20240671 Ver 1_Cover Letter and Attachments_20240509

-0- WithersRavenel
.. Our People. Your Success.
May 9, 2024
US Army Corps of Engineers NC -Division of Water Resources
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
Mr. Anthony Scarbraugh Ms. Stephanie Goss
2407 West Fifth St. 1617 Mail Service Center
Washington, NC 27889
Re: Coastal Carolina Regional
NWP 14 PCN Submittal
New Bern, Craven County
WR Project #23-0337-A
Mr. Scarbraugh and Ms. Goss,
Raleigh, NC 27699
Airport (EWN) - Aerospace Development Additional Area -
On behalf of the Coastal Carolina Regional Airport, we are requesting authorization from the
USACE to use NWP 14 for the development of an access road to provide access to a planned
Aerospace Corporate Development Area. We are also requesting a 401 permit from NCDWR.
The following table presents the proposed impacts:
Proposed Impact Table
Feature
Type of Impact
Impact Area
AC
Square Feet
Open
Waters
Permanent - Road Crossings
0.096
4,180
Totals
0.096
4,180
The proposed total permanent impacts to jurisdictional waters are 0.096 acres (see table below)
and therefore the project is eligible for authorization under an NWP 14.
While the proposed project is located within a coastal county, there are no tidal waters or CAMA
AECs within or adjacent to the review area and authorization from the NCDCM is not required for
proposed activities within the review area.
The Aerospace Development Area is ±93 acres located south and east of Runway 4 near Creekside
Park Drive (Lat: 35.06599°N; Lat:-77.04271°W). The review area is in the Neuse River Basin
(HUC: 030202040304) and drains to Brice Creek (Stream Index: 27-101-40-(1); Surface Water
Classification: C, Sw; NSW).
Proposed Project
The purpose of the project is to construct an access road between Old Airport Road and the
planned Aerospace Corporate Development located at the Coastal Carolina Regional Airport
(EWN). The Aerospace Development will be located on a 86.68 acre parcel (Parcel ID: 7-103-
12002) owned by Craven County, which is outside of the Airport Operations Area (AOA) of the
Coastal Carolina Regional Airport and will not be part of, or a function of the airport operations.
The Aerospace Corporate Development will be an industrial park, located outside of the
AOA/security fence, in which the businesses will support the aeronautical industry and will result
in the construction of new hangars, apron space, and taxilanes connecting the new apron to the
existing Taxiway A.
115 MacKenan Drive I Cary, NC 27511
t: 919.469.3340 1 www.withersravenel.com I License No. F-1479
Asheville I Cary I Charlotte I Greensboro I Pittsboro I Raleigh I Southern Pines I Wilmington

CCRA - Aerospace Development Additional Area :: WVi th ersRave n e l
New Bern, Craven County
NWP 14 PCN Submittal Our People. Your Success -
The Aerospace Development is proposed by Coastal Carolina Regional Airport to support
aerospace -related companies interested in locating on airport property with airside access in
Eastern North Carolina. EWN is located in close proximity to several military installations,
including MCAS Cherry Point, the Second Marine Aircraft Wing and Fleet Readiness Center East.
In addition to being able to support these military installations, this proposed development will be
able to support all types of aviation and aerospace activities from manufacturing and
maintenance/repair/overhaul to flight and flight test operations. Coastal Carolina Regional Airport
has recently been approached by multiple business entities that have inquired about basing their
operations at the airport and indicated that if a site on the airport was prepared and infrastructure
ready for development, they would be able to utilize the space with new aerospace -related
development.
Currently, EWN does not have a shovel -ready site to accommodate these requests. This project
will provide the airport with an area that has been cleared and a portion of the site prepared and
ready to immediately accommodate the aerospace development requests being received from
potential airport tenants. The Airport would significantly benefit from the land and/or hangar
leases for this area as well as increased fuel sales revenue due to the increased aircraft traffic and
users, this would help the Airport fulfill federal obligations to be self-sustaining.
The Aerospace Development will be aeronautical in nature, including the construction of new
hangars, apron space, and taxilanes connecting the new apron to the existing Taxiway A. The
proposed access road is necessary to provide access to the Aerospace Development from Old
Airport Road. The proposed access road is necessary to provide tenants, employees, clients,
visitors, etc. to access the Aerospace Development, as access would not be allowed through the
Airport Operations Area (AOA), which is a restricted access area inside the perimeter security
fence. Therefore, an access road from an existing public road, located outside of the AOA and
perimeter security fence is the only viable option. This request is specific to the access road.
Standard construction equipment and techniques for road construction will be used to construct
the proposed access road. Access during construction will be in uplands.
Project History
On October 12, 2022, and March 23, 2023, WithersRavenel (WR) conducted a site review of the
specific areas associated with the Aerospace Development Area Project at the Coastal Carolina
Regional Airport (EWN) for the purpose of evaluating the presence of wetlands, streams/riparian
buffers and federal and state listed threatened and endangered species and/or potential habitat
within the review areas. A Wetland Delineation Exhibit is attached.
Attached is the Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Request in support of the delineation.
Please note that we are not requesting issuance of a PJD in conjunction with issuance of the NWP
14 for this project.
In November 2022, WR sent a Federal Consistency Determination Request to the NC Division of
Coastal Management (NCDCM). A Federal Consistency Determination email was received from
NCDCM on January 20, 2023 which states that the project is consistent with NC's approved
coastal management program. The NCDCM Federal Consistency Determination emailh has been
included as an attachment.
In a letter dated July 6, 2023, NCSHPO recommended a comprehensive archeological survey be
undertaken due to there being twenty-five prehistoric and historic archeological sites within the
Page 2 of 4

CCRA - Aerospace Development Additional Area :: WVi th ersRave n e l
New Bern, Craven County
NWP 14 PCN Submittal our People. Your Success-
vicinity of the Area of Potential Effect. An archeological survey was conducted by Terracon
Consultants, Inc. in September 2023. In a follow-up letter after submission of the archeological
survey report, NCSHPO concurred that no new archeological sites eligible for the National
Register of Historic Places are located within the survey area. Copies of the NCSHPO letters are
included as attachments.
On 10/12/2022 and 3/23/23, WithersRavenel (WR) conducted a pedestrian survey to assess
vegetative communities and identify potential habitat for, or occurrences of federally listed species
within or immediately adjacent to the review area. WR completed a Threatened & Endangered
Species Assessment Report which has been provided as an attachment. The survey determined
that the only potential habitat within the site for federally listed species was for northern long-
eared bat (NLEB) and tricolored bat. Additionally, WR determined the proposed project would
have "No Effect" on all listed species except the NLEB and the tricolored bat.
WR completed a Consistency Determination for NLEB which determined the project "May Affect"
the NLEB. A copy of the Consistency Determination for NLEB has been provided as an attachment.
A USFWS Biological Opinion (BO) was issued on 9/25/2023 for the project under the Interim
Consultation Framework for the NLEB. The USFWS determined that the level of anticipated take
is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of the NLEB. A copy of the BO has been
provided as an attachment. Proposed Impacts
The proposed impacts consist of:
• 0.096 acres of permanent open water impacts (ponds) for construction of an access road.
Pond 1 and Pond 2 are proposed to be filled in their entirety to facilitate development of an access
road. The construction of the road will partially fill the ponds, but the entirety of the ponds are
being filled to eliminate the existing hazard these ponds create from being a wildlife attractant
within the approach slope of Runway 32. Removing the two ponds will help mitigate public safety
hazards associated with aircraft travel by eliminating wildlife habitat hazards to prevent wildlife
strikes.
The proposed permanent open water impacts are necessary for crossings of two jurisdictional
ponds for the construction of an access road necessary for the proposed Aerospace Corporate
Development Area. The proposed access road is routed through areas of the site that are currently
mowed/maintained. No impacts are proposed to other aquatic resources and the access road has
been designed to avoid onsite wetlands. No impacts are proposed for buildings or infrastructure
associated with the Aerospace Development.
Avoidance and Minimization
Prior to site plan design, the applicant requested that a detailed wetland delineation be conducted
so that impacts to wetlands and "waters" could be minimized.
Proposed permanent open water impacts for the Aerospace Corporate Development Area access
road project have been minimized to only those necessary for construction of an access road from
Old Airport Road. Various alternatives have been explored for the access road, all of which resulted
in impacts to Wetlands A and B. The proposed alignment avoids impacting Wetlands A and B.
The proposed alignment of the necessary access road means that impacts to two ponds are
unavoidable. The proposed road alignment is necessary to provide sufficient space for the planned
aerospace development while remaining within the project boundaries. The two ponds are
Page 3 of 4

CCRA - Aerospace Development Additional Area :: W i th ersRave n e l
New Bern, Craven County
NWP 14 PCN Submittal ❑urPeople.Your Success -
proposed to be entirely filled in order to construct the access road and necessary grading while
reducing the amount of open water near the airport to reduce conflicts with waterfowl attracted
to the ponds. Removing the two ponds will help mitigate public safety hazards associated with
aircraft travel by eliminating wildlife habitat hazards to prevent wildlife strikes.
Access during construction will occur within uplands. Additionally, sediment and erosion control
measures will be installed prior to construction.
Mitigation
Permanent impacts for open waters do not require mitigation, therefore, the applicant does not
propose mitigation for the 0.096 acres of permanent open water impacts.
Please feel free to contact me if you have questions or require additional information to complete
your review.
Sincerely,
WithersRavenel
Rick Trone
Environmental Scientist
Attachments:
• PCN Form
• Agent Authorization Form
• Parcel/Owner Information
• Aerial Exhibit
• USGS Quads
• Craven County Soil Survey
• Wetland Delineation Exhibit
• NCSHPO Letters
• NCDCM Federal Consistency Determination
• USFWS IPaC Species List
• NCNHP Letter
• Impact Exhibits
Appendices:
• USACE Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Request
• WR Wetlands and Threatened and Endangered Species Assessment Report
• United States Fish and Wildlife Service Biological Opinion
• NLEB Consistency Letter
Page 4 of 4

■■ WithersRavenel
lipOur People. Your Success.
AGENT AUTHORIZATION

WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
AUTHORITY FOR APPOINTMENT OF AGENT
The undersigned Owner Coastal Carolina Regional Airport (Client) does hereby appoint
Withers & Ravenel. Inc. as his, her, or it's agent for the purpose of petitioning the appropriate
local, state and federal environmental regulatory agencies (US Army Corps of Engineers, INC
Division of Water Quality, INC Division of Coastal Management, local municipalities, etc.)
f)rreview and approval of the jurisdictional boundaries of onsite jurisdictional areas
(wetlands, surface waters, riparian buffers, etc.) and/or; b) preparation and submittal of
appropriate environmental permit applications/requests for projects within the Coastal
Carolina Regional Airport property.
The Client does hereby authorize that said agent has the authority to do the following acts
on behalf of the owner:
(1) To submit appropriate requests/applications and the required
supplemental materials;
(2) To attend meetings to give representation on behalf of the Client.
(3) To authorize access to subject property for the purpose of
environmental review by appropriate regulatory agencies.
This authorization shall continue in effect until completion of the contracted task or
termination by the Client.
Date:
Agent's Name, Address & Telephone:
Signature of Client:
Withers & Ravenel. Inc.
7
- (Na - Print) (Title)
115 MacKenan Drive
Cary, NC 27511
(Signature).
Tel. [phone]
�i��-T-, I) ��— -?,I
Mailing Address
hLE 0 � z2SDZ,
City State Zip
Phone: Qik2 1
Email: A S�J- -JZ C 0 fr ,>i�!; �� %, C4
1,15 r�I icKenan Drive I Cary. NC 2751-1
1:'7>19.469,3340 If: 919:+67.6C08 ��w+nn+.w�ithcrsr,ven l.cum j License NO. C 08S2
C,,i•y I GI ccnshoro Pittsboro j Ra I (-ig II � 1NiII iI1"ton

■■ WithersRavenel
lipOur People. Your Success.
PARCEL/OWNER
INFORMATION

Craven County GIS Aerospace Development 1 inch =545feet
Craven County does NOT warrant the information shown on this map and should be used ONLY fortax assessment purposes. Printed on May 1, 2024 at 2: 56: 03 PM

5/1/24, 2:57 PM about:blank
Craven County Geographic Information System
W7
Craven County does NOT warrant the information shown on this page and
should be used ONLY for tax assessments purposes. Page generated on 5/l/2024 at 2:57:09 PM
PARCEL ID : 7-103 -12002
Owner:
Mailing Address:
Address of Property
Subdivision :
Property Description
Assessed Acreage
Deed Book Page:
Land Value:
Total Improvement(s) Value
Total Assessed Value:
Number of Improvements:
City Name:
Drainage District
Special District :
Sale Date
Deed
12/6/2007
2671-0835
CRAVEN COUNTY
PO BOX 1128 NEW BERN, NC 28563
HALL PROPERTY
86.78
2671 0835
$2,169,500
$0
$2,169,500
0
Seller Name
Deed Recording Date:
Recorded Survey:
Life Estate Deed :
Estate File Year-E-Folder
Tax Exempt:
Fire Tax District
Lot Dimension
Land Use :
Recent Sales Information
Buyer Name
1262007
H-108-G
Yes
TOWNSHIP 7
SERVICE - GENERAL
Type of Sale Sale Price
HALL, CLAUDE C & GUYOLA CRAVEN COUNTY PROPERTY SPLIT $1,905,500
Buildings or improvements where not found on this parcel.
about:blank 1/1

::WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
AERIAL EXHIBIT

0
0
O
a
OO o
� a
o a
o a
P
00
o O
Ll
P �
Do
o �
o
Ole
EBIRC11
A- AEROSPACE DEVELOPMENT AERIAL (2022) WithersRavenelEngineers I Planners I Surveyors
CRAVEN COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 300 600
1 inch = 600 ft.
a/ i
0

::WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
USGS QUADS

GRAPHIC SCALE Green
0 1000 2000
i i ✓ C/ ,
�� �. - r�,� j� • KEi?H ciR '� i-w��iiAy-_ s�� � �, {, o Sprung ��- -- -- —�
¢ --y �Rp �� h" . GREF Point
1 inch = 2000 ft. i �� - > — -
A
Fort
Fcsaao f f� __70 F� r Point
%� ` ,..1/� �`'`'% i-s (- Ind I \ I \\R'HaN 2 ;� �.__���:-__•:�,
RD
FAIR --
_
(-`coastal CaroUna,
\` J J � � � o -- ! gienal-Air o � •� � � °� r _ p
Granthams
�c r
REVIEW AREA
r
/
o! 0 �, 4
z
k
�y�0 � )-�,;/,✓ � r � � .. '%\ it %" II �� �� , <�' h x / > \,
Rpc-3
ICON EK, CT s
70
� .._, ��� 1\ � i,%' ; \ ; � \ ice', �, �" �1' -'� _/ -�` �\L/l Z J � � � ra� /� aP� •ly. w I I; y
P 0 1 ,NI f" r1 1� / : • ` / it P_\� l , \-� f 1,� : ; m
�„� � � �i
�� i Cart `� y % j ' / � _/i'/\,�-\- r�i . _� � �,'-�`,�, ��1 .�� � I o, ,:�_w� �•, i r 1/I � � ;� \� �i � (1 ?� \� v,�h
,r
I
CCRA- AEROSPACE DEVELOPMENT USGS (2019) - NEW BERN �0- WithersRavenel
1/ Engineers I Planners I Surveyors
NEW BERN CRAVEN COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA

GRAPHIC SCALE
0 300 600
1 inch = 600 ft.
0
CCRA- AEROSPACE DEVELOPMENT
REVIEW AREA
(_ r
11I \,•�•., r � � fr r �
USGS (2019) - NEW BERN
WithersRavenel
1/ Engineers I Planners I Surveyors

::WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
CRAVEN COUNTY
SOIL SURVEY

GRAPHIC SCALE
0 300 600
1 inch = 600 ft.
•
/I REVIEW AREA I
StA
M
h
CCRA- AEROSPACE DEVELOPMENT III
CRAVEN CO. SOIL SURVEY (1989) - Sheet 12 III
-40- WithersRavenel
NEW BERN CRAVEN COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA 1/ Engineers I Planners I Surveyors

::WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
DELINEATION EXHIBIT

GRAPHIC SCALE
0 300 600
1 inch = 600 ft.
;IREVIEW7AREA
0
0
WETLAND B
POTENTIALLY O
NONJURISDICTIONAL O
TO USACE
POND 2 Q POTENTIALLY NONJURISDICTIONAL
TO USACE O
POND 1
POTENTIALLY NON JURISDICTIONAL Q
TO USACE
WETLAND A
POTENTIALLY
JURISDICTIONAL TO
JQ USACE
O DITCH 2 Q
POTENTIALLY JURISDICTIONAL Q
TO USACE DITCH 1
O POTENTIALLY JURISDICTIONAL
TO USACE
0
P
O O O
P °
Q
0
o °
o
WETLAND D pQ� n
POTENTIALLY T
JURISDICTIONAL TO
O USACE -j NOTES:
WETLAND C °1) WETLAND DELINEATION PERFORMED BY WR ON 10/12/2022 & 3/23/23
POTENTIALLY Q 2) WETLAND/STREAM LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE, BASED ON GPS
NON -JURISDICTIONAL TO LOCATION, CRAVEN COUNTY GIS DATA, AND TOPOGRAPHIC INTERPRETATION.
USACE O
3) THIS PROPERTY MAY BE SUBJECT TO MUNICIPAL ZONING/PLANNING
BUFFERS WHICH SHOULD BE VERIFIED PRIOR TO DESIGN.
4) DELINEATION AND JURISDICTIONAL STATUS SHOULD BE VERIFIED BY USACE
0 PRIOR TO DESIGN.
CCRA-AEROSPACE DEVELOPMENT WETLAND DELINEATION EXHIBIT �0 WithersRavenel
1/ Engineers I Planners I Surveyors
NEW BERN CRAVEN COUNTY NORTH CAROHNA

■■ WithersRavenel
lipOur People. Your Success.
NCSH PO LETTERS

North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona M. Bartos, Administrator
Governor Roy Cooper
Secretary D. Reid Wilson
July 6, 2023
John Massey, P.E.
Talbert & Bright, Inc.
4810 Shelley Drive
Wilmington, NC, 28405
Office of Archives and History
Deputy Secretary, Darin J. Waters, Ph.D.
jmasseygtbiilm.com
Re: Aerospace development, Coastal Carolina Regional Airport, New Bern, Craven County,
ER 23-1364
Dear Mr. Massey:
Thank you for your April 9, 2023, submission concerning the above -referenced project. We have reviewed
the project and offer the following comments.
There are currently twenty-five prehistoric and historic archaeological sites within the vicinity of Area of
Potential Effect (APE), and within the Coastal Carolina Regional Airport. The APE also contains several
geographical features such as high ground adjacent to marsh, creeks, and rivers that suggest site
probability. Due to this, we recommend a comprehensive archaeological survey be undertaken prior to any
ground disturbing activities in the project area. We look forward to meeting with you to discuss the
appropriate archaeological methodology.
The purpose of this survey is to identify archaeological sites and make recommendations regarding their
eligibility status in terms of the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). This work should be
conducted by an experienced archaeologist who meets the Secretary of the Interior Professional
Qualifications Standards. A list of archaeological consultants who have conducted or expressed an interest
in contract work in North Carolina is available at https://archaeology.ncdcr.gov/archaeological-consultant-
list. The archaeologists listed, or any other experienced archaeologist, may be contacted to conduct the
recommended survey. Please note that our office requests consultation with the Office of State
Archaeology Review Archaeologist to discuss appropriate field methodologies prior to the archaeological
field investigation.
OSA's Archaeological Standards and Guidelines for Background Research, Field Methodologies,
Technical Reports, and Curation can be found online at: https://files.nc.gov/dncr-
arch/OSA_Gui delines_Dec20 l 7.pdf.
Please note that starting June 30, 2023, OSA will use Citrix ShareFile for archaeological consultants to
submit digital archaeological reports and site files for Environmental Review. Consultants should review
our ShareFile User Guidelines and submit a ShareFile User Access Form to Kim Urban
(kimberl..urbane,ncdcr.gov) to obtain access to ShareFile if they have not already done so.
Location: 109 East Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 Telephone/Fax: [phone]-6898

ER23-1364, July 06, Page 2 of
Additionally, the OSA has changed our Environmental Review report and site form submission
requirements. We now require:
• One (1) digital copy of the archaeological survey report, to be sent through ShareFile.
• One (1) digital copy of each NC Site Form(s) with site map(s) for each site that was recorded as part
of the archaeological investigation, to be sent through ShareFile. Please submit each site form as a
separate document.
• Hard copies of reports will be requested by the OSA once we determine that no further changes to
the report are needed. Concurrence letters will not be sent until after we receive the hard copy of the
final archaeological survey report.
More information on our Environmental Review submission requirements can be found at:
hM2s://archaeology.ncdcr.gov/programs/environmental-review.
We have determined that the project as proposed will not have an effect on any historic structures.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36
CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact Renee Gledhill -Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-814-6579
or environmental.reviewgncdcr.gov. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the
above referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
Ramona Bartos, Deputy
State Historic Preservation Officer
Location: 109 East Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 Telephone/Fax: [phone]-6898

North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona M. Bartos, Administrator
Governor Roy Cooper
Secretary D. Reid Wilson
December 29, 2023
Office of Archives and History
Deputy Secretary, Darin J. Waters, Ph.D.
Melissa McKay, RPA Melissa.mckay_(r)c,terracon.com
Terracon Consultants, Inc.
2401 Brentwood Road, Suite 107
Raleigh, NC 27604
Re: Aerospace development, Coastal Carolina Regional Airport, New Bern, Craven County,
ER 23-1364
Dear Ms. McKay,
Thank you for your submission of December 14, 2023, submitting the hard copy of the Phase I
archaeological survey report for the above -referenced undertaking. We have reviewed the submittal and
offer the following comments.
We concur that no new archaeological sites that could be considered eligible for the National Register of
Historic Places are located in the surveyed area for the reasons outlined in the report.
We have accepted the submitted document as the final compliance report for this archaeological survey.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36
CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact Renee Gledhill -Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-814-6579
or environmental.reviewgdncr.nc.gov. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the
above referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
Ramona Bartos, Deputy
State Historic Preservation Officer
Location: 109 East Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 Telephone/Fax: [phone]-6898

■■ WithersRavenel
lipOur People. Your Success.
DCM FEDERAL CONSISTENCY
EMAIL

From: Govoni, Daniel
To: Kreiser, Gary
Subject: RE: [External] Coastal Carolina Regional Airport (EWN) - Aerospace Development Area - New Bern, Craven
County - Federal Consistency Determination Request (WR#03150006.95) DCM2023004
Date: Friday, January 20, 2023 8:22:09 AM
Hello Gary,
North Carolina's coastal zone management program consists of, but is not limited to, the Coastal
Area Management Act, the State's Dredge and Fill Law, Chapter 7 of Title 15A of North Carolina's
Administrative Code, and the land use plan of the County and/or local municipality in which the
proposed project is located. It is the objective of the Division of Coastal Management (DCM) to
manage the State's coastal resources to ensure that proposed federal actions would be compatible
with safeguarding and perpetuating the biological, social, economic, and aesthetic values of the
State's coastal waters.
DCM has reviewed the submitted information pursuant to the management objectives and
enforceable policies of Subchapters 7H and 7M of Chapter 7 in Title 15A of the North Carolina
Administrative Code and concurs that the proposed activity is consistent with North Carolina's
approved coastal management program.
Prior to the initiation of the activities described, the applicant should obtain any other required State
approvals or authorizations. Should the proposed action be modified further, a revised consistency
determination could be necessary. This might take the form of either a supplemental consistency
determination pursuant to 15 CFR 930.46, or a new consistency determination pursuant to
15 CFR 930.36. Likewise, if further project assessments reveal environmental effects not previously
considered, a supplemental consistency certification may be required. If you have any questions,
please contact me at [phone]. Thank you for your consideration of the North Carolina
Coastal Management Program.
Daniel NL Govoni
Policy Analyst
Federal Consistency Coordinator
NC Division of Coastal Management
Department of Environmental Quality
252-515-5435
Daniel. Govoni(q-)ncdenr. gov
400 Commerce Avenue
Morehead City, NC 28557
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
From: Kreiser, Gary <[e-mail]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2022 2:09 PM
To: Govoni, Daniel <[e-mail]>
Subject: [External] Coastal Carolina Regional Airport (EWN) - Aerospace Development Area - New
Bern, Craven County - Federal Consistency Determination Request (WR#03150006.95)

CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an
attachment to Report Spam.
Mr. Govoni,
We are currently working on an aerospace development area at the Coastal Carolina Regional
Airport (EWN) in New Bern, Carven County. The proposed activities consist of potential development
of airport property.
The proposed project is located in a coastal county and will receive federal funding and therefore
requires a federal consistency determination under the Coastal Zone Management Act. Therefore,
we are submitting the following information to you for concurrence that the proposed project is
consistent with the Coastal Zone Management Act and the enforceable policies of NC's approved
Coastal Zone Management Program.
The review area is ±75 acres located south and east of Runway 4 near Creekside Park Drive (Lat:
35.06599°N; Lat:-77.04271°W). The review area is in the Neuse River Basin (HUC: 03020204) and
drains to Brice Creek (Stream Index: 27-101-40-(1); Surface Water Classification: C, Sw; NSW).
WithersRavenel completed a wetland delineation for the project area. There are three small
wetlands within the project area. Impacts to these wetlands will be avoided, but if any impacts are
required then 404/401 permits will be obtained. The project area is located more than ±2,000 If
east of Brice Creek, and is located well beyond the 75' AEC associated with Brice Creek. Therefore, a
CAMA permit is not required for the proposed project.
Additionally, a threatened and endangered species survey was conducted for the project area, and
the proposed project will have May Affect Not Likely to Adversely Affect on northern long-eared bat.
A request for concurrence for the USFWS has been submitted.
We believe that the proposed project is consistent with the Federal Coastal Zone Act of 1972 and
the enforceable policies of the NC Coastal Zone Management Program, and we are requesting
concurrence from NCDCM.
Attached are USGS Quads and aerial photography of the project area. Please let me know if you have
any questions or require any additional information to complete your review.
Thanks in advance with your help on this project.
Gary Kreiser, NCLSS
�---avenel
❑®
115 MacKenan Drive I Cary, NC '7511
Office:919.469.3340 I Direct: 919.-38.0397
Ekreiser(Dwithersravenel.com
1XIMIXIM110]

■■ WithersRavenel
lipOur People. Your Success.
USFWS IPaC SPECIES
LIST

4/22/24, 4:13 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources
IPaC U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
IPaC resource list
This report is an automatically generated list of species and other resources such as critical
habitat (collectively referred to as trust resources) under the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's
(USFWS) jurisdiction that are known or expected to be on or near the project area referenced
below. The list may also include trust resources that occur outside of the project area, but
that could potentially be directly or indirectly affected by activities in the project area.
However, determining the likelihood and extent of effects a project may have on trust
resources typically requires gathering additional site -specific (e.g., vegetation/species
surveys) and project -specific (e.g., magnitude and timing of proposed activities) information.
Below is a summary of the project information you provided and contact information for the
USFWS office(s) with jurisdiction in the defined project area. Please read the introduction to
each section that follows (Endangered Species, Migratory Birds, USFWS Facilities, and NWI
Wetlands) for additional information applicable to the trust resources addressed in that
section.
Location
Craven County, North Caroli
cuFa� Ra
—a I
o-
c �ask�
60
Local office
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
k. [phone]
1@ [phone]
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/3KTZL33SKBAMXMJK15XLFZRWHY/resources 1/20

4/22/24, 4:13 PM
IPaC: Explore Location resources
3916 Sunset Ridge Rd
Raleigh, NC 27607
O0000
Foy
�CO
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/3KTZL33SKBAMXMJKI5XLFZRWHY/resources 2/20

4/22/24, 4:13 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources
Endangered species
This resource list is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an analysis of
project level impacts.
The primary information used to generate this list is the known or expected range of each
species. Additional areas of influence (AOI) for species are also considered. An AOI includes
areas outside of the species range if the species could be indirectly affected by activities in
that area (e.g., placing a dam upstream of a fish population even if that fish does not occur at
the dam site, may indirectly impact the species by reducing or eliminating water flow
downstream). Because species can move, and site conditions can change, the species on this
list are not guaranteed to be found on or near the project area. To fully determine any
potential effects to species, additional site -specific and project -specific information is often
required. P t--,&
Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act requires Federal agencies to "request of the
Secretary information whether any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be
present in the area of such proposed action" for any project that is conducted, permitted,
funded, or licensed by any Federal agency. A letter from the local office and a species list
which fulfills this requirement can only be obtained by requesting an official species list from
either the Regulatory Review section in IPaC (see directions below) or from the local field
office directly. <0
For project evaluations that require USFWS concurrence/review, please return to the IPaC
website and request an official species list by doing the following:
1. Draw the project location and click CONTINUE.
2. Click DEFINE PROJECT.
3. Log in (if directed to do so).
4. Provide a name and description for your project.
5. Click REQUEST SPECIES LIST.
Listed speciesi and their critical habitats are managed by the Ecological Services Program of
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and the fisheries division of the National Oceanic
and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA Fisheries).
Species and critical habitats under the sole responsibility of NOAA Fisheries are not shown
on this list. Please contact NOAA Fisheries for species under their jurisdiction.
1. Species listed under the Endangered Species Act are threatened or endangered; IPaC also
shows species that are candidates, or proposed, for listing. See the listing status page for
more information. IPaC only shows species that are regulated by USFWS (see FAQ).
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/3KTZL33SKBAMXMJK15XLFZRWHY/resources 3/20

4/22/24, 4:13 PM
IPaC: Explore Location resources
2. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an office
of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of
Commerce.
The following species are potentially affected by activities in this location:
Mammals
NAME
Northern Long-eared Bat Myotis septentrionalis
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9045
Tricolored Bat Perimyotis subflavus
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
STATUS
Endangered
Proposed Endangered
jl�
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/10515
dolr\
West Indian Manatee Trichechus manatus Threatened
Wherever found 4k Marine mammal
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does
not overlap the critical habitat.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/4469
L)
Birds
NAME 0 STATUS
Eastern Black Rail Laterallus jamaicensis ssp. jamaicensis Threatened
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/10477
Red -cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis Endangered
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/7614
Rufa Red Knot Calidris canutus rufa Threatened
Wherever found
There is proposed critical habitat for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1864
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/3KTZL33SKBAMXMJK15XLFZRWHY/resources 4/20

4/22/24, 4:13 PM
IPaC: Explore Location resources
Reptiles
NAME
STATUS
American Alligator Alligator mississippiensis SAT
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/776
Green Sea Turtle Chelonia mydas Threatened
There is proposed critical habitat for this species. Your location
does not overlap the critical habitat.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6199
Leatherback Sea Turtle Dermochelys coriacea
Wherever found
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does
not overlap the critical habitat.
Endangered
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1493 Nei"
Amphibians
NAME STATUS
Neuse River Waterdog Necturus lewisi Threatened
Wherever found
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does
not overlap the critical habitat.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6772
Insects
NAM E STATUS
Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus Candidate
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9743
Flowering Plants
NAME STATUS
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/3KTZL33SKBAMXMJKI5XLFZRWHY/resources 5/20

4/22/24, 4:13 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources
Rough -leaved Loosestrife Lysimachia asperulaefolia Endangered
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2747
Critical habitats
Potential effects to critical habitat(s) in this location must be analyzed along with the
endangered species themselves.
There are no critical habitats at this location.
J
You are still required to determine if your project(s) may have effects one
all above listed species.
Bald &Golden Eagles
Bald and golden eagles are protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act' and
the Migratory Bird Treaty Act2.
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to
bald or golden eagles, or their habitats3, should follow appropriate regulations and consider
implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described in the links below.
Specifically, please review the "Supplemental Information on Migratory Birds and Eagles".
LILT]
Additional information can be found using the following links:
• Eagle Management https://www.fws.gQv//program/eagle-management
• Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds
https://www.fws.gov/library/collections/avoiding-and-minimizing-incidental-take-
migratory-birds
• Nationwide conservation measures for birds
https://www.fws.gov/sites/default/files/documents/nationwide-standard-conservation-
measures.pdf
• Supplemental Information for Migratory Birds and Eagles in IPaC
https://www.fws.gov/media/supplemental-information-migratory-birds-and-bald-and-
golden-eagles-may-occur-project-action
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/3KTZL33SKBAMXMJKI5XLFZRWHY/resources 6/20

4/22/24, 4:13 PM
IPaC: Explore Location resources
There are likely bald eagles present in your project area. For additional information on bald
eagles, refer to Bald Eagle Nesting and Sensitivity to Human Activity
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization
measures to reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, see the PROBABILITY OF
PRESENCE SUMMARY below to see when these birds are most likely to be present and
breeding in your project area.
NAME
Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus
This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area,
but warrants attention because of the Eagle Act or for potential
susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of
development or activities.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1626
BREEDING SEASON
Breeds Sep 1 to jul 31
144
NO\
Golden Eagle Aquila chrysaetos Breeds elsew r
This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, F� \ r %
but warrants attention because of the Eagle Act or for potential
susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of
development or activities.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1680
Probability of Presence Summary
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely
to be present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your
project activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read
"Supplemental Information on Migratory Birds and Eagles", specifically the FAQ section titled
"Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before using or attempting to
interpret this report.
Probability of Presence( )
Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s)
your project overlaps during a particular week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4-
week months.) A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The survey
effort (see below) can be used to establish a level of confidence in the presence score. One
can have higher confidence in the presence score if the corresponding survey effort is also
high.
How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps:
1. The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in
the week where the species was detected divided by the total number of survey events
for that week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and the Spotted
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/3KTZL33SKBAMXMJKI5XLFZRWHY/resources 7/20

4/22/24, 4:13 PM
IPaC: Explore Location resources
Towhee was found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in
week 12 is 0.25.
2. To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of
presence is calculated. This is the probability of presence divided by the maximum
probability of presence across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability of presence
in week 20 for the Spotted Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence at week
12 (0.25) is the maximum of any week of the year. The relative probability of presence on
week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is 0.05/0.25 = 0.2.
3. The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical
conversion so that all possible values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the
probability of presence score.
To see a bar's probability of presence score, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
g
Breedin Season( 1� lk
Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time -frame inside which the bird breeds
across its entire range. If there are no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your
project area.
Survey Effort ( )
Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of
surveys performed for that species in the 1Okm grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The
number of surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys.
To see a bar's survey effort range, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
No Data ( )
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
Survey Timeframe
Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant
information. The exception to this is areas off the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are
based on all years of available data, since data in these areas is currently much more sparse.
probability of presence breeding season i survey effort no data
SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Bald Eagle Aiii i06 611111116 I I I I I I I I I I I I 11A11110 6iii ilia
Non -BCC
Vulnerable Golden Eagle ++++ ++yy + ++++ TTTT TTTT ++ ++ + +++ TTTT ++ ++ ++++ ++++ TTT+
Non -BCC
Vulnerable
What does IPaC use to generate the potential presence of bald and golden eagles in my specified
location?
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/3KTZL33SKBAMXMJK15XLFZRWHY/resources 8/20

4/22/24, 4:13 PM
IPaC: Explore Location resources
The potential for eagle presence is derived from data provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN),. The
AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets and is queried
and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as occurring in the 10km grid cell(s) which your project
intersects, and that have been identified as warranting special attention because they are a BCC species in
that area, an eagle (Eagle Act requirements may apply). To see a list of all birds potentially present in your
project area, please visit the Rapid Avian Information Locator (RAIL) Tool.
What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs of bald and golden eagles in my
specified location?
The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC), and other
species that may warrant special attention in your project location.
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian Knowledge
Network (AKN),. The AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey., banding, and citizen science
datasets and is queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as occurring in the 10km grid
cell(s) which your project intersects, and that have been identified as warranting special attention because
they are a BCC species in that area, an eagle (Eagle Act requirements may apply), or a species that has a
particular vulnerability to offshore activities or development.
Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your project area.
It is not representative of all birds that may occur in your project area. To get a list of all birds potentially
present in your project area, please visit the Rapid Avian Information Locator (RAIL) Tool.
What if I have eagles on my list?
�f
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid violating
the Eagle Act should such impacts occur. Please contact your local Fish and Wildlife Service Field Office if
you have questions.
f �
Migratory birds
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act' and the Bald and Golden
Eagle Protection Act2.
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to
migratory birds, eagles, and their habitats3 should follow appropriate regulations and
consider implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described in the links below.
Specifically, please review the "Supplemental Information on Migratory Birds and Eagles".
1. The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918.
2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
Additional information can be found using the following links:
• Eagle Management https://www.fws.gov//program/eagle-management
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/3KTZL33SKBAMXMJK15XLFZRWHY/resources 9/20

4/22/24, 4:13 PM
IPaC: Explore Location resources
• Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds
https://www.fws.gov/library/collections/avoiding-and-minimizing-incidental-take-
migratory-birds
• Nationwide conservation measures for birds https://www.fws.gov/sites/default/files/
documents/nationwide-standard-conservation-measures.pdf
• Supplemental Information for Migratory Birds and Eagles in IPaC
https://www.fws.gov/media/supplemental-information-migratory-birds-and-bald-and-
golden-eagles-may-occur-project-action
The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the
USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) list or warrant special attention in your
project location. To learn more about the levels of concern for birds on your list and how
this list is generated, see the FAQ below. This is not a list of every bird you may find in this
location, nor a guarantee that every bird on this list will be found in your project area. To see
exact locations of where birders and the general public have sighted birds in and around
your project area, visit the E-bird data mapping tool (Tip: enter your location, desired date
range and a species on your list). For projects that occur off the Atlantic Coast, additional
maps and models detailing the relative occurrence and abundance of bird species on your
list are available. Links to additional information about Atlantic Coast birds, and other
important information about your migratory bird list, including how to properly interpret and
use your migratory bird report, can be found below. %Nor
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization
measures to reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, see the PROBABILITY OF
PRESENCE SUMMARY below to see when these birds are most likely to be present and
breeding in your project area.
NAME
Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus
This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area,
but warrants attention because of the Eagle Act or for potential
susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of
development or activities.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1626
Brown -headed Nuthatch Sitta pusilla
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular
Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA
Chimney Swift Chaetura pelagica
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its
range in the continental USA and Alaska.
BREEDING SEASON
Breeds Sep 1 to jul 31
Breeds Marl to jul 15
Breeds Mar 15 to Aug 25
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/3KTZL33SKBAMXMJKI5XLFZRWHY/resources 10/20

4/22/24, 4:13 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources
Chuck-will's-widow Antrostomus carolinensis Breeds May 10 to Jul 10
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular
Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA
Eastern Whip -poor -will Antrostomus vociferus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its
range in the continental USA and Alaska.
Golden Eagle Aquila chrysaetos
This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area,
but warrants attention because of the Eagle Act or for potential
susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of
development or activities.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecptspecies/1680
Kentucky Warbler Geothlypis formosa
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its
range in the continental USA and Alaska.
Breeds May 1 to Aug 20
Breeds elsewhere
144
\O\
Breeds Apr 20 to Aug 20
King Rail Rallus elegans Breeds May 1 to Sep 5
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its
range in the continental USA and Alaska.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/8936
Least Tern Sternula antillarum antillarum
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its
range in the continental USA and Alaska.
AII-N
Lesser Yellowlegs Tringa flavipes
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its
range in the continental USA and Alaska.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9679
Painted Bunting Passerina ciris
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular
Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA
Pectoral Sandpiper Calidris melanotos
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its
range in the continental USA and Alaska.
Breeds Apr 25 to Sep 5
Breeds elsewhere
Breeds Apr 25 to Aug 15
Breeds elsewhere
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/3KTZL33SKBAMXMJKI5XLFZRWHY/resources 11/20

4/22/24, 4:13 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources
Prairie Warbler Setophaga discolor Breeds May 1 to Jul 31
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its
range in the continental USA and Alaska.
Prothonotary Warbler Protonotaria citrea Breeds Apr 1 to Jul 31
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its
range in the continental USA and Alaska.
Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus Breeds May 10 to Sep 10
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its
range in the continental USA and Alaska.
Rusty Blackbird Euphagus carolinus Breeds elsewhere
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular
Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA 0
Semipalmated Sandpiper Calidris pusilla 4Breeds elsewhere
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular
Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA
Southeastern American Kestrel Falco sparverius paulus Breeds Apr 1 to Aug 31
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular
Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/4076
Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina Breeds May 10 to Aug 31
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its
range in the continental USA and Alaska.
Probability of Presence Summary
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely
to be present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your
project activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read
"Supplemental Information on Migratory Birds and Eagles", specifically the FAQ section titled
"Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before using or attempting to
interpret this report.
Probability of Presence( )
Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s)
your project overlaps during a particular week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4-
week months.) A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The survey
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/3KTZL33SKBAMXMJKI5XLFZRWHY/resources 12/20

4/22/24, 4:13 PM
IPaC: Explore Location resources
effort (see below) can be used to establish a level of confidence in the presence score. One
can have higher confidence in the presence score if the corresponding survey effort is also
high.
How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps:
1. The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in
the week where the species was detected divided by the total number of survey events
for that week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and the Spotted
Towhee was found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in
week 12 is 0.25.
2. To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of
presence is calculated. This is the probability of presence divided by the maximum
probability of presence across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability of presence
in week 20 for the Spotted Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence at week
12 (0.25) is the maximum of any week of the year. The relative probability of presence on
week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is 0.05/0.25 = 0.2.
3. The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical
conversion so that all possible values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the
probability of presence score. 40ft '�
To see a bar's probability of presence score, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
Breeding Season( )
l
Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time -frame inside which the bird breeds
across its entire range. If there are no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your
project area.
Survey Effort (1)
Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of
surveys performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The
number of surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys.
To see a bar's survey effort range, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
No Data ( )
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
Survey Timeframe
Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant
information. The exception to this is areas off the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are
based on all years of available data, since data in these areas is currently much more sparse.
probability of presence breeding season I survey effort — no data
SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/3KTZL33SKBAMXMJKI5XLFZRWHY/resources 13/20

4/22/24, 4:13 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources
Bald Eagle loll loll IIII IIII 1*1140 +II I I1 *001 Iloo 11*111111111
Non -BCC
Vulnerable
Nuthatch
Brown -headed
N toll loll loll loll I I I I I I ��1 loll loll loll loll loll loll
BCC - BCR
Chimney Swift III I I I I I +++* IIII 1M 00011111 loll 1111 111111101111111+ ++++ ++++
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Chuck-will's- IIII IIII IIII IIII I I F� �� I I I IIII IIII IIII IIII IIII III
widow
BCC - BCR
Eastern Whip- I I I I III I I I I 14- 4 IIII III I I I I I IIII IIII IIII 141 1114
poor -will
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Golden Eagle 411 41111111+ IIII 114 - +++ +14 I 1 ► -E-+ t+++ +1 I I IIII IIII 114
Non -BCC
Vulnerable
Kentucky ____
Warbler
BCC Rangewide.p
(CON)
King Rail �� I I IIII IIII IIII IIII IIII IIII ++++ ++*+
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Least Tern ++++ 44 + + I I I I I I I I I I I IIII IIII III 1- ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++
BCC Rangewide eo
(CON)
Lesser IIII IIII IIII IIII IIII I I I I I I I r o I I I IIII I I I I I I I I III I
Yellowlegs
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Painted ++++ ++++ +++--I I 114 IIII IIII IIII IIII I I ++ IIII I I 11 I I I
Bunting
BCC - BCR
Pectoral IIII IIII IIII 14+ +-III ++++ ++++ o+++ +* 11 +++ I I I ++ ++++
Sandpiper
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Prairie Warbler IIII IIII IIII IIII IIII IIII IIII I I I I I M++ +0+ I IIII III I
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
https://ipac.ecosphere.fvvs.gov/location/3KTZL33SKBAMXMJKI5XLFZRWHY/resources 14/20

4/22/24, 4:13 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources
Prothonotary ++++ ++++ ++++ 1111111� ���� ���+ TT+T ++++ ++++ ++++ TTT+
Warbler I I I
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Red-headed 04 �AIIIIIII UN *111111$111L iiii iiii iii I10014+ ***1
Woodpecker
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Rusty Blackbird I I-++ ++T+ *000 111111101111111 ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++
BCC - BCR
Semipalmated IIII IIII I I I I I F++ 411 III I I I IIII 441 IIII IIII III F
Sandpiper
BCC -BCR
Southeastern -4 L++iolllii+ I II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I- I� I �4 11 III _N
American
Kestrel
BCC - BCR
Wood Thrush III [++++ +++] IIII IIII IIII 11 I 1 IIII 1 I I I I 1 I I 11444
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory
birds. r,1
Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize impacts to all
birds at any location year round. Implementation of these measures is particularly important when birds
are most likely to occur in the project area. When birds may be breeding in the area, identifying the
locations of any active nests and avoiding their destruction is a very helpful impact minimization measure.
To see when birds are most likely to occur and be breeding in your project area, view the Probability of
Presence Summary. Additional measures or permits may be advisable depending on the type of activity
you are conducting and the type of infrastructure or bird species present on your project site.
What does IPaC use to generate the list of migratory birds that potentially occur in my specified
location?
The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC), and other
species that may warrant special attention in your project location.
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian Knowledge
Network (AKN). The AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey, banding, and citizen science
datasets and is queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as occurring in the 10km grid
cell(s) which your project intersects, and that have been identified as warranting special attention because
they are a BCC species in that area, an eagle (Eagle Act requirements may apply), or a species that has a
particular vulnerability to offshore activities or development.
Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your project area.
It is not representative of all birds that may occur in your project area. To get a list of all birds potentially
present in your project area, please visit the Rapid Avian Information Locator (RAIL) Tool.
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/3KTZL33SKBAMXMJK15XLFZRWHY/resources 15/20

4/22/24, 4:13 PM
IPaC: Explore Location resources
What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds potentially
occurring in my specified location?
The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data provided by
the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). This data is derived from a growing collection of survey., banding, and
citizen science datasets.
Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information becomes
available. To learn more about how the probability of presence graphs are produced and how to interpret
them, go the Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me about these graphs" link.
How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering or migrating in my area?
To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding, wintering,
migrating or year-round), you may query your location using the RAIL Tool and look at the range maps
provided for birds in your area at the bottom of the profiles provided for each bird in your results. If a bird
on your migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated with it, if that bird does occur in your
project area, there may be nests present at some point within the timeframe specified. I"Breeds
elsewhere" is indicated, then the bird likelv does not breed in vour oroiect area. �y
What are the levels of concern for migratory birds?
Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern:
1. "BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) that are of concern throughout their
range anywhere within the USA (including Hawaii, the Pacific Islands, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin
Islands);
2. "BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in
the continental USA; and
3. "Non -BCC - Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on your list either
because of the Eagle Act requirements (for eagles) or (for non -eagles) potential susceptibilities in
offshore areas from certain types of development or activities (e.g. offshore energy development or
longline fishing).
Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made, in
particular, to avoid and minimize impacts to the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC species of
rangewide concern. For more information on conservation measures you can implement to help avoid and
minimize migratory bird impacts and requirements for eagles, please see the FAQs for these topics.
Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects
For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species and
groups of bird species within your project area off the Atlantic Coast, please visit the Northeast Ocean Data
Portal. The Portal also offers data and information about other taxa besides birds that may be helpful to
you in your project review. Alternately, you may download the bird model results files underlying the portal
maps through the NOAA NCCOS Integrative Statistical Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird
Distributions and Abundance on the Atlantic Outer Continental Shelf project webpage.
Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use throughout the
year, including migration. Models relying on survey data may not include this information. For additional
information on marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study and the nanotag studies or contact
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/3KTZL33SKBAMXMJK15XLFZRWHY/resources 16/20

4/22/24, 4:13 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources
Caleb Spiegel or Pam Loring.
What if I have eagles on my list?
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid violating
the Eagle Act should such impacts occur.
Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report
The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of birds of
priority concern. To learn more about how your list is generated, and see options for identifying what other
birds may be in your project area, please see the FAQ "What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds
potentially occurring in my specified location". Please be aware this report provides the "probability of
presence" of birds within the 10 km grid cell(s) that overlap your project; not your exact project footprint.
On the graphs provided, please also look carefully at the survey effort (indicated by the black vertical bar)
and for the existence of the "no data" indicator (a red horizontal bar). A high survey effort is the key
component. If the survey effort is high, then the probability of presence score can be viewed as more
dependable. In contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar means a lack of data and, therefore, a lack
of certainty about presence of the species. This list is not perfect; it is simply a starting point for identifying
what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might be there, and if they
might be breeding (which means nests might be present). The list helps you know what to look for to
confirm presence, and helps guide you in knowing when to implement conservation measures to avoid or
minimize potential impacts from your project activities, should presence be confirmed. To learn more
about conservation measures, visit the FAQ "Tell me about conservation measures I can implement to
avoid or minimize impacts to migratory birds" at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources page.
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/3KTZL33SKBAMXMJK15XLFZRWHY/resources 17/20

4/22/24, 4:13 PM
IPaC: Explore Location resources
Marine mammals
Marine mammals are protected under the Marine Mammal Protection Act. Some are also
protected under the Endangered Species Actl and the Convention on International Trade in
Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora.
The responsibilities for the protection, conservation, and management of marine mammals
are shared by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service [responsible for otters, walruses, polar bears,
manatees, and dugongs] and NOAA Fisheries! [responsible for seals, sea lions, whales,
dolphins, and porpoises]. Marine mammals under the responsibility of NOAA Fisheries are
not shown on this list; for additional information on those species please visit the Marine
Mammals page of the NOAA Fisheries website.
The Marine Mammal Protection Act prohibits the take of marine mammals and further
coordination may be necessary for project evaluation. Please contact the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service Field Office shown. CNN
1. The Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973. It
2. The Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora
(CITES) is a treaty to ensure that international trade in plants and animals does not
threaten their survival in the wild.'
3. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an office
of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of
Commerce.
The following marine mammals under the responsibility of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
are potentially affected by activities in this location:
West Indian Manatee Trichechus manatus
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/4469
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/3KTZL33SKBAMXMJK15XLFZRWHY/resources 18/20

4/22/24, 4:13 PM IPaC: Explore Location resources
Facilities
National Wildlife Refuge lands
Any activity proposed on lands managed by the National Wildlife Refuge system must
undergo a 'Compatibility Determination' conducted by the Refuge. Please contact the
individual Refuges to discuss any questions or concerns.
There are no refuge lands at this location.
Fish hatcheries
There are no fish hatcheries at this location.
Wetlands in the National Wetlands Inventory
(NWI) 0 440. )
Impacts to NWI wetlands and other aquatic habitats may be subject to regulation under
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, or other State/Federal statutes.
For more information please contact the Regulatory Program of the local U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers District.
N _4�14
This location did not intersect any wetlands mapped by NWI.
NOTE: This initial screening does not replace an on -site delineation to determine whether
wetlands occur. Additional information on the NWI data is provided below.
Data limitations
The Service's objective of mapping wetlands and deepwater habitats is to produce reconnaissance level
information on the location, type and size of these resources. The maps are prepared from the analysis of
high altitude imagery. Wetlands are identified based on vegetation, visible hydrology and geography. A
margin of error is inherent in the use of imagery; thus, detailed on -the -ground inspection of any particular
site may result in revision of the wetland boundaries or classification established through image analysis.
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/3KTZL33SKBAMXMJK15XLFZRWHY/resources 19/20

4/22/24, 4:13 PM
IPaC: Explore Location resources
The accuracy of image interpretation depends on the quality of the imagery, the experience of the image
analysts, the amount and quality of the collateral data and the amount of ground truth verification work
conducted. Metadata should be consulted to determine the date of the source imagery used and any
mapping problems.
Wetlands or other mapped features may have changed since the date of the imagery or field work. There
may be occasional differences in polygon boundaries or classifications between the information depicted
on the map and the actual conditions on site.
Data exclusions
Certain wetland habitats are excluded from the National mapping program because of the limitations of
aerial imagery as the primary data source used to detect wetlands. These habitats include seagrasses or
submerged aquatic vegetation that are found in the intertidal and subtidal zones of estuaries and
nearshore coastal waters. Some deepwater reef communities (coral or tuberficid worm reefs) have also
been excluded from the inventory. These habitats, because of their depth, go undetected by aerial
imagery. '�4
precautions recautions
�
Federal, state, and local regulatory agencies with jurisdiction over wetlands may define and describe
wetlands in a different manner than that used in this inventory. There is no attempt, in either the design or
products of this inventory, to define the limits of proprietary jurisdiction of any Federal, state, or local
government or to establish the geographical scope of the regulatory programs of government agencies.
Persons intending to engage in activities involving modifications within or adjacent to wetland areas should
seek the advice of appropriate Federal, state, or local agencies concerning specified agency regulatory
programs and proprietary jurisdictions that may affect such activities.
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/3KTZL33SKBAMXMJKI5XLFZRWHY/resources 20/20

■■ WithersRavenel
lipOur People. Your Success.
NCNHP LETTER

Roy Cooper, Governor
p■ ■■© NC DEPARTMENT OF
MEN ME NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
■ ■■■
April 22, 2024
Troy Beasley
Withers & Ravenel
115 MacKenan Drive
Cary, NC 27511
RE: Aerospace Development Area; 23-0337-A
Dear Troy Beasley:
D. Reid Wilson, Secretary
Misty Buchanan
Deputy Director, Natural Heritage Program
NCNHDE-25739
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
A query of the NCNHP database indicates that there are records for rare species, important natural
communities, natural areas, and/or conservation/managed areas within the proposed project
boundary. These results are presented in the attached 'Documented Occurrences' tables and map.
The attached 'Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one -mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally -listed species is documented within the project area or indicated within a one -mile
radius of the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service
(USFWS) for guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
httl2s://www.fws.gov/offices/Directory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
Also please note that the NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional
correspondence if a Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Land and Water Fund
easement, or an occurrence of a Federally -listed species is documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact the NCNHP at natural.heritaaeCo)dncr.nc.aov.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
DEPAR701ENT 0F NA3URAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Intersecting the Project Area
Aerospace Development Area
Project No. 23-0337-A
April 22, 2024
NCNHDE-25739
No Element Occurrences are Documented within the Project Area
There are no documented element occurrences (of medium to very high accuracy) that intersect with the project area. Please note, however, that althougl
NCNHP database does not show records for rare species within the project area, it does not necessarily mean that they are not present; it may simply mear
the area has not been surveyed. The use of Natural Heritage Program data should not be substituted for actual field surveys if needed, particularly if the pr
area contains suitable habitat for rare species. If rare species are found, the NCNHP would appreciate receiving this information so that we may update oui
database.
No Natural Areas are Documented within the Project Area
Managed Areas Documented Within Project Area{
Managed Area Name Owner Owner Type
Craven County - Creekside Park Craven County Local Government
Craven County Open Space Craven County Local Government
{NOTE: If the proposed project intersects with a conservation/managed area, please contact the landowner directly for additional information. If the project intersects with a Dedicated Nature Pr
(DNP), Registered Natural Heritage Area (RHA), or Federally -listed species, NCNHP staff may provide additional correspondence regarding the project.
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at httos://ncnhde.natureserve.ora/help. Data query generated on April 22, 2024; source: NCNHP, Winter (January)
Please resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 2 of 5

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Aerospace Development Area
Project No. 23-0337-A
April 22, 2024
NCNHDE-25739
Element Occurrences Documented
Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Taxonomic
EO ID
Scientific Na ME
Common Name
Last
Element
Accuracy
Federal
State
Global
State
Group
Observation Occurrence
Status
Status
Rank
Rank
Date
Rank
Animal
4814
Waterbird Colony
Waterbird Colony
2014-07-08
BC
1-Very
---
---
GNR
S3
Assemblage
High
Bird
19142
Haliaeetus
Bald Eagle
2019
E
2-High
Bald/Golden
Threatened
G5
S3B,S3
leucocephalus
Eagle
N
Protection
Act
Bird
35782
Sternula antillarum
Least Tern
2014-06-19
BC
2-High
---
Special
G4
S3B
Concern
Dragonfly or
38998
Coryphaeschna ingens
Regal Darner
2004-Pre
H?
5-Very
---
Significantly
G5
S2?
Damselfly
Low
Rare
Dragonfly or
33788
Triacanthagyna trifida
Phantom Darner
2004-Pre
H?
5-Very
---
Significantly
G5
SH
Damselfly
Low
Rare
Mammal
38996
Myotis austroriparius
Southeastern Bat
2018-02-14
E
2-High
---
Special
G4
S2
Concern
Natural
25492
Tidal Freshwater Marsh---
2013-08-26
B
4-Low
---
---
GNR
S4
Community
(Giant Cordgrass
Subtype)
Natural
24818
Tidal Swamp
---
2006-04-14
BC
2-High
---
---
G3G4
S4
Community
(Cypress --Gum
Subtype)
Reptile
9438
Alligator
American Alligator
2022-04-20
E
4-Low
Threatened
Threatened
G5
S3
mississippiensis
Similar
Appearance
Vascular Plant
18720
Aeschynomene
Sensitive Jointvetch
1956-09
H
4-Low
Threatened
Threatened
G2
Sl
virginica
Vascular Plant
18719
Aeschynomene
Sensitive Jointvetch
1949-09-12
X
4-Low
Threatened
Threatened
G2
Sl
virginica
Vascular Plant
11354
Bidens trichosperma
Crowned Beggar -ticks
1952-08-30
H
3-Medium
---
Significantly
G5?
Sl
Rare
Peripheral
Vascular Plant
20022
Sabulina paludicola
Godfrey's Sandwort
1951-08
H
4-Low
---
Endangered
GI
S1
Page 3 of 5

Element Occurrences Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Taxonomi EO ID Scientific NameM Common Name Last
Gro Observation
Date
Vascular Plant 17479 Sagittaria filiformis Water Arrowhead 1951-10-07
Vascular Plant 11322 Solidago verna Spring -flowering 1951-05
Goldenrod
Natural Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Site Name Representational Rating
Trent River/Brice Creek Marshes R5 (General)
Brice Creek Swamps R3 (High)
Managed Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
17a7aged Area Name
Owner
City of New Bern Open Space
City of New Bern
Craven County - Creekside Park
Craven County
Craven County Open Space
Craven County
Craven County Open Space
Craven County
Craven County Open Space
Craven County
Craven County Open Space
Craven County
Croatan National Forest
US Forest Service
NC Hazard Mitigation Buyout Property - Craven NC DPS, Division of Emergency
County
NC Hazard Mitigation Buyout Property - Craven
County
NC Hazard Mitigation Buyout Property - Craven
County
NC Hazard Mitigation Buyout Property - Craven
County
NC Hazard Mitigation Buyout Property - Craven
County
North Carolina Coastal Land Trust Easement
Management
NC DPS, Division of Emergency
Management
NC DPS, Division of Emergency
Management
NC DPS, Division of Emergency
Management
NC DPS, Division of Emergency
Management
North Carolina Coastal Land Trust
Element Accuracy
Occurrences
Rank
H 3-Medium
H 3-Medium
Collective Rating
C5 (General)
C4 (Moderate)
Federal State M
Status Status
--- Significantly G4G5 SH
Rare
Owner Type
Local Government
Local Government
Local Government
Local Government
Local Government
Local Government
Federal
State
State
State
State
State
Private
Peripheral
Threatened G3 S3
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at httos://ncnhde.natureserve.ora/help. Data query generated on April 22, 2024; source: NCNHP, Winter (January)
Please resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 4 of 5

NCNHDE-25739: Aerospace Development Area
0
N
a
Ro,
R
ads
Rd
James City
Kelso Rd
70
Coastal
Airport Rd
Carolina
10
Regional
Airport
; 7ft
�a
grices CreeK
w
i
i
0
7
O
Kale Rd
�a
Liee
s
Lill put
n
Lan Jing
o
v
e
^
n
�
ca
Sellhorn g1,16
3
0
T
Ol
a
Td6
P
�d
O
i
a
N
�dY
OP
Taberna
W �`
Country Club
0
0.33 0.65
A
70 1.3 Miles
S
I I
I i I i
t i I P
April 22, 2024
®
NHP Natural Area (NHNA)
®
Managed Area (MAREA)
Q
Buffered Project Boundary
Q
Project Boundary
Page 5 of 5
Esri, NASA. NCA. USGS, FEMA
Duke University., State of North Carolina DOT, Esri, TomTom, Garmin. SafeGraph,
GeoTechnologies, Inc, METI/NASA, USGS, EPA, NIPS, US Census Bureau,
USDA, USFWS

::WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
M PACT EXHIBITS

PROJECT
LIMITS
PROPOSED
` ACCESS
N ROAD
ry
Q
z
FUTURE
PAVEMENT
(TYP.)
FUTURE
BUILDING
(TYP.)
POND 2 —\ W1.2
(--ift, I W,
DITCH 2 -
NOIMPACT
x
I L WETLAND B
- NO IMPACT
x
1
x
W1.1
t/
X
Q�
J
POND 1
.9mLik.: .
WETLAND A
- NO IMPACT
DITCH 1 -
NO IMPACT
0
i
2.
Ak
V
U m
S
17
�w
o sw
fF
z
c�
a
w z
W i m
o�
n
w
S
QLLOF�rN
C STAL R °A°
��=o ow
��moa�o
—
-
ROLINA
REGIONAL
N3a
AIRPORT
x
\ + 1 \
d
W
CL
0
VICINITY MAP ��
a
<_ U m
Q N =
X
NOT TO SCALE •�
/� �'e
`� z Q x
z Q W
OU W � F
� ` �.• ti
Qa o V) as
} I
zz W W
oz wU
x
x
J
WETLAND C
- NO IMPACT
/ WETLAND D
- NO IMPACT
•
VA.1 POND 1
VV1.2 POND2
Q
Q Q �
`� �
�z
d O
N
Of
W
,
400 200
0 400
0
SCALE IN FEET
,o> Y
1 "= 400'
ENVI
RONMENTAL I
MPACT WINTI TI ES
°°te
APRIL 2024
TEMPORARY
PERAN MENT
SCO1e
- .oa
IMPACT
IMPACT
D,—
PCC
NUMBER
SPECI A GATT ON
OPEN WATER
OPEN WATER
Checked
imm
(�
(AGE
(m
(AC)
Project No.
2208-2307
Ow
ROAD CROSSI NG
—
—
2,120
0.049
Sheet N°.
OV12
ROAD CROSS NG
—
—
2,060
0.047
TOTAL I MPACT:
0
1 0
4,180
0.0960

IMPACT OW1 -
PERMANENT POND IMPACT
ROAD CROSSING
0.049 ACRES (2,120 SF)
DITCH 2 -
) IMPACT
POND 1 IMPACT PLAN
SCALE: 1 " = 50'
50 25 0 50
SCALE IN FEET
1 "= 50'
PROPOSED
ACCESS ROAD
WETLAND A
NO IMPACT
i
f.r �
DITCH 1 -
NO IMPACT
POND 1 IMPACT GRADING PLAN
SCALE: 1 " = 50'
va
LEGEND
r12171AZ WETLANDS
Date
�APRIL 2024
OPEN WATER
f�li�Gji%GiGG%G Seale
Draw
PCC
PROPOSED ACCESS ROAD Pr.1-td
JMM
Project No.
2208-2307
— — — -20.0- — - EXISTING CONTOUR Sheet No.
20.0PROPOSED CONTOUR W1.1

POND 2 IMPACT PLAN
SCALE: 1 " = 50'
50 25 0 50
SCALE IN FEET
1 "= 50'
U m 3
M1-1 Z a
IMPACT OW2 - �q
PERMANENT POND IMPACT EXISTING PIPE TO -- z
ROAD CROSSING ----- _
BE DEMOLISHED
-----�1 0.047 ACRES (2,060 SF)
— — — — — — —
-- -- - - - - - - -
tN
15.00
zaU
PROPO ED- - - - - - - - - - - - - - / I 11&awX 2
FENCE \\ / i �POND
PROPOSE NNaaoF m`
ACCESS
a /
15.00 — x ROAD
�rl 1 1
+
i
0 1 7
i
6 0p / 17.00 \
- - - - \\�\ p \\ \1 �1 1 /j 1 1 I I j // 18.0o
w
\ r \ 1 1 \ 1 I I 1 11 r 1 1 / / ,/ // `\ a a
1\ \I1 11 11 /II PROPOSED <� o
EXISTING 11 1 11 1 1\ 1 1 1�1 II 1 I / /J �,GONTO(JRS w o a
FENCE TO BE 1 I 1 \ 1
1 I \ 1 1 111 lit
DEMOLiStiED \1\ 1\ li 11 i i li Ili iii'/ / i z� o w N
Q o
ww w
a
cO 11 1 I I I 11II LR
\ �w o �I11 II /\ CL
N
Of
`max /I 1 ^ h-c' 1 I 1 1 1 I I \ -I 1 4 4 / / / it,` / �\ 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 i♦ \
—� x — x
POND 2 IMPACT GRADING PLAN
SCALE: 1 " = 50'
LEGEND
r12171AZ
va
WETLANDS
Date
APRIL 2024
�
f�li�Gji%GiGG%G
OPEN WATER
Seale
Draw
PROPOSED ACCESS ROAD
PCC
JMM
Project No.
Pr.1-td
2208-2307
- — — -20.0- — -
EXISTING CONTOUR
Sheet No.
20.0
PROPOSED CONTOUR
W1.2