20240681 Ver 1_West Chatham St Permit Application Attachments_20240514

Permit
Drawings

VICINITY MAP
(NOT TO SCALE)
fJl , r
UMSTEAD PARK
40
a
t FRl�`ICLN9 .L � �
cr`zi", nt o
z
lU'
r fi.
z d
I✓IOFiRiS�ILLN Pli1'
re ELHCTI21,DR
C Nr ➢IA' :J AI'I: k❑
y Q yR
CA
o0
z � x ALL It„ � arc
sNC 4 y,�s
z � ri1L_.g6URrClf ST
(WEST ST.)
x
Sl��l�t
x
yv 'ISA 511� MA NA!1D ND
l
J Vie✓n .� ll�L
-r,t,.W7 7
y a.i
40
ti
fY y 64
L:^ S
� C1`
D
7
_Y2_
Y4'=
10#00
- - m
-Y1-
TOWN of
CARY
NORTH CAROLINA
316 North Academy Street
1871 Cary, N.C. 27513
e
Tel:[phone] Fax:[phone]
www.townofcary.org
CONNECTING CARY SIDEWALKS
Project Limits -HIGH HOUSE RD TO ROUNDABOUT
Project No. ST4005 - W. CHATHAM ST (#9)
INDEX OF SHEETS
Sheet No. Description
Cv 001 COVER SHEET
GN 001 - GN 003 GENERAL NOTES & TYPICAL SECTIONS
SW 1.0 - SW 1.2 SIDEWALK PLANS
ECN 001 - ECN 004 EROSION CONTROL NOTES
EC 1.0 - EC 1.2 EROSION CONTROL PLANS
XS 0.0 - XS 1.22 CROSS SECTIONS
D1 - D7 NCDOT & TOC DETAILS
TMP-1 - TMP-8 TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT PLANS
Total Sheets 55
PERMIT DRAWING
SHEET 1 OF 3
Contact Information:
Amir Nezarati, PE
Senior Project Manager WETLAND AND SURFACE WATER IMPACTS PERMIT
amir.nezarati @carync.gov
[phone]
BEGIN PROP. RETAINING WALL #1
it-L- Sta. 11+36.00 END PROP. RETAINING WALL #2
END PROP. RETAINING WALL #1 -L- Sta. 25+50.00 100
ICI -L- Sta. 11+74*00 P
-L- BEGIN PROP. RETAINING WALL #2
i W. CHATHAM sT(sx1011)-L- Sta. 24+00.00
BEGIN BRIDGE
13#W
i.......
J L—J L L_J L__J L --- J U L_J L_J L_J L—J
----------------------------_ —_— ✓ ................
-- ____---------- --_ �i/ ---'
\� II 11'i I�ill�l�
-Ll-
j MULTI -USE PATH
� END BRIDGE
-Ll- Sta. 10+66.91
BEGIN PROJECT
W. CHATHAM ST
-Yl- Sta. 10+10.00
Revisions
Date Description
-L1- Sta. 11+11.91
1
SITE 1
-t- I5a00
_Y3_
_----------_--� L— _—_--_—_—_—_---- ,.................. \�---_
Oi00 IB+00 �_ B+OD 20#W
�TnrECREST RD
_Y7_
CHARLES CT
-Y4-
WILLOW ST
—_
22+Op
f �
-Y5-
W PARK ST
Site
Feature
Wetland
Impacts
Stream Impacts
Temporary
Permanent
Temporary
remporary (Stabilization
Permanent
Ft^2
Acre
Ft^2
Acre
LF
Ft^2
Acre
LF
Ft^2
Acre
LF
Ft^2
Acre
1
UT to MacGregor Downs Lake - SC
Structure Stabilization
17
135
< 0.01
UT to MacGregor Downs Lake - SC
Bank Stabilization
5.0
35.0
< 0.01
5.0
38.0
< 0.01
Project Total
5
35
< 0.01
22
173
1 < 0.01
Survey for this project was completed by Town of Cary professional
land surveyors. Coordinate control based on the following:
Horizontal - 1 "=20', Vertical - N/A
Drawn By : Jakub Taraba, PE
Designed By: Jakub Taraba, PE
Date: 2/26/2024
1
a 1
■ :. As+cn
-Y6-
END PROJECT \
W. CHATHAM ST
-L- Sta. 26+11.01
Internal Control Approval Authorizing Release By The Town of Cary
Project Engineer Transportation & Facilities Dept. (Check Indicating Type of Plan)
Jeff Meador, PE Final Drawings (No Marking)
Certification Optional:
Preliminary Drawings - Do Not Use For Construction
X Progress Drawing - Do Not Use For Construction
Final Drawing - Not Released For Construction
Signature Date SEAL Final Drawing - For Review Purposes Only
Not a Certified Document as to the Original Document but ONLY as to the Revisions

II ;
II ;
II ;
II
II i
II
II
I 1
I I W M
PERMIT DRAWING
SHEET 2 OF
Wetland Impacts Stream Impacts
C4n a TOP=44474' Site Feature Temporary Permanent Temporary emporary (Stabilization Permanent
I I ' / I I
W INV(SE)=43.2.54 �0� I I Ft^2 Acre Ft^2 Acre LF Ft^2 Acre LF Ft^2 Acre LF Ft^2 Acre
i 1 UT to MacGregor Downs Lake - SC 17 135 <0.01
a BZ 2 /' /' i I Structure Stabilization
UT to MacGregor Downs Lake - SC 5.0 35.0 <0.01 5.0 38.0 <0.01
I I TOP=43742' I
Bank Stabilization
.i I I INV(SE)=433.32' I I II II iv I I i BZ 1
4
Pro'ect Total 5 35 < 0.01 22 173 < 0.01
I I I I -
�/ I I
II
II
N II
I I TONW)=431.7 III
' I'INVWW)=431.71'
nai i i INV(S)=2431.66IIl\Il\ II I IIIIII�INV8E)=431.46' ' " I 12" O,,Rrr'am�N ^
TOP=4 4.65'
INV(S)-9,15J/ 09 II I I I
IP jRIP II
I �
I
Q i $ RAP <
1
� 12CM I _ • �G y � " N / / ���'C J �' n I I
n i .12
tiA i � � � S �TOP=4 6.01' INV=42857' R I I
I IINV(SE) 431.95' I " CM 12" CM c► OP-445.66'
I 1V`1WEM
INV=427. 6' S� ) O
�I I INV-428. I I I V(E)=440.98'
i FJ 1 �1 I I I IN (NW)=440.96'
Cp \�d�I I T P=435.69' - RIP cn I I O
- - - - - -
INV NW)=431.09'
30"&
�
VV, fil-T --- \
/8. L TSE)=430.89' ___ ___06 O=36TP4
t--I
O
I INV(NE)=429.37' CONC CONC
RCP I -REWAf IE) L J
10 +00
------- ------ MT�7�I-------- ------- ss _ 8' VC ���� OS
-------- �Sili - Tom- -- ----- -- --- --- �- - --
2 41-RC-e- _ --- - - - - ___________ •
T(NW)=4 .72' -/ V(NE)= 31.8 TOP=444.67' _ _TOP=445.82' , ^ � IN�V(NEf-430.62' ' ' w CH THAM 'I,IVO = 0 �� �� - - -W- - INV(NW)=430.67' -w 1NV(NE)=441.O2' 8" AC �( J
6VL� i INV(NE)=431.89'
I E�=430.57' i � i INV(SW)=RECESSED
-w- - INV(SW)=430.62' INV(W)=440.97'
- � ��� � BOTTOM CUL-427 69'
10 - 00
=435.40' II
E)=431.05' I
II
II
I
I
\
STEPS 6'
II
10 APPROX.LOCATION
I
15" RCP_
(POSSIBLY PAVED OVER)
F I
A
iF
P=431.57'
II
>E)=428.20'
I I
;
I
IW)=428.04'
II
JE)=427.88'
I I
II
CN /
II II
m
II
m
II
�I I
PHOTNIA
oil
I I
12" CM
II �
II
+
II �
II
11
PHOTNIA
II
II
1 1
II
II
PHOTNIA
II
II II CC
II
SOPI, LLC
I I
�
1
TOP=431.56'
INV(NW)=427.48'
UT TO MacGREGOR
DOWNS
LAKE (SC)
TSB ,S1 E H -
�'`��� - � - - VARIES, -w- - - - •
INS�T BZ 1
�1 P' �`��P - N _ - PLUG & FILL
ca ��y/�- 4 W/FLOWABLE MATERIAL o1 v ,
ago' CB3 l NCO cn ��-�OO C G DI 02 ��4Un
-T F - - - - 24" RCP -IV cB-G o4 24" RCP -IV OT0P=442.12' - 15" RCP -III 1 15" RCP -III
8 - - -T FO- - - - - 4 - - - - - - - - - - -T FO W . •• - I
---- IN = 6 2 8"VC J
I I F 4" RC P_I 1 I I W
2�`� 34 M TOP=435 _ _
mTi - 15"- =III 24"I P- ®T - --- B'! Mn = F- INV(NE)- --- ` -?UT L - - - - - -r-- -�C- --:-r- V
---I _ _ - T - T -
L1I 08 �Zl ---T-- 1 --- T G T _ W
- - - - - _ --------------------------
9 TONS C I OAP ----------------- F TCE TC �� PP \9° TCE TCE C( Z W
I ` 1 " GU W/110 SY EO FAB �--
N BAN S ONLY �� F 12" OAK 12. 0 \ >I\ \ 6 \ W' PINE TCE
' \/ 1 18' PINE J W
1 i'/ 1 0\QQ 18" PINE 22 K I „ PIN\ \ \\ \ ss 14" OAK 0 V
12" P
IW/11 NSY GEOI FAB ` 1 ej�� G� C 14" GUM "O �0 10" T 12" OAK r`c� \ G+\ C
y / 24' TWIN A 112" TRIPLE K I " TWA \ \ 9C,\ �%\ \ " OAK 22" OAK
j I K ��� OAK o ° �'��' OAK UM �� \ v9\ \ \\� \ ; 15" PINE 16" OAK 0
2 \\
. 12' OAK ��\ \ �G�\ \ \14" OAK !t j /^ 14" OAK
12" 20 F1 • PjN OAK 20" OAK -X 2" wD 25" OAK OAK 14" OAK
/ \�
�F
WE Wt------ T�� ,r j 18" OAK , \ \\ \ /
TCE T E TCE `n \J� 12 GUM F \ \ \
18' U M
ml6" PINE m CC SOPI, LLC �1 P\\J 9� \��o
J 14" OAK 0 Q'c` •\ \\ \ ' 9�
\ J
00
3
ff �
vb \
12" •PINE � ALj° �' �o S .� L
�b lA W ➢� W
GUY R- WAVRA, JR- r �, F
2 0' 0' 2 0' 4 0' 80
��r�
INSET GRAPHIC SCALE 40
CP-III JUNE C. FINCH HEIRS
7-
0- 0.
\ s o
I
JOSEPH BRUCKERT ' M I 1�' ' -1 F 2 /) I \� \ IL
SITE 1----- SS-----� Mro Nib.
PERMANENT 9� � > P o\\ \
b \
1 1 2-7 STREAM I M PACTS F s� ° ���
10' 010' 2 0' 3 0'
GRAPHIC SCALE
TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACTS KEY PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACTS
PERMANENT STREAM IMPACTS TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACTS
- BZ 1 - RIPARIAN BUFFER LIMIT - ZONE 1 TB TOP OF STREAM BANK
A
BZ
2- RIPARIAN BUFFER LIMIT - ZONE 2
JS JURISDICTIONAL STREAM
22.0 LF (173. SF)
� 9 \ \
/ � 4
Col
RICHARD E. LAWHUN \
CHING PING WEI \\
1 r_1V1r-vr%r-Xr% r 01 rtr-MM IMPACTS �Q ( / �o�
5.0 LF (35.0 SF)
w
Q
0
Signature
Revisions
Proj . No.
ST4005
Design By:
JT
Drawn By:
JT
Date:
2/26/2024
Scale Hor:
1" = 20'
Scale Ver:
N/A
SHEET NO.
SW
1.0

i
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
W�
M
III
OWE
II
II
xW�
II
II
x�a
A
II
F
II
II
II
II
II
�O
a
II
II
I
I
II
I TOP=437.42'
I INV(SE)=433.32'
I
I
I
I II
IN II
I� II
I
I
I� II
I
II
II
CD ITOPI
� III
- 35.51' I I o
' 1' INV(NW)=431.71'
II
I
a
INV(S)=431.66'
V�E)=431.46'
I
II
00
HH-
�
Fj I
V
v
W
E
4 3
z
O
10 +00
/0X
BZ 2
BZ 1-
444.0 —
PERMIT DRAWING
SHEET 3 OF -1 1
'PO
Impacts
Stream Impacts
Wetland
Site Feature Temporary
Permanent
Temporary
emporary (Stabilization
Permanent
TOP=44474'
INV(SE)=432.54.�/G�' i i Ft^2 Acre
Ft^2
Acre
LF
Ft^2
Acre
LF
Ft^2
Acre
LF
Ft^2
Acre
17
135
<0.01
1 UT to MacGregor Downs Lake - SC
Structure Stabilization
5.0
35.0
<0.01
5.0
38.0
<0.01
UT to MacGregor Downs Lake - SC
Bank Stabilization
5
35
< 0.01
22
173
< 0.01
,X. 103 I I 1 1 Project Total
�
II
/ � I I
N I ICA
II
II
II
442.0
I 11L"j o' - no12" /- — — _ _ / , TOP=4 4.65') 1 I I
8 INV(S)= 9.I5 I I I I
IC 10" OR IP ' 0 _ I I " CO
`y G 12 "M
nn i
I\ �T T = 4 6.01' 2 RC
INV=42 7
II
IINV( I" CM c► I \\ II OP=445.66'
I = 8. E)=440.98' O
T P= 4 35.69'
-
-----------------------
--- ----- - - -------------------------
CN
��
INV NW)=431.09'
I SE)=430.89'
-
4 8°0
m
\
I TOP- 6.07'
0c° I INV(NE)= 9.37'
I —REWAf
---- -
CONC
-------
RCP IE)5
------ -
�L�I--------
---------SS----------
----------- ---
N
0
TOP=434.72'-i
IIFLW,NE�=430.57'
TOP=435.64'
/ /' INV(SW)ERECESSED
C� — -
J�'� W CH T rO = 0 �\
�
6LL
<,/ BOTTOM CUL=427.69'
/1
-
—
w
'? / P
VARIES —w— —
BZ 1
INSC�
CT
/� ��
N
//
—
-
11 +0
I
O C13
15"
CP-III
33 CIO
— �
Q�v
7,3 f00
09 CB-e //
M��
Mai
MAN
1 0 ,
n
ARM —
I'
UT TO MacGREGOR
DOWNS LAKE (SC)
GRAPHICIT E 1
TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACTS KEY PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACTS
I I IN (NW)=440.96' O
CONC rt�� L J
w- _ TOP=444 _ _ TOP=445.82' -- ,
INV(NW)=4 .67' INV(NE)=441.0 g° qC L( ,
INV(SW)= 30.62' INV(W)=440.
PLUG & FIL
m
LOWABLE MA IAL 0=1V)
f ► l5 fO0 N
O TOP=442.1 15" RCP -III 15" RC -III
Eff 4 — — — — T FO I W
1 = 6z ---- JW
=zuT� W N
\ T —
CE Z W
I 14 L
Iz• o \ \ `� �;' PINE TCE
\ ' 8" PINE J W
22" OAK PIN \ \ \ s 14" OAK V
` CPI` ' 0 OAK 12" P
PINE 16" OAK , `7 V
OAK �° �v / ^ 14,10
OAK ,ram �° IV I "OAK 14" OAK
`O \
18" OAK
\ ° 9
3-
to �0 �\ ��• �� �
DUNE C. FINC HEIRS 2�'4
m � \
9� OO °
%0 \\ r
9
—PERMANENT
STREAM I M TS (6 6 °� \ \ 0
22.0 LF (173. SF)
°
J'
0 -XIC
PERMANENT STREAM IMPACTS TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACTS
RICHAR E. LAWHUN
RIPARIAN BUFFER LIMIT - ZONE 1 TB TOP OF STREAM BANK k / CHIN PING WEI 0 \
— BZ 1 — TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACTS
8" VC
5.0 LF (35.0 SF)
�0
BZ
2—
RIPARIAN BUFFER LIMIT - ZONE 2
JS
JURISDICTIONAL STREAM
F�
w
_
v S
�--)
0�-�/
U
w
0
U
Signature
Revisions
Proj . No.
ST4005
Design By:
JT
Drawn By:
JT
Date:
2/26/2024
Scale Hor:
1" = 20'
Scale Ver:
N/A
SHEET NO.
SW
1.0

Buffer
Drawings

VICINITY MAP
(NOT TO SCALE)
UMSTEAD PARK
40
z
z d
I✓I�)FiFir��,ILL�l'li1' .)!N ]5
y rf
_Uns LZEf;7'R4 rJR
"h� 0 0
C" xr nawvaNl: ku T,p,
ti,T}
_ p
CA
o0
s nC 4 yr, l
z
;,. z (WEST F ST.) 5r
Y
v
a
MA NA' r:D
4-�
A i lit, _
� 1ST
y>- 40
4
V
s 64
sL 1 r
L
_Y2_
0
.— � 'd,b S 57'S7'OJ1 E tl+00
10#00
. m
-Y1-
TOWN of
CARY
NORTH CAROLINA
316 North Academy Street
1871 Cary, N.C. 27513
Tel:[phone] Fax:[phone]
www.townofcary.org
CONNECTING CARY SIDEWALKS
Project Limits -HIGH HOUSE RD TO ROUNDABOUT
Project No. ST4005 - W. CHATHAM ST (#9)
INDEX OF SHEETS
Sheet No. Description
CV 001 COVER SHEET
GN 001 - GN 003 GENERAL NOTES & TYPICAL SECTIONS
SW 1.0 - SW 1.2 SIDEWALK PLANS
ECN 001 - ECN 004 EROSION CONTROL NOTES
EC 1.0 - EC 1.2 EROSION CONTROL PLANS
XS 0.0 - XS 1.22 CROSS SECTIONS
D1 - D7 NCDOT & TOC DETAILS
TMP-1 - TMP-8 TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT PLANS
Total Sheets 55
Contact Information:
Amir Nezarati, PE
Senior Project Manager BUFFER IMPACTS PERMIT
amir.nezarati @carync.gov
[phone]
BUFFER DRAWING
SHEET 1 OF 3
BEGIN PROP. RETAINING WALL #1
it-L- Sta. 11+36.00 END PROP. RETAINING WALL #2
END PROP. RETAINING WALL #1 -L- Sta. 25+50.00 100
ICI -L- Sta. 11+74.00 P
-�- BEGIN PROP. RETAINING WALL #2
i W. CHATHAM sT(sx1011)-L- Sta. 24+00.00
BEGIN BRIDGE
a+ao -i----
13#00
.......
J L—J L L_J L__J L --- J U L_J L_J L_J L—J
------------------------------- ✓ ................
_-------------�---------�— — —s�/
\� 11 11'i I�illli ry
-Ll-
j MULTI -USE PATH
� END BRIDGE
-Ll- Sta. 10+66.91
BEGIN PROJECT
W. CHATHAM ST
-Yl- Sta. 10+10.00
Revisions
Date Description
-L1- Sta. 11+11.91
1
SITE 1
-t- I5a00
_Y3_
� I
_----------_--� I-- _—_--_—_—_—_---- ,.................. \�---_
OiOD IB+00 �_ r91 20+00
'm——•—m—m—m m—m—w
22+Op
f � _
VV/
�TnrECREST RD
_Y7_
CHARLES CT
-Y4-
WILLOW ST
Survey for this project was completed by Town of Cary professional
land surveyors. Coordinate control based on the following:
Horizontal - 1 "=20', Vertical - N/A
Drawn By : Jakub Taraba, PE
Designed By: Jakub Taraba, PE
Date: 2/26/2024
-Y5-
W PARK ST
Site
Feature
Buffer Impacts- Zone 1
Buffer Impacts -Zone 2
Temporary
Permanent
Temporary
Permanent
Ft^2
Acre
Ft^2
Acre
Ft^2
Acre
Ft^2
Acre
UT to MacGregor Downs Lake - SC
ROADWAY FILL
352
<0.01
193
0
UT to MacGregor Downs Lake - SC
PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE FILL
327
< 0.01
1913
0.04
214
< 0.01
901
0.02
Project Total
327
< 0.01
2265
0.05
214
< 0.01
1094
0.02
a �
■ :. 2s+cn
-Y6-
END PROJECT \
W. CHATHAM ST
-L- Sta. 26+11.01
Internal Control Approval Authorizing Release By The Town of Cary
Project Engineer Transportation & Facilities Dept. (Check Indicating Type of Plan)
Jeff Meador, PE Final Drawings (No Marking)
Certification Optional:
Preliminary Drawings - Do Not Use For Construction
X Progress Drawing - Do Not Use For Construction
Final Drawing - Not Released For Construction
Signature Date SEAL Final Drawing - For Review Purposes Only
Not a Certified Document as to the Original Document but ONLY as to the Revisions

TOP=444.74' I I
INV(SE)=432.54\QI�' I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I�
I IN
I I�
I I�
I I �
� I I
I I
TOP=4 4.65'1 1
INV(S)= 9.15j
�10" ORN
IP RIP
RAP
O 12" CM i ►V I / /J 6
TOP=4 6.01' JS INV=42857' R
T = f I IINV(SE) 431.95' I " CM 12" CM .c►
I V W 4 3�11 II INV=427.�6'Sr I\NV=428.'
FJ V E 2 CA I \`�.- T P=435.69' RIP v
E) / \ \ t '-q'30:9zr---------------------------�-----------------------•
1
CN
30"F(�,&G
M"M 3
ZONE 2
IMPACTS
0.003 AC (142.53 SF)
0 I
'?' P BZ 1
S -7-
-F �� 33 co15" RCP-111 09 CB .E �� a' CB �� � - � 73 f00
-- _-- - 24"RCP-IV CB-G o4
r ,,/�II►�1�,E
I/pry
I I TOP=435.51' III
I' INV(NW)=431.71'
INV(S)=431.66' I1 I o,;f�
I ORNINVvvE)=431.46'
� ;
v
g
III
BZ 2
BZ 1-
ry'Q-I SS
- , TOP=435
- INV(NE)- - -
=435.40 j I� _ �_ - 1NV( - - - - O- g _ ---
- T T --- -
E)=431.05' I11 CROSS ��� L t � 08 --------------------------- F TCE V
-------------
_--- F TCE
F PERMANENT _ _ 12" OAK ° `ram32 °
\ �i ZO N E 14" GU >\QF, 18" PINE 22" OAK
STEPS 10 APPROX.LOCATION NSY GEOI FaB(n ;c��� �G� IMPACTS 14" GUM �0 \ 10" T 12" OAK
(POSSIBLY PAVED OVER) F ' 0.022 AC (950.94 SF)24' TWIN .(3 12" TRIPLE K
15" RCP_ / OAK o �'��'� OAK
P=431.57' --- II
>E)=428.20' I I � PERMANENT 20\ K 12' OAK 25" OAK ,ram
)W)=428.04' TEMPORARY 11 12 `C�,
JE)=427.88' ZONE 2 I I WE °PIN ZONE 1 )• OAK -X 2" wD
IMPACTS i i N � IMPACTS 18" OAK
T E 0. 036 AC (1562. 71 S F) ,� \J� 12"GM
0.002 AC (92.7$ SF) m ,� 18, 0 z�� PCB
II II m 12" Gib
- � TEMPORARY
III II PHOTNIA
m16" PINE I� CC S� PACTS �P\�
TEMPORARY III l
ZONE 1 11 12" CM 14" OAK 0.003 AC (121.45 S) \0
IMPACTS
II II o
0.004 AC (165.31 Sh�� o m TEMPORA
II PHOTNIA ZONE 1
I I W 12" PINE / IMP TS
it it PHOTNIA AC (1 2 SF)
II II CC SOPI, LLC GUY R. WAVRA, JR.
II 6,/O
I I
� 1
TOP=431.56'
INV(NW)=427.48' DUNE C. FINC
UT TO MacGREGOR
DOWNS LAKE (SC)
BUFFER DRAWING
SHEET 2 OF 3
0 TOP=446.2C
_n Al
Site
Feature
Buffer Impacts- Zone 1
Buffer Impacts -Zone 2
Temporary
Permanent
Temporary
Permanent
Ft^2
Acre
Ft^2
Acre
Ft^2
Acre
Ft^2
Acre
UT to MacGregor Downs Lake - SC
ROADWAY F ILL
352
< 0.01
193
0
UT to MacGregor Downs Lake - SC
PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE FILL
327
<0.01
1913
0.04
214
<0.01
901
0.02
Project Total
327
< 0.01
2265
0.05
214
< 0.01
1094
0.02
m
V)
C0N -
Ss 8" VC
- -
- - -T FO- 4 - - - - - - - -
\AITE 1
JOSEPH BRUCKERT CP 2
10' 0' 10' 2 0' 3 0'
GRAPHIC SCALE
o� 32
KEY
S �v;
BZ 1 - RIPARIAN BUFFER LIMIT - ZONE 1 TB TOP OF STREAM BANK ��s
BZ 2- RIPARIAN BUFFER LIMIT -ZONE 2 JS JURISDICTIONAL STREAM �
PERMANENT ZONE 1 IMPACTS
TEMPORARY ZONE 1 IMPACTS
PERMANENT ZONE 2 IMPACTS
TEMPORARY ZONE 2 IMPACTS
f
I I I LT
CONC -
- -w- -
PLUG & FILL _
W/FLOWABLE MATERIAL
P=442.12'
� nr -.
II
OP=v45.66'
I I I V(E)=440.98'
I I IN (NW)=440.96'
I L� I I I
oS
TOP=444.67' _ TOP=445.82'
INV(NW)=430.67' -w INV(NE)=441.02' 8" Al
INV(SW)=430.62' INV(W)=440.97'
of
C B-G
CB-G �5 f00
15" RCP -III
- - - - - - -T FO
8" VC
.-�OTL - - - - -
TCE T--------------C.
CE TC E 12c
\ 6 Q' PINE 18' PINE
I " PIN\ \ \� \ \ ss /' C 14" OAK
OAK
1 „��.� \ \ 9"OAK 22"
15" PINE 16 OAK ,r'`7
�14" OAK ^ 14'c' OAK
I " OAK 14" OAK
F \ \
ro \ ss
ov
3-
� ff
0
0
'0
L J
Q
V
V)
I
W
J W
I =
W N
Z Lu
J W
V
U
/V 6
H HEIRS
0 \ \
o o I \
too \ \ r
/ \ \
\ P 6
\\
� � R
j
oy 2� ell
RICHARD E. LAWHUN \
CHING PING WEI \\
z
a
ry0
x�
O °'4
z °
C o 0
0
U b-0 6
y
Signature
Revisions
Proj . No.
ST4005
Design By:
JT
Drawn By:
JT
Date:
2/26/2024
Scale Hor:
1" = 20'
Scale Ver:
N/A
SHEET NO.
SW
1.0

II ;
II ;
II ;
II
II 1
II
II
I I
I
I
II WM
II ��
A 1
II II TOP=444°74'
I I h�l W ; INV(SE)=432.54�
II
---
' I 1 I I TOP=437°42' I I INV(SE)=433.32' I I 11 Illy I I i BZ 1
/4 / I 1
- I I • • .. /X�// I I
11 11 i ice, 444°0
TOP-435.51' 1 ° ; H 442.0
' I' INV(NW)=431"71' LjI
rr11�� INV(S)=431.66' I II q;
oV I V�E)-431°46' III I III�I 12 /— — — _ _ _ / / TOP=4 4"65
INV(S)= 9.I5
I10„ OR /
IP J / []
o 12„CM
T =4 6.01' �2
IINV( I CM INV=42 7 °
3
\\``` II
F I v w 4 1 °
V E 2 CA \ \`. I- T P= 4 35
0 --- ----- - - -------------------------
- --------------
I I INV NW)=431.09' - L}
30"�&O N 2- SE)=430.89' PERMANENT m \ ` n�I ---- ZONE N E 1 / , HH RCP '� �- INV(NE)= 9.37' CONC
REII�(1NE) 5
10+00 IMPACTS ----------------------- =��I--------- -------�----------_- _ s
0.016 AC (701.59 SF) TOP=434.72' 0 =435.64' C_P_ �-------- --- -
`� 1 IIFI,W,NE�=430.57' / /' INV(SW)ERECESSED J�'� W CH T r��VO = 0 �\
PERMANENT 3 6LL �� BOTTOM CUL=427.69' _ /1
ZONE 2 co t VARIES -w- - -
M PACTS — /�'�
�, , �P r' � BZ 1
0.003 AC (142.53 SF) Q o- co
CBF ,� / 33
Oxs 11 + 0 15" RCP -III o9 CB-E /' a / CB- - f� — N l3 f00
F - - - - - 24" RCP- cB-G 04 4" RCP -IV
V11
/ ` ►41 J \� �..�,� .i.
..... vim'INV
• , .� ■a a �.��alp
�QQIS 60
ff
Owl OVA
of
IMPACTS
0 :1
TEMPORARY
•-•- -
BUFFER DRAWING
E:l TOP=446.2C
_n Al
Site
Feature
Buffer Impacts- Zone 1
Buffer Impacts -Zone 2
Temporary
Permanent
Temporary
Permanent
Ft^2
Acre
Ft^2
Acre
Ft^2
Acre
Ft^2
Acre
UT to MacGregor Downs Lake - SC
ROADWAY F ILL
352
< 0.01
193
0
UT to MacGregor Downs Lake - SC
PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE FILL
327
<0.01
1913
0.04
214
<0.01
901
0.02
Project Total
327
< 0.01
2265
1 0.05
214
< 0.01
1094
1 0.02
zn�
8° VC
O 12"jCM
IMPACTS II II
0.004 AC (165.31 S14 o �0 m TEMPORA
OTNI A 1 �E ZONE 1
0 / IMP I �
it it PHOTNIA AC (1 2 SF)
II II CC SOPI, LLC GUY R. WAVRA, JR. ���3
i
TOP=431.56'
INV(NW)=427 48'
II
OP=v45.66'
O
I
I
I I
I IN
V(E)=440.98'
(NW)=440.96'
O
— CONC
rt��
L J
— w— _
TOP=444
_ _ TOP=445.82' --
,
INV(NW)=4 .67'
INV(NE)=441.0 8° AC
L( ,
INV(Sw 30.62'
INV(W)=440.
PLUG & FIL
� LOWABLE
MA
IAL
of
v )
f ►
02
/5 +00
N
O TOP=442.1
15" RCP -III 15" RC -III
I W
I
Eff 4
= 6
z
---- — — — — T FO
J
-
TW
I i
— — ` —?UTL
W
E—CE �
Z Uj
Iz• o \\
`� �PINE
TCE
8' PINE
J W
PIs\
14" OAK
T2
cp'\ AK OAK 12, P
I T C0 'PINE 16" OAK ,r'`7 V
OAK �° / ^ 14" OA
Vj v I "OAK 14" OAK /
`O \ /
18" OAK
4.
Too°�
3o
cJb L
JUNE C. FINC HEIRS 2l:�4
UT TO MaCGREGOR / cG 0� \\ \
DOWNS LAKE (SC) 9 �211 - `00.
NITF 1
JOSEPH BRUCKERT
`cam
10' 010' 2 0' 3 0'
GRAPHIC SCALE
o� 32
b
PPS%R
' O
9\
KEYY CP. F� 1 / ,� 0'
BZ — RIPARIAN BUFFER LIMIT - ZONE 1 TB TOP OF STREAM BANK dos e o �,/
rp,
BZ 2— RIPARIAN BUFFER LIMIT -ZONE 2 JS JURISDICTIONAL STREAM / / 7
PERMANENT ZONE 1 IMPACTS PERMANENT ZONE 2 IMPACTS �o RICHAR E. LAWHUN \
Ok / CHIN PING WEI \
TEMPORARY ZONE 1 IMPACTS TEMPORARY ZONE 2 IMPACTS / \
F�
w
_
�--)
O
U
w
O
U
Signature
Revisions
Proj. . No.
ST4005
Design By:
JT
Drawn By:
JT
Date:
2/26/2024
Scale Hor:
1" = 20'
Scale Ver:
N/A
SHEET NO.
SW
1.0

Protected Species/
Section 7

DocuSign Envelope ID: 4E73058A-1611-4105-AE9A-148B56BD6439
CARY
TRANSPORTATION
May 6, 2024
Ms. Rachel Capito
Regulatory Project Manager
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
Subject: Section 7 Concurrence/Conference Request for the West Chatham Street
Sidewalk Extension Project. Town of Cary, Wake County, NC.
SAW-2023-00314
Dear Ms. Capito,
The purpose of this letter is to assist in the concurrence/conference request from the U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service (USFWS) pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, as amended
(16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) (ESA) for the subject project.
As of May 5, 2024, the USFWS's Information for Planning and Consultation (IPaC) lists the
following federally protected species as potentially occurring in the study area.
Scientific Name
Common Name
Federal
Habitat
Biological
Status
Present
Conclusion
Perimyotis subflavus
tricolored bat
Proposed
Yes
Not Required
Endangered
Picoides borealis
red -cockaded woodpecker
Endangered
No
No Effect
Necturus lewisi
Neuse River waterdog
Threatened
No
No Effect
Noturus furiosus
Carolina madtom
Endangered
No
No Effect
Fusconaia masoni
Atlantic pigtoe
Threatened
No
No Effect
Alasmidonta
dwarf wedgemussel
Endangered
No
No Effect
heterodon
Elliptio lanceolata
yellow lance
Threatened
No
No Effect
Rhus michauxii
Michaux's sumac
Endangered
Yes
No Effect
919.469.4000 1 carync.gov I PO Box 8005 Cary, NC 27512

DocuSign Envelope ID: 4E73058A-1611-4105-AE9A-148B56BD6439
Tricolored bat
USFWS optimal survey window: May 15-August 15
On September 14, 2022, the USFWS announced a proposal to list the tricolored bat (Perimyotis
subflavus - PESU) as endangered under the Endangered Species Act. USFWS has not provided
an official effective listing date. A review of NHP records updated on January 2, 2024, indicates
no known occurrences within 1.0 mile of the study area. Habitat for the tricolored bat, consisting
of mature trees with 3" DBH or greater is present in the study area. Upon the official listing of the
species, the Town of Cary will commit to no tree clearing from April 1- October 15. No work at
night is proposed. Additionally, limited pile driving will be required for the pedestrian bridge
however no blasting or other loud/percussive construction activities are planned. Additionally, no
blasting, pile driving, or other loud/percussive construction activities is planned. Based on this
information, upon the official listing of the tricolored bat, the suggested Biological Conclusion for
the species would be May Affect, Not Likely to Adversely Affect.
Red -cockaded woodpecker
USFWS optimal survey window: November — early March
Biological Conclusion: No Effect
Habitat is not present for the red -cockaded woodpecker. Wake County is not within a red -
cockaded woodpecker (RCW) consultation area as outlined in the USACE RCW
SLOPES agreement. Following the effects determination key this project will have no
effect on red -cockaded woodpecker. A review of NHP records updated on April 1, 2024
indicates no known occurrences within 1.0 mile of the study area.
Neuse River waterdog
USFWS optimal survey window: November 15 — March 15
Biological Conclusion: No Effect
Habitat is not present for the Neuse River waterdog. A review of NHP records updated on
April 1, 2024 indicates no known occurrences within 1.0 mile of the study area. No aquatic
surveys are recommended for this species.
Carolina madtom
USFWS optimal survey window: March 1 — November 1
Biological Conclusion: No Effect
Habitat is not present for the Carolina madtom. A review of NHP records updated on April
1, 2024 indicates no known occurrences within 1.0 mile of the study area. No aquatic
surveys are recommended for this species.
Atlantic pigtoe
USFWS optimal survey window: March 1 — November 1
Biological Conclusion: No Effect
Habitat is not present for the Atlantic pigtoe. A review of NHP records updated on April 1,
2024 indicates no known occurrences within 1.0 mile of the study area. No aquatic surveys
are recommended for this species.
Dwarf wedgemussel
USFWS optimal survey window: March 1 — November 1
Biological Conclusion: No Effect
Habitat is not present for the dwarf wedgemussel. A review of NHP records updated on
April 1, 2024 indicates no known occurrences within 1.0 mile of the study area. No aquatic
surveys are recommended for this species.
CA It 1 TRANSPORTATION 2

DocuSign Envelope ID: 4E73058A-1611-4105-AE9A-148B56BD6439
Yellow lance
USFWS optimal survey window: March 1 — November 1
Biological Conclusion: No Effect
Habitat is not present for the yellow lance. A review of NHP records updated on April 1,
2024 indicates no known occurrences within 1.0 mile of the study area. No aquatic surveys
are required for this species.
Michaux's sumac
USFWS Optimal Survey Window: May -October
Biological Conclusion: No Effect
Habitat in the form of maintained areas, roadside, and utility rights -of -way are present
within the study area. A survey was conducted on May 4, 2023 and Michaux's sumac
was not observed. A review of NHP records updated on April 1, 2024 indicates no known
occurrences within 1.0 mile of the study area
Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act
The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act is enforced by the USFWS. Golden eagles do not
nest in North Carolina. Habitat for the bald eagle primarily consists of mature forests in proximity
to large bodies of open water for foraging. Large dominant trees are utilized for nesting sites,
typically within 1.0 mile of open water.
A desktop-GIS assessment of the project study area, as well as the area within a 1.0-mile radius
of the project limits, was performed on November 30, 2022, using 2019 color aerials. A
waterbody large enough or sufficiently open to be a considered potential feeding sources was
identified. Since there was foraging habitat within the review area, a survey of the project study
area and the area within 660 feet of the project limits was conducted on December 13 and 20,
2022. No eagles or eagle nests were observed during the field surveys. A review of NHP
records updated on April 1, 2024 indicates no known occurrences within 1.0 mile of the study
area. Due to the lack of nests, known occurrences, and minimal impact anticipated for this
project, it has been determined that this project will not affect this species.
The Town of Cary believes that the requirements of Section 7(a)(2) of the ESA have been
satisfied and hereby ask for your assistance with obtaining concurrence/conference from the
USFWS.
Please contact me at [phone] ([e-mail]) or our consultant, Chris
Rivenbark at [phone] ([e-mail]) if you have any questions or would like
additional information.
Sincerely,
Ea
DocuSigned by:
Mir "arai
DA1FD56B062C499...
Amir Nezarati, PE
Senior Project Manager
Town of Cary - Transportation Department
CARPTRANSPORTATION

DocuSign Envelope ID: 4E73058A-1611-4105-AE9A-148B56BD6439
Upstream Picture 1
Upstream Picture 2
CA It 1. TRANSPORTATION

DocuSign Envelope ID: 4E73058A-1611-4105-AE9A-148B56BD6439
Downstream Picture 1
,P'�IM '
RAI w
C W
F� � 3 yr F,� � -•
�., '� ;- {`::F -� � •.ems" � _
Downstream Picture 2
Cw RY TRANSPORTATION 5

DocuSign Envelope ID: D93518C3-F230-4149-965A-47847BF7C923
J4 -c
C
William B.
o � Umstead State
N N, Park
0
W E e
L
6
�L.
.sO S
Lake Crabtree
County Park
T
o%
%
Z
0i 54
v
PJ e
S
des .y qs Ca
s�'lleCarpenter�'d Morrisville Cary Pkwy
L
N
v
pchurch
It Rd
Rd
N
Apex
55
m "/ectra Dr
Prestonwood Project Study Area
Country Club 54 n NE Maya
D q
CD/ m
os� � 54
w
S
'S
Cary Asbury
WakeMed
E Park St Soccer Park
Fred G. Bond
Metro Park
Qy
l/
Rd
m 74
aMaynard
Ora
SW
cd
r
ti
m
�y
A
/ray
o
c
O
N
0
Q
awe
Y
SF
v
Dillard
1
or
Apex
v
Community
Park
MacGregor
Downs Country
Piney Plains
Macedonia
Club
64
Tryon Rd
ro
y
y s
F a
ec �
ro` 2 Knights Play
M I leV, Center
113
PREPARED BY:
A RY
C
Heml
Natt
LIVE INSPIRED'" —
TOWN OF CARY SIDEWALK EXTENSION
CHATHAM STREET
�F
WAKE COUNTY
�a
FIGURE 1: VICINITY MAP
�,'�

II• r
+ o
0`
W
Ch
PLegend
Study ProjectArea
JM Potential Perennial Stream
_. �i _ y �°err �•?�. � �' �` �'�.$�
r.„
r _
,� ,a, ; ,. •• f Ape% Rd �� n��*�F
• Id
Old O d1�
-
P x Rd
r
Y t,
r
:
jy0 IL
ALI-
2099
fly • , .1, .+r
-
r yyyy
♦ r k
vt- a ry ° � ' •.�':� ' � 1Y: ` n ` ,,,,,�.�, r W Parkk St
•4
ry
y . - �51 ooze � t�° �=' '� � •k•°s
` Mathe .._--_• a sop - •� ��`; s . Y • �. _ ��'' � � -,
I Spn I rPl-' �', �.�.f. �\� -, e O^ .' :✓.'� ~� vp ��F � - • .� � _ 4,_ +,� '�' 'i,
A o
Cn s'
€'
War•
w o�
:t ry
Willow. St
n
1ppp 1
{
y. „
n. F � �
I
t
V
S Ail
:
IV
1. 200''[G�►�t+ld Man L ri•r .
•
r - a
A Tr
•
dp
.Ghland cometecrest Rd Q' N• �- �; '� ,',���'� ;+ r
H1�11 HpUse. �1• A a 1' �t I t• �. • �r ,Iprf 1 I ,' TJFwCD
,�-
is ,
• y U
It L
390 As ,
CAJJY
LIVE INSPIRED'" —
Or
TOWN OF CARY SIDEWALK EXTENSION
CHATHAM STREET
WAKE COUNTY
FIGURE 2: WATER RESOURCE MAP
r

5/5/24, 4:36 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources
IPaC U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
IPaC resource list
This report is an automatically generated list of species and other resources such as critical
habitat (collectively referred to as trust resources) under the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's
(USFWS) jurisdiction that are known or expected to be on or near the project area
referenced below. The list may also include trust resources that occur outside of the project
area, but that could potentially be directly or indirectly affected by activities in the project
area. However, determining the likelihood and extent of effects a project may have on trust
resources typically requires gathering additional site -specific (e.g., vegetation/species
surveys) and project -specific (e.g., magnitude and timing of proposed activities) information.
Below is a summary of the project information you provided and contact information for
the USFWS office(s) with jurisdiction in the defined project area. Please read the
introduction to each section that follows (Endangered Species, Migratory Birds, USFWS
Facilities, and NWI Wetlands) for additional information applicable to the trust resources
addressed in that section.
Location
Wake County, North Carolina
C)o
qh
Y� vim'
I Yoa
Local office
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
t. [phone]
JEJ [phone]
67--A
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/NYG6JHBVINFUZMKK5ZGADP4BZM/resources 1/16

5/5/24, 4:36 PM
IPaC: Explore Location resources
3916 Sunset Ridge Rd
Raleigh, NC 27607
G��cv
IO�
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/NYG6JHBVINFUZMKK5ZGADP4BZM/resources 2/16

5/5/24, 4:36 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources
Endangered species
This resource list is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an analysis
of project level impacts.
The primary information used to generate this list is the known or expected range of each
species. Additional areas of influence (AOI) for species are also considered. An AOI includes
areas outside of the species range if the species could be indirectly affected by activities in
that area (e.g., placing a dam upstream of a fish population even if that fish does not occur
at the dam site, may indirectly impact the species by reducing or eliminating water flow
downstream). Because species can move, and site conditions can change, the species on
this list are not guaranteed to be found on or near the project area. To fully determine any
potential effects to species, additional site -specific and project -specific information is often
required.
Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act requires Federal agencies to "request of the
Secretary information whether any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be
present in the area of such proposed action" for any project that is conducted, permitted,
funded, or licensed by any Federal agency. A letter from the local office and a species list
which fulfills this requirement can only be obtained by requesting an official species list
from either the Regulatory Review section in IPaC (see directions below) or from the local
field office directly. 0 .
For project evaluations that require USFWS concurrence/review, please return to the IPaC
website and request an official species list by doing the following:
1. Draw the project location and click CONTINUE.
2. Click DEFINE PROJECT.
3. Log in (if directed to do so).
4. Provide a name and description for your project.
5. Click REQUEST SPECIES LIST.
Listed speciesi and their critical habitats are managed by the Ecological Services Program of
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and the fisheries division of the National Oceanic
and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA Fisheries).
Species and critical habitats under the sole responsibility of NOAA Fisheries are not shown
on this list. Please contact NOAA Fisheries for species under their jurisdiction.
Species listed under the Endangered Species Act are threatened or endangered; IPaC
also shows species that are candidates, or proposed, for listing. See the listing status
page for more information. IPaC only shows species that are regulated by USFWS (see
FAQ).
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/NYG6JHBVINFUZMKK5ZGADP4BZM/resources 3/16

5/5/24, 4:36 PM
IPaC: Explore Location resources
2. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an office
of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of
Commerce.
The following species are potentially affected by activities in this location:
Mammals
NAME
Tricolored Bat Perimyotis subflavus
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/10515
Birds
NAME
Red -cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis
STATUS
Proposed Endangered
STATE 0
tZ \\
Endangered
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/7614 X);Iw
Amphibians .0
NAME � � STATUS
Neuse River Waterdog Necturus lewisi Threatened
Wherever found -'0
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location
does not overlap the critical habitat.
tttips://4os.fws.gov/ecp/�Species/6772
Fishes
NAME STATUS
Carolina Madtom Noturus furiosus Endangered
Wherever found
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location
does not overlap the critical habitat.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/528
Clams
NAME STATUS
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/NYG6JHBVINFUZMKK5ZGADP4BZM/resources 4/16

5/5/24, 4:36 PM
IPaC: Explore Location resources
Atlantic Pigtoe Fusconaia masoni
Wherever found
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location
does not overlap the critical habitat.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5164
Dwarf Wedgemussel Alasmidonta heterodon
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/784
Yellow Lance Elliptio lanceolate
Wherever found
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location
does not overlap the critical habitat.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/4511
Threatened
Endangered
Threatened
Insects
NAME 1\TATUS
�:-Xs
Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus Candidate
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/sDe-cies/9743
-- r\v
Flowering Plants
NAME oomSTATUS
Michaux's Sumac Rhus michauxii Endangered
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5217
Critical habitats
Potential effects to critical habitat(s) in this location must be analyzed along with the
endangered species themselves.
There are no critical habitats at this location.
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/NYG6JHBVINFUZMKK5ZGADP4BZM/resources 5/16

5/5/24, 4:36 PM
IPaC: Explore Location resources
You are still required to determine if your project(s) may have effects on
all above listed species.
Bald &Golden Eagles
Bald and golden eagles are protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act' and
the Migratory Bird Treaty Act2.
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to
bald or golden eagles, or their habitats3, should follow appropriate regulations and consider
implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described in the links below.
Specifically, please review the "Supplemental Information on Migratory Birds and Eagles".
Additional information can be found using the following links:
• Eagle Management https://www.fws.gQv//program/eagle-manage n
• Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds
https://www.fws.gov/library/collections/avoiding-and-minimizing-incidental-take-
migratory-birds
• Nationwide conservation measures for birds
https://www.fws.gov/sites/default/files/documents/nationwide-standard-conservation-
measures.pdf
-%Id% k
• Supplemental Information for Migratory Birds and Eagles in IPaC
https://www.fws.gov/media/supplemental-information-migratory-birds-and-bald-and-
golden-eagles-may-occur-project-action
There are likely bald eagles present in your project area. For additional information on bald
eagles, refer to Bald Eagle Nesting and Sensitivity to Human Activity
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization
measures to reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, see the PROBABILITY OF
PRESENCE SUMMARY below to see when these birds are most likely to be present and
breeding in your project area.
NAME
Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus
This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area,
but warrants attention because of the Eagle Act or for
potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types
of development or activities.
BREEDING SEASON
Breeds Sep 1 to jul 31
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/NYG6JHBVINFUZMKK5ZGADP4BZM/resources 6/16

5/5/24, 4:36 PM
IPaC: Explore Location resources
Probability of Presence Summary
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely
to be present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your
project activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read
"Supplemental Information on Migratory Birds and Eagles", specifically the FAQ section
titled "Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before using or
attempting to interpret this report.
Probability of Presence (LL)
Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s)
your project overlaps during a particular week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4-
week months.) A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The survey
effort (see below) can be used to establish a level of confidence in the presence score. One
can have higher confidence in the presence score if the corresponding survey effort is also
high.
How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps:
1. The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events
in the week where the species was detected divided by the total number of survey
events for that week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and the
Spotted Towhee was found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted
Towhee in week 12 is 0.25.
2. To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of
presence is calculated. This is the probability of presence divided by the maximum
probability of presence across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability of
presence in week 20 for the Spotted Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence
at week 12 (0.25) is the maximum of any week of the year. The relative probability of
presence on week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is 0.05/0.25 = 0.2.
3. The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a
statistical conversion so that all possible values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is
the probability of presence score.
To see a bar's probability of presence score, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
Breeding Season( )
Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time -frame inside which the bird breeds
across its entire range. If there are no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in
your project area.
Survey Effort ( )
Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of
surveys performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The
number of surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys.
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/NYG6JHBVINFUZMKK5ZGADP4BZM/resources 7/16

5/5/24, 4:36 PM
IPaC: Explore Location resources
To see a bar's survey effort range, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
No Data ( )
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
Survey Timeframe
Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently
relevant information. The exception to this is areas off the Atlantic coast, where bird returns
are based on all years of available data, since data in these areas is currently much more
sparse.
probability of presence breeding season survey effort no data
SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Bald Eagle M loll 1111 Nile Illy t��� �rt�� Nell fill Ill1
Non -BCC
Vulnerable me
What does IPaC use to generate the potential presence of bald and golden eagles in my specified
location?
The potential for eagle presence is derived from data provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN),.
The AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey., banding, and citizen science datasets and is
queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as occurring in the 10km grid cell(s) which
your project intersects, and that have been identified as warranting special attention because they are a
BCC species in that area, an eagle (Eagle Act requirements may apply). To see a list of all birds potentially
present in your project area, please visit the Rapid A' In Information Locator (RAIL) Tool.
What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs of bald and golden eagles in my
specified location?
The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) and other
species that may warrant special attention in your project location.
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian Knowledge
Network (AKN). The AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey., banding, and citizen science
datasets and is queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as occurring in the 10km grid
cell(s) which your project intersects, and that have been identified as warranting special attention
because they are a BCC species in that area, an eagle (Eagle Act requirements may apply), or a species
that has a particular vulnerability to offshore activities or development.
Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your project area.
It is not representative of all birds that may occur in your project area. To get a list of all birds potentially
present in your project area, please visit the Rapid Avian Information Locator (RAIL) Tool.
What if I have eagles on my list?
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid
violating the Eagle Act should such impacts occur. Please contact your local Fish and Wildlife Service Field
Office if you have questions.
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/NYG6JHBVINFUZMKK5ZGADP4BZM/resources 8/16

5/5/24, 4:36 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources
Migratory birds
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act' and the Bald and Golden
Eagle Protection Act2.
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to
migratory birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and
consider implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described in the links below.
Specifically, please review the "Supplemental Information on Migratory Birds and Eagles".
1. The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918.
2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
Additional information can be found using the following links:
• Eagle Management https://www.fws.gQv//program/eagle-management
• Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds \0
https://www.fws.gov/library/collections/avoiding-and-mini 'zing- ci �*nt%aI-take-
migratory-birds
• Nationwide conservation measures for birds https://www.f ov/sites/default/files/
documents/nationwide-standard-conservation-measures.pdf
• Supplemental Information for Migratory Birds and.Eagles in IPaC
https://www.fws.gov/media/supplemental-information-migratory-birds-and-bald-and-
golden-eagles-may-occur-pr.G ect-action
The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the
USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) list or warrant special attention in your
project location. To learn more about the levels of concern for birds on your list and how
this list is generated, see the FAQ below. This is not a list of every bird you may find in this
location, nor a guarantee that every bird on this list will be found in your project area. To
see exact locations of where birders and the general public have sighted birds in and
around your project area, visit the E-bird data mapping tool (Tip: enter your location,
desired date range and a species on your list). For projects that occur off the Atlantic Coast,
additional maps and models detailing the relative occurrence and abundance of bird
species on your list are available. Links to additional information about Atlantic Coast birds,
and other important information about your migratory bird list, including how to properly
interpret and use your migratory bird report, can be found below.
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization
measures to reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, see the PROBABILITY OF
PRESENCE SUMMARY below to see when these birds are most likely to be present and
breeding in your project area.
NAME BREEDING SEASON
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/NYG6JHBVINFUZMKK5ZGADP4BZM/resources 9/16

5/5/24, 4:36 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources
Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus Breeds Sep 1 to Jul 31
This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area,
but warrants attention because of the Eagle Act or for
potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types
of development or activities.
Chimney Swift Chaetura pelagica
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its
range in the continental USA and Alaska.
Chuck-will's-widow Antrostomus carolinensis
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular
Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA
Kentucky Warbler Geothlypis formosa
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its
range in the continental USA and Alaska.
Breeds Mar 15 to Aug 25
Breeds May 10 to Jul 10
. Ik n\k*\*
Breeds Apr 20 to Aug 20
; A( V'%�
Prairie Warbler Setophaga discolor 'W'WVBreeds May 1 to Jul 31
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its
range in the continental USA and Alaska.
Prothonotary Warbler Protonotaria citrea
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its
range in the continental USA and Alaska.
% _.P M
Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its
range in the continental USA and Alaska.
Rusty Blackbird Euphagus carolinus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular
Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA
Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its
range in the continental USA and Alaska.
Breeds Apr 1 to Jul 31
Breeds May 10 to Sep 10
Breeds elsewhere
Breeds May 10 to Aug 31
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/NYG6JHBVINFUZMKK5ZGADP4BZM/resources 10/16

5/5/24, 4:36 PM
IPaC: Explore Location resources
Probability of Presence Summary
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely
to be present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your
project activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read
"Supplemental Information on Migratory Birds and Eagles", specifically the FAQ section
titled "Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before using or
attempting to interpret this report.
Probability of Presence (LL)
Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s)
your project overlaps during a particular week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4-
week months.) A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The survey
effort (see below) can be used to establish a level of confidence in the presence score. One
can have higher confidence in the presence score if the corresponding survey effort is also
high.
How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps:
1. The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events
in the week where the species was detected divided by the total number of survey
events for that week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and the
Spotted Towhee was found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted
Towhee in week 12 is 0.25.
2. To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of
presence is calculated. This is the probability of presence divided by the maximum
probability of presence across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability of
presence in week 20 for the Spotted Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence
at week 12 (0.25) is the maximum of any week of the year. The relative probability of
presence on week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is 0.05/0.25 = 0.2.
3. The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a
statistical conversion so that all possible values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is
the probability of presence score.
To see a bar's probability of presence score, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
Breeding Season( )
Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time -frame inside which the bird breeds
across its entire range. If there are no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in
your project area.
Survey Effort ( )
Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of
surveys performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The
number of surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys.
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/NYG6JHBVINFUZMKK5ZGADP4BZM/resources 11/16

5/5/24, 4:36 PM
IPaC: Explore Location resources
To see a bar's survey effort range, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
No Data ( )
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
Survey Timeframe
Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently
relevant information. The exception to this is areas off the Atlantic coast, where bird returns
are based on all years of available data, since data in these areas is currently much more
sparse.
SPECIES
Bald Eagle
Non -BCC
Vulnerable
Chimney Swift
BCC
Rangewide
(CON)
Chuck-will's-
widow
BCC - BCR
Kentucky
Warbler
BCC
Rangewide
(CON)
Prairie
Warbler
BCC
Rangewide
(CON)
probability of presence breeding season survey effort no data
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
10 11 1111 1111 $111 t111 IM 1111 III dil II
+++ 44 +++# 11010001111111111111 4 1+ + 4*
++++ + I ++++ ++++ +++++++
++++ 44 ++++ +++ + ���� ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++
Prothonotary Warbler ++ I I ++ ++++ + TT TT0 TTT�T I ++ I * +T++ ++++ ++++ ++++ I +++
BCC
Rangewide
(CON)
Red-headed Woodpecker 1�� 0000 000 000 0001 Iola iia iiii ;w 1*11 0*1*
BCC
Rangewide
(CON)
Rusty Blackbird III IJ++� +1 I I III + ++ I I I I-++ ++++ +++i III
BCC - BCR
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/NYG6JHBVINFUZMKK5ZGADP4BZM/resources 12/16

5/5/24, 4:36 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources
Wood Thrush BCC 4+d I I ++ I I I I F1111101000+ I I I I Ill r l .l l l I I I I I I I I I E++ I I I
Rangewide
(CON)
Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to
migratory birds.
Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize impacts to all
birds at any location year round. Implementation of these measures is particularly important when birds
are most likely to occur in the project area. When birds may be breeding in the area, identifying the
locations of any active nests and avoiding their destruction is a very helpful impact minimization
measure. To see when birds are most likely to occur and be breeding in your project area, view the
Probability of Presence Summary. Additional measures or permits may be advisable depending on the
type of activity you are conducting and the type of infrastructure or bird species present on your project
site.
What does IPaC use to generate the list of migratory birds that potentially occur in my specified
location?
The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation C tic rn (BCC), and other
species that may warrant special attention in your project location.
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian Knowledge
Network (AKN). The AKN data is based on a growing collection of �nurvey, banding, and citizen science
datasets and is queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as occurring in the 10km grid
cell(s) which your project intersects, and that have been identified as warranting special attention
because they are a BCC species in that area, an eagle (Eagle Act requirements may apply), or a species
that has a particular vulnerability to offshore activities or development.
Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your project area.
It is not representative of all birds that may occur in your project area. To get a list of all birds potentially
present in your project area, please visit the Rapid Avian Information Locator (RAIL) Tool.
What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds potentially
occurring in my specified location?
The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data provided by
the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). This data is derived from a growing collection of survey., banding,.
and citizen science datasets.
Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information becomes
available. To learn more about how the probability of presence graphs are produced and how to interpret
them, go the Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me about these graphs" link.
How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering or migrating in my area?
To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding, wintering,
migrating or year-round), you may query your location using the RAIL Tool and look at the range maps
provided for birds in your area at the bottom of the profiles provided for each bird in your results. If a
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/NYG6JHBVINFUZMKK5ZGADP4BZM/resources 13/16

5/5/24, 4:36 PM
IPaC: Explore Location resources
bird on your migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated with it, if that bird does occur in
your project area, there may be nests present at some point within the timeframe specified. If "Breeds
elsewhere" is indicated, then the bird likely does not breed in your project area.
What are the levels of concern for migratory birds?
Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern:
1. "BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) that are of concern throughout their
range anywhere within the USA (including Hawaii, the Pacific Islands, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin
Islands);
2. "BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in
the continental USA; and
3. "Non -BCC - Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on your list either
because of the Eagle Act requirements (for eagles) or (for non -eagles) potential susceptibilities in
offshore areas from certain types of development or activities (e.g. offshore energy development or
longline fishing).
Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made, In
particular, to avoid and minimize impacts to the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC species of
rangewide concern. For more information on conservation measures you can implement to help avoid
and minimize migratory bird impacts and requirements for eagles, please see the FAQs for these topics.
Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects
For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species and
groups of bird species within your project area off the Atlantic Coast, please visit the Northeast Ocean
Data Portal. The Portal also offers data and information about other taxa besides birds that may be
helpful to you in your project review. Alternately, you may download the bird model results files
underlying the portal maps through the NOAA NCCOS Integrative Statistical Modeling and Predictive
Mapping of Marine Bird Distributions and Abundance on the Atlantic Outer Continental Shelf project
webpage. F V %
Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use throughout the
year, including migration. Models relying on survey data may not include this information. For additional
information on marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study and the nanotag studies or contact
Caleb Spiegel or Pam Loring.
What if I have eagles on my list?
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid
violating the Eagle Act should such impacts occur.
Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report
The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of birds of
priority concern. To learn more about how your list is generated, and see options for identifying what
other birds may be in your project area, please see the FAQ "What does IPaC use to generate the
migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location". Please be aware this report provides the
"probability of presence" of birds within the 10 km grid cell(s) that overlap your project; not your exact
project footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look carefully at the survey effort (indicated by the
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/NYG6JHBVINFUZMKK5ZGADP4BZM/resources 14/16

5/5/24, 4:36 PM
IPaC: Explore Location resources
black vertical bar) and for the existence of the "no data" indicator (a red horizontal bar). A high survey
effort is the key component. If the survey effort is high, then the probability of presence score can be
viewed as more dependable. In contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar means a lack of data and,
therefore, a lack of certainty about presence of the species. This list is not perfect; it is simply a starting
point for identifying what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might
be there, and if they might be breeding (which means nests might be present). The list helps you know
what to look for to confirm presence, and helps guide you in knowing when to implement conservation
measures to avoid or minimize potential impacts from your project activities, should presence be
confirmed. To learn more about conservation measures, visit the FAQ "Tell me about conservation
measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory birds" at the bottom of your
migratory bird trust resources page.
Facilities
National Wildlife Refuge lands
Any activity proposed on lands managed by the National Wildlife Refuge system must
undergo a 'Compatibility Determination' conducted by the Refuge. Please contact the
individual Refuges to discuss any questions or concerns.
4r VA14
There are no refuge lands at this location.
Fish hatcheries
There are no fish hatcheries at this location.
Wetlands in the National Wetlands Inventory
(NWI)
Impacts to NWI wetlands and other aquatic habitats may be subject to regulation under
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, or other State/Federal statutes.
For more information please contact the Regulatory Program of the local U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers District.
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/NYG6JHBVINFUZMKK5ZGADP4BZM/resources 15/16

5/5/24, 4:36 PM
IPaC: Explore Location resources
This location did not intersect any wetlands mapped by NWI.
NOTE: This initial screening does not replace an on -site delineation to determine whether
wetlands occur. Additional information on the NWI data is provided below.
Data limitations
The Service's objective of mapping wetlands and deepwater habitats is to produce reconnaissance level
information on the location, type and size of these resources. The maps are prepared from the analysis of
high altitude imagery. Wetlands are identified based on vegetation, visible hydrology and geography. A
margin of error is inherent in the use of imagery; thus, detailed on -the -ground inspection of any
particular site may result in revision of the wetland boundaries or classification established through
image analysis.
The accuracy of image interpretation depends on the quality of the imagery, the experience of the image
analysts, the amount and quality of the collateral data and the amount of ground truth verification work
conducted. Metadata should be consulted to determine the date of the source imagery used and any
mapping problems.
Wetlands or other mapped features may have changed since the date of the imagery or field work. There
may be occasional differences in polygon boundaries or classifications between the information depicted
on the map and the actual conditions on site. if
Data exclusions r4AS
Certain wetland habitats are excluded from the National mapping program because of the limitations of
aerial imagery as the primary data source used to detect wetlands. These habitats include seagrasses or
submerged aquatic vegetation that are found in the intertidal and subtidal zones of estuaries and
nearshore coastal waters. Some deepwater reef communities (coral or tuberficid worm reefs) have also
been excluded from the inventory. These habitats, because of their depth, go undetected by aerial
Imagery.
Data precautions
Federal, state, and local regulatory agencies with jurisdiction over wetlands may define and describe
wetlands in a different manner than that used in this inventory. There is no attempt, in either the design
or products of this inventory, to define the limits of proprietary jurisdiction of any Federal, state, or local
government or to establish the geographical scope of the regulatory programs of government agencies.
Persons intending to engage in activities involving modifications within or adjacent to wetland areas
should seek the advice of appropriate Federal, state, or local agencies concerning specified agency
regulatory programs and proprietary jurisdictions that may affect such activities.
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/NYG6JHBVINFUZMKK5ZGADP4BZM/resources 16/16

Agent
Authorization

DocuSign Envelope ID: D93518C3-F230-4149-965A-47847BF7C923
Agent Authorization Form
PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
LOT NO. Several PLAN NO. Several PARCEL ID: Several
Site Location : Chatham Street, Optimist Farm Road East and Optimist Farm Road West
Cary NC
Please print:
Property Owner:
Property Owner:
Town of Cary (NCGS 40A-11)
C/O: Mr. Amir Nezarati
The undersigned, registered property owners of the above noted property, do hereby authorize
Matt Martin, RK&K
(Contractor / Agent)
& Chris Rivenbark, RK&K
(Contractor / Agent)
to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance and acceptance of
this permit or certification and any and all standard and special conditions attached.
Property Owner's Address (if different than property above):
316 N. Academy Street // Cary, NC 27513
Telephone: [phone]
We hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to the
best of our knowledge.
Docusigned by: �-LL
Authorized Signature
1/30/2023
Date:
Authorized Signature
Date: