20160013 Ver 1_Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination_20151229

,a rr�acx�r�n�r �a
PR�LlMIh1ARY JURISDlCT1QNAL QETERMlNA7��C1 FORM
BACKGRC7UN�7 INFORMATIDN
A. REP�RT CQMPLETIQN DATE FC�R PRELI{VIII�AFtY JtJR15QiCTIONAL
DETERM1NATi�I� �JD):
B. NAME A�JD A[]DF�ESS C?F PERS(7�1 REC,�LJESTfNG PREL111I'�INARY JD:
Jim Mason, NCDOT,1598 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1598
C. DiSTRIC7 C�FFIGE, F[�LE NAME, �4ND NllMBER;
D. PR�JECT LC}CATIQN(Sj AND BACKGROUND INF[iRMAT1C3h�:
B-5354, Replacement of Bridge No. 360 on SR 4771 (Eckerson Rd) over US 29
(USE THE ATTACHEa TABLE T� DQCUMENT MlJ�.71PLE WATE�'BDDIES AT DIFFERENT
SI7ESy
5t�#e: NC CDllil�]II�3�fISi1I�34i��lff�F1: Guilford [',j��; Greensboro
Center coordinafes c�f siie {lafllong in dec�ree decamal fvrmat}:
Lat. 36.17597 °N; Long. -79.71186 �UII.
cxx.xxxxx, c-xx.xxxxx>
Universal Trar�sverse Mercator: Z� se�ect E: N:
�c�iilE �� f18�iGS� Wc'3t$Ci3C3d]l: Reedy Fork (Hardys Mill Pond)
lder�iify (estima�e} amaunt c�f wa#ers in the review area:
Non-wefiar�d waters:
sas linear #eet: 2o-so �so� w�dth (ft) andlor acres.
GOWc'il'Cf111 G�aSS: Riverine
S�iE�p'1 '�jQ1ih1: Perennial
�l'U����aC1CiS� o.o��wz�, o.oa �waa> �Ci85.
�{]+4V�fd'lFl [;�:a$g: Palustrine
Name of any wa�e� bvdies c�n #he sit� that have been identified as 5ectic�n � a
waters:
Tidal:
Non-Tidal:
�

E. REVI'EW PERF�4RME� FC}R SITE EVALUATft?N �CHECK ALL THAT
APPLY]:
� Qffice �Desk) �eterminati�an. C]ate:
� Field Determinatian. Da�e�s}:.
SUPPiDRTING DATA. Data re�riewed for prelirninary JD
�check all tha� apqly - che�ked items shvuld be included in case file and,
w e ehecked and requested, appropriately reference saurces �elow�:
✓ Maps, plans, plQts or p�at submitted by c,r an behalf vf the
Li�]�JIfCa11�ICO�1Sli{t�l�f: Location Map, Vicinity Map, Jurisdictional Resources Map
�✓ ❑ata sheets preparedlsubmift�ed by or on k�e'�alf af the
app ' ntfeans�ltant.
(]ffice concurs wit�r data sheetsCdelinea#ian report.
�ffic� does not c�ncur with data shee#sldelineation report.
� Dafa she�ts pr�par�� by the Corps:
❑ Cvrps navigable waters` study:
❑ U.S. Geological Sunrey Hydrolagic A�las:
� LJSGS NHD dafa
� USGS 8 and 1� digit HUG m�ps
❑ U.S, Gevlvgica[ Survey map(s}. Ci#e scal'e R quad r�ame:
❑ IJSDA Natural Resources Canservat�ar� Senrice Soil Survey.
Git�tion:
❑ Nativnal wetlands inverrtvry rnap(s}. Ci#e narne:
❑ StateJLoca! wefiland inventc�ry ma�{s):
❑ FEMAIFIRM maps:
� 1+DC�-year Fl�adplair� Ele�ativn is:
([�ational Geodect�c Verti�al Da�tum af 1929}
❑ Pf�otograp�s: Aerial [Name & Date}: vr
Qther (Name & Qate}:
� Previous det+ermina#ivn�s}. 'Fi[e no. and dafe of respvnse letter:
� Uther informat�vn �please specify):
2

1. The Carps of Engin��rs b�lieves #hat there may be ju�risdic#inr�al waters of the
United States on the subject site, and the permit applican� ar other affected party
who r�ques#ed fhis pr�liminar}r JO is hereby advised of his or her option ta
request anc� obtair� an ap�ravec� jurisdic#ic�nal determinativn �JD} fvr that site.
fVevertheless, th� permit app�icant or other persan wha requested this
prelirr�inary JD has de�lined to exercise t�e op�ic�n to abtain an appraved J� in
this instance and at this time.
2. In any circumstance where a permi# applicant cabtains an individual �ermit, or
a�la#ionwid� Gen�ral Pcrmit �NWP� or other g�neral permit verification re�quiring
"pre-�onstructian nofification" {PCIWa, or requests verification for a nor�-reparting
NWP �r other general permit, and the permi# applican# has no# requeste�i an
�pproved JQ f�ar the ac#ivity, tfae permrt applicant is hereby r�ade aware of the
fc�llowing: (1) the permit applicant has elecfed ta see�C a permit authorizatian
b�sed on a pr�liminary JD, which dves nvt make an official determination af
jurisdictionaP waters; (2� ihat the ap�licant has the optivn tc� re�uest an approved
J[3 befvre accepting the terms and evn�itions af the p�rmit auth�rization, and
thad ba�ing a permit authorization c�n an approved JD couid possibly result in less
compensatoryr mitigation heing required or dif�erent special cvnditians; (3} tha#
the appficant has th� right to requ�s# an in�ividual �ermit rather than accepting
#he terms and cond�tions of the N1NP or ofher general permit aufhc�rization; �4}
that the applicant can accept a permit authoriza#ivn and #h�rehy agree fo �amply
with a!I the terms and conc�itians of that permit, �ncluding vuhaiever mitigation
requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; �5} that undertaking
any activity in refiance upvn the subj�ct permi# authorization withaut r�qu�sfing
an appraved J[J constitutes the applican#'s acceptance af the use of the
preliminary JQ, but that either form of JD will be process�ed as sovn as is
practica�le; {G} �ccep#ing a permit au#horization (e.g., signing a prc�ffered
individual perrnit} t�r �ndertaking any activity in reliance vr� any farm of Corps
permit authoriza#ion based vn a prelimin�ry JD cans#itut�s agr��ment that all
we#iands and a#h�r water bodies on the site affiected in any way by that aetivity
are jurisdictiona! waters of #he �Jnited States, and precludes any challenge ta
such juri�dictio� in �ny a�ministrative ar judicial cQmpliance or enf�rcement
actifln, or in any administrative appeal or in �ny Federal courf; and (7} wheiher
#he applicant elect� to use either an appra�+ed JD or a preliminary JD, that JD
wili be pracessed as soon �s is practicat�le. Further, an approrred Ja, a proffered
individual permit (and all terms and conditions cvntained therein), or individual
permi# der�ial can be �dministra#ively appealed p�rrsuant to 33 �C.F.R. Part 331,
and that in any administrat�ve appeai9 jurisdictivn�al issues can h� raised �s�e 33
C.F.R. 331.5{a)(2}). If, during that administra#�v�e ap�eal, ut becomes necessary
tv make an afficiad d+etermina#ion whe#�er CVIIA jurisdiction �xists vver � sit�, or
to provide an offic�al delineation af jurisdic#�onal wa#ers on the site, the Corps wiff
pravide an ap�rc�ved Ja #o �ccamplish that result, as saon as is p�actieable.

7f�is �relirninary J� fin�s that there "may �e"wat�rs of fhe lJnited Stafes or� ti�e
s�bject pro��ct site, �nd identifies all aquatic �eafures �n t�e s�#e tha# couid �e
aff�cted t�y the prapc�sed ac#ivity, �ased on #F�e foliQwing 3nformation.
IiW€Pi�RTAr+1T N[?7�: Tt�e infarmation recorded on thFs €orm has nvt
necessarily been verified by the Cc�rps and shauld nc�t Eae r�lied upvn for
lat�r 'urisdiGt�on�l deterrnir�atians.
Signat�tre and date of �
Rec�ulat�ry Project Manar�er
{REQI.JIRED�
�
_ ..--�_ � � �'
c�nat��r� at� of
L
ersan reque ting prefiminary ,�D
(R�QI�IRE , �nkess ohtaining
tk�e� signafure is impracii�able)

Estimated Amount
Site Cowardin of Aquatic Resource Class of Aquatic
Number Latitude Longitude
�XX.XXXXX> �-XX.XX,o�X> Class in the Review Area Resource
(lin. ft.or ac.)
Str�m 36.1 �369 -79.74108 Riv�ine 585 I�. ft. �on-Section 10 -
SD Perennial o
Wet�nd 36.1 �345 -79.74142 Palu�rine 0.0'6�ac. �on-Section 10 -
WZ Wetland
Wet�nd 36.1�374 -79.74017 Palu�rine O.O�jac. �on-Section 10 -
WAA Wetland
� � � � 0 0
� � � � 0 0
� � � � 0 0
� � � � 0 �
� � 0 � 0 �
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
� o � � 0 �
� � � 0 0 �

TIP Project No.: B-5354
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
PfOJ@Cf/Slf2: Replacement of Bridge No. 360 on SR 4771 (Eckerson Rd) over US 29 City/County: City: Greensboro Cp,; GUilfO�d Sampling Date: 06/23/2015
North Carolina Department of Transportation `"'"�°°"v�v, WZ WET
Applicant/Owner: State: NC Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): Mason, �. Pr��e, �. Section, Township, Range: "'
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): COIlCaV2 Slope (%): 0-2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): P �at: 36.17345 �ong: -79.71142 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Congaree loam, 0-2°/o slopes, frequently flooded (CoA) NWI ciassification: PF01 F
Are climatic / h drolo ic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes � No 0(If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation �J, Soil 0, or Hydrology � significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � No 0
Are Vegetation �, Soil �, or Hydrology � naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Yes 0 No 0
Yes � No�
Yes � No �
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes � No
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primarv Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) � Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
❑ Surface Water (A1) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (614) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Q High Water Table (A2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) �✓ Drainage Patterns (B10)
� Saturation (A3) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) [] Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑ Water Marks (61) � Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (63) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
❑ Iron Deposits (B5) �✓ Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
�✓ Water-Stained Leaves (B9) [] Microtopographic Relief (D4)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13) �✓ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No ❑� Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes � No g Depth (inches): 6.0
Saturation Present? Yes � No � Depth (inches): ��� Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes 0 No 0
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
SurFace water not present at sample location, but present nearby
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Piot size: W�in Wetland � % Cover Species? Status
�. Liquidambar styraciflua 30.0 Y FAC
2. Fraxinus pennsylvanica 15.0 Y Facw
3 Select
4 Select
5 Select
6 Select
45.0 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 22.5� 20% of total cover: 9�00
Saplinq Stratum (Piot size: W/in Wetland �
�. Carpinus caroliniana 3.0 N FAC
2, Lindera benzoin 1.0 N FAC
4.
5.
6.
Select
Select
Select
Select
4.0 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 2�00 20% of total cover: 0.80
5hrub Stratum (Plot size: )
�. see Sapling Stratum Select
2 Select
3 Select
4 Select
� Select
50% of total cover: 0.00
Herb Stratum �Piot S�Ze: W�in Wetland �
�. Microstegium vimineum
2. Boehmeria cylindrica
3.
6.
7.
50% of total cover: 27.50
Woodv Vine Stratum (Piot size: W�in Wetland �
�, Parthenocissus quinquefolia
4.
5.
Select
0.0 = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 0.00
,� �
�
Y FAC
N FACW
Select
Select
Select
Select
Select
Select
Select
Select
Select
55.0 = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 11.00
5.0 Y Facu
Select
Select
Select
Select
5.0 = Total Cover
50°/o of total cover: 2•50 20% of total cover: 1.00
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
�:�c�3!
Sampling Point: WZ WET
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3•0 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 4.0 (g)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 75 (A/B)
(NaN: Not a Number)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiplv bv:
OBL species x 1= 0.00
FACW species x 2= 0.00
FAC species x 3= 0.00
FACU species x 4= 0.00
UPL species x 5= 0.00
Column Totals: 0.00 �q� 0.00 �g�
(NaN: Not
Prevalence Index = B/A = NaN a Number)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
❑ 1- Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
❑✓ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
❑ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
0 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft(6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft(1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation �
Present? Yes 0 No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
B-5354
Sampling Point: WZ WET
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) °/o Color (moist) % Tvpe' LocZ Texture Remarks
0-3 10YR 4/1 80 10YR 4/4 20 C M SiLo
3-11 7.5YR 5/4 80 7.5YR 5/2 15 D M SiCILo
--- --- --- 7.5YR 3/4 5 C M ---
11+ 10YR 5/1 90 10YR 3/3 10 C M SiCILo
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
0 Histosol (A1)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
� Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5)
� 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
0 Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
� Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Sandy Redox (S5)
� Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. ZLocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
0 Dark Surface (S7) � 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
� Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) � Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
� Thin Dark SurFace (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148)
� Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) 0 Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
❑✓ Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147)
D Redox Dark Surtace (F6) 0 Very Shallow Dark Surtace (TF12)
) � Depleted Dark Surface (F7) � Other (Explain in Remarks)
� Redox Depressions (F8)
� Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
� Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
0 Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
� Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes � No�
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

TIP Project No.: B-5354
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
PfOJ@Cf/Slf2: Replacement of Bridge No. 360 on SR 4771 (Eckerson Rd) over US 29 City/County: City: Greensboro Cp,; GUilfO�d Sampling Date: 06/23/2015
North Carolina Department of Transportation `"'"�°°"v�v, WAA WET
Applicant/Owner: State: NC Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): Mason, �. Pr��e, �. Section, Township, Range: "'
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): COIlCaV2 Slope (%): 0-2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): P �at: 36.17374 �ong: -79.71017 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Congaree loam, 0-2°/o slopes, frequently flooded (CoA) NWI ciassification: PEM1 F/PF01 F
Are climatic / h drolo ic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes � No 0(If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation �J, Soil 0, or Hydrology � significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � No 0
Are Vegetation �, Soil �, or Hydrology � naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes 0 No 0
' � Is the Sampled A?ea ❑ ❑
Hydric Soil Present. Yes � No within a Wetland. Yes � No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes � No �
Remarks:
Wetland created by beaver activity.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primarv Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) � Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
QSurface Water (A1) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (614) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Q High Water Table (A2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) �✓ Drainage Patterns (B10)
� Saturation (A3) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) [] Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑ Water Marks (61) � Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (63) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
❑ Iron Deposits (B5) �✓ Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑✓ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
� Water-Stained Leaves (B9) [] Microtopographic Relief (D4)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13) �✓ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes ❑� No ❑ Depth (inches): 2•5
Water Table Present? Yes � No g Depth (inches): 0.0
Saturation Present? Yes � No � Depth (inches): ��� Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes 0 No 0
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
SurFace water between 1-5 inches surrounding sampling site.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Piot size: W�in Wetland � % Cover Species? Status
�. Betula nigra 10.0 Y FAcw
2. Salix nigra 5.0 Y oa�
3 Select
4 Select
5 Select
6 Select
50% of total cover: 7•50
Saplinq Stratum (Piot size: W/in Wetland �
�. Platanus occidentalis
2.
4.
5.
6.
50% of total cover: 5.00
5hrub Stratum (Plot size: )
�. see Sapling Stratum
3.
4.
50% of total cover: 0.00
Herb Stratum �Piot S�Ze: W�in Wetland �
�. Leersia oryzoides
2. Ludwigia palustris
3. Polygonum hydropiperoides
4. Sagittaria latifolia
5. Dichanthelium clandestinum
6.
7.
15.0 = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 3.00
10.0
Y FACW
Select
Select
Select
Select
�:�c�3!
Sampling Point: W'�` WET
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5•0 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 5.0 (g)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 OO (q/g�
(NaN: Not a Number)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiplv bv:
OBL species x 1= 0.00
FACW species x 2= 0.00
FAC species x 3= 0.00
FACU species x 4= 0.00
UPL species x 5= 0.00
Column Totals: 0.00 �q� 0.00 �g�
N N N
( a . ot
Select Prevalence Index = B/A = NaN a Number)
10.0 = Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
20% of total cover: 2�00 ❑ 1- Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
❑✓ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
Seiect ❑ 3- Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
Seiect ❑ 4- Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
seiect data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Seiect 0 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
Select
Select
0.0 = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 0.00
75.0
40.0
10.0
5.0
5.0
Y oa�
Y oa�
N oa�
N oa�
j�f FAC
Select
Select
Select
Select
Select
Select
135.0 - Total Cover
50% of total cover: 67.50 20% of total cover: 2�•00
Woodv Vine Stratum (Piot size: W�in Wetland �
� Select
4.
5.
Select
Select
Select
Select
0.0 = Total Cover
50°/o of total cover: 0.00 20% of total cover: 0.00
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft(6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft(1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation �
Present? Yes 0 No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
B-5354
Sampling Point: WAA WE�
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) °/o Color (moist) % Tvpe' LocZ Texture Remarks
0-5 10YR 4/1 95 10YR 4/4 5 C M Lo
5-12+ 7.5YR 4/3 100
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
0 Histosol (A1)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
� Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5)
� 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11;
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
0 Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
� Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Sandy Redox (S5)
� Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Lo
ZLocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
0 Dark Surface (S7) � 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
� Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) � Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
� Thin Dark SurFace (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
� Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑✓ Depleted Matrix (F3)
D Redox Dark Surtace (F6)
� Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
� Redox Depressions (F8)
� Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
� Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
0 Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
� Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
(MLRA 147, 148)
0 Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
0 Very Shallow Dark Surtace (TF12)
� Other (Explain in Remarks)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes � No�
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

TIP Project No.: B-5354
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
PfOJ@Cf/Slf2: Replacement of Bridge No. 360 on SR 4771 (Eckerson Rd) over US 29 City/County: City: Greensboro Cp,; GUilfO�d Sampling Date: 06/23/2015
North Carolina Department of Transportation `"'"�°°"v�v, UPL
Applicant/Owner: State: NC Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): Mason, �. Pr��e, �. Section, Township, Range: "'
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): NOne Slope (%): 0-2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): P �at: 36.17376 �ong: -79.71032 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Congaree loam, 0-2°/o slopes, frequently flooded (CoA) NWI ciassification: N/A
Are climatic / h drolo ic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes � No 0(If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation �J, Soil 0, or Hydrology � significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � No 0
Are Vegetation �, Soil �, or Hydrology � naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Yes 0 No 0
Yes � No�
Yes � No �
Is the Sampled Area �
within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primarv Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) � Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
❑ Surface Water (A1) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (614) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) �✓ Drainage Patterns (B10)
� Saturation (A3) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) [] Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑ Water Marks (61) � Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (63) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
❑ Iron Deposits (B5) �✓ Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
� Water-Stained Leaves (B9) [] Microtopographic Relief (D4)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13) � FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No 0 Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes � No g Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes � No � Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes 0 No 0
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft ) % Cover Species? Status
�. Betula nigra 70.0 Y FAcw
2. Platanus occidentalis 25.0 Y Facw
3 Select
4 Select
5 Select
6 Select
95.0 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 47.50 20% of total cover: 19.00
Saplinq Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft )
�. Liquidambar styraciflua 5.0 Y FAC
2, Quercus phellos 5.0 Y FAC
4.
5.
6.
Select
Select
Select
Select
10.0 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 5.00 20% of total cover: 2.00
5hrub Stratum (Plot size: )
�. see Sapling Stratum Select
2 Select
3 Select
4 Select
� Select
50% of total cover: 0.00
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft �
�. Microstegium vimineum
2. Glyceria striata
3.
6.
7.
50% of total cover: 40.00
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft �
1.
4.
5.
Select
0.0 = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 0.00
,� �
C11
Y FAC
Y oa�
Select
Select
Select
Select
Select
Select
Select
Select
Select
80.0 = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 16.00
Select
Select
Select
Select
Select
0.0 = Total Cover
50°/o of total cover: 0.00 20% of total cover: 0.00
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
�:�c�3!
Sampling Point: UPL
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6•0 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 6.0 (g)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 OO (q/g�
(NaN: Not a Number)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiplv bv:
OBL species x 1= 0.00
FACW species x 2= 0.00
FAC species x 3= 0.00
FACU species x 4= 0.00
UPL species x 5= 0.00
Column Totals: 0.00 �q� 0.00 �g�
(NaN: Not
Prevalence Index = B/A = NaN a Number)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
❑ 1- Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
❑✓ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
❑ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
0 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft(6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft(1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation �
Present? Yes 0 No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
B-5354
Sampling Point: UPL
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) °/o Color (moist) % Tvpe' LocZ Texture Remarks
0-5 10YR 4/3 100 SiLo
5-12+ 7.5YR 4/4 70 7.5YR 5/4 20 C M SiCLLo
--- --- --- 7.5YR 4/3 10 C M ---
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
0 Histosol (A1)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
� Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5)
� 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11;
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
0 Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
� Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Sandy Redox (S5)
� Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
ZLocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
0 Dark Surface (S7) � 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
� Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) � Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
� Thin Dark SurFace (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148)
� Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) 0 Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147)
D Redox Dark Surtace (F6) 0 Very Shallow Dark Surtace (TF12)
� Depleted Dark Surface (F7) � Other (Explain in Remarks)
� Redox Depressions (F8)
� Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
� Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
0 Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
� Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes � No�
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMEN� OF
"CRANSPORI'ATI ON
DIVISION OF H[GHWAYS
PROJF.C7' DF,VELOPMENT BL
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSfS UNIl'
GUILFORD COUNTY
REPLACE BRIDGE NO. 360 oN SR 4771
OVER US 29
B-5354
Figure 1

. i � / , �
. ` � -- ` •
�� � .
1J \ � j - - -.� � \1 1 � � \1 Y �' • ' � 1 ^ • ` ` � ' t
� l � � � � � �-'. � � , g�:� _r ,,1 ' _ _ �.
, , , , �5 ; .� � � ' .�
_� ; � j ` �`..—� �� � .
� � �� � �
z � '� / -.�-� ' /� .
�_ , �� ` / . , _�.. . �� � ,
. ; T,. � � `� . ../ _ - - ` 1� i ,
- � ��' �• .�ti S� ' �. � _ a � � ` \; \ •>
- . / ' / � � y. '. . � ! N � r1 -_
� ' e '. ��/_� r= ���,1� ' � ��% _ QQY �`�` l,` � ( � � �� � %j -
- , , � , t— — '� � Cs ' \ �,/ r
. � _ . —. �� � �
. ;�. �, `� :,. �.. _ �� .
,r, ° �� _� HCt7' � ��', . � �-� . `' - ' % �-. .
,, . _ J � � �' � �, „ ��.
; -�� �- ti, yeo _ -- ` �%� � t - \\ �' �`'�/' �� '
' \
.- _ - - ; � - ;;' 1 r' -
,, - ' . . ;� � .� � ..�� ' `-'-=:�_ _ �-�<�
_ :.�= r � � ��j+�� �'•� - - -�1 � -' I
. �; �-__ ,t _ r._ � �.
� � , �. -- `� � -� � � .� -�� � ` �� ��
; ,��f � : � ' ,, � = �, r P��, � � , : , - - . � ��� ��`,:.�' ,,,
, � ? `L -- �, _ � �... %' ;, ' ����` . /:11 �. _ ! � �� � � \ ' = j
� ��� a '� "� -� s� � � - - � , O ...
�� � � � F- , " i = �� c�.� - ��� �� , ,-
\ ����p� � �� ��� ����� � ' ,�� � � � e�,6G �t��� /%� �l
. �eQ • �ii` � , � � �'6 � � �
�� �o.�e�`�' _ -� � � � , _ _ ,�; 1, �a�,� � �,�.. ti�� ` � .
� r � � ,,� l�� � . _ ; �
� � ' � '� . i _/ � \ , �4.rf � �..� \, �
' - g ,• _ � �, IL/ �; - �"' j KGo"'e '� P ' 1. Y
� - ��� ryah p �' �� ,.' '- J "� � . � • g�a� \'�, r Q<` � •` .
� � � �r , -� _ � � � � � �'-� � � ��•.,
� o � �J.
� � k�`'d �� /� / 's . / �` • erbosb ,¢s� � �
�r_ � ,' �1 epP �� `' � �
. i - ' O{ . � � - , � r/` � :`\� Y �,� / i � '� �
♦-, O - / � �' � \NV � P � . ) �_
�! % o° � � / , , 1 � ^� -�'.�.: �. f � ' , `;,'.,il � , �� Reedy Fork pk : Ribbon Grass Ter /4srP � , f ' � �.�' =-
�� n 1 . � ,:-; - �{ �,..._.---,�� �;,- : ��� �,�.� ��- � ,� f,--
% 1 • ' ' ` `, � _ '�, � : . � Bluestem Dr � '.rr,� ,: , % J
� � . � ,� ���` � -�! . ; /
�� _ r �-' �,ae • � � �� '�' % ��: � �� = ��; � � � �\,?" ���
� � '�•ti 1 �, q -- � '�' "�� �, r �r/j��
i� ; d`` �• � ti '� r �� /i, �
. �
• • g� . i� 'si� • ' �r� O5. '�-.��) �� �� � � � � I �, I
1 �/ •� �• �o - �. � � ' � � --'!
� • � ►' � �1, � ` . . •' , �( .,\ ��
e� )
.� �
_ � � . ' � ee� �,: _ ' � , �
/-�_
�.°' � �-,)��, �`i�C • r ) ' �, � \ � i! ' � f �
,�`' . �e Ch , . J,��' r,f -� tiQ < ,
�� � • � ,� _' ►`�" ,�� - . ,� : ' p �/ I 1, -
� � � • � -- �`'� �
�q r,-��.. , � � �- - �
� •_. �Ita � 'cr, . t ._-�-- \\ . ; � � i� .
`' oF "ORTM �.09 FIGURE 2:PROJECT VICINITY -• ��. ,` � "�, '�, __ �,�' N �� , � ' '
,�Q�� °�y - � �'' � ;'.� '�; o \ ---. —
Legend
� � " „f_ �-o. �\ ,. --
Replacement of Bridge No. 360 on =�— ��� ��� � `� A''i�a��
� � SR 4771 (Eckerson Rd) over US 29 ' • '�� �= � "' � ' .,,� �� ' `c�G,J,r, ��� ��� O Project Study Area
9� ��� , . - 'f ( w � } - I
r f Roads
< �'Tpp TpANSQ B-5354, Guilford County _��� f/ '� _` - y\ � , �_ _ .; fr � _ - __ � ,
� � 0 330 660 1,320 1,980 ' 2,640 �
. ` �� - �� • , � rv. �'� �r .'� ' -- . � ----. �-.. �eet
`, ��''- - � � �% •� . ; ,,. • �� � •" Copyright:02013�N'ational'GeographicSociety�-cubed

, ,. t r �� � ' ' �; ' �. � ai �ro� � �f y '�'f �1 �"� � t: �� �. . �� ' '3G#A" y
�� s � � ��N �'� � � � � . . ��'r "�.'�� � � ' R re� '
( � r �;F � -�, r � � .�
� 3 r
�� �� � � .
.Y��, � ' � �"� .� � d � � � L � � � � � 1"'[i
< ",� N � -f'j ;�+ � ` � x ` s WeUand W'AA � � a�^ !" � y
� �% ��p , t�� % ��ly J���'�t�.i/ y� � /*�y�.,,,'�".��/ ��,�. ` ,� f.11� �Ys� ,�`�'.j�i... a �'% ���_
,,�j Iiy� � rt j� r�.� },. ,��. ' �P 7of � �"6' .. `,7' i � ir .�:' �� 2 - ��
. "8�]' �� �� . � }�,� � _ � a�, ��,/// �
� � ', � x "��'�j��� "e � ' � / .i!- � � � �
,. , > � ; �
���i� �.� ��� '�♦ ..��r.. ' � � � �` i F:� � � WtYlTnd Wl � 'i� ,� . �_: J .;.
1 \ ' ' S `�` � ��
.
: � ,��11 �1� �� � ; � ��" � �� �: . ��.. �,�,����� � � :� � . � �
.�; . � �
.�
.�. � � � �� F ��y/ . �
�� �\.\ 1� . � �',� ,a'�p•.... . .,r ,Tr�. . � a�,�i ,V� ro����ssv?�� h �,.� ��� k
� I \ � , m °'`��� ,� � ,;� ; F ¢[yj��'; .� �,�` � _: `
t`'� � \� /. � �' �wr.i.-�YF` �Z ' ��� � N� f�` r -Hd�:.��, W s';.6 �k � ,
\ . � �' � � — �`' n ,� 4 'il, n • 3
� �" �„� ��'�\� '!r ,� � _� �!M�' .��.�� ' s a �"���¢'' �� �� �Se � � ,f _�f , °s'�'. * ��� � � t ' '/ a �. - r,�+..� � :
�;�� fE �, - * �` � �� ���� ��� � � -�� ,
.. fi .' :�' � � . a' F, ��. � �� � • �,+�: � ��� � ¢' /� . � � r � " � � n �/ �, �,.i �
. �. . . � o��. P � � p � -`�� � i�� t � ;� ir � . � T ��, � P� � � � i
�� ki� �• � a6 � � ,� � � � � �!>� r
���` # � L � . ' � �¢ ��y ��y �g � '� St��am SD � ',. � � ,,.ti � v � � � d
^+ , . � €�` � � �� �a � �
� e s:r �� i t a �
�k. � �JN� �',!�•..,w ��, _ � �� .�i'� � �"`.,Y �P,� -r'� '�;i A, � 'F� -'���t't,`An �'�;.� _ `�� �� � �� `�,�.. .
� � �
, �
� " '
\ ��s n �y,����
-0"�' , �:° B ��t�`r� \ � . \ 7�� ��� �''� * te'� i�� #�p~,�i", i. �{v�� � F�� i �`j��
,c„ V' � ��'�� � '� � , ti �� �K d. ` J�, '�i
��� � �g �, u� �r���,�� ,�- � �a�, s � y ,< ,
`�i ,.o° � �; - � � `� ! �'I� � ��P/�dz, � � �f�{ � � � ��� ���r^� `�^`' >i e
4 � i . , � � ���,#j �. 9" ' � _ ��� ' �� / k' h � ' y � � �i' i� � �..�L '� 4 .
� I � #�y, � R1t� � q��}�'�",p ����1 �
�": � . �_ � ���u�... \ , i�:�,
' wt '1 A�' i� . � r i w '�' ��� a -� . ., fi � e. .' .:�s
a ,'� ��,� � ( �� � ���,a' � ��� ��� � � � � 4Y t� . � � ,
� �,�',� , � �± J. .� � Fu. �i '� I .�5 � .. � � � ♦ . { .
. j,�� �a' ' � �` ''�- �;� '` '�'�� - �-,�,''� �"�4 {'� �4 '
�, . . :��P� � �a <
'� �,.�j�"�""'- x�+� � +,������ �a �� +�'��3 d i �A1 ;�'�t �i ��+ F��'
�fi� e. �` i
�, " . p�;� �a%� ��r `a t+`�!u,�`�� ,� " �"+�, '� y� ��-� :d �
�
� � �.,� °'`��R�`�': �a�'. a"�'js� �,a a � ✓ � t," 2 a�' � -r+�,�( , �
r'.0 §` •
,/ �{ s ,�(��� �S �i �a A t y
� . ; � 14� �- : �'4! r��qlMlr; � r � � }� ' P y //�f /� 1 "M�, �9Y �� �� � k � �V�I. � � � ��._
Y-+r x � ;� sr ��� >` f ��> ' � s
�5�,! d�r • ��
. i�^�1 r�eg�� Y e `.r;X� o� ,,�t� i ;y, y ' � i A�'�r y�y �9E*::'. .
. �"�i��" t 7"fi�'i � �'�� h � �r.. : �1 � r�,; �'f � � '' �, � ,w a�qa� � r�.�, � � `
, � - � ' �* < � � � � � -1 � . �"�r' '���,V� ' �. . � � f#.y. :' • r
��;. a � ,�� ,�e,vrr. r.s� . +r� #J� / i sK � p '� t . ;jP �� d�a,£l'1 j t A �1
� r �' +,: a�
�
y r (,�,q � c` ,G ; �. r" d l '�, � � s .� -'8f'� � � � �",�� 1
.
� �
' ° �. 1F •: � fi � J : . .
,
F
i, t :K � � � � ��r � � � �� t� ' g� �h'��. � y�' - - _ � ,.
. * r ` ^
. � . . � "y ,�r� � � ��^ � , � � � f~,� ,�.r 9F��R'�y�' 1 �' � �4 F �"`d r xx � r? r "� .�.'�'�� / d ��i, `�y� � t-�/i �
����� � , , � �
�[��, ,,Y���.. �� �+ Y" y � � r � �� �/r� � taa {�""'�'"�`a j i✓ '� M � � � Q�� �� J i ..� ; „ � % t,
.°�G� Nt.;P ��' +� A,.�S�p � � I �'+�[ <� � a j'�( �,� .� �t��. 1l ��s� `f �� r y Y�,,� �' � �
�`� � � a� ,� � � s���, G � �� i,� ,L. � �,�'° s " � � r " � d r .s � '�E % �� '� - �'r � r'� f ..�� �� !f � �� � �,� � � � �
.� �t. .�� f ��? . � ��� � "!x��"`.�r�.r-»'v;s \� "�s�`�� � s«`�� .,� �I�`: � �,, ��,«� .., �� .:+r l,"�"R�'��+«" �' ,sW "� �� ! ��. .�gi , ^ `� ���i
�,,� �r ; � I ..«+.rl� �� �q" �,g,- .. 1 - �� � �"�r - � ��� � t.9; {,�. � � ,..�j ��, ,�) Ph'�+i� /" ig �� s e>.,y�,� � �Jr; f ��,���:. � i. '�'� ��� �.:�' �. ,.
� ,r . �, 5 1 ,�rr � �r... , � � �.r+� * � �rr rX t S , P 5 n.k"' � �'�� ir �% �7 �' r�� � .
t' ,:� f.f� � /F��, �Pi�'.' �'�J��� �� * � � .� ��. � � r; a�` � aF c t'� +�� r'�� 1r ';� � �*�� � �,. i t >�
� f �- ��.. ..� � � . �`� � , � ��.�xa ,._ S.✓ , Y + � � y�i1��A'� �.
� r. �j,� a. � , . . ;• { '< fr
,� *+��� a� ` '`�r `�' � fJ � _z r�, �i I '� _�,^», �' �� ��,u e � r � � '` r� ' �
.:; �. ,� y�&t � :y �� . � � d c� '? x j er,,r c � l*r�_A'h � r`'� A n �5.� :� � !�'y,`�� '� � °� } �
,��ste �t,e r� ,� �+ l ,� t, �t i ;°�� a u 1 `'s 1¢ a "° "a� o '� � � 1 �� �/�i � ' t1 '� „�� I � � .
� � � . � �.�1�ti�� i'� �i � r `�`� ' °s�yg �4 .� � '�� �'� t �bi1'' R a`;; r �' /'�E"n. � ��' n 6 ; , ° j "
�,�% � � ,r� ��u ar � �N �„�+' � � 1 �i. > . � rr,r� F{; J sir �r x � �*�,#�' r� �ki �; p� � � ��,�.r J m � � �,, , �#' � ! k` �.�'� � � t d' x .c. �� .
�� ,;�'�� .I1��� "Me r K�v i � /��e.2 l 'Y �"l }k �i '(y � P ' . .ijM � �p ��{ ! h � �� .. �
� . �. '� / "� " ����� ���i4 , � � '� / 3 r l Y'ip A I ��- x, � -�u ' >` �'
^ ��f, fr*& ��<1,� ! � �� �' y i } „� �' '�; .m �` j � ,i?'� t� w " � n F f � ��,�,R a �` � � ` ��1� v`4.�i" . � `
� �"!3` � � 1 Aot�r � l�� .�, �x � , � '7' � '�
���v % W � � Y� I -
�,�� ._. � . . , � _,��_....�i �` , fJ � , �� �K ���.�� �-Legend
�',� '�� � r i': � f �R � �'� r ,�� �p ,
� � k , ��� , � , d
FIGURE 3: ' �,; �R, � ���� �� ,��' a�f��,�� �� ���� `�� � ��'� � Roads �
JURISDICTIONAL RESOURCES ��x�d'+` �, �'��':> �' ; , ',�`:`" ! � '� ` � �� �" ��^
���. ; 7�: ar.. !' . .. �� P+.. . ap� � t � ' �� �
��rM �� �� ,�, ,�; `� �'"� F .�,�w6����`,� k ,� �-�:�,,�� • ; �—�� Pro�ect Study Area�, .
� � ,. �,�,�►' ' � _
Replacement of Bridge No. 360 on ���, �r, �' � �n?�,e� w , �" ,, �,,.,, � �,� ' � r �, �
SR 4771 (Eckerson Rd) over US 29 � ��`� � � �,, � � � � � � ; „ � -� ��, _ � ; � Streams
y , � �, ��"�� e
�t�<;'f ,�::' ��; S�"`� ','��# F�" :� _��,' °' Wetlands
. ,,;
y �" � , � �9 !=- 4. � � �
B-5354, GuilfordCounty '/�_�� - �;���'�, � i �' '�.; '�' , ., ' \ % "�� _,�,_ . ,�.:--
",, ;� �� . � �. ,��, r � .�f �' ,,� w0 112.5 225 450 675 900
, �r � ;` , �" . `� _ �:;1�' Feet
,b, ��: 3 � �Yr���'a�ia�'�� 7�;�:A��`' ,r.F� � � 's` a ' � '� "":F�,.� �i,:4�f..��rt "��,+�t�r�� � � a<"��
,� j ��� •s' � ,� �i � N_�ri;�li�ap. NC Centerfor Ge.ogr�phicJnformartao�andAn�a,�,l,ysis, N,C 911 Bo,ard