20151321 Ver 1_401 Application_20151215

YYEEG
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.
December 22, 2015
Mr. William Elliott
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers A��
Asheville Regulatory Field Off
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, NC 28801
Mr. Alan Johnson
Division of Water Resources
Department of Environmental Quality
610 East Center Street, Suite 301
Mooresville, NC 28115
Ms. Karen Higgins
404 & Buffer Permitting Unit Supervisor
Division of Water Resources
Department of Environmental Quality
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27604
Mr. Byron Hamstead
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Asheville Field Office
160 Zillicoa St.
Asheville, NC 28801
2 0 1 5 1 3 2 1
InIC�C��pb�
�oEr. 2 s zoos I
- WA
Subject: Pre -Construction Notification for NWP#14 for Asbury Chapel Thoroughfare
Extension and NWP#29 for Walden Subdivision Phase 1 and 2, Mecklenburg County, NC.
Dear Ms. Higgins and Messrs. Elliott, Johnson and Hamstead,
Enclosed is a request for permits associated with the Asbury Chapel Thoroughfare Road
Extension (NWP#14) and the proposed adjacent development known as Walden Subdivision
Phase 1 and 2 (NWP #29) located at 13124 Ramah Church Road, Huntersville, Mecklenburg
County, North Carolina. The jurisdictional features located on both projects were delineated and
verified by the USACE (William Elliott) on December 17, 2013 and a jurisdictional
determination request is enclosed for final approval.
Proposed permanent impacts associated with the Asbury Chapel Thoroughfare Road Extension
total approximately 125 linear feet of stream impacts (Table 1). The impacts being proposed are
associated with the construction of a thoroughfare road which is being required by the Town of
Huntersville in order to facilitate connectivity from Huntersville-Concord Road to Ramah
Charlotte Office: www.wetlands-epg.com Asheville Office:
10612-D Providence Rd. 1070 Tunnel Rd., Bldg. I
PMB 550 Suite 10, PMB 283
Charlotte, NC 28277 Asheville, NC 28805
[phone] [phone]
[e-mail] 1 [e-mail]

Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.
Church Road as well as provide access for future adjacent developments in this area. Figures A,
B, and C depict this road on thoroughfare plans and shows its location in relation to other
planned transportation improvements in the area which is part of a long-term planning horizon.
Ultimately, the existing Asbury Chapel Road will be re -aligned and this road connection will
serve as the main thoroughfare as a result of this re -alignment (see attached Figure B). Impacts
to stream channels associated with this road could not be avoided due to Perennial Stream B
bisecting the entire project area. Also, the road's location/alignment was constrained due to the
existing/adjacent nature preserve and existing residential developments. The road crossing does
avoid a wetland to the west and has been designed to cross the stream channel at a perpendicular
angle to minimize impacts. A bottomless arch culvert/span was not feasible in this location due
to increased cost and NCDOT's policy in which they strongly discourage these type of structures
on public thoroughfares in which NCDOT will assume responsibility for maintenance of the road
once constructed. Impacts associated with the crossing has been designed to the minimum
necessary. The proposed design minimizes the length of impacts by placing the pedestrian
sidewalks at the edge of the right-of-way and minimal use of rip rap.
We are considering this road and subsequent impact a single/complete project independent of the
adjacent development since it is part of the thoroughfare plan and being required to be built by
the applicant/developer on behalf of the Town of Huntersville. The subdivision as described
below could be developed without the need of this size/type road. Due to the minimal impacts
and degraded nature of Perennial Stream B, no compensatory mitigation is being proposed.
Table 1: Summary of Proposed Impacts
Asbury Chapel Thoroughfare Extension (NWP #14)
[Impact Description Wetland acre
Stream linear feet
Road Crossing ----
125
For the Walden Subdivision Phase 1 and 2 project, proposed permanent wetland impacts will
total 0.06 acres and 50 linear feet of stream channel for lot fill and road crossing/grading.
Temporary impacts associated with the installation of a sewer line will total 0.17 acre and 40
linear feet of stream channel. All impacts associated with the Walden Subdivision Phase 1 and 2
project are being requested under a Nationwide Permit #29. Of the 1.66 acres of wetlands and
11,907 linear feet of stream on site, only 0.06 acres of wetlands and 50 linear feet of intermittent
stream will be permanently impacted.
Table 2: Summary of Proposed Impacts
Walden Subdivision Phase 1 and 2 WP #29
Impact Description
Wetland acre
Stream linear feet
Lot Fill
0.06
----
Road Crossing
----
50
Sewer (temp)
0.17
40
Total Impacts
0.23 acre
90 linear feet
Charlotte Office: www.wetiands-epg.com Asheville Office:
10612-D Providence Rd. 1070 Tunnel Rd., Bldg. I
PMB 550 Suite 10, PMB 283
Charlotte, NC 28277 Asheville, NC 28805
[phone] [phone]
[e-mail] 2 [e-mail]

Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.
The current site plans for the subdivision were designed to avoid jurisdictional features to the
maximum extent practicable while still incorporating necessary site development and viable
access/connectivity. Impacts to Intermittent Stream H (50 linear feet) is associated with a road
crossing to access high ground portions of the site for lot development. The adjacent wetland
impact (Wetland 1, 0.06 acre) could not be avoided and still allow the necessary grading/slopes
for the road. This area also needs to be filled as part of access to the nearby storm water
treatment facility for construction and maintenance. The engineering/planning team evaluated
the construction of a retaining wall in this area to reduce/minimize impacts but it was cost
prohibitive ($>56,000) considering the minor impact. Also, all temporary impacts associated
with the sewer line installation will be restored to pre -construction contours and the
preliminary/proposed trail system will avoid impacts to stream channels and wetlands on the site
as well. Due to the minor permanent impacts associated with this single/complete project, no
compensatory mitigation is being proposed.
Also enclosed is a copy of our Threatened/Endangered Species Evaluation which incorporates
the area of both projects. Based upon known occurrences for federally listed species in
Mecklenburg County and their habitat requirements, the proposed impact locations include
potential habitat for the recently listed Northern Long Eared Bat (NLEB). Both project sites are
composed of partially wooded/forested vegetation suitable for the NLEB. However, due the
project location (which is at least 45 miles away from a known occurrence), we believe this
project is not likely to adversely affect the Northern Long Eared Bat and will have no effect to
any other listed species.
We appreciate the opportunity to provide this information and please contact us if you have any
questions.
Sincerely,
Amanda Jones, PWS
Amanda Jones
Regulatory Specialist
Heath Caldwell, PWS
21
"
U
Heath Caldwell
Environmental Scientist
Charlotte Office: www.wetlands-epg.com Asheville Office:
10612-D Providence Rd. 1070 Tunnel Rd., Bldg, I
PMB 550 Suite 10, PMB 283
Charlotte, NC 28277 Asheville, NC 28805
[phone] [phone]
[e-mail] 3 [e-mail]

Permit Application

Office Use Only.-
Corps
nly:Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
❑X Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 14 and 29 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes ❑X No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
❑X 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
❑ Yes ❑X No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ❑X No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
❑ Yes ❑X No
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes ❑X No
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project:
Asbury Chapel Thoroughfare Extension and Walden Subdivision Phase 1 and 2
2b. County:
Mecklenburg
2c. Nearest municipality / town:
Huntersville
2d. Subdivision name:
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Forestar Real Estate Group, Inc.
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
Larry Long
3d. Street address:
3330 Cumberland Blvd. STE 275
3e. City, state, zip:
Atlanta, GA, 30339
3f. Telephone no.:
770-272-7440
3g. Fax no.:
3h. Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form —Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑X Other, specify: Engineer
4b. Name:
Timothy F. Coey
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
The Bayard Group
4d. Street address:
11220 Elm Lane #205B
4e. City, state, zip:
Charlotte, NC 28277
4f. Telephone no.:
704-618-2926
4g. Fax no.:
704-248-7951
4h. Email address:
[e-mail]
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
Amanda Jones
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC - Wetlands & Environmental Planning Group
5c. Street address:
1070 Tunnel Road, Bldg. 1
5d. City, state, zip:
Asheville, NC 28805
5e. Telephone no.:
828-708-7059
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 10

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1 a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
01943117
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
ILatitude: 35.0467 Longitude: -80.8176
1 c. Property size:
75.7 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
North Prong Clarke Creek
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
Class C
2c. River basin:
03040105- Rocky
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The majority of the site is currently composed of forested areas and pasture/agricultural fields. General land use in the vicinity consists of residential
developments.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 1.66
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 11,907
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
Construction of a thoroughfare road (NW#14) and residential development to include road crossings, lot fill, and sewer line (NW #29).
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Excavation and grading of the site will use standard equipment - excavator, trackhoe, dump trucks, etc.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (includingall prior phases)in the past?
❑X Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
❑ Preliminary ❑ Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company:
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
Site visit was conducted by William Elliott on 12/17/2013 to confirm WEPG's delineation in which findings/determination is included for final
determination.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
El Yes ❑X No ❑ Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
❑X Yes ❑ No
6b. If yes, explain.
The Walden Subdivision is a phased development. Future phases have not been designed yet. However, the entire property has been delineated so
that any future phases can avoid/minimize impacts to waterstwetlands during planning/design of those phases.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form —Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑X Wetlands ❑X Streams — tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
Type of jurisdiction
Area of
number
Corps (404,10) or
impact
Permanent (P) or
DWQ (401, other)
(acres)
Temporary T
W1 T
Excavation
Headwater Wetland
Yes
Corps
0.15
W2 T
Excavation
Headwater Wetland
Yes
Corps
0.02
W3 P
Culvert
Headwater Wetland
Yes
Corps
0.06
W4 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes
-
W5 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W6 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
0.23
2h. Comments:
All wetland impacts are associated with the Walden Subdivision Phase 1 and 2 project. Permanent impacts total 0.06 acres (Wetland 1) and temporary
impacts total 0.17 acre.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial (PER) or
Type of
Average
Impact
number
intermittent (INT)?
jurisdiction
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(feet)
feet)
S1 P
Culvert
Stream B
PER
Corps
10
72
S2 P
Fill
Stream B
PER
Corps
10
53
S3 P
Culvert
Stream H
INT
Corps
5
38
S4 P
Fill
Stream H
INT
Corps
5
12
S5 T
Excavation
Stream GG/G
INT
Corps
5
40
S6 -
Choose one
-
-
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
215
3i. Comments:
Stream Impact B (S1 and S2) is associated with a road crossing for the Asbury Chapel Thoroughfare Extension project. Stream Impact H (S3 and S4)
is associated with a road crossing for the Walden Subdivision Phase 1 and 2 project. Stream Impact GG/G (S5) is associated with a temporary
excavation for the installation of a sanitary sewer line for the Walden Subdivision Phase 1 and 2 project.
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01 -
Choose one
Choose
02 -
Choose one
Choose
03 -
Choose one
Choose
04 -
Choose one
Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d. 5e.
Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other:
6b.
Buffer Impact
number—
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet)
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet
131 -
Yes/No
B2 -
Yes/No
B3 -
Yes/No
B4 -
Yes/No
B5 -
Yes/No
B6 -
Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
6i. Comments:
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Due to the location of the wetlands and streams on the site, opportunities to avoid all surface waters were limited. The impacted wetland and stream
areas span the location of proposed access routes and sanitary sewer right-of-ways for the site. Plan design for the residential lots and roadway
access was oriented and located to limit additional fill to onsite wetlands and streams while maintaining required development lots and site access/
egress requirements. See cover letter for more details.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Construction techniques will implement approved erosion control methods to avoid/minimize impacts to onsite/adjacent offsite receiving conveyances.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
❑ ro Payment to in -lieu fee ram
y program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
Choose one
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
Yes QX No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ❑X No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
30.3%
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑X Yes ❑ No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
Percent impervious for Asbury Chapel Thoroughfare Extension is 30.3% and 38.1 % for Walden Subdivision Phase 1 and 2. Storm water on the site
will be handled/treated by BMPs as shown on the attached plans. Storm water for the thoroughfare road will be treated by BMPs associated with the
residential development.The stormwater plan has not been submitted/approved by Mecklenburg County but has been designed to meet their criteria.
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
Mecklenburg County
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which localgovernment's jurisdiction is thisproject?
Mecklenburg County
❑X Phase II
❑ NSW
3b. Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
El Yes ❑X No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑Coastal counties
❑HQW
4a. Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ORW
(check all that apply):
❑Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑X No
attached?
S. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑X Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑X Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes ❑X No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes ❑ No
letter.)
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑Yes ❑X No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 26 .0200)?
2b. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑Yes ❑X No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
E] Yes ❑X No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
No surface water impacts are anticipated for subsequent phases of the Walden Subdivision project. However, if impacts are to occur for future phases,
they will be minor and mitigated for if necessary along with proper storm water treatment. Also, if future extensions of the Asbury Chapel Road
Thoroughfare are built (as shown on Fig. B) then additional impacts to surface waters may occur based on preliminary evaluation of maps showing
surface water features. Any impacts to streams/wetlands (by others) should be permitted and mitigated as well which will prevent degradation to
downstream water quality along with installation of appropriate storm water treatment facilities.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Wastewater generated on the site will be transported to the nearest treatment facility via sewer lines.
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ❑X No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ❑X No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
-
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
A threatened/endangered species assessment was conducted on the site in which no Federally protected species were identified (report enclosed).
Habitat does exist for the Northern Long Eared Bat but no adverse effects are anticipated (see attached cover letter).
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ❑X No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
No essential fish habitat in this region.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ❑X No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
SHPO's website: http://gis.ncdcr.gov/hpoweb/
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑X Yes ❑ No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
Regulated floodplain is located along the eastern boundary of the project in which no impacts are proposed. No grading/fill will occur/be placed within
the floodway or floodplain as part of this project. Subsequently, no change in base flood elevations will occur as part of this project.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
http://polaris3g.mecklenburgcountync.gov
signed Amanda Jones
DN• cn=Amanda ones, a=WEPG,
Amanda Digitally Jones,
ou=Leonard S. Pindner, PLLC, Wetlands &
Emnonmental Planning Group,
Amanda Jones for WEPG
Jones email=amanda [e-mail],
-Us12-22-2015
Dale. 2015.12 22 11.22.27 -05'00'
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant isprovided.)
Page 10 of 10

WEPG I
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.
Agent Authorization Letter
The purpose of this form is to authorize our firm to act on your behalf in matters related to aquatic
resource (i.e. stream/wetlands) identification/mapping and regulatory permitting. The
undersigned, who are either registered property owners or legally authorized to conduct due
diligence activities on the property as identified below, do hereby authorize associates of
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC, Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group (WEPG) to act on my
behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance, and acceptance of applicable
permit(s) and/or certification(s).
Project/Site Name: WA L.b&j
Property Address: 13?r3 ym-r cQ'r? l) E 4"C' " A4 A� p yVIV103 Kf )JC X077
Parcel Identification Number (PIN): !ij`�/f 3l� j
Select one: *P., �G�l� I A `��iy► I_� �
Name:
Company: !moi
�' toffy
Sky A*J 6- A9
Mailing Address: /1'L24 CIA, ).AW,,, [ 40-1'P'r 1u G 907
Telephone Number: 20 4- fly' - V7 24
Electronic Mail Address: Jej ., g bll t,,,"d4Vd# J&Ak.4 ' cor,
* The Interested Buyea/O1her acknowledges that an agreement and/oa• formal contract to pan chase and/or conduct
dare diligence activities exists behveen the current property owner and the signatmy of this authorization in cases
where the property is not owned by the signaloty.
Charlotte Office: www.wetlands-epg.com Asheville Office:
10612-D Providence Rd. 1070 Tunnel Rd., Bldg. I
PMB 5S0 Suite 10, PMB 283
Charlotte, NC 28277 Asheville, NC 28805
[phone] [phone]
[e-mail] 2 amanda.iones Pwetlands-epg.com

Project Location /
Base Maps

BROWN PROPERTY
MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NC
,
� — ".. •" F� •, .:. _ _-^�— �,_ - ,•• �. a �• `",��� � _." ..,
j
♦ k\ - w, '
41
"
SITE
'ani
i
• QUAD NAME:
I Kis
r Cornelius, NC •` "`
_.
O i
LOCATION: SCALE
Lat: 35.0467 1:24,000
Long: -80.8176 ACRE
HUC:03040105 232.93 1:." ..•
Ad how Clk - � t r, h i :j: '.i' Igre
FIGURE NO. WALDEN SUBDIVISION Drawn By: Reviewed By:
2 Mecklenburg Co., INC LRG LSR
DATE:
USGS MAP - WATERS OF THE U.S.
EXISTING CONDITIONS STUDY 12/17/2014 /
• SUBJECT TO USACE/NCDENR VERIFICATION

t, .f
M !
OWI q; L� � �
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Grc
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.
len. [e-mail]
[phone]
www.wetlands-epg.com
i

E'n�B
.I9P FnpWkB
o '►
ir�4 i^ F3
MeB MeD MO Wk B "y
or
eD Cc B2
PSE
EnD
B �.
4
_ "Cf'D,
EnD
VVO
wD WkD
H. B�MO P821
f .,
�TMj a
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.
[e-mail]
[phone]
www.wetlands-epg.com

l` Flow Path: Jurisdictional features on the
i� site flow into North Prong Clarke Creek, to
- Clarke Creek, then to Rocky River (TNW).
J
1
•' N
_ � � ..0 � .�. �. i° ►moi. � ,� , .�.C`'Y,.
1
_
A _ -
. x
4 = e� v' . �. � �', ? _ _t . � - . i Flow Path
o
r �Pro'ctBouneary
0 05 1 2 ;
•'
EPS
FIGURE NO.
6
WALDEN SUBDIVISION
Mecklenburg Co., NC
Navigation Pathway Map
*Approximate boundary
Drawn By: I Reviewed By:
HAC LSR
DATE:
8/27/2015

C
0
C
0
.4-J
0
u
�0
C
LU
Existing Conditions /
Delineation

Sheet Index
0.0 - Sheet Index
0.1 -Vicinity Map
1 .0 - Boundary / Existing Conditions (600 scale) "�WW%180�
OA 9U Dngi
lw Impact G°Napmenl
1.1 - Boundary / Existing Conditions (80 scale)
1.2 - Boundary / Existing Conditions (80 scale)
1.3 - Boundary / Existing Conditions (80 scale)
1.4 - Boundary / Existing Conditions (80 scale) Nat Pw Capp .U.
1.5 - Boundary / Existing Conditions (80 scale) Flan U... ! P-1191
1.6 -Boundary /Existing Conditions (80 scale)o
Z N
1.7- Boundary / Existing Conditions (80 scale)
1.8 -Boundary /Existing Conditions (80 scale)
O oa�a
z t °m
1.9 - Boundary / Existing Conditions (80 scale) J og
1.10 - Boundary / Existing Conditions (80 scale) za
1.11 - Boundary / Existing Conditions (80 scale)
1.12 - Boundary / Existing Conditions (80 scale)
1.13 - Boundary / Existing Conditions (80 scale)
1.14- Boundary / Existing Conditions (80 scale)
1.15 - Boundary / Existing Conditions (80 scale)
1.16 - Boundary / Existing Conditions (80 scale) sheet
Index
1.17- Boundary / Existing Conditions (80 scale)
An! Nx
1.18 - Boundary / Existing Conditions (80 scale) 0.0

lace Pmtnaa PLLC
]]1 Coddle Um DKK
Can "H110 7 7
CIM Ste Deem
vR � �� DaMopmenl
NSmmaO-Scal.—BuOdYiy Deeq�
M PN �dt
RP
Nd For Caeebeetlae
Fl- U... / P-1191
��30 Z
Zo
SITE °
o�
> = 3m
r) amo
U) � °
Z m
uJ > 5
ti
z m
NT
<<F CONCORD ROAD o-
weM einsn
s.«t nua
VICINITY MAP Vicinity
SCALE Map
Se.ei No:
0.1

ENLARGEMENT SCHEDULE.
1 - SHEET 1 I
2 - SHEET 1.2
3 - SHEET 1 3
4 - SHEET 1 4
-
- - - �'.
INTERMITTENT
°°° it
ie°c
5 -SHEET 7.5
_ STREAM'lP
-
u. Kzeas
"
srHeE�r t.� = 921' L.F.
MITTENT
ST
-
0.10'ACRES ,
EAM O
s - SHEET 1.8
_ W LAND VV
9
6 L.F.
9 - SHEET 1.9 -
0.0 'CRES \• :"ll
0.1
"ACRES ,
10-SHEET 1.10
.. -
11- SHEET 1.11-
12 - SHEET 1.12
WETLAND R
13 - SHEET 1.13 TI AN U
0.03 ACRES ',
14 - SHEET 1.14 - - _ 1.01-ACR - 1'� ,
-
wt F« c... df..
Flan U..... / P-1191
15 - SHEET 1.15 - ..- - _ _ -
16-SHEET 1.16 _ _ - - - - j
`
_ - _
STREAM, N •` .
n - SHEET 1.17
2,676 L.F.
Q
z N
18 -SHEET 1.18
1.54' ACRES',
z o w
1 -
INT ITTENT .
>
REAM A I_NTERM�TTENT.
=STREAM
rr
p a o 0
o o
141 L.F -M11"
g
STREA B 0.05 ACR S - 1,193�L.F.'
` :J o°
z m
4,951 .F` 0.49 ACRES -
,
u� > s
a
1.92 AC ES'
Z m
WETLAND K
_ . -
0.2� ACRES
,
pER NNIAL,STREAM B
OP
CENTERLINE
POND D pOf�Tl N
I CTS-AS PROPERTY LINE
0.22ACRES WETLAND F' OFF-SIE -
�',• -
WETLAND C -0.04 ACRES-'
STREAM J;,: _
..
0.01 ACRES
WETLAND FF
." y
LOCATED
_
_
0.24 ACRES"
-
OFF-SITE
INTERMIT ENT
sti,a ne.
- STREAM
" _
Boundary/
,
r : 6311.F!•
IN,
WETLAND-1
_
Existing
0.04 ACRES
0.06 ACRES
Conditions
INTERMITTENT
600-Scale
S_
• STREAM
H -
cwt Ift
0RnPHic SCALE - -�
500 0 300 600 1200 -
- WETLAND HH
�F,
LOCATED OFF-SITE ,�
08
ACRES '
1.0
_- _

ENLARGEMENT AREA 1
1.2 MATCHLINE
STREAM N
2,676 L.F.
�•/
1,Z4 ACRES— — . /
\ \ LOCATED
\ \ OFF—SITE INTERMITTENT
\ \ STREAM P
\ \ 921 L. F.
\ \ 0.10 ACRES
\ \ INTERMITTENT
\ \ STREAM P
\ \ PORTION
\ \ OFF—SITE
GRAPHIC SCALE
80 0 40 80 160
WETLAND W
0.01 ACRES
WETLAND V
0.01 ACRES
MI D Ml Wmk Drlw
Con SLIteNCD 29027
tlw 91. Oa.l�i
Irtgacl �.+w�t
S,�-S.ab d,lldn9 Dnlq�
9.d.
Not For Don cVw
iJ
Z Flan Ucmee / P-1191
cQ =
G Z N
M O N
� dm
Z
� W o
Q m
z m
Boundary/
Existing
Conditions
80 -Scale
— Na
1.1

i
I
we Partner, PLLC
I
I »1 casae voxel wive
lmo 9�IleNL 280P
I Gb 91e llee�
lm Lryact lxMapnwn!
saa-sass anm�v oea�
ENLARGEMENT AREA 2 I '�
I
I
Not Eos Canotructlon
ILJ.1 Flnn Chen.. / P-1191
z
J
I
U
Q
G Z �
0�0
o
O o�¢
PERENNIALZ 2
STREAM N �g
QW
m
L
2,676 L.F. I
1.54 ACRE I
PORTION
LOCATED
OFF-SITE'
Boundary/
.00 �,/ I Existing
Conditions
' 80 -Scale
GRAPHIC SCALE �• Stwl No:
80 0 40 80 160
�` 1.2

INTERMITTENT
STREAM P
1.4 MATCHUNE
-�921
—
L.F.
— —
-------------'9S�
-------
ePmmsa PLLC
10 ACRES'
]J1 m
eMot W.
c J�t Ni 7
I
/
// /
OA SIV M�
Iw Lrpect Dwtlapmmt
9mo1-Scds BNkh9 �.e4�
I�
WETLAND U
1.01 ACRES
III
Not Pa Canetructlon
Flan llcenae / P-1191
I WETLAND V
J
0.01 ACRES
Z:071
N
I
8
UI
o�
m o og�
ow<
z� �m=
WETLAND VV
j C,
INTERMITTENT
0.01 ACRES
3 Z
=
I
STREAM P
I
PORTION
I
OFF—SITE
I
ENLARGEMENT AREA 3
m
Boundary/
rY
Existing
Conditions
80 -Scale
GRAPHIC SCALE
.,.
80
0 40 80 160

r------------------------ 1.5MATCHLINE -- --_
INTERMITTENT
I STREAM Q
/', I I lae Portn� PLLC
986 L.F. I ]]1 Cd�d� MOe D e
conear4 Nc 1601]
0.12 ACRES
/ �/ • � • s,¢, -km. -66„9 6..�
i
ENLARGEMENT AREA 4
I/
.
-•
I
6.ds
�
PERENNIAL
'•�
I
STREAM N
�'
ETLAND U
Nol Fo Cone4ucUon
w I
PORTIONS OF
2,676 L.F.
'--
/''
1.01 ACRES
I�
J I
STREAMS
1.54 ACRES
-'�•
-
o
UI
Q
N NDP
------
,_,-,NANDP
Z �
"
OFF-SITE
- - - -"
' '
I
o ° o�<
Z �_O�
I
/
- •,
INTE MITTE T
I
IS N
INTEWAUTn
- -BEAM P
921 L.F.
0.10 ACRES
�./L ------------
GRAPHIC SCALE
80 0 40 80 160
STREAM M
W
1,193 L.F. I z m
0.49 ACRES
WETLAND U
1.01 ACRES
I
WETLAND U I 6s T6¢
PORTION I Boundary/
Existing
Conditions
------------ ----------J 80 -Scale
1.3 MATCHLINE
�,• 9iNl N¢
1.4

I
I
e Partner., PLLC
I
u1 coed. Mo ee W.
Cm 9rIt.NC 28027
CIS Sn. 0..p
W Impoct O.Mopmml
9na1—Ssdi Bu0Eh9 OhWi
ENLARGEMENT AREA 5
I �d.
I
I
INol for Canetrucllon
llJ FOm llcenee / P-1181
IZ
J
IU
z o
m
I^
am
d
p Rmo
INTERMITTENT I ° 2256
STREAM Q I 1 LL�g
V Q
986 L.F. I m
0.12 ACRES
I _ _
WETLAND R
0.03 ACRES
I
asx nik
Boundary/
Existing
' Conditions
_ J 80 -Scale
GRAPHIC SCALE 1.4 MATCHUNE Sheol No
80 0 40 80 160
1.5

INTERMITTENT
STREAM Q
986 L.F.
0.12 ACRES
z
x
117 MATCHLINE
/ '71 yyI Ww
PERENNIAL i C.nwV Il 2=7
�• I OA 9VU..�i
� In I.ry.cl D.Wapmnl
STREAM N
0.
2,676 L.F.
=a.
�•. �' 1.54 ACRES %�
WETLAND U
1.01 ACRES
GRAPHIC SCALE
80 0 40 80 160
INTERMITTENT
STREAM M
1,193 L.F.
N.l Fa Can.Wcllon
F4m llcenas / P-1191
0.49 ACRES
n
WETLAND U
o om
1.01 ACRES>
m
= 3m
p � aro0
m 0 0~�¢
:3Z a we
In LL O ¢
Z mz
uJ > �; 5
WF �
3 Z m
m
=
ENLARGEMENT AREA 6
Boundary/
Existing
Conditions
80 -Scale
Mal N�
1.6

ENLARGEMENT AREA 7
LLI
Z
J
2
Q
GRAPHIC SCALE
80 0 40 80 160
1.6 MATCHLINE
Not Fr Co cflw
Flan 1.1— 0 P-1191
INTERMITTENT I
STREAM M
1,193 L.F.
0.49 ACRES
f, I
Boundary/
Existing
Conditions
80 -Scale
.i No
1.7

1.9 MATCHLINE
i i a, Pmpes PLLC
i
i I c°,�dN°rid° asm�
ENLARGEMENT AREA 8 i� PERENNIAL
STREAM B
4,951 L. F.
1.92 ACRES
No! For Ccn,trucN°n
F11m Ucmm / P-1191
Z
7 N
0 N
� d�
m
O o��a
ZILJ
mz
u'Q
W o
Z m
L
oa.° er N+a
AM Ttlr
Boundary/
Existing
Conditions
80-Scale
GRAPHIC SCALE
80 0 40 60 160
1.8

ENLARGEMENT AREA 9
GRAPHIC SCALE
80 0 40 80 160
1.14 TSNLIN� -
IETLAND F
.04\ACRE
y LAND C
ET
< < 0. ACRES
J J
PERENNIAL In WATER
STREAM B P DD
4,951 L. F. �;' 0.22 ACE
�ES
1.92 ACRES \
i \
— - -- — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
�,,,_ 1.8 MATCHLINE
Not FQ CautvW_
FYm U— / P-1191
Boundary/
Existing
Conditions
80 -Scale
9u.1 No:
1.9

ENLARGEMENT AREA 11
I
PERENNIAL I
STREAM B
4,951 L. F.
1.92 ACRES
I
if I
i�c I
> I
----------------------------------- --------
GRAPHIC SCALE 1.10 MATCHLINE �••
SO 0 40 EO 160
331 Codae IJ -.t 0riw
Cm SNC
taN2802]
DbCAI. W.Y�i
1w 9�9.ct D.Mapmml
sme-s.a. a�vanv 9..q�
ia+�"i. mJO1uwm�
sa.
Not Fa C-.t,..tlan
Flan U... I P-1191
shat nu:
Boundary/
Existing
Conditions
80 -Scale
9�w1 No-
1.11

— — — —-11] N� LINA
\ q. q. \ q� q� — — q. q. — q. q— q— — q— q. q. � � q. q— q— q.
ENLA GEMENT AREA 0 �'
\ �� \ \PERE1\INIAL ' ��� mv
S\TREAM B q`
NrWd -d m
\ 4,951 L.
\1,92 ACRES
!j
TERMITTE T \
Not Fa ConrtNcllon
TREAM A ''
FYm tlm- P -11tH
1\0.05 41 L.R\
,C S\ \
zU do
N
\ O OF.p�
�r'-• \ \ In U.
2
W S �
\ 0
WETLAND\F 3
.04 ACRES\ a
qyp 1 .qR
'W.ETLA D C
-, -,0.01 7ACIES\ Boundary/
Existing
Conditions
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — \ -- —�— —� _ -- _— 80 -Scale
GRAPHIC SCALE 1.9 MATCHLINE
80 0 40 80 160
s�.t Na
1.10

STREAM N
2,676 L.F.
1.54 ACRE
GRAPHIC SCALE
80 0 40 80 160
/. 73 IVATCHLNE
—
WETLAND K
0.25 ACRES
ENLARGEMENT AREA 12
STREAM B
4,951 L. F.
1.92 ACRES
------------
PERENNIAL I
STREAM J I
I
LOCATED I
OFF—SITE I
J CENTERLINE
SERVES AS
PROPERTY LINE
Not Fw C.ctl n
Finn U... / P-1191
Q
Z
Boundary/
Existing
Conditions
80 -Scale
b.t No
1.12

ENLARGEMENT AREA 13
PERENNIAL
STREAM N
PORTION
OUTSIDE PROPERTY
STREAM N
2,676 L.F.
1.54 ACRES
j
— — do — — — — — — — — — — I — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
GRAPHIC SCALE 1.12 MATCHLINE
80 0 4C 80 160
ml Cod,
W �O"
Cm t. NC 2=7
smm-s.d. e.nann o..pi
s.dc
Not For �,Hm
F� Uc— / P-1181
z
� N
O N
� mo
� U �W
PERENNIAL
STREAM B
E U
4,951 L. F.
3
_�
1.92 ACRES
STREAM\
CENTERLINE'
SERVES AS
PROPERTY LINE
Boundary/
Existing
Conditions
_________—_
80 -Scale
�`
1.13

r -----------------
I
ENLARGEMENT AREA 14
I
I
I
I PERENNIAL
I
I STREAM B
W I 4,951 L. F.
I 1.92 ACRES
=I
a l
�I
^I
I
I
I
I �
ii
GRAPHIC SCALE
80 0 40 80 160
1.15 MATCHLINE
-777 -------------------" "Wim'
331 Codd, lda t Ddi
Can 9 , C TBa27
tlM 9b M�
lw Impost D.wlepmn!
4ndl-Sidi BuIMY�Y DnIT
f� IOAT.6fvn
S.d.
WETLAND FFF
Not F
PORTION or Fl -0 P-119 L­r—na1
OFF-SITE
z n
Zo
Qmo
o�o�
V) W 2 -
Utz
J W O
z m
Boundary/
Existing
Conditions
80 -Scale
°" 1.14

1.16 MATCHLINE
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 4 — —
ENLARGEMENT AREA 15
331 Co .OA Drlw
fmaorE, NC 28D1]
tlM Slis Dnlyn
Le. I�aat Dewlapmenl
WETLAND FFF
9n-9cale Bu9lYp Deelyi
PERENNIAL
0.24 ACRES
STREAM B
4,951 L. F.
1.92 ACRES
Not far Canebucllon
INTERMITTENT
Flan lloenae f P-1191
STREAM GG/G
Q m
631 L. F.
o N
0.04 ACRES
> _ m
Ll � d'm0
PERENNIAL
��o
° °2Q
STREAM B
WETLAND HH
g
J W C,
PORTIONLOCATED
3 z m
OFF-SITE
OFF-SITE
WETLAND FFF
PORTION
sna. nD.
OFF-SITE
Boundary/
Existing
Conditions
-----------------
-- -- -----------DD------------
80 -Scale
GRAPHIC SCALE
1.14 MATCHLINE
sti»t Ne
90 0 40 80 160 i�—per
°"
1.15

ENLARGEMENT AREA 16
1.16 MATCHLINE
-----------------------------
I
INTERMITTENT I
STREAM H I
408 L.F.
0.08 ACRES
I
STREAM B
4,951 L. F.
1.92 ACRES
WETLAND 1
0.06 ACRES
---------------------------------- -------
GRAPHIC SCALE 1.15 MATCHLINE
80 0 40 80 160
ml COEAa Wa .t N.
Ccna 0.�t�NC� TB(12]
04
smm-s.a. muana IMiy�
Not Fa Can ctl.
Flan uc.na. I P-1181
Z N
:G N
ZO w
O S Ni
A o amo
�95 o
U� 'i oda
JJ w m Ljz
LLJ
JK pa
z m
z
Boundary/
Existing
Conditions
80 -Scale

PERENNIAL�,•Pp� �D
STREAM J ENLARGEMENT AREA 17
���� J3, COON. Yarkel dlv.
C At. He
I'D 2002]
LOCATED
lo. imm.a o..aopmait
Smol—Sctl. B.iklnp Dsflpn
OFF-SITE
Not Fw COnatruOOOn
u`""'P-"p'
PERENNIAL
l STREAM B
z
w
4,951 L. F.
Z
Q
I 1.92 ACRES
o� o.
Q Amo
I
mot
N
J 22
z � m=
J K G
W O
m
3z m
I
L
STREAM
�M
I
CENTERLINE
I WETLAND K
SERVES AS
0.25 ACRES
PROPERTY LIN
Boundary/
rY
Existing
L----------------
Conditions
---------------------------
80 -Scale
GRAPHIC SCALE 1.16 MATCHUNE
80
0 40 80 160
1.17

i 1 1 1
11 I P --
EN LARG EM ENT
--ENLARGEMENT AREA 18 INTERMITTENT 11
I ', "f .AW 48027
STREAM H9v
s.a-s.a. al9r.,a o..lvl
408 L.F.
I I I 1111 i1(159 Stic m.W�wl
0.08 ACRES
i 1,111
1 Not For CmeWCUm
FYm Ucmw f P-1191
I I
1 !
I 1 1
w 1 1, 1
JZ E
J z o
Z
FV— I I f1 >H omo
L] o��
Q I
N O
I I I !I '•. Z J ami
O5
I UK ti
I m
I I,I1 1 L
I I
I 1 I 1 »•,• Iwl_wrto-�
I •1 I
1
1 1 I !
I 1, 1 awW q�
I 1 1
1 1 STwI 1HIr
1 11 Boundary/
Existing
Conditions
80 -Scale
GRAPHIC SCALE ...
91w1 N¢
80 0 40 80 160
"` 1.18

Thoroughfare Road
d

•
fah •
CM
Asbury a oad
• Exten ' n Protest Site
•
•
FIGURE NO. Drawn By: Reviewed By:
A A /r r1 00% Asbury Chapel Road Extension Al LSR
DATE:
2004 MUMPO Thoroughfare Plan 1 12/21/15

Ole`
br,
r�0-16".
Asbury Chapel Thoroughfare
Extension on Project Site
•
W S i i
a "S•.S,>,:`�,� .4f ill K Hl It W MIR K\t
Ln'
t
, � 7
.t' r •ry
r
_r
Jq_..-
R:r,: p, ft
4 a I
I'"
9\rte
MecAlenbmg
m
r�
FIGURE NO.I Overview of Thoroughfare Plan
r
B kA /C D ` Mecklenburg Co., NC
Thoroughfare Maps
h ttp://vc. chormeck. org/
Drawn By: Reviewed By:
Al LSR
DATE:
12/21/15

i
-t:—
fit
itt
`t 1
t
till
Asbury Chapel Thoroughfare Road til!
Extension on Project Site t
° 1,1
E
t
IN
i
.;fill
FIGURE NO.
C
i
�TI�
r i
ri
,
Asbury Chapel Thoroughfare Road
Mecklenburg Co., NC
Drawn By:I Reviewed By:
Al LS R
DATE:
Thoroughfare Maps
http://vc.charmeck.oro/ 12/21/15

Sheet Index
0.0 - Sheet Index
0.1 -Vicinity Map
1.0 - Boundary / Existing Conditions (1000 scale)
2.0 - Site Layout (1000 scale)
2.1- Site Plan (200 scale)
2.2 - Site Plan (200 scale)
2.3 - Site Plan (200 scale)
3.0 - Perennial Stream B Thoroughfare Crossing Impact
4.0 - Perennial Stream B Thoroughfare Culvert Crossing Profile
5.0 - Perennial Stream B Culvert Cross Section
Xz
Mal Fa C..W .
Sheet
Index
0.0

^-a
� o �
� o
0
z
C
O
j\C
V /
C
8 a F E A56UKYCHAPELTHOKOUGHPAKF-EXTEN5ION i 5
O y ' HUNTr5VILLr-N RTH CAROUNA y �IiIt
D Z f FORESTAR
¢ q33330 CUMBERLAND BLVD, BTE 275
i ATLANTA, GA 30339 ? y F

GRAPHIC SCALE
1000 0 500 1000 2000
IN
� V7!c ^\\
� Nic
� J \
/ali�- VA'
PERENNIAL STREAM B
CRD&SING.-, If
(12 LF R1 IqF,
Qj
r\
,mac
PAP
Lj
EXISTING
DNDITIONS
Irl 11a
1.0

GRAPHIC SCALE
1000 0 500 1000 2000
,,
j/
�J
ill(J'/l ✓�//{?f(11 ����`111i );
.`.��r`�i' \������iV.. >(1 /l' � 1\\\t}—.r ^��ti\\.`.� 1}��(�\�...� `1•�.\ t\`� i
It
1� y i \ / >!�f .::t acr,.,,. \2. t F� 1. 3 _ ,c�PPP :.� ✓7 /t
r d
1 t1 1\ \ \\tit
1 f � ��\t � l� � J 3/ 1 % � � , �/n(r�v,f i _, �l�f y i �-i��v , � �J •...��
(l { C { a_ BERENN AL=SYI3EAM B t(r! fJ_ ///l "
V A G� $SING. .i //t� � r i�J1� J) (JJf Ilj
J� C PACT, k((l i < \ l 1)� / / \ \�J�
12 IDE J\t\(`( ��� ! r' " �S /\\t i�1�
,ate ,� _ r..� ��•� \`
IF
( /rL ,, k L r /i /✓l/ir — \�
4\ \ a < \
\\i� N`
—Ar
j)jtf 1�
1 r(11
r� > (�\� \�\ i/// J ✓r/ 1
�\)1
A
r17 .. c
�---
��(��•, \ \ J11
we
1
��,irl
`� > >
40\'
�`� f \7fiL��iir � `i �\\t}� ,\ �\{(r�1-10�
'M k_JJh11411 t �b c,��\\ S ��t\k —�� \`, 41 �ii(S� G..��ir> _ �h\\1 \�►y, �
W i ems.
I- ti" �
a
u
OVERALL
SITE
PLAN
ww
2.0

GRAPHIC SCALE
w.E 200 0 100 200 400
a zm o�
a�
mem rte. ern
\\tee
Nd F.
P-„in
FMu--
PERENNIL TEANI�B
R SSIN { �
FIV.'PA j 1tl /}\} ° !I}}{j}{irj}j(l//// '
/l 1
1,0 0 T ( /�•/ r,�–�� �w �.— _
�RAP
z
12"CF RIP EA H $IDEt
INCCUQED IN (� , \ (~_ \ °
°
TOTgL) ! } 1 ! III!J! t - \ - `
( SFfESHEElT3.0/ t ?
I
{ \ .V { t aMillI//I l}f(ljt{��:�\(Amo
Ld
co
j / / 1 } Jj l f 1 j !} J / / 1 ( 11(� ///1 / / / `" '." ,�\ \ j � _= ,,-. ��, /(� � ! �/ J / ! � �i'� ,-' r ) ( I ! } I ��- .--• � +��
®..,�..
/ I}tr j
fit 1 1 / 1 I
Site
Site
\ /—�.� e / r 1
/ZP(
an
If, �~` `\\ °\� \\ \ i ( / ' } 1 ) ! ! / 7 /\y
200 -Scale
2.1

J/' / / J 1 f B J�
4 \ / ./ P I /. ✓ �\ t 1 ! 0 • \ \ �\ \\ �.
aIeoS-ooz
veldBlis
! i / J }
� k / or 1 t / t < `` .., ` \ � y �,, �e ,� \ \ \
f/ // / r / t
I \\ ,-- �. \�\�, k ✓ 1
BB 11 /I/ / f r
/ / 11/ 1 1 � \ 1/// �' B 1/>B ( \ I � \\ \\�� •`
it;
10 N
o�� � �
� f, ! 1 ! �
\P \ \\ /'` 11 !I } 1 \ j t\li\i\\\\\1``�: �``\\�\\�\\4y\�/✓— � �/ kit
��-
11 !
\
—
\\`.� \` \ t} t
\' \ \\
` -' / //✓'// e' -�. f� �` /) } \\%1\11 , \ 4t B i\\\1� _e� o/�/�f/�^FFA==
do
\ 1
LOLL-d
Z PH
\, `�~` �, \ \ \ �.
•,. % 1 / ! ! l Jr r ,, / o ✓ _ � �.- / s -E + i y I ! i \\ \ \\ � ^- � -- %%•�-moi/�
\\ ``'�\41 �`�\ i\ \\ ��,y
f
\\ 1 1 P / --"^ -.l_ / ��.\\� w/ y�/� FE E
B /
\
(; !/ \ •es
i s/ ! I !i kPl
\ e \ \ \ �' •,�
\ \ \
P ! ! }\ \, "� � \ \ + B y/'. � FGF�J / r _ f j �% j
\" �.,,_ ~` --- --� /� �
e \ \ .`
v..o.�,..�q
yaubrq toL9 �`+1
\ ~\
`'\
\ 1 \ \
��pm
z2w OF?
oot ooz ooz o ooz
m� ]�V3S 3IHdVb0
aArsn

1I}l10
//0\\"
\(}\\II}i\\\t
D Ise
o -u
(A R
rl
O
o
/ 1 0
O
r
E A5BURYCHAFELTHOROUGHFARE.EXTEN51ON
HUNTER5MLMNORTH CAROUNAro FOR
GJ QQQ ggqqqyl 3330 CUMBERLAND BLVD, 5TE 275
z , t ATLANTA. GA 30339 P $
i 9 BBB

GRAPHIC SCALE
,)0 0 25 50 10(
PERENNIAL STRIEAM B
4
t li� CROS§lNd.
ff
t100 �F WPA&
(12 L�,\ RIP RAP EACH SIDE
t INCWD�D SIV TOTAL)
tu
f � 1
t
/ I E
U -1 lb
—� / ----
r PFF
w
•��i"AV
/
4 r
m
� f i
\ i I I
! �! 1 1 1 i U1
/ �
t I t I I
i
STREAM B
"HOROUGHFARE
CROSSING
�ft
3.0
r
'
1
J
I /
w
•��i"AV
/
4 r
m
� f i
\ i I I
! �! 1 1 1 i U1
/ �
t I t I I
i
STREAM B
"HOROUGHFARE
CROSSING
�ft
3.0

PROPOSED GRADE
No! fR Wrowllm
f. u,.,,. 0 �„%
WING WING
WALL
WALL
690
(
I
RIP RAP
IP RAP
z
680
670
- - -
0
�m
660
+
O 00
1 +00
Irl
Z o o2
2d
EXISTING GRADE
PIPE TO BE BURIED
SIZE = 120" RCP
PIPE TO BE l�P
1
o J
1 -FT MINIMUM INTO
CLASS III
-FT MINIMUM INTO
>
EXISTING CREEK BED
LENGTH = 72 FT
EXISTING CREEK BED
m
m
INV IN =671.00
=
INV OUT = 669.33
u
SLOPE = 2.3%
>w
m
30
0 15
30 60
wm wu m STOP. uu w m
GRAPHIC SCALE
IT'S THE Law. . LA
*.ATM
PERENNIAL
STREAM B
THOROUGHFARE
CULVERT
CROSSING
PROFILE
®r ■n
4.0

-��,�..rya.�+l�fi.rs3.lwttaxiYn:ar51t6syC
�
A
��11�Q1�,ffi�. LtI'n�,M�Ofu�I� b62�1C�f�PYWR/!f„Ji
M�••••p-A2ros7L �'}5t
�:f7iFa �
-
•
�i ..r
;,,�.11•� �¢
�
�ZY�f•Rs1l]P6T✓.-/�
dcvnwt+t�=m'yn�crrr �sr�ras�.r r��`,�aysmatt
•lWOSra.ill:; Ixl'OfWli\.i:DL)
�Lvsst .Ivw'crla3a��dmr.,,>_
�� �
1
�.�y.mJiln1TA,
.... n.u�_' yV�N1NMR4Ril.1CTdV'dVGli>$G`
hi3iKltNfj[��VFI:{�SvIQYIIYJ/���F194
- liLLk /�"��\
i. a�+�iJeseir22vv.s>=w SY..�L.6\R�•x'IrtJmej!1rAM%�11�
a Y'1 1CsiVkClfNl�iwms8/�Yiie•1u1
�„`1*piYOiiL`�(1'4YF
•�C14�� Qi+x=�tl:/lb',Y2Ai'
�"�_ �w.avm.ay._=rtrrs.CRfw�maQ.r'�•e.��
�� � �
B�In��s6
f %2.
•
Wrarw.�.�rxasH.na
�Rraaawr: vr�oa� IC -M
-�rSDfILiGIM'ffil•�/ xwrt-�
�aa•seex!\.:+In�
.cam••• • _•.�.,e '.f I.yafla�wex1-
�
1 11
1
1 1 1
11
11 1
p �
•
•
1
•
•
•
'RSiL 'a "BY��
s
"7
�-"
^vrs
��", �1f•'1S.V,'
'FN/Ss�-
S17 ',ib Yy;y�f/�.
iL'TF _ 1[MfMRj6F��J !f/��R�\iitKY.>ti
�_'Mf4! tffbl�R3Y•L'rP1Si� L. 3p)��S.IILTif�fl'YP/ID.�i.�
�\�}yy✓�/iifG' lniJt
Y► 2.fi.Al wi!!li>�
�
�yy 61Li1C � �
_s'/gft"_S7�SCT�1•Y�.: _ �
._. ll ICTEO
'gm)a{nT-r31>Y.171%[�'3^'�
^�A'L�. T'7/��■
p/'CK�T•_ r+G+It6R'"ti''`,�II� S'� \��•
��;`��
G(fQ .d1 :IiG1XCS1'afRTSGM
.ri. Y`i�! �+24I�i1�Si%.1tRW9W'RtC
Tp[y9t000RV/Jf13� -
i?Itrr�pSWR CY., „
cg' .,
E^y���.�i. 4�SJ'A�►T
�n _
2R4k71Ht++{S..frLT':C¢e�y
^. nazovl w3�rssnA�♦ix.r.�e>!'a+��in
. �
'�
• 1
�Fraresnxlsvn�l�u�.'I•� i�
1�nlLsr♦car���enrr��rvanotw•e
w`�aaswte�rwx+e�y�i�^osva�tvrs:�+«+rs�.r�vn+vn.-wl<cusa:.
.tom
�
���
���
s
PERENNIAL
1 11
1
1 1 1
11
11 ISTREAM
B
CROSSCULVERT
of ♦ ♦ ♦ •SECTION
.
1

�
�
►
i
:�� ;<_. c.: �
? c T, A j,. 2 » # «�q?;# I
,)©?, AR \:

Sheet
Index
...
0.0
�rMw
Sheet Index
0.0 - Sheet Index'
0.1 -Vicinity Map
1.0 - Boundary / Existing Conditions (1000 scale)
2.0 - Site Layout (1000 scale)
-„q
Fft U,, P
2.1- Site Plan (200 scale)
2.2 - Site Plan (200 scale)
2.3 - Site Plan (200 scale)
2.4 - Site Plan (200 scale)
W N
3.0 - Stream GG/G and Wetland FFF Impact
°
3.1 - Wetland K Impact
o CoQ
2� Z 2 56
3.2 - Perennial Stream B Crossing
S -
3.3 - Intermittent Stream H & Wetland I Impacts
UQ
w m
4.0 - Intermittent Stream H Culvert Crossing Profile
5.0 - Intermittent Stream H Culvert Cross Section
6.0 -Wetland FFF Anti -Seep Collar Locations
6.1 - Wetland K Temporary Clearing Impact
6.2 - Anti -Seep Collar Detail/Notes
6.3 - Intermittent Stream GG/G Cross Section
�..
Sheet
Index
...
0.0

^-a
v�
�' to
� o
� z rTl
� o
0
z
� o
o
C�
c
C a E E WALDE.N5U5DN15ION-FHA5E.Lbz
H(ANTCR5VILLC, NORTH CAROUNA � fit
-P
D Z r FOR q s•
Q 3330 CUM ERLAND 5LW, 5TE 275 igg pcliy(II�P
ATLANTA, GA 30339 3 $ e i'"

GRAPHIC SCALE
1000 0 500 1000 200(
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIL __J=
PROJECT DATA
PROJECT DATA:
PROPOSED SUBDIVISION NAME: WALDEN SUBDIVISION
PARCEL NUMBERS (NOW OR FORMERLY): 01943117
DEVELOPER: FORESTAR REAL ESTATE GROUP INC.
ZONING: NR(CD)
3330 CUMBERLAND BLVD., STE 275
ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30339
PHASE 16 2 ACREAGE: 62.06
770-272-2138
SITE ACREAGE 219.70
DESIGNER: AMICUS PARTNERS, PLLC
PROPOSED USE SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED
331 CODDLE MARKET DRIVE, SUITE 110
CONCORD•NORTH CAROLINA 28027
704-573-1621
`a` `i�?f 1(� =.r�` \,\l.`�' �, F'`. \ !``=\��\��=• �`` �)( (flln\�: — 11tf1 f%i/
^11r�r/r��,1ll���l1v
0
1re (`,� ,}1\ \',1�`j
��� J � _ �/ / �\%/� \' � ,\�\\1 X11✓/ it �{��\ �11 -� �t�\\ \ ,•���%
75,
,r.
PERENNIAL ST RE
v
r CROSSIASBUNG IMP
PART OF CHAPEL
=,\/^\V j
THORO FARE
} \ f EXTEN SUBMITTAL �` �11Z\\� / Cvs 7Li. r n JJ f(r�i
e��
MITT
STREAM GG! I ' 1 ✓_' i�� � +J \L-,tK �` y ^ �_— � �
\ (C ( ? 3 „ F TEMPORARY IMP
i(§(�j//jc� �7 � r�`
c,��� Irl r
7_75
\ W TLAND
t
Asa : F I .AIPOR NR)' 1114PACT7 a'R�
r.SHEET 3 I) `�` )i `
WTFFF' - — - 1, 4. I /moi✓ / r �,
){ f\\ / ), ii \ ✓/�� //// A
%1 �c
r \ / / =✓ J1�{/ /A / N MSA \ a'=t r FET o
S T�1/ crMEAN, H
4 \ .�r✓%
12 LF P'iA.P
/(r�i1,111
INCLUDE!: r, Toj)X�
S��
(71 �� �\ % 1 \— U { ►1 ,.<,;,.
• �t(���/��1fj/�\\\ ( ll { %r / !rl'� \ \ �/}{11t) )y�
• �. \.1 f l� IJ2 tf �\���\\` �/ �j� (/( �i= %f t ��/Itr< J \t��� �� i� �+� 1 C11<�✓ -: \ �r\�- �
s•.J ,� \„ �`�` ) J („/)1 �ai�`\�\��1- ... �1 /11#`,� �1 t� � \\ \ � !j l\\1,i�,_, ^ 111
\((l�(�ift
<< r I > � \� 1t n i a`�rJi 5�1111i L� JjI `lll\(41l }i> (1\yM,- t�{r�ikl1k{�'/A \ �% flu 1 r�il(St sir}
NM .� o.rAl.rl.
Rn 1iw� � F1N1
EXISTING
;ONDITIONS
4Mlft
1.0

PROJECT DATA:
PROPOSED SUBDIVISION NAME: WALDEN SUBDIVISION
DEVELOPER: FORESTAR REAL ESTATE GROUP INC.
3330 CUMBERLAND BLVD., STE 275
ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30339
770-272-2138
DESIGNER: AMICUS PARTNERS, PLLC
331 CODDLE MARKET DRIVE, SUITE 110
CONCORD, NORTH CAROLINA 28027
704-573-1621
PROJECT DATA:
PARCEL NUMBERS (NOW OR FORMERLY): 01943117
ZONING: NR(CD)
PHASE 1 6 2 ACREAGE: 62.06
SITE ACREAGE: 219.70
PROPOSED USE SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED
� . � � ?.:� �•-~� ' <i ��-fN f! �)}�� [.,�,1{) (( {may f d�^��\�; pF . J� �J � l 1 i `\ /�/ r/ ^� �1 � �` } i\\ �
1 �����\�! � -�\` // } // �� `�li�)li :\1 (• \i7///J{t\�(\L `1R" //�}} r �a �J�i �l\�_//
•. Lam_?% � �\\\�1��� /(t l(� r �� ll 1�i)( \11� � �/((\\\ \\\\ � ) f( \ it lClli t{\�\�\�'�'
J/JL�//ice/1j(�{1L�
\\\\ )�
`s, �r��=' ; ���\ •= � _ / •. •, ` �' i_ ,:'� �f1' \lam >_ % �\ \\� \t /� \ \ �"� -`
✓,i'r -� ` - J PERN^IAL SIRE B
C�`9ct
CROSSING. IMP
\1 �` PART GF. SBU CHAP r,
THORO FARE WE TL,:1 r
\) EXTEN SUBMITTAL f
} I l t /ills
IN
Fz
MITT T
STREAM GG/
40 LF TEMPORARY IMP
USitl4 �,�„ a (1 ` �r� % `- \� ' ��� \+•-_ -r; /�f }! tr } I({}'` `�l ���JLi �i J r�
w TLAW)
K E 0F MPORAAI' IMFkACT
SHEET
GRA 2 �CvAf.E� y �_) \ ���\ _
t'f j --N _T3.3./
~J y /qS �v IQ BF f/p•. M.ITTENT r//l itj/t (�i'Z-/�
r��-
�I`RFAMH
S \1R ✓r��3'?�l}} i}((c� //i/ /`_, —/ 5LIL. IMPA.'G•-�yf
(12 LI- •.,•n `�!@C \
- r; rp )) 1 I� /)r/�� i��•,��
�
Mat Far Cw6Ve1M
Fi- u— / P-1191
Overall
Site
Plan
Rlrl M.
2.0

GRAPHIC SCALE
200 0 100 200 400
} J
</ io f m m
SEWETO�B� VA`
SEE�BOREDo'�.ti --....
SHEET &V \\
/'
-NATtJRE tRA1L
-Lb ION -MA \VARY
` ON—
EXISTING'
\ECR
—CONDITIONS 11 /
r r t 9rf!/t�lt/ /
rjlf
W _ ILP.'NWFF l ,' A
3i8�7i
/ f
r
1 ,. E.Et 310
!
I _bi fll''l 1 FNT
/GG�G _''INT_ERMITT !) /�
L1Fj/ /I \SlREAl1�lGG/G�(1f�
EN.P0F?NFjy/ ~ `Np"TMPACT\� J ( }
SEWETO�B� VA`
SEE�BOREDo'�.ti --....
SHEET &V \\
/'
-NATtJRE tRA1L
-Lb ION -MA \VARY
` ON—
EXISTING'
\ECR
—CONDITIONS 11 /
r r t 9rf!/t�lt/ /
rjlf
Not F, Ca�6u.Um
F11.�r 0 P -„w
Site
Plan
200 -Scale
2.1
/ f
r
Not F, Ca�6u.Um
F11.�r 0 P -„w
Site
Plan
200 -Scale
2.1

�4 \ I 77 \� t I \ `•mom\ \�\ \ iII/rte
o
/7e
\
\ 73 / 79/ \ \ \ / / I 92
�—
w ' \72 v 80
_10o i / / ' I I I I 1
71 \ r8r
\ 70 I / g2�\ /R/ 102-- — 93 — - -� 89 J - / / ,
/ \ m
i / —
69 I i83 / 88 A / Z / o
67�OD
IAC
MY
•,, . �`, AAeE AREA / rr]' � m -tn r ' f�/ �,l
\ '— 1 ' t 1-� m OQm mT /Z
4.8
\/ \ \; \ z — — \ ti , �8 47 _ (A� r49
o
\ I�53 62 T 51a � , / `� / - O O Z C:cn z 5 � _IG/_ �:0 �CD
apm
co z i
\ __. SAND_ .� l i . O.•, /� i, �.�� � ;�
\cl)\\\\\\\ (
SF-2—
m\
m ,.-,41
tn 7 '0.S
a'on;� / f!I >_—; e �, \ \\ \�\\1 I) R ((, l t \ \II \ t I
/
—
-Z 3' ! 42/
// 27 29\\
/rte 35,
rri
i.z5 Ac\
N j WALDEN SUBDIVISION-PHA5E., s z g
I1UNTeR SVILLP NOR CAROLINA till
N €g ®
N 4 FOF
3330 CUMeE RE5TAR
RIAND BLVD, STE 275
i ATLANTA• GA 30339 P O A
g SS 6

GRAPHIC SCALE
200 0
100 200 400 Us �
Atc
`� \ \ � j
�` `` \ Off. \\ \ \ _ ..- �-. `�, \`` `,\`` \ \ \ \ \ \ ! --'' •,.. `' �-- --1�' — \. �, �-- -- — — — '" 1 ! i \
.�� .�,.
\ � ..•,�,` �\\\\� \ t1\)I1I}f \/ ff 1 I �--�\ � \ -�� ---��— _�� =
I1
SjANITAM �=�` —~; r 1 � � /
�FQ
—SEWER\ —~ — `� —
nm I, -0P -11M
/ r ~
4� <i/.
P� j /� � � '� � �,�`. \ \ I /j j I I \ t \ �' , �'— /,/-'.�� 1\tt `\ \ �. `•._.-',�/
0 0 0a
t I r �.��-`-4_—
�2 'o
-
'`\\
\ \ ` ` /NATORE=T�RAIL•
`\\,\ \ \\ LOCAMOIV /'
a/ \
/
/0
; , \ MAIJ VARY
\,SASiED
EXISTIfVCS�IL•D'
j� `��,\
--_ l/ i G.�.�i�-P� 1 0\
•\\
\ra-,�Z �� l— \ \\ ` \`,
\\\\\\ tt l 1 1' (\ k—�
Site
-=�'7EhiP�l"vPACT1\ 1\\
\\\� I ;����
�1r �'i ���� V'�ir�'I �� ��\\\� 1� �(;•.\\: - �/� ..—�_" _ ,._
Plan
_ ,SFE S! BEET 3.1 ( \ 1
`�`� � ,- °''moi' /-,n•-., \ � \\ � � \�' \\ \ \\ � \ �. — -
200 -Scale
2.3

sa r.s
/ 1
' -- / T-�..�'� •� � t,,. v'
/ /_ —� ��'� {
� � �
� � ry P� y' l t •� �9 /
aleld OZ
U
F
Ile
'Tfi
i�''-\l',)VdV41VON//1� '�
1 J J I J /
�a ``
% - ot
243,�lN,,AH311gl
foo
Xtarc
P
M7 ON
001, ON
A�9�0 a! WI
'^
3IV3s OlHdda0
AMR
awsn

i
I
GRAPHIC SCALE
50 0 25 50 100*+
1 _
ETLAN D;'F a ► o/ / i `� '
,338SF Tt ,
SANITA
EWER;-1A
CT • ` 81T
�0
SEES ET,,',
N
Oz lt!�53
` • ♦ \' \\ \ \ \ co o 2m
\ \ 1
• \� E `66/6
.ter a.
_— • ♦ • X1r�r-r'r•r•,• •r�,�r•r \fir\ \ r.r�,� '/ •r \ \�. \ \ vv
\ \ ` // \ • r' \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ STREAM GG/G
AND
• \ \� \t' 1
WEFF
//_``_ _—\\\ \�� \\ \\� \\\ \\\ IMPACT

_
3MrZ"
GRAPHIC SCALE
s:r-se. iii �.ae
50
0 25
50 100
f
■
r
I '
' �WETLAND K
805 SF—TEMPORARY
i••
f, .
SANITARY SEWER
f"
f' IMPACT
i
i
z mo
1,
i
SE SHEET 6.1 AND 6.2
O o poQ
z<
/
■
Z m
—�
�~
f
/
1\�
y i
----- —
�.,,
' "" �+_._, /'!
_■ � /
rJ
atm
9 Z99
/
-
\
`
WETLAND K
IMPACT
89Q89
°`� �_� — ���„e�
LU
ter' /f
�°
3.1

I�
GRAPHIC SCALE
50 0 25 50 100
Sol
\ �"F AI L''TAI FRS
\ wiDVIDED BY,
`DVE40P
aJ N
0
BigJ
Z mo
OOZ 20--
D J "mz
d> > > 5
tl� M
\ Q z M
' I L STAI OSS
Is
PIS YIDED 8Y
DE• kLOPEI,
RICAL
o e
A
/ e �
a � �
a �
� a
PERENNIAL
STREAM B
CROSSING
W.d'.
3.2
3m coft UWA elm
12°220V
.z
ft mzf+ "24 o.en
� \
°ry
xo� � arwetlm
aJ N
0
BigJ
Z mo
OOZ 20--
D J "mz
d> > > 5
tl� M
\ Q z M
' I L STAI OSS
Is
PIS YIDED 8Y
DE• kLOPEI,
RICAL
o e
A
/ e �
a � �
a �
� a
PERENNIAL
STREAM B
CROSSING
W.d'.
3.2

GRAPHIC SCALE
50 0 25 50 100
\ \ \cl
WETLAND\I \ INTERMlTT��1T\
47` SFI,,MPA `, ~STREAM -H \
\E �H.E'ETJ44\I, ��~\ OSSING
�-5 - -F I M PA�T�
_I_NCLUDED- - OT
1 I L STAIRS
PR -YIDED 8Y
RICAL
.-T.
/
Fv Ono6udlon
Ffm Ib— / F11Y1
/
- r
- - - / INTERMITTENT
/ n/1 STREAM H &
c� </
WETLAND I
IMPACTS
_- --- , 3.3
�c
U5 z
I
99.
--.
9998
- r
- - - / INTERMITTENT
/ n/1 STREAM H &
c� </
WETLAND I
IMPACTS
_- --- , 3.3

4
MT -r.
OAlb WAR
v"
Nut Fa 0—bUM.
Flt UN / F6-1191
WING
WALL
690 PROPOSED GRADE
680
670
660 U5 0 0 omQ
z
0+00 1 +00 2+00_�
RIP RAP SIZE = 36" RCP 7
RIP RAP Q
EXISTING GRADE CLASS III s U,
PIPE TO BE BURIED o
LENGTH = 195 FT z
1 -FT MINIMUM INTO INV IN =678.00 PIPE TO BE BURIED _
EXISTING CREEK BED INV OUT = 671.61 1 -FT MINIMUM INTO
SLOPE = 3.3% EXISTING CREEK BED 3
30 0 15 30 60
s vw m STOP. boa m m
GRAPHIC SCALE "�`am=
"'"rb..
IT'S THE LAW.
b•b tr
OWIb �
INTERMITTENT
STREAM H
CULVERT
CROSSING
arm N.
4.0

690
•ie�
6706--
0+00
706--0+00
HORIZONTAL GRAPHIC SCALE
1 INCH = 20 FEET
VERTICAL GRAPHIC SCALE
1 INCH = 2 FEET
2 0 1 2 4
SIZE = 36' RCP
CLASS III
LENGTH = 195 FT
',- PIPE TO BE BURIED
UPSTREAM HEADWALL AT 1 -FT MINIMUM INTO
INTERMITTENT STREAM H EXISTING CREEK BED
e tau m STOP. cAL w m
O[ -CAL CUM A7 M1.
IT'S THE LAW. ;
1+00
% Lr-
Mot Fm M6udlon
Flm Ul . FL -11M
.. ma.®
mom..
STREAM H
CULVERT
CROSS
SECTION
Irl"
5.0

LFCfMD
GRAPHIC SCALE
50 0 25 50
100
ANTI -SEEP
-Ei ;... COLLAR �IIIL7�:
\III!!;:=_ _:••_
R ' FT
.�IjIV
=•i11?11L� �IIIL�
ANTI -SEEP
EV ERY 150 FT -
SHEET 6.2
���-iillllll�.
COLLAR
SEE SPECS ON
•.�'S�
1TEMPORARY
A
GRADES
TO '
i •
BE RESTORED
•
�i
TO EXISTING•�� �, �.
3M C.".
ftevo
•.��. •YI. Orel
I
m. U.._ / r -HM
Cz-
WETLAND F/FF
ANTI -SEEP
COLLAR
LOCATIONS

GRAPHIC SCALE
..
50
0 25 50 100
-
r* /
r \
■
.
1 ■
■
IMF. OenheeUml
FTm Lb—. P-11°1
V
■
40' MAX WIDTH
4TLAND Ki
i TEMPORARY
a 8 S�TEMPORARY
/ �
CLEARING.
N
� o
SANI�ARY SEWER
GRADES TO
Nm
�/IPACT
BE RESTORED
° Z oa
i TO EXISTING
° > g
z E ¢
CONDITIONS
W = m
-
3
;
i
can r..
Z9g
■
. er
899 999 _
-
-
9L9�L9�
® -
i
------------_ .
--------- ■
'
WETLAND K
TEMPORARY
1 I
---
CLEARING
IMPACT
1
•-'_,\ d7?� 11Q
Ln
�
6.1
989 089

Water Quality Certification No. 3884
ANTI -SEEP COLLAR
PLAN
Water Quality Cefhiicavon No. 3884
8
Water Quality Certification No. 3884
the Minimum Design Criteria for the Fast -Track Permitbrg of Pump Stations and Force Main
published on the DNislon of Water Quabty's wobsde. Exceptions to lhls condition require
applxtathon submittal to, and vmtten approval by, the Division.
12. If concrete Is used during the construction, then all necessary measures shall be taken to
prevent drrect contact between uncured or curing concrete and waters M the state. Water
that inadvertently contacts uncured concrete shall not be discharged to waters tithe state
due to the potential torr elevated pH and possible aquatic hfel fish kills.
13. Any rip•rao required for ptoper culvert placement stream stabilization. or restoration of
temporarily disturbed areas shall be restricted to the the area directly Impacted by approved
canshuctian activity. All dp-mp shall be buried andi'D., "keyed in' such that the Original stream
elevation and streambank centaurs are restored and maintained. Placement of rip -rap or
other approved materials shall not result a de-stabil,zalron Of the stream hed Or banks
upstream or downstream of the area
14 Annual native species suitable forwet locations shall be planted and established vnthin
jurisdictional wetlands fersolf and erbs�cn control. Non•nattvo perennials such as fescue are
prohibited,
15, A ane -time application of ferbh¢or to re-establish vegetabon is allowed in distorted areas
including riparian butters, but Is restricted to no cfnaer than 10 feet from top of bank of
streams. Any fertilizer application must comply with all other Federal. State and Laze'
regulations.
16 The construction corridor (including access roads• sediment ani erosion control measures
and stockpiling of materials) is Iinvled to 40 feet ( 12 2 maters) in width in wetlands and across
stream channels and mutt be minimized to the maximum extent practicable
17 Permanent, maintained access corridors shall be reslncled to the minimum width practicable
and shalt not exceed 15 feet in width except at manhole txadans A 15•foot by 15 -feet
perpendicular vehicle turnaround must be spaced at I?abl 500 feet (152.4 meters) apart
18 'An ariti•saep collar shaft be Fwd a1 Che daHnslream (utdiky tine gradiem) w'eUand'bountlary
-and every 150 feet (45 7 meters) up the gradient urild the utMy exits the wittland for burled
utilay fines. Anb-seep ccilars-may be constructed unit, Gass 8 concrete, compacted Nay,
,PVC pipe, cc metal Collars. Wetland crossings that are directionally dnlRd, and perpendicular_
wetland crossings that are open cut and less than 150 feet (d5 7 meters) long do not require
anti -seep carars. The compacted clay shall have a specific inlilration of 1 X 10.5 cmtsee or
tars. A rotten and plan vm%v d ogrom is attached for the anti -seep cogam.
The-follc vodgspe:dicatc9s shall aopt y to Elai ss if concrete.
6j, MimKLiii epmem cr3nte`ni ikki per cubtc yard iii# r6uncr d course a'ggrejaie 5 0
b)' Minimum cement content, sacks per cubic yard with angular course aggregate 5,5'
c) Maximum lvaler�oimttm raho gallons per sac* 6 8
d) Slump rangy 2" to d`c
e) Mmimtrm strongui - 28 Qay Dsi_ 2,500
ig The applicant shell have a spacvfa plan for restoring wetland contours Any excess matenal
will be removed to a high ground disposal area.
The mixing of topsoil and subsoils within the wetlands alorg ubRy corridors shall be
minimized to the greatest extent practical, During excavafon, the soils shag be placed on
sane to minimize impacts whenever possible Topsoil excavateG from utility trenches will be
Water Quatity Corti icaLon No. 3884 5
sm a u. ilab! ttm.
rusr�°
a ttr o..r■�
r.. Far on+rsr.e
� rm�y ori
t� >�
eat Fa Oarb m.
Film Lb— 0 P-1191
ANTI -SEEP
COLLAR
DETAIU
NOTES
WIM w
6.2
Utility Line
(DIametar Varies)
if It I
I Class B Concrete
or Compacted Clay
IIIIIIIIII.
II/III/I//•
Michas
1h Wift
Not
to exceed t feet
SECTION
%I CII
/I lI
IIII
IIII.
IIII or Compacted Clay
' IIII
1•
I/
I.iII"„IIi'I�
III
,� II ►I
III
Inches
`,Gjnches
'Cinch :.
�"
PLAN
Water Quality Cefhiicavon No. 3884
8
Water Quality Certification No. 3884
the Minimum Design Criteria for the Fast -Track Permitbrg of Pump Stations and Force Main
published on the DNislon of Water Quabty's wobsde. Exceptions to lhls condition require
applxtathon submittal to, and vmtten approval by, the Division.
12. If concrete Is used during the construction, then all necessary measures shall be taken to
prevent drrect contact between uncured or curing concrete and waters M the state. Water
that inadvertently contacts uncured concrete shall not be discharged to waters tithe state
due to the potential torr elevated pH and possible aquatic hfel fish kills.
13. Any rip•rao required for ptoper culvert placement stream stabilization. or restoration of
temporarily disturbed areas shall be restricted to the the area directly Impacted by approved
canshuctian activity. All dp-mp shall be buried andi'D., "keyed in' such that the Original stream
elevation and streambank centaurs are restored and maintained. Placement of rip -rap or
other approved materials shall not result a de-stabil,zalron Of the stream hed Or banks
upstream or downstream of the area
14 Annual native species suitable forwet locations shall be planted and established vnthin
jurisdictional wetlands fersolf and erbs�cn control. Non•nattvo perennials such as fescue are
prohibited,
15, A ane -time application of ferbh¢or to re-establish vegetabon is allowed in distorted areas
including riparian butters, but Is restricted to no cfnaer than 10 feet from top of bank of
streams. Any fertilizer application must comply with all other Federal. State and Laze'
regulations.
16 The construction corridor (including access roads• sediment ani erosion control measures
and stockpiling of materials) is Iinvled to 40 feet ( 12 2 maters) in width in wetlands and across
stream channels and mutt be minimized to the maximum extent practicable
17 Permanent, maintained access corridors shall be reslncled to the minimum width practicable
and shalt not exceed 15 feet in width except at manhole txadans A 15•foot by 15 -feet
perpendicular vehicle turnaround must be spaced at I?abl 500 feet (152.4 meters) apart
18 'An ariti•saep collar shaft be Fwd a1 Che daHnslream (utdiky tine gradiem) w'eUand'bountlary
-and every 150 feet (45 7 meters) up the gradient urild the utMy exits the wittland for burled
utilay fines. Anb-seep ccilars-may be constructed unit, Gass 8 concrete, compacted Nay,
,PVC pipe, cc metal Collars. Wetland crossings that are directionally dnlRd, and perpendicular_
wetland crossings that are open cut and less than 150 feet (d5 7 meters) long do not require
anti -seep carars. The compacted clay shall have a specific inlilration of 1 X 10.5 cmtsee or
tars. A rotten and plan vm%v d ogrom is attached for the anti -seep cogam.
The-follc vodgspe:dicatc9s shall aopt y to Elai ss if concrete.
6j, MimKLiii epmem cr3nte`ni ikki per cubtc yard iii# r6uncr d course a'ggrejaie 5 0
b)' Minimum cement content, sacks per cubic yard with angular course aggregate 5,5'
c) Maximum lvaler�oimttm raho gallons per sac* 6 8
d) Slump rangy 2" to d`c
e) Mmimtrm strongui - 28 Qay Dsi_ 2,500
ig The applicant shell have a spacvfa plan for restoring wetland contours Any excess matenal
will be removed to a high ground disposal area.
The mixing of topsoil and subsoils within the wetlands alorg ubRy corridors shall be
minimized to the greatest extent practical, During excavafon, the soils shag be placed on
sane to minimize impacts whenever possible Topsoil excavateG from utility trenches will be
Water Quatity Corti icaLon No. 3884 5
sm a u. ilab! ttm.
rusr�°
a ttr o..r■�
r.. Far on+rsr.e
� rm�y ori
t� >�
eat Fa Oarb m.
Film Lb— 0 P-1191
ANTI -SEEP
COLLAR
DETAIU
NOTES
WIM w
6.2

HORIZONTAL GRAPHIC SCALE
1 INCH = 20 FEET
I I I I 40 =met.
VERTICAL GRAPHIC SCALE
1 INCH = 2 FEET
2 O 1 2 4 pal Far LL.baenm
Am u— ® 1-I1CI
EX. CREEK BOTTOM
ELEV: 671.00 FT
EX. TOP OF BANK
ELEV: 673.61 FT
a
O N
N
�m
26.6
680
U)
W = m
670
660
0+00 0t25 8" SS LINE
ELEV: 665.64 FT (TOP)
CONTINUES ON IN *-y
INTERMITTENT STREAM GG/G BOTH DIRECTIONS
CROSS SECTION
b.4 ar
bW1b R
W.d T/s
INTERMITTENT
STREAM GG/G
CROSS
SECTION
vac,m mSTOP. rru n6 is
06-C" ON= AT [p.
IT'S THE LAW. ,
\ 6.3

f r Parcels Not Verified
o - 1 PERENNIAL TRIBUTARY N
i WETLAND VV b USACE
0.01 Acres y 2676 1f/1.54 Acres
INTERMITTENT � _" "��•,
WETLAND V A ' : TRIBUTARY P
0.01 Acres �, 921 If/0.1 Acres H
EVALUATION
Y FORM (DP7)
WETLAND U
1.01 Acres 7 -
' INTERMITTENT
%O TRIBUTARY Q 19 i
INTERMITTENT
-or TRIBUTARY M 8 986 If/0.12 Acres
tvia 1193 1f/0.49 Acres
1 UPLAND DATA
INTERMITTENT FORM (UDP2)
TRIBUTARY A 9
141 If/0.05 Acres *! WETLAND DATA
PIPES
10 FORM (DP4)
PERENNIAL WETLAND R
TRIBUTARY B 0.03 Acres
4951 If/1.92 Acres » , ( 4 '
STREAM' f% WETLAND DATA
PIPE EVALUATION ` /~ FORM (DPS) PIPES
.. FORM (DP6) t. ' ,r r
4 j
OPEN WATER °' n
POND D ;
0.22 Acres
WETLAND DATAks1
, ' o FORM (DP3)
WETLAND G F f UPLAND DATA
! 2 Q FORM (UDP1)
0.05 Acres Fure
n
WETLAND FFF ` 3 "^> WETLAND K
0.24 Acres T'r�D� INTERMITTENT 0.25 Acres
TRIBUTARY GG/G
0.04 Acres INTERMITTENT
q' WETLAND I TRIBUTARY H
y #
LANDSCAPE PHOTO 408 If/0.08 Acres
�' ` 0.06 Acres
LOCATION AND DIRECTION _ -
NON -JURISDICTIONAL
• GULLIES/SWALESRevised based on 12/17/13
710,(
STREAM ! �' ,(' ' ' ; e• —� USACEfield verification
FIGURE NO. WALDEN SUBDIVISION Drawn By: Reviewed By:
8 Mecklenburg Co., NC NRN LSR
DATE:
DELINEATION MAP – WATERS OF THE U.S.
EXISTING CONDITIONS STUDY 8/18/15
SUBJECT TO USACE/NCDENR VERIFICATION

ASBURY THOROUGHFARE EXTENSIONNVALDEN SUBDIVISION PHASE 1 AND 2
APPROXIMATE JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND AND STREAM DIMENSIONS
JURISDICTIONAL WETLANDS
Sq Ft
Acres
JURISDICTIONAL RPWs
LF
Acres
Jurisdictional Wetland C
435.6
0.01
Jurisdictional Intermittent Tributary A
141
0.05
Jurisdictional Wetland F
1742.4
0.04
Junsdictional Perennial Tributary B
4951
1.92
Jurisdictional Wetland FFF
10454
0.24
Jurisdictional Intermdtent Tributary GG/G
631
0.04
Jurisdictional Wetland 1
2613.6
0.06
Jurisdictional Intermittent Tributary H
408
0.08
Jurisdictional Wetland K
10890
0.25
Junsdictional Intermittent Tributary M
1193
0.49
Jurisdictional Wetland R
1306.8
0.03
Jurisdictional Perennial Tributary N
2676
1.54
Jurisdictional Wetland V
435.6
0.01
Jurisdictional Intermittent Tributary P
921
0.1
Junsdictional Wetland W
435.6
0.01
Junsdictional Intermittent Tributary Q
986
0.12
Jurisdictional Wetland U
43996
1.01
Total Jurisdictional Wetlands
72310
1.66
Total Jurisdictional RPWs
11907
4.34
JURISDICTIONAL PONDS
Jurisdictional Pond D
9583.2
0.22
Total Jurisdictional Ponds
9583.2
0.22
TOTAL SITE ACREAGE 75.7
TOTAL WATERS OF THE US ACREAGE 6.22
TOTAL UPLAND ACRES 69.48
NOTES
Table 1: WOUS
Summary Table
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Leonard S. Rindner. PLLC.

oaf

Photo 5: View of Intermittent Tributary M (view north).
Walden
FPGMecklenburg County, NC - Photos taken 08/17/15
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Leonard 5 lLndner, PLLC.

0

00 ILIiR' �'� '�y ♦t` �:� fix. a. °j
a .
7 .
1
1
ar
e, pit/� '
•'�
, .�`��
i
0

Photo 9: Photo of Wetland R (view southeast).
Walden
WEP G Mecklenburg County, NC - Photos taken 08/17/15
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.

D

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Walden/Brown Property City/County: Huntersville, Mecklenburg
Aoolicant/Owner: Bayard Group State: NC
Investigator(s): NRN, HAC Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): valley Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): MLRA 136 Lat: 35.4164 N Long: -80.8165 W
Soil Map Unit Name: WkE: Wilkes loam
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X
Are Vegetation ' Soil - or Hydrology ' significantly disturbed?
Are Vegetation ' Soil - or Hydrology - naturally problematic?
Sampling Date: 8/17/15
_ Sampling Point: UDP 1
- Slope (%): 0-2
Datum:
NWI classification:
No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes= No=
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes= No = Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes= No 0✓ within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes= No 0✓
Remarks:
Data point taken approximately 30' south of Wetland FFF.
Representative Upland Data Form for Wetlands C, F, HH, I and K.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
=Surface Soil Cracks (66)
=Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
=Surface Water (Al) =True Aquatic Plants (1314)
=High Water Table (A2) =Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
E::]Drainage Patterns (1310)
=Saturation (A3) =Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
=Moss Trim Lines (B16)
=Water Marks (131) =Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
=Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
=Sediment Deposits (132) =Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
=Crayfish Burrows (C8)
=Drift Deposits (133) =Thin Muck Surface (C7)
=Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
=Algal Mat or Crust (134) =Other (Explain in Remarks)
=Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
=Iron Deposits (135)
=Geomorphic Position (D2)
=Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
=Shallow Aquitard (D3)
=Water -Stained Leaves (69)
=Microtopographic Relief (D4)
=Aquatic Fauna (1313)
=FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes= No= Depth (inches): -
Water Table Present? Yes= No= Depth (inches): -
Saturation Present? Yes= No= Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes= No ✓�
_
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont —Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicato
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' ) % Cover Species? Status
1. Acer rubrum 70 Y FAC
2 Liquidambar styraciflua 20 Y FAC
3 Liriodendron tulipifera 5 N FACU
6.
7. _
95
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 30'
1 Liquidambar styraciflua 10
2.
4.
6.
7.
10
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30'
1.
3.
6.
7.
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30' ) —
1 Hexastylis arifolia 5
2 Lycopodium digitatum 5
4.
7
9.
10.
11.
12. _
10
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1.
4.
5.
or on a separate sheet.)
Sampling Point: UDP 1
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 5 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 80% (A/B)
= Total Cover Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
Y FAC FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x4=
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
= Total Cover"
01 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
5( 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
03 - Prevalence Index is :53.01
04 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
= Total Cover Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Y FAC Tree —Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
Y NI approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb —All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine—All woody vines, regardless of height.
= Total Cover
= i otai cover
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes✓ No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont —Version 2.0

SOIL
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to
Sampling Point: UDP 1
r or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc Texture Remarks
0-16 7.5YR 5/6 100 Silty loam
RM=Reduced Matrix. MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
=Histosol (Al)
=Histic Epipedon (A2)
=Black Histic (A3)
=Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
=Stratified Layers (A5)
=2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
=Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
=Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
=Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
=Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
=Sandy Redox (S5)
=Stripped Matrix (S6)
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Sc
=Dark Surface (S7)
=2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
=Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
=Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
=Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
=Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
=Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
=Depleted Matrix (F3)
=Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 136, 147)
=Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
=Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
=Other (Explain in Remarks)
=Redox Depressions (F8)
=Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
=Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
=Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
=Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes= No 0
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Walden/Brown Property City/County: Huntersville, Mecklenburg
Applicant/Owner: Bayard Group State: NC
Investigator(s): NRN, HAC Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): valley Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): MLRA 136 Lat: 35.4164 N Long: -80.8165 W
Soil Map Unit Name: CeD2 Cecil sandy clay loam NWI classification:
Sampling Date: 8/17/15
- Sampling Point: UDP 2
- Slope (%): 8-15
Datum:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation - Soil - or Hydrology - significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes= No=
Are Vegetation - Soil - or Hydrology - naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes= No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes= No 0 within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes= No 0✓
Remarks:
Data point taken approximately 30' North of Wetland R.
Representative Upland Data Point for Wetlands S, T, U, VV and V.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
=Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
=Surface Water (Al) IZITrue Aquatic Plants (614)
=Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
=High Water Table (A2) =Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
=Drainage Patterns (1310)
=Saturation (A3) =Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) =Moss Trim Lines (1316)
=Water Marks (131) =Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
=Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
=Sediment Deposits (132) =Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
=Crayfish Burrows (C8)
=Drift Deposits (63) =Thin Muck Surface (C7)
[Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
=Algal Mat or Crust (B4) =Other (Explain in Remarks)
=Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
=Iron Deposits (B5)
=Geomorphic Position (D2)
=Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
=Shallow Aquitard (D3)
=Water -Stained Leaves (139)
=Microtopographic Relief (D4)
=Aquatic Fauna (B13)
=FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes= No= Depth (inches): -
Water Table Present? Yes= No= Depth (inches): -
Saturation Present? Yes= No= Depth
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes= No2:1
(inches): _
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: UDP 2
3.
Hydrophytic
4. Vegetation
5. Present? Yes= No 0
30 = Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
% Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1 Liriodendron tulipifera
35 Y FACU
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
2 Ulmus alata 30 Y FACU
3.
Species Across All Strata: 7 (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 28% (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
65 = Total Cover
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 30'
)
OBL species x 1 =
1 Ulmus alata
20 Y FACU
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3=
2 Liriodendron tulipifera 5 Y FACU
3,
FACU species x4=
4,
UPL species x 5 =
5.
Column Totals: (A) (B)
6.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
7.
25
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
30'
= Total Cover
01 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
1 Liqustrum japonicum
45 Y UPL
02 - Dominance Test is >50%
Q3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
2
3
Q4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
4.
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
5.
_
6.
'Indicators of hydric sod and wetland hydrology must
7.
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
30'
=
45 Total Cover)
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
1 Microstegium vimineum
30 Y FAC
Tree — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
2
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
3.
4
Sapling — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
5.
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
6.
Shrub — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
7.
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
8.
9
Herb —All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
10.
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
11
12•
Woody vine —All woody vines, regardless of height.
30 = Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1 Lonicera japonica
30 Y FAC
3.
Hydrophytic
4. Vegetation
5. Present? Yes= No 0
30 = Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

SOIL
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or
Sampling Point: UDP 2
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Loc Texture Remarks
0-4 5YR 4/4 100 Loamy Clay
4-12 5YR 5/8 100
Clay
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators:
=Histosol (Al)
=Dark Surface (S7)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
=2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
=Histic Epipedon (A2)
=Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
=Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
=Black Histic (A3)
=Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
=Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
=Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
=Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
=Stratified Layers (A5)
=2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
=Depleted Matrix (F3)
=Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 136, 147)
=Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
=Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
=Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
=Other (Explain in Remarks)
=Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
=Redox Depressions (F8)
=Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
=Iron -Manganese Masses (1712) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
=Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
=Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
=Sandy Redox (S5)
=Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
=Stripped Matrix (S6)
=Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes= No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont —Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Walden/Brown Properly City/County: Huntersville, Mecklenburg
Applicant/Owner: Bayard Group State: NC
Investigator(s): NRN, HAC Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): valley Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): MLRA 136 Lat: 35.4164 N Long: -80.8165 W
Sampling Date: 8/17/15
- Sampling Point: DP3 -Wet FFF
- Slope (%): 0-2
Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: MO: Monacan loam NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation - Soil - or Hydrology ' significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes FTI No=
Are Vegetation - Soil - or Hydrology ' naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes= No= Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes 0 No = within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes= No =
Remarks:
Representative Wetland Data Form for Wetlands C, F, HH and I.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
=3urface Soil Cracks (B6)
=Surface Water (Al)
=True Aquatic Plants (B14)
=Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
=High Water Table (A2)
=Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
EPrainage Patterns (1310)
=Saturation (A3)
=Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) =Moss Trim Lines (616)
=Water Marks (B1)
=Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
=Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
=Sediment Deposits (B2)
=Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
=Crayfish Burrows (C8)
=Drift Deposits (B3)
=Thin Muck Surface (C7)
=Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
=Algal Mat or Crust (64)
=Other (Explain in Remarks)
=Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
=Iron Deposits (B5)
=Geomorphic Position (D2)
=Inundation Visible on Aerial
Imagery (67)
=Shallow Aquitard (D3)
=Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
=Microtopographic Relief (D4)
=Aquatic Fauna (B13)
=FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present?
Yes= No= Depth (inches): -
Water Table Present?
Saturation Present?
Yes= No= Depth (inches): -
Yes= No= Depth (inches): 3"
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes = No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont —Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicato
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' ) % Cover Species? Status
j. -Acer rubrum 75 Y FAC
2 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 15 N FACW
3 Liquidambar styraciflua 8 N FAC
4.
6.
7. _
98
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 30'
1 Ulmus americana 10
2 Liquidambar styraciflua 10
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
20
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30'
1 Ligustrum sinense 20
3.
5.
7
Sampling Point: DP3 -Wet FFF
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 5
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 80%
= Total Cover Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
Y FACW FACW species x 2 =
Y FAC FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x4=
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
(A)
(B)
(A/B)
(B)
= Total Cover"
01 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Y FACU 02 - Dominance Test is >50%
Q3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
04 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
OProblematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
-- = i ozai mover
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1 Microstegium vimineum 90 Y FAC
2 Boehmeria cylindrica 5 N FACW
3.
4.
6.
7.
= Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1.
3.
5
= Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb —All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine — All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes= No=
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont —Version 2.0

SOIL
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to
Sampling Point: DP3 -Wet FFF
or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Tvoe Loc Texture Remarks
0-16 10YR 5/1 90 7.5YR 5/6 10 RM M Silty loam
Hydric Soil Indicators:
=Histosol (Al)
=Histic Epipedon (A2)
=Black Histic (A3)
=Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
=Stratified Layers (A5)
=2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
=Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
=Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
=Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
=Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
=Sandy Redox (S5)
=Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
teduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
=Dark Surface (S7)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Sc
=2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
=Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
=Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
=Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
=Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
=Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
=Depleted Matrix (F3)
=Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 136, 147)
=Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
=Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
=Other (Explain in Remarks)
=Redox Depressions (F8)
=Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
=Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
=Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
r IRed Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yesm No 0
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont —Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Walden/Brown Property City/County: Huntersville, Mecklenburg
Applicant/Owner: Bayard Group State, NC
Investigator(s): NRN, HAC Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): valley Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): MLRA 136 Lat: 35.4164 N Long: -80.8165 W
Sampling Date: 8/17/15
- Sampling Point: DP4-Wet R
Slope (%), 8-15
Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: CeD2: Cecil sandy clay loam NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation - Soil - or Hydrology ' significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes a✓ No=
Are Vegetation - Soil - or Hydrology - naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes= No= Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes 0 No = within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes 0 No =
Remarks:
The area appears to have been ditched at some point in time.
Representative Wetland Data Point for Wetlands S, T, U, VV and V.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
is that
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
=Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Primary Indicators (minimum
of one required; check all apply)
=Surface Water (Al)
=True Aquatic Plants (B14)
=Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
=High Water Table (A2)
=Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
QJ Drainage Patterns (1310)
=Saturation (A3)
=Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) =Moss Trim Lines (1316)
=Water Marks (B1)
=Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
=Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
=Sediment Deposits (B2)
=Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
=Crayfish Burrows (C8)
=Drift Deposits (133)
=Thin Muck Surface (C7)
[Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
=Algal Mat or Crust (134)
=Other (Explain in Remarks)
=Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
=Iron Deposits (135)
=Geomorphic Position (D2)
=Inundation Visible on Aerial
Imagery (137)
=ShallowAquitard (D3)
=Water -Stained Leaves (139)
=Microtopographic Relief (D4)
=Aquatic Fauna (B13)
=FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present?
Yes= No= Depth (inches): -
Water Table Present?
Saturation Present?
Yes= No= Depth (inches): -
Yes= No= Depth (inches): 1 ��_
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes= No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont —Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP4-wet R
6.
7.
15 = Total Cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1 Juncus effusus 30 Y FACW
2. Carex stricta 20 Y OBL
3 Boehmeria cylindrica 15 Y FACW
4.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
bn
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1.
3.
5.
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
= Total Cover
= Total Cover
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree —Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb —All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine — All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes= No=
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont —Version 2.0
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
% Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
I.-Fraxinus pennsylvanica
35
Y FACW
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 9 (A)
2 Salix nigra
30
Y OBL
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 9 (B)
3 Acer rubrum 20 Y FAC
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5•
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100% (A/B)
6.
7
Prevalence Index worksheet:
85
= Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 30'
)
OBL species x 1 =
1 Fraxinus pennsylvanica
35
Y FACW
FACW species x 2 =
2 Salix nigra
20
Y OBL
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x4=
3 Acer rubrum 10 N FAC
4.
UPL species x 5 =
5,
Column Totals: (A) (B)
6.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
7.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
65
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30'
= Total Cover
01 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
1. Comus amomum
15
Y FACW
Q2 - Dominance Test is >50%
2.
Q3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
3.
Q4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
OProblematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
4
6.
7.
15 = Total Cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1 Juncus effusus 30 Y FACW
2. Carex stricta 20 Y OBL
3 Boehmeria cylindrica 15 Y FACW
4.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
bn
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1.
3.
5.
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
= Total Cover
= Total Cover
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree —Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb —All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine — All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes= No=
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont —Version 2.0

SOIL
Profile Description: (Describe to
the indicator or confirm the absence
Sampling Point: DP4-Wet R
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc Texture Remarks
0-16 7.5YR 5/1 90 5YR 5/8 10 RM M Silty loam
C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced
Soil Indicators:
__JHistosol (Al)
=Histic Epipedon (A2)
=Black Histic (A3)
=Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
=2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
=Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
=Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
=Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
=Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
=Sandy Redox (S5)
=Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Sc
=Dark Surface (S7)
=2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
=Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
=Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
=Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
=Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
=Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
=Depleted Matrix (F3)
=Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 136, 147)
=Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
=Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
=Other (Explain in Remarks)
=Redox Depressions (F8)
=Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
=Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
=Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
=Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yesa] No =
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Walden/Brown Property City/County. Huntersville, Mecklenburg
Applicant/Owner: Bayard Group State: NC
Investigator(s): NRN, HAC Section, Township, Range.
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): valley Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): MLRA 136 Lat: 35.4191 N Long- -80.8109 W
Soil Map Unit Name: MO: Monacan loam NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation - Soil ' or Hydrology - significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes FTI No=
Are Vegetation - Soil ' or Hydrology - naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
Sampling Date: 8/17/15
_ Sampling Point: DP5 - Wet K
_ Slope (%): 0-2
Datum:
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes= No = Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes= No= within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes= No =
Remarks:
Wetland feature at toe of slope and extends as drainage feature for surrounding pasture. Area at toe
of slope potentially historical cattle scour area.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
Surface Soil Cracks (66)
=Surface Water (A1)
=True Aquatic Plants (614)
=Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
=High Water Table (A2)
=Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
=Drainage Patterns (1310)
=Saturation (A3)
=Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) =Moss Trim Lines (1316)
=Water Marks (131)
=Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
=Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
=Sediment Deposits (132)
=Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
=Crayfish Burrows (C8)
=Drift Deposits (133)
=Thin Muck Surface (C7)
=Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
=Algal Mat or Crust (134)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
=Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
=Iron Deposits (135)
=Geomorphic Position (D2)
=Inundation Visible on Aerial
Imagery (137)
=Shallow Aquitard (D3)
=Water -Stained Leaves (139)
=Microtopographic Relief (D4)
=Aquatic Fauna (613)
=FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present?
Yes= No=✓ Depth (inches):
Water Table Present?
Saturation Present?
Yes= No0 Depth (inches):
YesQ✓ No= Depth (inches): 55"
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes �✓ No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1.
2.
WA
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 30'
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30'
1.
Sampling Point: DP5 -Wet K
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
% Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 2 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species 100%
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC' (A/B)
0
U
6.
7. _
25
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1 Microstegium vimineum 45
2 Leersia oryzoides 45
3 Vernonia noveboracensis 5
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
on
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1.
3.
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
= Total Cover Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x4=
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
= Total Cover
01 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Q2 - Dominance Test is >50%
03 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
04 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
EProblematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
= Total Cover I Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Y OBL Tree — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
Y FACW approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
N FACW (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
= Total Cover
= Total Cover
Shrub — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 It (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb —All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine — All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes= No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont —Version 2.0

SOIL
to the death needed to
or
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Tyne' Loc
0-3 10YR 4/1 100
3-16 10YR 3/1
85 7.5YR 5/6
15 RM M
Texture
Silty loam
Silty loam
Sampling Point: DP5 - Wet K
Remarks
Hydric Soil Indicators:
=Histosol (Al)
=Dark Surface (S7)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
=2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
=Histic Epipedon (A2)
=Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
=Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
=Black Histic (A3)
=Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
=Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
=Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
=Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
=Stratified Layers (A5)
=2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
=Depleted Matrix (F3)
=Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 136, 147)
=Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
=Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
=Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
=Other (Explain in Remarks)
=Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
= Redox Depressions (F8)
=Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
=Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
=Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
=Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
=Sandy Redox (S5)
=Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
=Stripped Matrix (S6)
=Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
✓=
Depth (inches):
Hydric
Soil Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

Stream Reach Evaluation Form
Date: 1 8/17/2015 1 Evaluator: I H. Caldwell I Easting: 1 -80.8157
Proiect: I Walden -Brown PrODertv: DP6 - Tributary B I Northinq: 1 35.4165
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent if > 19 or perennial if > 30*
(riaht-click the purple number and left -click Update Field to summarize points)
A.
Geomorphology
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
SCORE
1a.
Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
3
2.
Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
1
3.
In -channel structure: riffle-/ step- pool sequence
0
1
2
3
2
4.
Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
2
5.
Active/relic floodplain
0
1
2
3
1
6.
Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
1
7.
Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
1
8.
Headcuts
0
1
2
3
1
9.
Grade controls
0
0.5
1
1.5
1
10.
Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
3
11.
Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
0
Geomorphology
Subtotal
a Man-made ditches are not rated: see discussion in NCDWU Manual
S. Hvdroloav
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
3
13. Iron Oxidizing Bacteria
0
1
2
3
1
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
1.5
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
1
16. Organic debris lines or piles Wrack lines
0
0.5
1
1.5
1
17. Soil -based Evidence of high water table?
0.5
No = 0
Yes = 3
3
23.
Crayfish
0
Hydrology
Subtotal
1.5
C. Bioloav
18.
Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
3
19.
Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
3
20.
Macrobenthos note diversity and abundance
0
1
2
3
1
21.
Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
0
22.
Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
1
23.
Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
1
24.
Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
25.
Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
26.
Wetland plants in streambed
FACW= 0.75, OBL= 1.5, Other= 0
0
Biology
Subtotal
* narannini ctraamc may nkn ha iriantifiari imunn nthar mathnric Sea nano 35 nt N(:I)WO mania)
Notes:
Representative Stream Form for Perennial Tributaries J and N.
I certify that this evaluation conforms to the latest version of
the NCDWQ document entitled Methodology for Identification
Heath Caldwell, WEPG
of Intermittent and Perennial Streams and their Origins.
Signature of Certified Evaluator
(version 4.11)
Form #PC039

Stream Reach Evaluation Form
Date: W:1:7:22015 Evaluator: I H. Caldwell
Eastin :
-80.8165
Project: I Walden -Brown Property: DP7 - Tributary P
Northing:
35.4164
Total Points:
1a.
Stream is at least intermittent if > 19 or perennial if > 30*
2�.5
(right -click the purple number and left -click Update Field to summarizepoints)
2
A.
Geomorphology
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
SCORE
1a.
Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2
2.
Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
1
3.
In -channel structure: riffle- / step- pool sequence
0
1
2
3
0
4.
Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
1
5.
Active/relic floodplain
0
1
2
3
0
6.
Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
2
7.
Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
0
8.
Headcuts
0
1
2
3
2
9.
Grade controls
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
10.
Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
1
11.
Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
0
Geomorphology
Subtotal
a Man-made ditches are not rated: see discussion in NCDWQ Manual
B. Hvdrology
12.
Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
1
13.
Iron Oxidizing Bacteria
0
1
2
3
0
14.
Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
1.5
15.
Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
1
16.
Organic debris lines or piles Wrack lines
0
0.5
1
1.5
1
17.
Soil -based Evidence of high water table?
No = 0
0.5
Yes = 3
3
0
24.
Amphibians
0
Hydrology
Subtotal
1.5
C. Biology
18.
Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
1
19.
Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
3
20.
Macrobenthos note diversity and abundance
0
1
2
3
0
21.
Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
0
22.
Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
23.
Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
24.
Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
25.
Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
26.
Wetland plants in streambed
FACW=
0.75, OBL= 1.5, Other= 0
0
Biology
Subtotal
* perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See page 35 of NCDWQ manual.
Notes:
Representative Stream Form for Intermittent Tributaries A, GG/G, H, M and Q.
I certify that this evaluation conforms to the latest version of
the NCDWQ document entitled Methodology for Identification
Heath Caldwell, WEPG
of Intermittent and Perennial Streams and their Orioins.
Signature of Certified Evaluator
(version 4.11)
Form #PC039