820057_Routine Inspection_20240507

Inspection
for Visit:
0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: — 7 Arrival Time: ':GO , Departure Time: 'D, County: Region:
Farm Name: %�.,Llnp„/pp j ,� Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: (/67.Grp "Le.co.�,r , Title:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
6(
Latitude:
Phone:
Integrator:���
Certification Number:�� g
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Wean to Finish
ILayer
Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder
o2oc) AMi {�
Non -La er
Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish
i
Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean
�II{
Jim
Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder]Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish
l'
Layers
jBeef Stocker y
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
�'
Pullets
Beef Brood Cowl
Turke s
Turke Poults
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yese-ETNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
J 'Vo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
[2-No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page 1 of 3
511212020 Continued

Facility Number: Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: C 1;Z
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in): f �7
Observed Freeboard (in): �� n_4
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes -EnlNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes E�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? []Yes eNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? [:]Yes E:fNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes eNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need [:]Yes [J'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. [:]Yes E�)No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Pending ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes t�]`No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes _[�eNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes eNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes 12No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes _'C:�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes -E:rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check [:]Yes TNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:_
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. [—]Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes .eNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 511212020 Continued

Facility Number: - 6`7
Date of Inspection: 3: 7
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes /❑'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate boxes) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes .:] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes Z No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes eNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
[—]Yes fNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes eNo
❑ Yes .-No
❑ Yes eNo
❑ Yes &No
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Reviewer/Inspector Name: k);On-Z 2560 Phone: ` ,lb
Reviewer Inspector Signature: Date: 5 / 7
Page 3 of 3 511212020

racmry NO, O_7 Time In
Farm Name Time Out
Owner
Integraro'
—
Operator Site Rap.
13ack-up No.
No.
OC Circle: General or NPDES
FREEBOAmu: vesign
bserved
Crop Yield
Rain Gauge
Soil Test tr%- it Yy Wettable Acres
Weekly Freeboard Daily Rainfall _Z
Spray/Freeboard Drop
Weather Codes
Waste Analvcig-
120 min Inspections ly_
Dare
Sludge Survey c31�31,7-3
Calibration(GPM _�%17��5 Q 3F'I
Waste Transfers
Rain Breaker
PLAT
1-in Inspections
of ate Nitrogen (N) Date
Nitrogen (N)
Y rk7
l� �3 .7)