The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutDivision Bridge FSM Worksheet_980042 NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FIELD SCOPING MEETING WORKSHEET Return with Comments to Division by 05/15/24 (Two weeks prior to FSM) TIP No.: BP11.R050 FIELD SCOPING MEETING DATE: 05/29/2024 DIVISION: 11 LOCATION: On Site (36.145991143241744, -80.85713797795171) COUNTY: Yadkin ROUTE (US / NC / SR): SR 1320 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Replace Bridge 980042 on SR 1320 (Sparks Rd) over Dobbins Creek. FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION: RURAL LOCAL TIER: SUB-REGIONAL/LOW VOUME MPO / RPO AREA: NORTHWEST PIEDMONT MUNICIPALITY: HAMPTONVILLE ATTENDEES NAME (PRINT) PHONE No E-MAIL DIVISION CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER Ivan H. Dishman (336)903-9245 ihdishman@ncdot.gov AREA BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER Mark Biggerstaff (828)803-9954 mabiggerstaff@ncdot.gov DIVISION BRIDGE MAINTENANCE ENGINEER Ethan Osborne (336)903-9124 eosborne@ncdot.gov DIVISION UTILITY COORDINATOR NA DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL OFFICER Kevin Hining (336)903-9129 kjhining@ncdot.gov DIVISION RIGHT OF WAY REPRESENTATIVE Christopher Steele (336)667-9114 cjsteele@ncdot.gov HYDRAULICS REPRESENTATIVE Marc Shown/Jon Moore (919)707-6751 mshown@ncdot.gov jlmoore PDEA REPRESENTATIVE Na NEU REPRESENTATIVE Kevin Hining (336)9039129 kjhining@ncdot.gov GEOTECHNICAL REPRESENTATIVE Shane Clark (828)250-3390 scclark@ncdot.gov STRUCTURE DESIGN REPRESENTATIVE Na ROADWAY DESIGN REPRESENTATIVE Na LOCATION AND SURVEYS REPRESENTATIVE Larry Absher (336)903-9500 lrabsher@ncdot.gov WORK ZONE TRAFFIC CONTROL REPRESENTATIVE Na DIVISION (COMPLETED BY DIVISION STAFF AND SENT WITH THE FSM LETTER) EXISTING FEATURES FEATURE BRIDGED: DOBBINS CREEK (BRIDGE / CULVERT) LENGTH 75 (FT.) DECK WIDTH (OUT TO OUT) 30.5 (FT.) WATER DEPTH: (FT.) HEIGHT BED-TO-CROWN: (FT.) PRIOR SURVEY DATE: 01/18/1971 POSTED: SV 26 TTST: 39 STRUCTURE TYPE: PRESTRESSED CONCRETE CHANNELS SPAN TYPE: SUFFICIENCY RATING: 47.13 POSTED SPEED LIMIT IN PROJECT VICINITY: 55 (MPH / STATUTORY 55MPH) DETOUR: OFF-SITE ON-SITE STAGE CONSTRUCTION IF DETOUR IS OFF-SITE, PROVIDE DESCRIPTION OF DETOUR ROUTE SR 1300 - SR 1314 - SR 1316 APPROXIMATE LENGTH OF DETOUR? 3 ( MILES ) IMPROVEMENTS NEEDED TO ROAD ON DETOUR? IMPROVEMENTS NEEDED TO BRIDGES ON DETOUR? ARE BRIDGES ON DETOUR CURRENTLY PROGRAMMED ON TIP? COMMENTS: ARE THERE EMS, SCHOOL , OR BUSINESS ACCESS ISSUES? COMMENTS: ARE THERE ANY RAILROAD CROSSINGS ON DETOUR? COMMENTS: SHOULD WORK ZONE PEDESTRIAN ACCESS BE MAINTAINED DURING CONSTRUCTION? REASONS: no sidewalk or other pedestrian facilities present (absense of need). IMPACT RATING TO UTILITIES OVERHEAD UTILITY LINES IN CONFLICT POWER TRANSMISSION LINES IN CONFLICT TELEPHONE / CABLE LINES IN CONFLICT FIBER OPTIC IN CONFLICT WATER IN CONFLICT SEWER IN CONFLCIT NATURAL GAS IN CONFLICT OTHER IN CONFLICT BASED ON THE PAST HISTORY NEAR THIS PROJECT SITE, WHAT IS THE ESTIMATED TIME REQUIRED TO COMPLETE UTILITY ADJUSTMENTS MONTHS IS THERE ANY FUTURE UTILITY CONSTRUCTION ANTICIPATED IN THE PROJECT AREA IS A FEMA BUY-OUT PROPERTY BEING IMPACTED HYDRAULICS UNIT (COMPLETED BY HYDRAULICS UNIT STAFF PRIOR TO THE FSM) WILL THIS PROJECT REQUIRE A FEMA PERMIT? IS THERE UNUSUAL SCOUR POTENTIAL? IS PROTECTION NEEDED? ARE BANKS STABLE? IS PROTECTION NEEDED? DOES STREAM CARRY APPRECIABLE AMOUNT OF LARGE DEBRIS? WILL THE PLACEMENT OF BENTS IN THE WATER BE ALLOWED COMMENTS WERE HYDRAULIC ALTERNATIVES BESIDES A BRIDGE CONSIDERED COMMENTS POSSIBLE SPAN LAYOUT: GEOTECHNICAL UNIT (COMPLETED BY GEOTECHNICAL UNIT PRIOR TO THE FSM) EXISTING FOUNDATION REPORTS? IF SO, ATTACH. KNOWN GEOLOGICAL FEATURES IN AREA WHICH MAY AFFECT DESIGN None Known ARE PERMITS NEEDED FOR INVESTIGATIVE WORK AT SITE COMMENTS: ARE THERE ANY HISTORICAL AND / OR VIBRATION SENSITIVE STRUCTURES NEAR BY COMMENTS: ARE THERE ANY KNOWN LANDFILLS AND / OR GEOENVIRONMENTAL HAZARD SITES AT OR WITHIN CLOSE PROXIMITY TO THE PROJECT SITE COMMENTS: DEPTH OF WEATHERED ROCK OR ROCK BELOW STREAMBED ( FT. ) ARE ANY IMPACTS ANTCIPATED TO NATURAL SPRINGS OR ARTESIAN WELLS COMMENTS: POSSIBLE FOUNDATION TYPE: PD & EA AND NEU UNIT (COMPLETED BY PDEA STAFF PRIOR TO THE FSM) TRAFFIC FORECAST (AS PREPARED BY TRANSPORTATION PLANNING BRANCH AND PROVIDED BY PDEA) Accident History: -L- BASE YEAR (2021) ANNUAL AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 150 % TRUCKS/DUALS -L- DESIGN YEAR (2040) ANNUAL AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 300 % TRUCKS/DUALS SHOW -Y-LINE TRAFFIC IF APPLICABLE FOR BRIDGES OVER / UNDER. -Y- BASE YEAR (20 ) ANNUAL AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC % TRUCKS/DUALS -Y- DESIGN YEAR (20 ) ANNUAL AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC % TRUCKS/DUALS TRAFFIC SAFETY (AS PREPARED BY THE TRAFFIC SAFETY UNIT AND PROVIDED BY PDEA) OPERATING SPEED: 55 MPH CRASH RATE: 240.93 WETLANDS AT SITE COMMENTS: KNOWN ENDANGERED SPECIES POPULATIONS IN AREA COMMENTS: TROUT OR TVA COUNTY COMMENTS: CAMA COUNTY PRIMARY NURSERY AREA MORATORIA IF YES-DURATION COMMENTS: IS WATER FEATURE CLASSIFIED AS A WILD AND SCENIC RIVER COMMENTS: WHAT IS THE WATER QUALITY CLASSIFICATION FOR THIS PROJECT: WS-III WILL A COAST GUARD PERMIT BE REQUIRED COMMENTS: IS THE PROJECT SITE IN OR NEAR ANY OF THE FOLLOWING: NATIONAL FOREST WILDLIFE REFUGE STATE, COUNTY, OR LOCAL PARK AIRPORT A LAKE FOR RECREATION OR POWER GENERATION WATER SUPPLY RESERVOIR NUTRIENT SENSITIVE WATERS PUBLIC USE BOAT RAMP CEMETARIES WILL A FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION PERMIT BE REQUIRED IS THE PROJECT AREA KNOWN FOR POTENTIAL INDIAN, COLONIAL, OR OTHER ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES KNOWN OR POTENTIAL HISTORIC PROPERTIES IN THE AREA IS THE BRIDGE STRUCTURE ITSELF, OR ANY PART THEREOF, CONSIDERED HISTORIC WILL THE PROJECT IMPACT A CHURCH, COMMUNITY CENTER, OR OTHER PUBLIC FACILITY IS THIS PROJECT ON A STATEWIDE BICYCLE ROUTE OR A LOCAL NON-MARKED BICYCLE ROUTE ANY CLARIFICATION OR COMMENTS ON ITEMS ABOVE: ROADWAY DESIGN UNIT (COMPLETED BY ROADWAY DESIGN UNIT PRIOR TO FSM) ALIGNMENT: EXISTING HORIZONTAL EXISTING VERTICAL POSSIBLE DESIGN STANDARDS POSSIBLE DESIGN SPEED (MPH) POSSIBLE DESIGN EXCEPTIONS COMMENT APPROXIMATE PROJECT LENGTH 600 (FT) NUMBER AND WIDTH OF LANES 2 - 10' WIDE LANES SHOULD THIS PROJECT HAVE CURB AND GUTTER OR SHOULDER APPROACHES COMMENT TOTAL SHOULDER WIDTH 3 (FT) PAVED SHOULDER WIDTH 0 (FT) CLEAR ROADWAY ON STRUCTURE 28 (FT) WILL EXISTING DRIVEWAYS, BUSINESS ACCESS, -Y- LINES OR RAMPS NEED TO BE RELOCATED COMMENTS: IS THERE ADDITIONAL RIGHT OF WAY / PERMANENT EASEMENTS / TEMPORARY EASEMENTS ANTICIPATED FOR CONSTRUCTION COMMENT ARE ANY RETAINING WALLS ANTICIPATED IS THERE A POSSIBILITY OF RELOCATEES IF SO, DESCRIBE ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: STRUCTURE DESIGN UNIT (COMPLETED BY THE STRUCTURE DESIGN UNIT PRIOR TO THE FSM) POSSIBLE SUPERSTRUCTURE: TYPE: NUMBER OF SPANS LENGTH OF SPANS (FT) WILL RAILROAD INVOLVEMENT BE REQUIRED WILL STRUCTURE REQUIRE DESIGN FOR VESSEL IMPACT OR FENDER SYSTEM DESCRIPTION: ARE ANY RETAINING WALLS ANTICIPATED CONSTRUCTABILITY AND ACCESS (DISCUSSED AT THE FSM BY DIVISION BRIDGE MANAGER) METHOD OF ACCESS: TOP-DOWN (WORK BRIDGE / CAUSEWAY) PROPOSED LOCATION RELATIVE TO EXISTING STRUCTURE: PROPOSED LENGTH (FT) WIDTH (FT) MATERIAL AND EQUIPMENT ACCESS TO SITE: TRACTOR-TRAILER ACCESS BARGE ACCESS HEAVY EQUIPMENT ACCESS POSTED ROADS AND POSTED BRIDGES IN VICINITY THAT MAY AFFECT ACCESS ARE CONSTRUCTION STAGING AREAS AVAILABLE NEAR SITE ANY ANTICIPATED AREAS OF TEMPORARY SHORING REQUIRED ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED / RESOLVED AT FSM BY ATTENDEES LIST ALTERNATIVES TO BE STUDIED BY ROADWAY DESIGN: 1) 2) 3) DESCRIBE ANY DISCUSSION REGARDING HOW THE ALTERNATIVES WERE DECIDED UPON, WHY CERTAIN ALTERANTIVES WERE REJECTED, AND IF AN ALTERNATIVE WAS SELECTED, WHY. CHECK ONE TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT (CHECK ONE) CATIGORICAL EXCLUSION (CE) PROGRAMMATIC CATIGORICAL EXCLUSION (PCE) THE OPTIMUM LET DATE FOR THIS PROJECT IS: ADDITIONAL COMMENTS AND/OR UNRESOLVED ISSUES TO BE ADDRESSED: