820334_routine_20240320

Division of Water Resources
Facility N lituifiher'_,'
Divisiou of, Soil aftd.Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: aCompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation Technical Assistance
C
Reason for Visit: ,Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: ammN Region:
Farm Name: 3T Owner Email:
Owner Name: Fe CW U 0 Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
Ousite Representative: MUK f-E aho r!
Certified Operator: �Q rfl-Q
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Phone:
Integrator: PmMie
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Design uk-refit
:Design Current
)6igfiCurre t
Swine Capacity
Wet Poultry '
Capacity pop.,,
I �Cap 1PoppWean
to Finish
F
Layer
Dairy Cow
\4
Wean to Feeder
IkAN
Non -Layer
Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish
�V­.
Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean
Design -Current
Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder
Dry, Poultry
Capacity Pop.
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
Layers
Beef Stocker
Gilts
Non -Layers
Beef Feeder
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other lSq-11
Turkey Poults
J
A,
FT
FOther
4,
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: E] Structure 0 Application Field F-1 Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
[:] Yes P No F-1 NA [:] NE
❑ Yes No F-1 NA E] NE
❑ Yes No F-1 NA Ej NE
❑ Yes
No
F-1 NA
[:] NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
E] NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
[:] NE
Page I of 3 511212020 Continued

Facility Number: jDate of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?: �] _
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
0
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
�4 No ❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ONE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes � No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window
indowr n ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): � `� H a '1 , l' Yj
13. Soil Type(s): r J
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Tra sfers
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes 0 No
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? 0 Yes ((No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑NA ❑NE
❑NA ❑NE
Page 2 of 3 511212020 Continued

Facility Number: I jDate of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes No
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes MjNo
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes [K No
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWW?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signatut
Page 3 of 3
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes M No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes "Z No ❑ NA ❑ NE
[:]Yes 17 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes � No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes P
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ YesLN
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Phone:q 19 w
Date: �j 2
511212020