Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNC0083313_Staff Comments_19950131e I v 7 is • n (w p A. MON z A. (). EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS FINAL Permit No. NCO083313 During the period beginning on the effective date of the permit and lasting until expiration, the Pennittee is authorized to discharge from outfall(s) serial number 001. Such discharges shall be limited and monitored by the permittee as specified below: Effluent Characteristics Flow BOD, 5 day, 200C Total Suspended Residue NH3 as N Dissolved Oxygen — Fecal Coliform (geometric mean) Total Residual Chlorine Discharge Limitations Monthly Avg, 0.005 IVIGD 10.0 mg/I 30.0 mg/I 2.0 mg/I 200.0 /100 ml * Sample locations: E - Effluent, I - Influent. Monitoring Requirements Measurement Sample *Sample Daily Max Frequency Type, Locatlon Weekly Instantaneous I or E 15.0 m g / I Weekly Grab E 45.0 m g/ I Weekly Grab E Weekly Grab E Weekly Grab E 400.0 /100 ml Weekly Grab E 28.0 µg/I 2/Week Grab E ** The daily average dissolved oxygen effluent concentration shall not be less than 6.0 mg/l. The pH shall not be less than 6.0 standard units nor greater than 9.0 standard units and shall be monitored weekly at the effluent by grab sample. There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts. Vw IAS�c VT773' - Tr SOC PRIORITY PROJECT: No IF YES, SOC NUMBER TO: PERMITS AND ENGINEERING UNIT WATER QUALITY SECTION ATTENTION: Mack Wiggins DATE: March 23, 1995 NPDES STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION COUNTY Henderson PERMIT NUMBER NCO083313 PART I - GENERAL INFORMATION 1. 2. 3. 4. Facility and Address: Brookside Village Association Post Office Box 571 Naples, NC 28760 Date of Investigation: March 21, 1995 Report Prepared By: Paul White Persons Contacted and Telephone Number: Ken Cobb 704-681-2732 5. Directions to Site: From the intersection of SR 1006 (Howard Gap Rd) and SR 1528, proceed east for 0.3 mile and turn in paved drive on right. Brookside Village entrance is immediately on the left. The proposed discharge point is on Featherstone Creek beyond the end of the paved drive. 6. Discharge Point(s), List for all discharge points: Latitude: 350 22" 39" Longitude: 820 28' 01" Attach a USGS map extract and indicate treatment facility site and discharge point on map. U.S.G.S. Quad No. F9NW U.S.G.S. Quad Name Fruitland 7. Site size and expansion area consistent with application? yes Yes No If No, explain: Page 1 RE 9. 10. Topography (relationship to flood plain included): WWTP site is near a small stream and has So slopes. Narrow strip bordering stream may flood. Location of nearest dwelling: 200 feet. Receiving stream or affected surface waters: Featherstone Creek. a. Classification: C b. River Basin and Subbasin No.: French Broad 04-03-02 C. Describe receiving stream features and pertinent downstream uses: Receiving stream drains a narrow wooded valley with pastures and suburban development along the stream. Downstream uses include aquatic and wildlife propagation, agriculture, fishing, water supply (Protected area of Asheville's WS-IV watershed begins approximately 2 miles downstream in Mud Creek. PART II - DESCRIPTION OF DISCHARGE AND TREATMENT WORKS 01 a. Volume of wastewater to be permitted .005 MGD (Ultimate Design Capacity) b. What is the current permitted capacity of the Wastewater Treatment facility? none C. Actual treatment capacity of the current facility (current design capacity none d. Date(s) and construction activities allowed by previous Authorizations to Construct issued in the previous two years: Construction of the WWTP has not yet begun. e. Please provide a description of existing or substantially constructed wastewater treatment facilities: none f. Please provide a description of proposed wastewater treatment facilities: The proposed facility is a 5000 gpd extended aeration activated sludge plant with a 1250 gal. equalization basin, an aeration basin for 30 hr. detention time, a clarifier with maximum overflow rate of 300 gpd/sq. ft., a tertiary filter with dual cells 2.8 sq. ft. each, disinfection, tertiary filter, effluent pump station, and sludge holding facilities. g. Possible toxic impacts to surface waters: Ammonia, chlorine, cleaning chemicals. h. Pretreatment Program (POTWs only): n/a in development approved should be required not needed Page 2 2. Residuals handling and utilization/disposal scheme: Septage hauler. a. If residuals are being land applied, please specify DEM Permit Number Residuals Contractor Telephone Number b. Residuals stabilization: PSRP PFRP OTHER C. Landfill: d. Other disposal/utilization scheme (Specify): 3. Treatment plant classification (attach completed rating sheet): II 4. SIC Codes (s) : 6513 Wastewater Code(s) of actual wastewater, not particular facilities i.e., non -contact cooling water discharge from a metal plating company would be 14, not 56. Primary 07 Secondary Main Treatment Unit Code: 0617 PART III - OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION 1. Is this facility being constructed with Construction Grant Funds or are any public monies involved. (municipals only)? no 2. Special monitoring or limitations (including toxicity) requests: none 3. Important SOC, JOC, or Compliance Schedule dates: (Please indicate) none Date Submission of Plans and Specifications Begin Construction Complete Construction Page 3 4. Alternative Analysis Evaluation: Has the facility evaluated all of the non -discharge options available. Please provide regional perspective for each option evaluated. Spray Irrigation: Insufficient area available. Connection to Regional Sewer System: None available. Subsurface: Insufficient area available. Other disposal options: none S. Other Special Items: PART IV - EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS There are no non -discharging alternatives available on the property of the applicant. In completing the application for the original permit, the applicant did considerable research in trying to locate nearby available property which would be appropriate for an on -site waste disposal system. There does not appear to be any property available in small enough acreage which the applicant could obtain. It is recommended that the permit be re -issued. Signature of Report Preparer r ater QVality Regional Supervisor Page 4