The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About310039_Digester Influent/Effluent Sampling Q1_20240419ANALYTICAL & CONSULTING CHEMISTS Environmental Chemists, Inc. 6602 Windmill Way, Wilmington, NC 28405 ■ 910.392.0223 Lab 1 910.392.4424 Fax 710 Bowsertown Road, Manteo, NC 27954 ■ 252,473.5702 Lab/Fax 255-A Wilmington Highway, Jacksonville, NC 28540 • 910.347.5843 Lab Fax infotc�environmentalchemists.com Smithfield Hog Productions - Warsaw Date of Report: Apr 10, 2024 Post Office Box 856 Customer PO #: Warsaw NC 28398 Customer ID: 08110011 Attention: Report #: 2024-07439 Project ID: Wastewater/Digester Lab ID Sample ID: Collect Date/Time Matrix Sampled by 24-17981 Site: Influent 3/29/2024 12:10 PM Water Derek Brown Test Method Results Date Analyzed Sulfur EPA 200.7 49.4 mg/L 04/09/2024 Copper EPA 200.7, Rev 4.4. 1994 2.06 mg/L 04/04/2024 Zinc EPA 200.7, Rev 4.4. 1994 2.98 mg/L 04/04/2024 pH SM 4500 H B-2011 7.8 units 04/02/2024 Result estimated Analyzed out of 15 minutes hold time. Ammonia Nitrogen SM 4500 NH3 C-2011 679 mg/L 04/02/2024 Total Phosphorus SM 4500 P (F-H)-2011 56.0 mg/L 04/05/2024 Fecal Coliform SM 9222 D-2015 MF >600000 Colonies1100ml- 03/29/2024 Total Nitrogen (Cale) Nitrate+ N itrite-N itrogen EPA353.2, Rev. 20, 1993 0.33 mglL 04/04/2024 Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen (TKN) SM 4500 Norg B-2011 873 mglL 04/04/2024 Total Nitrogen Total Nitrogen 873 mglL 04/05/2024 Report #: 2024-07439 Page 1 of 2 Environmental Chemists, Inc. 1 ` W ANALYTICAL & CONSULTING CHEMISTS Smithfield Hog Productions - Warsaw Post Office Box 856 Warsaw NC 28398 Attention: 6602 Windmill Way, Wilmington, NC 28405 • 910-392,0223 Lab • 910.392.4424 Fax 710 Bowsertown Road, Manteo, NC 27954 ■ 252.473.5702 Lab/Fax 255-A Wilmington Highway, Jacksonville, NC 28540 ■ 910.347.5843 Lab/Fax info@environmentaichemists.com Date of Report: Apr 10, 2024 Customer PO #: Customer ID: 08110011 Report #: 2024-07439 Project ID: Wastewater/Digester Lab ID Sample ID: Collect Date/Time Matrix Sampled by 24-17984 Site: Effluent 3/29/2024 12:20 PM Water Derek Brown Test Method Results Date Analyzed Sulfur EPA 200.7 47.7 mg/L 04/09/2024 Copper EPA 200 7. Rev 4A4 1994 2.87 mg/L 04/04/2024 Zinc EPA 200 7, Rev 4.4, 1994 3.13 mg/L 04/04/2024 pH SM 4500 H B-2011 7.2 units 04/02/2024 Result estimated. Analyzed out of 15 minutes hold time. Ammonia Nitrogen SM 4500 NH3 C-2011 40.5 mg/L 04/02/2024 Total Phosphorus SM 4500 P (F-H)-2011 77.8 mg/L 04/05/2024 Fecal Coliform SM 9222 D-2015MF 180000 Colonies/100mL 03/29/2024 Total Nitrogen (Cale) Nitrate+Nitrite-Nitrogen EPA 363.2. Rev 2 0, 1993 0.11 mg/L 04/04/2024 Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen (TKN) SM 4500 Norg B-2011 1120 mg/L 04/04/2024 Total Nitrogen Total Nitrogen 1120 mg/L 04/05/2024 Comment: Reviewed by: Report # 2024-07439 Page 2 of 2 Environmental Chemist, Inc., Wilmington, NC Lab #94 6602 Windmill Way Wilmington, NC 28405 910.392.0223 Sample Receipt Checklist Date:-3L4 h Report Number: _ 2024- ! Receipt of sample: ECHEM Pickup Client Delivery ❑ JUPS ❑ FedEx ❑ Other ❑ ❑ YES 10 NO 0 N/A 1. Were custody seals present on the cooler? ❑ YES 10 NO I 0 N/A 2. If custody seals were present, were they intact/unbroken? Original temperature upon receipt 13 X °C Corrected temperature upon receipt How temperature taken: ❑ Temperature Blank 17 Against Bottles IR Gun ID: Thomas Traceable S/N 210886869 IR Gun Correction Factor °C: 0.0 0 YES ❑ NO 3. If temperature of cooler exceeded 6°C, was Project Mgr./QA notified? YES ❑ NO 4. Were proper custody procedures (relinquished/received) followed? YES ❑ NO 5. Were sample ID's listed on the COC? 0 YES ❑ NO 6. Were samples ID's listed on sample containers? YES ❑ NO 7. Were collection date and time listed on the COC? 0 YES ❑ NO 8. Were tests to be performed listed on the COC? 0 YES ❑ NO 9. Did samples arrive in proper containers for each test? YES ❑ NO 10. Did samples arrive in good condition for each test? 0 YES ❑ NO 11. Was adequate sample volume available?' 0 YES ❑ NO 12. Were samples received within proper holding time for requested tests? YES ❑ NO 13. Were acid preserved samples received at a pH of <2? YES ❑ NO 14. Were cyanide samples received at a pH >12? YES ❑ NO 15. Were sulfide samples received at a pH >97 YES ❑ NO 16. Were NH3/TKN/Phenol received at a chlorine residual of <0.5 m/L? ** YES ❑ NO 17. Were Sulfide/Cyanide received at a chlorine residual of <0.5 m/L? ❑ YES 10 NO 18. Were orthophosphate samples filtered in the field within 15 minutes? * TOC/Volatiles are pH checked at time of analysis and recorded on the benchsheet. ** Bacteria samples are checked for Chlorine at time of analysis and recorded on the benchsheet. Sample Preservation: Sample(s) by adding (circle one): (Must be completed for any sample(s) incorrectly preserved or with headspace) were received incorrectly preserved and were adjusted accordingly H2SO4 HNO, HCI NaOH me of preservation: If more than one preservative is needed, notate in comments below ite: Notify customer service immediately for incorrectly preserved samples Obtain a new sample or tify the state lab if directed to analyzed by the customer. who was notif,A, date and time: Volatiles Samp were received with headspace COMMENTS: DOC. QA.002 Rev 1 .0 m 4; N m QC CD y 3 1L] � is c a W k ` O 0 m Sample Typo Composite G) 0 G) 0 G) n G? 0 L7 0 O 0 i7 n G) n O n (7 n or Grab G) � Container (P or G) 0 ^ Chlorine mg1L ID � LAB ID NUMBER NONE HCL X N X H2SO4 N X X HNO3 N C C NAOH THIO Z X )C cu W OTHER o Z o Z rn ry (D n W c W rn N N N v 0 c0i m ' a► o � � c � M a d v 3 c to a M a y N O M O < ssa O 1 a o 13 ° a r m r M D � N O1 T1 I D 3 M n M s a i 3 = o m O Z OZ O � � Z n � O r i