20240060 Ver 1_More Info Received - Applicant Update_20240220

Baker, Caroline D
From: Perry Isner <[e-mail]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2024 5:20 PM
To: Martin, Matthew K CIV (USA)
Cc: [e-mail]; Thomas, Zachary T
Subject: [External] Re: [Non-DoD Source] Re: Request for Additional Information:
SAW-2023-02500 (NCRR Industrial / US Hwy 42 Business / Clayton NC / Johnston
County)
Attachments: NCRRI ndustrial_PCN p 1 &2.pdf
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless verified. Report suspicious emails with the Report Message
button located on your Outlook menu bar on the Home tab.
Good afternoon Matthew, hope you are well. After discussion with Garretson at Redgate it was determined that
the applicant will be NCRR rather than Redgate; see statement from him below:
"With respect to the Agent Authorization and Redgate's involvement in the project. Redgate has been hired by NCRR to
be their Development Manager for this project, leading all consultant and contractor teams through the design,
permitting, construction, lease up, and stabilization phases. Redgate has no ownership in the deal, property, or any
aspect of the project. Ultimately, NCRR will continue to own and operate this development at completion. For all Town
of Clayton related permits, the permit holder is NCRR, with NCRR issuing payments for the various fees as required."
As such I have updated the PCN accordingly, and the revised pages 1&2 are attached here. Please let me know if you
have any questions. Thanks,
On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 11:48 AM Martin, Matthew K CIV (USA) <[e-mail]> wrote:
Perry,
Thank you for the reply and the additional information. Within 15 days please include the following requested
information.
• Agent authorization form for the applicant that your firm is representing (Redgate). The previously provided
form is for the landowner.

4. Applicant Information (if clW%rwd from owner)
40. Applicant is:
❑ Agent © O6w, spedy: Developer
4b. Name:
Gametwn Browne
40 Business name
f a Ibag :
Redgate
4d. Streetaddress:
223 S. West Street Suite 900
4e. City, state, zip:
Raleigh, NC 27603
4f. Telephone no.:
919.819A427
49. Fax no,
rds
4h. Email address:
gamMsbn.bruwne@redgete-re.00m
3. AgeriVConsultant lMmmatl—(if applicabta(
58. Neme:
Perry Isner
5b. Businessblename
da Ilca:
WeOends8 Waters, Inc.
5c. Street address:
328 East Broad Sheet Suite D
5d. City, slate, zip:
Statesville, NC 28877
5e. Telephone no.:
704.773.4239
51. Faz no.:
n/a
59. Email address:
[e-mail]
Thank you,
Matthew K. Martin, PWS
Regulatory Specialist
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
CE-SAW-RG-R
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
Mobile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
We would appreciate your feedback on how we are performing our duties. Our automated Customer Service Survey
can be accessed by copying and pasting the following link into your web browser:
https://re_ uq latory.ops.usace.army.mil/customer-service-surveyl. Thank you for taking the time to visit this site and
complete the survey.
From: Perry Isner <[e-mail]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2024 1:40 PM
To: Martin, Matthew K CIV (USA) <[e-mail]>

Cc: [e-mail]; Thomas, Zachary T <zachary.thomas@deg. nc.gov>
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] Re: Request for Additional Information: SAW-2023-02500 (NCRR Industrial / US Hwy 42
Business / Clayton NC / Johnston County)
Good afternoon Matt, hope you are well. Below are responses to your request for additional information. Please let
me know if you have any questions about the provided information.
1. The Red -Cockaded Woodpecker (RCW) requires old, living pine trees to excavate roosts and nest
cavities; additionally, suitable nesting habitat for the RCW include pine stands with a low or sparse understory and
ample old -growth pines. The site does not contain potentially suitable habitat for the Red -cockaded Woodpecker as the
age of the existing pine stands on site are relatively young (<30 years), with a dense understory. The NC NHP report
indicates no known occurrences of the RCW within a one -mile radius of the project area.
Approximately 2500' downstream of the project area is an existing impoundment of the continuation of Tributary 1;
according to a review of historic aerial images, this impoundment has been present since at least 1957. Given the size
and longevity of this offsite impounding structure, it would act as a significant barrier to aquatic life passage. As such, it
is our assessment that the headwater tributaries on site have been effectively cut off from the biological community of
the downstream receiving waters, and therefore do not constitute potentially suitable habitat for any of the protected
aquatic species known to occur in this region. The NC NHP report indicates no known occurrences of any of the
protected aquatic species known to occur in this region within a one -mile radius of the project area.
2. From the project engineer: "The site was designed to minimize long term impacts to the wetlands and streams to the
maximum extent practicable. The site was designed with 3:1 slopes. Greater than 3:1 slopes on site would lead to
potential erosion and sedimentation issues into the wetlands and streams. The minimum width for safe movement of
fire trucks and other necessary vehicles were done on sides bordering wetlands. The use of retaining walls near impacts
are not feasible due to proximity to building footings and storm structures within the roadway. The walls would need to
be more of a financial burden due to these factors. The site was graded to minimize the amount of ponds and
uncontained flows into the wetlands and streams. This included raising the site above high groundwater and other soil
factors to properly convey all impervious areas to ponds on site. With this design, no undetained impervious areas enter
wetlands or streams on site. The buildings on site are designed and sized to make the site financially feasible. Reduction
in building footprint, parking, and associated infrastructure, reduces the marketability of the site and reduces the
likelihood of the project being buildable."
3. See attached agent authorization.
On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 4:01 PM Martin, Matthew K CIV (USA) <[e-mail]> wrote:
Perry,

Good morning, my name is Matt Martin and I have been assigned as the project manager for your project. Thank you
for your PCN, dated December 22nd, 2023, for the above referenced project. I have reviewed the information and need
clarification before proceeding with verifying the use of Nationwide Permits (NWP) 39. Please submit the requested
information below (via e-mail is fine) within 30 days of receipt of this Notification or we may consider your application
withdrawn and close the file. Please email ([e-mail]) me if you have any questions/concerns
or would like to set up at time to discuss.
1.Per General Condition 18, no activity is authorized under any NWP which is likely to directly or indirectly
jeopardize the continued existence of a threatened or endangered species or a species proposed for such
designation, as identified under the Federal Endangered Species Act (ESA), or which will directly or indirectly
destroy or adversely modify designated critical habitat or critical habitat proposed for such designation.
a.To verify compliance with Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act please include a discussion of habitat
for federally listed species shown on your IPaC. For aquatic species listed on the site a Suitable Habitat
Assessment should be conducted, including qualifying descriptions with measurements and
photographs provided to USACE.
2.Per General Condition 23 (a) The activity must be designed and constructed to avoid and minimize adverse
effects, both temporary and permanent, to waters of the United States to the maximum extent practicable at
the project site (i.e., on site).
a.Please directly address how general 23(a) has been met at impact sites 2 and 4. If further avoidance and
minimization is not practicable, please provide justification for the size of this building and explain
how avoiding or minimizing is not practicable.
Matthew K. Martin, PWS
Regulatory Specialist
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
CE-SAW-RG-R
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
Mobile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
We would appreciate your feedback on how we are performing our duties. Our automated Customer Service Survey
can be accessed by copying and pasting the following link into your web browser:

https:Hregulatory.ops.usace.army.mil/customer-service-survey/. Thank you for taking the time to visit this site and
complete the survey.
Perry Isner
Wetlands & Waters, Inc.
328 East Broad St. Suite D
Statesville, NC 28677
704.773.4239
perryisner(c�wetlands-waters.com
0
The information contained in this email message is confidential and may be legally privileged and is intended only for the use of the
individual or entity named above. If you are not an intended recipient or if you have received this message in error, you are hereby notified
that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this email is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately
notify us by return email or telephone if the sender's phone number is listed above, then promptly and permanently delete this message.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration.
Perry Isner
Wetlands & Waters, Inc.
328 East Broad St. Suite D
Statesville, NC 28677
704.773.4239

perryisnerCa)-wetlands-waters.com
0
The information contained in this email message is confidential and may be legally privileged and is intended only for the use of the individual
or entity named above. If you are not an intended recipient or if you have received this message in error, you are hereby notified that any
dissemination, distribution or copy of this email is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify us by
return email or telephone if the sender's phone number is listed above, then promptly and permanently delete this message. Thank you for
your cooperation and consideration.