl---Future
Furore GotTCwrse Irrigation
Lake W, Iter
4111
00
041
013
010
n0
LAKE WYLIE'SUB-BASIN l'OTAL FLOW
87.0
9I_5
81.1
91.4
a9.i
?16,9
le.2
75.4
7111.7
48.7
-19.9
I1111
-1.9

oil'i. A b a;... Rnr;n VViehr4rnwnlc - Summnry Shen (in mvrl5
Prat Ib
Entity
F -Illy
Source Water
20M
Wllhdruwa
2007
Wirhd-
2008
Wilhdea on
200+1
IV'Ahdrmra
2(110
11'iihdr-.
21111 2012 2013
LV ll d- 51'ithdrawn IVithdrnw a.
201.1 --
ilrthdruwal
2� WSS
2014 Nsmr
Induslhal
I.Amount
I.Ant-i
I Amnunt
I Amnunl
I Amaum
1 Amount t Amount I Ammmr
4maum
Wilhdrawol DiffernncC
Wiltidrnwol DilTerrare
SWF• 1 Cel.anme lesson
Celnt er plans
Caw, ba RI, er
Estimate
Eatimore
FISHING CREEK RESERVOIR
Induslhal
SWF• 1 Cel.anme lesson
Celnt er plans
Caw, ba RI, er
Oil
D D
•1 .1
(in it
4 I n
lin
041
SWF 2 Resolute Forest ProdurRs(Bowwer)
Pulp and Paper Mi0
Catawba Rrrer
)3 7
2'r 11
_.
3117
7N I
2117
'•, +
30 7
-1 r.
307
.14
SWF-3 Springs lnduslnd '
Once Complex
Cala%ba Rrrn
Int
17
1.
n
it it
1111
fl
-
113
11 1
110
U:
SWF-( Nation Fatal Chenucal
Manufaciannl! I°lane
Calow ha RI%n'
14
,
22
14 11
SWF•n Nell lndusin---Future
-
1. 1.
.. 1.
0D
or,
111
.nl
PWS
SWF-5 Rocs 'kill f EmergerrniBwkupl
Ctitow ba Rtter
ID
1Al
all
411
[IQ
L0 11
00
u 0
U a
011
SWF-6 UmonCotumlLan-1. Count)
CU%bdRIM Plam
C=u baRner
174
IIIb
I65
IGS
174
Ira
155
156
ITi''
224
-:-5
163
117
SWF-7 Chow Matto"
Chew. WTP
FrshmgCarl.Reserorr
2x
z
35
26
27
30
30
29
__
511
-t s
34
.11
Power
till
SWF-9 Duke Enenrkw Colporanan
Future - Nets
Fishing, Creel. Ra5cn wr
°sat
""
u u
410
it II
n u
00
1111
IF
110
Il It
0 0
11 1)
Agrirul turaVl rrl=ation
SWF-II Basin Agn cull malls mb al+m Demand
Vanes
Vane
^
" r
'1 +
54
g r
t 1
Nr.
t1 Al
Oji
1{d'i
-711
1:
011
NWF-3 Cannel C ountn Club
Gulf Course lmgaum
Carmel LaL..MitAlpine CL
-
-
-
n2
02
110
02
03
till
N W F.5 Fuelhome Coumn Club
Golf Course Irngitrun
-
-
-
-
-
SI 1
it 1
II 0
Ill
0 1
1111
NWF-ht TPC at Piper Glen
Golf Course lml;at+on
Pond
-
-
-
-
112
It,
I10
02
Ill
011
S W Y -1s Walerrord Golf C1uh
Golf Course Imbaum
Cala%ba Rn er
-
-
'- u
20
1111
20
20
till
SWF 11) Basin Residential Lakeside Imrabon'
Resldenual Lal.midc Imj:asian
Ftsh.,%Creek Reser ori
u M
I10
IF"
it"
1113
SWF-II Ne.. GdFCuurx•IQ--Future
Future Golf Course lrngau on
Fishml: Creel. ftesen olr
-
'r+r
00
U0
1111
1111
FISHING CREEK RESREVOIR
SUB -BASIN TOTAL FLOW
12..5.3
63.2
52.9
56A
L4.9
"-s
c6,c
w1 c.
c40
149.5 _
-M.1;
_56.7
-1.7
GREAT FA LI_S - D EA RBO RN R ES£R V OI R
Induslriol
SWO41 Nell indulin--lulure
-
"'
011
1117
.1 •
011
-Ill
Agri nruliu mM rritation
SWG-I Basan Agnctiltural --non De1'1 ind
Varies
e'-
:
11,°.
1 6
SWG-2 Brain Rmldatfrai Lakes. lnsgonon"
Rentdmual Lakestde 1 -gain-
Great Falls Bmenon
111
till
r1 1
,1 .
1111
GREAT FALLS-DEARBORN RESERVOIR
SUB -BASIN TOTAL FLOW
15
f5
[:5
14
1.5
IS
15
01S
03
1.6
-1.2
U.4
41
CEDAR CREEK RESERVOIR
Industrial
SWC -O Ne. lndusm---Fulure
-
110
00
uu
U1
-411
Agnes[ruraMmigation
SWC -1 Bath A4ncsdtumllrmgmttrn Denund
Vanes
Vanes-'
"
'r.
1.
ur.
111
117
-lift
Ill
an
SWC -2 Basm Raldent+al LoLmi de lmgalrnn°
Kesldenual Lakeside Inngnuon
Cedar Creek Resenuu
-
-
-
-
1141
02
02
Ila
CEDAR CREEK RESERVOIR SUB -BASIN TOTAL FLOW
0.6
9A
0,,46
4A
O.i
0.6
0-6
03
00
0.7
-OJ
9x1
-9.1
LAKE WATEREE
Industrial
NC, lndusln-Fuiwe
PWS
SWW-1 Camden
Cin of Corina WTP
Lake Waleree
26
26
32
3 1
23
_ -
: :1
.1 a
-1 k
74
.04
SWW-2 LugofC F] gm Weser Autbon n
LugolF Elgin WTP
Lake Waseree
24
2S
23
1.1..1
__
__
-,.
.',i
t
43
-211
__
II.I
Power
SW W-3 Duke Fner),p� Cnrpontmn
Full-- New
Lake Waleree
Ito
011
Irl
II U
00
01)
110
II 0
Il 0
1111
00
Agri r11lr a mitt migalion
SWWA Basin AgnCsillural Irrigation Demand
Vanes
Vanes
1'
1
SW W-5 Rat1r1 Re,. Idannal LA -de Irnyation'"
Resideural Lakeside tmgai-
LaLe Waleree
-
-
-
1111
1 "
1 7
011
LAKE WATEREE SUB -BASIN TOTAL FLOW
63
6.1
s 1
5.4
5-'
i.6
s -c
ti 9
6.0
9.6
-Ln
6 c
4L3

Pmj 1D
Emily
Facility
Receiving VVatrr
20M
Return
2007
Return
2008
Relum
2009
Return
2010
Rerum
2011
Return
2012 2013
Return Return
2014
Re[um M6 WSS
I
2014 VVSSip
Industrial
.Amount
Am/unt
ArrMunl
Amnum
Amount
,Amount
ks unt Amaun[
Amount Relurn DlRermcr
4V01sdra al Difference
NRJ-I Bauer Heal thcme Corporauon
Bi -.ler Healthcare Corporation
Nonh For'. Cato. ba R,, ar
I I
Estimale
Filimate
LAKE JAMEN
Industrial
NRJ-I Bauer Heal thcme Corporauon
Bi -.ler Healthcare Corporation
Nonh For'. Cato. ba R,, ar
I I
l 3
-41 fi
417
n11
NRJ-2 Coals Aniencori Inc
Sevier Finishing Plain
North Fork Caiowba Pi, ur
04
M i'
1 0
1 1
1 1
.4 s
i 2.
4f 7
It 5
0 tY
Public Waslewlrler, Syslemnr (PAVS)
NRJ-3 Cits ar Mars9iv
Marton WTP
Nicks Cn-6
412
03
_
03
_
02
02
0
011
112
-112
191
al l
NRJ-4 Cm of Moncarm
Cru.tctwWl'F
Cawxba Rssa
01
III
u1
111
0.0
00
00
00
of
411
Ian
00
NRJ-5 TnxnofOldFort
Old FanWWTP
Curl II Creek
04
94
H3
113
:11
02
ill
02
of
05
-03
112
411
PWS - Dame is
NRJ4, Blue Rldl;e C C Dee elopnlent LLC
Blue Rid L'e C CDee elopnscnt LLC
North Fork Catawba Raver
011
02
412
112
0,
112
02
9 n
look
112
412
1113
9 it
NRJ-7 Lin, iIte Harbor Pr Owners Assoc
Umilie Harbor Pr Owncrs Assoc
Line Ilk Rn cr
111
111
41 1.
41 I
to 1
1) 1
It 1
SI 1
0 I
02
41 1
V)
it 11
NRJ-N Llnvdle Bosons Inc
Linville Rcsons l ncorriorared
Limi.11e Rtver
00
0t
412
92
02
02
0_T
(I i7
to 41
02
4)2
00
110
ArriculturaVlm=atian
NIU -`D Suck Crock Trout Farm
Suck Creck Trout Farm
Buck Cmek
1 3
1 3
1 3
1 3
1 3
J3
1 3
11 to
i1 to
1 3
-1 3
n It
0"
NRJ-10 Harris Crock Trawl From"
i tarns Creek Trout Farm
Hans Creek
119
09
'0.9
rt 9
0.7
0.0
Ito
0 I
o0
It.)
-ll 9
0 0
911
NRJ-1 I NC Wildlife Resources Commosnon
Am Imng Stale Fish Hlncben - Upper
Annsimnl�. Creek
Cox
tl R
0 H
Oil
n R
0 k
t1 H
4t R
n R
II R
n n
11 It
it t1
MRJ.i 2 NC Wi kill fe Rcsourccs Curmuv 5rnn
Arms[rvnf. 51aIc Fish Hatcher+ -Loner
Arrrvslrvng Crock
33
3 3
J3
3 3
.43
3 3
3 3
1.)
) 3
31
11 n
3 3
10 0
NFU- 13 NC WIIdh fe Resources C - -m
Armstrong Store Fish I-Ialchm
Bee Rock Creel,
rl5
t1$
05
0 5
IT 5
115
to 5
01
415
115
n 0
f1 5
1111
NRJ-1.4 NC Wildlife Resources Cormuss"
Manors Sime Fish Halchen
Calawba River
it 3
413
.13
0 3
n 3
11 3
ie :
112
it
.0 I.
n 2
II It
LAKE JAMES SUB
-BASIN TOTAL FLOW
9.9'
19.1
10.4
105
105
9.4
9.3
4.2
6.2
10.9
-4.7
6.4
-0.2
LAKE R 110011 SS
]ndm[rial
NRR•J SGL Cabon Curpa r atioii
SOL Carbon Gsrporation
S41v er Creek
" '
" '
'"'
.1
"
"
"
-
1 U
112
1 '_
all
PWS
NRR-'- Cin oFl-c mi
Lenoir W P
Lake RWhrxs
02
91
111
Nit
113
02
01
02
02.
111
01
it
1111
NRA -3 C1h'of Lenoir
Lower Creek WWTP
Lovsw Creek
2.2
22
26
2R
29
21
25
25
25
29
-03
25
41 f1
NRA.4 Cin of Marion
Corpe trig Ureek W W T?
Corlxalmg Creel.
R
0 R
0 to
ri a
419
1 II
a 9
09
9 9
to 1
oil
NRR -5 Crh of Morl;mlon
Cawxba Rn er Pvllu4ton Cwntrd Facilely
Catawba Rei er
47
49
42
42
47
41.
47
5x
41
5 0
413
46
0 1
NRR -6 City of Morganuln"
Catawba Rn a WTP
Lake Rhodlim
Ir 6
9' 0
Ito
1111
0 41
110
17 0
lit)
loll
02
4; 2
11 0
If o
NRR•7 Town of Valdese
Lake Rhcdtss'ipVP
Lakc Rhodlom
16
2.7
23
21
241
1a
25
25
19
54
-35
21
413
A;siculluratit nigi1l lass
NRR.H NC Wildlife Resources ConYn4esion
Table Reek Slate Fish Halclven
Insh Creek
'
"'1
'n
119
u
ori
i19
0 it
u 9
u 4I
LAKE R1EOD111SS SUB -BASIN TOTALFLOW
133
lu
11.2
11.9
125
115
12.5
14.9
12.2
163
4.1
12.4
-0.2
LAKE FIICKORI'
Induilrial
NRH- I HufTrruO F/rvi Inc
Huffman Finishing
Lake H[cknn
t1 I
al
0 1
It I
Is I
a s
0 1
110
1411
11 2
411
n n
oil
?WS
NRH -2 Con ofHockam'
Hlcknn. WTli
Lake Hlcknn
'13
11n
oil
011
11 3
041
011
lin
1t 11
414
41.4
0n
90
NRH -3 Cots of Hlckon
Nordieos4 V,'13'TP
Lakc Hrckoi3
16
34
33
35
34
32
27
I i
28
53
-.15
38
-i 0
NRJi-a City of Levwir
Gvurpoxder t'mck. WWrFP
Cninli"der CreeL
419
1 1
1 it
1 2
1 2
1 1
1 1
13
1 1
1 1
1111
1 1
410
,NRH -5 T. -of Granite Fans
Grro»[e Foil. WWTP
Cnin pnxnla Cseek
04
04
It
04
113
r13
10
04
03
114
413
i,4
411
LANE HICKORYSUB-HASIN TO_TALFLOW
5.3
S.0
4.7
5.3
L,3
4.7
4.1
4.9
43
7.4
-3.2
5.3
-1.1
LOOKOUT SHOALS LAKE
Induslydal
NAL -1 Schn4ider Mills Inc
Schneider MlOs WWTP
Mudd, Pork
"4
'' t
"
"'
^ i
111
0 1
, I
II3
1111
1 1
041
PWS
NPI -2 Towu orTavim%,lle'
Tal lorsvi Re WWT'P
Lower Lulfc Rha
it d
" G
It v
" v
114
04
94
04
II4
ill
04
011
LOO KO UT SI IOA LS LA KE S
U B -B ASI N TOTA L FLO IN
01l.
4J,`
9.s
0.9
0.0
0.7
0.7
0.1
0.7
0.9
.0.2
0.7
0.0

T, hl. .A a f"w •n... h.+. lVne.— Ilk— [ —t. U.-- C—n.,— Q16— fin —11
Pent 1D
Entity
Facility
Reemint Water
20%
Return
200-7
Relum
2008
Retum
1 2009
Return
2010
Return
2011 1
Return
2012 2013
Return Rem-
1 2014
Return 2006 WSS
2014 IVS NIP
00
it it
it 0
n0
11 it
011
1111
011
00
11 it
kl a
0.4
MOUNTAIN ISLAND LAKE
Anwn.nt
Amounl
Amount
Amount
Amount
Amount
.Amount .Amount
.Amount Return Difference
I
Wilhdrxwat Diffcrmrc
PWS
Erlimalr
Esltmote
LAKE NORMAN
PWS
NR.N-I Cin of Clanlnaftl
NRN•2 City of Ciarenta'I
NRN-3 Copy of Claret k`
NRN4 City of Conc,a
NRN•5 Cim of Cciro, a"
NPN -f, Cim orHlcko
NRN-7 Lincoln C&jnh
PWS- Dou alit
NRN-R Aqua North Carolina
NRN-10 Heater Uliblim Inc
Power
NRN-Irl Duke Ener L, Corpoiatim
NRN- I I Duke Enalw Corporation
McLln Creek WWWTP McLin Creek
North WWTP Mull Creek
South WWTP McLrn Greek
Mirth iWWTP Gtc Crlxk,
Southeast W'11Wr7P MCL- Creel.
Hlckon "IT L, le Creel
Lincoln Counh WT -P Lake Norill
Aqua North Cuolmm Lake Nomtan
Dla rid head WWTP Lois Nafman
M orshall Stearn StAnon Lake Norman
McGw le Nuclear Power Plant Luke Nonirmn
LAKE NOR M AN SUR -BASIN TOTAL FLOW
02
01
01,
Is9
04
11.9
It 0
nn
+! It
La
42
ill
n 1
117
04
Do
01
i111
lilt
IA
42
0 I
111
117
04
0 a
0 1
00
11 0
'1.11
01
01
0 �
i1H
114
00
IN it
It 1)
110
1.7
02
No I
. I
0'6
04
to 0
tt 0
1
11 M
011
011
IA
111
at
DSi
117
all
111
410
it 1
it I
Oil
110
I.3
01
0 1
1111
07
Ott
It 1
INC
01 1
It I
to 11
t111
1.2
l!_
0 1
00
a+J
II II
to 1
0 1
(1 41
It n
13
it
0 I
too
07
OIG
0.1
0 l
(111
lilt
IA
n2
01
(11
10
114
U 1
11 1
0 1
(11
-
2.2
+1+1
to It
At 1
-03
414
06
19 11
41 1
411
-
-
-1.1
41
it I
Of)
n7
U 0
11 1
Il 1
till
00
not
11 a
1.1
00
it it
it 0
n0
11 it
011
1111
011
00
11 it
kl a
0.4
MOUNTAIN ISLAND LAKE
PWS
NPM -1 Charlotte Weer
LeaS Dukes WTP
McDouell Creek
-
04
O3
It
113
113
03
Ito
I14
04
Oto
O3
it it
NR.M-2 Clurlone Wuer
McDowttl Creel, WWI?
McDc'.di Crc k
4 9
49
45
46
4 7
4 f
4 It
49
5 0
'J 9
-5 n
4 V
O 1
Power
NRM•3 Duke Fnergl Corporation
McGuire Nuclear Po%rr Plonl
Mountain Island Lake
lilt
nil
'no
11 It
111t
oil
410
nil
till
00
a it
NRM-4 Duke EnerlD Corpomim
Rlrcrbmd S1cam Sixion
M.ountmn Island Lake
Ill)
all
00
loll
till
of a
00
to 11
110
-
O0
00
MOUNTAIN ISLAND BIKE SUS-IiA5IN TOTALFLOW
5.G
53
4.0
4.9
$A
4.1
4.9
$_i
5.3
14.3
-S•4
5,2
4.1
LAKE WYLIE
InduitnAl
NRY-1 Clartanl Corporation
?4 writ Hollti Eut (MI IE) Facdth
Lille WN lte
1 to
04
04
414
04
04
03
"1
to 3
1.2
-09
04
-01
NRY 2 Doha Apparel Inc
Della Apparel Incorporated
Clark Creek
INK
011
IJ 9
09
09
0 9
0+7
Wo
09
119
oil
It 9
4 it
NRY-3 FMC C-porauari
Lrlhtum Dt, tslon Plant
Abemeth, Creek
10
I19
06
O6
to
0C,
1) (1
07
07
07
01
67
it 11
NRY-4 Magda s, Temnnals Holdings LP
Cheerio lit II Te muri al
Long Creek
00
Oil
too
is 11
It to
(Ill
011
It a
II 11
lit;
00
It Il
1111
NRY-5 National Fmll Product Comp=Inc
National Fruit Product Cc Inc
Carpen ler Crock
02
02
112
02
02
Ill
02
11n
n0
02
-02
00
110
NRY-6 Pharr Yarns. Inc
Pharr Yarns Industnal W% rP
'South Fork Cmanba Ri,cr
11 I
III
It 1
0 1
II 1
to I
0 I
II 1
111
01
Ulf
411
110
Closed Rhodta. Inc
R.hOdta Incofpnralad
0 B
00
011
Ill]
till
UO
0 D
lilt
1111
1) Is
lilt
11 It
it it
NAY -7 Textron Inc
Terlron Incotporal. `d
Cro„dcis Creek
it 1
0 1
it I
Ill
it 1
0 1
0 1
It I.
011
0 D
4t 1
1111
it 0
NRY41 Transifontaigne Termtnaltnl+.Inc
Chmlf11te7Pal, Creek Tersrunal 9 l
Pan Creek
it to
lilt
Ito
111k
it0
till
OU
no
lip
011,
410
Ill)
till
NRY-7 TransMontaigne 7ermin.alin C.. Inc
Cheerio ueFPa„ Creck Tcrnxnal N2
Ps„ Creek
i10
lilt
It()
to if
41 ft
0I0
011
tl n
1111
till
Il It
too
lilt
NRY•111 Yorkshue Annencr<s. Inc
Yvrkshuc Amatcas Incorporated
S ouch Fort. Caton ba Rt s n
it fl
till
00
It if
IN it
VO
110
lin
is 11
DO
1111
00
till
NRY-1I General Eleatic Componc-tdld.on
General MMMC Cotnpam•Huckon
Cline Creek.
II 1
111
111
IA C
u 1
D 1
01
till
n n
Ill
-0 I
lilt
4111
NRY-12. Siemens Eeer;R,. Inc 1'
Siemens Enerykx Inc
104
107
07
54
54
64
f8
75
til
107
-24
641
17
PIVS
NRY-13 Cit, of Bd0 t
Bel marl WTP
South Fork Caton ba Ri,a
02
(It
0 I
O I
0I
at
0 1
00
till
02
-02
61
411
NRY-i4 Cly of Bol moat
Bclrnont WWTP
LAkc W,ilc
13
1 3
1 4
14
1 3
1 1
1 3
1 4
14
22
41 N
12
to I
NRY-15 Cth of Chemcdlc
Chem'c1Ile IVWTP
ind.A Cteck
OR
114
194
04
115
45
OG
06
0,9
413
05
0t
NRY-16 Two Rix els U1,I11es iGautlnra-Crarrrrrlon3
Ca toato WTP
Long Creek
06
07
1311
O is
0 0
ills
0 0
coo
11 f,
u 7
at 1
02
a 4
NRY-17 Two Rr, en Unitues {Gasionle-Cramenon}
Cron -dm Creek W WTP
Cro xlen Creek
is
21
2 1
23
__
16
2.2
2 a
23
37
-14
2 0
113
NRY•IH Two R1,en Ulrluues tGastonla-Crentermnl
Long Creek WWTP
Long Creek
60
60
53
L4
fi3
6o
5G
f2
f4
12
-111
6Y
414
NRY-19 Cin of HtckoA
Henn Fora: WWTP
Henry Fort.
24;
24
22
23
23
22
24
2R
25
35
-10
25
OO
NRY-21l Clot of Llncdnlon`'
Llncolnlon WTP
South Fork Catanba Ri,er
0
114
03
n4
03
INN
03
o4
1111
-05
05
-112
NRY-21 City of Lincoftnlonr
Grxaiwon W'147P
South Fork C=% but Brno
31
29
T_!
24
2f1
34
24
_
2.4
36
-12
25
All
NRY-'-2. Cin ofLoµcll
Lo.'rHWWTP
South Fork Cason baRiser
03
03
...4
113
6
03
'3.3
0.3
03
3
113
04
-01
0.2
ilii

Tahl. A 1 . f alnwhr..1V,. lira, Ilii r Ratio, Rervrrne . C"r.nm: Chet lin —.11
P_j ID
Emir.
FscShly
Itrasivirig IVaorr,
111116
Return
1 10177
Return
1 1111411
Return
lane
Realm
2010
Relum
11111 1
Return
21712 2013
Return Rel.-
1 2014
Rrrum 2006 11% I's
12014 WS':SI'P
l! n
P 10
NRY-24 C11s of Move r 110111
.oat, H011. WWTP
.Amount
Amaunl
%n wml
Amaunr
A—larr
Amount
Amaunl Amount
Amount Return Dili mire
Wilhill—al DUT rmre
2:
.71
417
23
00
NRY-25 CIiy ii Ne Mme
Clink Cteek WWTP
Clark Creel:
39
1 b
"1
Estimate
Estimate
NKY•23 C>tt 91.Mount Holt
Mourn1100% W I
La tow_%he
'.� a
it i
U I
00
(I 1
[pip
111
II U
011
111
•0 1
l! n
P 10
NRY-24 C11s of Move r 110111
.oat, H011. WWTP
Lake W1,11c
25
22
21
20
19
20
22
:1
2:
.71
417
23
00
NRY-25 CIiy ii Ne Mme
Clink Cteek WWTP
Clark Creel:
39
1 b
"1
1 9
211
1 8
1 7'
2 1
i%
44
-2 6
1 9
-u I
NRY-26 Lencoln Cowan)n
Fomn Civet, W
WWTP
Fomn' Creel.
06
0 6
0 1
U 7
Oil
0 M
Ott
1341
It 19
0 6
41 L
'.8 I
41 I
NRY-27 Two Rnm 111duteli (C'astonla-Came p
Eagle Road VA TP
South Fork Celau6a Rn cr
1 4
05
0 6
it 5
05
03
Il6
U G
U f.
15
41 1)
05
❑ 1
N'RY-211 Tottn of Dallas
Dallas %4'WTP
Lung Crest
U 4
it 4
a 3
114
o, 4
03
113
114
04
04
till
41 3
00
NRY-29 Toto of Mmden
Mwdm WWTP
Ctark C=k
0 5
03
113
it 3
03
03
03
03
03
It 5
412
u 3
00
NRY-311 Town of MLAdens llle"
MCAdGni Ile WWTP
South Fork Calawba Rot a
0 1
0 0
1111
till
0 0
U 0
00
00
OIL
111
41 1
0 U
(10
NRY-31 Towsi aswitcl r'
Lata Street IAVTP
Maureen Creek
U -1
02
112
112
112
02
0i
02
01
113
412
132
-0 1
NRY-37 Chart one %Vater
Lang Creek WWTP 1Fulurel
Lala I%%lie
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
41 1]
an
to U
r) M
li 0
(111
NRY-3)5 Lincoln Coonn
Ulan Creek WWTP
Krllipn Creek
-
-
-
-
0 %
0 9
all
u 9
U 7
U2
PWS, Dornovilic
NRY-32 £oreluns W>icr Smite Inc
Queens I%arbor WWTP
Lake W; he
411.
n 11
toil
NRY-33 Cmirtma Water Senaee Inc
Rnerpamle VAo TP
Lake Wt lie
't'
.,
.I o
�'
�,
� r
.,
'�r�
01
-111
1111
00
NRY-34 Rulc.ms WWTP
Il.de. ass WWTP
Lake W, lie
"
'''
'' "
"
"'
Ir r
r
It l
-ill
00
00
Power
NRY-35 Duke Ena1< Corporation
Allen Steam Plana
LAI: Ws lie
0 U
on
04.
"to
loll
It IN
U 0
tin
"a
till
00
NRY-36 Duke Emlrb Corponauon
14ncoln Combw.usn'Furbme Fanlm
Killian Creek
o, 0
0 0
(10
till
011
0 0
01i
(III
n 0
IN II
00
PWS - Dememir
SRY-I Carolina. Water Smite Inc
Tego Car 2
Lake W11tr
I. _
u _
_
_
(1 2
lit)
02
loop
SRY•? Carolina water "-cc Inc
Tega Can i
Late Wl he
113
411
n 2
It to
Puwrr
m"n
SRY-3 Dade Fuirry-3 Cotpoin
Cam%ba Nuclear SLalion
All ism Creel,
n n
u II
to U
It 0
it it
n U
el It
toll
u u
D U
Oil
1111
0 U
LAKE WYLIE
SLB -BASIN TOTAL, FLOW
47.,0
36,-5
25.2
301
31.5
313
,30,E
32.9
33b
493
-16.0
31.9
IA
FISHING CREEK RESERVOIR
PH'S
NRF -I Chorlc0e Willa
F=ein WTP
Ste.ilrs Creek
20
2 1
28
3 0
29
34
33
3 8
3 1
18
18
36
a[
NRF -2 Charlene Willer
Ireton Creek W WiP
ligan Creek
95
K it
s 1
7 9
It 3
79
7 6
91
H 6
%i 0
-34
12
.0 ("
NRF.3 Chsrlone Wua
Sugar Creek WWTP
Little Seger Creek
13 2
130
12:
12 6
125
1 17
12 l
114
111
380
-63
121
-12
NRF4 Charlene Waren
McAlpine Crock WWTP
McAlpine Check
473
414,13
515
472
46 6
44 5
435
467
49 6
$33
-58
474
21
NRF -5 Union Couni}Putrt"c WiiM DeWinci t
Tascisr Adds Cicck VI
Txehe Mile Creek
23
27
33
3 6
36
16
35
33
33
33
0 1
38
-U 3
PWS - Dwrrslic
NRF-( Carolina Wilier Scrslcc Inc
Forest Ridge WWTP
Inlns Creek
"
402
Ir;
lit
Irl.
112
412
1111
00
InuSnlrlial
SRF -I Roolute Fom( Produce (73o.'aia)"
Pulp and pop& Mill
Car ba Rita
11 1
192
240
25 1t
232
295
I) 91
296
259
2119
-39
29 f:
-17
SRF-'_ Celanese ACClalc'
Celnsn
Camba Rnff
to it
110
00
Utz
510
0U
U1)
Ifo
570
•5718
too
it
SRF -3 Nation Ford Chenucal
Calass ba. Ria
I u
I u
1 SI
1 I
I I
I I
_
.-
12
on
--
no
SRF4 Spnnlrs 1,4wirW
Grace Camples
FuhoN Creek Lake
't K
37
07
16
0 1
00
0 0
P a
112
$411
•9 9
013
a 2
P W'5
SRF -5 FW Mot
Fula Mot WATT
Lh a Brmcll
119
10
1 0
10
10
10
1 1
11
14
413
1 Il
it I
SRF -6 Lancaster
LanWrler WWTP
Fislu[1g Creek Lake
24
23
23
24
lip
2 1
2 3
_-
23
39
4) (1
2 1
11 2
SRF -7 Lanczier Cormn
lndianland ""I?
Cora. ba ]L, et
II 2
03
04
o, 5
or,
0 6
U 6
0 7
0111
u 7
17 1
0 9
-(1
SBF -K Rock Hot[
hilml limier Creek WWTP
Manchette Creek
K2
8K
90
1112
99
94
92
102
104
113
41.9
1111
03
PWS - APmrslic
SRF -9 Carolina Water Senlce Inc
Lamplighter Village SCwe DL5[ncl
McAlpine Creek.
^ '
" 1
+I
U 3
till
(1 3
0(I
SRF 14P Fexsiood Sewer Drinct
Foestood Sneer Dlslnc[
Since Creek
" -
'" it
111
41 1
it 11
04)
FISHING CREEK RESERVOIR SLB -BASIN TOTAL FLOW
179.1
109.7
116.9
116.8
1t3.3
1153
104.6
120.6
1 120.2
204.6
54.5
1 123.1
-2.9

Table AI - Calawba-Waleree River Bassa Returns - Summary Sheet tin med)
GREAT FALLS-DEARBORN RESERVOIR
2(w
2007
2INJ8
2oo4
201U
2011
2012 2013
21114
rnjlD
Entity
Facility
Receiving Water Rcrurn
Amount
Reno-
A --I
Return
Amount
Return
Amiruaf
Return
Amaiml
Resum
Amounl
Restive. Retum
Amount Amount
Return Za0644'SS
Amount Return Di Dercnce
Esnmale
2a 14 WS;41P
'I EstimateilludDilrermre
Estimate ­
GREAT FALLS-DEARBORN RESERVOIR
PWS
SRG-I Chrsles Severs DisOtcl
Lando Marietta VAM Fishing Creek
ti I
is 1
. - n 1 n 1 n 2 _
r
0 3
ri 1
"2 �
SRG-2 York"
Fushrnt, Cruel WWTP Fishing Creek
1 1
1f n "7 111
13
.41 i
u K i' t
GREAT FALLS-DEARBORN RESERVOIR SUB -BASIN -TOTAL FLOW
111
1.2
i1 1.1 0.0 1.0 1.1 1.7
LZ
1.7
-01
1.1 0.1
CEDAR CREEK RESERVOIR
PWS
MCA Chester Scx>'_v D.L-I
Rocky Creek WWI? Rorke Cmck
05
'14
:+ a o J u 5 r• 5 ,, c ,,
116
It N
4l :.
11 } u 1
SRC -2 Gauer Falls
Grew Falls WWiF Rock} Cmek Loke
LI'.
fl«
112 112 i ':12 n
03
II 3
p 11
li 2 711
CEDAR CREEK RESERVOIR SUB -BASIN TOTAL FLOW
0.7
0,6
0.6 6.6 0.3 0.7 11.7 01
0.7
Lt
-01
017 01
LAKE WATEREE1
I2
LAKE WATEREESUB-BASMTOTAL FLOW 0.0 0.0_ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 OA 0.0 0.0 1 0.0 0.0
Note$
I General Note 24114 raises higl bawd and mth black Inv are based on armal 2014 data ohlyned dared% from the tower user or acquired from a wther source
2 Cresteral Nolo 21114 salues sd,ch me not highlighted arul using red scs[ +serc set to be equal to their respectn a esntrcstm made in the 721114 Casauba- Wateree Wash MDnar;cnten[ GruuP s Water Suppe h9uler Plan inlets
staled olhc-sea Bass mums,d in pin lout Annual Water Use Repnas prom IG21113 used ptD)ecuoss estimates from Ore 24X1; Calaxha-Walerce Water Supph Studs
3 In 21x)7 Spnny;s Indu roes red urn) otter staler use as a consialt c to reducipg pFOdu€ti an
4 Cxeneral Note 'Mt report continues io focus an xaler uses greaser than I IMI NMI gallons Per dues
5 Criv or Stases dlc xishdruxal %dues reflect mks Loolous Shoals uuhdraual amvunss Wahen,tal data from the Cm s South Yadkin Riser Basin intake is nue included in (Its repon
f, C111 Df Hsckan's WTP bxkuuhrresrduals tetum is occauritel for in the natlxlras%d Bou Therefore n 0 Ingd nrretum is noted here
7 C.1 -Acetate repotted Fenlrss as closed to 24MIr
h Dasa for 2014 tins obtained from the NC D W R Loral. Ware Supph Plan for spec) tic uftht%
4 Cxneral Note Sn" minor dteserepanaes in sureunauon are due to rounding:
III Actiial rttthdfar%al and return rates far Sselium EnerL� ins, l(bronerh S4cireass Westinghouse) are drfferatt from prulecirons due to changes at the planl Flowerer net s%ilhdra.ad for Swrricn% rs sbtl conustersl xtds projections
II Cin ofhlorganron'%Cata%%baRiser WTP backslash stuff etas not drschargedal the WTP rot 2LI12 or 24113
12 Csasimia NrTP discharge n accounted fa m the xilhJraxal Dox TherclDre h n rrgd of rewrn rs noted here
13 Cin or Clarcmari soot W WTP i% no%% -aged h• dsc Cn Df Hrckan and is a dasmani fxtht+ Froin 2012 so 21,I4 there ,- no disrharlK
14 Cin of McAdenidle WW rs now treated b% Two Riters Uulioes iGasrunra-Crwnerwa)
15 Town of Nigh Shoals purchase..ares from Lincoln Counn Tmo Rrters Ulllthes IGaslanta-Cramenonl tFeals the lams+nmte%rater
H. Toxo D€Stan1v liar Jecurrussioned r1s tater imasment P1ont and Hart Purchases %sale from Mounl Halh
17 cm orcenin CF Southcast TFCalrnetl Plant 35 n0 to fter d15Chaiging. Ba%% no. goes to Ctn or Nexlonss Clark Cieel W1%'TP
IN Cin or Munon Calawtia W WTP closed at the and of 24 MMr
10 Huns Creek Trout Fame xas closet! to 2txr2 Jue la druid hl. and has no plans of reopening
211 Due so drought conditions to 201? NPDFS pemut Otqulresrsenu necesntaled Resnlutc stonng a greaser anowsl treated eflluenl in their eluent holding ponds than woald norrnadh occur othermse the return w she nter "uld has c been tush ilreaier
21 Rrsereresi Gar) Course appears to be closed due to no response w xue itis requests far the past sc%erul scars crssad dch%cn (allure and d4sconnccled phone number
22 Chc:se Metropolitan's WTP %rtthdraual f"21113 is not w dgdrass a[ u the plant and Dccnunts for WTP backwash velums
23 Trump Natranal GoICCousse xas raml:rl% leaven as'The Point' poor to 2012
24 21113.2014 dua far Maroon Lao Club yasPcoussc t% -aa estirnw d In F20in surf
25 2013-2tr1 4 data For Lincolnson WTP baclwash ietstm assumed m be sures, aas 21112 due I. IntL of NC-DW'R Loral Water Suppls Plass data for din NPDES dtschmge to 21, t3
21, 2013-aril4 data era sapphed for York's F)5htng Creek WWTP 201 3.2014 retain usuaned to be as flags, of histonc suer supplied data 121107.21,121
27 Lincoln Cornh', Fame, Creel W WTP decorrutusunoed in 24112 and ail r, usL-veer Ilex rs steeled at their Ksihan Creek W W%P
2K Begmmnp, I. Apnl 21,14 the TDxn of Long V, ceased operating its WTP and began xholcale waler purdsues hoar the Cm or Hlckon W tier use from ApM to December 2014 4s included in Htclon's wales use
21J, Lakeside resrdenlial tmgatwn %altres include haseltne 1211! 11 imgahnn Taus eslabhsbcd through the NCSU Lakm,de Imgavon S4uds plus conaspondtng gromh rases on trngation use for each -4, hcgironarig m 24111 as published in she CWW MG 14AW Suw% %1[. ter Plan
311 Begrmung ret JUIN ?014 the Tnwn of Stanlnt,nsLe -4LU n sloe rias taken m er bis Twa R1%en Utilibn Therefore. the totrn no long. has Dn% direct aaunsater accounts

Table A2 - Catawba -11 ntcree Rir er Basin Reservoir Base(] 11 ithdratsalfReturn Summary (mgd)
,z
2014 Projection
Individual Resevoir
2014 Projection
Individual Reseuoir
Reservoir 2014
Atlual
{2006 Water Supply Study)
Difference
(2014 CWWMG Waley
Difference
74
-32
53
-11
Supply Master Plan)
0.9
ff-71hdrawals
07
0.0
Norman 10
22
-11
James
118
125
-08
125
-0.7
Rhodhiss
254
294
-40
264
-10
Hidsory
135
192
-57
185
49
Lookout Shoals
44
66
-2.2
46
-03
Norman
664
799
-135
71 1
-0,7
Mountain Island
1080
1443
-363
t18 4
-104
Wylie
78.7
987
-200
8116
-19
Fishing Creek
550
1405
-855
567
-17
Greal Fails
03
16
1 2
04
.01
Rocky Creek
03
07
-03
0 4
.01
Waleree
6.0
86
-26
6 0
-05
Subtotal'
369.7
541.9
-172.1
396.0
-26.3
Percent Difference (Actual to Projected)
.31.8%
6.696
Returns
James 62
109
-47
64
-02
Rhodhiss 122
163
-41
$24
-02
Hickory 43
74
-32
53
-11
Lookout Shoals 07
0.9
-02
07
0.0
Norman 10
22
-11
11
00
Mountain island 5.3
103
-50
52
01
Wylie 335
495
-160
319
16
Fishing Creek 1202
2046
-845
1231
-29
Great Falls 12
17
0.5
1 1
01
Rocky Creek 09
11
02
07
02
Waterea 0.0
00
00
00
00
Subtotal' 185.5
304:8
-119.3
186.0
-2.5
Percent Difference (Actual to Proiected)
-39.1%
1.3%
Net Withdrawals
James 56
17
39
so
-05
Rhodhiss 132
U2
00
141
-09
Hickory 93
lie
-25
13.1
-39
Lnokoul Shoats 37
57
-21
39
-03
Norman 654
777
-124
700
.46
Mountain Island 102.7
1340
-313
1132
105
Wylie 451
492
.40
486
-35
Fishing Creek -652
64.2
-10
-fib 4
1.2
Great Falls -09
-01
-07
-07
-02
Rocky Creek 0 6
-05
.01
-0.3
-02
Waleree 60
66
26
6.5
-05
Subtotal' 184.2
237.0
-52.8
208.0
•23.8
Percent Difference (Actual to Projected)
-22.3%
-11.4%
Notes:
1 88'm of 2014 actual withdrawal data derived from actual water usage, the remainder is based on estimates
'_ 92°m of 2014 actual return data derived from actual xater returns, the remainder is based on estimates
1 Minor differences in summations are due to rounding

Table A3 - Summary of 2006 Water Supply Study (WSS) Rtojectioas and 28196 2674 Actual/Estimate (AIE) Annual Average Wandrawal, Return, and Net Withdrawal Rates by WatershedLn m d)
Ncaaa
1 - Beae riea ware hawed M the maw racenr Madehlo years lur winch wMdrirab and rutu,= warn reetrded as wthnad in 1ha 2006 Water Soppy Stady ranging bohi n 1999 and 2007
2 Mw .n aumrr+ahons duo- to rwndlog
Year
Reservoir
Base'
2006 (PIE)
2007(AIE)
2008(AJE)
2009(A1E)
2010(")
2011(81@1
2012(PJE)
2013(AIE)
2014(WE)
2018
2028
2038
2048
2058
Withdrawals
lames
11
12
12
12
12
t2
11
11
17
12
13
14
15
32
34
Rhodhrs,
26
25
25
24
23
24
24
23
25
25
30
33
36
40
44
Hlckoq
18
15
i5
16
15
15
16
14
14
14
21
25
30
37
44
Looknul Shoals
1
5
5
4
4
5
4
4
4
4
7
9
10
12
12
Norman
60
65
67
60
64
64
60
61
66
66
99
118
133
169
179
Mountain island
101
122
120
114
110
121
114
111
105
108
153
172
192
207
224
Wylie
92
87
93
81
82
89
06
80
75
79
101
120
130
141
155
F6hirig Creek
103
125
63
53
56
59
60
57
53
55
146
159
172
183
195
Great Falls -Dearborn
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
0
0
2
2
2
2
2
Cedar Creex
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
1
1
1
t
t
Waleree
6
6
8
6
5
6
6
5
6
6
9
11
26
27
56
Subtotal
420
465
4M
371
374
403
383
3a
361
370
587
554
747
851
946
Relums
James
9
10
10
10
11
11
9
9
6
6
11
12
12
13
14
Rhodhiss
14
13
13
12
12
13
12
12
14
12
17
18
20
21
23
Hickory
6
5
5
5
5
5
5
4
5
4
8
9
11
14
t6
Lookout Shoals
1
I
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
t
1
1
1
1
Norman
2
3
2
2
1
2
1
1
1
1
2
3
3
4
4
Mrwntaln Island
6
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
12
14
16
18
t8
Wylie
45
42
37
25
30
31
31
31
33
34
52
59
Be
77
89
Fishirig F.-teek
165
180
110
117
117
113
115
105
121
120
213
234
254
272
291
GtaatFa1:s-17earbbrn
I
I
I
I
I
1
1
1
1
1
2
3
5
7
9
Cedar Creek
1
I
I
I
1
i
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
3
3
Waleree
!+
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Subtotal
250
167
154
178
183
182
161
170
188
lob
319
355
392
430
468
Net WittwfRF is
James
2
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
6
6
2
2
3
19
20
Rhodhiss
12
12
13
12
11
11
13
11
11
13
73
15
16
19
21
Hickory
12
4
10
11
10
10
11
10
9
9
13
16
19
23
28
Lookout Shoals
0
4
4
3
4
4
4
4
4
4
6
8
9
11
11
Norman
58
63
65
58
63
63
58
60
65
65
97
115
130
165
175
Mountalo [Mand
95
117
114
109
106
123
109
t06
101
103
141
158
176
109
206
Wylie
47
45
56
56
52
58
55
49
43
45
49
fit
62
64
66
Flshnng Creek
•62
-54
-47
-64
-61
-54
=56
-48
-67
-6s
-67
-75
-82
-89
-96
Great Falls•4earhom
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
-1
1
0
-1
•3
•5
-7
Cedar Creek
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
-1
1
-2
2
waheree
5
6
6
6
6
6
6
5
6
6
9
11
26
27
56
Subtotal
170
204
224
193
191
121
207
199
175
raw
253
30!
3°53
421
478
Ncaaa
1 - Beae riea ware hawed M the maw racenr Madehlo years lur winch wMdrirab and rutu,= warn reetrded as wthnad in 1ha 2006 Water Soppy Stady ranging bohi n 1999 and 2007
2 Mw .n aumrr+ahons duo- to rwndlog

Table A4 Summary o12014 Waley Supply Master Plan (WSMP) Prqnyons and 280E - 2074Actual/Estimate (Alf) Annual Average Withdrawal, Retrmn, and Net MMdrawaf Rafes by Watershed (M )
Year
Reservoir
2006(AIE)
2007(AIE)
2008(AIE)
20D9 (AfE)
2010 (AJE)
2011(AfE)
2012(AJE)
2013(AIE)
2014 (AIE)
Base'
2015
7025
14135
2045
2055
2465
H+Rhrirawals
James
12
12
12
12
12
11
11
12
12
12
12
12
12
13
13
14
Rhodhlss
25
25
24
23
24
24
23
25
25
26
25
28
29
31
33
35
Hickory
15
15
16
15
15
16
14
14
14
16
17
19
27
29
31
34
Lookout Shoals
5
5
4
4
5
4
4
4
4
4
5
5
6
7
8
9
Norman
65
67
60
64
64
60
fit
66
66
62
66
75
81
104
113
127
Wtmlam Island
122
120
114
114
127
114
111
106
108
114
120
138
160
179
196
215
Wylie
87
93
81
82
89
86
80
75
79
74
79
84
87
92
98
105
Fishug Creek
125
63
53
56
59
60
57
53
55
54
56
61
66
73
Sia
129
Great Fags-Oeartaom
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
Cedar Creek
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
Wateree
6
6
6
5
6
6
5
6
6
4
5
7
a
45
47
49
Subtotal
463
408
371
374
403
383
369
3162
370
369
306
4"
478
575
660
710
Returns
James
10
14
10
11
11
9
9
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
7
7
Rhodhiss
13
13
12
12
13
12
12
14
12
12
13
13
14
15
15
16
Hickory
5
5
5
5
5
5
4
5
4
5
6
6
7
7
a
9
Lookout Shoals
1
1
1
1
1
1'
1
1
1
1
i
1
1
1
1
1
Norman
3
2
2
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
Mountain Island
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
6
7
a
9
10
Wylie
42
37
25
30
31
31
31
33
34
30
33
41
52
58
65
72
Fishing Creek
180
110
117
117
113
115
145
121
120
116
125
132
136
151
163
176
Great Fa1L5-Dearhom
1
1
1
I
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
3
4
5
Cedar Creek
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
Wateree
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Subtotal
261
184
178
183
182
181
170
188
186
177
792
284
279
152
M
799'
Net Wlflydrawals
,tames
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
6
6
5
5
6
6
fi
7
7
Rhodhiss
12
13
12
11
11
13
11
11
13
14
14
15
16
17
18
19
HOM
9
10
11
10
10
11
10
9
9
11
12
13
20
22
24
26
Lookout Shuts
4
4
3
4
4
4
4
4
4
3
4
5
5
6
7
8
Norman
63
65
58
63
63
58
60
65
65
61
65
74
a0
102
112
125
Mounpain lstand
117
114
109
106
123
149
106
101
103
109
114
132
153
171
1B7
205
Wylie
45
56
56
52
58
55
49
43
45
44
46
43
35
34
34
33
Fishing Creek
-54
47
-64
-fit
-54
-56
48
-67
-65
-62
-69
-71
-72
-78
45
-47
Greal Falls-Qearbom
0'
0
0
0
1
1
0
-1
•1
1
-1
-1
-2
2
-3
-4
Cedar Creek
0
0
4
0
0
0
0
0
-1
-1
1 1
-1
-1
-1
-1
2
Wateree
6
5
6
5
6
6
5
6
6
4
5
7
6
4,5
47
49
Subtotal
204
124
193
191
221
287
199
175
184
189
195
741
248
323
386
479
Notes:
I - Base rales were based on the most recent avw&e years for which wdhdrawafs and returns were re&"cd as outlined in the 2014 CW WMG Water Supply Master Plan. rarrrrK] between 2010 and 2011
2 - Mror tfiHerenres in Sufrma"Is due to Munding

150
140
130
120
110
im 100
a�
80
r
CD
a 60
es,
50
a
Q
e; 40
30
20
10
0
-10
Figure Al C ataw ba-Wateree Net Withdrawal Trends by Water User Type
Public Water Systems Industrial Power

550
500
450
400
q4f,
M
300
3
�o
t 250
yCK_
r
200
150
100
50
0
2000
Figure A2 - Comparison of Projected Net Withdrawal to Actual Net Withdrawal
2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050 2055 2060 2065
Year
2006 WS5 Projection
—
Actual Reported
Data
2414
WSMP Projection
-22%
-1196
2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050 2055 2060 2065
Year

250
240
230
220
210
IME
�a
200
r
190
m
z
180
170
160
150
2006
Figure A2 -A - (Detail) Comparison of Projected Net Withdrawal to Actual Net Withdrawal
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Year

250
240
230 -
220
210
E
R
200
L
i
190
m
Z
180
170
160
150
2006
Figure A2-13 - (Detail) Comparison of Actual Net Withdrawal to Annual Precipitation
20.00
Not Water Withdrawal
Annual Precipitation - Inches Below Historical ^
Normal 15.00
T �
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Year
10.00 A
a
M
3
5.00
ca
0.00 E
Q
Y
C.
-5.00 Z
L
IL
a
-10.00
-15.00
-20.00
2014

480.00
460.00
440.00
420.00
-a
400.00
to
3
2
t 380.00
�.a
Z 360.00
34000
320.00
300.00
2006
Figure A2 -C - (detail) Comparison of Actual Withdrawals to Annual Precipitation
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Year
20.00
15.00
10.00
c
c
3
5.00
v
0.00
c
a:r
iC
Q
-5.00 .5
d
3
C
-10.00 Q
-15.00
-20.00
2014

350.00
300.00
a, 250.00
r -
L
§ 200.00
V
z
150.00
100.00
2006
Figure A2 -D - (Detail) Comparison of Actual Returns to Annual Precipitation
1 30.00
20.00
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Year
-20M -20.00
-30.00
2014

150
140
130
120
110
100
M
80
ea
3
L 70
-o
50
N
61'
Z
50
40
30
20
10
0
-10
Figure A3 - 2014 Catawba-Wateree Actual Net Withdrawal Comparison with Projections
Public Water Systems Industrial Power Agriculture/irrigation*
Water Use Category
0 2014 Projection
(200fi WSS)
U 2014 Projection
(2014 WSMP)
■ 2014 Actual
*A/( "actual" is based on
CWWMG Water Supply
Master Plan projections
except actual data has
been supplied for direct
withdrawals for golf
course irrigation.
Methodology in A/1
projections changed
between 2006 Water
Supply Study and 2014
Water Supply Master
Plan.

150
140
130
120
110
100
90
tko
80
2 70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
-10
Figure A4 - Catawba-Wateree 2013 to 2024 Net Withdrawal Comparison
..... ........ -.- ...... --------- -- - ------ - ------------------ -- -------- ---- --- --------- -
— -- - ----------- - - - --
- ------- - - -----
...........
-------- - -----
80
— ----- --- - ------- - - --------------------- - -- - ---- ------------ - - ------- - ---------------- ------------------------------------
74
-------- - -- - -- - ------ - ------- - --- - ----
74 9% 70 69
----------- ------------------------------------------------------------- - - --------
- — ------- - --- -------------- — - — ---- - ------- -
-------- - ------- — ------- -------- - — -- - -------- ----------- - ---- - - ------- - ------- --------
- — ----------
0%
- ----- - ----------- - ---------------- - -------- ---- - --------- ------------------ ----- ----
--------- -------- - ---- - -- ---------- - ------------------ - --------------- --------------------
---- - -------------------- - ------- - --------- -------------- --------- I --------- ----------
0 100%
Public Water Systems Industrial Power Agriculture/Irrigation*
Water Use Category
* 2013 Actual
■ 2024 Actual
•A/l 'actual' is
based on CWWMG
Water supply
Master Plan
projections except
actual data has
been supplied for
direct withdrawals
for gal( course
Irrigation.

■■■ c
r =rte
■
■■ ■
7
■■ 7
oil
1
EEI1 1
1 1
■
1 ■
1
E
;
�M■
■1■
■i1
MUM
■■r■
■t 7
��
5001000
NMI
on
■r■
■N 7
M1 1
■1 I
a
■1�
=V�2
=AOS
M:■
M:=
■ice
■1■
MENE
mom
"■--
M m
mom

�C�
�� I�
��
..�.
..�
��
��
��
��
��
��
��

150
100
0
{7
50
3
L
0
w
z
-50
-100
Figure A7 - 2006 to 2014 Catawba-Wateree Water NET Withdrawals (By Sub -Basin)
■ LAKE JAMES aLAKE RHODHISS n LAKE HICKORY
■ LOOKOUT SHOALS LAKE o LAKE NORMAN u MOUNTAIN ISLAND LAKE
vLAKE WYLIE QFISHING CREEK RESERVOIR wGREAT FALLS-DEARBORN RESERVOIR
61 CEDAR CREEK RESERVOIR m LAKE WATEREE
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Year

Duke Energy [ Catawba-Wateree Annual Water Use for the Year 2094 L�
Attachments F^
3tegorical Water Use
ipporting Information
r CWWMG Members

This page intentionally left blank.

Table Bl - CW'WMG Cateaoricul Water USE by Public Water Sunoly Member
2014 Summary of Catawba-Wateree Water Management Group Categorical Water Use 1 of 6
2006 (MGD)
2007(MGD)
Praj ID Entity
Facility
Reaeivdng'4Water
Total WD
RES
COM
IND
INS
Total WD
RES
COM
IND
INS
LAKE JAMES
NA
LAKE RHODHISS
NWR-I Town of Granule Fells
Granite Falls WTP
Lake Rhodhiss
12
0.8
O.l
0.2
0.1
13
09
01
01
01
NWR-2 City of LenOiF'
Lenoir WTP
Lake Rhodhiss
64
17
10
05
02
67
16
10
05
0"
NWRA City of Morganton
Catawba River WTP
Catawba River
E5
1 is
17
22
06
90
1 7
?a
13
1
NWR4 Town of Valdese
Valdese WTP
Lake Rhodhiss
14
n 9
0 2
20
01
41
07
!I 2
19
01
14 KER110DHi.i.V SUIT-RAS1NTOTAL
20.4
4.7
3.0
49
1A
20,6
4.e
3,0
4,8
1.1
LAKE HICKORY
NWH-I City of HtckorY'
Hickory WTP
Lake Hickory
126
go
1 4
0 r,
o 0
1 a 3
84
ci 7
0 b
NWH-2 Town of Longview'
Longvncw WTP
Lake Hickory
0 8
0 1.
n 2
0 2
06
0 7
U 4
0.1
02
O.D
I AKE HXWORYNIJR-RANIN TOTA1,
13.4
L4
3.5
0.9
0.6
11.0
8,8
3.7
0,9
0.6
LOOKOUT SHOALS LAKE
t4rL- I City of S1alesYtlle'"
Statesville WTP
Lookout Shpn1A Lake
3 8I'
3 7
1 3
1 T
09
02
LOOKOUT SHOALS I_4KESUR-RA.V1N TOTAL
3.8
1.3
1.7
1.0
4.2
3,7
2.3
1.7
0.9
0.2
LAKE NORMAN
073
014
0 l3
NWN-1 Charlotte Water'
Lee S. Flukes WTP
Lake Norman
199
n 8
13
0 6
D o
21 0
10 "s
it 7
NWN-2 Lincoln County
Lincoln County WTP
Lake Norma
25
14
O.3
03
0 1
26
1.5
03
03
0 1
NWN-3 Town of Mooresville"
MooresvtRe WTP
Lake Normans
40
19
is=+
0 1
4 3
20
1 H
0,
0 1
IAAE NONIAN SUR-RASIN TOTAL
26A
13.1
4.4
1.2
0.8
Z7.9
143
43
1.3
0.9
MOUNTAIN ISLAND LAKE
NWM-1 Charlotte Water?
Franklin & Vest WTP
Mountain Island Lahe)Lake Norman
999
-194
16.5
3.2
1 1
972
50',
1 b t,
1 .
t 1
NWM-2 Two Rivers. Ltiltaics (Craslanna-Cramcrlon}'
Gasionto WTP
Mountain Island Lakc
180
.1 1
2.7
0.8
U.4
173
40
26
07
04
NWM-3 City of Mount Holly
:+,Taunt Holly WTP
Mounlain Islimul Lake
2.3
1.2
0.1
09
00
24
1 2
01
1 0
0 1
AIfHINTAININLAND AliESUR-11A.NINTOTAL
1201
54.6
193
4.9
3.5
11+6.9
55.4
16.2
5.0
3.5
LAKE WYLIE
NWY-6 City of Belmanl"
Belnrom WTP
Lake Wylie
2 1
()q
412
0.2
00
2 0
09
02
02
on
SWV-I Rack Hill"
City of Rack Hill WTP
Lake Wylie
15.?
59
2.S
05
01
166
6.3
' .,
1, =
ri %
LAKE IVYI1ESUR-RASINTOTAL
17.3
6.8
2.9
0,7
0.5
1"
7.2
3.1
0.8
0.5
FISHING CREEK RESERVOIR
39
SWF-6 Limon ColLaasasaer Col'
Catawba River Plant
Catawba River
174
7 5
17
G3
0.4
189
8.2
1.8
03
as
SWF-7 Chester Metro
Chester WTP
Fishing Creek Reservotr
28
07
0 3
1,2
00
22
07
03
1.0
00
FISHING CREEK RESERVOIR SUR-RA.VIN TOTAL
20.2
8.2
2.0
L5
0.4
20.9
9.0
2.1
13
0,5
GREAT FALLS -DEARBORN RESERVOIR
NA
ROCKY CREEK - CEDAR CREEK RESERVOIR.
NA
LAKE WATEREE
SWW-1 Camden"
City of Camden WTP
Lake Waterce
2.6
10
u 6
0 1
0.1
2 6
1.1
0 S
t1 1
ti 1
SWW-2 LugofTElgin Water Authority
Lugo1T--Elgin WTP
Lake Waterce
2.4
1 4
02
C1 n
0.0
2 5
1 4
0 l
DO
6 r1
L.4KEIVATEREESUR-RASINTOTAL
5.1
2.3
0.9
0.2
012
511
2.5
OA
0.2
0.1
CA TA IVRA -11ATEREE RASI,N TOTAL
226.8
99.6
37.6
15.1
7.2
227.6
1033
34.8
15.2
T.4
2014 Summary of Catawba-Wateree Water Management Group Categorical Water Use 1 of 6

Table R! - C WW041G Catevarical Wag" lim by Public Watrr Sunnh Member
2014 Summary of Catawba-Wateree Water Management Group Categorical Water Use 2 of 6
20081NTGDl
20094MGD1
PrejID Eii ily
Facility
Receiving Water
TotelWD
RES
COM
IND
INS
TotalWD
RES
CONI
IND
INS
LAKE JAMES
VA
LAKE RHODHISS
NWR-I Town of Granite Fells
i;ranne Falls WTP
Lake Rhodhiss
1.2
0.9
01
0.1
u 1
1 1
0.7
OJ
0.1
0
NWR-2 City of Lenoir'
Lenoir WTP
Lake Rhorlhiss
59
1.6
1.0
05
0.2
is
16
1.0
0.5
0 2
NWR-3 City of Morganton
Catawba River WTP
Catawba River
94
1 5
1 6
'- 1
01.
7.8
1 3
1 5
' 0
0 0
NWR4 Town of Valdese
ValdeseN'TP
Lake Rhodhiss.
35
06
is:
16
01
3,1
0i
a!
14
(11
LAKE RHODHI.KS.SUR-RV1N TOTAL
19.0
4.5
2.8
4.4
1.0
17.8
4.2
2.7
4.1
0.9
LAKE HICKORY
NWH-1 City of Hickory"
Hickory WTP
Lake Hickory
12.7
8.1
14
06
1) 6
12.1
77
_
06
06
NWH-3 Town of Longview
Longview WTP
Lake Hickory
15
0.3
0 I
02
00
15
03
0 1
0,
no
l.4l1EHICKORVSUB-NANINTf1TAL
14.2
8.4
33
0.S
O.5
13.6
8.0
3.3
0.8
0,6
LOOKOUT SHOALS LAKE
NWL-1 City orSlaiesvillc°
Slatcsville WTP
Lookout Shoals Lake
2.8
1 0
1.3
07
0.1
31
11
1 4
118
0
1.0f)NO UT SH(JAI S LAAE SUR-RASIN T6ITAL
2.8
l.0
13
0.7
ILI
3.1
I, t
1.4
0.8
0.2
LAKE NORMAN
NWN-1 Charlotte Wader'
Lee S Dukes WTP
Lake Norman
157
" n
` 1
0 5
id i
165
S
3
05
0 6
NWN-2 Lincoln County
Lincoln County WTP
Lakc Norrnan
24
13
01
0.2
O l
26
l 4
03
01
01
NWN-3 Town of Moorrsville"
Mooresville WTP
Lake Norman
37
14
1 1
r3 7
02
40
15
r"
04
oz
LIVE IV001AN NUX-RAtiIN TOTAL
21.8
10.7
3.6
1.0
0.8
23.1
IIA
3.9
1.1
0.9
MOUNTAIN ISLAND LAKE
NWM-1 Charlotte Watcr'
Franklin & Vest WTP
Moumain 1siand Lake/Lake Norman
91 3
460
13.3
2,111,
30
897
461.3
I2.7
2.6
3.1
N WM-2 Two Rivers Ulihnes (Gastoma-Cramenon)'
Gastonia WTP
Mountain Island Lake
170
39
2S
0.7
03
16.8
3.9
3 5
0.7
01
NWM-3 City of Mount Holly
Mount Holty WTP
Mountain Island Lake
27
1 4
0.1
1.1
01
26
1.3
01
1.1
0.1
4I0UNTAINi.W-4NDLIAESL+R-RAVINT0TAL
IIt.O
51.2
13.9
4.6
3.4
109.1
SIA
ISJ
4.4
3.5
LAKE WYLIE
NWYk City of Belmont"
BelmomtWTP
Lake Wylie
19
0.8
02
0.2
00
I8
08
0.2
0.2
00
SWY-1 Rock Hill"
City of Rock Hill WTP
Lake Wylie
14 I
53
` it
11 s
tie
140
56
7 5
u t
It 5
I -411E ii"YLIESUR-11,01NTOTAL
16,0
6.l
2.9
0.7
0,5
15.8
6.4
2.7
0.7
0,5
FISHING CREEK RESERVOIR
19
35
SWF6 Union ColLancaster Co''
Calawba River Plan[
Catawba River
t65
79
2.1
03
0.5
16 5
79
1.2
02
03
SWF-7 Chesler Metro
Chesser WTP
Fishing Creek Reservoir
25
07
03
10
00
26
07
03
0.9
00
n.SNING CREFJI RESERVOIR SUR-RAVIN TOTAL
19.0
8.5
2A
1.3
0.5
19.1
9.4
1-5
1.1
0.3
GREAT FALLS - DEA RHORN RESERVOIR
NA
ROCKY CREEK -CEDAR CREEK RESERVOIR
NA
LADE WATEREE
SW W -I Camden"
City of Camden WTP
lake Watrrce
2.2
0.9
tt 5
P 1
91
2.1
0.1
05
0.1
11 1
SWW-2 LugoffElgmWater Authority
LugolbElginWTP
Lake Wateree
2.3
13
02
170
UU
21
1.2
0.2
0.0
110
1,1KE1fAT£R££SIIIi-RA.SINTOTAL
4.5
2,2
0.7
0.i
0.1
4.2
2.0
0.7
0.1
0,1
CATAtfRA-WATEREEBA.SINTf1TAL
20SJ
92.6
33,2
13.7
7.1
1 205.8
92.9
31.6
l2,9
d.9
2014 Summary of Catawba-Wateree Water Management Group Categorical Water Use 2 of 6

Table B1 - CWWRIG Caletarical Water Ilse b% Pabtic Waler Sunni% Member
2014 Summary of Catawba-Wateree Water Management Group Categorical Water Use 3 016
2010 (NIGD)
2011 (MGD)
PrajlD Entity
Facility
RrcnvinRHatrr
TolalWo
RES
COM
IND
INS
Tata[WD
RES
COM
IND
INS
LANE JAMES��
NA
LAKE RHODHISS
NWR-I Town of Granite Falls
Granite Falls WTP
Lake Rhodhiss
10
07
01
01
0 1
1 2
09
0 1
0]
0 1
NWR-2 City of Lenoir`
Lenoir WTP
Lake Rhodhiss
6 1
t r.
1 0
05
U 2
66
33
[a
0.3
04
NWR-3 City of Morganton
Catawba River WTP
Catawba River
32
1
1 6
2 1
fi "
B 4
16
1 7
26
0 5
NWR4 Town of Valdese
Valdese WTP
Lake Rhodhiss
34
11 f.
02
t 6
0 l
3 1
02
0 1
1 t
05
1,111ERff0Dff1.XTSU11-"V1NTfiTAL
18.7
4.4
2.8
1.3
1.0
19.3
5.9
3.7
4.1
1.5
LAKE HICKORY
NWH-1 City of Hickory'`
Hickory WTI`
Lake Hickory
129
8 1
1
t
{i n
139
so
11.
1 J
1r 9
NWH-? Town ofLongviewt
Longview WTP
Lake Hickory
09
03
0l
ii' -
un
08
03
til
.it
00
LAKE H1CKORV NUXR4.YIN TOTAL
13.6
8A
3.5
0.8
U.6
14.7
91
3.1
1.4
0.8
LOOKOUT SHOALS LAKE
NWL-I Cny of Slatesville"
Statesville WTP
Lookout Shoals Lake
3.2
1 1
9 5
0 R
a.2
10
17
12
al
i '
LO()KOUT.SHOA1.S 1,IKE.SUB-IL4.S1N TUTAL
3.2
LI
1.5
0.8
0.2
3.0
1.2
1.2
0.1
0.:
LAKE NOR141AN
NWN- I Charlotte Water'
Lee S. Dukes WTP
Lake Norman
166
17
1 t
4-1 'I
0 5
173
86
22
0 S
05
NWN-2 Lincoln County
Lincoln County WTP
Lake Norman
` a
1.5
03
03
01
77
1 5
04
01
n 0
NWN-3 Town of Mooresville`
Mooresville WTP
Lake Norman
42
1,5
1 a
n
0,
4 3
13
1-7
0 5
n2
L.4KE NORAIAN.SUN-HAti1N TOTAL
23.2
10.7
3.8
1.1
O,R
;J.3
111
4.3
1.3
0.6
MOUNTAIN ISLAND LAKE
NWM-1 Charlotte Water'
Franklin do Vest WTP
Mountain Island LakcJLake Norman
1049
487
131
25
3.1
924
461
11.7
25
29
NWM-2 Two Rivers Utilities {Gnsionia-Cmmertonj"
Gastonia IkTP
Mountain Island Lake
ISO
4 1
2.7
08
n a
173
4'
1 '
06
0 1
NWM-3 City of Mnum Hutly
Mount Holly WTP
Mountain Island Lake
2.6
t 3
0.1
1 1
0 1
25
10
0.1
03
0.0
MOUNTAIN I.SL.4" I-4KE RUIf-NAV1N TOTAL
125A
54.1
15.6
4.4
3.5
112.2
51.7
13.1
3.4
3.0
LAKE WYLIE
NWY-6 City of Belmanl
Belmont WTP
Lake Wylie
1 9
oil
0.2
02
00
1.8
07
0.2
05
DA
SWY-1 Rock Hill"
City of Rock Hill WTP
Lake Wylie
154
8.8
28
0 5
1 4 8
52
2.8
05
05
I-4KE WYLIE NUR-IMSIN T01AL
t7.3
9.6
3.0
0.7
0.5
16,6
5„9
3.0
1.0
0.6
FISHING CREEK RESERVOIR
SWF-6 Union CafLancaster Co' �
Catawba River Plant
Catawba River
174
7x9
12
02
03
160
96
09
f,
ti
SWF-7 Chester Metro
Chester WTP
Fishing Creek Rescrvow
2 1
06
03
09
00
3 0
06
0.3
20
00
FISHING CREEL RESERIYHRNUXAAVINTOTAL
20,1
8,6
1,5
1.1
0.3
19.0
10,3
1.2
2.2
0.3
GREAT FALLS - DFARBORN RESERVOIR
NA
ROCKY CREEK - CEDAR CREEK RESERVOIR
NA
LAKE WATEREE
SWW-I Camden"
city or Camden W 7P
Lake Waleree
2.3
On
0 5
0 1
0.1
2 2
to
tl5
0.2
(it
SWW-2 Lugoff Elgin Water Authority
Lugorf Elgin WTP
Lake Waicrcc
77
12
0 2
00
0 0
2 2
1.2
01
0.3
0.0
_ LAKE II ATER£E.SUILRA.SINTOTAL
4.5
2.1
0.7
O.t
0.1
4.4
2.2
0.6
U_S
ELI
(.A TA IVA4-WA TEREE HANIN TOTAL
2259
99.1
32.6
13.4
7.0
213A
97.9
30.1
14.1
7.1
2014 Summary of Catawba-Wateree Water Management Group Categorical Water Use 3 016

Tehle RI - r ww qtr: Ca troa meal W. I- tine by Puhlir ►Vater Canah Giem her
2014 Summary of Catawba-Wateree Water Management Group Categorical Water Use 4 o1 6
x0121MGD)
2013 (MGD)
P'roj 111 Entity
Facility
Rrreivingl5'nrer
Total WD
RES
COM
IND
INS
WHC
TotalWD
RES
COM
IND
INS
WILL"
LAKE JAMES
IV A
LAKE RHIODHISS
NWR-1 Town ofGrrnitcFalls
Granite Falls WTP
LakeRhadhoss
12
04
01
01
00
04
12
03
01
00
00
04
NWR-2 Cary or Lenoir'
Lenoir ATP
Lake Rhodhiss
57
13
04
0.1
02
22
59
1.3
04
O 1
G2
2G
NWR-3 City or Morganton
Catawba River WTP
Catawba River
as
14
17
29
05
11
91
14
21
33
04
12
NWR4 Town of Valdesc
Valdese WTP
Lake Rhoilhiss
32
0.2
01
12
00
09
33
0.6
01
13
00
05
_
1AJ1 E RHOD IfL5S ,SC1R-HAVIN TOTAL
11146
3.3
2.2
4.4
0,7
4.6
18.7
3.6
2.7
4.7
0.7
4.1
LAKE HICKORY
NWHi-1 Cityof Hickory'
Hickory WTP
Lake Hickory
1 1 4
50
1"
0 8
04
36
101
49
1 3
(16
0
11
NWH-2 Town of Lonkvie%'
Longview WTP
Lake Hickory
09
03
o2
0 l
013
00
09
0.3
rt 2
0 1
0.0
00
L.4KEH1CiORYSU8-MV1NTOTAL
12.4
5.3
1.9
0.9
0.4
3.6
10.9
5,2
1.4
0.7
0.3
3.1
LOOKOUT SHOALS LAKE.
NWL-I cityofstawiville"
Statesville WTP
Lookout Shoals Lake
3.0
12
1.0
01
02
01
3.2
1 i
09
02
02
0 t
L f7O O UT SH0,11.V 1 ANE SUB-RA.4IN TOTAL
3.0 -
L.2
1.0
0.1
0.2.
0.1
3.2
1.1
0.9
0.2
0.2
0.1
LAKE NORMAN
NWN-1 Charlotte Water'
Lee S. "es V TP
Lake Norman
l80
94
25
0.5
06
0.2
18.1
9.6
3.2
0.5
0.8
0.2
NWN-2 Lincoln County
Lincoln County WTP
Lake Norman
24
15
0.4
03
00
00
25
14
0.2
03
01
cc
NWN-3 Town of Mooresville'
Mouresvi Ile WTP
Lake Norman
47
15
1 G
o ,
It •1
0.0
48
1.5
1.5
07
0.1
at
IAKENORMAN NVh-RAtINT01AL
25.1
12.4
4.5
1.5
1.0
0.2
25.5
12A
5.0
1.4
1.3
Ili
MOUNTAIN ISLAND LAKE
NWM-1 Charlotte Water'
Franklin k Vest WTP
Mountain Island LakelLake Norman
894
467
124
23
30
10
849
450
149
21
3.9
i I
NWM-2 Two Rivers Utilities (Gaslonta-Cramerionr
Gastonia WTP
Mountain lslmW I -Ac
[so
47
1.3
07
10
1.4
177
64
18
10
12
2 0
NWM-3 City of Mount Hotly
Mount Holly WTP
Mountain Island Lake
25
10
0-2
0.5
0 0
06
25
10
05
0.6
00
0 1
M()UNTAINISI-4 NDI-4NENUK-RANINT1)TAL
109.9
52.3
13.9
3.5
4.0
3.0
105.1
52.4
t7.2
3.7
5.0
3.2
LAKE W VLIE
NWY-6 City of Bclmont"
Belmont %VTP
Lake Wylie
19
06
02
0.3
02
00
lb
0.6
02
03
0.2
0.0
SWY-1 Rack Hill"
City of Rock Hill WTP
Lake Wylie
150
45
14
0 o
01
4.9
144
5.1
1 0
(1 5
02
43
1.411E 1i7'LIESLl11.1L481NTOTAL
16.8
5.1
1.6
1.0
0.5
4.9
16.0
5.6
1.2
0.8
0.4
4.3
FISHING CREEK RESERVOIR
SWr•-6 Union CiVLancaster Ca"
Catawba River Plant
Catawba River
15 5
98
1,
1 '
n
21
165
95
1i
031
ll '
24
SWF-7 Chester Metro
Chester WTP
Fishing Creek Reservoir
30
06
03
10
00
00
29
05
02
1.0
0.0
00
_ FLSHING(WEEKRENERVOIR.' UXIIANINTUTAL
18.5
10.4
1.6
1.3
0.3
2.3
14.5
10.0
1.4
L.3
01_
2A
GREAT FALLS - DEA RBORN RESERVOIR
NA
ROCK Y CREEK - CE DA R CREEK RESERVOI R
NA
LAKE WATEREE
SWW-I Camden
City ofCamdcn WTP
Lake WatereC
21
11
0 1
1
ol
01
20
1.0
0
0 1
0U
02
SWW-2 LugotTElgin Water Authority
Lugoff-Elgin WTP
hike Water"
2i
12
01
01
0 I
00
0 1
11
OL
01
01
00
I4 EH'ATEREES'UR-RANINTOTAL
1 4.2
2.3
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
1 4.1
2.1
0.3
0.2
0-1
0.2
Cil TAWRA-IllArEREE BASIN TOTAL
2085
92.3
27.1
12.9
7.2
18.9
1 203.0
92.5
30.1
13.1
8.2
17.8
2014 Summary of Catawba-Wateree Water Management Group Categorical Water Use 4 o1 6

Tahle DI ['Wwur rni"ariral Waier lice by PuhlirWairr Sunnly Illemhrr
2014 Summary of Catawba-Wateree Water Management Group Categorical Water Use S of 6
2014(NIGD)
Prat !D Entity
Facility
Receiving Nater
via WD,
RES
C ONI
IND
INS
WHL
LAKE JAMES
NA
LAKE RHODHISS
N W R-1 Town of Granite Falls
Gratute Falls 1VTP
Lake Rhodhiss
11
*3
o 1
00
00
04
NW R-2 City of Lenoir'
Lrimir WFP
Lake Rhodhiss
64
14
05
01
02
21
NWR-3 City of Morganton
Catawba River WTP
Catawba River
Is
13
Is
30
04
11
N WR -4 Town of Valdese
Valdese ATP
Lake Rhodhiss
29
02
0 l
12
00
06
I.A1! E RHfllllfIXT SUR-RANIN TOTAL
18.8
3.4
2.5
4.9
0.7
4.2
LAKE HICKORY
N WH -1 City or Hickory'
Hickory WTP
Lake Hickory
105
41
I
It t,
11
33
NW H-2 Town of Longview'
Longview WTP
Lake Hickory
02
01
u 1
i r i
0 0
00
IAKE HICKORY.SUI4AAVI,V TOTAL
10.7
4.4
1.3
0.6
0.3
3.3
LOOKOUT SHOALS LAKE
N WL- I City orstatesville°
Slatesvitle WTP
Lookout Shoals Lake
31
12
09
0.2
02
01
L(N)NOUT.4110AL.S1.4KE.SUR-DA.V1NTIlTAL
3.1
1.2
0.9
0.2
11.2
0.1
LAKE NORMAN
N WN- I Charionc Water'
Lee S. Dukes NVTP
Lake Norman
19-1
9.6
3.3
05
09
02
N WN 2 Luscoln County
Lincoln County WTP
Lake Nu man
21
is
0.2
0.3
01
0 0
N WN -3 Town of Mooresville'
Mooresville WTP
Lake Norman
53
15
1'
IP N
ti 1
00
I-4KE NORMAN.SUR-RrI1'IN TOTAL
26.3
1 Z.6
5.2
1.5
1.3
0.2
MOUNTAIN ISLAND LAKE
NWM-1 CharOoueWater'
Franklin1CVeslWTP
%founsainisland LukelLakeNorman
872
461
158
22
38
08
y WM-2 Two Rivers Ulihbes IGossonia-CtamcrtoiW
Gastonia WTP
Mountain Island Lake
176
45
1.3
07
09
15
IVWM-3 City of Mntmt Holly
Mount Holly W -TP
Mountain island Lake
25
10
02
0 5
00
06
MOUNTAIN LVLANDI A E.SUN-1"VIN r0TAL
1073
53.7
173
3.3
4.8
2.8
LAKE WVLIE
NWY-6 City of Belmont'
EclmpnlWTP
Lake Wylie
t8
06
0.2
03
02
00
SWY-1 Rock Hilly
City of Rock Hill WTP
Lake WyGc
165
58
u .
42
1A RE WYf IE.SUXIIASIN TOTAL
18.Z
6.4
2.8
1.5
0.8
4.2
FISHING CREEK RESERVOIR
SWF-6 Union Coll-ancaster Co' `
Catawba River Plant
Catawba River
18 I
101
1 '
0,
22
SWF 7 Chester Metra
Chester WTP
Fishing Creek Reservoir
29
06
0.3
12
0.0
00
FISHING CREEK REVERVINR tiUR-HASIN TOrA1.
20.8
10.7
1.7
IA
0.2
Z-2
GREAT FALLS - DEARBORN RESERVOIR
N.4
ROCKY CREEK - CEDAR CREEK RESERVOIR
NA
LAKE WATEREE
SWW-I Camden"
City of Camden WTP
Lake Waterer
1.9
10
Ii 3
00
00
112
SWW-2 Lugoff Elgin WinerAuthonly
Lugoff-Elgin WTP
lake Waterce
? 3
13
02
0.2
0.0
0.0
1AKE IVATER,EE.VUXR4.V1N TOTAL
4.2
25
0.5
0.2
0.0
0.2
(:ATAHri1L4-If'ATEREEmsmTOTAL
209.6
92.8
3I.2
13.7
8.3
17,2
2014 Summary of Catawba-Wateree Water Management Group Categorical Water Use S of 6

Tabic -DI Notes
For North Carolina entities supplying only partial categorical data, missing data is determawd as a caleboncal percentage of total withdrawal !rased an the average hisioncal cahegoncat water use try the entity as publhthed in the 2LKl'.
7007, 2008, 2009. 2010 and dal 1 North Carolina Local Water Supply flans
3 For entities supplying; only partial caleboncal data, without avaiinbhhty of complete historical data lin the Local Water Supply Plans, missing data is determined as a percentage of Intal wuhdmwal based on the weighted asxrti hntatrcal
water use by ail basin users for which complete categorical data is available
3 Coy of l enohr breakdowns for the years 7006 and 2010 estimated with actual data for 2007 - 200
4 City of Hickory repotted combined cinnmercialhndustnalfinsuhuuonal %oler use Estimated breakdowns m these categories are detrrmmed per note I Pnor to 2012. wholesale+ were included hu the rcsiden11a1 and combined
commemiaVtndustnaUmstnuuonal water use reported In 2012with the inclusion of the wholesale reporting category, wholesales were backed out of the total residential and cammrresallinduslnal msmutinnal water use, lheaeb$ wdtxmg,
these categofhcs water use as compared Io previous years
5 To" of Longview 2006 breakdown csnianed with 2002 Local Water Supply Plan information 2007-2010 breakdown estimated from Tcpnned rcsidcnunVnori residrnttal dnia 2011 & 2013 reported data combined
commerchaliindusmol water use Estimated breakdowns in these categories frohn 2011 onward is determined per note I Begmmng in mod -2014 Longvte.t' began purchasing Water wholesale from the City of Hickory. ihwonunuing ute of tis
awn intake
6 City of Stmesville 201 t msnnnional water use esurnatrd per nate I Cnlcgonwal water use data was provided by the utility from 7013 and Onward
7 Charlene Water use split between WTP according to muff oftotal water withdrawn at each plant Residemial includes Residential, lawn Rrsidcrihsal. and Malh-f amdy; Commercial mcludcs Commccctal, lacune, Lawn, Lawn
Commercial and Swimming Pools
8 Town of Klooresvlle reported combumd commerctalhndustnaiiinsututhona4 water use Eslimmed breakdown in these categories is determined per note 2
9 Two Rrvtrs Utilities {Gastomdj 20t B categorical use reported is rrfercitced from NC DENR - DWR'- -Eel 1 Local Water Supply Plan Caicgoncal water use data was provided by the utility from 7013 and onward
10 Not Used
I I City of Belmont 20M breakdown estimated Willi reported 2007-2010 data
12 laity of Rack Hill repnrtcd combined ellmmerehalflndtisirmVinStltnllonal water use Eslhmatcd breakdown to Ureic categones is determined per note'_
13 Union Co 'Lancaster Co breakdown csfunnled with Union Cc Catawba Basin consumption only ino Yadkin Basins and estrmahed i ancashU WSD commercial, Industrial. and institutional ratios per nope 3
14 City of Camden's commercial, industrial, and institutional water use estimated per note w
15 General Note h1war dhl%renew In summations are due to rounding
16 General Note The "Total" column is Inken fiom'"abic A 1 (I c Tolal Annual Average Withdrawal}
17 W14L (Mohcsalcl category added to reporting hegmntng With 2012 data
2414 Summary of Catawba-Wateree Water Management Group Categorical Water Use 6 of 6

Table B2 - CWWMG Categorical Waiter Use Summary by Sub -basin.
Average Annual Categorical Water Use (MGD)
Sub -basin
Res
2006
Com
Ind
Inst
Res
2047
Com
Ind
Inst
Res
2008
Com
Inc!
Inst
James
Rbodhiss
4.7
3.0
4.9
1.0
4.8
8.8
3-0
3.7
4.8
0.9
1.1
0.6
4.5
8.4
2.8
3.5
4.4
0.8
I.0
0.6
Hickory
8.4 3.5 0.9 0.6
Lookout Shoals
1.3
1.7
1.0
0.2
1-3
1.7
0.9
0.2
1.0
1.3
0.7
0.1
Norman
13.1
4.4
1.2
0.8
14.3
4.3
1.3
0.9
10.7
3.6
1.0
0.8
Mountain Island
54.6
19.3
4.9
3.5
55.4
16.2
5.0
3.5
51.2
15.9
4.6
3.4
Wylie
6.8
2.8
0.7
0.5
7.2
3.1
0.8
0.5
6.1
2.9
0.7
0.5
Fishing Creek
8.2
2.0
1.5
0.4
9.0
2.1
I.3
0.5
8.5
2.4
1.3
0.5
Great Falls
I
2.3
0.9
0.2
0.2
2.5
0.8
0.2
0.1
Rocky Creek
Wateree
2.2 0.7 0.1
0.1
Total Basin
99.6
37.6
15.1
7.2
103.3
34.8
15.2
7.4
92.6
33.2
13.7
7.1
2014 Sub -Basin Summary of Catawba-Wateree Water Management Group Categorical Water Use 1 of 4

Table B2 - CWWMG Categorical Water Use Summary by Sub -basin
Average Annual Categorical Water Use [MGI])
Sub -basin
Res
2009
Com
Ind
Inst
Res
2010
Com
Ind
Inst
Res
2011
Com
Ind
Inst
James
4.2
s 2.7
4.1
0.9
Rhodhiss
4.4
8.4
2.8
3.5
4.3
0.8
1.0
0.6
5.9
9.2
1.2
3.7
3.1
1.2
4.1
1.4
0.1
1.5
0.8
0.2
Hickory
Lookout Shoals
8.0 3.3 0.8 0.6
1.1 1.4 0.8 0.2
1.1 1.5 0.8 0.2
Norman
11.4
3.9
1.1
0.9
10.7
3.8
1.1
0.8
11.6
51.7
4.3
13.1
1.3
3.4
0.8
3.0
Mountain Island
51.4 15.2 4.4 3.5
54.1 15.8 4.4 3.5
Wylie
6.4
2.7
0.7
0.5
9.6
3.0
0.7
0.5
5.9
3.0
1.0
0.6
Fishing Creek
8.4
1.5
1.1
0.3
8.6
1.5
1.1
0.3
10.3
1.2
2.2
0.3
Great Falls
Rocky Creek
Wateree
2.0
0.7
0.1
0.1
2.1
0.7
0.1
0.1
2.2
0.6
0.5
0.1
Total Basin
92.9
31.6
12.9
6.9
99.1
32.6
13.4
7.0
97.9
30.1
14.1
7.1.
2014 Sub -Basin Summary of Catawba-Wateree Water Management Group Categorical Water Use 2 of 4

Table I12 - CWWMG Categorical Water Use Summary by Sub -basin
Average Annual Categorical Water Use (MGD
Sub -basin
Res
Com
2012
Ind
Inst
Whl'
Res
Com
2013
Ind
Iust
Whl°
James
3.3
2.2
4.4
0.7
4.6
Rhodh iss
3.6 2.7 4.7 0.7
4.1
Hickory
5.3
1.9
0.9
0.4
3.6
5.2
1.1
1.4
0.9
0.7
0.2
0.3
0.2
3.1
0.1
Lookout Shoals
1.2 1.0 0.1 0.2
0.1
Norman
12.4
4.5
1.5
1.0
0.2
1.2.4
5.0
1.4
1.3
0.3
Mountain Island
52.4
13.9
3.5
4.0
3.0
52.4
17.2
3.7
5.0
3.2
Wylie
5.1
10.4
1.6
1.6
1.0
1.3
0.5
0.3
4.9
5.6
1.2
0.8
0.4
4.3
Fishing Creels
2.3
10.0 1.4 13 0.2
2.4
Great. Falls
Rocky Creek
Wateree
2.3
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
2.1
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.2
Total Basin
92.3
27.1
12.9
7.2
18.9
92.5
30,1
13.1
8.2
17,8
Notes:
1. Whl (Wholesale) category added to reporting beginning with 2012 data
2014 Sub -Basin Summary of Catawba-Wateree Water Management Group Categorical Water Use 3 of 4

Table B2 - CWWNIG Categorical Water Use Summary by Sub -basin
Average Annual Categorical Water Use (MGI))
Sub -basin
Ices
Com
2014
Ind
Inst
Whl'
James
Rhodhiss
Hickory
3.4 2.5 4.9 0.7
4.4 1.3 0.6 0.3
4.2
3.3
Lookout Shoals
1.2
0.9
0.2
0.2
0.1
Norman
12.6
5.2
1.5
1.3
0.2
Mountain Island
51.7
17.3
3.3
4.8
2.8
Wylie
6.4
2.8
1.5
0.8
4.2
Fishing Creek
10.7
1.7
1.4
0.2
2.2
Great Falls
Rocky Creek
Wateree
2.5
0.5
0.2
0.0
0.2
Total Basin
92.8
32.2
13.7
8.3
17.2
Notes:
1. Whl (Wholesale) category added to reporting beginning with 2012 data
2014 Sub -Basin Summary of Catawba-Wateree Water Management Group Categorical Water Use 4 of 4

Table B3 - CWWMG Member Water Use Summary Per Relative Size Classification
Withdrawal Rate
CWWMG Member
2414 Water Use (MGD)
Member % of Total
CWWMG Use
Classification % of
Total CWWMG Use
0-5 MGD
Town of Granite Falls
1.1
4.5%a
10.1%
Town of Valdese
2.9
1.4%
Town of Longview
0.2
0.1%
City of Statesville
3.1
1.5%
Lincoln County
2.8
1.3%
City of Mount }-lolly
2.5
1.2%
City of Belmont
1.8
0.8%fl
Chester Metro
2.8
1.3%
Camden
1.9
0.9%
Lugoff Elgin Water Authority
2.3
1.1%
5-15 MGD
City of Lenoir
6.4
3.0%
4
14.7.0
City of Morganton
8.5
4.1'%Q
City of Hickory
10.535
5.0%
Town of Mooresville
5.3
2.5%
�I5 MGD
Rock Hill
16.5
7.9%
75.2%
Charlotte Water
105.4
50.3%
Two Rivers Utilities (Gaston ia-Cramerton)
17.6
8.4%
CRWTP (Union Co/Lancaster Co)
18.1
8.6%
TOTAL
209.6
100.0%
100.007
2014 Summary of CWWMG Water Water Use
By Relative Size Classification 1 of 1.

100%
95%
90%
85%
80%
75%
w
D 70%
m
65%
60%
4
cn
55%
t]
50%
O
Q
45%
0 40°I
0
0
35%
w
aw 30%
35°,+'0
20%
15%
10%
5%
0°I.
Rhodhiss
Figure 61 - 2014 Categorical Water Use Share in Each Sub -basin
a Residential
o Commercial
+Industrial
* Institutional
a Wholesale
Hickory Lookout Shoals Norman Mountain Island Wylie
Fishing Creek Wateree All 5u14mins

110 -
105
100
85
so
as
so
75
Cs
70
L7
65
m
N
D 60
56
B
50
C
Q
m 45
Q1
an
Q
35
30
25
20
1s
10
5
0
Figure B2 - Categorical Water Use by Year (2006-2014)
Residential
w2006 0 2001
m2008 w 2009
w2010 "2011
u2012 12013
— ©2044 --
-----------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------
- — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — -- — — — —"— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — --_.
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — --— — — — — — — — — — -
----------------------------------------------------
Nate: Tracking of
Whofesale water use
------_------ category began in 2012.
No categorical data for
---------------------------- prroryeorsreported.
----------------------------------
--------------------------
Pft — -1111111MMMUSMAL — — — — — — — — — —
---------------- --
d
Commercial Industrial
Institutional
Wholesale

120
100
80
Vj
to
m
N
60
k
fd
m
U
O
to
{u
tj 40
20
Figure 62-A - Average Annual Daily Categorical Water Usage
Residential
rnmmPrrini
- -
-
—
Note.
Who*
use category
In zo
coteg
prior
7rocking of
sore water Industrial
began
a. No Institutional
3ricol doto for
ears reported. --+-- Wholesale
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

120
115
Ito
�a
105
100
m
3
4
95
5
90
85
80
Figure B2 -B - Average Annual Daily Categorical Water Usage
Residential - 3 Linear (Residential )
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
-- --
-- - _ __
----.-------_
_ -_-�
-4.9% per year
declining trend
(2006 to 2014)
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

50
so
40
20
to
0
Figure 62-C - Average Annual Daily Categorical Water Usage
Commercial - i Linear (Commercial)
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2012 2012 2013 2014
-__-____-_----__
- - - _ - --- -..
- - ----
-----------
-2.3% per year
declining trend
(2006 to 2014)
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2012 2012 2013 2014

F -A
19
1$
17
Figure 82-1) - Average Annual Daily Categorical Water Usage
Industrial ------> Linear (Industrial )
13
12
11
10
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

u
y
20
18
16
14
12
10
6
L7
Figure 132-E - Average Annual Daily Categorical Water usage
Institutional -----> Linear (Institutional )
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
--------------------------------- ------------
--- _
-
1.7 per yea r
increasing trend
--�
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

20.0
19.5
19.0
18.5
a
do
to
m
DLA
17.5
�a
U
U
0 17.0
m
a
u
16.5
1.6.0
15.5
15.0
Figure B2 -F - Average Annual Daily Categorical Water Usage
--*-- Wholesale ------3 Linear (Wholesale)
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
-3.6% per year
declining trend
.,L I
Note:
Wholesale
use
Tracking of
water
otegory began
in t2012.
cat
prix
No
goriralal data for
years reported
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

100°10
95%
90%
85%
80%
75%
70°f i
Figure B3 -Annual Basin -wide Water Use Share by Category (2006-2014)
0
rh 65%
m
60%
m
u 55%
0
m
50%
C3
a
tO 45%
0
0.
40%
m
0 35%
0
m
30%
U
w
0. 25%
20%
15%
10%
5%
0%
Residentlal
Commercial
[R-tfl-h H,
Industrial
Instltional
w2006 im 2007
o2008 o2009
w2010 ia 2011
o2012 a 2013
w 2014
Nate: Tracking of
Wholesale water use
category began in 2017.
No categorical data for
prior years reported.
Wholesale

Figure B3 -A - Annual Basin wide Water Use Share by Category (2014)
(Water Use (in MGD), % of Categorical Use)
■ Residential s Commercial m Industrial ■ Institutional a Wholesale

Figure B4 - Residential Water Use in Each Sub -Basin (2006-2014)
as % of Sub -Basin Tota! Consumption
Nate: Substantial differences reflected in 20I1-2012 sub -basin
residential categorical use are typically the result of new
reporting requirements far the wholesale water use category,
0 2006
w 2007
2008
�a 2009
m2010
2011 ,
u 2012
w2013
80%
C
QO0
E 70%
C
a
L
60%
ro
U
m 50%
a
u
0
el
3D%
20%
10%
0%
LAKE LAKE HICKORY LOOKOUT LAKE NORMAN MOUNTAIN LAKE WYLIE FISHING LAKE
RHODHISS SHOALS LAKE ISLAND LAKE CREEK WATEREE
RESERVOIR

Figure B5 -+Commercial Water Use in Each Sub -Basin (2006-2014)
as % of Sub -Basin Total Consumption
100°Io -
Note: Substantial differences reflected in 2011 -2012 suit -basin
commercial categorical use are typically the result of new
90% reporting requirements for the wholesale water use category,
which for some utilities was included in the residential and/or
commercial water use categories prior to 2012.
80%
0
C
si
E 70%
H
C
0
V
L
ro 60%
Uu
'i
boo .50%
d
a+
10
U
CQ
F 40%
m
30%
H
w
4
F
20%
10%
d% -i �R s it . �� a�■A� ��.
LAKE LAKE HICKORY LOOKOUT LAKE NORMAN MOUNTAIN LAKE WYLIE FISHING
RHODHISS SHOALS LAKE ISLAND LAKE CREEK
RESERVOIR
■ 2006 ■ 2007
* 2008 z2009
* 2010 w2011
a2012 a 2013
a 2014
LAKE
WATEREE

100%u
90%
80%
c
a
C
CL
E 70%
c
a
u
ro 60%
sE
K4
20%
10%
Figure B6 - Industrial Water Use in Each Sub -Basin (2006-2014)
as % of Sul? -Basin Total Consumption
Nate: Substantia/ differences reflected in 2011 present
sub -basin categorical use are typically the result of
estimated historical data (2006-201.0) in the absence
of actual reported data for same users, whereas the
2011 -present categorical use reflects actual data
reported by those users. for sub -basins with sinal/
consumptions, differences in historical estimates
versus 2011 -present actual data may appear more
dramatic.
LAKE.
RHODHISS
le"In
LAKE HICKORY
LOOKOUT
SHOALS LAKE
LAKE NORMAN
© 2006 a2007
ra 2008 a 2009
w2010 u2011
x2012 u2013
w2014
MOUNTAIN LAKE WYLIE FISHING 'LAKE
ISLAND LAKE CREEK WATEREE
RESERVOIR
40%
-
ro
m
a 30%
0
K4
20%
10%
Figure B6 - Industrial Water Use in Each Sub -Basin (2006-2014)
as % of Sul? -Basin Total Consumption
Nate: Substantia/ differences reflected in 2011 present
sub -basin categorical use are typically the result of
estimated historical data (2006-201.0) in the absence
of actual reported data for same users, whereas the
2011 -present categorical use reflects actual data
reported by those users. for sub -basins with sinal/
consumptions, differences in historical estimates
versus 2011 -present actual data may appear more
dramatic.
LAKE.
RHODHISS
le"In
LAKE HICKORY
LOOKOUT
SHOALS LAKE
LAKE NORMAN
© 2006 a2007
ra 2008 a 2009
w2010 u2011
x2012 u2013
w2014
MOUNTAIN LAKE WYLIE FISHING 'LAKE
ISLAND LAKE CREEK WATEREE
RESERVOIR

100%
50%
80%
v,
30%
0
20%
Figure B7 - Institutional Water Use in Each Sub -Basin (2006-2014)
as % of Sub -Basin Total Consumption
, ilffi
n 2006
■ 2007
Note: Substantial differences reflected in 2011 -present
sub -basin categorical use are typically the result of
ra 2008
2009
estimated historical data (2006-2010) in the absence of
w2010
w2011
actual reported data for some users, whereas the 2011-
a 2012
w 2014
present categorical use reflects actual data reported by
42013
those users. For sub -basins with smoll consumptions,
differences in historical estimates versus 2011 -present
actual data may appear more dramatic.
10%
Kai
fl
, ilffi
0/o
LAKE LAKE HICKORY LOOKOUT LAKE NORMAN
MOUNTAIN LAKE WYLIE
FISHING LAKE
RHODHISS SHOALS LAKE
ISLAND LAKE
CREEK WATEREE
RESERVOIR

100%
90%
80%
Figure B8 - Wholesale Water Use in Each Sub -Basin (2012 - 2014)
as % of Sub -Basin Total Consumption
Note: Wholesale water use not tracked as part of categorical use reporting prior to
2012. Therefore, only 2012 to present data is shown for this water use category.
m2012
cc 2093
w2014
20%
10%
0%
B" - -r
LAKE LAKE HICKORY LOOKOUT LAKE NORMAN MOUNTAIN LAKE WYLIE FISHING LAKE
RHODHISS SHOALS LAKE ISLAND LAKE CREEK WATEREE
RESERVOIR

Figure B9 - 2014 CWWMG Member Water Use Per Relative Size Classification
100.0%
90.0%
80.0%
70.0%
60.0%
0
50.0%
0
0
40.0%
U
30.0%
20.0%
10,1%
10.0%
members0.0%
0-5 mgd
14.7%
1
4
members
5-15 mgd
CWWMG Member Size Classification
}15 mgd

s

Duke Energy 1 Catawba-Wateree Annual Water Use for the Year 2014 4
Attachments �f

This page intentionally left blank.

Tnlile M - CW WT.1C Averse. Deilw Wadsr YYgRRrvw el h. M -A fns F.aRl:r Waenr S..mnav M.mh-
2015 (MGDt
Pamj 1D Entity
Facility RectivinZ WR1er
Jan
Fcb
Scar
Apr
Me}
June
Jui
-Yu1
Srpi
Ocr
Nov
Dec
ANNUAL
AVC
LANE JAkIE.S
S4
FAKE RHODIIISS
NW'R-1 Town of Grannc Falli
Gcarute Falls WTP Lake Rhodbss
1 IJ
to
10
09
t 0
to
10
t 2
09
10
1 1
! 1
1 1
NW'R-2 C11y of Lenoir
Leriarr WTP Lake Rhodhns
69
6 5
6 0
6 3
66
66
65
63
63
61
60
6 0
r.
NWR� I City of M0,$., -tun
CAI awha Rrvcr WTP Catawba Rwcr
91
83
77
78
87
91
It
9t
93
91
a7.
11"1
65
NWR-4 Town of Vstd-
V mfd- WTI, Lake Rhodh.,
3 I
2 1
_ 6
2 7
3 0
3 3
3 1
2 9
2 9
2 11
2 6
_.
2 9
L4KE RHODMISSSUB-BASINTOTAL
28.1
18.6
IT.d
17.11
193
2"
19A
Ms
195
19.1
18.9
17.3
1"
LAKE HICKORY
NWH-1 City of Hickory
IlukoryWIT Lake Hickory
.0
44
1,,
li]
I4c
II9
121
tt1
112
1416
01
a3
IU4
NWH-. Town of Lon6wtew'
Lon6vlrw LYr'P Lace Hickory
u h
0 9
0 1
_
-
112
LAKE HICKORY SUB -BASIN TOTAL
1111.5
I03
103
18.2
11.5
1U9
TS.t
11.]
11.1
10.6
9.7
93
10.7
LOOKOUT SHOALS LAfkE
NWL-I City of5lrrtcsvilte
S7aies,111. WTP Loakous Shoats Lake
3 r,
7 l
f 5
.}
LOOKOOTSHOALS LAKE SUR-JiIASIN TOTAL
3.2
310
2.9
29
33
3.5
35
3.2
3.2
3.1
2.1
2.8
3.1
LAKE NORMAN
NWN.I Charlatle Water
Lee S Dukes 1LTP 'Lake Norman
161
164
164
159
207
221
jti 2
21 3
199
146
156
13 7
LE
NWN-2. Lmcoin County
Linwtn Counly WrP Lake Norman
2 8
14
25
2.4
3 1
3 2
12
3 1
3 1
2 8
26
_..
2 F
NWN-3 Town of Moores,,]],
Mooresnlle WTP Lake No,-
4 8
47
5 3
50
57
62
61
56
5 6
5 3
4 7
_
{
L4KENORMANSUB-BASIN TOTAL
23.7
Z35
24.1
233
29A
31.5
315
38.0
2814
26.7
22.9
213
26.3
MOUNTAIN ISLAND LAKE
NWM- I ChaTwle ww"
Franklin & VMI WfS Mounram Island Lakf&ake NormvF
B24
780
75 1
79 4
92 1
973
964
960
93 8
956
83 '
162
872
NWM.2 TmooRivers ['sthtir•:IGuionia-Cramenonl
G>IonraWTP Mountain lslaodLake
1117
182
t92
190
190
179
165
174
179
165
ISS
157
176
NWM-3 City of Mount Holl,
Moues 'Hotly WTP %lountmn Island Lake
2 5
2 5
24
25
2.7
27
2 7
26
2 5
27
24
21
2 5
MOUNTAIN ISLAND 1AKESUB-HASIN TOTAL,
103.6
98.6
97.6
1089
113.1
111.8
I IS.S
116.0
114.1
114.E
101.7
91.2
107.4
LA K E WYLI E
NWY-6 City of Bel mons
DOwnt VViP Lakc Wylie
10
1 6
1 6
1 ti
1 7
20
111
1 7
1 9
2 1
1 7
1 h
SWY•I Rock Hill
City of Rock Hill WTP Lake Wylie
116
934
t3:
€52
t81
164
198
19;
11,111
185
161
154
lo`
tAKEWYLI€SUB-,BASIN TOTAL
15.2
115.1
14.8
16.8
19.9
1L1
.21A
20.4
20.7
20.5
t7.6
17.1
18.2
FISHING CREEK RESERVOIR
S WF -6 Union Coli.awozer Co
Cwawtia RaveT Plant Catawba River
I s 6
1 5 0
144
160
ZQ 5
11 7
306
20 9
70 1
Ia 7
16 6
I+ 1
'5 1
SWF 7 Chester Metro
Clsesier " TP FahNg Creek Rcsenvir
2 f.
I ii
t:!
2 7
2 a
2 9
2 1
2 F.
2 8
2 4
2 7
' a
I n
FISHING CREEK HSERVOIR.SUR-RA.SINTOTA!
[8.2
1.8.0
18.0
18.8
28.7
Si.6
27A
23S
ZZ.9
22.2
t9.3
f"
20.8
GREAT FALLS • DEARBORN RESERVOIR
HA
ROCKY CREEK - CEDAR CREEP{ RESERVOIR
NA
LIKE WATEREE.
SWW-1 Camden
City of Camden W7'P Lake Walercr
20
19
19
SwW.2 LuyolFEtbin Water Aulhoray
L.Vofl=Elbrn WTP ]eke Waterer
_ .
113
21
2 3
T I
t
14 KE WATEREE'S11XAASP, TOTAL
4.1
3.9
3.6
4.2
49
4.9
49
4S
4.2
4.2
3.9
3.6
4.2
C074hIGME.4MRERTOTAL
194.4
€87.1
I84.5
190.6
220.6
227.3
227.4
224.4
220.2
217.1
192.4
175.8
2115.4

250
200
Figure C1- 2014 CWWMG Member Water Withdrawals By Month
LAKE RHODHISS SUB -BASIN TOTAL
LOOKOUT SHOALS LAKE SU8-BAS IN TOTAL
MCOUNTA IN 15LAN0 LAKE SUB -BASIN TOTAL
FISHING CREEK RESERVOIR 5UB-BA51N TOTAL
CWW'MG MEMBER TOTAL
LAKE HICKORY SUB -BASIN TOTAL
LAKE NORMAN SUB -BASIN TOTAL
LAKE WYLIE SUB -BASIN TOTAL
LAKE WATEREE SUB -BASIN TOTAL
so
0
Jan
Feb Mar Apr May lune Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec
Month

240
230
220
0 210
C7
170
160
150
Figure C2 _ 2014 CWWMG Member Water Withdrawals By Month
-- 0 CWWMG MEMBER TOTAL
--- Annual Average
PF = Peaking Factor,
Monthly Average /
Annual Average
Jan Feb Mar Apr May June JI
Month
riCL
L
n
a
rl
rl
LL
a
11
II
LL
I'I
of
G7
IY
LL
11
133..
Q
II
!L
00
OG
C7
31
LL
Il
Jan Feb Mar Apr May June JI
Month

ti

I

FN
440 S. Church Street Suite 1000. Charlotte. NG 28202
704 338 61700
hdrinc.cgm
Q 2015 HDR, Inc., all rights reserved