HomeMy WebLinkAbout820229_structrual inspection_202403120 Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 820229 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS820229 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Structure Evaluation Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Follow-up County: Sampson Region: Fayetteville
Date of Visit: 03/14/2024 Entry Time: 01:00 pm Exit Time: 2:00 pm Incident #:
Farm Name: P&J Farms Owner Email:
Owner: Nelson Porter Phone: 910-594-0061
Mailing Address: 216 Bizzell St Newton Grove NC 283667500
Physical Address: 5394 William R King Rd Newton Grove NC 28366
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35' 13' 53" Longitude: 78' 16' 54"
4 miles E.on Hwy. 50 and 55 from Newton Grove turn right on Rufus B King Rd. 1/2 mile on left.
Question Areas:
Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Other Issues
Certified Operator: Elbert N Porter Operator Certification Number: 17890
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Curtis Barwick
On -site representative Curtis Barwick
Primary Inspector: Steve Guyton Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Katie Fontenot
Inspection Summary:
DWR staff did a follow up visit to perform a structural inspection. The farm is in the process of closing their lagoons and had the
"old" lagoon empty and the "New lagoon" was in the progress of agetation and removing sludge. DWR staff had no concerns with
the status of the old lagoons sludge remal from the actual lagoon itself. DWR will complete a second follow up visit to perform a
structrual evaluation when the "new" lagoon is compelted.
Page 1 of 3
Permit: AWS8202Z Owner: Nelson Porter Facility Number:820229
Inspection Date:03/14/24 Inspection TypeStructure Evaluation Reason for Visit:Follow-up
Regulated Operations
Swine
Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine - Feeder to Finish 2,700 I 0
Total Design Capacity: 2,700
Total SSLW: 364,500
Waste Structures
Effective Built Closed Designated Observed
Type Identifier Date Date Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon
1
03/15/2005
I D1/01/199C
19.00
0.00
Lagoon
2
03/15/2005
D1/01/199C
19.00
0.00
Lagoon
NEW
05/10/2006
I
10/01 /2019
19.00
Lagoon
OLD
05/10/2005
10/01 /2019
19.00
Page 2 of 3
Permit: AWS8202Z Owner: Nelson Porter Facility Number: 820229
Inspection Date:03/14/24 Inspection TypeStructure Evaluation Reason for Visit:Follow-up
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
MEIEI
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Led larc
❑
0 ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
0 ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicablE
❑
000
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Other Issues
Yes
No NA NE
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
0 ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
MEIEI
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit,
❑
0 ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
0 ❑
❑
CAW M P?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
0 ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Page 3 of 3