20160011 Ver 1_401 Application_20160116

E3 0� VJA �<G
o -r
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
❑ Section 404 Permit Section 10 ❑ rmit
1 b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: or General Permit (GP) number:
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes ❑ No
1 d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
❑X 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
❑ Yes ❑X No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ❑ No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bankX❑
or in -lieu fee program.
Yes ❑ No
1 g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes NX No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Hornet/Frito Lay Expansion
2b.
County:
Mecklenburg
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Charlotte, NC
2d.
Subdivision name:
N/A
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Frito Lay, Inc.
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
Tax Parcel ID 20324102
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
Ray Riley
3d.
Street address:
2700 Nevada Boulevard
3e.
City, state, zip:
Charlotte NC 28273
3f.
Telephone no.:
972-334-3950
3g.
Fax no.:
3h.
Email address:
ray.riley1 @pepsico.com
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a.
Applicant is:
❑X Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b.
Name:
Craig R. Wyant RLA/SWS
4c.
Business name
(if applicable):
dba A Fine Line Design
4d.
Street address:
P.O. Box 163
4e.
City, state, zip:
High Shoals NC 28077
4f.
Telephone no.:
704-240-0793
4g.
Fax no.:
4h.
Email address:
[e-mail]
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name:
Craig R. Wyant RLA/SWS
5b.
Business name
(if applicable):
dba A Fine Line Design
5c.
Street address:
P.O. Box 163
5d.
City, state, zip:
High Shoals NC 28077
5e.
Telephone no.:
704-240-0793
5f.
Fax no.:
5g.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 10

B.
Project Information and Prior Project History
1.
Property Identification
1a.
Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
20324102
1 b.
Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.116 Longitude: 80.936
1 c.
Property size:
17.95 acres
2.
Surface Waters
2a.
Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
Steele Creek HUC 03050103
2b.
Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
C
2c.
River basin:
Catawba
3.
Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
Approximately 9 acres of the site consists of an existing industrial man ufacuring/shipping facility and parking. The remaining 9 acres of the site is
undeveloped and mostly forested with medium aged successional mix of trees dominated by Eastern Red Cedar (Juniperus virginiana). All
surrounding land use is industrial or commercial use. (Additional information is attached)
3b.
List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.41
3c.
List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 0
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
Expand the existing shipping and distribution facility for the manufacturing plant on land that is already owned. (Detailed information attached)
3e.
This
Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
project consists of clearing and grading of the site to create a tractor trailer storage and vehicle turnaround facility. (Additional information attached)
4.
Jurisdictional Determinations
4a.
Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (includingall prior phases in the past?
❑X Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Comments:
4b.
If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
❑ Preliminary ❑X Final
4c.
If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company: Craig R. Wyant RLA/SWS
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
Field verified by Alan Johnson (NCDEQ-DWR August 2015), coordination and office verification by William Elliott (USACE Wilmington -Asheville
Office).
5.
Project History
5a.
Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑ Yes 0 No ❑ Unknown
5b.
If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6.
Future Project Plans
6a.
Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes Q No
6b. If yes, explain.
Future phases are not anticipated for this project.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑X Wetlands StreaE3 — tributaries Buffers Open \❑ters P❑d Construction ❑
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
2b.
Type of impact
2c.
Type of wetland
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other)
2f.
Area of
impact
(acres)
W1 P
Excavation
Choose one
Yes
DWQ
0.35
W2 P
Draining
Choose one
Yes
DWQ
0.06
W3 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W4 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W5 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W6 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
0.41
2h. Comments:
Impacts are to Isolated Wetlands only.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
Stream impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
3b.
Type of impact
3c.
Stream name
3d.
Perennial (PER) or
intermittent (INT)?
3e.
Type of
jurisdiction
3f.
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g.
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
S1 -
Choose one
S2 -
Choose one
S3 -
Choose one
-
S4 -
Choose one
-
S5 -
Choose one
-
S6 -
Choose one
-
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
3i. Comments:
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then indivi ually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01
Choose one
Choose
O2 -
Choose one
Choose
03 -
Choose one
Choose
O4 -
Choose one
Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico Dawba C]ndleman Other
6b.
Buffer Impact
number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet)
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet
B1
Yes/No
B2
Yes/No
B3 -
Yes/No
B4 -
Yes/No
B5 -
Yes/No
B6 -
Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
6i. Comments:
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Various arrangements and layouts of the required parking and turnaround were tried on land that is owned. Surrounding land is already developed with
industrial uses so it cannot be used. The only remainng land has two isolated wetlands that are located such that the proposed parking and turnaround
cannot be situated to avoid or minimize impacts. Reducing the size of the project or a no buld option would not satisfy the purpose and need. All
appropriate stormwater management, sediment and erosion control measures will be utilized to protect downstream water quality.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
All appropriate stormwater management, sediment and erosion control measures will be utilized to protect downstream water quality. Other
jurisdictional waters are not present on the site so there will be no direct or indrect impacts other than the two isolated wetland areas.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑X Yes ❑ No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑X DWQ ❑ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
❑X Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
A private mitigation bank is not available for this HUC. Riparian wetland credits only are available for this HUC from the EEP.
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑X Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
Choose one
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
0.25 acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments: Riparian wetland credits only are available for this HUC from the EEP.
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
❑ Yes ❑X No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c.
6d.
6e.
Zone
Reason for impact
Total impact
Multiplier
Required mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes X❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
62.03%
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑X Yes ❑ No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative
description of the plan:
This plan is designed to be approved by the designated municipality of Charlotte Mecklenburg Stormwater
Services.
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
Charlotte Mecklenburg Stormwater Svcs.
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which localgovernment's jurisdiction is thisproject?
Charlotte/Mecklenburg NC
❑X Phase II
❑ NSW
3b.
Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes X❑ No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a.
Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ORW
(check all that apply):
❑Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑X Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑X Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes ❑X No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes ❑ No
letter.)
Comments:
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
F] Yes ❑X No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b.
Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
F1 Yes ❑X No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑Yes ❑X No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
This project is not anticipated to be a phased project which will result in new additional stormwater. All stormwater and sediment erosion control plans
for
this new construction will follow State and Local regulations to prevent any degradation of downstream receiving waters.
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a.
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
This
project will not generate any new wastewater since it does not involve structures. Existing project is connected to public sanitary sewer system.
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ YesX❑ No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑X Yes ❑ No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Asheville, NC -
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
NC Natural Heitage Program database search.
Coordination with USFWS Asheville office. (Letter attached, additional biological assessment is under contract to review site for suitable habitat)
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ❑X No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
Project does not occur in Coastal Waters or Trout Waters. Sources contacted include NC Wildlife Resources Commission and USFWS.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ❑X No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
Coordination with NC State Historic Preservation Office.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes ❑X No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
Project will not build in FEMA designated 100 year flood zones. Nearest floodplain is greater than 4,000 feet away.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map Panels and local Mecklenburg County GIS mapping database.
Craig R. Wyant RLA/SWS
December 30, 2015
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant is provided.
Page 10 of 10

S. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ®No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
®Yes No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Asheville, NC -
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
NC Natural Heitage Program database search. -
Coordination with USFWS Asheville office. (Letter attached, additional biological assessment is under contract to review site for suitable habitat)
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
Project does not occur in Coastal Waters or Trout Waters. Sources contacted include NC Wildlife Resources Commission and USFWS.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
E] Yes ®No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
Coordination with NC State Historic Preservation office.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
Project will not build in FEMA designated 100 year flood zones. Nearest floodplain is greater than 4,000 feet away.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map Panels and local Mecklenburg County GIS mapping database. '
Craig R. Wyant RLA/SWS
—C 73 ` —_ mac..
December 30, 2015
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant Isprovided.)
Page 10 of 10

December 30, 2015
Ms. Cyndi Karoly
NC Division of Water Resources
Wetlands Branch
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Telephone:[phone]
Fax:[phone]
Subject: PCN Isolated Wetlands Application
Hornet/Frito Lay Expansion
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
Dear Ms. Karoly:
On behalf of the Frito Lay Company, I am hereby submitting the attached PCN application for
NCDEQ-DWR Isolated Wetlands Permitting. The project is located at N 35.1160 and W 80.9360 on
the Fort Mill, NC -SC Quadrangle of the USGS. The project is located within the Catawba River Basin
HUC 03050103 and is more than 4,000 feet upstream of Steele Creek. The site has no tributaries or
streams but contains two identified isolated wetland areas that have no conveyances leading into or out
of them. They are completely surrounded by upland. The existing Frito Lay Manufacturing and
distribution facility is located southwest of the City of Charlotte on Nevada Boulevard. From 1-77
south of Charlotte, take Westinghouse Boulevard west to South Tryon Street (Hwy 49), turn left
(south) and follow to Nevada Boulevard on left. Site is on left side of Nevada Boulevard A project
Location map is attached.
This project is necessary to expand the parking and turnaround facilities for 68 semi tractor -trailer
vehicles for ongoing and continued operation of the manufacturer. Equipment to be used on this
project will include typical earthmoving and construction equipment. Loaders, dozers, trucks,
trackhoes, graders, cranes, and a variety of other large and small equipment will be used throughout
various stages of construction.
The Waters of the U.S. have been delineated, surveyed, and verified by Alan Johnson of the
NCDENR-DWR Mooresville Field Office. Mr. Johnson has coordinated with Mr. William Elliott of
the USACE Wilmington District Asheville Field Office to verify the two identified areas as Isolated
Wetlands. Maps have been attached which show the extent of delineated and surveyed wetlands on
this site. Data forms and photographs are attached for both areas.
The database of the NC State Historic Preservation office has been consulted and indicates no
features within the vicinity of the site. The database of the NC Natural Heritage Program has been
consulted and indicates no elements or occurrences within the vicinity of the site. The USFWS
Asheville Field Office has been contacted for a review of protected species. Upon advisement from the
USFWS, a qualified biologist has been contracted to review the site in more detail for the presence of
identified species or suitable habitat. A special moratorium for land clearing between the dates of May
15 and August 15th will be followed as necessary to protect any temporary roosting habitat of the Long
Eared Bat.
The stormwater management plan has been designed in accordance with the local requirements of
the designated local authority of the Charlotte Mecklenburg Stormwater Services. A final approval
letter is pending.

Mitigation for this project will be coordinated with the NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program/. Ms.
Kelly Williams has been contacted regarding the availability of credits. A letter of credit availability
from her office is attached.
A check in the amount of $240 is enclosed for payment of the NCDEQ permit processing fee.
Please do not hesitate to contact me if you should have questions or if there is any way that I can be of
assistance to you.
Sincerely,
Craig R. Wyant RLA/SWS
A Fine Line Design
P.O. Box 163
High Shoals NC 28077
704-240-0793
[e-mail]

Project Hornet/Frito Lay
Continued Response
PCN Form - Version 1.4 January 2009
Page 3 of 10
Item B.
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the
vicinity of the project at the time of this application.
The entire site consists of 17.95 acres. Approximately 9 acres of the western side
of the site consists of an existing industrial manufacuring/shipping facility and
parking. The remaining 9 acres of the eastern portion of the site is undeveloped
and mostly forested with medium aged successional mix of trees dominated by
Eastern Red Cedar (Juniperus virginiana) on the western and northern sides and
mixed medium aged trees dominated by hardwoods on the eastern side. The
eastern half of the site has approximately 10 feet of old fill. Near the top of the old
fill is a depressed area which has collected water over many years and has
become Isolated Wetland #1 (W-1) which has been delineated and surveyed to
be 0.35 acre in size. It is expected that this depressed area is the result of
settling of the old fill material or otherwise left uneven due to mass grading. A
railroad spur construction around the eastern and northern sides of the site has
resulted in a similar Isolated Wetland #2 (W-2) which has been delineated and
surveyed to be 0.06 acre in size. This area occurs in a shallow graded ditch
running along the side of the railroad. A former U.S. Army Munitions Facility
occurred on the site prior to 1969. Since that time, the construction of a building
and surrounding parking on the western half of the site was originally used as a
tire manufacturing and distribution facility. The site is now used for snack food
manufacturing, distribution, and shipping. All surrounding land use is industrial or
commercial use.
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project.
The purpose of the project is to expand the existing the parking and turnaround
area for 68 parking spaces for semi tractor trailers required for the shipping and
distribution facility for the manufacturing plant on land that is already owned.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be
used.
This project consists of clearing and grading of a formerly filled area of forest to
create a tractor trailer storage consisting of 68 parking spaces and vehicle
turnaround area. will be constructed as a part of the site grading. Equipment to
be used will consist of loaders, graders, trucks, trackhoes, backhoes, and other
typical construction equipment.

AGENT CERTIFICATION OF AUTHORIZATION
I, Ramey ,
representing Frito-Lam Inc.
hereby certify that I have authorized Craig R. Wyant RLA/SWS to act on my behalf and
take all actions necessary to the processing, issuance, and acceptance of this request for
wetlands determination, permitting and any and all standard and special conditions
attached.
We hereby certify that the above information submitted in this application is true and
accurate to the best of our knowledge.
`1
Agent's signature
May] 2015
Date
4C P 4
Applicant's sign ture
May 28, 2015
Date
Completion of this form will allow the agent to sign all future application correspondence.

Jurisdictional Determination Request
aaa
U5 Army Corps
of Engineers
Wilmington District
This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (JD) from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
to the appropriate Corps Field Office (or project manager, if known) via mail, electronic mail, or
facsimile. A current list of county assignments by Field Office and project manager can be
found on-line at: http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Re ug latoDPermitPro r�px , by
telephoning: 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below:
ASHEVILLE REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
General Number: 910-251-4633
Fax Number: [phone]
Version: December 2013 Page 1

Jurisdictional Determination Request
INSTRUCTIONS:
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E and F.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part G.
NOTE ON PART D — PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that all JD
requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to proceed with the
determination, which may include inspection of the property when necessary. This form must be
signed by the current property owner to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D - NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for JD
requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) projects will be
conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD may not
be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of 1985. If you or
your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in USDA programs, you
should also request a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural
Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
Version: December 2013 Page 2

Jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: 2700 Nevada Boulevard
City, State: Charlotte NC 28273
County: Mecklenburg
Directions: From 1-485 Take Tryon Street (Highway 49) South 1.5 miles to Nevada Boulevard on left.
Site is .7 mile on left side of Nevada Boulevard.
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): 20324102
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: Craig R. Wyant RLA/SWS
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 163 High Shoals NC 28077
Telephone Number: 704-240-0793
Electronic Mail Addressl: [e-mail]
Select one:
❑ I am the current property owner.
✓❑ I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant
❑ Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
❑ Other, please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION
Name: Frito-Lay, Inc.
Mailing Address: 2700 Nevada Boulevard
Charlotte, NC 28273
Telephone Number: 972-334-3950
Electronic Mail Address 3: [e-mail]
❑ Proof of Ownership Attached (e.g. a copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record data)
1 If available
Z Must attach completed Agent Authorization Form
3 If available
Version: December 2013 Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY OWNER CERTIFICATION
I, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property/properties identified herein,
do authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps)
to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on-site investigations
and issuing a determination associated with Waters of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction
under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of
1899.
Ray Riley
Property Owner (please print)
Ray Riley
Property Owner Signature
May 28, 2015
Date
Digitally signed by Ray Riley
DN: cn=Ray Riley, o=Frito-Lay, ou=Engineering,
email=[e-mail], c=US
Date: 2015.05.28 12:01:18 -05'00'
E. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION TYPE
Select One:
❑ I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
This request does include a delineation.
❑ I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
This request does NOT include a delineation.
❑ I am requesting that the Corps investigate the property/project area for the presence or
absence of WOUS5 and provide an approved JD for the property identified herein. This
request does NOT include a request for a verified delineation.
❑ I am requesting that the Corps delineate the boundaries of all WoUS on a property/project
area and provide an approved JD (this may or may not include a survey plat).
I am requesting that the Corps evaluate and approve a delineation of WoUS (conducted
by others) on a property/project area and provide an approved JD (may or may not
include a survey plat).
4 For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
5 Waters of the United States
Version: December 2013 Page 4

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F. ALL REQUESTS
❑i Map of Property or Project Area (attached). This Map must clearly depict the boundaries
of the area of evaluation.
❑✓ Size of Property or Project Area ±18 acre Project Area acres
�✓ I verify that the property (or project) boundaries have recently been surveyed and marked
by a licensed land surveyor OR are otherwise clearly marked or distinguishable.
G. JD REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS OR AGENCIES
(1) Preliminary JD Requests:
❑✓ Completed and signed Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form6.
P✓ Project Coordinates: 35.1159
Latitude -80.9373
Maps (no larger than 11x17) with Project Boundary Overlay:
Longitude
❑1 Large and small scale maps that depict, at minimum: streets, intersections, towns
❑✓ Aerial Photography of the project area
W✓ USGS Topographic Map
❑✓ Soil Survey Map
aOther Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
6 See Appendix A of this Form. From Regulatory Guidance Letter No. 08-02, dated June 26, 2008
Version: December 2013 Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
Delineation Information (when applicable):
Wetlands:
7 Wetland Data Sheets
a
❑✓
Upland Data Sheets
Landscape Photos, if taken
Tributaries:
W-1 USACE Assessment Forms
❑1 Other Assessment Forms
(when appropriate)
Field Sketch overlain on legible Map that includes:
■ All aquatic resources (for sites with multiple resources, label and identify)
■ Locations of wetland data points and/or tributary assessment reaches
■ Locations of photo stations
■ Approximate acreage/linear footage of aquatic resources
(2) Approved JDs including Verification of a Delineation:
Wf Project Coordinates:
Latitude
Longitude
Maps (no larger than 11x17) with Project Boundary Overlay:
❑✓ Large and small scale maps that depict, at minimum: streets, intersections, towns
❑✓ Aerial Photography of the project area
W-1 USGS Topographic Map
�✓ Soil Survey Map
❑✓ Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site Plan,
previous delineation maps)
1987 Manual Regional Supplements and Data forms can be found at:
http:/Iwww.usace.army.mil/Missions/CivilWorks/RegulatoryProgramandPermits/reg supp.aspx
Wetland and Stream Assessment Methodologies can be found at:
http://portal.ncdenr.org/c/document library/get file?uuid=76f3c58b-dab8-4960-ba43-45b7faf06f4c&groupld=38364 and,
http://www.saw.usace.armV.mil/Portals/59/docs/regulatory/publicnotices/2013/NCSAM Draft User Manual 130318.pdf
8 Delineation information must include, at minimum, one wetland data sheet for each wetland/community type.
Version: December 2013 Page 6

Jurisdictional Determination Request
Delineation Information (when applicable):
Wetlands:
7 Wetland Data Sheets9
Tributaries:
PIUSACE Assessment Forms
❑✓ Upland Data Sheetsa Other Assessment Forms
(when appropriate)
PILandscape Photos, if taken
Field Sketch overlain on legible Map that includes:
• All aquatic resources (for sites with multiple resources, label and identify)
• Locations of wetland data points and/or tributary assessment reaches
• Locations of photo stations
• Approximate acreage/linear footage of aquatic resources
Supporting Jurisdictional Information (for Approved JDs only)
aApproved Jurisdictional Determination Form(s) (also known as "Rapanos
Form(s)")
PI Map(s) depicting the potential (or lack of potential) hydrologic connection(s),
adjacency, etc. to navigable waters.
9 Delineation information must include, at minimum, one wetland data sheet for each wetland/community type.
Version: December 2013 Page 7

Jurisdictional Determination Request
I. REQUESTS FOR CORPS APPROVAL OF SURVEY PLAT
Prior to final production of a Plat, the Wilmington District recommends that the Land
Surveyor electronically submit a draft of a Survey Plat to the Corps project manager for
review.
Due to storage limitations of our administrative records, the Corps requires that all hard-
copy submittals include at least one original Plat to scale) that is no larger than 11"x17"
(the use of match lines for larger tracts acceptable). Additional copies of a plat, including
those larger than 11"xl7", may also be submitted for Corps signature as needed. The
Corps also accepts electronic submittals of plats, such as those transmitted as a Portable
Document Format (PDF) file. Upon verification, the Corps can electronically sign these
plats and return them via e-mail to the requestor.
(1) PLATS SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL
❑ Must be sealed and signed by a licensed professional land surveyor
❑ Must be to scale (all maps must include both a graphic scale and a verbal scale)
❑ Must be legible
❑ Must include a North Arrow, Scale(s), Title, Property Information
❑ Must include a legible WoUS Delineation Table of distances and bearings/metes
and bounds/GPS coordinates of all surveyed delineation points
❑ Must clearly depict surveyed property or project boundaries
❑ Must clearly identify the known surveyed point(s) used as reference (e.g. property
corner, USGS monument)
❑ When wetlands are depicted:
• Must include acreage (or square footage) of wetland polygons
• Must identify each wetland polygon using an alphanumeric system
Version: December 2013 Page 8

Jurisdictional Determination Request
❑ When tributaries are depicted:
• Must include either a surveyed, approximate centerline of tributary with
approximate width of tributary OR surveyed Ordinary High Water Marks
(OHWM) of tributary
• Must identify each tributary using an alphanumeric system
• Must include linear footage of tributaries and calculated area (using approximate
widths or surveyed OHWM)
• Must include name of tributary (based on the most recent USGS topographic
map) or, when no USGS name exists, identify as "unnamed tributary"
❑ all depicted WoUS (wetland polygons and tributary lines) must intersect or tie -to
surveyed project/property boundaries
❑ Must include the location of wetland data points and/or tributary assessment
reaches
❑ Must include, label accordingly, and depict acreage of all waters not currently
subject to the requirements of the CWA (e.g. "isolated wetlands", "non -
jurisdictional waters"). NOTE: An approved JD must be conducted in order to
make an official Corps determination that a particular waterbody or wetland is not
jurisdictional.
❑ Must include and survey all existing conveyances (pipes, culverts, etc.) that
transport WoUS
Version: December 2013 Page 9

Jurisdictional Determination Request
(2) CERTIFICATION LANGUAGE
When the entire actual Jurisdictional Boundary is depicted:
include the following Corps Certification language:
"This certifies that this copy of this plat accurately depicts the boundary of the jurisdiction
of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act as determined by the undersigned on this date.
Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, the determination of
Section 404 jurisdiction may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five (5) years from
this date. The undersigned completed this determination utilizing the appropriate Regional
Supplement to the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual."
Regulatory Official:
Title:
Date:
USACE Action ID No.:
When uplands may be present within a depicted Jurisdictional Boundary
include the following Corps Certification language:
"This certifies that this copy of this plat identifies all areas of waters of the United States
regulated pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act as determined by the
undersigned on this date. Unless there is change in the law or our published regulations,
this determination of Section 404 jurisdiction may be relied upon for a period not to exceed
five years from this date. The undersigned completed this determination utilizing the
appropriate Regional Supplement to the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands
Delineation Manual."
Regulatory Official:
Title:
Date:
USA CE Action ID No.:
Version: December 2013 Page 10

Jurisdictional Determination Request
(3) GPS SURVEYS
For Surveys prepared using a Global Positioning System (GPS), the Survey must include
all of the above, as well as:
❑ be at sub -meter accuracy at each survey point.
❑ include an accuracy verification:
One or more known points (property corner, monument) shall be located with the
GPS and cross-referenced with the existing traditional property survey (metes and
bounds).
❑ include a brief description of the GPS equipment utilized.
Version: December 2013 Page 11

Environmental
Quality
November 17, 2015
Ray Riley
Frito Lay, Inc.
2700 Nevada Boulevard
Charlotte, NC 28273
Project: Hornet/Frito Lay
PAT MCCRORY
Governor
DONALD R. VAN DER VAART
Secretary
Expiration of Acceptance: May 17, 2016
County: Mecklenburg
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) is willing to accept
payment for compensatory mitigation for impacts associated with the above referenced project as indicated in the table
below. Please note that this decision does not assure that participation in the DMS in -lieu fee mitigation program will be
approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts. It is the responsibility of the applicant to
contact permitting agencies to determine if payment to the DMS will be approved. You must also comply with all other
state, federal or local government permits, regulations or authorizations associated with the proposed activity including
G.S. § 143-214.11.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. If we have not received a
copy of the issued 404 Permit/401 Certification/CAMA permit within this time frame, this acceptance will expire. I
is the applicant's responsibility to send copies of the permits to DMS. Once DMS receives a copy of the permit(s) an
invoice will be issued based on the required mitigation in that permit and payment must be made prior to conducting the
authorized work. The amount of the in -lieu fee to be paid by an applicant is calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and
policies listed at http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/eep.
Based on the information supplied by you in your request to use the DMS, the impacts that may require compensatory
mitigation are summarized in the following table. The amount of mitigation required and assigned to DMS for this impact
is determined by permitting agencies and may exceed the impact amounts shown below.
River CU Location
Basin (8 -digit HUC)
Stream (feet)
Wetlands (acres) Buffer I Buffer II
(Sq. Ft.) (Sq. Ft.)
Cold
Cool Warm
Riparian
Non -Riparian
Coastal Marsh
Impact Catawba 03050103"*
0
0 0
0.41
0
0 0 0
I he Gatawpa us txpanaea Service Area will be utilized for this impact Upon receipt of payment, DMS will take
responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. The mitigation will be performed in accordance with the In -Lieu
Fee Program instrument dated July 28, 2010.
Thank you for your interest in the DMS in -lieu fee mitigation program. If you have any questions or need additional
information, please contact Kelly Williams at [phone].
cc: William Elliott, USACE- Asheville
Craig Wyant- agent
Sincerely,
James. 'tanfill
Asset Management Supervisor
!-`Nothing Compares
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality
1601 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601
919-707-8600

United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Asheville Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
December 10, 2015
Mr. Craig R. Wyant RLA/SWS
A Fine Line Design
Post Office Pox 163
High Shoals, North Carolina 28077
Dear Mr. Wyant:
Subject: Proposed Hornet/Frito Lay Expansion Project; Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
Log No. 4-2-16-059
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) has reviewed your letter for the above -referenced
project dated and sent via email on November 20, 2015. In your letter, you requested our review
of the site for known federally protected species. We submit the following comments in
accordance with the provisions of the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act, as amended
(16 U.S.C. 661-667e); the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. §4321 et seq.); and
section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531-1543) (Act).
Project Description
According to the information you provided, your client proposes to construct a parking and
distribution truck turnaround area on a partially wooded 17.95 acre lot in Charlotte, North
Carolina. You indicated that proposed project would result in permanent impacts to two
wetlands (0.35 acre and 0.06 acre) that are isolated from surface waters. Your letter did not
indicate if you are proposing any compensatory mitigation for the proposed impacts.
According to our records, the landcover within the proposed project area and surroundings
primarily consists of medium- and high-intensity development and Southern piedmont dry oak -
pine forest.
Federally Listed Endangered and Threatened Species
In your letter you state that, "the site does no exhibit suitable habitat for any of the listed species
known to occur in the area." In the interest of preventing or mitigating for impacts to federally
protected species, the Service respectfully requests that you elaborate on the basis for this
assertion given your familiarity with the site.

According to Service records, suitable roosting habitat occurs within the project area for the
federally threatened northern long-eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis). During the summer,
northern long-eared bats typically roost singly or in colonies in a wide variety of forested
habitats, underneath bark, or in cavities/crevices of both live trees and snags. Northern
long-eared bats have also been documented roosting in man-made structures (i.e., buildings,
barns, etc.) during the summer. Northern long-eared bats predominately winter in hibernacula
that include caves and abandoned mine portals. It should be noted that the general habitat types
described above may not be all-inclusive; additional habitat types may be identified as new
information is obtained.
The nearest Service record of occurrence for this species is greater than 45 miles from the project
site. Moreover, suitable habitat appears to be minimal on site. As long as the tree -cutting
moratorium (May 15 – August 15) is incorporated into development plans, the Service maintains
that the probability of "take" that could occur from this project would be insignificant and/or
discountable. Therefore, we would concur with a determination that the proposed project "may
affect", but is "not likely to adversely affect" the northern long-eared bat as long as the
moratorium is observed.
According to Service records, the periphery and eastern portion of the project site may contain
suitable habitat for the federally endangered Schweinitz's sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzii).
The Schweinitz's sunflower occurs in relatively open habitats—road, power -line, and other
maintained rights-of-way; early successional fields; forest ecotonal margins; forest clearings; etc.
It thrives in full sun but also grows in the light shade of open stands of oak -pine -hickory. This
species generally occurs on soils characterized as moist to dryish clays, clay-loams, or sandy -
clay loams that often have high gravel content. The species is known from a variety of soil types,
including Iredell (Fine, Montmorillonitic, Thermic Typic Hapluduff), Enon (Fine, Mixed,
Thermic Ultic Hapludalf), and Cecil (Clayey, Kaolinitic, Thermic Typic Hapludult). According
to our records, the nearest recent occurrence of this species exists less than 4.5 miles away in
soils similar to those that are present at the project site (Iredell fine sandy loam).
In accordance with the Act, it is the responsibility of the appropriate federal agency or its
designated representative to review its activities or programs and to identify any such activities
or programs that may affect endangered or threatened species or their habitats. If it is determined
that the proposed activity may adversely affect any species federally listed as endangered or
threatened, formal consultation with this office must be initiated.
The Service appreciates the opportunity to comment on this project. Please contact Mr. Byron
Hamstead of our staff at 828/258-3939, Ext. 225, if you have any questions. In any future
correspondence concerning this project, please reference our Log Number 4-2-16-059.
Sincerely,
- - original signed - -
Janet A. Mizzi
Field Supervisor
2

Thu, Dec 10, 2015 4:52 PM
Subject: USFWS Response: Hornet/Frito Lay Expansion
Date: Thursday, December 10, 2015 4:35 PM
From: Hamstead, Byron <[e-mail]>
To: <[e-mail]>
Conversation: USFWS Response: Hornet/Frito Lay Expansion
Mr. Wyant,
Attached is the Service's response for the project referenced above. Please contact me
should you have any questions.
In the future, send similar requests to me that you may have previously sent to Bryan
Tompkins. I look forward to working with you.
Regards,
Byron
Byron Hamstead
Fish and Wildlife Biologist
USFWS Asheville Field Office
160 Zillicoa St., Suite B
Asheville, NC, 28801
828-258-3939 ext. 225
This email correspondence an any attachments to and from this sender is subject to the
Freedom of Information Act and may be disclosed to third parties.
Page 1 of 3

United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE.SERVICE
.k-;UV111C 1,166 Of`.itt
160 ZfIticoa SLT-Nli
Asheville. North Carolina
December I4,, 2015
NIL Craig R. Wyant RLA)SWS
A Fine Lige Design
Host Office, Fox 163
High Shoals, North Carolina 28977
Gear lir. Wyant:
Subject: Proposed HometlFrito Lay Expansion FroJiect; Mecklenburg County, NorthCarolina
Log No. 4-2-16-059
The U.S. Fish and Wild]ife Service (Service) has reviewed your letter for the above -referenced
project dated and sent via email on November 20, 2015- In your letter, you requested our revieiv
of the site for known federally protected species. We submit the following Comments in
accordance with the provisions of the Fish and Wi[d]ite Coordination Act as amended
(16 U-S.C. 661-667e)-, the National Environmental Pol icy Act (42 L.S.C..4321. et seq.); and
section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531-1.5 43) (Act).
f iiect Descripjmgn
According to the information you provided, your client proposes to construct a parking and
distribution truck turnaround area on a partially wooded 17_95 acre lot in Charlotte, North
Carolina. You indicated that proposed proiect would result in permanent impacts to two
wetlands (0.35 acre and 0.06 acre) that are isolated from surface waters. Your letter did not
indicate if you are proposing any compensatory mitigation for the proposed impact`s.
According to our record&, the landcover within the proposed project area and surroundings
primari ly consists of medium- and high-intensity development and Southern piedrnont dry oak -
pine forest_
Federally Listed Endangered and Threatened Species
In your letter you stage that, "the site &vs no exhibit suitable ha birat,ffir any q the fured speciies
known !'D accur in the arC'a-- In the interest of preventing or mitigating for impacts to federally
protected species, the Service respectfully requests that you elaborate an the basis for this
Page 2 of 3

x9sertion given your bmiiiarily witli the site_
Page 3 of 3

OOMP �lto EX. CONCRETE /\
�C,NCRF
O
Ix
A S OOpORF>E
(1 / r
�� TOOPORErF 1 4Sph�i, \
IFX cR4�<
Fk Gq
45pyq�T
1
FSTPopCRFEIE \ / C
o
l �
r_f L x
77
EX. CHAIN LINK FENCE
ORMERLY
N INC.
15 M8: 17-424
241-03
FRITO-LAY GES BUILDING AND PARKING LOT ADDITION
M
7r'Rl PROJECT HORNET
Good fun! CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
SWM -1
PHASE 1 DRY TIE
DETENTION BASIN BM #1. N65°41'41"E
"Z4111 224.88'
636 —
37—
8 638 o
X39 \ \ w o
12
\/ \644
v�
\ �> WETLAND #2 — m
.who
640
-642
—645 \\
NN � \\
o \
\\\ \
WETLAND #1
637 636 % (0.35 ac.) \\\\V
—777 c
SWM -3
PHASE 1 SAND FILTER
SWM -2
PHASE 1 SAND FILTER
SEDIMENTATION CHAMBER
HA5KELL ARCHITECTS and ENGINEERS, N.A. A WETLAND MITIGA
NORTH CAROLINA - Architecture # 51202, Engineering # C-2136
MASK E L L The Haskell Company
I I Riverside Avenue
Jacksonville, Florida 32202
Phone # [phone] No DESCRIPTIC
0 80 160
PERMIT ISSUE
NOT FOR OONSTRWrION
"111—° �TRRRR AnG�R.TRRR RL TMG°ss EswITM
coAGe�vcv PR oio�NAL AcnO aVRiR RRVG ouG ANo
PPROVAL
12/23/15 Sheet Number:
EXHIBIT 01
Project No.:
33682201
F Uiy� F
HCP #3
MICHAEL H. WHEELER, P.E.
CIVIL ENGIN5ER
i
N.
$ a
REG. Nib 743"iia
■
II
r
r
ii
O
o
l �
r_f L x
77
EX. CHAIN LINK FENCE
ORMERLY
N INC.
15 M8: 17-424
241-03
FRITO-LAY GES BUILDING AND PARKING LOT ADDITION
M
7r'Rl PROJECT HORNET
Good fun! CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
SWM -1
PHASE 1 DRY TIE
DETENTION BASIN BM #1. N65°41'41"E
"Z4111 224.88'
636 —
37—
8 638 o
X39 \ \ w o
12
\/ \644
v�
\ �> WETLAND #2 — m
.who
640
-642
—645 \\
NN � \\
o \
\\\ \
WETLAND #1
637 636 % (0.35 ac.) \\\\V
—777 c
SWM -3
PHASE 1 SAND FILTER
SWM -2
PHASE 1 SAND FILTER
SEDIMENTATION CHAMBER
HA5KELL ARCHITECTS and ENGINEERS, N.A. A WETLAND MITIGA
NORTH CAROLINA - Architecture # 51202, Engineering # C-2136
MASK E L L The Haskell Company
I I Riverside Avenue
Jacksonville, Florida 32202
Phone # [phone] No DESCRIPTIC
0 80 160
PERMIT ISSUE
NOT FOR OONSTRWrION
"111—° �TRRRR AnG�R.TRRR RL TMG°ss EswITM
coAGe�vcv PR oio�NAL AcnO aVRiR RRVG ouG ANo
PPROVAL
12/23/15 Sheet Number:
EXHIBIT 01
Project No.:
33682201
F Uiy� F
HCP #3
MICHAEL H. WHEELER, P.E.
CIVIL ENGIN5ER
i
N.
$ a
REG. Nib 743"iia

Good
650 -
640 -
630 -
0+00 1+00
WETLAND #1 NORTH -SOUTH GRADING PROFILE
HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1" = 30'
VERTICAL SCALE: 1" = 3'
FRITO-LAY GES BUILDING AND PARKING LOT ADDITION
PROJECT HORNET
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
HASKELL ARCHITECTS and ENGINEERS, N.A. A I WETLAND MIT
NORTH CAROLINA - Architecture # 51202, Engineering # C-2136
MASK E L L The Haskell Company
I I I Riverside Avenue
Jacksonville, Florida 32202
Phone # [phone] Nn nF.grpu
2+00
-650
-640
630
2+75
PERMIT ISSUE
Nor Fon ooNO M M11111
Sheet Number:
EXHIBIT 02
Project No.:
33682201
MICHAEL H, WHEELER, P.E.
CIVIL ENGIf gER,
-z
7.. �7_., T •`�011e Doffs.{- ,i Y
`� REG. Fi2'G31
LIMITS OF EXISTING
WETLAND
01
EXISTING
GRADE
PROPOSED\\�\j
GRADE
x /\ x \xX/
�\ \\/\\/\\/\\/
//\�//\�//\�//
\\\
'Ax/
X/
0+00 1+00
WETLAND #1 NORTH -SOUTH GRADING PROFILE
HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1" = 30'
VERTICAL SCALE: 1" = 3'
FRITO-LAY GES BUILDING AND PARKING LOT ADDITION
PROJECT HORNET
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
HASKELL ARCHITECTS and ENGINEERS, N.A. A I WETLAND MIT
NORTH CAROLINA - Architecture # 51202, Engineering # C-2136
MASK E L L The Haskell Company
I I I Riverside Avenue
Jacksonville, Florida 32202
Phone # [phone] Nn nF.grpu
2+00
-650
-640
630
2+75
PERMIT ISSUE
Nor Fon ooNO M M11111
Sheet Number:
EXHIBIT 02
Project No.:
33682201
MICHAEL H, WHEELER, P.E.
CIVIL ENGIf gER,
-z
7.. �7_., T •`�011e Doffs.{- ,i Y
`� REG. Fi2'G31

650-
50
640-
640
630-
630
LIMITS OF EXISTING WETLAND 01
EXISTING
GRADE
//
PROPOSED A
GRADE
I / �/
/
/�
\//
0+00 1+00
WETLAND #1 EAST -WEST GRADING PROFILE
HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1" = 30'
VERTICAL SCALE: 1" = 3'
FRITO-LAY GES BUILDING AND PARKING LOT ADDITION HASKELL ARCHITECTS and ENGINEERS, KA. A I WETLAND MIT
NORTH CAROLINA - Architecture # 51202, Engineering # C-2136
PROJECT HORNET NASKELL The Haskell Company
I I I Riverside Avenue
Jacksonville, Florida 32202
Good ung CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA Phone # [phone] No DESCRII
2+00
• 650
M
630
2+25
PERMIT ISSUE
Nor Fon ooNO M M11111
F 11 F111 III 11111 TIINI" IEI 111ELI F01 11111
NI
Sheet Number:
EXHIBIT 03
Project No.:
33682201
MICHAEL H, WHEELER, P.E.
CIVIL ENGIf gER,
w MR
01
0+00 1+00
WETLAND #1 EAST -WEST GRADING PROFILE
HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1" = 30'
VERTICAL SCALE: 1" = 3'
FRITO-LAY GES BUILDING AND PARKING LOT ADDITION HASKELL ARCHITECTS and ENGINEERS, KA. A I WETLAND MIT
NORTH CAROLINA - Architecture # 51202, Engineering # C-2136
PROJECT HORNET NASKELL The Haskell Company
I I I Riverside Avenue
Jacksonville, Florida 32202
Good ung CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA Phone # [phone] No DESCRII
2+00
• 650
M
630
2+25
PERMIT ISSUE
Nor Fon ooNO M M11111
F 11 F111 III 11111 TIINI" IEI 111ELI F01 11111
NI
Sheet Number:
EXHIBIT 03
Project No.:
33682201
MICHAEL H, WHEELER, P.E.
CIVIL ENGIf gER,
w MR

:�1
630 -
PROPOSED-
ROPOSED GRADE
GRADE
LIMITS OF EXIS�ING WETLAND
r
70,i
EXISTING
GRADE
mx/
_
FRITO-LAY GES BUILDING AND PARKING LOT ADDITION
PROJECT HORNET
Good fun! CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
0+00 1+00
WETLAND #2 NORTH -SOUTH GRADING PROFILE
HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1" = 30'
VERTICAL SCALE: 1" = 3'
HASKtLL AKUNl I to 15 and tNU1N1=tKS, K
NORTH CAROLINA - Architecture # 51202, Engineering # C-2136
MASK E L L The Haskell Company
I I Riverside Avenue
Jacksonville, Florida 32202
Phone # [phone]
2+00
WETLAND MITIGATION 112/23/15
-640
630
2+25
PERMIT ISSUE
NOT FOR 00NOTF11=1011
Sheet Number:
EXHIBIT 04
Project No.:
33682201
MICHAEL H. WHEELER, P.E.
CIVIL ENGIN5ER
REG. Flt 74'3"iia

.�l
PROP(
GF
630
626
LIMITS OF
ISTING WETLAf
EXISTING
0+00 1+00
WETLAND #2 EAST -WEST GRADING PROFILE
HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1" = 30'
VERTICAL SCALE: 1" = 3'
640
630
—1- 626
1+75
FRITO-LAY GES BUILDING AND PARKING LOT ADDITION HASKELL ARCHITECTS and ENGINEERS, N.H. A WETLAND MITIGATION 12/23/15
NORTH CAROLINA - Architecture # 51202, Engineering # C-2136
Way;PROJECT HORNET HASKELL The Haskell Company
I I I Riverside Avenue
Jacksonville, Florida 32202
Good fuYll CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA Phone # [phone] No DESCRIPTION DATE
MICHAEL H. WHEELER, P.E.
PERMIT ISSUE
I
CIVIL ENGINEER
NOT FOR 00NOTF11=1011
Sheet Number:
EXHIBIT 05
i
Project No.:
33682201
RE 74363