The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20160091 Ver 1_Application_20160127Carpenter,Kristi From: Thomson, Nicole J Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2016 3:57 PM To: David.E.Bailey2@usace.army.mil; Wanucha, Dave Cc: Carpenter,Kristi; Powers, Tim; Lancaster, Jamie J; dpetty@tgsengineers.com; Parker, Jerry A Subject: Bridge 75 on SR 1127 (Borland Rd), Orange Co. Attachments: Cover letter Att L Att G.pdf; Bridge 75 USGS.pdf; Bridge 75 soil.pdf; SF-670075 _HYD_SMP_20160105.pdf; SF-670075_Permit Drawings_Buffer_20160105.pdf; SF-670075_Permit Drawings_Stream_20160105.pdf; Wetland and Stream Impact Summary Sheet.pdf; SF-670075 Buffer Impact Summary Sheet.pdf; Bridge 75 New Hope Creek.pdf; 670075 Orange75NoSurvey Architecture 8-28-2013.pdf; 670075 AR13-07-0033NoSitesPresent.pdf; 670075 Email on Stream form.pdf Follow Up Flag: Flag Status: Good afternoon! Follow up Flagged Please see the attached permit application for the proposed replacement of Bridge 75 in Orange County. Let me know if you have any questions or concerns. Thanks so much! Nikki Nicole J. Thomson Division Environmental Supervisor Assistant Division Environmental Office 919-754-7806 Mobile PO Box 14996 Greensboro, NC 27415-4996 Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties. Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties. Transportation January 27, 2016 US Army Corps of Engineers Raleigh Regulatory Field Office Attn: IvL•. David Bailey 3331 Aeritage Trade Dr, Ste. 105 Wake Forest, NC 27587 Attention: Mr. Dave Bailey and Mr. Dave Wanucl�a PAT McCRORY Covernor NICHOLAS J. TENNYSON Seaetary NC Division of Water Resources Winston-Salem Regiona] Office Attn: Mr. Dave Wanucha 450 W. Hanes Mill Rd., Ste. 103 Winston-Salem, NC 27105 Subject: Notification far the replacement of Bridge #75 over New Aope Creek on SR 1127 (Borland Road) in Orange County. WBS # 17BP.7.R.86 Dear IvL•. Bailey and Mr. Wanucha, The North Carolina Department of Transportation is scheduled to replace Bridge #75 with a new bridge at the same location. I have included the Attachments G& L with a project description and a set of the project plans. A stormwater management plan is also attacl�ed. Please review this project for compliance by your Division. We plan to begin construction as soon as possible. If fuMher information is required, please contact Jerry Parker at (336) 256-2063. Your early review and consideration will be appreciated. Sincerely, �� . �z� �� . Mills, P.E. Division Engineer, Division 7 Enclosm�es cc: Tim Powers, NCDOT Barry Harrington, Roadside Environmental Field Operations Engineer Jeremy Warren, NCDOT Chuck Edwards, District 1, Distr�ict Engineer �Nothing Compares� .�_. S�afe ofNotih Camlina � Department ofTrenspo�a�ion � Division ofHiKhmays, Division 7 0�ce 1554 Yanceyville Sheet, Greensboro, NC 27405� P. O. Hox 14996, Greensborq NC 27415-499fi 33G-487-000� Transportation PAT McCRORY Governor NICHOLAS J. TENNYSON Secremry Attachment L: Low Impact Bridge Replacement Process Low Impact Bridge Project No.: B-N/A County: Oranqe Bridge No.75 over New Hope Creek on SR 1127 (Borland Rdl WBS Element Number: 17PB.7.R.86 This project is subject to the Low Impact Bridge Process as agreed to on October 6, 2009. This project meets the documentation requirements and approval procedures under NEPA, as defined by FHWA, for Low Impact Bridge Replacements. This project meets the standards of NCDOT's Minimum Criteria Rules. Date: January 27. 2016 Applicant Name: NCDOT Applicant Address: 1584 Yancewille Street Greensboro, NC 27415 Primary Coutact for Project:_ Jerry A Parker Phone No.: 336-256-2063 Is this an after-the-fact application: Yes X No River Basin: Neuse River Basin Stream Classification: WS-V: NSW; 16-41-1-(0.5)• 03-06-OS Regulatory Authorization Options for this Activity FederaL USACE Nationwide General Permit 3— Maintenance State: General Water Quality Certification #3883 and/or Buffer Authorization Local: None Project Description — The project consists of replacing Bridge #75 over New Hope Creek on SR 1127 (Borland Road) and improving roadway approaches. The existing 36' long X 20' wide, timber deck with timber joists, timber caps, posts and piles at end and interior bents and concrete encased timber abutments, dual span bridge is structurally deficient and will be replaced with a new, single span 70' L X 30' W, cored slab, single span bridge at the same location. An oft=site detour will be utilized during construction. The project involves no wetland impacts (tl�ere are no wetlands within the project area), 34 linear feet of temporary stream impacts (associated with the �Nothing Compares�.._ StateofNotlhCaroli��a � DepahinentofTransporta�ion � DivisionofHigh�vays,Division70�ce 1584 Yanceyville Street, Greensboro, NC 27405� P. O. Box 14996, Greensbom, NC 27415-4996 33G487-0000 �:5}. 7Yansportation PAT McCRORY Govemor NICHOLAS J. TENNYSON Secretary possible use of an impervious dike to remove the western bent) and 3,633 square feet of Jordan Lake Riparian buffer impact (2,416 sq. fr. Zone 1 and 1,217 sq. ft. Zone 2) and are listed as "allowable" per the Jordan Lake Riparian Buffer Rules Table of Uses. There are no deck drains on the bridge; instead, stormwater runoff will be captw�ed at 2 proposed drop inlets and discharged into existing roadside ditches and outlet at non-erosive velocities. Biologists from the Biological Surveys Group surveyed the project site for the Dwarf Wedgemussel (Alasmidonta heterodon) and determined that the mussel does not existing within the project vicinity and therefore issued a"no effecY' detennination (see attached letter). Habitat surveys for the Red Cockaded Woodpecker, Michaux's Sumac and Smooth Coneflower determined that there is no habitat for any of the named species, nor any specimens present, within the project area. The Bald Eagle is protected in every county in North Carolina under the Bald and Gold Eagle Protection Act; however, no suitable feeding/water source is located within one mite of the project study area to suppo�i Bald Eagle l�abitat. Also, Mr. Gary Jordan (USFWS) recently released the Programmatic Conference Opinion (PCO) for the recently listed Nortl�ern Long Eared Bat (NLEB). This opinion, states in part, that "... rt rs the Servrce's conference opinion that NCDOT activities in eastern North Carolina (Divisions 1-8), as proposed, are not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of the NLEB. " Signature: _�- � . l� ��'t-�"�J �� M � Print Name: � �, � �, � Title: �� i5� OV-1 TiV�j� YlL°C6' � �Nothing Compares`�.��_. S�ateofNorthCarolina � DepartmentoFTranspotlation � Divisio�ofHighways,Division70ffice ISS4 Yanceyville Street, Greeneboro, NC 27405� P. O. Box 14996, Greensboro, NC 274 t5-4996 � 336-487-0000 Structure No. s�oo�5 WBS 17BP.7.R.86 COun Orange Brid e Number 75 D05CPI tiofl Bridge No. 75 over New Hope Creek on SR 1127 Baeln Cape Fear ClassHication ws-v; Nsw Strsem SIN is�i-i-{a.e> T New Hope Creek - Perennial gj� Length = 237 fl W itllh = 10 -15 fl Timber deck on limber joists, end and interior benls: Type timber caps on limber piles, concre�e encased. Existing Structure oouwe s ar, Siie 36 ft. x 20 ft. SuH. Ratin � e.�s Proposed Structur T 24" Cored Slab Bridge-Single Span Size (w�am�om a cuq �o n. x ao n. Strs�m USACE Im aets LF Y Non 40A Im cts LF No USACE Im actc AC No WNl�nds Non,041m acts AC No CAMA Im ects AC No NC DWC BuHen Im cts SF Y Bulfer A Ifcatfon Ra ulred >40 k Y/IJ � NC DWQ StormWa Permit Re uired Y!N N H�bll�t (yln) Bald Eagte-No; Smooth Conetiower-Yea; Micheux's Sumac-No SpselN Pl�fent Ba10 Eagle-No; Smooth Cone(lower-No; Mfchauz's TiE Sumac-No No habitet & No ENect for Bald Eagle end Micheux's BIo COnCIUsiOn Sumec; Habitat & No Effect tor Smooih ConeTlower Moratorium T e N Dates N Native/Flatche N Trout Watere Trout S cies Present N Trout Conditions YM N WRC Reviewer iravis wiison CAMA AEC� No E�seMiN Fiah H�bILt /n No N�v.O nin No USCG P�rmR No Historic Pro erties N Archaeolo ical Resources N Trlbel Lends N 4 Resources N 6 f LWC Reaources N Wlld �nd Sc�nic Rlwr No Forest Service Lends N TVA Aeea N FEMA Bu out N FEMA Flood Stud v (MOn) USTs Haz Mats N Relocateea N Locdlon LAT 36,0�3855 LONG ae.i26se4 Pro'ect Comments Brld9e No. 75 is loceted over New Hope Creek an SR 1127 (Bodend Rd). The proJect study area consists oi miz of hardwood foreat, pine torest, and maintalned disturbed. There are several rock islende in the atream around the bridge that had some sedlmen[ accumulation. Solls were checked to determine if they were wetlands. Based on soll criteria found the islends were determined not to be wetlands. No aultable feeding/water source is located wilhin 1 mi�e of the prqect study area Including 660 foot radius trom the edge of Ihe study area lo suppoA betd eagle hebitat. Since there wae no foraging habitat wilhin the revlew area, a survey of the pro)ect study area and the area within 660 teet of the pro�ect Ilmlts was not conducted. Hebitat ia not present for Michuax's sumac. Habltat is presenl for Smooth coneflower atong the edges of the roadwa thet are not mowed. Note: Blue text added by TGS Enginee�s, Black texl provided by NCDOT. Completed by: David B. Petty, P 5/2016 �-� Lead@ gin \ � Environry Me101icer � � :��.� �: . • . �� ' � � � � s � � :� i� � ��- a � 6 � • , . , .� , �- � �,� - ��,, �,� �'"� � : � , N�� 'p , � �'�°, F . : � T�� 4' , �. . � • �� I � , � . , a iC'� � �� F� L� .. .� • ��" :., • �� 8#� .i 1r�� : � _ . ,�� • � � . .�.� . � . . �� . , �. vJ „ 4 - - � F,,.� � � ��t° F a � �� " � a. � ��, . � e � � � �� . . R . .;. � � a . ,:, _ , • h ,R" . �, �a - . � . . _. . � � e . o - _ , P _ � �,�° � - �� Bridge 75 � �� ' ' . . . . n , : i° � � =F� � � � ��.� � �� F �� --� � , . . � � � .. . .a� �I,,, � � • ��, � ry i � � , N �, e .ti � ,� ` . � I r � � 1 � �� ,� �� , �y . �— . � . � ' ��, ' . �� r � � ' u r � „ „ _ ,�: • ��1� � ��' I• ` , � , - I • ; .� -�, l.�E� � . �L �� 9 . �, , .' � � � tl _ - � _� �7. �.i, y' - � • 7 .� n '�.� - e�°� � j ` - 1 � . p � . n �� °� ." �� .��.• A � � ,� �ir � « ��.�F �. � � � `� � .. ,: . �, ��,.i�� : y t , � �� . _ . � . e .� � „� .� i,. �,� _. ti �� . �� ¢ � .� � . 9�, , r � �uu�:� a�` — � � �z� 9 � • �e�� ` � �� , . . � � ,:� . _ . , , . , , , ti, E • � � , ■ ti . _ _ -,,,ti � �- �� . : :� r � . . . :� . �A _ . � m y i . . a . , �� , � � ' , . �m��l� -�, � �� `_ s ��°I`: , '; f :�:� � o �, ^�, . � . � � • ; . , • _ ;: � � _ , - - ' �� ,'� : . I°� r �., �� „ . - ` � , � _ � ^ � _� �:�� ° �� a o: v � ��r _,_ � � � Ia ��,,� � �' � � • I I � } - � t Map Location Soil Map Figure 2 NCDOT Bridge 75 over New Hope Creek rQ��,�Rr+��.�� , Borland Road, Hillsborough, NC ,��, � Gr`;e � Orange County " r'��` '�" DURHAM (* ,r ` �� Y� ORANGE Orange County Soil Survey, 1977 ; , Soil Sheet 22 �� January 15, 2016 '��',�� CHATHAM WAKE �jF��C�f?2A�S�� 1 inch = 1.000 feet Hi hWa North Carolina DepartmenY of TransportaYfon "` � �Stormwater „<„ „_,,, Highway Stormwater Program � � �',' STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN (Version 2.03; Released October 2015) FOR NCDOT PROJECTS WBS Element: 17BP.7.R.86 TIP No.: SF-670075 County(ies): Orange Page 1 of 2 General Project Information WBS Element: 178PJ.R.86 TIP Number: SF-670075 Pro'ect T e: Brid e Re lacement Date: 1/5/2016 NCDOT Contact: William G. Galen Cail, PE Contractor / Desi ner: TGS En ineers David B. Petty, PE Address: 1590 Mail Service Center Address: 706 Hillsborough Street Raleigh, 27699-1590 Suite 200 Ralei h, NC 27603 Phone: 919J07-6711 Phone: 919-773-8887 Ext. 104 Email: cail@ncdot. ov Email: d ett Qa t sen ineers.com Cit /Town: Hillsborou h Count (ies): Oran e River Basin(s): Ca e Fear CAMA County? No Wetlands within Project Limits? No Pro'ect Descri tion Pro'ect Length (lin. miles or feet): 380 feet Surroundin Land Use: Forest, cropland Pro osed Pro'ect Existin Site Pro"ect Built-U on Area (ac.) 0.2 ac. 0.2 ac. Typical Cross Section Description: Two 10' wide paved travel lanes w/ paved shoulders at guardrail locations, 3' wide Two 9' paved travel lanes with 0' to 4' wide grassed shoulders and grassed side slopes grassed shoulders and grassed side slopes ranging from about 6(H):1(V) to 2(H):1(V). ranging from about 6(H):1(V) to 2(H):1(V). Annual Avg Daily Traffic (veh/hr/day): Desi n/Future: 900 Year: 2015 Existin : 900 Year: 2015 General Project Narrative: Replacement of Bridge No. 670075 on SR 1127 (Borland Road) over New Hope Creek in Orange County south of Hillsborough, NC. Proposed 70' long by 30' wide single-span (Description of Minimization of Water bridge to replace existing 36' long by 20' wide double-span bridge. The proposed grade is about 1' above existing ground in the vicinity of the bridge and roughly matching Quality Impacts) existing by about 120' left of stream and about 105' right of stream (looking downstream). Proposed bridge to be located in same location as existing bridge. The proposed bridge will have no direct discharge into the water or buffers. Stormwater runoff on the existing bridge discharges directly into the water for the full length of the bridge. No deck drains will be installed. Stormwater runoff from the proposed bridge is to flow to two (2) proposed drop inlets at the southeast approach. Runoff will be discharged at minimum practicable slopes, yielding minimum velocities and diffused with a riprap pad at the pipe outlet(0.4 cfs in 10-year event). All proposed stormwater runoff is discharged as far away from the stream and at lowest velocities as practicable. Waterbod Information Surface Water Body (1): New Hope Creek NCDWR Stream Index No.: 16-41-1- 0.5 NCDWR Surface Water Classification for Water Body Primary Classification: Water Supply V(WS-V) Su lemental Classification: Nutrient Sensitive Waters NSW Other Stream Classification: None Im airments: None Aquatic T&E Species? No Comments: NRTR Stream ID: New Ho e Creek Buffer Rules in Effect: Jordan Lake Pro'ect Includes Brid e S annin Water Bod ? Yes Deck Drains Dischar e Over Buffer? No Dissi ator Pads Provided in Buffer? Deck Drains Dischar e Over Water Bod ? No (If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) (If yes, describe in the General Project Narrative; if no, justify in the (If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) General Project Narrative) :�.; Hi�;Ylwdy North Carolina Department of Transportation btOCYY1WFlt�i' Highway Stormwater Program �.;� STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN (Version 2.03; Released October 2015) FOR NCDOT PROJECTS WBS Element: TIP No.: SF-670075 County ies): Orange Pa e 2 of 2 Preformed Scour Holes and Energy Dissipators Station & Coordinates Drainage Pipe/Structure BMP Sheet (Road and Non Road Surface Energy Dissipator Area Conveyance Dimensions Q10 V10 Associated w/ No. Pro'ects Water Bod T e Ri ra T e ac Structure in cfs f s Buffer Rules? -L- 14+14 LT � 2 (1)New Hope Riprap Apron / Pad Class'B' <0.1 Pipe 15 0.4 0.4 N/A 36.00381 °, -79.12605° Creek Additional Comments ' Refer to the NCDOT Best Management Practices Toolbox (2014), NCDOT Standards, the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Hydraulic Engineering Circular No. 14 (HEC-14), Third Edition, Hydraulic Design of Energy uissiparors tor Gulverts and Ghannels (July 2006), as applfcable, tor desfgn guidance and crfteria. � �o 0 V ., � V � � O V See Sheet 9-A For Index of Sheets THIS PROJECT IS NOT WITHIN ANY MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES. CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD II. ��1�� ll' �� Jl�� Y �� 1L�� V'V' � Il � ORAI�GE CO U1�T Y LOCATI011I: BRIDGE NO. 670075 OVER 1VEW 011t SR 1127 (BORLAND RD) TYPE OF WORK GRADING, DRAIIVAGE, PAVING, A111D STRUCTURE BUFFER IMPACTS PiL��,INiIIVARY FL.�N� DO NOT USE POR CONSTRUCTION NCDOT CONTACT: V I R G I1V I A M A B R Y HYDRAULICS GRAPHIC SCALES DESIGN DATA PROJECT LENGTH P�NS PREPARED e,,: P�,Ns P�PA�o Fon: ENG7IVEER �e,� °` °"'� c,��' ADT 2015 = 900 �� TGS ENGINEER$ NCDOT � 20 10 O 20 40 �� 804—C N. LAFAYETTE ST PRIORIN PROJECTS UNIT � � T= b %* LENGTH ROADWAY PROJECT 17BP.7.R.86 #670075 =0.058 MILES � SHELBY,NC 28750 1020 Birch Rid e Dr. '��, o LENGTH $TRUCTURE PROJECT 17BP.7.R.86 #670075 =0.014 MILES r� PH (704) 476-0003 Raleigh, NC �7610 � a" PLANS V= 45 MPH r cORP. LICENSE NO.: C-0275 P�. �"P oF bQ°@` * TTST -3% +DUAL =3% TOTAL LENGTH PROJECT 17BPJ.R.86 #670075 =0.072 MILES srcxazuns: T�"" 20 10 0 20 40 � � LEONARD G. FLETCHER PE ROADWAY DESIGN RIGHT OF WAY DATE: � PROJECT ENGIhEER E/VGINEER PROFILE (HORIZONTAL) FUNC CLASS = RURAL - APRIL 21, 2015 LOCAL R.E. BURNS & soNs co P. O. BOX T 168 4 Z O 4 $ S7ATESV�LLE. NC 28687 RIOJECT DESlGN ENG/NEER LETTING DATE: PH fT04)92<-86C6 PROFILE (VERTICAL) SUB REGIONAL TIER r.s. zo�z sznNnann srEc,Ficaz,oNs APRIL 21,2015 S7GNAT[IRE: K70075 Rdv Permit Drawines tsh buffer.den 12/9/2075 3:07:55 PM TGS BufFer Zone (BZ) Impacts Area of Allowable Area of Allowable Bridge Impact Bridge Impact within BZl within BZ2 � - , , �,,. LEGEND '� �� ;�� iiii�i �ii: SITE 2416 sq ft 1217 sq ft EXISTING BRIDGE DIMENSIONS 36'X20' (DOUBLE—SPAN), 90 DEG. SKEW PROPOSED BRIDGE DIMENSIONS 70'X30' (SINGLE—SPAN), 90 DEG. SKEW TOTAL PROJECT LENGTH — 380' � BZ , � JOSEPHINE F. & SAMUEL T. HINSON BEGIN PROJECT EXISTING oH UTILITY LINE (APPROXIMATE LOCATION) 17BP.7.R.86 —L— STA. 11 + 50.00 WOODS ;t,.; �_;,1z� �s ��;_,; �r; � ��' �1- �, � �-� � � BUFFER ZONE IMPACTS : �� PROJECT REFERENCE NO. P E RM I T D RAW I N G �7BP.7.R.86 (SF-670075J FOR BRIDGE #670075 TG� TG5 ENG/NEERS ENc,iNiERS 706 H/LLSBOROUGH ST � SU/TE 200 O RA N G E C O U N TY �� PHL�9/9J 77328887 �\� j }, � 24'x10' TEMPORARY WORK PAD AT ELEV. 523', IF NECESSARY. CLASS II RIP RAP TO BE REMOVED AND RESTORED TO EXISTING EXISTING R\W I - TO SR llO2 F ----------F �-� (DODSON CROSSROADS RD) _ _ _ _ - - — — —L— SR //27 (BO � EXISTWG �R WOODS � // � �i � F i �� F -------- I,_ F � i�i � � � ,_ � - � (�` " L �� ,.� -, � � - -_ - � - fl- L�, �� t.�" r ' y ii. �� iiii., PDE CLASS II RIP RAP BM#I I EXISTING CONCRETE SILL TO REMAIN 6, N � � JOSEPHINE F, & SAMUEL T. HINSON NOTES: 1. NEW HOPE CREEK IS IN THE CAPE FEAR RIVER BASIN. 2. JORDAN LAKE BUFFER RULES IN EFFECT. 3. DO NOT INSTALL DECK DRAINS. 4. CLEARWG SHALL BE PERFORMED PER NCDOT METHOD II. 5. NO UTILITY RELOCATIONS ANTICIPATED DUE TO THIS PROJECT. GRAPHIC SCALE 20 10 0 20 40 SF-670075_Pcrmit Drawing�sh_buffer impacts.dgn I/5/2016 5:51:33 PM TGS CONDITIONS AFTER REMOVAL OF EXISTING BENT IS COMPLETE. G��o tio�` � NG � �P p oe �P JOSEPHINE F. & SAMUEL T. HINSON — TEMPORARY IMPERVIOUS DIKE, IF NECESSARY, FOR REMOVAL OF EXISTING BENT � 24'x4' EXISTING CONCRETE BENT TO BE REMOVED �� CLASS B RIP RAP � DISSIPATOR PAD QZ-o, �FS W 0 o D S g V2-0.4 FT5 l\ nio=a.a cFs �o-o.< � � - � ��s��s' ��i-v-� v � ti � � �� ' _ ,. .,., ..,,� ��PDE-�L � r �- < � �.��[��I'� F — ------ F —_ �- F — — �, - - I l. ' I �" is� RCP-iv� 1s zci , � i C. _ i i I.�l.rTl7 ---------- F�, -- � �� I_��LJ I —'�� F � � , F -`;"a- �� '-�� , ��-� r � � �. � --' �iii N � � � �ii iiii P E ' � PDE � � CLASS II RIP RAP �� WOODS �� '` �, � \ e2 % -� C T� � � � � � �� . , TB v� , �� O,o� 5,�� \F�\ �� END PROJECT 17BP.7.R.86 —L— STA. 15 + 30.00 �, -�; � ,-, EXISTING R\W __ _ _ T 0 S�? 1113 - (ARTHUR MINNIS RDJ EX�dN�-!�W ,�'�: , r�''�,, �`'t � JOSEPHINE F. & SAMUEL T. HINSON PERMIT DRAWING SHEET 1 OF 2 PROJECT REFERENCE NO. EXISTING BRIDGE DIMENSIONS 36'X20' (DOUBLE-SPAN), 90 DEG. SKEW PERMIT DRAWING l7BP.7.R.86 �SF-670075J BufFer Zone (BZ) Impacts PROPOSED BRIDGE DIMENSIONS 70'X30' (SINGLE-SPAN), 90 DEG. SKEW TG� res ENG/NEERS F O R B RI D G E# 6 7 0 0 75 �N��N-ERs �06 H/LLSBOROUGH ST TOTAL PROJECT LENGTH - 380' � su�TE Zoo Area of Allowable Area of Allowable RALE/GH, /VC zTeos Bridge Impact Bridge Impact O RAN G E C O U N TY �� PH �9/9J 773-8887 within BZl within BZ2 LEGEND r —_;' ;�% �'%% BUFFER ZONE IMPACTS , ,,, „ ,,: SITE 2A16 sq ft 1217 sq ft � ��" '\ � � � ��-� � 24'x10' TEMPORARY WORK PAD AT ELEV. 523', IF NECESSARY. � � � ``" CLASS II RIP RAP TO BE REMOVED AND RESTORED TO EXISTING J �� CONDITIONS AFTER REMOVAL OF EXISTING BENT IS COMPLETE. ��o tio�` 1 ` NL � �P � � �, � sz�� 0 �P � 82 ) °' \� JOSEPHINE F. & SAMUEL T. HINSON JOSEPHINE F. & SAMUEL T. H�NSON 'a C�, ^ TEMPORARY IMPERVIOUS DIKE, IF NECESSARY, FOR REMOVAL OF EXISTING BENT „� \ �, s�� \� �, � 24'x4' EXISTING CONCRET�'BENT TO BE REMOVED EXISTING OH UTILITY LINE ` �\ � ��--, �� CLASS B RIP RAP BEGIN PROJECT �aPPRox�n�a,Te �oca,-r�or,� '� � DISSIPATOR PAD END PROJECT 17BPJ.R.86 �l ��, WOODS g 17BPJ.R.86 Q2-0.3 CFS —L— STA. 11 + 50.00 j � —L— STA. 15 + 30.00 - V2-0A FT5 l\ � _ WOODS � � \ �� \ - _ _ _ nio a a cFs � 9 �, _ _ ^, � —�� k� �,- � -� � ,o o< �' � `�,� �-- ��j� _�� - , � Z � z . � � -�„ k�� ` � �� - - W�� ' , , � � �- �J ��-�J-�� .��;r- �J� � -�J-' �J . r� , " � - ��-C� J . I � � �i � � ` s V P E � - � -- - � '�, _ , ' � � �—PD ��,� � �PDE—� w '�'�" -"/i " r' i � . � . - ____ � '. � or /: /�, ' " � ' n. . . � � � ,�j/, � �i.� C � EXISTING R\W -- � qF � EXISTING R\W ' � ee5 �- I � T'�{ �� _ �. r � _ _ - TO SR 1102 F,-�� , � � � ia ��' i ��.r� �i _� F� �- ------ F-__ �� TO SR 1113 (DODSON CROSSROADS RD) ��S __________SF --------- ' � ------ F _ (ARTHUR MINNIS RDJ -- � --_ --- ---- --- _ . . _ . . . .. . . . .. _ -' _ _- f_— II L�I I i ' � .- B 2GI . . . _ - - - _ - _ - -L- SR //27 BORLAND RDl � I i � !. � l8' BST �� .� I I f, is� RCP-iv __ ___ - � i i I �. Ts zci - - - - ---- — __ , � - ,-� -----_ - ,-� _, �, ---------- F -- - - F ---- -__ _ � 5se _ ^ r'�ti_l �1,. �� _r`_ � ' \�� s•"� _i - - ---- � s��- �� -�_�-��i�� _ �� !^ ;-r � •� r F - . - - - - ,, � �' � - -- 53e- - I - -- �� i _ , � _ � �- . ' ExisrWc R�W __ r �— o-� �—� >> _; � � ,, - _.�� , E NG��'� ��- � � -�� i , ; X, � _�� -�� s �r `-�� r .-, - u�. �� ti5 � � _ � � � � � s i i �h '`' � � � iii. - - s�e _, ._ j � � WOODS � � poE '�� p E '� ppE XISTING TRk�1SPORTATION CLASS II RIP RAP BMtt� "/ � CLASS II RIP RAP ��CILITY BOU�fD RY �� Y� �, �� N �� WOODS \_ � / EXISTIN(3�' CONCRETE � -- � � % � �� `� SILL TO REMAIN a, \� ; � � � �s � �` _, � �-L�� - � � JOSEPHINE F, & SAMUEL T. HINSON "�- � �le '�� JOSEPHINE F. & SAMUEL T. HINSON NOTES � � 1. NEW HOPE CREEK IS IN THE � ��re C � � CAPE FEAR RIVER BASIN. O,a� f� �,\ 2. JORDAN LAKE BUFFER RULES IN EFFECT. \ C�,p � 3. DO NOT INSTALL DECK DRAINS. �� e ��'f- � 4. CLEARWG SHALL BE PERFORMED PER � �\ �� NCDOT METHOD IL s �� , �s �' �� \ 5. NO UTILITY RELOCATIONS ANTICIPATED � DUE TO THIS PROJECT. � � �, �, \ f ►/` � � �j `� `-; ,. GRAPHIC SCALE �n-� �� C �� 40 ��s �� PERMIT DRAWING SHEET 2 OF 2 � � �� SF-670075_Pcrmit Drawing�sh_buffer impacts.dgn I/5/2016 5:51:01 PM TGS � �o 0 V ., � V � � O V See Sheet 9-A For Index of Sheets THIS PROJECT IS NOT WITHIN ANY MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES. CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD II. ��1�� ll' �� Jl�� Y �� 1L�� V'V' � Il � ORAI�GE CO U1�T Y LOCATI011I: BRIDGE NO. 670075 OVER 1VEW 011t SR 1127 (BORLAND RD) TYPE OF WORK GRADING, DRAIIVAGE, PAVING, A111D STRUCTURE STREAM IMPACTS PiL��,INiIIVARY FL.�N� DO NOT USE POR CONSTRUCTION NCDOT CONTACT: V I R G I1V I A M A B R Y HYDRAULICS GRAPHIC SCALES DESIGN DATA PROJECT LENGTH P�NS PREPARED e,,: P�,Ns P�PA�o Fon: ENG7IVEER �e,� °` °"'� c,��' ADT 2015 = 900 �� TGS ENGINEER$ NCDOT � 20 10 O 20 40 �� 804—C N. LAFAYETTE ST PRIORIN PROJECTS UNIT � � T= b %* LENGTH ROADWAY PROJECT 17BP.7.R.86 #670075 =0.058 MILES � SHELBY,NC 28750 1020 Birch Rid e Dr. '��, o LENGTH $TRUCTURE PROJECT 17BP.7.R.86 #670075 =0.014 MILES r� PH (704) 476-0003 Raleigh, NC �7610 � a" PLANS V= 45 MPH r cORP. LICENSE NO.: C-0275 P�. �"P oF bQ°@` * TTST -3% +DUAL =3% TOTAL LENGTH PROJECT 17BPJ.R.86 #670075 =0.072 MILES srcxazuns: T�"" 20 10 0 20 40 � � LEONARD G. FLETCHER PE ROADWAY DESIGN RIGHT OF WAY DATE: � PROJECT ENGIhEER E/VGINEER PROFILE (HORIZONTAL) FUNC CLASS = RURAL - APRIL 21, 2015 LOCAL R.E. BURNS & soNs co P. O. BOX T 168 4 Z O 4 $ S7ATESV�LLE. NC 28687 RIOJECT DESlGN ENG/NEER LETTING DATE: PH fT04)92<-86C6 PROFILE (VERTICAL) SUB REGIONAL TIER r.s. zo�z sznNnann srEc,Ficaz,oNs APRIL 21,2015 S7GNAT[IRE: K70075 Rdv Permit Drawines tsh stream.den 1/5/2016 2:17:42 PM TGS SF-670075_Pcrmit Drawing�sh_sheam impacts.dgn I/5/2016 5:02:24 PM TGS SF-670075_Pcrmit Drawing�sh_sheam impacts.dgn I/5/2016 5:02:56 PM TGS 540 530 520 —L— J/ He//TJVa ELEV = 538,12 EXISTING BRIDGE TO BE REMOVED Pl = 12+52°00 EL = 532a95' VC = l20' — K = 27 DS = 25 MPH � �— f =Ji�.�-�°,�—__ RESTORED FLOODPLAIN -� FLOW AREA AT ABUTMENT 1 = 49 SF � CLASS II RIP RAP KEY—IN 3.5' (TYP.) T PROP. EXCAVATION TO ELEV. 526.6' EXISTING CONCRETE SILL TO REMAIN 12+00 13+00 24'x10' TEMPORARY WORK PAD AT ELEV. 523', IF NECESSARY. - CLASS II RIP RAP TO BE REMOVED AND RESTORED TO EXISTING CONDITIONS AFTER REMOVAL OF EXISTING BENT IS COMPLETE. ST RUCT URE HYDRAULIC DAT A GL —L— STA. 13 + 42 .00 PROP. 1@70' 24" CSU W/4'-0" CAPS UTILIZED PROP. GRADE = 532.46' SKEW = 90° --- � —�--- ---- � - _-- DESIGN DISCHARGE _ 1000 CFS DESIGN FREQUENCY = 25 YRS � �� j � DESIGN HW ELEVATION = 527.3 FT �� BASE DISCHARGE _ 1400 CFS BASE FREQUENCY = l00 YRS BASE HVy ELEVATION = 528.75 FT OVERTOPPING DISCHARGE _ 1,900+ CFS OVERTOPPING FREQUENCY = 500+ YRS OVER7"OPPIN� ELEVATION = 53/.92xx FT xxOVERTOPPING ELEVATION REPRESENTS LOVyEST HIGH POINT ON DECK/ROADWAY, W HICH OCCURS AT SAG @—L — ST A. 14+63.28 SF-670075_PermitUrawing_pfl.dgn US/20164:OL50 PM TGS 100 YR. W.S. ELEV. = 528.75' E D GRADE —L — ST , l5 +300 ELEV = 532e20 25 YR. W.S. ELEV. = 527.3' Pl = l4 -�-75v00 �OW SIDE EL = 53/074' LOW CHORD VC = ll0' PROP. GRADE K — 80 DS = 45 MPH _ _ ^ ----- �------ - -- --�---�t�JU5�26% l+)0,8364% � EX. GRADE � RESTORED FLOODPLAIN FLOW AREA AT ABUTMENT 2 = 60 SF PROP. EXCAVATION TO ELEV. 526.6' 1.5:1 NORMAL ' SLOPE W/ CL. II RIP RAP (TYP.) EXISTING CONCRETE SILL TO REMAIN 14+00 APPROX. W.S. ELEV. = 521' ON DATE OF SITE VISIT (6✓162015) EXISTING CONCRETE SILL TO BE REMOVED PERMIT DRAWING FOR BRIDGE #670075 ORANGE COUNTY 15+00 PERMIT DRAWING SHEET 3 OF 3 WETLAND PERMIT IMPACT SUMMARY WETLAND IMPACTS SURFACE WATER IMPACTS Hand Existing Existing Permanent Temp. Excavation Mechanized Clearing Permanent Temp. Channel Channel Natural Site Station Structure Fillln Fillln in Clearing in SW SW Impacts Impacts Stream No. (From/To) Size / Type Wetlands Wetlands Wetlands in Wetlands Wetlands impacts impacts Permanent Temp. Design (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (tt) (ft) (ft) 13+28/13+45 1 @70' CSU 34 TOTALS*: 0 34 0 *Rounded totals are sum of actual impacts 1►[��1�� Revised 2013 10 24 Project Trackiug No. (Intei izal Use) 13-07-0033 HISTORIC ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPES NO SURVEY REQUIRED FORM This form only pertains to Historic Architecture and Landscapes for this project. It is not valid for Archaeological Resources. You must consult separately with the Archaeology Group. PROJECT INFORMATION Project No: County: Orange WBS No.: 17BP.7. R.74 Document Type: Fed. Aid No: Funcling: X State Federal Fe�leral X Yes No Permit Stated as "not yet known" in Permit(s): Type(s): review request, so assume Federal Proiect Description: Repla�e Bridge No. 75 on SR 1127 (Borland Road) over New Hope Creek (off-site detour planned). SUMMARY OF HISTORIC ARCHITEC'1'Ulll: A1Vll LA1Vll�C:AYL�'� Kr:V11;W Description of review activities, results. anrl conclusions: HPOWeb reviewed on 26 August 2013 and yielded no NR, SL, LD, DE, or SS properties in the Area of Potential Effects (APE). Orange County current GIS mapping, aerial photography, and tax information indicated a mostly wooded APE (viewed 26 August 2013). The APE intersects a large parcel to the north of the existing bridge on which stands a house and outbuildings dating to the early twentieth century; located approximately 520 feet east of the bridge and 140 feet north of SR 1127 (Borland Road), the buildings are beyond likely project impact. Originally constructed in 1954 and rebuilt in 1987, Bridge No. 75 is a 36-foot-long, two-span, timber, stringer/multi-beam bridge and is not eligible for the National Register according to the NCDOT Historic Bridge Survey as it is not historically, architecturally, or technologically significant. Google Maps ��Street View" confirmed the absence of critical historic structures and landscapes in the APE (viewed 26 August 2013). No architectural survey is required for the project as currently defined. Whv the avnilable inform�tion provides � reliable basis for reasonablv predictin� that there �re no unidenti�etl si�ni�cant historic architectur�l or lantlscape resources irt the proiect area: APE extends 300 feet from each end of the existing bridge (NW-SE) and 100 feet to either side of the SR 1127 (Borland Road) centerline (NE-SW) to encompass proposed construction activities. Comprehensive historic architectural survey of Orange County (1993-4) and county GIS/tax materials and other visuals illustrate the absence of significant architectural resources in the APE. No National Register- listed properties are located within the APE. Should any design elements of the project change, including improvements along the off-site detour route, please notify NCDOT Historic Architecture as additional review may be necessary. SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION X Map(s) ❑Previous Survey Info. ❑Photos ❑Correspondence FINDING BY NCDOT ARCHITECTURAL HISTORIAN NCDOT Architectural Historian -- NO SURVEY REQUIRED I� ❑Design Plans Hi.rtoric Archi(ecltu�e and l.mitLccapes NO SURG7iY REOUIRGD jo�ni fa• ib/inor 7ranspm�lnlion P�•ojecls us Ot�nlifrerl in Ihe 2007 Progirmnnnlic Ag�•eemenl. Hillsbarou�h F, .--�� r3 e, �-- I j� i I't t'�� r' j i `..`rr :: ; h� � ,l�lr/r.. i � 1 { ( \ ' � ". � �� '��ri h<S � 11 � (.(1��I-c:',��""!- .. � � - _�... '`� I .t••"-�--' /'.�'�,, 1G, • '"•• ' 1 - ' `� � �' � � �;` "`'., t! � � � � , `S . �1 �_ . _ � . `, ,. i c� �_nq� :, . � _ _ __. .- � `- y3 O '- � � �� f' - r_.�n„_�li;r;, � „� ,v,. _ ��' _ �;_�If�;l�.il_� Q --v:` '''�` -�,. ^,. U7 � b . Rt� j �i � "�'` � _ tQi' � �� . p` f�{ ��- ' � . `:C;'-- y Y� t� i � � ,F .. � � 'y 1 . , 81} �i -.:`;� � � � � ..� 5 1 �� C , �. . r : .j. � . � . . . . . �,f „�. C C ',� � � � 4,y ' u� . . � . . _ ', . ��}- �e `�`t ,i � ` I �J , - � r� �i�� , i: � � �� k � ti i � . / �� ry' r �� ._ 1 � �' . - � � . �'J�� . �0, d . ' " �+t�� _ . 11(t,.y �'' � I �� •� �tl',� I � �� . `� ' �1 ,- ' "'-i .i x . f _ '�I ,. _ _ 4.� , �ti 5 � . i . {.. . . F, y: �"^-a-k..- �l. �,l I� . _. _' . . �'h: ' . � � . ^._��t � � � , � � �p � � � �'`� ORA(��GE� -, �, ��, 'r__. � , i , � - �yz .:.i _ �r i � � -� �, � _ a '�; �ti , �., .� 'i 2� .�. +, � � , ��r �i ��' y� � � � �� iev Farrn F�t� �ti -- �- o a � �, ,r., , » T. � `:s�.� � �. Project Area ��`� � $'=� . 1v y�• c1 . . � . •j, , N !#.� � �t�' ' ,n ,� 6� c�K, . � � � � ` ��, }�} : (; Ye"' b j; �� '3' L�ti' _.,,� li:lli.r . . � �.. �r. i.�:;�• � Q . �"+�,. 4s'�� j 1 �,,� ; � �, 'a sR ��z� _; �� t, I_. _� �' N _ _�, _ .:r� �---�_. , , � � �,• � %�`, �� ,�>� r, ,; . �,� _,- -., - ''�ti � 'r � Arf�trr Pdiri�tie (2z1 � _ --- � Bridge No. 75 WBS No. 17BP.7.R.74 Base map: HPOWeb, nts NCDOT — Historic Architecture August 2013 Tracking No. 13-07-0033 Orange County Project Tracking No.:13-07-0033 13-07-0033 NO NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES �a�`�� ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES ��-a��'�'•, � ��r ��u a ' 3 � � ,� �,�� ;; PRESENT OR AFFECTED FORM �� ;�� ' o�'� �' This form only pertains to ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES for this project. It is not � `} 8 ¢�='�� valid for Historic Architecture and Landscapes. You inust consult separately with the ��-� ��v � Historic ArchiYecture and Landscapes Group. PROJECT INFORMATION Project No: na i-VBS No: 17BP.7.R.74 F.A. No: na Federal Perinit Aeguired? County: Orange Document.• Attachment G Funcling: � State ❑ Federal � Yes ❑ No Per�nit Type: ProjectDescription: NCDOT Division 7 intends to replace Bridge No. 75 on SR 1127, Borland Road, over New Hope Creek. The replacement bridge is assumed to be proposed at generally the same location and alignment. For the purposes of the archaeological review the proposed project area is 633.6 feet long (slightly more than 193.12 meters) and extends right-of-way (RO� width from 60 feet to 100 feet (30.48 meters). Thus, the aYea of potential effects (APE) is estimated at roughly 1.45 acres (nearly .59 hectares). A US Army Corps of EngineeYs permit is anticipated but the exact type was unknown at the time of the aYchaeological investigations. SUMMARY OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL FINDINGS The North Carolina Department of7"ransportatron (NCDOT) Archaeology Group revlewed the subjectprojectand determined.• � There are no National Register listed ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES within the project's area of potential effects. � No subsurface archaeological investigations are required for this project. ❑ Subsurface investigations did not reveal the presence of any archaeological resources. ❑ SuUsurface investigations did not reveal the presence of any archaeological resources considered eligible for the National Register. ❑ All identified archaeological sites located within the APE have been considered and all compliance for archaeological resources with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and GS 121- 12(a) has been completed for this project. � There are no National Register Eligible or Listed ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES present or affected by this pxoject. (Attach any note.r or docunzent,r a,r needec� NO NATlONAL RF.GlSTFR ELIGLBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOGOGICAL SITES PRF.SF.NT OR AFFF,CTED �o�n2 for Minor Tran.r/�orlation Projects as Qualifed in !he 2007 Pr�ogr�ammafic Agreemenf. 1 Of 5 Project Tracking No.:13-07-0033 Briefdescrrption ofreviewactivrtres, results ofreview, and conclusions: As noted on the Survey Required Form dated August 22, 2013, the current project APE contained no previously recorded archaeological resources. A rough predictive model for the distribution of archaeological resources in Orange County was generated by researchers at the Research I.aboratories of Archaeolo�T at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNGCH) in 1994. According to that model much of New Hope Creek has a high potential for archaeological resources in differing areas. Broader alluvial areas are expected to have a higher potential for longer-term prehistoric settlements while upland areas might have a fair potential for scatters of pYehistoYic materials. These prehistoric sites may be oveYlaid with some abandoned historic-period occupations. At the current project area, the alluvial landform is narrow with longer slopes on the margins of the APE. Despite these factors, and as a result of the UNGCH study suggesting prehistoric occupation of the New Hope Creek drainage basin, an archaeological reconnaissance was recommended to assess the necessiry for further archaeological investigation. The archaeological reconnaissance of the APE was undertaken on October 16, 2013 by NCDOT archaeologists Shane Petersen and Brian Ovexton. A walkover investigation of the entire APE was completed for the proposed bridge replacement project. As expected the majority of the APE was significantly sloped and considered unlikely to contain intact significant archaeological deposits. Much of the easement along SR 1127 on the north side had been altered to accommodate a utilities easement as well. Additionally, areas immediately adjacent New Hope Creek appeared to be composed of pooxly drained hydric soils. No subsurface investigations were considered to be necessary within the current APE. No further archaeological investigations are recommended for the replacement of Bridge No. 75 as proposed. Should the project change further investigation may be necessary. The project as described should be considered to be compliant with Section 106 and NCGS121-12a. References: Daniel, I. R., Jr. 1994 An Archaeological Sur�ey of Portion.r of Orange County, Nortb Carolina. Research Report No. 12, Research Laboratories of Archaeology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION See attached: � Map(s) ❑ Previous Survey Info ❑ Other: Signed: Shane C. Petersen NCDOT ARCHAEOLOGIST II � Photos ❑Correspondence November 13, 2013 Date NO NATlONAL RF.GlSTFR ELIGLBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOGOGICAL SITES PRF.SF.NT OR AFFF,CTED �o�n2 for Minor Tran.r/�orlation Projects as Qualifed in !he 2007 Pr�ogr�ammafic Agreemenf. 20f5 � ; =, � �,(�s� .�r�n�,. r �{•C'i�-�1.� ��' ��. �`! -S' j/` ";.•^ ■ - R , � � , •' �� R` �, •�� ..� ��.-� � f:'+ '�,r 1� }' ;�� - , . � � �+ � � �'� � , t '�►t l .• '�+ . „� �r,!r_ i +, ,� �� •� �� -,��-�� i..,� 0,��.�..?w i 't. � �{ � � •� j�,�. ,i�It � ,,�` c� ,,� r � . ��, �;; .� + t y��7 = '!i' �c �x'` �' ' ''�� °t'� � �► i�' r' � � .s- w� , 7, �' ��j _• �� ' �, • `� •� , � �, ^j�r ��}-��i �.�ti�'� -"�.l.J,�iy�,�� fyi� �� '` � � .,; �~� � IIK -qf h � .lrt. I�� .'�'�`�� t _..x}ti'{�`.+ i f ' .� . ..�'- . w' r� ► �� • �� . �" '^ '� � ' �� „ �+. � :� �'� 1� \'� �`'.� �M � • Ys , � r. -� / � � i J d f-� ..� f "��.��r �t y�� ; , .� i `� -. , !� l , I �".. �� 1,�%�j� �' _� �: � } F �, .� . . ' ' ,4I � ,� �' C'� J ��/.� � Y �� - .�i+ � _ � ; • � � � i � • r i .1� 1� � �+ 1! 1 �.s + � � '� ,�� r >, r �,. , . � � , 'Y. r. R � �F .,7`�' • �'�'+t �' riI � �" � � ;� � .F � , ' �tit� .� � w F �, �K �t'� �. ,�µ I �q. � � +�,y- i ; � � �' 1 t r� � �'«!��,�,,f�+ ;� 4' . , ' t . �I ' • � r� ".�� ' f �I � f . �1 't�r' _ I'M �j�� f� t. �y�.��i•� • • r�• IN+ •��'• / �� f, .;,, �+ �� 's:*� , �'� . �t� �' y, �' � �A � �` �i�� •" f�,�'+#� �K�" r� f -i;�.�j�• , � � ,� i t I� ' ,,. ! � � � �"+'v ` �. "!�,' • •�.�, �%'j, �;,N �•`�-�'..4�- t , :�i ! •`•/'.r _�'�+.��,��. �j�n► � .w}�.. �.q�' � �� y� f�' ��t � .� .r. -fR" �'*� ��.. ��._ y„ r�y ��=1�1�� r �� t ' J s4 q� • � � � � � � T i � pp�� / 1 • � 1 '*S� Ta� �� '�f_ ' '!�.+ f �•�� '� ,� � '~M�. µ �� .'�t�..� � _� , y .l� r ,S � M �` Project Tracking No.:13-07-0033 � � r � ��'aj ��. f� ��}�, � � �� +� .,� �Y,3,.: ; - .�' � � � � ., � - � . � � ±��'�ya,. �, � t� y,, � ,sr ,� ' L : � � , ��, -� ' i , ��' �i Y-" �eCi �'�1►- �3^�r^i�� ; �� '��` '� �.�` �� ".�� •` r7' �' K •� �ifi� +�• t. � • �r r �� ;:�� f ��'1 i•�' '�, '� t�. ♦-� ;��fk,� rr'�� a�*. j ' � �' + � � � ,h 4 � � . <s„ i �'�+ � � �1 v`� .�, /.`,� '� ' • � j- � 'S '^'1f �ti. � �+�A�� !'�. h� v'd .� �} y� � ; . `�r�. � �. � " � �'�'� L r' �7�r � fi;�'�",� y� { ►�� • � { � : ,' I`A'► � - �+�' W � �. yc , � � �� r ., ��` •,t � �r� ��'�r'��* �.{�� ."},;��a��'-��,�,��I��_r�� . b�. � � �`,�,�,' .:. , T � �'�y � M M.'d-4++�� t,rf,�t_ . :it��ir��;,e�'^ • 44 '1�'�f��,a,+.' � J��,.' P - !.�,� �, �.�,� �• w. Y�� '+• ��,�� r �'', -?T ; , �-','�`�_. r �� . ' � •� . ' �, ` � "" ' � p �• \ . � ''v.. :la +t�,',,� R�� . f,,.� .� � �� r d �.I.P'� � ��, �• �, � � '4� '4 .i` .�•�� f•IVl_ y �yjy�� ♦� � � �� ` �' F .l! +� �� . .�la�i � _ rJ 'y �✓ 'R i� ♦ . 1 . � N ,R� � � 1 i .7., _ � „ � i� fi'yN_ �•�y�w� :!1%,�� '1 P ! � ~ a � ��1�,'1: �`� � . . � �,,;,� , i '�I� � �},•:.�',�'��•sf.�t��.�t'n�`:t":.+�`M�. ��+,�,,�c � ; z ,.�y't:'*�� - •f['�' ' a� : �', ^� Jf ' � "� r ,ii,'rr � � s � • }�,r:� ,�' �'�ds �' , � mt , � �„ yt .. � yt ,,! � � �. ' -l� � r:,} A ,� " I� � , � c� ' � �q .�� . ��r _ct� j� �' y �� ,, ` � �}'!-�%�T�.' A- _ i y� �� I � .�. � � �,� � � � . -. �, �l " + ` +f.�f, y�.j�'�+,��H � :i 7l�`L.. � �' �,� � .� I 3 • �'�� •��!�."� ' �� 'T'�� r iw� �� . ,t�'.�,�� .�. , -�� • . �� ' ', ,. �� . a -� ,� , .� �+ r - - � .�_ e ► • °•+►� �„� s � ' � ; � , �. ' � � � �'1 � � ' r1 � � ' ' � � � � "�t'� �� , C � . . i'� � � +� l ;.�; r,�� , + � j �N� �� . 1 M�� v► a :� � �t � � �`�; � ' �' ', � � � , 4' j �f �'.�� a� � - � �°�' � �� jb""'� � � ', '+� �� , , , ~ ! _ _..�_ � llerial photograph illust�-ating the approximate project 11PE (outlined in yellow) in relation to l3ridge No. 75. "NO NATIONAL REGISTh.'R EL/GIBI,E OR L/STED ARCHAF.OLOGICAL S7TF.S PRFSFNT OR AFFF.CTED form� �or Minor Transportation Projects as QualiJied in the 2007 Progr�arnmatic Agreemenl. 3 of 5 Project Tracking No.:13-07-0033 Photograph of Bridge No. 75 facing northwest. -�: • , � �-� ,. . -- ,�� ,�� j � � � � --- - - - i _ - �� `� � _ � .. � � , � � ,..,: � � �'�`' ;�.. _ `''+ � ,� ' ; � ,,. � y � � . �- «xr. 1'� � T k Y .;yb�^4 � ; . .. a -; � -�i 7�a.,�r - ,X- i`-- y " F �` r- . :;r�� . i�= �k �e .v :', e{� �. ..,�a+ � '�`�� ' � . .✓-� �.. �'r � e � � . s � 'fr �+� t , � �� 1�U`��" '" �.� . .. . . �j�j �;:. F� - � 1� _-.s�•� '� ��'' ? r -� �� iR:�r ��,�� .. �..ir : . e".1 .. '�.. - ""�,.. '� 1 . . . . . . � . , ' � t u p x� � � � �� i� � °�r�' ,, , ;�p t f K a �, Y �� - �; �� Y $ , � �' � `"�` f -'' s �,` s `� +4 � �:. �Vi �� "'L b,��.: ,rw ' 'e" q Fv4A �F ��y�.. ; ;.� f . . 'ii . � fF.l�3 �h �fl � } a� `�' s �E. • � m w � � - ��Y A ��a e _ s�;,.. �-: ti . di P .. � A � ' '' � � a 1 , S�d+�.,��;'�ab �+� .� a4F� N� �� 1 a �� #� 9 �*r•" � s : h vg.. � �ry�l � ;Lo.w..' , EI`F � : �, �� t;� r �i'9c �,,,, _ w � . . . . ,� t rd yr,� �r� ¢ . . . � :. N s�� n .�.b'd'r"B �.� : � - . . .~ . - _ � �.._.... -- � ' - - .. � . - ..i . . - ' � _ . . ` Yr��.._.��, f � � . ' , _ __ , . .. .. � s�' j _y��.c�T3'.�' j`. i'S-�..... . �� 1 � .k$.'i. tia�;�- �� . Photograph of historic-period farmstead (earl�r 20r'�-centurj�?) east of Bridge No. 75 facing north. NO NATlONAL RF.GlSTFR ELIGLBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOGOGICAL SITES PRF.SF.NT OR AFFF,CTED �o�n2 for Minor Tran.r/�orlation Projects as Qualifed in !he 2007 Pr�ogr�ammafic Agreemenf. 4of5 Project Tracking No.:13-07-0033 Photograph of Brid�e No. 75 facing southeast. NO NATlONAL RF.GlSTFR ELIGLBLE OR LISTF.D ARCHAEOGOGICAL SITES PRF.SF.NT OR AFFF,CTED �o�n2 for Minor Tran.r/�orlation Projects as Qualifed in !he 2007 Pr�ogr�ammafic Agreemenf. S Of 5 Lancaster, Jamie J From: Sent: To: Subject: Attachments: Jamie- Mason, James S Wednesday, October 28, 2015 11:32 AM Lancaster, Jamie J RE: Division 7 Design Build Bridges 400271 WA wetland form.doc; 400271 WA-WB upland form.doc; 400271 WB wetland form.doc; 670023 wet forms.pdf I put comments next to all of the bridges below. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks, Jim From: Lancaster, Jamie J Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2015 8:43 AM To: Mason, James S Subject: Division 7 Design Build Bridges Jim, Wanted to see if you could get some information for me on some Division 7 bridges that were looked at in late 2013/ early 2014. I know you looked at some that we added in Fall of 2014, but am not sure if you looked at the ones in 2013/2014. Can you provide me with any stream forms that you have for the following bridges: 400189 — only 1 perennial stream, no forms done 400271— only have wetland forms (attached); no stream forms, only 1 perennial 670023 — only have wetland forms (attached); no stream forms, perennial 670075 - only 1 perennial stream, no forms done 670173 - only 2 perennial streams, no forms done Also, on Bridges 400189 and 400272, it was noted that small whorled pogonia surveys would need to be conducted in spring of 2015. Do you know if these surveys occurred and what the results were. (it does not appear that they were completed. Amy James had the bridges and did not complete them before she left and I think they fell through the cracks. Is it okay to complete them next spring?) Please let me know if you have any questions or need additional information. Thanks, Jamie Jamie J. Lancaster, PE Project Executive Priority Projects Unit North Carolina Department of Transportation 919 707 6620 office I I a n ca ste r(�a, n cd ot. g ov 1595 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1595 `�-� �`'"1`�1C��II1C� �C?17'I��T��, -��._.� Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties. Facebook Twitter YouTube Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PAT MCCRORY GOVF.RNOR Memorandum to From: Subject: ANTHONY J. TATA SF,CRETARY January 13, 2014 Pam Williams, Transportation Program Management Unit Jerry Parker, Division 7 Environmental Supervisor Jared Gray, Environmenta] Program Supervisor Natural Environment Section, Biological Surveys Group Protected species screening memo for the Dwarf Wedgemussel (Alasmidonta heterodon) associated with the replacement of Bridge No. 75 over New Hope Creek on SR 1127; Orange County; Design Build Project; WBS 17BP.7.R.74. Proposed Bridge Replacement Project The proposed project calls for the replacement of Bridge No. 75 on SR 1127 (Borland Road) over New Hope Creek, in Orange County. The federally endangered Dwarf Wedgemussel is listed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service for Orange County. New Hope Creek is located in the Cape Fear River Basin. From the project site, New Hope Creek flows 23.8 mile before entering Jordan Lake. A map of the project site is attached. NCDOT Biologist Jared Gray from the Biological Surveys Group did a review of the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NHP) database on December 31, 2013, to determine if there were any records of listed mussels within the proposed project study area or receiving waters. This review indicated that there are no known occurrences of the federally protected Dwarf Wedgemussel within the project area. Furthermore, there are no known records of Dwarf Wedgemussel for the Cape Fear River Basin. Therefore the biological conclusion for the replacement of Bridge No. 75 over New Hope Creek is No Effect for Dwarf Wedgemussel. File: 17BP.7.R.74 MAILING ADDRESS: NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PROJECT DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS UNIT 1598 MAIL SERVICE CENTER Rn�eicH NC 27699-1548 TELEPHONE: 919-707-6000 FAX: 919-212-5785 WEBSITE: NCDOT. GOV LOCATION: CENTURYCENTER, BUILDING B 1020 BIRCH RIDGE DRNE Rn�eicr+ NC 27610 BUFFER IMPACTS SUMMARY IMPACT BUFFER TYPE ALLOWABLE MITIGABLE REPLACEMENT STRUCTURE SIZE / STATION ROAD PARALLEL ZONE 1 ZONE 2 TOTAL ZONE 1 ZONE 2 TOTAL ZONE 1 ZONE 2 SITE NO. TYPE (FROM/TO) CROSSING BRIDGE IMPACT (ft2) (ft2) (ftZ) (ftz) (ft2) (ft2) (ft2) (ft2) 1@70' CSU 12+68/14+19 X 2416 1217 3633 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL: 2416.0 1217.0 3633.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Rev. May 2006