20140394 Ver 3_PCN Application Package - No drawings_20160108

Strickland, Bev
From:Higgins, Karen
Sent:Friday, January 08, 2016 4:54 PM
To:Strickland, Bev
Subject:FW: Haw River Interceptor Phase 2B and 2C PCN
Attachments:14088 PCN Application Package - No construction drawings.pdf
fyi

Thanks-
Karen

Karen Higgins
401 & Buffer Permitting Unit Supervisor
Division of Water Resources
Department of Environmental Quality

919 807-6360 office
[e-mail]

512 N. Salisbury Street, Suite 942-E, Raleigh, NC 27604
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617

Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.

From: Josh Johnson \[mailto:[e-mail]\]
Sent: Friday, January 08, 2016 2:58 PM
To: [e-mail]
Cc: Homewood, Sue <[e-mail]>; Higgins, Karen <[e-mail]>; MATT BECKWITH
([e-mail]) <[e-mail]>
Subject: Haw River Interceptor Phase 2B and 2C PCN

Good Afternoon David,
On behalf of the City of Burlington, we are submitting a Preconstruction Notification for Phase 2b and 2C of the Haw
River Interceptor. You should receive hard copies of the PCN, PCN Attachments, and the construction drawings early
next week as well. All of the items can be found at
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/t64pbk1orhl3b4z/AAA6qpvfDbOYfMrqspwdzW3ia?dl=0.

Phase 2B and 2C are the last two legs in the proposed rehabilitation of the City’s 42” sanitary sewer interceptor and pick
up at the end of Phase 2A and continue to just past Graham Hopedale Road in Burlington. The PCN package includes the
newly permitted impacts as well as the cumulative impacts from the project. The only new impacts are to streambanks
where we are replacing existing aerial crossings with new aerial crossings. The primary impact will be the streambank
stabilization for to protect these piers but the piers themselves are outside of the normal water level.
1

The project is currently out for bid and the City hopes to begin construction in March 2016. If I can assist in anyway
during your review or if you have any questions please let me know.

Thanks.

Joshua S. Johnson, P.E.

Alley, Williams, Carmen, and King, Inc.

740 Chapel Hill Road

P.O. Box 1179

Burlington, N.C. 27216

Tel. [phone]

Fax [phone]

2

a M alle
cK
January 7, 2016
carmen, and kinV., inc
Engineering • Architecture • Land Surveying
David E. Bailey, PWS
Regulatory Project Manager
US Army Corps of Engineers
CE -SAW -RG -R
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
Subject: City of Burlington's Haw River Interceptor— Phase 2B and 2C
AWCK Project Number 14088
Dear Mr. Bailey:
Please find enclosed a Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Application and several attachments
supporting it. I've enclosed two copies of all of the following attachments as well as placing pdf's of the
PCN and attachments at https://www.dropbox.com/sh/t64pbklorhi3b4z/AAA6gpvfDbOYfMrgspwdzW3ia?dl=0.
The enclosed items are:
1. Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form.
2. Agent Authorization Form — AWCK.
3. Agent Authorization Form — ECS.
4. Project Area Exhibit Map for Phase 2.
5. Property Owners Exhibit.
6. ECS Wetland and Stream Delineation Report — Project #09-24748.
7. 11"x17" Construction Drawings for Haw River Interceptor Phase 213 and 2C.
8. Stream Impact Drawing—Sheet 1 of 2.
9. Stream Impact Drawing—Sheet 2 of 2.
10. Cumulative Stream and Wetland Impacts.
11. Phase 1 Stream and Wetland Impacts.
12. Phase 2A Stream and Wetland Impacts.
13. Phase 2B and 2C Stream and Wetland Impacts.
14. Phase 2A PCN —without exhibits (exhibits available upon request) from January 2015.
The Haw River Interceptor is a 42" sanitary sewer line that runs along the banks of the Haw River from
Graham Hopedale Road in northeastern Burlington until it reaches the East Burlington Waste Water
Treatment Plant. The Interceptor was installed in 1960 and is in need of replacement. The project is a
phased project with construction on Phase 1 completing in January 2015 and Phase 2A completed in the
summer of 2015. The design of Phase 213 and 2C are completed and Phase 213 is projected to begin
construction in March 2016. Phase 2C is projected for fiscal year 2016-2017. This permitting package is
intended to permit Phase 2B and 2C under the Nationwide Permit #12 and NC Water Quality
Certification #3884. Phase 1 and Phase 2A had previous impacts to streams and wetlands and these
impacts are summarized on the chart for Cumulative Stream and Wetland Impacts. While the US Army
Corps of Engineer's does not require a difference between the permanent streambank impacts and
740 Chapel Hill Road (27215) - P.O. Box 1179 - Burlington, North Carolina 27216
Tel. - [phone] - Fax — [phone] - awck.com
ESTABLISHED - 1960

permanent streambed impacts, the NC Division of Water Resources views streambank impacts as
temporary. This is the reason for the delineation between the two in the Cumulative chart.
The City of Burlington currently has Phase 2B out for bids and hopes to begin construction in March
2016. While reviewing the enclosed documents if you have any questions please let me know. I will
email you the document folder from dropbox and you can contact me at [phone] or through
email at [e-mail].
Sincerely,
ALLEY, WILLIAMS, C MEN & KING, INC.
Jo a S. Johnso E.
Enclosures.
cc: Matt Beckwith, P.E. City of Burlington
Karen Higgins, NCDWR (4 copies and review check of $240.00)
Sue Homewood, NC DWR (with attachments and with email)
Corey Basinger, NC DWR (without attachments and with email)
740 Chapel Hill Road (27215) - P O Box 1179 - Burlington, North Carolina 27216
Tel - [phone] - Fax — [phone] - awck corn
ESTABLISHED - 1960

C3 Y
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
❑X Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1 b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 12 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑X Yes ❑ No
1 d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
❑X 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
❑ Yes X❑ No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ❑X No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
❑ Yes ❑X No
1 g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
N Yes NX No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Haw River Interceptor Project - Phase 2B and 2C
2b.
County:
Alamance
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Burlington, NC
2d.
Subdivision name:
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Multiple Owners - City of Burlington Easement - See Attachment
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
n/a
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
Frank Hope, Interim City Manager
3d.
Street address:
425 S. Lexington Avenue
3e.
City, state, zip:
Burlington, NC 27215
3f.
Telephone no.:
[phone]
3g.
Fax no.:
n/a
3h.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a.
Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b.
Name:
4c.
Business name
(if applicable):
4d.
Street address:
4e.
City, state, zip:
4f.
Telephone no.:
4g.
Fax no.:
4h.
Email address:
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name:
Josh Johnson
5b.
Business name
(if applicable):
Alley, Williams, Carmen, and King, Inc.
5c.
Street address:
740 Chapel Hill Road, P.O. Box 1179
5d.
City, state, zip:
Burlington, NC 27216
5e.
Telephone no.:
[phone]
5f.
Fax no.:
[phone]
5g.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 10

B.
Project Information and Prior Project History
1.
Property Identification
1a.
Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
Multiple Owners, View Attachments
1 b.
Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 36.106494 Longitude: 79.388499
1 c.
Property size:
4,684 If or 4.5 acres
2.
Surface Waters
2a.
Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
Servis Creek, 16-15
2b.
Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
WS -V; NSW
2c.
River basin:
Cape Fear
3.
Project Description
3a.
Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The replacement sewer line is being installed within the existing sanitary sewer easement and primarily within the
existing sanitary sewer trench. At all points near streams or wetlands the sewerline is being installed at the same
horizontal and vertical location as the existing line to minimize impacts to these features.
3b.
List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.0 on Phase 213-2C
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 130 LF within
Easement. Project parallels Servis Creek but creek is off the easement except for at the two crossings.
3d.
Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
To replace the existing 50+ year old Haw River Interceptor in an effort to reduce environmental impacts due to the
degradation of the existing line.
Page 3A of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The City of Burlington is replacing the existing 42" Haw River Interceptor from Graham Hopedale Road to the East Burlington
Wastewater Treatment Plant. The project is a phased project with construction on Phase 1 completing in January 2015 and Phase
2A completed in the summer of 2015. The design of Phase 2B and 2C are completed and Phase 2B is projected to begin
construction in March 2016. Phase 2C is projected for fiscal year 2016-2017. Phase 2B is from Servis Creek (NC DENR ID#16-
15) and extends 2,725' and includes Aerial Crossing #1 of Servis Creek. Phase 2C picks up at this point and runs 1,959', crosses
Graham Hopedale Road and includes Aerial Crossing #2 of Servis Creek. Phase 1 was previously permitted in June of 2014 by
Kimley-Horn & Associates on behalf of the City of Burlington. Phase1 and Phase 2A were previously permitted and included a
total of 0.2241 acres of temporary impacts to herbaceous wetlands, 0.1249 acres of permanent impacts from conversion of
forested wetlands to herbaceous wetlands, 0.2999 acres of permanent fill within wetlands for a maintenance path, 48' of
permanent impacts and loss of waters of the US to streams, 94' of permanent impacts for bank stabilization that resulted in no
loss of jurisdictional waters (no permanent impacts within the streambed), and 25' of temporary stream impacts. A chart showing
these impacts, as well as the Phase 213-2C impacts, is included as an attachment to this form.
Phase 2B -2C of the Haw River Interceptor is 4,684' in length and is being replaced in the same trench as the existing sewer line.
2,554' is a new 42" sanitary sewer line replacing an existing 42" sanitary sewer line in the same trench and 2,130' is a new 42"
sanitary sewer line replacing an existing 36" sanitary sewer line in the same trench. The 2,130' replacing the 36" sanitary sewer
line will also replace a parallel 24" sanitary sewer line. The project is within the floodplain of Servis Creek and the Haw River but
is not within the floodway except at crossings. The project will have a maximum disturbed area (based upon permanent and
temporary easements) of 4.6 acres. The City of Burlington is in the process of acquiring easements but intends to begin work with
written permission prior to completing easement acquisition.
The project will have two aerial stream crossings of Servis Creek. These crossings are being permitted with this PCN. Both
crossings are replacing existing aerial stream crossings. The existing stream crossing will be replaced at the same horizontal and
vertical location as the existing line and are shown in detail on Sheets 4, 9, 10, and 14 of the plans and on the attached exhibits.
The aerial crossings are designed to span the existing streams with the only impacts being piers inserted into the stream banks
and the removal of the existing aerial crossings. The project alignment was delineated by ECS Carolinas, LLC and confirmed by
both NC DWR and the USACOE.
Impacts at the stream and wetland crossing have been minimized by using the existing horizontal and vertical location. The aerial
stream crossing piers are outside of the bottom of the streambank to prevent minimize stream impacts while protecting the
sewerline that carries an approximately an average daily flow of 4.0 MGD. The existing vertical locations are maintained in an
effort to prevent reductions of the flow characteristics of the existing sewerline which could lead to diminished capacity and
Dverflows during storms.
The existing sewerline is within a cleared outfall that crosses into the riparian stream buffers of Servis Creek in some places.
However, sewerline replacement within the buffer is an exempt act and the project will maintain this exemption by limiting clearing
within the buffer in order to comply with the buffer rules. This compliance will also include eliminating the temporary construction
easement within Zone 1 of the buffer.
Due to the size of the line, heavy construction equipment including backhoes, excavators, dump trucks, bulldozers, and other
utility construction equipment is expected to be used during the construction.
Page 313 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
❑ ❑Unknown
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
X Yes No
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments: A copy of the Phase 1 PCN is
attached to this PCN.
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
El
of determination was made?
X Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency/Consultant Company:
Name (if known): David Bailey — USACOE, Sue Homewood,
ECS Carolinas, LLP
DW R
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
A copy of ECS Carolinas, LLP final report is attached from 12/18/14. David Bailey and Sue Homewood visited the site on
11/18/14.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
X Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
Phase 1 was previously permitted in June of 2014 by Kimley-Horn & Associates on behalf of the City of Burlington. Phase1
included 0.21457 acres of temporary impacts to herbaceous wetlands, 0.1249 acres of permanent impacts from conversion oll
forested wetlands to herbaceous wetlands, 0.2999 acres of permanent fill within wetlands for a maintenance path, 8' of permanent
impacts and loss of waters of the US to streams, 94' of permanent impacts for bank stabilization that resulted in no loss o
jurisdictional waters (no permanent impacts within the streambed), and 25' of temporary stream impacts. Phase 2A was permitted
in January 2015 and included an additional 40' of permanent stream impacts and 0.0086 temporary impacts to wetlands. A chart
showing these impacts, as well as the Phase 213-2C impacts, is included as an attachment to this form.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
X Yes ❑ No
6b. If yes, explain.
The project is a phased project with construction on Phase 1 completing in January 2015 and Phase 2A completed in the
summer of 2015. The design of Phase 2B and 2C are completed and Phase 2B is projected to begin construction in March
2016. Phase 2C is projected for fiscal year 2016-2017. Phase 2C is the last projected phase of the project.
Page 3C of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands ❑X Streams — tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
2b.
Type of impact
2c.
Type of wetland
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other)
2f.
Area of
impact
(acres)
W1 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W2 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W3 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W4 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W5 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W6 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
Stream impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
3b.
Type of impact
3c.
Stream name
3d.
Perennial (PER) or
intermittent (INT)?
3e.
Type of
jurisdiction
3f.
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g.
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
S1 P
Excavation and Stabilization
Stream SC -1
PER
Corps
50
26
S2 P
Excavation and Stabilization
Stream SC -2
PER
Corps
50
26
S3 -
Choose one
S4 -
Choose one
S5 -
Choose one
-
S6 -
Choose one
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
52
3i. Comments:
Both Stream crossings are replacements of existing aerial stream crossings. Stream SC is currently stabilized with rip rap at both crossings. The
proposed impacts will be limited to the existing impacted areas. The aerial crossing will limit impacts to the banks of the stream and no stream bed
impacts are anticipated.
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then indivi ually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01 -
Choose one
Choose
02 -
Choose one
Choose
03 -
Choose one
Choose
04 -
Choose one
Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑X Other:Jordan
6b.
Buffer Impact
number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet)
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet
B1
Yes/No
B2 -
Yes/No
B3 -
Yes/No
B4 -
Yes/No
B5 -
Yes/No
B6 -
Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
61. Comments: All buffer crossings will be exempt from buffer rules. All crossings are within 15 degrees of 90 and will have 10' or less maintenance
corridors and all parallel impacts will be within Zone 2 of the buffer. No new impervious areas are proposed within the buffer.
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The new sewerline will be installed within the existing trench and within the existing easement. The temporary construction easement is limited to Zone
2 or outside of the riparian buffers. The only stream crossings are at the existing locations of crossings. Changing the horizontal or vertical elevations
at the crossings is not being done due to existing grades and the nature of the existing sewerline which carries a flow of approximately 4.0 MGD. The
impacts at the crossings are limited to streambanks and not streambed impacts.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Clearing is limited to outside of the stream buffers and the streambank stabilization for the aerial crossings will reduce the risk of future sewer failure
while limiting the impacted area to the previously impacted area.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
El Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
Choose one
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
❑ Yes ❑X No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c.
6d.
6e.
Zone
Reason for impact
Total impact
Multiplier
Required mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
All buffer crossings will be exempt from buffer rules. All crossings are within 15 degrees of 90 and will have 10' or less maintenance
6h. Comments: corridors and all parallel impacts will be within Zone 2 of the buffer. No new impervious areas are proposed within the buffer.
Page 7 of 10

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑X- Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
No
new impervious area is proposed within the buffer. By complying with the buffer rules as a sanitary
Yes No
sewer maintenance activity and/or limited impacts to Zone 2 of the Riparian Buffer, the project is exempt
❑ ❑X
from the Riparian Buffer Rules.
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
0
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
No
new impervious area is proposed. By complying with the buffer rules as a sanitary sewer maintenance
activity and/or limited impacts to Zone 2 of
the
Riparian Buffer, the project is exempt from the Riparian Buffer Rules.
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative
description of the plan:
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which localgovernment's jurisdiction is thisproject?
City of Burlington
❑ Phase II
❑ NSW
3b.
Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑Coastal counties
❑HQW
4a.
Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ORW
(check all that apply):
❑Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.4 January 2009

F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
Yes
❑ No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes
❑X No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes
❑ No
letter.)
Comments:
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes
❑X No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b.
Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes
❑X No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes
❑X No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a.
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
This flow through this project will continue to be discharged at the East Burlington Waste Water Treatment Facility. No new sanitary
sewer is expected
to be generated by this project.
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes Q No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ❑X No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
-
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
An online review showed no endangered species or designated critical habitats within the area
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes Q No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
A review of the EFH Mapper found on the NFMS website showed no essential fish habitat near the project area.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ❑X No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
The project will be within an existing sanitary sewer easement. No new areas will be impacted.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑X Yes ❑ No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
The project will be primarily outside of the floodway. The existing sewerline is being replaced in two small sections within the floodway along Servis
Creek and at the aerial crossings of Servis Creek. No new fill will be installed at the replacement areas and the Servis Creek aerial crossings will result
in no change in the flood elevation. The project will limit fill to providing cover of the sanitary sewer line outside of the floodway.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
NC FRIS, local records, and NC Onemap.
JoS�A S. Jaf{N Se t'J
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Applic .Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant isprovided.)
�l � J � 1P
Date
Page 10 of 10

City of Burlington's Haw River Interceptor — Phase 2A and 2B
Burlington, North Carolina
AGENT AUTHORIZATION
This form authorizes Josh Johnson of Alley, Williams, Carmen, and King, Inc. to act as our
agent in stream/wetland matters including U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and North Carolina
Division of Water Resources field verification and permit application.
Property Address: City of Burlington
Approximately From 519 Riverside Drive to
1100 N. Graham Hopedale Road along the
existing sanitary sewer line.
Owner Information:
Name: City of Burlington
Address: P.O. Box 1358
Burlington, N.C. 27216
Telephone Number: [phone]
Fax Number: (33 6) 513-5467
E-mail Address: [e-mail]
/"LD
i
Signature:Date: S

ait)loleurliriptari' Hawli%rerinteraenlar— AIaseI
Aurlin@tari, Nor I aaralin a
AGINT AtinaRIJAIKIN
Tf h farm a(rtl oriaas US Carrolinas, I LP to aat a.f our agent iri stream�jwetland matters
inclrr( in@ U.J. Army Corps al Ind ineers an( North Carolina Dhiisia ri afl Water Rem unies diel(
verilication ari(I permit application.
Propert)lAddre!9: City oil Bujilirigton
AFlPlroxl matelN From 511 Ri veroi ce Drive to
110a N. Clra hap HonledAl e Ra a6 a lorig the
exisitirig sandtarN sremar line.
Owner Inilorrr atic n:
Name: City otl Bur] irigtori
Addre:is: P.O. Box 1318
Bur] irigt ori, N.C. 277 11
TelephoneNumler: (33 1) 2, 7-9{ 50
lax Number: ( 331) 511-14167
1-n ail Address: Fnigl nieeniriga ci . bur] ir.gt or.. nc . us
9iE nature: - Data: - �-!�-�

Property Land Owners and Parcel Identification Numbers
Haw River Interceptor - Phase 213 & 2C
Owner
Parcel ID Number
Irving Fineberg Investments
149108
Claude O. Sexton, Jr.
148863
Larry J. Sykes & Theo G. Sykes
148861
David Lewis Sherman
148573
James M. Vining Heirs
148870
James L. Piper & Alice F. Piper
148587
Mark A. Boyce & Roxanne Boyce
148588
Mark A. Boyce & Roxanne Boyce
149878
Clarence E. Piper & Mary J. Piper
148248
Dorothy Coble Parks
147885
Dorothy Coble Parks
147883
Jacqueline S. Sellars Living Trust
139861
Joe Louis Wilson
139861
Jacqueline S. Sellars Living Trust
139859
Donnell Ross & Annette E. Ross
139663
Robert E. Morgan
139872
Lacy Donnell Ross
139874
Joann Jeffreys Robertson
147881
Lacy Donnell Ross
141203
The parcel and owner information in the above table was obtained from the Alamance County GIS
Website and AWCK's deed research. The City of Burlington either has, or is acquiring, an easement
throughout the project corridor. Individual landowners should not be contacted regarding
regulatory issues. All comments, conversations and correspondence concerning regulatory
information should be referred to the City of Burlington and/or its authorized agent, Josh Johnson
of AWCK.

D
ECS CAROLINAS, LLP `Setting the standard for Service"
® Geotechnical . Construction Materials • Environmental . Facilities NCRegistered EngineenngFrrmE-ID78
December 18, 2014
Mr. Josh Johnson
Alley Williams, Carmen, and King
740 Chapel Hill Road
PO Box 1179
Burlington, North Carolina 27216
Reference: Report of Wetland Delineation
City of Burlington -Haw River Interceptor
Riverside Drive
Burlington, North Carolina
ECS Project No. 09-24748
Dear Mr. Johnson:
ECS Carolinas, LLP (ECS) is pleased to submit this report of the jurisdictional waters/wetland
delineation of City of Burlington -Haw River Interceptor located in Burlington, North Carolina.
This report summarizes our findings for the site.
Background
ECS was contracted to identify the locations of waters of the U.S., including wetlands, for the
above referenced site. The project study area (PSA) is a proposed sewer line that is
approximately 8,000 linear feet long, 50 feet wide, and is located along the Haw River beginning
at Riverside Drive and ending north of Tom Barnwell Trail. The PSA consists of wooded land
and residential yards. The site runs through multiple residential parcels. The project area is
transected by multiple streams and runs parallel with Service Creek. One wetland is located on
the central portion of the study area in close proximity to a man-made pond.
Wetlands are defined by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and the United States
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as "those areas that are inundated or saturated by
surface or groundwater at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and under normal
circumstances do support a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil
conditions." In order for an area to be classified as wetland, hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils,
and wetland hydrology indicators must be present.
Literature Review
ECS reviewed the United States Geological Survey (USGS) Topographic Map, United States
Department of Agriculture (USDA) Soil Survey, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service
(USFWS) National Wetland Inventory (NWI), and Federal Emergency Management Act (FEMA)
Floodplain FIRM map to obtain information regarding the site.
4,811 Koger Blvd., Greensboro, NIC 27407 • T 336-856-7150 • F: 336-856-7160 • www.ecslirnited.corn
ECS capitol Services, PLLC • ECS Carotinas, LLP • ECS central, PLLC - ECS Florida, LLC • ECS P id-Adantc LLC • ECS Midwest LLC • ECS Soitheast, LLC • ECS Texas, LFP

Haw River Interceptor -Wetland Delineation
Burlington, North Carolina
ECS Project 09-24748
December 18, 2014
• The USGS Topographic Map, Burlington, NC Quadrangle (Figure 1) depicts Service Creek
and several unnamed tributaries (blue lined streams) which transect the PSA and flow to the
Haw River.
• The USDA Soil Survey indicates that hydric and non -hydric soils are present within the site.
Soils consist of Buncombe Loamy fine sand (Ba) which is occasionally flooded, Enon fine
sandy loam (EdC, EdC2) which occurs on 2 to 6 percent slopes, Mixed alluvial land (Md)
that is well drained, and Wilkes soils (WbD, WbD2, WbE, WcD) which occur on steep slopes
and is well drained.
• The USFWS NWI shows that there are fresh water ponds and emergent wetlands near the
PSA. The Haw River is shown as a riverine system.
• The FEMA Floodplain FIRM map indicates that the majority of the PSA is located within a
floodplain. The PSA is located in Zone AE which is within the channel of any stream or
adjacent area.
Site Reconnaissance
ECS personnel conducted the site reconnaissance on September 25, 2014. During our
reconnaissance, we observed the PSA for evidence of ponds, streams and wetlands. Ponds
are located adjacent to the site boundaries. The ponds are not located within the limits of the
PSA. Streams are located throughout the PSA and also run parallel to Phase 2 of the study
area. The streams have defined bed and banks, meanders, ordinary high water mark (OHWM),
and contained base flow at the time of our site visit. Perennial and intermittent streams were
present based on our observations.
A wetland was observed near in the central section of the PSA behind a pond at the end of
Wilkins Street. The PSA begins in the south and follows the Haw River to the north toward N.
Graham Hopedale Road. The wetland consists of a concave area within the river floodplain.
The wetland contained wetland hydrology indicators, hydrophytic vegetation and hydric soils.
The wetland is separated from upland areas by distinct topographic and vegetation breaks. The
soils throughout the uplands are bright and appear to be well drained to depths of at least
twelve inches.
Two intermittent streams transect the PSA. These streams are marked in Figure 5 as stream B
(SB). Service Creek intersects the PSA near Squaw Valley Trail; this system is marked as
stream C (SC). Due to the width of the stream and the anticipated width of PSA that spans over
the creek, both stream banks were flagged for approximately 100 feet.
Figure 5 shows the approximate location of the, streams, wetlands within the PSA, and ponds
located outside of the PSA. Figure 5 is based on our field notes and should only be used for
preliminary planning purposes.
2

Haw River Interceptor -Wetland Delineation
Burlington, North Carolina
ECS Project 09-24748
December 18, 2014
Watershed Classification
Service Creek and other unnamed tributaries which flow to the Haw River, are located within the
site boundary. According to the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural
Resources -Division of Water Resources (NCDENR-DWR), the PSA is located in the Cape Fear
River Basin and Haw River Sub -basin in an area that has been classified as WS -V, NSW
Waters. Based on the NCDENR-DWR watershed classification, mandatory state vegetative
buffers are required adjacent to the streams located within the PSA. The width of the vegetative
buffer is dependant on the density of the impervious surfaces that will be associated with the
development of the site. Additionally, the streams within the PSA are located within a
designated Critical Supply Watershed and are subject to a special management strategy as
specified in 15A NCAC 2B .0248. Local buffer requirements may also apply.
Additional Considerations
The PSA is located in the Haw River Watershed, which is part of the Jordan Lake Watershed.
Riparian areas on all sides of perennial streams, lakes and ponds must be protected and
maintained in accordance with the NCDENR-DWR rules. A minimum 50 foot riparian buffer is
required on all sides of perennial streams and surface waters. A variance must be obtained
prior to impacting these buffers for non-exempt activities. Additional consultation may be
needed pertaining to this project and if a variance is needed.
Recommendations
Based on our scope of work, ECS is preceded with a request for a jurisdictional determination
(JD) with the USACE. Stream features will also be verified by the NCDENR-DWR. The JD and
stream verification was conducted on November 20, 2014. All flag locations indicated in Figure
5 have been verified by the USACE and NCDENR-DWR. Following agency verification, the
flags should be surveyed to determine the exact location and extent of the jurisdictional areas.
General Discussion
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act regulates the discharge of dredge and fill materials into
waters of the United States (lakes, rivers, ponds, streams, etc.), including wetlands. Waters of
the United States include the territorial seas, navigable coastal and inland lakes, rivers and
streams, intermittent streams, and wetlands. Activities that could be regulated under Section
404 include the placement of fill for construction of roadways; residential, commercial or
industrial structures; and the construction of water retention ponds along tributaries. The EPA
and the USACE jointly administer the Section 404 program. Section 401 of the Clean Water Act
grants each state the authority to approve, condition, or deny any Federal permits that could
result in a discharge to State waters.
Streams, ponds and wetlands are regulated by the USACE and NCDENR-DWR. Permits are
required prior to impacting wetlands or open waters, including ponds, lakes and perennial or
intermittent streams. Mitigation and stormwater management plans will be a condition of any
permits issued for the site. Buffers may be required adjacent to the streams.
3

Haw River Interceptor -Wetland Delineation
Burlington, North Carolina
ECS Project 09-24748
December 18, 2014
For impacts to one-half acre or more of wetlands or to more than 300 linear feet of stream
channel, an individual permit (IP) may be required. An IP requires a habitat analysis, alternative
site analysis, project justification, plans to avoid and minimize impacts, and a proposed
mitigation plan. Depending on the habitat analysis and the extent of impacts, an Environmental
Impact Statement may be required by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. An IP allows for a
public comment period and may require 4 to 18 months to obtain depending on conditions
arising during the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers review and public comment period.
Closure
ECS appreciates the opportunity to provide wetland services for your project. Please contact us
at [phone] if you have any questions concerning this report.
Sincerely,
ECS Carolinas, LLP
Ken Vilagos
Staff Scientist
Brian E. Maas, REM
Director of Environmental Services
•�
`W. B�� V4 Jczl��
randon Fulton, PWS, LSS
Environmental Project Manager
Attachments: Figure 1 —
USGS Topographic Map
Figure 2 —
USDA Soil Survey
Figure 3 —
USFWS NWI Map
Figure 4 —
FEMA FIRM Map
Figure 5 —
Wetland/Stream Flag Location Map
Appendix I
— Data Sheets
Appendix II
— Stream Form
il

r p w }
PROJECT
... T
-
,.4 r , STUDY AREA\
C _ }f':, I. �- {� rte• ! j
END OF PSA
HAW RIVER
0—If INTERCEPTOR PAHSE 2
^, � ° � �-f ' •e '``� l `� "1��(
l� -• � 1k
1 .��,�'�! i. V fly r,+� / r:x ,f, `� - '` r � � r [iii• _ /. ' ��fr" Q.:
BEGINNING OF PSA
13
461
Puni
° '� 3 �•
50
� ��'� lu I �� 'r�-��,,+,'� _`• "(! 1 xp' Lid _�� ti'-
01r�
'\ �l J � ,!, `1[p�n � iE � 4? �� �•! • r r �{ �' '��' � r Ste. S tf'y '_
n�
SOURCE: FIGURE 1
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP: E F
SITE LOCATION MAP
LAKE BURLINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA
QUADRANGLE, DATED 1969 HAW RIVER INTERCEPTOR
BURLINGTON ,NORTH CAROLINA BURLINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA
QUADRANGLE, DATED 1969 REVISED
1981 ECS Project 09-24748
Scale: 1" = 2,000' STM

L E -7 Vd r Wb D '
Ec B2 � 1 yE� Etl 2
`t
r Ld Sa HcB: Ee 1) , * Erd C
WbE H 6C 2,'
Edi E s E!
1 t WbC 10,
' +� --lhE cE '� EdB
W E ,WibD B � ,Epi Edi
VVCD
I7e.
WCD Ti
Of IWK2
WbD
E `
E Ed � -
.:WbC/
�`
EG" ^.r f
r D
is ' ' �� ',EdB y
Ed C2
wbCWbD
Wd
,
w .,.
r
�Z
WbE°
E�, ��,,,, HHB.-,, �� ,- x � ihE-�
WbDi
-- L d
oil r. LEGEND r
Ikk A_' •

I, M
God

. a'r
u ■
1 e a
®■ We■
% sills ■�®
ce,
a ■
is n°mq`
° ,% r
■ e ■ ■ a
■ ■ ° is ■ r
tl i
In
is
o■ ■
LEGENDi
ra..
..
Approximate PSA a a
...
�'+�� '■.
■ E ti.
SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREAS SFHAs SUB]ECT TO
'
`
iI�
INUNDATION BY THE 1% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD EVENT
u ■
■
rtpio'
The 1% annual chance flood! (100yearflood), also known as the base flood, is the flood that
_ ■ i. %
°
`L
c E
■ ■'■ a all
has a 1% charm W being eqn sled 4r e—Wed in any give year. The'Sgenal I'll Hazard
Area ,s tits area ial to fooding by the 1% annul chance flood. Amax of SpaLla4 Food
■ e ■
■ ■ ■ ■ '�
■ ■ ■ , ■
t ■ e
Hazard indude Zones A, AE, AH, AO, AR, 499, V, and VE. The Base Flood Elevation is the
■ ■ .' ■
�
I� ■ ■
water-surtaceefevabon orthe l% d""'Ichancefloud.
■ ■ ■ ■
ZONE A No Base Flood Elevation deltemined.
■ ■ ■
�� °
ZONE AE Base Rood Elevations de[ennined,
ZONF AN Fhad depths of 1 to 3 feet (usually areas of ponding); Base Rood Elevabons
I ■ ■
■ °
■
n
® 1■r
ddernined.
el , ,
■ ■ e
_. ioEe ■
ZONEAO Flood depths of 1 rn 3 loot (usually sheet flaw on sloping [nviaD); —rage
depths determined. For areas of alluvial fan floodiig, u loclCres also
determined,
ZONEAR Special Flood Hall Area formerly protected form the 1% annual chance
flood by a flood -trot system that was subsequentry deceitifed. Zane AR
indlostcs that thin tamer Rood "b"' system Is beng restored m provide
protection from the 1% annual chanre a "'nate.- flood.
ZONE A99 Areas to be promoted (rein I% annual chance flood by a Federal flood
protection system under construction; no 0ase Flood Elevations determined.
ZONE VE nnw,: al food zone with v kxity Pry drd (wave aC kii 11a Flood Plevolipns
debentilrled
��.. FLOOD WAY AREAS IN ZONE AE a f
The flopdway, Is the chanfel M a stream plus any adiacerd noogplaln areas that must be kept ■
free of eirk—hment so that the 1% annual dlance flood can be clrrigl wirbout substantial °
n flood heighis. 6
LadOTHER FLOOD AREAS
ZONE M Areas of 0.2% annual chance rood; areas of 1% annual dlance flood with
averl depths of less than 1 tout nr with drainage areas ""'than
1 sgnare
mile; and a—probEcted by leases Run 1% annual cban. food, - ® u
OTHER AREAS , ti "■ ,..� a
70 EX Arras determined to to culudde the 0.2% annual Nance floodclaln.
ZONED Areas in whiN Rood hazardsale. undetermined, but ra—Ible.
COASTAL BARRIER RESOURCES SYSTEM (CBRS) AREAS
OTHERWISE PROTECTED AREAS (OPAS)
CBRS an—and OPAsare ohnnhally, lo[atCd wlth,n orad]atent to Special Flood liamni A-
1% n—f
mar.1%an—f drerse floodplain bwndary
0.2%—.1 oy— "Owl, hnpral3N
Fleadway neuri ry
Zone C bgundary
..................•.. CMS a" CPA boundary
—, auund■ry dl Sul Ffupd Haaard Area Zones and boundary
d,,k,rk 5".1 F" ll—d Areas & diferent case Mood
Eivabl flood depth, dr hdod v lwtrB
Wx Mood E - tl line and value, Nevabon rn fl
(EL287) W� Flom fl— 4ne when, unlform Mdrin tang; eie Wh In
rept*
Referencad W the slodF, Anniston Va�l paNm M 1988
S— I Cmss sealcn lme
---------za Throw[ line
9]ti]3o" 3, z5d. Geag2phk—rdlnates re.—.d.. the Nth American unto. of
1983 (NAC a3!
4275) 2000-nctrr falvasal Transverse Merralor grid fck, mne 17
1477 500 FEET 50[10 -foot pnd values'. Nadi Cardrina S2R Plane mardinaR system
(11PS2ONE 3200, State Pine NAD 83 fan)
BM5510x Nurth Carolina Geodetic Survey bench mark (nor r— informabon
win nudNwww ams erata Ire us) 0e■
EM5510 Nal rendetic Survey bench made (for more InVinaeon vM I
fl hrm-lrwww apvh
NGSSB GFS lCm ye]tkalC (ra Marksnr CO Frotiallori AM
BMS$1B NCFMP earth Marks tta mare MTamallon vISIC
hho'+Iwww _c mO,nr,4_I
• Mi.$ River Mine
" SOURCE:
Rg FEMA FIRM
Map Number 3710888500J
Dated 09/06/2006
NOT TO SCALE
A ®-•
TM
Cis
■ ® ,
ti ■ � ■c
■' ■' ■' ■ K. r■,
I■ 1sill
6.
■
■ % ■%■
ti 'x
mL
F .P
re
■e ,
FIGURE 4
FEMA FIRM MAP
HAW RIVER INTERCEPTOR
BURLINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA
ECS Project 09-24748

THE STREAMMETLAND LOCATIONS SHOWN ON THIS MAP ARE APPROXIMATE. THEY HAVE BEEN DELINEATED BY ECS ON
SEPTMEBER 25, 2014. THEY HAVE NOT BEEN VERIFIED BY THE USACE OR THE NCDENR-DWQ. THEY HAVE NOT BEEN
SURVEYED.
LEGEND FLAG NUMBERSANFO
Approximate Location of Project Study Area
/V Approximate Location of Intermittent Stream WETLAND FLAGS =
Approximate Location of Wetlands'_
SA 1-21 Flag Number/Approximate Location: STREAM/POND FLAGS =
DP -1 ■ Approximate Location of Data Point
,,. Stream Flags = 40
Wetland Flags = 15
4 Total Flags = 55
DRQ ;
r'.
M' JAN
�t
N
�E SOURCE:
S Alamance County GIS
2010 Aerial Photograph and
ECS Field Notes
Approximate Scale: 1" = 890'
.q
>r-� IIL� DP -2
4 d'K
r�
i
FIGURE 5
APPROXIMATE STREAM/WETLAND
FLAG LOCATION MAP
HAW RIVER INTERCEPTOR
BURLINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA
M ECS Project 09-24748
SC 1-6
Non -Jurisdictional
SC 100-126
Drainage feature
J 5
t"
17
`
SIB 1-5
o
T ;r.
"+��
t� �►�k+l��.�� cit
�,...
"{ !
JV
f
V
sst A
HAW RIVER r `'
, �
INTERCEPTOR PAHSE 2
■ WA 1-15
l
M' JAN
�t
N
�E SOURCE:
S Alamance County GIS
2010 Aerial Photograph and
ECS Field Notes
Approximate Scale: 1" = 890'
.q
>r-� IIL� DP -2
4 d'K
r�
i
FIGURE 5
APPROXIMATE STREAM/WETLAND
FLAG LOCATION MAP
HAW RIVER INTERCEPTOR
BURLINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA
M ECS Project 09-24748

WETLAND ND iiETERMINA'"ON DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
PM16ctFSite: p City(Cqunty:
APpEft antlQv�ri$r % j,#� ,
m_� State:, sampling I?oirtt +�,
Investig�tntj}: +•'*^ _ Sas ttQri,Tawnshlp. Range; 1,-r6
Landrorm (Nllslopa, terrace, etc.): c 4n >f __ Local relief (concave, convex, none): r, Slope
5uhreglon ji-RR or MLRA): L,PVJ,�- 'LAI: f Long: F'�%13X3'3? Datttni:
Soil Map 0111t Name: x Z,13 :. '
RIW7cla5sifiGbliion:
Are climatic I hydfolugic conditions on the sKB typical nor this time of year? Yens No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Am Vkgetultr} -i- . 50D or 4ydrologty sigpilimntly dtshirhed? Are 'Nu mril Clrouttxtnri m' pr rrl7 Ytm No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map. showing sampling, point locations, transects, Important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes Nowt` "` Is the Sampled Area '
Hydric Soil Present? Ye .` No✓ within a Wetland? Yas lar
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes _ N1__
YReniarks: 'n
HYDROLOGY
kC
,, W i A,.. p 2 7
Ad
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
P— lr�m [I lMkok1<� tminimurn of 15 reau�ad c
Surface Water (Al)
High Water Table (A2)
Saturation (A3)
_ Water Marks (131)
Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Drift Deposits (133)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
Iron Deposits (135)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
*Fi Id O
all that uhl
True Aquatic Plants (1314)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Thin Muck Surface (C7) ,
Other (Explain in Remarks)
e bservatlons. -- –
StWfoce is F?rt#tient? Yes No G1�pth (Ih s)c _
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (Inches):
sc� tt:at�, r'rrtlnFinlirn a tyrsudxr
Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
Drainage Patterns (810)
_ Moss Trim Lines (816)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Crayfish Burrows (CO)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Saturation Present? ^^ , Yes No Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes
gauge, monitoring well,
Remarks:
g
N4
-US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

v EGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
4bsoZte Dom1narr Indicator
f�ltrii;izft: (L ) � les? S'tO5
ia�+r,,w.,ic, ." rr.�,, Ifr.ft
r-
, _ _+
d,
17-0 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: CPO— 20% of total cover -?-4
50IM09MCk SIMLLffn (Plot size: 7- 1
3. - c Jl %(-7
CC
a
7.
41..
atm - n Total cover
50% of total cover: 'a `} 20% of total cover: %3
Herb Stratum (Plot size: /S )
PAO3 P) GEA C_
+I.
6
7.
10.
11.
= Total Cover
50°k of total cover: 20% of total cover:_
QQI f, ltle-Stratum (PkX size:
, /xt x"til rte, _ iQ I
3.
d
:a
= Total Cover
50% of total cover:_ 20% of total cover. --3—
Rernarks: (tr'&de photo numbers here of on a sepasart+r Oeet,) % }
�J
i�
Sampling Point: P
Eiona)nance Fest worMheet:
NUMI)Lr of Domlrutnt Species
That lira Cat. FACK or FAC, � (A)
Total Nutter of Dominant
Spades Across Ala Strata: (13)
Percent of Dominant Species F' d/
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: {B)
Total % Cover of: _ htultToly hv_
OBL species x 1 = `^
FACW species ---LO x 2 =
FAC species% x3= 33
FACU species '749 x 4 = Z&)
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: 193 (A) 53 9 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 0-6
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
32 - Dominance Test is >50%
.3 - Prevalence Index is 53.01
— 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data In Remarks or on a separate sheet)
— Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
11ndicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology muss:
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1
m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

I SOIL
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indh
Matrixestuxi ettkuc+
iet*I --QwLwL,ux— , __ _C0110F Wrst) Type' —L—o?— Texture
jai 0. -
Sampling Poirit.
`Type: C=Gariceptrat M. DzDeplstlon, RWReduc�d Mh trix MS4USked Sand Gralrrs. 2Location: PL=Pore Uninst, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils :
_ Histosol (Al)
Dark Surface (81)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) ,
Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
of Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Stratified Layers (A5)
�. Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
2 cm Muck.(A10) (LRR N)
Redox Dark $urface (F6)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
Thick Dark Surface. (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136,122)
31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Red Parent Material (1721) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or'problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
—
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric
soil Present? Yes Mc'
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont -Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
J City/County, x�3 s sanapin)l Uflt, I
Pro ecUSite: QtVr I . AIc,,,-- l
APPIicanUOwnen�..- _stare:-�t�
Sart,fahng Plalnr_1�Y�'r
Investlgator(s): j .; ,� _ - Section, Township, Range:,
Landform (hlllslope, terrace, etc.): 1 ." LGwi rellaf (cancvv+e, convex, none): ,r ;= _ _ _ Slope
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Long: �9 . -42=� 3 Datum: NAD 9 3
Soil Map Unit Name: W'-!S.a: ,. ,,. , • NWI classification:
Are climatic 1 hydrologic conditions on the site typicalforthis time of year? Yes No _ (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation - Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes_ No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (if needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map. showing sampling: point locations, transects, Important features, etc.
Hydropl c Vegetation Present? Yes No.
Hydrlc Soil Preserrt? Yes No
Wetiand Hydrology Presont? Yes V' No
-, 0�
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Nmary Indleators minlir fi of c
urface Water (A1)
ligh. Water Table (A2)
{ -Iaturatiran (Al,
Water Marks (B1)
Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Drift Deposits (63)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
Iron Deposits (135)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
'Field Observations:
Surface Water Present?
Water Table Present?
Saturation Present?
, Remarks:
Is the Sampled Area 11
within a Wetland? • Yes No
True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Recent Iron Reduction In Tilled Soils (C6)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
v Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138).
_ Drainage Patterns (610)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Crayfish Burrows (Ca)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
R Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
— Microtopographic Relief (D4)
— FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Yes / No V Depth (inches):
Yes No Depth (inches):
Yes No Depth (inches) Q ^ (, Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes -�/ No
gauge, monitoring well,
'US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont- Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Husuiute uominant moicator
Tt e +jir (talo[ size: ) (%� /Cover SPRWes? Status
4-
6.
7.
J�� = Total Cover
50% of total cover: _ S- 20% of total cover::. _
Saplinabrub Stratum
_ (Plot size: 1
1, t
A EAC,
2 (Ia
4,
ti.
B.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: —� 20% of total cover:_
1-14 Stratum (Plot size:
2.2gLi clic��� I<
Sampling Point -2Z
uominance Test worksheet: `
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Talal MunattQr of Domitaax
Spaces Acl'OSS All Sttalks:
parcent a 6 minant solcias
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (Am)
Prevalence Index worksheet: i
Total % Cover of:
Nitiltiepy
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 = __
FAC species
_ x 3 =
FACU species
x4= _
UPL species
_ x 5 =
Column Totals:
(Al (ri}
Prevalence Index - BIA =
1.4t phyttc Vegetation Indicators:
Pupid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
Ind'icatom of #tydric soil and livetland hydfalo y must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Veoetation Strata:
Tree - wroudy plants, (Axcluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
— more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
10.
11.
= Total Carer
50% of total cover: 7�- _ 20% of total cover y
V-0jid vide ftawrn (Plot size: }
1. 1Ai,-� rr�rr✓. I 'Ll J tri S— t
2.
3,
�1.
r' _ - Total Cover
50% of total cover: -5_ 20% of total cover:
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 it (1
M) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2,0

SOIL Sampling -Point: _
Prq isa a� gscrtptlan: (Desprlbeto the depth needed to doc{miant tho Insiicattir or cenfirmr tho aUs$nce of Inrllc,tors,)
Depth Matrix Redox Features _
inch '.Color.(moist) % Color(molat) % Type' L062 Texture
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, I
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosoi (Al)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
— Black Histic (A3)'
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
— 2 cm Muck,(A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
Thick Dark Surface. (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
— Sandy Redox (S,5)
— Stripped Matrix (S6)
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Reduced Matdxr MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: • PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont- Version 2.0
Indicators for Problematic Hydric 801153:
—, Dark Surface (S7)
— 2 cm- Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
— Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147,148)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
— Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147,148)
(MLRA 147,148)
3my Gleyed Matrix (F2)
— Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Z.Oeprated Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 13 6, 147)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF1 2)
Depleted Dark Surface (177)
— Other (Explain in Remarks)
— Redox Depressions (F8)
— Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127,147)
unless disturbed or'problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont- Version 2.0

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: q%5 I /"I t( Project/Site:
r:
EvaluatoCounty
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent Stream Deter
if z1.9 oroerennial if 2 30* -� Ephemeral
Latitude: X06 Zq 3 Z
Longitude:
(circle one) Other T
K Perennial e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 1
1 a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
Absent
0
Weak
1
Moderate
1-
Strong
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
I f
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
21. Aquatic Mollusks -
22. Fish
23. Crayfish
1
0.5
0.5
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
1
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0.5
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
2
S
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
OV
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
3
9. Grade control
0
C1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channels
=
Yes = 3
artiflual altches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal =12
12. Presence of Baseflow 4 1 2 3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria _ 1 2 3
14. Leaf litter 1.5 0.5 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 1 1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0 ' - 1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table? No = 0 es =
C. Bioloav (Subtotal = IC 11 1
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
2
1 1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
2
3 _
21. Aquatic Mollusks -
22. Fish
23. Crayfish
1
0.5
0.5
2
1
1
3
1..5
1.5
24. Amphibians 42
0.5
1
1-5
25. Algae C,02
0.5
1
1-5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
Other = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: ' m4e.
c
Sketch:

Cumulative Stream and Wetland Impacts
Wetland Impacts
Phase
Label
Type of Impact
Permanent
Temporary
Loss of Waters
of the US
Previously Permitted
1
W1
Temp. Crossing
0.1589
X
1
W1
Access Path
0.2467
0.2467
X
1
W1
Crossing, Conversion to herb wetland
0.1185
0.1185
X
1
W2
Temp. Crossing
0.0568
X
1
W2
Access Path
0.0532
0.0532
X
1
W2
Crossing, Conversion to herb wetland
0.0064
0.0064
X
2A
WA
Temp. Crossing
0.0084
X
Cumulative Wetland Impacts
1 0.4248
0.2241
0.4248
Stream Impacts
Phase
Label
Type of Impact
Permanent
Temporary
Loss of Waters
of the US
Previously Permitted
1
S1
Temp. Crossing, Bank Stabilization
39
0
X
1
S1
Temp. Crossing, Bank Stabilization
18
0
X
1
S3
Temp. Crossing
25
0
X
1
S3
Installation of RCP Wingwalls
8
8
X
1
S4
Temp. Crossing, Bank Stabilization
37
0
X
2A
SB
Inlet, Pipe, Outlet Box within stream
40
40
X
2A
SB
Replacement of Existing Rip -Rap within stream
37
0
X
2B
SC -1
Temp. Crossing, Bank Stabilization
26
0
2B
SC -2
Temp. Crossing, Bank Stabilization
26
0
Cumulative Stream Impacts
194
62
48

Phase 1 Stream and Wetland Impacts
Wetland Impacts
Phase
Label
Type of Impact
Permanent
Temporary
Loss of Waters of
the US
Previously Permitted
1
W1
Temp. Crossing
0.1589
X
1
W1
Access Path
0.2467
0.2467
X
1
W1
Crossing, Conversion to herb wetland
0.1185
0.1185
X
1
W2
Temp. Crossing
0.0568
X
1
W2
Access Path
0.0532
0.0532
X
1
W2
Crossing, Conversion to herb wetland
0.0064
0.0064
X
Phase 1 Wetland Impacts
0.4248
0.2157
0.4248
Stream Impacts
Phase
Label
Type of Impact
Permanent
Temporary
Loss of Waters of
the US
Previously Permitted
1
S1
Temp. Crossing, Bank Stabilization
39
0
X
1
S1
Temp. Crossing, Bank Stabilization
18
0
X
1
S3
Temp. Crossing
2S
0
X
1
S3
Installation of RCP Wingwalls
8
8
X
1
S4
Temp. Crossing, Bank Stabilization
37
0
X
Phase 1 Stream Impacts
102
25
8

Phase 2A Stream and Wetland Impacts
Wetland
Impacts
Phase
Label
Type of Impact
Permanent
Temporary
Loss of Waters
of the US Previously Permitted
2
WA
Temp. Crossing
0.0084
Phase 2 Wetland Impacts
0
0.0084
0
Stream Impacts
Phase
Label
Type of Impact Permanent
Temporary
Loss of Waters
of the US Previously Permitted
2
SB
Inlet, Pipe, Outlet Box within stream 40
40
2
SB
Replacement of Existing Rip -Rap within stream
37
0
Phase 2 Stream Impacts 40
0
40

Phase 2B & 2C Stream and Wetland Impacts
Wetland Impacts
Phase Label Type of Impact
Permanent
Temporary
Loss of Waters of
the US Previously Permitted
Phase 2B & 2C Wetland Impacts
0
0
0
Stream Impacts
Phase Label Type of Impact
Permanent
Temporary
Loss of Waters of
the US
Previously Permitted
2B SC -1 Temp. Crossing, Bank Stabilization
26
0
2B SC -2 Temp. Crossing, Bank Stabilization
26
0
Phase 2B & 2C Stream Impacts
52
1
0
0

IMPACTS
STREAM SC-1 (PERMANENT STREAMBANK) 26 L.F.
SSMH N0. 13 /
T ZONE 1
/ BUFFER
ZONE 2
/ BUFFER
EXISTING TOP
/OF BANK / PROP.
PIERS jf y
— — — — — — ONE 1
BUFFER
ZONE 2
BUFFER
I —3�1-
20 PERMANENT RIP-RAP l SSMH NO. 14
EASEMENT
EXISTING TOP
I OF BANK
64 OF 42 DIP AERIAL
EXISTING CROSSING REPLACING
WATERWAY EXISTING 42" CMP AERIAL CROSSING
/�C-
``, CA SEE SHEET 4 OF
��- •ti ! y� ATTACHED PLANS FOR
/ PLAN & PROFILE
SEAL
033170 _ ! SEE SHEETS 10 & 14
-o '' • FNG I NEE t'7p;� OF ATTACHED PLANS
FOR DETAILS
NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
0 40
PROJECT NO. - 14088
NEW STREAM IMPACTS FOR: SHEETNO
alley, williams, carmen & king, inc. CITY OF BURLINGTON
0-H T71ENGINEERS, ARCHITECTS & SURVEYORS 42" HAW RIVER INTERCEPTOR
740 chapel hill road p.o. box 1179 REPLACEMENT - PHASE 2B & 2C
Burlington, n.c. 27215 336/226-5534 ALAMANCE COUNTY, BURLINGTON, N.C.
UDU\-A
Firm's Engineering License No. F-0203 SCALE 1" = 40' 1 DATE: 1/7/16 DwGer WDF 111F 2

\ IMPACTS
\ EXISTING 21 " _ STREAM SC -2 (PERMANENT STREAMBANK) 26 L.F.
AERIAL CROSSING EXISTING 21" S.S.
\ BEING REMOVED BEING REMOVED
\ EXISTING FROM SERVICE
\ WATERWAY
/ SSMH NO. 27A
\SSMH N0. 27
/- I
SSMH NO. 29/
SSMH NO.. 28
/
C'4
�\A
si0 0!
�S A
0331
y+, �O �hG I NEED�C7
lYJ1.•$Yt1�/�'
0 40
E
62' OF 42" DIP AERIAL
CROSSING REPLACING
EXISTING 36" CMP
AERIAL CROSSING
PROJECT NO. - 14088
PROP,
1
PIER &
RIP—RAP
ZONE 1 I
BUFFER
ZONE 2 CD
\ � \BUFFERVv\ 7M
N m
l
0un/
\ o
n
SEE SHEET 9 OF ATTACHED
PLANS FOR PLAN & PROFILE
SEE SHEETS 10 & 14 OF
ATTACHED PLANS FOR DETAILS
. - 1 X JL �
NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
NEW STREAM IMPACTS FOR: SHEET N°
alley, williams, carmen & king, inc. CITY OF BURLINGTON
ENGINEERS, ARCHITECTS & SURVEYORS 42" HAW RIVER INTERCEPTOR
740 chapel hill road p.o. box 1179 REPLACEMENT- PHASE 2B & 2C
burlington, n.c. 27215 336/226-5534 ALAMANCE COUNTY, BURLINGTON, N.C.
Firms Engineering License No. F-0203 SCALE 1" = 40' °ATE 117116 °W° eY WDF °F 2

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. SAW -2014-00852 County: Alamance U.S.G.S. Quad: NC-MEBANE
GENERAL PERMIT (REGIONAL AND NATIONWIDE) 'VERIFICATION
Pennittee: City of Burlington
attn: Harold Owen
Address: 425 South Lexington Avenue
Burlington, NC 27215
Agent: Allen, Williams, Carmen, and King, Inc.
attn: Josh Johnson, PE
Address: 425 South Lexington Avenue
Burlington, NC 27215
Size (acres) —4.4 Nearest Town Burlington
Nearest Waterway Haw River River Basin Haw. North Carolina.
USGS HUC 3030002 Coordinates 36.107624 N, -79.389475 W
Location description: The project includes an existing 30 foot wide sewer casement on the west side of the Haw River between
Riverside Drive and Servis Creek in Burlington, Alamance County, North Carolina.
Description of projects area and activity: This project includes Phase 2A of the Haw River Interceptor Replacement, which
replaces an existing an 42" gravity sewer line between Riverside Drive and Servis Creek includin2 two distinct crossings
ro'cets :
1 Crossing 1 Wetland Inr act 1 re uires the temporary discharge of dredged material into a total of 0.0086 acre of wetlands
for installation of sewer line;
2) Crossing 2 (Stream Impacts 1 and 2) requires the permanent discharge of fill material into 40 linear feet (0.007 acre) of
stream channel and the temporary discharge of dredged material into 32 linear feet (0.006 acre) of stream channel for
installation of a drou inlet/culvert structure and rip rat) dissipater ad/bank stabilization respectively.
Applicable Law: ® Section 404 (CIean Water Act, 33 USG 1344)
❑ Section 10 (Rivers and Harbors Act, 33 USC 403)
Authorization: Nationwide Permit Number: NWP 12 Utility Line Activities,
SEE ATTACHED RGP or NWP GENERAL, REGIONAL AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS
REMARKS: See also NW 12 permit verification dated 6/26/2014 for an earlier phase of the Haw River Interceptor single
and complete project.
Your work is authorized by the above referenced permit provided it is accomplished in strict accordance with the attached
conditions and your submitted application and attached information dated 1/8/2015 received 1/9/2015 via email . Any
violation of the attached conditions or deviation from your submitted plans may subject the permittee to a stop work order, a
restoration order, a Class I administrative penalty, and/or appropriate legal action.
This verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified below unless the nationwide authorization is modified,
suspended or revoked. If, prior to the expiration date identified below, the nationwide permit authorization is reissued and/or
modified, this verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified below, provided it complies with all requirements of
the modified nationwide pennit. If the nationwide pennit authorization expires or is suspended, revoked, or is modified, such that the
activity would no longer comply with the terms and conditions of the nationwide permit, activities which have commenced (i.e., are
under construction) or are under contract to commence in reliance upon the nationwide permit, will remain authorized provided the
activity is completed within twelve months of the date of the nationwide permit's expiration, modification or revocation, unless
discretionary authority has been exercised on a case-by-case basis to modify, suspend or revoke the authorization.
Activities subject to Section 404 (as indicated above) may also require an individual Section 401 Water Quality Certification. You
should contact the NC Division of Water Quality (telephone [phone]) to determine Section 401 requirements.
For activities occurring within the twenty coastal counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act (LAMA),
prior to beginning work you must contact the N.C. Division of Coastal Management.
This Department of the Army verification does not relieve the permittee of the responsibility to obtain any other required Federal,
State or local approvals/permits.
If there are any questions regarding this verification, any of the conditions of the Pennit, or the Corps of Engineers regulatory
program, please contact David Bailey at_919-554-4884 ext 30 or David.E.Bailey2 &usace.army.mil.
Corps Regulatory Official:
Expiration Date of Verification: 03/18/2017
Date: 2/2/2015
Copy furnished:
Sue Homewood, NCDENR-DWR, 450 W. Hanes Mill Rd, Suite 300, Winston-Salem, NC 27105

SAW -2014-00852 Special Conditions:
1. Temporary discharge of excavated or fill material into wetlands and waters of the United States will be
for the absolute minimum period of time necessary to accomplish the work. All authorized temporary
wetland impacts will be returned to pre -disturbance grade and contour, and re -vegetated. In wetland
areas where trenching is involved for pipe installation, wetland topsoil will be segregated from the
underlying subsoil, and no less than the top 6 inches of the trench will be backfilled with topsoil from
the trench.
2. No impacts to Servis Creek are authorized by this Nationwide Permit verification.
3. Please note that future phases of the Haw River Interceptor project and related activities may be
considered part of a single and complete project, and impacts may be considered cumulative, with
respect to compensatory mitigation and Nationwide Permit thresholds, with impacts permitted during
earlier phases authorized and documented under Action ID: SAW -2014-00852. Current cumulative
impacts to waters of the US for this single and complete project (including those impacts authorized on
2/212015) include permanent impacts (loss of waters) to 0.30 acre of wetlands, temporary impacts to
0.2243 acre of wetlands including 0.1249 acre of permanent wetland conversion, permanent impacts
(loss of waters) to 48 linear feet (0.008 acre) of stream channel, permanent impacts (not a loss of waters)
to 90 linear feet (0.015 acre) of stream channel, and temporary impacts to 57 linear feet (0.007 acre) of
stream channel. This amounts to a total loss of waters of the US of 0.308 acre.
Corps Regulatory Official: % Date: 2/2/2015
Expiration Date of Verification: 03/18/2017

Determination of Jurisdiction:
A. ❑ Based on preliminary information, there appear to be waters of the US including wetlands within the above described project
area, This preliminary determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process
( Reference 33 CFR Part 331).
B. ❑ There are Navigable Waters of the United. States within the above described project area subject to the permit requirements of
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Unless there is a change in the law or our
published regulations, this detennination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
C. ® There are waters of the US and/or wetlands within the above described project area subject to the permit requirements of
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations,
this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
D. ❑ The jurisdictional areas within the above described project area have been identified under a previous action. Please reference
jurisdictional determination issued . Action ID: SAW -
Basis For Determination: The proiect area exhibits water bodies with ordinary high water and wetland criteria as defined in
the applicable regional supplement to the 1987 wetland delineation manual. The water bodies on the site include Servis Creek
and an Unnamed Tributary to the Haw River, both Relatively Permanent Waters) as well as a wetland adiacent to the Haw
River. This determination is based on a field verification by David E. Bailey (USAGE) on 11/18/2014
Remarks:
The wetlands and other Waters of the US on the property were fla led by ECS Carolinas with chap es made in the field by
David E. Bailey (USACE).
E. Attention USDA Program Participants
This delineation/determination has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps' Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the particular site
identified in this request. The delineation/determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security
Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in USDA programs, you should request
a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
F. Appeals Information (ibis information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in B
and C above).
This correspondence constitutes an approved jurisdictional determination for the above described site. If you object to this
determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331. Enclosed you will find a
Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal this determination you
must submit a completed RFA forn to the following address:
US Anny Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Jason Steele, Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW, Room 1OM15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for appeal
under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP. Should you
decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by 4/1/2015.
**It is not necessary to submit an RFA form two the Division Office if you do not object to the determination in this correspondence.**
Corps Regulatory Official:��
David E. Bailey
Date of JD: 2/2/2415 Expiration Date of JD: 2/2/2020
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we continue to do so,
please complete our customer Satisfaction Survey online at li tp://reaulatory.tisacesurve..c�oml_.

NOTIFICATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL OPTIONS AND PROCESS AND
REQUEST FOR APPEAL
Applicant: City of Burlington File Number: SAW -2014-00852 I Date: 2/2/2015
Attached is: See Section below
INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT Standard Permit or Letter ofpermission) A
❑ PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission)
❑ PERMIT DENIAL C
® APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION D
❑ PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION E
SECTION I - The following identifies your rights and options regarding an administrative appeal of the above decision.
Additional information may be found at or htt ://www.usace,arm .mil/Missions/CiviIWorks/Re ulator Pro rainaiidPermits,as )x
or the Coros rep-ulations at 33 CFR Part 331.
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized, Your
signature on the Standard Pen -nit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request
that the permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section II of this form and return the form to the district
engineer. Your objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will
forfeit your right to appeal the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your
objections and may: (a) modify the permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the pennit to address some of your
objections, or (c) not modify the permit having determined that the pen -nit should be issued as previously written. After
evaluating your objections, the district engineer will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in
Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
o ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Pennit, you may sign the pen -nit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Pennission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
pen -nit.
APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terns and conditions therein,
you may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of
this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This forn must be received by the division engineer within 60 days
of the date of this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by
completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division
engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved ,ID or provide new
information.
• ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the
date of this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers
Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this forn and sending the forn to the district engineer. This form
must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.

E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps regarding the
preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved JD (which may be appealed),
by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new information for further consideration by the
Corps to reevaluate the JD.
SECTION 1I - REQUEST FOR APPEAL or OBJECTIONS TO AN INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your objections to an initial
proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to this form to clarify where your reasons or
objections are addressed in the administrative record.)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps memorandum for the
record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the review officer has determined is needed to
clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps may add new information or analyses to the record.
However, you may provide additional infornation to clarify the location of information that is already in the administrative
record.
POINT OF CONTACT FOR QUESTIONS ,OR INFORMATION:
If you have questions regarding this decision and/or the
If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you may
appeal process you may contact:
also contact:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division
Mr. Jason Steele, Administrative Appeal Review Officer
attn: David E. Bailey
CESAD-PDO
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, South Atlantic Division
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
60 Forsyth Street, Room IOM15
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any government
consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You will be provided a 15 day
notice of any site investigation, and will have the opportunity to participate in all site investigations.
Date:
Telephone number:
Signature of appellant or agent.
For appeals oft Initial Proffered Permits serul this form to:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, Raleigh Regulatory Field Office, attu: David Bailey, 3331 Heritage Trade
Drive, Suite 105, Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
For Permit denials, Proffered Permits and approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this form to:
Division Engineer, Commander, U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic, Attn: Mr. Jason Steele, Administrative Appeal
Officer, CESAD-PDO, 60 Forsyth Street, Room 10M15, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]

Action ID Number: SAW -2014-00852 County: Alamance
Permittee: City of Burlinl4ton (attn: Harold Owen)
Project Name: Haw River Interceptor / City of Burlington / Burlington, Alamance County / sewer
line replacement / municipal — Phase 2A
Date Verification Issued: 2/2/2015
Project Manager: David E. Bailey
Upon completion of the activity authorized by this permit and any mitigation required by the permit,
sign this certification and return it to the following address:
US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
attn: David E. Bailey
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
Please note that your permitted activity is subject to a compliance inspection by a U. S. Army Corps of
Engineers representative. Failure to comply with any terms or conditions of this authorization may
result in the Corps suspending, modifying or revoking the authorization and/or issuing a Class I
administrative penalty, or initiating other appropriate legal action.
I hereby certify that the work authorized by the above referenced permit has been completed in
accordance with the terms and condition of the said permit, and required mitigation was completed in
accordance with the permit conditions.
Signature of Permittee Date

WDENR
N or r Carolina Depadmenl of arivirorlrrient and Nutt. ral ResIC L rcefl
Pal MuC nory Dare Id R. � an der V aart
C averrian &Icratriry
Jany ary 29, 21(1115
City of E L rlingtorl
Attnl: Harolc OWEIri, City Manager
4125 S. Lexinatarl A% El
Burlington NC 2x21119
OW R #714-0394 % �l
Alamarlclel COL i
SIL bjeclt: APPROVAL CF 4011 WAITER CIUALITM CHRIIHICATIC N WITH ACIDITIC NAL CONDIIICINS
APPROVAL of Jordan 11i RIRARIAN BUHHER IMPAIMI M ITH AIDDIIIONAL CONDITIONS
City cif BL rlirlgi on Haw River IntElrciel i or Project — F h asEI 7181 Ph ase 2A
Dean Mn. Gwen:
YOL h a%o OL r apple al for the impacts listac below for 1 H e Flu rposEl desclrib ed in yOL r
application dated .larluary 8, X1015,, receivec by th a Di'v ision cif Water ResoL roes QDivisiori)
Jany ary 11 1, X1015. Th Else in ili s arEi covered by th El attached Water QL ality C Elrleral
CEirtificlationl Number 3884 arid th a Jordan flake Buffer RulEls arid the clorlc itions listed E Ellow.
Th is CElrtificlation is assOICiatEld with thEI i of Naiiorlwic a FlElrmit Number 12 CICICIEI it is issued to
you by th a U.S. Army Corps of EnginEiElrs. This approval shall supercede DW R#14-03511 issued
on Jurle 30, X1014. F leasEl not El that yoL shot Id gEli any other fEIC EIiial, statEl or local pElrmits
bElfcire proceeding with yoL r Flro.iEiclt irlaluc ing th OSO i inec by (but not limii Eld to' !IEic iment
anc Erosion Contilcil, Nonl-1 isclh arge, and Water Supply Waiershed regulations.
This appilm al IIEICIL illEls yoL to follow the conditions list Eld in th EI erl(IIOSEIC Certificiaticii clr
general permit and 1 H e following additional Cciriditiorls:
11. The fcillow irlg im Flaats are N ei y appi EIC Flrovidec that all cif the citli er specific anc
ElElneral conditions cif the Certification anc Joi arl LaICEI Buffer RulEfs arEI ni No CIi her
impacts are approved including incidElrltal irrl pacts. ]15A NCA C 02B .C1906(bi I1e)]
F hasEl 2A impacts:
Impact A ilcia
Temlporary/Permanent
fry pad Arr ount
404/4011 WEltlands
TElrr porary
01.0086 acres
StI larr s
F Elrrrl anent
4CI linElclr feet
StllElarr s
TEIm porary
321 linEiiclr feet
Winston -Sale rr A q ions I Offic(
Location: 4A W. Han( ,Mill Rd, Suita 300. W4 ,ton -Salem, Nortl Carolir a 27105
R ore: 31111-116-980M FO: 336-776.97911 Cr is tomer Servic e: 1-871-9134 748
Internet: f tlp://ponal.rcdenr.org/Heb/miq/vi;
A E q ual Clflnortunityl k ilf irmatiue Pallor Employer

city cf Bunlinifllcn
Ow RA V I-031941 v 2
4(11 / Bulfein APRROWIL
Ra@IE i �I c f
Ph ase 11 impacts:
Impact Area
Temporary) Permanerit
Impact Alm ount
404/ 401 Wetlanic s
REirrr anenit
0.421418 acres
404/401 Wetlanics
Temporary
0.221411 aches
9trearr s
REirmanient
4£1 lineae feet
Strearr s
Temporary/Stat ilization
119 lineae feet
Buffers
Temporary
211902 squauEi feet
Buffers
Rerrrarient
71119 square Met
2. Tr is approval is for th a puripose and design c Eisarit EIC iri y ciu r application. The khans and
specifications for 1 N is projeai are inaouklorated by refeuence w pari of th a Certification
aric Bu ffer Authorization. If yOL change you r klrojEiat, yciu miust niotify th a Division.arid
yot, may t e reqs, ired to s( bmit a r1Elw aklpli(iation paaka®e w ith tr a appropriate fee. If
th El kluaperty is sold, the r1Elw awr1Elr must t El given a ccipy of th is appro\jal letter and
General CertifiaationIs) /Perry it/At tho0zation and is rElsplonsiible fou acirr plying with all
(ionc itions. 1113A NCAC 02B .09071d)(2)]
'I. Mitigation far R1 ase I irr khat is required as indicated in tlh a DVIU R#14-0394 approval
datec June 30, X1114.
Th is appuoval aric its cioric itions are firial and biric ing unlEiss acintested. G.S. 1143-2119.5]
This Certification) Buffer A utl arization can to contested as klrovidEic in A rtic les 3 aric 4 of
General Statute 1190B by filing a written petition for ari ac miinisi rative hearing 1 a 1 N e Office of
Ac rr inistrative Heauings ISN ereby 4iuwn as OATH) within Mxty 1160) calendar days).
A petit iori form m ay t El obtairied frorri the CIAH at Fti p://wti w.niaoaF .corn / cir by calling the
OA H Cllerk's Office at (919) 4371-300CI far inifcirrr al iori. AI rIEititiori is consideuec filed w1l en the
original and cine 1111; copy along wit N ariy apklliaablEi CIAH film@l fee is rEiaei%ac in i l El CIAH do ring
normal office 11 ouus (Moric ay tli rot, Ell Fric ay betw eEiri 8:OOam and 5:OOpm,, ey GIL dire@l ciffiaial
state holidaysj.
The petition rT ay be faxed to tr El CIAH at 15191 4311-31100, provided the origirial and one aapy of
the petition alorig w ith ariy applicat le OATH filing fee is received by tl e CIAH w ithin five 119)
business days fcillawing the fared transrT Nsion.
M ailing adduess far tl El CIAH:
If ser aing via US Pcistad SlervicEi:
Clffi(IEi of Admiriisi rative Hearings)
6x14 Mail Service Ceriter
RaleiElN, NC 21699-67714
If sendir 51 via c ediveiq uirvice (WIS, Feidbk, etcj:
Office of Ac miriisi rative Heauings
11x1111 New Hak El Ch L ral Raac
Raleigh, NCI 27609-6285

Clity of Burlin®tan
[IWRt 14-C13941 U
401 / BuIfElr APPROVAL
Pa00 3 oil 3
C rie 1111] ciapy of th a rjEititian m L st also be servec to OE NR:
Jahn Rvaris, C eneral Caunsel
Department cif Environmerit and Natural REISOLIICEIS
11E101 N ail !lervice CEiriter
RaleiElh, NC 31699-16011
Th is IettEir aomplEitEis ih a nEi'viEiw of thEi C ivision L rider section 401 of 1 N e Cllean Water Ad and
th E1.1011C ari 1-40 Riparian BL ffEir RL les as descinibed iri 15A NCAC .0367. Rlease cioritaat !IL e
Homewood at 33EI-176-9693 or sue.homewooc ([e-mail] if�OL have any gLEistiaris air
concerns.
SiriaEirely,
F
W. Clorey Basiriger
Regiorial SupEmv isor
W atEir QL ality Regional C rIEiral ioris
C ivisiari of Water ResclL r(]EIs
BriCIIosL res: GC 38841
cci: Josl- Joh risori, AW CK 11via ern ailj
Cavic Baikiy, USA CE Raleigh REigL latory Rielc Office 11via email
CWR WSRC 4011filEis
CWR 40191 BLffEir Purnittirig Unit