20240630 Ver 1_Cambro_PCN_SupportingDocuments_20240426

ATTACHMENT A
NWP Tearsheet
(SAW-2019-01512)

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. SAW-2019-01512 County: Alamance U.S.G.S. Quad: NC -Mebane
GENERAL PERMIT (REGIONAL AND NATIONWIDE) VERIFICATION
Permittee: NCIC LLC
Attn: Brian Hall
Address: P O Box 8050
Greensboro, NC 27409
Size (acres) —19 Nearest Town Mebane
Nearest Waterway UT to Moadams Creek River Basin Cape Fear
USGS HUC 03030002 Coordinates 36.091704 N,-79.299864 W
Location description: The proiect area, part of the North Carolina Industrial Center, is located approximately 0.15 mile south
of the intersection of Lake Latham Road and Sun Ray Lane, in Mebane, Alamance County, North Carolina.
Description of projects area and activity: This verification authorizes the permanent discharge of fill material into 42 linear feet
of stream channel (6 linear feet are a loss of waters of the US from culvert fill, 36 linear feet are associated with a rip rap
dissipater pad), necessary for the installation of one road crossing. These impacts are necessary to provide access and
infrastructure for the Airgas site at the North Carolina Industrial Center (NCIC) development.
Applicable Law(s): ® Section 404 (Clean Water Act, 33 USC 1344)
❑ Section 10 (Rivers and Harbors Act, 33 USC 403)
Authorization: NWP 39. Commercial and Institutional Developments
REMARKS: The use of this permit has been verified After -the -Fact.
SEE ATTACHED NWP GENERAL, REGIONAL, AND/OR SPECIAL CONDITIONS
Your work is authorized by the above referenced permit provided it is accomplished in strict accordance with the enclosed
Conditions, your application signed and dated 8/15/2019, and additional information provided via email on 9/19/2019, and the
enclosed plans EX 1, EX 2, EX 3, and EX 4. Any violation of the attached conditions or deviation from your submitted plans
may subject the permittee to a stop work order, a restoration order, a Class I administrative penalty, and/or appropriate legal
action.
This verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified below unless the nationwide authorization is modified, suspended
or revoked. If, prior to the expiration date identified below, the nationwide permit authorization is reissued and/or modified, this
verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified below, provided it complies with all requirements of the modified
nationwide permit. If the nationwide permit authorization expires or is suspended, revoked, or is modified, such that the activity would
no longer comply with the terms and conditions of the nationwide permit, activities which have commenced (i.e., are under construction)
or are under contract to commence in reliance upon the nationwide permit, will remain authorized provided the activity is completed
within twelve months of the date of the nationwide permit's expiration, modification or revocation, unless discretionary authority has
been exercised on a case -by -case basis to modify, suspend or revoke the authorization.
Activities subject to Section 404 (as indicated above) may also require an individual Section 401 Water Quality Certification. You
should contact the NC Division of Water Resources (telephone [phone]) to determine Section 401 requirements.
For activities occurring within the twenty coastal counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA), prior
to beginning work you must contact the N.C. Division of Coastal Management.
This Department of the Army verification does not relieve the permittee of the responsibility to obtain any other required Federal, State
or local approvals/permits.
If there are any questions regarding this verification, any of the conditions of the Pennit, or the Corps of Engineers regulatory program,
please contact David E. Bailev at [phone], Ext. 30or David.E.Bailev2(dusace.armv.mil.
Date: 2019.10.02 16:54:03
Corps Regulatory Official:-04'00' Date: 10/02/2019
Expiration Date of Verification: 03/18/2022

SPECIAL CONDITIONS
1. In order to compensate for impacts associated with this permit, mitigation shall be provided
in accordance with the provisions outlined on the most recent version of the attached
Compensatory Mitigation Responsibility Transfer Form. The requirements of this form,
including any special conditions listed on this form, are hereby incorporated as special
conditions of this permit authorization
2. Please note that this project is considered cumulative with earlier phases of the NC Industrial
Center with respect to compensatory mitigation and Nationwide Permit thresholds. As such,
impacts permitted for this project (SAW-2019-01512) are considered cumulative with
impacts permitted during earlier phases authorized and documented under Action IDs:
SAW-2017-02495, SAW-2011-02215, and SAW-2002-21260. Current cumulative impacts to
waters of the US for this single and complete project include permanent impacts (loss of
waters) to 153 linear feet (0.014 acre) of stream channel and 0.07 acre of wetlands, and
temporary impacts to 82 linear feet (0.01 acre) of stream channel. This amounts to a total
loss of waters of the US of 0.084 acre.
Date:2019.10.02
CoRegulatorys Official: 1 6:53:47-04'00' Date: 10/02/2019
Expiration Date of Verification: 03/18/2022
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we continue
to do so, please complete the Customer Satisfaction Survey located at http://corpsmapu.usace.army.mil/cm_apex/Vp=136:4:0
Copy furnished:
Paul Stephens IV, E.I., ECS Southeast, LLP, 3820 Faber Place Drive, Suite 200, North Charleston SC 29405
Sue Homewood, NCDEQ-DWR, 450 W. Hanes Mill Rd., Suite 300, Winston Salem NC 27105

Compensatory Mitigation Responsibility Transfer Form
Permittee: NCIC LLC, Attn: Brian Hall Action ID: SAW-2019-01512
Project Name: Airgas Culvert / North Carolina Industrial Center / Mebane / Alamance County County: Alamance
Instructions to Permittee: The Permittee must provide a copy of this form to the Mitigation Sponsor, either an approved
Mitigation Bank or the North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services (NCDMS), who will then sign the form to verify the
transfer of the mitigation responsibility. Once the Sponsor has signed this form, it is the Permittee's responsibility to ensure
that to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Project Manager identified on page two is in receipt of a signed copy of this
form before conducting authorized impacts, unless otherwise specified below. If more than one mitigation Sponsor will be
used to provide the mitigation associated with the permit, or if the impacts and/or the mitigation will occur in more than one
8-digit Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC), multiple forms will be attached to the permit, and the separate forms for each Sponsor
and/or HUC must be provided to the appropriate mitigation Sponsors.
Instructions to Sponsor: The Sponsor must verify that the mitigation requirements (credits) shown below are available at the
identified site. By signing below, the Sponsor is accepting full responsibility for the identified mitigation, regardless of
whether or not they have received payment from the Permittee. Once the form is signed, the Sponsor must update the bank
ledger and provide a copy of the signed form and the updated bank ledger to the Permittee, the USACE Project Manager, and
the Wilmington District Mitigation Office (see contact information on page 2). The Sponsor must also comply with all
reporting requirements established in their authorizing instrument.
Permitted Impacts and Compensatory Mitigation Requirements:
Permitted Impacts Requiring Mitigation* 8-digit HUC and Basin: 03030002, Cape Fear River Basin
Stream Impacts (linear feet)
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Warm
Cool
Cold
Riparian Riverine
Riparian Non-Riverine
Non -Riparian
Coastal
6
*If more than one mitigation sponsor will be used for the permit, only include impacts to be mitigated by this sponsor.
Compensatory Mitigation Requirements: 8-digit HUC and Basin: 03030002, Cape Fear River Basin
Stream Mitigation (credits)
Wetland Mitigation (credits)
Warm
Cool
Cold
Riparian Riverine
Riparian Non-Riverine
Non -Riparian
Coastal
12
Mitigation Site Debited: Benton Branch Mitigation Bank
(List the name of the bank to be debited. For umbrella banks, also list the specific site. For NCDMS, list NCDMS. If the NCDMS
acceptance letter identifies a specific site, also list the specific site to be debited).
Section to be completed by the Mitigation Sponsor
Statement of Mitigation Liability Acceptance: I, the undersigned, verify that I am authorized to approve mitigation
transactions for the Mitigation Sponsor shown below, and I certify that the Sponsor agrees to accept full responsibility for
providing the mitigation identified in this document (see the table above), associated with the USACE Permittee and Action
ID number shown. I also verify that released credits (and/or advance credits for NCDMS), as approved by the USACE, are
currently available at the mitigation site identified above. Further, I understand that if the Sponsor fails to provide the
required compensatory mitigation, the USACE Wilmington District Engineer may pursue measures against the Sponsor to
ensure compliance associated with the mitigation requirements.
Mitigation Sponsor Name:
Name of Sponsor's Authorized Representative:

11 Signature of Sponsor's Authorized Representative Date of Signature
Conditions for Transfer of Compensatory Mitigation Credit:
• Once this document has been signed by the Mitigation Sponsor and the USACE is in receipt of the signed form, the
Permittee is no longer responsible for providing the mitigation identified in this form, though the Permittee remains
responsible for any other mitigation requirements stated in the permit conditions.
• Construction within jurisdictional areas authorized by the permit identified on page one of this form can begin only after
the USACE is in receipt of a copy of this document signed by the Sponsor, confirming that the Sponsor has accepted
responsibility for providing the mitigation requirements listed herein. For authorized impacts conducted by the North
Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT), construction within jurisdictional areas may proceed upon permit
issuance; however, a copy of this form signed by the Sponsor must be provided to the USACE within 30 days of permit
issuance. NCDOT remains fully responsible for the mitigation until the USACE has received this form, confirming that the
Sponsor has accepted responsibility for providing the mitigation requirements listed herein.
• Signed copies of this document must be retained by the Permittee, Mitigation Sponsor, and in the USACE administrative
records for both the permit and the Bank/ILF Instrument. It is the Permittee's responsibility to ensure that the USACE
Project Manager (address below) is provided with a signed copy of this form.
• If changes are proposed to the type, amount, or location of mitigation after this form has been signed and returned to
the USACE, the Sponsor must obtain case -by -case approval from the USACE Project Manager and/or North Carolina
Interagency Review Team (NCIRT). If approved, higher mitigation ratios may be applied, as per current District guidance
and a new version of this form must be completed and included in the USACE administrative records for both the permit
and the Bank/ILF Instrument.
Comments/Additional Conditions: A letter from Benton Branch Mitigation Bank, confirming they are willing and able to
accept the applicant's compensatory mitigation responsibility, dated 9/18/2019 was included with the preconstruction
notification.
This form is not valid unless signed below by the USACE Project Manager and by the Mitigation Sponsor on Page 1. Once
signed, the Sponsor should provide copies of this form along with an updated bank ledger to:1) the Permittee, 2) the USACE
Project Manager at the address below, and 3) the Wilmington District Mitigation Office, Attn: Todd Tugwell, 11405 Falls
of Neuse Road, Wake Forest, NC27587 (email: todd. tugwell@usace. army. mil). Questions regarding this form or any of the
permit conditions may be directed to the USACE Project Manager below.
USACE Project Manager: David E. Bailey
USACE Field Office: Raleigh Regulatory Office
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
Email: David. E. [e-mail]
Date: 2019.10.02
16:53:22-04'00'
USACE Project Manager Signature
10/02/2019
Date of Signature
Current Wilmington District mitigation guidance, including information on mitigation ratios, functional assessments, and
mitigation bank location and availability, and credit classifications (including stream temperature and wetland groupings) is
available at http://ribits.usace.army.mil

a s eugae3 g}JoN'auegM e a
oP� z
atla21 SS333tl dW31 o o -
a >e
321f11�f1211SbRI�NI
o�z x
�..W
£ 3SVHd DION o a�
abd
1aa$0;i
/ /
-Ask
/
I
/
/
dtlse9 I
I
✓I / L
/
i 3 •/ 3LL] f// /O
[3NIl
t O65 �NI �.ryy�
'IAN�� gIb]RM,
bc. vue�c
O U m Q
m a ewvv° - x3 - �v��an-sue�nx3-oeo-energy -1 Tian.em

a s eugae3 g}JoN'auegan e a
pQo a atl0il SS3JJtl dW31 0 o a m CMm v N`P _= 321f11�f1211Stl21�N1 ~ w
�: x �z� x
£ 3SVHd DION o a

a s euilae3 g}IoN'auegan e a
F
pro a av0H SS333Y dW31 z o m M
321f11of1211Stl21JN1
v a z
£ 3SVHd DION wo o a
I 1 0 1 0 1 m 1 Q I I
0 U m Q
m os —.1. - c x3 - �v��an-sue�nx3-oeo-energy-�aeoe� w>~��.w a�x�ewn

a s eugaep gpoN'auegan _
atl021 SS399tl dW31 z
w
f r N `P- _= 3uniof121im:INI
y rA" � o
£ 3SVHd DION
os��W
r
N
r
O
9 n n
C
/ //
IT
; IN
0 U m Q
m os —.1. - > x3 - �v�an-suenx3-oeo-energy-�aeoew ��.w a�x�ewn a >,vx ax.em

Determination of Jurisdiction:
A. ® There are waters, on the above described project area that may be subject to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
(CWA) (33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403). This preliminary
determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process (Reference 33
CFR Part 331). However, you may request an approved JD, which is an appealable action, by contacting the Corps
district for further instruction. Please note, if work is authorized by either a general or nationwide permit, and you wish
to request an appeal of an approved JD, the appeal must be received by the Corps and the appeal process concluded prior
to the commencement of any work in waters of the United States and prior to any work that could alter the hydrology of
waters of the United States.
B. ❑ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described project area subject to the permit requirements of
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403) and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) (33 USC §
1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to
exceed five years from the date of this notification.
C. ❑ There are waters, within the above described project area that are subject to the permit requirements of Section 404 of the
Clean Water Act (CWA) (33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this determination
may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
D. ❑ The jurisdictional areas within the above described project area have been identified under a previous action. Please reference
jurisdictional determination issued DATE. Action ID: FILE NUMBER.
Basis For Determination: See the Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination form dated 10/02/2019.
Remarks: None.
E. Attention USDA Program Participants
This delineation/determination has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps' Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the particular site
identified in this request. The delineation/determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security
Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in USDA programs, you should request
a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
F. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdiction determinations as indicated in B and C
above).
This correspondence constitutes an approved jurisdiction determination for the above described site. If you object to this
determination you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331. Enclosed you will find a
Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal this determination you
must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Phillip Shaman, Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW, Room 10M15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for appeal
under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP. Should you
decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by N/A.
**It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Division Office if you do not object to the determination in this correspondence.
Corps Regulatory Official: Date: 2019.10.02 16:53:03-04'00'
David E. Bailev
Date of JD: 10/02/2019 Expiration Date of JD: N/A

NOTIFICATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL OPTIONS AND PROCESS AND
REQUEST FOR APPEAL
Applicant: NCIC LLC (Attn: Brian Hall) File Number: SAW-2019-01512
Date: 10/02/2019
Attached
is:
See Section below
❑
INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT Standard Permit or Letter ofpermission)
A
❑
PROFFERED PERMIT Standard Permit or Letter ofpermission)
B
❑
PERMIT DENIAL
C
❑
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
D
®
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
E
SECTION I - The following identifies your rights and options regarding an administrative appeal of the above decision.
Additional information may be found at or http://www.usace.annv.mil/Missions/CivilWorks/Res4ulatorvPros4ramandPennits.asbx
or the Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331.
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request
that the permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section II of this form and return the form to the district
engineer. Your objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will
forfeit your right to appeal the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your
objections and may: (a) modify the permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your
objections, or (c) not modify the permit having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After
evaluating your objections, the district engineer will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in
Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein,
you may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of
this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days
of the date of this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by
completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division
engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or provide new
information.
• ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the
date of this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
• APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers
Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the district engineer. This form
must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.

E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps regarding the
preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved JD (which may be appealed),
by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new information for further consideration by the
Corps to reevaluate the JD.
SECTION II - REQUEST FOR APPEA BJECTIONS TO AN INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your objections to an initial
proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to this form to clarify where your reasons or
objections are addressed in the administrative record.)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps memorandum for the
record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the review officer has determined is needed to
clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps may add new information or analyses to the record.
However, you may provide additional information to clarify the location of information that is already in the administrative
record.
POINT OF CONTACT FOR QUESTIONS OR INFORMATION:
If you have questions regarding this decision and/or the
If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you may
appeal process you may contact:
also contact:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division
Mr. Phillip Shannin, Administrative Appeal Review Officer
Attn: David E. Bailey
CESAD-PDO
Raleigh Regulatory Office
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, South Atlantic Division
U.S Army Corps of Engineers
60 Forsyth Street, Room 1OM15
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
Phone: [phone]
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any government
consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You will be provided a 15 day
notice of any site investigation, and will have the opportuni to participate in all site investi ations.
Date:
Telephone number:
Signature of appellant or agent.
For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits send this form to:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, Attn: David E. Bailey, 69 Darlington Avenue, Wilmington, North Carolina
28403
For Permit denials, Proffered Permits and Approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this form to:
Division Engineer, Commander, U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic, Attn: Mr. Phillip Shannin, Administrative
Appeal Officer, CESAD-PDO, 60 Forsyth Street, Room 1OM15, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]

Action ID Number: SAW-2019-01512
Permittee: NCIC LLC (Attn: Brian Hall)
County: Alamance
Project Name: Airgas Culvert / North Carolina Industrial Center / Mebane / Alamance County
Date Verification Issued: 10/02/2019
Project Manager: David E. Bailey
Upon completion of the activity authorized by this permit and any mitigation required by the permit,
sign this certification and return it to the following address:
US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Attn: David E. Bailey
Raleigh Regulatory Office
U.S Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
or
[e-mail]
Please note that your permitted activity is subject to a compliance inspection by a U. S. Army Corps of
Engineers representative. Failure to comply with any terms or conditions of this authorization may
result in the Corps suspending, modifying or revoking the authorization and/or issuing a Class I
administrative penalty, or initiating other appropriate legal action.
I hereby certify that the work authorized by the above referenced permit has been completed in
accordance with the terms and condition of the said permit, and required mitigation was completed in
accordance with the permit conditions.
Signature of Permittee
Date

ATTACHMENT B
Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Package

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE)
Form Approved -
REQUEST FOR JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD)
OMB No. 0710-0024
For use of this form, see Sec 404 CWA, Sec 10 RHA, Sec 103 MP RSA; the proponent agency is CECW-COR.
Expires 2024-04-30
DATA REQUIRED BY THE PRIVACY ACT OF 1974
Authority Rivers and Harbors Act, Section 10, 33 USC 403; Clean Water Act, Section 404, 33 USC 1344; Marine Protection, Research, and
Sanctuaries Act, Section 103, 33 USC 1413; Regulatory Programs of the Corps of Engineers; Final Rule 33 CFR 320-332.
Principal Purpose The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine whether there are any aquatic resources
within the review area that are or that may be subject to federal jurisdiction under the regulatory authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local government agencies, and the
public, and may be made available as part of a public notice or FOIA request as required by federal law. Your name and property
location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in any approved jurisdictional determination (AJD), which will
be made available to the public on the District's website and on the Headquarters USACE website.
Disclosure Submission of requested information is voluntary, however, if the information is not provided there may be some delay in
processing your request. Failure to provide this information will not result in an adverse action.
System of Record Notice (SORN): The information received is entered into our permit tracking database and a SORN has been
completed (SORN #A1145b) and may be accessed at the following website:
http://dpcid.defense.gov/Privacy/SORNsindex/DOD-wide-SORN-Article-View/Article/670116/a1146b-ce.aspx
The Agency Disclosure Notice (ADN)
The Public reporting burden for this collection of information, 0710-0024, is estimated to average 10 minutes per response, including time for reviewing
instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information.
Send comments regarding the burden estimate or burden reduction suggestions to the Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, at
[e-mail]. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no
person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number.
1. To (District Name): RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
2. I am requesting a JD on property located at (Street Address): West Holt Street
City/Township/Parish: Mebane County: Alamance State: North Carolina
Acreage of Parcel/Review Area for JD: 25.08
Section: N/A Township: N/A Range: N/A
Latitude (decimal degrees): 36.095767 Longitude (decimal degrees):-79.29287
(For linear projects, please include the center point of the proposed alignment.)
3. Please attach a survey/plat map and vicinity map identifying location and review area for the JD.
4. ❑ I currently own this property. I plan to purchase this property.
❑X I am an agent/consultant acting on behalf of the requester.
❑ Other (please explain):
Samet Corporation is the applicant for this project, see attached Agent Authorization form.
ENG FORM 6247, NOV 2023 PREVIOUS EDITIONS ARE OBSOLETE. Page 1 of 2

5. Reason for request: (check as many as applicable)
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources
under Corps authority.
I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would
be used to avoid and minimize impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting process.
F�ii;i
I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may require authorization from the Corps; this request is
accompanied by my permit application and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities in a navigable water of the U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list
and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of the tide.
A Corps JD is required in order to obtain my local/state authorization.
I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the
aquatic resource on the parcel.
I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
El Other:
6. Type of determination being requested:
ElI am requesting an approved JD.
I am requesting a preliminary JD.
1-1 1 am requesting a "no permit required" letter as I believe my proposed activity is not regulated.
ElI am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information to inform my decision.
7. Typed or Printed Name: Timothy O'Halloran, PWS
Company Name: ECS Southeast, LLC
Address: 1812 Center Park Drive, Suite D, Charlotte, NC 28217
Daytime Phone No.: 980-920-9615
Email Address: [e-mail]
By signing below, you are indicating that you have the authority, or are acting as the duly authorized agent of a person or entity with such authority, to
and do hereby grant Corps personnel right of entry to legally access the site if needed to perform the JD. Your signature shall be an affirmation that you
possess the requisite property rights to request a JD on the subject property.
Digitally signed by Timothy O'Halloran
EN. O="ECS Southeast, LLC", CN=T imothy O'Halloran, E=t,hal loan@.csl i mited Com
Signature: Baas°°"amtbaa°tb°-Otmisd°°°ma°t Date: April 25, 2024
Est. 20
Date 202404d.-V i-si SF121
Foxit PDF Reader Version. 12.1 2
ENG FORM 6247, NOV 2023 Page 2 of 2

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE)
Form Approved -
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD)
OMB No. 0710-0024
For use of this form, see Sec 404 CWA, Sec 10 RHA, Sec 103 MPRSA; the proponent agency is CECW-COR.
Expires 2024-04-30
DATA REQUIRED BY THE PRIVACY ACT OF 1974
Authority Rivers and Harbors Act, Section 10, 33 USC 403; Clean Water Act, Section 404, 33 USC 1344; Marine Protection, Research, and
Sanctuaries Act, Section 103, 33 USC 1413; Regulatory Program of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; Final Rule for 33 CFR
Parts 320-332.
Principal Purpose The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine whether there are any aquatic resources
within the review area that may be subject to federal jurisdiction under the regulatory authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local government agencies, and the
public, and may be made available as part of a public notice or FOIA request as required by federal law. Your name and property
location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in any resulting jurisdictional determination (JD), which
may be made available to the public on the District's website and/or on the Headquarters USACE website.
Disclosure Submission of requested information is voluntary; however, if information is not provided, the request for a JD cannot be evaluated
nor can a PJD be issued.
The Agency Disclosure Notice (ADN)
The public reporting burden for this collection of information, 0710-0024, is estimated to average 25 minutes per response, including the time for
reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of
information. Send comments regarding the burden estimate or burden reduction suggestions to the Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters
Services, at [e-mail]. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of
law, no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control
number.
SECTION I - BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: 4/25/24 (ECS)
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD:
Samet Corporation (POC Mr. Britton Settle)
309 Gallimore Dairy Road, Greensboro, NC 27409
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
D. PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: North Carolina County/Parish/Borough: Alamance City: Mebane
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Latitude: 36.095767 Longitude:-79.29287
Universal Transverse Mercator: 17 S 606587.00 in E, 3962471.00 in N
Name of nearest waterbody: Moadams Creek
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
1-1 Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
Field Determination
Date(s): April 2, 2024 (ECS)
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY JURISDICTION.
Site
Latitude (decimal
Longitude
Estimated amount of
Type of aquatic resource
Geographic authority to which the
Number
degrees)
(decimal degrees)
aquatic resource in review
(i.e., wetland vs. non-
aquatic resource "may be" subject
area (acreage and linear
wetland waters)
(i.e., Section 404 or Section
feet, if applicable)
101404)
Potential
Wetland
36.096141
-79.293866
0.15 ac
Wetland
Section 404
Waters 1
ENG FORM 6249, NOV 2023 Page 1 of 4

Site
Latitude (decimal
Longitude
Estimated amount of
Type of aquatic resource
Geographic authority to which the
Number
degrees)
(decimal degrees)
aquatic resource in review
(i.e., wetland vs. non-
aquatic resource "may be" subject
area (acreage and linear
wetland waters)
(i.e., Section 404 or Section
feet, if applicable)
101404)
Potential
Wetland
36.094011
-79.292379
0.12 ac
Wetland
Section 404
Waters 2
Potential
Wetland
36.093742
-79.291491
0.03 ac
Wetland
Section 404
Waters 3
Potential
Wetland
36.094043
-79.29298
0.02 ac
Wetland
Section 404
Waters 4
Potential
Wetland
36.096539
-79.293750
0.02 ac
Wetland
Section 404
Waters 5
Potential
Non-
36.096508
-79.294336
0.04 ac / 5041f
Non -wetland Waters
Section 404
wetland
Waters 1
Potential
Non-
36.096144
-79.293737
<0.01 ac / 253 if
Non -wetland Waters
Section 404
wetland
Waters 2
Potential
Non-
36.096376
-79.293744
<0.01 ac / 681f
Non -wetland Waters
Section 404
wetland
Waters 3
Potential
Non-
36.094194
-79.291160
0.10 ac / 1,220 if
Non -wetland Waters
Section 404
wetland
Waters 4
Potential
Non-
36.093664
-79.291425
<0.01 ac / 199 if
Non -wetland Waters
Section 404
wetland
Waters 5
1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby
advised of his or her option to request and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an informed decision after having discussed
the various types of JDs and their characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
ENG FORM 6249, NOV 2023 Page 2 of 4

2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit
verification requiring "preconstruction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or other general permit, and the permit
applicant has not requested an AJD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has
elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD or no JD whatsoever, which do not make an official determination of jurisdictional aquatic
resources; (2) the applicant has the option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing
a permit authorization on an AJD could possibly result in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) the
applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit
authorization; (4) the applicant can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that permit,
including whatever mitigation requirements the USACE has determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject
permit authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the PJD or reliance on no JD whatsoever;
(6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of USACE permit
authorization based on a PJD or no JD whatsoever constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the review area affected in any way by that
activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement
action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be
processed as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual
permit denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it becomes appropriate to make
an official determination whether geographic jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official delineation of
jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the USACE will provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD
finds that there "may be" waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be" navigable waters of the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all
aquatic features in the review area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information:
F. SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources below where indicated for all checked items:
Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map: Figure 7: Potential Waters of the US Map
Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
1-1 Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
1-1 Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report.
Rationale:
1-1 Data sheets prepared by the USACE:
1-1 Corps navigable waters' study:
U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
USGS NHD data.
USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:
Figure 2: USGS Topographic Map/ 1:24,000 & 1994 Mebane, NC Quad
USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey.
Citation: Figure 3: USDA-NRCS Spatial Soil Survey; dated 2019
National Wetlands Inventory map(s).
Cite Name: Figure 4: USFWS National Wetland Inventory Map
1-1 State/Local Wetland Inventory map(s):
FEMA/FIRM maps:
ENG FORM 6249, NOV 2023 Page 3 of 4

Figure 5: FEMA Flood Hazard Zone Map; Panel: 3710981500K, dated 11/17/2017
100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
Photographs: FX1 Aerial (Name & Date): Figures 3 through 5
or X❑ Other (Name & Date): Appendix II: Photograph Log
Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
Other information (please specify):
Figure 6: USGS Elevation Map
Appendix III: Antecedent Precipitation Tool
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily been verified by the USACE and should not be relied upon
for later jurisdictional determinations.
Name of Regulatory Staff Member Completing PJD
Date
Signature of Regulatory Staff Member Completing PJD
Name of Person Requesting PJD
Date
Signatureof Person Requesting PJD (REQUIRED, unless
obtaining the Signature is Impracticable
Saao,I
met Corporation (ECS as Authorized Agent)
2024-04-25
r„
�m a,=„o ma,„ao na„=m
Districts may establish timeframes for requester to return signed PJD forms. If the requester does not respond within the established time frame, the
district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is necessary prior to finalizing an action.
ENG FORM 6249, NOV 2023 Page 4 of 4

(......p....
f0 m � W NO'1 th M � f00 N
V V V V V V V V V
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
zzzzzzzzz
w w w w w w w w w
000000000
w w w w F F F F F
K K K K 0 0 0 0 0
000000000
Q Q Q Q LL LL LL LL lL
N N N N N N N N N
N N N N N N N N N
Q Q Q Q J J J J J
0000
LL LL LL LL� M M N M
LLLLLLLL�����
zzzzzzzzz
zzzzzzzzz
888888888
K K K K K K K K K
U U U U U U U U U
2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
K K K K K K K K K
000000000
zzzzzzzzz
����33333
m m m m a a a a a
a a a a
0 0 o o o
Z Z Z Z Z
a a a a a a a a a

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: April 2, 2024
Project/Site: Cambro 2 Site
Latitude: 36.096508
Evaluator: Tim O'Halloran, PWS
County: Alamance
Longitude:-79.294336
Total Points:
25.5
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other Stream 1
Stream is at least intermittent
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30`
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 9 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 8.5 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = 8
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL =
1.5 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: 2 crayfish found and multiple scuds. Assessment was conducted between points 10 and 11.
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: April 2, 2024
Project/Site: Cambro 2 Site
Latitude: 36.096144
Evaluator: Tim O'Halloran, PWS
County: Alamance
Longitude:-79.293737
Total Points:
28.5
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other Stream 2
Stream is at least intermittent
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30`
A. Geonnor holo (Subtotal = 7 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 10.5
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = 11
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: Multiple crayfish found, multiple juvenile salamanders observed, caddisfly, dragonfly larvae, scuds.
Assessment was conducted etween points 3 and 5. Perennialbased on biology.
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: April 2, 2024
Project/Site: Cambro 2 Site
Latitude: 36.096406
Evaluator: Tim O'Halloran, PWS
County: Alamance
Longitude:-79.293716
Total Points:
25.5
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other Stream 3
Stream is at least intermittent
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30`
A. Geonnor holo (Subtotal = 6 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 9.5 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = 10
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL =
1.5 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: Multiple crayfish found, multiple juvenile salamanders observed, caddisfly, scuds.
Assessment was conducted etween points 3 and 4. Perennialbased on biology.
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: April 2, 2024
Project/Site: Cambro 2 Site
Latitude: 36.094194
Evaluator: Tim O'Halloran, PWS
County: Alamance
Longitude:-79.291160
Total Points:
31
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other Stream 4
Stream is at least intermittent
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30`
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 11.5 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 9.5 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = 10
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL =
1.5 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: Multiple crayfish found, multiple juvenile salamanders observed, scuds.
Assessment was conducted etween points 21 an 22.
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: April 2, 2024
Project/Site: Cambro 2 Site
Latitude: 36.093664
Evaluator: Tim O'Halloran, PWS
County: Alamance
Longitude:-79.291425
Total Points:
25
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other Stream 5
Stream is at least intermittent
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30`
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 5 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 10
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = 10
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL =
1.5 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: Multiple crayfish found, multiple juvenile salamanders observed, salamander eggs, caddisfly, dragonfly larvae,
scuds. Assessment was conducted
etween points 3 and 4. Perennial based on
biology.
Sketch:

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-0024, Exp:1113012024
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT.•
See ERDC/EL TR-12-9; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Cambro Building 2 City/County: Mebane/Alamance Sampling Date: 4/2/2024
Applicant/Owner: Samet Corporation State: NC Sampling Point: DP1
Investigator(s): Timothy O'Halloran, PWS Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): toeslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 0-5
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 36.096174 Long:-79.29389 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: CnD2- Cullen Clay Loam, 10-15% Slopes, Moderately Eroded NWI classification: N/A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
This data point represents Wetland 1 and 5, both are headwater forest wetlands. Wetland 1 is abuts Stream 2 and at the base of Stream 3. Wetland 5
drains into Stream 3.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
X Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
X High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
X Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
—Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
X Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
—Iron Deposits (135)
—Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 0.5
Water Table Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 0
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP1
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
Liriodendron tulipifera
12
Yes
FACU
Number of Dominant Species
2.
Acernegundo
25
Yes
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A)
3.
Liquidambarstyraciflua
10
No
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Salix nigra
10
No
OBL
Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 83.3% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
57
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
29
20% of total cover:
12
OBL species 28 x 1 = 28
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15
)
FACW species 6 x 2 = 12
1.
Acernegundo
8
Yes
FAC
FAC species 92 x 3 = 276
2.
FACU species 12 x 4 = 48
3.
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
4.
Column Totals: 138 (A) 364 (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.64
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
X 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
8
=Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
4
20% of total cover:
2
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 )
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Microstegium vimineum
40
Yes
FAC
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2.
Carex pedunculata
18
Yes
OBL
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Juncus effusus 6 No FACW
4.
Ranunculus bulbosus
4
No
FAC
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub -Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
68
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
34
20% of total cover:
14
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1.
Vitis rotundifolia
5
Yes
FAC
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
5
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
3
20% of total cover:
1
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: DP1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
(inches)
Color (moist)
%
Color (moist) % Type
Loc
Texture Remarks
0-3
10YR 4/2
90
7.5YR 4/4 10 C
PL/M
Loamy/Clayey Distinct redox concentrations
3-9
10YR 6/1
80
7.5YR 4/6 20 C
PL/M
Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
9-18
10YR 6/1
40
10YR 6/6 40
M
Loamy/Clayey
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
The remaining 20% from 9-18" is 7.5YR 4/6
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions(F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
ENG FORM 6116-4, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-0024, Exp:1113012024
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT.•
See ERDC/EL TR-12-9; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Cambro Building 2 City/County: Mebane/Alamance Sampling Date: 4/2/2024
Applicant/Owner: Samet Corporation State: NC Sampling Point: DP2
Investigator(s): Timothy O'Halloran, PWS Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): convex Slope (%): 10-15
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 36.096193 Long:-79.29393 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: CnD2- Cullen Clay Loam, 10-15% Slopes, Moderately Eroded NWI classification: N/A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
This data point represents the uplands surrounding Wetlands 1 and 5
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
—Surface Water (Al) —True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
—Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
—Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
—Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
—Iron Deposits (135)
—Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP2
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1. Liriodendron tulipifera
2. Liquidambar styraciflua
3. Juniperus virginiana
4. Pyrus calleryana
5.
6.
7.
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
% Cover
Species?
Status
22
Yes
FACU
18
Yes
FAC
6
No
FACU
4
No
UPL
50
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
25
20% of total cover:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15
)
1. Ligustrum sinense
15
Yes
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
15
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
8
20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 )
1. Lonicera japonica
10
Yes
2. Lamium purpureum
15
Yes
3. Hedera helix
10
Yes
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
35
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
18
20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: N/A
)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Me
FACU
3
FACU
UPL
FACU
7
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
1
(A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
6
(B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
16.7%
(A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species 0
x 1 =
0
FACW species 0
x 2 =
0
FAC species 18
x 3 =
54
FACU species 63
x 4 =
252
UPL species 19
x 5 =
95
Column Totals: 100 (A)
401
(B)
Prevalence Index = B/A
=
4.01
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub -Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No X
ENG FORM 6116-4, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: DP2
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
(inches)
Color (moist)
%
Color (moist) % Type Loc
Texture Remarks
0-3
10YR 4/2
100
Loamy/Clayey
3-10
10YR 6/6
70
10YR 5/8 30 M
Loamy/Clayey
10-18
10YR 6/4
85
7.5YR 5/6 15 C M
Loamy/Clayey Distinct redox concentrations
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11:
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions(F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
ENG FORM 6116-4, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-0024, Exp:1113012024
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT.•
See ERDC/EL TR-12-9; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Cambro Building 2 City/County: Mebane/Alamance Sampling Date: 4/2/2024
Applicant/Owner: Samet Corporation State: NC Sampling Point: DP3
Investigator(s): Timothy O'Halloran, PWS Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Valley Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 10-15
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 36.095217 Long:-79.292943 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: CnD2- Cullen Clay Loam, 10-15% Slopes, Moderately Eroded NWI classification: N/A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
This area was assessed for wetland and stream characteristics because its located within a valley. The 3 wetland parameters were not present within
this drainageway.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
—Surface Water (Al) —True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
—Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
X Drainage Patterns (1310)
—Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
—Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
—Iron Deposits (135)
—Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP3
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
Acernegundo
40
Yes
FAC
Number of Dominant Species
2.
Celtis occidentalis
16
Yes
FACU
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A)
3.
Juglans nigra
12
No
FACU
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 5 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 40.0% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
68
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
34
20% of total cover:
14
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15
)
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
1.
Ligustrum sinense
18
Yes
FACU
FAC species 55 x 3 = 165
2.
FACU species 71 x 4 = 284
3.
UPL species 11 x 5 = 55
4.
Column Totals: 137 (A) 504 (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.68
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
18
=Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
9
20% of total cover:
4
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 )
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Lamium purpureum
6
No
UPL
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2.
Hedera helix
25
Yes
FACU
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Stellaria media 5 No UPL
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub -Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
36
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
18
20% of total cover:
8
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1.
Vitis rotundifolia
15
Yes
FAC
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
15
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
8
20% of total cover:
3
Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: DP3
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
(inches)
Color (moist)
% Color (moist) % Type Loc
Texture Remarks
0-6
7.5YR 3/4
100
Loamy/Clayey
6-10
7.5YR 4/6
50 7.5YR 3/4 50
Loamy/Clayey
10-18
5YR 4/6
100
Loamy/Clayey
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11:
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions(F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
ENG FORM 6116-4, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-0024, Exp:1113012024
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT.•
See ERDC/EL TR-12-9; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Cambro Building 2 City/County: Mebane/Alamance Sampling Date: 4/2/2024
Applicant/Owner: Samet Corporation State: NC Sampling Point: DP4
Investigator(s): Timothy O'Halloran, PWS Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): toeslope/bottom land Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 0-2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 36.094005 Long:-79.292311 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: ChA- Chewacla Loam, 0-2% Slopes, Frequently Flooded NWI classification: N/A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
This data point represents characteristics of Wetland 2, a bottomland hardwood forest that drains into Stream 4
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
X Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
X High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
—Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
—Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
X Iron Deposits (135)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
X Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 0.5
Water Table Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 0
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP4
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
% Cover
Species?
Status
1. Platanus occidentalis
35
Yes
FACW
2. Liriodendron tulipifera
8
No
FACU
3. Quercus phellos
8
No
FAC
4. Acernegundo
22
Yes
FAC
5. Celtis laevigata
6
No
FACW
6.
7.
79
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
40 20% of total cover:
16
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15
)
1.
Acernegundo
25
Yes
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
25
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
13
20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 )
1.
Juncus effusus
12
Yes
2.
Carex pedunculata
18
Yes
3.
Rubus allegheniensis
3
No
4.
Potentilla indica
3
No
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
36
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
18
20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30
)
1.
Vitis rotundifolia
5
Yes
2.
Smilax rotundifolia
12
Yes
3.
4.
5.
17
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
9
20% of total cover:
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
FAC
I
FACW
OBL
FACU
FACU
8
FAC
FAC
4
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
7
(A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
7
(B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
100.0%
(A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species 18
x 1 =
18
FACW species 53
x 2 =
106
FAC species 72
x 3 =
216
FACU species 14
x 4 =
56
UPL species 0
x 5 =
0
Column Totals: 157 (A)
396
(B)
Prevalence Index = B/A
=
2.52
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
X 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub -Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
ENG FORM 6116-4, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: DP4
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Loc Texture Remarks
0-5 10YR 4/2 95 7.5YR 4/6 5 C M Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
5-16 10YR 6/6 80 10YR 4/2 20 D M Loamy/Clayey
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11:
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions(F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
ENG FORM 6116-4, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-0024, Exp:1113012024
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT.•
See ERDC/EL TR-12-9; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Cambro Building 2 City/County: Mebane/Alamance Sampling Date: 4/2/2024
Applicant/Owner: Timothy O'Halloran, PWS State: NC Sampling Point: DP5
Investigator(s): Timothy O'Halloran, PWS Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): convex Slope (%): 10-15
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 36.094018 Long:-79.292281 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: CnD2- Cullen Clay Loam, 10-15% Slopes, Moderately Eroded NWI classification: N/A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
This data point represents the upland conditions within the southern portion of the site and surrounding Wetlands 2 and 4
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
—Surface Water (Al) —True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
—Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
—Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
—Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
—Iron Deposits (135)
—Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP5
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
Liriodendron tulipifera
12
Yes
FACU
Number of Dominant Species
2.
Quercus phellos
8
No
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A)
3.
Acernegundo
20
Yes
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Acer rubrum
8
No
FAC
Species Across All Strata: 9 (B)
5.
Fagus grandifolia
12
Yes
FACU
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
Liquidambarstyraciflua
10
No
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 55.6% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
70
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
35
20% of total cover:
14
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15
)
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
1.
Acernegundo
12
Yes
FAC
FAC species 83 x 3 = 249
2.
Ligustrum sinense
20
Yes
FACU
FACU species 54 x 4 = 216
3.
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
4.
Column Totals: 137 (A) 465 (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.39
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
32
=Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
16
20% of total cover:
7
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 )
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Lonicera japonica
10
Yes
FACU
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2.
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub -Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
5
20% of total cover:
2
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1.
Vitis rotundifolia
5
Yes
FAC
2.
Smilax rotundifolia
10
Yes
FAC
3.
Toxicodendron radicans
10
Yes
FAC
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
25
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
13
20% of total cover:
5
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: DP5
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
(inches)
Color (moist)
% Color (moist) % Type Loc
Texture Remarks
0-7
10YR 4/2
100
Loamy/Clayey
7-11
7.5YR 6/6
80 10YR 4/2 20 D M
Loamy/Clayey
11-16
10YR 6/6
100
Loamy/Clayey
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11:
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions(F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
ENG FORM 6116-4, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-0024, Exp:1113012024
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT.•
See ERDC/EL TR-12-9; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Cambro Building 2 City/County: Mebane/Alamance Sampling Date: 4/2/2024
Applicant/Owner: Samet Corporation State: NC Sampling Point: DP6
Investigator(s): Timothy O'Halloran, PWS Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): valley/drainageway Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 0-5
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 36.094079 Long:-79.292917 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: ChA- Chewacla Loam, 0-2% Slopes, Frequently Flooded NWI classification: N/A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
This data point represents Wetland 5, a headwater forested wetland that drains into Stream 4. This feature is located within a drainageway
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
—Surface Water (Al) —True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
—Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
X High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
X Drainage Patterns (1310)
X Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
X Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
—Iron Deposits (135)
—Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 10
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 2
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP6
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1. Acernegundo
55 Yes
FAC
Number of Dominant Species
2.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 4 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
55 =Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
28 20% of total cover:
11
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: N/A
)
FACW species 10 x 2 = 20
1.
FAC species 63 x 3 = 189
2.
FACU species 0 x 4 = 0
3.
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
4.
Column Totals: 73 (A) 209 (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.86
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
X 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
=Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 )
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1. Juncus effusus
5 Yes
FACW
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2. Carex caroliniana
5 Yes
FACW
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Ranunculus bulbosus 8 Yes FAC
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub -Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
18 =Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
9 20% of total cover:
4
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: N/A )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: DP6
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Loc Texture Remarks
0-5 10YR 4/2 90 7.5YR 4/6 10 C PL/M Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
5-16 10YR 6/6 80 10YR 4/2 20 D M Loamy/Clayey
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11:
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions(F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
ENG FORM 6116-4, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

Fn7___C- q ECS SOUTHEAST, LLP "Setting the Standard for Service"
NCR Registered Engineering Firm P-1078
`g].„ Geotechnical •Construction Materials • Environmental ' Facilities NC Registered Geologists Firm C-406
SC Registered Engineering Firm 3239
Property/Site:
Address of Site:
Agent Authorization
Cambro 2 Site
TBD NC 119 HWY, Mebane, NC
Parcel Identification Number (PIN):
Client/Applicant Information:
Name:
Address:
Telephone Number:
Fax Number:
E-mail Address:
Authorization:
176238
Samet Corporation (POC Britton Settle)
309 Gallimore Dairy Road
Greensboro, NC 27409
336-403-1131
[e-mail]
I, the undersigned, do hereby authorize ECS to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary
for the processing of this request, to furnish supplemental information in support of this request,
including stream/wetland matters in coordination with the USACE and the NCDWR field
verification and permit application: , .1,,
Authorized Signature:
Date:
ECS Capitol Services, PI_LC • ECS Florida, LLC • ECS Mid -Atlantic, LLC • ECS Midwest, LLC - ECS Southeast, LLP • ECS Texas, LLP
www.ecslimited.com

re;
Cit
ECS SOUTHEAST, LLP "Setting the Standard for Service'
•. Geotechnical • Construction Materials • Environmental • Facilities NC Registered Eggr ng Finn F-1a7$
NC Re945tered Geologists Fnm C-dQB
SC Regislered Engmeermg Firm 3239
Property/Site:
Address of Site:
Agent Authorization
Cambro Building 2
TB❑ INC 119 HWY, Mebane, NC
Parcel Identification Number {PIN}: 176238
Client/Applicant Information:
Name: Michael Ortiz
Address: 14851 Delta Lane, Huntington Beach, CA 92647
Telephone Number: 909-354-8303
Fax Number:
E-mail Address: [e-mail]
Authorization:
1, the undersigned, d❑ hereby authorize ECS to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary
for the processing of this request, to furnish supplemental information in support of this request,
including stream/wetland matters in coordination h the USAGE and the NCDWR field
verification and permit appli
Authorized Signature:
Date:
—y—QC/
ECS Capitol Services- PLLC • ECS Fbpda, LLC • ECS Mid-Atlanbc. LLC • ECS Midwest- LLC • FCS Southeast, LLP • CCS Texas. LLP
www.ecsl united, com

4/25/24. 11:19 AM
Alamance County Tax Record Application - Parcel Ref No - 176238
Alamance County Government
TAX ADMINISTRATION RECORD SEARCH
Property Owner
Owner's Mailing Address
Property Location Address
A CAMPBELL HOLDINGS LLC
��HUNTINGTON
5801 SKYLAB ROAD
NC 119 HWY
BEACH , CA92647-2056
Administrative Data
_ _—A
Administrative Data
Valuation Information
Parcel ID No. 176238
Legal Desc NC INDUSTRIAL CENTER
OLD Tax Map ID 10-12-47
LOT 24
Tax Value $
GRIN 9815335704
Plat Bk/Pg 81 / 5
Tax Value - Land and all permanent improvements,
if any, effective January 1, 2023,
Owner I 698120
date of County's most recent General Reappraisal
Tax District 45 - E ALAMANCE
Assessed Value $ 1,395,037
Land Use Code 300
If Assessed Value does not equal Market value,
then the parcel may be in a tax
Land Use Desc VACANT INDUSTRIAL LAND
deferment program, be split by the county line, or be overridden to match a
alternative valuation approach.
Neighborhood MNCIC
Improvement Detail
(1st Major Improvement on Subject Parcel)
Year Built
0
Built Use/Style
Current Use
/
Grade
* Percent Complete
0
Heated Area (S/F)
0
Fireplace (Y/N)
N
Basement (Y/N)
N
** Bedroom(s)
0
** Bathroom(s)
0 Full Bath(s) 0 Half Bath(s)
*** Multiple Improvements
0
* Note -As of January 1
* * Note- Bathroom(s), Bedroom(s), shown for description only
* * Note - If multiple improvements equal "MLT" then parcel includes
additional major improvements
Sales History
2 Previous Sales Found for Parcel number 176238
Record Num Date
Name
Book/Page
Sale Price
1 2021
A CAMPBELL HOLDINGS LLC
3957 / 0701
$1,257,500.00
2 2021
NCIC LLC
3957 / 0699
$629,000.00
https://alamance.ustaxdata.com/print.cfm?ownerlD=&parcellD=176238 1 /2

4/25/24, 11:19 AM
Alamance County Tax Record Application - Parcel Ref No - 176238
Building Sketch
Land Supplemental
Deeded Acres
25.402
Tax District Note
45 - E ALAMANCE
Present -Use Info
VACANT INDUSTRIAL LAND
Improvement Valuation (1st Major Improvement on Subject Parcel)
* Improvement Tax Value $
** Improvement Assessed Value $
0
* Note - Tax Value effective Date equal January 1, 2023, date of County's most recent General Reappraisal
** Note - If Assessed Value not equal Tax Value then variance resulting from formal appeal procedure
Land Value Detail (Effective Date January 1, 2023, date of County's most recent General Reappraisal)
Land Full Value (LFV) $
Land Present -Use Value (PUV) $ ** Land Total Assessed Value $
1,395,037
1,395,037 1,395,037
** Note: If PUV equal LMV then parcel has wt qualified for present use program
https://alamance.ustaxdata.com/print.cfm?ownerlD=&parcellD=176238 2/2

Appendix I: Figures

E—lO } a S
W H W W Z z Q LS LQof D N
2° N to z tr O R R ci Z as LU
1�a p �QWQ H v, aN
p J m U U Q ° 64
Li�U m 0 W Z= U a
Q H >. L w m U
U W Q 0 w c 'o
co
D �j Q _ ~ a
o °/ R a
U a 10 Q
3
Y '
Leban- Ra
i
R
O
Is Poom)je0 3
— —
a6uej
4
Collin c�
— —
— — — — — -----U �
aouetuely
IS41UINN
-- — ---------—----
t�irii_: 7
O
!n
A
u
m
V
IS 410-A IV
`ter
C 30
_
W
C'
Q
C
t7
15 P�ry1 N
sm
Q
1S 4)r
jz3 is 47g
S
J N
C•`
N �
N �
d tp
O
u
�a =
P�j gryy s Noox\0 3 a
�OoJ a
o
u � n
� � m
J N
d d
T.
L O
U
Q
00
O
LO
N
2
Q
U)
U
4)
O
a_
0
L
A
F rJc
Gr RO
°oaf' P�! uey�A
c�
I, m
w J
A21 u°SP°Q
p'U
Q:
'4
O
A
S4iJ
fQ >lJed aleiodjoo
M
cn
C
J
Lo
6
N
O
0

-lz °y
0
w � Q S ; 3 �S so ,'i pp o
w
W W Z Z U
a N
FON � Z 0 (� Z C,ir,V st R �� R N Z
5 W
�a O H Q w Q tea zQ v, o
p of J coO U OQ Qm �J iJ�U m 0Hw�z� o
N
<= Oog a.
co co
< >. -a UN � wQ O Crn LL
w _
` R Q
U a 0
ell
_ J~ "1 • ' ,, .. I � —� % �.e _a� � >, •; 1.
--y- 1�J��/...i_-- / � •� •�:`� �, `� Via:. I/,/�•\'
IM•.r�0� i _ ` •—
-_ ,...: it II \� = i. `�b a • J� L.__�_._.
NO
-J �44yyy��
,�.e♦• /LO
BOO LL
00
G
ti
04
.����_�!• µ' �. �.L. �f i- ,.fir=%

-lz v °
O }< r y
W H W W Z Z 3 �S 4��,� r gm l 00 N
���jjjLO
a �LLioo WJ „ � o
�a O ~ Q W Q Z y> N curry St V R m Z N W
a llfJ w LPL/
O CoU a o ° N
�/�O U a w
V iii a.
Q< y y N Q o >. LL v U 0
cn I Ll I F-- ofa co w LL
c w O LU Q D 3 °
N O > Q R Q
(j a`
7 �Q , ' ii. � _ �Y. '�. �., _- _ •'��i- � icy';, i Y .
�, .+: �s. � Y-« •ate .w - �'. ,.
I.
r dL
G
F-
'h
o
�
o
LU
o
C
�
O
>
O
"O
�
O
�
O
LL
Q
O
O-
+�
_
c-
O
O
U)
�75
Lo
O
U)
L
-
U
Q
(�
-0
o
NC
O
CCCO
O
�CC
O
1�
ON
�
J
J
J
J
_• - �
U
U
U
o
r
�

E-lZ = °s, v
iJO W H Q Y z 3 , '� s�.. o N
^ L U W Z Z 0 0 S 4�{,� O N
aof D � o �' o LO
U w 0 0 Q a — c; v u as
aN � Z U �' nl Q m �,irty SL cRi - R c) Z LO W
a 0 mQ QH Q o r 0
N S
Ci �V UQw�
i=
0 0 J W m CO as 0
a.
LL
I Ll IQ H O N W H o m e w m w leLL
cn 0 LL Z Q >
c w p >w a Z a 3 °
D O > Q R Q
u 1 0
74
� •. 4 s � 'Sri: � �
r" x
-O
O
LL
hf. Ilfl.+j
-2
U
�
{
fn
_0
N
_
(6
m
p
>
J
O
1
) r,
a
Q
o
m
=
-O
O
=
_0
m
N
N
_
c LL
-o
O
O
O
00
LL
Q
(]
w
J
N
N
O
>,
s
O
�
N
U
'o
tYn
`
fir•. b .a � '�; �� �w� i '
_
rL
A
c
Q
Ni
c

WH W w ~ a LU a 0 0
Q W Z z Q
a N � z CU of D
of (n Z .s R Z W
VimLLJ
Q;
.. W
Q
OLl I W
co W LL
w oz"aw o Q W
R a
(j a F0
Z �Q
V
(6
O
Ln
N
2
N
Q
S
7
Ln
(a
V
0
0
p
O
O
Z
�
W
d
�
N
W
0
J
W
a�
O LL
mr

WO �LU W z CL >. N
woo O 0w0 RII M z_aO
E w
�
LUO N �z uCD
OQ W Q W m
a CM0 of QoND
CO Wz om� a
Q H = fi
H Z a I Ll I
C7 >
L>La w
Q F s >,Q
U qt
LL Cf)o ~ W
C) WQ Q to
C� �L,L
�0 a�zD dO OU a ! Q
�
� V
O
-i
-0 O
LL
i J
M
y0
3
lIl
V
MO
-0 ~O
N O
O
\
lL
3 �
cm
0-
z 2
G
i
,
M
aC
O
CD
3
f6
ate.
Q
M
Ln
OO
z N
-0 Q
C
ffle
Ln
��.
a o
c o
�i 2 _
_
CD
0 co
V
�
I
JF
�
� p
V
a N
O
CD
N
O lL
O
N
f6 Q
V 6 O
O n � 0
Ln
i
I C CD
O
O Ln
z Z 111
fa irr i
r r M
T
J-i
n
fa El
rs r
0 V J..i iLo
z N N
LU a a° Sri o o ■
■

Appendix II: Photographic Log

April 4, 2024

ECS Southeast, LLC
�W
F.
i
L4
3 - Culvert at the end of Potential Non -wetland Waters 1.
4 - Confluence of Potential Non -wetland Waters 1 and Potential Non -wetland Waters 2.
ECS Project No. 49:22646

ECS Southeast, LLC
5 - General conditions of Potential Non -wetland Waters 2.
6 - View of the start of Potential Non -wetland Waters 2.
ECS Project No. 49:22646

ECS Southeast, LLC
7 - View of the lower end of Potential Non -wetland Waters 3 transitioning to Potential Wetland
Waters 1.
8 - General conditions of Potential Non -wetland Waters 4.
ECS Project No. 49:22646

April 4, 2024
W11,
�- 1, : "
1,7

April 4, 2024
yhAS i,.yi S
Su 'tip Grox'tl�WA -IN
P�
1 w l
y S'l

ECS Southeast, LLC
13 - General conditions of Potential Wetland Waters 4.
14 - General conditions of Potential Wetland Waters 5.
ECS Project No. 49:22646

Appendix III: Antecedent
Precipitation Tool (APT)

� 01 rl O
V
O
6
V
NO
a N
O
d
V
CO
y
C
_
a
Q
C
U
T
p
❑
c6
� rl O rl
p
E m
a
z
� N
O
N
0
z r-I
�
01
❑
ai
L
Q O O r
p
� In m rn
N rl rl
.0
C N
O
N
N
M
O
N
N
0
-
Q 01 to O
C ~ N O
p N
N T
C
O
U
N
a)
y
w
N
O
N
CO
a w v
6
E
E
E N
C
O
O
Z
O
Z
u M
V
U
p
�
UJ
C
❑
N
L m ul
Q O
C
rl
N
rl
O
ul
O]
N
O O O O
l0 T l0
� (O Il1 lfl
p
m
rn
ai
>
m
N
Cl
O]
ul
W
y
.4
N
n
Q
W N M O]
T
c m
� N
O
N
'-
r r r
p
D7
N
C
r^n
u^i
U m to
�
ul
ul
lD
Q mO �
a
fl
N
6 Q M
O
M
M M
9 �
n
N N
C
m
Ill
h
O
LL N
N W W
E W L #
n
rl
T
rl
N
�
D
Ln
0 z
z N N
F
N
N
N
C M N
O Q z W
2 O
CD
W
v z O
C N
N
L J
of
SO
ol
Z
N
_c
0
0
0
N
W
O
O
O
�
❑
T
N
N
N
p
O
O
O
❑
O
M
N
N
N
u^
N N
T
N
N
N j
>a)
O N
N
Q w
z�
C3)
>q
-
o
m
0
z
U
E1� �✓�
m
U N
O Q
e�.
Vl
u
c
u
C
❑
C
O
�
� Q�
�p
p
u
t
N
7.
Q
Wg
ai
a
�_C.
.
to
O
o
N
❑
v
00 h tp ul � M N rl O
(S@gDUI) IlpJuip�l

ATTACHMENT C
Impact Exhibits

ATTACHMENT D
Statements of Availability for Stream, Wetland, and Buffer Credits

Restoration Systems, LLC
1101 Haynes St. Suite 211
Raleigh, North Carolina
Ph: [phone]
Fx: [phone]
Statement of Mitigation Credit Availability
Motes Creek Buffer Mitigation & Nutrient Offset Bank
April 26, 2024
Rebecca Chandler
NC Division of Water Resources
Re: Availability of Compensatory Riparian Buffer Credits
Project: Cambro Building 2, Alamance County, HUC 03030002 (HAW subwatershed)
This document confirms that 79,874.00 Credits (Credits) from the Motes Creek Buffer Mitigation
& Nutrient Offset Bank (Bank) under the RS Haw River Subwatershed - Phase 1 Buffer & Nutrient
Offset Umbrella Mitigation Banking Instrument (UMBI) are currently available and all or a portion
may be used, once transferred, for compensatory mitigation relative to the Cambro Building 2
project, and as proposed by Samet Corporation (Applicant).
The Applicant may ultimately purchase the Credits, if they are available, following Permit issuance.
Should the Applicant purchase the Credits at that time, we will complete and execute the Mitigation
Credit Transfer Certificate (Certificate) within five (5) days of receipt of the full purchase price.
We will additionally provide copies of the completed and executed Certificate to the Applicant, the
Division of Water Resources (DWR) and, if needed, other regulatory agencies. In addition, we will
provide DWR with an updated copy of the Bank's Ledger, reflecting the transaction. Transaction
information in the updated Bank Ledger will include relevant Permit and Applicant information as
well as the number and resource type of the debited Credits.
Should your office have any questions, please contact me at 843.261.3049.
Sincerely,
Caitlan B. Parker
Restoration Systems, LLC

fires
Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC Stream and Stream Banks
Statement of Availability — Cape Fear 03030002
April 25, 2024
Samet Corporation
Attn: Britton Settle
309 Gallimore Dairy Road
Greensboro, NC 27409
Re Project: Cambro Building 2
This document confirms that the Samet Corporation (Applicant) for the Cambro Building 2 (Project) has expressed an
interest to utilize 556.00 Stream Mitigation Credits from the EBX sponsored RES Cape Fear 02 Umbrella Mitigation Bank,
specifically 552.70 Stream credits from the Cloud and Banner site and 3.30 Stream credits from the Tobacco Road Site, in the
Cape Fear HUC 03030002. As the official Bank Sponsor, Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC, attests to the fact that
mitigation is available for reservation at this time.
These mitigation credits are not considered secured, and consequently are eligible to be used for alternate purposes by the
Bank Sponsor, until payment in full is received from the Applicant resulting in the issuance of a Mitigation Credit Transfer
Certificate by the bank acknowledging that the Applicant has fully secured credits from the bank and the Banker has
accepted full responsibility for the mitigation obligation requiring the credits/units.
The Banker will issue the Mitigation Credit Transfer Certificate within three (3) days of receipt of the purchase price. Banker
shall provide to Applicant a copy of the Mitigation Credit Transfer Certificate and a documented copy of the debit of credits
from the Bank Official Credit Ledger(s), indicating the permit number and the resource type secured by the applicant. A copy
of the Mitigation Credit Transfer Certificate, with an updated Official Credit Ledger will also be sent to regulatory agencies
showing the proper documentation.
Please contact me at 919-209-1055 or [e-mail] if you have any questions.
Best Regards,
Amy Staley
Credit Sales Manager
RES
cc: Julia Tillery, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
cc: Rebecca Chandler, NCDEQ Division of Water Resources
cc: Timothy P. O'Halloran, ECS Southeast, LLC

fires
Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC Stream and Wetland Banks
Statement of Availability — Cape Fear 03030002
April 25, 2024
Samet Corporation
Attn: Britton Settle
309 Gallimore Dairy Road
Greensboro, NC 27409
Re Project: Cambro Building 2
This document confirms that the Samet Corporation (Applicant) for the Cambro Building 2 (Project) has expressed an
interest to utilize 0.50 Wetland Mitigation Credits from the EBX sponsored RES Cape Fear 02 Umbrella Mitigation Bank,
specifically 0.50 Wetland credits from the Tobacco Road Site, in the Cape Fear HUC 03030002. As the official Bank Sponsor.
Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC, attests to the fact that mitigation is available for reservation at this time.
These mitigation credits are not considered secured, and consequently are eligible to be used for alternate purposes by the
Bank Sponsor, until payment in full is received from the Applicant resulting in the issuance of a Mitigation Credit Transfer
Certificate by the bank acknowledging that the Applicant has fully secured credits from the bank and the Banker has
accepted full responsibility for the mitigation obligation requiring the credits/units.
The Banker will issue the Mitigation Credit Transfer Certificate within three (3) days of receipt of the purchase price. Banker
shall provide to Applicant a copy of the Mitigation Credit Transfer Certificate and a documented copy of the debit of credits
from the Bank Official Credit Ledger(s), indicating the permit number and the resource type secured by the applicant. A copy
of the Mitigation Credit Transfer Certificate, with an updated Official Credit Ledger will also be sent to regulatory agencies
showing the proper documentation.
Please contact me at 919-209-1055 or [e-mail] if you have any questions.
Best Regards,
Amy Staley
Credit Sales Manager
RES
cc: Julia Tillery, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
cc: Rebecca Chandler, NCDEQ Division of Water Resources
cc: Timothy P. O'Halloran, ECS Southeast, LLC

ATTACHMENT
USFWS Request for Technical Assistance Letter

CECS SOUTHEAST, LLC NC Engineering License No. F-1519
Geotechnical • Construction Materials • Environmental • Facilities
April 23, 2024
Mr. John Ellis
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
P.O. Box 33726
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636
Reference: U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service — Request for Technical Assistance
Cambro 2 Site
West Holt Street, Mebane, Alamance County, North Carolina
ECS Project Number: 49:22646
Dear Mr. Ellis:
ECS Southeast, LLP (ECS) is pleased to submit this Request for Technical Assistance for the proposed Cambro 2 Site,
located in Mebane, Alamance County, North Carolina.
Background Information
The Project Study Area (PSA) is located along West Holt Street in Mebane, Alamance County, North Carolina (Figure 1).
The PSA is approximately 25.08 acres and identified as Alamance County Parcel Identification Number (PIN) 176238. The
PSA consists of undeveloped forested land. The purpose of the project is to develop the site with an industrial facility, as
part of the NC Industrial Center.
Desktop Assessment
ECS utilized the USFWS Information Planning and Consultation (IPaC) tool to identify federally listed threatened and/or
endangered species with potential to occur within the PSA or general project vicinity. ECS also utilized the North Carolina
Natural Heritage Program (NC NHP) protected species database for current and historic occurrence records of federally
listed threatened and endangered species documented within a one -mile radius of the PSA.
The USFWS IPaC tool identified one specie, the tricolored bat, as having potential to occur onsite, which is listed in Table
1 of this report. The NC NHP database identified no records of current or historic occurrences or designated critical habitats
of federally threatened or endangered species onsite. The NHP database identified not records within a 1-mile radius of the
PSA. The IPaC and NC NHP database reports are provided (See Attached).
Additional species- and site -specific details are reflected in Table 1 of this report and summarized in the narratives,
thereafter:
I axle i : bite-snecitic i-eaerai I nreatenea & tnaanaerea bnecies ana Haaitat information
Common Name Listing Status Suitable Habitat Habitat Present? USFWS Optimal
Scientific Name Survey Window
Tricolored Bat Proposed FE During spring, summer, and fall, tricolored batsare found in forested habitatswhere Yes May 15 —August 15
Perimyotis subflavus they roost in trees, primarily among leaves of live or recently dead deciduous
hardwood trees, but are also found in Spanish moss, pine trees, and occasionally
human structures. During the winter, tricolored bats are often found in caves and
abandoned mines.
F=
E=
1812 CENTER PARK DRIVE, SUITE D, CHARLOTTE, NC 28217 • T: 704-525-5152 F: 704-357-0023
ECS Florida, LLC • ECS Mid -Atlantic, LLC • ECS Midwest, LLC • ECS Pacific, Inc. • ECS Southeast, LLC ECS Southwest, LLP
ECS New York Engineering, PLLC - An Associate of ECS Group of Companies • www.ecsiimited.com
"ONE FIRM. ONE MISSION."

USFWS Request for Technical Assistance
Lincolnton Meadows Site - Lincolnton, North Carolina
ECS Project No. 49:21926
Onsite Habitat Assessment
On April 12, 2023, qualified ECS personnel familiar with habitat for tricolored bat conducted an onsite habitat assessment.
ECS characterized habitat within the PSA as undeveloped woodlands and agricultural fields. Species composition within
the undeveloped woodlands included winged elm (Ulmus alata), sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua), sycamore (Platanus
occidentalis), river birch (Betula nigra), red maple (Acer rubrum), eastern red cedar (Juniperus virginiana), tulip poplar
(Liriodendron tulipifera), white oak (Quercus alba), water oak (Quercus nigra), Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense),
muscadine (Vitis rotundifolia), greenbrier (Smilax rotundifolia), Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica), and English ivy
(Hedera helix).
Species Determination Requests
TrinnlnrPrl hat -
The site is primarily forested and contained deciduous hardwood trees with cavities. The forested areas may provide suitable
tricolored bat habitat. Based on site conditions observed during the habitat assessment, ECS is requesting a "Not Likely
to Jeopardize the Continued Existence of the Proposed Species" determination from the USFWS for tricolored bat.
Closing
Should you have any questions or require any additional information in support of these findings, please do not hesitate to
contact Mr. Timothy O'Halloran at [e-mail]. We appreciate your assistance.
ECS Southeast, LLC
Timothy O'Halloran
Environmental Project Manager
tohalloran(a)ecslimited.com
Attachments:
Photograph Log
Figure 1: Site Location Map
Figure 2: USGS Topographic Map
Figure 3: USDA-NRCS County Soils Map
USFWS Raleigh Field Office IPaC Results
NCNHP Database Results
Brandon Fulton, LSS, PSC, PWS
Environmental Principal
Bfulton(a)ecslimited.com

v �•
�ryIi� A
i
r ®;
r
71
r
i � A
c a�^
-
�r

m
w-hoto 3 — View of a forested wetland area identified within the site boundary.
a
-WOMI.
ME,
Im

Photograph Log
Lincolnton Meadows Site - Lincolnton, North Carolina
ECS Project No. 49:21926
Photograph Log
Photo 5 — View of a stream along the southern site boundary.
Photo 6 — View of a forested wetland that drains to the stream along the southern boundary.

E-1 z
a.I
«
/ LQ
L r
a = _ §
2§ \ \ & o o z ) % > \ z 1 LU
�k } ® \ \ \ § a „ \ �
.. q D
�U Cj I \ \ \ 2 § .. § %
t § j \ / \ \) \ LL
} 4 < d n
k a. R \
2 � 2 �
}
E&#m 3
Is � �r3 »S
--2©9R J °°��eec � c«@&
- - - - - - = IS --- amemmY ;------------ --
ƒ � £
§ a ggIV E \
\0 < c 2 k
IJ %per 75
&
I ° Is',19
a% &�
o \
\ t v
� ■ .. ,
�
P ®®� $°° 0 ° ±
a ( 0
2 f
� � §
! /
$
&
� r
/ ƒG RO
P #� ± NA� , =a
§. \
©o �©
45
/ \ ©°
g 2 -
LO
2
<
�
/
-
\ 3u) &
E
7 } \
0 �

E_lz _ Oy
Wo _ °
E w W H Z_ V 3 3 �S4o, �Smll o 0
w z = U �j J{ N 5` a w C\N
"a N � z O o (D Z Cutry St R II '`ya N Z W
4a O �QwQ z¢ Coll
o04
O J m O O OQ Qmo N
�U ZQ pM Qg m va.
. C1
Q H of N �� o > li '0 U
U W Q O U C1 rn m o W LL
w Q z w O` a R Q
Wl
CD, "
Vk
17
�s b• (/ n , , '�
�t,,. • —„`- _h!'pJ� Irk• �r � , 'r• 1i � - • •• :• ••,• t.
II + • `{11
�� • � _ �+.1� d � %' is e . • • (J ��..JJ
. + •� mil'-\_, \ •� • _J r _ - � l� ��
,1
``\ ,� 7 • ��• 1 d.- 1. • ♦ \` - p � ,•i • � "+\ � \,
1 • �(
- • %''-/ � e<r is � !•�- � 1 J
�N IL

W H W W Z Z - 3 �S 40�,� sm` o N
g ~
� �ui00 N� ii o M
4a N Z O Q Z N w N carry sr u R CD
0 0 OmWO a� o 13 N
iJ�t�i I: Nan a m N C9
LL
Q �� m v m W
Q o
w >W J Z 3 �
N O > Q R Q
U a •F � Q
•�
� �� - �• � T•~ 46 9 1-yam
F
tA
j
-0 o
o W
W :y
o W
o 4) 41b
�• � a� -o �_ 1.
a) o
o ', • �.
a o
°
v�
o � cn
0 1 11
o 0 0
o cn C. o
LO
o i a
Q o = o o y - or a
a0 N CO c N LL
o {� S` y i a c �' �, o
� O E E E1 a.
7 _
�. J J J J
fr,
a) J
U C� W
Q m U 0 p K '•'
G U U U U W �' •r_ ��' a. p N
9 T

United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
3916 Sunset Ridge Rd
Raleigh, NC 27607
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
In Reply Refer To:
Project Code: 2024-0078632
Project Name: Cambro 2 Site
04/17/2024 19:58:38 UTC
Subject: List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project
location or may be affected by your proposed project
To Whom It May Concern:
The enclosed species list identifies threatened, endangered, proposed and candidate species, as
well as proposed and final designated critical habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your
proposed project and/or may be affected by your proposed project. The species list fulfills the
requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the
Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). If your project area
contains suitable habitat for any of the federally -listed species on this species list, the proposed
action has the potential to adversely affect those species. If suitable habitat is present, surveys
should be conducted to determine the species' presence or absence within the project area. The
use of this species list and/or North Carolina Natural Heritage program data should not be
substituted for actual field surveys.
New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of
species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Please feel free to
contact us if you need more current information or assistance regarding the potential impacts to
federally proposed, listed, and candidate species and federally designated and proposed critical
habitat. Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the
Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be
completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be
completed by visiting the IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and
implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be requested
through the IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the enclosed list.
The purpose of the Act is to provide a means whereby threatened and endangered species and the
ecosystems upon which they depend may be conserved. Under sections 7(a)(1) and 7(a)(2) of the
Act and its implementing regulations (50 CFR 402 et seq.), Federal agencies are required to
utilize their authorities to carry out programs for the conservation of threatened and endangered

Project code: 2024-0078632
04/17/2024 19:58:38 UTC
species and to determine whether projects may affect threatened and endangered species and/or
designated critical habitat.
A Biological Assessment is required for construction projects (or other undertakings having
similar physical impacts) that are major Federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the
human environment as defined in the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)
(c)). For projects other than major construction activities, the Service suggests that a biological
evaluation similar to a Biological Assessment be prepared to determine whether the project may
affect listed or proposed species and/or designated or proposed critical habitat. Recommended
contents of a Biological Assessment are described at 50 CFR 402.12.
If a Federal agency determines, based on the Biological Assessment or biological evaluation, that
listed species and/or designated critical habitat may be affected by the proposed project, the
agency is required to consult with the Service pursuant to 50 CFR 402. In addition, the Service
recommends that candidate species, proposed species and proposed critical habitat be addressed
within the consultation. More information on the regulations and procedures for section 7
consultation, including the role of permit or license applicants, can be found in the "Endangered
Species Consultation Handbook" at:
https://www.fws. gov/sites/defaultlfiles/documents/endangered-species-consultation-
handbook.pdf
Migratory Birds: In addition to responsibilities to protect threatened and endangered species
under the Endangered Species Act (ESA), there are additional responsibilities under the
Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGEPA) to
protect native birds from project -related impacts. Any activity, intentional or unintentional,
resulting in take of migratory birds, including eagles, is prohibited unless otherwise permitted by
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)). For more
information regarding these Acts, see https://www.fws.gov/program/migratory-bird-permit/what-
we-do.
The MBTA has no provision for allowing take of migratory birds that may be unintentionally
killed or injured by otherwise lawful activities. It is the responsibility of the project proponent to
comply with these Acts by identifying potential impacts to migratory birds and eagles within
applicable NEPA documents (when there is a federal nexus) or a Bird/Eagle Conservation Plan
(when there is no federal nexus). Proponents should implement conservation measures to avoid
or minimize the production of project -related stressors or minimize the exposure of birds and
their resources to the project -related stressors. For more information on avian stressors and
recommended conservation measures, see https://www.fws.gov/library/collections/threats-birds.
In addition to MBTA and BGEPA, Executive Order 13186: Responsibilities of Federal Agencies
to Protect Migratory Birds, obligates all Federal agencies that engage in or authorize activities
that might affect migratory birds, to minimize those effects and encourage conservation measures
that will improve bird populations. Executive Order 13186 provides for the protection of both
migratory birds and migratory bird habitat. For information regarding the implementation of
Executive Order 13186, please visit https://www.fws.gov/partner/council-conservation-
migratory-birds.
2of11

Project code: 2024-0078632
04/17/2024 19:58:38 UTC
We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages
Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project
planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Code in the header of
this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project that you submit
to our office.
Attachment(s):
• Official Species List
• USFWS National Wildlife Refuges and Fish Hatcheries
• Bald & Golden Eagles
• Migratory Birds
OFFICIAL SPECIES LIST
This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the
requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether
any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed
action".
This species list is provided by:
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
3916 Sunset Ridge Rd
Raleigh, NC 27607
[phone]
3 of 11

Project code: 2024-0078632
04/17/2024 19:58:38 UTC
PROJECT SUMMARY
Project Code: 2024-0078632
Project Name: Cambro 2 Site
Project Type: Commercial Development
Project Description: The proposed project would involve development for an industrial
facility.
Project Location:
The approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https:
www. google.com/maps/(a)36.095800749999995,-79.2929788184004,14z
.; F'C1r -
Counties: Alamance County, North Carolina
4 of 11

Project code: 2024-0078632 04/17/2024 19:58:38 UTC
ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT SPECIES
There is a total of 2 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list.
Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include
species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species
list because a project could affect downstream species. Note that 1 of these species should be
considered only under certain conditions.
IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA
Fisheriesi, as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the
Department of Commerce.
See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially
within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office
if you have questions.
NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an
office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of
Commerce.
5 of 11

Project code: 2024-0078632
04/17/2024 19:58:38 UTC
MAMMALS
NAME
STATUS
Tricolored Bat Perimyotis subflavus Proposed
No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Endangered
This species only needs to be considered under the following conditions:
• This species only needs to be considered if the project includes wind turbine operations.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/10515
INSECTS
NAME STATUS
Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus Candidate
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9743
CRITICAL HABITATS
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S
JURISDICTION.
YOU ARE STILL REQUIRED TO DETERMINE IF YOUR PROJECT(S) MAY HAVE EFFECTS ON ALL
ABOVE LISTED SPECIES.
USFWS NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE LANDS
AND FISH HATCHERIES
Any activity proposed on lands managed by the National Wildlife Refuge system must undergo a
'Compatibility Determination' conducted by the Refuge. Please contact the individual Refuges to
discuss any questions or concerns.
THERE ARE NO REFUGE LANDS OR FISH HATCHERIES WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA.
BALD & GOLDEN EAGLES
Bald and golden eagles are protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Actl and the
Migratory Bird Treaty Act2.
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to bald or
golden eagles, or their habitats3, should follow appropriate regulations and consider
implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described in the links below. Specifically,
please review the "Supplemental Information on Migratory Birds and Eagles".
1. The Bald and Golden Eap-le Protection Act of 1940.
2. The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918.
3. 50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)
6of11

Project code: 2024-0078632
04/17/2024 19:58:38 UTC
There are likely bald eagles present in your project area. For additional information on bald
eagles, refer to Bald Eagle Nesting and Sensitivity to Human Activity
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures
to reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, see the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE
SUMMARY below to see when these birds are most likely to be present and breeding in your
project area.
1►/Juhl
1:1:11111911►rMll1I_WelQI
Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus Breeds Sep 1 to
This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, but warrants attention Jul 31
because of the Eagle Act or for potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain
types of development or activities.
https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1626
PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE SUMMARY
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be
present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project
activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read "Supplemental
Information on Migratory Birds and Eagles", specifically the FAQ section titled "Proper
Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before using or attempting to interpret
this report.
Probability of Presence (■)
Green bars; the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your project
overlaps during that week of the year.
Breeding Season( )
Yellow bars; liberal estimate of the timeframe inside which the bird breeds across its entire
range.
Survey Effort (1)
Vertical black lines; the number of surveys performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s)
your project area overlaps.
No Data (—)
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
■ probability of presence breeding season 1 survey effort — no data
SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Bald Eagle I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I++++ +++i 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I
7of11

Project code: 2024-0078632 04/17/2024 19:58:38 UTC
Non -BCC
Vulnerable
Additional information can be found using the following links:
• Eagle Management https://www.fws.gov/program/eagle-management
• Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds https://www.fws.gov/library
collections/avoiding-and-minimizing-incidental-take-mi rator.
• Nationwide conservation measures for birds https://www.fws.gov/sites/default/files/
documents/nationwide-standard-conservation-measures.pdf
• Supplemental Information for Migratory Birds and Eagles in IPaC https://www.fws.gov/
media/supplemental-information-mi ratory-birds-and-bald-and-golden-ea les-may-occur-
project-action
MIGRATORY BIRDS
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Acti and the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Act2.
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to
migratory birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and consider
implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described in the links below. Specifically,
please review the "Supplemental Information on Migratory Birds and Eagles".
1. The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918.
2. The Bald and Golden Eas71e Protection Act of 1940.
3. 50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures
to reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, see the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE
SUMMARY below to see when these birds are most likely to be present and breeding in your
project area.
BREEDING
NAME SEASON
Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus Breeds Sep 1 to
This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, but warrants attention Jul 31
because of the Eagle Act or for potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types
of development or activities.
https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1626
8 of 11

Project code: 2024-0078632
04/17/2024 19:58:38 UTC
BREEDING
NAME
SEASON
Chimney Swift Chaetura pelagica
Breeds Mar 15
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
t0 Aug 25
and Alaska.
https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9406
Prothonotary Warbler Protonotaria citrea
Breeds Apr 1 to
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
Jul 31
and Alaska.
https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9439
Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus
Breeds May 10
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
to Sep 10
and Alaska.
https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9398
Rusty Blackbird Euphagus carolinus
Breeds
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions
elsewhere
(BCRs) in the continental USA
https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9478
Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina
Breeds May 10
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
to Aug 31
and Alaska.
https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9431
PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE SUMMARY
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be
present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project
activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read "Supplemental
Information on Migratory Birds and Eagles", specifically the FAQ section titled "Proper
Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before using or attempting to interpret
this report.
Probability of Presence (■)
Green bars; the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your project
overlaps during that week of the year.
Breeding Season( )
Yellow bars; liberal estimate of the timeframe inside which the bird breeds across its entire
range.
Survey Effort (1)
Vertical black lines; the number of surveys performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s)
your project area overlaps.
No Data (—)
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
9of11

Project code: 2024-0078632 04/17/2024 19:58:38 UTC
■ probability of presence breeding season I survey effort — no data
SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Bald Non -BCC Eagle I I I I I I I I I I-++ ++++ ++++ ++N+ ++++ I+++ ++I+
Vulnerable
Chimney Swift +++ ++ ++++ +111 Jill 1111 Jill L I 1 1 ���� ll++ ++++ ++++
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Warbler Prothonotary
++++ ++++ ++++ + 1 I 1 I I I 1 1777 TM ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++
Warbler
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Red-headed JIWoodpecker +000 01+1 *++* ++++ + ++ ++ + �+ ++++ ++1+++
BCC Rangewide��
(CON)
Rusty Blackbird +++* *+++ T+++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++
BCC -BCR
Wood Thrush
BCC Rangewide ++++ ++++ ++++ +011 Od +," +," ,+++ ++1+ +++-1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1
(CON)
Additional information can be found using the following links:
• Eagle Management https://www.fws.gov/program/eagle-management
• Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds https://www.fws.gov/library
collections/avoiding-and-minimizing-incidental-take-migratory-birds
• Nationwide conservation measures for birds https://www.fws.gov/sites/default/files/
documents/nationwide-standard-conservation-measures.pdf
• Supplemental Information for Migratory Birds and Eagles in IPaC https://www.fws.gov/
media/suDDlemental-information-mis7ratorv-birds-and-bald-and-p-olden-eap-les-mav-occur-
project-action
10 of 11

Project code: 2024-0078632
04/17/2024 19:58:38 UTC
IPAC USER CONTACT INFORMATION
Agency:
Army Corps of Engineers
Name:
Timothy O'Halloran
Address:
1812 Center Park Drive
Address Line 2:
Suite D
City:
Charlotte
State:
NC
Zip:
28217
Email
[e-mail]
Phone:
9809209615
LEAD AGENCY CONTACT INFORMATION
Lead Agency: Army Corps of Engineers
11 of 11

Roy Cooper, Governor
■■■■ NC DEPARTMENT OF
■■I�r■i NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
■ ■■■
April 17, 2024
Timothy O'Halloran
ECS Southeast, LLC
9001 Glenwood Avenue
Raleigh, NC 27617
RE: Cambro 2 Site
Dear Timothy O'Halloran:
❑_ Reid Wilson, Secretary
Misty Buchanan
Deputy Director, Natural Heritage Program
NCNHDE-25670
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
Based on the project area mapped with your request, a query of the NCNHP database indicates that
there are no records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, and/or
conservation/managed areas within the proposed project boundary. Please note that although there
may be no documentation of natural heritage elements within the project boundary, it does not
imply or confirm their absence; the area may not have been surveyed. The results of this query
should not be substituted for field surveys where suitable habitat exists. In the event that rare
species are found within the project area, please contact the NCNHP so that we may update our
records.
The attached `Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one -mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally -listed species is found within the project area or is indicated within a one -mile radius of
the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) for
guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
httr)s://www.fws.gov/offices/Directory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
The NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a
Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Land and Water Fund easement, or Federally -
listed species are documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact the NCNHP at natural.heritage�dncr.nc.gov.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
DEPAR7HEN7 OF NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
121 W. JONES STREET. RALEIGH. NC 27603 • 1691 MAIL SERVICE CENTER. RALEIGH. NC 27609
OFC 919.707.9120 • FAX [phone]

3
0
\
$
\
\
\
/
j
�
�
+\
0
\\
d
%/
\
\/
2
</
»
tt
G:
E
ee
\2
EE
�:
e
c-
= c-
©
0
\\
�\
CO
e 0 0
&\
c-
c-
} a a
« / /
\
c
}
6\
\
�\
0
\eyx
CO
\\
CO/ a o
/ a \ \
4
«
2
x/&5
t
CO
o
e
e
\
\cn
±
\
co n/
< Uz
\
(U
\U
\CO
\
\
/
\ 0
\
\
/
\
j e e t
\
co
co
©z
\
0
0)///
�(
\
E
\
® e \ 0 /
/ )
\
}
\
\
§
O
e
D O O z
0
-
\
\
§
CO
0>
m /
/>
\
\
0
\ \
�\
E
e
} 2
\/
m
2
§
$©
H
\
LE
CO/
\
CO \
\\
\
\
t
(
°
CO
�\
\
±
E
//\
10
\CO/��
Z
\CO/
E
\
y
/ e = = 2
^ E
3\
`
eee
Co o 0
®ee
CL
x
/
g
}
t
\ / _ = o
�/
/ \
t
4 4 2 2/
E
e
2
_
m m-
U x x m
m§
/
%
\ \ \ \ \
\ f
3
Z
/ / ©
0
0
> >
e e»» e
2
Z
Z
xxGGz
\/
§
\
/

-----�
N 9Yh 5't — — — — — — — — — — — — —y—
R p Y a
v W �
A V
N �
w �S Las N c
IS 4�y N
w
IS p�F N
1S Is N JS pu A, IS 4JbS
♦ �n
�S aap� N ;S sa/ae4D N
U = 3
� 3 3
fake Trl
J
o Tate Ave
x
H
v
c
C
3 �
o d/e 6l l DN
Iosp°a
P
i. iJ pb w a
Py
l
Y
T GI
m 1
ta�aa
LO
LO
0
00
N
O
�m
=U
C7 �
E Z
FQ
a cs
m
Q
w C:
ce =3
Q o
� m �
v v -0
o �
Q :3
V
N
O
as
M
O
M

ATTACHMENT F
NCSHPO Request for Environmental Review Letter

EC ECS SOUTHEAST, LLC NC Engineering License No. F-1519
Geotechnical • Construction Materials • Environmental • Facilities
April 23, 2024
Ms. Renee Gledhill -Earley
State Historic Preservation Office
4617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-4617
Reference: North Carolina Historic Preservation Office Review Request
Cambro 2 Site
West Holt Street, Mebane, Alamance County, North Carolina
ECS Project Number: 49:22646
Dear Ms. Gledhill -Earley,
ECS Southeast, LLP (ECS) is pleased to submit this letter request for North Carolina Historic Preservation Office (HPO)
review of the subject property pursuant to National Historic Preservation Act Section 106 and North Carolina General Statute
121-12(a).
PROJECT INFORMATION
The Project Study Area (PSA) is located on West Holt Street in Mebane, Alamance County, North Carolina. The PSA is
approximately 25.08 acres. According to the Alamance County Geographic Information System (GIS) website, the Parcel
Identification Numbers (PIN) is 176238. The PSA consists of undeveloped forested land. The purpose of the proposed
project is to develop the site with an industrial facility, as part of the NC Industrial Center.
The NC SHPO database did not identify resources within the PSA. Three resources were identified within 1,500 feet of the
PSA. Twenty resources were identified within 1,500 feet of the PSA and are classified as `Surveyed Only' or Surveyed Only,
Gone'. A map depicting the historic resources within the project vicinity is attached as Figure 4.
Should you have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Timothy O'Halloran
at [e-mail].
Respectfully submitted,
ECS Southeast, LLC
Timothy O'Halloran
Environmental Project Manager
Attachments :
Photograph Log
Figure 1: Site Location Map
Figure 2: USGS Topographic Map
Figure 3: USDA-NRCS County Soils Map
Figure 4: NCSHPO HPO Database Map
I 4e_OLK.
W. Brandon Fulton, LS°S, PSC, PWS
Environmental Principal
1812 CENTER PARK DRIVE, SUITE D, CHARLOTTE, NC 28217 • T: 704-525-5152 F: 704-357-0023
ECS Florida, LLC • ECS Mid -Atlantic, LLC • ECS Midwest, LLC • ECS Pacific, Inc. • ECS Southeast, LLC ECS Southwest, LLP
ECS New York Engineering, PLLC - An Associate of ECS Group of Companies • www.ecsiimited.com
"ONE FIRM. ONE MISSION."

v �•
�ryIi� A
i
r ®;
r
71
r
i � A
c a�^
-
�r

m
w-hoto 3 — View of a forested wetland area identified within the site boundary.
a
-WOMI.
ME,
Im

Photograph Log
Lincolnton Meadows Site - Lincolnton, North Carolina
ECS Project No. 49:21926
Photograph Log
Photo 5 — View of a stream along the southern site boundary.
Photo 6 — View of a forested wetland that drains to the stream along the southern boundary.

E-1 z
a.I
«
/ LQ
L r
a = _ §
2§ \ \ & o o z ) % > \ z 1 LU
�k } ® \ \ \ § a „ \ �
.. q D
�U Cj I \ \ \ 2 § .. § %
t § j \ / \ \) \ LL
} 4 < d n
k a. R \
2 � 2 �
}
E&#m 3
Is � �r3 »S
--2©9R J °°��eec � c«@&
- - - - - - = IS --- amemmY ;------------ --
ƒ � £
§ a ggIV E \
\0 < c 2 k
IJ %per 75
&
I ° Is',19
a% &�
o \
\ t v
� ■ .. ,
�
P ®®� $°° 0 ° ±
a ( 0
2 f
� � §
! /
$
&
� r
/ ƒG RO
P #� ± NA� , =a
§. \
©o �©
45
/ \ ©°
g 2 -
LO
2
<
�
/
-
\ 3u) &
E
7 } \
0 �

E_lz _ Oy
Wo _ °
E w W H Z_ V 3 3 �S4o, �Smll o 0
w z = U �j J{ N 5` a w C\N
"a N � z O o (D Z Cutry St R II '`ya N Z W
4a O �QwQ z¢ Coll
o04
O J m O O OQ Qmo N
�U ZQ pM Qg m va.
. C1
Q H of N �� o > li '0 U
U W Q O U C1 rn m o W LL
w Q z w O` a R Q
Wl
CD, "
Vk
17
�s b• (/ n , , '�
�t,,. • —„`- _h!'pJ� Irk• �r � , 'r• 1i � - • •• :• ••,• t.
II + • `{11
�� • � _ �+.1� d � %' is e . • • (J ��..JJ
. + •� mil'-\_, \ •� • _J r _ - � l� ��
,1
``\ ,� 7 • ��• 1 d.- 1. • ♦ \` - p � ,•i • � "+\ � \,
1 • �(
- • %''-/ � e<r is � !•�- � 1 J
�N IL

W H W W Z Z - 3 �S 40�,� sm` o N
g ~
� �ui00 N� ii o M
4a N Z O Q Z N w N carry sr u R CD
0 0 OmWO a� o 13 N
iJ�t�i I: Nan a m N C9
LL
Q �� m v m W
Q o
w >W J Z 3 �
N O > Q R Q
U a •F � Q
•�
� �� - �• � T•~ 46 9 1-yam
F
tA
j
-0 o
o W
W :y
o W
o 4) 41b
�• � a� -o �_ 1.
a) o
o ', • �.
a o
°
v�
o � cn
0 1 11
o 0 0
o cn C. o
LO
o i a
Q o = o o y - or a
a0 N CO c N LL
o {� S` y i a c �' �, o
� O E E E1 a.
7 _
�. J J J J
fr,
a) J
U C� W
Q m U 0 p K '•'
G U U U U W �' •r_ ��' a. p N
9 T