The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About780091_Routine_202402200 Division of Water Resources ❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency Facility Number: 780091 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS780091 ❑ Denied Access Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine Inactive Or Closed Date: County: Robeson Date of Visit: 02/12/2024 Entry Time: 12:45 pm Exit Time: 1:00 pm Farm Name: 5075 & 5076 Owner: Murphy -Brown LLC Mailing Address: PO Box 487 Physical Address: Region: Fayetteville Incident #: Owner Email: Phone: 910-296-1800 Warsaw NC 283980487 Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy -Brown LLC Location of Farm: Latitude: 34' 37' 28" Longitude: 79' 23' 26" take hway 130/83 from Maxton. Turn SE (left) on SR 1107. Go past SR 1131 on left. Turn right on farm path Question Areas: Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application Records and Documents Other Issues Certified Operator: Ronald Lee Matthews Operator Certification Number: 990008 Secondary OIC(s): On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone 24 hour contact name Mike Cudd On -site representative Mike Cudd Primary Inspector: Katie Fontenot Phone: Inspector Signature: Date: Secondary Inspector(s): Inspection Summary: Records were reviewed in January 2024 DWR staff noticed beans were being pumped on Oct 2023 but on your IRR-2 they are labled as being pumped on wheat. When DWR showed up for routine compliance inspection the same piviot P-5 that staff saw pumping in october was currently pumping with NO CROP, but was documend as being pumped on Wheat. Smithfield planted a wheat crop on saturday the next day and plans to harvest properly. Make sure all member on your team are familar with the WUP. Make sure you OIC is doing their 24-hour checks. Make sure all your record keeping is consistent with the actual pumping events. Page 1 of 5 Permit: AWS78009' Owner: Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number:780091 Inspection Date:02/12/24 Inspection TypeCompliance Inspection Reason for Visit:Routine Regulated Operations Swine Design Capacity Current promotions Swine - Wean to Finish 20,660 I 20,660 Total Design Capacity: 20,660 Total SSLW: 2,375,900 Waste Structures Effective Built Closed Designated Observed Type Identifier Date Date Date Freeboard Freeboard Lagoon 7075 06/06/2006 I 10/01 /2019 31.00 Lagoon 7075(B) 06/06/2006 10/01/2019 29.00 44.00 Lagoon 7075A 03/07/2005 I D1/01/1997 27.80 44.00 Lagoon 7075B 03/07/2005 D1/01/1997 27.80 Lagoon 7076 06/06/2006 I 10/01 /2019 29.00 Lagoon 7076(B) 06/06/2006 10/01/2019 29.00 44.00 Lagoon 7076A 03/07/2005 I D1/01/1997 30.36 44.00 Lagoon 7076B 03/07/2005 D3/31/1997 30.36 Page 2 of 5 Permit: AWS78009' Owner: Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number: 780091 Inspection Date:02/12/24 Inspection TypeCompliance Inspection Reason for Visit:Routine Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ❑ ❑ Discharge originated at: Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other ❑ a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ State other than from a discharge? Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes No NA NE 4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard? ❑ 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ larc ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)? 6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ ❑ ❑ waste management or closure plan? 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ ❑ ❑ 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicablE ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ ❑ ❑ maintenance or improvement? Waste Application Yes No NA NE 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ maintenance or improvement? 11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ If yes, check the appropriate box below. Excessive Ponding? ❑ Hydraulic Overload? ❑ Frozen Ground? ❑ Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑ PAN? ❑ Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.? ❑ Total Phosphorus? ❑ Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? ❑ Outside of acceptable crop window? Evidence of wind drift? ❑ Application outside of application area? ❑ Crop Type 1 Corn, Wheat, Soybeans Page 3 of 5 Permit: AWS78009' Owner: Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number: 780091 Inspection Date:02/12/24 Inspection TypeCompliance Inspection Reason for Visit:Routine Waste Application Yes No NA NE Crop Type 2 Coastal Bermuda Grass (Pasture) Crop Type 3 Crop Type 4 Crop Type 5 Crop Type 6 Soil Type 1 Goldsboro loamy sand, 0 to 2% slopes Soil Type 2 Lynchburg sandy loam Soil Type 3 Rains sandy loam Soil Type 4 Soil Type 5 Soil Type 6 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ Management Plan(CAWMP)? 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ determination? 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ Records and Documents Yes No NA NE 19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ If yes, check the appropriate box below. WUP? ❑ Checklists? ❑ Design? ❑ Maps? ❑ Lease Agreements? ❑ Other? ❑ If Other, please specify 21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ If yes, check the appropriate box below. Waste Application? ❑ Weekly Freeboard? ❑ Waste Analysis? ❑ Soil analysis? ❑ Waste Transfers? ❑ Weather code? ❑ Rainfall? ❑ Page 4 of 5 Permit: AWS78009' Owner: Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number: 780091 Inspection Date:02/12/24 Inspection TypeCompliance Inspection Reason for Visit:Routine Records and Documents Yes No NA NE Stocking? ❑ Crop yields? ❑ 120 Minute inspections? ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey ❑ 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ ❑ ❑ 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipmen ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ (NPDES only)? 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ appropriate box(es) below: Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon ❑ List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ Other Issues Yes No NA NE 28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates? 29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit, ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application) 31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ If yes, check the appropriate box below. Application Field ❑ Lagoon / Storage Pond ❑ Other ❑ If Other, please specify 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ CAW M P? 33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ 34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ Page 5 of 5