20160081 Ver 1_401 Application_20160116

January 18, 2016
Karen Higgins
NCDWR
401 Buffer Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC
4901 TRADEMARK DRIVE
RALEIGH, NC 27610
[phone] • FAX [phone]
environmentalservicesinc.com
Re: 401 WQC Request for Arcadia Ridge
Apex, NC
Ms. Higgins:
24160081
Enclosed please find an application for a wetland impact associated with Arcadia Ridge located
in Apex, NC. The Town of Apex has previously conducted the necessary buffer review and
determined that no buffers are present onsite. The Town of Apex is also responsible for the
storm water plan review. A Section 404 application has also been submitted to the USACE.
Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns. Thank you.
Sincerely,
Environmental Services, Inc.
Jeff Harbour, PWS
JAN 21 ?016

o�OFWAT!g9
� 9
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
❑X Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 29 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes ❑X No
1d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
❑X 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
le.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
❑ Yes ❑X No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
❑X Yes ❑ No
1 g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes ❑X No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Arcadia Ridge
2b.
County:
Wake
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Apex
2d.
Subdivision name:
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
JAN 9 12016
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Meritage Homes of the Carolinas
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
Brian Ketchem
3d.
Street address:
5400 Trinity Road, Suite 107
3e. City, state, zip:
Raleigh, NC, 27607
3f.
Telephone no.:
919-926-2616
3g.
Fax no.:
919-926-2601
3h.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b. Name:
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
Jeff Harbour
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
ESI
5c. Street address:
4901 Trademark Drive
5d. City, state, zip:
Raleigh, NC 27610
5e. Telephone no.:
919-212-1760
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 10

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a'. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): 10721287171;0721286953
1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.72422 Longitude: -78.9234
1c. Property size:
37 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
Beaver Creek
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
WS -IV; NSW
2c. River basin:
Cape Fear
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
This property is undeveloped and contains two drained ponds with a low lying wetland area confined to a small depression between two drained
ponds.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.24
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 0
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
Purpose of project is to provide residential housing to the Apex area.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
A small wetland pocket will be affected by the proposed development. Typical equipment will be used during construction.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project(including all priorphases) in thepast?
❑X Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
0 Preliminary El Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): J. HarboudL. Roper
Agency/Consultant Company: ESI
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
USACE: July 1, 2014 SAW -2014-01190 site visit conducted but PJD document not issued
Apex: June 16, 2014 (Apex 14-009) and February 18, 2015 (Apex 15-002)
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑Yes ❑X No ❑ Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ❑X No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑X Wetlands ❑ Streams — tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction .
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Tem ora
2b.
Type of impact
2c.
Type of wetland
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other)
2f.
Area of
impact
(acres)
W1 P
Fill
Headwater Wetland
Yes
Corps
0.24
W2 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W3 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W4 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W5 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W6
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
0.24
2h. Comments:
Wetland is in a low point in the landscape between two drained ponds. Dominated by sweetgum, red maple and willow oak with an understory
comprised of Chinese privet, greenbriar, giant cane, and scattered ferns. NCWAM assessment resulted' in a Medium quality; possibly justifying a 1.5:1
mitigation ratio.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed•on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
Stream impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
3b.
Type of impact
3c.
Stream name
3d.
Perennial (PER) or
intermittent (INT)?
3e.
Type of
jurisdiction
3f.
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g.,
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
S1
Choose one
-
-
S2
Choose one
-
-
S3 -
Choose one
-
-
S4
Choose one
-
-
S5
Choose one
-
-
S6 -
Choose one
-
=
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
3i. Comments:
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01 -
Choose one
Choose
02 -
Choose one
Choose
03 -
Choose one
Choose
04 -
Choose one
Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected ,pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
66. Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑X Other: Cape Fear
6b.
Buffer Impact
number—
Permanent (P) or
Tem ora T
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet)
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet
131 -
Yes/No
B2 =
Yes/No
B3 -
Yes/No
B4 -
Yes/No
B5 -
Yes/No
B6 -
Yes/Nb
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
61. Comments: Features have been reviewed by Town of Apex and are not subject to a buffer per Apex #14-009 and #15-002
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The wetland cannot be completely avoided as it lies in the central portion of the site. The entire 0.24 acre wetland is. proposed to be impacted but will
be offset through compensatory mitigation.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
All appropriate erosion and sediment control measures will be used during the construction phase. These measures will be monitored and maintained
for the duration of the construction period.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts, to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑X Yes ❑ No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑' DWQ ❑X Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
0 Mitigation bank
ElPayment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: Cripple Creek Stream & Wetland Mitigation Bank
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
Attached a er states ate bank currently has up 0.48 acre of credit available for this pro1ec . pp scan proposes a 1.51 ratio.-
a io.3c. Comments:
3c.
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
Choose one
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetlarid mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form -Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
Yes No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ❑X No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
Ab.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
40%
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
0 Yes ❑ No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
Most of this site drains into one area and the site is designed with one large wet detention pond for stormwater quantity and quality. The Town of
Apex has reviewed and approved the stormwater management plan.
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
Town of Apex
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which localgovernment's jurisdiction is thisproject?
Town of Apex
❑ Phase II
❑ NSW
3b.
Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑jC Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c.
Has the approved, Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑X Yes ❑ No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑Coastal counties
❑HQW
4a.
Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ORW
(check all that apply):
[KSession Law 2006-246
❑.Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
Yes ❑ No
attached?
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
'Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
Q Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
Q Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes
Q No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes
❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes
❑ No
letter.)
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
El Yes
0 No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B.0200)?
2b. Is thisan after -the -fact permit application?
El Yes
X❑ No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑Yes
Eg No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Municipal sewer
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version. 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this ,project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ❑X No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ YesX❑ No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
-
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
ESI completed a habitat assessment plus a NHP database query.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ❑X No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NOAA-Fisheries
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ❑X No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
NCSHPO
B. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
-T
❑ Yes ❑X No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
NC Floodmaps
1 91 fj K6-rcq-,-
1311.6
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
Applic n Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant isprovided.)
Page 10 of 10

Statement of Mitigation Credit Availability
Cripple Creek Stream & Wetland Mitigation Bank
January 11, 2016
Mr. James Lastinger
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
3331 Heritage Trade Drive
Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
Re: Availability of Compensatory Riparian Wetland Credits
Project: Arcadia Ridge
We are providing this letter in accordance with 33 CFR §332.8(r), to confirm that .48 Riparian Wetland Mitigation
Credits (Credits) from the Cripple Creek Stream & Wetland Mitigation Bank (Bank) are currently available and may
be used, once transferred, for compensatory mitigation relative to the Arcadia Ridge project, and as proposed by
Meritage Homes of the Carolinas (Applicant).
The Applicant may ultimately purchase the Credits, if they are available, following Permit issuance. Should the
Applicant purchase the Credits at that time, we will complete and execute the Compensatory Mitigation
Responsibility Transfer Form (Transfer Form) within five (5) days of receipt of the full purchase price.
We will additionally provide copies of the completed and executed Transfer Form to the Applicant, the Bank's US
Army Corps (USACE) Project Manager and, if needed, other regulatory agencies. In addition, we will provide USACE
with an updated copy of the Bank's Ledger, reflecting the transaction. Transaction information in the updated Bank
Ledger will include relevant Permit and Applicant information as well as the number and resource type of the debited
Credits.
Should your office have any questions, please contact me at 919.334.9123.
Sincerely,
kvv A
Tiffani Bylow
Restoration Systems, LLC

ACME Mapper 2.1 - 4.2 mi W of Apex NC
h ttp J/m ap pe r. ac m e. c o m
1 of 1 10/30/2014 12:51 Pb

4W)
i® gown o f x
THE PEAK OF (•s000 LIVING:
P.O. 8OX 250
APEX, NORTH CAROLINA 27502
June 16, 2014
Lauren Roper
Environmental Services, Inc.
524 S. New Hope Road JApex 14-009
Raleigh, NC 27610
Subject: Stream Buffer Determination
Welton Property Site
Primary Watershed —Jordan Lake Watershed
Dear Ms. Roper,
On June 11, 2014, 1 met with you at the subject site toevaluate two (2) drainage features
depicted on the USDA Soil Survey and/or USGS Topographic maps and determine if they were
subject to the Town of Apex (Town) riparian buffer rules. Based on the information obtained
during the site visit and per the requirements set forth in Section 6.1.11 of the Town Unified
Development Ordinance (UDO), I have determined the following riparian buffer widths as
summarized in the table below.
This on-site determination shall expire five (5) years from the date of this letter. Landowners or
affected parties that dispute a determination made by the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) or
Delegated Local Authority in the Jordan Lake watershed may request a determination by the
DWQ Director.
Pp Ek
1873
Z i Q
Z
0��y cA�ov
Shown as
Shown as
Determination made,
Determined .. .
Drainage Feature'
_ -
ori IJSGS
on Soil
=
=
in the field
BufferVidth'-
Siarvey
Pond A
Present
Present
Not Subject
0 Feet
Feature B
Intermittent
Perennial
Ephemeral (11 Pts)
0 Feet
This on-site determination shall expire five (5) years from the date of this letter. Landowners or
affected parties that dispute a determination made by the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) or
Delegated Local Authority in the Jordan Lake watershed may request a determination by the
DWQ Director.
Pp Ek
1873
Z i Q
Z
0��y cA�ov

Town of Apex
Stream Buffer Determination (Apex 14-009)
Page 2 of 2
An appeal request must be made within sixty (60) days of date of this letter or from the date
the affected party (including downstream and/or adjacent owners) is notified of this letter. A
request for a determination by the Director shall be referred to the Director in writing c/o Ian
McMillan, DWQ Wetlands/402 Unit, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650.
Otherwise the appeal procedure will be in accordance with UDO Section 6.1.11.
If you dispute the Director's determination, you may file a petition for an administrative
hearing. You must file the petition with the Office of Administrative Hearings within sixty (60)
days of receipt of this notice of decision. A petition is considered filed when it is received in the
Office of Administrative Hearings during normal office hours. The Office of Administrative
Hearings accepts filings Monday through Friday between the hours of 8:00am and 5:00pm,
except for official State holidays. To request a hearing, send the original and one (1) copy of the
petition to the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-
6714. A copy of the petition must also be served to the Department of Natural Resources, c/o
Mary Penny Thompson, General Counsel, 1601 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1601.
This determination is final and binding unless, as detailed above, you ask for a hearing or appeal
within sixty (60) days.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Michael S. Deaton, PE
Environmental Programs Manager
Attachments
cc: Tim Donnelly, Public Works & Utilities Director
Pp Ek�
1973
Z <
O�Ty
CPI

Welton Property NDisc,atmer
I, Maps makes every etfort to produce and pubhsh
0 205 410 820 Feet 'the most current and accurate information possible
I I I I I I I 1 I However, the maps are produced for information purposes
1 inch = 400 feet and are NOTsurveys No warranties. expressed orimphed
.are provided for the data thereinits use.orits intervrefahon.

ACM I, \Mapper 2.1 - 6.0 km W of pex NC
htth:' `nu�l,l,cr acmc.cixn...
: of,] 611)"2014 1:45 PM

7 MW'

ff
l i( '
(� til
t\L p%vq Stream 1denMuation corm N erston 4.11 _
Date: t �y _ Project/Site: W �i.Y, Latitude: Ki 7Z `) PS
Evaluator. 11 �� lCounty:, r 1/ Longitude: C� K- 'i� t� C L t
�V � g - 76• I Z3s
Total Points: S am-9eterrnination (circle one) Other
if > f9 orerer niat if _> 30'
Stream is at least intermittent `` er Intermittentermittent Perennial e.g. Cua� A+sne:
A. Geomoroholoov (Subtotal = ��) Absent Weak; ModerateF Strong 1
1' Continuity of channel bed and bank
1 01Q
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
0
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
rte,
lJ
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
22. Fish
1
2
3
5. Active'relict floodplain
6. Depositional bars or benches
(22
1
1 1
2
2
1 3
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1 1
2
3
8. Headcuts ` ---A
1.5
1
2
3
9. Grade control
10. Natural valey
0
0
0
1
1
1.5
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
o =
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions Ln manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal
12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 1 2 1 3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 2 3
14. Leaf litter 1.5 1 0. 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris _ 0 0.5 1 1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 1 1.5-
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table? No = 0 es =-3
C. Bioloav (Subtotal = 3 )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3
2
1
0 i
19. Rooted upland plants in stream ed 3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks _
_ 1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish 0
0.5
1 1
1.5
24. Amphibians1
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae ; )
0.51
1.5
26. Wetland plants in stream': ed
FACW = 0.75;
OBL =1.5 Q0ther = 0
'perennial streams may also be identifed using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:
I

gown
of o�x
THE PEAK OF6000 LIVING
P_ O. 19O% 250
APEX, NORTH CAROLINA 27502
February 18, 2015
Jeff Harbour
Environmental Services, Inc.
524 S. New Hope Road pex 15-00
Raleigh, NC 27610
Subject: Stream Buffer Determination
Gasiorowski Property Site
Primary Watershed —Jordan Lake Watershed
Dear Mr. Harbour,
On February 13, 2015, 1 visited the subject site to confirm your stream call on Feature A as
depicted on the USDA Soil Survey and/or USGS Topographic maps and determine if it was
subject to the Town of Apex (Town) riparian buffer rules. Based on the information obtained
during the site visit and per the requirements set forth in Section 6.1.11 of the Town Unified
Development Ordinance (UDO), I have determined the following riparian buffer width as
summarized in the table below.
This on-site determination shall expire five (5) years from the date of this letter. Landowners or
affected parties that dispute'a determination made by the .Division of Water Quality (DWQ) or
Delegated Local Authority in the Jordan Lake watershed may request a determination by the
DWQ Director.
PP E_ -k.
1Dri �
o,�Ty , CAF''�v
�r'• iiiat ad e_.:ry
De er=.m e
- t
a'�e`°.Fea�ture�'
�,�4
x•;�
.�_�.. '����.
;�;.:,
!�Dra�n
- -
�
Ephemeral
Feature A
Intermittent
Perennial
0 Feet
(14 & 14.5 Pts)
Not Part of a Natural
Pond A
Not Present
Present
0 Feet
Drainage Way
This on-site determination shall expire five (5) years from the date of this letter. Landowners or
affected parties that dispute'a determination made by the .Division of Water Quality (DWQ) or
Delegated Local Authority in the Jordan Lake watershed may request a determination by the
DWQ Director.
PP E_ -k.
1Dri �
o,�Ty , CAF''�v

Town of Apex
Stream Buffer Determination (Apex 15-002)
Page 2 of 2
An appeal request must be made within sixty (60) days of date of this letter or from the date
the affected party (including downstream and/or adjacent owners) is notified of this letter. A
request for a determination by the Director shall be referred to the Director in writing c/o Ian
McMillan, DWQ Wetlands/402 Unit, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650.
Otherwise the appeal procedure will be in accordance with UDO Section 6.1.11.
If you dispute the Director's determination, you may file a petition for an administrative
hearing. You must file the petition with the Office of Administrative Hearings within sixty (60)
days of receipt of this notice of decision. A petition is considered filed when it is received in the
Office of Administrative Hearings during normal office hours. The Office of Administrative
Hearings accepts filings Monday through Friday between the hours of 8:OOam and S:OOpm,
except for official State holidays. To request a hearing, send the original and one (1) copy of the
petition to the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-
6714. A copy of the petition must also be served to the Department of Natural Resources, c/o
Mary Penny Thompson, General Counsel, 1601 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1601.
This determination is final and binding unless, as detailed above, you ask for a hearing or appeal
within sixty (60) days.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Michael S. Deaton, PE
Environmental Programs Manager
Attachments

(Joins lower left)
'9
µin
CrT� s {— E CrC C:rE�
r R� wn �, '.. GIC
. XL 11.1.. l t
!e Au Ra Au
C -,L
I CIE
r -
U.
C,G: t CrC2c(Ci a3
�E 03-2
rGrC f
t 7 ,CrE \'' i ayC Y r�
f CrC2 C,E �=` i^ CrC2 a GrH E
` Y '
),ro N 1 y
c C2
CIC2 Gr sr 4 0
C'S2 CrC2 FA
Ms82 CrBi. — % -�1 l �t
! <
cre Cr
` ( CrCz ' crC
iii`• ��'.�. �„/ � � /Cre
(}� tGIC
C, CIE
s'rE
cCrC2 GrC1 Cr82 Y C.r L—'
GrC CrC
YiC2 L GrB yV j�
C:C2 N. �r CrE
M? 3; .. + G2 _ WO
.} M
. IN
Cr'''u,, MtC-2 € �7 ! S Au
Mre Wsi;c i'V:i i 3 'y*yf CrC2
+..
GIB ,r CrC,. WsC`h r ; ; y} J
CrC1 �1M,
GrC
CrE ti to CrC2
e. S\. WSC4, } Ala i
GrB
t02 to ft,cfE 4r1CIPU
cru ON,
�1� f
rE ^
rn
crc2
• A { r�
q�q
crc_ { � � � � '! t CrE,
c� A:r / . Crt;'f Cre
-� - :�
CC" i. 4"^�r� CtH�,." Crd2`el
}
cd—
ey �' CrE3? Y 1'6 iMvC3Lr:2,•
I, A? _/ 1
rfC, CrC2 rr t
f t1 �,. crc2
Vic 2
It 2
r ` r d K J . ✓ ". 1 �1
Xu ` CrEr. A2 jp
TA
R T' Pfti� :,u CG
Au
PC
'A AfA
1 �
A.
FC2

ACME 1A"
.._. ie.coml
1 of 1 10/30/2014 12:51 PM

NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: a ht 1 S
ProjectlSite: G14'4;'o ti%Z
Latitude: '� s, -7 a 3 a
Evaluator:
County: �O r,
Longitude: 'oil *1151
Total Points:
termination (circle one)
Other
Stream is at least intermtertEphemeral
ntermittent Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
if > 19 or erenrtial if a30'
2
3
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = ��5
Absent
Weak
Mod rate
Strong
1' Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
16. Organic debris lines or piles
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
O
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Activelrelict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
B. Headculs
"-
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
Q.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
I I
N (= 0)
Yes = 3
Sketch: ,�,%
�ti
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
A Hvriminnv MIMMMl = H, s 1
U. Presence of Baseflow
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0 1
1
2
2
3
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5 1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
f 1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
.1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Y =
3
C. Biology (Subtotal = 3 )
1 B. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants In streambed
3
2
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
W
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants In streambed
"-
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See
p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch: ,�,%
�ti

N ►i-1107.
NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: I �`
Projectlsite:GASt ro 5V_r+
Latitude:
Evaluator: �`
County: 004'e_
Longitude:_?0. 04 L0
Total Points: • ,r
Stream is at least intermittent
§Iream Determination (circle one)
1a&t&mq0Internnittent Perennial
Other
e.g. Quad Name:
it z 19 or pefennial if z 30'
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
A. Geomorphology ( Subtotal =
Absent
Weak
ModqLate
Strong
1' Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
0 0
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
16. Organic debris lines or piles
J_ 2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple- col sequence
0
YO = 3
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
t
1
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial depositsKO
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No
,
Yes = 3
e artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal = 5 }
12. Presence of Basefiow
0 1
2 3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
ILA> 1
2 3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
0 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0 0.5
1 1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0 0.5
1) 1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
YO = 3
C. Biology Subtotal =
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
21. Aquatic Mollusks
ON
1
1
2
2
3
3
22. Fish
W
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1 L
1.5
26- Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other - 0
'perennial streams may also be Identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: 5
4,
yow,
1�
d ova nS
Sketch: �ZD

Point A -upstream
Point A -downstream

Point B -upstream
Point B -downstream
IN
irA-
4L
Point B -upstream
Point B -downstream

NC WAM Wetland Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 4.1
Rating Calculator Version 4.1
Wetland Site Name Arcadia Ridge Wetland Impact Area Date 1/11/2016
Wetland Type Headwater Forest Assessor Name/Organization Jeff Harbour/ESI
Notes on Field Assessment Form (Y/N) NO
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N) NO
Wetland is intensively managed (Y/N) NO
Assessment area is located within. 50 feet of a natural tributary or other open water (Y/N) NO
Assessment area is substantially altered by beaver (Y/N) NO
Assessment area experiences overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions (Y/N) NO
Assessment area is on a coastal island (Y/N) NO
Sub -function Rating Summary
Function Sub -function
Metrics
Rating
Hydrology Surface Storage and Retention
Condition
MEDIUM
Sub -Surface Storage and Retention
Condition
MEDIUM
Water Quality Pathogen Change
Condition
MEDIUM
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
Condition/Opportunity
MEDIUM
NA,
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
NO
Particulate Change
Condition
HIGH
Condition/Opportunity
NA
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
NA
Soluble Change Condition
HIGH
Condition/Opportunity
HIGH
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
NO
Physical Change Condition
LOW,
Condition/Opportunity
LOW
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
NO
Pollution Change Condition
NA,
Condition/Opportunity
NA
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N) NA
Habitat Physical Structure Condition MEDIUM
Landscape Patch Structure Condition LOW
Vegetation Composition Condition MEDIUM
Function Rating Summary
Function
Metrics/Notes
Rating
Hydrology
Condition
MEDIUM
Water Quality
Condition
HIGH
Condition/Opportunity
HIGH
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
NO
Habitat
Conditon
LOW
Overall Wetland Rating MEDIUM

NC WAM WETLAND ASSESSMENT FORM
Accompanies User Manual Version 4.1
Kanng taicwator version 4.7
Wetland Site Name Arcadia Ridge Wetland Impact Area Date 1/11/2016
Wetland Type Headw ater Forest T Assessor Name/Organization Jeff Harbour/ESI
Level III Ecoregionj Piedmont Nearest Named Water Body Beaver Creek
RiverBasini Cape Fear ' USGS 8 -Digit Catalogue Unit 03030002
(- Yes No Precipitation within 48 hrs? Latitude/Longitude (deci-degrees) 35.7242, -78.9234
Evidence of stressors affecting the assessment area (may not be within the assessment area)
Please circle and/or make note on last page if evidence of stressors is apparent. Consider departure from reference, if
appropriate, in recent past (for instance, approximately within 10 years). Noteworthy stressors include, but are not limited
to the following.
• Hydrological modifications (examples: ditches, dams, beaver dams, dikes, berms, ponds, etc.)
• Surface and sub -surface discharges into the wetland (examples: discharges containing obvious pollutants, presence of nearby
septic tanks, underground storage tanks (USTs), hog lagoons, etc.)
• Signs of vegetation stress (examples: vegetation mortality, insect damage, disease, storm damage, salt intrusion, etc.)
• Habitat/plant community alteration (examples: mowing, clear -cutting, exotics, etc.)
Is the assessment area intensively managed? rYes {:.. No
Regulatory Considerations (select all that apply to the assessment area)
E7 Anadromous fish
f Federally protected species or State endangered or threatened species
r) NCDWQ riparian buffer rule in effect
[- Abuts a Primary Nursery Area (PNA)
j-; Publicly owned property
Ci N.C. Division of Coastal Management Area of Environmental Concern (AEC) (including buffer)
r Abuts a stream with a NCDWQ classification of SA or supplemental classifications of HQW, ORW, or Trout
F Designated NCNHP reference community
[-i Abuts a 303(d) -listed stream or a tributary to a 303(d) -listed stream
What type of natural stream is associated with the wetland, if any? (check all that apply)
(-j . Blackwater
(: Brownwater
(Wt Tidal (if tidal, check one of the following boxes) (_', Lunar {"} Wind r Both
Is the assessment area on a coastal island? ( Yes ( No
Is the assessment area's surface water storage capacity or duration substantially altered by beaver? Yes {: • No
Does the assessment area experience overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions? ('}Yes r:.+No
1. Ground Surface Condition/Vegetation Condition — assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider alteration to the ground surface (GS) in the assessment area and vegetation structure
(VS) in the assessment area. Compare to reference wetland if applicable (see User Manual). If a reference is not applicable,
then rate the assessment area based on evidence of an effect.
GS VS
4 �A (:�A Not severely altered
('. B 17B Severely altered over a majority of the assessment area (ground surface alteration examples: vehicle tracks, excessive
sedimentation, fire -plow lanes, skidder tracks, bedding, fill, soil compaction, obvious pollutants) (vegetation structure
alteration examples: mechanical disturbance, herbicides, salt intrusion [where appropriate], exotic species, grazing,
less diversity [if appropriate], hydrologic alteration)
2. Surface and Sub -Surface Storage Capacity and Duration — assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface storage capacity and duration (Surf) and sub -surface storage capacity and
duration (Sub). Consider both increase and decrease in hydrology. Refer to the current NRCS lateral effect of ditching guidance for
North Carolina hydric soils (see USACE Wilmington District website) for the zone of influence of ditches in hydric soils. A ditch
s 1 foot deep is considered to affect surface water only, while a ditch > 1 foot deep is expected to affect both surface and ditch
sub -surface water. Consider tidal flooding regime, if applicable.
Surf Sub
.A rA Water storage capacity and duration are not altered.
ry B B Water storage capacity or duration are altered, but not substantially (typically, not sufficient to change vegetation).
{"'r C 1 C Water storage capacity or duration are substantially altered (typically, alteration sufficient to result in vegetation
change) (examples: draining, flooding, soil compaction, filling, excessive sedimentation, underground utility lines).
3. Water Storage/Surface Relief — assessment area/wetland type condition metric (answer for non -marsh wetlands only)
Check a box in each column for each group below. Select the appropriate storage for the assessment area (AA) and the wetland
type (M•
AA WT
3a. (- � A Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water > 1 foot deep
B r, B Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 6 inches to 1 foot deep
t'" C C Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
t'•"•;+ D (i D Depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
3b. ;A Evidence .that maximum depth of inundation is greater than 2 feet
(71 B Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is between 1 and 2 feet
(*"+C Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is less than 1 foot

4. Soil Texture/Structure — assessment area condition metric
Check a box from each of the three soil property groups below. Dig soil profile in the dominant assessment area landscape
feature. Make soil observations within the 12 inches. Use most recent National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils guidance for
regional indicators.
4a. i"` A Sandy soil
(7: B Loamy or clayey soils exhibiting redoximorphic features (concentrations, depletions, or rhizospheres)
(-j C Loamy or clayey soils not exhibiting redoximorphic features
D Loamy or clayey gl'eyed soil
E Histosol or histic epipedon
4b. (7,A Soil ribbon < 1 inch
(, B Soil ribbon z 1 inch
4c. (F,A No peat or muck presence
B A peat or muck presence
5. Discharge into Wetland — opportunity metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface pollutants or discharges (Surf) and sub -surface pollutants or discharges (Sub).
Examples of sub -surface discharges include presence of nearby septic tank, underground storage tank (UST), etc.
Surf Sub
(`:A (}A Little or no evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the assessment area
�+ B (:, B Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the wetland and stressing, but not overwhelming the
treatment capacity of the assessment area
r_. -C C,, C Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges (pathogen, particulate, or soluble) entering the assessment area and
potentially overwhelming the treatment capacity of the wetland (water discoloration, dead vegetation, excessive
sedimentation, odor)
6. Land Use — opportunity metric
Check all that apply (at least one box in each column). Evaluation involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. Consider sources
draining to assessment area within entire upstream watershed (WS), within 5 miles and within the watershed draining to the
assessment area (5M), and within 2 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment area (2M). Effective riparian buffers
are considered to be 50 feet wide in the Coastal Plain and Piedmont ecoregions and 30 feet wide in the Blue Ridge Mountains ecoregion.
WS 5M 2M
F-] A [- A r A z 10% impervious surfaces
r B r. B f- B < 10% impervious surfaces
r C F C r C Confined animal operations (or other local, concentrated source of pollutants)
f- D r, D 17 D z 20% coverage of pasture
rE (- E r E Z 20% coverage of agricultural land (regularly plowed land)
r F 17 F I- F z 20% coverage of maintained grass/herb
G
F3 G F G a 20% coverage of clear-cut land
f_ J H i✓• H CZ., H Little or no opportunity to improve water quality. Lack of opportunity may result from hydrologic alterations
that prevent drainage or overbank flow from affecting the assessment area.
7. Wetland Acting as Vegetated Buffer— assessment area/wetland complex condition metric
7a. Is assessment area within 50 feet of a tributary or other open water?
C?Yes �' No If Yes, continue to 7b. If No, skip to Metric 8.
Wetland buffer need only be present on one side of the water body. Make bufferjudgment based on the average width of the wetland.
Record a note if a portion of the buffer has been removed or disturbed.
7b. How much of the first 50 feet from the bank is weltand? Descriptor E should be selected if ditches effectively bypass the buffer.
('j A z 50 feet
(-j B From 30 to < 50 feet
C From 15 to < 30 feet
("? D From 5 to < 15 feet
E < 5 feet or buffer bypassed by ditches
7c. Tributary width. If the tributary is anastomosed, combine widths of channels/braids for a total width.
0 515 -feet wide % > 15 -feet wide (7) Other open water (no tributary present)
7d. Do roots of assessment area vegetation extend into the bank of the tributary/open water?
(� Yes
)No
7e. Is tributary or other open water sheltered or exposed?
C7 Sheltered — adjacent open water with width < 2500 feet and no regular boat traffic.
(`,, Exposed — adjacent open water with width >_ 2500 feet or regular boat traffic.
8. Wetland Width at the Assessment Area — wetland type/wetland complex metric (evaluate for riparian wetlands only)
Check a box in each column. Select the average width for the wetland type at the assessment area (WT)
and the wetland complex at the assessment areas (WC). See User Manual for WT and WC boundaries.
WT WC
("=A r A a 100 feet
{`f B (7: B From 80 to < 100 feet
(: C (: C From 50 to < 80 feet
("1 D r,, D From 40 to < 50 feet
= E ;") E From 30 to < 40 feet
(71 F {,, F From 15 to < 30 feet
(7, G G From 5 to < 15 feet
C,H rjH <5feet

9. Inundation Duration - assessment area condition metric
Answer for assessment area dominant landform.
A Evidence of short -duration inundation (< 7 consecutive days)
r: B Evidence of saturation, without evidence of inundation
(7� C Evidence of long -duration inundation or very long -duration inundation (7 to 30 consecutive days or more)
10. Indicators of Deposition - assessment area condition metric
Consider recent deposition only (no plant growth since deposition).
C:,A Sediment deposition is not excessive, but at approximately natural levels.
` B Sediment deposition is excessive, but not overwhelming the wetland.
{" C Sediment deposition is excessive and is overwhelming the wetland.
11. Wetland Size - wetland type/wetland complex condition metric
Check a box in each column. Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric evaluates three aspects of the wetland area: the
size of the wetland type (WT), the size of the wetland complex (WC), and the size of the forested wetland (FW) (if applicable, see User
Manual). See the User Manual for boundaries of these evaluation areas. If assessment area is clear-cut, select "K" for the FW column.
WT
WC
FW (if applicable)
(7,+A
(7" A
r A
a 500 acres
(7: B
(" - B
(r', B
From 100 to < 500 acres
C
tr%C
(7jC
From 50 to < 100 acres
(- D
r D
; D
From 25 to < 50 acres
("" E
{" E
(" E
From 10 to < 25 acres
(r F
(7) F
r. F
From 5 to < 10 acres
(" G
(7G
(" G
From 1 to < 5 acres
H
rj H
{"1 H
From 0.5 to < 1 acre
(:..1
(#7,.l
(:_: I
From 0.1 to < 0.5 acre
'{J
{',9J
(":J
From 0.01 to <0.1 acre
rj K
("r K
(""= K
< 0.01 acre or assessment area is clear-cut
12. Wetland Intactness - wetland type condition metric (evaluate for Pocosins only)
(7j A Pocosin is the full extent (>- 90%) of its natural landscape size.
(": B Pocosin is < 90% of the full extent of its natural landscape size.
13. Connectivity to Other Natural Areas - landscape condition metric
13a. Check appropriate box(es) (a box may be checked in each column). Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This
evaluates whether the wetland is well connected (Well) and/or loosely connected (Loosely) to the landscape patch, the contiguous
metric naturally vegetated area and open water (if appropriate). Boundaries are formed by four -lane roads, regularly maintained utility
line corridors the width of a four -lane road or wider, urban landscapes, fields (pasture open and agriculture), or water > 300 feet wide.
Well Loosely
( A
n
>- 500 acres
B
;� B
From 100 to < 500 acres
C) C
(7,C
From 50 to < 100 acres
0 D
(r' D
From 10 to < 50 acres
rE
rj E
< 10 acres
("; F
(:: F
Wetland type has a poor or no connection to other natural habitats
13b. Evaluate for marshes only.
C73 Yes (":No Wetland type has a surface hydrology connection to open waters/stream or tidal wetlands.
14. Edge Effect - wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
May involve a GIS effort with field adjustment. Estimate distance from wetland type boundary to artificial edges. Artificial edges include
non -forested areas z 40 feet wide such as fields, development, roads, regularly maintained utility line corridors and clear -cuts.
Consider the eight main points of the compass.
(^? A No artificial edge within 150 feet in all directions
B No artificial edge within 150 feet in four (4) to seven (7) directions
fa C An artificial edge occurs within 150 feet in more than four (4) directions or assessment area is clear-cut
15. Vegetative Composition - assessment area condition metric (skip for all marshes and Pine Fiat)
CCA Vegetation is close to reference condition in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of appropriate
species, with exotic plants absent or sparse within the assessment area.
{± B Vegetation is different from reference condition in species diversity or proportions, but still largely composed of native species
characteristic of the wetland type. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clearcutting or
clearing. It also includes communities with exotics present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata.
(` C Vegetation severely altered from reference in composition. Expected species are unnaturally absent (planted stands of non -
characteristic species or at least one stratum inappropriately composed of a single species). Exotic species are dominant in
at least one stratum.
16. Vegetative Diversity - assessment area condition metric (evaluate for Non -tidal Freshwater Marsh only)
f `aA Vegetation diversity is high and is composed primarily of native species (<10% cover of exotics).
( i B Vegetation diversity is low or has > 10% to 50% cover of exotics.
(_`., C Vegetation is dominated by exotic species (>50% cover of exotics).

17. Vegetative Structure — assessment area/wetland type condition metric
17a. Is vegetation present?
t:' Yes 0 No If Yes, continue to 17b. If No, skip to Metric 18.
17b. Evaluate percent coverage of assessment area vegetation for all marshes only. Skip to 17c for non -marsh wetlands.
C:A z 25% coverage of vegetation
t"`. B < 25% coverage of vegetation
17c. Check a box in each column for each stratum. Evaluate this portion of the metric for non -marsh wetlands. Consider structure
in airspace
Dense shrub layer
above the assessment area (AA) and the wetland type (WT) separately.
B
AA
WT
C:,, C
o{"
C:
A
f+} B
;' j A
{! B
Canopy closed, or nearly closed, with natural gaps associated with natural processes
Canopy but
B
{,. B
Moderate density herb layer
present, opened more than natural gaps
v
,C C
tr . C
Canopy sparse or absent
o
iC'A
(7�A
Dense mid-story/sapling layer
rF,B
0' , B
Moderate density mid-story/sapling layer
Ci C
f"= C
Mid-story/sapling layer sparse or absent
riA
f :A
Dense shrub layer
B.
B
Moderate density shrub layer
0 #: • C
C:,, C
Shrub layer sparse or absent
A
) A
(-
Dense herb layer
B
{,. B
Moderate density herb layer
YZ (''=C
(-� C
Herb layer sparse or absent
18. Snags — wetland type condition metric
C" .rA Large snags (more than one) are visible (> 12 -inches DBH, or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
t+, B Not A
19. Diameter Class Distribution — wetland type condition metric
{"°:A Majority of canopy trees have stems > 6 inches in diameter at breast height (DBH); many large trees (> 12 inches DBH) are
present.
(:} B Majority of canopy trees have stems between 6 and 12 inches DBH, few are > 12 -inch DBH.
d"a G Majority of canopy trees are < 6 inches DBH or no trees.
20. Large Woody Debris — wetland type condition metric
Include both natural debris and man -placed natural debris.
ALarge logs (more than one) are visible (> 12 inches in diameter, or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
(-t,B Not
V. Vegetation/Open Water Dispersion — wetland typelopen water condition metric (evaluate for Non -Tidal Freshwater
Marsh only)
Select the figure that best describes the amount of interspersion between vegetation and open water in the growing season. Patterned
areas indicate vegetated "areas, while solid white areas indicate open water.
{'<AB ffC f"D
r j
22. Hydrologic Connectivity — assessment area condition metric (evaluate for riparian wetlands only)
Examples of activities that may severely alter hydrologic connectivity include intensive
ditching, fill, sedimentation, channelization, diversion, man-made berms, beaver dams, and stream incision.
"'; A Overbank and overland flow are not severely altered in the assessment area.
j B Overbank flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
t: C Overland flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
{ r D Both overbank and overland flow are severely altered in the assessment area.
Notes

wetland photo
station
ohemeral
nature photo
1,-4wetland im
ephemeral
feature photo
station
area
t
1
ake County, City of Raleigh
NDisclaimer
0 205 410 820 Fee[ Maps makes every effort to produce and publish
the most current and accurate information possible.
I i i I i i i I However, the maps are produced for information purposes,
1 inch = 400 feet and are NOT surveys. No warranties, expressed or implied
,are provided for the data therein, its use, or its interpretation.

Arcadia Ridge, Apex, NC
Wetland Impact Area

WC' 1hWA CfrPam Tr1pnfiitrnfinn Fnrm Versinn 4.11 PO I ti- 4.
Date: a ll S
Project/Site: Gus inp s 1Ll
Latitude: 3 3 0�
Evaluator: .
County: `,,} f
�p�
Longitude: ` 761t 1451
Total Points:
§UeamMatermination (circle one)
Other
Stream is at !east intermittent
Ephemeral ntermittent Perennial
e.g Quad Name:
if 1=19 or emnnfat ff 2:30*
2
3
eomor holo Subtotal = (O'
A. Geomorphology'
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1 a Continuity of,channel, bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step-pool,(i
d le= ool sequence
a
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
6.Active/relictfloodplain .
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
T'Recent alluvial deposits
-10
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
9
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
N = 0]
Yes = 3
Ir
artificial ditches are not rated; see diiscussions in manual
R 14wirninnv mfihtntni = q • S 1
12. Presence of Baseflow
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria -
0 1 2
1 2
3
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5 1 - 0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0 e
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0 ,1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0 Y ,_
3
f: RinTnnv M"MAtal
18. Fibrous roots in streambed`
3
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
0
20'., Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
w1
2 ,
3
21. Aquatic MollusksCO-)
1
2 _
3
22. Fish
0
0.5_
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0.5
1
1.5
24, Amphibians
;toot
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0.5
1
1.5 '
26. Wetland plants, In streambed_
FACW = 0,75; OBL =_ 1.5 Other 0
"perennial streams may also be Identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:
OVA
Ir

Point A -upstream
Point A -downstream

NC DWn Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: a �� l 5
Project/Site:GAS i rD JVA
Latitude: 315,._Pa f p
Evaluator: 3 � b 0
County: 0036e
Longitude: _7 U
Total Points:, 11
Stream Is at least Intermittent t�
S etermination (circle one)
hem Intermittent Perennial
Other
e.g. Quad Name:
ff a 19 or erennla1 if z 30•
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
A. Geomorphology Subtotal =� • `S
Absent
Weak
Mod ate
Strong
1a' Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
1,16. Organic debris lines or piles
17.8 olkba "sed evidence of high water table?
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
22. Fish
23. Crayfish 0
2
.3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool. sequence
,0
0.5
2
3
4. Particlesize.of stream substrate
0.5
1
1.5
3
5. Activefreiictfloodplain
OBL =1.5 Other - 0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
NokDo No-Do
Yes =. 3
dMclal ditches are not rated; see discussions In manual
B . H drolo Subtotal = "
12. Presence of Basedow
0 1 2 3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
1 2 3
14. Leaf lifter
1.5 • 0 0
15: Sediment on plants or debris'
0, Qt6j 1.5
1,16. Organic debris lines or piles
17.8 olkba "sed evidence of high water table?
0 0.5 1 1.5
' . No = 0 Y = 3
C Blology fSubtotal =
18. Fibrous'roots in streambed 3
2
0,
19. Rooted upland plants In streambed 3
2
0
20. Macrobenihos (note diversity and abundance)
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1 _
1
2
2
3
3
22. Fish
23. Crayfish 0
0.5
0.5
1
1
1.5
1.5
24. Amphibians I ON
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae IN
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75;
OBL =1.5 Other - 0
'perennial stream_ s may also'be Identified using other methods. See p. 3.5 of manual''.
Notes: 1jjejpy3
VAA1, i
drovat�3
Sketch: �i

Point B -upstream
Point B -downstream

THE SIGNATURES KID® eeOW CWrYTHAT THE$ SU=ET HA9 bl o REVIEW/9T MO APPROV W SOLELY
PER FI n N9 SIGN® ON THC HeCf OF THESE WN5TRUC11ON MANL9.
/1� A[/A
CM I G
AM rue 0 ENV. PROGRAMS 9DAM
CKA ���
4
-1RANSPORZA710N LNG Arz
4,4 AZ__
CIN -019PCCTIONS DAT[ PaNN1N - ATION 0 TE
PUSUC WORMp-WATVV5ENER DATE PIXG D Te
FIHi11C w Pu -rC DAR r SDN lalwvx RG. DA �
(J J
rueuc wORK5-94e DATe
`��`
�• ��J�•_
USI.: SLNGIE FAMILY I
1
l
FIN- 0721 2955 96
iT
= �1�5E: SINGLE FAMILY 1
_� _
pW; 0721--29-5445
ZONED- R-5CW
L"u' SINGLE PMARY
1
�J
NANCYWA R
MN:0721-19-7520
ZONED: R -00W
LI VA
NICNPEL LAWRENCE
MN:0721-167GI9
ZONED: R4OY7
USE SINGLE FAMILY
MCHAEL LAWRENCE
PIN: 0721-16785=
ZONED:X-0
USE: SINGLE FAMILY
Q2
K C:
Z ----------------
C)m
Q01 Z
K �
Q �
L
aaj
MIFIIAEL LAARENCE
FIN: 0721-167619
ZONED: R-0
USC SINGLE FAMILY
SHIRLGYCARAWAY
FIN: 0721-39-0461
ZONED: R-0OW
USG 5114GLE FAMILY
SHIRLEY CARAWAY
PIN: 0721-39-3376
ZONED: R-000
USE: SINGLE rANILY
HALEY FAMILY 5He RGLIY UC
FIN: 0721.39-7579
ZONm: R-0Ow
USE: 501F.LE F—LY
J c
J m
CL Q.
O
Z J
p� LU E
W
N W N
Z c
c
0
i LL,
c
c
0
W
U
211 N. SALEM ST.
SULTE 001
PO BOX 1062
APEX, INC 27502
OfR.: 919.387-1174
Regctrntlon: P-0151
WYIYLIanaCIOWn.t010
Z�
�0
'g
F� z
IL
Lu
C 0
J
Q Z J
J
Q O
LLJQ
Ln
W
L�
I'= 100' FSMJ
JULY G, 2015
IMLs TRC REVIfw
nwls PERTRc
0 50 100 200
2
GRAPHIC SCALE
1260-2

•, •\ •\ `=--�c_<_„ 'r'.�� :\ __-'__•' .I• 'I - n♦ i I ; I 1 { i i ; I ' , , ._----_ - _ `__ I' J C
, . ♦ I` '\ I `-�_ -qii_ -,1�>� � / �� ________ :e`•1______-- `__ , ; { ' I i �l -_____ '_' ' II; J ID
CL
`-_i -_ - __ ,11i 11' i i i i 1 - ,' ( \� i i ;', `_ -_ ____'__"' {r:^y[^/d/♦7 CL
"� I' -CL
---"--- , V
�'7,,,°- Ot,�� _y ��' i- - ```-,�`• `i ' ; i i ' 1 1 , _` i i i A _ _____________'__' _-,
C{'
I4444ppppi `'�, 1 - 'as"O�^n` 'i'_i ___ a''. ``♦ `' ```V I) , I I (/ ' , ' 'I I ' ---_
' -- - ; �1 1 'i i 1" /' 'rr•,la - -1 waH` 1 _, ' - Wa.(..., . � .` ` i I I 1 1 J 1 I1 1 C
--- 11.1 r---' $ _ ; 1 ob
Lu E
_` �1- F.••r ,I '; i\`, \`'�it LLI 01
��`'��,
I u __ ,' �4:r�__� � �-_� _ ,�'�\ ��'- :`_ � ; i ,_'yam= =-s%3 C
' rI' CPI
-- 1 r - -- ' -- -- --ZE:s
_ /KY!''' IA1 Il it°� it �' _ - — __--_� _�` • C' - }}}���/-- I$/ II I ' U
' A°at' /� i _ ' j I _1�1�.11..-- — r
''I _r'!' - _ ,I i 1 $ I \' i'' -I '�' af' ' 's°' C
'i
r`-- $}n,',-- -- C
--1p1 N O ' '
/! t� f , i I E �'. I nI i,°, i . �� � c
�T----,!--- �I i'1� -.y , w
_ „II„I It ;�,- g
' r•- _. - y n . ,},n. = '(i/i '� i � 'i ��';• / / '^ � � � i n _ � _ ,�'i I � e i-; i - - � ' i i/ ,
i i _•” �jyr it �,p�-fF. '14'______' :i �, '.�.�//:' �� - ci;L�a Qx ._1 I -'� �Il� �'b-/i ' i 721 N. SALEM ST..
;lil '1 IJ I'i�,�,_ _ ''l, /I', ;;, - - '�'o .-li%%' �' 1'( v 1 /.i e. �' ©-~-i-sivtia �� I`- - --, 'n'J.'I'a �- -- -' ,`•SUITE 001
PO BOX 1062
APEX NC 77502
Offllx 919-W-1174 Istretlon: P-0151
�'._----------
" _ ' ``:•,//'%!, .'r 1I X11' - fri`u - ;` `♦ I `JJ-_ _ >'- - _JLLi�'':' �0-- '
']-.i'' •`. /J I-,��'i I `'.� ``-- - _ ___ 1 ``i'�"`�'L__``- '.`t' -C
•--- ____- •`_ ' '-"' : / _,ice , . . / ` —
` ` 'i
r•9 %
' I' �� '
IT.y 11` -
J a
r.
--------------
----- ; ; , ; 1111 ♦ m �° r'Iq r ®`7
' II 1 1. --
_- -_ - ,rte _ -
i i 1' i 1' '� ri'�!'♦. ey 6 _ n r Vl_ \ :n" '" �r GINL;•.•' �;:
'. `. w.r:.m ✓-I - , _ , I d �` • `` _ +•- LJ$aeG I r `` I _L__- , Oar u
I �I I``------ --'-- ; , , f,�`,` \ , , ' ` !, .d - ''----` _ '1 � '_ f_��dy Ir --'-,1 ` '�`
m>...•,.a 1,n* A, /%rI" ',i 11 - I ud.,a 3" I
---- 1 i '1i` iii'liu'I � . i d ``�, �'`i \' i ='<-1
1 i '',ii ''''i'\1``'r� ,�� =�:Fa�tg 1�<..-. -- /;� j`Y _\ \ 2Y ; f`�•. `/
11'i
1
` I•.: 1'1� �``. / '� Y : ' N Ir
r('ii..
\�
,\�\�`.�` `` `` - , ``i I �'T.a'- ' 1..,.i' 1 I 1 r ( 5 - 1 ��•� ` a,l♦ 1,♦` `` / , 1
/
_ _ ' ,� i �n1 I , -. i i,i �!'i 1`I''',� ('' �\\ -----'`- r = ..a°' I, a"i � %�''' 1 i }1' I 1 � i !; �= L_ � ' \`�'` _.�/ �r N ' 3 � 1 � ♦
/
- ,``2 ` - '' ;; 1 I � `C '`�`` , �1 '`. `` ----` 1 I I , 1 Y-• y 1--I-t I / �` /�� ,I � 1
/� f� i• • t.7r w.m.,'`i �,�♦ :' � `---- ' '®' i i �e a 1�I' �i'1=C�-- moi\ / // =/i, 1>♦\ e`a "ta`S � a �% „ 1, � o ._ � z
a'
_ ,_ ' rel, I tl I I M�Sr _ — '' \��`"`:.®_ __- ''I' i/I'I ''1/' 1'll' /1 , ` � T — I� S',A _�•\�\ /j \ 0�\a`\ ,'�-%��' � LL U
I I` .s' \Tfi`s- , grsr ':' Q'r :�,.�.�b=c;7i11(1 , ' ' ' ' ' 1 'y91\r \•\C `\p'``,'` /1i\a,
� ter, g
_-� i�� r _I �`. ,/-A' �• r 1'° ' r i'i�,i' i J :� � \,\+',i I f j \�' i\' I``• `_.
r\i` Q 3
�}�,rr.•dn.,yf�,', !T''�'_�i.'I i Y \``L�"�`�� `,` , 1 � 1 � , I 1 ' � \'` � I A •°\1-J
p' /' _ .'ii%i1� { / ' ' J ' { ' ! • ~ ' -+I y In. '' 1 l01 I i I i I 1`\ 1P�1 z
/I''Y�'1 , I ^ : • I -:�:: n , ,i ( , SBA'-'"�Y i Ali I I 11 ' Ilk
' it ��`" `''i,' ' I ilf
.1 `` '-- • ,I �' B I,� I I' i i / � _'`� � L' ',' n`,``'® -_ -_ 1 o -n �' i '-� � - �l o � `� ,` 11, 1' ♦ -`----- O z
ry' 11 I ✓ / 1 , dial , ` ``` _`-' , ,\`Iy .e.m ` o — ��y yy}��/,1 9 1 I I W
' i II•�`1 P I ' , �'/ - ill 1 `_i ' '// I `
\r i 1i \', \' '�..:.i � rJ'i "�xf;.id�� ♦ `� l�w°'"'�i�' I �''f ,'i i i ``\i i ; i r ' ' i `.� '-"__ -_-_'_ __ '_ ®��°.`., �ft�� ' � /, � 1 _� � Yc � _ �`, ``` i�l0v i ' y ;'� - _____ (n 1�' O
--------
----------
X
-----
�.e-• Z
--- I I I''�I1 ♦1 - �'' �b.r��'','i/, 7 , 1 , �� 1 t I\ % __ ' -NG i_ol% Y I . �' % : 1'� ' � ° >�-�--,tiX -
-- -- L, 'i•, ' 11 T;' I ' �.T.d %1+,,�,, Ji : ' i1 i ��! i ' � 1 ���\!♦ ---Tla _ -
/`� _i_� if -• Yom\ i1 T lil f
.� \ - _ _ y,,.B< / =Jl:'�- --''.' ' ' i n Iii `__ _0' In V
♦
`. °Z1 }♦'�'! I ``\ ``�`-"� ' `I ' �iY�`. `: t, -G'_ 'may`. "'.�"''" '%., '� >-�'- _ A/SC /''D ' i 11 ' i ,,h; "'yn r -----1N i O
1111 l/ - -�= - r \, I 1 _
/ . `_, /�, n I ' it'!`r-_ �
i / _ ' -_ ''�%'� jL_ Y/ r J IIi ♦\,'
` '-. ``.�` `� i i`it+,�g; >a °Aw°��»rom; '• ' / if''i�''IJ . �I I'� •♦(%C �^. `` ,.•J' �'1----__-{ 1--- : � � ��1 1 r ,1\��` � ° �'�♦INA----- �' i -. z
Nores: iii II(111``h' nwr,i s-y,.�r�', �`•.' a,/1 i ` / f '\_'_r - ; ^�' �'-�-'-1_ 1 _ .�/ r \ I♦ ,'�,� I 1 i I_ �:' -- ( l 1n
I'�i I `2'<'_ - � �7-m..,".�as-= __ : '>•y./ - - - , Ls J
I. ALLCONSTRUCIIONANDMATERIAL9SIWLCONFDRMTOTONMOPAPEM STAN DARDS AND WECMCATIONS. `-� IAI! II `'� li,J 11 `1, I;' `'� -'��♦` 7- �- _ -`Ie �____' ♦�\ \1,; ,L %'L;J
2. DOUNOARYANDTOPOGRAPHICINFOR`IIONINFORMATIONTAFEN1.ASURVC/PROVIDEDBYSMIRII `�. IIII I� 11 ,7 ,1` .♦. `` ll' 'a- \-� - 1-\___--�i J, I'•♦\�`♦`'` \ '\ ,'iI In
srnnn-suRVEYORS. --- ,M�I', dl' // �```'k Y� -i: /':L •"'\ -- ,�-�'. _I -i '� _\ \'I: V1
i
�. me SDE B M THE PRaAA.FY wATerssn©PRDTFaIDN OVERLAY DISTRICT. 1 '
No 100-TT1Jt rLpCDPWN ON me --- -
5. PER FEMA MAP /37200 2100) DA1TD 02 MAY 2006 MERE IS , `
rROPERiY. "---- `J',' 11111 '- �•' --__ ----------' '`I `` � /i' ' `----- �\--- - "-'''" --- ' ----___�._ `l-``• `_----------
r
. mE5REnA90EENevAUTATEDFORTMEe%ISiENCEWN2ilANDSANvsrRWJ15. TM LOCATION OF THESE ``l, t ', ° I // -- ; , `;_` -- --- --`_-- -`, �',,h_ - - - .� -� -_-= ` - -- ` - 1 , ` a -\-'U°'----' '-----V
J tix
---- - - W
�. y ---- --- _-- - s-- '_--- -- --
CNVIRONMENTPLrCATUR61NCU101NG STREAM BURQt9 ARE 5HOV/r10.95URVEYCD. TOWN OF APpt `. •'PQC{` � � ,% I I '--- ---------- -' I" --�".�-- -'- '� -
PRDJ[CT� 15 2.
•.� .� `-_ `.,J. I� pl `-----------`-� r` �� -! :�-�-�.
_ - _ _ _ \ _
0. LETTER tI ASN TO5 BATEvI VII SEDT MOR TANNG DOVIII mE OnSnNMWIT. RIRE A ` I Y ' _____-_-______ _ _ _ _-____
-----------
LETTER Or ASEBT05 ABATG/Q°i(YILL NEED TO ACCOMPANYmEAPPt1GT10N FOR RRMR. ,' f-_' ,/ _ _ �_______ .!, ___ \ - _
♦ r 1^1
V !
.� `. �`` i ni`. � N __- �' ` ri ;'_' _ .�".-- • -•c�S -------- - -- - - --- - -1 `ITS _ L -- -
9. ANYANDALLEXBnNGMLWAND 5E XTANR55nALLEEREMOVEDANDORABAN EDA COWMNGTO , ` `______ \ Ir II 11.. �„- 1 ; yl -r_ „- J_F': �t '��- �-�-\ _ �` _____--
wARE couNmnrxm DEPaxrMenr sPcclnuncNs. �` �..,------`� -lam �.y I -_
-'--- �\ ` _
1,''4 I; il� v't \!��___ ____ r ,; Iii '/ /i'' /��/ /`\\ • �\\\� \ �� `__-------- ' _ \ ♦ `-__. Z
r� z3O
------ `----- /+K' , /// \� :\\\-�_� \\ \ ��_- - -- LL •-
_V`,\`:\\ \� --- I'=100'SMJ
mESIGNATURD APID®er10WCCRfIPI TMATm8SnL2T NA9 OEEN REVIEWED AND APPROVED SOU3Y Ii` I ` ; / \\ .�' i `
FER mC SSIGNED ON mE neer Or TM5 olt5mlcnON PWB. 1 ;; J'S11 \\ -�. ��ITi` ��` // // /' /�//b " '�••v �. \n`.��\ `` !\-\\�� /�• _-��`-------•
/o( '� A{I$ ``'`.I ! ,A `��.. Jdl', •-Z`' _.[;`��! // j'/ si'' �:�y \ `� �\ \ \ \.� ,. /r / .� __ -. JULY G. 2015
CM -BIGINMMG OAR RK9 - FJIV. PRIKRM.l9 Are lu lawttP ? e'\_ r , 'R - �/ /'- '>T C,{. \ ' .� \\ `.� \ • . • . • : • : • : 1
pl-TRANSPDRTATION DATE NG DATE
A/ d fT `f' }M 1 } I,'' / / 7 fix"-/ v \\\ \ \ \ • • --/ % / h L `.
ate,_ .- ax,•1,l.eon. .\.\�\\ \\\ \'!/; ;`/: �Q ,
;T r
LM- ING IN9 ON5 �D.AJT[ / PIANNMG-TRANSPORTATION DATE I `M-yzs ' �I �/' '\ \ `. ; \\ `.\ f, -
/•^IIS ; ' , .91r�. A', `-----`\
` - Y
rU WORKI-WATERSEWER DAR Fl DATE4T7Dd� `.____/I , 1 l-,. __��. ���: /� \\ti \\ I 0 50 100 200
PUEUC WORt:9-CU.CIWC DAM nON 1 CVDURAL RE5. DAM /i 'r' - - `-- _ •may \ \
c W>7IDc9 -DIE own
Placu' % 1i -- t ,
- - — GRAPFIIC SCALE
1 2GO-2

<1111111i'M
MICHAEL LAWRENCN
PIN: 0721-18-7G 19
ZONED: K -50W X
1,151f: 51NGLE FAMILY
01111 1
01
till/ I
'EA III
170
95
K,
U -Y9
0/7G,
A 17
/j//
IJ/Y,1
MICHAEL LAWRE I �` _ _ _ _ Q / 1.6 / /
PIN: ,O-721-18-7886 —
/ZONED: R-80WII I ------ 20
—1-151f: 5NGLf—ffAMItY—
NJ AI OGJ4
X"
f
(G I
03
235
\'-/ /� I II I \\\ / // / /-•.'/:... / If 241
7L-;
Ml?g,LAWRfN(,L
IN 15-76 19
7
ZONED: P 5
<Y
1-80 .... — — --
U51f:,9INGLIf f;
J
/30
z
..... .....
GRAPHIC SCALE
c u tp
(5 z
Z
, Z-,
S
K Sam ST.
S==
po am *a
AM NC 97=
OR= 919167-1174
ftlotl t1m: "31
ON
1-=GOI 5M1
12/15115
I - 2
I 12GO-2

A—a , Wdgc M -a 4 t 5
G.tt.,
MOM!
I . ALL G0115TKUCNON AND MAI MALL 5HALL CONPOR TO TOWN OF AMIN STANDAWS AND
5" IFICA710N5.
2. ml DEVELOPER SHALL INSTALL WLAMER RESISTANT TEMPORARY ROAD NAME 5GN5 AT ALL
IMOUCi101S PRIOR TO MAT ARRIVAL mE5e TMIPOKARY 5IeN5 5HA3L BE MAINTANED BY THE
ME E OFER UNTIL RCFIALED BY TH[ FBNAANENT 5161,15.
3. CON5TRJCn V 10.E FARXING SHALL BE LIMITED TO ONE SIDE Of THE ROAD VTOSIR OF PRE
t"RANT51. 5WG O RSICAMI 4 %O CON$TRUCNON VEr KU 5 THIS SIDE OF STREP 5MA L M R
ENGU511AN0 5FANSM. ONCE me FIRST UR OF ASFHKT S PASSABLE BY VINCLE9. TEMFORARY
5TREET SIGNS SMALL BE REQUIRED.
4. SILT FENCE INSTALLATION SHALL MAINTAIN 3 OF CLEARANCE AROM FRE HYDRAN75.
GRADING NOTES
I . TH15 PROJECT WILL GRADE LE55 THAN 50% OF
THE LOTS DURING THE GRADING PHASE OF THE
PROJECT AND MAKING THI5 PROJECT A STAGED
GRADING PROJECT.
2. PHASES 4 AND 5 ALL DRAIN INTO ONE DRAINAGE
OA51N AND THAT DRAINAGE BA51N INTEGRITY 15
BEING MAINTAINED. 50 APPROXIMATELY 90% OF
THE PRE-DEVCLDFMENT DRAINAGE AREAS ARE
BEING PRE5ERVW.
LOT GRADING:
LOT5 T AL LOTS % F LOTS
T PROJECT I 4r%
PHASE4 26 56 146%
FHASE5 134 174 46%
PPu m�CERI�AF�SIGH9 F,7/,,7 �Y/LS
CM GNGII CLANG RAS -RNV. FROGINACRS IM
pA-TRANSFORfATION DAR 1E
Cm -4(�fi! i E NG
INBFECTNONS DAR PLANNING - TRANSPORTATION DATE
PUM10 MOIR! - WAT[RrYW[R DAR A OAR
rJnTa i
W
PUBLIC WOW. GECTpC DAR TION P CUTLRAL M. DAR
014
PUBLX: WOW -5I E DATE
0 SO 100 200
GRAPHIC 5CALE
C U m
J c
C
p
U z 9
o?j
w
LU
Q `
(D 0
w 2
' c
I�
0
rn
c
c
c
w
U
221 N. SALEM ST.
SURE 001
PO BOX 1062
APEX, NC 27502
ORio: 919-387-1174
RRgiRtntim: P-0151
/e
.S
Z�
Q Z
�C
L Z L
W 0 U
UU Z
Q
I..L (�I1�1
Q V
Q U
U Ln w
Q 0
V 1
W
Q
nLn �
LL
<•= I00 5MJ
JULY G. 2015
G
1 2GO-2