20151170 Ver 1_More Info Received_20160125

I.I
CWS
Carolina Wetland Services
Carolina Wetland Services, Inc.
550 East Westinghouse Boulevard
Charlotte, NC 28,273
704-527-1177 - Phone
704-527-1133 - Fax
TO: Ms. Sheri Montalvo
NCDWR—NC DWR, 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
512 N. Salisbury St
9th Floor, Archdale Building
Raleigh NC 27604
Date: 01/21/2016
CWS Project #: 2015-3535
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
WE ARE SENDING YOU: ®Attached ❑Under separate cover via the following items:
® Prints ❑ Plans ❑ JD Package ❑ Specifications
❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑ Wetland Survey ® Other
KINDLY NOTIFY US AT ONCE
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
❑For approval ❑Approved as submitted
❑For your use ❑Approved as noted
❑Resubmit
F-1 Submit
copies for approval
copies for distribution
®As requested ❑Returned for corrections ❑Return corrected prints
❑For review and comment ❑For your verification and signature
REMARKS: Per Alan Johnson's request a copy of the stream relocation plan for the Creeks Landing project
,(DWR# 15-1170) for the central file.
Copy to: File
Thank you,
74ma",
Kelly aures, PWS
Project Manager
NORTH CAROLINA • SOUTH CAROLINA

CAROLINA WETLAND SERVICES, INC.
550 E. Westinghouse Blvd.
Charlotte, NC 28273
704-527-1177 (office)
704-527-1133(fax)
January 12, 2015
Mr. Alan Johnson
NC DWR — 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
512 N. Salisbury Street
9'h Floor Archdale Building
Raleigh, NC 27603
Subject: Stream Relocation Plan
Dear Mr. Johnson:
Creek's Landing (DWR #15-1170)
Union Co., North Carolina
CWS Project No. 2015-3535
(;IF
U
SIV 'a 1016
U1,
The Creek's Landing site is approximately 135 acres in extent and is located south from the intersection of
Weddington Road and Airport Road in Union County, North Carolina (Figure 1, attached). The purpose of
this project is to develop a residential subdivision in a developing area of Union County, North Carolina.
Carolina Development Services, LLC, has contracted Carolina Wetland Services, Inc. (CWS) to provide
Section 404/401 permitting services for this project. Per a condition set forth in the issued 401 Water
Quality Certification (DWR # 15-1170, attached), a stream relocation plan is necessary to be approved by
your office prior to commencing the impacts proposed for the project.
Applicant Name: Carolina Development Services; POC: Mr. Johnathan McCall
Mailing Address: 6707 Fairview Road, Suite B, Charlotte, NC 28210
Phone Number of Owner/Applicant: 704-401-7185
Street Address of Project: south from the intersection of Weddington Road and Airport Road in
Union County, North Carolina
Waterway: UTs to East Fork Twelve Mile Creek
Basin: Catawba (HUC 03040103)
City: Union County Incorporated
County: Union
Tax Parcel ID numbers: 060-030-23, 060-060-12, and 060-030-15
Decimal Degree Coordinate Location of Project Site: 35.001359°, -80. 655074°
USGS Quadrangle Name: Matthews, NC (1988) and Waxhaw, NC (1986)
Site Conditions
The project area consists mostly of forested land and open fields (Figure 2, attached). Typical on-site
vegetation includes willow oak (Quecus phellos), sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciva), Chinese privet
(Ligustrum sinense), winged elm (Mmus alata), red maple (Acer rubrum), mockemut hickory (Carya
tomentosa), Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica), sawtooth blackberry (Rubes argutus), greenbrier
(Smilax rotundifolia), Christmas fern (Polystichum acrostichoides), and muscadine (Vitis roduntifolia).
NORTH CAROLINA . SOUTH CAROLINA
WWW.CWS-INC.NET

Creek's Landing January 12, 2015
Stream Relocation Plan CWS Project No. 2015-3535
Purpose and Need for the Stream Relocation
There are eight jurisdictional seasonal RPW stream channels (Streams A -H) and four jurisdictional
wetlands (Wetlands AA -DD) located within the project area (Figure 3, attached). On -Site streams are
unnamed tributaries to East Fork Twelve Mile Creek. The purpose of the project is to develop
approximately 35 acres of the 48 acre property into a single-family subdivision consisting of 68 lots
(Figures 4, attached). This will result in impacts to jurisdictional waters of the U.S.
The original plan for the proposed road crossing was a piped conveyance instead of the currently proposed
culvert (Figure 5, attached). This original plan included a 1531f, 30 -inch, "L" -shaped reinforced concrete
pipe (RCP) with a 151f rip rap apron at the outlet. Permanent impacts associated with this design totaled
167 linear feet of Stream B.
In order to reduce impacts to jurisdictional waters of the U.S., a straight culvert with stream relocation was
chosen in lieu of a piped conveyance (Figures 6 and 7, attached). A straight culvert is the favored design as
it will maintain aquatic life passage, is easier to maintain, and has a lower potential to clog versus a piped
conveyance. Permanent impacts associated with this culvert installation total 1091f of Stream B. Due to a
an extreme bend in Stream B, 125 linear feet of temporary impacts is proposed for relocation This
relocation will allow for the culvert to be aligned with downstream waters at the outlet, but creates a
loss of 15 if during the relocation of the existing stream to the relocated stream (Stream 7, attached).
In order to maintain minimal impacts, the proposed impacts to Stream B total 2491f, consisting of 109
If of permanent impacts (culvert installation), 125 linear feet of temporary impacts (relocation), and a
151f net loss (from existing to relocated). Impacts are summarized in Table 1, below.
Table 1. Summary of proposed impacts.
Jurisdictional
Impact
Temporary
Impacts
Feature
Type
or
(linear feet)
Impacts (acre)
Permanent
Road Crossing (Culvert)
Permanent
109
0.01
Stream B
Stream relocation
Temporary
125
0.01
Stream relocation (net
permanent
15
0.00
loss of waters)
Total Permanent Stream Impacts
124
0.01 acre
Total Temporary Stream Impacts
125
0.01 acre
Total Stream Impacts
2491f
0.02 acre
The proposed culvert is a 100 -linear foot, 30 -inch reinforced concrete pipe (RCP) with headwalls at
both the inlet and outlet of the culvert. The proposed culvert will be buried at least six inches below
the bed of the channel to allow passage of aquatic life and maintain low flows. Impacts associated with
the straight culvert design were reduced through the use of headwalls at the inlet and outlet of the proposed
culvert in order to minimize the length required for the proposed crossing. The proposed culvert is also
designed to maintain bankfull channel dimensions upstream and downstream of the proposed culvert.
In -stream structures will provide stabilization and prevent upstream incision, as necessary. Natural
coconut matting, riparian seed, and native plants will be installed on both sides of the relocated Stream
B for bank stabilization and erosion control. Vegetation species will be chosen to fit in with the
existing plant community, as well as add diversity, particularly in the riparian zone. Currently, much
of the riparian area is dominated by invasive Chinese privet. Chinese privet and other invasive species
such as Japanese honeysuckle will be removed and/or treated.
2

Creek's Landing January 12, 2015
Stream Relocation Plan CWS Proiect No. 2015-3535
All channel work will be constructed in the dry in accordance with Water Quality Certification No.
3890. Proper sediment and erosion control measures will be used to minimize disturbances to
downstream waters.
Methods
A geomorphic survey was performed by CWS scientists Kelly Thames, Wetland Professional in
Training (WPIT), Kaitlin McCulloch, Staff Scientist I, and Ben McGuire, Staff Scientist I on
December 28, 2015. This assessment included a longitudinal profile and representative cross sections
of the existing stream channel (Figures 8 —11, attached). Due to the extreme bend in Stream B, the
relocation is necessary in order to align the proposed culvert with downstream waters. The stream
relocation plan proposes for Stream B to exit the proposed culvert and flow for a relocated 125 if to a
logical tie-in point downstream. This plan ultimately reduces permanent stream impacts from 249 if to
1241f.
Stream B exhibits stable characteristics and was determined a good reference reach to survey for the
relocated design. A longitudinal profile and cross sectional surveys were performed on a
representative riffle and a representative pool feature (Figures 9 —11, attached). The average drainage
area for Stream B is approximately 0.064 square miles (41.16 acres), channel slope averages 0.018
ft/ft, and sinuosity is 1.17 ft/ft. Bankfull width and mean depth for this reach are 4.92 feet and 0.39
feet, respectively, with a bankfull area of 1.91 sq. ft. and width/depth ratio of 12.66. The flood prone
width for this reach is 10 feet and greater. Application of Rosgen Level II Stream Classification to a
representative riffle section identified Stream B as a C type channel (Table 2, below).
Stream Design
CWS developed.a stream design for the relocation of Stream B downstream of the culvert installation
based on existing channel conditions (Figure 7, attached). This design will improve the goals of the
project and enhance future water quality by adding sinuosity to reduce sheer stress, increasing the
quality of epifaunal substrate, and enhancing the buffer with native riparian plantings. The old
channel will be filled and planted. Typical cross sectional dimensions for the relocation will be based
on the existing cross sectional dimensions (Figure 12, attached). A longitudinal profile was developed
for the relocation to exit the proposed culvert and tie-in to the existing channel at a logical downstream
location (Figure 13, attached).

Creek's Landing January 12, 2015
Stream Relocation Plan CWS Proiect No. 2015-3535
Table 2. Summary of Existing and Design Stream Conditions
Parameter
Existing
Proposed
-- -Riffle.
Propo"sed,.
:Pool
Length of Evaluated (ft.)
352
125
-hamnel Dimensions
Bankfull Width (ft.)
4.92
5
5
Mean Bankfull Depth (ft(.)
0.39
0.39
0.70
Width/Depth Ratio
12.66
12.66
5.87
Bankfull Area (sq. ft.)
1.91
1.91
2.86
Bankfull Maximum Depth (ft.)
0.76
0.76
1.17
Width Floodprone Area (ft.)
>10
>10
>10
Entrenchment Ratio
2.13
2.13
7.32
-Channel Pattern .
Sinuosity
1.17
1.21
{.Channel Profile
Channel Slope
0.018
0.035
Rosgen Stream Type
C
C
CWS will utilize a pump around to work in the dry and apply other erosion and sediment control
techniques to minimize sediment escape from the site during construction. These techniques include
employing coir fiber logs within the channel bed immediately downstream of the construction area.
These logs are meant to temporarily prevent downstream sediment migration and will be removed
once the channel has been stabilized with matting.
The relocated channel reach is designed to have profile and dimension similar to the upstream reach,
however it has been designed with added sinuosity. The restored stream will have similar channel
stability and dimensions to the original channel, as well as provide an uplift of aquatic function by
providing a higher quality riparian buffer through planting native plants and controlling invasive plant
species. The improvements to the relocated stream are designed to minimize erosion, downstream
sediment accumulation, and downstream scouring by redirecting flow and reducing sheer stress.
Planting Plan
Natural coconut matting (coir matting), native seed mix, live stakes, and native plants will be installed
on both sides of Stream B in various zones for bank stabilization and erosion control. Vegetation
species will be chosen based on the existing plant community and to add species diversity, particularly
in the riparian zone.
Stream banks consist of three zones: 1) lower stream banks, 2) upper stream banks, and 3) riparian
buffer (Figure 14, attached). Revegetation of the area directly adjacent to the relocated channel is
especially important to prevent erosion, downstream sedimentation, and provides important water
quality and habitat services. Wetland plant species such as silky dogwood (Cornus amomum), river
birch (Betula nigra), black willow (Salix nigra), and soft rush (Juncus effusus) will be planted on the
lower stream banks (Zone 1, approximately 506 square feet [sfJ). Black willow and clusters of soft
rush will be planted on outside stream bends for dense rooting and erosion control. Upper stream
banks (Zone 2, approximately 782 sf) will be planted with other moisture -tolerant species such as
green ash and red maple. The riparian buffer (Zone 3, approximately 9,474 sf) will be planted with
4

Creek's Landing January 12, 2015
Stream Relocation Plan CWS Proiect No. 2015-3535
species such as ironwood, slippery elm, and spicebush (Lindera benzoin). All disturbed areas will be
seeded with temporary and permanent native riparian and wetland seed mixes, and stream banks will
be matted with natural coconut matting. Planting plan details are summarized in Table 3 (below) and
Figure 13 (attached).
Table 3. Proposed Planting Plan, Old Blair's Mill Stream Relocation Project
Zon'e,a - L'ower Stream Banks _(506 sq
„ ..,
Common name
Botanical name
Size
Spacing
# of Plants
Soft rush
Juncus effusus
Plug
3' O.C.
100
Silky dogwood
Cornus amomum
Live stake
2' O.C.
45
Black willow
Salix nigra
Live stake
2' O.C.
45
Elderberry
Sambucus canadensis
Live Stake
T O.C.
45
Common name
Botanical name
Size
Spacing
# of Plants
Green ash
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Bare root
4' O.C.
20
River birch
Betula nigra
Bare root
T O.C.
20
Red maple
Acer rubrum
Bare root
T O.C.
20
_Zoue,3, Ri arianBuffer;(9,474:sift)
Common name
Botanical name
Size
Spacing
# of Plants
Spicebush
Lindera benzoin
One Gallon
8' O.C.
148
Green ash
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
One Gallon
10' O.C.
25
Red maple
Acer rubrum
One Gallon
10' O.C.
25
Ironwood
Carpinus caroliniana
One Gallon
10' O.C.
25
Slippery elm
Ulmus rubra
One Gallon
10' O.C.
25

Creek's Landing January 12, 2015
Stream Relocation Plan CWS Project No. 2015-3535
On behalf of Carolina Development Services, CWS is submitting this stream relocation plan in order
to satisfy the conditions required by the Section 401 Water Quality Certification.
Please do not hesitate to contact me at 704-408-1683, or through email at [e-mail] should
you have any questions or comments regarding this request.
Sincerely,
C
zln- . Awr��
fd� JU441t�
Gregg Antemann, PWS
Kelly Thames, WPIT
Professional Wetland Scientist
Project Scientist
Attachments: Figure 1. USGS Site Location Map
Figure 2. Aerial Imagery Map
Figure 3. Approximate Jurisdictional Boundary Field Map
Figure 4. Overall Site Plan
Figure 5. Originally Proposed Impacts
Figure 6. Proposed Impacts Overview
Figure 7. Proposed Stream Relocation Plan
Figure 8. Geomorphic Survey Overview
Figure 9. Existing Cross Section - Pool
Figure 10. Existing Cross Section - Riffle
Figure 11. Existing Longitudinal Profile
Figure 12. Typical Cross Section
Figure 13. Proposed Longitudinal Profile
Figure 14. Planting Plan
401 Water Quality Certification (DWR # 15-1170)
cc: Mr. Johnathan McCall, Carolina Development Services
N

s
4 "� L„, '^S � � F .X i 1. _ � � t { {�t , t �e a• — � f J't �....
xx
t t
.t
tet, x�.3
9 '
1' 'G
..3 .. a, _
x
Iry
Gwd
,
i
,
r
}
,• Weddington Road
,
4 -
I
- {Ew �c
,
F
r '
y � ` ( ���� •"'4. � iti r ;� i 1'� 1. .i
.x
,
` e00 ire',{ MiY Airport Road
>' 0
1
a
_II
� A
.
lip
y f
\ .1
t J Legend
U.
} - Project Limits
Ail:�� �r~' `�, ff :� Excluded Parcel
IIJ
• 2, 000 1,000 0 2,000 Feet
REFERENCE: 7.5 MINUTE TOPOGRAPHIC QUADRANGLE MATTHEWS, NC, DATED 1988 AND WAXHAW, DATED 1986
SCALE: 1" . 2000' DATE. 10-26-2015 USGS Site Location Map FIGURE NO.
CWS PROJECT NO: DRAWN BY:
2015-3535 AVH Creek's Landing
APPLICANT NO: CHECKED BY: CAROLINA Union Co., North Carolina
KMT WETLAND SERVICES CWS Project No. 2015-3535

lAk
Proposed Impacts -Overview SUMMIT
-
��' LAND SERVICES, P.0
e d' / / 0 i° it slwa�es • / Q� 10111- — 626.2101
8522'25 `4� r 1.. _ • •• ` W
REVISIONS
Es
►�o/�E 1 NUE H. HONEY—
?� LB 4a0e PG JGa� • e -",'1 �/' 111 1t... _ • • • 1 0�,zo
�
POINT OF NGS MONUMENT
II/ N(Y) BY33''32• E 1 I�� 1!� 1 lr 0 433,3776..86 s�AD832011)
E(x) 1,519,684.02 sFr
POND 1-14
- /^'. i/ f ,.o \ \ \... ✓ 34 �1 2�1 39 35 36 /11.(
/ • \ \ ^ \ /-'� i I ITRACT 11
/ 158 159 160 161r ^ 1 /38 `
r 162 163 164 TP/m60-030-15 � 3� Iv PHA E Q_ 39
' I 166 y • V y Oa aarotcN 21I895 AAlles nna
LINE OF 157 / \ _ O 167 — no v AUAW 95J,7�5 af___ q0
_1 I 1 c \
(I�ASf o ILE CREEK ��— — — — — — — a 1 168 ., POND 2 " aD Iwo PG too t �• :^' N 4�1 ---- �SE. r \ u 4
�32
1 / — ., \ 6� /Q—__ 1 �pAW F. • T 1 1 135 \ \ / & a;
POND 3QEF 6�1 42 / rn
" /155 154 L13 31 \ _I
202' 201 200 � • L 170 Z28 ,26 of �' � 1 � ^, IG I c
\O • try/ as-aas-ma ? J 134 1 1 / \
171
P \ \ Lra taxr PG s7a F 8 1 1 V 133 II I
avu PG W 1 /4%29
I 0 173 r Oa -G0.7 OIEB n ',1 1� jI / 1
1 / z6o PH SE \, � r rocvrE I 1 F 13� c
174 rn 2.8 cu Aac (z rsAONs oE(TA AR cnoRo 6FAFIRG cHORo LENGTH np
\\
X 138 \ -p 1 I I z a0.VE zs9sss� szs.00' zs=zzss•G�E 533°3eza"w zs�.3o' W � U U
175 1Q1• pa�oati-pft \ i 10 1 1�7 ➢ 13� 1 �� �N1 ° c ,� � W �
7155 p5• E � 1^1 1 13 1 11 �1 O
{ 82 —' ^ 1L^11 I1i-1 ---� \ \ \ 92 192 \ \O 177 / g •09• E X99 12J 1 11 6 12 1 ;/� VJ I c En p O
81 80 [71]jg �jJ n /\\\ \ 93 191 \ 0178 A 1 1G5 1 II �:= I 1tPPy/Ni clro-tte '� W
h 78 \ \ 94 \ \ 179 1_48 2 = 101 1281_/ a % l>G'744CM PAia95 LW
08.7 \ 190 180 D 151 152 N 1 29 __ ,' �: q 04 aOaD PIG lat 94
7s•k.w\\ ` 7� 95 \ Z 147 149 150 14 _j 1 1 ` �I/ ,' J •! N
l>s IaIU PA ST7 37 LOT
LAT a/ 181 > a ❑ z 1 _ _ 127 j `` o cw
\ 8 L7 JI
L C>g \ \ 96
�, ♦�— 1 11 23 DI ' l o
/ (AT / `✓\ \ / SZ6 � K PROJECT.
1 102
OM H
\ foltE PA JI LOT de 7�C/\J\ \ 98 �� �/ 187 \ \Cl\83/ 194 D 1J 136 16 I1V�L- 12•�
T r _ 7✓✓✓0✓ \ \..�' i C / 139 138 137 1► L-1 y
120 W -------
/\ LAT 184 N B 21'21 E .09 .. 3 17 1 O
142 12
1 I� \� rr��
\\ \ 100 %f 185 r 0 :, �� 1 3 1 I�
6°✓ Naa as orz� F 1 1x1.9 1 I.1~` ® Q Q
0-060-12 �� 140 eilr�c Larwtrs x °r8 / 18
a .r rta c naarua � 2
I of/ ��
ON,ion P10. 7(h
gZ 41 102 !.a°', � ., c, v .. I m r —---------� h
66 �' 'Y "t" 141 {/ = 1 1 121 —="`o�� b
.. /9! /\\\ 3 120 f \ / /
C \ 103 /N PHASE LINE 87 m ; 1119 ` ,
(n ge lm� 65�/ .\ \•, I 116' 117 118 1 1 i/ / 43 61aZ%i o _
SG:
�.
�$Ue 64 \ \\ 106 109 Proposed Impacts .^ 44
/ \ �\ 106 107
cvrr LAT �� 63 \ /� Sos - Figure 6. Plan View and Profile 48
LOT ar 62 \ J1 — ❑❑ POND
_ _ — vaIosG2-mt
¢ LOT 47 \ °� Y�j S / ;fes OP
% SHEET'
POTIINS
\ AA,s i
8 Kph 54 53
POND 59 58 57 55 I \1g \•15 111
gf IT H
aa��oay��Ef° n r LD5o
fn
PROPERTY UNE ll \\ <
LU
4 n L53h'A 4, CREEK 7R—su�"r`� -�
Project Limits
/i• 7 LSG
N44
�� ---- // 9 ON W"7 PG 00
Sw. w eo
n �/•, Gs me -m0 ..
' "L RROM (1A RK TWELVE RIG.PROJ.DATE: 06-01-20
OR 6= Po 847 �f� L T \' CREEK TRIBUTA - SCALE ". = 1'
25'x25'SIGHT TRIAN 25'x25'SIGMT TRIANGLE BRAWN BY: R.
'29 10'x70'SIGHT DISTANCE 10'x70'SIGHT DISTANCE HECKED BY: M(
FIG''-
N 4

Seasonal RPW B
- 167 If permanent impacts (pipe)
.� 153'30 -inch RCP piped conveyance
e
rJ o
O
O
i1
'r
Alternative Plan View Figure
% Creek's Landing
Union Co., North Carolina 5
�' CWS Project No. 2015-3535

SD 1155-154 PROFILE
0+00 1+00 2+00
Impacts - Plan View and Profile
Legend
Proposed Culvert
Proposed Impact
Proposed Steam Relocation
Proposed Relocated Stream
• • • • .. Avoided Seasonal Stream
Avoided Perennial Stream
�' .' Seasonal Stream B
//A
SIT
LANES, P.C.
2
2'241
.2100
.1
1lEs.mn:
'604.7 o � % ,8� / — % 1 U
LEGEND NZ IM.1
J `��'%� \\� •�. \- DETAILISHEET DETAIL DETAIL
OZ
PO?. ° 'D'
REFERENCE SYMBOL DESCRIPTION
lab LProposed impact: z109 If permanent PROPERTY x
� g
' `l ,, •\� ,\
{/ J ' !\I V / �`///�''',�''' �JI ` \l\ l\�X�59$2 ' •,, `\\ ' -`• S ' , ,r Ja 111
83Md/ �•J. �` 'r!
1 f .•------
-- RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE
Q3Q � impact (culvert) 603.0 — — _ EXISTING NRB LINE
Y32GENERAL PUBLIC UTI
LITY EASEMENT
60lSI IS
62 100 linear foot,30-Inch RCP ----------0=---- EISTING MINOR CONTOUR
EN V#I-W S`
a
(buried 6" below the stream bed) m— IXISINGMAORCONTOUR
///ffX(L \ `• ,� ••\•�� �(, SBS _ 722 PROPOSED MINOR CONTOUR r `
'599.6 .I 720 PROPOSED .1 CONTOUR
f / % ` \ i 0• gyp'• --� <�
0)
PROPOSED R.C.P.
/ ,�! •`, F ye'I J +/11 \ "L W '•;�\ W W Proposed stream relocation (140 If). PROPOSED STORM DRAINAGE MANHOLE SHEET
- '
/
f 595 15 If permanent impact (net loss)
- P
590 ROPOSED CATCH BASIN cq
/X— 555125 If temporary impact (stream
1 560 PROPOSED FLARED END SECTION z
,X. \•`\• PRE , C NC 4Dkk O,E relocation) z
t I lI h r; A L INES / �/ r. x
�l [. PROPOSED RIP -RAP APRON z C:)
C� ,i
m
59 `. ,-'- 0
60.594. \ L N
Proposed relocated i. =� ate` ti. -� \ r.� ` GRAPHIC SCALE Cf)
stream reach
I RIG.PROJ.DATE: M
_ r. inr - i- CALE:
125 If -_� tt,
Perennial Stream B ` ,'-• ' ' w �O 1f DRAWN BY:
J HECKED BY:
�r P`\\\ /qW.\\\\ CAR rrrrir
F
1
,.•�.� � � V `� ••kul-
Proposed
g1�r11G �`��`V

SCALE: 1" : 50,
DATE: 10-26-15FIGURE
Proposed Stream Relocation
NO.
CWS PROJECT NO:
2015-3535
DRAWN BY:
AVH
11
creek's landing
/
7
APPLICANT NO:
CHECKED BY:
C A R Q L f IN A
Union Co., North Carolina
KMT
WETLAND SERVICES
CWS Project No. 2015-3535

590 Cross Section 1- Pool
589
588
z587-----------------------------------------------
586 - ----
w 585 -
584
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Station (ft.)
----- Bankfull Width ----- Flood -Prone Width — Water Surface
Parameter
Existing Condition
Bankfull Width ft.
1.1
Mean Bankfull Depth ft.
0.7
Width/Depth Ratio
5.87
Bankfull Areas . ft.
2.86
Bankfull Maximum Depth ft.
1.17
Width of Floodprone Area ft.
> 33
Entrenchment Ratio
7.32
Sinuosity
1.17
Water Surface Slope ft./ft.
0.018
Ros en Stream Type
E
SCALE: n/a
DATE: C-20 1
-U
Representative Cross Section -Pool
FIGURE No.
CWS PROJECT NO:
2015-3535
DRAWN BY:
KMT
BY:
Y.
Creek's Landing
Monroe, North Carolina
9
APPLICANT NO:
CHECKED
GCA
CAROLINA
WETLAND SERVICES
CWS Project No. 2015-3535

589
588
587
0
586
w
585
584
0 5
----- Bankfull Width
Cross Section 2- Riffle
10 15 20 25 30 35
Station (ft.)
— — - Flood -Prone Width -— Water Surface
Parameter
Existing Condition
Bankfull Width (ft.)
4.92
Mean Bankfull Depth (ft.)
0.39
Width/Depth Ratio
12.66
Bankfull Area (sq. ft.)
1.91
Bankfull Maximum Depth (ft.)
0.76
Width of Floodprone Area (ft.)
10.47
Entrenchment Ratio
2.13
Sinuosity
1.17
Water Surface Slope (ft./ft.)
0.018
Rosgen Stream Type
C
SCALE:
n/a
DATE:
1-6-2016
Representative Cross Section -Riffle
FIGURE NO.
CWS PROJECT NO:
2015-3535
APPLICANT NO:
DRAWN BY:
KMT
CHECKED BY:
Creek's Landing
Monroe, North Carolina
/' O
GCA
CAROLINA
WETLANCJ SERVICES
CWS Project No. 2015-3535
1

0'00£
"
4
LL
O'SLZ m
,
J1x
)f
I
O'OSZ
m
O
O'SZZ
O'OOZ
x
LL
Y
m
'
O'SLI
O
"
O'OSI o m
O'SZI
4-0
--
—
— —
--
—
— —
--
—
—
— _—
— —
—
— —
—_
,ry
v--
---
--�--
-
--
---
--
---
--
H
0'SL
aE .
a�
0'OS
a�
�
m
0'SZ
0'0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
Q�
O�
O�
Cn
00
00
00
00
GC
00
00
00
In
In
In
lln
In
W0
WO
(laaj)
UOIJUAail
PIGUIU-, NO.
11

Typical Cross Section
Bankfull width
5'
ankfull Depth
0.76'
d � I0 t :� 20
Distance (ft.)
----Bankfull Width
SCALE:
n/a
DATE:
1-6-2016
CAROLINA
WETLAND SERVICES
Typical Cross Section
FIGR TRE NO.
12
CWS PROJECT NO:
2015-3535
DRAWN BY:
KMT
ro Creek'sLanding
Monroe, North Carolina
CWS Project No. 2015-3535
APPLICANT NO.
CHECKED BY:
GCA
Typical Cross Section
Bankfull width
5'
ankfull Depth
0.76'
d � I0 t :� 20
Distance (ft.)
----Bankfull Width

C
N
0
a
T
NQ
m
m
-Zi
z
O m
-�0
ill z
N
W O
Longitudinal Profile -Relocation
W
593.0
592.0
591.0
-
I
D
D
3
o
m
590.0
G)
N
�
K
589.0
D
-i0)"A
�
588.0
'
587.0
A
x
586.0
ELI
- - -- - �
_i
�
585.0
• �
bTf
z
X
584.0
00
� x
�r
•
c
583.0
a.
<
z
M
"A
p
582.0
r `
•
W581.0
� �
x
`
O
580.0
v
�
p
579.0
C
578.0
as
577.0
how
b
576.0
zxr
O {T 0
o
575.0
om °
m
b
O O
O
O O O O O O
O
O
O O
N
C �
C
k4 O vi O k6 C
kd�
C
tn O
Np
O
N
kn
kn t-N
N
eq
r-
M
O
Station (feet)
a
---
- Water Surface
Existing Thalweg • RTOB X LTOB x RBKF
�- LBKF
- - -
Proposed Thalweg
N
w
z
0

Water Resources
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
Mr. Jonathan McCall
Carolina Development Services
2627 Breckonridge Centre Drive
Monroe, NC 29110
PAT MCCRORY
DONALD R. VAN DER VAART
secrernrh
S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
1 irecror
December 8, 2015
DWR# 15-1170
Union County
Subject: APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification with Additional Conditions
Creek's Landing
Dear Mr. McCall:
You have our approval, in accordance with the General Certification and those
conditions listed below, for the purpose proposed in your application dated November 3, 2015,
and received by the Division of Water Resources (the Division) on November 6, 2015. After
reviewing your application, we have determined that this project is covered by Water Quality
General Certification Number 3890 which can be viewed on our web site at
http://Portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/swp/ws/401. The General Certification allows you to use
Nationwide Permit Number 29 once it is issued to you by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
(COE), Please note that you should get any other federal, state or local permits before
proceeding with your project, including those required by (but not limited to) Sediment and
Erosion Control, Non -Discharge, and Water Supply Watershed regulations.
The above noted Certification will expire when the associated 404 permit expires unless
otherwise specified in the General Certification. It is advised that all conditions of the
Certification are reviewed prior to initiation of the project. In addition to the requirements of the
Certification, you must also comply with the following conditions:
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in your
application. If you change your project, you must notify us in writing, and you may be
required to send us a new application for a new Certification. If total wetland fills for this
project (now or in the future) exceed one acre, or of total impacts to streams (now or in
the future) exceed 150 linear feet, compensatory mitigation may be required. If the
property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of the Certification and approval
letter; and is thereby responsible for complying with all conditions. 15A NCAC 02H
.0506 and 15A NCAC 02H.0507
2. The Mooresville Regional Office shall be notified in writing once construction at the
approved impact areas has commenced. 15A NCAC 02H .0502 (e)]
State of Korth Carolina i Environmental Quality I Water Resources I Water Quality Regional Operations
hlooresrille Regional Of6cel 610 Fast Center Avenue, Suite 3011 Mooresville, North Carolina 28115
704 663 1699

3. Approved Impacts:
Type of Impact
Amount Approved
Temporary Impact
Amount Approved
Permanent Impact
Stream
0 linear ft.
126 linear ft.
Stream relocation
0 linear ft.
125 linear ft.
Wetland
0 acre
0 acre
4. Diversion Ditches and other storm water conveyances as related to the sediment and
erosion control measures shall be matted and/or stabilized to reduce sediment loss and
turbidity. This includes interior/exterior slopes of sediment basins. 15A NCAC 02H .0506
(b)(3) and (c)(3)
5. Bare/fill slopes in excess of 10 feet in height and within 30 feet of surface waters shall be
matted. 15A NCAC 02H .0506 (b)(3) and (c)(3)
6. A final, written storm water management is required per condition #12 of the General
Certification. Stormwater discharge structures at this site shall be constructed in a
manner such that the potential receiving streams (of the discharge) will not be impacted
due to sediment accumulations, scouring or erosion of the stream banks. 15A NCAC 02H
.0506(b)(5)
7. Use of native vegetation and other soft stream bank stabilization techniques is
recommended where practicable instead of riprap or other bank hardening methods. If
riprap is necessary, it shall not be placed in the streambed, unless approved by DWR
8. During the construction of the project, no staging of equipment of any kind is permitted in
waters of the U.S., or protected riparian buffers. 15A NCAC 02H .0506(b)(3)
9. A final stream design (for the relocated stream section) shall be submitted and
approved by staff prior to any stream impacts at the site.
10. The Permittee shall ensure that the final design drawings adhere to the permit and to the
permit drawings submitted for approval. 15A NCAC 02H .0507 (c) and 15A NCAC 02H
.0506 (b)(2) and (c)(2)
11. All mechanized equipment operated near surface waters must be regularly inspected and
maintained to prevent contamination of stream waters from fuels, lubricants, hydraulic
fluids, or other toxic materials. 15A NCAC 02H.0506(b)(3)
This Certification can be contested as provided in Articles 3 and 4 of the General Statute
150B by filing a written petition for an administrative hearing to the Office of the Administrative
Hearings (hereby known as OAH). A petition form may be obtained from the OAH at
http://www.ncoah.com/or by calling the OAH Clerk's Office at [phone].
Within sixty (60) calendar days of receipt of this notice, a petition must be filed with the
OAH. A petition is considered filed when the original and one (1) copy along with any applicable
OAH filing fee is received in the OAH during normal office hours (Monday through Friday, 8:00
am to 5:00 pm, excluding state holidays).

The petitions may be faxed to the OAH at [phone], provided the original and one
(1) copy of the petition along with any applicable OAH filing fee is received by the OAH within
five (5) business days following the faxed transmission. Mailing address for the OAH:
If sending via US Postal Service:
Office of Administrative Hearings
6714 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-6714
If sending via delivery service (UPS, FedEx, etc.)
Office of Administrative Hearings
1711 New Hope Church Rd.
Raleigh, NC 27609-6285
One (1) copy of the petition must also be served on DEQ as follows:
Mr. Sam M. Hayes, General Counsel
Department of Environmental Quality
1601 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1601
This letter completes the review by the Division under Section 401 of the Clean Water
Act. If you have any questions, please telephone Mr. Alan Johnson in the Mooresville Regional
Office at 704-663-1699 or Ms. Karen Higgins in the Central Office in Raleigh 919-807-6360.
c�>�z Corey Basinger, Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Mooresville Regional Office, DEQ
Attachments
cc: Greg Antemann, CWS (email)
William Elliot, Army Corps of Engineers, Asheville (email)
Karen Higgins, Wetlands Unit
MRO, Land Quality