The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutNC0074705_Permit Issuance_20060501O� WA�F9 Michael F. Easley Q Governor �O G D. E. Benton Uj r Chief Deputy Secretary p 1V North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director Division of Water Quality May 1, 2006 Mr. Jay Wiese, Vice President Terminal Services Magellan Terminals Holdings, L.P. One Williams Center, MD 27-3 Tulsa, Oklahoma 74172 Subject: Issuance of NPDES Permit NCO074705 7145 Old Mount Holly Road Charlotte I Terminal Mecklenburg County Dear Mr. Wiese: The Division of Water Quality (the Division) hereby issues the attached NPDES permit for the subject facility. This permit is issued pursuant to the requirements of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and the Memorandum of Agreement between North Carolina and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) dated May 9,1994, or as subsequently amended. RENEWAL SUMMARY The Division's renewal evaluation included a reasonable potential analysis (RPA), in accordance with EPA permitting guidance. The Division made the following changes to your previous permit based on data from your Discharge Monitoring Report (DMRs) submitted over the last permit cycle: • Turbidity — RP = Yes; add permit limit (50 NTU); increase monitoring from quarterly to Monthly. • MTBE — deleted from permit (required for WS waters only - not Class C). • Naphthalene — add monthly monitoring to address diesel. • EPA Methods 624/625 — delete monitoring from permit; parameters not detected. If any parts, monitoring frequencies, or sampling requirements contained in this permit are unacceptable to you, you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing, upon written request, within thirty (30) days following receipt of this letter. You must submit this request in the form of a written petition, conforming to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes, and file it with the office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-6714. Unless such a demand is made, this permit shall be final and binding. WIM NCDENR N. C. Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 919-733-5083 Customer Service 1-800-623-7748 Issuance of NPDES Permit NC0074705 Magellan Terminal Holdings, LLC Charlotte I Terminal Page 2of 2 Please notice that this permit is not transferable except after notifying the Division of Water Quality. The Division of Water Quality may modify, or revoke and reissue this permit. This permit does not affect your legal requirements to obtain other permits required by the Division of Water Quality, the Division of Land Resources, the Coastal Area Management Act, or other federal or local governments. If you have questions concerning this permit, please call Joe Corporon at (919) 733-5083, extension 597 or email joe.corporon(a)ncmail.net. Since'reelly, ce : V4..: Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Attached: NPDES Permit, NC0074705 cc: Central Files Aquatic Toxicology Unit Mooresville Regional Office. Surface Water Protection NPDES Proeram Permit NCO074705 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY PERMIT TO DISCHARGE WASTEWATER UNDER THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM DES In compliance with the provisions of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful standards and regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission, and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended, Magellan Terminals Holdings, L.P. is hereby authorized to discharge wastewater from outfalls located at the Magellan Terminals Holdings, L.P. Charlotte I Terminal 7145 Old Mount Holy Road Paw Creek Mecklenburg County to receiving waters designated as an unnamed tributary to Paw Creek in the Catawba River Basin in accordance with effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other conditions set forth in Parts I, II, III and IV hereof. This permit shall become effective June 1, 2006. This permit and authorization to discharge shall expire at midnight on June 30, 2010. Signed this day May 1, 2006. Alan W. Klimek, P.E., D6ector Division of Water Quality By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission Permit NCO074705 SUPPLEMENT TO PERMIT COVER SHEET All previous NPDES Permits issued to this facility, whether for operation or discharge are hereby revoked, and as of this issuance, any previously issued permit bearing this number is no longer effective. Therefore, the exclusive authority to operate and discharge from this facility arises under the permit conditions, requirements, terms, and provisions described herein. Magellan Terminals Holdings, L.P. is hereby authorized: 1. to continue to operate the existing Water Pollution Control System consisting of • oil/water separator and (servicing the truck -loading rack) • carbon filter (servicing the truck -loading rack) • wastewater tank (servicing the truck -loading rack) • diked areas (secondary containment for surface storage tanks) with hand -operated discharge valves (for stormwater and city water used for washing and/or hydrostatic testing), located at the Charlotte I Terminal, 7145 Old Mount Holy Road, Paw Creek, Mecklenburg County, and 2. to discharge from said treatment facility through Outfall 001 at a specified location (see attached map) into an unnamed tributary to Paw Creek, a Class C waterbody located within the Catawba River Basin. Charlotte I Terminal Outfall 001 (Flows south) • ff '• •_1� " Approximate Property Boundary NC Hwy 27 Magellan Terminals Holdings, L.P. Charlotte I Terminal State Grid/Ouad: F15SW(Mt. Island Cake) Latitude: 35016' 45" N Longitude: 80° 55' 30" W Rmciving Stream: UT to Paw Creek Drainage Basin: Catawba River Basin Stream Class: C Sub -Basin: 30834 North ON UT to Paw Creek Permit NCO074705 A. (L) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREINTS During the period beginning on the effective date of the permit and -listing until expiration, the Permittee is authorized to discharge treated stormwater from Outfa11001�Such discharges shall be limited and monitored by the Permittee as specified below: EFFLUENT CIIARACTE TI S LIMITS-'- MONITORING REQUIREMENTS Monthly Average Daily Maximum Measurement Frequency Sample Type Sample Location Fl Episodic 1 Effluent otal Suspended Solids 45.0 m MonthlyGrab Effluent Oil and Grease2 Monthly Grab Effluent Turbidity3 50 NTU Monthly Grab Effluent Benzene Monthly Grab Effluent Toluene Monthly Grab Effluent Ethyl Benzene Monthly Grab Effluent ylene Monthly Grab Effluent hthalene Monthly Grab Effluent Ac e Toxici Annually Grab Effluent Footnote . 1. Flow — D , g periods of no flow, the Permittee shall submit a monthly Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR) indicating "No discharge." Flow must be monitored with each discharge and may be monitored in one of four ways: a) measure flow continuously; b) calculate flow based on total rainfall per area draining to the outfall; exclude built -upon area (best method for facilities with large runoff -collection ponds); c) estimate flow at 20-minute intervals during the entire discharge event; or d) report flow based on discharge pump logs. 2. Oil and Grease — Where possible, the grab sample for oil and grease should be skimmed from the surface of a quiescent (calm water) zone. 3. Turbidity — Effluent shall not cause receiving stream turbidity to exceed 50 NTU. If receiving stream background turbidity exceeds 50 NTU, effluent shall not cause this background value to increase. 4. Acute Toxicity (Fathead Minnow, 24-hour), Annual [see Special Condition A.(2.)]. The Permittee shall discharge no floating solids or foam visible in other than trace amounts. The Permittee shall discharge no tank solids, tank bottom water, or tank rag layer. Following hydrostatic tank or pipe testing, the Permittee shall discharge no wastes containing benzene concentrations greater than 74.1 µg/L, or toluene concentrations greater than 11 µg/L. Permit NCO074705 EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS SPECIAL CONDITIONS A. (2.) ACUTE TOXICITY MONITORING (ANNUAL) The Permittee shall conduct annual toxicity tests using protocols defined as definitive in EPA Document EPA/600/4-90/027 entitled "Methods for Measuring the Acute Toxicity of Effluents to Freshwater and Marine Organisms." The monitoring shall be performed as a Fathead Minnow (Pimephales promelas) 24-hour static test. Effluent samples for self -monitoring purposes must be obtained below all waste treatment. The permittee will conduct one test annually, with the annual period beginning in January of the calendar year of the effective date of the permit. The annual test requirement must be performed and reported by June 30. If no discharge occurs by June 30, notification will be made to the Division by this date. Toxicity testing will be performed on the next discharge event for the annual test requirement. The parameter code for this test is TAE6C. All toxicity testing results, required as part of this permit condition, will be entered on the Effluent Discharge Form (MR-1) for the month in which it was performed, using the appropriate parameter code. Additionally, DWQ Form AT-1 (original) is to be sent to the following address: Attention: North Carolina Division of Water Quality Environmental Sciences Branch 1621 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621 Completed Aquatic Toxicity Test Forms shall be filed with the Environmental Sciences Branch no later than 30 days after the end of the reporting period for which the report is made. Test data shall be complete and accurate and include all supporting chemical/physical measurements performed in association with the toxicity tests, as well as all dose/response data. Total residual chlorine of the effluent toxicity sample must be measured and reported if chlorine is employed for disinfection of the waste stream. Should any test data from either these monitoring requirements or tests performed by the North Carolina Division of Water Quality indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit may be re- opened and modified to include alternate monitoring requirements or limits. NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum control organism survival and appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid test and will require immediate follow-up testing to be completed no later than the last day of the month following the month of the initial monitoring. FILE CONTENTS: Left side: ❑ BIMS Tracking Slip NPDES PERMIT DRAFT & FINAL CHECK LIST EiOROZ-16 Permit No. NPDES Permit Writer: Right side: G. '7e R.Torpo7ial ❑ Streamline Package Sheet (to region, only if streamlined) ❑ Draft Permit Cover Letter. (add new policy text; summarize major changes to0 ❑ Draft Permit (order: cover, supplement, map, effluent sheets, sponditions) ❑ Facility Map (E-Map: include facility Outfalls; U and D sample locations) ❑ Fact Sheet. (documents permit writer's issues and re -issue logic) ❑ Permit Writer's Notes (if not in Facts Sheet -- chronology, strategy, DMR Review, RPA, etc.) ❑ Staff Report from Region (as appropriate — not needed if streamlined) ❑ Old Permit (Text, Effluent Sheets and Special Conditions) ❑ Permit Application. (New Permit or Renewal; any additional pemrittee correspondence) ❑ Acknowledgement Letter (NPDES Unit written response to Renewal Application) ❑ Permittee Responses (to acknowledgement letter, if any) ❑ Waste Load Allocation (reference date; notes if recalculated for current action) Note: Italics indicate special c diti ns not always required or applicable. G Submitted to b V- G rX f`t 7r'Pe I eview: Date 1 6(0 Admin cutoff date 1 B'�/Peer Review completed by (}'. (r`C.d �.�`p ,�(/ Date t9' Updated Public Notice System [date] 1�5 I/// -0 a . Updated BIMS Events: [date] l �p 9�Submitted for Public Notice on /"r/�t. .1Mewspaper Notice Received . Actual Notice date(s) t V/74 Draft Permit &aileE-Mailed) to (Regional Staff) by Date j�/ ❑ Regional Office Review / pprov completed by i%uiia2 Received on [Date] �w ❑ Additional Review by [TOX/DEH] ❑ Additional Review/Approval completed initiated by ❑ EPA Review Draft sent to t"/ tt- initiated by Date Date ❑ EPA Review /Approval [mail / E-mail] completed by Date Received FINAL to Mike / Susan / Tom / Gil r signature on Letter Dated ❑ Additional Review [other] d Final Files transferred to Server (Permits Folder) a -lam BIMS Final Updates: Events ' Limits ✓ Version 060ct05 DWQ Response to Permittee comments on Draft Permit Joe Corporon / NPDES Program April 20, 2006 Magellan Charlotte I Terminal (#NC0074705): 1). Turbidity — Changed from quarterly to monthly. Requesting this be changed back or dropped. No exceedences of turbidity recorded since at least January 2004. Response: The Division evaluates turbidity (and other parameters) using the EPA - mandated Reasonable Potential Analysis, or RPA. This equation evaluates a given parameter's database for reasonable potential to exceed its water -quality stream standard. As in your case, when the RPA maximum predicted for turbidity (88.2 µg/L) exceeds the allowable concentration (standard 50 NTU), the Division adds a limit equal to the standard and monthly monitoring. We apply this consistently across the state. No change to the final permit. 2) Benzene — For hydro test only changed limit from 71.4 ug/1 to 1.19 ug/l. Why so stringent a limit? Can this be changed back or increased? Response: The draft text is in error and will be corrected. For hydrostatic tank testing, the benzene discharge limit of 74.1 µg/L is for Class C waters -- the Limit 1.19 is for Water Supply (WS) waters. Because this facility discharges to Class C, the Final Permit will be corrected to reflect the previous permit limit of 74.1 µg/L 3) Section 1 (Water Pollution Control System) on Supplement to Permit Cover Sheet page: The waste holding tank mentioned would actually be better described as a waste water tank. Also the carbon filter is not part of a ground water remediation system but part of truck -loading rack water treatment. It is used in conjunction with the oil/water separator and wastewater holding tank. Response: The Supplement to Cover page has been revised considering the above: • oil/water separator and (servicing the truck -loading rack) • carbon filter (servicing the truck -loading rack) • wastewater tank (servicing the truck -loading rack) • diked areas (secondary -containment for surface storage tanks) with hand - operated discharge valves (for stormwater and city water used for washing and/or or hydrostatic testing). Thanks for the thorough review of the Draft Permit. DWQ is currently generating the Final Permit for signature and issuance. This final will reflect the above comments and responses. Draft NPDES Permit Review Magellan Charlotte Subject: Draft NPDES Permit Review Magellan Charlotte From: "Potts, Paul" <Paul.Potts@magellanlp.com> Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 11:10:04 -0500 To: <joe.corporon@ncmail.net> CC: "Bowen, Mark" <Mark.Bowen@magellanlp.com> Mr. Corporon: Thank you for the opportunity to comment on our draft NPDES permits for our refined products storage terminals in Charlotte. Please see our comments noted below: Charlotte I Terminal (#NC0074705): 1). Turbidity — Changed from quarterly to monthly. Requesting this be changed back or dropped. No exceedances of turbidity recorded since at least January 2004. 2) Benenze — For hydro test only changed limit from 71.4 ugfl to 1.19 ug/i. Why so stringent a limit? Can this be changed back or increased? 3) Section 1 (Water Pollution Control System) on Supplement to Permit Cover Sheet page: The waste holding tank mentioned would actually be better described as a waste water tank. Also the carbon filter is not part of a ground water remediation system but part of truck -loading rack water treatment. It is used in conjunction with the oil/water separator and waste water holding tank. Charlotte II Terminal (#NC0005185): — 1) Turbidity— Changed from quarterly to monthly. Requesting this be changed back or dropped. No exceedances of turbidity recorded since at least January 2004. 2) MTBE — Request the testing for this parameter be dropped since none has been detected since at least January 2004. Also note this is not a requirement for Charlotte I. 3) Phenol — Request the testing for this parameter be dropped since only sporadic low-level (e.g. 0.012 — 0.14 mg/1) detections have been recorded since at least January 2004. Also note this is not a requirement for Charlotte 1. 4) Benenze — For hydro test only changed limit from 71.4 ug/I to 1.19 ug/l. Why so stringent a limit? Can this be changed back or increased? 5) Section 1 (Water Pollution Control System) on Supplement to Permit Cover Sheet page: It is indicated that the oil/water separator is used to treat stormwater however this is only a physical separation. Can the word "treatment' be dropped in Section 1 and Section 2 (i.e. treatment facility) as to not imply any chemical or filtration processes? 6) Williams Terminal Holdings, LP on cover page and supplement pages needs to be changed to Magellan Terminals Holdings, LP. Please contact me if you have any questions or need any additional information. Thank you again for this opportunity. Paul Potts Sr. Environmental Specialist Magellan Midstream Partners, LP One Williams Center, MD 27-3 Tulsa, OK 74012 918-574-7725 918-574-7247 Fax 1 of 1 4/18/2006 12:24 PM DENR/DWQ FACT SHEET -- NPDES PERMIT DEVELOPMENT NPDES Permit NCO074705 Facility Information Applicant/Facility Name: Magellan Terminals Holding, L.P. - Charlotte I Terminal Applicant Address: Mr. Jay Wiese, Vice President Terminal services Facility Address: 7145 Old Mount Holly Road C H 27), Paw Creek, NC 28130 Permitted Flow Not limited Type of Waste: Diked area stormwater, truck -loading rack wastewater Facility/Permit Status: Active / Renewal County: Mecklenburg Miscellaneous Receiving Stream: UT to Paw Creek Regional Office: Mooresville Stream Classification /Segment: C / [11-120-(2.5)] State Grid / USGS Quad: F 15 SW / Mountain Island Lake 303(d) Listed? No Permit Writer: Joe Corporon Subbasin: 03-08-34 Date: 13Mar06 Drainage Area (mi2): 0.1 La[. 350 16' 45" N Long. 80° 55' 30" W Summer 7 10 cfs) 0.0 Winter 7Q10 (cfs): 0.0 30 2 cfs) 0.0 Average Flow (cfs): 0.0 IWC N: 100% BACKGROUND Waste Load Allocation (WLA) and Bulk -Storage SOP. A Waste Load Allocation was last conducted in March 1993, for discharge to receiving stream, Paw Creek [segment 11-120-(2.5)], classified C waters of the state. The 1993 VILA recommended monitoring for benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylene (BTEX), TSS, Turbidity, oil & grease, pH, and Lead. The Division established new effluent limits and monitoring requirements for the previous permit following Requirements for Discharges from Oil and Petroleum Storage Facilities (SOP 2001, version 30Ju101). This permit required monitoring for benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylene (BTEX), Total Suspended Solids (TSS), Turbidity, Oil & Grease, MTBE, EPA Methods 624/625 (for volatile and semi - volatile organic compounds), and Acute Toxicity appropriate for episodic discharges. In September 2003, Magellan Terminals Holdings, L.P. acquired this facility from previous owner/operator Williams Energy Ventures and registered a name -change with the Division. Stormwater collected from the truck -loading racks area is treated by an oil/water separator and combined with stormwater collected behind diked areas. This combined treated wastewater discharges at Outfall 001. Fact Sheet NPDES NCO074705 Renewal Page I PERMITTING STRATEGY New SOP for Oil Terminals. The Division established renewal criteria for this permit according to the NPDES Permitting Requirements for Petroleum Bulk -Storage 2005 Permitting Strategy, version September 9, 2005 (2005 SOP). This document recommends 12 criteria for renewal including reasonable potential analyses (see Renewal Summary). Reasonable Potential Analysis (RPA): The.Division conducted a reasonable potential analysis (according to EPA guidelines) in order to establish numerical potential for a given parameter to exceed its water quality stream standard. The Division established a list of parameters of concern (POCs) based on the previous permit. However, most permit parameters were not detected during this permit cycle, therefore no RPA was warranted. One exception, Turbidity (with a standard of 50 NTU), indicated reasonable potential with a maximum predicted of 88.2 NTU at the highest reported monthly -average flow of 0.019 MGD. Therefore, a permit limit of 50 NTU (the standard) was added to the permit. Whole Effluent Toxicity (WET) Testing. This facility has "passed" annual toxicity testing for the last five years ("Pass" or LC-50 >100). No changes to the permit recommended. Review of EPA Methods 624/625. The Division reviewed annual analytical data (for the years 2003 through 2005) reported from EPA test methods 624/625 (volatile and semi -volatile hydrocarbon compounds). These test methods did not detect any of the listed parameters at the method levels of detection. RENEWAL SUMMARY • Turbidity — RP = Yes; max predicted 88.2 NTU (n =10 / 10 hits); add permit limit of 50 NTU; increase monitoring from quarterly to Monthly. • MTBE — delete from permit (monitoring for WS water only - not Class Q. • Naphthalene — add monthly monitoring to address diesel, per 2005 SOP. • EPA Methods 624/625 — delete monitoring from permit; parameters not detected. PROPOSED SCHEDULE FOR PERMIT ISSUANCE Draft Permit to Public Notice: Permit Scheduled to Issue: March 15, 2006 May 8, 2006 NPDES DIVISION CONTACT If you have questions regarding any o above information or on the attached permit, please contact Joe Corporon, NPDFyS�rogram, E at 9) 733-5083 ext. 597. Fact Sheet NPDES NCO074705 Renewal Page 2 RMIONAL OFFICE COMMENTS IN'c Off-e�L Flo CO�a2r�7— NAME: ,:j,fW"K aU (�`rfI �Cf �� DATE: 3 Z Gam/a6 TE• NPDES SUPERVISOR: DATE: Fact Sheet NPDES NCO074705 Renewal Page 3 Table 1. Project Information Facility Name WWTP Grade NPDES Permit Outfall Flow, Ow (MGD) Receiving Stream Stream Class 7010s (cfs) 7010w (cfs) 3002 (cfs) OA (cfs) Time Period Data Source(s) lagell,an Terminals Holdings, L.P.,-Charlotte:Terminal I Par01 Par02 Par03 Par04 Par05 Par06 Par07 Par08 Par09 Parl0 Par11 Par12 Par13 Par14 Parl5 Class 1 NC0074705 6 0.019 UT of Paw Creek WS-1V 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Jan 2002 - Dec 2005 DMRs Table 2. Parameters of Concern Name Type Chronic Modifier Acute PQL Units Turbidity It 74705 Magellan I - RPA, input 3/13/2006 REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS Magellan Terminals Holdings, L.P., Charlotte Terminal I Outfall 6 NCO074705 Ow - 0.019 MGD Time Period Jan 2002 - Dec 2005 Ow (MQD) 0.019 WWTP Class Class 1 7010S (cfs) 0 I WC (%) 0* 7010S 100 7010W (Cfs) 0 0 7010W 100 3002 (Cfs) 0 03002 100 Avg. Stream Flow, OA (cls) 0 0 OA 100 RwlvkV Stream UT of Paw Creek Stream Class WS•IV STANDARDS & PARAMETER TYPE CRITERIA (2) POL Units REASONABLE POTENTIAL RESULTS RECOMMENDED ACTION ttl rf chmab Am* n 004 MWProd Ow AffWv& Cur Anita: WA C 60 ugn 1 0 WA _ - Note: nc12 Chronic: 60 -- Llmttted data set Acute: WA Benzene C 1.2 ug/i 1 0 WA Note: nc12 Chronic: _—. 1 -- NO hits No Breit rendred _- —.—_—.—.—_—.—.— Limited data set Monthly monitoring medetwy Acute. WA Toluene NC 11 ugA 1 1—NIA Nate: nci2 _ __ Chromic: - 11 _ _ _ _ No hits. No iirmit required -- -•— — — --- --- Limited date set Monthly monitoring madatory Acute: WA Turbidity NC 50 ugrt 10 /0 88.2 - Note: n<12 _ _ Chronic: ---50 — _ _ _ RP =Yes. Lirmit requires ---- — — — — — --- Umtlted data set Acute: WA NC ug/I 0 0 WA Chronic: #VALUE! ----------------------------- Acute: WA C 36 2 26.7 __#VALU__ Chrot>!c: E! — — — --- — - — — — - — — -- -- Acute: WA 0 0 WA ____ _ Chronic: error Q Type ------ — —•— — — — — — — -•— — — Acute: WA 0 0 WA Acute: WA 0 0 WA _ _ _ _ Chromic: srror Q Type '--- — — — ................... Acute: WA 0 0 WA Chronic: snot Q Type ------ — — ---- --- - — ----- — — Acute: WA 0 0 WA Chromic: snot Q Type -- — — ------------------ Acute: WA - 0 0 WA ------------------ _ _ _ Chronic: srrar Q Type ------------- Acute: WA 0 0 WA Chronc senor A Type -- - —---_—_— __—_— — —__ —.—.— Acute: WA 0 0 WA _ Chronic: snot Q Type --_— —_— —_—.- — —_— — —.—.— —.— Acute: WAt 0 0 WA _ ---- Chronic srror @Type ---- ----- --- --- ----- --- --- Lagend: " Freshwater Discharge C a Catc1mgenic NC- Non-carvfwpenic A a Aesthetic 74705 Magellan I - RPA, rpa 3/13/2006 REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS Turbidity Date Data BDL=1/2DL Results 1 Jan-02 Std Dev. 6.1627 2 Feb-02 Mean 7.1500 3 Mar-02 C.V. 0.8619 4 Apr-02 n 10 5 May-02 6 Jun-02 Mult Factor= 4.4100 7 Jul-02 Max Value 20.0 ugA 8 Aug-02 Max Pred Cw 88.2 ugA 9 Sep-02 10 Oct-02 11 Nov-02 12 Dec-02 13 Jan-03 14 Feb-03 2.8 2.8 15 Mar-03 16 Apr-03 12 12.0 17 May-03 18 Jun-03 19 Jul-03 2 2.0 20 Aug-03 21 Sep-03 22 Oct-03 5.5 5.5 23 Nov-03 24 Dec-03 25 Jan-04 14 14.0 26 Feb-04 27 Mar-04 28 Apr-04 29 May-04 30 Jun-04 31 Jul-04 3 3.0 32 Aug-04 5.5 5.5 33 Sep-04 34 Oct-04 35 Nov-04 36 Dec-04 20 20.0 37 Jan-05 38 Feb-05 39 Mar-05 40 Apr-05 5.5 5.5 41 May-05 42 Jun-05 43 Jul-05 44 Aug-05 45 Sepas 46 Oct-05 1.2 1.2 47 Nov-05 48 Dec-05 49 60 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 199 200 74705 Magellan I - RPA, data -2- 3/1 ar2006 The Knight Publishing Co., Inc. Charlotte, NC North Carolina } ss Affidavit of Publication Mecklenburg County} THE CHARLOTTE OBSERVER --------------------------------------------------+--------------------------- NCDENR/DWQ/NPDES CAROLYN BRYANT 1617 MAIL SERVICE CTR RALEIGH NC 27699-1617 REFERENCE: 30045571 5667136. MaGellan Terminals Before the undersigned, a Notary Public of said County and State, duly authorized.to administer oaths affirmations, etc., personally appeared, being duly sworn or affirmed according to law, doth depose and say that he/she is a representative of the Knight Publishing Company a corporation organized and doing business under the laws of the State of Delaware, and publishing a newspaper known as The Charlotte Observer in the city of Charlotte, County of Mecklenburg and State of North Carolina and that as such he/she is familiar with the books, records, files and business of said Corporation and by reference to the files of said publication the attached advertisement was inserted. The following is correctly copied from the books and files of the aforesaid Corporation and Publication. PUBLISHED ON: 03/18 AD SPACE: 94 LINE UNIT A NPDES On the basis d thorough staff review end a-7pticetion d NC {ierreraf Statute 143.21. Public law 92.5W and other awful standards and rag. ulations, the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission to issue a NabOnel PoOutant Discharge Elfmfna�ion ff DES) wastewater di to the Person(s) 6sted� effective 45 days worn tt,e� put�of this mice. Q��p 6h permit wI0 be until 30 days aRar�Pubh aarB Or •this rrotioe An coarmmwrd received prior to that date are conWeted In the final deteim;rtayons 9 fhB proposed fit, The Director at the NC Divisiorr ofWater QuaNtY may decide to hold a public meeting for the proposed ,should the Divi�sm reoaive a significantgnea . deof public ntw Copies of the draft permit and other supportin information on Trte used to determine conditions Arest In a draft upon request and of the c= of re f are available com- ments and/or for intorrnaEion to the NC �issiionMo iWatteer Quality at the above address or call fhe Point Source Branch at (919)_ 733.5= exiension 520. Please k0jde the NPDES permit number (attached) In communicationhderested persons may also visit the Division dater Quality at 512 N. Setlsbiuy Street, Raleigh. HQ 27604-ti48 between.the hoursd.g�0 am. and &OD pm. to review Information on fffe. Man �Terminals HOkki s, LP. (NPDES Permit NC00051' has for renewal d its Pit to an unnamed tri tary Turtliid, mTo tl� River BastaPhenol -Cluality, limited This straarn.� r"a'► s8.1una Ulu ocatior. to the lecetving Mage9an Terminals Holduxls, tLC (NC00'i'4705), has applied for renewal Ofisch its permit darging to an unnamed tributary of Paw Creek, located within the Catawba River Basin. Turbidity is water-qual. ty�0� ing iis ds ge may affect future waste -load allocations to LP51i87130 FILED ON: 03/24/06 I NAME. _ _ TITLE. DATE: In Testimony MVeosaid. f I have hereunto set my ha�aI"id affixed my seal, the day and ye r r Notary: -W--- It My Com�mii(s�ysion Expires!:COM i�JD z ►SoT 'T F c Na Ft�yw Lp pc s cW raR o-G-� ,5A-t-'A t,�(, -Vdt� F6�� to A- S-5 QP fL- nJp Pz1 ts-N GaLzf = 6.9 s ►� 53L /�A 6z� f4 1.60 5V-$ ®d �'r N F 6�16as' _ At, -,vk i.z c l Gov N o �� nth yvi 0 itAI6= /4.0 Pea tic, /F SJFN AP �� dJ NI I c tNI) xLsb = OIV-�I „U6� 471 c 9s �e szaoA-tom = S�3 1-0a-z-6 MrBC--; 6_2%-� �/6zs =,J rVA- = 2 .6 Tub- S 5- c-, fraWS q— �16 •J . Avr. _ . fir—. ,f�&YVIIe- 15 —Kb, _ (a s ) - JTr4-0s �p t�4a� rTJIV-p-�. ( r O Whole Effluent Toxicity Testing Self -Monitoring Summary h `'-"C- (-� V� CZ`D 9�q 7 1B, 2006 YEAR JAN FISH MAR APR Wuton Inc. -ABC One Hour Cleaners 241m N p/f1im: Nak and - - H Pass - Pass - - NP/Pus - - Pass NC0084395/001 Begin ll/I/30K)3 Fr,,urnry.Q + MUJun Sep Da + NonComp:Single 2005 - - Pass - - Pau - - Pass - - Pass County Onlow Region: WIRO Subbasin: WOKO: 2004 - - uses - - Pass - - Pen - - Pave PF: 0,216 snocul tars _ _ Pan - - Pasts - - Pus - - 7QIO:Tidal IWC(%)900 Om¢ 2008 Wa1POInl Steven-Wagnm WWTP WIim: 95s P20o2- Pass - - Pus - - Pass - - Paso - NCON5762/m)I Begin MI/2005 Frequency Feb May Aug Nov + Nencomp:Single tom - Pass - - Pass - - Pus - - Pass - County. Scanual Region FRO Schemes.: LUM51 2061 - Pus - - Pass - - Pass - - P. _ PF: 7.0 Slecio 2005 _ Pass - _ Pus _ - Pans _ - Pau 7QIO: 117 IWC(%)90 Qdc 21)N Weyerhaeuo.New Bern clrs aim 13% 2002 son - - NW6.8 - - nA - - 72.1 - - NC0003191/OOI Begin B/I2004 FrtquenyQ lan Ars ulOct + NNCmp:Single 2003 36.5 - - a8.a - - >lN - - Nla,,mn - - County. Creven Regiw WARD Subb ain: NEU08 200a 1&4 - - nA - - lam 36A - -IN - - PF:320 stecon 2N5 35.0 - - 36.0 - - Lam 445 - lam 368 7QIO: 329 FWC(%)13 2006 Weyerhaeuser-Plymaulh(Roanoke) cars lim: 6.8% Y ID02 - >1N - - 73.6 - - >IN - - >tN - NC0000690/NI Begin&1/1997 Fro mar,. QPN ♦ Feb May Aug Nov + NonComp:Single 2003 - 73.8 - - -IN - - >100 - - a1N County Martin Region'. WARD Subbasin: ROAN 2004 - 38.5 - - IN _ _ -IN _ _ PF: 55.0 Samar 2aN - Lam 73.8 - >1N - - >100 - - >tN 7QIO : 1160 IWC(%)6.8 omrc 2306 Whitevllle-Whltemarah WWTP chr liar: 50% 2012 35.4 91.9 a100 <25 -25 >1N a10K) 94.9 IN <25 <25 1.10 NCN21920/N1 Begin 91112ON Frequency Jan Apr Jul Oct + NNComp'. Single 20M >100.35A >tN 822 048 02,2 -IN -IN 822 >IN >1N two a2.2 Cowry: Columbus Region: WIRO Subbuin: LUM58 2004 -IN IN WARP) >100.>100(p) >100>100(P) >ID0>100(P) >1N >10s >10) >100 - - PF: 3,0 Specur 2N5 02.2 - - Pass - - uses - - Pass - 7Q10:07 IWC(%)50 ONee 2001 Wlldwood Green char aim: 72-A 2002 - Pasta - - Pass - - Pass - - near - NOX63614/NI Begin IVl/2N3 FrequmcyQ Feb May Aug Nov + NcnCpmp:SmIa 2003 - Pass - -- Paz. - - Fat >tN >1N Pass - Counry: Wake Region: PRO Subbasm: NEU01 2004 - Lam Pass - N"... - - Pus - - Pas. - PE 01 srccul 2005 _ Pass - - Pus - - Pass - - Fan 7QIO: ON IWC(%)72 (Jnec 2 oa Wilkesboro Cub Creek W P fllr aim: 3.7%; ifPF 6.6 MGD thr aim 5.0% and - - Pus - - 1.1d Pus - Pass - - Pass NCW21717/N1 Begin 1/120% Frequency Marlun SWDa + NNComp:Su,Ic 2003 - - Pue - - Pass - - Pus - - use. Century Wilkes Regina: WSRO Suhbarm YAD01 2004 - - Pass - - Pus - - Pass - - Pau PF: 49 $cut 2a05 - - Pus - - Pus - - Pass -- - Pus 7Q10'. 196 IWC(%)3.72 ONv 2N6 Williams Terminal; HoltlNµ LP. 24hr LC50 as monir pis 2002 - NCN7457&M Begin NI2N2 FrequmcYA NonComp: 2O33 - - IN County: Guilford Regina: WSRO Subbasiar CPFae 2Nt- - - aIN PF: 0.OD57 apmul ZM5 _ _ >100 7QI() 0.0 IWC(•/a)IN Omer 2K)O6 Williams Terminate Holdings, L.P. 24hr LC50 ac monit pis 2002 - - - >IN NCN7470S/NI Begin 9/I/2N1 Fry twccy:A NonComp: 2N3 - - - Para County Mecklenburg Region: MRO Subhuin M34 2Na - - - - _ >100 PF: 0 special 2005 _ 7QIO'.0 IWC(%)IN Omer. 2005 Williams TernslnnIs holdings-G'bm. 24hr LC50 ac monir epiS 2012 - >IN NC00036711001 Degin l/1/2N2 FrequencyA N.Cca p'. 2033 - - County Guilford Region: WSRO Subbasin. CPFN 2004 - - PF: NA special 2015 _ _ -IN 7Q10: 0.0 IWC(V.) IN Curer: 2005 Wlllmmston WWTP chr aim 0.32% 2002 - - Pass - -- ran. - - Pass - - Pass NC0020044/00I Begin 1/1/2N3 FrequencyQ Marlun Sep Dm + NonComp: Single 2009 - - Pass - -- Pass - - Paz. - - Pass County. Martin Region: WARD Subbarm, ROAN 20011 - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass PF: 2.4 specut 200S - - Pass - - Pass - - Pass - - Pu. 7QIO 1170 IWC(-)0.26 O,Iv 2005 LEGEND: PERM -Permit Requlrmand LET=Administrative Lester -Target FrequNRy- Monitoring frequenry; Q-Quarterly. M- Monthly.BM- Bbnonlhly. SA- Semiannually A -Annually OWD. Only when discharging; D-Discantinm Begin- First month required 7QIO=RmivigsbeamlmflmcTitedw(cN) +-quarlerlY mordtain6 inmeases l0 mpnthlY Won failmeNNR MNtha that seating mntomw-m. ran. Apr, lul.Oct NNCoarp=Current PF- Permitted Bow(MGD) IWCM=Instream warm mNcnhaliN P/F- Pass/Fail test AC=ACWc CHR=Chronic Dam Notation: f-Patterns! Minnow;•-Ceredapheria sp.;my -Myeid Wimp;ChV- Chronic value;P- Mortality cremated Percentage m highest comacu nion;m- Performed by DWQ Aquatic Tox Unit bt - Bad out Reporting Notation: ---Dare Narequked, NR-Not repaned Facility Activity Sum I - Inactive.N - Newly lsmed(TO Nnwq); H- Arrive ben not discharging;} -Mom data available for month in question; -ORC signs=needed �-e�R*u�lEUtwk�tr�y;9. SOC PRIORITY PROJECT: Yes_ To: Permits and EngmeeHmg Unit Water Quality Section Attention: Carolyn Bryant. Date: January 5, 2005 NPDES STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION County: Mecklenburg MRO No.: 04-139 Permit No. NCO074705 PART I - GENERAL INFORMATION 1. Fa£iliiy and address: Magcllan Terminal :minalc Holdings LP-Cbarlottc Formerly Williams Energy Ventures 7145 Old Mount Holly Road Charlotte, North Carolina 28130 2. Date of investigation: 12-14-04 3. Report prepared by: Samar Bou-Ghazale, Env. Engineer I JAN 10 2005 D DENR - WATER QUALITY POINT SOURCE BRANCH 4. Persons contacted and telephone number: Mr. Mike Harris, Lead Operator; (704) 399-8457. 5. Directions to Site: From the junction of I-85 and Highway 27 in Charlotte, travel west on Highway 27 (Freedom Drive) approximately three (3) miles to Old Mt. Holly Road. Turn right onto Old Mt. Holly Road and travel approximately 0.75 mile to facility located on the right (south) side of the road. 6. Discharge Point(s). List for all discharge points: Latitude: 350 16' 42" Longitude: 800 55' 30" Attach a U.S.G.S. map extract and indicate treatment facility site and discharge point on map. USGS Quad No.: F 15 SW USGS Quad Name: Mountain Island Lake 7. Site size and expansion are consistent with application? Yes X No_ If No, explain: 8. Topography (relationship to flood plain included): Sloping south toward an unnamed tributary to Paw Creek at the rate of 3 to 5%. The site is not located in a flood plain. 9. Location of nearest dwelling: None within 1000 feet of the discharge point. 10. Receiving stream or affected surface waters: Unnamed tributary to Paw Creek. a. Classification: C b. River Basin and Subbasin No.: Catawba River Basin; 030834 C. Describe receiving stream features and pertinent downstream uses: The receiving stream is a narrow and shallow drainage ditch. General C classification uses downstream PART H DESCRIPTION OF DISCHARGE AND TREATMENT WORKS 1. Type of wastewater to be permitted: 0% Domestic 100% Industrial a. Volume of Wastewater: The wastewater is generated from storm water that falls on the entire site. b. What is the current permitted capacity of the wastewater treatment facility? N/A. C. Actual treatment capacity of the current facility (current design capacity)? N/A. d. Date(s) and construction activities allowed by previous Authorizations to Construct issued in the previous two years: N/A e. Please provide a description of existing or substantially constructed wastewater treatment facilities: Wastewater from the loading rack is directed to an oil water separator, a carbon filter and a holding tank. Storm water run-off from the tank area discharges to a containment area located on the south side of the property. f. Please provide a description of proposed wastewater treatment facilities: N/A g. Possible toxic impacts to surface waters: Due to nature of the wastewater there could be some toxicity concern. h. Pretreatment Program (POTWs only): N/A. NPDES Permit Staff Report Page 2 2. Residuals handling and utilization/disposal scheme: Sludge accumulates in the oil/water separator at a rate such that cleaning only needs to be done every five to ten years. When cleaning is done the company contracts a licensed waste disposal facility for removal and disposal. 3. Treatment plant classification (attach completed rating sheet): Class I 4. SIC Code(s): 5171 Primary: 39 Main Treatment Unit Code: 53000 PART III - OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION 1. Is this fiwility being constructed with Construction Grant Funds or are any public monies involved (municipals only)? N/A. 2. Special monitoring or limitations (including tonicity) requests: N/A. 3. Important SOC, JOC or Compliance Schedule dates: (please indicate) N/A. 4. Alternative Analysis Evaluation: Has the facility evaluated all of the non -discharge options available. Please provide regional perspective for each option evaluated. Spray irrigation: N/A Connection to regional Sewer System: N/A Discharge to an infiltration gallery: N/A 5. Air Quality and/or Groundwater concerns or hazardous material 'utilized at this facility that may impact water quality, air quality or groundwater? There are no groundwater concerns. The facility stores a variety of hazardous materials typically associated with bulk storage facilities. Aar Quality Permit for this facility is not required by Mecklenburg County. PART IV - EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS Magellan Terminals Holdings is requesting an NPDES Permit renewal for the discharge of treated wastewater. The wastewater is generated from an oil water separator and stormwater runoff. NPDES Permit Staff Report Page 3 A review of the past year's self -monitoring data, from 11/2003 through 10/2004, revealed no violations. It is recommended that the NPDES Permit be renewed as requested. Signature of Report1freparer Water QualitAegional, Supervisor tll(o o� r Date NPDES Permit Staff Report Page 4 /� MMAEGELLRAN=w November 11, 2004 Mr. Charles H. Weaver, Jr. NCDENR/Water Quality/NPDES Unit 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Re: NPDES Permit Renewal Applications Magellan's Charlotte I Terminal #NC0074705- Magellan's Charlotte II Terminal #NC0005185 Dear Charles: ONE WILLIAMS CENTER PO BOX 22186 TULSA, OK 74121-2186 (918)574-7000 Please find attached the NPDES permit applications for the renewal of the above referenced permits. There have been no changes in the source, treatment or discharge of wastewater at these refined product storage terminals since the last permits were issued. The wastewater discharges consist of non -contact storm waters from diked storage tank areas; storm water and wash water from loading rack areas treated with oil/water separators and hydrostatic waters from testing tanks and/or associated pipelines. There are virtually no solids generated from treatment of the wastewaters at either of these terminals. Every few years any sediments are removed from the oil water separators and the floor drain mud boxes in the loading racks. These sediments are disposed of off -site as a product contact waste. Please let me know if you have any questions or need any additional information. Please also continue to direct any correspondence to my attention as well. Sincerely, Paul Potts Sr. Environmental Specialist Magellan Midstream Partners One Williams Center, MD 27-3 Tulsa, OK 74172 (918)574-7725 (918) 574-7247 fax paul.pottsCc7?magellanip.com attach.