Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20090048 Ver 2_Final Restoration Plan_20160115            Restoration Plan Addendum  Final      January 15, 2016  Little Pine Creek II Restoration Project  Alleghany County, North Carolina  DEQ Contract No. D13022S  SCO No. 07‐07088‐01  DMS ID No. 856    New River Basin  HUC 05050001            PREPARED FOR:      NC Department of Environmental Quality  Division of Mitigation Services  1652 Mail Service Center  Raleigh, NC  27699‐1652           FINAL RESTORATION PLAN ADDENDUM    Little Pine Creek II Restoration Project  Alleghany County, North Carolina  DEQ Contract No. D13022S  SCO No. 07‐07088‐01  DMS ID No. 856    New River Basin  HUC 05050001          PREPARED FOR:      NC Department of Environmental Quality  Division of Mitigation Services  1652 Mail Service Center  Raleigh, NC  27699‐1652          PREPARED BY:       Wildlands Engineering, Inc.  1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104  Charlotte, NC 28203  Phone: 704‐332‐7754        January 15, 2016   Little Pine Creek II Restoration Project  FINAL Mitigation Plan Addendum  Page i  TABLE OF CONTENTS  1.0 Project Background ............................................................................................... 1  2.0 Restoration Project Goals and Objectives .............................................................. 1  3.0 Baseline Information –Project Site and Watershed Summary ................................ 2  3.1 WATERSHED HISTORICAL LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT TRENDS ............................................. 2  3.2 WATERSHED ASSESSMENT .................................................................................................. 3  4.0 Baseline Information – Review of Previously Collected Stream Existing Conditions 3  4.1 STREAM ALIGNMENT VERIFICATION ..................................................................................... 3  4.2 CROSS SECTION RESURVEY RESULTS ..................................................................................... 3  4.3 BED MATERIAL SIZE VERIFICATION ....................................................................................... 4  4.4 BANKFULL VERIFICATION .................................................................................................... 5  4.5 DESIGN DISCHARGE ........................................................................................................... 6  5.0 Baseline Information – Review of Existing Wetland Conditions .............................. 7  6.0 Reference Sites ...................................................................................................... 8  6.1 REFERENCE STREAMS ......................................................................................................... 8  6.2 REFERENCE WETLAND ....................................................................................................... 8  7.0 Determination of Credits ..................................................................................... 10  8.0 Project Site Mitigation Plan ................................................................................. 11  8.1 STREAM DESIGN ............................................................................................................. 11  8.2 WETLAND DESIGN........................................................................................................... 14  8.3 WETLAND AND BUFFER PLANTING ..................................................................................... 15  8.4 DESIGN JUSTIFICATION ..................................................................................................... 15  8.5 SEDIMENT TRANSPORT ANALYSIS ....................................................................................... 15  8.5.1 COMPETENCE ANALYSIS ................................................................................................... 16  8.5.2 CAPACITY ANALYSIS ......................................................................................................... 17  8.6 PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION SUMMARY ............................................................................... 18  8.6.1 STREAM RESTORATION GRADING AND STRUCTURE INSTALLATION ........................................... 18  8.6.2 NATURAL PLANT COMMUNITY RESTORATION ...................................................................... 18  9.0 Maintenance Plan................................................................................................ 19  10.0 Performance Standards ....................................................................................... 20  10.1 STREAMS ....................................................................................................................... 21  10.2 HYDROLOGY ................................................................................................................... 21  10.3 VEGETATION .................................................................................................................. 22  10.4 OTHER PARAMETERS ....................................................................................................... 22  11.0 Monitoring Plan .................................................................................................. 23  11.1 SITE SPECIFIC MONITORING .............................................................................................. 23  12.0 Long‐Term Management Plan .............................................................................. 24  13.0 Adaptive Management Plan ................................................................................ 25  14.0 Financial Assurances ............................................................................................ 25  15.0 References .......................................................................................................... 26    TABLES  Table 1. Project Goals and Objectives ........................................................................................ 2  Table 2. Existing Conditions Resurvey Data ............................................................................... 5  Table 3.   Design Discharge Analysis Summary ............................................................................ 7  Table 4. Summary of Reference Reach Geomorphic Parameters .............................................. 8  Table 5. Determination of Credits ............................................................................................ 10    Little Pine Creek II Restoration Project  FINAL Mitigation Plan Addendum  Page ii  Table 6a.   Design Morphologic Parameters – Little Pine Creek .................................................. 13  Table 6b.   Design Morphologic Parameters – Tributaries........................................................... 14  Table 7.   Dimensionless Critical Shear Stress Calculations – Little Pine Creek ......................... 17  Table 8.  Sediment Transport Capacity Analysis ....................................................................... 17  Table 9.   Maintenance Plan ....................................................................................................... 20  Table 10. Monitoring Requirements .......................................................................................... 24      FIGURES  Figure 1 Existing Conditions Hydrologic Features Map   Figure 2 NC Mountain Regional Curves With Project Data   Figure 3 Concept Design  Figure 4 Proposed Monitoring Components      APPENDICES  Appendix 1  Existing Conditions Geomorphic Survey Data and Photo Log  Appendix 2 USACE Routine Wetland Determination, NCWAM Data Forms and Stream Classification Forms, JD  approval letter  Appendix 3 Conservation Easements and Plats   Little Pine Creek II Restoration Project  FINAL Mitigation Plan Addendum  Page 1    1.0 Project Background  Wildlands Engineering (Wildlands) is completing a design update for the Little Pine II Restoration Design‐ Bid‐Build Project for the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality ‐ Division of Mitigation  Services (DMS).  This project will include restoration of approximately 3,362 existing linear feet (LF) of  Little Pine Creek and three unnamed tributaries (UTs) to Little Pine Creek, enhancement of 1.20 acres of  wetlands, and preservation 4.42 acres of wetlands.    This report functions as an addendum to the approved 2008 Little Pine Creek Restoration Plan (Ward  Consulting Engineers, Inc., 2008), herein referred to as the 2008 Plan.  Where appropriate, this  document references relevant sections of that report.  This addendum is intended only to verify existing  baseline information provided in the 2008 Plan and provide necessary background information to  support the updated design approach.  Site maps are included with the original restoration plan as  Figure 1.  2.0 Restoration Project Goals and Objectives  The Project is located in the Little River & Brush Creek Local Watershed Plan (LWP) planning area.   Planning documents for that LWP can be found at:  http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/eep/rbrps/new.  The  project is located in Hydrologic Unit (HU) 05050001030030 which was identified as a Targeted Local  Watershed in DMS’s 2009 New River Basin Restoration Priority (RBRP) plan and is identified in the Little  River & Brush Creek LWP Project Atlas as sites LPC1‐04 (stream) and LPC1‐W10 (wetland).  DMS developed an LWP for the 111‐square mile drainage area that included land use analysis, water  quality monitoring and stakeholder input to identify problems with water quality, habitat and hydrology.   The Little River watershed (HUC 05050001030030) and Brush Creek watershed (HUC 05050001030020)  are characterized as primarily agricultural and mixed hardwood forest lands and Brush Creek has a  history of habitat degradation issues due to embedded riffles and a lack of functional riparian areas.   DMS completed the Little River & Brush Creek LWP in June 2007.  The Little River & Brush Creek LWP identified the following major stressors in the watershed:   unforested buffers that are heavily grazed; livestock access to streams; heavily eroded stream banks;  land‐disturbing activities on steep slopes; and storm water runoff in and around the town of Sparta.  The  LWP identified the Little Pine Creek II Restoration Project (LPC1‐04) as a stream restoration opportunity  with the potential to improve water quality, habitat, and hydrology within the Brush Creek watershed.   The primary goals of the Little Pine Creek II Restoration Project address multiple stressors identified in  the LWP and described in Table 1.       Little Pine Creek II Restoration Project  FINAL Mitigation Plan Addendum  Page 2    Table 1. Project Goals and Objectives   Little Pine Creek II Restoration Project – Mitigation Plan Addendum  Goal Objective Expected Outcomes  Restore riparian buffers. Plant native tree and understory  species in riparian zone  Create and improve forested riparian  habitats.  Provide a canopy to shade  streams and reduce thermal loadings.   Create a source of woody inputs for  streams.  Reduce flood flow velocities  on floodplain and allow pollutants and  sediment to settle.  Exclude cattle from project  streams.  Install fencing around conservation  easements adjacent to cattle  pastures  Reduce pollutant inputs including fecal  coliform, nitrogen, and phosphorous.  Stabilize eroding stream  banks.  Reconstruct stream channels with  stable dimensions.  Add bank  revetments and in‐stream structures  to protect restored/enhanced  streams.  Reduce inputs of sediment into streams.  Construct stream channels  that are laterally and  vertical stable.  Construct stream channels that will  maintain a stable pattern and profile  considering the hydrologic and  sediment inputs to the system, the  landscape setting, and the  watershed conditions.  Return a network of streams to a stable  form that is capable of supporting  hydrologic, biologic, and water quality  functions.    Improve instream habitat.  Install habitat features such as  constructed riffles and brush toes  into restored/enhanced streams.   Add woody materials to channel  beds.  Construct pools of varying  depth.    Improve aquatic communities in project  streams.    Improve channel and  floodplain connectivity.  Reconstruct stream channels with  bankfull at or near the floodplain  elevation (with bank height ratios  ranging from 1.0 to 1.1).  Raise local groundwater elevations.   Inundate floodplain wetlands and vernal  pools.  Reduce shear stress on channels  during larger flow events.    Permanently protect the  project site from harmful  uses.  Establish a conservation easement  on the site.    Ensure that development and  agricultural uses that would damage the  site or reduce the benefits of project are  prevented.    3.0 Baseline Information –Project Site and Watershed Summary  3.1 Watershed Historical Land Use and Development Trends  The Little Pine Creek II watershed (Watershed) is located in a rural area approximately eight miles east  of the Town of Sparta (refer to Figure 4 in the 2008 Plan).  Land use within the Watershed is historically  rural and dominated by agriculture and forest.  A review of historical aerials from 1964, 1983, and 1998  verified that land use on the project site and in the Watershed has remained relatively consistent for the  past 50 years (historic aerial photos are provided in Appendix 13 of the 2008 Plan).    Little Pine Creek II Restoration Project  FINAL Mitigation Plan Addendum  Page 3    There are no signs of impending land use changes or development pressure evident in the  watershed.   Mr. Travis Dalton, the Alleghany County Planner, reviewed the Watershed conditions and,  during a telephone interview, confirmed that the historic agricultural and timber production land uses in  the Watershed are expected to continue for the foreseeable future with no indications of land use  shifts.   No transportation projects or major roadway improvements are planned for the area (T. Dalton,  personal communication, June 4, 2012).    3.2 Watershed Assessment  On June 15, 2012, Wildlands conducted a watershed reconnaissance visit to verify current land uses  observed from the aerial photography and to identify potential stressors.  Consistent with information  depicted in aerial photography, land use within the Watershed is predominantly timber and agricultural  production.  Disturbed areas within the Watershed consist of large (several acres) fields with recent  farm waste applications or recent tillage for new crop installation.  A few single‐family homes have been  built in the past five years, but there is no evidence of significant new development.  No areas of  widespread floodplain or overland erosion were noted within the Watershed.  Stream banks throughout  the Watershed are eroded and appear to be the primary source of fine grain sediment to the  downstream reaches.    The Watershed perimeter closely follows Glade Valley Road, Glade Creek School Road, and Barrett Road  (as shown in Figure 4 of the 2008 Restoration Plan).  Topography can be described as somewhat hilly to  gently rolling.  There are no impoundments that significantly affect hydrology or sediment transport in  the Watershed.  Culverts at various road crossings throughout the Watershed influence sediment  transport at isolated locations.  Channel substrate ranges from cobble to fines.   4.0 Baseline Information – Review of Previously Collected Stream Existing Conditions   On‐site existing conditions assessments were conducted by Wildlands in June 2013.  The intent of the  existing conditions assessment effort was to verify previous, detailed surveys completed for the 2008  Plan and to identify any geomorphic changes or apparent disturbances that had occurred since that  date.    4.1 Stream Alignment Verification  Wildlands was unable to recover existing control points, therefore review of the existing topographic  survey was largely qualitative.  Wildlands compared the existing stream alignments and floodplain areas  to the 2008 survey during field assessments.  In general, the 2008 survey appears to be an accurate  representation of the current site and stream condition.  Although stream banks have clearly continued  to erode since 2008, the stream centerline or thalweg did not appear to have shifted significantly and  depositional features within the channels were still located in the same approximate locations.    4.2 Cross Section Resurvey Results  As part of the survey verification effort, Wildlands also conducted additional surveys at four cross  sections that were surveyed for the 2008 Plan.  The resurveyed cross sections included Little Pine Creek  XS6 (located upstream of Glade Creek School Road), Little Pine Creek XS14 (located downstream of the  road), Tributary A XS1, and Tributary C XS6.  Cross sections of Little Pine Creek and Tributary A were field  located with a handheld GPS unit.  However, no spatial data were provided for Tributary C so Wildlands  located the cross section using photographs and maps from the 2008 Plan.  Data from the additional  survey efforts are provided in Appendix 1.  The locations of the project reaches and surveyed cross  sections are shown in Section 12 on Plan Sheets 1 and 3 of the 2008 Plan, as well as on Figure 1 of this    Little Pine Creek II Restoration Project  FINAL Mitigation Plan Addendum  Page 4    document.  The additional survey performed by Wildlands was not tied to grid, but was adjusted based  on point elevations provided in the existing survey data.    Based on a review of the additional survey data, it appears continued deposition has occurred on the  bar features present on both Little Pine XS6 and Little Pine XS14.  Tributary A XS1 was noted as a riffle  section during the 2008 survey; however, during Wildlands resurvey this area was noted as a pool.   Because of this, Wildlands resurveyed the next downstream riffle to provide an additional comparison.   For this cross section, the cross‐sectional area between the 2008 riffle survey and the 2013 riffle survey  are similar.  A precise analysis of the Tributary C XS6 resurvey was not possible due to the uncertainty of  the location of the new surveyed cross section as compared to the original surveyed in 2008.  However,  the comparison of the two cross sections suggests that Tributary C has enlarged somewhat since 2008.   Existing conditions data from the new cross sectional surveys are shown in Table 2.  4.3 Bed Material Size Verification  To verify the existing sediment distributions, Wildlands also conducted pebble count on Little Pine XS14  and collected a sample from a nearby, well developed point bar.  Comparisons to the original particle  size distributions indicate that significant changes in the bed material sizes have not occurred (Table 2).   Originally, Little Pine Creek was characterized with a D50 of 59 which is near the top end of the coarse  gravel size range.  The results of Wildland’s pebble counts indicate that the stream has a D50 of 72  which is near the lower end of the small cobble size class range.         Little Pine Creek II Restoration Project  FINAL Mitigation Plan Addendum  Page 5    Table 2. Existing Conditions Resurvey Data   Little Pine Creek II Restoration Project – Mitigation Plan Addendum    Notation Units  Little Pine XS6  Little Pine XS14  Tributary A  XS1  Tributary C XS6  stream type   C C/F E G  drainage area DA sq mi 2.57 3.34 0.37 0.11  bankfull cross‐ sectional area Abkf SF 45.6 52.9 10.5 7.1  width at bankfull wbkf feet 23.7 31.9 6.6 8.0  maximum depth at  bankfull dmax feet 3.4 3.5 2.2 1.6  mean depth at  bankfull dbkf feet 1.9 1.7 1.6 0.9  bankfull width to  depth ratio wbkf/dbkf  12.3 19.2 4.1 8.9  low bank height  feet 4.7 5.0 2.2 3.2  bank height ratio BHR  1.4 1.5 1.0 2.0  floodprone area  width wfpa feet 100+ 106+ 61.1 16.9  entrenchment ratio ER  4.2+ 3.3+ 9.3 2.1  Particle Size Distribution from Pebble Count  d50 Description    Small Cobble     d16 mm ‐ 28 ‐ ‐    d35 mm ‐ 57 ‐ ‐    d50 mm ‐ 72 ‐ ‐    d84 mm ‐ 144 ‐ ‐    d95 mm ‐ 174 ‐ ‐    d100 mm ‐ 362 ‐ ‐  Particle Size Distribution from Bar Sample   d15 mm ‐ 7 ‐ ‐   d30 mm ‐ 38 ‐ ‐   d50 mm ‐ 59 ‐ ‐   d85 mm ‐ 117 ‐ ‐   d95 mm ‐ 123 ‐ ‐   d100 mm ‐ 183 ‐ ‐  4.4 Bankfull Verification  Bankfull stage indicators on Little Pine included flat depositional features and prominent breaks in slope.   Bankfull stage was determined to be the top of bank on Tributary A.  Bankfull calls on Tributary C were  difficult because the stream has been heavily manipulated, however, bankfull was approximated for  classification purposes at a prominent break in slope.  Manning’s equation was applied to the surveyed  cross‐sections to calculate an estimated bankfull discharge.  The results are presented in Table 3.  Existing conditions bankfull area and discharge estimates were compared to drainage area and  discharge estimates from two Little Pine II reference reaches described in the 2008 Plan, the two Little  Pine III reference reaches described in the approved Mitigation Plan for the project (Wildlands    Little Pine Creek II Restoration Project  FINAL Mitigation Plan Addendum  Page 6    Engineering, Inc., 2014), the North Carolina Mountain Regional Curve (Harman et. al., 2000), the  regional flood frequency relationships developed for the Little River and Laurel Branch Local Watershed  Plans (LWP) (WK Dickson & Co., Inc., 2005), and the revised NC Rural Regional Curve (Walker,  unpublished).  It should be noted that the study area for the LWP includes the project site.  The Little  River and Laurel Branch LWP regional flood frequency curve was developed from analysis of three USGS  gages in North Carolina and five USGS gages in southern Virginia. Section 4 of the LWP describes, in  detail, the methodology and results. The analysis presented in the LWP shows that the regional flood  frequency curve predicts lower discharge values per unit drainage area than other published regional  curves applicable to the physiographic area. The results of each of these analyses for each of the project  reaches are presented in Figure 2.    Bankfull discharge estimates developed with Manning’s equation for the project reaches were regressed  against drainage area and plotted with discharge‐drainage area relations for the other hydrologic  methods described above (Figure 2).  The Manning’s equation discharge estimates plot below the North  Carolina Mountain regional curve and slightly above the 1.8‐year recurrence interval discharges from  the Little River and Laurel Branch LWP regional flood frequency curve.  The discharge – drainage area  relation for Meadow Fork (also estimated with Manning’s equation), a reference reach of similar  drainage area, also plots near the 1.8‐year LWP discharge.  This suggests that the regional hydrology  may be better represented by the LWP regional flood frequency curve than the mountain regional  curve.  4.5 Design Discharge  Based on the results of the analysis presented in Section 4.4 and Figure 2, design discharges were  selected for the Little Pine Creek reaches that were lower than the design discharges documented in the  2008 Plan.  Design discharges for each of the project reaches were selected to fall between the 1.2‐ and  1.8‐year recurrence interval predictions of the LWP regional flood frequency curves and to be generally  consistent relative to other estimates of existing bankfull discharges. Table 3 summarizes the results of  each of the discharge analyses described in this section.          Little Pine Creek II Restoration Project  FINAL Mitigation Plan Addendum  Page 7    Table 3.  Design Discharge Analysis Summary   Little Pine Creek II Restoration Project – Mitigation Plan Addendum  Reach  Drainage  Area  (sq.  miles)  Existing  Cross  Section,  Manning’s  n value  Estimated  Bankfull Flow  (Manning’s)   Qbkf (cfs)  NC  Mountain  Regional  Curve   Qbkf (cfs)  Walker NC  Rural  Regional  Curve   Qbkf (cfs)  Little River LWP  Gage Analysis    Q 1.2 YR (cfs)  Little River LWP  Gage Analysis   Q 1.8 YR (cfs)  Design   Qbkf (cfs)  Little Pine u/s  of Glade Creek  School Road  2.57 XS6, 0.05 170 207 117 124 156 140  Little Pine d/s  of Glade Creek  School Road  3.34 XS14,  0.05 185 252 144 154 194 170  Meadow Fork  – Reference1 4.37 ‐‐ 224 ‐‐ ‐‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐  Tributary A 0.37 XS1,  0.045 56 47 26 24 31 28  Tributary B 0.26 ‐‐ ‐‐ 36 19 18 23 21  Tributary C 0.11 XS6, 0.04 46 19 10 9 11 10  UT to Little  Pine Creek ‐  Reference2  0.05 ‐‐ 23 ‐‐ ‐‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐  UT2A –  Reference1 0.12 ‐‐ 20 ‐‐ ‐‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐  1:  Reference from the approved Little Pine III Restoration Plan (DMS, 2014)  2:  Reference from the 2008 Plan.    5.0 Baseline Information – Review of Existing Wetland Conditions  Wildlands conducted a limited review of existing jurisdictional wetlands (Wetlands 2A, 2B, and 3) which  were delineated and mapped by the previous consultant using guidance from the United States Army  Corps of Engineers (USACE) 1987 Wetland Delineation Manual.  Previously delineated Wetland 1 wasn’t  reviewed because it’s no longer in the project area.  A re‐delineation was performed by Wildlands on  April 27, 2015.  The re‐delineation was fairly consistent with the previous delineation with minor  deviations including the addition of a new Wetland 1 and the removal old Wetland 3.  Wetland 3 was  removed due to a lack of hydric soils during the 2015 review.  Re‐delineated wetlands range in size from  0.32 to 4.42 acres.  The wetlands exhibited areas of inundation, saturation within the upper 12 inches of  the soil profile, drainage patterns, water stained leaves, and sediment deposits.  Low‐chroma soils  within the wetlands ranged from 7.5YR 3/1 to 10YR 2/1 with redox concentrates of 5YR 4/6 to 7.5YR 3/4.  Vegetation in Wetland 1 is primarily herbaceous and includes soft rush (Juncus effusus), sedges (Carex  spp.), and purplestem aster (Symphyotrichum puniceum).  Wetlands 2A and 2B are primarily forested.  Wetland 2A is primarily a white pine canopy with skunk cabbage (Symplocarpus foetidus), sedges, and  soft rush common in the underlying herbaceous.  Canopy species within Wetland 2B include green ash  (Fraxinus pennsylvanica), red maple (Acer rubrum), and tulip poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera).  Common  understory species include elderberry (Sambucus canadensis), silky dogwood (Cornus amomum),  spicebush (Lindera benzoin), and tag alder (Alnus serrulata).  Observed herbaceous species include skunk  cabbage, jewelweed (Impatiens capensis), sedges, and soft rush.  Wetland 1 and Wetland 2A are  proposed for enhancement credit.  Wetland data forms, which were submitted to the US Army Corps of     Little Pine Creek II Restoration Project  FINAL Mitigation Plan Addendum  Page 8    Engineers for verification on June 29, 2015, are included in Appendix 2.  Wetland boundaries were field  verified with the US Army Corps of Engineers on September 4, 2015.    6.0 Reference Sites   6.1 Reference Streams  Reference reaches are one source of information in the development of design parameters. Most  reference quality reaches in the North Carolina Mountains are in heavily wooded areas and the mature  vegetation contributes greatly to their stability. In addition, reference reaches tend to be located in  higher gradient valleys with smaller drainage areas that are less prone to past and present disturbance.   For this project, two reference reaches from the 2008 Plan were utilized in combination with two  reference reaches that were recently surveyed for the Little Pine Creek III Restoration Project.  Table 4  provides a summary of the reference geomorphic parameters.  More information on the references  reaches can be found in the 2008 Plan and in the approved 2014 Little Pine III Mitigation Plan.    6.2 Reference Wetland  Wetland 2B located along the lower portion of Little Pine Creek was identified as a reference condition  wetland for the project site.  Wetland 2B is an undisturbed forested wetland proposed for  preservation.  Using the North Carolina Wetland Assessment Method (NCWAM) and the observer’s best  professional judgement, Wetland 2B classifies as a bottomland hardwood forest.  Dominant canopy  species include red maple, green ash, and tulip poplar.  Primary understory species include elderberry,  silky dogwood, spicebush, and tag alder.  The herbaceous vegetation is dominated by skunk  cabbage.  Other common herbaceous species include jewelweed, sedges, and soft rush.    Table 4. Summary of Reference Reach Geomorphic Parameters   Little Pine Creek II Restoration Project – Mitigation Plan Addendum      Meadow Fork1 Basin Creek2 UT to Little Pine  Creek2 UT2A – Ref1  Parameter Notation Units min max min max min max min max  stream type     E4 C4 B4a/C4a A/B4/1  drainage area DA sq mi 4.4 6.8 0.051 0.12  bankfull  discharge Qbkf cfs 224 ‐‐ 23 20  bankfull cross‐ sectional area Abkf SF 44 57.4 3.79 5.08 18.1  average velocity  during bankfull  event  vbkf fps 5.1 ‐‐‐ 4.18 5.86 ‐‐  width at  bankfull wbkf feet 21.4 16.4 6.17 11.11 12.6  maximum depth  at bankfull dmax feet 3.1 2.5 0.82 1.03 2  mean depth at  bankfull dbkf feet 2.1 1.9 0.046 0.69 1.4  bankfull width  to depth ratio wbkf/dbkf   10.2 16.4 9.11 24.3 8.7  depth ratio dmax/dbkf   1.5 1.32 0.92 1.84 1.4    Little Pine Creek II Restoration Project  FINAL Mitigation Plan Addendum  Page 9        Meadow Fork1 Basin Creek2 UT to Little Pine  Creek2 UT2A – Ref1  Parameter Notation Units min max min max min max min max  bank height  ratio BHR   1.1 1 1.01 2.12 1  floodprone area  width wfpa feet >200 70 14.31 46.33 31  entrenchment  ratio ER   >2.2 2.3 1.29 7.49 2.4  valley slope Svalley ft/ft ‐‐‐ 0.0139 0.0516 ‐‐  channel slope Schannel ft/ft 0.01 0.0126 0.0473 0.0433  sinuosity K   ‐‐‐ 1.1 1.09 1.7  riffle slope Sriffle ft/ft 0.0239 ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐ 0.0404 0.0517  riffle slope ratio Sriffle/Schannel   2 ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐ ‐‐‐ 0.9 1.2  pool slope Spool ft/ft ‐‐‐ 0.00490.0061 0.00290.0351 0.01 0.014  pool slope ratio Spool/Schannel   ‐‐‐ 0.346 0.43 0.09 1.05 0.2 0.3  pool‐to‐pool  spacing Lp‐p feet ‐‐‐ 224 15.77 90.45 78  pool spacing  ratio Lp‐p/wbkf   ‐‐‐ 3.9 7.8 2.09 11.99 6.2  maximum pool  depth at  bankfull  dpool feet ‐‐‐ 3.1 0.7 1.5 2.2 2.5  pool depth ratio dpool/dbkf   ‐‐‐ 1.66 1.17 2.5 1.5 1.7  pool width at  bankfull wpool feet ‐‐‐ 40.6 4.15 7.4 16.3  pool width ratio wpool/wbkf   ‐‐‐ 1.32 0.55 0.98 1.3  pool cross‐ sectional area at  bankfull  Apool SF ‐‐‐ 64.4 1.26 6.93 23.2  pool area ratio Apool/Abkf   ‐‐‐ 1.12 0.29 1.59 1.3  belt width wblt feet ‐‐‐ 105 19 26 ‐‐‐  meander width  ratio wblt/wbkf   ‐‐‐ 3.2 2.52 3.45 ‐‐‐  meander length Lm feet ‐‐‐ 350 55 140 ‐‐‐  meander length  ratio Lm/wbkf   ‐‐‐ 11.4 7.29 18.56 ‐‐‐  radius of  curvature Rc feet ‐‐‐ 76.7 133.8 22 66 ‐‐‐  radius of  curvature ratio Rc/ wbkf   ‐‐‐ 2.5 4.36 2.65 8.75 ‐‐‐  1:  Reference from the approved 2014 Little Pine III Restoration Plan  2:  Reference from the 2008 Plan.        Little Pine Creek II Restoration Project  FINAL Mitigation Plan Addendum  Page 10    7.0 Determination of Credits  Mitigation credits presented in Table 5 are projections based upon the site design.  Upon completion of  construction, the project components and credits data will be revised to be consistent with the as‐built  condition.  Table 5. Determination of Credits  Little Pine Creek II Restoration Project – Mitigation Plan Addendum  Mitigation Credits     Stream Riparian Wetland Non‐riparian  Wetland Buffer  Nitrogen  Nutrient  Offset  Phosphorus Nutrient  Offset  Type R RE R RERRE    Totals 3,131 1720  1.47N/AN/AN/AN/A  N/A   Project Components  Project  Component or  Reach ID  Existing  Footage /  Acreage  Proposed  Stationing/Location Approach  (P1, P2, etc.)  Restoration or  Restoration  Equivalent  Restoration  Footage or  Acreage  Mitigation  Ratio  Proposed  Credit  Little Pine  Reach 1  2,894  100+00 – 105+30 P2 Restoration 530 1:1 530  Little Pine  Reach 2A 106+19 – 121+31 P1 Restoration 1,512 1:1 1,512  Little Pine  Reach 2B 121+31 – 124+51 P1 Restoration 321 1:1 321  Tributary A 119 200+00 – 200+86 P2 Restoration 86 1:1 86  Tributary B 50 300+00 – 301+04 P1 Restoration 104 1:1 104  Tributary C 299 400+49 to 406+27 P1  Restoration 578 1:1 578  Tributary D 899 500+00 to 506+55 Preservation Restoration  Equivalent 655 5:1 131  Tributary E 50 600+00 to 600+50 Preservation Restoration  Equivalent 50 5:1 10  Tributary F 153 700+00 to 701+53 Preservation Restoration  Equivalent 153 5:1 31    Little Pine Creek II Restoration Project  FINAL Mitigation Plan Addendum  Page 11    Project Components  Project  Component or  Reach ID  Existing  Footage /  Acreage  Proposed  Stationing/Location Approach  (P1, P2, etc.)  Restoration or  Restoration  Equivalent  Restoration  Footage or  Acreage  Mitigation  Ratio  Proposed  Credit  Wetland 1 0.32 N/A Planting,  fencing Enhancement 0.32 2:1 0.15  Wetland 2A 0.88 N/A  Planting,  fencing Enhancement 0.88 2:1 0.44  Wetland 2B 4.42 N/A Fencing Preservation 4.42 5:1 0.88  Component Summation  Restoration  Level  Stream (linear  feet)  Riparian Wetland  (acres)  Non‐Riparian  Wetland (acres)  Buffer (square  feet) Upland (acres)  Restoration 3,131 N/A N/A  N/A N/A   Enhancement N/A  1.2  N/A  N/A  N/A  Enhancement I N/A N/A  N/A  N/A  N/A  Enhancement II N/A N/A N/A  N/A  N/A  Creation  N/A N/A N/A  N/A  N/A  Preservation 858 4.42 N/A N/A   N/A  1:  Stream lengths and wetlands areas are not the same as original restoration plan due to design and easement changes.  2:  Proposed stream lengths and credits do not include easement breaks.    8.0 Project Site Mitigation Plan  8.1 Stream Design   The project includes stream restoration and preservation as well as wetland enhancement and  preservation.  The specific proposed stream types are described below.  Stream types were selected  based on the surrounding landscape, climate, watershed conditions, and natural vegetation  communities.  Design parameters for each reach are shown in Tables 6a and 6b.  The conservation  easement, which was laid out and recorded during the 2008 Plan design, established the project  boundaries for this design update.  The proposed conceptual design and the existing conservation  easement boundaries are depicted on Figure 3.  Little Pine Creek Reaches 1, 2A, and 2B; Tributary A; Tributary B; and Tributary C will be constructed as a  C type streams according to the Rosgen classification system (Rosgen, 1996).  Type C streams are slightly  entrenched, meandering streams with well‐developed floodplains and gentle gradients of 2% or less.   They occur within a wide range of valley types and are appropriate for the project landscape.  For Little  Pine Reach 1, which begins at the upstream project boundary and ends at the Glade Creek School Road  bridge, the existing conservation easement boundary lies either on or close to Little Pine Creek’s existing  right top of bank from the upstream project boundary downstream 300 LF.  Approximately halfway    Little Pine Creek II Restoration Project  FINAL Mitigation Plan Addendum  Page 12    down Reach 1, Wetland 1 is present in the left floodplain.  Little Pine Creek Reach 1 is designed between  these two constraints with a meander belt width ratio at the lower end of the typical reference reach  and design ratios. The design alignment falls well within design parameters and is expected to provide  adequate lateral energy dissipation; however, instream bank structures including brush toe and root  wad wrapping are proposed for installation on the outside meander banks to strengthen the bank toe  throughout this reach as added insurance against scour prior to vegetation establishment.     Downstream of the bridge, through the Murphy property, Little Pine Reach 2’s easement was  established to closely meander with the 2008 Plan design.  The easement here is narrow and dictates  the proposed stream alignment.  The design utilizes a compound bend to carry the stream through the  Murphy property within the conservation easement provided.  Here as with upstream, the outside  meander banks will be revetted with brush toe structures to strengthen the toe against scour prior to  vegetation establishment.     The morphologic design parameters as shown in Tables 6a and 6b for the project reaches fall within the  ranges specified for C streams (Rosgen, 1996).  However, the specific values for the design parameters  were selected based on designer experience and judgment and were verified with morphologic data  from reference reach data sets.    The designed channel slopes for the Little Pine Creek reaches range from approximately 0.4% to 1.5% (at  the downstream end to connect back to the existing channel bed grade) with an overall reach slope of  0.82%.  The design width to depth ratio for Reach 1 is 14 and the design width to depth ratio for Reach 2  is 14.6.  Reach 1 is designed as Priority 2 restoration and a floodplain bench will be constructed along  this entire reach.  Reach 2A is designed to fully reconnect with its existing floodplain (Priority 1).  In  order to connect Reach 2B back to the existing channel bed grade at the downstream end, this reach is  also designed as Priority 1 but will become slightly incised towards the tie‐in point.  This type of design  will prevent the need for a Priority 2 with significant floodplain cut and a sudden rise in floodplain  elevations at the tie‐in.  These reaches are all designed to have entrenchment ratios greater than 2.2.   The design sinuosity for Reach 1 is 1.09 and the design sinuosity for Reach 2A and 2B is 1.23.    The design reaches for Tributaries A and B are very short reaches that connect perennial streams to  Little Pine II.  The design slopes of these reaches are 1.7% and 0.6%, respectively, and the design width  to depth ratios are 13.2 and 14.2, respectively.  Both tributaries are designed to incise slightly in order to  connect to the proposed bed elevation of Little Pine Creek.  This approach is the same as that described  above for the downstream end of Little Pine Creek and is proposed for the same reasons.  Both  tributaries are designed with a sinuosity of 1.09.    Tributary C is a longer design reach that will meander through Wetland 2A and discharge to Little Pine  Creek.  This design slope for this reach is 1.66 ft/ft, the design width to depth ratio is 13.7, and the  design sinuosity is 1.23.  This stream will be constructed to have an entrenchment ratio greater than 2.2.   The Priority 1 design connects Tributary C to its existing floodplain wetland.  Like the other reaches  described above, this channel will become slightly incised at the downstream end to connect to the  proposed bed of Little Pine Creek.  Three very small tributaries (D, E, and F) are also designed to connect  to the new alignment of Little Pine Creek.  These tributaries are proposed for preservation credit.           Little Pine Creek II Restoration Project  FINAL Mitigation Plan Addendum  Page 13    Table 6a.  Design Morphologic Parameters – Little Pine Creek  Little Pine Creek II Restoration Project – Mitigation Plan Addendum   Notation Units  Little Pine R1 (u/s  of Glade Creek  School Road)  Little Pine R2 (d/s  of Glade Creek  School Road)     Min Max Min Max  Stream Type   C C  Drainage Area DA sq mi 2.57 3.34  Design Discharge Q cfs 140 170  Bankfull Cross‐Sectional Area Abkf SF 41.3 39.3  Average Velocity During  Bankfull Event vbkf fps 3.7 4.5  Width at Bankfull wbkf feet 24.0 24.0  Maximum Depth at Bankfull dmax feet 2.5 2.3  Mean Depth at Bankfull dbkf feet 1.7 1.6  Bankfull Width to Depth  Ratio wbkf/dbkf  14.0 14.6  Low Bank Height   2.5 2.3  Bank Height Ratio BHR  1.0 1.0  Floodprone Area Width wfpa feet >49 >53  Entrenchment Ratio ER>2.2>2.2  Valley Slope Svalley ft/ft 0.0055 0.0131  Channel Slope Schannel ft/ft 0.0050 0.0106  Riffle Slope Sriffle ft/ft 0.0067 0.0131 0.0036 0.0566  Riffle Slope Ratio Sriffle/Schannel  1.4 2.5 1.4 2.5  Pool Slope Spool ft/ft 0.0000 0.0026 0.0000 0.0077  Pool Slope Ratio Spool/Schannel 0.00.50.0 0.5  Pool‐to‐Pool Spacing Lp‐p feet 36 168 36 168  Pool Spacing Ratio Lp‐p/wbkf  1.5 7.0 1.5 7.0  Sinuosity K  1.09 1.23  Belt Width wblt feet4812048 120  Meander Width Ratio wblt/wbkf  2.0 5.0 2.0 5.0  Meander Length Lm feet 168 288 168 288  Meander Length Ratio Lm/wbkf  7.0 12.0 7.0 12.0  Radius of Curvature Rc feet 48 96 48 96  Radius of Curvature Ratio Rc/ wbkf  2.0 4.0 2.0 4.0         Little Pine Creek II Restoration Project  FINAL Mitigation Plan Addendum  Page 14    Table 6b.  Design Morphologic Parameters – Tributaries  Little Pine Creek II Restoration Project – Mitigation Plan Addendum   Notation Units Tributary A Tributary B Tributary C     Min Max Min Max Min Max  Stream Type   C C C  Drainage Area DA sq mi 0.38 0.26 0.11  Design Discharge Q cfs 28 21 10  Bankfull Cross‐Sectional  Area Abkf SF 6.8 8.5 3.1  Average Velocity During  Bankfull Event vbkf fps 3.7 2.5 2.9  Width at Bankfull wbkf feet 9.5 11.0 6.5  Maximum Depth at  Bankfull dmax feet 1.1 1.1 0.7  Mean Depth at Bankfull dbkf feet 0.72 0.77 0.47 Bankfull Width to Depth  Ratio wbkf/dbkf  13.2 14.3 13.7  Low Bank Height   1.1 1.1 0.7  Bank Height Ratio BHR  1.0 1.0 1.0  Floodprone Area Width wfpa feet >18 >18 >13  Entrenchment Ratio ER >2.2>2.2>2.2 Valley Slope Svalley ft/ft 0.018 0.0065 0.0199  Channel Slope Schannel ft/ft 0.017 0.006 0.0166  Riffle Slope Sriffle ft/ft 0.018 0.0321 0.0084 0.0150 0.0232 0.0415  Riffle Slope Ratio Sriffle/Schannel  1.1 1.8 1.4 2.5 1.4 2.5  Pool Slope Spool ft/ft 0.00 0.0089 0.0000 0.003 0.0000 0.0083  Pool Slope Ratio Spool/Schannel 0.00.500.5 0 0.5 Pool‐to‐Pool Spacing Lp‐p feet 14 67 17 77 10 46  Pool Spacing Ratio Lp‐p/wbkf  1.5 7.0 1.5 7.0 1.5 7.0  Sinuosity K  1.06 1.09 1.23  Belt Width wblt feet19772277 13 46 Meander Width Ratio wblt/wbkf  2.0 5.0 2.0 5.0 2.0 5.0  Meander Length Lm feet 77 124 77 132 46 78  Meander Length Ratio Lm/wbkf  7.0 12.0 7.0 12.0 7.0 12.0  Radius of Curvature Rc feet 19 43 22 44 13 26  Radius of Curvature Ratio Rc/ wbkf  2.0 4.0 2.0 4.0 2.0 4.0    8.2 Wetland Design  The proposed stream and wetland restoration project includes three distinct riparian wetland zones  referred to as Wetland 1, Wetland 2A, and Wetland 2B (Figure 3).  Wetland 1 is an area upstream of  Glade Creek School Road.  This area is in an open pasture adjacent to Little Pine Creek and was  previously used for cattle (though now it is fenced).  Wetland 1 is proposed for wetland enhancement  and work done on this zone will primarily involve planting with native species.  Wetland 2A is located    Little Pine Creek II Restoration Project  FINAL Mitigation Plan Addendum  Page 15    south of the road adjacent to Tributary C.  This wetland is currently partially forested with primarily  white pine canopy and herbaceous plants such as skunk cabbage, sedges, and soft rush.  Portions of this  wetland do not have tree canopy.  Work proposed on Wetland 2A includes planting of understory  species under the canopy and planting native wetland tree species in the open areas.  Some of the pine  trees will be harvested for use in the construction of the stream channels and these will be replaced  with native wetland trees.  Wetland 2B is a fairly large bottomland hardwood forested wetland  proposed for preservation.  This wetland will serve as the reference community for Wetlands 1 and 2A.   Planting for the wetland enhancement zones is described in the following section.  8.3 Wetland and Buffer Planting  The target communities for the restored riparian buffer zones will be based on the following:   Reference conditions from forested areas within or near to the project site;   Native trees, appropriate for the physiographic setting, with proven success in early successional  restoration sites; and   Vegetation listed for the community types in Guide to the Natural Communities of North Carolina  (Schafale, 2012) likely to occur on the site.  The natural community type for the conversion of the Little Pine Creek floodplain from pasture to  forest is Montane Alluival Forest.    8.4 Design Justification  Based on assessments of the watershed and existing channels, the project design has been developed to  correct system wide channel instability observed along Little Pine Creek and its tributaries caused by  past livestock access, channelization, and lack of woody riparian vegetation.  The streams are actively  eroding, and in the case of Little Pine Creek, the stream is cutting laterally at a fairly rapid pace.  The  eroding stream banks are a major source of sediment to the project streams and downstream trout  waters.  The buffer along much of the site’s stream length and portions of the wetland communities  have been denuded.  Habitat within the streams is degraded due to lack of lack of floodplain vegetation  for shading and cover and lack of diverse habitats within the channel.  The active erosion will not cease  without intervention and, in this case, full restoration is warranted to stabilize the system and improve  aquatic habitat.  In addition, the natural wetland and floodplain vegetation communities can be greatly  improved through planting and protecting the site with a conservation easement.    8.5 Sediment Transport Analysis  To begin an analysis of sediment supply a watershed assessment must be performed.  Wildlands staff  performed a watershed reconnaissance, reviewed a series of aerial photographs dating back to 1964,  and reviewed land cover data in order to assess the current condition of the watersheds and identify  time periods when the watersheds underwent changes that would affect the sediment load such as  development or land clearing.  As previously described, land cover within the watersheds has remained  relatively consistent since 1964 (see Section 3 for more information).  During the period between the  summer of 2012 and the summer of 2013, Wildlands visited the project site frequently to conduct  existing conditions surveys and perform design analysis.  Depositional features observed within the  project streams remained relatively stable with little or no change in dimension or location during that  period.  Wildlands also conducted a review of the 2008 detailed topographic survey of Little Pine Creek  upstream of the project site in 2013, approximately five years after the date of the survey.  Bars and  islands noted on the survey were still evident in the field and appeared to be to the same dimensions    Little Pine Creek II Restoration Project  FINAL Mitigation Plan Addendum  Page 16    and elevations as they were when originally surveyed.  Based on Wildlands review of onsite sediment  deposition patterns and the upstream survey, it appears that the Project streams have relatively low  sediment supplies.  Low sediment supply channels are less prone to morphologic adjustment and,  therefore, are less risky restoration projects.  However, to further verify the stability of the proposed  design, Wildlands performed a sediment transport analysis on Little Pine Creek described in the  following sections.    8.5.1 Competence Analysis  A competence analysis was performed for each of the design reaches to compare shear stresses along  the channel at the design bankfull discharge with the size distribution of the bed material.  Standard  equations were used to calculate the critical dimensionless shear stress needed to move the bed  material and the depth and slope combination needed to produce that stress for Little Pine Creek.  The  shear stress calculated with this method for Little Pine Creek was also verified with a HEC‐RAS model.   The results of the competence analysis for Little Pine Creek indicate that the proposed channel will have  the shear stress to move the majority of the larger particles supplied to the channel during bankfull  events.  It also indicates that the design depth and slope are adequate to move the bed material.   However, grade control will be used to ensure that downcutting does not occur after construction.  This  analysis is not appropriate for very small streams and was not performed in the tributaries.     During the onsite existing conditions survey, only one well developed sediment bar was determined to  be adequately built to represent transport at a bankfull event.  This bar was present on the interior of an  unstable meander bend.  Large branches from a tree rooted to the outside of the bend were  overhanging the bar and could have potentially acted as an obstruction during high flow events,  influencing the material which deposited on the bar.  The two largest particles on the lower third of this  bar were 183 mm and 104 mm, respectively.  See Appendix 1 for the bar distribution and photos of the  bar and the tree overhang (located on Page 2 of the Photo Log in Appendix 1).  Wildlands conducted  pavement/subpavement samples on the same stream just downstream on the DMS owned Little Pine III  project.  In order to determine whether the tree branches influence the deposition on the bar,  Wildlands reviewed the subpavement samples taken from the downstream project.  The largest  subpavement material on the downstream project was 113 mm, which is within the range of larger  material found on the bar on the project site.  Therefore, the bar sample taken on the project site was  determined to be a reliable indicator of transport at bankfull flow.         Little Pine Creek II Restoration Project  FINAL Mitigation Plan Addendum  Page 17    Table 7.  Dimensionless Critical Shear Stress Calculations – Little Pine Creek  Little Pine Creek II Restoration Project – Mitigation Plan Addendum     Little Pine  Creek  Tributary A Tributary B Tributary C  Overall Channel Average Shear Stress  (lbs./ft2) 0.74 N/A N/A N/A  Largest Particle Entrained by Channel  Shear Stress from Shields Curve (mm)1 57 N/A N/A N/A  Largest Particle Entrained by Channel  Shear Stress from Revised Shields Curve  (mm)1  122 N/A N/A N/A  Largest Particles from Bar Sample (mm)  First largest, Second largest  183, 104 N/A N/A N/A  Largest Particle from Riffle Pebble Count  (mm) 362 N/A N/A N/A  Predicted Mean Depth to Move Largest  Particle on the Bar (ft)1  First largest, Second largest  2.7, 1.3 N/A N/A N/A  Design Depth (ft) 1.6 N/A N/A N/A  Predicted Slope to Move Largest  Particles (ft/ft)1  First largest, Second largest  0.0124,  0.0058 N/A N/A N/A  Design Slope (ft/ft) 0.0079 N/A N/A N/A  1: From Revised Shields Diagram from Wildland Hydrology 2001    8.5.2 Capacity Analysis  A capacity analysis is necessary to determine if a stream has the ability to pass the sediment load  supplied by the watershed.  This analysis was done using the sediment transport capacity hydraulic  design module in HEC‐RAS. HEC‐RAS models were built for existing and proposed bankfull conditions of  Little Pine Creek. The sediment transport capacity module uses the hydraulic model along with bed  material data to estimate the sediment load that the modeled stream can move at a bankfull discharge.  For this analysis, the Meyer‐Peter Muller transport equation was selected based on consideration of the  channel size and slope, bed material size ranges, and channel velocities.  For information on this and  other equations please consult the HEC‐RAS user’s manual (HEC, 2010). The results for the existing  channel and proposed channel analyses are shown in Table 8.     Table 8. Sediment Transport Capacity Analysis  Little Pine Creek III Stream & Wetland Restoration Project  Reach Existing, tons/day Proposed, tons/day  Little Pine Creek Total Load 35,430 37,402  Little Pine Creek Average Load 844 891    Little Pine Creek II Restoration Project  FINAL Mitigation Plan Addendum  Page 18      The results in Table 8 indicate that sediment transport capacity for Little Pine Creek will increase  somewhat when the proposed design is implemented. These results indicate that aggradation is not  likely a problem.  As discussed above, the upstream watershed has remained stable for decades and is  not supplying significant amount of sediment.  If the watershed supply remains static and the model  results are accurate, the system will be at a slight risk for degradation.  Stream power, in‐stream  velocities, energy slope, shear stress, bed and bank resistance and turbulence were considered during  the design process and grade control structures and constructed riffles were incorporated and  manipulated to manage stream power and reduce or eliminate the potential for degradation and  incision following construction activities. Excess stream power over substantial distances nor  degradation are anticipated following construction. Grade control structures are described in Section 8.6  8.6 Project Implementation Summary  The stream and wetland restoration will be constructed as described in this section.  A full set of  preliminary design plans is included with this mitigation plan for review.  8.6.1 Stream Restoration Grading and Structure Installation  Stream restoration is proposed for all project reaches.  Most of this stream restoration work will be  Priority 1 restoration.  Priority 1 restoration will include raising the bed of the channel so that bankfull  stage is at the existing floodplain elevation.  New channel will be excavated for much of the restored  reaches, but in some locations the new stream will cross or run within the existing channel.  Little Pine  Creek Reach 1 will be constructed as Priority 2 restoration meaning that a floodplain bench will be cut at  a lower elevation than the original floodplain.  The downstream end of each project reach will become  slightly incised in order to tie the proposed bed into the bed grade of the receiving stream.  This will  eliminate the need to cut priority 2 benches along these reaches.      For all project reaches, the cross sections will be constructed to accommodate the design bankfull  discharge, the pattern will be reconstructed so that the channel meanders through the floodplain, and  riffle‐pool bed morphology will be reestablished.  The cross‐sectional dimensions of the design channels  will be constructed to flood the adjacent floodplain and existing wetlands frequently. The reconstructed  channel banks will be built with stable side slopes, planted with native materials, and matted for long‐ term stability.  The slightly meandering planform of the channels will be built to mimic natural mountain  streams.  Pools will generally be built in the outside of the meander bends and riffles will be built in the  straight sections of channel between meanders.  Various types of constructed riffles have been designed  for the restoration reaches to provide grade control throughout the entire length of the project reaches.   Constructed riffles will incorporate native stone and alluvium and, in many cases, woody materials.   Other grade control structures such as j‐hooks and cross vanes will also be installed at certain points in  Little Pine Creek.  On‐site alluvial and excavated rock will be used to construct riffles and in‐stream  structures.  Details of each type of constructed riffle are included with the draft plans.  Wood structures  will also be incorporated into the restoration reaches including root wads and brush toe for bank  protection and angled log drops.  Details for each of these structures are also included with the draft  plans.  Locations of all proposed structures can be seen of the plan and profile sheets.  8.6.2 Natural Plant Community Restoration  As a final stage of construction, riparian stream buffers and wetland enhancement zones will be planted  with native trees and herbaceous plants. Wetland 2B located along the lower portion of Little Pine Creek  was identified as a reference condition wetland for the project site and best classifies as a montane  alluvial forest system.  The woody and herbaceous species selected for the planting plan are based on    Little Pine Creek II Restoration Project  FINAL Mitigation Plan Addendum  Page 19    this community type, observations of the occurrence of species in the reference site buffers, and best  professional judgment on species establishment and anticipated site conditions in the early years  following project implementation. Enhancement zones will be planted with canopy species in areas  where no canopy currently exists.  In areas where the canopy is present, understory species will be  planted to supplement the existing community.  Some of the white pines will be removed from Wetland  2A to use for woody material in the construction of the stream.      Individual tree and shrub species will be planted within the project easement including stream banks,  floodplains zones, and wetland enhancement areas. These species will be planted as bare root  (floodplain zones and wetland enhancement zones) and live stakes (stream banks) and will provide  additional stabilization to the outsides of constructed meander bends and side slopes. Juncus and carex  plugs will be installed at the toe of banks of the restoration reaches. Species planted as bare roots will  be spaced at an initial density of 520 plants per acre (12 feet by 6 feet spacing). Live stakes will be  planted on channel banks at 3‐foot spacing and point bars will not be planted with live stakes. Targeted  densities after monitoring year 3 are 320 woody stems per acre. Juncus and carex species plug spacing  will be three to five feet.  Permanent herbaceous seed will be placed on stream banks and bench areas  and all disturbed areas within the project easement. The stream banks will be planted with live stakes.  The riparian buffers and wetland areas will be planted with bare root seedlings. Proposed permanent  herbaceous species are shown in the plan set.  9.0 Maintenance Plan  The site shall be monitored on a regular basis and a physical inspection of the site shall be conducted a  minimum of once per year throughout the post‐construction monitoring period until performance  standards are met.  These site inspections may identify site components and features that require  routine maintenance.  Routine maintenance should be expected most often in the first two years  following site construction and may include the following:         Little Pine Creek II Restoration Project  FINAL Mitigation Plan Addendum  Page 20    Table 9.  Maintenance Plan  Little Pine Creek II Stream & Wetland Restoration Project  Component/Feature Maintenance through project close‐out  Stream  Routine channel maintenance and repair activities may include chinking of in‐ stream structures to prevent piping, securing of loose coir matting, and  supplemental installations of live stakes and other target vegetation along the  channel.  Areas where storm water and floodplain flows intercept the channel  may also require maintenance to prevent bank failures and head‐cutting.   Beaver activity will be monitored and beaver dams on project streams will  typically be removed during the monitoring period by a contracted entity to  allow for bank stabilization and stream development outside of this type of  influence.  Wetland  Routine wetland maintenance and repair activities may include supplemental  installations of live stakes and other target vegetation within the wetland.   Areas where floodplain flows intersect the wetland may also require  maintenance to prevent scour.    Vegetation  Vegetation shall be maintained to ensure the health and vigor of the targeted  community.  Routine vegetation maintenance and repair activities may  include supplemental planting, pruning, mulching, and fertilizing.  Exotic  invasive plant species or excessive native volunteer tree growth that  threatens the viability of planted species shall be controlled by mechanical  and/or chemical methods.  Any vegetation control requiring herbicide  application will be performed in accordance with NC Department of  Agriculture (NCDA) rules and regulations.   Site boundary  Site boundaries shall be identified in the field to ensure clear distinction  between the mitigation site and adjacent properties.  Boundaries may be  identified by fence, marker, bollard, post, tree‐blazing, or other means as  allowed by site conditions and/or conservation easement.  Boundary markers  disturbed, damaged, or destroyed will be repaired and/or replaced on an as‐ needed basis.    Ford and Culvert Crossings  Permanent crossings within the site may be maintained only as allowed by  Conservation Easement or existing easement, deed restrictions, rights of way,  or corridor agreements.      Any identified high priority problem areas will be visually monitored and remedial actions will be  discussed with DMS staff to determine a plan of action.  A remedial action plan will be submitted if  maintenance is required.  10.0 Performance Standards  The stream restoration performance criteria for the project site will follow approved performance  criteria presented in the NCDMS Mitigation Plan Template (version 2.1, 09/01/2011), NCDMS Annual  Monitoring Report Format, Data Requirements, and Content Guidance (April 2015), and the Stream  Mitigation Guidelines issued in April 2003 by the USACE and NCDWQ.  Annual monitoring and semi‐ annual site visits will be conducted to assess the condition of the finished project.  The stream  restoration sections of the project will be assigned specific performance criteria components for  hydrology, vegetation, and morphology.  The wetland enhancement sections will be assigned specific  performance criteria for vegetation. Performance criteria will be evaluated throughout the five year  post‐construction monitoring.  If all performance criteria have been successfully met and two bankfull    Little Pine Creek II Restoration Project  FINAL Mitigation Plan Addendum  Page 21    events have occurred in separate years during the five year period, DMS or monitoring consultant may  propose to terminate stream and/or vegetation monitoring pending little to no prevalent invasive  species issues are occurring. An outline of the performance criteria components follows. An outline of  the performance criteria components follows.  10.1 Streams  Dimension    Riffle cross sections on the restoration reaches should be stable and should show little change in  bankfull area, maximum depth ratio, and width‐to‐depth ratio. Per NCDMS guidance, bank height ratios  shall not exceed 1.2 for restored channels to be considered stable. For restored, meandering streams,  such as Rosgen C and E‐type streams, entrenchment ratios shall be at least 2.2.  All riffle cross sections  should fall within the parameters defined for channels of the appropriate Rosgen stream type. If any  changes do occur, these changes will be evaluated to assess whether the stream channel is showing  signs of instability. Indicators of instability include a vertically incising stream bed or eroding channel  banks. Changes in the channel that indicate a movement toward stability or enhanced habitat include a  decrease in the width‐to‐depth ratio in meandering channels or an increase in pool depth. Remedial  action would not be taken if channel changes indicate a movement toward stability.   In order to assess channel dimension success, seven permanent cross sections will be installed on Little  Pine Creek, and one per 20 bankfull widths along tributaries on restoration reaches, with riffle and pool  sections in proportion to NCDMS guidance.  Each cross section will be permanently marked with pins to  establish its location. Cross section surveys will include points measured at all breaks in slope, including  top of bank, bankfull, edge of water, and thalweg.  If moderate bank erosion is observed within  permanent pool cross sections during the monitoring period, an array of bank pins will be installed in  the permanent cross section where erosion is occurring for reaches with a bankfull width of greater than  three feet.  Bank pins will be installed on the outside bend of the cross section in at least three locations  (one in upper third of the pool, one at the permanent cross section, and one in the lower third of the  pool).  Bank pins will be monitored by measuring exposed rebar and maintaining pins flush to bank to  capture bank erosion progression.  Annual cross section and bank pin survey (if applicable) will be  conducted during the five year monitoring period.  Profile and Pattern    Longitudinal profile data for the stream restoration reaches should show that the bedform features are  remaining stable. The riffles should be steeper and shallower than the pools, while the pools should be  deep with nearly flat water surface slopes. The relative percentage of riffles and pools should not  change significantly from the design parameters. Adjustments in length and slope of run and glide  features are expected and will not be considered a sign of instability. The longitudinal profile should  show that the bank height ratio remains very near to 1.0 for the majority of the restoration reaches.    Substrate   Substrate materials in the restoration reaches should indicate a progression towards or the maintenance  of coarser materials in the riffle features and smaller particles in the pool features.    A reach‐wide pebble count will be performed in each restoration reach each year for classification  purposes.  A pebble count will be performed at each surveyed riffle to characterize the pavement.    10.2  Hydrology  Stream     Little Pine Creek II Restoration Project  FINAL Mitigation Plan Addendum  Page 22    Two bankfull flow events must be documented on the restoration reaches within the five‐year monitoring  period.  The two bankfull events must occur in separate years.  Stream monitoring will continue until  success criteria in the form of two bankfull events in separate years have been documented.    Bankfull events will be documented using photographs and either a crest gage or a pressure transducer,  as appropriate for site conditions.  The selected measurement device will be installed in the stream  within a surveyed riffle cross section.  The device will be checked at each site visit to determine if a  bankfull event has occurred.  Photographs will also be used to document the occurrence of debris lines  and sediment deposition.  10.3 Vegetation  The final vegetative success criteria will be the survival of 260 planted stems per acre in the riparian  corridor at the end of the required monitoring period (year five).  The interim measure of vegetative  success for the site will be the survival of at least 320 planted stems per acre at the end of the third  monitoring year.  The extent of invasive species coverage will also be monitored and controlled as  necessary during year 1 post construction, then as needed throughout the required monitoring period  (five years).     Vegetation monitoring plots will be installed across the restoration site to measure the survival of the  planted trees.  The number of monitoring quadrants required will based on the NCDMS monitoring  guidance documents.  Vegetation monitoring will occur in the fall.  10.4  Other Parameters  Photo Reference Stations  Photographs will be taken once a year to visually document stability for five years following  construction. Permanent markers will be established and located with GPS equipment so that the same  locations and view directions on the site are photographed each year. Photos will be used to monitor  restoration reaches as well as vegetation plots.    Longitudinal reference photos will be established at the tail of riffles approximately every 300 LF along  the channel by taking a photo looking upstream and downstream.  Cross sectional photos will be taken  of each permanent cross section looking upstream and downstream.  Reference photos will also be  taken for each of the vegetation plots.  Representative digital photos of each permanent photo point,  cross section and vegetation plot will be taken on the same day that the stream and vegetation  assessments are conducted.  The photographer will make every effort to consistently maintain the same  area in each photo over time.   Photographs should illustrate the site’s vegetation and morphological stability on an annual basis.  Cross  section photos should demonstrate no excessive erosion or degradation of the banks.  Longitudinal  photos should indicate the absence of persistent bars within the channel or vertical incision.  Grade  control structures should remain stable.  Deposition of sediment on the bank side of vane arms is  preferable.  Maintenance of scour pools on the channel side of vane arms is expected.    Visual Assessments  Visual assessments will be performed along stream reaches on a semi‐annual basis during the five year  monitoring period.  Problem areas will be noted such as channel instability (i.e. lateral and/or vertical  instability, instream structure failure/instability and/or piping, head cuts), vegetation health (e.g. low  stem density, vegetation mortality, invasive species or encroachment), beaver activity, or livestock  access.  Areas of concern will be mapped and photographed accompanied by a written description in the    Little Pine Creek II Restoration Project  FINAL Mitigation Plan Addendum  Page 23    annual report.  Problem areas with be re‐evaluated during each subsequent visual assessment.  Should  remedial actions be required, recommendations will be provided in the annual monitoring report.  11.0 Monitoring Plan  Using the NCDMS Baseline Monitoring Report Template (02/2014), a baseline monitoring document and  as‐built record drawings of the project will be developed within 60 days of the completion of planting  and monitoring device installation on the site.  Complete monitoring reports will be prepared annually in  the fall and submitted to NCDMS using the NCDMS Annual Monitoring Report Format, Data  Requirements, and Content Guidance (April 2015). The monitoring report shall provide a project data  chronology that will facilitate an understanding of project status and trends, population of NCDMS  databases for analysis, research purposes, and assist in decision making regarding close‐out. The  monitoring period will extend five years beyond completion of construction or until performance criteria  have been met. All survey will be tied to grid.    11.1 Site Specific Monitoring  Project monitoring requirements are listed in more detail in Table 10.  Approximate locations of the  proposed vegetation plots and cross section monitoring components are illustrated in Figure 4.       Little Pine Creek II Restoration Project  FINAL Mitigation Plan Addendum  Page 24    Table 10. Monitoring Requirements  Little Pine Creek II Stream & Wetland Restoration Project  Parameter Monitoring  Feature  Quantity/ Length by Reach  Frequency Notes Little Pine  Creek Trib A Trib B Trib C Wetland  Enhancement  Dimension  Riffle Cross  Sections 3 1 1 1 n/a  Annual  Pool Cross  Section 2 n/a n/a 1 n/a  Pattern Pattern n/a n/an/an/an/an/a 1 Profile Longitudinal  Profile Y Y Y Y n/a Annual 2  Substrate  Reach wide  (RW), Riffle  (RF) 100  pebble count  1 RW,     3 RF  1 RW,    1 RF  1 RW,   1 RF  1 RW,    1 RF n/a Annual    Hydrology Crest Gage/  Transducer 1 1 1 1 2 Quarterly 3, 4  Vegetation Stem Counts 8 Annual 5 Exotic and  nuisance  vegetation    Annual 6  Project  Boundary   Annual 7  Reference  Photos Photographs 14 Annual   1. Pattern will be collected during as‐built baseline monitoring survey only, unless observations indicate lack of lateral stability.  2. Entire profile will be surveyed on an annual basis for restoration and enhancement level 1 streams since the proposed stream  lengths are less than 3000 LF   3. Crest gages and/or transducers will be inspected during semi‐annual site visits, evidence of bankfull events will be documented  with a photo when possible.  Transducers will be set to record stage once every two hours.  Device will be inspected and  downloaded semi‐annually.   4. One wetland gage will be placed in Wetland 1 and one wetland gage will be placed in Wetland 2A.    5. The size of individual quadrants will be 100 square meters for woody tree species and shrubs. Vegetation assessments will be  conducted following the Carolina Vegetation Survey (CVS) Level 2 Protocol for Recording Vegetation (2006).  6. Locations of exotic and nuisance vegetation will be mapped.  7. Locations of fence damage, vegetation damage, boundary encroachments, etc. will be mapped.  12.0 Long‐Term Management Plan  Upon approval for close‐out by the Interagency Review Team (IRT) the site will be transferred to the  NCDEQ Division of Natural Resource Planning and Conservation’s Stewardship Program.  This party shall  be responsible for periodic inspection of the site to ensure that restrictions required in the conservation  easement or the deed restriction document(s) are upheld.  Endowment funds required to uphold  easement and deed restrictions shall be negotiated prior to site transfer to the responsible party.    Little Pine Creek II Restoration Project  FINAL Mitigation Plan Addendum  Page 25    The NCDEQ Division of Natural Resource Planning and Conservation’s Stewardship Program currently  houses DMS stewardship endowments within the non‐reverting, interest‐bearing Conservation Lands  Stewardship Endowment Account.  The use of funds from the Endowment Account is governed by North  Carolina General Statue GS 113A‐232(d)(3).  Interest gained by the endowment fund may be used only  for the purpose of stewardship, monitoring, stewardship administration, and land transaction costs, if  applicable.  The NCDEQ Stewardship Program intends to manage the account as a non‐wasting  endowment.  Only interest generated from the endowment funds will be used to steward the  compensatory mitigation sites.  Interest funds not used for those purposes will be re‐invested in the  Endowment Account to offset losses due to inflation.  13.0 Adaptive Management Plan  Upon completion of site construction DMS will implement the post‐construction monitoring protocols  previously defined in this document.  Project maintenance will be performed as described previously in  this document.  If, during the course of annual monitoring it is determined the site’s ability to achieve  site performance standards are jeopardized, DMS will notify the USACE of the need to develop a Plan of  Corrective Action.  The Plan of Corrective Action may be prepared using in‐house technical staff or may  require engineering and consulting services.  Once the Corrective Action Plan is prepared and finalized  DMS will:   Notify the USACE as required by the Nationwide 27 permit general conditions.   Revise performance standards, maintenance requirements, and monitoring requirements as  necessary and/or required by the USACE.   Obtain other permits as necessary.   Implement the Corrective Action Plan.   Provide the USACE a Record Drawing of Corrective Actions.  This document shall depict the  extent and nature of the work performed.  14.0 Financial Assurances  Pursuant to Section IV H and Appendix III of the Division of Mitigation Service’s In‐Lieu Fee Instrument  dated July 28, 2010, the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality has provided the US Army  Corps of Engineers Wilmington District with a formal commitment to fund projects to satisfy mitigation  requirements assumed by DMS.  This commitment provides financial assurance for all mitigation  projects implemented by the program.       Little Pine Creek II Restoration Project  FINAL Mitigation Plan Addendum  Page 26    15.0 References  Harman, W.H. et. al. 2000.  Bankfull Regional Curves for North Carolina Mountain Streams.    NC Mountain Curve.  Proc. AWRA Conf. Water Resources in Extreme Environments, Anchorage, AK. Pp.  185‐190.  Rosgen, D.L. 1996. Applied River Morphology. Pagosa Springs, CO: Wildland Hydrology Books.  Schafale, M.P. 2012. Guide to the Natural Communities of North Carolina, 4th approx. North Carolina  Natural Heritage Program, Raleigh, North Carolina.  U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Hydrologic Engineering Center (HEC), 2010. HEC‐RAS River Analysis  System User’s Manual, Version 4.1. Accessed online at:   http://www.hec.usace.army.mil/software/hec‐ras/documentation/HEC‐RAS_4.1_Users_Manual.pdf  Walker, Alan, unpublished. NC Rural Mountain and Piedmont Regional Curve.   Ward Consulting Engineers, P.C., 2008.  Little Pine Creek Restoration Plan.  Prepared for the North  Carolina Division of Mitigation Services.  Wildlands Engineering, Inc., 2014.  Little Pine Creek III Mitigation Plan.  Prepared for the North Carolina  Division of Mitigation Services.  W.K. Dickson and Co,. Inc., 2005. Little River and Brush Creek Local Watershed Plans, Preliminary  Findings and Recommendations Report.  Prepared for the North Carolina Division of Mitigation  Services.  W.K. Dickson & Co., Inc., 2006.  Little River and Brush Creek Local Watershed Plan:  Technical  Memorandum and Preliminary Project Atlas.  Prepared for the North Carolina Division of Mitigation  Services.                FIGURES CE CE CE CE CE C E C E CE CECECE CECE CECECE CE CE CE CECECE C E CE CE CE CE CE C E C E C E C E C E C E C E C E C E CE C E CE C E CE C E CE CE CEC E C E CE CE CE CE C E Little Pi ne C r e e k TribB TribC TribDTribF T r i b E Trib A Wetland 1 Wetland 2A XS-1 XS-6 XS-6XS-14 Wetland 2B UT1toTribC Figure 1 Hydrologic Features MapLittle Pine C reek II Restoration ProjectMitigation Plan AddendumNew River Basin 05050001 Alleghany County, NC 0 250125 Feet ¹ Project Parcels CE CE Conservation Easement Existing Wetlands Tributaries Little Pine Creek Resurvey Sections Non Project S treams 2011 Aerial Photography Figure 2 NC Mou ntain Regional CurvesWith Project Data OverlayLittle Pine Creek II Restoration Project Mitigation Plan AddendumNew River Basin (05050001)Alleghany County, NC CE CE CE CE CE C E C E CE CECECE CECE CECECE CE CE CE CECECE C E CE CE CE CE CE C E C E C E C E C E C E C E C E C E CE C E CE C E CE C E CE CE CEC E C E CE CE CE CE C E Little Pi n e C r e e k TribB TribC Trib A Wetland 1 Wetland 2A Wetland 2B TribDTribF T ri b E Figure 3 Concept DesignLittle Pine C reek II Restoration ProjectMitigation Plan AddendumNew River Basin 05050001 Alleghany County, NC 0 250125 Feet ¹ Project Parcels CE CE Conservation Easement Stream Restoration Non Project Streams Stream Preservation Wetland Appr oach Enhancement Preservation 2011 Aerial Photography CE CE CE CE CE C E C E CE CECECE CECE CECECE CE CE CE CECECE C E CE CE CE CE CE C E C E C E C E C E C E C E C E C E CE C E CE C E CE C E CE CE CEC E C E CE CE CE CE C E !A !A Little Pi ne C r e e k TribB TribC Trib A Wetland 1 Wetland 2A Wetland 2B TribD TribF T ri b E Figure 4 Monitoring ComponentsLittle Pine C reek II Restoration ProjectMitigation Plan AddendumNew River Basin 05050001 Alleghany County, NC 0 250125 Feet ¹ Project Parcels CE CE Conservation Easement Stream Restoration Stream Preservation Non Project Streams Wetland Appr oach Enhancement Preservation Proposed Cross-Sections Proposed Vegetation Monitoring Plots !A Proposed Wetland Gages 2011 Aerial Photography APPENDIX 1. Existing Geomorphic Survey Data and Photo Log Li t t l e P i n e C r e e k I I R e s t o r a t i o n P r o jec t (NC E E P P r o jec t N u m b e r 8 5 6 ) Wa t e r s h e d 25 7 1 . 8 45 . 6 23 . 7 25 7 6 . 4 96 + 3. 4 1. 9 12 . 3 4. 1 + 1. 4 C Cr o s s - S e c t i o n P l o t s Re s u r v e y Su m m a r y  Da t a Ne w  05 0 5 0 0 0 1 Up p e r  Ne w Wi l d l a n d s ,  IE ,  AK T Li t t l e P i n e C r e e k - R e a c h 1 Fi e l d  Cr e w Da t e XS  ID St r e a m  Ty p e Ba n k  He i g h t  Ra t i o En t r e n c h m e n t  Ra t i o Me a n  De p t h  at  Ba n k f u l l  (f t ) W/ D  Ra t i o Ba n k f u l l  El e v a t i o n  (f t ) Ba n k f u l l  Wi d t h  (f t ) Ba n k f u l l  Cr o s s ‐Se c t i o n a l  Ar e a  (f t 2 ) Cr o s s ‐Se c t i o n  6:    View Downstream Ri v e r  Ba s i n 2. 5 7  sq .  mi l e s Cr o s s ‐Se c t i o n  6:    Vi e w  Up s t r e a m Ma x  De p t h  at  Ba n k f u l l  (f t ) Fl o o d  Pr o n e  Wi d t h  (f t ) 6/ 2 4 / 1 3 Fl o o d  Pr o n e  Ar e a  El e v a t i o n  (f t ) XS 6  (R i f f l e ) Dr a i n a g e  Ar e a 25 6 9 . 0 0 25 7 0 . 0 0 25 7 1 . 0 0 25 7 2 . 0 0 25 7 3 . 0 0 25 7 4 . 0 0 25 7 5 . 0 0 25 7 6 . 0 0 25 7 7 . 0 0 0+ 0 0 0 + 1 0 0 + 2 0 0 + 3 0 0 + 4 0 0 + 5 0 0 + 6 0 0 + 7 0 0 + 8 0 0 + 9 0 1 + 0 0 Elevation (feet) St a t i o n  (f e e t ) Li t t l e   Pi n e  Cr e e k  ‐ Re a c h  1 Cr o s s ‐Se c t i o n  6 (R i f f l e )   3/ 2 1 / 0 8  (2 0 0 8  Mi t i g a t i o n  Pl a n ) 6/ 2 4 / 1 3  (W i l d l a n d s  Re s u r v e y  ‐   no t  ti e d  to  gr i d ) Wi l d l a n d s  Ba n k f u l l  Fi e l d  Ca l l Floodprone Li t t l e P i n e C r e e k I I R e s t o r a t i o n P r o jec t (NC E E P P r o jec t N u m b e r 8 5 6 ) 25 6 2 . 2 52 . 9 31 . 9 25 6 4 . 7 10 6 + 3. 5 1. 7 19 . 2 3. 3 + 1. 5 C Cr o s s ‐Se c t i o n  14 :    Vi e w  Up s t r e a m C r o s s ‐Se c t i o n  14 :   View Downstream Ba n k  He i g h t  Ra t i o St r e a m  Ty p e Fl o o d  Pr o n e  Ar e a  El e v a t i o n  (f t ) Fl o o d  Pr o n e  Wi d t h  (f t ) Ma x  De p t h  at  Ba n k f u l l  (f t ) Me a n  De p t h  at  Ba n k f u l l  (f t ) W/ D  Ra t i o En t r e n c h m e n t  Ra t i o Ba n k f u l l  Wi d t h  (f t ) XS  ID XS 1 4  (R i f f l e ) Dr a i n a g e  Ar e a 3. 3 4  sq .  mi l e s Da t e 6/ 2 4 / 1 3 Fi e l d  Cr e w Wi l d l a n d s ,  IE ,  AK T Su m m a r y  Da t a Ba n k f u l l  El e v a t i o n  (f t ) Ba n k f u l l  Cr o s s ‐Se c t i o n a l  Ar e a  (f t 2 ) Cr o s s - S e c t i o n P l o t s Li t t l e P i n e C r e e k - R e a c h 2 Re s u r v e y Ri v e r  Ba s i n Wa t e r s h e d Up p e r  Ne w Ne w  05 0 5 0 0 0 1 25 5 8 25 5 9 25 6 0 25 6 1 25 6 2 25 6 3 25 6 4 25 6 5 0 2 0 4 0 6 0 8 0 1 0 0 Elevation (feet) St a t i o n  (f e e t ) Li t t l e  Pi n e  Cr e e k  ‐ Re a c h  2 Cr o s s ‐Se c t i o n  14  (R i f f l e ) 3/ 2 1 / 0 8  (2 0 0 8  Mi t i g a t i o n  Pl a n ) 6/ 2 4 / 1 3  (W i l d l a n d s  Re s u r v e y  ‐   no t  ti e d  to  gr i d ) Li t t l e P i n e C r e e k I I R e s t o r a t i o n P r o jec t (NC E E P P r o jec t N u m b e r 8 5 6 ) 25 7 2 . 9 10 . 5 6. 6 25 7 5 . 1 61 . 1 2. 2 1. 6 4. 1 9. 3 1. 0 E Tr i b  A ‐   Cr o s s ‐Se c t i o n  1:    Vi e w  Up s t r e a m T r i b  A ‐   Cr o s s ‐Se c t i o n  1:  View Downstream Ba n k  He i g h t  Ra t i o St r e a m  Ty p e Fl o o d  Pr o n e  Ar e a  El e v a t i o n  (f t ) Fl o o d  Pr o n e  Wi d t h  (f t ) Ma x  De p t h  at  Ba n k f u l l  (f t ) Me a n  De p t h  at  Ba n k f u l l  (f t ) W/ D  Ra t i o En t r e n c h m e n t  Ra t i o Ba n k f u l l  Wi d t h  (f t ) XS  ID Tr i b  A XS 1  (R i f f l e ) Dr a i n a g e  Ar e a 0. 3 8  sq .  mi l e s Da t e 5/ 2 1 / 2 0 1 3 Fi e l d  Cr e w Wi l d l a n d s ,  IE ,  AK T Su m m a r y  Da t a Ba n k f u l l  El e v a t i o n  (f t ) Ba n k f u l l  Cr o s s ‐Se c t i o n a l  Ar e a  (f t 2 ) Wa t e r s h e d Up p e r  Ne w Cr o s s - S e c t i o n P l o t s Tr i b u t a r y A Re s u r v e y Ri v e r  Ba s i n Ca t a w b a  03 0 5 0 1 0 1 25 7 0 25 7 1 25 7 2 25 7 3 25 7 4 25 7 5 25 7 6 0 1 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 6 0 7 0 8 0 9 0 1 0 0 Elevation (feet) St a t i o n  (f e e t ) Tr i b u t a r y   A Cr o s s ‐Se c t i o n  1 (R i f f l e  , mo v e d  sl i g h t l y  do w n s t r e a m   du r i n g   20 0 8   re s u r v e y ) 3/ 2 1 / 0 8  (2 0 0 8  Mi t i g a t i o n  Pl a n ) 6/ 2 4 / 1 3  (W i l d l a n d s  Re s u r v e y  ‐   no t  ti e d  to  gr i d ) Wi l d l a n d s  Ba n k f u l l  Fi e l d  Ca l l Floodprone Area Li t t l e P i n e C r e e k I I R e s t o r a t i o n P r o jec t (NC E E P P r o jec t N u m b e r 8 5 6 ) 25 7 2 . 0 7. 1 8. 0 25 7 3 . 6 16 . 9 1. 6 0. 9 8. 9 2. 1 2. 0 G Tr i b  C ‐   Cr o s s ‐Se c t i o n  6:    Vi e w  Up s t r e a m T r i b  C ‐   Cr o s s ‐Se c t i o n  6:  View Downstream Ba n k  He i g h t  Ra t i o St r e a m  Ty p e Fl o o d  Pr o n e  Ar e a  El e v a t i o n  (f t ) Fl o o d  Pr o n e  Wi d t h  (f t ) Ma x  De p t h  at  Ba n k f u l l  (f t ) Me a n  De p t h  at  Ba n k f u l l  (f t ) W/ D  Ra t i o En t r e n c h m e n t  Ra t i o Ba n k f u l l  Wi d t h  (f t ) XS  ID Tr i b  C XS 6  (R i f f l e / R u n ) Dr a i n a g e  Ar e a 0. 1 1  sq .  mi l e s Da t e 5/ 2 1 / 2 0 1 3 Fi e l d  Cr e w Wi l d l a n d s ,  IE ,  AK T Su m m a r y  Da t a Ba n k f u l l  El e v a t i o n  (f t ) Ba n k f u l l  Cr o s s ‐Se c t i o n a l  Ar e a  (f t 2 ) Wa t e r s h e d Up p e r  Ne w Cr o s s - S e c t i o n P l o t s Tr i b u t a r y C Re s u r v e y Ri v e r  Ba s i n Ca t a w b a  03 0 5 0 1 0 1 25 7 0 25 7 1 25 7 2 25 7 3 25 7 4 25 7 5 0 1 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 6 0 7 0 8 0 Elevation (feet) St a t i o n  (f e e t ) Tr i b u t a r y  C Cr o s s ‐Se c t i o n  6 (R i f f l e / R u n ) 3/ 2 1 / 0 8  (2 0 0 8  Mi t i g a t i o n  Pl a n ) 6/ 2 4 / 1 3  (W i l d l a n d s  Re s u r v e y  ‐   no t  ti e d  to  gr i d ) Fl o o d p r o n e  Ar e a Wi l d l a n d s  Bankfull Field Call Summary d16 (mm)28 d35 (mm)57 d50 (mm)72 d84 (mm)144 d95 (mm)174 Pebble Count Plots Little Pine - XS14 Riffle Existing Conditions- 06/24/2013 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0.010.1110100100010000 Pe r c e n t  Cu m u l a t i v e  (% ) Particle Class Size (mm) Little Pine ‐XS 14 Riffle Pebble Count Particle Distribution  6/24/2013 Sand Gravel Cobble Boulder Bedrock SandSandSilt/Clay 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% In d i v i d u a l  Cl a s s  Pe r c e n t Particle Class Size (mm) Little Pine ‐XS 14 Riffle Individual Class Percent  6/24/2013 Little Pine Creek II Restoration Project Mitigation Plan Addendum w w z LL I_ z w U w W CL % Gravel Coarse J Fine 35.0 44.3 6.5 1.4 SIEVE SIZE PERCENT SPEC." FINER I PERCENT PASS? (X=NO) 5 100.0 D10= 0.6120 4 65.0 3 65.0 USCS= GP 2 36.6 1 23.4 Total Weight of Sample: 7859.Og 0.5 17.7 4.10" 0.375 16.0 #4 14.2 #10 12.8 #18 11.4 #35 9.2 #60 5.4 #120 1.9 #230 0.9 111111111111 111 HIM Ills 111 111111 mill 11 111111111 milli 1101:1 11111 1 1 I NEI MINE 111u 11 111 11111111 11 % Gravel Coarse J Fine 35.0 44.3 6.5 1.4 SIEVE SIZE PERCENT SPEC." FINER I PERCENT PASS? (X=NO) 5 100.0 D10= 0.6120 4 65.0 3 65.0 USCS= GP 2 36.6 1 23.4 Total Weight of Sample: 7859.Og 0.5 17.7 4.10" 0.375 16.0 #4 14.2 #10 12.8 #18 11.4 #35 9.2 #60 5.4 #120 1.9 #230 0.9 (no specification proviaea) Location: Coarse Bar Sediment (Sample #1) r-, Summit Engineering Ft. Mill. South Carolina Tested By: Mimi Hourani %IN SIZE - mm. % Sand % Fines Medium Fine Silt Clay 4.4 7.4 1.0 Material Description Atterherg_Limits PL= LL= PI= Coefficient D90= 120.6542 D$5= 117.4657 D60= 67.0063 D50= 59.2566 D3O= 37.7168 D15= 6.9850 D10= 0.6120 Cu= 109.49 Cc= 34.69 Classification USCS= GP AASHTO= Remarks Total Weight of Sample: 7859.Og Secondary Axis: 7.20", 4.10" Client: Wildlands Engineering Project: Little Pine I1 Project No: SL -262-11 Date: 07-16-13 GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION TEST DATA 7/18/2013 Client: Wildlands Engineering Project: Little Pine II Project Number: SL -262-11 Location: Coarse Bar Sediment (Sample #1) Date: 07-16-13 USCS Classification: GP Testing Remarks: Total Weight of Sample: 7859.Og Secondary Axis: 7.20", 4.10" Tested by: Mimi Hourani Gravel Sand Fines Cobbles CoarseFine Total Coarse Medium Fine Total Silt Clay Total 35.0 44.3 6.5 50.8 1.4 4.4 7.4 13.2 1.0 D10 D15 D20 D30 Sieve Test l. . D60 Dry Cumulative D95 Cumulative 17.4256 Sample Pan Sieve Weight 117.4687 120.6542 and Tare Tare Tare Weight Opening Retained Percent (grams) (grams) (grams) Size (grams) Finer 7859.00 0.00 0.00 5 0.00 100.0 4 2747.00 65.0 3 2747.00 65.0 2 4985.40 36.6 1 6019.50 23.4 0.5 6469.00 17.7 0.375 6600.30 16.0 #4 6743.02 14.2 #10 6853.05 12.8 #18 6963.07 11.4 #35 7135.97 9.2 #60 7434.61 5.4 #120 7709.68 1.9 #230 7788.27 0.9 ComponentsFractional Gravel Sand Fines Cobbles CoarseFine Total Coarse Medium Fine Total Silt Clay Total 35.0 44.3 6.5 50.8 1.4 4.4 7.4 13.2 1.0 D10 D15 D20 D30 D50 D60 D80 D85 D90 D95 0.6120 6.9850 17.4256 37.7168 59.2566 67.0063 114.1836 117.4687 120.6542 123.8125 Fineness Modulus_ Cu Cc 8.10 109.49 34.69 Summit Engineering Little Pine Creek II Restoration Project                 Photo Log, Appendix 1  Mitigation Plan Addendum  Page 1  Looking downstream along Little Pine Creek, above Glade  Creek School Road.  04/2015  Little Pine Creek upstream of road.  Eroded bank with exposed  cobble layer.  Shawn points to bankfull.  06/2013  Little Pine Creek upstream of Glade Creek School Road.  Vegetated mid‐channel bar with steep riffle below.  06/2013  Little Pine Creek, just upstream of Glade Creek School Road  bridge.  Eroded bend.  06/2013 Looking upstream along Little Pine Creek, at Glade Creek  School Road bridge.  06/2013  Glade Creek School Road bridge over Little Pine Creek, looking  upstream.  Little Pine Creek II Restoration Project                 Photo Log, Appendix 1  Mitigation Plan Addendum  Page 2  Little Pine Creek in horse pasture, just below Glade Creek  School Road bridge.  06/2013 Little Pine Creek meander bend erosion in horse pasture.   06/2013 Little Pine Creek bank erosion.  06/2013 Little Pine Creek active bank erosion.  06/2013 Coarse bar sampled on Little Pine Creek.  06/2013 Coarse bar sampled on Little Pine Creek.  06/2013 Little Pine Creek II Restoration Project                 Photo Log, Appendix 1  Mitigation Plan Addendum  Page 3  Little Pine Creek, near downstream project extents.  06/2013 Looking upstream along Tributary A. 04/2015 Tributary A at Little Pine Creek confluence.  06/2013 Looking upstream along Tributary B.04/2015 Looking upstream along Tributary C. 04/2015 Looking upstream at UT1 to Tributary C.04/2015 Little Pine Creek II Restoration Project                 Photo Log, Appendix 1  Mitigation Plan Addendum  Page 4  Looking downstream along Tributary D. 04/2015 Looking upstream along Tributary E.04/2015 Looking upstream along Tributary F. 04/2015 View of Wetland 1. 04/2015  View of Wetland 2A. 04/2015 View of Wetland 2B 04/2015  APPENDIX 2. USACE Routine Wetland Determination, NCWAM Data Forms and Stream Classification Forms US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date: Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point: Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range: Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%): Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification: Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? Yes No Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes No Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10) Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16) Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4) Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: LittlePineIIRestorationProjectAlleghany4/27/15 WildlandsEngineeringNC DP1-Wetland1 IanEckardt floodplainconcave0 LRRNN36.507205W-80.986821 Alluvialland(Ad) ✔ ✔✔ ✔ ✔✔ ✔ Samplingpointlocatedwithinanapreviouslygrazedpasture.Treesandsaplingshavebeen removed. ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔2 ✔0(atsurface) ✔0(Saturatedatsurface)✔ US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version VEGETATION (Four Strata) – Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: Absolute Dominant Indicator Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. = Total Cover Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. = Total Cover Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. = Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. = Total Cover Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 3 - Prevalence Index is ”3.01 4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) 1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) 30' 15' ✔ 5' Carexlurida Juncuseffusus Symphyotrichumpuniceum 60 30 10 100 Yes Yes No OBL FACW OBL 30' ✔ DP1-Wetland1 US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version SOIL Sampling Point: Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicatoror confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: Histosol (A1) Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147) Histic Epipedon (A2) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) Black Histic (A3) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Red Parent Material (TF2) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8) Other (Explain in Remarks) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present, Stripped Matrix (S6) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks: 0-1410YR2/1100siltloam ✔ ✔ DP1-Wetland1 US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date: Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point: Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range: Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%): Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification: Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? Yes No Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes No Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10) Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16) Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4) Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: LittlePineIIRestorationProjectAlleghany4/27/15 WildlandsEngineeringNC DP2-Upland1 IanEckardt floodplainnone0 LRRNN36.507096W-80.986983 Alluvialland(Ad) ✔ ✔✔ ✔ ✔✔ ✔ Samplingpointlocatedwithinanapreviouslygrazedpasture.Treesandsaplingshavebeen removed. ✔ ✔ ✔✔ US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version VEGETATION (Four Strata) – Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: Absolute Dominant Indicator Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. = Total Cover Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. = Total Cover Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. = Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. = Total Cover Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 3 - Prevalence Index is ”3.01 4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) 1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) 30' 1 1 15' ✔ 5' Festucasp.100 100 Yes FAC-UPL 30' ✔ SamplinglocationcoveredinanunknownfescuethatlikelyhasawetlandratingrangingfromFAC toUPL.AFACratingwasusedtocompletethisform. DP2-Upland1 US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version SOIL Sampling Point: Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicatoror confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: Histosol (A1) Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147) Histic Epipedon (A2) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) Black Histic (A3) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Red Parent Material (TF2) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8) Other (Explain in Remarks) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present, Stripped Matrix (S6) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks: 0-5 5-14 10YR3/4 10YR3/3 100 100 loam loam ✔ DP2-Upland1 US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date: Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point: Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range: Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%): Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification: Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? Yes No Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes No Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10) Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16) Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4) Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: LittlePineIIRestorationProjectAlleghany4/27/15 WildlandsEngineeringNC DP3-Upland IanEckardt floodplain 0 LRRNN36.507323W-80.987757 Alluvialland(Ad) ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔✔ ✔ Samplinglocationinthevicinityofpreviouslydelineatedwetland(2008).Areahashydrophytic vegetationandhydrology(wrackline)butlacksindicatorsofhydricsoils. ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔✔ Wracklinesvisiblefromrecentoutofbankevent. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version VEGETATION (Four Strata) – Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: Absolute Dominant Indicator Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. = Total Cover Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. = Total Cover Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. = Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. = Total Cover Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 3 - Prevalence Index is ”3.01 4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) 1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) 30' 2 2 100 15' Sambucusnigra30 30 YesFAC ✔ 5' Festucasp.65 65 YesFAC 30' ✔ DP3-Upland US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version SOIL Sampling Point: Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicatoror confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: Histosol (A1) Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147) Histic Epipedon (A2) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) Black Histic (A3) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Red Parent Material (TF2) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8) Other (Explain in Remarks) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present, Stripped Matrix (S6) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks: 0-8 8-14 10YR3/4 10YR4/3 100 100 loam loam ✔ DP3-Upland US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date: Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point: Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range: Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%): Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification: Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? Yes No Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes No Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10) Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16) Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4) Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: LittlePineIIRestorationProjectAlleghany4/27/15 WildlandsEngineeringNC DP4-Wetland2A IanEckardt floodplainnone0 LRRNN36.505221W-80.98809 Alluvialland(Ad) ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔✔ ✔ Areaplantedinwhitepine. ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔0(Saturatedatsurface)✔ US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version VEGETATION (Four Strata) – Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: Absolute Dominant Indicator Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. = Total Cover Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. = Total Cover Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. = Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. = Total Cover Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 3 - Prevalence Index is ”3.01 4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) 1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) 30' Pinusstrobus25 25 YesFACU 3 4 75 15' Alnusserrulata15 15 YesOBL ✔ 5' Carexlurida Symplorcarpusfoetidus 60 15 75 Yes Yes OBL OBL 30' ✔ DP4-Wetland2A US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version SOIL Sampling Point: Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicatoror confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: Histosol (A1) Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147) Histic Epipedon (A2) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) Black Histic (A3) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Red Parent Material (TF2) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8) Other (Explain in Remarks) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present, Stripped Matrix (S6) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks: 0-2 2-14 10YR3/3 10YR4/1 100 805YR4/620CPL siltloam siltloam ✔ ✔ DP4-Wetland2A US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date: Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point: Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range: Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%): Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification: Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? Yes No Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes No Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10) Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16) Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4) Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: LittlePineIIRestorationProjectAlleghany4/27/15 WildlandsEngineeringNC DP5-Upland IanEckardt floodplain 0 LRRNN36.505093W-80.987702 Alluvialland(Ad) ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔✔ US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version VEGETATION (Four Strata) – Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: Absolute Dominant Indicator Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. = Total Cover Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. = Total Cover Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. = Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. = Total Cover Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 3 - Prevalence Index is ”3.01 4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) 1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) 30' Pinusstrobus80 80 YesFACU 1 2 50 15' 1030 80320 90350 3.9 5' Rubussp.10 10 YesFAC 30' ✔ DP5-Upland US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version SOIL Sampling Point: Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicatoror confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: Histosol (A1) Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147) Histic Epipedon (A2) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) Black Histic (A3) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Red Parent Material (TF2) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8) Other (Explain in Remarks) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present, Stripped Matrix (S6) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks: 0-147.5YR3/4100 sandyloam ✔ DP5-Upland US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date: Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point: Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range: Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%): Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification: Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? Yes No Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes No Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10) Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16) Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4) Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: LittlePineIIRestorationProjectAlleghany4/27/15 WildlandsEngineeringNC DP6-Wetland2B IanEckardt floodplainnone0 LRRNN36.50516W-80.98861 Alluvialland(Ad) ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔✔ ✔ ✔ ✔✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔1 ✔0(atsurface) ✔0(Saturatedatsurface)✔ US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version VEGETATION (Four Strata) – Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: Absolute Dominant Indicator Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. = Total Cover Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. = Total Cover Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. = Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. = Total Cover Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 3 - Prevalence Index is ”3.01 4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) 1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) 30' Acerrubrum30 30 YesFAC 3 3 100 15' Alnusserrulata20 20 YesOBL ✔ 5' Symplorcarpusfoetidus90 90 YesOBL 30' ✔ DP6-Wetland2B US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version SOIL Sampling Point: Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicatoror confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: Histosol (A1) Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147) Histic Epipedon (A2) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) Black Histic (A3) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Red Parent Material (TF2) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8) Other (Explain in Remarks) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present, Stripped Matrix (S6) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks: 0-6 6-14 10YR4/1 7.5YR3/1 85 85 7.5YR3/4 7.5YR3/4 15 15 C C PL PL siltloam siltloam ✔ ✔ DP6-Wetland2B US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date: Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point: Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range: Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%): Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification: Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? Yes No Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes No Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10) Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16) Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4) Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: LittlePineIIRestorationProjectAlleghany4/27/15 WildlandsEngineeringNC DP7-Upland2B IanEckardt floodplain 0 LRRNN36.505242W-80.988742 Alluvialland(Ad) ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔✔ ✔ Samplinglocationexhibitswracklinesfromrecentoutofbankeventandhydrophyticvegetationbut lacksindicatorsofhydricsoils. ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔✔ Wracklinedepositsfromrecentoverbankeventpresent. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version VEGETATION (Four Strata) – Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: Absolute Dominant Indicator Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. = Total Cover Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. = Total Cover Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. = Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. = Total Cover Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 3 - Prevalence Index is ”3.01 4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) 1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) 30' Acerrubrum Pinusstrobus20 15 35 Yes Yes FACU FAC 4 5 80 15' Acerrubrum Linderabenzoin 10 10 20 Yes Yes FAC FAC ✔ 5' Symplorcarpusfoetidus10 10 YesOBL 30' ✔ DP7-Upland2B US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version SOIL Sampling Point: Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicatoror confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: Histosol (A1) Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147) Histic Epipedon (A2) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) Black Histic (A3) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Red Parent Material (TF2) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8) Other (Explain in Remarks) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present, Stripped Matrix (S6) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks: 0-147.5YR4/4100loam ✔ DP7-Upland2B US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date: Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point: Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range: Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%): Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification: Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? Yes No Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes No Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10) Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16) Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3) Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4) Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: LittlePineIIRestorationProjectAlleghany4/27/15 WildlandsEngineeringNC DP8-Upland2B IanEckardt floodplainconcave0 LRRNN36.505594W-80.988585 Alluvialland(Ad) ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔✔ ✔ Samplinglocationinaconcavedepressionattoeofslope.Depressionhasapproximately6"of standingwaterfromrecentoutofbankevent.Areaexhibitsindicatorsofhydrologybutlacks hydrophyticvegetationandindicatorsofhydricsoils. ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔6 ✔ ✔0(atsurface)✔ Concavedepressionwithstandingwaterfromrecentoutofbankevent. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version VEGETATION (Four Strata) – Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: Absolute Dominant Indicator Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. = Total Cover Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. = Total Cover Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. = Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. = Total Cover Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 3 - Prevalence Index is ”3.01 4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain) 1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) 30' 15' 5' 30' ✔ Concavedepressiondevoidofvegetation. DP8-Upland2B US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version SOIL Sampling Point: Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicatoror confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks 1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: Histosol (A1) Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147) Histic Epipedon (A2) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) Black Histic (A3) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Red Parent Material (TF2) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8) Other (Explain in Remarks) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present, Stripped Matrix (S6) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks: 0-1410YR3/3100siltloam ✔ DP8-Upland2B NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 Date: t# 2VE S Project/Site: L;4g., PA, 1j: Latitude: 36'50yd-q-1 Evaluator: ��Gl<c�r�i� County: �ff �µ Longitude: :23� Total Points: Stream rpere least intermittent a � s Stream Dete 'n tion (circle one) Ephemeral Other OT) -I-r, r,: b C if > 19 orperennial if 2:30* ntermitten Perennial e.g. quad Name: A. ueomor holo (Subtotal =_6,5__) Absent Weak Moderate Strong 1a' Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 0.5 1 1.5 2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3 3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool, -ripple-pool sequence 0 1 2 3 4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3 5. Active/relict floodplain 0 0.5 2 3 6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3 7. Recent alluvial deposits CO)1 0.5 2 3 8. Headcuts 1 2 3 9. Grade control 0 0.5 1 1.5 10. Natural valley 0 (0-6_5 1 1 1.5 11. Second or greater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3 di uuaai uucnes are no[ raved; see discussions in manual B. Hydrology (Subtotal= 1 12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 Cp 13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2 3 14. Leaf litter 1.5 0.5 0 15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5 16. Organic debris lines or piles 0.5 1 1.5 17. Soil -based evidence of high water table? No = 0 Yes = 3 U. t5idogy (Subtotal= (e) n S ) - 18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0 19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 2 1 0 20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 1 2 3 21. Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3 22. Fish 0.5 1 1.5 23. Crayfish 0.5 1 1.5 24. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5 25. Algae 0.5 1 1.5 26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0 'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See(( p. 35 of manual. Notes: �1'rC �n i•.AAI�a N3 %lRT !C UVS Vl �: C-�f1VM rr tiQ q'n:.,a Sketch: U U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS WILMINGTON DISTRICT Action ID: 2009-00591 County: Alleghany U.S.G.S. Quad: VA -Cumberland Knob NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION Property Owner: NC Division of Mitigation Services / Harry Tsomides Address: 5 Ravenscroft Drive, Suite 102 Telephone Number: 828-545-7057 Size (acres): 14.7 (within the conservation easement) Nearest Town: Sparta Nearest Waterway: Little Pine Creek Coordinates: 36.506937 IN, -80.987760 °W River Basin/ HUC: New River /05050001 Location description: The proiect is located off Glade Creek School Road east of Sparta, Alleghany County; North Carolina. Indicate Which of the Following Apply: A. Preliminary Determination X Based on preliminary information, there may be waters of the U.S. including wetlands on the above described project area. We strongly suggest you have this property inspected to determine the extent of Department of the Army (DA) jurisdiction. To be considered final, a jurisdictional determination must be verified by the Corps. This preliminary determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process (Reference 33 CFR Part 331). If you wish, you may request an approved JD (which may be appealed), by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also, you may provide new information for further consideration by the Corps to reevaluate the JD. B. Approved Determination There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described property subject to the permit requirements of Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification. _ There are waters of the U.S. including wetlands on the above described property subject to the permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification. _ We strongly suggest you have the wetlands on your property delineated. Due to the size of your property and/or our present workload, the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner. For a more timely delineation, you may wish to obtain a consultant. To be considered final, any delineation must be verified by the Corps. _ The waters of the U.S. including wetlands on your project area have been delineated and the delineation has been verified by the Corps. We strongly suggest you have this delineation surveyed. Upon completion, this survey should be reviewed and verified by the Corps. ' Once verified, this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to CWA jurisdiction on your property which, provided there is no change in the law or our published regulations, may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years. _ The waters of the U.S. including wetlands have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat signed by the Corps Regulatory Official identified below on Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification. _ There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described project area which are subject to the permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or` our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification: _ The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA). You should contact the Division of Coastal Management to determine their requirements. Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US and/or wetlands without a Department of the Army permit may constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311). If you have any questions regarding this determination and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact Tasha Alexander at 828-271-7980, ext. 226 or tasha.l.alexander@usace.army.mil. C. Basis for Determination: D. Remarks: Site visit was conducted on September 3, 2015 with Steve Kichefski, USACE and Ian Eckardt, Wildlands Engineering, Inc. The potential waters of the U.S. including wetlands approximate boundaries are depicted on the map labeled Figure 3: Delineation Map, Little Pine Creek II Restoration Project, provided via email on September 18, 2015. E. Attention USDA Program Participants This delineation/determination has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps' Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the particular site identified in this request. The del ineation/determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in USDA programs, you should request a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work. F. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in B. above) This correspondence constitutes an approved jurisdictional determination for the above described site. If you object to this determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331. Enclosed you will find a Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal this determination you must submit a completed RFA form to the following address: US Army Corps of Engineers South Atlantic Division Attn: Jason Steele, Review Officer 60 Forsyth Street SW, Roorn 1OM15 Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801 In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for appeal under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP. Should you decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by **It is not necessary to submit a form to the Division Office if you do not object to the determination in this correspondence. Corps Regulatory Official: sha lexander( Issue Date of JD: October 28, 2015 Expiration Date: N/A The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we continue to do so, please complete our Customer Satisfaction Survey, located online at http://re ug latoa.usacesurvey.co . Copy furnished: Ian Eckardt, Wildlands Engineering, Inc., 1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104, Charlotte, NC 28203 SECTION I - The following identifies your rights and options regarding an administrative appeal of the above decision. Additional information may be found at http•//www usace army mil/Missions/CivilWorks/ReaulatoryPro_gramandPennits.aspX or Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331. A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit. • ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit. • OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request that the permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section II of this form and return the form to the district engineer. Your objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will forfeit your right to appeal the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your objections and may: (a) modify the permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your objections, or (c) not modify the permit having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After evaluating your objections, the district engineer will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in Section B below. B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit • ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, .you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit. • APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice. C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice. D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or provide new information. • ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the date of this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD. • APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the district engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice. NOTIFICATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL OPTIONS AND PROCESS AND REQUEST FOR APPEAL Applicant: NC Division of Mitigation Services / Harry Tsomides File Number: SAW -2009-00591 Date: October 28, 2015 Attached is: See Section below F11 INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter ofpermission) A F11 PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter ofpermission) B ❑ PERMIT DENIAL C ❑ APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION D PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION E SECTION I - The following identifies your rights and options regarding an administrative appeal of the above decision. Additional information may be found at http•//www usace army mil/Missions/CivilWorks/ReaulatoryPro_gramandPennits.aspX or Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331. A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit. • ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit. • OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request that the permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section II of this form and return the form to the district engineer. Your objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will forfeit your right to appeal the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your objections and may: (a) modify the permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your objections, or (c) not modify the permit having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After evaluating your objections, the district engineer will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in Section B below. B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit • ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, .you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit. • APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice. C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice. D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or provide new information. • ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the date of this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD. • APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the district engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice. E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps regarding the preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved JD (which may be appealed), by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new information for further consideration by the Corps to reevaluate the JD. SECTION I1 - REQUEST FOR APPEAL or OBJECTIONS TO AN INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your objections to an initial proffered pennit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to this form to clarify where your reasons or objections are addressed in the administrative record.) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps memorandum for the record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the review officer has detennined is needed to clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps may add new information or analyses to the record. However, you may provide additional information to clarify the location of information that is already in the administrative record. POINT OF CONTACT FOR QUESTIONS OR INFORMATION: If you have questions regarding this decision and/or the if you only have questions regarding the appeal process you may appeal process you may contact: also contact: District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, Mr. Jason Steele, Administrative Appeal Review Officer Attn: Tasha Alexander CESAD-PDO 828-271-7980 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, South Atlantic Division 60 Forsyth Street, Room 1OM15 Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801 Phone: (404) 562-5137 RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any government consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You will be provided a 15 day notice of any site investigation, and will have the opportunity to participate in all site investigations. Date: Telephone number: Signature of appellant or agent. For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits send this form to: District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, Attn.: Tasha Alexander, 69 Darlington Avenue, Wilmington, North Carolina 28403 For Permit denials, Proffered Permits and approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this form to: Division Engineer, Commander, U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic, Attn: Mr. Jason Steele, Administrative Appeal Officer, CESAD-PDO, 60 Forsyth Street, Room 10M15, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801 Phone: (404) 562-5137 ATTACHMENT PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM BACKGROUND INFORMATION A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD): c am, C � B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PRELIMINARY JD: North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources — Division of Mitigation Services POC: Harry Tsomides, 828-545-7057 5 Ravenscroft Drive, #102 Asheville, NC 28801 C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Little Pine II Restoration Project (USE THE ATTACHED TABLE TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE WATERBODIES AT DIFFERENT SITES) State: North Carolina County/parish/borough: Alleghancy City: N/A Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat. 36.506937° N, Long. -80.987760° W. Universal Transverse Mercator: Name of nearest waterbody: Little Pine Creek Identify (estimate) amount of waters in the review area: Non -wetland waters: 3,972 linear feet: 1 - 25 width (ft) and/or acres. Cowardin Class: Riverine Stream Flow: Perennial & Intermittent Wetlands: 5.74 acres. Cowardin Class: Palustrine forested Name of any water bodies on the site that have been identified as Section 10 waters: Tidal: Non -Tidal: 1 E REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY): t5 Office (Desk) Determination. Date .P Field Determination. Date(s): 4i,49er— 3, 1. The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional waters of the United States on the subject site, and the permit applicant or other affected party who requested this preliminary JD is hereby advised of his or her option to request and obtain an approved jurisdictional determination (JD) for that site. Nevertheless, the permit applicant or other person who requested this preliminary JD has declined to exercise the option to obtain an approved JD in this instance and at this time. 2. In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre -construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an approved JD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware of the following: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization based on a preliminary JD, which does not make an official determination of jurisdictional waters; (2) that the applicant has the option to request an approved JD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an approved JD could possibly result in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) that the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) that the applicant can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5) that undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting an approved JD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the preliminary JD, but that either form of JD will be processed as soon as is practicable; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit authorization based on a preliminary JD constitutes agreement that all wetlands and other water bodies on the site affected in any way by that activity are jurisdictional waters of the United States, and precludes any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether the applicant elects to use either an approved JD or a preliminary JD, that JD will be processed as soon as is practicable. Further, an approved JD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331, and that in any administrative appeal, jurisdictional issues can be raised (see 33 C.F.R. 331.5(a)(2)). If, during that administrative appeal, it becomes necessary to make an official determination whether CWA jurisdiction exists over a site, or . 2 to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional waters on the site, the Corps will provide an approved JD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This preliminary JD finds that there "maybe" waters of the United States on the subject project site, and identifies all aquatic features on the site that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information: SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for preliminary JD (check all that apply - checked items should be included in case file and, where checked and requested, appropriately reference sources below): ® Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant: Submitted by Wildlands Engineering on behalf of CMSWS. ® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant. Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report. ❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. ❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps: ❑ Corps navigable waters' study: ❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: ❑ USGS NHD data. ❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps. U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: Charlotte East 7.5 Quadrangle. ® USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: Mecklenburg County Soils. ❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: ❑ State/Local wetland inventory map(s): ❑ FEMA/FIRM maps: ❑ 100 -year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929) ® Photographs: ® Aerial (Name & Date): 2011. or ® Other (Name & Date): photolog included with this submittal ❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter- ® Other. information (please specify): A previous delineation was completed as part of a prior issued permit SAW -2009-00591. MPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessari er ped i5y the Cprps and should not be relied uuon for later iurisdictional de Si�nature and date of Regulatory Project Manager (REQUIRED) Signature and date of person requesting preliminary JD (REQUIRED, unless obtaining the signature is impracticable) Jurisdictional features within the Little Pine II Restoration Project Estimated Site Cowardin amount of Class of aquatic Latitude Longitude aquatic number Class resource resource in review area 1 Little Pine 36.507115°N -80.987421 °W Riverine 2,535 linear feet non -section 10 — Creek non -wetland 2 Tributary A 36.507199°N -80.987726°W Riverine 67 linear feet non -section 10 — non -wetland 3 Tributary B 36.505510°N -80.987861'W Riverine 50 linear feet non -section 10 — non -wetland 4 Tributary C 36.505233°N -80.987677°W Riverine 305 linear feet non -section 10 — non -wetland 4 UT1 to 36.504870°N -80.987232°W Riverine 34 linear feet non -section 10 — Tributa C non -wetland 5 Tributary D 36.504879°N -80.988923°W Riverine 744 linear feet non -section 10 — non -wetland 6 Tributary E 36.504697°N -80.991297°W Riverine 132 linear feet non -section 10 — non -wetland 7 Tributary F 36.504813°N -80.9910704°W Riverine 105 linear feet non -section 10 — non -wetland 8 Wetland 1 36.507208'N -80.986825°W Palustrine, 0.32 acres non -section 10 — Forest wetland 8 Wetland 36.505232°N -80.988076°W Palustrine, 0.88 acres non -section 10 — 2A Forest wetland 8 Wetland 36.505020°N -80.988639°W Palustrine, 4.42 acres non -section 10 — 2B Forest wetland Figure 3: Delineation Map W I L, D L A N D S 0 250 500 Feet Little Pine Creek II Restoration Project ENGINEERING I I I I I I t New River Basin 05050001 Alleghany County, NC APPENDIX 3. Conservation Easements and Plats 0332. 1021 BK: 00332 PG: 1021 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA ALLEGHANY COUNTY SPO File Number 003 -AJ EEP Site ID Number 856 Prepared by: Office of the Attorney General Property Control Section Return to: NC Department of Administration State Property Office: Blanc Rice .1321 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1321 FILED ALLEGHANY COUNTY LIZABETH REEVES ROUPE REGISTER OF DEEDS FILED Nov 10, 2009 AT 04:21:56 pm BOOK 00332 START PAGE 1021 END PAGE 1029 INSTRUMENT # 02735 CONSERVATION EASEMENT AND ACCESS EASEMENT THIS CONSERVATION EASEMENT AND ACCESS EASEMENT, pursuant to the pr isions of N.C. General Statutes Chapter 121, Article 4 and made this _���day of �, 2009, by Gregory G. Walker and wife Melissa R. Walker, ("Grantor"), whose mailing address is 5324 Olive Rd. Raleigh NC 27606, and Katrina Walker Brittain and Charles M. Brittain ("Grantor") whose mailing address is 1013 Blue Wren Dr. Fayetteville NC 28012 to the State of North Carolina, ("Grantee"), whose mailing address is State of North Carolina, Department of Administration, State Property Office, 1321 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1321. The designations Grantor and Grantee as used herein shall include said parties, their heirs, successors, and assigns, and shall include singular, plural, masculine, feminine, or neuter as required by context. WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of N.C. Gen. Stat. § 143-214.8 et seQ., the State of North Carolina has established the Ecosystem Enhancement Program (formerly known as the Wetlands Restoration Program) within the Department of Environment and Natural Resources for the purposes of acquiring, maintaining, restoring, enhancing, creating and preserving wetland and riparian resources that contribute to the protection and improvement of water quality, flood prevention, fisheries, aquatic habitat, wildlife habitat, and recreational opportunities; and 0332. 1022 BK -00332 PGA 022 WHEREAS, The State of North Carolina is qualified to be the Grantee of a Conservation Easement pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 121-35; and WHEREAS, the Ecosystem Enhancement Program in the Department of Environment and Natural Resources has approved acceptance of this instrument; and WHEREAS, the Department of Environment and Natural Resources, the North Carolina Department of Transportation and the United States Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District entered into a Memorandum of Agreement, (MOA) duly executed by all parties in Greensboro, NC on July 22, 2003. This MOA recognizes that the Ecosystem Enhancement Program is to provide for compensatory mitigation by effective protection of the land, water and natural resources of the State by restoring, enhancing and preserving ecosystem functions; and WHEREAS, the acceptance of this instrument for and on behalf of the State of North Carolina was granted to the Department of Administration by resolution as approved by the Governor and Council of State adopted at a meeting held in the City of Raleigh, North Carolina, on the 8th day of February 2000; and WHEREAS, Grantor owns in fee simple certain real property situated, lying, and being in Glade Creek Township, Alleghany County, North Carolina (the "Property"), and being more particularly described as that certain parcel of land containing approximately 127.72 acres and being conveyed to the Grantor by deed as recorded in Estate File Number 03E 2841 of the Wake County Registry, North Carolina; and WHEREAS, Grantor is willing to grant a Conservation Easement over the herein described areas of the Property, thereby restricting and limiting the use of the included areas of the Property to the terms and conditions and purposes hereinafter set forth, and Grantee is willing to accept such Conservation Easement. This Conservation Easement shall be for the protection and benefit of the waters of Little Pine Creek NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants, terms, conditions, and restrictions hereinafter set forth, Grantor unconditionally and irrevocably hereby grants and conveys unto Grantee, its successors and assigns, forever and in perpetuity, a Conservation Easement of the nature and character and to the extent hereinafter set forth, over a described area of the Property, referred to hereafter as the "Easement Area", for the benefit of the people of North Carolina, and being all of the tract of land as identified as Conservation Easement Area acres and Conservation Easement Area 0.70 acres together along with a 60' wide Right of Way as shown on a plat of survey entitled "Conservation Easement Survey for the State of North Carolina, Ecosystem Enhancement Program Big Harris Creek " Dated March 23, 2009, certified by Ken Suttles #L-2678 ,and recorded in May Book 11, Page 119, June 26, 2009 in Alleghany County Registry. Conservation Easement Area being more particularly described as follows: See Attached Exhibit A 0332. 1023 BK: 00332 PG: 1023 I. DURATION OF EASEMENT Pursuant to law, including the above referenced statutes, this Conservation Easement shall be perpetual and it shall run with, and be a continuing restriction upon the use of, the Property, and it shall be enforceable by the Grantee against the Grantor and against Grantor's heirs, successors and assigns, personal representatives, agents, lessees, and licensees. II. GRANTOR RESERVED USES AND RESTRICTED ACTIVITES The Easement Area shall be restricted from any development or usage that would impair or interfere with the purposes of this Conservation Easement. Unless expressly reserved as a compatible use herein, any activity in, or use of, the Easement Area by the Grantor is prohibited as inconsistent with the purposes of this Conservation Easement. Any rights not expressly reserved hereunder by the Grantor have been acquired by the Grantee. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the following specific uses are prohibited, restricted, or reserved as indicated: A. Recreational Uses. Grantor expressly reserves the right to undeveloped recreational uses, including hiking, bird watching, hunting and fishing, and access to the Easement Area for the purposes thereof. Usage of motorized vehicles in the Easement Area is prohibited, except as they are used exclusively for management, maintenance, or stewardship purposes, and on existing trails, paths or roads. B. Educational Uses. The Grantor reserves the right to engage in and permit others to engage in educational uses in the Easement Area not inconsistent with this Conservation - Easement, and the right of access to the Easement Area for such purposes including organized educational activities such as site visits and observations. Educational uses of the property shall not alter vegetation, hydrology or topography of the site. C. Vegetative Cutting. Except as related to the removal of non-native plants, diseased or damaged trees, and vegetation that obstructs, destabilizes or renders unsafe the Easement Area to persons or natural habitat, all cutting, removal, mowing, harming, or destruction of any trees and vegetation in the Easement Area is prohibited. D. Industrial, Residential and Commercial Uses. All are prohibited in the Easement Area. E. Agricultural Use. All agricultural uses within the Easement Area including any use for cropland, waste lagoons, or pastureland are prohibited. F. New Construction. There shall be no building, facility, mobile home, antenna, utility pole, tower, or other structure constructed or placed in the Easement Area. G. Roads and Trails. There shall be no construction of roads, trails, walkways, or paving in the Easement Area. Existing roads or trails located in the Easement Area may be maintained by Grantor in order to minimize runoff, sedimentation and for access to the interior 9 0332. 1024 BK: 00332 PG- 1024 of the Property for management, maintenance, stewardship purposes, or undeveloped recreational and educational uses of the Easement Area. Existing roads, trails or paths may be maintained with loose gravel or permanent vegetation to stabilize or cover the surfaces. H. Signs. No signs shall be permitted in the Easement Area except interpretive signs describing restoration activities and the conservation values of the Easement Area, signs identifying the owner of the Property and the holder of the Conservation Easement, signs giving directions, or signs prescribing rules and regulations for the use of the Easement Area may be allowed. I. Dumping or Storing. Dumping or storage of soil, trash, ashes, garbage, waste, abandoned vehicles, appliances or machinery, or other material in the Easement Area is prohibited. I Grading, Mineral Use, Excavation, Dredging. There shall be no grading, filling, excavation, dredging, mining, or drilling; no removal of topsoil, sand, gravel, rock, peat, minerals, or other materials. K. Water Quality and Drainage Patterns. There shall be no diking, draining, dredging, channeling, filling, leveling, pumping, impounding or diverting, causing, allowing or permitting the diversion of surface or underground water. No altering or tampering with water control structures or devices, or disruption or alteration of the restored, enhanced, or created drainage patterns. All removal of wetlands, polluting or discharging into waters, springs, seeps, or wetlands, or use of pesticide or biocides is prohibited. In the event of an emergency interruption or shortage of all other water sources, water from within the Easement Area may temporarily be used for good cause shown as needed for the survival of livestock and agricultural production. L. Subdivision and Conveyance. Grantor voluntarily agrees that no subdivision, partitioning, or dividing of the underlying fee that is subject to this Easement is allowed. Unless agreed to by the Grantee in writing, any future conveyance of the underlying fee for the Easement Area and the rights as conveyed herein shall be as a single block of property. Any future transfer of the fee simple shall be subject to this Conservation Easement. Any transfer of the fee is subject to the Grantee's right of unlimited and repeated ingress and egress over and across the Property to the Easement Area for the purposes set forth herein. M. Development Rights. All development rights are removed from the Easement Area and shall not be transferred. N. Disturbance of Natural Features. Any change, disturbance, alteration or impairment of the natural features of the Easement Area or any intentional introduction of non- native plants, trees and/or animal species by Grantor is prohibited. The Grantor may request permission to vary from the above restrictions for good cause shown, provided that any such request is consistent with the purposes of this Conservation Easement. The Grantor shall not vary from the above restrictions without first obtaining written approval from the N.C. Ecosystem Enhancement Program, whose mailing address is 1652 Mail Services Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1652. 0332. 1025 BK:00332 PG -1025 III. GRANTEE RESERVED USES A. Ingress, Egress, and Inspection. The Grantee, its employees and agents, successors and assigns, receive the perpetual right of unlimited and repeated ingress and egress to the Easement Area over the Property at reasonable times to undertake any activities to restore, manage, maintain, enhance, and monitor the wetland and riparian resources of the Easement Area, in accordance with restoration activities or a long-term management plan. Unless otherwise specifically set forth in this Conservation Easement, the rights granted herein do not include or establish for the public any access rights. B. Restoration Activities. These activities include planting of trees, shrubs and herbaceous vegetation, installation of monitoring wells, utilization of heavy equipment to grade, fill, and prepare the soil, modification of the hydrology of the site, and installation of natural and manmade materials as needed to direct in -stream, above ground, and subterraneous water flow. IV. ENFORCEMENT AND REMEDIES A. Enforcement. To accomplish the purposes of this Conservation Easement, Grantee is allowed to prevent any activity within the Easement Area that is inconsistent with the purposes of this Easement and to require the restoration of such areas or features of the Easement Area that may have been damaged by such activity or use. Upon any breach of the terms of this Conservation Easement by Grantor, their successors or assigns, that comes to the attention of the Grantee, the Grantee shall, except as provided below, notify the Grantor, their successors or assigns in writing of such breach. The Grantor shall have ninety (90) days after receipt of such notice to correct the conditions constituting such breach. If the breach remains uncured after ninety (90) days, the Grantee may enforce this Conservation Easement by appropriate legal proceedings including damages, injunctive and other relief. The Grantee shall also have the power and authority, consistent with its statutory authority: (a) to prevent any impairment of the Easement Area by acts which may be unlawful or in violation of this Conservation Easement; (b) to otherwise preserve or protect its interest in the Property; or (c) to seek damages from any appropriate person or entity. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Grantee reserves the immediate right, without notice, to obtain a temporary restraining order, injunctive or other appropriate relief if the breach of the term of this Conservation Easement is or would irreversibly or otherwise materially impair the benefits to be derived from this Conservation Easement. The Grantor and Grantee acknowledge that under such circumstances damage to the Grantee would be irreparable and remedies at law will be inadequate. The rights and remedies of the Grantee provided hereunder shall be in addition to, and not in lieu of, all other rights and remedies available to Grantee in connection with this Conservation Easement. B. Inspection. The Grantee, its employees and agents, successors and assigns, have the right, with reasonable notice, to enter the Easement Area over the Property at reasonable times for the purpose of inspection to determine whether the Grantor, their successors or assigns are complying with the terms, conditions and restrictions of this Conservation Easement. C. Acts Beyond Grantor's Control. Nothing contained in this Conservation Easement shall be construed to entitle Grantee to bring any action against Grantor, their successors or assigns, for any injury or change in the Easement Area caused by third parties, 5 0332 1026 BK: 00332 PG: 1026 resulting from causes beyond the Grantor's control, including, without limitation, fire, flood, storm, and earth movement, or from any prudent action taken in good faith by the Grantor under emergency conditions to prevent, abate, or mitigate significant injury to life, damage to property or harm to the Property resulting from such causes. D. Costs of Enforcement. Beyond regular and typical monitoring, any costs incurred by Grantee in enforcing the terms of this Conservation Easement against Grantor, their successors or assigns, including, without limitation, any costs of restoration necessitated by Grantor's acts or omissions in violation of the terms of this Conservation Easement, shall be borne by Grantor. E. No Waiver. Enforcement of this Easement shall be at the discretion of the Grantee and any forbearance, delay or omission by Grantee to exercise its rights hereunder in the event of any breach of any term set forth herein shall not be construed to be a waiver by Grantee. V. MISCELLANEOUS A. This instrument sets forth the entire agreement of the parties with respect to the Conservation Easement and supersedes all prior discussions, negotiations, understandings or agreements relating to the Conservation Easement. If any provision is found to be invalid, the remainder of the provisions of the Conservation Easement, and the application of such provision to persons or circumstances other than those as to which it is found to be invalid, shall not be affected thereby. B. Any notices shall be sent by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested to the parties at their addresses shown above or to other address(es) as either party establishes in writing upon notification to the other. C. Grantor shall notify Grantee in writing of the name and address and any party to whom the Property or any part thereof is to be transferred at or prior to the time said transfer is made. Grantor further agrees to make any subsequent lease, deed, or other legal instrument by which any interest in the Property is conveyed subject to the Conservation Easement herein created. D. The Grantor and Grantee agree that the terms of this Conservation Easement shall survive any merger of the fee and easement interests in the Property or any portion thereof. E. This Conservation Easement may be amended, but only in writing signed by all parties hereto, and provided such amendment does not affect the qualification of this Conservation Easement or the status of the Grantee under any applicable laws, and is consistent with the purposes of the Conservation Easement. F. The parties recognize and agree that the benefits of this Conservation Easement are in gross and assignable provided, however, that the Grantee hereby covenants and agrees, that in the event it transfers or assigns this Conservation Easement, the organization receiving the interest will be a qualified holder under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 121-34 et seq. and § 170(h) of the Internal Revenue Code, and the Grantee further covenants and agrees that the terms of the 6 0332 1027 BK: 00332 PGA 027 transfer or assignment will be such that the transferee or assignee will be required to continue in perpetuity the conservation purposes described in this document. VI. QUIET ENJOYMENT Grantor reserves all remaining rights accruing from ownership of the Property, including the right to engage in or permit or invite others to engage in only those uses of the Easement Area that are expressly reserved herein, not prohibited or restricted herein, and are not inconsistent with the purposes of this Conservation Easement. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the Grantor expressly reserves to the Grantor, and the Grantor's invitees and licensees, the right of access to the Easement Area, and the right of quiet enjoyment of the Easement Area. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said rights and easements perpetually unto the State of North Carolina for the aforesaid purposes. AND Grantor covenants that Grantor is seized of said premises in fee and has the right to convey the permanent Conservation Easement herein granted; that the same are free from encumbrances and that Grantor will warrant and defend title to the same against the claims of all persons whomsoever. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the Grantor has hereunto set his hand and seal, the day and year first above written. 0332, 1028 BK: 00332 PGA 028 SEAL) Gregory G. talker Melissa R. Walker NORTH CAROLINA COUNTY OF A-Ak I, /,Seo,..., 10A::44oZ, , a Notary Public in and for the County and State aforesaid, do hereby certify that Gregory G. Walker and wife Melissa R. Walker, Grantor, personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the execution of the foregoing instrument. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and Notary Seal this the AP day of �,,,, , 2001. `��io'i Notary Public �.0� 4E 4P v = " z. My commission expires: � r On 'tTON G,�� 0332 1029 BK:00332 PG:1029 r ' (SEAL) OK 4A" Ak.atrna er Bn Walker NORTH CAROLINA Charles M. Brittain a Notary Public in and for the County and State aforesaid, do hereby certifythat Katrina Walker Brittain and spouse Charles M. Brittain, Grantor, personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the execution of the foregoing instrument. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and Notary Seal this the ak�— day of 'a , 200A. \1111111/// Notary Public a:: .ypTARY . n • PU$lIC My commission expires: G,=•. . �'' '�• a�-HYD ANoI�°J�. IIII Landowner Signatures I have reviewed the survey located in Ali.eghany County NORTH based on a survey by Suttles Surveying, P.A. and I am in agreement with the survey as it is prepared by MAP FILE No. 13680 Suttles Surveyin P.A., Ken eth D. Suttles, PLS, License # 2678. Subdivision Exception This Piat of Land shown hereon does not lie This plat represents a survey or division of within the Alleghany County Water Supply ---�,% ,. %x.-01 property that does not require approval from Watershed Management & Protection Ordinance 0 (! DATE 1 - --- -------------------- the Alleghany County Planning Board/Planner as Adopted December 28, 1983 and Amended for the follow'n reasons: December 1, 1997. l s1r i w^ 1 0 VVMN DATE fail;✓if iso . © 'NA�+t•4r I� Ardf This Plat of Land hereon does not lie within ,�,� / , /'_ . I D a a Protected Mountain Ridge as identified �! by the map entitled "Identification of 0�6 � DATE — Date Review Officer Protected Mountain Ridges in the County of Alleghany. / This Plat of Land hereon does not lie within / OWNER DATE a Flood Hazard Area as determined by the / Stat of N T CCirolina, County of Alleghony Federal Emergency Management Agency. / y, DALLAS BEDSAUL and CAROLYN B. EASTRIDGE and DENNIS EASTRIDGE 1 _fie[—�5 __--, Review Officer of /4 DEED BOOK 310, PAGE 223, FIRST TRACT i Alleghany County, certify that the map or plat This plat of land shown hereon does not lie to which this certification is affixed meets all within an area designated by the State of North statutory requirements f ecor ing. Carolina as High Quality Water (HQW) or Outstanding / Resource Waters (ORW). Date Review Officer i Date Review Officer / / // CONTROL CORNER / Existing 5/8" Rebar • 2491) NEW LIME S20"03'08"E 22.23' 119 N 0i / 'h orb �'S- (1235) REVISED NEW CORNER I / / \q °°16� 5/8" Rebar Set w/Cap �P\1t(Conservation Esm't.) cp / oc '14- DeWAYNE L. ROBERTS and wife, JENN1E S. ROBERTS DEED BOOK 213, PAGE 473 (1235) REVISED NEW CORNER 5/8" Rebar Set w/Cap (Conservation Esm't.) \ \ Fp PP I� 90 0� h. \\� o� Pte\ '1 � 9 �oe / IS, 9 \ ,► o Pd\'� / cl BRIDGE ?p y� \PP �n 5600 \ \ D° h TIE LINE \ N44'04'00"E 7.41 yk° \ \ Existing L� / \ \5/8" Rebar • 2F� / STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA > \ \ \ L /CONSERVATION EASEMENT AREA / \ r (Ecosystem Enhancement Program) \ DEED BOOK 311, PAGE 729 I \ I ROBERT M. MURPHY and GLENN D. MURPHY I DEED BOOK 218, PAGE 441 \ For reference see a survey by Suttles Surveying, P.A. \ MAP FILE No. 136808 \ COPYRIGHT Q 2009 SUTTLES SURVEYING, P.A. No part of this drawing may be reproduced, stored on a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any meons (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, scanning or otherwise) without prior written permission. 3 FILED ALLEGHANY COUNTY LIZABETH REEVES ROUPE REGISTER OF DEEDS FILED Jun 26, 2009 AT 12:58:11 pm BOOK 00010 START PAGE 0119 END PAGE 0119 INSTRUMENT # 01612 / A Portion, of V F. GUY WALKER and wife, EARLINE M. WALKER / tx� (Greg Walker and tuif+e, Melissa Walker / o Katrina L. Brittain and husband, Charles Brittain) DEED BOOK 130, PAGE 349 . NEW CORNER 5/8' Rebar Set )nservation Esm't.) Existing 1" Iron Pipe in the right—of—woy limits TAX MAP INFORMATION PROJECT DESCRIPTION PIN: 4010788660 SPO FILE NUMBER 003 -AJ SUBDIVISION: LAURA BEDSAUL ESTATE NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program Project Name: Little Pine Greek II Owned' '09 walker and wife. Memo walker dtrina L. Brittain and husband, Charles Brittain STATE OP NORTH CAROLINA CONSERVATION EASEMENT AREA (Ecosystem Enhancement Program) REVISED NEW CORNER 5/8" Rebar Set w/Cap WELL (Conservation Esm't.) REVISED NEW CORNER N" 5/8" Rebar Set w/Cap (Conservation Esm't.) NOTES: ALL DISTANCES SHOW HEREON ARE HORIZONTAL. ALL AREAS DERIVED FROM COORDINATE COMPUTATIONS. F. GUY WALKER and wife, EARLINE M. WALKER NO NORTH CAROLINA GEODETIC SURLY MONUMENTARON DEED BOOK 130, PAGE 349 IS WITHIN 2,000 FEET OF SUBJECT PROPERTY. NO IMPROVEMENTS LOCATED OTHER THAN SHOWN HEREON. NO UNDERGROUND UTILITIES LOCATED OTHER THAN SHOW HEREON. NO TITLE SEARCH CONDUCTED AT TIME OF SURVEY PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO ANY RIGHTS-OF-WAY EASEMENTS OF RECORD, OR RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS. THIS SURVEY DOES NOT CERTIFY LEGAL 777LE TO THE LAND ITSELF NOR THE BOUNDARIES SHOWN HEREON. BARN USERS OF THIS PLAT SHOULD OBTAIN A CURRENT LEGAL TITLE OPINION TO OWNERSHIP OF THE BOUNDARIES. NUMBERS IN (,{) PARENTHESES: SEE SPREADSHEET FOR COORDINATES. ALL PREVIOUS CORNERS WERE REMOVED FROM THE SITE AND NEW CORNERS WERE ESTABLISHED 3/10/09 CONSERVATION EASEMENT SURVEY for the STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA Ecosystem Enhancement Program — Little Pine Creek II Glade Creek Townsh Alleghany County, N.C. ufflps-3urc�P iq, P.A. 40 South Main Street 419 SOUTH KING ST. Suite NORTH CAROLINA 00 MARION,, N110RGANTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28752 28655 828.652.9382 828.433.0423 FAX 828.659.9600 FAX 828.433.9577 TOLL FREE 800.652.9382 dour6suttlessurvev.com ken@suttlessurver.com f G1 ROPD v VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE NORTH CAROLINA, B URKE COUNTY I _ KENNETH SUTTLES CERTIFY THAT UNDER MY DIRECTION AND SUPERVISION THIS MAP WAS DRAWN FROM AN ACTUAL FIELD LAND SURVEY MADE UNDER MY DIRECTION AND SUPERVISION, DEED DESCRIPTION RECORDED IN DEED BOOK 130, PAGE 349 THAT THE ERROR OF CLOSURE CALCULATED BY LATITUDES AND DEPARTURES IS 1: 10,000 + THAT THE BOUNDARIES NOT SURVEYED ARE SHOWN AS BROKEN LINES PLOTTED FROM INFORMATION FOUND IN SEE PLAT THAT THIS MAP WAS PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE STANDARDS OF PRACTICE FOR LAND SURVEYING IN THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA. WITNESS MY ORIGINAL SICNATURE, REGISTRATION NUMBER, AND SEAL THIS -0l DAY DF A.D., 2009 23rd AL-2678 RCH P.L.S. No CAR *% ESS �• Q SEAL * ' L-2678 •�V�?` D. 1, KENNETH D. SUTTLES, CERTIFY THAT UNDER MY DIRRCTION ANN SUPERVISION THIS MAP WAS DRAWN FROM CONTROL ESTABLISHED BY GPS. THAT THIS GPS SURVEY WAS PERFORMED TO CLASS "C" FGCC SPECIFICATIONS AND THAT I USED STATIC. CPS FIELD PROCEDURES AND COORDINATES WERE OBTAINED BY LEAST SQUARES ADJUS'MENT. THAT THIS SURVEY WAS PERFORMED ON JULY 2008 USING TOPCON HYPER PLUS RECIEVERS AND ALL COORDINATES ARE BASED ON NAD '8312003, NAVD 1988 AND GEOID 2003. THIS SURVEY IS OF ANOTHER CATEGORY, SUCH AS THE RECOMBINATION OF EXISTING PARCELS, A COURT ORDERED SURVEY, OR OTHER EXCEPTION TO THE DEFINITION OF SUBDIVISION. REVISIONS: 1-1 (3/25/09) - Revised lines of easement per land owner request; added barn and well locations 40 20 0 40 80 SCALE: 1" 40' DPAWN BY: FRANK POUNDS/PS DATE: 14742F3�9111 3/10/09 KDS APPROVED BY: FIELD CREW: CG, JJ, JA, DC, JP LEGEND —0-- POINT -(}- IRON PIPE SET - EXXISTING IRON PIPE {}- CONCRETE MONUMENT - P.K. NAIL, RAH,ROAD SPIRE or COTTON GIN SPIKE -0,,, POWER POLE COMPUTER ... 13680.DCA ___- FIELD BOOK_ 08_14 FILE NAME___?368OC_r1l-DWG__ MAP FILE No. 1-2 300C= rl 0325 0296 A Alleghany County 01-29-2009 NORTH CAROLINA Real Estate Excise Tax $180.00 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA ALLEGHANY COUNTY SPO File Number 003-ZH Prepared by: Office of the Attorney General Property Control Section: Blane Rice Return to: NC Department of Administration State Property Office 1321 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1321 BK:00325 PG -0296 FILED ALLEGHANY COUNTY LIZABETH REEVES ROUPE REGISTER OF DEEDS FILED Jan 29, 2009 AT 03:57:53 pm BOOK 00325 START PAGE 0296 END PAGE 0304 INSTRUMENT # 00209 CONSERVATION EASEMENT TIWC �#ORMAT ON RECORDED ALLEGHANY T COLLECTOR 115,410 e, THIS CONSERVATION EASEMENT DEED, pursuant tothe nrovisions of N.C. General Statutes Chapter 121, Article 4 and made this .� day of A , 2009, by Clifford C. Phillips and Roberta S. Phillips Trustees for lifford . Phillips Revocable Trust, and Trustee; for Roberta S. Phillips Revocable Trust, as Tenants in Common and Clifford C. Phillips and Roberta S. Phillips as Tenants by the Entirety (" Grantor "), whose mailing address is 154 Akers Lane, Eunice, NC 286239 ("Grantee"), whose mailing address is State of North Carolina, Department of Administration, State Property Office, 1321 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1321. The designations Grantor and Grantee as used herein shall include said parties, their heirs, successors, and assigns, and shall include singular, plural, masculine, feminine, or neuter as required by context. WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of N.C. Gen. Stat. § 143-214.8 et sea., the State of North Carolina has established the Ecosystem Enhancement Program (formerly known as the Wetlands Restoration Program) within the Department of Environment and Natural Resources for the purposes of acquiring, maintaining, restoring, enhancing, creating and preserving wetland and riparian resources that contribute to the protection and improvement of water quality, flood prevention, fisheries, aquatic habitat, wildlife habitat, and recreational opportunities; and WHEREAS, The State of North Carolina is qualified to be the Grantee of a Conservation Easement pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 121-35; and WHEREAS, the Ecosystem Enhancement Program in the Department of Environment and Natural Resources has approved acceptance of this instrument; and WHEREAS, the Department of Environment and Natural Resources, the North Carolina Department of Transportation and the United States Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District entered into a Memorandum of Agreement, (MOA) duly executed by all parties in 0325 BK: 00325 PG: 0297 0297 Greensboro, NC on July 22, 2003. This MOA recognizes that the Ecosystem Enhancement Program is to provide for compensatory mitigation by effective protection of the land, water and natural resources of the State by restoring, enhancing and preserving ecosystem functions; and WHEREAS, the acceptance of this instrument for and on behalf of the State of North Carolina was granted to the Department of Administration by resolution as approved by the Governor and Council of State adopted at a meeting held in the City of Raleigh, North Carolina, on the 8th day of February 2000; and WHEREAS, Grantor owns in fee simple certain real property situated, lying, and being in Glade Creek Township, Alleghany County, North Carolina (the "Property"), and being more particularly described as that certain parcel of land containing approximately 22.104 acres and being conveyed to the Grantor by deed as recorded in Deed Book 229 Page 583 of the Alleghany County Register of Deeds, North Carolina; and WHEREAS, Grantor is willing to grant a Conservation Easement over the herein described areas of the Property, thereby restricting and limiting the use of the included areas of the Property to the terms and conditions and purposes hereinafter set forth, and Grantee is willing to accept such Conservation Easement. This Conservation Easement shall be for the protection and benefit of the waters of (Little Pine Creek II). NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants, terms, conditions, and restrictions hereinafter set forth, Grantor unconditionally and irrevocably hereby grants and conveys unto Grantee, its successors and assigns, forever and in perpetuity, a Conservation Easement of the nature and character and to the extent hereinafter set forth, over a described area of the Property, referred to hereafter as the " Conservation Easement Area" , for the benefit of the people of North Carolina, and being all of the tract of land as identified as Conservation Area 11.27 acres. Conservation Easement Area is shown on a plat of survey entitled "Conservation Easement Survey for the State of North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program"dated -and certified by Kenneth D Suttles License # L2678 and recorded in Plat Book /10Registry: Conservation Easement Area being more partic ilarly escribea as fol ows: [ LEGAL DESCRIPTION ATTACHED ] The purposes of this Conservation Easement are to maintain, restore, enhance, create and preserve wetland and/or riparian resources in the Easement Area that contribute to the protection and improvement of water quality, flood prevention, fisheries, aquatic habitat, wildlife habitat, and recreational opportunities; to maintain permanently the Easement Area in its natural condition, consistent with these purposes; and to prevent any use of the Easement Area that will significantly impair or interfere with these purposes. To achieve these purposes, the following conditions and restrictions are set forth: I. DURATION OF EASEMENT Pursuant to law, including the above referenced statutes, this Conservation Easement shall be perpetual and it shall run with, and be a continuing restriction upon the use of, the 0325 0298 BK:00325 PG -.0298 Property, and it shall be enforceable by the Grantee against the Grantor and against Grantor's heirs, successors and assigns, personal representatives, agents, lessees, and licensees. II. GRANTOR RESERVED USES AND RESTRICTED ACTIVITES The Easement Area shall be restricted from any development or usage that would impair or interfere with the purposes of this Conservation Easement. Unless expressly reserved as a compatible use herein, any activity in, or use of, the Easement Area by the Grantor is prohibited as inconsistent with the purposes of this Conservation Easement. Any rights not expressly reserved hereunder by the Grantor have been acquired by the Grantee. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the following specific uses are prohibited, restricted, or reserved as indicated: A. Recreational Uses. Grantor expressly reserves the right to undeveloped recreational uses, including hiking, bird watching, hunting and fishing, and access to the Easement Area for the purposes thereof. Usage of motorized vehicles in the Easement Area is prohibited, except as they are used exclusively for management, maintenance, or stewardship purposes, and on existing trails, paths or roads. B. Educational Uses. The Grantor reserves the right to engage in and permit others to engage in educational uses in the Easement Area not inconsistent with this Conservation Easement, and the right of access to the Easement Area for such purposes including organized educational activities such as site visits and observations. Educational uses of the property shall not alter vegetation, hydrology or topography of the site. C. Vegetative Cutting. Except as related to the removal of non-native plants, diseased or damaged trees, and vegetation that obstructs, destabilizes or renders unsafe the Easement Area to persons or natural habitat, all cutting, removal, mowing, harming, or destruction of any trees and vegetation in the Easement Area is prohibited. D. Industrial, Residential and Commercial Uses. All are prohibited in the Easement Area. E. Agricultural Use. All agricultural uses within the Easement Area including any use for cropland, waste lagoons, or pastureland are prohibited. F. New Construction. There shall be no building, facility, mobile home, antenna, utility pole, tower, or other, structure constructed or placed in the Easement Area. G. Roads and Trails. There shall be no construction of roads, trails, walkways, or paving in the Easement Area. Existing roads or trails located in the Easement Area may be maintained by Grantor in order to minimize runoff, sedimentation and for access to the interior of the Property for management, maintenance, stewardship purposes, or undeveloped recreational and educational uses of the Easement Area. Existing roads, trails or paths may be maintained with loose gravel or permanent vegetation to stabilize or cover the surfaces. H. Signs. No signs shall be permitted in the Easement Area except interpretive signs describing restoration activities and the conservation values of the Easement Area, signs 0325 BK:00325 PG:0299 0299 identifying the owner of the Property and the holder of the Conservation Easement, signs giving directions, or signs prescribing rules and regulations for the use of the Easement Area may be allowed. I. Dumping or Storing. Dumping or storage of soil, trash, ashes, garbage, waste, abandoned vehicles, appliances or machinery, or other material in the Easement Area is prohibited. J. Grading, Mineral Use, Excavation, Dredging. There shall be no grading, filling, excavation, dredging, mining, or drilling; no removal of topsoil, sand, gravel, rock, peat, minerals, or other materials. K. Water Quality and Drainage Patterns. There shall be no diking, draining, dredging, channeling, filling, leveling, pumping, impounding or diverting, causing, allowing or permitting the diversion of surface or underground water. No altering or tampering with water control structures or devices, or disruption or alteration of the restored, enhanced, or created drainage patterns. All removal of wetlands, polluting or discharging into waters, springs, seeps, or wetlands, or use of pesticide or biocides is prohibited. In the event of an emergency interruption or shortage of all other water sources, water from within the Easement Area may temporarily be used for good cause shown as needed for the survival of livestock and agricultural production. L. Subdivision and Conveyance. Grantor voluntarily agrees that no subdivision, partitioning, or dividing of the underlying fee that is subject to this Easement is allowed. Unless agreed to by the Grantee in writing, any future conveyance of the underlying fee for the Easement Area and the rights as conveyed herein shall be as a single block of property. Any future transfer of the fee simple shall be subject to this Conservation Easement. Any transfer of the fee is subject to the Grantee's right of unlimited and repeated ingress and egress over and across the Property to the Easement Area for the purposes set forth herein. M. Development Rights. All development rights are removed from the Easement Area and shall not be transferred. N. Disturbance of Natural Features. Any change, disturbance, alteration or impairment of the natural features of the Easement Area or any intentional introduction of non- native plants, trees and/or animal species by Grantor is prohibited. The Grantor may request permission to vary from the above restrictions for good cause shown, provided that any such request is consistent with the purposes of this Conservation Easement. The Grantor shall not vary from the above restrictions without first obtaining written approval from the N.C. Ecosystem Enhancement Program, whose mailing address is 1652 Mail Services Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1652. III. GRANTEE RESERVED USES A. Ingress, Egress, and Inspection. The Grantee, its employees and agents, successors and assigns, receive the perpetual right of unlimited and repeated ingress and egress to the Easement Area over the Property at reasonable times to undertake any activities to restore, 0325 BK:00325 PG -0300 0300 manage, maintain, enhance, and monitor the wetland and riparian resources of the Easement Area, in accordance with restoration activities or a long-term management plan. Unless otherwise specifically set forth in this Conservation Easement, the rights granted herein do not include or establish for the public any access rights. B. Restoration Activities. These activities include planting of trees, shrubs and herbaceous vegetation, installation of monitoring wells, utilization of heavy equipment to grade, fill, and prepare the soil, modification of the hydrology of the site, and installation of natural and manmade materials as needed to direct in -stream, above ground, and subterraneous water flow. IV. ENFORCEMENT AND REMEDIES A. Enforcement. To accomplish the purposes of this Conservation Easement, Grantee is allowed to prevent any activity within the Easement Area that is inconsistent with the purposes of this Easement and to require the restoration of such areas or features of the Easement Area that may have been damaged by such activity or use. Upon any breach of the terms of this Conservation Easement by Grantor, their successors or assigns, that comes to the attention of the Grantee, the Grantee shall, except as provided below, notify the Grantor, their successors or assigns in writing of such breach. The Grantor shall have ninety (90) days after receipt of such notice to correct the conditions constituting such breach. If the breach remains uncured after ninety (90) days, the Grantee may enforce this Conservation Easement by appropriate legal proceedings including damages, injunctive and other relief. The Grantee shall also have the power and authority, consistent with its statutory authority: (a) to prevent any impairment of the Easement Area by acts which may be unlawful or in violation of this Conservation Easement; (b) to otherwise preserve or protect its interest in the Property; or (c) to seek damages from any appropriate person or entity. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Grantee reserves the immediate right, without notice, to obtain a temporary restraining order, injunctive or other appropriate relief if the breach of the term of this Conservation Easement is or would irreversibly or otherwise materially impair the benefits to be derived from this Conservation Easement. The Grantor and Grantee acknowledge that under such circumstances damage to the Grantee would be irreparable and remedies at law will be inadequate. The rights and remedies of the Grantee provided hereunder shall be in addition to, and not in lieu of, all other rights and remedies available to Grantee in connection with this Conservation Easement. B. Inspection. The Grantee, its employees and agents, successors and assigns, have the right, with reasonable notice, to enter the Easement Area over the Property at reasonable times for the purpose of inspection to determine whether the Grantor, their successors or assigns are complying with the terms, conditions and restrictions of this Conservation Easement. C. Acts Beyond Grantor's Control. Nothing contained in this Conservation Easement shall be construed to entitle Grantee to bring any action against Grantor, their successors or assigns, for any injury or change in the Easement Area caused by third parties, resulting from causes beyond the Grantor's control, including, without limitation, fire, flood, storm, and earth movement, or from any prudent action taken in good faith by the Grantor under emergency conditions to prevent, abate, or mitigate significant injury to life, damage to property or harm to the Property resulting from such causes. 5 0325 BK:00325 PG -0301 0301 D. Costs of Enforcement. Beyond regular and typical monitoring, any costs incurred by Grantee in enforcing the terms of this Conservation Easement against Grantor, their successors or assigns, including, without limitation, any costs of restoration necessitated by Grantor's acts or omissions in violation of the terms of this Conservation Easement, shall be borne by Grantor. E. No Waiver. Enforcement of this Easement shall be at the discretion of the Grantee and any forbearance, delay or omission by Grantee to exercise its rights hereunder in the event of any breach of any term set forth herein shall not be construed to be a waiver by Grantee. V. MISCELLANEOUS A. This instrument sets forth the entire agreement of the parties with respect to the Conservation Easement and supersedes all prior discussions, negotiations, understandings or agreements relating to the Conservation Easement. If any provision is found to be invalid, the remainder of the provisions of the Conservation Easement, and the application of such provision to persons or circumstances other than those as to which it is found to be invalid, shall not be affected thereby. B. Any notices shall be sent by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested to the parties at their addresses shown above or to other address(es) as either party establishes in writing upon notification to the other. C. Grantor shall notify Grantee in writing of the name and address and any party to whom the Property or any part thereof is to be transferred at or prior to the time said transfer is made. Grantor further agrees to make any subsequent lease, deed, or other legal instrument by which any interest in the Property is conveyed subject to the Conservation Easement herein created. D. The Grantor and Grantee agree that the terms of this Conservation Easement shall survive any merger of the fee and easement interests in the Property or any portion thereof. E. This Conservation Easement may be amended, but only in writing signed by all parties hereto, and provided such amendment does not affect the qualification of this Conservation Easement or the status of the Grantee under any applicable laws, and is consistent with the purposes of the Conservation Easement. F. The parties recognize and agree that the benefits of this Conservation Easement are in gross and assignable provided, however, that the Grantee hereby covenants and agrees, that in the event it transfers or assigns this Conservation Easement, the organization receiving the interest will be a qualified holder under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 121-34 et seq. and § 170(h) of the Internal Revenue Code, and the Grantee further covenants and agrees that the terms of the transfer or assignment will be such that the transferee or assignee will be required to continue in perpetuity the conservation purposes described in this document. VI. QUIET ENJOYMENT 6 0325 0302 BK- 00325 PG- 0302 Grantor reserves all remaining rights accruing from ownership of the Property, including the right to engage in or permit or invite others to engage in only those uses of the Easement Area that are expressly reserved herein, not prohibited or restricted herein, and are not inconsistent with the purposes of this Conservation Easement. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the Grantor expressly reserves to the Grantor, and the Grantor's invitees and licensees, the right of access to the Easement Area, and the right of quiet enjoyment of the Easement Area. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said rights and easements perpetually unto the State of North Carolina for the aforesaid purposes. AND Grantor covenants that Grantor is seized of said premises in fee and has the right to convey the permanent Conservation Easement herein granted; that the same are free from encumbrances and that Grantor will warrant and defend title to the same against the claims of all persons whomsoever. and IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the Grantor has hereunto set his hand and seal, the day &4"Ale- (SEAL) Roberta S. Phillips Trustees for Clifford C. Phillips Revocable Trust tiueCe� (SEAL) RobertrS. Phillips Trustees for Roberta S. Phillips Revocable Trust (SEAL) C. Phillip's and Roberta S. Phillips NORTH CAROLINA COU TY OF L'a �R7) a Notary Public in and for the County and State of esaid, do hereby certify that Clifford C. Phillips and Roberta S. Phillips Trustees for Clifford C. Phillips Revocable Trust. Grantor, personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the execution of the foregoing instrument. IN WI SS WHEREOF, I hav hereunto set my hand and Notary Seal this the day of cL , 200 [. JEAN R. MF30RNE NOTA.9Y PUBLIC 1100My Ct>WV Nath CtuoWta Notary Public MY commission 612 2010 My commission expires: 0325 0303 BK -00325 PG -0303 NORTH CAROLINA COIANTY OF I, &_el , a Notary Public in and for the County and State afolresaid, do here certify that Clifford C. Phillips and Roberta S. Phillips Trustees for Roberta S. Phillips Revocable Trust. Grantor, personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the execution of the foregoing instrument. IN WI SS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and Notary Seal this the days , 2009. EJE:e"�"I�IR. Notary Public a� :,!rs.: My commission expires: NORTH OF Ke �Jid,do here y c rtify that Cliffor, Grantor, personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the execution of the foregoing instrument. IN V4TrYESS WHEREOF, I have ereunto set my hand and Notary Seal this the 200. My commission expires: & • /';� . azo /d Notary Public JEAN R. Y POD Alloyhany CooAy 1-10 Noah Caroiin3 My Commission fres 612.2010 0325 0304 BK: 00325 PG:0304 \ L E G A L D E S C R I P T I O N Legal description of the conservation easement survey for the State of North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program and being a portion of the property known as the Clifford Phillips and wife Roberta S. Phillips property as recorded in Deed Book 162, Page 768 and being located in the Glade Creek Township, Alleghany County, North Carolina and being described as a portion of that certain tract as follows: BEGINNING on 5/8" rebar set, a new corner (N=1,008,388.5649 ft, E=1,414,416.4140 ft), said rebar lying North 24 degrees 35 minutes 44 seconds East - 166.91 feet from a 12" spike having NAD83 coordinates of N=1,008,236.7950 ft, E=1,414,346.9430 ft, Elevation 2562.82 feet and CSF = 0.99999417; thence, South 86 degrees 33 minutes 38 seconds East - 230.60 feet to an existing 3/8" rebar; thence, North 03 degrees 13 minutes 49 seconds East and crossing Little Pine Creek - 326.62 feet to an existing 3/8" rebar; thence, North 72 degrees 42 minutes 07 seconds East - 449.69 feet to an existing 3/8" rebar; thence, North 72 degrees 42 minutes 07 seconds East - 565.38 feet to a 5/8" rebar set, said rebar set lying South 19 degrees 52 minutes 53 seconds West - 337.35 feet from a PK nail set in the center of a bridge over the center of a creek, said rebar also lying South 72 degrees 42 minutes 07 seconds West - 290.51 feet from an existing 1" iron pipe; thence, from said 5/8" rebar set, twenty-eight (28) new lines the following courses and distances: South 18 degrees 19 minutes 46 seconds East - 176.81 feet to a 5/8" rebar set, South 33 degrees 28 minutes 21 seconds East and crossing Little Pine Creek - 221.90 feet to a 5/8" rebar set, South 16 degrees 20 minutes 32 seconds East - 131.94 feet to a 5/8" rebar set, North 85 degrees 10 minutes 34 seconds West - 9.57 feet to a 5/8" rebar set, North 84 degrees 29 minutes 05 seconds West - 70.51 feet to a 5/8" rebar set, North 87 degrees 46 minutes 54 seconds West - 54.06 feet to a 5/8" rebar set, South 77 degrees 23 minutes 01 second West - 94.88 feet to a 5/8" rebar set, South 69 degrees 08 minutes 57 seconds West - 37.08 feet to a 5/8" rebar set, South 55 degrees 01 minute 34 seconds West - 86.84 feet to a 5/8" rebar set, North 25 degrees 32 minutes 35 seconds West - 16.24 feet to a 5/8" rebar set, North 86 degrees 43 minutes 21 seconds West - 74.97 feet to a 5/8" rebar set, North 79 degrees 43 minutes 45 seconds West - 44.48 feet to a 5/8" rebar set, North 54 degrees 21 minutes 15 seconds West - 66.21 feet to a 5/8" rebar set, North 79 degrees 55 minutes 18 seconds West - 99.15 feet to a 5/8" rebar set, South 70 degrees 41 minutes 35 seconds West - 37.98 feet to a 5/8" rebar set, North 6 - degrees 52 minutes 32 seconds West - 43.48 feet to a 5/8" rebar set, North 78 degrees 26 minutes 54 seconds West - 79.88 feet to a 5/8" rebar set, South 66 degrees 04 minutes 25 seconds West - 73.38 feet to a 5/8" rebar set, South 77 degrees 30 minutes 56 seconds West - 40.22 feet to a 5/8" rebar set, South 27 degrees 14 minutes 06 seconds West - 127.52 feet to a 5/8" rebar set, North 88 degrees 18 minutes 55 seconds West - 70.38 feet to a 5/8" rebar set, South 01 degree 51 minutes 21 seconds East - 41.84 feet to a 5/8" rebar set, South 13 degrees 26 minutes 34 seconds West - 70.49 feet to a 5/8" rebar set, South 55 degrees 34 minutes 28 seconds West - 122.17 feet to a 5/8" rebar set, South 80 degrees 52 minutes 53 seconds West - 239.96 feet to a 5/8" rebar set, North 59 degrees 33 minutes 46 seconds West - 86.20 feet to a 5/8" rebar set, North 06 degrees 21 minutes 09 seconds West - 72.74 feet to a 5/8" rebar set, North 00 degrees 53 minutes 01 second East - 89.57 feet to the point of BEGINNING; containing 11.27 acres as shown by Suttles Surveying, PA on Map File No. 13680 and recorded in the Alleghany County Register of Deeds as Plat Book 10, Page 100. Together with and subject to covenants, easements, and restrictions of record. I ,WI44,"li", 60-1,.. This Plat of Land shown hereon does not Ile within the Alleghany County Water Supply Watershed Management dtt Protection Ordinance as Adopted December 28, 1983 and Amended December 1, 1997. This Plat of Land hereon does not lie within a Protected Mountain Ridge as identified by the map entitled 'Identification of Protected Mountain Ridges in the County of Alleghany. This "at of Ldnd hereon does not lilt within a Flood Hazard Area as determined by the Federal) Emergency Management Agency. This plot of ItRid shown hereon does Trot III* within an area designated by the State of North Carolina as High Quality Water (HOW) or Outstandin4 Resource Waterp (ORW). Date Review Offic G kill, .nl. Subdivision Excerption This plat represents a survey or dlvision Of Private Rood Disclosure property that does not require approval Nom A privately mointalned rood serves this parcel of land. the Alleghany County Planning Board/Planner As a private road, and not a public road, the responsibility for a fall w reAl I ons: for maintenance of this road is upon the property owners. ILK oz�v' School Bus service is not provided on private roads by the Alleghany County School system. State rood maintenance �Z3•��� . R�'� and snow removal are not provided on private roads by the NCDOT. Road conditions may adversely affect the timely Date Review Offic delivery of emergency services. Stet N ardl a, County of Atleghdny I � Review Officer of Allegha County, cer that the map or pial to which this certification is affixed meets all statutory requirem s for recording. 1-25-2,A" Oate Review Office BY06N FRAWLIN teOaDRI NE, JR. and wife, TRACIE M. WOODRUFF O&D BOOK 250, PAGE 115 NAD IM N s 1,006,407.9676 R. E t 1, 414, 094.5831 Ft. �- - - - 1xiistln9 3/8' Rabor TIE LIVE ONLY NS5.40'06"E 84.116 TOPS PT. (12' spike) INCGS HAD 1983 N - 1,008,339.1290 Fit, E - 1,414,045.2170 Ft. ELEV. • 2561.42 Ft. CF . 0.99999434 5/8' Reber Set IltnUA M. MLION and hueboNd, EbWARD 1MLSON DEED ROOK 94, PAGE 529 "M 1963 f+► • 1,008,31SK5649 rt, E • 1,414,416.4140 Ft, MEM CORNER (CONTROL) 5/8" Rebor Set (Conservation Eun't.1 I I I Elbetinq 3/111' Rebar (� ,v �i x.l va llU, 1 „ ,1,1 d•I II'- )ill . Londoymer SignatuYee I have revieered the survey located in Alleghany County and I om in agreement with the survey as it is prepared by Suttles Surveying, P.A. nneth D. Suttles, PLS, License 2678. el .R DAT / / :R D 10,0100\ \ \ PK Noll s.c..1 MMllfce (Cofter of thl nbik� i RORE'RY N. MURPHY end MENN 0. MURPHY a 7 \ DEED BOOK 216, PAGE 441 irst" y 1Ir Pipe o ' n Px Nail set TIE LINE �y0�• vl `�"` \� 24 e6 M t>rM1 eKOO •� " GR 31 sk Gall Ria r� 565 �diw `ot Erlshlnq 3/W ROW M 5/8. C2111111411C2111111411 Rebar . l(21M(47" UMOw 01111 u( r�l tleRebor ^ N 4 09 1 urns PW aim 10' .w. e y \ 6 ter wild's 449 4k-". SrA?r OF NORTflf CARbLIWA � � STEVE R. MALLS CONSERVATI0II EASEMENT ARA'A .0 DEED 900K 227, PAGE 2917 ` (Peosystem anhaneement Progrwft) \ urnF Ow 1Y9(tx Ia� DEED BOOK 305, PACE 10461 )sass) 5/b' ltsbor Set 6Af(e tNRt +tear%.'a .le. 11.27 ACRaS � sate ��j + � mt cu Wftb. ow e�"Ot Z vaf+l) NEIM CORNER erg^' t eR,Mlic►I � sro- Rebar sort \, it N (e1 �� e�l 2 (z,e) L21 „n"Al sr+nNc �b rri r7 (zaM1.�9 (ae �l�e7r Mh ar 11 L1�0 (2C� L0 y (Conservation Esn+ t.) I 1d' awP 3�-Q z ry �i1 I • s�ll.�al (z,e) 1 1`> � eynrt a/i CMF, (204 b.r. • oaw�l�) (�) sJMr ft" 011111 awMs 01 r 3/r Ihk� M Y f/d' Mar Sal NIrz awle `o an° 58633' "E (207) aM.Me1:t. � �, i 33'38'E 322.41 (TIE LANE) � (sae) N 230,60 ace oawiw + wwc,reMat telvn CLIFroRD 0F9lL1P9 Rebar and wife, Edathq 5/b' RYblsr s/6' a' a/r Mw ew lee a•Mes tI' Cap • t 2, w �� ROA,y i1b) R09ERTA S. PHILLIPS a "+R so istetlnq J/I!1" Rebar (201)� Rp1a _ HEED BOOK 162, PAGE 768 L153 LS �l 38* p sae`� • QJ,1Y CM► /L5 aAr Me: fr doe" _ a 64 IME \ ss�ps 34 -_ _ �,�•N -no olow$10 000-L g 561"55' �_ w as AWL M i �- xistlnq 1%2" Mon Pipe �'13"M 3'14. UE CfleC - [t>: �� T ` �� - � PP ANS. ; KD5 resu gest►: CG, JJ, JA, BM I I �� � THE PRIVATE 10' GRAVEL ROAD I �r �- - �--- rt�>� MEN Existing 3/8" Rebw E E2 p1AGEA8 9 p.IF':U10 C. PHILLIPS ���,3 and G. P SIPS Ph'. (1Y 3p#rd) 11.CCIIIIC 1RMI9Pt7N111Mt DEED BOOK I ROAERTA S. PHILLIPS 19" GIP 30' PRIVMTE R/W (DO. ret, PG. Tell) NCCS NAD 1983 GEED BOOK 300, PAGE 1090! I N 1,008,236.7950 FL E • 1,414,346.9430 Ft. ELEV. - 2562.82 Ft. CF a 0.99999417 rB1 ft C. ILLIPS CI.IFP'Oand wife. 110!lERTA S. PHILLIPS 1 I GEED BOOK 300, PAGE 10erD' Y 1 DANNY 1 and vrife DESIREE R. ANDEFeB � DEED Boox 162, PAGE 692 1 BEARINGS AND DISTANCES ALONG [t>: �� T ` �� - � PP ANS. 1 No YES. DISI'AINCES 5�011,1V itiE`RtON ARE HO1R170NTAG. ALL AREAS DERIVED F'RON COORDINA IE COAIfPUTA T10NS. NO NOl41N CAROI+ AVA GEUDE'TIC 5't1R►dF'Y MON. UMENTA TIpV IS M77HM 2,000 FEET OF SUBJECT PROPERTY. NO IM9r'ROVE'AAEN1'S LOCA JE'D OTHER THAN 5/'It711N HEREON. NO UfVDL14GR0(llhyJ U7ILlT1L►"5 LOCATrD dTNE'R THAN SNDIYH/ HEREON. NO 717Lf SEARCH CONDUCTED AT TIME OF S11RVE1'. PROT'ERTY 1S S1115',AECT Tb ANY RICH 15' - OF- WAY, fASE1llEN15 OF RECORD, OR RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS. CHIS SURVEY DOE'S NOT G"ERTTFY LEGAL 1I7LE TO TN£ LAND ITSELF NOR THE BOUNDARIES SHOWN HEREON. ilisflt5 OF 1Hl5 PLAT SHOULD OBTAIN A CUI4RFIVT LEGAL TITLE OPINION ; KD5 resu gest►: CG, JJ, JA, BM I I �� � THE PRIVATE 10' GRAVEL ROAD I 117 OWNERSHIP OF THE BOUNDARIES. fVs(IMB'ERS NV (/') PARENTHESE`S' 5EE SPREAD5i4E1rT FAR COOM7'DINANTLrS CDPYh'1►GHi' © root Su7`1'L!!.T' SdRVJ!'YING, P.A. Ne port W this draw" may ars raproduosX stored on a rstrtebl arYteMM or tronemitted In any form or by any msarj's (eNetronlc, mechanical, photocopylnq, scarming or otherwise) without prior writlen-permisaion. -,,TAX MAP INFORMATION � NC PIN: 4010580202_ 1/9(2009 2:12:38 PM • r.�-�,,. „v. �.., ::.;._ _ ,. . LINE LENGTH BEARING L41 27,94 S58'49'52'W L42 32.82 $11'26'03'W L43 48,52 S15'28'25'E L44 80,57 S27'51'07'E L45 43.25 S12'51'01'E L46 39,70 S31'15'43'V L47 40.05 S53'04'15'V L48 51.73 S77'32'20'V L49 52.92 N85'34'09'V L50 46.38 N64.29'11'V L51 69:00 N55'36'54'V L52 67.06 N77'19'46'V L53 51.36 S79'54'38`V L54 24.33 S78'57'49'W L55 118.95 S64'46'23'W L56 116.22 S70'59'40'V L57 86.37 S71'26'32'V L58 101,45 S71'26'32'V L59 78.86 S73'37'15'V L60 41:75 N79'45'10'V L61 69:46 N52'42'22'V L62 45,43 N42'58'42'V 1- PROJECT DESCRIPTION 5P0 FILE ; KD5 resu gest►: CG, JJ, JA, BM 63 86.82 - N43.41'17'W L64 33.33 N66'29'18'V L6g 51.76 - N66'29'18'V NUMBER 003-741 NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program Project Marne: Little Pine Creek N Owner: Clifford Phillips � I 1 � I � I 1 I BEARINGS AND DISTANCES ALONG THE TIE LINES LINE LENGTH BEARING T1 2 P \ BEARINGS AND DISTANCE'S ALONG THE E'<OUNDARY OF THE NEW CONSERVATION EASEMENT LINE LENGTH BEARING L5 176.81 S18'19'46'E L6 221.90 S33'28'21'E L7 131:94 $16'20'32'E Le 9,57 N85'10'34'V L9 70.51 N84'29'05'W 1-10 54.06 N87.46'54'V L11 94.88 S77.23'01'V L12 37,08 S69'08'57'V L13 86.84 S55'01'34'V L14 16.24 N25'32'35'V LIS 74.97 N86'43'21'V L16 44,48 N79'43'45'V L17 66.21 N54'21'15'V L18 99.15 N79'55'18'V L19 37:98 S70'41'35'V L20 43.48 N69'52'32'V L21 79,88 N78'26'54'V L22 73:38 S66'04'25'V L23 40.22 S77'30'56'V L24 127:52 S27.14'06'V L25 70,38 N88'18'55'V L26 41.84 $01'51'21'E L27 70.49 S13'26'34'V L28 122:17 S55'34'28'V L29 239.96 S80'52'53'V L30 86.20 N59'33'46'V L31 72,74 N06'21'09'V 1-32 89.57 N00'53'01 0.00 S16'20'32'E T2 82.62 N16'20'32'W n � CLIFFORD C. PHILLIP'S and rife, �. R01lERTA S. PHPHILLIPSPJ, DEED BOOK 227, PAGE 298 a ,r. .� PP/Mm". I `f fi7R REFERENCE SEE A ItECOR'DEO PLAT Ot~ TRE PROOET2'1Y OF ALPHAGEAN ANDtR5 ESTATE RECORDED IN MAP BOOK S, PAGE 90 IN THE OFFICE OF THE REGISTER OF DEEDS OF ALLEGHANY COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA. 6o'rt,st?'1"vaifiolt Eetseme'nt S"urvey for the State of North:- Gvtratina, Ecos'yste'm Enhancement Program G'taaWt C'ratsill: rowinsAfp A tteg►Ptesrlty" E'erttt* ; KD5 resu gest►: CG, JJ, JA, BM 'E 11gy. N. C. f1..I�y i}i 4.µ e VICINITY YAP NOT TO SCALE NORTH CAROLINA, B URKE COUNTY L _KENNE`Ri_ D. SUTTEES _ Cil`RTfPY THAT 1718'1'ER 1lT DIRECTION AND SUPERVISION THIS YAP WAS DRA AN FROM /N ACTUAL FIELD LAND SURV;iY MADE UNDER MY DIRECTION DEED AND SUPERVISION, DEED DESCRIPTION RECORDED IN j DEEP BOOK 300 P 1060 d OOK 162, PAGE 708 AAT THE ERROR OF CLOSURE CALCULATED BY LATITUDES A1►D DEPARTURES IS 1: 10.000 + TRA? TAB BOUNDARIES NOT SURVEYED ARE SHOWN AS BROKEN LIMBS PLOTTED FROM INI►ORA(AT/OA► FOUND /N a SAT - -- _ RAT THIS AP WAS PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE 1/lTII 711.1 STANDARDS OF P1tAC17C1 FOR LAND SURVEYING IN THE STATE 0? NORIA CAROLINA PER C.S. 47-30 AS AAfENDPLI, � Mi !y'1' dJkIC3'IUL S7'ClVA7b*, 1tEI;lSTRAtM11 /ri7'DIDIl7t, AND 30BAL TATS 81h- DAY OF ACA D. R A.B., zoos. �. i P.L.S. No L-267fl '��••F Ess i''••�r t SEAL # ; L-2678 . •.TJ•: UKP; f. II' A rt1rNE'T77 0. tt►mLrs. cgRTrFr r11'AT OIYDER Art' DIRECTION AND SUPERVISION THIS YAP IAS DRAWN FROM CIONTROL BSTABLISAEI BY GPS. THAT THIS CPS SURVEY WAS PERFORMED TO CLASS "C" FiCCC SPECIFICATIONS IND THAT I USED STATIC. CPS FIELD PROCEDURES AND OOORDINATBS FIRE OBTAINED BY LEAST SQUARES ADIUSXEA? 1'YIAT THIS SURVEY IAS PERFORMED ON JULY ZOOd USING lbPCON HYPER PLUS RBCIBYERS AND ALL COORDINATICS Alta BASED ON NAD '83/2003, NAi'D flBd AND CEOID 2003, TINS SURVEY IS (Ill' aTFIER CATE0010Y, SUCH As IFIE RECdMlJIIVATIDN aF EXISTING PARCELS, A COURT ORDERED SURVEY, OR OTHER EXCEPTION TO THE DEFlNTION OF St1Bt)fVIS101N . IREvrstoNs: FILED k � ALLEGHANY COUNTY LIZABETH REEVES ROUPE E REGISTER OF DEEDS Ii ;FILED Jan 23, 2009 AT 11:30:54 am BOOK 00010 .START PAGE 0100 END PAGE 0100 INSTRUMENT # 00152 280 100 0 OO 400 scuts: 1' a 200' tree I9r: FRANK POUNDS DA": OCTOBER 30, 2008 "VWM gy LEGEND -0-- le'OINT -4- IRON pipe SL+'C -$• tVSTIIr'G [ltOlf 1'tt1'R -U-- C014 ; KD5 resu gest►: CG, JJ, JA, BM CR)r"A! MOPtti)11[LM!' huf h Aurarry, P.,�. - '- p.r. N�. IkAILROAD or 40 South 1[sils Street 419 SOVM KING ST. `n'•. P01i'ER POI.)E suite 200 cl�tanr IMAIMN, NnC100fMA Il�ltrox, noun 26752 28655 828.1352.9382 828.433.0423 COMPUTER_.,•_13680.dcaFIELD BOOK 08-09 08-10 PAX 828.659.9600 FAX 828.433.9577 ---1---- TOU FFJZ t1110.652.lN2 FILE NAME__._13680_d�!_ MAP FILE No. 136HO ___ _ - 0325 0287 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA ALLEGHANY COUNTY SPO File Number 003-ZI Prepared by: Office of the Attorney General Property Control Section: Blane Rice Return to: NC Department of Administration State Property Office 1321 Mail Service Center a Raleigh, NC 27699-1321 /300 171ZAZ BK:00325 PG -0287 FILED ALLEGHANY COUNTY LIZABETH REEVES ROUPE REGISTER OF DEEDS FILED Jan 29, 2009 AT 03:56:35 pm BOOK 00325 START PAGE 0287 END PAGE 0295 INSTRUMENT # 00208 CONSERVATION EASEMENT Alleghany County 01-29-2009 NORTH CAROLINA Real Estate Excise Tax $13.00 THIS CONSERVATION EASEMENT DEED, pursuant to the provisions of N.C. General Statutes Chapter 121, Article 4 and made this " day of X9&&gjje, 2009, by Steven R. Walls, (" Grantor "), whose mailing address is 525 Glide Creek School Road, Ennice North Carolina 28623 ("Grantee"), whose mailing address is State of North Carolina, Department of Administration, State Property Office, 1321 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1321. The designations Grantor and Grantee as used herein shall include said parties, their heirs, successors, and assigns, and shall include singular, plural, masculine, feminine, or neuter as required by context. TA INFORMATi N RECORDED AIt.EC3NANY COLLECTOR WITNESSETH: � a9 oq WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of N.C. Gen. Stat. § 143-214.8 et sea., the State of North Carolina has established the Ecosystem Enhancement Program (formerly known as the Wetlands Restoration Program) within the Department of Environment and Natural Resources for the purposes of acquiring, maintaining, restoring, enhancing, creating and preserving wetland and riparian resources that contribute to the protection and improvement of water quality, flood prevention, fisheries, aquatic habitat, wildlife habitat, and recreational opportunities; and WHEREAS, The State of North Carolina is qualified to be the Grantee of a Conservation Easement pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 121-35; and WHEREAS, the Ecosystem Enhancement Program in the Department of Environment and Natural Resources has approved acceptance of this instrument; and WHEREAS, the Department of Environment and Natural Resources, the North Carolina Department of Transportation and the United States Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District entered into a Memorandum of Agreement, (MOA) duly executed by all parties in. Greensboro, NC on July 22, 2003. This MOA recognizes that the Ecosystem Enhancement Program is to provide for compensatory mitigation by effective protection of the land, water and natural resources of the State by restoring, enhancing and preserving ecosystem functions; and 0325 0288 BK -00325 PG -.0288 WHEREAS, the acceptance of this instrument for and on behalf of the State of North Carolina was granted to the Department of Administration by resolution as approved by the Governor and Council of State adopted at a meeting held in the City of Raleigh, North Carolina, on the 8th day of February 2000; and WHEREAS, Grantor owns in fee simple certain real property situated, lying, and being in Glade Creek Township, Alleghany County, North Carolina (the "Property"), and being more particularly described as that certain parcel of land containing approximately 5.842 acres being conveyed to the Grantor by deed as recorded in Deed Book 227 Page 297 of the Alleghany County Registry of Deeds, North Carolina; and WHEREAS, Grantor is willing to grant a Conservation Easement over the herein described areas of the Property, thereby restricting and limiting the use of the included areas of the Property to the terms and conditions and purposes hereinafter set forth, and Grantee is willing to accept such Conservation Easement. This Conservation Easement shall be for the protection and benefit of the waters of (Little Pine Creek II). NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants, terms, conditions, and restrictions hereinafter set forth, Grantor unconditionally and irrevocably hereby grants and conveys unto Grantee, its successors and assigns, forever and in perpetuity, a Conservation Easement of the nature and character and to the extent hereinafter set forth, over a described area of the Property, referred to hereafter as the "Conservation Easement Area ", for the benefit of the people of North Carolina, and being all of the tract of land as identified as Conservation Easement Area A, 0.62 acres, Conservation Easement Area B, 0.05 acres, and Conservation Easement Area D 0.14 acres", identified as shown on a plat of survey entitled "Conservation Easement Survey for the State of North Carolina, Ecosystem Enhancement Program dated A D &9- O % ,certified by Kenneth D. Suttles License #L2678 and recorded in Plat Book _/,0, Registry: Conservation Easement Area being more particularly described as foll s: [ LEGAL DESCRIPTION ATTACHED ] The purposes of this Conservation Easement are to maintain, restore, enhance, create and preserve wetland and/or riparian resources in the Easement Area that contribute to the protection and improvement of water quality, flood prevention, fisheries, aquatic habitat, wildlife habitat, and recreational opportunities; to maintain permanently the Easement Area in its natural condition, consistent with these purposes; and to prevent any use of the Easement Area that will significantly impair or interfere with these purposes. To achieve these purposes, the following conditions and restrictions are set forth: I. DURATION OF EASEMENT Pursuant to law, including the above referenced statutes, this Conservation Easement shall be perpetual and it shall run with, and be a continuing restriction upon the use of, the Property, and it shall be enforceable by the Grantee against the Grantor and against Grantor's heirs, successors and assigns, personal representatives, agents, lessees, and licensees. 0325 BK: 00325 PG: 0289 0289 II. GRANTOR RESERVED USES AND RESTRICTED ACTIVITES The Easement Area shall be restricted from any development or usage that would impair or interfere with the purposes of this Conservation Easement. Unless expressly reserved as a compatible use herein, any activity in, or use of, the Easement Area by the Grantor is prohibited as inconsistent with the purposes of this Conservation Easement. Any rights not expressly reserved hereunder by the Grantor have been acquired by the Grantee. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the following specific uses are prohibited, restricted, or reserved as indicated: A. Recreational Uses. Grantor expressly reserves the right to undeveloped recreational uses, including hiking, bird watching, hunting and fishing, and access to the Easement Area for the purposes thereof. Usage of motorized vehicles in the Easement Area is prohibited, except as they are used exclusively for management, maintenance, or stewardship purposes, and on existing trails, paths or roads. B. Educational Uses. The Grantor reserves the right to engage in and permit others to engage in educational uses in the Easement Area not inconsistent with this Conservation Easement, and the right of access to the Easement Area for such purposes including organized educational activities such as site visits and observations. Educational uses of the property shall not alter vegetation, hydrology or topography of the site. C. Vegetative Cutting. Except as related to the removal of non-native plants, diseased or damaged trees, and vegetation that obstructs, destabilizes or renders unsafe the Easement Area to persons or natural habitat, all cutting, removal, mowing, harming, or destruction of any trees and vegetation in the Easement Area is prohibited. D. Industrial, Residential and Commercial Uses. All are prohibited in the Easement Area. E. Agricultural Use. All agricultural uses within the Easement Area including any use for cropland, waste lagoons, or pastureland are prohibited. F. New Construction. There shall be no building, facility, mobile home, antenna, utility pole, tower, or other structure constructed or placed in the Easement Area. G. Roads and Trails. There shall be no construction of roads, trails, walkways, or paving in the Easement Area. Existing roads or trails located in the Easement Area may be maintained by Grantor in order to minimize runoff, sedimentation and for access to the interior of the Property for management, maintenance, stewardship purposes, or undeveloped recreational and educational uses of the Easement Area. Existing roads, trails or paths may be maintained with loose gravel or permanent vegetation to stabilize or cover the surfaces. H. Signs. No signs shall be permitted in the Easement Area except interpretive signs describing restoration activities and the conservation values of the Easement Area, signs identifying the owner of the Property and the holder of the Conservation Easement, signs giving 3 0325 BK:00325 PG:0290 0290 directions, or signs prescribing rules and regulations for the use of the Easement Area may be allowed. I. Dumping or Storing. Dumping or storage of soil, trash, ashes, garbage, waste, abandoned vehicles, appliances or machinery, or other material in the Easement Area is prohibited. J. Grading, Mineral Use, Excavation, Dredging. There shall be no grading, filling, excavation, dredging, mining, or drilling; no removal of topsoil, sand, gravel, rock, peat, minerals, or other materials. K. Water Quality and Drainage Patterns. There shall be no diking, draining, dredging, channeling, filling, leveling, pumping, impounding or diverting, causing, allowing or permitting the diversion of surface or underground water. No altering or tampering with water control structures or devices, or disruption or alteration of the restored, enhanced, or created drainage patterns. All removal of wetlands, polluting or discharging into waters, springs, seeps, or wetlands, or use of pesticide or biocides is prohibited. In the event of an emergency interruption or shortage of all other water sources, water from within the Easement Area may temporarily be used for good cause shown as needed for the survival of livestock and agricultural production. L. Subdivision and Conveyance. Grantor voluntarily agrees that no subdivision, partitioning, or dividing of the underlying fee that is subject to this Easement is allowed. Unless agreed to by the Grantee in writing, any future conveyance of the underlying fee for the Easement Area and the rights as conveyed herein shall be as a single block of property. Any future transfer of the fee simple shall be subject to this Conservation Easement. Any transfer of the fee is subject to the Grantee's right of unlimited and repeated ingress and egress over and across the Property to the Easement Area for the purposes set forth herein. M. Development Rights. All development rights are removed from the Easement Area and shall not be transferred. N. Disturbance of Natural Features. Any change, disturbance, alteration or impairment of the natural features of the Easement Area or any intentional introduction of non- native plants, trees and/or animal species by Grantor is prohibited. The Grantor may request permission to vary from the above restrictions for good cause shown, provided that any such request is consistent with the purposes of this Conservation Easement. The Grantor shall not vary from the above restrictions without first obtaining written approval from the N.C. Ecosystem Enhancement Program, whose mailing address is 1652 Mail Services Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1652. III. GRANTEE RESERVED USES A. Ingress, Egress, and Inspection. The Grantee, its employees and agents, successors and assigns, receive the perpetual right of unlimited and repeated ingress and egress to the Easement Area over the Property at reasonable times to undertake any activities to restore, manage, maintain, enhance, and monitor the wetland and riparian resources of the Easement 4 0325 BK -00325 PG -0291 0291 Area, in accordance with restoration activities or a long-term management plan. Unless otherwise specifically set forth in this Conservation Easement, the rights granted herein do not include or establish for the public any access rights. B. Restoration Activities. These activities include planting of trees, shrubs and herbaceous vegetation, installation of monitoring wells, utilization of heavy equipment to grade, fill, and prepare the soil, modification of the hydrology of the site, and installation of natural and manmade materials as needed to direct in -stream, above ground, and subterraneous water flow. IV. ENFORCEMENT AND REMEDIES A. Enforcement. To accomplish the purposes of this Conservation Easement, Grantee is allowed to prevent any activity within the Easement Area that is inconsistent with the purposes of this Easement and to require the restoration of such areas or features of the Easement Area that may have been damaged by such activity or use. Upon any breach of the terms of this Conservation Easement by Grantor, their successors or assigns, that comes to the attention of the Grantee, the Grantee shall, except as provided below, notify the Grantor, their successors or assigns in writing of such breach. The Grantor shall have ninety (90) days after receipt of such notice to correct the conditions constituting such breach. If the breach remains uncured after ninety (90) days, the Grantee may enforce this Conservation Easement by appropriate legal proceedings including damages, injunctive and other relief. The Grantee shall also have the power and authority, consistent with its statutory authority: (a) to prevent any impairment of the Easement Area by acts which may be unlawful or in violation of this Conservation Easement; (b) to otherwise preserve or protect its interest in the Property; or (c) to seek damages from any appropriate person or entity. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Grantee reserves the immediate right, without notice, to obtain a temporary restraining order, injunctive or other appropriate relief if the breach of the term of this Conservation Easement is or would irreversibly or otherwise materially impair the benefits to be derived from this Conservation Easement. The Grantor and Grantee acknowledge that under such circumstances damage to the Grantee would be irreparable and remedies at law will be inadequate. The rights and remedies of the Grantee provided hereunder shall be in addition to, and not in lieu of, all other rights and remedies available to Grantee in connection with this Conservation Easement. B. Inspection. The Grantee, its employees and agents, successors and assigns, have the right, with reasonable notice, to enter the Easement Area over the Property at reasonable times for the purpose of inspection to determine whether the Grantor, their successors or assigns are complying with the terms, conditions and restrictions of this Conservation Easement. C. Acts Beyond Grantor's Control. Nothing contained in this Conservation Easement shall be construed to. entitle Grantee to bring any action against Grantor, their successors or assigns, for any injury or change in the Easement Area caused by third parties, resulting from causes beyond the Grantor's control, including, without limitation, fire, flood, storm, and earth movement, or from any prudent action taken in good faith by the Grantor under emergency conditions to prevent, abate, or mitigate significant injury to life, damage to property or harm to the Property resulting from such causes. D. Costs of Enforcement. Beyond regular and typical monitoring, any costs incurred by Grantee in enforcing the terms of this Conservation Easement against Grantor, their 0325 BK -00325 PG -0292 0292 successors or assigns, including, without limitation, any costs of restoration necessitated by Grantor's acts or omissions in violation of the terms of this Conservation Easement, shall be borne by Grantor. E. No Waiver. Enforcement of this Easement shall be at the discretion of the Grantee and any forbearance, delay or omission by Grantee to exercise its rights hereunder in the event of any breach of any term set forth herein shall not be construed to be a waiver by Grantee. V. MISCELLANEOUS A. This instrument sets forth the entire agreement of the parties with respect to the Conservation Easement and supersedes all prior discussions, negotiations, understandings or agreements relating to the Conservation Easement. If any provision is found to be invalid, the remainder of the provisions of the Conservation Easement, and the application of such provision to persons or circumstances other than those as to which it is found to be invalid, shall not be affected thereby. B. And Grantor covenants that Grantor is seized of said premises in fee and has the right to convey the permanent Conservation Easement herein granted; that the same are free from encumbrances except those exceptions to title as noted, and that Grantor will warrant and defend title to the same against the claims of all persons whomsoever. C. Any notices shall be sent by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested to the parties at their addresses shown above or to other address(es) as either party establishes in writing upon notification to the other. D. Grantor shall notify Grantee in writing of the name and address and any party to whom the Property or any part thereof is to be transferred at or prior to the time said transfer is made. Grantor further agrees to make any subsequent lease, deed, or other legal instrument by which any interest in the Property is conveyed subject to the Conservation Easement herein created. E. The Grantor and Grantee agree that the terms of this Conservation Easement shall survive any merger of the fee and easement interests in the Property or any portion thereof. F. This Conservation Easement may be amended, but only in writing signed by all parties hereto, and provided such amendment does not affect the qualification of this Conservation Easement or the status of the Grantee under any applicable laws, and is consistent with the purposes of the Conservation Easement. G. The parties recognize and agree that the benefits of this Conservation Easement are in gross and assignable provided, however, that the Grantee hereby covenants and agrees, that in the event it transfers or assigns this Conservation Easement, the organization receiving the interest will be a qualified holder under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 121-34 et seq. and § 170(h) of the Internal Revenue Code, and the Grantee further covenants and agrees that the terms of the transfer or assignment will be such that the transferee or assignee will be required to continue in perpetuity the conservation purposes described in this document. 0325 BK: 00325 PG: 0293 0293 VI. QUIET ENJOYMENT Grantor reserves all remaining rights accruing from ownership of the Property, including the right to engage in or permit or invite others to engage in only those uses of the Easement Area that are expressly reserved herein, not prohibited or restricted herein, and are not inconsistent with the purposes of this Conservation Easement. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the Grantor expressly reserves to the Grantor, and the Grantor's invitees and licensees, the right of access to the Easement Area, and the right of quiet enjoyment of the Easement Area. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said rights and easements perpetually unto the State of North Carolina for the aforesaid purposes. AND Grantor covenants that Grantor is seized of said premises in fee and has the right to convey the permanent Conservation' Easement herein granted; that the same are free from encumbrances and that Grantor will warrant and defend title to the same against the claims of all persons whomsoever. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the Grantor has hereunto set his hand and seal, the day and year first above written. eL > (SEAL) Steven R. Walls NORTH CAROLINA OF I, , a Notary Pblic in and for the County and State of resaid, do hereby certify that , Grantor, personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the execution of the foregoing instrument. INWI + SS WHEREOF, I have hereunto et my hand and Notary Seal this the9 day o 001. Notary Public JEAN R. 0900RNE NOTARY PUBLIC A=% My commission expires: C. a+�+o fi 0325 BK:00325 PG. -0294 0294 Legal descriptions of a 0.14 acre tract, a 0.05 acre tract, and a 0.62 acre tract located upon the lands of Steven R. Walls as recorded in Deed Book 227, Page 297, and being located in Glade Creek Township, Alleghany County, North Carolina as shown on a plat prepared by Suttles Surveying, PA captioned Conservation Easement Survey for the State of North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program, map file number 13680B, dated January 8, 2009 and recorded in the Alleghany County Register of Deeds as Plat Book 10, Page 99. First Tract: BEGINNING on a 5/8 inch rebar set (station 9904) at a barb wire fence having NAD83 coordinates of N = 1,008,523.1045 feet and E = 1,415,849.2876 feet and being located North 16 degrees 20 minutes 32 seconds West -228.61 feet from a 5/8 inch existing rebar which is the Southwest corner of the aforementioned Deed Book 227, Page 297; thence, from said point of BEGINNING North 16 degrees 20 minutes 32 seconds West —103.55 feet with the common line of a portion of the Clifford C. Phillips and wife Roberta S. Phillips property as recorded in Deed Book 162, Page 768 to be conveyed to the State of North Carolina as recorded in Deed Book 305, Page 1046 to a 5/8 inch rebar set (station 2036) in the Phillips Eastern boundary line; thence, leaving said Phillips line and running a new line through the aforementioned Walls property, South 79 degrees 54 minutes 02 seconds East - 95.47 feet to a 5/8 inch rebar set as a new corner (station 2035); thence, continuing a new line South 16 degrees 24 minutes 21 seconds West - 76.63 feet to a 5/8 inch rebar set (station 2034), a new corner; thence, continuing a new line, South 78 degrees 05 minutes 14 seconds West - 44.16 feet to the point of BEGINNING and containing 0.14 acres. Second Tract: BEGINNING on a new corner, a 5/8 inch rebar set near a small stream in the Eastern boundary line of a portion of the Clifford C. Phillips and wife Roberta S. Phillips property as recorded in Deed Book 162, Page 768 to be conveyed to the State of North Carolina as recorded in Deed Book 305, Page 1046 and being located North 33 degrees 28 minutes 21 seconds West — 146.62 feet from a 5/8 inch rebar set, the Northwest corner of Deed Boo k 227, Page 297 Tract One and the Southwest corner of Tract Two fo the same; thence, with the Eastern line crossing Little Pine Creek, North 33 degrees 28 minutes 21 seconds West - 75.28 feet to a 5/8 inch rebar set (station 2084); thence, continuing with the Phillips line, a new bearing of North 18 degrees 19 minutes 46 seconds West - 50.53 feet to a 5/8 inch rebar set (station 2039) in the Phillips line, said point being located South 18 degrees 19 minutes 46 seconds East —126.28 feet from a 5/8 inch rebar set as a control corner (station 2201); thence, leaving the Phillips line and running a new line, North 74 degrees 40 minutes 36 seconds East - 27.60 feet to a 5/8 inch rebar set (station 2038), a new corner; thence, another new line, South 14 degrees 37 minutes 00 seconds East - 122.00 feet to the point of BEGINNING and containing 0.05 acres. Third Tract: BEGINNING on a 5/8 inch rebar set (station 2040) in the Northern line of the Walls tract as recorded in Deed Book 227, Page 297 and being in the Southern boundary line of the Robert M. Murphy and Glenn D. Murphy tract as recorded in Deed Book 218, Page 441 and is located South 72 degrees 42 minutes 07 seconds West - 63.58 feet from a control point, an existing 1" inch iron pipe having NAD83 coordinates of N = 1,009,089.0409 and E = 1,415,911.9412; thence, a new line through the Walls property, South 35 degrees 37 minutes 37 seconds East - 74.99 feet to a 5/8 inch rebar set, a new corner (station 2013); thence, continuing a new line South 05 degrees 31 minutes 41 seconds West - 112.35 feet to a 5/8 inch rebar set, a new corner (station 2014); thence, continuing another new line, South 34 degrees 39 minutes 18 seconds West - 67.81 feet to a 5/8 inch rebar set, a new corner (station 2203); thence, continuing South 66 degrees 10 minutes 06 seconds West - 94.13 feet to a 5/8 inch rebar set, a new corner (station 2001); thence, continuing another new line and crossing Little Pine Creek, North M1 0325 BK:00325 PG:0295 0295 17 degrees 08 minutes 01 second West - 97.91 feet to a 5/8 inch rebar set, a new corner (station 2002); thence, continuing a new line, North 65 degrees 44 minutes 33 seconds East - 59.21 feet to a 5/8 inch rebar set, a new corner (station 2003); thence, continuing another new line North 00 degrees 56 minutes 07 seconds East - 84.59 feet to a 5/8 inch rebar set, a new corner (station 2004); thence, continuing with a new line North 62 degrees 08 minutes 57 seconds West - 58.98 feet to a 5/8 inch rebar set near a barb wire fence in the aforementioned common line with Murphy and Walls; thence, along the common line North 72 degrees 42 minutes 07 seconds East —123.00 feet to the point of BEGINNING and containing 0.62 acres. �Rtj NOitEkT M. MlJltOHY and CaLTIN 0. U(Nv tY DEED BOOK 218, PAGE 441 5N5 1 t "I ^; t� �8 s>' MEw CORNER C�.__R W��10�E ROO Exifsting 3/6" Reber � Z� O" 0 O W* COftt�T! T - (Conservation " Rebar Set t- (onservation Esm't.) p lzo NEW 1xtRi4ER 98 w ( I (tan 5/8' Reber Set ` 5/a' Rebar Set(Conservation Esm't.) (conservation Eern't) \� \ I O 3 (3 l O Z tr7 - c` F. 00Y WALKER and wife, EARLINE M. WALKER 00 SOX 0�` DEED BOOK 130, PAGE 349 t�tido \ ��,e� � tom► � � J1� � �Z �, s -.► 5/1f Reber Set STA1 t OP NOR?7If CAROLINA QiOe" CONSERVATION EASEMENT ARBA ~B' y (Beosystei n. 8%haneeww*t Progrown) DEED BOOK 307, PACE /022 r� 5g �1 dad N/8 Reba Sint d oo�,`� • (Conservation Esni t.) \f g'I ACRS h STA 71 OP N0)trJr C.I"LIVA " e ` `►y .� 11• c CONSERVATION BASEMENT AREA A • (E1l cosystem nhancement Progrltm) DEED BOOK 307, PAGH 11`022 4� (stat► . NEW CCIRNER , i}\ t , obi 5/8 Rebor Set o f, ~« (Conservation Esih't) A Eason NEw CDftNERt 5/8"Reber Set (21 X i I's (Conservation Eem't.) jr, �f 'this Islet of Laid herbAtn does not lite wittM \ (aesri o Protected Mountain Ridge os identified New CARPER by the mop entitled "Identificdtion of /e" Reba Set Protected Mountain Ridges in the (Consarvatean £ern"ll.) f \\\ County of Ali \ egetany' ; \` � �:: -.. ��i dais plat of LOW hW44" daesl Aot lie WRAirt o Flood Hazard Area at detenhined by the Federal Emergency Management Agency. 9 This plat of Iteral shawh rtereori does not NtOS- within an gree designated by the 9tote of North ti 0 F. OuY WALM(ER and wife, EARLINt M. WALKER Carcina as High Quality Water (HOW) or OLtstondir� �1,� E'er 5.03 ACA!ECS DEED BOOK 137, PAGE 684 (Resource Waters (ORW). + Sr -OVEN R. iALLS ` DEkD BOOx 287 PACE 499' ihit Plot of Ural shown her" deet not He PK Noll Set IPJ (center of the bridge and the creek) within the Alhsghany ('.aunty Miter Supply DEED 900K 305• PAGE 1046 J� For rowents sae a swvey by Sutdlls Suneyhy, P.A. LendbvMel �Igahature 1 /sore rev4e�watd the surae located in AN an Count tadsell an a survey o. "View3680SurveyWeg, P.A. Y � y y MAP FILE No. 13680 RAO 19AI5 N = 1,009,Ot)9.M09 Ft. $ P011( ~ taex SA and I am in agreement with the surrey as it in prepared by 9uttles Surveying, P.A., Kenneth Suttles, PLS, (license / 2675. E = 1,415,911.5412 Ft. EKist" 1' kon Pipe a 1A b6 \ f ��� 'tom 5$ 63 \ --------------�- - -- -- --...+ WMER ATE t2S C -Oak i ti Sc� t bid Abe R\+ \ "I ^; t� �8 s>' MEw CORNER C�.__R W��10�E ROO Exifsting 3/6" Reber � Z� O" 0 O W* COftt�T! T - (Conservation " Rebar Set t- (onservation Esm't.) p lzo NEW 1xtRi4ER 98 w ( I (tan 5/8' Reber Set ` 5/a' Rebar Set(Conservation Esm't.) (conservation Eern't) \� \ I O 3 (3 l O Z tr7 - c` F. 00Y WALKER and wife, EARLINE M. WALKER 00 SOX 0�` DEED BOOK 130, PAGE 349 t�tido \ ��,e� � tom► � � J1� � �Z �, s -.► 5/1f Reber Set STA1 t OP NOR?7If CAROLINA QiOe" CONSERVATION EASEMENT ARBA ~B' y (Beosystei n. 8%haneeww*t Progrown) DEED BOOK 307, PACE /022 r� 5g �1 dad N/8 Reba Sint d oo�,`� • (Conservation Esni t.) \f g'I ACRS h STA 71 OP N0)trJr C.I"LIVA " e ` `►y .� 11• c CONSERVATION BASEMENT AREA A • (E1l cosystem nhancement Progrltm) DEED BOOK 307, PAGH 11`022 4� (stat► . NEW CCIRNER , i}\ t , obi 5/8 Rebor Set o f, ~« (Conservation Esih't) A Eason NEw CDftNERt 5/8"Reber Set (21 X i I's (Conservation Eem't.) jr, �f 'this Islet of Laid herbAtn does not lite wittM \ (aesri o Protected Mountain Ridge os identified New CARPER by the mop entitled "Identificdtion of /e" Reba Set Protected Mountain Ridges in the (Consarvatean £ern"ll.) f \\\ County of Ali \ egetany' ; \` � �:: -.. ��i dais plat of LOW hW44" daesl Aot lie WRAirt o Flood Hazard Area at detenhined by the Federal Emergency Management Agency. 9 This plat of Iteral shawh rtereori does not NtOS- within an gree designated by the 9tote of North ti 0 F. OuY WALM(ER and wife, EARLINt M. WALKER Carcina as High Quality Water (HOW) or OLtstondir� �1,� E'er 5.03 ACA!ECS DEED BOOK 137, PAGE 684 (Resource Waters (ORW). + Sr -OVEN R. iALLS ` DEkD BOOx 287 PACE 499' ihit Plot of Ural shown her" deet not He S1rAlt Or MONTH CANCLINA CON9M011ION EAIE'MEMt AREA within the Alhsghany ('.aunty Miter Supply DEED 900K 305• PAGE 1046 Watershed Management Lit Protection Ordinance For rowents sae a swvey by Sutdlls Suneyhy, P.A. as Adopted Dec 28 1963 and Amended MAP FlIF No. 13680 December 1, 1997. Date Review Officer 5uWv1sldn Exception This pkat represents a survey or division of property that does not require approval from the Alleghany County Planning Soard/Nonnter for i>ss followina rea8ons:,gs, r+te3 nods Dote St tb f 14012h, Carollnd, CowntJ of Allbghorly l A.fislt► Review Officer of Alleghon County, cerlAy that the map or plat to which this certification is affixed meats alt statutory requirem is for recoFdin91 Dat( � Review Officer )5 N *"� ( 4'� 5JlI' tabor Set iMr'w COW" $/8' Rebar Set W (Conservation Esm"t) 7 54 Z (sox) NEw coo" 95.4 7 5/8" Rebor Sed Q N dD381 (Co+servotion Esm't.) o\ 0.141 ACNE $ SrAft *?,NORTH CANOLI*A CONSERVATION EASEMENT ARBA "D" (Scosystem Enhaneemevst Program) A S� + to DEED BOOK 307, PAGE f022 \ \ NEN CORNER' I \ _. �_ 4.1 5/8" Rebar SEA �„• ..-- oft!' Rdtar Sot S1g'0`?t4"w (Conservation Esm't.) (Conservation Esm't.) PK NO -"Set NAD 1983 N • 1.009,523.1045 Ft. 31r Rebar Set \ E s 1,415,849.2876 Ft. r PCR *f`EItENCE *l! A RECIMOED PLAY CA► 1W PR**9RTY' CIF AUettAtrAN ARDERS ESTATE RECOIRtim th (SAP BOOK B. PAGE 90 N THE OFFICE OF THE REGISTER OT' DEEDS OF ALLEGNANY COUNTY, NORTH CAROLMA. IA Paton of; ' COMORD C. WILLIPS and wile, ROWRTA S. PiIILIPS DEED BOOK 162, PAGE 768 A1101": LL D►SrANCte"S 31400 M-WOk Aftf N0W2"dN11AL. ALL AREAS DEMWD FWW C06RDNNA M C0A/PiJrA71CXVS AV NORIW CARCEAVA VrOIDE7IC "WY AIt7NUAIENTA170N is WITHIN 1,000 FEET OF SUBJECT PROPERTY IND AWPROWWl!7N15 LOCATED 01f1E'R IMAM SNOOV ktkf IN, NO UNIDERGROVIA110 UTK.17WS LOICAIED DIHE1? THAN SMOMW ME*15101N. AW 11TLE SLVARCH CONOUCTM AT 11YEr OF 5VPWY. iROAEERTY IS Si aE'CT 10 ANY MGN TS- OF- WAY, CAS' WNiS OF RECOMAr7, OR RESTMCi9t"E COt"ANTS. POS SURWY DOES N01 CERTIFY LEGAL 777kE TO tW LANV ITSELF NOR fliC SOUROARIES SHOWN HEREON. LOSERS CWF TMS PLAT SNOULD 08MIN A OL4?fffNT LE (GAL 771LE OFINION TO ONHERSMP OF INC BOUNDARIES MU V8FR AW (/) PAREN?ft"SLr.T, STC SPREAD SF I Ft7lt" 600V0A7rS. CnP1*Yllkr0 W09 It tkV SMV,OnMG, O.A. No port of this drowkig may to reproduced stored on o retrieval system or transmitted in any fwm or by any moons (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, scanning or otherwise) without prior written permissloo. 1 i Ir CMP \\i r ` \ \A tiIFFORD C. 04LLWS and note. ROWATA s PHILLIPS DEED BOOK 227, PAGE 295 exietho 5/Ir Reber o 14" Cblp 31Y PRIVATE R/M (DAB 162. PG 786) Iti t) TE LW ONLY -� - N53'01'20'E 15.40 - 13 5/el' 30' PRIVATE R/M (Yid 167. PC 1611) 36' CMPCW f j a DANitY RAY ANOffRs _ --- and wife. Z N DE it BOOKS 162, PACES 692 °,i Existing 1"I— ran Pie ` — TAX MAP INFORMATION PROJECT DESCRIPTION NC PIN 4010680637 -- SPO FILE fh1UM43ER 003-21 NC Ecosystem Enhancement Progrnfn Project Nome: Little Pine Creek II Owner: Steven R. Wallis Conservation F"ement Survey for the State of North ' Ca°roliim Ecosystem Enhancement Program COade Clieeb Tistastsh4! Cot.anE'y' VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE NORTH CAROLINA, BURKE COUNTY I. KENNETH Q. 3LITTLES _ ICr111VY r!YAT L1N LR Mr M1"RECTION AND SUPERVISION THIS YAP IFAS DRAWN FROM AN ACTUAL FIELD LAND SURVEY MADE UNDER MY DIRECTION AND SUPERVISION, DEED DESCRIPTION RECORDED iN µ])EEO BOOK 227, 297 THAT THE ERROR Of CLOSURE CALCULATED BY LATITUDES AND DEPARTURES IS f: 4_10.000 + THAT THE BOUNDARIES NOT SURVEYED ARS SOOWN AS BROEEN LINES PLOTTED FROM INFORMATION FOUND IN SEE PLAT THAT THIS MAP RTAS PREPARES IN ACCORDANCE WTH TH/' STANDARDS OF PRACTICE' FOR LAND SURVEYING IN THE STAT( OF NORTH CAROLINA PER C.S. 47-30 AS AMENDED. *7TWRSS MY O XHIliL *OAMU, RECISTR ?Y&N MVMWAX AND SEAL THIS 8th DAY OF JANUARY A.D., 2009. P.L.S. NO L-2678 € O'oFEssro�.•� �' 24 SEAL 9r * = L-2678 y D. II, it1IAVM EI. as. A:'XRTIPY 1'IIAr twDrft MY DIRECTION AND SUPERVISION THIS MAP WAS DRAWN FROM CONTROL ESTABLISHED BY CPS. THAT THIS CPS SURYEY WAS PERFORMED TO CLASS "C" PCCC SPECIFICATIONS AND THAT I USED STATIC. SPS F7BLD PROCEDURES AND COORDINATES ARE OBTAINED BY LEAST SQUARES ADJUSNEMT. THAT THIS SURVEY i/AS PERFORMED ON JULY 2008 USING' TOPCON HYPER PLUS RBCIEVERS AND ALL COORDINArtS ARE BASED ON NAD '83/2003, NAYD 1908 AND CE01D 2003. TtNfi SURVEY is OF ANO.1CAIEGORY. SU0`I A5 THE RECOMBINA1AgN OF EXISTING PARCELS, A COURT ORDERED SURVEY, OR OTHER EXCEPTION TO THE DEFINITION OF SUBDIVISION. REVISIONS: I FILED ALLEGHANY COUNTY LIZABETH REEVES ROUPE REGISTER OF DEEDS FILED Jan 23, 2009 AT 11:30:27 am BOOK 00010 START PAGE 0099 END PAGE 0099 INSTRUMENT # 00151 I 60 30 0 fro 120 RCAi.i: 1" 60' DRAWN off: FRANK POUNDS D.&TIs: OCTOBER 30, 2WO APPA&M VT, KOS mat's comm: CG JJ JA, BM LEGEND "-d"-- POINT -�- (RUN PIPE' SLAT -•($ EXCSTING IPON PTM - 0. -- CONCRETE MONUMENT V ? L mu. RAICROND SM or MMN CW S= .hu111Ps .#urs ryingl PA PDXE10 POLE 40 Saath Nab Street 419 SOUTH KING ST. $uite 2W ICARtON, NORCi'H CMR011�11 ilMANT(AI, RIM CAR61MA 28752 28655 1928.952.9382 528.433.0423 COMPUTER 13880.dco _ FiELD BOOK_ 06`o9_oe_to FAX 828.659.9600 FAX 826.433.9577 TOLD YRgE AOO.852.9302FILE NAME__ _,3tyeoA_dvr�_ MAP FILE No.� 368OA. __ FILED DA m 0318 BK: 00318 PG: 1405 ALLEGHANY COUNTY 1405 LIZABETH REEVES ROUPE REGISTER OF DEEDS FILED May 22, 2008 AT 10:25:33 am BOOK 00318 START PAGE 1405 END PAGE 1412 INSTRUMENT # 01418 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA CONSERVATION EASEMENT Alleghany COUNTY SPO File Number 003-ZJ Prepared by: Office of the Attorney General Property Control Section Return to: NC Department of Administration State Property Office: Blane Rice 1321 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1321 THIS CONSERVATION EASEMENT DEED, made this _ . day of 2008, by Dewayne L. Roberts and wife Jennie S. Roberts, (" rantor"), whose fiXiling address is 223 Wilson Rd. Ennice, NC 28623, to the State of North Carolina, ("Grantee"), whose mailing address is State of North Carolina, Department of Administration, State Property Office, 1321 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1321. The designations Grantor and Grantee as used herein shall include said parties, their heirs, successors, and assigns, and shall include singular, plural, masculine, feminine, or neuter as required by context. WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of N.C. Gen. Stat. § 143-214.8 et se the State of North Carolina has established the Ecosystem Enhancement Program (formerly known as the Wetlands Restoration Program) within the Department of Environment and Natural Resources for the purposes of acquiring, maintaining, restoring, enhancing, creating and preserving wetland and riparian resources that contribute to the protection and improvement of water quality, flood prevention, fisheries, aquatic habitat, wildlife habitat, and recreational opportunities; and WHEREAS, The State of North Carolina is qualified to be the Grantee of a Conservation Easement pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 121-35; and WHEREAS, the Ecosystem Enhancement Program in the Department of Environment and Natural Resources has approved acceptance of this instrument; and WHEREAS, the Department of Environment and Natural Resources, the North Carolina Department of Transportation and the United States Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District entered into a Memorandum of Agreement, (MOA) duly executed by all parties in Greensboro, NC on July 22, 2003. This MOA recognizes that the Ecosystem Enhancement Program is to provide for compensatory mitigation by effective protection of the land, water and natural resources of the State by restoring, enhancing and preserving ecosystem functions; and 0318 BK: 00318 PG -1406 1406 WHEREAS, the acceptance of this instrument for and on behalf of the State of North Carolina was granted to the Department of Administration by resolution as approved by the Governor and Council of State adopted at a meeting held in the City of Raleigh, North Carolina, on the 8"t' day of February 2000; and WHEREAS, Grantor owns in fee simple certain real property situated, lying, and being in Glade Creek Township, Affqghany County, North Carolina (the "Property"), and being more particularly described as that certain parcel of land containing approximately 24.43 acres and being conveyed to the Grantor by deed as recorded in Deed Book 213 at Page 473 of the Alleghany County Registry, North Carolina; and WHEREAS, Grantor is willing to grant a Conservation Easement over the herein described areas of the Property, thereby restricting and limiting the use of the included areas of the Property to the terms and conditions and purposes hereinafter set forth, and Grantee is willing to accept such Conservation Easement. This Conservation Easement shall be for the protection and benefit of the waters of Little Pine Creek II NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants, terms, conditions, and restrictions hereinafter set forth, Grantor unconditionally and irrevocably hereby grants and conveys unto Grantee, its successors and assigns, forever and in perpetuity, a Conservation Easement of the nature and character and to the extent hereinafter set forth, over a described area of the Property, referred to hereafter as the " Easement Area ", for the benefit of the people of North Carolina, and being all of the tract of land as identified as Conservation Easement Area, approximately 1.17 Acres as shown on a plat of survey entitled "Conservation Easement Survey" dated January 3, 2008, certified by Kenneth D.Suttles and recorded in Map Book 0010, Page 0030 Alleghany County Registry. Easement Area being more particularly described as follows: [SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT] Legal Description The purposes of this Conservation Easement are to maintain, restore, enhance, create and preserve wetland and/or riparian resources in the Easement Area that contribute to the protection and improvement of water quality, flood prevention, fisheries, aquatic habitat, wildlife habitat, and recreational opportunities; to maintain permanently the Easement Area in its natural condition, consistent with these purposes; and to prevent any use of the Easement Area that will significantly impair or interfere with these purposes. To achieve these purposes, the following conditions and restrictions are set forth: L DURATION OF EASEMENT This Conservation Easement shall be perpetual. It is an easement in gross, runs with the land, and is enforceable by Grantee against Grantor, their personal representatives, heirs, successors, and assigns, lessees, agents, and licensees. II. GRANTOR RESERVED USES AND RESTRICTED ACTIVITES 0318 BK: 00318 PG: 1407 1407 The Easement Area shall be restricted from any development or usage that would impair or interfere with the purposes of this Conservation Easement. Unless expressly reserved as a compatible use herein, any activity in, or use of, the Easement Area by the Grantor is prohibited as inconsistent with the purposes of this Conservation Easement. Any rights not expressly reserved hereunder by the Grantor have been acquired by the Grantee. The following specific uses are prohibited, restricted, or reserved as indicated: A. Recreational Uses. Grantor expressly reserves the right to undeveloped recreational uses, including hiking, bird watching, hunting and fishing, and access to the Easement Area for the purposes thereof. Usage of motorized vehicles in the Easement Area is prohibited, except as they are used exclusively for management, maintenance, or stewardship purposes, and on existing trails, paths or roads. B. Educational Uses. The Grantor reserves the right to engage in and permit others to engage in educational uses in the Easement Area not inconsistent with this Conservation Easement, and the right of access to the Easement Area for such purposes including organized educational activities such as site visits and observations. Educational uses of the property shall not alter vegetation, hydrology or topography of the site. C. Vegetative Cutting. Except as related to the removal of non-native plants, diseased or damaged trees, and vegetation that obstructs, destabilizes or renders unsafe the Easement Area to persons or natural habitat, all cutting, removal, mowing, harming, or destruction of any trees and vegetation in the Easement Area is prohibited. D. Industrial, Residential and Commercial Uses. All are prohibited in the Easement Area. E. Agricultural Use. All agricultural uses within the Easement Area including any use for cropland, waste lagoons, or pastureland are prohibited. F. New Construction. There shall be no building, facility, mobile home, antenna, utility pole, tower, or other structure constructed or placed in the Easement Area. G. Roads and Trails. There shall be no construction of roads, trails, walkways, or paving in the Easement Area. Existing roads or trails located in the Easement Area may be maintained by Grantor in order to minimize runoff, sedimentation and for access to the interior of the Property for management, maintenance, stewardship purposes, or undeveloped recreational and educational uses of the Easement Area. Existing roads, trails or paths may be maintained with loose gravel or permanent vegetation to stabilize or cover the surfaces. H. Signs. No signs shall be permitted in the Easement Area except interpretive signs describing restoration activities and the conservation values of the Easement Area, signs identifying the owner of the Property and the holder of the Conservation Easement, signs giving directions, or signs prescribing rules and regulations for the use of the Easement Area may be allowed. 3 0318 BK:00318 PG -1408 1408 I. Dumping or Storing. Dumping or storage of soil, trash, ashes, garbage, waste, abandoned vehicles, appliances or machinery, or other material in the Easement Area is prohibited. J. Grading, Mineral Use, Excavation, Dredging. There shall be no grading, filling, excavation, dredging, mining, or drilling; no removal of topsoil, sand, gravel, rock, peat, minerals, or other materials. K. Water Quality and Drainage Patterns. There shall be no diking, draining, dredging, channeling, filling, leveling, pumping, impounding or diverting, causing, allowing or permitting the diversion of surface or underground water. No altering or tampering with water control structures or devices, or disruption or alteration of the restored, enhanced, or created drainage patterns. All removal of wetlands, polluting or discharging into waters, springs, seeps, or wetlands, or use of pesticide or biocides is prohibited. In the event of an emergency interruption or shortage of all other water sources, drought, or current irrigation system fails, water from within the Easement Area may temporarily be used for good cause shown as needed for the survival of livestock, agricultural and nursery production. In addition, portable pumps with attached hoses are allowed in the Easement Area provided they do not unnecessarily uproot the vegetation therein. Any Grantor impacts to the Easement Area because of irrigation, repairs, or maintenance, shall be done in a manner that restores any disturbed soils and vegetation to the previous condition to the greatest extent practicable. Grantor will need to seek permission from the Ecosystem Enhancement Program, whose mailing address is 1652 Mail Services Center, Raleigh, NC 27699, if access to the stream waters becomes a routine or permanent process. L. Subdivision and Conveyance. Grantor voluntarily agrees that no subdivision, partitioning, or dividing of the underlying fee that is subject to this Easement is allowed. Unless agreed to by the Grantee in writing, any future conveyance of the underlying fee for the Easement Area and the rights as conveyed herein shall be as a single block of property. Any future transfer of the fee simple shall be subject to this Conservation Easement. Any transfer of the fee is subject to the Grantee's right of ingress, egress, and regress over and across the Property to the Easement Area for the purposes set forth herein. M. Development Rights. All development rights are removed from the Easement Area and shall not be transferred. N. Disturbance of Natural Features. Any change, disturbance, alteration or impairment of the natural features of the Easement Area or any intentional introduction of non- native plants, trees and/or animal species by Grantor is prohibited. The Grantor may request permission to vary from the above restrictions for good cause shown, provided that any such request is consistent with the purposes of this Conservation Easement. The Grantor shall not vary from the above restrictions without first obtaining written approval from the N.C. Ecosystem Enhancement Program, whose mailing address is 1652 Mail Services Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1652. 0318 BK: 00318 PG: 1409 1409 III. GRANTEE RESERVED USES A. Ingress, Egress, Regress, and Inspection. The Grantee, its employees and agents, successors and assigns, receive the perpetual right of general ingress, egress, and regress to the Easement Area over the Property at reasonable times to undertake any activities to restore, manage, maintain, enhance, and monitor the wetland and riparian resources of the Easement Area, in accordance with restoration activities or a long-term management plan. Unless otherwise specifically set forth in this Conservation Easement, the rights granted herein do not include or establish for the public any access rights. B. Restoration Activities. These activities include planting of trees, shrubs and herbaceous vegetation, installation of monitoring wells, utilization of heavy equipment to grade, fill, and prepare the soil, modification of the hydrology of the site, and installation of natural and manmade materials as needed to direct in -stream, above ground, and subterraneous water flow. IV. ENFORCEMENT AND REMEDIES A. Enforcement. To accomplish the purposes of this Conservation Easement, Grantee is allowed to prevent any activity within the Easement Area that is inconsistent with the purposes of this Easement and to require the restoration of such areas or features of the Easement Area that may have been damaged by such activity or use. Upon any breach of the terms of this Conservation Easement by Grantor, their successors or assigns, that comes to the attention of the Grantee, the Grantee shall, except as provided below, notify the Grantor, their successors, or assigns in writing of such breach. The Grantor shall have ninety (90) days after receipt of such notice to correct the conditions constituting such breach. If the breach remains uncured after ninety (90) days, the Grantee may enforce this Conservation Easement by appropriate legal proceedings including damages, injunctive and other relief. The Grantee shall also have the power and authority, consistent with its statutory authority: (a) to prevent any impairment of the Easement Area by acts which may be unlawful or in violation of this Conservation Easement; (b) to otherwise preserve or protect its interest in the Property; or (c) to seek damages from any appropriate person or entity. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Grantee reserves the immediate right, without notice, to obtain a temporary restraining order, injunctive or other appropriate relief if the breach of the term of this Conservation Easement is or would irreversibly or otherwise materially impair the benefits to be derived from this Conservation Easement. The Grantor and Grantee acknowledge that under such circumstances damage to the Grantee would be irreparable and remedies at law will be inadequate. The rights and remedies of the Grantee provided hereunder shall be in addition to, and not in lieu of, all other rights and remedies available to Grantee in connection with this Conservation Easement. B. Inspection. The Grantee, its employees and agents, successors and assigns, have the right, with reasonable notice, to enter the Easement Area over the Property at reasonable times for the purpose of inspection to determine whether the Grantor, their successors or assigns are complying with the terms, conditions and restrictions of this Conservation Easement. C. Acts Beyond Grantor's Control. Nothing contained in this Conservation Easement shall be construed to entitle Grantee to bring any action against Grantor, their successors or assigns, for any injury or change in the Easement Area caused by third parties, 0318 BK:00318 PG:1410 1410 resulting from causes beyond the Grantor's control, including, without limitation, fire, flood, storm, and earth movement, or from any prudent action taken in good faith by the Grantor under emergency conditions to prevent, abate, or mitigate significant injury to life, damage to property or harm to the Property resulting from such causes. D. Costs of Enforcement. Beyond regular and typical monitoring, any costs incurred by Grantee in enforcing the terms of this Conservation Easement against Grantor, their successors or assigns, including, without limitation, any costs of restoration necessitated by Grantor's acts or omissions in violation of the terms of this Conservation Easement, shall be borne by Grantor. No Waiver. Enforcement of this Easement shall be at the discretion of the Grantee and any forbearance, delay or omission by Grantee to exercise its rights hereunder in the event of any breach of any term set forth herein shall not be construed to be a waiver by Grantee. V. MISCELLANEOUS A. This instrument sets forth the entire agreement of the parties with respect to the Conservation Easement and supersedes all prior discussions, negotiations, understandings or agreements relating to the Conservation Easement. If any provision is found to be invalid, the remainder of the provisions of the Conservation Easement, and the application of such provision to persons or circumstances other than those as to which it is found to be invalid, shall not be affected thereby. B. Any notices shall be sent by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested to the parties at their addresses shown above or to other address (es) as either party establishes in writing upon notification to the other. C. Grantor shall notify Grantee in writing of the name and address and any party to whom the Property or any part thereof is to be transferred at or prior to the time said transfer is made. Grantor further agrees to make any subsequent lease, deed, or other legal instrument by which any interest in the Property is conveyed subject to the Conservation Easement herein created. D. The Grantor and Grantee agree that the terms of this Conservation Easement shall survive any merger of the fee and easement interests in the Property or any portion thereof. E. This Conservation Easement may be amended, but only in writing signed by all parties hereto, and provided such amendment does not affect the qualification of this Conservation Easement or the status of the Grantee under any applicable laws, and is consistent with the purposes of the Conservation Easement. F. The parties recognize and agree that the benefits of this Conservation Easement are in gross and assignable provided, however, that the Grantee hereby covenants and agrees, that in the event it transfers or assigns this Conservation Easement, the organization receiving the interest will be a qualified holder under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 121-34 et seq. and § 170(h) of the Internal Revenue Code, and the Grantee further covenants and agrees that the terms of the 0318 BK: 00318 PGA 411 1411 transfer or assignment will be such that the transferee or assignee will be required to continue in perpetuity the conservation purposes described in this document. VI. QUIET ENJOYMENT Grantor reserves all remaining rights accruing from ownership of the Property, including the right to engage in or permit or invite others to engage in only those uses of the Easement Area that are expressly reserved herein, not prohibited or restricted herein, and are not inconsistent with the purposes of this Conservation Easement. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the Grantor expressly reserves to the Grantor, and the Grantor's invitees and licensees, the right of access to the Easement Area, and the right of quiet enjoyment of the Easement Area. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said rights and easements perpetually unto the State of North Carolina for the aforesaid purposes. AND Grantor covenants that Grantor is seized of said premises in fee and has the right to convey the permanent Conservation Easement herein granted; that the same are free from encumbrances and that Grantor will warrant and defend title to the same against the claims of all persons whomsoever. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the Grantor has hereunto set his hand and seal, the day and year first above written. a NORTH CAROLINA OF afo said, do hereby certify that Grantor, personally appeared befo foregoing instrument. IN WITXS WHEREOF, I have day of4-r--, .200 a Notary PI ic in and or the County State o t% and iX, e t is day, and acknowle ged the execution of the set my hand and Notary Seal this the / JEPIP "'ORNE MY Co' Notary ublic My mmission expires: 41" /Z- /t) R. OSBORNE NOTARY PUBLIC Ai!M bbl North C_o*, Nty Commission 6.10010 0318 BK:00318 PG:1412 1412 Exhibit A Legal Description State Property Office, Roberts 13638 Legal description of the conservation easement for the State of North Carolina and being a portion of the DeWayne L. Roberts and wife Jennie S. Roberts property located in Glade Creek Township, Alleghany County, North Carolina and being a portion of Deed Book 213, Page 473. Beginning on a 5/8 inch rebar set, a new corner of said easement; said rebar is located North 13 degrees 05 minutes 59 seconds West, 96.27 feet from the west corner of the bridge on State Road 1457 commonly known as Glade Creek School Road; said iron pipe is also located a bearing of South 41 degrees 02 minutes 17 seconds east 359.31 feet from a 12 inch spike, a GPS point whose coordinates are NAD 1983, North 1,009,689.248; East 1,415,468.807; elevation 2594.65 feet; combined scale factor.99999420 also said iron pipe is being located in the northeastern line of the right of way of State Road 1457, known as Glades Creek School Road and runs seven new courses and distances through the Roberts property and said line being also located northwest of the stream; thence North 80 degrees 28 minutes 31 seconds East, 73.67 feet to a half inch rebar set with a cap; thence South 76 degrees 48 minutes 50 seconds East, 54.82 feet to a one half inch rebar set with cap; thence North 43 degrees 15 minutes 28 seconds East, 107.38 feet to a one half inch rebar set with cap; thence North 42 degrees 22 minutes 35 seconds East, 127.64 feet to a one half inch rebar set with cap; thence continuing North 45 degrees 51 minutes 46 seconds East, 79.16 feet to a one half inch rebar set with cap; thence North 54 degrees 08 minutes 42 seconds East, 45.28 feet to a one half inch rebar set with cap; thence North 54 degrees 08 minutes 42 seconds East, 44.64 feet to a 5/8 inch rebar set in the eastern boundary line of the said Roberts property and being located in the western boundary of the Dallas Bedsaul property as recorded in Deed Book 310, Page 223, the first tract; thence with the outside line of the DeWayne Roberts property and the west line of the Dallas Bedsaul property South 22 degrees 54 minutes 19 seconds East, 87.20 feet to a 5/8 inch rebar set at a fence corner; said rebar being the fifteenth corner of Deed Book 213, Page 473, being the eleventh corner of Deed Book 130, Page 349, and being the thirteenth corner of Deed Book 310, Page 223, of the fourth tract, said corner also being a northwest corner of the F. Guy Walker and wife Earline M. Walker property as recorded in Deed Book 130, Page 349, thence with the outside line of the DeWayne Roberts property and the northern line of the F. Guy Walker property South 44 degrees 04 minutes 00 seconds West, 474.78 feet to a 5/8 inch rebar set, a new corner of said Easement in the old outside line, said corner is also located a bearing of North 44 degrees 04 minutes 00 seconds East, 7.41 feet from a 5/8 inch rebar which is in the outside line of the Walker and Roberts property; said new corner in the Easement is also located thirty feet northeast of the centerline of Glades Creek School Road, State Road 1457; thence with the northeastern right of way line of State Road 1457 and known as Glades Creek School Road, North 40 degrees 04 minutes 50 seconds West, 184.92 feet crossing the centerline of the stream and a small branch to the point of beginning, containing 1.17 acres and being a portion of the DeWayne.L. Roberts and wife Jennie S. Roberts property as recorded in Deed Book 213, Page 473, and shown on a plat prepared by Suttles Surveying, P.A. and dated December 18, 2007, captioned Conservation Easement Survey for the State of North Carolina, Glade Creek Township, Alleghany County, North Carolina. FILED ALLEGHANY COUNTY LIZABETH REEVES ROUPE REGISTER OF DEEDS FILED Mar 06, 2008 AT 10:14:33 am BOOK 00010 START PAGE 0030 END PAGE 0030 INSTRUMENT # 00595 10-30 i Existing 5/8" Rebar Existing 1/2' Condultd �Existing 5/8" Rebar IIBRANCH 1 I � I I � I � I 1 I � 1 � I � I � I � EDITH C. DeBORD and husband, RONALD DeBORD DEED BOOK 139, PAGE 11 PLAT BOOK 7, PAGE 23, TRACT 3 DeWAYNE L ROBERTS andwife, NIE JENS. ROBERTS DEED BOOK 224, PAGE 32 I I 1 I � I 1 � 1 � I � I � I � I Existing AAe Existing 5/8' Rebar I/ Existing 1/2' Conduit dating Concrete Cylinder DeWAYNE L. ROBERTS and wife, ✓ENNIE S. ROBERTS DEED BOOK 213, PAGE 473 For reference ane a map by Lands End Surveying, dated September 1, 1998, entitled, 'Boundary Division For 'GLENN D. MURPHY HEIRS.' DRAWING No. 98-042 .� Existing 1' Iron Rod moo 1 1JN� BEARINGS AND DISTANCES ALONG THE NEW BOUNDARY OF THE CONSERVATION EASEMENT VI LINE LENGTH BEARING L1 73.67 N80.28'31'E L2 54,82 S76'48'50'E L3 107.38 N43.15'28'E L4 127.64 N42.22'35'E L5 79.16 N45.51'46'E L6 45.26 N54.08'42'E L7 44.64 N54.08'42'E L8 87.20 S22.54'19'E 12' Spice (GPS PT.) NAD 1983 \ 1� N – 1,009,889.248 Ft. E – 1,415,468.807 Ft. ELEV. – 2594.65 Ft. CSF – 0.99999420 36" CMP 50' R/W ;ASB Mail'• 01 NnI11 8rciti11 t.:r'Ir'I is f-I!�''hnny �k� .1.��(di�"�lit��w Cerlit,f t Olt tie M p -or p!al tD why lch this ewt tie�,tion is attixej meets all statutory requirements for recording. �Rj /— �1 J P ,kms c- a�„ SUBJECT 0-010 NAD 1983 N = 1,010,087.324 ft. E - 1,415,964.691 Ft. ELEV. - 2590.75 Ft.l CSF = 0.99999481 HEADWALL 12' Spike (GPS PT.) SR 1444 VICINITY NAP NOT TO SCALE Certificate of Exception I (we) hereby certify that I am (we are) the owners(s) of the property shown and described hereon, which was conveyed to me (us) by deed recorded in Book 213, Page 473, DeWAYNE L. ROBERTS and wife, ✓ENNIE S. ROBERTS DEED BOOK 213, PAGE 473 NEW CORNER 5/8' Rebar Set ELEPHONE PEDESTAL CORNER 1/2" Rebar Set �e NEW CORNER b_ 1/2" Rebar Set . F,p ti Ct}, O 4(• NOTES. LL DISTANCES SHOWN HEREON ARE HORIZONTAL. ALL AREAS DERIVED FROM COORDINATE COMPUTATIONS. NO NORTH CAROLINA GEODETIC SURVEY MONUMENTAT70N IS WI THIN 2,000 FEET OF SUBJECT PROPERTY. NO IMPROVEMENTS LOCATED OTHER THAN SHOWN HEREON. NO UNDERGROUND UTILITIES LOCATED OTHER THAN SHOWN HEREON. NO TITLE SEARCH CONDUCTED AT TIME OF SURVEY. PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO ANY RIGHTS-OF-WAY, EASEMENTS OF RECORD, OR RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS. THIS SURVEY DOES NOT CERTIFY LEGAL TI TLE TO THE LAND ITSELF NOR THE BOUNDARIES SHOWN HEREON. USERS OF THIS PLAT SHOULD OBTAIN A CURRENT LEGAL 77 TLE OPINION TO OWNERSHIP OF THE BOUNDARIES. COPYRIGHT Q 2008 SUTTLES SURVEYING, P.A. TAX MAP INFORMATION PIN: 4011504288 SUBDIVISION: K3-043 A TELEPHONE CABLE J�� 5/8' Rebar � IS UNDERGROUND. Y! PF 112- / R t ;l 4 TELEPHONE PEDESTAL 01& 1/2wCORNER Rebar Set BRANCH NEW CORNER �tri Nr W �� +\ 1/2" Rebar Set NEW CORNER / 4► 5/8' Rebar Set NEW UNEt NEWUN f 1/�YY COORerN Set w PP -1 - NOTE: g f S0/i�7 ELECTRIC SERVICE ISUNDER OUND POWER POLES. AT THE BRIDGE `% F �{ N CORNER Rebar Set 44'04'00"E 7.41 (TIE UNE) Pbor Set Conservation Easement Survey For: STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA Glade Creek Township Alleghany County, N.C. d 3 /W�v DATE / w v�.�t.✓S 3 ! J �Ua✓ DATE REVISIONS: REVISED DECEMBER 31, 2007, ADDED VMS CONSERVATION EASEMENT. REVISED JANUARY 3, 2008, ADDED CERTIFICATE OF EXCEPTION STATEMENT. NORTH CAROLINA, ALLEGHANY COUNTY THE FOREGOING CERTIFICATE OF NOTARY PUBLIC FOR ALLEGHANY COUNTY IS CERTIFIED TO BE CORRECT AND FILED FOR REGISTRATION ON THIS DAY OF 20 AT AM PN IN BOOS PG REGISTER OF DEEDS 100 50 0 100 200 ID cALIE: 1" = 100' anewrr a1r: FRANK POUNDS wzs:: DECEMBER 19, 2007 Appiliam liff, KDS PTKD cam' JOHN JOLLY, SCOTT HANNA, LARRY CORPENMG LEGEND -0— POINT -0— IRON PIPE SST EXISTING IRON PIPE -�1- CO1vCRETE MONUMENT 4�1- P.L Na IAMMAD SIM or COTM GIN V= POWMR POLE COMPUTER— ?3638•DCA _ FIELD BOOK_ 07-17_+_ FILE NAME__?�3-8-D"�___ MAP FILE No. 1 3638-Rl NORTH CAROLINA, BURKE COUNTY I, KENNETH D. SUTTLES CERTIFY THAT UNDER MY DIRECTION AND SUPERVISION THIS AAP WAS DRAWN FROM AN ACTUAL FIELD LAND SURVEY MADE UNDER MY DIRECTION AND SUPERVISION, DEED DESCRIPTION RECORDED IN DEED BOOK 213, PAGE 473 THAT THE ERROR OF CLOSURE CALCULATED BY LATITUDES AND DEPARTURES IS 1: 10.000 + TEAT THE BOUNDARIES NOT SURVEYED ARE SHOWN AS BROKEN LINES PLOTTED FROM INFORMATION FOUND IN SEE PLAT THAT THIS MAP WAS PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE STANDARDS OF PRACTICE FOR LAND SURVEYING IN TRX STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA PER G.S. 47-30 AS AMENDED. FITNESS MY ORIGINAL SIGNATURE, REGISTRATION NUMBER, AND SEAL THIS 3rd DAY OF JANUARY A.D., zoos. tettr– R L.S. , No L- 7 CAR.• STE11: rN- SEAL * ; L-2678 ¢� � % Sl1R`1`' •'• •• D. '••.,. I, KENNETH D. SUTTLES, CERTIFY THAT UNDER MY DIRECTION AND SUPERVISION THIS MAP WAS DRAWN FROM CONTROL ESTABLISHED BY GPS. THAT THIS CPS SURVEY WAS PERFORMED TO CLASS "C" FGCC SPECIFICATIONS AND THAT I USED STATIC. GPS FIELD PROCEDURES AND COORDINATES WERE OBTAINED BY LEAST SQUARES ADJUSMENT. THAT THIS SURVEY WAS PERFORMED ON DECEMBER POOP USING TOPCON HYPER PLUS RECIEVERS AND ALL COORDINATES ARE BASED ON NAD '83/2003, NAVD 1988 AND GEOID 2003. THIS SURVEY IS OF ANOTHER CATEGORY, SUCH AS THE RECOMBINATION OF EXISTING PARCELS, A COURT ORDERED SURVEY, OR OTHER EXCEPTION TO THE DEFINITION OF SUBDIVISION. !�u}flrs -!*urvrying, #-A- 40 South ifain Street 419 SOUTH KING ST. Suite 200 MORGANTON, NORTH CAROLINA MARION, NORTH CAROLINA 28655 28752 828.652.9382 828.433.0423 FAX 828.659.9600 FAX 828.433.9577 TOLL FREE 800.652.9382 dougAsuttlessurvey.com ken®suttlessurvey.com 0325 0278 L -Devi STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA ALLEGHANY COUNTY SPO File Number 003-ZL Prepared by: Office of the Attorney General Property Control Section: Blane Rice Return to: NC Department of Administration State Property Office 1321 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1321 /62. 100 BK:00325 PG -.0278 FILED ALLEGHANY COUNTY LIZABETH REEVES ROUPE REGISTER OF DEEDS FILED Jan 29, 2009 AT 03:54:18 pm BOOK 00325 START PAGE 0278 END PAGE 0286 INSTRUMENT # 00207 CONSERVATION EASEMENT Alleghany County 01-29-2009 NORTH CAROLINA Real Estate Excise Tax $12.00 THIS CONSERVATION EASEMENT , pursuant to the provisions of N.C. General Statutes Chapter 121, Article 4 and made this -,M day of xh,AAw, 2009, by Glenn D. Murphy and wife Judy S. Murphy , ( " Grantor "), whose mai ing address is 703 Glade Creek School Rd. Ennice, NC 28623, and Robert M. Murphy and Michelle D. Murphy whose mailing address is 2314 Dogwood Lane, Clarksville, TN 37043, ("Grantor"), ("Grantee"), whose mailing address is State of North Carolina, Department of Administration, State Property Office, 1321 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1321. The designations Grantor and Grantee as used herein shall include said parties, their heirs, successors, and assigns, and shall include singular, plural, masculine, feminine, or neuter as required by context. WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of N.C. Gen. Stat. § 143-214.8 et seQ., the State of North Carolina has established the Ecosystem Enhancement Program (formerly known as the Wetlands Restoration Program) within the Department of Environment and Natural Resources for the purposes of acquiring, maintaining, restoring, enhancing, creating and preserving wetland and riparian resources that contribute to the protection and improvement of water quality, flood prevention, fisheries, aquatic habitat, wildlife habitat, and recreational opportunities; and WHEREAS, The State of North Carolina is qualified to be the Grantee of a Conservation Easement pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 121-35; and WHEREAS, the Ecosystem Enhancement Program in the Department of Environment and Natural Resources has approved acceptance of this instrument; and WHEREAS, the Department of Environment and Natural Resources, the North Carolina Department of Transportation and the United States Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District entered into a Memorandum of Agreement, (MOA) duly executed by all parties in Greensboro, NC on July 22, 2003. This MOA recognizes that the Ecosystem Enhancement 1 5f 0325 0279 BK -00325 PG:0279 Greensboro, NC on July 22, 2003. This MOA recognizes that the Ecosystem Enhancement Program is to provide for compensatory mitigation by effective protection of the land, water and natural resources of the State by restoring, enhancing and preserving ecosystem functions; and WHEREAS, the acceptance of this instrument for and on behalf of the State of North Carolina was granted to the Department of Administration by resolution as approved by the Governor and Council of State adopted at a meeting held in the City of Raleigh, North Carolina, on the 8`" day of February 2000; and WHEREAS, Grantor owns in fee simple certain real property situated, lying, and being in Glade Township, Alleghany County, North Carolina (the "Property"), and being more particularly described as that certain parcel of land containing approximately 25.96 acres and being conveyed to the Grantor by deed as recorded in Deed Book 218 Page 441 of the Alleghany County Registry of Deeds in , North Carolina; and WHEREAS, Grantor is willing to grant a Conservation Easement over the herein described areas of the Property, thereby restricting and limiting the use of the included areas of the Property to the terms and conditions and purposes hereinafter set forth, and Grantee is willing to accept such Conservation Easement. This Conservation Easement shall be for the protection and benefit of the waters of (Little Pine Creek II). NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants, terms, conditions, and restrictions hereinafter set forth, Grantor unconditionally and irrevocably hereby grants and conveys unto Grantee, its successors and assigns, forever and in perpetuity, a Conservation Easement of the nature and character and to the extent hereinafter set forth, over a described area of the Property, referred to hereafter as the "Easement Area", for the benefit of the people of North Carolina, and being all of the tract of land as identified as Conservation Easement with 0.62 acres as shown on a plat of survey entitled "Conservation Easement Survey for the State of North Carolina "dated , certified bv Kenneth D. Suttles, License#L2678 and recorded in Plat Book 10 -Noe 4 A I A IL, Law Re ist : Conservation Easement Area being more particularly escribed as follows:' [LEGAL DESCRIPTION ATTACHED] The purposes of this Conservation Easement are to maintain, restore, enhance, create and preserve wetland and/or riparian resources in the Easement Area that contribute to the protection and improvement of water quality, flood prevention, fisheries, aquatic habitat, wildlife habitat, and recreational opportunities; to maintain permanently the Easement Area in its natural condition, consistent with these purposes; and to prevent any use of the Easement Area that will significantly impair or interfere with these purposes. To achieve these purposes, the following conditions and restrictions are set forth: I. DURATION OF EASEMENT Pursuant to law, including the above referenced statutes, this Conservation Easement shall be perpetual and it shall run with, and be a continuing restriction upon the use of, the Property, and it shall be enforceable by the Grantee against the Grantor and against Grantor's heirs, successors and assigns, personal representatives, agents, lessees, and licensees. 2 0325 0280 BK:00325 PG:0280 II. GRANTOR RESERVED USES AND RESTRICTED ACTIVITES The Easement Area shall be restricted from any development or usage that would impair or interfere with the purposes of this Conservation Easement. Unless expressly reserved as a compatible use herein, any activity in, or use of, the Easement Area by the Grantor is prohibited as inconsistent with the purposes of this Conservation Easement. Any rights not expressly reserved hereunder by the Grantor have been acquired by the Grantee. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the following specific uses are prohibited, restricted, or reserved as indicated: A. Recreational Uses. Grantor expressly reserves the right to undeveloped recreational uses, including hiking, bird watching, hunting and fishing, and access to the Easement Area for the purposes thereof. Usage of motorized vehicles in the Easement Area is prohibited, except as they are used exclusively for management, maintenance, or stewardship purposes, and on existing trails, paths or roads. B. Educational Uses. The Grantor reserves the right to engage in and permit others to engage in educational uses in the Easement Area not inconsistent with this Conservation Easement, and the right of access to the Easement Area for such purposes including organized educational activities such as site visits and observations. Educational uses of the property shall not alter vegetation, hydrology or topography of the site. C. Vegetative Cutting. Except as related to the removal of non-native plants, diseased or damaged trees, and vegetation that obstructs, destabilizes or renders unsafe the Easement Area to persons or natural habitat, all cutting, removal, mowing, harming, or destruction of any trees and vegetation in the Easement Area is prohibited. D. Industrial, Residential and Commercial Uses. All are prohibited in the Easement Area. E. Agricultural Use. All agricultural uses within the Easement Area including any use for cropland, waste lagoons, or pastureland are prohibited. F. New Construction. There shall be no building, facility, mobile home, antenna, utility pole, tower, or other structure constructed or placed in the Easement Area. G. Roads and Trails. There shall be no construction of roads, trails, walkways, or paving in the Easement Area. Existing roads or trails located in the Easement Area may be maintained by Grantor in order to minimize runoff, sedimentation and for access to the interior of the Property for management, maintenance, stewardship purposes, or undeveloped recreational and educational uses of the Easement Area. Existing roads, trails or paths may be maintained with loose gravel or permanent vegetation to stabilize or cover the surfaces. H. Signs. No signs shall be permitted in the Easement Area except interpretive signs describing restoration activities and the conservation values of the Easement Area, signs identifying the owner of the Property and the holder of the Conservation Easement, signs giving 3 0325 0281 BK:00325 PG:0281 directions, or signs prescribing rules and regulations for the use of the Easement Area may be allowed. I. Dumping or Storing. Dumping or storage of soil, trash, ashes, garbage, waste, abandoned vehicles, appliances or machinery, or other material in the Easement Area is prohibited. J. Grading, Mineral Use, Excavation, Dredging. There shall be no grading, filling, excavation, dredging, mining, or drilling; no removal of topsoil, sand, gravel, rock, peat, minerals, or other materials. K. Water Quality and Drainage Patterns. There shall be no diking, draining, dredging, channeling, filling, leveling, pumping, impounding or diverting, causing, allowing or permitting the diversion of surface or underground water. No altering or tampering with water control structures or devices, or disruption or alteration of the restored, enhanced, or created drainage patterns. All removal of wetlands, polluting or discharging into waters, springs, seeps, or wetlands, or use of pesticide or biocides is prohibited. In the event of an emergency interruption or shortage of all other water sources, water from within the Easement Area may temporarily be used for good cause shown as needed for the survival of livestock and agricultural production. L. Subdivision and Conveyance. Grantor voluntarily agrees that no subdivision, partitioning, or dividing of the underlying fee that is subject to this Easement is allowed. Unless agreed to by the Grantee in writing, any future conveyance of the underlying fee for the Easement Area and the rights as conveyed herein shall be as a single block of property. Any future transfer of the fee simple shall be subject to this Conservation Easement. Any transfer of the fee is subject to the Grantee's right of unlimited and repeated ingress and egress over and across the Property to the Easement Area for the purposes set forth herein. M. Development Rights. All development rights are removed from the Easement Area and shall not be transferred. N. Disturbance of Natural Features. Any change, disturbance, alteration or impairment of the natural features of the Easement Area or any intentional introduction of non- native plants, trees and/or animal species by Grantor is prohibited. The Grantor may request permission to vary from the above restrictions for good cause shown, provided that any such request is consistent with the purposes of this Conservation Easement. The Grantor shall not vary from the above restrictions without first obtaining written approval from the N.C. Ecosystem Enhancement Program, whose mailing address is 1652 Mail Services Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1652. III. GRANTEE RESERVED USES A. Ingress, Egress, and Inspection. The Grantee, its employees and agents, successors and assigns, receive the perpetual right of unlimited and repeated ingress and egress to the Easement Area over the Property at reasonable times to undertake any activities to restore, manage, maintain, enhance, and monitor the wetland and riparian resources of the Easement 4 0325 0282 BK:00325 PG -.0282 Area, in accordance with restoration activities or a long-term management plan. Unless otherwise specifically set forth in this Conservation Easement, the rights granted herein do not include or establish for the public any access rights. B. Restoration Activities. These activities include planting of trees, shrubs and herbaceous vegetation, installation of monitoring wells, utilization of heavy equipment to grade, fill, and prepare the soil, modification of the hydrology of the site, and installation of natural and manmade materials as needed to direct in -stream, above ground, and subterraneous water flow. IV. ENFORCEMENT AND REMEDIES A. Enforcement. To accomplish the purposes of this Conservation Easement, Grantee is allowed to prevent any activity within the Easement Area that is inconsistent with the purposes of this Easement and to require the restoration of such areas or features of the Easement Area that may have been damaged by such activity or use. Upon any breach of the terms of this Conservation Easement by Grantor, their successors or assigns, that comes to the attention of the Grantee, the Grantee shall, except as provided below, notify the Grantor, their successors or assigns in writing of such breach. The Grantor shall have ninety (90) days after receipt of such notice to correct the conditions constituting such breach. If the breach remains uncured after ninety (90) days, the Grantee may enforce this Conservation Easement by appropriate legal proceedings including damages, injunctive and other relief. The Grantee shall also have the power and authority, consistent with its statutory authority: (a) to prevent any impairment of the Easement Area by acts which may be unlawful or in violation of this Conservation Easement; (b) to otherwise preserve or protect its interest in the Property; or (c) to seek damages from any appropriate person or entity. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Grantee reserves the immediate right, without notice, to obtain a temporary restraining order, injunctive or other appropriate relief if the breach of the term of this Conservation Easement is or would irreversibly or otherwise materially impair the benefits to be derived from this Conservation Easement. The Grantor and Grantee acknowledge that under such circumstances damage to the Grantee would be irreparable and remedies at law will be inadequate. The rights and remedies of the Grantee provided hereunder shall be in addition to, and not in lieu of, all other rights and remedies available to Grantee in connection with this Conservation Easement. B. Inspection. The Grantee, its employees and agents, successors and assigns, have the right, with reasonable notice, to enter the Easement Area over the Property at reasonable times for the purpose of inspection to determine whether the Grantor, their successors or assigns are complying with the terms, conditions and restrictions of this Conservation Easement. C. Acts Beyond Grantor's Control. Nothing contained in this Conservation Easement shall be construed to entitle Grantee to bring any action against Grantor, their successors or assigns, for any injury or change in the Easement Area caused by third parties, resulting from causes beyond the Grantor's control, including, without limitation, fire, flood, storm, and earth movement, or from any prudent action taken in good faith by the Grantor under emergency conditions to prevent, abate, or mitigate significant injury to life, damage to property or harm to the Property resulting from such causes. D. Costs of Enforcement. Beyond regular and typical monitoring, any costs incurred by Grantee in enforcing the terms of this Conservation Easement against Grantor, their 5 0325 0283 BK:00325 PG. -0283 successors or assigns, including, without limitation, any costs of restoration necessitated by Grantor's acts or omissions in violation of the terms of this Conservation Easement, shall be borne by Grantor. E. No Waiver. Enforcement of this Easement shall be at the discretion of the Grantee and any forbearance, delay or omission by Grantee to exercise its rights hereunder in the event of any breach of any term set forth herein shall not be construed to be a waiver by Grantee. V. MISCELLANEOUS A. This instrument sets forth the entire agreement of the parties with respect to the Conservation Easement and supersedes all prior discussions, negotiations, understandings or agreements relating to the Conservation Easement. If any provision is found to be invalid, the remainder of the provisions of the Conservation Easement, and the application of such provision to persons or circumstances other than those as to which it is found to be invalid, shall not be affected thereby. B. Any notices shall be sent by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested to the parties at their addresses shown above or to other address(es) as either party establishes in writing upon notification to the other. C. Grantor shall notify Grantee in writing of the name and address and any party to whom the Property or any part thereof is to be transferred at or prior to the time said transfer is made. Grantor further agrees to make any subsequent lease, deed, or other legal instrument by which any interest in the Property is conveyed subject to the Conservation Easement herein created. D. The Grantor and Grantee agree that the terms of this Conservation Easement shall survive any merger of the fee and easement interests in the Property or any portion thereof. E. This Conservation Easement may be amended, but only in writing signed by all parties hereto, and provided such amendment does not affect the qualification of this Conservation Easement or the status of the Grantee under any applicable laws, and is consistent with the purposes of the Conservation Easement. F. The parties recognize and agree that the benefits of this Conservation Easement are in gross and assignable provided, however, that the Grantee hereby covenants and agrees, that in the event it transfers or assigns this Conservation Easement, the organization receiving the interest will be a qualified holder under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 121-34 et seq. and § 170(h) of the Internal Revenue Code, and the Grantee further covenants and agrees that the terms of the transfer or assignment will be such that the transferee or assignee will be required to continue in perpetuity the conservation purposes described in this document. VI. QUIET ENJOYMENT Grantor reserves all remaining rights accruing from ownership of the Property, including the right to engage in or permit or invite others to engage in only those uses of the Easement Area that are expressly reserved herein, not prohibited or restricted herein, and are not 0325 0284 BK -00325 PG -.0284 inconsistent with the purposes of this Conservation Easement. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the Grantor expressly reserves to the Grantor, and the Grantor's invitees and licensees, the right of access to the Easement Area, and the right of quiet enjoyment of the Easement Area. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said rights and easements perpetually unto the State of North Carolina for the aforesaid purposes. AND Grantor covenants that Grantor is seized of said premises in fee and has the right to convey the permanent Conservation Easement herein granted; that the same are free from encumbrances and that Grantor will warrant and defend title to the same against the claims of all persons whomsoever. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the Grantor has hereunto set his hand and seal, the day and year first above written. Glenn D. Murphy acid w,irfe Judy Robert M. Murphy and wife Michelle D. Murphy NORTH CAROLINA aAd COUNTY OF L (SEAL) (SEAL) a Not Public and for the County and State tfoes2a'd, do hereby certify that .ax-vc and , Grantor, personally appeaiWd before me this day and acknowledged the ReciVion of the foregoing instrument. IN WIT ESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and Notary Seal this the daffy of dtwue-4:��_, 200 . Notary Public My commission expires: %2- /0 EJEANOTAIR�IY1yPLMW MW N. C� 61Norlhhefon 612 -Me 0325 0285 BK:00325 PG -0285 inconsistent with the purposes of this Conservation Easement. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the Grantor expressly reserves to the Grantor, and the Grantor's invitees and licensees, the right of access to the Easement Area, and the right of quiet enjoyment of the Easement Area. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said rights and easements perpetually unto the State of North Carolina for the aforesaid purposes. AND Grantor covenants that Grantor is seized of said premises in fee and has the right to convey the permanent Conservation Easement herein granted; that the same are free from encumbrances and that Grantor will warrant and defend title to the same against the claims of all persons whomsoever. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the Grantor has hereunto set his hand and seal, the day and year first above written. (SEAL) Glenn D. Murphy and wife hudy S. Murphy (SEAL) Robert M. Murph a wife Michelle D. Murphy '"TEVwlE SS EE COUNTY OF /�'f ► t/' I, FC-,eA --LI I may -h , a Notary Public in and for the County and State a resaid, do hereby certify that R o k a v 4 M. M u.r c h q and i k , Grantor, personally appe red before me this day acknowledged e execution of the foregoing instrument. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and Notary Seal this the Z6 day of �o�Nwwa 12008. My commission expires: Notary Public MATTy�� STATE OF TENNESSEE NOTARY �. �p PUBLIC = yTCOMER`l GOJ 0325 BK:00325 PG:0286 0286 Legal Description of the conservation easement survey for the State of North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program and being a portion of the Robert M. Murphy and Glen D. Murphy property as recorded in Deed Book 218, Page 441, and being part of that certain tract as described as follows: Said tract being located in Glade Creek Township, Alleghany County, North Carolina and being bounded on the North by the Robert M. Murphy and Glen D. Murphy tract and on the East by the same, on the South by a portion of the Steven R. Walls property as recorded in Deed Book 227, Page 297 to be conveyed to the State of North Carolina as recorded in Deed Book 307, Page 1022 (see a plat prepared by Suttles Surveying, PA; Map File No. 13680A; Plat Book 10, Page 99 of the Alleghany County Registry). BEGINNING on a 5/8 inch rebar set, a new corner of the conservation easement, said corner being located South 85 degrees 43 minutes 45 seconds West - 75.23 feet from a PK nail set in the centerline of the bridge over Little Pine Creek and in the centerline of Glade Creek School Road (North Carolina State Road 1457); the conservation easement runs a new line, from said new corner, South 41 degrees 31 minutes 43 seconds East — 87.51 feet crossing said Little Pine Creek to a new corner, a 5/8 inch rebar set (station 8000); thence, continuing a new line South 24 degrees 24 minutes 10 seconds West - 36.60 feet to a new corner, a 5/8 inch rebar set (station 8001); thence, continuing another new line South 04 degrees 55 minutes 03 seconds East - 53.52 feet to a new corner, a 5/8 inch rebar set (station 8002); thence, continuing a new line South 54 degrees 36 minutes 09 seconds East - 158.83 feet to a new corner, a 5/8 inch rebar set (station 2040), said rebar being located in the Northern line of the aforementioned Walls property and also being located South 72 degrees 42 minutes 07 seconds West - 63.58 feet from an existing one inch iron pipe, said iron pipe being located South 72 degrees 42 minutes 07 seconds West - 24.66 feet from the aforementioned PK nail in the centerline of SR 1457, total distance from said centerline point to the new corner is 88.24 feet; thence, with the common boundary line of the Walls property, South 72 degrees 42 minutes 07 seconds West -123.00 feet to a new corner, a 5/8 inch rebar set (station 2041), said corner being located North 72 degrees 42 minutes 07 seconds East - 103.93 feet from a 5/8 inch rebar set which is the Northwest corner of the aforementioned Walls property; thence, leaving said Walls line, a new line through the Murphy property North 55 degrees 29 minutes 46 seconds West - 83.28 feet crossing Little Pine Creek to a new corner, a 5/8 inch rebar set (station 8003); thence, continuing a new line North 23 degrees 58 minutes 14 seconds West -102.21 feet to a new corner, a 5/8 inch rebar set (station 8004); thence, continuing a new line North 11 degrees 11 minutes 57 seconds East - 91.90 feet to a new corner, a 5/8 inch rebar set (station 8005); thence, continuing a new line North 33 degrees 14 minutes 37 seconds East - 59.80 feet to the point of BEGINNING containing 0.62 acres as shown on a plat by Suttles Surveying, PA; captioned Conservation Easement Survey for the State of North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program, Glade Creek Township, Alleghany County, North Carolina, map number 13680B and being dated January 8, 2009 and recorded in the Alleghany County Register of Deeds as Plat Book 10, Page 98. .• , mi +•,i..u.1f / NORYN baseh on a u rvej by Sutt1M Surveyltig, P.A. a e + ilMrdrl ' it H'i'"f" � � � ..r•.. / MAP FILE No. 13880 Lbndowner `'Slijnlot oto �-ya� < '` ""' ✓ I have r*Oewed the survey located in Alleghtlhy County and 1 am ih agreement with the surrey a$ it IS prepared by / Suttles Surveying, P.A., Kenneth D. Suttles, PLS, License / 2678. P0 o• \ / OhNNER DATE Q 5 / srArE 6F NMnH cAmx.INA CONSERVAT04 EASEMENT AREA ()INNER DATE (Ecosystem Enhancement Programs) PEED BOOK 318, PAGE 1405 / MAP BOOK 10, PAGE 30 % MAd i263 NEw Ca1tleEft � ` PK Nail set10 98 N t 1,009,'314."$ Pt. 5/8' Rebar sat Y (center of the bridge drwi the er#*) ! E : 1,415,673.8741 Ft. (Conservation Esm t) 5'4 / Trt c CONTROL CORNER 585'4345`M 75.23 / � — 13RIDor r MEW cCivRER1 5/8" Rebar Set (�a�/ / \ • tj \\ This Plat of LtMtd shown hereon does not lie (Conservation Cam't.) F. *JYLIKER and elk, EARUNE M. wALK19t within the Alleghany County (Nater Supply / view GYIRNPTe ` ` DEED BOOK 130, PAGE 349 q Watershed Management & Protection Ordinance §/8" Rebar set (Bow) \ '` ivi as Adopted December 28, 1983 and Amended (Conservation Esm't.) ` December 1, 1997. rn IV ` C Thos Plat of LdiAd hereon doer riot Ile within/ '' 3 \ ih *Protected Mountain Ridge as Identified r� ba' R/w \ by the map entitled 'Identification of f1Ew CORNER (1) Protected Mountain Midges in the / ) 5/8" ervation Eeber ot ( ) County of Afleghorly. �' ! This PW of Land hereon does net :Ile within / z 31 0.62 ACRE ♦ \\\`i a Flood Hazard Area as determined by the I ♦♦ FILED Federal Emergency Management Agency. N1='N CdRNER �., . ALLEGHANY COUNTY � 5/8" Rebar Set This plat of land thawln hereon flloes not No (eoo4) (Conservation fsm't.) NEW CdR1WR #?MMt M. MURPHY and GLENN o, MURPHY`s,p � LIZABETH REEVES ROUPE within an area designated by the State of North 5/8" Rebar Set DEED BOOK 218, PAGE 441 REGISTER OF DEEDS Corolino os High Quality Water (HOW) or Outstandin(Conservation Esrn't.) Outstanding \ ✓M y Resource Waters ORW). i 4 2 ���, FILED Jan 23, 2009 Date eview otficc'o0'1'�'W�'v�n. er>r \ AT 11:30:06 am 4pi�r'" ,♦ BOOK 00010 SUbdiwtsibn Exceptidn � d ; eo 4bJq r R•� ` ♦ T111e plot represents a survey cw division of 00 START PAGE 0098 /r4 �• F property that does not require approval fHmy '2c,•!S'd, f►'r the Alleghany County Planning Board/PlonAer r �ip'�r ��8 ♦♦ �\ END PAGE 0098 for the foil win yea s: A!i "2e T t `► \ INSTRUMENT # 00150 OAS ht PK NWI set Ow Ce 6 Nike Cdlf" y2Ai.4}',F 4 y0[1o` 4 \ - ------ - • . �. 5/8" Rebar Set `fl ZJ ✓, "W bat Existing 1" Mon \ (Conservation Esm't.) 4gOt 4 pipe Date eview Offi (3) 5 58 + \ St a ad Ill rCh Ca1'afktd, Count df Alle hath ` /ass. 5/8" Rebar Set N — 1,009,070.i�i7 Ft, \ Y q y \ --�' 1p (Conservation Eerri't.) C - 1,415,650.8362 Ft. \ I /l Review Officer of "���\ �9�6„ '`� _ �' FENc� CONTROL CORNER Allegha y County, certif that the map or plot v� \ ` to which this certifica n is affixed meets oil ItOSLTtt M. MURPHY and aLEW D, MURPHY B _•� ~'� S .4 BPRB iZE �` ' ` statutory/ requireiments for re�cordin GEED BOOK 218, PAGE 441 3 \ IEvEtI R. MALI $' t \ Date Review Office — — Eiiisting 31V R66ar BII.1�� E55}6 � tn� USED 227, PACE 297 \ sw aid 3J"A' Raw so ` + 8Op 221. P I 1 I STATE OF 14001H CAROLINA CONSERVATION EASEMENT AREA \ •F \ ` (Ecosystem EEBE7P1�� I , DD K30ACE\ 1 For reit ow see I e slur lily by "tNrs suryt0 q, h:A. No It''s.. Map FBe No. 136MA ' ALL OVSTANCES SHOWN HEREON ARE H"?ONTAL. STATL OF NORTH CAROLINA ALL AREAS DERIVED n?OAI COORDWA7T COMPUTA710NS. 00INSERVATif1N EASEMENT AREA tl .r J NO NORM CAROLINA GEA7Ef]IC SURVEY ArAONUINENTATICMV (Ecosystem Enhancement Program) IS WITHIN 2.000 FEET OF SUBJECT PROPERTY. DEED BOOK 305, PAGE 1046 ` r I NO #4PROVEMENTS LOCATED 07HER THAN S><1l')Ii1V HEREON. i NO UNDERGROUND UYXI tr•S LOCATED OYWX THAN SNOWN HLF74ErDl1l. Far millbrenee see o eumiey by 5utttas %rveyhq. P.A, Tr Mop File No. 13680 ` ` -~y ,� NO 17rLE SiEARCH CONDUCTED AT WE OF SURVEY. PRoprRTY /5 SUi4JECT TO ANY RIGHTS -CNK• -WAY, EASE'A ALTS 1 OF RECORD, OR RESTRiC17W COVENANTS. THYS SURVEY DOES NOT CERTAFY LEGAL RILE TO 7W LAND ITS'E'LF NOR THE BOUNDARIES SHOWN HEREON. � 1 IOPINION TO OWNERSM'P OF INE 800HOARIEESS.�T LEGAL ATLE 1 NU1119FR'S IN (1) PAREIVIWSES; SEE SPREAD-9415tT FAR COMONVANITS. COPYRACNf' a L'bf19 S'1~7'77"L& SVRnrY*G, P.A. No pert of this drewiry may be Fop adiced, stored an a retrieval sy*tMN or tnaromftted in any form a by any means (electronic, mechanical, 0oteeopylnq, seeming or otherwise) without prier written permissiay. \1 t TAX MAP INFORMATION PROJECT DESCRIPTION SPO FILE NUMBER 003-0 NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program Project Name: Little Pine Creek b Owner: Robert M. Murphy Glex1 D. Murphy COArSERVAP1011V NASPkENr SURVEY far the EcaaysteT'1L Enhancement Clede 6vok 7r6umteINIjD SirArf OF MORrA CAROLINA Program Atleghn"V Cdiaxty, R.L', -.L- NC PIN 4010590582 )12009 2:24:31 PM VICINITY MAP - NOT TO SCALE ))NORTH CAROLINA, BURKE COUNTY 1 KENNETH 0. Si.lTTLES _ CII'RTIFY 4"Pi'A7- U"rR A1'Y DIRECTION AND SUPERVISION PMIS YAP WAS DRAWN PROAL AN ACTUAL PTELD LAND SURVEY MADE UNDER MY DIRECTION AND SUPERVISION, DEED DESCRIPTION RECORDED IN DEED 06QK 215, PAGE 441 TWAT THE ERROR OF CLOSURE CALCULATED BY LATITUDES A" DEPARTURES IS h, ,10,666 + _ THAT THE BOUNDARIES NOT SURVEYED A" SHOWN AS BRONrN LINES PLOTTED FROM INFORMATION FOUND IN SEE PLAT TRAP THIS MIP AS 1 "PARD IN ACCORDANCE WITH 191E STANDARDS OF PRAM171 FOR LAN( SURVEYING IN 79B STAT! OF NORTH CAROLINA PER G.S. 417-30 AS AMENDED. #TT tSS NY 6100iAL �FlCNA (!IRR, XPCMMFMN NI/M10AX ARD SEAL THIS 6th DAY OF NUARY A.I., 2009. 1� ' .L.S. Ne L-2678 CAWON %�4•�oE rs S ! 0'x%`2 { .? SEMI L-2678 * •I _* bLL . it f I� 4 r. ACL1`Ii9VEf71' D'' s rr�ss. CE7trfl'D'1' f1�A7+ rt�nt�r � DIRECTION AND SUPERVISION THIS MAP WAS DRAWN FROM CONTROL ESTABLISHED BY GPS. THAT THIS CPS SURVEY WAS PERFORATED TO CLASS "C" FGCC SPECIFICATIONS AND THAT I USED STATIC. CPS FIELD PROCEDURES AND COORDINATES WERE OBTAINED BY LEAST SQUARES ADJUSMENT. THAT THiS SURVEY WAS PERFORMED ON JULY 2008 USING TOPCON HYPER PLUS RECIEVERS AND ALL COORDINATES" ARE BASED ON NAD '80003, NAYD 1988 AND CEOID 2003. *PS s1URVIEY is tw CATEGOR'Y, SUCH A$ RIE OtCOMHINAPON OF EXISTING PARCELS, A COURT ORDERED SURVEY, OR OTHER EXCEPTION M THE DEFINITION OF SUBDIVISION. ] ISIONS: 40 20 0 40 8o !CAUL: 1" = 40' p1RAINN >y: FRANK POUNDS IDAVS: NOVEMBER! 18, 2008 KDS rm'D cnse: OG, JJ, J1A, EIM LEGEND •-0-- fRON F�Pl SET -0- )E7Q$'1'I?IG IRON 1pf" Q Q -C}- C01*CRtM M0WMEN'1' htfilpS J.UruPyi1#0 P -A V PA.'NAIL IiAf MAD 90 er M"ft CIN MW 40 South Maim Street 419 SOUTH KING ST. `n'.. PO*ER POLE Suitezoo MoolVIX. 1 ff, 110 '8 CAM"A Alt�tor, NORfII MM 28752 28655 828.852.9382 828.433.0423 I-C7 OMPUTER_.•.-.13680.40°-ti__- FIELD BOOK _2a__0_9 00-1 0 FAX 826.659.9600 FAX 828.433.9577 TOLL » 00(T.052.9M2 FILE NAME_ ,_1J888_d j��_ MAAP FILE Na 13680®