190029_Application_20240402

State of North Carolina
Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Water Resources
Animal Waste Management Systems
Request for Certification of Coverage
Facility Currently covered by an Expiring Sate Non -Discharge General Permit
On September 30, 2024, the North Carolina State Non -Discharge General Permits for Animal Waste Management Systems will
expire. As required by these permits, facilities that have been issued Certificates of Coverage to operate under these State
Non -Discharge General Permits must apply for renewal at least 180 days prior to their expiration date. Therefore, all applications
must be received by the Division of Water Resources by no later than April 3, 2024.
Please do not leave any question unanswered Please verify all information and make any necessary corrections below.
Application must be signed and dated by the Permittee.
1. Certificate Of Coverage Number: AWC190029
2. Facility Name: MancoDairyFann
3. Permittee's Name (same as on the Waste Management Plan): J Lynn Mann
4. Permittee's Mailing Address: 1486 Manco Dair, Rd
City: Pittsboro State: NC
Telephone Number: 919-542-4667 Ext. E-mail: mancofarmsCalg nail.com
5. Facility's Physical Address: 1486 Manco Dairy Rd
City: Pittsboro State: NC
6. County where Facility is located: Chatham
7. Farm Manager's Name (if different from Landowner):
8. Farm Manager's telephone number (include area code):
9. Integrator's Name (if there is not an Integrator, write "None"):
10. Operator Name (OIC): Jesse L. Mann Phone No.: 919-842-2661
11. Lessee's Name (if there is not a Lessee, write "None"):
12. Indicate animal operation type and number:
Current Permit: Operations Type Allowable Count
Cattle - Milk Cow 150
Operation Types:
Swine
Cattle
Dry Poultry
Wean to Finish
Dairy Calf
Non Laying Chickens
Wean to Feeder
Dairy Heifer
Laying Chickens
Farrow to Finish
Milk Cow
Pullets
Feeder to Finish
Dry Cow
Turkeys
Farrow to Wean
Beef Stocker Calf
Turkey Pullet
Farrow to Feeder
Beef Feeder
Boar/Stud
Beef Broad Cow
Wet Poultry
Gilts
Other
Non Laying Pullet
Other
Layers
Zip: 27312-8045
Zip: 27312
OIC #: 20971
Other Trees
Horses - Horses
Horses - Other
Sheep- Sheep
Sheep - Other

13. Waste Treatment Lagoons, Digesters and Waste Storage Ponds (WSP): (Fill/Verify the following information.
Make all necessary corrections and provide missing data.)
Structure
Name
Structure Type
(Lagoon/Digester/
WSP)
Estimated
Date
Built
Liner Type
(Clay, Synthetic,
Unknown)
Capacity
(Cubic Feet)
Estimated
Surface Area
(Square Feet)
Design Freeboard
'Redline"
(Inches)
1
Storage
12/17/1982
Full, clay
57,100.00
5,400.00
22.00
2
Storage
5/9/1996
Full, clay
31,002.00
3,000.00
18.00
Submit one (1) copy of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP) with this completed and signed
application as required by NC General Statutes 143-215.10C(d), either by mailing to the address below or sending it via
email to the email address below.
The CAWMP must include the following components:
1. The most recent Waste Utilization Plan (WUP), signed by the owner and a certified technical specialist, containing:
a. The method by which waste is applied to the disposal fields (e.g. irrigation, injection, etc.)
b. A map of every field used for land application (for example: irrigation map)
c. The soil series present on every land application field
d. The crops grown on every land application field
e. The Realistic Yield Expectation (RYE) for every crop shown in the WUP
f. The maximum PAN to be applied to every land application field
g. The waste application windows for every crop utilized in the WUP
h. The required NRCS Standard specifications
2. A site map/schematic
3. Emergency Action Plan
4. Insect Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted
5. Odor Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted
6. Mortality Control Checklist with selected method noted - Use the enclosed updated Mortality Control Checklist
7. Lagoon/storage pond capacity documentation (design, calculations, etc.) Please be sure the above table is
accurate and complete. Also provide any site evaluations, wetland determinations, or hazard classifications that may be
applicable to your facility.
8. Operation and Maintenance Plan
If your CAWMP includes any components not shown on this list, please include the additional components with your submittal.
(e.g. composting, digesters, solids separators, sludge drying system, waste transfers, etc.)
I attest that this application has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that,
if all required parts of this application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not
included, this application package will be returned to me as incomplete.

Note: In accordance with NC General Statutes 143-215.6A and 143-215.613, any person who knowingly makes any false
statement, representation, or certification in any application may be subject to civil penalties up to $25,000 per violation. (18
U.S.C. Section 1001 provides a punishment by a fine of not more than $10,000 or imprisonment of not more than 5 years, or both
for a similar offense.)
Print the Name of the Permittee/Landowner/Signing Official and Sign below. (If multiple Landowners exist, all landowners
should sign. If Landowner is a corporation, signature should be by a principal executive officer of the corporation):
Name (Print): L / /
Signature:
Name (Print): __
Signature:
Name (Print):
Signature:
Title: wn t P-
Date:
Title:
Date:
Title:
Date:
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
E-mail: [e-mail]
NCDEQ-DWR
Animal Feeding Operations Program
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
If you have any questions regarding this application or the general permits, please call [phone].

ROY COOPER
Governor
ELIZABETH S. BISER
Secretary
RICHARD E. ROGERS, JR.
Director
J Lynn Mann 4
Manco Dairy Farm
1486 Manco Dairy Rd
Pittsboro, NC 27312-8045
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
February 12, 2024
Subject: Application for Renewal of Coverage for Expiring State General Permit
Dear Permittee:
Your facility is currently approved for operation under one of the Animal Waste Operation State Non -Discharge General Permits,
which expire on September 30, 2024. In order to ensure your continued coverage under the State Non -Discharge General
Permits, you must submit an application for permit coverage to the Division of Water Resources (DWR) by April 3, 2024.
Enclosed you will find a "Request for Certificate of Coverage for Facility Currently Covered by an Expiring State
Non -Discharge General Permit." The application form must be completed, signed by the Permittee, and returned to the DWR by
April 3, 2024.
Mailing Address: NCDEQ-DWR
Animal Feeding Operations Program
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699 1636
Email: animal.operationsadeq.nc.gov
phone: [phone]
Please note that you must include one (1) CODV of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP) with the
completed and signed application form. A list of items included in the CAWMP can be found on page 2 of the renewal
application form.
Failure to request renewal of your coverage under a general permit within the time period specified may result in a civil penalty.
Operation of your facility without coverage under a valid general permit would constitute a violation of NC G.S. § 143-215.1
and could result in assessments of civil penalties of up to $25,000 per day.
Copies of the animal waste operation State Non -Discharge General Permits are available at
www.deq.nc.pov/animalpennits2024. General permits can be requested by writing to the address above.
If you have any questions about the State Non -Discharge General Permits, the enclosed application, or any related matter please
feel free to contact the Animal Feeding Operations Branch staff at 919-707-9129.
Sincerely,
A;
Michael Pjetraj, Deputy Director
Division of Water Resources
Enclosures: Request for Certificate of Coverage for Facili: Currently Covered by an Expiring- State Non -Discharge General
Permit
_ 1\arthC,,nlimDgartmmtofEnriraamentalQmlitr DieisioaofWater Resourtes
t�-QE z121gorthSalisburySure 1636Mail SeniteCmt�r Raleigh, North Carolina27699-1636
—' 919.'.0', 9129

ROY COOPER
Governor
ELIZABETH S. BISER
Secretary
RICHARD E. ROGERS, JR.
Director
J Lynn Mann 4
Manco Dairy Farm
1486 Manco Dairy Rd
Pittsboro, NC 27312-8045
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
February 12, 2024
Subject: Application for Renewal of Coverage for Expiring State General Permit
Dear Permittee:
Your facility is currently approved for operation under one of the Animal Waste Operation State Non -Discharge General Permits,
which expire on September 30, 2024. In order to ensure your continued coverage under the State Non -Discharge General
Permits, you must submit an application for permit coverage to the Division of Water Resources (DWR) by April 3, 2024.
Enclosed you will find a "Request for Certificate of Coverage for Facility Currently Covered by an Expiring State
Non -Discharge General Permit." The application form must be completed, signed by the Permittee, and returned to the DWR by
April 3, 2024.
Mailing Address: NCDEQ-DWR
Animal Feeding Operations Program
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699 1636
Email: animal.operationsadeq.nc.gov
phone: [phone]
Please note that you must include one (1) CODV of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP) with the
completed and signed application form. A list of items included in the CAWMP can be found on page 2 of the renewal
application form.
Failure to request renewal of your coverage under a general permit within the time period specified may result in a civil penalty.
Operation of your facility without coverage under a valid general permit would constitute a violation of NC G.S. § 143-215.1
and could result in assessments of civil penalties of up to $25,000 per day.
Copies of the animal waste operation State Non -Discharge General Permits are available at
www.deq.nc.pov/animalpennits2024. General permits can be requested by writing to the address above.
If you have any questions about the State Non -Discharge General Permits, the enclosed application, or any related matter please
feel free to contact the Animal Feeding Operations Branch staff at 919-707-9129.
Sincerely,
A;
Michael Pjetraj, Deputy Director
Division of Water Resources
Enclosures: Request for Certificate of Coverage for Facili: Currently Covered by an Expiring- State Non -Discharge General
Permit
_ 1\arthC,,nlimDgartmmtofEnriraamentalQmlitr DieisioaofWater Resourtes
t�-QE z121gorthSalisburySure 1636Mail SeniteCmt�r Raleigh, North Carolina27699-1636
—' 919.'.0', 9129

State of North Carolina
Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Water Resources
Animal Waste Management Systems
Request for Certification of Coverage
Facility Currently covered by an Expiring Sate Non -Discharge General Permit
On September 30, 2024, the North Carolina State Non -Discharge General Permits for Animal Waste Management Systems will
expire. As required by these permits, facilities that have been issued Certificates of Coverage to operate under these State
Non -Discharge General Permits must apply for renewal at least 180 days prior to their expiration date. Therefore, all applications
must be received by the Division of Water Resources by no later than April 3, 2024.
Please do not leave any question unanswered Please verify all information and make any necessary corrections below.
Application must be signed and dated by the Permittee.
1. Certificate Of Coverage Number: AWC190029
2. Facility Name: MancoDairyFann
3. Permittee's Name (same as on the Waste Management Plan): J Lynn Mann
4. Permittee's Mailing Address: 1486 Manco Dair, Rd
City: Pittsboro State: NC
Telephone Number: 919-542-4667 Ext. E-mail: mancofarmsCalg nail.com
5. Facility's Physical Address: 1486 Manco Dairy Rd
City: Pittsboro State: NC
6. County where Facility is located: Chatham
7. Farm Manager's Name (if different from Landowner):
8. Farm Manager's telephone number (include area code):
9. Integrator's Name (if there is not an Integrator, write "None"):
10. Operator Name (OIC): Jesse L. Mann Phone No.: 919-842-2661
11. Lessee's Name (if there is not a Lessee, write "None"):
12. Indicate animal operation type and number:
Current Permit: Operations Type Allowable Count
Cattle - Milk Cow 150
Operation Types:
Swine
Cattle
Dry Poultry
Wean to Finish
Dairy Calf
Non Laying Chickens
Wean to Feeder
Dairy Heifer
Laying Chickens
Farrow to Finish
Milk Cow
Pullets
Feeder to Finish
Dry Cow
Turkeys
Farrow to Wean
Beef Stocker Calf
Turkey Pullet
Farrow to Feeder
Beef Feeder
Boar/Stud
Beef Broad Cow
Wet Poultry
Gilts
Other
Non Laying Pullet
Other
Layers
Zip: 27312-8045
Zip: 27312
OIC #: 20971
Other Trees
Horses - Horses
Horses - Other
Sheep- Sheep
Sheep - Other

13. Waste Treatment Lagoons, Digesters and Waste Storage Ponds (WSP): (Fill/Verify the following information.
Make all necessary corrections and provide missing data.)
Structure
Name
Structure Type
(Lagoon/Digester/
WSP)
Estimated
Date
Built
Liner Type
(Clay, Synthetic,
Unknown)
Capacity
(Cubic Feet)
Estimated
Surface Area
(Square Feet)
Design Freeboard
'Redline"
(Inches)
1
Storage
12/17/1982
Full, clay
57,100.00
5,400.00
22.00
2
Storage
5/9/1996
Full, clay
31,002.00
3,000.00
18.00
Submit one (1) copy of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP) with this completed and signed
application as required by NC General Statutes 143-215.10C(d), either by mailing to the address below or sending it via
email to the email address below.
The CAWMP must include the following components:
1. The most recent Waste Utilization Plan (WUP), signed by the owner and a certified technical specialist, containing:
a. The method by which waste is applied to the disposal fields (e.g. irrigation, injection, etc.)
b. A map of every field used for land application (for example: irrigation map)
c. The soil series present on every land application field
d. The crops grown on every land application field
e. The Realistic Yield Expectation (RYE) for every crop shown in the WUP
f. The maximum PAN to be applied to every land application field
g. The waste application windows for every crop utilized in the WUP
h. The required NRCS Standard specifications
2. A site map/schematic
3. Emergency Action Plan
4. Insect Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted
5. Odor Control Checklist with chosen best management practices noted
6. Mortality Control Checklist with selected method noted - Use the enclosed updated Mortality Control Checklist
7. Lagoon/storage pond capacity documentation (design, calculations, etc.) Please be sure the above table is
accurate and complete. Also provide any site evaluations, wetland determinations, or hazard classifications that may be
applicable to your facility.
8. Operation and Maintenance Plan
If your CAWMP includes any components not shown on this list, please include the additional components with your submittal.
(e.g. composting, digesters, solids separators, sludge drying system, waste transfers, etc.)
I attest that this application has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that,
if all required parts of this application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not
included, this application package will be returned to me as incomplete.

Note: In accordance with NC General Statutes 143-215.6A and 143-215.613, any person who knowingly makes any false
statement, representation, or certification in any application may be subject to civil penalties up to $25,000 per violation. (18
U.S.C. Section 1001 provides a punishment by a fine of not more than $10,000 or imprisonment of not more than 5 years, or both
for a similar offense.)
Print the Name of the Permittee/Landowner/Signing Official and Sign below. (If multiple Landowners exist, all landowners
should sign. If Landowner is a corporation, signature should be by a principal executive officer of the corporation):
Name (Print): L / /
Signature:
Name (Print): __
Signature:
Name (Print):
Signature:
Title: wn t P-
Date:
Title:
Date:
Title:
Date:
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
E-mail: [e-mail]
NCDEQ-DWR
Animal Feeding Operations Program
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
If you have any questions regarding this application or the general permits, please call [phone].

COMPREHENSIVE NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT PLAN (CNMP) — North Carolina
Certification Sheet
Animal Feeding
Operation AFO Name:
Lynn Mann Dairy Farm
Owners :
Lynn Mann
Address:
1486 Manco Dairy Rd Pittsboro, NC 27312
Farm/Tract Numbers
Tract 2427
Count ies
Chatham
OVERALL COMPREHENSIVE NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT PLAN APPROVAL
Certified Conservation Planner (CCP): As a CCP in North Carolina, I have reviewed your conservation
plan prepared for the farms/tracts listed above, and determined that it meets the technical requirements
for a USDA Comprehensive Nutrient Management Plan (CNMP). This Plan includes planned (or existing)
practices for the following CNMP components: (1) Manure and Wastewater Handling and Storage, (2)
Land Treatment, (3) Land Application of Manure or Organic Products, and (4) information on
recommended Record Keeping. This CNMP may also include components that address Feed
Management and Other Utilization Options. This CNMP contains all land units specific to this AFO that
you own, operate, or have decision -malting authority and on which manure or organic by-products will be
generated, handled, stored, or applied.
Signature: Date: 31.I c-A
Name (printed): Carl Henry Outz Jr
Title: Certified Conservation Planner A enc IOr .: Chatham SWCD
DESIGN OF CNMP COMPONENTSIPRACTICES
CNMP Manure and Wastewater Storage and Handling: All practices needed for the handling and
storage of manure and wastewater either exist or have been designed according to NRCS standards.
Signature: 0 ,, z idDate: d 2' Cf
Name (printed): Carl Henry ootz J
Title: ccp Agency/Org: Chatham SWCD
Land Treatment: All practices needed to maintain soil erosion to a sustainable level (on fields planned
for manure application) either exist or have been designed according to MRCS standards.
Signature: Date: 1CR
-
Name (printed): Carl Henry Outz Ir
Title: ccP Agency/Org: Chatham SwCD
CNMP Land Application: The nutrient management/waste utilization plan has been developed according
to NRCS standards 590, 633, and other applicable standards.
Si nature: &4Date: 3j 17— f "-Y-
Name (printed): car] Henry Outz Jdi
Title: ccP Agency/Org: Chatham swCD
NPPH, NC Supplement 2006-001 September 2006 P. 1

COMPREHENSIVE NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT PLAN (CNMP) — North Carolina
Additional Information for Producers
WHAT IS A USDA COMPREHENSIVE NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT PLAN (CNMP)?
Your CNMP is a USDA Conservation Plan that addresses the natural resource concerns
associated with the management of manure and wastewater from livestock operation. Your
CNMP addresses:
Manure and
Your CNMP ensures your operation has adequate collection, storage, and/or
Wastewater
treatment of manure and organic by-products that allow land application of wastes
Storage and
in an environmentally sound manner. Manure handling and animal mortality
Handling
disposal practices that are designed as part of your CNMP will meet applicable
NRCS standards.
Land Application
Your CNMP includes a Nutrient Management/Waste Utilization Plan for all fields
of Manure and
where manure or organic by-products are applied to ensure that nitrogen,
Wastewater
phosphorus, and other potential pollutants do not cause a water quality problem.
Your Nutrient Management Plan meets NRCS's standards 590 and 633 in the
Field Office Technical Guide.
Land Treatment
Your CNMP includes erosion control practices on all land where manure or
for Application
organic by-products are applied to ensure soil loss is kept to a sustainable level.
Areas
Example practices include conservation tillage, cover crops, contour farming,
diversions or terraces, or similar practices. All erosion control practices designed
as part of your CNMP will meet NRCS standards in the Field Office Technical
Guide.
Record Keeping
Although operation and maintenance records are your responsibility, your CNMP
includes record -keeping recommendations associated with each practice in your
CNMP. State laws and regulations identify specific record -keeping requirements
for regulated or permitted operations.
Your CNMP may also address:
Feed Feed management activities may be used to reduce the nutrient content of
Management manure, reducing land application requirements. Examples include phase
feeding, amino acid supplemented low crude protein diets, or the use of low phytin
phosphorus grain and enzymes, such as phytase. You should always consult a
professional animal nutritionist before making any changes, as feed management
activities are not a viable or acceptable alternative for all operations.
Other Utilization There are a number of alternative technologies to conventional manure
Options management being evaluated in North Carolina and across the Nation as
environmentally safe alternatives to land application of manure.
NORTH CAROLINA LAWS OR REGULATIONS
USDA does not have a regulatory role for nutrient management. Although CNMPs are only
required by USDA for animal operations participating in the Environmental Quality Incentives
Program under the 2002 Farm Bill, your CNMP may assist you in meeting federal or state water
quality regulations or permit requirements. You should be aware of applicable laws and
regulations in North Carolina that regulate the storage, handling, and land application of manure
and organic by-products generated on your operation. For additional information on certified
Waste Utilization Plans and applicable state laws and regulations, contact the North Caroli na
Department of Environment and Natural Resources, D ivision of Water Quality [phone] or
Division of Soil and Water Conservation [phone].
NPPH, NC Supplement 2006-001 September 2006 p. 2

COMPREHENSIVE NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT PLAN (CNMP) — North Carolina
Checklist (page 1 of 3) CCP Initial: �e; :-
Animal Feeding
Operation AFO Name: Lynn Mann Dairy Farm
Owner(s): Lynn Mann
The items identified in the Plan column must be included in the Conservation Plan to report a
CNMP as planned. The items in the Design column may be completed during the practice
design for the specific CNMP components.
Plan
Design
Site information
Remarks/Location if Not in Folder
p
Names, phone numbers, and addresses of
the AFO owners and o erator s .
Location of production site: Legal
description, driving instructions from
nearest post office, and/or the emergency
911 coordinates.
p
Conservation plan map, and farmstead
sketch showing the general location of
barns, pens, storage structures, etc.
Clearly identified field identification
numbers or codes.
Soils map with interpretations appropriate
for pfanned CNMP practices.
®
Existing documentation of present facility
components that would aid in evaluating
existing conditions, capacities, etc. (i.e., as -
built plans, year installed, number of
animals a component was originally
designed for, etc.).
Plan
Design
Production Information
Animal Inventory Sheet: Animal types,
phases of production, and length of
confinement for each type at this site
®
Animal numbers and average weight for
each phase of production on this site 633
®
Calculated manure and wastewater
volumes for this site. Amount of manure
and wastewater to be land applied 633)
W
Manure storage type, volume, and
approximate length of storage.
Plan
Design
Applicable Permits or Certifications
®
Producer and operators informed of their
responsibilities to comply with any
applicable Federal, tribal, state, or local
permits and/or ordinances, including
operator certification, NPDES or other
federal/state permits.
NPPH, NC Supplement 2006-001 September 2006 p. 3

Checklist (page 2 of 3) CCP Initial: 040
Plan
Design
Land Application Site Information
Nutrient management (590)Iwaste
utilization (633) plan prepared in
accordance with applicable FOTG
standards, including but not limited to;
❑
Maps of land application area (field
identified consistent with plan map)
showing landuse and with marked
setbacks, buffers, and waterways, and
environmentally sensitive areas.
❑
■ Third -party receiver agreements (if
NA
applicable)
❑
■ Landowner names, addresses, for land
NA
application fields not owned by
producer.
p
■ PLAT and/or LI risk assessments for
potential nitrogen or phosphorus
transport from fields.
®
■ Crop types, realistic yield targets, and
expected nutrient uptake amounts.
®
■ Application equipment descriptions and
methods of application.
❑
■ Expected application seasons and
estimated days of application per
season.
p
■ Estimated application amounts per
acre (volume in gallons or tons per
acre, and pounds of plant available
nitrogen, phosphorus as P205, and
otassium as K20 per acre).
p
■ Estimate of acres needed to apply
manure generated on this site,
respecting any guidelines published for
nitrogen or phosphorus soil loading
limits.
❑
Lagoon Sludge Application Caution
NA (Storage Pond)
Page if applicable)
Plan
1 Design
Land Treatment Site Information
p
Practices existing or planned to achieve
soil loss tolerance on land application area
(i.e., residue management, cropping
rotation, diversions),
p
RUSLE (current version) Documentation
®
NC-CPA-52 Environmental Assessment
p
Practice designslspecifications for erosion
control practices per applicable FOTG
standards.
Plan
Design
Manure & Wastewater Storage and
Handling
❑
Practice designs/specifications for manure
and wastewater storage, treatment, and
handling practices per applicable FOTG
standards, including emergency action
fans (633).
®
Critically eroding areas around manure and
NA no ersion around manure storage pond, its
wastewater storage structures stabilized to
vegetated.
facilitate proper operation and maintenance
of the structures.
NPPH, NC Supplement 2006-001 September 2006 p. 4

Checklist (page 3 of 3) CCP Initial: is
Plan
Design
Actual ActivRy Records
®
Producer informed of record -keeping
responsibilities according to 590 and 633
standards, and applicable state regulations
on the storage, transport, transfer, testing,
and application of manure. Including but
not limited to:
©
■ Soil and manure test reports.
®
' Applied rates, methods of application,
and timing (month and year) of
nutrients applied (include all sources of
nutrients -manure, commercial
fertilizers, etc.).
®
■ Current and/or planned crop rotation.
❑
Weather conditions during nutrient
application (optional).
❑
General soil moisture condition at time
of application [i.e., saturated, wet,
moist, d optional).
❑
' Actual crop and yield harvest from
NA nutrient management plan projected rye.
manure application sites if used in lieu
of RYEs.
®
Record of internal inspections for
contained in SWCD office
manures stem components.
❑
Record of any spill events.
NA no spills have occurred
❑
Changes or modifications to CNMP
NA
Plan
Design
Mortality Disposal
p
Practices planned for morality disposal.
®
Design specifications and equipment used
to im lement the disposal plan.
Plan
Design
Operation and Maintenance
Q
Detailed operation and maintenance
procedures for the conservation system,
holding facility, etc., contained in the
CLAMP. This would include procedures
such as calibration of land application
equipment, storage facility emptying
schedule, soil and manure sampling
techniques, etc.
NPPH, NC Supplement 2006-001 September 2006 P. 5

C
O
L
U
if
O
z
a
z
U_
z
a
a.
z
LU
uj
U
Q
z
F--
z
LU
FE
F-
z
LU
z
W
2
uj
x
a
O
U
CD
O
CD
i
E
a
ti
o N E
O N
N L
CD N
'm U (n
v Lo
41 4J
E
LL Z O
SO
Q
c�
co
U
Z
LL
0
U)
d
C
� Q
0 O
C C
C [°
C C co
J J �
N
�z
o
�LL
Q
Q �
O
aJ
a
O
U
O O L
roLO
Q � M
7 7 Q
Z O v
C7
O1 t
a3 Qj
m
r
N
� L
E
az
CD
LO
s�
-,a
�o
cnr
a
J O ai
V
o
O
U
� C
O
a` a
O �
N
Y_
2
a
C
r
_m
E
n
C
C
°
C
O
V
cn
CL
ril
z
z

Nutrient Management Plan For Animal Waste Utilization
This plan has been prepared for:
Lynn Mann Dairy Farm
J. Lynn Mann
1486 Manco Dairy Rd
Pittsboro, NC 27312
06-21-2004
This plan has been developed by:
Carl Henry Outz Jr.
Chatham Soil and Water Conservation Dist
P. O. Box 309
Pittsboro, NC 27312
919-545-8353
utn ILI
Developer Signature
Type of Plan: Nutrient Management with Both Manure and Fertilizer
Owner/Manager/Producer Agreement
I (we) understand and agree to the specifications and the operation and maintenance procedures
established in this nutrient management plan which includes an animal waste utilization plan for
the farm named above. I have read and understand the Required Specifications concerning animal
waste management that are included with this plan.
4, -Y4,4� mc,;�, 1 og
ignature (owner) Date
Signature (manager or producer) Date
This plan meets the minimum standards and specifications of the U.S. Department of Agriculture -
Natural Resources Conservation Service or the standard of practices adopted by the Soil and Water
Conservation Commission.
Plan Approved By: s"0ALS a e
Technical Specialist Signature Date
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
104871 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 06-21-2004 Cover Page 1

C
C
t6
@
tl
O
c
L)
L)
O
c
C
°
U
z
z
J
-J
.J
J
W
w
w
W
w
w
w
w
w
W
W
w
W
w
w
w
w
W
2
W
2
W
2
VJ
N
CO"It
CO
IT
N
r
f�
N
I-
m
CO
CO
r
V'
coU
:q
LQ
NN
CO
f��
r
V
OI-
O�
CO
Q
r
En
[*)
N
O1
LO
-kT
M
et
-
N,
I CV
LO
4
r
N
M
ct
4.7
CD
N
(P
O
V
J
r
N
ch
V
u}
CO
co
0�
r
•-
N
N
U
aD
U
N
CO
N
M
0
N
Ln
c0
N
N
o
N
C
y
r c
o
c
cu o 0
LL
CD
_
m
_
7
J
G a o
9
C
U
C1
C3
CL
o ° 2
0 Z F=
4 LU U
U)oo..
LL
U
E
m c
� o
v d
0
a LL
Q1 �
m
�- v
T 0
N O
g�
a �u
LY
� C Z
as a
v m u
t
U V =
� ? o
a
� a c
L O N
E � a
Q � a
T � �
U N
� � C
v � O
U
0 a
0 p� U
n � x
o E
m
� m �
C.D E
m �
L 0
- D m
C U
V D �
n L �
� o a
m
N N
I?
O Q
a aa_
t r U_
� � c
� y a
3 � .
o ° c
m a�E
� m
o �
y �
V � �
c E ,C
�) CR
o � o
as U
c
G
y m o
- 4
m � w
� u m
- � C
v
� � v
lu Q
L ❑ D
D cn C
C D
Gl r N
p C
n
(p y v
EC - N
Ja
F-- - u
3 a
c o0 m
�
C D
N y N
[9
C_
41
� t
Q E m
y u
cn
G m m
LL
� o
o_
a ro N
� c
Q
UI =
C, 0
c N
Z) m

Nutrients applied in accordance with this plan will be supplied from the following
source(s):
Commercial Fertilizer is included in this plan.
S39
Dairy (Heifer) Liquid Manure Slurry waste generated 830,250 gals/year by a 150
animal Dairy (Heifer) Liquid Manure Slurry operation. This production facility has
waste storage capacities of approximately 180 days.
Estimated Pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen Generated per Year
Broadcast
8219
Incorporated
11207
Injected
12702
Irrigated
7472
Max. Avail.
PAN (lbs) *
Actual PAN
Applied (lbs)
PAN Surplus/
Deficit Obs)
Actual Volume
Applied (Gallons)
Volume Surplus/
Deficit (Gallons)
Year 1
8,219
22319
-14,100
2,254,633
-1,424,383
Year 2
8,219
17341
-9,122
1,751,735
-921,485
Year 3
8,219
16900
-8,681
1,707,163
-876,913
----- - -- -- - ---- - -- -- - ----
Note: In source ID, 5 means standard source, fJ means user defined source.
Max. Available PAN is calculated on the basis of the actual application method(s) identified in the plan for this source,
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 01-25-2006 Source Page Page 1 of 1

The table shown below provides a summary of the crops or rotations included in this plan for each field. Realistic Yield estimates are
also provided for each crop, as well as the crop's P205 Removal Rate. The Leaching Index (LI) and the Phosphorous Loss Assessment
Tool (PLAT) Rating are also provided for each field, where available.
If a field's PLAT Rating is High, any planned manure application is limited to the phosphorous removal rate of the harvested plant
biomass for the crop rotation or multiple years in the crop sequence. Fields with a Very High PLAT Rating should receive no
additional applications of manure. Regardless of the PLAT rating, starter fertilizers may be recommended in accordance with North
Carolina State University guidelines or recommendations. The quantity of P205 applied to each crop is shown in the following table if
the field's PLAT rating is High or Very High.
Planned Crops Summary
Tract
Field
Total
Acres
Useable
Acres
Plat
Rating
Ll
Soil Series
Crop Sequence
RYE
P205
Removal
(lbslacre)
Applied
(lbslacre)
2427
1
17.50
17.50
Low
15.0
Georgeville
Small Grain, Silage
10.8 Tons
58
NIA
Com, Silage
22.5 Tons
77
NIA
2427
10
5.70
5.70
Low
15.0
1 Georgeville
Com, Silage
22.5 Tons
77
NIA
Small Grain, Silage
10.8 Tons
58
N/A
Mixed Cool Season Grass -Hay
3.4 Tons
€ 48
NIA
2427
11
9.60
9.60
Low
15.0
Georgeville
Cam, Silage
22.5 Tons
77
NIA
Small Grain, Silage
10.8 Tons
58
NIA
Mixed Cool Season Grass -Hay
3.4 Tons
48
NIA
2427
12
17.40
17.40
Low
15.0
Georgeville
Small Grain, Silage
10.8 Tons
58
N/A
Corn, Silage
22.5 Tons
. 77
N/A
2427
13
10.90
10.901
Low
15.0
Georgeville
Small Grain, Silage
10.8 Tons
58
NIA
2427
14
4.30
4.30
Low
15.0 1
Georgeville
Corn, Silage
Com, Silage
22.5 Tons
21.9 Tons
77
74
N/A
NIA
Small Grain, Silage
10.4 Tons
56
NIA
Mixed Cool Season Grass -Hay
3.3 Tons
. 47
NIA
2427
15
9.90
9.90
Low
10.0
Cid
Fescue Pasture
4.4 Tons
7
NIA
2427
2
5.60
5.60
Low
15.0
Georgeville
Small Grain, Silage
10.8 Tons
58
NIA
2427
2427
3
4
4.70
3.20
4.70
3.20
Low
Low
15.0
10.0
Georgeville
Cid
Cam, Silage
Fescue Hay
Fescue Hay
22.5 Tons
4.9 Tons
4.4 Tons
77
77
69
NIA
N/A
N/A
2427
5
3.40
3.40
Low
10.0
Cid
Fescue Hay
4.4 Tons
b9
N/A
2427
6
22.20
22.20
Low
15.0
Georgeville
Small Grain, Silage
10.9 Tons
58
NIA
Com, Silage
22.5 Tons
77
N/A
2427
7
8,80
8.80
Low
15.0
Georgeville
Cam, Silage
22.5 Tons
_ 77
N/A
Small Grain, Silage
10.8 Tons
58
N/A
2427
8
4.90
4.90
how
15 0
Georgeville
Mixed Cool Season Grass -Hay
Cam, Silage
Small Grain, Silage
3.4 Tons
22.5 Tons
10.8 Tons
48
77
58
NIA
N/A
NIA
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 1/25/2006
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.
PCS Page Page 1 of 2

Planned Crops Summary
Tract
Field
Total
Acres
Useable
Acres
Plat
Rating
g
LI
Soil Series
Crop Sequence
RYE
P205
Removal
(lbs/acre)
Applied
(lbslacre)
Mixed Cool Season Grass -Hay
3.4 Tons
48
NIA
2427
9
11,001
11.001
Low
I5 0
Georgeville
Com, Silage
22.5 Tans
77
NIA
Small Grain, Silage
10.8 Tons
's
NIA
Mixed Cool Season Grass -Hay
3.4 Tonsl
49
N/A
rt,iIry IVIHLtiI: I-IYAU 1SY.1V
LI
Potential Leaching
Technical Guidance
Low potential to contribute to soluble
None
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
>= 2 &
Moderate potential to contribute to soluble
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned.
<= 10
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
High potential to contribute to soluble
Nutrient Management (590) should be planned. Other conservation practices that improve the soils
nutrient leaching below the root zone.
available water holding capacity and improve nutrient use efficiency should be considered. Examples
> 10
are Cover Crops (340) to scavenge nutrients, Sod -Based Rotations (328), Long -Term No -Till (778),
and edge -of -field practices such as Filter Strips (393) and Riparian Forest Buffers (391),
PLAT Index
Rating
P Management Recommendation
0 - 25
Low
No adjustment needed; N based application
25 - 50
Medium
No adjustment needed; N based application
51 - 100
High
Application limited to crop P removal
> 100
Very High
Starter P application only
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed 11251200E
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.
PCS Page Page 2 of 2

Narrative
1. Nitrogen application rates should not exceed 100 Ibs per application when applying the nitrogen, but
when the recommended rates exceed 100 lbs. N/Ac the nitrogen will need to be split applied in order for
the receiving crop to be able to utilize the nitrogen.
2. Records of waste application will need to be maintained to establish actual application rates. The
records will include date of application, amount of waste applied per acre by tract number and field
number. The most recent soil test and waste analysis will also need to be included, with these records.
These records will need to be maintained for five years.
3. When planting a crop that is not written into your waste management plan, there has been a realistic
yield table included that you will need to refer too, to obtain your nitrogen application rate. If the crop
you plan to plant hasn't been included, please let me know and I will revise this list. To determine this
rate you will need to refer to the crop and soil type on the realistic yield table.
4. The application rate in inches per hour will have to be determined at the time of land application of
your waste. To determine this amount, the nitrogen value on the most recent waste analysis in pounds per
thousand gallons and the nitrogen application rate listed in the waste management plan in pounds of
nitrogen per acre will be needed. If you have any questions or would like assistance determining these
values, contact me for assistance.
5. The maximum application rate for the soil types at Manco Dairy are .82 inche per hour. This
information was obtained from the NRCS publications for silt loam soil at a 1.0 inch per hour application
rate.
6. Factors that cause row crops to very might include previous year yields, conditions of crops presently
planted, weather conditions at the present and during the previous year, soil conditions, crop prices,
longevity of crops planted, farm needs, insect and disease conditions and conditions beyond the
producers control. When crop varies other than what has been written in this plan, the soil type for the
area and the realistic yield table provided should be used to determine the application rate for nitrogen of
the crop that will be planted in this area. Row crops are constantly being rotated, the above factors
determine what type of crops will be planted and where in the upcoming year.
7. The nitrogen application rate for fields designated as hayland when grazed by cattle, will need the
application rate reduced by 25%. This 25% reduction applies to grazed grassland fields only. When
pastures are to be hayed. the application rate, may be increased by 25 percent.
8. Buffer acreage was considered when this waste management plan was developed, there were no
reductions in the field acreage for buffers. There are adequate buffers between the fields and streams.
9. The nitrogen application rates in the utilization table have been figured with the maximun nitrogen
application rates for each specific crop. A minimal amount of commercial fertilizer has been used in the
utilization table to enable the producer to be able to use the maximum amount of animal waste per crop
and to still be able to use commercial fertilizer when needed. The producer may elect to use commercial
fertilizer to supplement or replace the animal waste nitrogen application altogether to obtain the total
nitrogen application values stated in the utilization tables. When the waste producer elects to apply
- ------------------------------------------------------------
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 01-25-2006 Narrative Page Page 1 of

Narrative
commercial fertilizer in the place of animal waste nitrogen, he needs to make sure that the maximun
appleation rate for nitrogen in the utilization table is not exceeded.
10. Mr. Mann retains the option to vary his crop rotation from corn silage - small grain where he can
plant soybeans or grass to control weeds in his crop fields on a as needed basis.
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 01-25-2006 Narrative Page Page 2 of

O C
7U o T
T Y
s"y Cd
o n o `3
U ct 4 T g
tw Cl
r
rn
Y
d T YO
4 } N y
-in Ln
03
Y
v O `d
Ob 0.
O Cd
,N
Cd o n
Cd
~ 0
� O Y
F" OA N 3 Ed
Qj
O r
C id C C
CIS Cd
o C,
Y
wY o
o •� a�i
C d 7
cd a 'y 'O
O . U N CS' 0
co T w cCd
C v U u
cn
O
3 O y N
4-
(u o 0
G m cd U
E O - O 7 O
C]
O Cd p g
O. 5
Y � �
cl m
c ° o
0
Cd oL `- -I-,
,> C� O
N
.co C
3
O 5
N
C �+
r k E
CD N O RO 3
W U O 4-i
y
O
P
o
O
O
O
O
O
a
O
o
O
Q
o
O
O
o
C- O
0
Q
o
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
0
o
q
o
0
o
d o
0
0
0
o
P
O
O
�
�
M
M
OQ
�
7
{"i
6�
n
O
�
00
r�
.--�
O
x
oC
�r.
r
N
oa
T
�D
N
vs
o
`7
N
N
M
vi
.�
f-
-�
O
N
M
f�7
O
N
�O
M
v]
A
M
l
7
L vI'D
a
O
O
O
O
O
OO
OO
0
OO
OP
qaO
OaO
OaO
ooa
0%
a• 7
N
V
[cD
M
N
M
�P
N
v7
N
N
M
r-
�n
N
O
� .?� �
Y �
N
—
o
o
N
—
V
M
o
N
v
M
o
'V
0
o
a
Q y� Q
z
N
o
c
td
o
cC
d
[C
v
ti
ti
o
c
7;
a
a
a
o
R]
a
cd
b
cd
a„
o
0
0
o
a
o
0
o
a
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
[
f11
L^
m
t'a
fL
W
4
m
m
LY1
G1
0]
Cm
m
07
Q
7
Z
O
O
O
O
a
O
a
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
¢
n
n
N
n
N
A
oo
N
O
E. C 5.
.<
r
�i
P
,f
N
V)
w
v,
�n
�o
�n
N
U z 4
z
0
o
a
o
0
0
0
N
C
O
G
O
C
O
C
q
C
O
C
O
C
O
^
O
C
O
O
IN,
C
O
O
�
F+
E-
F-
F
F
f-�
F-�
F-�
E^
i-+
F-
=
F
E-•
i-
�
oa
O
v,
N
v)
oc
O
vi
N
o0
O
oo
O
�n
N
W
O
vi
N
a+
V
w
v,
N
N
0
V
o°�n
m
cam❑
cd
to
m
CID
ea
W
id
w
�d
a❑
co
v)
r%]
V]
rn
v]
Vl
td
cd
R
C
c`d
�
C
Ltl
C
fd
to
ul
Co
C7
rn
C7
C7
vi
0
a]
a]
C7
0
i7
u
ro
E
E
E
;
R
4
0
U
ct;
E
u
o
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
a
O
o
O
o
Q
o
O
in
vs
In
A
4
a1
Q
M
M
v
n
o
P
o
0
C.
o
o
a
o
o
P
Q
q
o
Q
--
�n
Q,
o�
M
M
q+
o u
r
o
o
a
v;
v
'r
C
>
G]
>
N
>
eJ
>
E!
>
7
>
>
>
,
>
>
ajJ
>
N
>
aJ
>
�%
n
�❑
nn
�❑
y
6❑
y
`❑
N
awn
N
o�❑
N
o❑
N
o❑
OJ
n❑
Q3
n❑
63
bo
6]
m
y
oA
v
aqi
°w
a0i
cOi
o0i
aai
a0i
a0i
°
ti7
[]
C'7
C7
C7
C7
c�
c7
c7
c7
t:
c7
V
C7
q
C7
v
u
Q
O5
O,
Q+
:T
U
O
T
C+
O,
c9
6+
61
O\
l
o
M
M
M
C.a
M
�
cl'
cn
i'rl
rn
M
�
M
r/i
C'l
rn
M
v]
zn
un
M
�
M
�
cn
�
Ln
{/7
M
�
ILL
rqN
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
r�
IN
W
L
A,

G
,q
b
O
O
O
O
b
O
b
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
b
O
b b
O O
w ,v '�
O
O
O
O
O
O
b
b
b
b
O O
o ¢ y
o
oa
p.
V
W
o0
O
In
yr
N
M
'n
00
`
M
V
"
M
N
�
N
M
. 'p
E
N
01
N
re)
N
ID
'V
O
n
N
O1
V'1
M
�i'
O
�r
Er
v
N
N
00
V
�
N
ip
p y
b
O
b
O
O
b
O
b
C.
b
O
O
Cl
O
O
0
o
a o
Vt Q v
ti
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
c
CDo
m
is
_
oo
to
v
a" aS
=rr y
GO
00
Y'Y
N
N
M
CV
U
R
a
¢
C
o
4
m
Id
F.
C ¢
oa
m
Cl
O
N
'-
M
b
N
--
M
CD-�
N
M
Z a
a
o
o
L
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
Q
41
q
q
q
C7
LL^
q
q
m
m
Q
b
b
-
o
0
0
0
b
_
�
U Z Q
z z
0
o
O
0
M
M
M
M
M
4.
Q 4
00
00
00
(3'
N
N
0�
N
�
N
�
C
"
C
C
C
C
C
F
e--
04
'r
oa
O
v�
N
N
�n
N
N
oo
O
+n
N
N
o7
O
N
N
o0
O
:J
0A
:a
9
ro
cc
CUA
m
v
�
C7
v]
va
C7
cn
t7
vn
C7
cal
U
(6
C
E
(tl
E
ty
cy
:;:
rn
U
U
v
U
Un
U
cn
0
0
C.
O
o
C.
O
o
0
O
rV
V
N
N
00
W
O�
m
O
O
r'1
M
N
N
oc
m
7
ct
ON
Cl!
NO
obO
ob0
ln�
0�
G
G
`.� .�.
11)
M
N
N
cc
�o
V
Y
Q
N
N
—
v
aEn
v]
t�q
o�Cl
tell
�M
b4
W
00
oL
p
a
o
#)i
u
q
ai
O
0
GJ
F
4.)
W
U
U
C]
C7
C7
C7
C7
C7
C7
C7
u
u
m
m
m
M
M
M
� L7
cQ+l
M
M
M
b
r`
oc
00
C
L---
N
N
N
!V
N
N
N
N
N
N
It
N
It
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
O
O
O
�
T
N
i/1
[n
N
.-µ
N
4)
L"
3
ca
O
Q
L
O
U
U
C
O
C
M
rn
G`
�
O
C
�
7
O
�
U
�
id
C
3
v
v
o
z
a

O
O
a
o
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
C O
O O O O O
O
O
O O
O O O O C
o
CDO
O
o
Q CD0
0 0 0 _
C d y
2��+i d
n
cy
o
n
o
O+
�o
m
n
m
m
as
In
oa O` n
.p
O
.-�
Cl
N
�O
o
O,
O
O
O
_
o6
oc
N
16
N
O
m
kfi
fy y
O
O
N
N
N
O
N
m
M1
M
lJ
d'
N N N N N N
Q
p
O
O
0
O
0
O
0
o
0
p
0
O
o
O
p
O
a
O
o
O
0
O
0
O
o
O
a
O
o
O
0
O O O O O O
0 0 0 0
p a u
o
0
o
O
C.
O
O
O
O
a
o
O
o
p
p
p
Q
Q p C9 0 o q
o
C.
0
0
o
u
N
N
m
N
m
N
C
o0 oa v-1 N N m
..
� nv
O
O
D
O
,O
O
a
CDp
p
It
O
LnLn
C.
In
In ,n In CD V O
`
N
N
m
N
m
10
N m
z
:d
4G
[C
ai
cd
e6
A
ai
c�
�
c�
K.
cC
eG
LC
cd
LG [tl cC [C cd cd
D
o
O
O
O
O
p
O
O
O
O
D
6
O
O
O
O O O O D O
Z
Q
O
O
J
O
C
O
O
a
o
o
=
O
O
o
O O C p O O
�a
� � C vt
'z
vni
N
a
M1
•"�
n
�
N
v,
C
�J
�p
.p
�
O
O O � N C �
U
—
-N.
K
d
Cr
z
r
'd'
n
n
--
r
N
V m
m t
...
,-. ..
�?
—
o
V b
a°
m
m
m
°
M
m
M
n
M
m
=
_
'
-r
Q
U
ry
C�
oa
6+
oo
O,
N
T
rV
O�
00
00
U
N
w
oa m U N C 00
C
C
C
^
C
C
C
C
O
O
0
C
C
O
O
C
O O O C
c.
as
In
oa
as
oo
O
In
N
er
O
M
oo
O
vi
N
oo In m
O N O ri
N
m
m
N
N
rn
V
N
V
ry m
itlT
:S
R
cdT
[�
us
U
N
C
W
^.J
J
to
63
G
O
v
t
v U C
O
Lb�A
rr0}
cb�ll
t�
CQ
Ln
,Id
o
C
O
C
C
.�
C
.Cc
O
u
C
T
T T C pOq C p
'
C7
rn
C7
O
R
6U
O
C7
of
�n
t7
cC
C7
O
U
cd
0.
cd
cC
ro
T
c6 cc ctl V
(o C7
�n
w
X
O
X
C'
R
X
U
m
U
V U m E itl k
U
cn
i
rn
U
rn
U
V)
V.
rn
U
r � U) U r
O
O
O
O
b
O
O Cl
:
Ga'�
Oai
mm
mm
OOi
N x opa
T
vi
v'1
-zr
m m N N c0 oa
O
O
O
Cl
O
a
Q
C.
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
C.
O Cl CD O O CD
Q,
m
m
O,
,D
�
r
N S N N m O0
O
v
-:3-
O,
In
w)
et
m M rq N m oo
E- d
N
6l
O
N
7
4l
Al
>
N
6.1
>
N
y
>
N
Q}
>
N
7
N
7
N
7
LU
7
oj
>
'u
0
>
u
>
u
>
u
>
u
>
0 y 0 N
7 > > >
rn
o�0
aL
on
c0
W
aq
47
�q
aA
C1
CQ
N
b�A
a?p
Cl
Do
v
oL
0.1
o€i
N
ao
lu
Do
d N N 6Y
by aD a0 oA
o
c
a
o
0
0
0
0
0
o
a
o
.�
`o
o
`0
.a a 0 0 0 0
t7
C7
7
C7
C7
C7
C7
C7
C7
C7
C7
C07
U
i7
U
C7
U U (7 C07 C7 U
L
Q
C,
a,
rn
a
G,
0,
0,
0,
o,
rn
0
a
a
a
rn
a
o rn o rn o 0
In
s
m
rn
m
rn
m
re
M
m
rn
m
Ln
m
r10
M
rn
m
w
m
rn
M
rn
m
rn
m
rn
M
rn
M
rn
m M M M M In
rn w V) w rn rn
N
m
o r r
N
N
N
N
N
N
rr
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
CV
N
N N N N N N
N
N
N
N
rV
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N N N N N N
W
3
v

v v
o
a
o
c
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
O�
M
r
N
7
a
on
v
c
m
o
-
_
N
m
v
m
cc
N
I
-
•6
6 3 -N N
y
a
Q
O
O
O
C
O
C
p
C
O
C
4
C
O
O
O
o
O
O
0
4
p
o
P.
a
b
�
a
p
N
r+l
Ntj
.
CL
= °
O
Q
z
Cl
a
o
C.
C �
ry
G
cr
z
CLa
LV
�
o
r
O00
�
o
r�
m
ra
�
c
'�I
°
N
b
O
O
Lj�
r�
_
b
C4
L
Vl
0
0
o
a
v+
rn
o
0
ay
CD
0
o
0
3
y
y
CG
�q
a9
ail
bq
O
O
O
O
Q
m
m
In
rn
t+.
m
F
-r
r
r4
r
rI
rl
rl
r
N
N
F
0
T
C
r
i
N
l..
a4

0
0
o
a
a
o
0
0
o
a
o71'
0
0
0
o I
c
o
0000V
�2
,�
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
j
O
O
O
O
K
V] cR
22
o
a
ID
v
m
a
r
o
c-1
-
"I
n
.-.
o
Oo
00
v,
oa
w
'a
7
--
a
n
o
� K, v
O
N
v
O
•O
m
r
m
�O
V
N
N
N
D
7
N
+�
b
a
o
a
O
O
O
O
O
O
o
o
O
a
Cl
o
a
O
O
O
O
y y
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
C?
a
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
C
O 0.
C
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
C.
O
C.
O
O
a
CD
o
O
V'
N
cn
Ln
i0
N
•O
N
vi
o0
�O
N-+
0+
O+
lO
N
�n
�n
b adi
y
O Q
a
.,
vi
Ln
a
ln
N
V
V
�tl
N
a0
a0
V
V
L g
O
O
4'S
Vl
O
O
O
O
Yk
V1
Vl
O
In
Vl
V5
O
'n
��
v
ti
ti
a
ti
b
ti
b
ti
ti
ti
b
ro
v
o
v
a
�S.
O.
R
0
R
O
R
O
R
O
ctl
O
R
O
ttl
O
R
O
R
O
R
O
R
O
R
O
R
O
R
O
c3
O
R
O
R
O
R
O
R
a
R
O
Q
GQ
CTi
W
cc
m
q
4
x
x
q
�^..SL'
W
fA
u C�
N
O
O
vri
N
N
O
ac
tq
N
a
o
O
N
O
O
O
U z
C C
0
�
N
N
N
N
N
N
z z .
0
0
0
0
0
R U
Q
00
W
00
T
N
0000
00
C7,
fV
W
oa
4�
CV
o0
T
N
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
r
C
C
C
G
•'
a
O
C
C
C
E0
Ea
F
F
E`
E0
Eo-
F
a
N
i
O
U
b
m
ro
on
O
O
4
Oyq
O
_
2
[Ord
yOy
0
U]
w
U]
V)
c/3
N
cn
N
V]
�
V]
C
ODES
O
O
C
b11
C
b➢
O
7
r`i,
600
T
T
T
C
Oq
O
0
O
C7
R
n
a
U
a
R
C7
R
n
O
13
ca
O
R
N
R
R
R
C7
R
O
O
a
a
C7
n
y
Ey
/�
,o
,D
R
E
o
X
X
R
E
C
a
ea
=
a
k
c;3.�c
o
i
OR
u
U
v
is
F
C
o
k
X
K
v,
U
rn
U
U
Us
v)
U
w
w
w
n
U
O
a
CD
CD
CD
CZ)
N
eh
N
N
O
N
C 4
OO
O
O
O
O
G
O
O
C
O
O
O
O
O
O
CDO
O
a
CD
C
vi
vi
Id:
01
U
M
0,
�D
r
N
7
N
N
Oa
C�
O
O ca
F
N
N
v
}
v
ul
�
GL
b�A
aLC7
�
oLll
Ell
v
D
CY
O
�]
O
aJ
O
v
0
u
u
0
N
0
u
6
u
N
O
N
N
u
N
0
C7
(7
C�
C7
[7
C7
C'�
C7
C7
U
C7
C7
r+O�
C7
U
U
C7
C7
C7
C7
C7
N
.`�..
m
O
O+
m
O+
T
T
T
-
O
m
m
V]
m
m
VJ
m
m
C/]
m
U]
m
M
L/]
ul
M
C/j
m
C1
V]
Ln
V]
m
Ln
V]
m
m
V7
m
V]
fn
V]
m
V]
M
VS
m
V1
m
m
Vl
In
cn
C/]
m
m
f/J
m
U]
'6
y
L.
a
N
N
r•,
r*1
�
'�'�
N
N
�"1
7
�
O
�
[�
00
0+
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
h
N
lh
N
h
N
M1
N
M1
N
M1
cV
M1
N
r
N
r
N
r
N
i
F
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
h
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
lU
Q
4.,
n

n
L.
�
Z
w
|
j
a)\\
a
?
/)ƒ\
)
2oc
\ /LACD
/
\
\
)
e
§<
<
p-
%\\a
\
\
{
)
«
0
)
: 3
s
-
z
/
})
)\
�
u�zƒ«
\2
(
j{
/)
cn
jG
/
��
)
_
)
k
§
d
G
\
k
e
e
2
/
m
\
/
%
\
�
�(
?
/
Cd
(
\
—
\
\
\
�
\
e
k
/
/
a
ƒ
/
}
\

Required Specifications For Animal Waste Management
1. Animal waste shall not reach surface waters of the state by runoff, drift,
manmade conveyances, direct application, or direct discharge during operation
or land application. Any discharge of waste that reaches surface water is
prohibited.
2. There must be documentation in the design folder that the producer either owns
or has an agreement for use of adequate land on which to properly apply the
waste. If the producer does not own adequate land to properly dispose of the
waste, he/she shall provide evidence of an agreement with a landowner, who is
within a reasonable proximity, allowing him/her the use of the land for waste
application. It is the responsibility of the owner of the waste production facility to
secure an update of the Nutrient Management Plan when there is a change in the
operation, increase in the number of animals, method of application, receiving
crop type, or available land.
3. Animal waste shall be applied to meet, but not exceed, the nitrogen needs for
realistic crop yields based upon soil type, available moisture, historical data,
climatic conditions, and level of management, unless there are regulations that
restrict the rate of applications for other nutrients.
4. Animal waste shall be applied to land eroding less than 5 tons per acre per year.
Waste may be applied to land eroding at more than 5 tons per acre per year but
less than 10 tons per acre per year provided grass filter strips are installed where
runoff leaves the field (see USDA, NRCS Field Office Technical Guide Standard
393 - Filter Strips).
5. Odors can be reduced by injecting the waste or by disking after waste application.
Waste should not be applied when there is danger of drift from the land
application field.
6. When animal waste is to be applied on acres subject to flooding, waste will be soil
incorporated on conventionally tilled cropland. When waste is applied to
conservation tilled crops or grassland, the waste may be broadcast provided the
application does not occur during a season prone to flooding (see "Weather and
Climate in North Carolina" for guidance).
7. Liquid waste shall be applied at rates not to exceed the soil infiltration rate such
that runoff does not occur offsite or to surface waters and in a method which does
not cause drift from the site during application. No ponding should occur in order
to control odor and flies.
-- - - - - -- --- --- - ------------------------------------ --------------- -- ---------- ---------------------------- -
104871 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 6/21/2004 Specification Page 1

8. Animal waste shall not be applied to saturated soils, during rainfall events, or
when the soil surface is frozen.
9. Animal waste shall be applied on actively growing crops in such a manner that
the crop is not covered with waste to a depth that would inhibit growth. The
potential for salt damage from animal waste should also be considered.
10. Nutrients from waste shall not be applied in fall or winter for spring planted
crops on soils with a high potential for leaching. Waste/nutrient loading rates on
these soils should be held to a minimum and a suitable winter cover crop planted
to take up released nutrients. Waste shall not be applied more than 30 days prior
to planting of the crop or forages breaking dormancy.
11. Any new swine facility sited on or after October 1, 1995 shall comply with the
following: The outer perimeter of the Iand area onto which waste is applied from
a lagoon that is a component of a swine farm shall be at least 50 feet from any
residential property boundary and canal. Animal waste, other than swine waste
from facilities sited on or after October 1, 1995, shall not be applied closer that 25
feet to perennial waters.
12. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 100 feet to wells.
13. Animal waste shall not be applied closer than 200 feet of dwellings other than
those owned by the landowner.
14. Waste shall be applied in a manner not to reach other property and public
right-of-ways.
15. AnimaI waste shall not be discharged into surface waters, drainageways, or
wetlands by a discharge or by over -spraying. Animal waste may be applied to
prior converted cropland provided the fields have been approved as a land
application site by a "technical specialist". Animal waste shall not be applied on
grassed waterways that discharge directly into water courses, and on other
grassed waterways, waste shall be applied at agronomic rates in a manner that
causes no runoff or drift from the site.
lb. Domestic and industrial waste from washdown facilities, showers, toilets, sinks,
etc., shall not be discharged into the animal waste management system.
_- ----- - ------------------------------ -- --- -------------------------------------------- -- ------ --------------------- ---
104871 Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 6/21/2004 Specification Page 2

17. A protective cover of appropriate vegetation will be established on all disturbed
areas (lagoon embankments, berms, pipe runs, etc.). Areas shall be fenced, as
necessary, to protect the vegetation. Vegetation such as trees, shrubs, and other
woody species, etc., are limited to areas where considered appropriate. Lagoon
areas should be kept mowed and accessible. Berms and structures should be
inspected regularly for evidence of erosion, leakage, or discharge.
18. 1f animal production at the facility is to be suspended or terminated, the owner is
responsible for obtaining and implementing a "closure plan" which will eliminate
the possibility of an illegal discharge, pollution, and erosion.
19. Waste handling structures, piping, pumps, reels, etc., should be inspected on a
regular basis to prevent breakdowns, leaks, and spills. A regular maintenance
checklist should be kept on site.
20. Animal waste can be used in a rotation that includes vegetables and other crops
for direct human consumption. However, if animal waste is used on crops for
direct human consumption, it should only be applied pre -plant with no further
applications of animal waste during the crop season.
21. Highly visible markers shall be installed to mark the top and bottom elevations of
the temporary storage (pumping volume) of all waste treatment lagoons.
Pumping shall be managed to maintain the liquid level between the markers. A
marker will be required to mark the maximum storage volume for waste storage
ponds.
22. Waste shall be tested within 60 days of utilization and soil shall be tested at least
annually at crop sites where waste products are applied. Nitrogen shall be the
rate -determining nutrient, unless other restrictions require waste to be applied
based on other nutrients, resulting in a lower application rate than a nitrogen
based rate. Zinc and copper levels in the soils shall be monitored and alternative
crop sites shall be used when these metals approach excessive levels. pH shall be
adjusted and maintained for optimum crop production. Soil and waste analysis
records shall be kept for a minimum of five years. Poultry dry waste application
records shall be maintained for a minimum of three years.
Waste application records for all other waste shall be maintained for five (5)
years.
23. Dead animals will be disposed of in a manner that meets North Carolina
regulations.
104871 Database Version 3.1
---------- --- --- ---------------------------------------------------- -
Date Printed: 6/21/2004 Specification Pale 3

The Nutrient Management Recommendations table shown below provides an annual summary of the nutrient management plan
developed for this operation. This table provides a nutrient balance for the listed fields and crops for each year of the plan.
Required nutrients are based on the realistic yields of the crops to be grown, their nutrient requirements and soil test results. The
quantity of nutrient supplied by each source is also identified.
The total quantity of nitrogen applied to each crop should not exceed the required amount. However, the quantity of other
nutrients applied may exceed their required amounts. This most commonly occurs when manure or other byproducts are utilized
to meet the nitrogen needs of the crop. Nutrient management plans may require that the application of animal waste be limited so
as to prevent over application of phosphorous when excessive levels of this nutrient are detected in a field. In such situations,
additional nitrogen applications from nonorganic sources may be required to supply the recommended amounts of nitrogen.
Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
0
N
(lbs1A)
P205
(lbs1A)
K20
(lbs/A)
Mg
(lbs1A)
Mn
(lbs/A)
Zn
(lbs1A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Tract
Field
2427
1
Req'd Nutrients
117
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres I
App. Period
17.50
9II-3/31
Supplied By:
CROP
Small Grain, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fort.
57
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Georgeville
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample
Date
10.8 Tons
09-08-04
Manure
60
59
90
29
1
1
0
0
P Removal
Rating
58 lbslac.
Low
BALANCE
0
59
901
29
1
1
0
0
Tract
Field
2427
12
Req'd Nutrients
117
40
30
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
17.40
911-3/31
Supplied By:
CROP
Small Grain, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fort.
57
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Georgeville
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
t0.8 Tons
09-08-04
Manure
60
59
90
29
1
1
0
0
P Removal Rating
58 lbslac.
Low
BALANCE
0
19
60
29
1
t
0
0
Tract
Field
2427
13
Req'd Nutrients
117
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres I
App. Period
10.90
911-3/31
Supplied By:
CROP
Small Grain, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
57
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Georgeville
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
01
0
RYE Sample
Date
10.8 Tons
09-08-04
Manure
60
59
90
29
t
l
0
0
P Removal
Rating
58 lbslac.
Low
BALANCE
0
59
90
29
l
I
0
0
Tract
Field
2427
2
Req'd Nutrients
117
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres I
App. Period
5.60
9/1-3131
Supplied By:
CROP
Small Grain, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
6
0
0
0
Commercial Fort.
62
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Georgeville
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
10.8 Tons
09-08-04
Manure
55
51
82
26
1
1
0
+0-0
P Removal
Rating
58 lbslac.
Low
BALANCE
01
54
82
26
1
1
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 1/25/2006 NMR Page Page I of 9

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
0
N
(lbs/A)
P205
(lbslA)
K20
(lbs1A)
Mg
(lbs/A)
Mn
(lbs/A)
Zn
(lbs/A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Tract
Field
2427
6
Req'd Nutrients
I l l
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres I
App. Period
22.20
911-3/31
Supplied By:
CROP
Small Grain, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
01
0
0
Commercial Fert.
62
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Georgeville
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
10.9 Tons
09-08-04
Manure
55
54
82
26
[,a
0
0
P Removal
Rating
58 Ibslac.
Low
BALANCE
0
54
82
26
0
0
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 1/25/2006 NMR Page Page 2 of 9

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
N
(lbs/A)
P205
(lbs/A)
K20
(lbs/A)
Mg
(lbs/A)
Mn
(1bs1A)
Zn
(lbs/A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tonslA)
Tract
Field
2427 1
Req'd Nutrients
241
0
20
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
17.50 2115-6130
Supplied By:
CROP
Corn, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert,
121
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Georgeville
Residual
C
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
22.5 Tons
09-08-04
Manure
120
118
179
58
2
3
1
U
P Removal
Rating
77 Ibslac.
Low
BALANCE
0
118
159
58
2
3
1
0
Tract
Field
2427
10
Req'd Nutrients
241
60
90
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
5.70
2l15-6130
Supplied By:
CROP
Corn, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert,
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Georgeville
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
U
0
RYE I Sample
Date
22.5 Tons
09-08-04
Manure
241
238
360
116
4
5
1
0
P Removal
Rating
77 Ibslac.
Low
BALANCE
0
178
270
116
4
5
1
0
Tract
Field
2427
10
Req'd Nutrients
117
40
30
0
0
0
0
0
Acres I
App. Period
5,70
9/1-3131
Supplied By:
CROP
Small Grain, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
0
Commercial Fert.
57
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Georgeville
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
10.8 Tons
09-08-04
Manure
60
59
90
29
1
i
0
0
P Removal Rating
58 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
19
60
29
1
1
0
0
Tract
Field
2427
11
Req'd Nutrients
241
60
90
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
9.60
2115-6130
Supplied By:
CROP
Cam, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
121
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Georgeville
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
22,5 Tons
09-08-04
Manure
120
118
179
58
2
3
l
0
P Removal
Rating
77 Ibslac.
Low
BALANCE
0
58
89
58
2
3
1
0
Tract
Field
2427
11
Req'd Nutrients
117
40
30
0
0
0
0
0
Acres I
App, Period
9.60
911-3/31
Supplied By;
CROP
Small Grain, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
57
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Georgeville
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
10.8 Tons
09-08-04
Manure
60
59
90
291
1
1
0
0
P Removal
Rating
58 Ibslac,
ILOW
BALANCE
0
19
60
29
1
1
0
0
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 1/25/2006 NMR Page Page 3 of 9

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
1
N
(1bs/A)
P205
(1bs/A)
K20
(lbslA)
Mg
(lbs/A)
Mn
(lbslA)
Zn
(lbs1A)
Cu
(lbsIA)
Lime
(tonslA)
Tract
Field
2427
12
Req'd Nutrients
241
60
90
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
17.40
2115-6/30
Supplied By:
CROP
Corn, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
121
0
U
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Georgeville
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
U
RYE I Sample
Date
22.5 Tons
09-08-04
Manure
120
118
t 79
58
2
3
1
0
P Removal
Rating
77 lbslac.
Low
BALANCE
0
58
89
58
2
3
l
0
Tract
Field
2427
13
Req'd Nutrients
24I
10
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres I
App. Period
10.90
2115-6/30
Supplied By:
CROP
Com, Silage
Starter
D
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert,
121
0
0
0
0i
0
0
0
Soil Series
Georgeville
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample
Date
22.5 Tons
09-08-04
Manure
120
118
179
58
2
3
1
0
P Removal
Rating
77 lbslac.
Low
BALANCE
0
108
179
58
2
3
1
0
Tract
Field
2427
14
Req'd Nutrients
234
10
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
App_ Period
4.30
2115-6/30
Supplied By:
CROP
Corn, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
114
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Georgeville
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample Date
21.9 Tons
09-08-04
Manure
12C
1I8
1791
58
2
3
1
0
P Removal
Rating
74 lbslac.
Low
BALANCE
0
108
179
58
2
3
1
0
Tract
Field
2427
14
Req'd Nutrients
112
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
4.30
9l1-3/31
Supplied By:
CROP
Small Grain, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
57
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Georgeville
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample
Date
10.4 Tons
09-08-04
Manure
55
54
82
26
1
l
0
0
P Removal
Rating
56 lbslac,
Low
BALANCE
0
54
82
26
l
1
0
0
Tract
Field
2427
15
Req'd Nutrients
t43
0
10
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
9.90
811-7131
Supplied By:
CROP
Fescue Pasture
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
68
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Cid
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
4.4 Tons
09-08-04
Manure
75
74
112
36
l
2
U
0
P Removal
Rating
7 lbslac.
ILow
BALANCE
0
74
102
36
l
2
0
01
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 1/25/2006 NMR Page Page 4 of 9

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
1
N
(Ibs1A)
P205
(lbs/A)
K20
(lbs/A)
Mg
(lbs/A)
Mn
(ibs/A)
Zn
(lbs1A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Tract
Field
2427
2
Req'd Nutrients
241
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
5.60
2/15-6130
Supplied By:
CROP
Corn, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
121
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Georgeville
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
22.5 Tons
09-08-04
Manure
120
118
179
58
2
3
1
0
P Removal
Rating
77 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
118
179
58
2
3
1
0
Tract
Field
2427
3
Req'd Nutrients
212
0
10
0
0
0
0
0
Acres I
App. Period
4.70
8/1-7131
Supplied By:
CROP
Fescue Hay
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
107
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Georgeville
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample
Date
4.9 Tons
09-08-04
Manure
105
104
157
50
2
2
0
0
P Removal
Rating
77 lbslac.
Low
BALANCE
0
104
147
50
2
2
0
0
Tract
Field
2427
4
Req'd Nutrients
191
0
70
0
0
0
0
0
Acres I
App. Period
3.20
811-7131
Supplied By:
CROP
Fescue Hay
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
106
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Cid
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
4A Tons
09-08-04
Manure
85
84
127
41
2
2
0
0
P Removal
Rating
69 lbslac.
Low
BALANCE
0
84
57
41
2
2
0
0
Tract
Field
2427
5
Req'd Nutrients
191
0
100
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
3.40
8/1-7131
Supplied By:
CROP
Fescue Hay
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
106
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sail Series
Cid
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
4.4 Tons
09-08-04
Manure
85
84
127
41
2
2
0
0
P Removal
Rating
69 lbslac.
ow
BALANCE
0
84
27
41
2
2
0
0
Tract
Field
2427
6
Req'd Nutrients
241
10
30
0
0
0
0
0
Acres I
App. Period
22.20
2/15-6/30
Supplied By:
CROP
Corn, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert,
121
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Georgeville
Residual
0
0
0
0
0!
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
22.5 Tons
09-08-04
Manure
120
Its
179
58
2
3
1
0
P Removal
I Rating
77 lbslac.
ow
BALANCE
0
108
149
581
2
3
l
0
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 1/25/2006 NMR Page Page 5 of 9

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
N
(lbs1A)
P205
(lbs/A)
K20
(lbs/A)
Mg
(ibs1A)
Mn
(lbs/A)
Zn
(lbs/A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Tract field
2427
7
Req'd Nutrients
117
0
0
0
0
U
0
0
Acres
App. Period
8.80
9/1-3131
Supplied By:
CROP
Small Grain, Silage
Starter
0
0
U
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
62
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Georgeville
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE. Sample
Date
10.8 Tons
09-08-04
Manure
55
54
82
26
1
1
a
a
P Removal Rating
58 lbslac.
Low
BALANCE
0
54
82
26
1
1
0
0
Tract
Field
2427
7
Req'd Nutrients
241
10
30
0
0
0
0
0
Acres I
App. Periad
8.80
2/15-6/30
Supplied By:
CROP
Corn, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
121
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Georgeville
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample
Date
22.5 Tons
09-08-04
Manure
120
118
179
58
2
3
l
0
P Removal
I Rating
77 lbslac.
Low
BALANCE
0
108
149
58
2
3
1
0
Tract
Field
2427
8
Req'd Nutrients
117
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres I
App. Period
4,90
9/1-3131
Supplied By:
CROP
Small Grain, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
62
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Georgeville
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
10.8 Tons
09-08-04
Manure
55
54
821
26
1
1
0
0
P Removal
Rating
58 lbslac.
Low
BALANCE 1
0
54
82
26
1
1
0
0
Tract
Field
2427
8
Req'd Nutrients
241
10
30
0
0
0
0
0
Acres I
App. Period
4.90
2115-6/30
Supplied By:
CROP
Com, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
G
u
U
Commercial Fert.
121
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Georgeville
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
U
0
0
RYE I Sample
Date
22.5 Tons
09-09-04
Manure
120
118
179
58
2
3
1
0
PRemoval
Rating
77lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
108
149
58
2
3
l
0
Tract
Field
2427
9
Req'd Nutrients
117
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres I
App. Period
11.00
911-3131
Supplied By:
CROP
Small Grain, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
62
0
0
0
a
U
0
0
Soil Series
lGeorgeville
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0!
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
10.8 Tons
09-08-04
Manure
55
54
82
261
1
1
0
0
P Removal
Rating
58 lbslac.
Low
BALANCE
0
54
82
26
1
1
U
0
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 1/25/2006 NMR Page Page 6 of 9

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
1
N
(lbs/A)
P205
(lbs/A)
K20
(lbslA)
Mg
(lbs/A)
Mn
(lbs/A)
Zn
(lbs/A)
Cu
(Ibs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Tract
Field
2427
9
Req'd Nutrients
24l
I
30
0
0
0
0
0
Acres I
App_ Period
11.00
2/15-6/30
Supplied By;
CROP
Corn, Silage
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
CGmmercial Fert.
121
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sail Series
Georgeville
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sampie
Date
22.5 Tons
09-08-04
Manure
120
118
179
58
2
3
1
0
P Removal
Rating
77 lbs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
0
1081
1491
58
2
31
I
0
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 1/25/2006 NMR Page Page 7 of 9

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
2
N
(1bs1A)
P205
(lbs/A)
K20
(lbs/A)
Mg
(Ibs/A)
Mn
(lbs/A)
Zn
(Ibs/A)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Tract
Field
2427
10
Req'd Nutrients
147
40
30
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
5,70
8I1-7131
Supplied By:
CROP
Mixed Coal Season
Grass -Hay
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
72
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Georgeville
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
3.4 Tons
09-08-04
Manure
75
74
112
36
1
2
0
0
P Removal
Rating
48 lbslac,
Low
BALANCE
0
34
82
36
1
2
0
0
Tract
Field
2427
11
Req'd Nutrients
147
40
30
0
0
0
0
0
Acres I
App. Period
9.60
8/1-7131
Supplied By:
CROP
Mixed Cool Season
Grass -Hay
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fen.
72
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Georgeville
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE I Sample
Date
3.4 Tons
09-08-04
Manure
75
74
112
36
1
2
0
0
P Removal
Rating
48 lbslac.
Low
BALANCE
0
34
82
36
1
2
0
0
Tract
Field
2427
14
Req'd Nutrients
143
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres I
App Period
4.30
8/1-7/31
Supplied By:
CROP
Mixed Cool Season
Grass -Hay
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
68
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Georgeville
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE SampleDatc
3.3 Tons
09-08-04
Manure
75
74
112
36
1
2
0
0
P Removal
Rating
47 lbslac.
ow
BALANCE
0
74
112
36
1
2
0
0
Tract
Field
2427
7
Req'd Nutrients
147
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
8.80
8/1-7/31
Supplied By:
CROP
Mixed Cool Season
Grass -Hay
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
72
0
0
01
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Georgeville
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
3.4 Tons
09-08-04
Manure
75
74
112
36
1
2
0
0
P Removal
I Rating
48 lbslac.
Low
BALANCE
0
74
112
36
l
21
0
0
Tract
Field
2427
8
Req'd Nutrients
147
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
4.90
811-7131
Supplied By:
CROP
Mixed Cool Season
Grass -Hay
Starter
0
0
6
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
72
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Georgeville
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
3.4 Tons
09-08-04
Manure
75
74
112
36
t
1 2
0
0
P Removal
I Rating
48 lbslac,
Low
BALANCE
0
74
1121
36
1
2
0
0
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 1/25/2006 NMR Page Page 8 of 9

Nutrient Management Recommendations Test
YEAR
2
N
(lbs1A)
P205
(lbs1A)
K20
(lbs/A)
Mg
(lbs/A)
Mn
(lbs/A)
Zn
(lbslA)
Cu
(lbs/A)
Lime
(tons/A)
Tract
Field
2427
9
Req'd Nutrients
I47
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acres
App. Period
11.00
8/1-7/31
Supplied By:
CROP
Mixed Cool Season
Grass -Hay
Starter
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Commercial Fert.
72
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Soil Series
Georgeville
Residual
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
RYE Sample
Date
3.4 Tons
09-09-04
Manure
75
74
112
36
1
2
0
0
P Removal
I Rating
48 Ibs/ac.
Low
BALANCE
1 0
74
1121
36
1
2
0
0
NOTE: Symbol * means user entered data.
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 1/25/2006 NMR Page Page 9 of 9

7
w
P7
A
N
A
N
A
N
A
N
A
N
A
N
1 -
N N
A
N
A
N
A
N
A
N
A
N
A
N
A
N
A
N
A
N
A
N
A
N
A
N
7>
N
A
N ice+-
V
V
-]
V V
t1
V
V
V
J
V
J
J
til
J
V
J
J
V J
o
m
su
ai
w
w
w
a
a
a
o
m
m
w
UCD
Oroo
O00Q
Uroq
-
QIC•
(fq
:3
:3
CD
ci
�1
Q
ti
ti
�
X
U
U
U
Vr
fn
t�
w
00
C
�D
V
a
a
V
oo
Da
as
w
0o
0o
00
w
A
A
r
n
�
w �
a
a
o
a
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
pip
c
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
i
o
0
w
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0-1�
N
N
can
00
w
p�
a
W
A
"
•-•
o0
oa
o0
00
00
00
ov
m
n
00
oa
w
A
A
w
a
a,
�
�
�
U
cn
cn
N
c.n
c>,
cn
oo
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
-
0
0
o
a
o
o
a
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
O
[]
@
ro
a
fl
0
a
0
[D
[o
0
9
3
o'
N
N
--•
«-
N
W
.-.
N
N
N
w
w
o
cn
o
oa
r
C'
o
10
�O
�D
c,
v,
u�
v,
�n
�n
en
.�
W
w
Q
A
+1
'o
'.G
V
O
O
O
C
O
O
O
O
O
G
O
o
C
o
w
w
z
z
z
'z
z
z
z
z
Z
z
z
Z
2
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
o
0
o
o
o
o
0
0
0
0
o
a
a
�
ro
ry
m
rs
n
ro
ro
rn
ro
[o
rn
rn
ro
ro
h
n
[n
is
ro
rn
rn
ro
9
s
cv
a
K
LJ
w n CD
U] O w 0 N CD
O d — CDC.
�] °
w CD a c s
Cep N
Cn �• fD I-D
n
� C rn
C
a
CD �_ o
' y 0 w
<
•a e c- � w a-
x a ID o rn
CSC
n co n on
o CIDC ro n' � -s
-0 � CD
`< w- CO n
O
CL _n' oo CD ego
• � N � W
CD
w II + G
N
G
C7 .O 7
w w a Q
rn m
O v d N
�.
m o
o
n o. `-c
O
C. @
h O ^7 W
rD
Q @ w w
w x w rn
� rn
A
n D
� � o UQ to
O YD
w G <
N w
a O
O..�.y
cD

0
F_
N
N
G
O
Q1
C
O
41
C
O
E}
C
O
4]
O
N
G
O
N
c
U
O
GJ
o
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
O
N
m
N
m
N
m
N
m
N
m
N
m
N
m
N
m
N
m
N
0
E
E
U
V
a
U
c
O
o
o
0
o
G
c
o
0
G
0
c
0
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
w
N
N
00
N
00
N
N
N
N
N
N
O
G
o
o
p
O
O
O
O
0
Cl
Cl
Cl
O
O
O
O
O
O
V V
a
V G
w
�
00
vi
00
vi
00
vi
00
�n
W
vi
W
vi
cO
vi
00
vi
00
vi
i
C7
C;
t7
O
o�
V
v�
U
rn
U
rn
ti.
N
N
N
00
00
0a
0,
a,
o,
F'
V
V
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
3

The Available Waste Storage Capacity table provides an estimate of the number of days of storage capacity available
at the end of each month of the plan. Available storage capacity is calculated as the design storage capacity in days
minus the number of days of net storage volume accumulated. The start date is a value entered by the user and is
defined as the date prior to applying nutrients to the first crop in the plan at which storage volume in the lagoon or
holding pond is equal to zero.
Available storage capacity should be greater than or equal to zero and less than or equal to the design storage
capacity of the facility. If the available storage capacity is greater than the design storage capacity, this indicates that
the plan calls for the application of nutrients that have not yet accumulated. If available storage capacity is negative,
the estimated volume of accumulated waste exceeds the design storage volume of the structure. Either of these
situations indicates that the planned application interval in the waste utilization plan is inconsistent with the
structure's temporary storage capacity.
Available Waste Storaize Ca acit
Source Name
I Dairy (Heifer) Liquid Manure Slurry
Design Storage Capacity (Days)
Start Date
911
180
Plan Year
Month
Available Storage Capacity (Days)
1
1
180
1
2
180
1
3
180
1
4
180
1
5
180
1
6
180
1
7
I55
1
8
130
1
9
149
1
10
167
1
11
180
1
12
180
2
1
180
2
2
180
2
3
180
2
4
180
2
5
180
2
6
180
2
7
155
2
8
142
2
9
157
2
10
171
2
11
180
2
12
180
1
180
3
2
180
3
3
180
--------------- - -- - -- -- ----------------------------- ----------- .. ---------------------------- I ---
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 01-25-2006 Capacity Page Page 1 of 2

Available Waste Storage Capacity
Source Name
I Dairy (Heifer) Liquid Manure Slurry
Design Storage Capacity (Days)
Start Date
911
180
Plan Year
Month
Available Storage Capacity (Days)
3
4
180
3
5
180
3
6
180
3
7
167
3
8
142
3
9
145
3
10
147
3
11
150
3
12
152
* Available Storage Capacity is calculated as of the end of each month.
- --------------------------- -
-----....-------------------------- -- - ---- - --
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 01-25-2006 Capacity Page Page 2 of 2

NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT and
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
N.C. Practice Job Sheet: NC-590-633
Prepared for:
By. AC l —r1r'4t�
Farm:
WHAT IS NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT?
The conservation practice, Nutrient
Management, is managing the amount,
source, placement, form and timing of the
application of nutrients and soil amendments
to achieve realistic production goals, while
minimizing nutrient movement to surface or
ground waters. The practice, Waste
Utilization, is using agricultural waste such as
manure or wastewater in an environmentally
sound manner. These practices are jointly
accomplished through the development of a
Nutrient ManagementfWaste Utilization Plan,
which is normally part of a broader
Conservation Plan that addresses multiple
natural resource concerns on the land.
PURPOSE OF NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT
and WASTE UTILIZATION PRACTICES
Your nutrient management/waste utilization
plan is intended to accomplish one or more of
the following objectives:
• To budget nutrients for plant production.
• To properly utilize manure or organic by-
products as a plant nutrient source.
• To minimize the delivery of agricultural
nutrients to surface and ground water
resources.
• To maintain or improve the physical,
chemical, and biological condition of the
soil.
Tract: Dater o 4
• To utilize agricultural wastes for
livestock feed or as an energy source.
CONTENTS OF THE NUTRIENT
MANAGEMENT I WASTE UTILIZATION
PLAN
The information provided in this Job
Sheet and the attachments meet the
minimum requirements for a Nutrient
Management Plan for USDA-NRCS
purposes. This Nutrient Management
Plan includes-
1 A plan map and soils map for the area
planned (these may be part of the
overall Conservation Plan).
2. Location of designated sensitive areas
or resources (streams, wells,
sinkholes, etc.) and any associated
nutrient application setbacks, etc.
3. Your planned crop rotation.
4. Results of soil, plant, water tests.
5. Results from Phosphorus Loss
Assessment Tool (PLAT) or Leaching
Index (LI) as required.
6, Realistic yield expectations for the
crops in the rotation, and their source
if other than default values approved
for N.C.
7. Recommended nutrient application
rates for nitrogen, phosphorus, and
potassium, as well as timing, form,
NC Practice Job Sheet: NC-590 (August, 2003) Page 1

and method of application and
incorporation, if applicable.
8. This Job Sheet (or comparable
information), that provides the following:
• General requirements of this practice,
as well as additional requirements to
meet the natural resource protection
purposes listed above.
• Additional considerations specific to
this plan.
• Operation and maintenance
information associated with this
practice.
Because this Nutrient Management Plan
includes agricultural organic sources,
additional items are required in the plan to
ensure proper waste utilization:
• Waste Utilization Agreement (if
applicable)
• Waste Utilization Third Party
Agreement (if applicable)
• Additional engineering design and
operating information for waste storage
structures, transport, and application
system, as applicable. These designs,
and the instructions for operating these
structures, is an integral component of
your overall Nutrient Management/
Waste Utilization Plan.
• Emergency Action Plan to prevent
overtopping or other discharges from
storage structures or facilities, as
applicable.
This plan was developed based on the current
NRCS 590 and 633 standards and Federal,
state, or local regulations or policies.
Changes in laws or regulations may
necessitate a revision of the plan.
BASIC REQUIREMENTS FOR WASTE
UTILIZATION
General
All manure and organic residues must be
applied according to a nutrient management
plan (see the following section, "BASIC
REQUIREMENTS FOR NUTRIENT
MANAGEMENT")
You are required to acquire and comply
with all federal, state, or local permit
requirements related to the handling and
application of manure or organic
materials.
The nutrient management/waste
utilization plan must address all organic
waste generated at or brought to the
facility. A Waste Utilization Third Party
Agreement must exist to address all
organic waste not handled by the nutrient
management/waste utilization plan.
Manure or organic wastes will not be
applied to the following areas:
• surface waters,
• wetlands, unless constructed as a
component in a waste treatment
system,
• soils subject to frequent flooding
during the period when flooding is
expected,
• frozen, snow-covered, or saturated
soils,
• within 200 feet of a dwelling other
than those owned by the producer,
• within 100 feet of a well,
• within 25 feet of surface waters, or
• within any other setbacks as identified
by federal, state, or local laws or
regulations (e.g. NC General Statute
prevents swine lagoon effluent from
being applied within 75 feet of a
residential property boundary or
perennial stream or river if the facility
was sited on or after October 1995.)
Manure or organic wastes will be applied
in a manner not to reach surface waters,
wetlands (unless constructed as a
component in a waste treatment system),
property owned by others, or public right-
of-way.
Sludge that accumulates in waste storage
structures must be analyzed prior to land
NC Practice Job Sheet: NC-590 (August, 2003) Page 2

application. Adequate provisions (available
land and/or third party manure agreements)
must exist to ensure sludge is applied in
adherence to all nutrient application
requirements. All federal and state guidance
regarding the proper testing, handling,
planning, and application of sludge must be
followed for regulated operations.
Since compliance with all applicable North
Carolina laws is the responsibility of the
producer, you should consult the most current
version of the Guidance Memo for
Implementing the Environmental Management
Commission's Regulations for Animal Waste
Management for questions.
ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR
PROVIDING LIVESTOCK FEED
If applicable, all agricultural wastes or other
organic residues used for feedstock must be
handled in a manner to minimize
contamination and preserve its feed value.
Chicken litter stored for this purpose must be
covered. A qualified animal nutritionist shall
develop rations that utilize animal wastes.
ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR
PROVIDING A SOURCE OF ENERGY
If your facility is to be used for energy
production, all energy producing components
of the system are included in the Nutrient
Management/Waste Utilization Plan and
provisions for the utilization of residues of
energy production identified. Your Nutrient
Management Plan includes the use of these
residues, if applicable.
BASIC REQUIREMENTS FOR NUTRIENT
MANAGEMENT
General
Application of nutrients must comply with all
applicable Federal, state, and local laws and
regulations.
The realistic yield expectations (RYEs) in
this plan are based on one or more of the
following:
• Default values approved by the N.C.
Interagency Nutrient Management
Committee that incorporate soil
productivity information, yield data,
and research with North Carolina
soils, and cropping systems.
Additional information on the default
values may be found at:
www.soil.ncsu.edu/nmp/ncnmwg/indgx.htm
• Documented actual yield data from
the site, determined by the average of
the highest three yields of the last five
consecutive specific crop harvests.
(For forage crops, determine the
average of the highest three years of
the last five years.)
A fertilization rate recommended by
North Carolina State University may
be used in cases where no yield data
or approved RYE values exist for a
crop.
• An RYE inferred from a similar crop
on a soil with similar physical and
chemical features may be used for
new crops or in the absence of other
RYE data. This inferred RYE may
ONLY be specified by a certified
Nutrient Management planner.
Erosion, runoff, and water management
controls have been planned, as needed,
on fields that receive nutrients.
Soil Testing
This nutrient management plan has been
developed based on current soil test
results (no older than three years).
Soil samples must be collected and
prepared in accordance with North
Carolina State University or the North
Carolina Department of Agriculture and
Consumer Services (NCDA&CS)
Agronomic Division standards or
recommendations.
NC Practice Job Sheet: 1\[G590 (August, 2003) Page 3

Soil test analyses can be performed by any
laboratory or program that is certified by the
North Carolina Department of Environment
and Natural Resources (NCDENR), Division of
Water Quality, Laboratory Section.
NCDA&CS Agronomic Division uses the
Mehlich-3 extractant process for soil testing.
Growers who utilize other laboratories must
request the use of the Mehlich-3 methodology
to ensure the test results are compatible with
North Carolina's nutrient management
planning and assessment tools. For statewide
consistency, all laboratories used must
provide fertilization recommendations using
guidelines and methodologies as referenced
at the NCDA&CS website:
www.nca-qr.com/a.gronomy/0book.htm
Growers are encouraged to use a laboratory
that is supported by field research within the
state.
Soil testing shall include analysis for all
nutrients for which specific information is
needed to develop the nutrient plan.
Plant Tissue Testing
Tissue sampling and testing, when used, shall
be done in accordance with North Carolina
State University or NCDA&CS standards or
recommendations.
Manure Testing
Nutrient values of manure and organic by-
products shall be established for planning
purposes based on laboratory analysis,
acceptable default values, or historic records
for the operation.
When determining actual application rates, a
laboratory analysis is required. State
regulations require that waste be tested within
60 days of utilization for some operations. In
the case of daily spreading, the waste must be
sampled and analyzed at least once a year.
Acceptable laboratories include the
NCDA&CS Agronomic Division, or others
certified by the NCDENR.
Field Risk Assessment
A field -specific assessment of the
potential for phosphorus transport from
each field (or groups of similar fields)
have been conducted, using the North
Carolina Phosphorus Loss Assessment
Tool (PLAT)
PLAT assesses the potential for
phosphorus (P) to be transported from the
site to surface water through each of the
four primary loss pathways:
• sediment -bound P transported
through erosion,
• soluble P transported through
surface runoff,
• soluble P leached through the soil
profile, and
• non -incorporated source P
transported through surface
runoff.
Based on the assessment of each loss
pathway, PLAT produces a single rating
for each field. As shown below, this
rating will identify whether nitrogen or
phosphorus shall be the rate -determining
element in developing the planned
application rate for manure.
PLAT Rating I
Nutrient Application Criteria
LOW
Nitrogen -based manure
lication.
MEDIUM
_a
Nitrogen -based manure
application.
HIGH
Manure application limited to
phosphorus removal from site
in harvested lant biomass.
VERY HIGH
No additional manure
application to be specified in
plan for the site.
On all sites, regardless of the PLAT
rating, starter fertilizers may be
recommended in accordance with NCSU
guidelines or recommendations.
NC Practice Job Sheet: NC-590 (August, 2003) Page 4

In some cases, specific conservation practices
that reduce the potential for phosphorus
transport have been incorporated into PLAT.
Examples include buffers or filter strips,
ponds, water table management, and residue
management and conservation tillage.
Similarly, soil erosion rates, either existing or
planned, have been incorporated into your
PLAT analysis. This information is shown on
the PLAT results enclosed. Because the
management of the site actually affects the
PLAT rating, all practices identified on the
PLAT analysis (including any required to
achieve the specified erosion rate) must be
either already installed or included in a
Conservation Plan for the Nutrient
Management Plan to be approved.
Nutrient Application Rates
Recommended nutrient application rates are
based on North Carolina State University or
NCDA&CS recommendations that consider
current soil test results, RYEs, and
management.
Liming material shall be applied as needed to
adjust soil pH to the specific range required by
the crop or crops in the rotation for optimum
availability and utilization of nutrients.
The application amount and rate (inlhr) for
liquid wastes (e.g. applied through irrigation)
shall not result in runoff from the site. The
application shall not exceed the field capacity
of the soil.
The planned rates of nutrient application are
shown on the attached sheets. These rates
have been computed as follows:
Nitrogen Application - When the plan is
nitrogen -based (a PLAT rating of Low or
Medium), the application rate of manure or
organic by-products shall be based on the
recommended nitrogen rate using the RYE
for the site (or a rate recommended by
NCSU or NCDA in the case of crops
without established RYEs). This may
result in an application rate for other
nutrients that exceeds the soil test
recommendation.
When the plan is being implemented
on a phosphorus standard (a PLAT
rating of High or Very High), manure
or other organic by-products shall be
applied at rates consistent with the
phosphorus application guidance
below. In such situations, an
additional nitrogen application from
non -organic sources may be required
to supply nitrogen at the rate
recommended by the RYE.
Within the limits allowed by PLAT,
manure or other organic by-products
may be applied on soybeans at rates
equal to the estimated removal of
nitrogen in harvested plant biomass.
All nitrogen rates for hay production
are for pure grass stands. Due to the
nutrient recycling by grazing animals,
the planned nitrogen rate per unit
yield for hay crops shall be reduced
by 25% for the portion of the expected
yield that is removed through grazing.
Phosphorus Application — When
manure or other organic by-products
are used, the planned rates of
phosphorus application shall be based
on the PLAT rating for the site, as
follows:
Low or Medium Rating — The
planned manure or organic by-
product application rate is based
on the nitrogen needs of the crop.
High Rating — The planned
manure or organic by-product
application rate is limited to the
phosphorus removal rate of the
harvested plant biomass.
Very High Rating — No additional
manure or organic by-product
application is specified in the plan.
SIC Practice Jab Sheet: NC-590 (August, 2003) Page 5

On all sites, regardless of the PLAT rating,
starter fertilizers containing nitrogen,
phosphorus, and potassium may be
recommended in accordance with North
Carolina State University guidelines or
recommendations.
A single application of phosphorus applied
as manure or organic by-product may be
made at a rate equal to the recommended
phosphorus application or estimated
phosphorus removal in harvested plant
biomass for the crop rotation or multiple
years in the crop sequence.
When such single applications are
made, the rate shall:
♦ not exceed the recommended
nitrogen application rate during the
year of application, or
♦ not exceed the estimated nitrogen
removal in harvested plant bio-
mass during the year of application
when there is no recommended
nitrogen application, or
♦ not be made on sites with a Very
High PLAT risk rating.
Potassium Application — Planned
potassium application rates should
match the soil test recommended rates
as closely as possible. (This is
particularly critical in situations where a
potentially harmful nutrient imbalance
in crops or forages may occur, such as
grass tetany). When using manure or
other organic sources, the addition of
potassium from non -organic sources
may be required.
Other Plant Nutrients - The planned
rates of application of other nutrients if
applicable are consistent with North
Carolina State University or the
NCDA&CS guidelines or
recommendations.
Nutrient Application Timing
Timing of nutrient application shall
correspond as closely as possible with
plant nutrient uptake characteristics, while
considering cropping system limitations,
weather and climatic conditions, and field
accessibility. Nutrients shall not be
applied to frozen, snow-covered, or
saturated soil.
Manure or organic by-products shall not
be applied more than 30 days prior to
planting of the crop or forages breaking
dormancy.
For nutrients applied through irrigation
systems, application equipment should be
properly calibrated to ensure uniform
distribution of material at planned rates.
Plan Review and Revision Period
A thorough review and revision (if
needed) of the nutrient management plan
shall be conducted on a regular cycle, not
to exceed five years.
Heavy Metals Monitoring
For animal waste, including sludge, zinc
and copper concentrations shall be
monitored and alternative crop sites for
application shall be sought when these
metals approach excessive
concentrations. The following criteria and
actions are provided:
Mehlich-3Index
Action
(Zn-I]
300 (21 lbs/ac)
Peanuts are very sensitive to
zinc, and application on peanuts
should be limited. Seek
alternative sites when possible.
The risk of zinc toxicity is
greater with low soil pH and has
been seen at Zn-I as low as
300. *
500 (35 lbslac)
Critical toxic level for peanuts.
Cease application on peanuts. "
2,000 (142
Caution: Seek alternative sites
Ibs/ac)
when possible for all crops. *
3,000 (213
Critical toxic level for all crops.
Ibs/ate
Cease application for all crops. `
NC Practice Job Sheet: NC-590 (August, 2003) Page 6

COPPER
Mehlich-3Index
Action
Cu-I
2,000 (72 Ibslac)
Caution! Seek alternative sites
when possible for all crops. *
3,00a (108
Critical toxic level for all crops.
Ibslac)
Cease application on all crops.
* Maintain pH at 6.0 on these
sites.
When sewage sludge is applied, the
accumulation of potential pollutants (including
arsenic, cadmium, copper, lead, selenium,
and zinc) in the soil shall be monitored in
accordance with the US Code, Reference 40
CFR, Parts 403 and 503, and applicable state
and local laws or regulations. Additional
information on heavy metal criteria for sewage
sludge may be found in Land Application of
Sewage Sludge, EPAI831-6-93-002b
publication number at.,
htt :/lwww.e a. ov/n des✓ ubs/slud e. df
ADDITIONAL. REQUIREMENTS FOR
MINIMIZING DELIVERY OF NUTRIENTS TO
SURFACE AND GROUND WATER
In areas that have been identified as impaired
with agricultural nutrients being a likely
source, an assessment shall be completed of
the potential for nitrogen or phosphorus
transport from the site. (The streams/water
bodies in this category are listed in the USDA-
NRCS Field Office Technical Guide, Section
I.)
❑ NO
This nutrient management plan IS NOT in
an area where surface waters are
impaired, with agricultural nutrients
identified as a likely source. The Leaching
index (LI) is not required.
❑ YES
This nutrient management plan IS in an
area where surface waters are impaired,
with agricultural nutrients identified as a
likely source. The Leaching Index (LI)
is included in this plan.
While the results of the LI does not affect
your planned nutrient application rates,
some additional conservation practices
may be specified in the plan to reduce the
risk of nutrient movement from the field, if
applicable.
IMPORTANCE OF MANAGING
NUTRIENTS
Nitrogen and phosphorus are water
soluble elements and either or both may
be components of organic and inorganic
fertilizers. In soluble forms, both can
move with water as leachate down
through the soil, or over the soil surface
as runoff after rainfall. While nitrogen and
phosphorus exist in different forms and
may move through different transport
processes on the same site, they both
can have detrimental effects on both
surface and shallow ground water quality.
As an example, excess nutrients can
result in accelerated eutrophication with
severe algal blooms and fish kills.
Because of the topography, hydrology,
and other factors in the state, the
environmental problems from excess
nutrients reaching surface water may not
be exhibited near the contributing source,
but rather create water quality problems
far downstream. Consequently, the
Neuse River Basin, Tar -Pamlico Basin,
the Chowan River, the watershed of the
B. Everett Jordan Reservoir, and the
watershed of the New River in Onslow
County are listed as Nutrient Sensitive
waters in North Carolina.
Nitrogen: Nitrogen applied as fertilizer or
organic material is transformed into
nitrate and can move with the water
moving downward into the shallow ground
water and eventually to surface waters.
(Relatively small amounts of nitrogen
reach our surface waters through rainfall
runoff, ) The Leaching Index (LI) is a
NC Practice Job Sheet: NC-590 (August, 2003) Page 7

required part of the nutrient management plan
in some areas of the state with surface water
impairments. The LI uses soils information
and local climate data to assess the potential
hazard from leaching of nutrients. The results
of the LI analysis and recommended actions
are included in your nutrient management
plan, if applicable.
Phosphorus: Research in recent decades
indicates that, with high soil phosphorus
levels, phosphorus has more potential to be
transported off -site than recognized in the
past. Phosphorus can be transported in
several ways: (1) attached to soil particles
leaving the field through erosion, (2) in soluble
form leaving the field in surface runoff, and (3)
in soluble form leaching downward through
the soil profile, and eventually into surface
water. Unlike nitrogen, the most likely
transport pathway for phosphorus varies by
site, and depends upon such factors as soil
erosion rate, soil phosphorus levels, texture of
soils, existence of buffers, and other factors.
In N.C., PLAT is the tool used to assess
potential excessive phosphorus losses. The
results of the PLAT analysis and
recommended actions are included in your
nutrient management plan, if applicable.
If a site receives a PLAT rating of Low or
Medium, then applying manure at rates based
on the nitrogen needs of the crop is allowed.
It is important to realize that this may result in
phosphorus being applied at rates that
significantly exceed the crop's phosphorus
removal rate. In these cases, the planned
nutrient application rate is not sustainable,
and eventually a PLAT rating of High may be
reached.
OPERATION & MAINTENANCE
You are responsible for safe operation and
maintenance of this practice, including all
equipment. The following Operation &
Maintenance should be conducted:
1 Review the plan annually to determine if
adjustments or modifications to the plan
are needed. (The S.B. 1217
interagency group guidelines
accepted by the N.C. Division of
Water Quality for .0200 operations
specify a plan revision when there are
changes in crops or cropping patterns
that utilize more than 25 percent of
the nitrogen generated by the
operation.) As a minimum, nutrient
management plans shall be
thoroughly reviewed every five years
and revised if necessary. The next
review will be performed in
2. Protect fertilizer and organic by-
product storage facilities from weather
and accidental leakage or spillage.
3. Ensure proper calibration of
application equipment to ensure
uniform distribution of material at
planned rates.
4. Inspect and maintain the equipment
and facilities used to implement the
Nutrient Management/Waste
Utilization Plan regularly. Any needed
repairs should be made in a timely
manner.
5. Review the Emergency Action Plan, if
applicable, annually.
6. Records should be maintained for five
years, or for a period as required by
other Federal, state, or local
ordinances, or program or contract
requirements. To ensure adequate
information exists to support sound
nutrient management, NRCS
recommends the following records be
included:
• Soil test results and
recommendations for nutrient
application,
• Quantities, analyses and sources
of nutrients applied (When the
actual rates used exceed the
recommended and planned rates
on inorganic fertilizer plans,
NC Practice Job Sheet: NC-590 (August, 2003) Page 8

records should indicate the reasons for
the differences, e.g. inability to acquire
custom blended fertilizer.)
Dates and method of nutrient
applications,
Crops planted, planting and harvest
dates, yields, and crop residues
removed,
• Results of water, plant, and organic by-
product analyses, and
• Dates of review and person performing
the review, and recommendations that
resulted from the review.
NOTE; State laws or regulations may
define record -keeping requirements for
some operations.
7. Ensure that workers are protected from
and avoid unnecessary contact with
inorganic fertilizers and organic by-
products. Protection should include the
use of protective clothing when working
with plant nutrients. Extra caution must be
taken when handling ammonia sources of
nutrients, or when dealing with organic
wastes stored in poorly ventilated
enclosures.
8. Properly dispose of material generated by
the cleaning of nutrient application
equipment. Excess material should be
collected and stored or field applied in an
appropriate manner. Excess material
should not be applied on areas of high
potential risk for runoff or leaching.
9. Properly dispose of or recycle nutrient
containers according to state and local
guidelines or regulations.
NC Practice Job Sheet: NC-590 (August, 2003) Page 9

Crop Notes
The following crop note applies to field(s): 15
Fescue: Piedmont
Adaptation: Well -adapted.
In the Piedmont, tall fescue can be planted Aug. 20 to Oct. 10 (best) and Feb. 15 to Mar. 20. For
pure -stand broadcast secdtngs use 20 to 30 lb/ac., for drilled use 15 to 20 Ib/ac. seed. Use certified seed
to avoid introducing weeds or annual ryegrass. Plant seed 0.25" to 0.5" deep for pure stands, 0.25" in
mixture with clovers. Soil test for preplant and maintenance lime, phosphorus, and potassium
recommendations. Apply 40 to 60 lb/ac nitrogen at planting for pure stands only. Do not apply N for
mixtures with clovers but use proper legume inoculation techniques. Apply 150 to 200 lb/ac. N to
pure -stand fescue for hay production; reduce N rates by 25% for grazing. Apply N Feb. I to Mar. 20 and
Aug. 20 to Sept. 30, with equal amounts in each window. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305
Production and Utilization of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for additional information or
consult your regional agronomist or extension agent for assistance.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 1, 10, 11, 12, 13, I4, 2, 6, 7, 8, 9
Corn Silage: Piedmont and Mountains
In the Piedmont, corn should be planted when soil temperature reaches 52 to 55 degrees fahrenheit. Plant
1-2" deep. Adequate depth control is essential Review the NCSU Official Variety "green book" and
information from private companies to select a high yielding variety with the characteristics needed for
your area and conditions. Apply 10 to 12 lbs. nitrogen per ton of expected yield. All nitrogen can be
applied at planting. Also acceptable is to apply 2/3 to 3/4 of the nitrogen at planting and the rest when
corn is in the 7 to 9 leaf stage. Tropical corn for silage needs about 6-8 lbs nitrogen per ton of expected
yield applying no more than 100 to 120 lbs total nitrogen. Research has shown that nitrogen can be
reduced by approximately 15 percent when soil injected. The total N is dependent on the soil type and
expected yield. Apply phosphorus and potassium according to a soil test before planting. Phosphorus
is best utilized when banded with the planter as a starter. Plant samples can be analyzed during the
growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the corn. Timely management of weeds and insects is
essential in profitable corn silage production. Plant a cover crop after harvest.
---- --------------------------- ------- -------------
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed; 01-25-2006 Crop Note Page Page 1 of 3

The following crop note applies to field(s): 4, 5
Fescue: Piedmont
Adaptation: Well -adapted.
In the Piedmont, tall fescue can be planted Aug. 20 to Oct. 10 (best) and Feb. 15 to Mar. 20. For
pure -stand broadcast seedings use 20 to 30 Iblac., for drilled use 15 to 20 Ib/ac. seed. Use certified seed
to avoid introducing weeds or annual ryegrass. Plant seed 0.25" to 0.5" deep for pure stands, 0.25" in
mixture with clovers. Soil test for preplant and maintenance lime, phosphorus, and potassium
recommendations. Apply 40 to 60 Ib/ac nitrogen at planting for pure stands only. Do not apply N for
mixtures with clovers but use proper legume inoculation techniques. Apply 150 to 200 Iblac. N to
pure -stand fescue for hay production; reduce N rates by 25% to 50% for grazing. Apply N Feb. 1 to Mar.
20 and Aug. 20 to Sept. 30, with equal amounts in each window. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin 305
Production and Utilization of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for additional information or
consult your regional agronomist or extension agent for assistance.
The following crop note applies to field(s): 3
Fescue: Piedmont
Adaptation: Well -adapted.
In the Piedmont, tall fescue can be planted Aug. 20 to Oct. 10 (best) and Feb. 15 to Mar. 20. For
pure -stand broadcast seedings use 20 to 30 lb/ac., for drilled use 15 to 20 lb/ac. seed. Use certified seed
to avoid introducing weeds or annual ryegrass. Plant seed 0.25" to 0.5" deep for pure stands, 0.25" in
mixture with clovers. Soil test for preplant and maintenance lime, phosphorus, and potassium
recommendations. Apply 40 to 60 Ib/ac nitrogen at planting for pure stands only. Do not apply N for
mixtures with clovers but use proper legume inoculation techniques. Apply 150 to 200 lb/ac. N to
pure -stand fescue for hay production; reduce N rates by 25% to 50% for grazing. Apply N Feb. 1 to Mar.
20 and Aug. 20 to Sept. 30, with equal amounts in each window. Refer to NCSU Technical Bulletin' 305
Production and Utilization of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina for additional information or
consult your regional agronomist or extension agent for assistance.
----- ------ -------------------------
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 01-25-2006 Crop Note Page Page 2 of 3

The following crop note applies to field(s): 1, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 2, 6, 7, 8, 9
Small Grain Silage, Piedmont and Mountains
In the Piedmont, small grain silage should be planted from October 10 to November 3. In the Mountains,
small grain silage should be planted from September 15 to October 31. Plant 18 to 22 seed/drill row foot
at 1-1 1/2" deep and increase the seeding rate by 5% for each week seeding is delayed beyond the
optimum time frame. See the seeding rates table for applicable seeding rate modifications in the current
NCSU "Small Grain Production Guide".Also, increase the initial seeding rate by at least 10% when
planting no -till. Adequate depth control when planting the small grain is essential. Review the NCSU
Official Variety "green book" and information from private companies to select a high yielding variety
with the characteristics needed for your area and conditions. Apply approximately 30 lbs N at planking.
Increase N at planting by 20% for no -till. Phosphorus and potassium should be applied according to a
soil test at this time. The remaining N should be applied during February -March. Apply 10 to 12 lbs. N
per ton of expected yield. The total N is dependent on soil type and expected yield. Plant samples can be
analyzed during the growing season to monitor the nutrient status of the small grain. Timely management
of diseases, weeds and insects are essential for profitable small grain silage production. Plant a cover
crop after harvest.
The following crop note applies to fields): 10, 11, 14, 7, 8, 9
Mixed Cool Season Grasses: No Comment
--- --------------------------------------------------------------
Preview Database Version 3.1 Date Printed: 01-25-2006 Crop Note Page Page 3 of 3

EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN
PHONE NUMBERS
DWQ q19--571- 4700
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Q 11-
SWCD a19-642-99L40
NRCS a ij- 54 Z- 0` aqq a—X -- 3
This plan will be implemented in the event that wastes from your operation are leaking,
overflowing, or running off site. You should not wait until wastes reach surface waters or leave
your property to consider that you have a problem. You should make every effort to ensure that
this does not happen. This plan should be posted in an accessible location for all employees at
the facility. The following are some action items you should take.
Stop the release of wastes. Depending on the situation, this may or may not be possible.
Suggested responses to some possible problems are listed below.
A. Lagoon overflow -possible solutions are:
a. Add soil to berm to increase elevation of dam.
b. Pump wastes to fields at an acceptable rate.
c. Stop all flows to the lagoon immediately.
d. Call a pumping contractor.
e. Make sure no surface water is entering lagoon.
B. Runoff from waste application field -actions include:
a. Immediately stop waste application.
b. Create a temporary diversion to contain waste.
c. Incorporate waste to reduce runoff.
d. Evaluate and eliminate the reason(s) that caused the runoff.
e. Evaluate the application rates for the fields where runoff occurred.
C. Leakage from the waste pipes and sprinklers -action include:
a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
c. Close valves to eliminate further discharge.
d. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
D. Leakage from flush systems, houses, solid separators -action include:
December 18, 1996

a. Stop recycle pump.
b. Stop irrigation pump.
c. Make sure no siphon occurs.
d. Stop all flows in the house, flush systems, or solid separators.
e. Repair all leaks prior to restarting pumps.
E. Leakage from base or sidewall of lagoon. Often this is seepage as opposed to
a. Dig a small sump or ditch away from the embankment to catch all seepage, put
in a submersible pump, and pump back to the lagoon.
b. If holes are caused by burrowing animals, trap or remove animals and fill holes
and compact with a clay type soil.
c. Have a professional evaluate the condition of the side walls and lagoon bottom
as soon as possible.
2. Assess the extent of the spill and note any obvious damages.
a. Did the waste reach any surface waters?
b. Approximately how much was released and for what duration?
c. Any damage noted, such as employee injury, fish kills, or property damage?
d. Did the spill leave the property?
e. Does the spill have the potential to reach surface waters?
f. Could a future rain event cause the spill to reach surface waters?
g. Are potable water wells in danger (either on or off of the property)?
h. How much reached surface waters?
3. Contact appropriate agencies.
a. During normal business hours, call your DWQ (Division of Water Quality) regional office;
Phone - - . After hours, emergency number: 919-733-3942. Your phone call should
include; your name, facility, telephone number, the details of the incident from item 2 above,
the exact location of the facility, the location or direction of movement of the spill, weather
and wind conditions. The corrective measures that have been under taken, and the
seriousness of the situation.
b. If spill leaves property or enters surface waters, call local EMS phone number - -
c. Instruct EMS to contact local Health Department.
d. Contact CES, phone number - - , local SWCD office phone number - - and
local NRCS office for advice/technical assistance phone number - - .
4. If none of the above works call 911 or the Sheriffs Department and explain your problem to
them and ask that person to contact the proper agencies for you.
5. Contact the contractor of your choice to begin repair of problem to minimize off -site
2 December 18, 1996

damage.
a. Contractors Name: _
b. Contractors Address:
c. Contractors Phone:
Contact the technical specialist who certified the lagoon (MRCS, Consulting Engineer, etc.
a. Name: 1 ke —Sk� I o a K
b. Phone: 1 — 59 2 - aoZ9y E4 , 3
7. Implement procedures as advised by DWQ and technical assistance agencies to rectify the
damage, repair the system, and reassess the waste management plan to keep problems
with release of wastes from happening again.
December 18, 1996

U)
U
O
O
O
U
O
0
O
Q�
CG
c�
CD
W
m
E
L
m
U—
M
U
•
cu
•
c
0
'�
G
0
�
�
o
�
7
w
O
O
U
a
_
i
_
A
io
p
c
Q1 �j
� G
q
qt
o.
b m v
co `
b a�
c 3 co
U •� 7 U
C •bA
O O
c0 0
C+➢
K
cc c
V o
q 'in
C
.L" U
3 �
O �
o m
od 1
Q ?
• •
0
a
O
Ly
N Q
4 v
cC
C
� a
a
U
3
c
0
N
b0
v
C
O
0
cu
ed v
sJ.,
N
3
3
bB
ob c
Q °
•
0
c
0
N
O .2,
Q
Q

m
w lV
wI
L
O
C!)
C
x
C
V 'O
R -a
Qr
•
i;
O
L
0
0
o
EL
a
5
m °
n co ❑,
U 0.
o
%
lu
G
v
-
6 c
R
a,
w
C
o
�
I
C O
O �
-
S
O CL
O
n U
C
C
G
m
�
n
ro
G
tic
y
�
v
vn
C
O
O
va
3
C
t
i7L
v
s- C
rn
cz
7J
�d
y
C •q
w
2
CL
C
O
cc
N
i
c�
•
le
cq
.0
co
03
v
C]
O
N
N
ro
Cl.
l
rn
v
.A
u
O
I
O
Q

0
�
o
>
J
O
U
d
V
U
UD
y
y
b a o
Q,
O
9
C
C cd � ..°
U
U �
ca
Ld
R
C
u on
C
c --
3
m
7
o "
°�
a
ro O .O'Cjoj
ro
cV N 'UO
y
cd
uj 1 ro N L
R,
N
N� cd
a• co.E
m Y
3 .0oti°
•� 7 C
c y cr
N^
CL
0
E�-cOd
O
cu
cu
�
3
cli
u
cz
o �
0
0 L
�
� w
U �
O
d
d ccd
• i•
63
d
hp
G
W,45
�
o
o
cn
a
s�:
d
V_
d

4
d
r
a
k
/
»y CO
o•- ]
]
2
/2$
§
�
j
a(\
)
§,
7y3
a
\�
\ ƒ'
/
+±
q
\\0
U
§\t
Z a$
[ \
\ tee
e
k
C,j
g
\ ƒ §
~ G
g o
w © %
&
!©
»
40
94
//})7
e
3
i
{
w
\
\
@
j
\
z
q
/
u
)
8
§
e
Ed
B

Mortality Management Methods
(check which method(s) are being implemented)
l7 Burial three feet beneath the surface of the ground within 24 hours after knowledge of
the death. The burial must be at least 300 feet from any flowing stream or public body
of water.
2 Rendering at a rendering plant licensed under G.S. 106-168.7.
❑ Complete incineration
❑ In the case of dead poultry only, placing in a disposal pit of a size and design approved
by the Department of Agriculture.
❑ Any method which in the professional opinion of the State Veterinarian would make
possible the salvage of part of a dead animal's value without endangering human or
animal health. (Written approval of the State Veterinarian must be attached)
December 18, 1996

M
o
o �
E
0
4.
o
0
n.
v
� U
y �
CJ
C
U
Ca
�
:d

)
o 0
7
_
¢
%
u
�
\
�
<
{ k \
/
j \
E
bi)
ƒ
/
�
\
77
\
</
a
\ \
g
\
c
|
\
2
�\\
\ k ®
/
0
:
\
/
!
0
B

Nitrogen Application Rate Calculated. Using Soil Type and
Realistic Yield Table For Chatham Conn
SOIL TYPE 205B Geor7eville silt loam 2 to 6 % clones APPL_ nATF.
205B
Oat urain
104 lbs N/ac
Aug -April
205B
Wheat arain
132 lbs N/ac
Aug -April
205E
Barley ain
88 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
205B
Rye Parain
132 lbs N/ac
Aug -April
205B
Corn for uain
119 lbs N/ac
Feb -Jul
205B
Corn for silaLye
228 lbs N/ac
Feb -Jul
205B
Sor hum for urain
144 lbs N/ac
Aril -Jul
205B
Sor hum silage
228 lbs N/ac
Aril -Jul
205B
So beans
140 lbs N/ac
A riI-Se t
205B
Sor hum -Sudan ass for hay
180 lbs N/ac
Aril -Au st
205B
Sudan ass for hay
180 lbs N/ac
Aril -Au ust
205B
Fescue for hay
180 lbs N/ac
Au ust-Jul
205B
Orchard ass for hay
180 lbs N/ac
August -July
205B
Small grain for hay
120 lbs N/ac
Aug -April
205B
R e rass for hay
180 lbs N/ac
Feb -Ma
205B
Sudan rass for parazing
135 lbs N/ac
Aril -Au ust
205B
Fescue for grazinQ
135 lbs N/ac
August -July
205B
Orchard ass for grazina
135 lbs N/ac
Au ust-Jui
205B
Small 2rain for grazim
90 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
205B
Ryciarass for uuazim,
135 lbs N/ac
Feb -Ma
205B
Matua grass for hay
180 lbs N/ac
August -July
205B
Matua for uaziu
135 lbs N/ac
Au st-Jul
SOIL TYPE 205132 Geortyeville silty clav loam 2 to 6 % clones APPL. DATE
205B2
Oat arain
88 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril Y
205132
Wheat min
112 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
205B2
Barley rain
75 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
205B2
Rye Lyrain
112 lbs N/ac
Aug -April
205132
Corn arain
101 lbs N/ac
Feb -Jul
205132
Corn sila e
194 lbs N/ac
Feb -Jul
205132
So beans
119 lbs N/ac
Aril -Se t
205132
Sorghum rain
122 lbs N/ac
Aril -Jul
205B2
Sor hum silage
194 lbs N/ac
Aril -July
205B2
Sor hum- Sudaurrass for hay
153 lbs N/ac
Aril -Au ust
20532
Sudan rass for hay
153 lbs N/ac
Aril -Au ust
205B2
Fescue hav
153 lbs N/ac
Au ust-Jul
20532
OrchardLyrass hay
153 lbs N/ac
Au ust-Jul
205B2
Small orain hay
102 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
205B2
R e rass for hay
153 lbs N/ac
Feb -Ma
205B2
Sudanjarass for azin
115 lbs N/ac
April-AuLyust
205B2
Fescue for mzina
115 lbs N/ac
Au ust-Jul
205B2
Orchard ass for arazin2
115 lbs N/ac
Au st-Jul
205B2
Small grain for urazina
87 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
20552
Rvearass for grazinu
115 lbs N/ac
Feb -Ma
205B2
Matua for hay
153 lbs N/ac
Au ust-Jul
205B2
Matua for grazing
115 lbs N/ac
Au st-Jul

SOIL TYPE 205C Georgeville silt loam 6 to 10 % slopes APPL. DATE
205C
Oat Lyrain
96 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
205C
Wheat,rain
121 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
205C
Barley ain
81 lbs N/ac
Au -A rii
205C
R e ain
121 lbs N/ac
Au -A rii
205C
Corn grain
109 lbs N/ac
Feb -Jul
205C
Corn silage
210 lbs N/ac
Feb -Jul
205C
Sor hum grain
132 lbs N/ac
Aril -Jul
205C
SorLyhum sila e
210 lbs N/ac
Aril -Jul
205C
Soybeans
129 lbs N/ac
Aril -Se t
205C
Sorghum- Sudan ass hay
166 lbs N/ac
Aril -Au ust
205C
Sudan ass hay
166 lbs N/ac
Aril -August
205C
Fescue hay
166 lbs N/ac
August -July
205C
Orchard ass hay
166 lbs N/ac
Au st-Jul
205C
Small ain hay
110 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
205C
Rvearass for hay
166 lbs N/ac
Feb -Ma
205C
Sudan ass for 2razinsi
124 lbs N/ac
Mril-Aujaust
205C
Fescue for jaraziu
124 lbs N/ac
Au ust-Jul
205C
Orchard rass for Qrazin-a
124 lbs N/ac
Au st-Jul
205C
Small uain for grazing
82 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
205C
Rvearass for Lyrazina
124 lbs N/ac
Feb -Ma
205C
Matua for hay
166 lbs N/ac
August -July
205C
Matua for erazin
124 Ibs N/ac
August -July.
SOIL TYPE 205C2 Georgeville silt clay loam 6 to 10% slones APPL. DATE
205C2
Oat arain
84 lbs N/ac
Aug -April
205C2
Wheat rain
106 lbs N/ac
Aug -April
205C2
Barle ain
72 lbs N/ac
Aug -April
205C2
Rye arain
106 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
205C2
Corn arain
95 lbs N/ac
Feb -Jul
205C2
Corn sila a
182 lbs N/ac
Feb -Jul
205C2
Son -hum uain
120 lbs N/ac
Aril -Jul
205C2
Sor hum sila e
182 lbs N/ac
Aril -Jul
205C2
Soybeans
112 lbs N/ac
Aril -Se t
205C2
Sorghum-Sudanarass hay
144 lbs N/ac
April-Anaust
205C2
Sudan ass hay
144 lbs N/ac
April-AuLyust
205C2
Fescue hay
144 lbs N/ac
August -July
205C2
Orchardgrass hay
144 lbs N/ac
August -July
205C2
Small ain hay
96 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
205C2
R e ass for hav
144 lbs N/ac
Feb -Ma
205C2
Sudan ass for 2razinQ
108 lbs N/ac
April-Apizust
205C2
Fescue for grazina
108 lbs N/ac
Au ust-Jul
205C2
Orchard rass for uazing
108 lbs N/ac
Au ust-Jul
205C2
Small uain for grazing
72 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
205C2
R e rass for yrazina
108 lbs N/ac
Feb -Ma
205C2
Matua for hay
144 lbs N/ac
August -July
205C2
Matua for 2razing
108 lbs N/ac
August -July
SOIL TYPE 206C2 GeorLveville siltv clav loam 6 to 10 % slones APPL. DATE
206C2
Oats for vrain
84 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
206C2
Wheat for Lyrain
106 lbs Mae
Au -A ril
2

206C2
Barley for 2rain
721bs N/ac
Au -A ril
206C2
Rye for grain
106 Ibs N/ac
Aug -April
206C2
Corn for arain
951bs N/ac
Feb -Jul
206C2
Corn for sila e
182 Ibs N/ac
Feb -Jul
206C2
Sor hum for grain
1201bs N/ac
Aril -Jul
206C2
Sorg -hum for silage
182 Ibs N/ac
Aril -Jul
206C2
Soybeans
112 Ibs N/ac
Aril -Se t
206C2
Sorahum-Sudangrass hay
144 Ibs N/ac
April -August
206C2
Sudan ass hay
144 Ibs N/ac
Aril -Au ust
206C2
Fescue hay
144 Ibs N/ac
Au st-JuI
206C2
Orchard ass hay
144 Ibs N/ac
August -July
206C2
Small grain hay
96 lbs N/ac
Au -A mil
206C2
Rvearass for hay
144 Ibs N/ac
Feb -Ma
206C2
Sudan ass for eraziniz
108 Ibs N/ac
April-Aujaust
206C2
Fescue for arazina
108 Ibs N/ac
Au ust-Jul
206C2
Orchard ass for arazina,
108 Ibs n/ac
Au ust-Jul
206C2
Small arain for iaraziuy
72 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
206C2
R e rass for Larazina
108 lbs n/ac
Feb -Ma
206C2
Matua for hay
144 Ibs N/ac
Au ust-Jul
206C2
Matua for uazinja
108 Ibs N/ac
Au ust-Jul
SOIL TYPE 212B Herdon silt loam 2 to 6 % clnnec APPt,_ DATE
212B
Oat grain
1041bs N/ac
Au -A ril
212B
Wheat arain
1321bs N/ac
Aug -April
212B
Barley grain
88 lbs N/ac
Aug -April
212B
R e grain
1321bs N/ac
Au -A mil
212B
Corn yrain
1191bs N/ac
Feb -July
212B
Corn silage
228 Ibs N/ac
Feb -Jul
212B
Sorghum uain
138 Ibs N/ac
Aril -Jul
212B
Sor hum sila a
228 lbs N/ac
Aril -Jul
212B
Soybeans
140 Ibs N/ac
April -Sept
212B
Sorghum Sudan rass hay
175 lbs N/ac
April -August
212B
Sudan rass hav
175 Ibs N/ac
Amil-August
212B
Fescue hay
175 Ibs N/ac
Au ust-Jul
212B
Orchard ass hay.175
Ibs N/ac
Au ust-Jul
212B
Small iarain hay
120 Ibs N/ac
Au -A mil
212B
Ryearass for hay
175 Ibs N/ac
Feb -Ma
212B
Sudangrass for erazina
131 Ibs N/ac
April-Auizust
212B
Fescue for grazinQ
131 Ibs N/ac
Au ust-Jul
212B
Orchard ass for 2razina
131 Ibs N/ac
Au st-Jul
212B
Small arain for grazing
901bs N/ac
Au -A ril
212B
Rye ass for grazin2
131 Ibs N/ac
Feb -Ma
212B
Matua for hay
175 Ibs N/ac
August -July
212B
Matua for uazinLy
131 Ibs N/ac
August -July
SOIL TYPE 212C and 212D Herdon silt loam 6 to 10% APPL. DATE
and 10 to 15 % slopes
212C
Oat grain
961bs N/ac
Aug -April
212C
Wheat grain
121 Ibs N/ac
Au -A ril
212C
Barley rain
81 Ibs N/ac
Au -A ril
212C
Rye grain
121 Ibs N/ac
Au -A ril
212C
orn arain
1091 N ac
Feb -July

212C
Corn Sila e
210 lbs N/ac
Feb -Jul
212C
Sor hum ain
127 lbs N/ac
Aril -Jul
212C
Sor hum sila e
210 lbs N/ac
Aril -July
212C
Soybeans
129 lbs N/ac
April -Sept
212C
Sor hum Sudan ass hay
161 lbs N/ac
April -August
212C
Sudan ass hay
161 lbs N/ac
April -August
212C
Fescue hay
161 lbs N/ac
August -July
212C
Orchard rass hay
161 lbs N/ac
Au ust-Jul
212C
Small yrain hay
110 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
212C
RveLyrass for hay
161 lbs N/ac
Feb -Ma
212C
Sudan rass for 2razima
121 lbs N/ac
A-oril-AuLyust
212C
Fescue for grazin2
121 lbs N/ac
Au st-Jul
212C
Orchard ass for erazin2
121 lbs N/ac
August -July
212C
Small Lyrain for graziu
82 lbs N/ac
Aug -April
212C
Ryejarass for grazim
121 lbs N/ac
Feb -Ma
212C
Matua for hay
161 lbs Nlac
Au ust-Jul
212C
Matua for uazina
121 lbs N/ac
AuLust-July
SOIL TYPE 212D2 Herdon silt clav loam 10 to 15 % slo es APPL. DATE
212D2
Oat rain
83 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
212D2
Wheat grain
106 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
212D2
Barley ain
70 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
212D2
R e ain
1061bs N/ac
Au -April
212D2
Corn grain
95 lbs N/ac
Feb-July-
212D2
Corn sila a
182 lbs N/ac
Feb -Jul
212D2
Sor hum Lyrain
110 lbs N/ac
Aril -Jul
212D2
Sorghum sila e
182 lbs N/ac
Aril -Jul
212D2
Soybeans
112 lbs N/ac
Aril -Se t
212D2
Sor hum Sudan ass hay
140 lbs N/ac
Aril -Au ust
212D2
Sudan ass hay
140 lbs N/ac
Aril -Au ust
212D2
Fescue hay
140 lbs N/ac
Au ust-Jul
212D2
Orchard ass hay
140 lbs N/ac
Au ust-Jul
212D2
Small vrain hay
96 lbs N/ac
Au -A mil
212D2
R e rass for hay
140 lbs N/ac
Feb -Ma
212D2
Sudan ass for krazina
112 lbs N/ac
Aril -Au ust
212D2
Fescue for grazinLy
112 lbs N/ac
Au ust-Jul
212D2
Orchard ass for erazina
112 lbs N/ac
Au ust-JuI
212D2
Small Lyrain for grazina
77 lbs N/ac
Au -A it
212D2
Ryegrass for uazing
112 lbs N/ac
Feb -Ma
212D2
Matua for hay
140 lbs. N/ac
August -July
212D2
Matua for grazing
1121bs N/ac
August -July
SOIL TYPE 520C Cid silt loam 6 to 10% slones APPL. DATE
520C
Oat grain
60 lbs N/ac
Au -A nil
520C
Wheat grain
991bs N/ac
Au -A nil
520C
Barley rain
66 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
520C
Rye min
99 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
520C
Corn erain
92 lbs N/ac
Feb -Jul
520C
Corn sila e
177 lbs N/ac
Feb -Jul
520C
Sorghum grain
92 lbs N/ac
Aril -Jul
520C
Sor hum silage
1771bs N/ac
Aril -Jul
520C
Soybeans
92 lbs N/ac
April -Sent
I

520C
Sorghum Sudan ass hay
129 lbs N/ac
Aril -Au ust
520C
Sudan ass hay
129 lbs Nlac
Aril -Au st
520C
Fescue hay
129 lbs N/ac
Au ust-Jul
520C
Orchard rass hay
129 lbs N/ac
Au st-Jul
520C
Small arain hay
110 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
520C
R e ass for hay
129 lbs N/ac
Feb -Ma
520C
Sudan ass for Vrazinu
97 lbs N/ac
Aril -Au ust
520C
Fescue for zrazina
97 lbs N/ac
August -July
520C
Orchard ass for arazine
97 lbs N/ac
August -July
520C
Small arain for 2razing
821bs Nlac
Aug --April
520C
Rvejarass for 2razin
97 lbs N/ac
Feb -Ma
520C
Matua for hay
129 lbs N/ac
Au ust-Jul
520C
Matua for vrazin2
97 lbs N/ac
August -July
SOIL TYPE 35B Wedowee sandv loam 2 to 6 % slopes APPL. DATE
35B
Oat grain
117 lbs N/ac
Aug -April
35B
Wheat juain
144 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
35B
Barley ain
96 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
35B
R e,rain
144 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
35B
Corn uain
113 lbs N/ac
Feb -Jul
35B
Corn sila a
216 lbs N/ac
Feb -Jul
35B
Sorpzhum szrain
113 lbs Nlac
Aril -Jul
35B
Sorghum silage
216 lbs N/ac
Aril -Jul
35B
Soybeans
140 lbs N/ac
Aril -Se t
35B
Sorghum Sudan ass hay
150 lbs N/ac
Aril -Au ust
35B
Sudan rass hay
150 lbs N/ac
Mril-Auvust
35B
Fescue hay
150 lbs N/ac
August -July
35B
Orchard rass hay
150 lbs N/ac
August -July
35B
Small Lyrain ha
120 lbs Nlac
Au -A ril
35B
RveLyrass for hay
150 lbs N/ac
Feb -Ma
35B
Sudan ass for grazing
113 lbs N/ac
A-Dril-August
35B
Fescue for izrazinQ113
lbs N/ac
Au st-Jul
35B
Orchard ass for LyrazinLy
113 lbs N/ac
August -July
35B
Small uain for erazin2
90 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
35B
R e rass for arazina
113 lbs N/ac
Feb -Ma
35B
Matua for hay
150 lbs N/ac
Au ust-Jul
35B
Matua for uazing
113 lbs N/ac
Au ust-Jul
SOIL TYPE 57C Vance sandv loam 2 to 6 % slopes APPL. DATE
57C
Oat arain
108 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
57C
Wheat grain
132 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
57C
Barley ain
96 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
57C
Rye gjain
132 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
57C
Corn arain
921bs N/ac
Feb -July
57C
Corn silaize
177 lbs N/ac
Feb -Jul
57C
SorLjhum Lyrain
92 lbs N/ac
Aril -Jul
57C
Sorghum silage
177 lbs N/ac
April -July
57C
Soybeans
129 lbs N/ac
Aril -Se t
57C
Sor hum Sudan ass hay
175 lbs N/ac
April-AuLyust
57C
Sudan rass ha
175 lbs N/ac
Axil-AuLyust
57C
Fescue hay
175 lbs N/ac
Au st-Jul
57C
Orchard ass hay
175 lbs N/ac
August -July
57C
Small ain hay
1101bs N/ac
Au -A rii

57C
Rye arass for hay
175 lbs N/ac
Feb -Ma
57C
Sudan ass for mzim
131 lbs N/ac
Aril -Jul
57C
Fescue for grazing
131 lbs N/ac
Au st-Jul
57C
Orchard ass for arazing
131 lbs N/ac
August -July
57C
Small grain for arazina
82 lbs N/ac
Aug -April
57C
RAegrass for azing
131 lbs N/ac
Feb -Ma
57C
Matua for ha
175 lbs N/ac
August -July
57C
Matua for -yrazina
131 lbs N/ac
August -July
SOIL TYPE 50D Nanford-Badin complex 10 to 15 % slopes APPL. DATE
50D
Oat grain
84 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
50D
Wheat 2rain
99 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
50D
Barley rain
80 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
50D
Rye uain
99 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
50D
Corn grain
104 lbs N/ac
Feb -Jul
50D
Corn sila a
199 lbs N/ac
Feb -Jul
50D
Sor hum uain
104 lbs N/ac
Aril -Jul
50D
Sor hum sila a
199 lbs N/ac
Aril -Jul
50D
So beans
110 lbs N/ac
Aril -Sept
50D
Sor hum Sudan ass hay
184 lbs N/ac
Aril -Au ust
50D
Sudan ass hay
184 lbs N/ac
April-Aiieust
50D
Fescue hay
184 lbs N/ac
August -July
50D
Orchard ass hay
184 lbs N/ac
Au ust-Jul
50D
Small grain hay
110 lbs N/ac
Aug -April
50D
R-yegrass for hay
184 lbs N/ac
Feb -Ma
50D
Sudangrass for gazing
138 lbs N/ac
April -August
50D
Fescue for uazinu
138 lbs N/ac
August -July
50D
Orchard rass for azin
138 lbs N/ac
Au st-Jul
50D
Small arain for grazing
82 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
50D
Rvearass for araziniz
138 lbs N/ac
Feb -Ma
50D
Matua for hay
184 lbs N/ac
Au ust-Jul
50D
Matua for grazing
138 lbs N/ac
August -Jul
SOIL TYPE 130B Nanford-Badin complex 2 to 6 % slopes APPL. DATE
130B
Oat grain
91 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
130B
Wheat for min
108 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
130B
Barley for grain
72 lbs N/ac
Aug -April
130B
Rye for arain
108 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
130B
Corn for arain
113 lbs N/ac
Feb -Jul
130B
Corn for silage
216 lbs N/ac
Feb -Jul
130B --Sorghum
for grain
113 lbs N/ac
Aril -Jul
130B
Sorghum silage
216 lbs N/ac
April -July
130E
Soybeans
120 lbs N/ac
April -Sept
130B
Sor hum Sudangrass hay
200 lbs N/ac
Aril -Au ust
130E
Sudan ass for hay
200 lbs N/ac
Aril -Au st
130E
Fescue for hay
200 lbs N/ac
Au ust-Jul
130B
Orchard rass for hay
200 lbs N/ac
August -July
130B
Small tzrain for hay
120 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
130B
R e rass for hay
200 lbs N/ac
Feb -Ma
130B
Sudangrass for grazing
150 lbs N/ac
April -August
3

130B
Fescue for arazing
150 lbs N/ac
August -July
130B
Orchard ass for arazin
150 lbs N/ac
Auaust-July.
130B
Small rain for grazing
90 lbs N/ac
Aug -April
130B
R e rass for grazing
150 lbs N/ac
Feb -Ma
130B
Matua for hay
200 lbs N/ac
Au ust-Jul
130B
Matua for uazing
150 lbs N/ac
Au ust-Jul
SOIL TYPE 130C Nanford-Badin complex 6 to 10 % slopes APPL. DATE
130C
Oats for arain
85 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
130C
Wheat for arain
99 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
130C
Barley for Parain
66 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
130C
Rye for uain
99 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
130C
Corn for erain
104 lbs N/ac
Feb -Jul
130C
Corn for sila e
199 lbs N/ac
Feb -Jul
130C
Sor hum for grain
104 lbs N/ac
Aril -Jul
130C
Sor hum sila e
199 lbs N/ac
Aril -Jul
130C
Sor hum Sudangrass for hay
184 lbs N/ac
Aril -Au ust
130C
Soybeans
110 lbs N/ac
April -Sent
130C
Sudan ass for hay
184 lbs N/ac
April-Auiaust
130C
Fescue for -hay
184 lbs N/ac
Au ust-Jul
130C
Orchard ass for hav
184 lbs N/ac
Au ust-Jul
130C
Small emin for hay
110 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
130C
Rvegrass for hay
184 lbs N/ac
Feb -Ma
130C
Sudan ass for razing
138 lbs N/ac
Aril -Au ust
130C
Fescue for grazina
138 lbs N/ac
Au st-Jul
130C
Orchard ass for grazinia
138 lbs N/ac
Au ust-Jul
130C
Small Lyrain for jzrazin.2
82 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
130C
R-ye2rass for uaziw
138 lbs N/ac
Feb -Ma
130C
Matua for hay
184 lbs N/ac
Auaust-July.
130C
Matua for grazing
138 lbs N/ac
August -July
SOIL TYPE 130D Nanford-Badin complex 10 to 15 % slopes APPL. DATE
130D
Oats for vrain
85 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
130D
Wheat for Parain
99 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
130D
Barley for arain
66 lbs N/ac
Aug -April
130D
Rye for grain
99 lbs N/ac
Aug -April
130D
Corn for 2rain
104 lbs N/ac
Feb -Jul
130D
Corn for silage
199 lbs N/ac
Feb -Jul
130D
Sor hum for arain
98 lbs N/ac
Aril -Jul
130D
Sorghum for sila e
199 lbs N/ac
Aril -Jul
130D
Sorghum- Sudan ass for hay
184 lbs N/ac
Aril -August
130D
Soybeans
110 lbs N/ac
Aril -Se t
130D
Sudan ass for hay
184 lbs N/ac
April-Aujaust
130D
Fescue for hay
184 lbs N/ac
August -July
130D
Orchard ass for hay
184 lbs N/ac
Au ust-Jul
130D
Small Lyrain for hav
110 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
130D
Ryevrass for hay
184 lbs N/ac
Feb -Ma
130D
Sudan rass for 2razin2
138 lbs N/ac
Aril -Au ust
130D
Fescue for grazinp138
lbs N/ac
Au ust-Jul
130D
Orchardiarass Lyrazin2 for
138 lbs N/ac
Au ust-Jul
130D
Small 2rain grazing for
82 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
130D
Ryearass for iarazim
138 lbs N/ac
Feb -Ma
7

130D
Matua for hay
184 lbs N/ac
August -July
13OD
Matua for arazinv-
138 lbs Nlac
August -July
SOIL TYPE 51B Helena sandy loam 2 to 6 % slo es APPL. DATE
51B
Oats for 2rain
85 lbs Nlac
Au -A ril
51B
Wheat for arain
132 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
51B
Barley for min
88 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
51B
Rye for grain
132 lbs N/ac
Au -A mil
51B
Corn for 2rain
106 lbs N/ac
Feb -Jul
51B
Corn for silage
204 lbs N/ac
Feb -Jul
51B
Sorghum for min
1061bs N/ac
Aril -Jul
51B
Sor hum sila a
204 lbs Nlac
Aril -Jul
51B
Soybeans
140 lbs N/ac
Aril -Sent
51B
Sor hum -Sudan ass for hay
175 lbs Nlac
Aril -Au ust
51B
Sudan ass for hay
175 lbs N/ac
Aril -Au ust
51B
Fescue for hay
175 lbs N/ac
August -July
51B
Orchard ass for hay
175 lbs Nlac
Au ust-Jul
51B
Small uain for hay
120 lbs Nlac
Au -A ril
51B
R e rass for hay
175 lbs N/ac
Feb -Ma
51B
Sudan ass for Lyrazina
131 lbs Nlac
Amil-Auizust
51B
Fescue for grazing
131 lbs Nlac
Au ust-Jul
51B
Orchard rass for P-razina
131 lbs N/ac
August -July
51B
Small uain for grazinQ
90 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
51B
Rvearass for arazina
131 lbs N/ac
Feb -Ma
51B
Matua for graziniz
175 lbs N/ac
August -July
51B
Matua for jzraziny
131 lbs N/ac
August -July
SOIL TYPE 30B Cecil aravetly sandy loam 2 to 6 % slopes APPL. DATE
30B
Oats for arain
117 lbs Nlac
Au -A ril
30B
Wheat for grain
144 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
30B
Barley for arain
96 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
30B
Rye for yrain
144 lbs N/ac
Aug -April
30B
Corn for vrain
119 lbs N/ac
Feb -Jul
30B
Corn for sila e
228 lbs Nlac
Feb -Jul
30B
Sorghum for grain
150 lbs N/ac
Aril -Jul
30B
Sor hum sila a
228 lbs Nlac
Aril -Jul
30B
Soybeans
1401bs N/ac
April -Sent
30B
Sorghum Sudan ass for hay
225 lbs N/ac
Aril -August
30B
Sudaniarass for hay
225 lbs N/ac
Aril -Au ust
30B
Fescue for hay
225 lbs Nlac
August -July
30B
Orchardgrass for hay
225 lbs Nlac
Au st-JuI
30B
Small jarain for hay
120 lbs Nlac
Au -A mil
30B
R e rass for hay
225 lbs Nlac
Feb -Ma
30B
Sudan ass for uazina
169 lbs N/ac
April -August
30B
Fescue for arazinL,
169 lbs N/ac
August -July
30B
Orchardgrass for grazin2
169 lbs Nlac
Au ust-Jul
30B
Small arain for 2razina
90 lbs Nlac
Au -A mil
30B
Ryearass for arazinu
169 lbs Nlac
Feb -Ma
30B
Matua for hay
225 lbs N/ac
August -July
30B
Matua for Qrazing
169 lbs Nlac
Au ust-Jul

SOIL TYPE 37B Wedowee sandv loam 2 to 6 % slopes APPL. DATE
37B
Oats for grain
117 lbs N/ac
Aug -April
37B
Wheat for RTain
144 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
37B
Barley for grain
96 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
37B
Rye for Lyrain
144 lbs N/ac
Aug -April
37B
Corn for parain
113 lbs N/ac
Feb -Jul
37B
Corn for sila e
216 lbs N/ac
Feb -Jul
37B
Son hum for arain
113 lbs N/ac
Aril -Jul
37B
Sor hum sila a
216 lbs N/ac
Aril -Jul
37B
Soybeans
140 lbs N/ac
Aril -Sent
37B
Sor hum -Sudan ass for bay
150 lbs N/ac
Arril-Auvust
37B
Sudan rass for hav
150 lbs N/ac
Aril -Au ust
37B
Fescue for hay
150 lbs N/ac
Au ust-Jul
37B
Orchard ass for hay
150 lbs N/ac
Au ust-Jul
37B
Small arain for hay
120 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
37B
R e rass for hay
150 lbs N/ac
Feb -Ma
37B
Sudan ass for vrazina
113 lbs N/ac
Anril-Auvust
37B
Fescue for uaziii2
113 lbs N/ac
Au st-Jul
37B
Orchardgrass for grazing
113 lbs N/ac
August -July
37B
Small QTain for Qrazing
90 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
37B
Rvegrass for Lyrazing
113 lbs N/ac
Feb -Ma
37B
Matua for hay
150 lbs N/ac
Au ust-Jul
37B
Matua for yrazina
113 lbs N/ac
Au ust-Jul
SOIL TYPE 20B Geor eviile silt loam 2 to 6 % slopes APPL. DATE
20B
Oats for Grain
104 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
20B
Wheat for grain
132 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
20B
Barley for Lyrain
88 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
20B
Rye for arain
132 lbs Nlac
Au -A ril
20B
Corn for ain
119 lbs Nlac
Feb -Jul
20B
Corn for sila e
228 lbs N/ac
Feb -Jul
20B
Sorghum for grain
150 lbs N/ac
Aril -Jul
20B
Sor hum sila e
228 lbs N/ac
Aril -Jul
20B
So beans
140 lbs N/ac
Aril -Se t
20B
Sor hum Sudaniarass for hay
180 lbs N/ac
Aril -Au ust
20B
Sudan rass for hay
180 lbs N/ac
April -August
20B
Fescue for hay
180 lbs N/ac
Au ust-Jul
20B
Orchard rass for hay
180 lbs N/ac
Au ust-Jul
20B
Small Grain for hay
120 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
20B
for hay
180 lbs N/ac
Feb -Ma
--RyQarass
20B
Sudan ass for y-razinu
135 lbs N/ac
Anril-Aupaust
20B
Fescue for arazina
135 lbs N/ac
August -July
20B
Orchard rass for iarazing
135 lbs N/ac
Au ust-Jul
20B
Small parain for 2razina
90 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
20B
Ryearass for 2razing
135 lbs N/ac
Feb -Ma
20B
Matua for hay
180 lbs N/ac
Au st-Jul
20B
Matua for arazina
135 lbs N/ac
Au st-Jul
SOIL TYPE 20132 Georgeville silty clav loam 2 to 6 % slopes APPL. DATE
20B2
Oats for Grain
8bN/ac I Au -A ril
20B2
Wheat for Grain
I 112 lbs N/ac I Au -A ril
I

20B2
Barley for arain
75 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
20B2
Rye for arain
112 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
20B2
Corn for arain
101 lbs N/ac
Feb -Jul
20B2
Corn for silage
194 lbs N/ac
Feb -Jul
20B2
Sor hum for uain
127 lbs N/ac
Aril -Jul
20B2
Sor hurn silaLye
194 lbs N/ac
Aril -Jul
20B2
Soybeans
119 lbs N/ac
Aril -Sent
20B2
Somahum Sudan rass for hay
153 lbs N/ac
April -August
20B2
Sudan ass for hav
153 lbs N/ac
Aril -Au ust
20B2
Fescue for hay
153 lbs N/ac
August -July
20B2
Orchard ass for hay
153 lbs N/ac
Au ust-Jul
20B2
Small Grain for hay
102 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
20B2
R e rass for hay
153 lbs N/ac
Feb -Ma
20B2
Sudangrass for grazing
115 lbs N/ac
Aril -Au ust
20B2
Fescue for uazing
115 lbs N/ac
Au ust-Jul
20B2
Orchard ass for parazing
115 lbs N/ac
Au ust-Jul
20B2
Small izrain for 2razing
77 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
20B2
Rvevrass for jzrazin
115 lbs N/ac
Feb -Ma
20B2
Matua for hay
153 lbs N/ac
Au ust-Jul
20B2
Matua for 2razina
115 lbs N/ac
Au ust-Jul
SOIL TYPE 20C Georeeville silt loam 6 to 10 % slopes APPL. DATE
20C
Oats for arain
96 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
20C
Wheat for parain
121 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
20C
Barley for arain
81 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
20C
R e for juain
121 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
20C
Corn for arain
109 lbs N/ac
Feb -Jul
20C
Corn for silaize
210 lbs N/ac
Feb -Jul
20C
Sor hum for arain
138 lbs N/ac
Aril -Jul
20C
Sor hum sila e
210 lbs N/ac
Aril -Jul
20C
Soybeans
129 lbs N/ac
April -Sept
20C
Sorghum Sudan rass for hay
166 lbs N/ac
AT)ril-August
20C
Sudan ass for hay
166 lbs N/ac
Atril-Aiifiust
20C
Fescue for hay
166 lbs N/ac
August -July
20C
Orchard ass for hay
166 lbs N/ac
August -July
20C
Small Grain for hay
110 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
20C
Ryearass for hay
166 lbs N/ac
Feb -Ma
20C
Sudan ass for arazin2
124 lbs N/ac
Aril -Au ust
20C
Fescue for grazing
124 lbs N/ac
Au ust-Jul
20C
Orchard rass for grazina
124 lbs N/ac
Au ust-Jul
20C
Small ain for uaziu
82 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
20C
Ryearass for graziu,
124 lbs N/ac
Feb -Ma
20C
Matua for hay
166 lbs N/ac
Au st-Jul
20C
Matua for uazina
124 lbs Nlac
Au st-Jul
SOIL TYPE 23112 Geor eville sil cla loam 2 to 6 % slopes APPL. DATE
23B2
Oats for arain
88 lbs N/ac
Au -A mil
23B2
Wheat for grain
112 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
23B2
Barley for yrain
75 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
23B2
Rye for iarain
112 lbs N/ac
Au -A mil
23B2
Com for arain
101 lbs N/ac
Feb -Jul
23B2
Corn for silage
194 lbs N/ac
Feb -Jul
10

23132
Sor hum for rain
1221bs N/ac
Aril -Jul
23B2
Sorghum sila e
194 Ibs N/ac
Aril -Jul
23B2
Soybeans
119 Ibs N/ac
Aril -Se t
23132
Sor hum -Sudan rass for hay
153 Ibs N/ac
Aril -Au ust
23132
Sudan rass for hay
153 lbs N/ac
Aril -Au ust
23132
Fescue for hay
153 lbs N/ac
Au ust-Jul
23132
Orchard ass for hay
153 lbs N/ac
Au ust-Jul
23132
Small Grain for hav
102 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
23132
RveeTass for hay
153 lbs N/ac
Feb -Ma
23B2
Sudan ass for ff azin
115 Ibs N/ac
April-Atipaust
23132
Fescue for arazinia
115 Ibs N/ac
Au ust-Jul
23132
Orchard rass for mzina
115 Ibs N/ac
August -July
23132
Small rain for grazina
77 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
23132
R e ass for zraziu
115 Ibs N/ac
Feb -Ma
23132
Matua for ha
153 lbs N/ac
Au ust-Jul
23132
Matua for 2raziTiLy
115 Ibs N/ac
Au ust-Jul
SOIL TYPE 232B Geor eville silt loam 2 to 6 0 0 slopes APPL. DATE
232B
Oats for aram
91 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
232B
Wheat for grain
120 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
232B
Barley for grain
80 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
232B
Rye for uain
120 Ibs N/ac
Au -A ril
232B
Corn for 2rain
113 Ibs N/ac
Feb -Jul
232B
Corn for Sila e
216 Ibs N/ac
Feb -Jul
232B
Sorghum for grain
113 Ibs N/ac
Aril -Jul
232B
Soriahum silage
216 lbs N/ac
Aril -Jul
232B
Sorghum Sudangrass for hay
175 Ibs N/ac
Aril -Au ust
232B
Soybeans
120 Ibs N/ac
Aril -Se t
232E
Sudan ass for hay
175 Ibs Mae
Aril -Au ust
232B
Fescue for hay
175 Ibs N/ac
Au st-Jul
232B
Orchard ass for hay
175 Ibs N/ac
Au ust-Jul
232B
Small grain for hay
120 Ibs N/ac
Au -A ril
232B
R e rass for hay
175 lbs N/ac
Feb -Ma
232B
Sudan ass for grazin2
131 lbs N/ac
A riI-Au ust
232E
Fescue for arazin
131 lbs N/ac
Au ust-Jul
232B
Orchard rass for uazin-v
131 Ibs N/ac
Au ust-Jul
232B
Small uain for Lgaziny
90 Ibs N/ac
Au -A ril
232B
R e rass for urazina
131 Ibs N/ac
Feb -Ma
232B
Matua for hay
175 Ibs N/ac
Au ust-Jul
232B
Matua for grazina
131 Ibs N/ac
Au st-Jul
SOIL TYPE 232C Georgeville silt loam 6 to 10 % slopes APPL. DATE
232C
Oats for grain
851bs N/ac
Au -A ril
232C
Wheat for grain
110 Ibs N/ac
Au -A ril
232C
Barley -for yrain
74 Ibs N/ac
Aug -April
232C
Rye for ain
110 Ibs N/ac
Au -A ril
232C
Corn for grain
104 Ibs N/ac
Feb -Jul
232C
Corn for Sila e
199 Ibs N/ac
Feb -Jul
232C
Sorghum for grain
104 lbs N/ac
Aril -Jul
232C
Sorghum silage
199 lbs N/ac
Aril -Jul
232C
Soybeans
110 lbs N/ac
Aril -Se t
232C
Sor hum Sudangrass for hay
161 Ibs N/ac
Aril -Au ust
232C
Sudan ass for hay
161 Ibs N/ac
Aril -Au st
11

232C
Fescue for hav
161 lbs N/ac
Au st-Jul
232C
Orchard ass for hay
161 lbs N/ac
Au ust-Jul
232C
Small rain for hay
110 lbs N/ac
Aug -April
232C
R e rass for hay
161 lbs N/ac
Feb -Ma
232C
Sudangrass for vraziaz
121 lbs N/ac
Aril -Au ust
232C
Fescue for 2razina
121 lbs N/ac
Au ust-Jul
232C
Orchard ass for 2raziny
121 lbs N/ac
Au ust-Jul
232C
Small ain for 2razine
821bs N/ac
Au -A ril
232C
Ryearass for erazin
121 lbs N/ac
Feb -Ma
232C
Matua for hay
161 lbs N/ac
Au st-Jul
232C
Matua for 2razing
121 lbs N/ac
Au ust-Jul
SOIL TYPE 232D Gear eville silt loam 10 to 15 % slopes APPL. DATE
232D
Oats for uain
85 lbs N/ac
Aug -April
232D
Wheat for uain
1101bs N/ac
Au -A ril
232D
Bard for rain
741bs Nlac
Au -A ril
232D
Rye for yrain
110 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
232D
Corn for arain
1041bs N/ac
Feb -Jul
232D
Corn for silaLye
1991bs N/ac
Feb -Jul
232D
Sor hum for grain
104 lbs N/ac
A rii-Jul
232D
Sorghum for sila e
199 lbs N/ac
Aril -Jul
232D
Soybeans
110 lbs N/ac
Aril -Se t
232D
Sor hum Sudan ass hay
161 lbs N/ac
April-Aujaust
232D
Sudan rass for hay
161 lbs N/ac
April-Aulzust
232D
Fescue for hay
161 lbs N/ac
Au ust-Jui
232D
Orchard rass for hgy
161 lbs N/ac
Au ust-Jul
232D
Small rain for ha
110 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
232D
Rvearass for
161 lbs N/ac
Feb -Ma
232D
-hay
Sudan ass for Lyrazina
121 lbs N/ac
Aril -Au ust
232D
Fescue for grazing
121 lbs N/ac
Au st-Jul
232D
Orchard ass for jaraziniz
121 lbs N/ac
Au ust-Jul
232D
Small Lyrain for arazinii
82 lbs Nlac
Au -A ril
232D
R e rass for grazinu
121 lbs N/ac
Feb -Ma
232D
Matua for ha
161 lbs N/ac
Au ust-Jul
232D
Matua for uazinR
121 lbs N/ac
August -July
SOIL TYPE 232132 Georeeville silty clav loam 2 to 6 % slopes APPL. DATE
232B2
Oats for ain
781bs N/ac
Aug -April
232B2
Wheat for grain
1021bs N/ac
Au -A ril
232B2
Barley for arain
681bs N/ac
Au -A ril
232B2
Rye for urain
1021bs N/ac
Au -A ril
232B2
Com for uain
1041bs N/ac
Feb -Jul
232B2
Com for sila e
199 lbs N/ac
Feb -Jul
232B2
Sorghum for grain
961bs N/ac
Aril -Jul
232B2
Sor hum sila e
199 lbs N/ac
Aril -Jul
232B2
Soybeans
102 lbs N/ac
Aril -Sent
232B2
Sorghum-Sudanarass for hay
149 lbs N/ac
Aril -Au st
232B2
Sudan rass for hay
149 lbs N/ac
Aril -Au ust
232B2
Fescue for hay
149 lbs N/ac
Au st-Jul
232B2
Orchard ass for ha
149 lbs N/ac
Au ust-Jul
232B2
Small Grain for hay
102 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
232B2
Ryegrass for hay
149 lbs N/ac
Feb -Ma
232B2
Sudan ass for arazing
1121bs N/ac
Anril-Auayust
12

232B2
Fescue for araziu
112 lbs N/ac
August -July
232B2
Orchard ass for razin
112 lbs N/ac
Au ust-Jul
232B2
Small erain for araziu
77 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
232B2
R e rass for erazinia
112 lbs N/ac
Feb -Ma
232B2
Matua for hay
149 lbs N/ac
Au st-Jul
232B2
Matua for arazinia
112 lbs N/ac
Au ust-JuI
SOIL TYPE 232C2 Gcor eville silty clav loam 6 to 10 % slopes APPL. DATE
232C2
Oats for Lyrain
73 lbs N/ac
Aw-A ril
232C2
Wheat for Qrain
96 lbs Nlac
Au -A ril
232C2
Barley for arain
64 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
232C2
-Rye for grain
96 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
232C2
Corn for Qrain
90 lbs N/ac
Feb -Jul
232C2
Corn for silage
173 lbs N/ac
Feb -Jul
232C2
Sor hum for grain
90 lbs N/ac
Aril -Jul
232C2
Sor hum for sila a
173 lbs N/ac
Aril -Jul
232C2
Sor hum -Sudan ass for hay
140 lbs N/ac
Aril -Au ust
232C2
Soybeans
96 lbs N/ac
Aril -Se t
232C2
Sudan ass for hay
140 lbs N/ac
Aril -Au ust
232C2
Fescue for hay
140 lbs N/ac
August -July
232C2
Orchard rass for hay
140 lbs N/ac
August -July
232C2
Small arain for hay
96 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
232C2
R e ass for hay
140 lbs N/ac
Feb -Ma
232C2
Sudan ass for arazin2
105 lbs N/ac
Aril -Au ust
232C2
Fescue for 2Tazina
105 lbs N/ac
August -July
232C2
Orchard ass for P-raziniz
105 lbs N/ac
Au ust-Jul
232C2
Small grain for arazina
72 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
232C2
RveLyrass for grazin2
105 lbs N/ac
Feb -Ma
232C2
Matua for Qrazing
140 lbs N/ac
Au ust-Jul
232C2
Matua for 2razinLy
105 lbs N/ac
Au ust-Jul
SOIL TYPE 232D2 Geor eville silty clav loam 10 to 15 % slo es APPL. DATE
232D2
Oats for grain
73 lbs N/ac
Aug -April
232D2
Wheat for Lyrain
96 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
232D2
Barley for grain
64 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
232D2
Rye for grain
96 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
232D2
Corn for grain
90 lbs N/ac
Feb -Jul
232D2
Corn for silage
173 lbs N/ac
Feb -Jul
232D2
Sox hum far rain
90 lbs N/ac
Aril -Jul
232D2
Sorghum for sila e
173 lbs N/ac
Aril -Jul
232D2
Sorghum-Sudanarass for hay
140 lbs N/ac
Aril -Au ust
232D2
Soybeans
96 lbs N/ac
Aril -Se t
232D2
Sudan ass for hay
140 lbs N/ac
Aril -Au st
232D2
Fescue for hay
140 lbs N/ac
August -July
232D2
Orchard ass for hay
140 lbs N/ac
August -July
232D2
Small grain for hay
96 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
232D2
R e rass for hay
140 lbs N/ac
Feb -Ma
232D2
Sudan ass for grazinLy
105 lbs N/ac
Anril-August
232D2
Fescue for 2razin2
105 lbs N/ac
Au ust-Jul
232D2
Orchard ass for uazinLy
105 lbs N/ac
August -July
232D2
Small rain for 2razing
72 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
232D2
R e ass for zrazina
105 lbs N/ac
Feb -Ma
232D2
Matua for hay
140 lbs N/ac
Au st-Jul
13

232D2 I Matua for 2razing 1 105 lbs N/ac I August -July
SOIL TYPE 131B Nanford-Bailin complex 2 to 6 % slopes APPL. DATE
131B
Oats for uain
91 lbs N/ac
Aua- A ril
131B
Wheat for min
108 lbs N/ac
Au -A mil
131B
Barley for grazing
72 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
131B
Rye for rain
108 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
131B
Corn for arain
113 lbs N/ac
Feb -Jul
131B
Corn for sila e
216 lbs N/ac
Feb -Jul
131B
Sor hum for iarain
113 lbs N/ac
Aril -Jul
131B
Sorghum for silage
216 lbs N/ac
Aril -Jul
131B
Sor hum Sudan ass for hay
200 lbs N/ac
April -August
131B
So beans
120 lbs N/ac
Aril -Se t
131B
Sudan ass for ha
200 lbs N/ac
Aril -Au ust
131B
Fescue for hay
200 lbs N/ac
Au ust-Jul
131B
Orchard rass for hay
200 lbs N/ac
Au ust-Jul
131B
Small Lyrain for hay
120 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
131B
Rvearass for hay
200 lbs N/ac
Feb -Ma
131B
Sudan ass for graziny
150 lbs N/ac
Aril -Au ust
131B
Fescue for razin
150 lbs N/ac
Au ust-Jul
131B
Orchard ass for araziny
150 lbs N/ac
Au ust-Jul
131B
Small 2Tain for arazine
90 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
131B
R e rass for grazing
150 lbs N/ac
Feb -Ma
131B
Matua for hay
200 lbs N/ac
August -July
131B
Matua for parazing
150 lbs N/ac
August -July
SOIL TYPE 131C Nanford-Badin complex 6 to 10 % slopes APPL. DATE
131C
Oats for grain
85 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
131C
Wheat for grain
99 lbs N/ac
Aug -April
131C
Barley for min
66 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
131C
Rye for 2Tain
99 lbs N/ac
Aug -April
131C
Corn for arain
104 lbs N/ac
Feb -Jul
131C
Corn for sila e
199 lbs N/ac
Feb -Jul
131C
Sorghum for grain
104 lbs N/ac
Aril -Jul
131C
Sorghum silage
199 lbs N/ac
Aril -Jul
131C
Sor hu -SudanLyrass for hay
184 lbs N/ac
Aril -Au ust
131C
Soybeans
110 lbs N/ac
Aril -Se t
131C
Sudan rass for hay
184 lbs N/ac
Mril-Auizust
131C
Fescue for hay
184 lbs N/ac
Au ust-Jul
131C
Orchardgrass for hay
184 lbs N/ac
August -July
131C
Small grain for hay
110 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
131C
R e rass for hay
184 lbs N/ac
Feb -Ma
131C
Sudangrass for arazing
138 lbs N/ac
Aril -Au ust
131C
Fescue for arazing
138 lbs N/ac
Au ust-Jul
131C
Orchard ass for grazing
138 lbs N/ac
Au st-Jul
131C
Small arain for arazinE
82 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
131C
R e rass for 2razina
138 lbs N/ac
Feb -Ma
131C
Matua for hav
184 lbs N/ac
Au ust-Jul
131C
Matua for grazina
138 lbs N/ac
August -July
2 to 6 % slopes APPL. DATE
14

522A
Wheat for min
96 Ibs N/ac
Au -A ril
522A
Barley for arain
72 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
522A
Rye for grain
96 Ibs N/ac
Aug -April
522A
Corn for 2rain
113 lbs N/ac
Feb -Jul
522A
Corn for silage
192 lbs N/ac
Feb -Jul
522A
Sor hum for erain
113 lbs N/ac
Aril -Jul
522A
Sor hum for sila e
192 lbs N/ac
Aril -Jul
522A
Sorghum- Sudanrass for hay
150 lbs N/ac
Amil-AuLyust
522A
Soybeans
140 lbs N/ac
Aril -Se t
522A
Sudan ass for hay
150 Ibs N/ac
Aril -Au ust
522A
Fescue for hay
150 Ibs N/ac
August -July
522A
Orchard ass for hav
150 Ibs N/ac
Au ust-Jul
522A
Small arain for hay
120 Ibs N/ac
Au -A mil
522A
Rvegrass for hay
150 Ibs N/ac
Feb -Ma
522A
Sudan ass for Lyrazin2
113 Ibs N/ac
Aril -Au ust
522A
Fescue for grazing
113 Ibs N/ac
August -July
522A
Orchard ass for arazing
113 lbs N/ac
Au ust-Jul
522A
Small grain for grazing
901bs N/ac
Au -A ril
522A
Rvegrass for grazing
113 lbs N/ac
Feb -Ma
522A
Matua for hay
150 Ibs N/ac
Au ust-Jul
522A
Matua for grazin2
113 Ibs N/ac
Au ust-Jul
SOIL TYPE 41B Callison-Lienum complex 2 to 6 % slopes APPL. DATE
41B
Oats for arain
781bs N/ac
Za-Aixil
41B
Wheat for arain
96 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
41B
Barley -for ain
72 lbs N/ac
Au -A mil
41B
Rye for ain
96 Ibs N/ac
Au -A ril
41B
Corn for ain
113 lbs N/ac
Feb -Jul
41B
Corn for sila e
192 Ibs N/ac
Feb -Jul
41B
Sorghum for Qrain
113 Ibs N/ac
Aril -Jul
41B
Sor hum for silage
192 Ibs Nlac
Aril -Jul
41B
Sor hum -Sudan ass for hay
150 Ibs N/ac
Aril -Au ust
41B
Soybeans
140 Ibs N/ac
April -Sept
41B
Sudan rass for hay
150 Ibs N/ac
April -August
41B
Fescue for hay
150 Ibs N/ac
August -July
41B
Orchard ass for hav
150 Ibs N/ac
August -July
41B
Small arain for hay
120 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
41B
Rycarass for hay
150 lbs N/ac
Feb -Ma
41B
Sudan ass for grazing
113 lbs N/ac
Aril -Au ust
41B
Fescue for zrazing
113 Ibs N/ac
Au st-JuI
41 B
Orchard ass for parazin2
113 Ibs N/ac
Au st-JuI
41B
Small grain for grazinLy
901bs N/ac
Au -A ril
41B
Ryezrass for grazinLy
113 Ibs N/ac
Feb -Ma
41B
Matua for hav
150 Ibs N/ac
Au ust-Jui
41B
Matua for Lyrazina
113 Ibs N/ac
Au ust-Jul
SOIL TYPE 49B Nanford-Badin complex 2 to 6 % slopes APPL. DATE
49B
Oats for grain
91 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
49B
Wheat for arain
108 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
49B
Barley for arain
72 lbs N/ac
Au -A mil
49B
Rye for grain
108 Ibs N/ac
Au -A mil
49B
Corn for grain
113 Ibs N/ac
Feb -Jul
49B
Corn for sila e
216 Ibs N/ac
Feb -Jul
15

49B
Sorghum for grain
113 lbs N/ac
Aril -Jul
49B
Sorghum for silage
216 lbs N/ac
Aril -Jul
49B
Soybeans
120 lbs N/ac
April -Sept
49B
Sor hum -Sudan rass for hay
200 lbs N/ac
Amil-AuLyust
49B
Sudan ass for hay
200 lbs N/ac
Aril -Au ust
49B
Fescue for hay
200 lbs N/ac
Au st-Jul
49B
Orchard ass for hay
200 lbs N/ac
Au st-Jul
49B
Small arain for hay
120 lbs N/ac
Au -A mil
49B
Rve2rass for hay
200 lbs N/ac
Feb -Ma
49B
Sudan ass for grazing
150 lbs N/ac
April -August
49B
Fescue for grazing
150 lbs N/ac
Au ust-Jul
49B
Orchard ass for grazing
150 lbs N/ac
August -July
49B
Small 2rain for grazin
90 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
49B
R e rass for 2razina
150 lbs N/ac
Feb -Ma
49B
Matua for hay
200 lbs N/ac
Au ust-Jul
49B
Matua for grazinQ
150 lbs N/ac
August -July
SOIL TYPE 49132Nanford-Bailin complex 2 to 6 % complex APPL. DATE
49B2
Oats for 2rain
77 lbs N/ac
Au -A mil
49B2
Wheat for grain
92 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
49B2
Barley for ain
61 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
49B2
Rye for ain
92 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
49B2
Corn for uain
96 lbs N/ac
Feb -Jul
49B2
Corn for silage
184 lbs N/ac
Feb-Julv.
49132
Sorg hum for grain
96 lbs N/ac
Aril -Jul
49132
Sor hum for sila e
184 lbs N/ac
Aril -Jul
49B2
Soybeans
102 lbs N/ac
Aril -Se t
49132
Sor hum -Sudan rass for hay
170 lbs N/ac
A-pril-Auiaust
49B2
Sudan rass for hay
170 lbs N/ac
Aril -Au ust
49132
Fescue for hay
170 lbs N/ac
Au ust-Jul
49132
Orchard rass for hay
170 lbs Nlac
Au ust-Jul
49B2
Small grain for hay
102 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
49B2
Rye arass for hay
170 lbs N/ac
Feb -Ma
49B2
Sudan rass for Qrazin2
127 lbs N/ac
April -August
49B2
Fescue for 2razing
127 lbs N/ac
Au ust-Jul
49B2
Orchard ass for P-razinLy
127 lbs N/ac
Au ust-Jul
49B2
Small arain for arazing
76 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
49B2
R e ass for Lyrazing
127 lbs Nlac
Feb -Ma
49B2
Matua for hay
170 lbs N/ac
August -July
49B2
Matua for grazin2
127 lbs N/ac
August -July
SOIL TYPE 522B Cid-Lit!num complex 2 to 6 % slopes APPL. DATE
522B
Oats for arain
78 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
522B
Wheat for arain
96 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
522B
Barley for uain
72 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
522B
Rye for grain
96 lbs N/ac
Au -A rii
522B
Corn for 2rain
113 lbs N/ac
Feb -Jul
522B
Corn for sila e
192 lbs N/ac
Feb -Jul
522B
Sorghum for grain
113 lbs N/ac
Aril -Jul
522B
Sorg -hum for silage
192 lbs N/ac
Aril -Jul
522B
Sor hum Sudan ass for hay
150 lbs N/ac
Arril-AuLyust
522B
Soybeans
140 lbs N/ac
Aril -Se t
522B
Sudan ass for hay
150 lbs N/ac
April-Auzust
16

522B
Fescue for hay
150 lbs N/ac
August -July
522B
Orchardgrass for hay
150 lbs N/ac
Au ust-Jul
522B
Small arain for hay
120 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
522B
Rvearass for hay
150 lbs N/ac
Feb -Ma
522B
Sudan rass for arazinia
113 lbs N/ac
Aril -Au ust
522B
Fescue for jzrazing
113 lbs N/ac
Au ust-Jul
522B
Orchard ass for arazing
113 lbs N/ac
Au ust-Jul
522B
Small rain for grazing
90 lbs N/ac
Au -A mil
522B
Rvevrass for grazing
113 lbs N/ac
Feb -Ma
522B
Matua for hay
150 lbs N/ac
AuLust-July
522B
Matua for -razing .
113 lbs. N/ac
Au ust-Jul
SOIL TYPE 525B Cid-Li num complex 2 to 6% sla cs APPL. DATE
525B
Oats for grain
78 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
525B
Wheat for grain
96 lbs N/ac
Aug-Atpfil
525B
Barley for ain
72 lbs N/ac
Au -A mil
525B
R e for grain
96 lbs N/ac
Au -A mil
525B
Corn for grain
113 lbs N/ac
Feb -Jul
525B
Corn for sila e
192 lbs N/ac
Feb-JuI
525B
for yrain
113 lbs N/ac
Aril -Jul
--Sorghum
525B
Sor hum sila e
192 lbs N/ac
Aril -Jul
525B
Sorghum-SudaneTass for hay
150 lbs N/ac
Anril-Auvust
525B
Soybeans
140 lbs Nlac
Aril -Sept
525B
Sudan ass for hay
150 lbs N/ac
Aril -Au ust
525B
Fescue for hay
150 lbs N/ac
August -July
525B
Orchard ass for hay
150 lbs N/ac
August -July
525B
Small grain for hgy
120 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
525B
R e ass for hay
150 lbs N/ac
Feb -Ma
525B
Sudangrass for grazing
113 lbs N/ac
Aril -Au ust
525B
Fescue for 2razin2
113 lbs Nlac
Au ust-Jul
525B
Orchard ass for arazing
113 lbs N/ac
August -July
525B
Small parain for Qrazin2
90 lbs Nlac
Au -A ril
525B
Rvearass for parazinia
113 lbs N/ac
Feb -Ma
525B
Matua for hay
150 lbs N/ac
August -July
525B
Matua for grazin2
113 lbs N/ac
Au ust-Jul
SOIL TYPE 526E Cid-Lianum comnlex 2 to 6 % slopes APPL. DATE
526B
Oats for ain
78 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
526B
Wheat for grain
96 lbs N/ac
Aug -April.
526B
Barley for grain
72 lbs Nlac
Aug -April
526B
Rye for grain
96 lbs N/ac
Aug -April
526B
Corn for jarain
113 lbs N/ac
Feb -Jul
526B
Corn for silage
192 lbs N/ac
Feb -Jul
52613
Sorghum for grain
113 lbs N/ac
Aril -Jul
526B --Sorghum
for silage
192 lbs N/ac
Aril -Jul
526B
Sor hum -Sudan rass for hay
150 lbs N/ac
Aril -Au ust
526B
Soybeans
140 lbs N/ac
Aril -Se t
526B
Sudangrass for hay
150 lbs N/ac
Aril -Au ust
526B
Fescue for hay
150 lbs N/ac
August -July
526B
Orcharhyrass for hay
150 lbs N/ac
Au st-Jul
526B
Small arain for hay
120 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
526B
R e rass for hay
150 lbs N/ac
Feb -Ma
526B
Sudan ass for arazin2
113 lbs N/ac
Aril -August
17

526B
Fescue for juazin
113 lbs N/ac
Au ust-Jul
526B
OrchardLyrass for zrazina
113 lbs N/ac
Au ust-Jul
526B
Small Lyrain for arazina90
lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
526B
Rvearass for graziny
1131bs N/ac
Feb -Ma
526B
Matua for hav
1501bs N/ac
Au ust-Jul
526B
Matua for grazinLy
113 lbs N/ac
Au ust-Jul
SOIL TYPE 522C Cid silt loam 6 to 10 % slopes APPL. DATE
522C
Oats for agin
721bs N/ac i
Aug -April
522C
Wheat for uain
881bs N/ac
Aug -April
522C
Barley for Lyrain
661bs N/ac
Au -A ril
522C
Rye for grain
881bs N/ac
Au -A ril
522C
Corn for Rrain
1041bs N/ac
Feb -Jul
522C
Corn for sila e
1771bs N/ac
Feb -Jul
522C
Sor hum for uain
1041bs N/ac
Aril -Jul
522C
Soriahum silaize
1771bs N/ac
Aril -Jul
522C
Sor hum -Sudan rass for hay
138 lbs N/ac
April -August
522C
Soybeans
100 lbs N/ac
Aril -Se t
522C
Sudanass for hay
138 lbs N/ac
Aril -Au ust
522C
Fescue for hay
138 lbs N/ac
AuLust-July
522C
Orchard rass for ha
1381bs N/ac
Au ust-Jul
522C
Small arain for hay
110 lbs Nlac
Au -A ril
522C
R e rass for hay
1381bs N/ac
Feb -Ma
522C
Sudan ass for gazing
103 lbs N/ac
Aril -Au ust
522C
Fescue for ana-zina
103 lbs N/ac
Au st-Jul
522C
Orchard ass for uazinL,
103 lbs N/ac
Au ust-Jul
522C
Small Qrain for uazinu
821bs N/ac
Au -A ril
522C
Rvegrass for grazina
1031bs N/ac
Feb -Ma
522C
Matua for hay
138 lbs N/ac
Au ust-Jul
522C
Matua for Qrazin2
103 lbs N/ac
August -July
SOIL TYPE 525C Cid silt loam 6 to 10 % slopes APPL. DATE
525C
Oats for min
72 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
525C
Wheat for grain
881bs N/ac
Au -A ril
525C
Barley for grain
66 lbs N/ac
Aug -April
525C
R e for grain
881bs N/ac
Aug -April
525C
Corn for grain
1041bs N/ac
Feb -Jul
525C
Corn for sila a
1771bs N/ac
Feb -Jul
525C
Sorghum for grain
1041bs N/ac
Aril -Jul
525C
Sor hum silage
1771bs N/ac
Aril -Jul
525C
Sor hum -Sudan rass for hay
1381bs N/ac
Aril -August
525C
Soybeans
1291bs N/ac
April -Sent
525C
Sudanass for hay
138 lbs N/ac
April-Aujaust
525C
Fescue for hay
138 lbs N/ac
AuRust-July
525C
Orchard ass for hay
138 lbs N/ac
Au ust-Jul
525C
Small arain for hay
110 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
525C
Rye 2rass for hay
138 lbs N/ac
Feb -Ma
525C
Sudan ass for grazing
103 lbs N/ac
Aril -Au ust
525C
Fescue for araziu
1031bs N/ac
August -July
525C
Orchard ass for 2razing
103 lbs N/ac
Au ust-Jul
525C
Small grain for grazing
82 lbs N/ac
Au -April
525C
RyeaTass for grazing
103 lbs N/ac
Feb -Ma
525C
Matua for hay
138 lbs N/ac
Au st-Jul
18

525C I Matua for uazina 1103 lbs N/ac I AuLust-July
SOIL TYPE 68B-C Goldston-Badin cam lex 2-15 % slo es APPL. DATE
68B-C
Oats for arain
68 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
68B-C
Wheat for parain
84 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
68B-C
Barley for grain
72 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
68B-C
Rye for arain
84 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
68B-C
Corn for vrain
88 lbs N/ac
Feb -Jul
6813-C
Corn for sila e
168 lbs N/ac
Feb -Jul
68B-C
Sorghum for grain
88 lbs N/ac
A ril-Jul
68B-C
Sorghum sila e
168 lbs N/ac
Aril -Jul
6813-C
Sor hum -Sudan rass for hay
150 lbs N/ac
Aril -Au ust
68B-C
Soybeans
80 lbs N/ac
Aril -Sent
68B-C
Sudan ass for hay
150 lbs N/ac
Aril -Au st
68B-C
Fescue for hay
150 lbs N/ac
Au st-Jul
68B-C
Orchard ass for hay
150 lbs N/ac
Au st-Jul
68B-C
Small ain for hay
120 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
68B-C
Rvearass for hay
150 lbs N/ac
Feb -Ma
68B-C
Sudan ass for Qrazing
113 lbs N/ac
Aril -Au ust
68B-C
Fescue for vrazin
113 lbs N/ac
Au ust-Jul
68B-C
Orchard rass for arazina
113 lbs N/ac
August -July
68B-C
Small min for yraziniz
90 lbs N/ac
Au -A mil
68B-C
Rvearass for jzrazinja
113 lbs N/ac
Feb -Ma
68B-C
Matua for hay
150 lbs N/ac
Au ust-Jul
68B-C
Matua for uazinia
113 lbs N/ac
August -July
SOIL TYPE 68D Goldston-Badin complex I0-15 % slopes APPL. DATE
68D
Oats for rain
63 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
68D
Wheat for uain
77 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
68D
Barley for varain
66 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
68D
Rye for grain
77 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
68D
Corn for uain
81 lbs N/ac
Feb -Jul
68D
Corn for sila a
155 lbs N/ac
Feb -Jul
68D
Sor hum arain
81 lbs N/ac
Aril -Jul
68D
Sorh um sila e
155 lbs N/ac
Aril -Jul
68D
Sor hum -Sudan ass hay
138 lbs N/ac
Aril -Au st
68D
Soybeans
74 lbs N/ac
Aril -Sent
68D
Sudan ass for hay
138 lbs N/ac
Aril -Au ust
68D
Fescue hay
138 lbs N/ac
August -July
68D
Orchard ass hay
138 lbs N/ac
August -July
68D
Small arain hay
110 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
68D
RveRTass hay
138 lbs N/ac
Feb -Ma
68D
Sudan ass for arazing
104 lbs N/ac
Aril -Au ust
68D
Fescue for grazina
104 lbs N/ac
August -July
68D
Orchard ass for 2razing
104 lbs N/ac
Au ust-Jul
68D
Small grain for grazing
82 lbs N/ac
Au -A ril
68D
Ryegrass for grazing
104 lbs N/ac
Feb -Ma
68D
Matua for hay
138 lbs N/ac
August -July
68D
Matua for arazing
104 lbs N/ac
Au ust-Jul
19

NOTE: THESE ARE THE RECOMMENDED REALISTIC YIELD NITROGEN
APPLICATION RATES FOR THE SOIL TYPES LISTED ON THE PRECEEDING
PAGES. WHEN A CROP IS PLANTED THAT VARIES FROM THE WASTE
MANAGEMENT PLAN, THE NITROGEN APPLICATION RATES FROM ABOVE
MUST BE USED IN ORDER TO COMPLY WITH .0200 REGULATIONS. IF
HAYLAND IS USED FOR GRAZING, THE HAYLAND APPLICATION RATE
MUST BE REDUCED BY 25 PERCENT. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE
CALL OUR OFFICE, THE PHONE NUMBER IS 545-8353, OR 542-2244 EXT 3.
if

(CANAT Version: 1.61
'LAT Result-3 For: Chatham 6/25/2004 10:21:34 AM
:alendar Year:
:ounty
'roducer Identifier:
'ract Number:
'ield Number:
;oil Series:
rop:
iMPs :
'erti 1 i zers :
ippli cations
'oil Loss:
receiving Slope Distance
'oil Test 0" - 4"
WV_Factor (USER)
lydrologic Condition:
'ARTICULATE P = 2
'OLUBLE P = 1
�EACHATE P = 0
'OURCE P - 9
='OTAL P RATING = 12 (LOW)
INPUTS
2004
Chatham
Jesse Lynn Mann
2427
1
205B: Georgeville silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes
Corn (Silage) : Conservation Tillage - high residue
Tree/Shrub Buffer Width - 100 ft.
Dairy -slurry
Yearly Applied Amount: 35.96 1000 gal
Lb P205: 2.3 lb
Application Method: All other surface
3 t/ac/yr
50-99 ft
68
0.99
GOOD
OUTPUTS

ICANAT Version: 1.61
3LAT Results For: Chatham 6/25/2004 10:22:16 AM
INPUTS
:alendar Year:
2004
;ounty:
Chatham
,reducer Identifier:
Jesse Lynn Mann
'ract Number:
2427
'ield Number:
2
;oil Series:
205B: Georgeville silt loam,
2 to 6 percent slopes
:rep:
Corn (Silage) : Conservation
Tillage - minimum residue
3MPs:
Tree/Shrub Buffer Width =
100 ft.
'ertilizers:
Dairy -slurry
Yearly Applied Amount:
35.96 1000 gal
Lb P2O5:
2.3 lb
Application Method:
All other surface
applications
Toil Doss:
3 t/ac/yr
receiving Slope Distance
20-29 ft
'oil Test 0" - 4"
68
WV Factor (USER)
0.99
lydrologic Condition:
GOOD
OUTPUTS
'ARTICULATE P = 2
SOLUBLE P - 2
,EACHATE P = 0
SOURCE P = 14
'OTAL P RATING - 18 (LOW)

'CANAT Version: 1.61
'LAT Results For: Chatham 6/25/2004 10:22:43 AM
:alendar Year:
'ounty:
Iroducer Identifier:
'Tact Number:
'ield Number:
:oil Series:
'rop :
"MPS:
'ertilizers:
.pplications
:oil Loss:
:ecei-ving Slope Distance
:oil Test 0" - 4"
WV -Factor (USER)
lydrologic Condition:
'ARTICULATE P = 1
>OLUBLE P = 0
,EACHATE P = 0
'OURCE P - 3
'OTAL P RATING - 4 (LOW)
INPUTS
2004
Chatham
Jesse Lynn Mann
2427
3
205B: Georgeville silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes
Fescue (Hay) .
Vegetative Buffer Width = 10 ft.
Tree/Shrub Buffer Width - 10 ft.
Dairy -slurry
Yearly Applied Amount: 21.32 1000 gal
Lb P2O5: 2.3 lb
Application Method: All other surface
2 t/ac/yr
100-149 ft
26
1.02
GOOD
OUTPUTS

CANAT Version: 1.61
LAT Results For: Chatham 6/25/2004 10:23:15 AM
alendar Year:
ount y :
roducer Identifier
ract Number:
ield Number:
oil Series:
rop:
MPs.
'ertilizers:
pplications
oil Loss:
eceiving Slope Distance
oil Test 0" - 4"
WV Factor (USER)
.rtificial Drainage System
ydrologic Condition:
ARTICULATE P = 1
OLUBLE P = 1
,EACHATE P - 0
OURCE P - 7
'OTAL P RATING = 9 (LOW)
INPUTS
2004
Chatham
Jesse Lynn Mann
2427
4
525B: Cid-Lignum complex, 2
to 6
percent slopes
Fescue (Hay) .
Vegetative Buffer Width
= 10
ft.
Tree/Shrub Buffer Width
= 10
ft.
Dairy -slurry
Yearly Applied Amount:
19.19
1000 gal
Lb P205:
2.3
lb
Application Method:
All
other surface
3 t/ac/yr
0-9 ft
20
0.97
NO
GOOD
OUTPUTS

iCANAT Version: 1.61
'LAT Results For: Chatham 6/25/2004 10:23:44 AM
:alendar Year:
:ounty:
'roducer Identifier:
'ract Number:
'ield Number:
oil Series:
.rop :
',MPs :
'ertilizers:
pplications
.oil Loss:
.eceiving Slope Distance
,oil Test 0" - 4"
WV Factor (USER)
,rtificial Drainage System
.ydrologic Condition:
'ARTICULATE P = 1
:OLUBLE P - 1
,EACHATE P = 0
;OURCE P - 7
'OTAL P RATING - 9 (LOW)
INPUTS
2004
Chatham
Jesse Lynn Mann
2427
5
525B: Cid-Lignum complex, 2 to 6 percent slopes
Fescue (Hay) .
Vegetative Buffer Width = 10 ft.
Tree./Shrub Buffer Width = 10 ft.
Dairy -slurry
Yearly Applied Amount: 19.19 1000 gal
Lb P205: 2.3 lb
Application Method: All other surface
4 t/ac/yr
0-9 ft
20
0.97
NO
GOOD
OUTPUTS

ICANAT Version: 1.61
'LAT Results For: Chatham 6/25/2004 10:24:12 AM
.alendar Year:
'ount y :
'roducer Identifier:
`ract Number:
'ield Number:
;oil Series:
'rop .
,)MPs :
'ertilizers:
Lppli cations
;oil Loss:
receiving Slope Distance
;oil Test 0" - 4"
WV_Factor (USER)
[ydrologic Condition:
'ARTICULATE P = 3
;OLUBLE P = 2
,EACHATE P = 0
'DURCE P = 14
'OTAL P RATING = 19 (LOW)
2004
Chatham
Jesse Lynn Mann
2427
6
2O5B: Georgeville silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes
Corn (Silage) : Conservation Tillage - minimum residue
Vegetative Buffer Width = 10 ft.
Tree/Shrub Buffer Width = 25 ft.
Dairy -slurry
Yearly Applied Amount: 35.96 1000 gal
Lb P205: 2.3 lb
Application Method: All other surface
3 t/ac/yr
0-9 ft
47
1.01
GOOD
OUTPUTS

4CANAT Version: 1.61
?LAT Results For: Chatham 6/25/2004 10:24:38 AM
:alendar Year:
lounty:
?roducer Identifier:
Tact Number:
?ield Number:
Soil Series:
'rop:
3MPs :
?ertilizers:
applications
'oil Loss:
deceiving Slope: Distance
Soil Test 0" - 4"
WV —Factor (USER)
iydrologic Condition:
?ARTICULATE P = 2
SOLUBLE P - 1
=CHATE P = 0
SOURCE P - 14
'OTAL P RATING = 17 (LOW)
INPUTS
2004
Chatham
Jesse Lynn Mann
2427
7
205B: Georgeville silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes
Corn (Silage) : Conservation Tillage - minimum residue
Vegetative Buffer Width = 10 ft.
Tree/Shrub Buffer Width = 25 ft.
Dairy -slurry
Yearly Applied Amount: 35.96 1000 gal
Lb P205: 2.3 lb
Application Method: All other surface
3 t/ac/yr
0-9 ft
24
0.97
GOOD
OUTPUTS

ICANAT Version: 1.61
'LAT Results For: Chatham 6/25/2004 10:25:02 AM
;alendar Year:
;ounty :
Iroducer identifier:
.Tact Number:
'ield Number:
;oil Series:
`.rop :
iMPs :
'ertilizers:
Lpplications
;oil Loss:
.eceiving Slope Distance
;oil Test 0" - 4"
WV —Factor (USER)
lydrologic Condition:
'ARTICULATE P = 0
SOLUBLE P = 0
,FACHATE P = 0
;OURCE P — 3
'OTAL P RATING = 3 (LOW)
INPUTS
2004
Chatham
Jesse Lynn Mann
2427
8
205C: Georgeville silt loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes
Fescue (Hay) .
Vegetative Buffer Width = 25 ft.
Tree/Shrub Buffer Width = 100 ft.
Dairy -slurry
Yearly Applied Amount: 21.32 1000 gal
Lb P205: 2.3 lb
Application Method: All other surface
1 t/ac/yr
10-19 ft
24
0.97
GOOD
OUTPUTS

ICANAT Version: 1.61
ILAT Results For: Chatham 6/25/2004 10:23:35 AM
'alendar Year:
'ounty.
'roducer Identifier:
Tact Number:
'ield Number:
'oil Series:
Irop :
;MPs :
Iertilizers:
applications
'oil Loss:
teceiving Slope Distance
;oil Test 0" - 4"
WV —Factor (USER)
Iydrologic Condition:
)ARTICULATE P = 1
)OLUBLE P - 1
�EACHATE P = 0
)OURCE P - 14
'OTAL P RATING = 16 (LOW)
INPUTS
2004
Chatham
Jesse Lynn Mann
2427
9
205B: Georgeville silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes
Corn (Silage) : Conservation Tillage - minimum residue
Tree/Shrub Buffer Width = 100 ft.
Dairy -slurry
Yearly Applied Amount: 35.96 1000 gal
Lb P205: 2.3 lb
Application Method: All other surface
3 t/ac/yr
10-19 ft
26
0.97
GOOD
OUTPUTS

CANAT Version: 1.61
LAT Results For: Chatham 6/25/2004 10:26:05 AM
alendar Year:
ounty:
-roducer Identifier:
'ract Number:
'field Number:
oil Series:
'rop:
.MPS:
'ertilizex's:
_pplications
soil Loss:
receiving Slope Distance
;oil Test 0" - 4"
WV Factor (USER)
[ydrologic Condition:
'ARTICULATE P = 0
SOLUBLE P = 0
,EACHATE P — 0
SOURCE P = 3
'OTAL P RATING = 3 (LOW)
INPUTS
2004
Chatham
Jesse Lynn Mann
2427
10
205B: Georgeville silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes
Fescue (Hay) .
Vegetative Buffer Width = 25 ft.
Tree/Shrub Suffer Width = 100 ft.
Dairy -slurry
Yearly Applied Amount: 21.32 1000 gal
Lb P2O5: 2.3 lb
Application Method: All other surface
1 t/ac/yr
10-19 ft
26
0.97
GOOD
OUTPUTS

'CANAT Version: 1.61
'LAT Results For: Chatham 6/25/2004 10:26:22 AM
'alendar Year:
'ounty :
'roducer Identifier:
Tact Number:
'ield Number:
oil Series:
rop:
�MPs.
'ertilizers :
ppli cations
oil Loss:
ecei ving Slope Distance
oil Test 0" - 4"
WV —Factor (USER)
ydrologic Condition:
ARTICULATE P = 1
OLUBLE P = 1
,EACHATE P = 0
OURCE P - 14
OTAL P RATING = 16 (LOW)
INPUTS
2004
Chatham
Jesse Lynn Mann
2427
11
205B: Georgeville silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes
Corn (Silage) : Conservation Tillage - minimum residue
Tree/Shrub Buffer Width = 100 ft.
Dairy -slurry
Yearly Applied Amount: 35.96 1000 gal
Lb P205: 2.3 lb
Application Method: All other surface
3 t/ac/yr
10--19 ft
24
0.97
GOOD
OUTPUTS

:CANAT Version: 1.61
)LAT Results For: Chatham 6/25/2004 10:26:42 AM
INPUTS
:alendar Year:
2004
:ounty:
Chatham
'roducer Identifier:
Jesse Lynn Mann
Tact Number:
2427
'field Number:
12
'oil Series:
205B: Georgeville silt loam,
2 to 6 percent slopes
;rop:
Corn (Silage) : Conservation
Tillage - minimum residue
>MPs:
Vegetative Buffer Width =
100 ft.
Tree/Shrub Buffer Width -
100 ft.
'ertilizers:
Dairy -slurry
Yearly Applied Amount:
35.96 1000 gal
Lb P2O5:
2.3 lb
Application Method:
All other surface
applications
'oil Loss:
3 t/ac/yr
receiving Slope Distance
10-19 ft
'oil Test 0" -- 4"
26
WV (USER)
0.97
—Factor
iydrologic Condition:
GOOD
OUTPUTS
)ARTICULATE P - 1
SOLUBLE P - I
,EACHATE P = 0
>OURCE P = 14
'OTAL P RATING = 16 (LOW)

iCANAT Version: 1.61
ILAT Results For: Chatham 6/25/2004 10:27:02 AM
'alendar Year:
'ounty:
>roducer Identifier:
Tact Number:
,field Number:
Soil Series:
'rop :
3MPs :
'ertilizers :
applications
;oil Loss:
,eceiving Slope Distance
)oil Test 0" - 4"
WV —Factor (USER)
lydrologic Condition:
'ARTICULATE P =
0
)OLUBLE P =
1
jEACHATE P -
0
SOURCE P =
14
'OTAL P RATING = 15 (LOW)
INPUTS
2004
Chatham
Jesse Lynn Mann
2427
13
205B: Georgeville silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes
Corn (Silage) : Conservation Tillage - minimum residue
Tree/Shrub Buffer Width = 100 ft.
Dairy -slurry
Yearly Applied Amount: 35.96 1000 gal
Lb P205: 2.3 lb
Application Method: All other surface
3 t/ac/yr
100-149 ft
24
0.97
GOOD
OUTPUTS

ICANAT Version: 1.61
ILAT Results For: Chatham 6/25/2004 10:27:25 AM
:alendar Year:
'ounty :
'roducer Identifier:
.ract Number:
'ield dumber:
Soil Series:
:rop .
3MPs :
'ertilizers:
applications
'oil Loss:
receiving Slope Distance
'oil Test 0" - 4"
WV Factor (USER)
3ydrologic Condition:
'ARTICULATE P = 1
30LUBLE P - 1
=CHATS P - 0
30URCE P = 14
'OTAL P RATING = 16 (LOW)
INPUTS
2004
Chatham
Jesse Lynn Mann
2427
14
205B: Georgeville silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes
Corn (Silage) : Conservation Tillage - minimum residue
Tree/Shrub Buffer Width = 100 ft.
Dairy -slurry
Yearly Applied Amount: 35.96 1000 gal
Lb P205: 2.3 lb
Application Method: All other surface
3 t/ac/yr
100-149 ft
26
0.97
GOOD
OUTPUTS

ICANAT Version: 1.61
ILAT Results For: Chatham 6/25/2004 10:27:44 AM
'alendar Year:
;ounty.
'roducer Identifier
'ract Number:
'ield Number:
'oil Series:
'rop :
3MPs :
'ertilizers :
applications
'oil Loss:
receiving Slope Distance
'oil Test 0" - 4"
WV -Factor (USER)
lydrologic Condition:
'ARTICULATE P - 1
SOLUBLE P - 1
jEACHATE P - 0
;OURCE P = 3
.'OTAL P RATING = 5 (LOW)
INPUTS
2004
Chatham
Jesse Lynn Mann
2427
15
205B: Georgeville silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes
Fescue (Pasture)** :
Tree/Shrub Buffer Width = 15 ft.
Vegetative Buffer Width = 20 ft.
Dairy -slurry
Yearly Applied Amount: 15.96 1000 gal
Lb P205: 2.3 lb
Application Method: All other surface
1 t/ac/yr
0-9 ft
68
1.01
GOOD
OUTPUTS

CRY WASTE STORAGE ST I)MM
rWORKS=
„ ' ed-volu ir/9�//1i�ot��/s
J-UID & SOLID MANURE l� Nn/'l�N�l rr�� ek fig syc� Z,0 a,4
3 3 J`
€ Cows x 1 .6 ag 1� x . days x lft x i J LQ % confinement = / ft
y day -cow. 1 7.48gal .
2. MILKROOM & PARLOR WASTE '� + �r✓ r�ov,��5
cows x 5 gal. x —`l� days x' 1ft3 `y ft3
v day -cow ,7.48 gal. r , 3
2
3. RUNOFF FROM -OPEN AREAS - Area = i3 �0o ft
CN = lv6�,7 -for open area
Avg. Annual Rainfall = q6 i n. x of year of design storage
1 5- CT
With,Lin. using CN �,a'7p Runoff = -s" in.
Runoff inches x Area / 3 703ft2 x l ft'.
12 in.
4. RAINFAL.L - minus EVAPORATION ON STRUCTURE
J
(�A 'clase estimate (+. or -i0%) of the maximum liquid level surface -area �
may Oq used if exact dimensions are now known.) o�
�.-6 7 J0� 7NS;d{.ma JsiaUS uSE t� I y 12Y' rnd ►f.�i4L GrP f
�os�x f2.
I�ft2 surface area of liquid storage x (.13 in. rainfall - .10 in. evap.) N
day day
x ays x 1 ft. g0 6?3
I-C> 12 in. _ i
5. TOTAL LIQUID VOLUME REQUIRED t
ADD TO TOTAL LIQUID VOLUME FIcy 7_7- ',�1,?`k : 39
a. 25 YEAR STORM ON OPEN AREA -
(Area
= (? �i'D�
ft2}
CN = for open area
With 25 year 1 day storm of
4 ,0
in. using CN
Runoff
= J in.
3Go� ft2 x S a B i n . of
runoff
x 1. ft.
ft3
L9lY�v) 2
T2' zn.
P S3A ft surface area of
liquid
storage
7. 25 YEAR STORM ON STKUCTURE -
Use
.5 ft.
6, S ft.
8. ESW - 25 yr. - 1 day rain =
y
in. = Q =
cfs
Discharge = q = %,
cfs/ft., Stage
D. ft. Use "
Bottom Width = Q f- q
ft.
ESW STAGE
ft.
MOTE: Structures without D. A. may have an ESW constructed at 1.0` below the
top of dam. the A. E. may exempt individual sites that do not have
D. A. from the ESW requirement.
9. FREEBOARD
1.0 ft. 1

Animal Waste Management Plan Certification
(Please type or print all information that does not require a signature)
Exts. i `' bf- Neil or` Exparrdei (Please circle arie},
General Information:
Name of Farm: Facility No: -_. Aq
Owner(s) Name: J7 LVA1^1 Phone No: r .Z _ q(oto7
Mailing Address: ,je? 3
Farm Location: Fourteen Digit Hydrologic Unit:_ Q 2�2 QQQ� Q �00 3O
Latitude and Longitude:1 ! OIt
/ �� County:_ GSA %j6!q:�M�
Please attach a copy of a county road map with location identified and describe below (Be specific: road
names, directions, milepost, etc.): FA& C d r92 X r E/V
A r- k o e
Oyeration Description:
Type of Swine No, of Animals
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
Type of Poultry No. of Animals Type a the No. of Animals
❑ Layer ,ry Q
❑ Pullets ❑ Beef
Other Type of Livestock: Number of Animals:
Acreage Available for Application:1 3 �' „ . Required Acreage: � 5'
Number of Lagoons / Storage Ponds Total Capacity: 2�- Cubic Feet (ft3)
Are subsurface drains present on the farm: YES or NO (please circle one)
Owner / Manager Agreement
I (we) verify that all the above information is correct and will be updated upon changing. I (we) understand the operation and
maintenance procedures established in the approved animal waste management plan for the farm named above and will
implement these procedures. I (we) know that any expansion to the existing design capacity of the waste treatment and
storage system or construction of new facilities will require a new certification to be submitted to the Division of
Environmental Management before the new animals are stocked. I (we) understand that there must be no discharge of animal
waste from the storage or application system to surface waters of the state either directly through a man-made conveyance or
from a storm event less severe than the 25-year, 24-hour storm and there must not be run-off from the application of animal
waste. I (we) understand that run-off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas must be minimized using technical
standards developed by the Natural Resources Conservation Service. The approved plan will be filed at the farm and at the
office of the local Soil and Water Conservation District. I (we) know that any modification must be approved by a technical
specialist and submitted to the Soil and Water Conservation District prior to implementation. A change in land ownership
requires written notification to DEM qr a dew certification (if the approved plan is changed) within 60 days of a title transfer.
Name of Land Owner :
Signature:_
Name of Ma
ger(if different from owner):
Date: /yGt/, 14 1222
Signature: Date:
AWC -- April 24, 1996 1

Technical Specialist Certification
I. As a technical specialist by the North Carolina Soil and Water Conser V anon Commission
pursuant to 15A NCAC 6F .0005, 1 certify that the animal waste management system for the farm
named above has an animal waste management plan that meets or exceeds standards and specification
of the Division of Environmental Management (DEM) as specified in 15A NCAC 2H.0217 and the
USDA -Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) and/or the North Carolina Soil and Water
Conservation Commission pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H.0217 and 15A NCAC 6F _0001-.0005. The
following elements are included in the plan as applicable. While each category designates a technical
specialist who may sign each certification (SD, SI, WUP, RC, I), the technical specialist should only
certify parts for which they are technically competent.
IL Certification of Design
A) Collection, Storage,Treatment 5ystgm
Check tV appropriate box
Or Existing facility without retrofit (SD or WUP)
Storage volume is adequate for operation capacity; storage capability consistent with
waste utilization requirements.
❑ New, expanded or retrofitted facility (SD)
Animal waste storage and treatment structures, such as but not limited to collection systems,
lagoons and ponds, have been designed to meet or exceed the minimum standards and
specifications.
Name of Technical Specialist: (Please Print): Y. P, L Q 0 �.
Affiliation: 9 CS'
Address(Agency): ,f " .27 t z Phone No.: 6__q;--'9 Z40
Signature: Date: 9130 / 97
B) LUnd At)plication Sife (WUP)
The plan provides for minimum separations (buffers); adequate amount of land for waste
utilization; chosen crop is suitable for waste management; hydraulic and nutrient loading rates.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): ,4 Olez %
Affiliation:
Address(
Signature
Agency): v Phone No.:
Date: �� � T 7
Q Runoff Controls from Exterior Lots
Check the appropriate box
D Facility without exterior lots (SD or WUP or RC)
This facility does not contain any exterior lots.
Facility with exterior lots (RC)
Methods to minimize the run off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas have been
designed in accordance with technical standards developed by NRCS.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation:
Address(
Signature:
Date:
ANVC -- April 74, 1996

D) Apulication.and Handling Eiluipmprit
Check the appropriate box
Existing facility with existing waste application equipment (WUP or I)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been either field calibrated or
evaluated in accordance with existing design charts and tables and is able to apply waste as
necessary to accommodate the waste management plan: (existing application equipment can
cover the area required by the plan at rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or
nutrient loading rates, a schedule for timing of applications has been established; required
buffers can be maintained and calibration and adjustment guidance are contained as part of the
plan).
U New or expanded faciIiM or existing facility without existing waste application equipment (I)
Animal waste application equipment specified in the plan has been designed to apply waste as
necessary to accommodate the waste management plan; (proposed application equipment can
cover the area required by the plan at rates not to exceed either the specified hydraulic or
nutrient loading rates; a schedule for tirning of applications has been established; required
buffers can be maintained; calibration and adjustment guidance are contained as part of the
plan).
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):_ Sh eJ c
Affiliation.
Address(Agency
z7g P; r� ba a O c Z l3 i z
III. Certification of Installation
A) Collection, Stgran,Treatment Installaton
SFYVI(A -
ioneNo.:
ate: 1 z_gr 4 -
New, expanded or retrofitted facility (SI)
Animal waste storage and treatment structures, such as but not limited to lagoons and ponds,
have been installed in accordance with the approved plan to meet or exceed the minimum
standards and specifications.
For existing facilities without retrofits, no certification is necessary.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print):
Affiliation:
Address (Agency): NI Phone No.:
Signature:
ate:
AWC -- April bt, 1996

B) _Land ApnftatiQn Site (WUP)
Check the appropriate box
The cropping system is in place on all land as specified in the animal waste management plan.
❑ Conditional Approval: all required land as specified in the plan is cleared for planting; the
cropping system as specified in the waste utilization plan has not been established and the
owner has committed to establish the vegetation as specified in the plan by
(month/day/year); the proposed cover crop is appropriate for compliance with the waste
utilization plan.
❑ Also check this box if appropriate
if the cropping system as specified in the plan can not be established on newly cleared
land within 30 days of this certification, the owner has committed to establish an interim
crop for erosion control;
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): v
Affiliation:
Address(Agenc., Phone No.:
Signature: IADate:_ 4_13 o 1T 7
This following signature block is only to be used when the box for conditional approval in 111. B
above has been checked.
I (we) certify that I (we) have committed to establish the cropping system as specified in my (our) waste
utilization plan, and if appropriate to establish the interim crop for erosion control, and will submit to
DEM a verification of completion from a Technical Specialist within 15 calendar days following the date
specified in the conditional certification. I (we) realize that failure to submit this verification is a
violation of the waste management plan and will subject me (us) to an enforcement action from DEM.
Name of Land Owner:
Signatu
Name of Manager(if different from owner):
Signature:
Q —Runoff n i l from Exterior Lots (RC)
Date:
Date:
Facility with exterior lots
Methods to minimize the run off of pollutants from lounging and heavy use areas have been
installed as specified in the plan_
For facilities without exterior lots, no certification is necessary.
Name of Tech nical``Specialist
Affiliation: C-�n4 rycuYl :�
Address(Age
Signature:
I
se Print):��
hone No.-.UI J S Z— D
Date:A
/%�
AWC -- April 24, 1996 4

D) Application and Handling Eauinment Installation (WUP or I)
Check the appropriate block
❑ Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan is on site and ready
for use; calibration and adjustment materials have been provided to the owners and are
contained as part of the plan.
❑ Animal waste application and handling equipment specified in the plan has not been
installed but the owner has proposed leasing or third party application and has provided a
signed contract; equipment specified in the contract agrees with the requirements of the
plan; required buffers can be maintained; calibration and adjustment guidance have been
provided to the owners and are contained as part of the plan.
❑ Conditional approvalLAnimal waste application and handling equipment specified in the
plan has been purchased and will be on site and installed by
(month/day/year); there is adequate storage to hold the waste until the equipment is installed
and until the waste can be land applied in accordance with the cropping system contained
in the plan; and calibration and adjustment guidance have been provided to the owners and
are contained as part of the plan.
Name of Technical Specialist (Please Print): e ; [ r h
Affiliation: Alb ro 11 n errh 7 U e — r. ie v t-L - Cka+)-v rh
Address(Agency): 0, bleY Z 7ri ', r AjC 73 i t_ Phone No.: 5-La a2-b _
Signature: Ct Date: 1-11 g 9 7
The following signature block is only to be used when the box for conditional approval in III D
above has been checked.
I (we) certify that I (we) have committed to purchase the animal waste application and handling
equipment as specified in my (our) waste management plan and will submit to DEM a verification of
delivery and installation from a Technical Specialist within 15 calendar days following the date specified
in the conditional certification. I (we) realize that failure to submit this verification is a violation of the
waste management plan and will subject me (us) to an enforcement action from DEM.
Name of Land Owner:
Signature:
Name of Manager(if different from owner):
Date:
Signature: Date:
Please return the completed form to the Division of Environmental Management at the
following address:
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division Of Environmental Management
Water Quality Section, Compliance Group
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
Please also remember to submit a copy of this form along with the complete Animal Waste
Management Plan to the local Soil and Water Conservation. District Office and to keep a copy in
your files with your Animal Waste Management Plan.
AWC -- April 24, 1996

Chapter 5: Proper Application of Waste
Products Type B
Proper waste application involves knowledge of the waste application
system, the soils and crops, and the required buffers that must be adhered
to. This chapter will explain the required buffers and all other factors that
must be considered when you are trying to determine when and how much
waste to apply.
There are three different sets of buffers you should consider when land
WHAT BUFFERS ARE
applying animal waste. The first are those that are required by law. Under
REQUIRED WHEN 1
the existing 15A NCAC 2H .0200 Nondischarge Rules, you can not land
apply animal wastes within 25 feet of perennial streams. Perennial streams
MAKE LAND
are defined as streams indicated by a solid blue line on a United States
APPLICATIONS?
Geological Survey map. Effective October 1, 1995 for new or expanding
swine farms, you may not apply waste of any form within 50 feet of
List the necessary
residential property lines and rights -of -way. Furthermore, you may not
buffers for waste
apply waste within 50 feet of perennial streams. Again, these 50-foot
application.
buffers only affect swine farms constructed or expanded after
October 1, 1995. You should also review your waste management plan or
permit to see if any additional buffers are required.
A 100-foot buffer is required around wells for location of lagoons, other
waste treatment facilities, and land application sites. The same processes
that can contaminate a well from a lagoon can occur from a land
application site if improperly managed or the well is poorly constructed.
Even on a properly managed site it is best to maintain the buffer to reduce
the potential for problems.
The last buffer is a "good neighbor" buffer. Maintain a minimum distance
Describe why wind
of 200 feet from any homes or other buildings frequented by people.
speed and direction
Furthermore, do not make land applications on days with excessive wind.
should be considered
Drift on these days may irritate neighbors or pollute surface waters.
when applying waste.
North Carolina State University
5B-1

Animal Waste Manaaement Systems —April 1997
Record the date,
start Iecalion, and amount of irrigate, changing location,
effluent irrigated for each after each even[.
application event.
Evaluate lagoon or
storage pond level.
Maintain the required
Obtain a waste analysis
Sic at all limes within 60 days of application.
(freeboard plus 25-year,
24-hour storm).
Is the lagoon At least 1 time per year, set
depth more than the No or verify irrigation equtpmenl
permanent treatment calibration to apply correct
volume? amount wfthovt runoff.
Yes { No
Is "acrop actively Has the target
growing or within No Qf3 Nl7t Inl ate Yes plant -available nitrogen
30 days of being rate for the crop been
planted'+ applied? /
Yes
fs the ground
saturated or frozen?
Is it raining or
excessively windy?
Figure 5-1. Nutrient management and irrigation scheduling decision -making
flowchart -
North Carolina State Unrversity 5B-3

Animal Waste Manag-ment Systems April 1997
wastewater irrigation. Field capacity refers to the point where -the soil has
had time to drain away excess water from the large pores by gravity, but
still remains in a very moist condition. Permanent wilting point is where
there is so little water left in the soil that plants cannot remove the water
for their use.
Not all of the water added to soil is retained in the soil for use by plants.
Wastewater should be applied to soil such that it remains in the root zone
for uptake by the crop. Any wastewater not retained in the root zone will
likely transport waste nutrients to wherever it goes, resulting in a pollution
threat to either surface water, groundwater, or both.
To interpret soil -water measurements and apply them to irrigation
scheduling, you must be able to distinguish between two categories of
soil -water:
1. Gravitational Water the water in the soil that is free to drain or
move by the force of gravity. Gravitational water is computed as
the volume of water in the soil between saturation and field
capacity. When gravitational water is present in the root zone, the
soil is "too wet" to be irrigated with wastewater.
2. Plant -Available Water (PAW) —the amount of water held in the
soil that is available to plants. It is computed as the difference
between the water content at field capacity (referred to as upper
limit water content) and the permanent wilting point (often referred
to as the lower limit water content). Irrigation should be scheduled
to maintain the water content of the soil between these two
extremes. If there is no PAW deficit (i.e., the soil -water content is
above the upper limit), gravitational water is present and
wastewater irrigation should be delayed unless you are operating
under emergency conditions.
Soil texture greatly influences the portion of the soil pore volume that can
be occupied by gravitational water or plant -available water; therefore, it is
important to know your soil texture to determine how much water can
be irrigated.
The amount of plant -available water (PAW) that exists in the soil at any
given time is commonly expressed as the depth of water per unit depth of
North Carolina State University 5B- j

Animal Waste Manap—rent Systems April 1997
Estimating Soil -Water Content
Determiningwhether or not the field is " Describe techniques for
dry enough to be irrigated is not
always obvious. There are three practical methods of determining if the determining the amount
field is dry enough to be irrigated. These are: of water present in the
soil and when to irrigate.
1. a subjective method that involves "feeling" the soil,
2. objective methods utilizing soil -moisture measuring devices, and
3. an accounting approach (checkbook method) to estimate soil water.
One of these three methods for determining soil -water content should be
used to estimate the amount of water present in the soil at the start of
irrigation.
Feel Method
The feel method involves estimating soil -water by feeling the soil_ This
method is easy to use, and many growers schedule irrigation in this way.
This method is "subjective" since the results depend on the experience of
the person doing the measurement. The value of this method depends on
the experience of the operator. Some guidelines for estimating soil -water
content by the feel method are given in Table 5-2.
Use of the feel method is demonstrated in the following example. Suppose
your irrigation field is a sandy loam soil with a 15-inch root zone. You feel
the soil and observe that it forms a weak ball which falls apart. Based on
the guidelines given in Table 5-2, you can irrigate 0.3 to 0.4 inch of water
per foot of root zone depth. For a 15-inch (1.25-feet) root zone depth, the
permissible irrigation amount is:
038 inch ( )
0.3 in. x 1.25 ft to 0.5 inch 0.4 in. x l 25 ft North Carolina State University 5B-7

Animal Waste Mana---ment Systems April 1997
recommended ranges for traditional "fresh" water irrigation. You should
be aware that the calibration curves and recommendations supplied by the
manufacturer for these devices were developed for general conditions and
are not adequate for specific soil conditions and fields. You should also be
aware that wastewater objectives and recommendations are different from
fresh water recommendations. The differences will be discussed later in
this chapter. For irrigating wastewater, you will get better results if all
soil -water measuring devices you use are calibrated for the major soils you
are irrigating.
Checkbook Method
The checkbook method is an accounting approach for estimating how
much soil -water remains in the effective root zone based on water inputs
and outputs (like a daily balance on a bank account based on deposits and
withdrawals). Wastewater irrigation is scheduled when the soil -water
content in the root zone drops below a threshold level. Some of the
simpler checkbook methods keep track of rainfall, evapotranspiration, and
irrigation amounts. More sophisticated methods require periodic
measurements of the soil -water status and moisture use rates of the crop.
Checkbook methods require detailed daily record keeping which can
become time consuming for the more complex methods. One of the
advantages of the checkbook approach is that it can be programmed on a
computer. Computer programs have been developed to handle the
accounting and provide timely and precise scheduling recommendations.
To use the checkbook method, you must be able to estimate the rate that
water stored in the soil is being used. Water is removed from the root zone by
direct evaporation from the soil and transpiration by plants. Collectively, this
is referred to as evapotranspiration (ET). Evapotranspiration is affected by
many factors and varies seasonally and from day to day. On a hot, rainless
day, ET may approach 0.25 inch per day. Thus during dry, summer periods,
1 inch of water could be removed from the soil every 4 days. On the other
hand, more than a month may elapse before an inch is removed during
prolonged cold -wet winter periods. For these reasons, irrigation amounts must
vary seasonally in response to variation in evapotranspiration.
Average daily PET (PET is potential evapotranspiration ---the amount of water
that can be removed by a combination of the crops and evaporation) estimates
for several locations are shown in Table 5-3. These values can be used in the
North Carolina State University 5B-9

14nimal Waste Management Systems April 1997
Table 5-4. Use of the Checkbook Method for Irrigation Scheduling (Raleigh Location)
PAW `
in soil
Daily
PAW in soil
Storage 1
Comments
Date
at start of day
PET Rainfall Irrigation Drainage
at end
of day
inches
% of
inches
inches
% of
inches
PAW
PAW
5-01
- -
-
_
Don't know initial conditions at
this time
5-02
5-03
-
-
- 1.5 0.1
1.40
100
0,00
Assume FC reached at end of day
after rain
5-04
1.40
100
0.16 - -
1.24
89
0.16
5-05
1.24
89
0.16 - - -
1.08
77
0.32
5-06
1.09
77
0.16 -
0.92
66
0.48
5-07
0.92
66
0.16 - -
0.76
54
0.64
OK to irrigate
5-09
0.76
54
0.16 - 0.64 -
1.24
89
0.16
Irrigated 0.64 inch
5-09
1.24
89
0.16 - - -
1.08
77
0.32
5-10
1.08
77
0.16 0.75 0.27
1.40
100
0.00
Rain exceeded storage so had
0.27 inch of drainage or
seepage
5-11
1.40
100
O.16
- 1.24
89
0.16
5-12
1.24
89
0.16 -
1.08
77
0.32
5-13
1.08
77
0,16 -
- 0.92
66
0.48
Lagoon marker indicates need to
irrigate
5-14
0.92
66
0.16 0.48
1.24
89
0.16
Irrigated storage at start of day
(0.48 inch)
5-15
1.24
89
0.16
1.08
77
0.32
5-16
1.08
77
0.16 0.22
- 1.14
81
0.26
- 5-17
1.14
81
0.16 -
- 0.98
70
0.42
5-18
0.98
70
0.16
0.82
59
0.58
Would like to irrigate
5-19
0.82
58
0.16 - 0.50
- 1.16
83
0.24
Irrigated 0.5 inch
5-20
1.16
83
0.16 0,63 -
0.23 1.40
100
0.00
Rain exceeded storage so had
0.23 inch of drainage or
seepage
5-21
1.40
100
0.16 -
1.24
99
0.16
5-22
1.24
89
0.16 -
1.08
77
0.32
5-23
LOS
77
0.16
- 0.92
66
0.48
5-24
0.92
66
0.16 0.08 -
- 0.84
60
0.56
Lagoon marker indicates need to
irrigate
5-25
0.84
60
0.16 - 0,56
- 1.24
89
0.16
Irrigated 0.56 inch
5-26
1.24
89
0.16 -
- 1.08
77
0.32
5-27
L08
77
0.16 - -
- 0.92
66
0.48
5-28
0.92
66
0.16 1.32
0.68 1.40
100
0.00
Rain with 0.68 inch drainage
5-29
1.40
100
0.16 - -
- 1.24
89
0.16
5-30
1.24
89
0.16 -
1,08
77
0.32
5-31
1.08
77
0.16 -
0.92
66
0.48
Lagoon marker indicates need to
irrigate
Based
on a
maximum plant -available water content of the example soil of 1.4 inches.
Soil
storage at end
of day is amount of plant -available water depleted. It is computed as:
Soil Storage (end of day) = PAW (start gfday)+
PET - rainfall - irrigation + drainage
From Table 5-1, 50 percent depletion for a sandy loam sail ranges from
0.5 to 0.9 inch. Assume the maximum plant -available water content for
this soil is 1.4 inch (sandy loam soil in Table 5-1) so that the target
depletion value for this soil is 0.7 inch which corresponds to the magnum
recommended for a sandy loam. The crop grown is coastal bermudagrass,
North Carolina State University 5B-11

Animal Waste Manage---ent Systems April 1997
Table 5-4. Use of the Checkbook Method for Irrigation Scheduling (Raleigh Location)
PAW'
in soil
Daily
PAW in soil
Storage
Comments
Date
at start of day
PET Rainfall Irrigation Drainage
at end of day
incises
% of
inches
inches % of
inches
PAW
PAW
3-01
_
-
-
Don't know initial conditions at
this time
5-02
-
5-03
-
1.5 0.1
1.40 100
0.00
Assume FC reached at end of day
after rain
5-04
1.40
100
0.16 - -
1,24 89
0.16
5-05
1.24
89
0.16 - -
1.08 77
0.32
5-06
1.08
77
0.16 - -
0.92 66
0.48
5-07
0.92
66
0.16 - - -
0.76 54
0.64
OK to irrigate
5-09
0.76
54
0.16 - 0.64 -
1.24 89
0.16
Irrigated 0,64 inch
5-09
1.24
89
0.16 - -
1.08 77
0.32
5-10
1.09
77
0.16 0.75 - 0.27
1.40 100
0.00
Rain exceeded storage so had
0.27 inch of drainage or
seepage
5-11
1.40
100
0.16 -
- 1.24
89
0.16
5-12
1,24
89
0.16 - -
1.08
77
0.32
5-13
1.08
77
0.16 -
- 0.92
66
0.48
Lagoon marker indicates need to
irrigate
5-14
0.92
66
0.16 0.48
1.24
89
0.16
Irrigated storage at start of day
(0.48 inch)
= 5-15
1.24
89
0.16 -
1.08
77
0.32
5-16
1.08
77
0.16 0.22
- 1.14
81
0.26
5-17
1.14
81
0.16 -
0.98
70
0.42
5-18
0.98
70
0.16
- 0.82
59
0.58
Would like to irrigate
5-19
0.82
58
0.16 - 0.50
- 1.16
83
0.24
Irrigated 0.5 inch
5-20
1.16
83
0.16 0.63 -
0.23 1.40
100
0.00
Rain exceeded storage so had
0.23 inch of drainage or
seepage
5-21
1.40
100
0.16
- 1.24
89
0.16
5-22
1.24
89
0.16 - -
1.08
77
0.32
5-23
1.08
77
0.16 -
- 0.92
66
0.48
5-24
0.92
66
0.16 0.08 -
0.94
60
0.56
Lagoon marker indicates need to
irrigate
5-25
0.84
60
0.16 - 0.56
1.24
89
0.16
Irrigated 0.56 inch
5-26
1.24
89
0.16
- 1.08
77
0.32
5-27
1.08
77
0.16
0.92
66
0.48
5-28
0.92
66
0.16 1.32
0.68 1.40
IN
0.00
Rain with 0.68 inch drainage
5-29
1.40
100
0.16 - -
- 1.24
89
0.16
5-30
1.24
89
0.16
- 1.08
77
0.32
5-31
1.08
77
0.16 -
0.92
66
0.48
Lagoon marker indicates need to
irrigate
Based on a
maximum plant -available water content of the example soil of 1.4 inches.
2 Soil storage at end of day is amount of plant -available
water depleted. It is computed as:
Soil Storage (end of day) = PAW (start of day)+ PET - rainfall - irrigation + drainage
From Table 5-1, 50 percent depletion for a sandy loam soil ranges from
0.5 to 0.9 inch. Assume the maximum plant -available water content for
this soil is 1.4 inch (sandy loam soil in Table 5-1) so that the target
depletion value for this soil is 0.7 inch which corresponds to the maximum
recommended for a sandy loam.. The crop grown is coastal bermudagrass,
North Carolina State University 5B-11

Animal Waste Mann - -ment Systems April 1997
The amount of wastewater that can or should be applied during any single
irrigation cycle is dictated by how much water the soil can "soak up." This
varies from day to day and is influenced by:
l . Rainfall —when and how much it last rained.
2. Crop maturity —water uptake rate of the crop.
3. Soil type —texture, structure, depth, and cover.
4. Effective root depth —dependent on soil characteristics and crop
type and age.
Evapotranspiration —which is influenced by temperature, wind,
and relative humidity.
Wastewater irrigation should replace the water that has evaporated from
the soil or been removed by plants. This is referred to as the plant -
available water deficit. Most water taken up by plants is removed in the
upper half of the root zone. For the purpose of scheduling irrigation, this
zone is referred to as the effective root depth. Soil conditions in North
Carolina limit maximum rooting depths of most crops to 24 to 36 inches
so that the effective root depth is typically only 12 to 18 inches. It is
within this depth that we estimate or measure the plant -available water
deficit to be replaced by irrigation. If the irrigation volume applied
exceeds the PAW deficit, the excess either runs off or leaches below the
root zone and could potentially contaminate groundwater.
If the soil was completely dry so that the crop was severely wilted, the
plant -available water deficit would be the value shown in Table 5-1. In
reality, the soil is rarely this dry so that the amount to be replaced will be
less than the values shown in Table 5-1. At any given time, the plant -
available water deficit could range from none to the maximum values
shown in Table 5-1. Recommended wastewater irrigation volumes for a
range in soil -water contents and soil textures is shown in Table 5-2.
Wastewater irrigation objectives and recommendations are different from
fresh water recommendations. When irrigating with fresh water, the
objective is to keep the soil moist for optimum growing conditions. This is
desirable for all crops, but during dry periods, all of the water needed by
List five factors that may
influence the amount of
wastewater that can be
irrigated.
North Carolina State University 5B-13

Animal Waste Manw-ment Systems April 1997
Table 5-5. Approximate Water Infiltration Rates for Various Soil
Textures and Slopes
Slope
0 to 3% 3% to 9% 9+%
inches per hour
Sands >1.00 >0.70 >0.50
Loamy sands 0.70 to 1-00 0.50 to 1.00 0-40 to 0.70
Sandy loams and fine sandy loams 0.50 to 1.00 0.40 to 0.70 0.30 to 0.50
Loams and silt loams 0.30 to 0.70 0.20 to 0.50 0-15 to 0.30
Sandy clay loams and silty clay loams 0.20 to 0.40 0.15 to 0.25 0.10 to 0.15
Clays, sandy clays, and silty clays 0.10 to 0.20 0.10 to 0.15 <0.10
Source: Sprinkler Irrigation Association Journal. For poor vegetative cover or surface soil
conditions, actual rates may be as much as 50 percent less than shown.
Sandy soils have high intake capacity and runoff is not much of a concern.
Explain how to
But, sandy soils also have low plant -available water -holding capacity
determine how much
(PAW). For example, consider a deep sandy soil that has only 0.5 inch of
water to irrigate.
plant -available water per foot of soil depth. For an effective root depth of
1.5 feet, the maximum plant -available water deficit is only 0.75 inch.
0.5 in. PAW
- 1 S ft x = 0.75 in. PAW
�
For this example, if the application amount during any single irrigation
cycle exceeds 0.75 inch, some of the applied wastewater will leach below
the root zone and potentially pollute groundwater.
Taking all of the above factors into account, recommended wastewater
Explain how/why
irrigation amounts for a single irrigation cycle are in the range of 0.25 to
irrigation amounts need
0.75 inch per foot of effective root zone depth. There may be an occasion
to be adjusted
when the appropriate irrigation amount falls outside this range such as
seasonally.
when irrigation must occur during cold periods when PET is low, when
the soil has an unusually deep root zone providing a greater amount of plant -
available water storage, or to satisfy emergency action guidelines. But, these
situations are exceptions and should not occur on a regular basis.
Regardless of the calculated rate, you as the system operator should
monitor each waste application to verify adequate infiltration of the waste
into the soil. An irrigation cycle should be stopped if ponding and runoff
start to occur.
3
North Carolina State University
5B-15

Animal Waste Manaf - -zent Systems —April 1997
Precipitation Rate
Precipitation rate is normally expressed as unit depth of water (inch) per
unit of time, (usually an hour). The precipitation rate (inches per hour)
depends upon discharge rate and coverage diameter. The precipitation rate
is computed by first converting the discharge rate to a unit depth of water
(inch) per unit of area (such as acre or square feet), then dividing by the
wetted area of the sprinkler. Another important concept is total
application volume (also expressed as application depth, inch) which is
computed based on the amount of time the system operates at a given rate
on a given field. Your target application volume represents the total
volume (gallon/acre) needed to satisfy the PAN needs of the crop. This
application volume is used for planning; rarely can you apply this much
water during one irrigation cycle.
Wastewater analyses are often expressed in terms of pounds of plant -
available nitrogen (lb PAN) per 1,000 gallons of wastewater. When
s' irrigating, it is often preferable to express irrigation amounts as an
equivalent depth of water per acre, for example, 1/2 inch per acre.
Therefore, it is often necessary to convert between application volume
expressed as gallons per acre and application volume expressed as an inch
per acre. One inch of water spread over an acre, referred to as acre -inch, is
equal to 27,154 gallons.
Example:
If you wish to apply 0.4 inch of irrigation water, how many gallons per
acre should you apply?
0.4 in. x
27,154 gal 14,861 gal
=
acre -inch acre
Example:
Your waste analysis indicates that you have 2.5 pounds PAN per 1,000
gallons. if you wish to apply 75 pounds of PAN, how many inches should
you apply?
North Carolina State University 5B-17

Animal Waste Manc •Went Systems April 1997
Table 5-7. General Flow Rates and Coverage Diameter for Big Gun
Sprinklers
Taper Bore Nozzle
Gun Model
100T 150T 150T 200T 200T
Nozzle Diameter (inch)
Pressure
0.5
0.75
1.0
1.5
2.00
PSI
GPM
DIA
GPM
DIA
GPM
DIA
GPM
DIA
GPM
DIA
50
50
205
115
260
205
310
—
—
—
—
60
55
215
126
275
225
325
515
430
912
512
70
60
225
137
290
245
340
555
450
980
528
80
64
235
146
300
260
355
590
470
1047
548
90
68
245
155
310
275
365
625
485
1105
568
100
72
255
164
320
290
375
660
500
1167
592
110
76
265
172
330
305
385
695
515
1220
607
120
--
---
180
340
320
395
725
530
1277
622
Ring Type Nozzle
Gun Model
10OR 15OR 150R 20OR 20OR
Nozzle Diameter (inch)
Pressure 0.71 0.86 0.97 1.56 2.00
PSI
GPM
DIA
GPM
DIA
GPM
DIA
GPM
D1A
GPM
DIA
50
74
220
100
245
130
265
350
370
640
435
60
81
235
110
260
143
280
385
390
695
455
70
88
245
120
270
155
290
415
405
755
475
80
94
255
128
280
165
300
445
420
805
490
90
99
265
135
290
l75
310
475
435
855
505
100
105
270
143
300
185
320
500
445
900
520
110
110
275
150
310
195
330
525
455
945
535
120
-
-
157
315
204
335
545
465
995
545
North Carolina State University 5B-19

Animal Waste M_anar icnt SysLmS—April j 097
Procedure for computing precipitation rate.
1. Determine the sprinkler flow rate and wetted diameter from
manufacturer's literature.
From Table 5-6, Rainbird Model 70 with a 9/32-inch diameter
nozzle operated at 55 psi:
Sprinkler flow rate = 17.2 gpm
Vetted Diameter = 133 feet
2. Recommended sprinkler spacing is 50 to 65 percent of wetted
diameter. Using a value of 60 percent:
Design sprinkler spacing = 0.6 x 133 ft = 79.9 ft
Sprinklers are normally spaced in equal multiples of 20 feet based
on typical pipe length. Therefore, the design spacing would be
80 feet: for example, the sprinkler spacing along the lateral would
be 80 feet and the lateral spacing would be 80 feet such that the
effective area of a sprinkler would be 80 feet by 80 feet.
3. Precipitation rate is then computed as:
2 gpm3 x 17.
Precipitation rate (in.11u) — 96.= 0.26 in./hr
8Dft x soft
The application volume is then computed as the precipitation rate
multiplied by the operating time. In most cases, you will estimate the
desired application volume based on soil conditions as described above. If
this is the case, you then compute the time required to operate the system
to achieve the desired application volume. For example, if the desired
application volume is 0.6 inch, then the required operating time for the
system would be:
Compute the application
volume for a stationary
sprinkler irrigation system.
North Carolina State University 5B-21

Animal Waste ManaF, gent Systems Apri11997
For a wetted diameter of 355 feet, the wetted radius is:
355ft = 2 = 177.5ft
The precipitation rate is then computed as:
Precipitation rate (in./fir) = 96.3 x 260 gpm x 360 — = 0.35 in./lu
3.14 x (0.9 x 177.5 ft)- 320
Example:
What would be the precipitation rate in the previous example if the angle
of rotation was only a half circle?
96.3 x 260 gpm 360
Precipitation rate (in./hr) = , x ---- = 0.62 in./hr
3.14 x (0.9 x 1775 ft) 190
Note: The precipitation rate for a traveling gun sprinkler increases.
rapidly as the angle of rotation decreases. Since the infiltration
capacity of many soils is less than 0.5 inch per hour, it is important
that the gun sprinkler rotate as much of a full circle as possible so that
the precipitation rate does not exceed the infiltration capacity of
the soil.
Determination of Application Volume (Depth) for a Traveling
Gun Sprinkler
The volume of wastewater applied by a traveling gun depends on the flow
rate, lane spacing, travel distance, and travel speed. The travel lane spacing
should be approximately 70 to 80 percent of the sprinkler's wetted
diameter as shown in Figure 5-3. The application volume is computed by
the formula:
Application volume (in.) = 19.3 x sprinkler flow rate (gpm)
lane spacing (ft) x travel speed (in./min)
Compute the
precipitation rate and
application volume for a
traveling gun sprinkler.
Formula 11
North Carolina State University
5B-23

Animal Waste Mano- -anent Systems April 1997
If the lane spacing is 75 percent of the wetted diameter, the lane
spacing is:
0.75 x 355 ft = 266 ft
Travel speed (in./mitt) = 19.3 x 260 gpm = 31.4 in./min
266 ft x 0. b in.
Wetted
Diameter
X Lane Spacing X
(Approximately 70% to 80%
of Wetted Diameter)
Traveling Gun Buffer
Figure 5-3. Typical layout of a traveling gun irrigation system. Lane spacing is
typically 70 to 80 percent of wetted diameter.
System Calibration
Information presented in manufacturer's charts are based on average
operating conditions with relatively new equipment. Discharge rates and
application rates change over time as equipment gets older and
components wear. In particular, pump wear tends to reduce operating
pressure and flow. With continued use, nozzle wear results in an increase
in the nozzle opening, which will increase the discharge rate while
decreasing the wetted diameter.
Explain what effect
changing nozzle
diameter can have on
discharge rate and
wetted diameter.
North Carolina ,State University
5B-25

Animal Waste Mana—ment Systems April 1997
Many of the decisions on when and how much to irrigate wastewater are
APPLICATION USING
determined by the liquid nature of the waste and the potential for runoff
With slurry or solids application, these decisions surrounding liquid
SPREADER
application are not as critical. Certainly, it is still your job as the system
EQUIPMENT
operator to ensure that the applied wastes will not run off the property, but
the solid nature of the wastes greatly reduces the tendency of these
List the factors that must
materials to run off site. Therefore, the decision process for waste
addressed before
application is more related to the stage of crop growth and whether the
applying animal waste
crops need nutrient applications. Another important issue is the
w ithsr
with spreader or tanker
"trafficability" of the fields, or how easily your equipment can be operated
equipment.
to obtain uniform waste application without rutting the field or causing
soil compaction. Once the decision has been made to perform waste
application, you must be aware of your equipment's waste application rate.
This requires the calibration of the land application equipment.
A certain percentage of the nutrients in slurry and solid manures is tied up
in the organic portion of the waste and is not immediately available for
plant uptake. These nutrients will slowly become available to plants over
the course of several years. To satisfy your waste management plan, you
are only required to keep track of the nutrients that are available for the
first crop. It is possible, but quite tedious, to develop a system to
determine the "carry-over" nutrients from the organic portion of the
manure. It is beyond the scope of this training to do this exercise, and as
mentioned it is not required at this time. However, you may wish to
consider this issue to help minimize the potential for over application of
nutrients (especially nitrogen) that may be detrimental to your crops, soils,
or groundwater,
CALIBRATION OF MANURE SPREADERS
Effective utilization of manure is not possible if you do not know how much is
being spread over a given area. Calibration of your spreader is a simple and
effective way of improving utilization of nutrients in manure more effectively.
Only by knowing the application rate of your spreader can you correctly apply
manure to correspond to your crop needs and prevent water quality problems
through the over application of animal manure.
Applicators can apply manure, bedding, and wastewater at varying rates
and patterns, depending on forward travel and/or PTO speed, gear box
North Carolina State University
5B-27

Animal Waste ManaF--rent Systems April 1997
Example:
Your waste application method is a tractor -drawn tanker (honeywagon)
with a 2,500-gallon capacity. You apply a load to a field and measure the
application area as 22-feet wide by 280-feet long. What is the application
rate in gallons per acre?
First, figure the coverage area:
Coverage area (acres) = 280 ft x 22 ft= 0. ] 4 acre
43,560 ft2
Then figure the application rate:
Application rate for spreader (gal/acre) = 2,500 gal = 17,857 gal/acre
0.14 acre
Spreader Capacity
Liquid spreader capacities are normally rated by the manufacturer in
gallons. Multiply by 0.0042 to get tons.
Solid and semisolid spreaders are rated by the manufacturer either in
bushels or cubic feet (multiply bushels by 1.25 to get cubic feet). Most
spreaders have two rating capacities: (1) struck or level full, and
(2) heaped. Calibration of solid manure spreaders based on its capacity
(volume) is difficult to estimate accurately because the density of solid and
semisolid manures are quite variable. Density is the weight of the manure
per volume of manure ( pounds per cubic foot). Manure density varies
depending on the type and amount of bedding used as well as its storage
method. Therefore, if you estimate spreader application rates as the
volume of the manure the spreader holds, you are overlooking the fact that
some manure weighs more than other manure. This can cause a significant
error when calculating manure application. rates.
North Carolina State University 5B-29

Animal Waste Mana, nent Systems —April 1997
Calibration method.-
1. Locate a large and reasonably smooth, flat area where manure earl
be applied.
2. Spread the plastic sheet, tarp, or bed sheet smoothly and evenly on
the ground.
3. Fill the spreader with manure to the normal operating level. Drive
the spreader at the normal application speed toward the sheet
spread on the ground, allowing the manure to begin leaving the
spreader at an even, normal rate.
4. Drive over the sheet at the normal application speed and settings
while continuing to apply manure. if a rear discharge spreader is
used, three passes should be made: First, drive directly over the
center of the sheet; the other two on opposite sides of the center at
the normal spreader spacing overlap.
5. Weigh the empty bucket and plastic sheet, tarp, or blanket.
6. Collect all manure spread on the sheet and place it into the bucket.
7. Weigh bucket and manure and subtract the weight of the empty
bucket and ground sheet. This will give you the pounds of manure
applied to the sheet.
8. Repeat the procedure three times to get a reliable average.
9. Determine the average weight of the three manure applications.
10. Calculate the application rate using the following formula or
Table 5-8:
Application rate (tons/acre) _ lb manure collected x 21.78
sheet length (ft) x sheet width (ft)
11. Repeat the procedure at different speeds and/or spreader settings
until the desired application rate is achieved.
Formula 17
North Carolina State University 5B-31

Animal Waste Mana—rent Systems April 1997
Example:
What speed should you run if you wish to apply 4 tons of manure per acre
with a 3-ton spreader? Your spreader application width is 20 feet and your
spreader empties in 6 minutes.
Travel speed (mph) =
Spreader Pattern Uniformity
3 tons x 495
6 min x 20 ft x 4 tons/acre
= 3.1 mph
To determine the uniformity of spread and the amount of overlap needed,
place a line of small pans or trays equally spaced (2 to 4 feet) across the
spreader path. The pans should be a minimum of 12 inches by 12 inches
(or 15 inches in diameter), but no more than 24 inches by 24 inches; and
2 inches to 4 inches deep. Make one spreading pass directly over the
center pan. Weigh the contents caught in each pan or pour the contents
into equally sized glass cylinders or clear plastic tubes and compare the
amount in each.
The effective spread width can be found by locating the point on either
side of the path center where manure contents caught in the containers is
half of what it is in the center. The distance between these points is the
effective spreader width. The outer fringes of the coverage area beyond
these points should be overlapped on the next path to ensure a uniform rate
over the entire field. "Flat -top," "pyramid," or "oval" patterns are most
desirable and give the most uniform application. "M," "W," "steeple," or
"lopside" patterns are not satisfactory and one or more of the spreader
adjustments should be made. These patterns are described in the
calibration section found in Appendix L
Name three negative consequences of not following a proper
pumping schedule ....................................... see pages 513-1 to 5B-33
2. What buffers must be observed during waste application?
...................................................................................... see page 513-1
3. What are the five questions you should ask yourself before deciding
to irrigate wastewater? ................................................. see page 5B-4
REVIEW QUESTIONS
North Carolina ,State University
5B-33

Animal Waste Manag -gent Systems April 1997
• flow or delivery rate in gallons per minute (gpm) __
• diameter of throw of wastewater
• travel speed settings for traveling equipment
• tank or spreader capacity in gallons, pounds, tons, or bushels
• travel speed of tractor if pulling manure spreader
a number of sprinklers if solid -set system
• degrees of rotation of the sprinkler
7. Estimate of infiltration rates on each field `
Note: This number will vary with field conditions. See Chapter 5
for specifics on estimation of infiltration rates.
With the above information, you can make all of the calculations that will
allow you to properly operate your waste application equipment so that
agronomic rates are not exceeded. Important conversion factors and
formulas that are used for proper waste application are summarized on the
following pages. Most of these formulas are also included on the Record
Forms IRR-2, SLUR-2, and SLD-2, so that you can actually make your
calculations on these forms as you work through them. The record forms
do not include the equations for irrigation equipment application rate -or
travel speed.
North Carolina State University 1B-35

Animal Waste Manap--rent Systems April 1997
4. Application rate (gallons per acre)
Application rate (gal/acre) =
crop PAN requirement (lb) x 1,000
acre lb PAN per 1,000 gal
5. Application rate (tons per acre)
Application rate (tons acre) _ crop PAN requirement (lb/ac)
lb PANAon (from waste analysis)
6. Pound ofplant-available nitrogen applied per acre
application rate (gal) of waste applied lb PAN per 1,000 gal
lb PAN/acre applied = x
acre 1,004
7. Number of waste applications needed
It I Number of waste applications needed = total in. (or tons) needed to achieve desired PAN
application volume in. (or tons)/application event
8. Precipitation (application) rate for stationary equipment, inches
per hour
Precipitation rate (in.lhr) _
96.3 x sprinkler flow rate (gpm)
sprinkler spacing (ft) x lateral spacing (ft)
9. Time of irrigation system operation (hours)
Time of operation (hr) _
application volume (in.)
precipitation (application) rate (in.1hr)
10. Precipitation (application) rate for traveling gun; inches per hour,
where "w" is the angle of rotation expressed in degrees
Precipitation rate (in./hr) = 96.3 x sprinkler flow rate (gpm) x 360
3.14 x [0.9 x sprinkler radius (ft)] Z w
11. Application volume (depth) for traveling gun; inches
Application volume (in.) = 193 x sprinkler flow rate (gpm)
lane spacing (ft) x travel speed (in./min)
North Carolina State University 5B-37

Animal Waste iVanag,-Ment Systems April 1997
On the next few pages are example problems using these form>las. For EXAMPLE PROBLEMS
more practice using these formulas, there are additional problems in
Appendix E.
PROBLEM 1
You use a box spreader and you apply 1 ton of solids over a 30-foot wide
by 100-foot long area. What is your application rate in tons per acre?
First find the coverage area:
length (ft) x width (ft)
Coverage area (acres)
43,560 ft' per acre
Coverage area (acres) = 30 ft ] OD ft = 0.069 acre
43.560 ft` per acre
Then find the application rate:
Application rate for spreader (gal or tons/acre) = spreader load volume (gal or tans)
coverage area (acres)
1 ton
Application rate for spreader (tons/acre) _ = 14.5 tons/acre
0.069 acre
PROBLEM 2
You are spreading solids from a dairy dry stack using a box spreader with
a 250-cubic foot capacity. The weight of one 5-gallon bucket of solids is
17.5 pounds. What is the spreader load in tons?
Spreader load (tons) = Weight of 5 gal manure x 1.5 x spreader capacity (ft3 )
2,000
Spreader load (ions) = 17.5 lb x 1.5 x 250 ft3 = 3.3 tons
2,000
North Carolina State University 5B-39

Animal Waste Management Systems April 1997
PROBLEM 5
A spreader with a 3.3-ton load applies waste in a 40-foot wide strip with
an application rate of 16.5 tons per acre. It takes 2 minutes for the spreader
to empty its load. What was the travel speed of the spreader?
Travel speed (mph) = spreader load (tons) x 495
time (min) x width (ft) x application rate (tons/acre)
Travel speed (mph) = 3.3 tons x 495 = 1.2 mph
2 min x 40 ft x 16.5 tons/acre
PROBLEM 6
If the spreader in Problem 5 needed to apply 10 tons per acre of manure to
meet the requirements of a waste utilization plan, how fast should the
spreader be driven?
N
spreader load (tons) x 495
- Travel speed (mph) _
time (min) x width (ft) x application rate (tons/acre)
Travel speed (mph) = 33 tons x 495 _ 2 mph
2 min x 40 ft x .10 tons/acre
PROBLEM 7
A spreader being pulled at 3 mph empties a 3.5-ton load in 1.5 minutes
with an application width of 20 feet.
Question 1:
What is the application rate in tons per acre?
Application rate (tons/acre) _
spreader load (tons) x 495
time (min) x width (ft) x travel speed (mph)
Application rate (tons/acre) = 3.5 tons x 495 = 19.25 tons/acre
1.5min x 20 ft x 3 mph
North Carolina State University 58-41

Animal Waste Mana(--•went Systems --April 1997
PROBLEM 10
You operate a stationary irrigation system with a sprinkler flow rate of
14 gpm and a system layout with sprinkler spacing of 80 feet and lateral
spacing of 80 feet.
Question 1:
What is the precipitation rate in inches per hour?
Precipitation rate (in./hr) _
96.3 x sprinkler flow rate (gpm)
sprinkler spacing (ft) x lateral spacing (ft)
96.3 x 14 gpm
Precipitation rate (in./hr) _ $Oft x 80ft = 0.21 in./hr
Question 2:
Based on Problem 9, you wish to apply 0.92 inch of wastewater. How long
must you operate the stationary system to deliver the desired depth of
application?
Time of operation (hr) _
application volume (in.)
precipitation (application) rate (in./hr)
Time of operation (hr) = 0.92 in.= 4.4 hr (4 hr:24 min)
0.21 in./hr
PROBLEM 11
You land apply your manure with a manure spreader because it is too dry
and thick for irrigation or a tank spreader. Your waste analysis shows it
contains 16 pounds N per ton of manure. Your cropping sequence is corn
(grain) followed by winter wheat (grain). The average yield you have
recorded over the past 5 years is 90 bushels of corn and 35 bushels of
wheat. How many tons of manure per acre can you apply to maintain
agronomic rates?
North Carolina State University 5B-43

10. Are permits required?/Should the person contact permit agencies?
!� No Yes
When an environmental factor or resource is identified on the
site, the user will refer to the appropriate reference for policy
and document the appropriate action in the notes portion of this
form.
NOTES, DOCUMENTATION, FOLLOW-UP

ANIMAL FACILITY ANNUAL CERTIFICATION FORM
Certificate of Coverage or Permit Number
Facility Name (as shown on Certificate of Coverage or Permit)
Operator in Charge for this Facility
County
Certification #
Year 200
Land application of animal waste as allowed by the above permit occurred during the past calendar year
YES NO. If NO, skip Part I and Part II and proceed to the certification. Also, if animal waste
was generated but not land applied, please attach an explanation on how the animal waste was handled.
Part I : Facility Information:
1. Total number of application Fields ❑ or Pulls ❑ (please check the appropriate box) in the Certified Animal
Waste Management Plan (CAWMP):
Total Useable Acres approved in the CAWMP
2. Total number of Fields'❑ or Pulls El (please check the appropriate box) on which land application
occurred during the year:
Total Acres on which waste was applied
3. Total pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) applied during the year for all application sites:
4. Total pounds of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) allowed to be land applied annually by the CAWMP and
the permit:
5. Estimated amount of total manure, litter and process wastewater sold or given to other persons and taken
off site during the year
tons ❑ or gallons ❑ (please check the appropriate box)
6. Annual average number of animals by type at this facility during the previous year:
7. Largest and smallest number of animals by type at this facility at any one time during the previous year:
Largest
Smallest
(These numbers are for informational purposes only since the only permit limit on the number of animals
at the facility is the annual average numbers)
S. Facility's Integrator if applicable:
Part 1I: Facility Status:
IF THE ANSWER TO ANY STATEMENT BELOW IS "NO", PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN
DESCRIPTION AS TO WHY THE FACILITY WAS NOT COMPLIANT, THE DATES OF ANY NON
COMPLIANCE, AND EXPLAIN CORRECTIVE ACTION TAKEN OR PROPOSED TO BE TAKEN TO
BRING THIS FACILITY BACK INTO COMPLIANCE.
1. Only animal waste generated at this facility was applied to the permitted sites during ❑ Yes ❑ No
the past calendar year.
AFACF 3-14-03 1

2.
The facility was operated in such a way that there was no direct runoff of waste from
❑ Yes ❑ No
the facility (including the houses, lagoons/storage ponds and the application sites) during
the past calendar year.
3.
There was no discharge of waste to surface water from this facility during the past
❑ Yes ❑ No
calendar year.
4.
There was no freeboard violation in any lagoons or storage ponds at this facility during
❑ Yes ❑ No
the past calendar year.
5.
There was no PAN application to any fields or crops at this facility greater than the
❑ Yes ❑ No
levels specified in this facility's CAWMP during the past calendar year.
6.
All land application equipment was calibrated at least once during the past calendar year.
❑ Yes ❑ No
7.
Sludge accumulation in all lagoons did not exceed the volume for which the lagoon
❑ Yes ❑ No
was designed or reduce the lagoon's minimum treatment volume to less than the volume
for which the lagoon was designed.
8.
A copy of the Annual Sludge Survey Form for this facility is attached to this Certification.
❑ Yes ❑ No
9.
Annual soils analysis were performed on each field receiving animal waste during the
❑ Yes ❑ No
past calendar year.
10.
Soil pH was maintained as specified in the permit during the past calendar Year?
❑ Yes ❑ No
11.
All required monitoring and reporting was performed in accordance with the facility's
❑ Yes ❑ No
permit during the past calendar year.
12. All operations and maintenance requirements in the permit were complied with during ❑ Yes ❑ No
the past calendar year or, in the case of a deviation, prior authorization was received
from the Division of Water Quality.
13. Crops as specified in the CAWMP were maintained during the past calendar year on all ❑ Yes ❑ No
sites receiving animal waste and the crops grown were removed in accordance with
the facility's permit.
14. All buffer requirements as specified on the permit and the CAWMP for this facility were ❑ Yes ❑ No
maintained during each application of animal waste during the past calendar year.
"I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or
supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and
evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or
those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of
my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for
submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
Permittee Name and Title (type or print)
Signature of Permittee
Signature of Operator in Charge
(if different from Permittee)
Date
Date
AFACF 3-14-03 2

FORM FRBD-1
Waste Structure Freeboard and Daily Precipitation Record
Farm Owner Facility Number
Operator MonthfYear
Day
Waste Structure Freeboard (inches)1 2
Precipitation
(inches)3
Initials
Comments
#
#
#
#
#
#
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
1 Lagoon freeboard is the difference between the lowest point of a lagoon embankment and the level of liquid.
For lagoons with spillways, the difference between the level of liquid and the bottom of the spillway should be recorded.
Freeboard levels must be recorded at least weekly.
Rainfall must be recorded for every rain event.

C
v
C
0
U)
c
0
W
C
O
U
CL
Q
C
0
U
U
L
a
LL
Z
T
U
M
LL
O O
E J
_O
Co
O U O)
U)
E O LL
71 J
Z
O Q
C
O
m O
U L
Q
a
N N
� N
N �
LL
O
Q
I—
Q
0
U
a�
CO
o
U
7,
O �
❑ E
E
U �
co

kf
m
z
o
<
±
/
\
\
\
LL
\
CL
m
0
) f
\
D _
\
\
/
<
\
/
2
%
\
\ \
\
\
>
_
§
E
k
E
&
k
4.1
in
�
E
r_
E
2
U-
\
/
y
\�G
CL/\
§�\
§7«
\\\
/
\
\
I

Y
O
H
2
s
0
E
LL
LL
T
O
2
DJ
�
N
N
Q
U
O
US
N
Q
U
Q
O
F
T
a
U
O
N
U
O
U
U
N
a
m
Q
L
Lq
0
a�
m
m
a
E
E
rm
4
0
N
u
Q
v

ry
0
U
W
ry
J
W
n
0
ry
U
0
12
CD
Q
O
w
U
Lo
7
a m
m
N �
� U
d �
75 a)
� v
QS
� D
N �
ff7 U
Q) Q
(9 Q-
`o
}
m
cu
ao
Q
U
❑
N
LL
a
a
E
E
N_
T
u
cri
ai
N_
Cr}
a5
LL
N_
a
2
7D
N
}
r>

rE�i'i, J �lrrtrff fJ r�•rti vrE,r♦1� \-tf'S
'!\•! }v-tt`•"t vrfer}-1''/S�J1ff �k r� \\-J.tiJv-•ty J t i/�1r-•..1 r .'tl \r J ` ��y e
Ir�i�I,''I-!-*vlr-`/rl -l.,t5 � �fi�riJ-rE_tf""✓Sl\-t i7J\"r r1J�}/�I,.tiJ_t.f r,f €..#\�1 t ._._\��\J �I 4It.`tf♦I/
t 4 j t F t ` r r r •r [ ^ f - f ` + _ "" / ' - t - t J r t f } 1 - N f t ! r• ( '. / `',r •r \ \ f \ r �. ` f . S �\ /._
JNI� f yN4rtti�r\JN. \/
J`l'If`rtf1r jt/'ytr\il�t♦7��1 SJ f- t ♦ ;� ti-lfr ! r
J\/\f y`t� Sry r, \Jtf • �'!: 1 J�.�� - r"r - i �1 f /\ J `f 'r \f #r� •- ♦ / ;`k�l l,w\„r ; t`fr't\v E J ,#
`\i t Jr1'r! ll` t %`j \lSrti t r r \ / < _ \f / r r\ \r5^\ f l/ Y 2
1 '�,f vl,�wr`✓- 1`r� \ �FJ -# IiJ1t \N\\r ���-€\may Sr`!(�/�\l\# Yw Jtti ,,rf YrS
\ �!\ . I
J_4 }��f _ _ts_15\fr\J !\ _1€ t/ J..S�k ��rl� ! rl' / t
E�t 41t\�r�i/k/tflrfl+�t frk !1♦y!� ! 3_\rt yf _\E F�1rk-S}fstr 1i\\€�fk�\#tl..\��f��`N.
`t{
y.t �'!. tt, Jt �5r ^t it r1 r\'��� [i}it�j/St SQ�tt� j\ €\vJE` yE-I \\ram �tl.
/'\ J♦ t „l 1 r k S { r l l y I\ 1 ♦- 1♦ _l ti J,} /- y♦ t 1 J f y� [
�`- (\ \ �I rL � rl-1 f-..1 y � t k E l ! �5 r\ ! f .... ✓ ._ 4h -'-� -L .'
-_ ; .. ,•, � . _ J � , __�'��?�'�a��
r t - r l r r t -. .... f� t i ! t 1- � l rr l f ( f��� .•�JJ /`' \J •` r\ tr t J 1 1/ 1+�>\( I r
4 �i\ fv- \♦ e-I yr -I i•w "' S1/I/1�•\J\� w, !Etr�-\�7 J1 ♦f !.\! t
i•^/ ��4r.w*•S.^'J- r}fl..:.,•,r�l.-. S 1`tt.r.hrSfl�l J\#tj+�l�jt`•J#4�4E}�' jai 1^.gr
1 �\ ,- � 1 ,rk � t r !>, f iS•..J }� s l_\ .� !1 - JL J ..J \ (\ 1 J i � l J r f r J ,r _ t r l J; J-r l S /-\ r .. t r\ ;-- f \ r - 1
'\E ��_ r 1ltJ� ! 4!f`"d_f1. ti#! €�\lif r J ♦/ l ♦4-♦Y/tJt �iJJ\ y� `I r €/�t \\S \
\'ftl r/� \yr /\y1 }J,ri( fSf.-i�li 7 4"f, ftk�l.•ltf�/�S� \ItJ♦r,!�/��1�1!`IE\IY_tiJtij yt;•_'J\
\ \f ._ t . rly r J / ♦f ,\ �. , } 1J ♦ ry r ♦I� !` 1r �" t ; i
/ �lrt !_ t .ice• r JI t St,.\_s rf� I� �I ir�v€� rt �J114 r lti-!r\-\Ir€Jl!
tJ""tyt! \""\JI���r} t���}.•\�ll1 1�t}J•`f1 �If,�1tt_7,ltart(/'�J`i`1jSt/'\J1��t\rrlr`1itJ/j €rrl�~I#'��;rt�MI.J-1f..E�fF
\ ,.,• ♦ .., y / \ r . / Jy v t r rt 1 f •,.. 1
ti! r R f_ L r f - r\ J; ��! �, t t
\!t < 1 r♦
♦
i� �Jrl�tr�`1�tJr�l�frikJ�;' Sr f
'" r fl..-1� r `E.• yJit f1!`1! !-/ r\r . \ r �'ITr�Sw. ♦J\�`€lam 1�'�+tl\`•J i j �41r"`I`•7� 3
'�
f !,r\r r'=l�trf) r{f�EJ'rEk \ 1 r\ S +♦/f sll..•Z..,, ttit-^+\f..-t\#J�"•r\1E/
rl!L7 f tJ�1^rv+i !� rtri 1 !:t
` 1 1f } I" �k rr �tt� J� _ j�L! ,t ✓� ♦1
�tl�! \i lrrt�Jt�l JSr} �t#�♦ k*lJl,(# ti \r tiI /SIJ N.
�I/ r•1�1!"rti�l\iE�i_ /
r\rr Y J` ir•1\ r•r1�7�_f1 1` rtE�/-IN IJ�l�i1./1r♦3JiJ�r y�/\7,,�"11��1�I�f�rtJtti�t4r
J r♦ ! l 1 4 ti F!`ti 4 r\ !\ t f 1J I yf 1 E♦ I k I J It �1.i • S r\ t S F f 1 1
_ _ _ r J I 5 1 1 I •/� / �;` 1. } „ 11
_.f_E•r 1 t:_1, }r!ti'!`lk \\t�J�t�J 1r� �♦(♦€lJ� t �'/' ♦f\ y(`ryly t rr ry�F-'lr`�tr_.41 �fJtt�/\1—/t"'♦��\- �tr
�'i \mil �f\.I�-r I{l.�\f`! w�} �I\I\r1}♦1�Y
N.
♦!f f /;4;r!'!` j rrv'1 N.
.. i -.t` �r•' J � it ti✓♦.� 1 -- _ `'r♦'.F_f..t,r.tiv
_ \
� • J , f I` r +. r J \ r � f J \ J i- - - - u- � � J `! J � r
E\ I `' I ti J i♦ e r J _ - r _ rt 1 `�S 1 t
°,�t �1 "'` ..J.` jf\f' l!^lkvi;\ E: �. E\; ��a' �'SXF�ij ✓.\ \,t�♦f`, �J
\fllsy/1f1.
prat. a! `ftv`�..♦r\tl •lr�t%r'rtir._.�,:.. ..-__.- .�-
♦l\r sr�+ r1J5�11rl;=.
1
err}-^yiJ♦J
M \r - �Jyltd �\t'~fro FY
�1
St'4J.f4,arftlrf1E f 1 \,
IN s"4 �`,:�I :l=�.l�!'. wE ;1J�` r\I♦ j I`i'/i
'I._r•v, �t�rl�l•�r`\!`#J\a/�vF1`lilf} • r r`Ivlltir�_Sf\��-
' ~ l jam... i r ` ♦ J t l \J }i� ti -1, J� 4 ! t y t+ \ ��r a � /_ „�,. -�.,� � - .'�`� _ 1 ` �`I r�� l- il=\
41
�_ �!.tr-✓,is tiJ f v�/l - -.. d � "' -. - ! vl��-t"t.
r1 `r a\�} €f .�'f E t r -.• - +•,EJ rr\i+1�r
'f%'-\�S!`°t}�`J1~.'\J's\;�'l�j�\J. 4 _� r•Jc_-- _. _ is t' '•�yY,,`i -�/I..y'Jl��lt`t
$• ,., jt Alt /-�f 1i'
\rN,J�'`�y.�e
5! t N.
J ,� r\w♦r r`!'-r5r�%I ~�tf i�fv'11 R+//\�is•,yi �S/�!!� rk�J1 N,lJ
rl�t'_ Y` i�< yr `\i`-,r ! r• J� v' ..,. i1'i t �1y a/tir t\1 r\I\yw 4Erly Ir%♦~ft`f; ``+�-'!,�/Ilti...!/
„f-'rtJ.,�..J..�,1rrLjr�\mot-r j.♦�jrti�\/-t/t'rJi/ t \`,\ l�tt�r.1 ./J 1�1`�h ` y�ttr._/tlti--tl�l�-til~
'Jr1�v�`,.€J,r; !./Jls�i\rj yJti,rl�t`t.till•y' l~_lr♦fw�t♦"\/`y.4� <<I�}�sv/;f10Jf�t/may it'i~�l1i v y 1/\ft� lJ,• v
�rl'F•. mot" �!♦F..h�#.-• J€Jill ♦I�tirv�J�ll r�t1J♦lf TVQ{�7� 1�t,r�r\E'%�4r•I�!�J ICJ`/�*r`�~
€.I� \!'Iy�t I y r4, �vr. •Y'�l�t.�r. h1���`jJ _f • i .1s
Ft!_ ti/=tf♦�/.`ti.�-''irk€!0�/e�rt"�t-t-- J�f-•� `"�\sr ,j,,/ tiJ.1`#y t �tI`.i�yi�1J,�`l�,j j�li�lt„I_„
� - r ` ! ,., r � ! •• .-- '-r• j r J J 4 � 1 � ! / .- # - v ti 1 � J \ � \ / t ! 1 .!-�� j r•�! �{ [ ����i�i5q � J j ,, � i � r \tir rr t t r s � v � � J r t � ✓
r sir .-♦ �f• €� �S_ !_ I �, !Jti vLlr�-J^-
4r�rtl~fv Irlr j,. ;l.r" i_ t ti�,♦r� .r,r1r fr,\r .�-�1 �t�/i r�J;.-f rtr \f5` l! rtty.t,i�} 'tt 1`'r(,`I
�i / Jrl, �t
f`! �♦r•[.t1\rL E, 1J♦J
IN
.+_ ✓ / ti ✓ ••,,�Itt1��,,,,, [ \ w t / k ' f �/ y. r \
at
J \ _ 1 \ ♦ �r J Y'€+T 4 1-�E1� klf+ff 1f[YI $�� t � � , t � E _ 1 . t
N.
F`J, �tir•1� 1 .tJ- !r!`kN,l[��JJ
- 'TJ--.`-ram'-\�i�\ tJ`�♦�/i`-k..-w``:i Fi��=+.��tJ.•-/♦Yriw /\-•lr`, •.wrk"F�l t-.J _'l v,fk\ Jrl�f kr�-t�1, 4...Ft
j . ` r` ` 5 v F 1 rl a _. }�J! ✓ \� J� r.. J / ` } r /€ J T J I 1 +` I t +• { Yr ! ' r ,. ! t ' t l / \ r• !\ l 1 r w r `! �\. \rry \ t t h / . IN i
tir rJ:�tt'€ Jl _i! / jJ'h�}r tirt! J.. / l� *r t f♦ tiles 1�I�rt` . 4jr'�J, �11 '� `- _ri ^f,`/IJ_.
r'",--.tJ,- r`1 f_Jv�\r•1�'\rl `r♦1 �J�-! IJ\�\_IJrJ�\i_j ! � !� ~rh /tirl4flr J a. I-� �trj
rl k..5t rt I ♦ !_ f_'' !J / 1....♦mot Jw } �rf �r\_� !r'"l irkr\,. ,, 1�lrr\vw��rr�
4.4Jti}rN' �!;!J )•_%\t'�fl�1,.�lJ!
�fi_♦f
\
�•E - ' s.` 1\!\ it y 5 � rh 3 `fr �♦I `f a -1 J_,w,. �rti ~ fr i I\! r..j �\ �1. �# Ir fir♦ �J-
J {,r1_, !�!"rFJ`t� J \!ils� t!\�• ty~��J�\r♦r- i/!\E.4rJ^`�1 i_ r/1,. ! flr \t'"f t�1/ (♦r
!'`'sv. t k ytl,�1rl♦k`f�
\f!- IY! !',--J� i4 `f�'l.ttJ'!\( �` /\t.� �' /\ ��'��l/tr ftt �trJEf\/try4€-lt�r� % ♦1..• 4rlJtJ €�! \Jj!_L�-t�r� �_€'}�E
♦✓�..r'"`i�[Jf. t�,-.Frflr slti�r \1♦k\�r _I�'rF�l� 4rytfl ir`i/_Ifil���r♦mot•
-, . r} ! rt \ I _ r f�, r ` I l.. t .t ;, ti j ♦/ t 1 lf�+t �r - 'f
�tit�€tftitJy!'rtl� .I / !\j/ti-jt�ltit\€tk♦ ♦E'�rt�rtr- J_r#�-+'�l1-iJtj`(` ! a,
\`5-r\�lYtf�#� "�l�r.\J4 t _ f 1 ti 1t:}�i^� It`\ j\ f\f♦l�ftr J�#�1 /` ��\/� 1 /Elm/rtf(vl.t~ft'iv
f...1r�\wlt.._\Efyf�r..rYSf\`lJl,.ti/ l..y\'j-^.mil/\lei\rt'„tJii�r•,t`\r`^\�'J41�1\/lam. ♦//\J'�..J
� � _ . � -^ r \ J r I �.. f \ w ..-E J � J '- } ` I J h j AJ L �1 r J4 L•� f r € r -- i � J S 1_ t ,.♦ \ A t r \ J f - I \ r♦ \ j s J ` s_I r _!
\i{JS-r�L�j�-^ l3fti i�`rtrfl,�r`-tt-r� !t/L1rlJrJlr•tl\� �J,/tJZrfri IJF`l��yr!\J'ti14`'.•!/vJ't`�r,ft�J
_ ♦ \' i s 1 ` r \ ` I !. i �1rtif * f i ` t 1 `!� f j 1t �1 4 r' r ' / it Ni fit, . y \ �t J 1 : lr t' f f E 1
tr J Erg v1/♦\!J rift \ 1 �\t,l\r��;\
!'•r\!L li...\r\_�!•`�#t \r f\-� , ry�t�F!- �tJ--1\`y\-\I..r t" t y _i'"ti �.f � 1 - ••_ / rltr t,..w
`rNr�\ f�\�!/\ 1_!_I!r %\Nt/tiJ,.tr,,S`• tr�tiF'v lr`.rE t\ wy--l��jyjl~rtJt�+ti1�1J E�J1\J`I\�!1�\fll�lrl;\ItirSS�\r /v
'J"\mot\�. f,-�4J \J4.• l"�-1 l'r ..ff •l r•—'lt�wa l�Y-�I _._I%Milt

Field Calibration Procedures for Semi -Solid
Animal Waste Application Equipment
LOAD -AREA Information presented in manufacturer's charts are based on average operat-
MTHOD ing conditions for relatively new equipment. Discharge rates and application
SPREADER SYSTEM rates change over time as equipment gets older and components wear, For
pump and haul application equipment, application rates and patterns may
vary depending on forward travel and/or PTO speed, gear box settings, gate
openings, operating pressures, spread widths, and overlaps.
Equipment should be calibrated on a regular basis to ensure proper appli-
cation rates and uniformity. Calibration is a simple procedure involving col-
lecting and measuring the material being applied at several locations in the
application area. Calibration helps ensure that nutrients from animal waste
are applied efficiently and at proper rates,
Pump and Haul Application Systems
Liquid applicators and tank spreaders are an alterna-
tive to irrigation systems for transporting and apply-
ing liquid lagoon effluent, liquid manure slurries, and
lagoon sludges. Proper location and design of pump-
ing and loading pads are necessary to protect equip-
ment and operators and avoid damaging the lagoon
dike or embankment. Care should be taken to mini-
mize spills during loading and transport.
Semi -solid (slurry) applicators can be calibrated by
one of two methods: load -area method, and weight -
area method (see AG-553-4). Liquid applicators are
best calibrated by the load -area method.
Load -Area Method
To use the load -area method, you must know the
spreader capacity. Spreader capacity is normally rated
by the manufacturer and often is indicated on the
application equipment. Liquid spreaders are normally
rated in gallons while semi -solid spreaders are rated in
either bushels or cubic feet.
As the name implies, the load -area method
involves applying a full load to a measured area. For
ease of measurement, it is best to use a rectangular
field pattern. For PTO -driven spreaders, application
rate is dependent on ground speed so a uniform
speed must be maintained throughout the swath
length. Ground -driven applicators apply reasonably
uniform rates independent of ground speed.
Load -Area Method Calibration
Procedure
1. Spread at least one full load of manure in a
rectangular field pattern.
Z. Measure the length and width of coverage. Do
not include the outer fringe areas of the coverage
which receive much lighter applications than the
overlapped areas.
3. Multiply the length (feet) by the width (feet) and
divide by 43,560 to determine the coverage area in
acres.
4, Divide the weight or volume of load of manure in
the spreader by the acres covered to determine the
application rate in tons or gallons per acre.
5. If the application rate (Item 4) is not acceptable,
repeat the procedure at different spreader settings,
speeds, or both until the desired application rate
(tons or gallons per acre) is achieved.

LOAD -AREA METHOD
SPREADER SYSTEM
CALIBRATING LIQUID MANURE SPREADERS USING THE LOAD -AREA METHOD
1. Determine the capacity of the manure spreader.
a. gallons
2. Spread at least one full load using the regular spreading patterns of the applicator.
Trial Trial Trial
b. Forward speed, gear, or
throttle setting
c. PTO speed or setting
d. Spreader gate setting
3. Measure the area of spread.
e. Spread area width
ft
f. Spread area length
ft
g. Spread area (e X f)
ft,
h. Spread area (g _ 43,560)
acre
4. Compute the manure application rate.
i. Number of loads spread
j. Capacity per load (a)
gallons
k. Total manure spread (i X j)
gallons
I. Application rate (k _ h)
gal/acre
5. Compute the nutrient application rate.
m. Manure analysis N Ibs/1000 gallons
PZOS Ibs/1000 gallons
K20 Ibs/1000 gallons
n. Application rate N Ibs/acre
(l X manure PZ05 Ibs/acre
analysis number
1000) K 2 0 Ibs/acre
6. If the application rate is not acceptable, repeat the procedure at different spreader settings, speeds (Item 2),
or both, until the desired application rate is achieved.

Prepared by
LC. Barker, Biological and Agricultural Engineering Extension Specialist
R.O. Evans, Biological and Agricultural Engineering Extension Specialist
D.A. Crouse, Soil Science Extension Specialist
2,500 copies of this public document were printed at a cost of $577, or $.23 per copy.
Published by
NORTH CAROLINA COOPERATIVE EXTENSION SERVICE
Distributed in furtherance of the Acts of Congress of May 8 and June 30, 1914. Employment and program opportunities are offered to all people
regardless of race, color, national origin, sex, age, or disability. North Carolina State University, North Carolina A&T State University, U.S. Depart-
ment of Agriculture, and local governments cooperating.
7197-2.5M—JMGlKEL AG-553-5
197 31963

N C 'G r- "O C v u v
C O C O :6 O
td C N rn
77 'p V p O ++ n D
L O +� ❑. RS U 3 Y �
-o � t C CL odi 3 O w
v as o
.� o 3>° e�i C❑ Q rr, '� o U cn o = o 0 3 y
¢" U v ti U �. v 0' U N � m s N u o
'�i
O N U Q1 �O •a .0 \O M
s a N C O j y O U N N l-. U O n o
cC v E a--• sv. C, it O, -j O '-•� d 4] O ..� •C U C.
aoi a d� i U Z 2 G O Q
v cG L G3
v o rn > U r c3 U `� v >Ctj V Y o
Y _
+
cC > M
V 0 .0 it U c C > (d w v N
a a y C E o o
o ¢ U
'IS_ a�
°- m � o
Cd
o m =3�rl v E� 3
4-4
a; A!v
v Q>b.0 1 `C7 i c� � .9 4-� C
O C3 O L. q '� > cd ¢ cC s C Y .".
v S v U • O 0y L v V
o m o o a v} v o v N +' s-n
}i y .yam-. �Q•• v Y Y Q� •Y O i-1 �•.. Q P ^~ Q+ Ll 'Q
y Q3 a� z C,' R. U O Y O r I O T rq �S CJ ; O cd 4-. yr cd
v� ''-"i--i rn r�i� r"JnEn
U 4 'G '� o-. vJ �`Gy p +' m , C U -cs xi ��U., vi p a$ T
o o V>
ram, c� CIS�_ o ' L 3 bb �, C � 3 0 'J sz O o _ °_' a� � '`[ 3 cd >, Ln
a aJ
71 v a o o2S v
cn p v � .� C yQ Y� � v v 3 Q3 ct .i T - v,
+. Cs CO O C L v Y 0 m � rj • O . �� v¢ d .0
v � .� a o 3 d > ca O cis o C c Y
a� = v 3 � �,.� v O o o> El
O '� v�� •- CJ� as 0 -,? t> C m o 'a 0O idcl
a
al Z CD
,�, � U L C r 47 s.
U p C cJ v O L O v v c� U O r0 ++ Ur � O

C v0'Z G3c -��, y y j n r vcG� GR7 .• �
-0 w U wo L) °d Q
cdRcdOCL U cG iU _
C
_ U U O y H Vl J •-'r R '. Y V R Q. Q. .^ ro y..� •> yV] ro •iy N
4 ari bA p 0 vQi U Jii �? cUi U a; ai 6a ed © Cl,
co Y a) L Y U �! y cd vi -0
O v r y Q �, cd �
to O ,
'� G
to 0
In CF)
ca
• `� c,j vs °' v� vy o i .L� • � k o RQ, o
I40
a& cUa -, c- o
_d sU vl ' +� Erna U O L i
:, 3 a > v a Q
0 as
�' v 3 ai o a$ a, o ro �, o o �' s� �, >cd,, �. c, a, � ro Q °�' c o �' a
v bn N r--2 v v a, v ro C bA
7o O L 3 R >_ cad En ca. Qc ° vj . > v
p s.• Gz, Y 'G id T O +. _ , Q? CL o r-
y-- _,,, U c�a cad X L m
Q GA ro OEn S�tl •U `n ^ r s, y .� N ❑ �. 4j C� c,� `„ U 4 'G Q�i C C 4T v O
a: v ct� VIC
a a .'ov = c' `30 cd 4-
Ll- > 1-� co¢ v •'J o > oca ro
Cd T y �> O v QO U Q y O Q To E� V ,> o
3 N c� Q T -d C�j�° fi n GfJ 4" U ro a? j, i
o.C,t ate, au, 11 QJ -o v U L o -0 0 = v i ro
U a, .Y oas cd > Q Q. m ' E v Q o. cd cn
ro o L
a ca
cd ro c"i 3 v> ro o o °' °' bn a 7-y Cd
j o LT
y 7 o L7 O En U C1 � w Z cd j 7, �1
P. .. NQ U'amN^ ¢bA• Q' N
Q? u • r-O oN
, OO
•Eq >
0 % aa ,Q'_UMvLn
~� � O CC Q
L O cli n Lv> r yr NoLL
nQ y a, 0Q >Ocd .L. 4.9
cl > 3 cd O 3 Y Q v Kt
Y Q rn N C aj ro C v rn r•-. +-' •� fG 'O cd U G Q
a`i N Q N O O O O vv cri —C.-
o �] 4 G G cYC cG
V U T a U d aA
co
q 0 4-
cd cnU' ro 'C R i Q s. '+ cd O O G 4^ U va
Z O C• r 4- a, O 0. O ro .0 o QLn " T O YL' O� +�
al
+� o H ca o n ro on 3 v o.. ^ d ro -0 a.0 a
bD
v a c � � .� � •�' •� C � C
c`q c CM a 3 ° o. ocz Ln
v 3 z 3 o n
> v r CaEn
+.. N C.� In
as Y U rn N 0)N O O
v
cG O Q 'C1 CL cd j
00
0
`v" al
_ O o v c, C w o N oo
o o o rJ cn o 3 •� Q U N U O 4 0 0
.� JA cd Q O UC�j v sv '� cd O a+ p Z N N e
O �7 O O U � p p a] Q C CL U y cti o a
'G cd��•
O a U OU O ca
CL aa3 o O N y c9 }; i m ] a)
Ucas 3ii cti to
O cC cd 0- O' v • Z cd '• N 40 U O. '� Q C [/} Ci o
Y U a• L 9
i *' '� r C O ni R r- ".- C Q j U a [G CP] '4
O cG ro a~, V T ��" F J Q O CD X O R p p
R cd ID O s: C U ro s E 2 cn U m^ 4. O p 0 p p e
Z _ O cd O v' x, v V) N v cd A al O T U "" OL rn 4 b
C n v Q cd O v? cU3 c� ft /� C n ca 1 G
cd cC O Cr. 3 v> > U 3_ v Ey nS P] Q m

bL
4-4
2
O cd
I.C.vz
U
,t, N Z. �, �I} U L
U
O
U
d U 1 CD
y
�ii VJ U
C
C U
o Q.+ J ++ CG
i,•+
U
Q
Q O
d
O
5�
v
v
i■ d
bA c�
U
cF d
4 U
U O
y 0 U 4-
Q
i'.
❑ ❑
�
N
d
d
i y
Cu bq 43
a
U
O, O 'O
p
9
.. O d
i if
— Q+ 2
Q
M O
+-
W
d
N
O C3
s 4, L 3
r.
� d
a�
.�
v q q
m °'
v� o w
U
V
U
3 �' a' U
U N
U Ln
In
0
�
C c0- OL
j -�
z
< -v
u
d
U
-0
m
tz o cc
rr - ci C3 0- UO
A
0 0
o o
o
E v
o
o>
a
E 0
OO
ri
"C3
>O
a
cm .N
20O
U
m
N BCL, c
O G C
O
1.
O
p
GO
C U
'G
a
cdU
* U O
m
m cd
CL
a�
cC
c cd
sy,
N
m
y
O
O
41
Cd
O+
O
;
n
�
cn
o
U
c�
U�
x yQ
�
.�.�
U cn
N
U
Q>'J
=
3
y O
'O
s.
v>
U cd
cG
L
L U
G
m
d4
_
U C
>+
O
N
O• U
s
m p
d
❑
v
d N
O
�_
p
b
O i�
U
CL C
o
E
�
U
03
L
C
~�
a
y
k
p
T
.•
cL
o
cc
�cd
.
va 3
cn
ct 0-
ct=
Q
rn
H
Ell
E
0
0
�
67
td
{ } cd
a
E
z cz
G
r
O
co
Gr fl
U
Cd
CJ
E
v
>
E
O
CC
°} cd
U
�D
mlA A

� � � cd O � 4] M u• a ''-' 7, tG `C3 � �; U
0 U L y O
o 6 C7 0 v
�' U v° L
L a. L cd
cn
�,..° }; >,
con'Q cl vi r O b ¢� a O 'D p z to + fL "Sr cn 3
Q y U �1 U N O U y cd V, L� L Q�
❑ � � .T s. � 4-� =r.. � � � X � y ^' S1. +--' .� '� � � � O cC � OJ �' rn 03
Z y a 0� U U - '
U .O p O t
> O > > O " cd
cvileiUA
Q a. p .°p ° d s� ran U� U - O. y
v y._ s y v v v xs � o o -a d o � '- m
v y -� ' 3� P -d U U 7n o> r .0 D a
OE rU oO �sT y v 7t d °
Lnocn
[ iL-
a0i t
to ��Lo
mLO v i3O LaCA OOJ B L
bl) It " O uLi
d U cd n>
U icdCc- �d
?
cz
cz
� ,;o cc
O O OO
+1 U En v' �s
'o� rv ca U ca ocrnd-
o
o 0 a U EoU
= m .E: >+
o> d O
c°�n ov o � 4-B� °w mOu �„�
cn
vU PC o� ❑U
bb -a .Z M Q vv >
D
O
cd �- v — y
U 'O U u U m U cd s. D bD
U O
Ln
>
`n�.,
C �
'� v
Utd
y 'O
"a
O
3
,.�
*
Ltd,
ni
_
�C O' O
al
N
y
cd
n
Q
O
3
sU. LU
c
s s t)
D
U
2
4.
U y
rn
U
cC
CA
s
>,
�v
o m
Q. o
°' v
o v
a
o �-
ai
`moo
v
o
N_
v
.�
m-
CL
Z
.:
.�
4.
•
v�
cLn
N
cd
p
0 c� cn
O
O
y
O
s
U—
aJ
L.
L
¢
v
OR
uE
JOcOn
QU- av
'�O
NU
Lcd.
Ocd
_
U�O,
Dtd
OUG
v
t.
cd
C
A
�!o]
O
ay
4O)
Lvs
fl
cn
in
0
U
bOOy
tid .+�,
—'• yU
O
p cn
>
cd
>
cd
rn r-O
rn
O
r
D C
cn
cd
V] G] b!]
bA
v�
y
y >, . N
y"'
N
d
s�
1 ,
EF7
y
sr
..d
i "
to O
'cis
^�
U
a.] >cn
43
s
+
Vi
bA
1 U
bA
O
cd
(,61
co cd
M
tu
O
y
bj�L
OL COrn]
rvq�
s-
C
U
QLyS
�c
aLn _O
�'
3cn
�n
-Ec
V❑
L.
a
d
y
U
Z
U
U
U
O
kQL+
�z
-�

7 N
r _
i MCD
C
J
U
LnCU
c�a
C c o
C+7
M
C
0
M
O
�
�
z
Z
co
�
U
U
N N
d
N
C
Q
r
CV
Q Q0
O
N
C �
CD
OCO
r
O
COj
�
C
O
U�
� O
C
o7
O
to
Q co
—
n
-
�
�
O
CDQ
Ov
o
U �
-:�c o
U
c
N
E
o
c
J
U �
U r-
O
a
-
Q
J
U
O
E
Ln
O
Ln
V7
V)
cn
a�
h
O o�
r+
C'
Q v
ZD
C
N
c
O
M
qj
L
ULo
coo
E
CO
C
.O
O
-O
t
ECD-
oML
O o
OU
Cc)
U a
� o
�
Q
�
J
�
U
4
O
O
�
�s
C
�
v
O
x C
CQ
u2
c
m z
c
m
N
O
cc
U

�
o
z
z
00
4s
C)
U
c
o
N
4
A
a i
4
ti O
M
M
� v
O
N
O
� N
C �
O
�
O
�
N
J O
O
U
X
LIr
C
r
LJ
• b
C-D
a�
c
—
C
ro E
U
Q U v
cL orYU
f �
43
�
C�j C7)
U �
o
U
C
{�
O
J
N
O
C
Ln
O
N
N
N
z
z
N
W
z
z
z
z
�
�
C4
m
c+y
U
~
o
U
U
O
H
p
o
d
N
Q
�
�
0
D
co
O
o
r
f
C
O
O
V
CV
m
C
r--
O
O
07
N
O
O
ro co
ro
ro
U
4
�
Ln
.
r
d
a�
E
O
Q
v
U
O
U U
U Ln
a)
4
U Ln
N
'c
L:
od'U
Q o
CCU
N
Q
Q4
p
U
m
L
rc
(DCL
N
Uo
4
O
UcoCL
Ucn
U cn
Q
co
C
C
Lo
m
C
IR
O
J
O
J
o
j\
=o
E
Z:D
E
�x
ro
C
Q�
cu
C
Q)
tt
`
m
IL
H
LnH
h
L-J_
�
v

7 o
Z U
Ffr
fr
7-
I
0
U
0
0
o U)
U
o
o
.o 3
O
a
�-
a
Q a
en o
L:L
a1
a)
F-
o
7
c2
+-
U
c2
r
0
0
CL O
o --T-
��
Q 6
o
O o
ki
�•
ID
O
N
N
N
co �
�
z >
a CL
o Q-
o
2 L5
#
o
= C7
z
i
L
a
cc
°
CL
o
U r
-o 0
U r
m
;,
�
U
00
U
m
m
�
(J7
U)
�
m
ca.._
Q
O
m �
LL
a`
u o'
0
0
0
0l
0
o
0
0
0
O Q
•o N
O
•Q N
-P
'En
p N
"
.O N
O
O
'0 v7
O
O
U) °J
1
C3
U)
Uj
'—
Cl) J
a.
a
CL
LL
n
a Q
Lca L
j
3
U
3
i
U-
w
J
T
)
a)
1
`
ro
m
m
CO
--
0
O
ti
ip
U
It
cc
-
�
U
c�
6F-
o
a
a
a
o
o
Q !--
o
a
o
Q
a
o- o
qS
U)
M—
-
-q
f4
�
l`
id
{+—
U) CII
Ld
�
S
.Q
LY
•Q
�Q
� [L
=Q
•Q
L'C
-Q
`Q
�
�Q
-q
ti\
r-L
�m
' '�'
ti
y
LN
Er
An_
CE
�\
_�
14
1n
0
C7
a)
1,
r e,
1�
i%'
off
ro�
�'
m>
co>
ro>
.
(d>
F-
-
-
oC:L
>
6 C:L
>
Q
o Q-
=
�..,
`�
-3
m a)
J
m m
'
a) CD
�.�
�,.
�
a) m
v o
pU3
a
a
5
r,
U o
U Q
U
U
U
m
a
5
m
m
ro
as
��
m
? "
U h
U
U cd -
F
U
�
G'
W
Ed
W
11J
)
LL1ro
W
C
V
U
y
U
U6
PJ'
it
U
cr
rr]
q
s9
rt
i
r�
7
1
m
m
m
ra
m
a]
CL
Ln
�
U)
U)
-•-
coo
.�
co
a
D
a)
J
a
Y
Y�
Y a
r
Y m
i
X
Y
Y
X
X
cr
Cc
V J
�d C
�S C
L
06
lB C
• ,,
CL
co C
!
CL
sd
U
1J7
y b Oi N 'p N b1 t] Gl y v C7 N
O� N tad' p� py O a) O a) O m O
2
N l,L i N LL �A O- I.L N Q
•x O .x
X D O •X O
a w [� w a L n- w Li w a

O
O
J
Qa
Cil
0
O
LU
U)
U)
V)
VJ
,E
W
.y-
m
N
N
co
Q
O
U
W
LL
0
0
cn
a
�.
a
LC-4
i
O
O
V
fL
Q7
�
aq
L3
q)
J
Q
O
4�I
O
Q7
�'
N
U
u
U
0
0
0�
O O
BAQ f4>
U} IT
_p
_U
I�1
Ir
o ro
�
iiy
0 a
o cs
r
f
A c7
>
D N
>
y
o CL
o n
O
1
O
lr F
F
U
U
m
}J
m
ca
U F
U
ail
�
w
U
p
3
U
'
J
Ltj
N
S
m
pJ
°
aJ
Cl)
U)
a
T
(13
m
Q
a
p r
m
!.L
5
N
o
m
!�
iu
a
.q
o
0
0
0
a
o
00
rfo
O
CO
�7
ri)
O
r �yfj
O
N
JO5-
Q
,.eOq
N
O
Q
rl
4�
7
CL
O
Q O
O
Q O
Q b
LL
U} lL
Uj 1L
Cn LL
4
I%) [L
ca
_
_
O
N
�w
N
O
r
f
r
r
tea'•'
,i ..-
,rP�..�.
o
D
4?
Cc
N
U
Fes-
U
o
D
O
O
O
a o
a o
o. o
0
0
o
�(D.,a�
r d
N Q�
r Q7
;•Yy
r U
f,67�y
cS
�00
u
Q ''�
�C
JIA
is
n��
v➢
c0
aro,
LFi
r+s9
..4
NO//
���
l
=
•..
=c�
zc�`
T
=
zT
43,
�
R,j"
D
g
kj
P
V F
D
O F
O F
D
O F
O F
cff
O
°
J
6
-J
O
J
cri
J
(�
�+ l
i
Ld
ti (q
..
p ,�
Jd
co
i-e
Ln
o
^.
N45
En
En
Q
Q
Q
Q
a
Y
Y
Y
Y
Ycr
_
CL
41,
U�
a rn 'ao
rn m a m m m 'o m
m o m o1 o w,F 5 o m o
? -m
y a LL in a- U- in 0. LL f m aIL "' in 0. 1m 0.
x x o x o X o K o o
Q. w 0_ w 0_ l' a w 0. W 0_
T
,k

O
O
CV -
a
N
0
4-
cc
LLI
WE
i
Q
Q
0
O
P
P
O
U
N
' N
o
o
_ N
'p N
O O
_ N
•� N
o
6
Y N
'� (/�
O
O
N
-5 N
U) C)
O
O
a
r
a
a
a
u
N
'�
N
'_
Cl] 11
I
Li
�
_ U
(1] LL
U
LL
U
(n LL
cr
a
m
a
m
m
m
U
E
_m
U
r`
m-.
U
U
T
~
~
~
cc
F
F
ad
r
Fes-'
cr
O
Q 6
O
O
O
O
a p
O
O
L
a
so9
3R
o 0
o
?
a
-00
Q
C)
r
r
r v
r
CV
7
d
w 7
o°
o n
4
o Q
o
a La
Q
(1
co
CZ
'd O
U
U
U r
U
U
7 9
m
j
'� ]
m
j �
m
7
m
7
U
O F
U�
U
U
o
wNJ
r///,
�I-1
—2
U
Ln
U
'
"
U
U
U
Jj03
OD
O
Cf)
(!)
U]
C4
Cn
Im
/P/////.
N
v
a
ci
(D
Y
Y=_
Yu)
0
Y
Q
Q
Q
NO
"ti
coc:
iJ I
co C
0 r
IG
tf
C
M: Z)
-0rn CPb 1 N 01 U
p CD o
p
�L1
N p- o CL Q-LL N l_
o
oo x
o xN
w a d u,Q
a
0
0
0
0
-o m
o
o
'0 m
o
0
a
a
Q o
a o
IDr
a�
U
�
m
U
m
r
�
r
U
9
U
co
9
0
c. o
0
o
a o
0
0
C3
r�
m
m
o
0
o
Lr C3
C7
r
r
co 7
�
r
o-
2 0
21
2 Cj
T Cl
T r
T r
m �
C7 Q7
o
o
U
U
m
> �CEY
m
j
t� F-
U
w
d
uJ
2
U
U
J
m
P.N1
m
O
J
J
U)
_O
W
0
0
a
m
�
m
�
7
Q
Q
Y
Y
rc
b
6
U
N
p
IM
N
x
o
x
Q
o
w
c�
w
w

i
a � �
s E be
wL4 V, � `U
CL
a h L LL a. O
x. O Q ti
O. U7 p %
CQ ^ C
G m
6J is 43 +.
m m c
rJo
� c
_ Cq
cu
ro ?_ Cz
c fi
N o 0
w L
O
N � O
G M o a CD
a
Ecz
0 o c rn
o w C.
qo
N a
e
M
n
all
ay.
to,;
.L7 }vu cam. � 6•
Cl.
cam, � "-' .• � ems. D
cn v ✓�
y .a o10
O O
� 4
l,Iva tiF'R� J
2 F r
00 c wi �
a =85
? 7 1
a m _
N p �a N
�% tee. - ? O W '� o y © T•'�
qj
V h y G.i O r
Q

J \ k
)f }\
� ® \
� ) LL S
2 §/ \\
171, « =e §§
$ f � §
■k
, 2 % \
k\ \/
§ k .
2 r � � � � 0
°� \
\ �
» u
2 e k _ / $ 7 % $ / c \
§ a \ [ 2 t cq
* z E 2 5 « u
2 \
� 2 5
/C64 / \
k � \
«
{ �
fim»
§ )9r.= e
K � �E
° COP) )
k e
k \
sz-11 k
� , g
\ � \
k
G.
9
■ \
{ 2
a
7 CD
§ ■ »2 °~
• / §P
z �) k§ a o■¥ m

v � N y ? ✓f
uo
Q
o ti
N
y J
U
tn
a cay
� C)
c E Z y
CCC N •�• C
C y
C
C N:.
9. a• cr: C � G C `v
N 7 O V
VJ O C�l y C (c tm L
L �
bo
re =r
_ J 11On
I N _
O .0
L �
L7 p
Q V ti al
O
�V C Q O
� x V
1 �
tT
TI �
0. O I'm /4 O
a
O E
•� _ i C
U SL �IfH tiF.'Ri• �r j �
o - o o
SID _ err
.r
t I
�-L�
00

Soil Map Legend
Name: Jesse Lynn Mann
Date: May 13, 2002
Soil Map Symbol Mapping Unit
205B Georgeville Silt Loam, 2 to 6 % slopes
205C Georgeville Silt Loam, 6 to 10% slopes
525B Cid — Lignum Complex, 2 to 6% slopes
Non Technical Soil Description
Manco Dairy Farm
Lynn Mann
Chatham County
205B=Georgeville silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes
Setting
Landscape: Piedmont uplands in the Carolina Slate Belt mainly in the central and western
parts of the county
Landform: lnterstream divides and broad ridges
Typical Profile
Surface layer:
0 to 7 inches=brown silt loam
Subsoil:
7 to 10 inches=yellowish red silty clay loam
10 to 36 inches=red clay
36 to 44 inches=red clay that has strong brown mottles
44 to 53 inches=red silty clay loam that has yellow and brown mottles
Underlying material:
53 to 62 inches=red, yellow and brown saprolite that has white mottles
Soil Properties and Qualities
Depth class: Very deep

Agricultural drainage class: Well drained
Permeability: Moderate
Available water capacity: High to very high
Depth to seasonal high water table; kind: More than 60 inches
Shrink -swell potential: Low
Hazard of flooding: None
Surface runoff. Low
Hazard of water erosion: Severe
Soil reaction: Very strongly acid to strongly acid, except where the surface has been
limed
Parent material: Residuum weathered from fine-grained metavolcanic rocks
Depth to bedrock: More than 60 inches
Land Use
Dominant uses: woodland, pasture and hayland, and cropland
Other uses: Urban development
Agriculture
Cropland
Suitability: Well suited
Commonly grown crops: Corn, soybeans, small grain and tobacco
Management concerns: Erodibility and soil fertility
Management measures and considerations:
Resource management systems that include contour farming, conservation tillage, crop
residue management, striperopping, and sod -based rotations help to control soil erosion
and surface runoff and maximize the infiltration of water.
Applying lime and fertilizer according to recommendations based on soil tests helps to
increase the availability of plant nutrients and maximize productivity.
Pasture and hayland
Suitability: Well suited
Commonly grown crops: Tall fescue, orchardgrass and clover
Management concerns: Erodibility
Management measures and considerations:
Preparing seedbeds on the contour or across the slope helps to control soil erosion and
increase germination.
Fencing livestock away from creeks and streams helps to prevent streambank erosion and
sedimentation.
Planting adapted species helps to ensure the production of high -quality forage and
minimize soil erosion.
The timely removal of livestock from pastures so that forage plants can recover before
winter dormancy helps to maintain pasture and increase productivity.
Rotational grazing and a well planned clipping and harvesting schedule help to maintain
pasture and increase productivity.
When establishing, maintaining, or renovating hay and pasture, applying lime and
fertilizer according to recommendations based on soil tests helps to increase the
availability of plant nutrients and maximize productivity.
Woodland
Suitability: Well suited
Productivity class: Moderately high for loblolly pine
Management concerns: No significant limitations affect woodland management.

Management measures and considerations:
Leaving a buffer zone of trees and shrubs adjacent to streams helps to reduce siltation and
improve aquatic habitat by providing shade for the water surface
205C=Georgeville silt loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes
Setting
Landscape: Piedmont uplands in the Carolina Slate Belt, mainly in the central and
western part of the county
Landform: Ridges, hills and side slopes
Typical Profile
Surface layer:
0 to 7 inches=brown silt loam
Subsoil:
7 to 10 inches=yellowish red silty clay loam
10 to 36 inches=red clay
36 to 44 inches=red clay that has strong brown mottles
44 to 53 inches=red silty clay loam that has yellow and brown mottles
Underlying material:
53 to 62 inches —red, yellow and brown saprolite that has white mottles
Soil Properties and Qualities
Depth class: Very deep
Agricultural drainage class: Well drained
Permeability: Moderate
Available water capacity: High or very high
Depth to seasonal high water table; kind: More than 60 inches
Shrink -swell potential: Low
Hazard of flooding: None
Surface runoff: Low
Hazard of water erosion: Severe
Parent material: Residuum weathered from fine-grained metavolcanic rocks of the
Carolina Slate Belt
Depth to bedrock: More than 60 inches
Land Use
Dominant uses: woodland, pasture and hayland, and cropland
Other uses: Urban development
Agriculture
Cropland
Suitability: Moderately suited
Commonly grown crops: Com, soybeans, small grain and tobacco

Management concerns: Erodibility and soil fertility
Management measures and considerations:
Resource management systems that include contour farming, conservation tillage, crop
residue management, striperopping, and sod -based rotations help to control soil erosion
and surface runoff and maximize the infiltration of water.
Applying lime and fertilizer according to recommendations based on soil tests helps to
increase the availability of plant nutrients and maximize productivity.
Pasture and hayland
Suitability: Well suited for pasture; moderately suited for hayland
Commonly grown crops: Tall fescue, orchardgrass and clover
Management concerns: Erodibility
Management measures and considerations:
Preparing seedbeds on the contour or across the slope helps to control soil erosion and
increase germination.
Fencing livestock away from creeks and streams helps to prevent streambank erosion and
sedimentation.
Planting adapted species helps to ensure the production of high -quality forage and
minimize soil erosion.
The timely removal of livestock from pastures so that forage plants can recover before
winter dormancy helps to maintain pasture and increase productivity.
Rotational grazing and a well planned clipping and harvesting schedule help to maintain
pasture and increase productivity.
When establishing, maintaining, or renovating hay and pasture, applying lime and
fertilizer according to recommendations based on soil tests helps to increase the
availability of plant nutrients and maximize productivity.
Woodland
Suitability: Well suited
Productivity class: Moderately high for loblolly pine
Management concerns: No significant limitations affect woodland management.
Management measures and considerations:
Leaving a buffer zone of trees and shrubs adjacent to streams helps to reduce siltation and
improve aquatic habitat by providing shade for the water surface.
Planting the appropriate species, as recommended by a forester, helps to achieve
maximum productivity and ensure planting success.
525B=Cid-Lignum Complex, 2 to 6 percent slopes
Setting
Landscape: Piedmont Uplands in the Carolina Slate Belt, mainly in the central and
western parts of the county
Landform: Interstream divides, broad ridges, drainageways, and heads of drains
Typical Profile
Cid Soils
Surface layer:
0 to 2 inches=brown silt loam

Subsurface layer:
2 to 5 inches=very pale brown silt loam
Subsoil:
5 to 14 inches —yellow silty clay loam that has strong brown mottles
14 to 24 inches=yellow silty clay that has strong brown and light gray mottles
24 to 28 inches=light gray silty clay loam that has strong brown mottles
Bedrock:
28 to 35 inches=weathered highly fractured argillite
35 inches=unweathered slightly fractured argillite
Lignum soils
Surface layer:
0 to 6 inches ale yellow silt loam
Subsurface layer:
6 to 11 inches=very pale brown silt loam
Subsoil:
11 to 15 inches=brownish yellow silty clay loam that has light gray mottles
15 to 22 inches=brownish yellow silty clay loam that has reddish yellow and light gray
mottles
22 to 29 inches=yellow, strong brown, red, and light gray silty clay
29 to 47 inches=reddish yellow silt loam that has white mottles
Bedrock:
47 to 60 inches=weathered moderately fractured argillite
Soil Properties and Qualities
Depth class: Cid=moderately deep; Lignum=deep
Agricultural Drainage class: Somewhat poorly and moderately well drained
Permeability: Slow
Available water capacity: Cid=moderate; Lignum=high
Depth to seasonal high water table; kind: Cid-1.0 to 2.5 feet below the soil surface
during the months of December through May; Lignum=1.0 to 2.5 feet below the soil
surface during the months of December through May; perched
Shrink -swell potential: Moderate
Hazard of flooding: None
Surface runoff: Slow or medium
Hazard of water erosion: Severe
Parent material: Residuum weathered from argillite and other fine-grained metavolcanic
rocks
Depth to bedrock: Cid=20 to 40 inches to soft bedrock and 20 to 40 inches to hard
bedrock; Lignum=40 to 60 inches to soft bedrock
Land Use
Dominant uses: Woodland and pasture and hayland
Other uses: cropland
Agricultural Development
Cropland
Suitability: Moderately suited
Commonly grown crops: Corn, soybeans and small grain
Management concerns: Erodibility and wetness

Management measures and considerations:
Resource management systems that include contour farming, conservation tillage, crop
residue management, striperopping, and sod -based rotations help to control soil erosion
and surface runoff and maximize the infiltration of water.
Installing and maintaining an artificial drainage system helps to reduce wetness
limitations and improve the productivity of these soils.
Delaying planting in spring helps to minimize clodding and rutting resulting from
wetness caused by the high water table.
Maintaining drainageways and ditches helps to remove excess water.
Pasture and hayland
Suitability: Moderately suited for pasture; moderately suited for hayland
Commonly grown crops: Tall fescue, orchardgrass, and clover
Management concerns: Erodibility, wetness and rooting depth
Management measures and considerations:
Planting adapted species helps to ensure the production of high -quality forage and
minimize soil erosion.
Fencing livestock away from creeks and streams helps to prevent streambank erosion and
sedimentation..
Some areas may need artificial drainage for maximum productivity.
Woodland
Suitability: Moderately suited
Productivity class: Moderately high for loblolly pine
Management concerns: Cid=equipment use and windthrow hazard; Lignum—equipment
use
Management measures and considerations:
Restricting the use of standard wheeled and tracked equipment to dry periods helps to
minimize rutting and soil compaction, which occurs when the soils are saturated.
Periodically harvesting windthrown trees helps to increase the productivity of these
shallow soils.
Extra care is needed in maintaining roads and fire lanes because of the hazard of
windthrow.

CL
N
co
C3
O
I o
M
CLJ
Q
C
Ln
m
�,
m
C
CD
C
CD
Q)N
fi O
r
p C
tV C"i
LCD
CD
C
N
o
�
4
t.
O
l
Q
Co
C
C
�
O LC
o;
�
p Q
o
d �n
o
tD
ti
o
N
p
Cn
M
r
CZD
C
C
. �
C'o
+
Z.-o
CD
o
17
CD
cm
C CD
M
co
N
CD
CO
LO
3Q o
Q
Q?
Q
CD
O
N
U CD
CD
CD
C.i
C
C
a
V)
Ln
C:
cu
O
O
CD
O
CD
m
CDa
-
c
—
C
Cd
E
E
CXD
Ea_
E
o_��
a�'Egpo
.1
Q
CU
Ov
O U
4 (�
o a
CD
L
CV
cu
U CV
U
��
cu
a
�C=)
�o.�l�
y
J
Sn v
J
-
_T
.�Jr
d
Q
CL
Q
V
C
Q
cx
E
Ul
r
O
CTJ
O
Q
r
C
[+�
hNi
'CU
L
C3
G
V)
cD
Q
�O
�
Cif
O
cm
Ln
Q,
ro
cm
mrom
—
a�
LL-
LL-
�
—
�
i )
Q)
G
z
z
�
c
m
mLO
U co
CD
N
z
CZ3
+
� o
U
+ O
+
CD
ti.
p L
p C
La� o
C�!
t v
v
0
rO
03
m
c�
a-)
r
CD
\ CD
\ C7
Cd7 "V
CO
�O] CZ)
coLO
U�
ULO
LC]
CD
CT
r
C
o�
C
o
O
co
O
_
C�6
cJ7
Lr)
L
_
v
Q
CD`C)
z-
a�Eo
C C-
O
4 U U
O
D U
�
BLn
CD=
B CD=C�j
� o
Cif
y
E
�a•Eti
3Lo.ti
�o
cV
J
J
Ln
m
on
Qom]
y
V �
Q
Q
�
U
0o
17
O,
LC7
O
O
s�
S
•CO
s�
N
S Q
E
C
Q
GEC
E
to
x Q
Ln
En
V)
Sd
y
•�

a
O
'
73
4-
C)
N
L
0
E.�
0
cc
N
N
d
0
N
L
Q7
w
N
QY
CD
O
cm)
O
o o N
U)
O
O_
a
J
IL
a
a o
a o
r
(D
r
cpG
0�
cC
v
H
y
c
Q
U
f
0
0
a 0
O
Q p
r
i4
tr
m
m
r
r
m
m
a) a)
Q) CD
ca
�
�
m
0
U
U
f`s
a..j
U
m
m
"
w
p
J
p J
cn
{
Vi
m
O
4�
n7
y
a
Y
d
X
C
u;
C
e.
n
C
W
4
O Q
O
d
4
O
C)
v
0
O
0
O O
'� N
CD
:O'''J
N
O
O
.O N
O
O
U7
J
CD_
_ Ui
J
_I
-,
-
^!
a
a
s
a
a
r`
1
-
i
1
Q°
o
a o
I
LL,
ca
U-
(n LL
W
co
N L
i
m
�_
°
v
o
v
m
m
j
m
d
E
m
m
r
f
�
�
c
H
--
F-ID
-
1-
-1—'
o
cc
n
- E
ccr,
l a
¢
C
Q
m
Un
co
rJ
cti
co
p a
O 2
D m-
7
` cl
7
D p-
7
-o p
a 0
o
'-
m
m
-
p m
m m
0-
CD
R
>
1"
1
> ro
U
i�
U
V
U F-
U f"
�
Ili
W
-
W
-
W
„
m
la
m
L
_flJ
D
N
N
N
v
a�-
a
i
a.r
a _
o,
H
a
❑!
b:
07
Na
i71
N
m
=mx
ap
L
U)
O
6
LLP°
y
pO
0.
W
IL
W
a

Q
U
LL
�a
v
n
All L
O
O
O N
J
ZM
.O N
J
.
ib
❑.
Yj.
�a�}
a °
a °
LL
CA Li
—
F
F
F-
Q7
47
a
o
0 o
c
4-
o O
cs
7
aU
o
o
c
_
e
cc
r
fL -
r
�"�
>
5 7
H
p CL
O Q
� o
is °
_
r
m
as
_
m
7 L7
O
D
LL1
�
W
U
u�
j
U
J
`
J
m
cl
Qi
CL
D
0
J
f
O
O
ro
a
o
X
Y
�f
a
LE
d
D
d
d
Q
O
Q
O
D
Q
O
O
O
O
O
Q
p
fn
O
C,
Q.
O
d
O
'Q N
U7 J
C;'
-1
O
+.
'0 co
Cn
O
`l
Q
y
'� N
U) J
D
O
a �;
'p iNn
fn J
O
_
O
f:
B
W
�
a.
in U-
cra U_
U_
in LL.
❑
m
T
m
�_
'Dc�
T
m
T
L)
u
CD
�.
U
c6
Y
m
L)
N
C7
L)
;9
m
P-
.o
a
r
7
r
7
r
J
r
F-
C)_
U
F
IR
o
0
o
a
D
O
Q
Q
g- C)
h;`Q
O
O'_ O
1.%4
D
O'_°
o
"_
o m
m
o m
o�
=
CC
S
y
C
L
S
=
'�
S
U
U
r
nT
�
r
r
.�
o °-
o a
o°
o a
o a
7
o
-D o
o
__
0 o
U +-
U o
d
U Q
U o
lul
y
cts
co
F
O F
00 F
U
;j
W
uj
ID
JID
m
m
CD
Le
Q
Q
¢
Q
v
c
ML
"
c
3
e
ce
M c
to
m e
m
N
U
m
y
U
❑=
w
a
C
y a
O)
w
w I
a.
w
(L
v
rL
W
n
W
a

O
O
�Q N
J
0 N
J
CL
:t ''-
L
ca
LL
m
r
m
r
9
U
o
c
It
m
O
m
Fa0
s
_
i
Y
'"
r
7
a)�
ca
F>
>
a
0.
s'�
2 C7
S C7
2
2
m m
s
m a�
cm
i'
2 ca
CC I—
7
Cc F
U o
U
m
w
m
c0
S
1�
�
o
o
70
73
Y
Y
m
m r-
❑I
N
m._,
LL
V1
o
C
mt
LL
a
O O 4 00 O l0T,
C
O O .4 Zn O O 'o Cf Om c J n JJ
a
a
a,
U
i O
U
U
U-
r
O0
0
ca
U
H
U
C7
a
a
o
.7Jd
Q U
O
O
p, p
O
O
U
'0
O
O
0
>
>
o '�
>
>
o
7
>
cc
a
o
3=s
o rs
o m
o ro
N
T
m
m o
m o
rz
Ctl
p
�-
'
O
-a O
O
2
2
S
CD
U
C) F—
U
w
w
5 %
moo,
Mono0.1
0
004F,
O
O
O
0
"p DIO
O
- N
O
O
O
J
� J
G
LL
a
a P
U� LL
f.L.
r
U
m
c7
o
m
o
m
U
13
{j
F
F-
a
o
0 0
0
0
C 0
e
>
>
ro
7
7
s
a
a
s
o
0
a
s
0
m
0
cca
cca
r
m
m
m
m
va
p 7
Q
O �
a O0
2 C7
? 0D
= C7
2
2
m m
m m
im
ro
ft f
F�
UCD
U CD
m
>
m
>
U
U F-
w
w
U
V
a
�I
m
m
Vj
C!7
0
0
a
rL
CL
y
-0
a
m
C
O
m
O
LL
X
6
X
O
w
IL
Lil
o

U.S. DEPART'AENT OF AGRICiLTUaE
SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE
NC-CPA-1
Rev. 11-91
CONSERVATION PLAN MAP LEGEND
Name YEbSrG LYi M ",4M Address 1'4S(. ma.4C.0 emu, aP� sS'��neoe N� a�31� Zip 3•:13'.
FIELD ACRES LAND USE MAP SYMBOLS
N�.
1-7. (,
Croe1P sd
�
L?I.�
CrpPl�rsd
S
8
Cr-aI R.18
C •
C. rop4 911,8
Crb ! �4 NC3
�
� t • �
L'ro�l ��1 �.
4
{
0—r0 p 4 ,4 r48
t `I
y . �
Crap 1 �, ��►.
Fo', gcv:rdcry .
. a!^ :r Land -se Bandar
Fi:id bL'2L 3'. .
,2D ;c
yield i'isbsr
?r;voi? Roo•i - � � � � � �
?ahl'c Roca
3olieiags, hcvses . ■ J
perennial sfream
117 aril i f?rt Streon �� J
Yegz`al're':Ynizrday
EXISTING PLANED
Fence-
4Shen exisfilr:g fences ore cembired wiih othar
symbols, they may ne shown as `c'lows:
Fen.a ai)lc aofh siies
al racd . —'r A _ —4
Fa_Are along any side
a ` d : i th ------ X--
F.nc: is be removed.
]itch 'o he removed _.
T-2
T^maze .
—
D-1 D-2
-he dots reprssec" blocks, ' e orraws
represen• spi.Js
Drnimge dii;,. _ — —
(apen drl n,
T:le ]rein
Dan and ?eserva r . _
=izli i3crdar.--•--•--
ebreak —FF— — —F--
S?rirg ord r3u3h
xcavnlad 'folding Pii,
'_Lgonn
9¢:2r Can 'rol
5'ructu�'
Field or land use boundary and field number may be shown in red.
Water features may be shown in blue.

U. S. DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE
SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE
NC-CFA-3
(4/75)
SOIL MAP INTERPRETATIONS
DATE _

U. S. DEPT, OF AGRICULTURE
SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE
Interpretative
i Groupings
SOS
NC—CPA-3
(4/75)
SOIL MAP INTERPRETATIONS
DATE l { C
Interpretations of ISoils
'�
v`c ( I � � . ! T L c � u2,fYl
3 A-c-� ,�N P.-� Cc -CX-Q-
("1-cflo
c;c1 S -, I Loam
P
r� P Qc�.
— C� 7�
^ �O
6�� � cu�
qd bu-,�)" P,�` c1-c-�

5 , L;PT. OF AGRICULTURE
,on CONSERVATION SERVICE
SOIL MAP LEGEND
NAME 1-.' ' � � � � DATE
NC-CPA-2
10-77
Soils on This Unit of Land are:
map symbol Ma in Unit
-S, 4 Loam) ,--��/ �1ope-:�
4 Lon-m L
--
Interpretative - Interpretations of Soils
Groupings
'Dos C, -TI Lo, R m
Q-S
GS
o`-70
r- c-