Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20240633 Ver 1_ePCN Application_20240501DW R Dlvlslon of Water Resources Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form For Nationwide Permits and Regional General Permits (along with corresponding Water Quality Certifications) October 2, 2023 Ver 4.3 Initial Review Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process? Yes No Is this project a public transportation project?* Yes No Change only If needed. Does this project involve maintenance dredging funded by the Shallow Draft Navigation Channel Dredging and Aquatic Weed Fund or involve the distribution or transmission of energy or fuel, including natural gas, diesel, petroleum, or electricity? Yes No BIMS # Assigned Version# * 20240633 1 Is a payment required for this project?* No payment required Fee received Fee needed - send electronic notification Select Project Reviewer* Ryan Conchilla:ryan.conchilla Information for Initial Review 1a. Name of project: TIP U-4758 1a. Who is the Primary Contact?* Robert Crowther 1b. Primary Contact Email:* recrowther@ncdot.gov Date Submitted 5/1 /2024 Nearest Body of Water West Fork Deep River Basin Cape Fear Water Classification WS-IV;CA Site Coordinates Latitude: 36.065008 A. Processing Information Is this project connected with ARPA funding? Yes No County (or Counties) where the project is located: Guilford Is this a NCDMS Project Yes No Longitude: -80.007620 Reviewing Office* Central Office - (919) 707-9000 1c. Primary Contact Phone:* (919)707-6112 Is this project a public transportation project?* Yes No Is this a NCDOT Project?* Yes No (NCDOT only) T.I.P. or state project number: U-4758 WBS # (1) 40251.1.1 1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps: Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act) Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act) Has this PCN previously been submitted?* Yes No 1b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization? Nationwide Permit (NWP) Regional General Permit (RGP) Standard (IP) 1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? Yes No Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number: 14 - Linear transportation NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS): 1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR: 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit Individual 401 Water Quality Certification le. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWR 401 Certification: For the record only for Corps Permit: 1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit application? * Yes No 1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts? Yes No 1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts? Yes No 1h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties? Yes No 1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed? Yes No B. Applicant Information 1d. Who is applying for the permit? Owner Applicant (other than owner) le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project? Yes No 2. Owner Information 2a. Name(s) on recorded deed: NCDOT 2b. Deed book and page no.: 2c. Contact Person: 401 Water Quality Certification - Express Riparian Buffer Authorization Yes No Yes No 2d. Address Street Address 1598 Mail Service Center Address Line 2 City Raleigh Postal / Zip Code 27699-1598 2e. Telephone Number: (919)707-6108 2g. Email Address:* ekcheely@ncdot.gov 3. Applicant Information (if different from owner) 3a. Name: Robert Crowther 3b. Business Name: 3c. Address Street Address 1598 Mail Service Center Address Line 2 city Raleigh Postal / Zip Code 27699-1598 3d. Telephone Number: (919)707-6112 3f. Email Address:* recrowther@ncdot.gov C. Project Information and Prior Project History 1. Project Information 1b. Subdivision name: (if appropriate) 1c. Nearest municipality / town: High Point 2. Project Identification 2a. Property Identification Number: 2c. Project Address Street Address Address Line 2 City Postal / Zip Code 3. Surface Waters 3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project: West Fork Deep River 3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:" WS-IV;CA 3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?* Cape Fear 3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located. 030300030101 4. Project Description and History State / Province / Region NC Country US 2f. Fax Number: State / Province / Region NC Country us 3e. Fax Number: 2b. Property size: State / Province / Region Country 4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application:* Johnson Street and Sandy Ridge Road are 2-lane roads that together serve as a connection between Greensboro and High Point. General land use within the immediate proximity of this project is mostly residential and agriculture. There are other community resources located along these roads including churches, sports complexes, and Piedmont Triad Farmers Market. There are also large tracts of forested lands along stream corridors that are crossed by both Johnson Street and Sandy Ridge Road. 4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past? Yes No Unknown 4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 5.00 4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property: 11,625 4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:" The purposes of this proposed project are to improve existing and projected traffic flow and capacity on Johnson Street and Sandy Ridge Road, to provide facilities for pedestrians and bicyclists along the corridor, and to provide a facility that conforms to NCDOT roadway design standards. Johnson Street and Sandy Ridge Road are important north -south transportation routes in the area that experience traffic congestion and delays due to capacity deficiencies. The corridor is locally and regionally important as a connection between High Point and Greensboro, including major destinations such as the Piedmont Triad International Airport (PTIA) and the Piedmont Triad Farmers Market. The existing roadways also lack adequate facilities for pedestrians and bicyclists, which limits mobility for these travelers. 4i. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:" The proposed project would widen Johnson Street and Sandy Ridge Road along the full project corridor from the current two-lane with grass shoulder facility to a four -lane median divided facility with 4' bike lanes in each direction and 5' sidewalks on each side. A new four -lane bridge will be built over the West Fork Deep River on the location of the existing bridge and to the east to avoid impacts to the Johnson Street Sport Complex, which is a Section 6(f) resource. The existing bridge will be used for traffic during the construction of half of the proposed bridge, and then removed to complete bridge construction. The proposed bridge will have the same typical section as the proposed roadway. Standard road and bridge building equipment such as trucks, dozers, and cranes will be used. 5. Jurisdictional Determinations 5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?* Yes No O Unknown Comments: 5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?* Preliminary Approved Not Verified Unknown N/A Corps AID Number: SAW-2013-01044 5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Name (if known): Matthew Thomas and Benjamin Cogdell Agency/Consultant Company: Atkins Other: 5d. List the dates of the Corp jurisdiction determination or State determination if a determination was made by the Corps or DWR On -site agency meeting conducted on 08/12/2014. SAW-2013-01044 (PJD) issued on 03/11/2015. On -site riparian buffer review conducted by NCDWR on 03/21/24 and determination issued on 03/28/24. NCDWR Project #20240225. An on -site review of water resources was conducted by USACE (Eric Alsmeyer) on 04/23/24. No changes were made to jurisdictional boundaries, but one note was added to the permit drawings for Impact Site 2. 6. Future Project Plans 6a. Is this a phased project?" Yes No Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity? D. Proposed Impacts Inventory 1. Impacts Summary 1a. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply): Wetlands Streams -tributaries Buffers Open Waters Pond Construction 2. Wetland Impacts 2a1 Reason (?) 2b. Impact type* (?) 2c. Type of W. * 2d. W. name 2e. Forested * 2f. Type of Jurisdicition * ?) 2g• Impact area Hand Clearing T __] Headwater Forest WAA Yes Corps 0.004 (acres) 2g. Total Temporary Wetland Impact 0.004 2g. Total Wetland Impact 0.004 2i. Comments: 3. Stream Impacts 2g. Total Permanent Wetland Impact 0.000 3a. Reason for impact (?) 3b.lmpact type* 3c. Type of impact* 3d. S. name* ��3e. Stream Type* �[3f. Type ofh.Impact ❑ (?) urisdiction* length* g1 Site 1 - Construction Access Temporary Culvert UT to West Fork Deep River Perennial Both 38 (SW) Averege (feet) (linear feet) S2 Site 2 - Construction Access Temporary Other fest Fork Deep River Perennial Both 25 34 Averege (feet) (linear feet) S3 Site 2 - Construction Access Temporary Workpad/Causeway J West Fork Deep River Perennial Both 25 49 Averege (feet) (linear feet) S4 Site 2 -Culvert Construction fff:] Culvert West Fork Deep River Perennial Both 25 15 Average (feel) (linear feet) 3i. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet: 0 3i. Total permanent stream impacts: 3i. Total temporary stream impacts: 15 121 3i. Total stream and ditch impacts: 136 3j. Comments: There are no bents proposed to be placed within the streambed of West Fork Deep River with the new bridge at Impact Site 2. Please see attached cover letter for further description of these stream impacts. 6. Buffer Impacts (for DWR) 6a. Project is in which protect basirl Check all that apply. Neuse Tar -Pamlico Catawba Randleman Goose Creek Jordan Lake Other 6b. Impact Type 6c. Per or Temp 6d. Stream name 6e. Buffer mitigation required? 6f. Zone 1 impact 6g. Zone 2 impact Site 1 Road Crossing - Allowable P UT to West Fork Deep River No 807 1,245 Site 2 Road Crossing - Allowable P West Fork Deep River No 0 1,247 Site 2 Bridge - Allowable P West Fork Deep River No 9,215 3,869 Site 3 Road Crossing - Allowable P UT to West Fork Deep River No 32 2,255 Site 4 Outlet Channel -Allowable P UT to West Fork Deep River No 1,272 1,177 Site 5 Roadway Fill - Allowable w/ Mitigation P UT to West Fork Deep River Yes 1,057 9,765 6h. Total buffer impacts: Zone 1 Zone 2 Total Temporary impacts: 0.00 0.00 Zone 1 Zone 2 Total Permanent impacts: 12,383.00 19,558.00 Zone 1 Zone 2 Total combined buffer impacts: 12,383.00 19,558.00 6i. Comments: Please see attached cover letter for further description of these riparian buffer impacts. E. Impact Justification and Mitigation 1. Avoidance and Minimization la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project: The proposed widening project does not result in any sections of newly located roadway. The replacement of the existing bridge over the West Fork Deep River will maintain the approximately perpendicular crossing and not result in any wetland impacts. The existing bridge has 2 interior bents, 1 of which is within the banks of the West Fork Deep River. The proposed bridge will also have 2 interior bents, but both will be located outside of the river The new bridge will not discharge deck water directly into the West Fork Deep River. 1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques: Best management practices and sedimentation and erosion control measures will be used during construction of the proposed project. No more than 50 % of the width of the West Fork Deep River shall be blocked at any one time during bridge demolition and construction. Temporary causeways will be removed using the least impacttul measures possible. 2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State 2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? Yes No 2c. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): DWR Corps 2d. If yes, which mitigation option(s) will be used for this project? Mitigation bank Payment to in -lieu fee program Permittee Responsible Mitigation 4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program 4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached. Yes No 4b. Stream mitigation requested: (linear feet) 15 4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWR only): (square feet) 10,822 4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested: (acres) 4c. If using stream mitigation, what is the stream temperature: warm 4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: (acres) 4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: (acres) 4h. Comments NC DMS commits to implementing sufficient compensatory mitigation credits to offset the impacts associated with this project as determined by the regulatory agencies in accordance with the In -Lieu Fee Instrument dated July 28, 2010. Please see attached Mitigation Acceptance Letter for further information. 6. Buffer mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) - required by DWR O 6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires buffer mitigation? If yes, you must fill out this entire form - please contact DWR for more information. Yes No 6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact. 6c. Reason for impact 6d. Total impact (square Multiplier 6e. Required mitigation feet) (square feet) done 1 Roadway Fill 1,057 Zone 2 Roadway Fill 6f. Total buffer mitigation required 9,765 6g. If buffer mitigation is required, is payment to a mitigation bank or NC Division of Mitigation Services proposed? Yes No 6j. Comments: NC DIMS commits to implementing sufficient compensatory mitigation credits to offset the impacts associated with this project as determined by the regulatory agencies in accordance with the In -Lieu Fee Instrument dated July 28, 2010. Please see attached Mitigation Acceptance Letter for further information. F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR) O 1. Diffuse Flow Plan 1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the INC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules? Yes No What type of SCM are you providing? Level Spreader Vegetated Conveyance (lower SHWT) Wetland Swale (higher SHWT) Other SCM that removes minimum 30 % nitrogen Proposed project will not create concentrated stormwater flow through the buffer 2. Stormwater Management Plan 2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250? * Yes No Comments: G. Supplementary Information 1. Environmental Documentation 1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land? * Yes No 1b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State (North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?* Yes No 1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearing House? Yes No 2. Violations (DWR Requirement) 2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)? * Yes No 3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement) 3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? * Yes No 3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description. The proposed action is a widening of an existing roadway that would improve projected traffic flow and provide facilities for pedestrians and bicyclists. Additional future development would be subject to local and state ordinances, but is not anticipated to occur as a result of this project. 4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement) 4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project? Yes No N/A 5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement) 5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?* Yes No 5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts? Yes No 5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. 5d. Is another Federal agency involved? Yes No O Unknown What Federal Agency is involved? FHWA 5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8? Yes No 5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat? Review of USFWS Information for Planning and Consultation (IPaC) database. Please see attached cover letter for additional information regarding protected species. 6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement) 6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?* Yes No 6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat? Review of NOAA Fisheries Essential Fish Habitat Mapper. 7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement) 7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status? Yes No 7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources? Please see attached Archaeology Form and Historic Architecture and Landscapes Form. 8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement) Be. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? * Yes No 8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: This proposed project meets FEMA requirements by obtaining State Floodplain Compliance (SFC) approval through the Hydraulic Unit's Highway Floodplain Program. 8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA National Flood Hazard Layer and the North Carolina Flood Risk Information System. Miscellaneous Please use the space below to attach all required documentation or any additional information you feel is helpful for application review. Documents should be combined into one file when possible, with a Cover Letter, Table of Contents, and a Cover Sheet for each Section preferred. Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document U-4758 PCN Attachment Package-compressed.pdf 39.22MB File must be PDF or KMZ Comments Signature By checking the box and signing below, I certify that: • The project proponent hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief'; and • The project proponent hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401 certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time. • I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form; • I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction' subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act"); • I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act"); • I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND • I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form. Full Name: Erin K. Cheely Signature 61,0 k Cheel Date 5/1/2024 O