Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20151334 Ver 1_Application_20151218Trans�ortation December 17, 2015 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Field Office 151 Patton Avenue, Room 208 Asheville, NC 28801-5006 ATTN: Ms. Loretta Beckwith NCDOT Coordinator PAT McCRORY Covernor NICHOLAS J. TENNYSON 5ecrntary SUBJECT: Application for Section 404 Nationwide Permits 23, 33, and Section 401 Water Quality Certification for the Proposed Replacement of Bridge No. 87 on US 64 over the Broad River in Rutherford County, Federal Aid Project No. BRSTP-64(84); Division 13; TIP No. B-4811; $240.00 debit WBS No. 38581.1.1. Dear Madam: The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to replace bridge number 87 on US 64 over Broad River in Rutherford County with a triple span, 250' prestressed concrete girder bridge on a new alignment to the north. The existing bridge will be utilized as an onsite detour during construction. There will be 70 lf (0.39 ac) of permanent impacts to su►•face waters from roadway embankment for the project. There will be 0.10 acre of temporary impacts to surface waters resulting from causeways to construct the new bridge and demolish the existing bridge. Personal communication with Lori Beckwith of USACE on July 14, 2014 determined that the permanent impacts from this project are to an overflow channel of the Broad river where the water is basically ponded except during high flow events and therefore to be considered open water irnpacts that are jurisdictional but nonmitigable. Please see enclosed copies of the Pre-Construction Notification (PCN), USFWS Concurrence Letter, Stormwater Management Plan, Permit Drawings, and Roadway Plansheets. A Categorical Exclusion (CE) was completed in July 2014 and distributed shortly thereafter. Additional copies are available upon request. A letter frorn USFWS dated December 1, 2015, granted concurrence for the northern long-eared bat and Indiana bat with a cal] of May Affect, Not Likely to Adversely Affect for both species and a tree cutting moratorium was issued for the project extending from April 15 to August I5. This project is located in a trout county; therefore comments from the NCWRC will be required priof• to authorization by the Corps of Engineers. By copy of this lette�• and attachment, NCDOT hereby requests NCWRC Review. NCDOT requests that NCWRC forward their comments to the Corps of Engineers and the NCDOT within 30 calendar days of receipt of this application. �Nothing Campares�...�. State of North Carolina � Depa�tment of Transportation � PDE,A-\ah�ral Environment Section 1020 Birch Ridge D�ive, 27610 � 1598 �tail Service Center � Raleigl�, North Carolina 27699-1598 919-707-6000 T 919-212-5785 F This project calls for a letting date of April 19, 2016 and a review date of March 1, 2016; however, the let date may advance as additional funding becomes available. A copy of this permit application and its distribution list will be posted on the NCDOT Website at: http://connect.ncdot.gov/resources/Environmental. If you have any questions or need additional information, please call Jeff Hemphill at (919) 707-6126. Sincerely, � — �� Richard W. Hancock, P.E., Manager Project Development and Environmental Analysis Unit cc: NCDOT Permit Application Standard Distribution List �o� vvArE�,� Office Use Only: � � 4 � Corps action ID no. i�. � i � r DWQ project no. � � Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008 Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form A. Applicant Information 1. Processing 1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps: � Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit 1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 23,33 or General Permit (GP) number: 1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? � Yes ❑ No 1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply): � 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit ❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization 1 e. Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for DWQ 401 For the record only for Corps Permit: because written approval is not required? Certification: ❑ Yes � No ❑ Yes � No 1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation � Yes � No of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program. 1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h ❑ Yes � No below. 1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ❑ Yes � No 2. Project Information 2a. Name of project: Replacement of Bridge 87 over Broad River on US 64 2b. County: Rutherford 2c. Nearest municipality / town: Lake Lure 2d. Subdivision name: not applicable 2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state g_4811 project no: 3. Owner Information 3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: North Carolina Department of Transportation 3b. Deed Book and Page No. not applicable 3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if not applicable applicable): 3d. Street address: 1598 Mail Service Center 3e. City, state, zip: Raleigh, NC 27699-1598 3f. Telephone no.: (919) 707-6126 3g. Fax no.: (919) 212-5785 3h. Email address: jhemphill@ncdot.gov 4. Applicant Information (if different from owner) 4a. Applicant is: ❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify: 4b. Name: not applicable 4c. Business name (if applicable): 4d. Street address: 4e. City, state, zip: 4f. Telephone no.: 4g. Fax no.: 4h. Email address: 5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable) 5a. Name: not applicable 5b. Business name (if applicable): 5c. Street address: 5d. City, state, zip: 5e. Telephone no.: 5f. Fax no.: 5g. Email address: B. Project Information and Prior Project History 1. Property Identification 1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): not applicable 1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 35.4249 Longitude: - 82.1655 (DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD) 1 c. Property size: 2.7 acres 2. Surface Waters 2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to Broad River proposed project: 2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: C 2c. River basin: Broad 3. Project Description 3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: Forest communities, minor commercial and residential development. 3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.0 acre 3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 377 If 3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: To replace a structurally deficient and functionally obsolete bridge. 3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The project involves replacing a 5 span 235-foot reinforced concrete deck girder bridge with a 250-foot, 3-span prestressed concrete girder bridge on a new alignment to the north with the existing bridge utilized as an onsite detour. Standard road building equipment, such as trucks, dozers, and cranes will be used. 4. Jurisdictional Determinations 4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property / project (including all prior phases) in the past? ❑ Yes � No ❑ Unknown Comments: 4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made? ❑ Preliminary ❑ Final 4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company: Name (if known): Other: 4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation. 5. Project History 5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for � Yes � No ❑ Unknown this project (including all prior phases) in the past? 5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions. 6. Future Project Plans 6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes � No 6b. If yes, explain. C. Proposed Impacts Inventory 1. Impacts Summary 1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply): ❑ Wetlands ❑ Streams - tributaries � Buffers � Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction 2. Wetland Impacts If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted. 2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f. Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction number — Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ — non-404, other) (acres) Tem orar T Site 1❑ P � T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ Site 2❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ Site 3❑ P � T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ Site 4❑ P � T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ Site 1❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps Utility Impacts ❑ No ❑ DWQ 2g. Total wetland impacts 2h. Comments: 3. Stream Impacts If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this question for all stream sites impacted. 3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g. Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of Average �mpact length number - (PER) or jurisdiction stream (linear feet) Permanent (P) or intermittent (Corps - 404, 10 width Temporary (T) (INT)? DWQ — non-404, (feet) other) Site 1❑ P� T Causeway Broad River � PER � Corps g� 140 ❑ INT ❑ DWQ Site 1❑ P 0 T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ Site 2❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ Site 3❑ P � T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ Site 4❑ P � T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ Site 5❑ P 0 T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ 3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 0 Perm 140 Temp 3i. Comments: 4. Open Water Impacts If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of the U.S. then individuall list all o en water im acts below. 4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e. Open water Name of impact number— waterbody Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres) Permanent (P) or (if applicable) Temporary T 01 ❑P�T 02 � P 0 T Broad River Roadway fill Overflow channel 0.39 03 ❑P�T 04 ❑P�T 0.39ac Permanent 4f. Total open water impacts (70 If) 0 Temporary 4g. Comments: 5. Pond or Lake Construction If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below. 5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e. Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland Pond ID Proposed use or (acres) number purpose of pond Excavat Flooded Filled ed Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded P1 P2 5f. Total 5g. Comments: 5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no: 5i. Expected pond surface area (acres): 5j. Size of pond watershed (acres): 5k. Method of construction: 6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ) If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer im acts below. If an im acts re uire miti ation, then ou MUST fill out Section D of this form. 6a. ❑ Neuse ❑ Tar-Pamlico ❑ Other: Project is in which protected basin? ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman 6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g. Buffer impact number — Reason for impact Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact Permanent (P) or Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet) Tem orar T) re uired? B1 ❑P❑T ❑Yes ❑ No B2 ❑P❑T ❑Yes ❑ No B3 ❑P❑T ❑Yes ❑ No 6h. Total buffer impacts 6i. Comments: D. Impact Justification and Mitigation 1. Avoidance and Minimization 1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project. See Stormwater Management Plan. Existing roadway drainage consists of grass shoulders with ditches. Existing ditches flow through buffers in grass swales to lake. Proposed roadway includes hazardous spill basin / dry detention basins that collect roadway drainage and discharge on each side of bridge. The existing bridge will be utilized as an onsite detour. 1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques. Best Management Practices for Surface Waters will be used during all phases of construction. 2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State 2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for ❑ Yes � No impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? ❑ DWQ ❑ Corps ❑ Mitigation bank 2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this project? ❑ Payment to in-lieu fee program ❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation 3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank 3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: not applicable 3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity 3c. Comments: 4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program 4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ❑ Yes 4b. Stream mitigation requested: 0 linear feet 4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold 4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): 0 square feet 4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: 0 acres 4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: 0 acres 4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: 0 acres 4h. Comments: 5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan 5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan. 6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ 6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires ❑ Yes � No buffer mitigation? 6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the amount of mitigation required. 6c. 6d. 6e. Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation (square feet) (square feet) Zone 1 Zone 2 6f. Total buffer mitigation required: 6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank, permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund). 6h. Comments: E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ) 1. Diffuse Flow Plan 1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ❑ Yes � No within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules? 1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why. ❑ Yes � No Comments: 2. Stormwater Mana ement Plan 2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? N/A 2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? � Yes ❑ No 2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: 2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan: See attached. ❑ Certified Local Government 2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ❑ DWQ Stormwater Program � DWQ 401 Unit 3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review 3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project? not applicable ❑ Phase II 3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ❑ NSW apply (check all that apply): ❑ USMP ❑ Water Supply Watershed ❑ Other: 3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been � Yes ❑ No attached? 4. DWQ Stormwater Pro ram Review ❑ Coastal counties 4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply ❑ HQW (check all that apply): ❑ ORW ❑ Session Law 2006-246 ❑ Other: 4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been attached? ❑ Yes ❑ No NA 5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review 5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ❑ Yes ❑ No NA 5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ❑ Yes ❑ No NA F. Supplementary Information 1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement) 1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the � Yes ❑ No use of public (federal/state) land? 1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State � Yes ❑ No (North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? 1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.) � Yes ❑ No Comments: 2. Violations (DWQ Requirement) 2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ❑ Yes � No or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)? 2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ❑ Yes � No 2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s): 3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement) 3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ❑ Yes additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? � No 3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description. Due to the minimal transportation impact resulting from this bridge replacement, this project will neither influence nearby land uses nor stimulate growth. Therefore, a detailed indirect or cumulative effects study will not be necessary. 4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement) 4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility. not applicable 10 5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement) 5a. Wiil this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or � Yes ❑ No habitat? 5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act � Yes ❑ No i m pacts? ❑ Raleigh 5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. � Asheville 5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat? N.C. Natural Heritage Program database; USFWS-website; biological surveys for protected species listed for Ruthertord County which includes: White irisette, Dwarf-flower heartleaf, Indiana bat & small whorled pogonia. Biological Conclusions of "No EffecY' were rendered for these species. Habitat for the plant species exists, but surveys conducted in the study area in 2008, 2009 and 2014 resulted in no specimens being found. An Indiana bat report from 2009 determined that bats were at least night roosting on the bridge but the species were not identified. USFWS requested that bridge demolition take place between August 15 to May 15 to avoid the bats regardless of species though concurrence was not requested at the time for Indiana bat. After the NLEB was listed in 2015, concurrence was requested for both bat species. Concurrence was received for Indiana bat and the NLEB from USFWS on October, 2015 with a call of MANLTAA and a tree cutting moratorium from April 15 to August 15. An eagle survey was conducted on October 21, 2015 with no nests or birds observed. NHP listed a known eagle nest approximately 2 miles to the northwest of the project on Lake Lure. Another survey will be conducted prior to construction to ensure the eagles haven't moved their nest to within 660 feet of the project footprint. 6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement) 6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ❑ Yes � No 6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat? NMFS County Index 7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement) 7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation � Yes � No status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in North Carolina history and archaeology)? 7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources? NEPA Documentation 8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement) 8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? � Yes ❑ No 8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: NCDOT Hydraulics Unit coordination with FEMA 8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA Maps /� /�-��- � Richard W. Hancock, P.E. �z—���2d �� ApplicanbAgent's Printed Name Applicant/AgenYs Signature Date (AgenYs signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.) 11 United States Department of the Interior FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Asheville ['ield Office 160 Zillicoa Street Asheville, Norkh Carolina 28801 December 1, 2015 Ms. Carla Dagnino NC Department of Transportation Western Region Environmental Program Supervisor II 1598 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1598 Dear Ms. Dagnino: Subject: Endangered Species Concurrence for Proposed Replacement of Bridge Number 87 on US 64 over the Broad River, Rutherford County, North Carolina On November 13, 2015, we received your letter (via email) requesting section 7 concurrence on effects the subject bridge replacement may have on the federally endangered Indiana bat (Myotis sodalis) and the federally threatened northern long-eared bat (Myotis septentNionalis). The following comments are provided in accordance with section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531-1543) (Act). We have reviewed the information provided in your concurrence request letter and the North Carolina Department of Transportation's Section 7 survey results for the northern long-eared bat and the Indiana bat, associated with the replacement of bridge 87 over the Broad River on US 64 in Rutherford County (TIP No. B-4811). The action area for this proposed project is within the known range of the aforementioned bat species. However, we agree with your project commitments requiring that tree removal activities take place during the period of August 15-April 15, in order to avoid effects to �hese bats, will reduce the potential for effects to bats to a discountable level. Additionally, since the existing bridge provides summer roosting potential for bats, we support the project commitment that a survey will be conducted prior to construction in any given year to ensure bats are not present. We also support the project commitment that an eagle survey will be conducted prior to construction to ensure eagles have not built a next within 660 feet of the project footprint since suitable habitat for bald eagle exists on Lake Lure approximately 1 mile west of the project site. Accordingly, we concur with your biological conclusion that the proposed construction may affect, but is not likely to adversely affect the Indiana bat or the northern long-eared bat. Therefore, we believe the requirements under section 7(c) of the Act are fulfilled. However, obligations under section 7 of the Act must be reconsidered i£ (1) new information reveals impacts of this identified action that may affect listed species or critical habitat in a manner not previously considered, (2) this action is subsequently modified in a manner that was not considered in this review, or (3) a new species is listed or critical habitat is determined that may be affected by the identified action. If we can be of assistance or if you have any questions about these comments, please contact Mr. Andrew Henderson of our staff at 828/258-3939, Ext. 227. In any future correspondence concerning this project, please reference our Log Number 4-2-16-064. Sincerely, � i'� ` ' _ �� anet A. Mizzi Field Supervisar ����� }������. North Carolina Department of Transportation �1t�C11�4V�1tE�Y Highway Stormwater Program � � STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN (Version 2.01; Released December 2014) FOR NCDOT PROJECTS WBS Element: 38581.1.1 TIP No.: B-4811 County(ies): Rutherford Page 1 of 2 General Project Information WBS Element: 38581.1.1 TIP Number: B-4811 Project Type: Bridge Replacement Date: 2/27/2015 NCDOT Contact: Jonathan L. Moore, PE Contractor / Designer: HNTB North Carolina, P.C. / John F. Watson, PE Address: 1020 Birch Ridge Rd Address: 343 E. Six Forks Road, Suite 200 Raleigh, NC 27610 Raleigh, NC 27609 Phone: 919 707-6738 Phone: 919 424-0444 Email: 'Imoore6@ncdot. ov Email: 'fwatson@hntb.com Cit /Town: Lake Lure Count (ies): Rutherford River Basin(s): Broad CAMA Count ? No Wetlands within Project Limits? No Pro'ect Descri tion Pro'ect Len th lin. miles or feet : 0.227 Mi Surroundin Land Use: Rural Residential / Forest Pro osed Pro'ect Existin Site Pro'ect Built-U on Area ac. 0.9 ac. 0.6 ac. Typical Cross Section Description: 2- 11' Lanes with 4' Paved Shoulders and Roadside Ditches. 2- 11' Lanes with Grass Shoulders and Roadside Ditches. Annual Avg Daily Traffic (veh/hr/day): Desi n/Future: 4200 Year: 2035 Existin : 2846 Year: 2013 General Project Narrative: This project involves the replacement on Rutherford County Bridge #0087, an existing 1@ 47' - 2", 3@ 47' - 6", 1@ 47' - 2" Reinforced Concrete (RC) Deck Girder Bridge on (Description of Minimization of Water RC Piers, . The proposed bridge is a 1@ 85' - 0", 1@ 80' - 0", 1@ 85' - 0" Prestressed Concrete Girder Bridge with 4' - 0" End Bent Caps and no Deck Drains. Roadway Quality Impacts) drainage will be collected in a combination of ditches and closed systems. No stormwater will be discharged directly into the Broad River. Waterbod Information Surface Water Body (1): Broad River NCDWR Stream Index No.: 9-(22) NCDWR Surface Water Classification for Water Body Primary Classification: Class C Su iemental Classification: Other Stream Classification: Impairments: None Threatened/Endangered Species? No Comments: NRTR Stream ID: Buffer Rules in Effect: N/A Project Includes Bridge S anning Water Bod ? Yes Deck Drains Discharge Over Buffer? N/A Dissi ator Pads Provided in Buffer? N/A Deck Drains Discharge Over Water Body? No (If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) (If yes, describe in the General Project Narrative; if no, justify in the (If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) General Project Narrative) � �j�����r�l,�, North Carolina Department of Transportation 51[li'li7t'�'zit['Y Highway Stormwater Program `�.' STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN (Version 2.01; Released December 2014) FOR NCDOT PROJECTS WBS Element: 38581.1.1 TIP No.: B-4811 Count ies): Rutherford Pa e 2 of 2 Preformed Scour Holes and Energy Dissipators Drainage Pipe/Structure BMP Sheet Station (Road Projects) or Surface Energy Dissipator Area Conveyance Dimensions Q10 V10 Associated w/ No. Coordinates (Non-Road Projects) Water Bod Ty e Ri ra T e (ac) Structure (in) (cfs) (f s) Buffer Rules? 4 -L- 14+65 RT i1)Broad Riprap Apron / Pad Class I 1.9 Pipe 18 4.3 2.7 N/A River 4 -L- 17+48 LT i1)Broad Riprap Apron / Pad Class I 0.3 Pipe 15 1.6 2.4 N/A River Additional Comments ` Refer to the NCDOT Best Management Practices Toolbox (2014), NCDOT Standards, the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Hydraulic Engineering Circular No. 14 (HEC-14), Third Edition, Hydraulic Design of Energy Dissipators for Culverts and Channels (July 2006), as applicable, for design guidance and criteria. See Sheet 9 A For Index of Sheets � � —L— STA 10+00.00 BEGIN TIP PROJECT B-4811 CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED � TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD THERE IS NO CONTROL OF ACCESS ON THIS PROJECT. �THIS PROJECT IS NOT WITHIN ANY MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES. ����� �ll' ����� �������� �� �Y ����� �� 1LJ�ll�� V'V' ��� R UTHERFORD CO U1�TY LOCATI011I: BRIDGE 87 OVER THE BROAD RIVER 0111 US 64 TYPE OF WORK GRADING, DRAINAGE, PAVIIVG AND STRUCTURE S URFA CE WA TER IMPA CTS PERMIT ❑ \` _ zk`. �� �.. —�—�,. \\ �'. . —L— STA 16 + 50.00 —L— STA 22+00.00 END TIP PR( TO RUTHERFORDTON — - --- � I s s �'I � � � �� �' �� B-4811 PERMIT DRAWING SHEET 1 OF 4 B�C�h1[1PII.lE°l[°l� lE�1L�N� DO NOT USE FOft RAW AC�L*IgITION F�ff81E][,IhHI[I�.S\I83' �1LAN� DO NOT USE POR CONS'CRUCTION Prepo�ed in tl� Office of: H1'DRAULICS ENGINEER GRAPHIC SCALES DESIGN DATA PROJECT LENGTH DIVISIOIV OF HIGHWAYS 50 25 0 5o too ADT 2013 = 2846 LENGTH OF ROADWAY TIP PROJECT B-4811 = .178 MI. �000 a�.�h Ridge Dr., Raleigh xe, 2�6�0 ��� ����� ADT 2035 = 4200 LENGTH OF STRUCTURES TIP PROJECT B-4811 = .049 MI. Z°'Z srallonnn srEcrFrcazroxs ��� ����� PLANS �( = 11 % rE. � SIGNAT'URE: � 50 25 0 50 t00 D= 60 % TOTAL LENGTH TIP PROJECT B-4811 = .227 MI. RIGHT OF WAY DATE: KEVIN E. MOORE, PE �.� a T= 7 %* MARCH 27, 2015 reo�scr sn�crxEax ROADWAY DESIGN ���� ���� PROFILE (HORIZONTAL) ENGINEER �� q����� V = 50 MPH l0 5 0 l0 20 * TTST =1% DUAL=6% LETTIIVG DATE: MARK HUSSEY AP RI L 19 � Z O� 6 f'ROJECT DES7GN ENG7NEER FUNC CLA55=ARTERIAL PE PROFILE (VERTICAL) REGIONAL TIER s,cxnr�xE: 6 � PROIECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO. � B-48/l 4 � � � � RNJ HEET NO. i :�.-��-.;,�. ', ROADwAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS ; �Ar� � N��� �<<r_ r_ T s� � -� ��� � � � � � � � � � I � � ' �� � ��� �c � � 1�-^^J�� I I � ( `�, I ' i �.3 � , � � c> � � r. � � I '� � Z O w � NOTE: SEE SHEET 5 FOR PROFILE ENGINEER ENGINEER dNc����.� � ��..s��v� DO NOT I;SE FOR i W qCQU[91TION �llA�1LilllalllLV � ll ll'llelllLV � DO NOT USE �O CONSTRU(,'T10N p � � � t '� s � � _, � �, , -�_ t ,s �� �� � I ��_ � �, � �� ��� �' � '� " , ,'' ',y � a I Z i I i) ? i � � .i � ' i � ! r� r�7 / l � i 'uj � CJ - i, j L i �� _!" f�- � � u'. : � �j / I �. ' � , ' � r �� {'�i - _:':�^ . Hi F;n cnR - � j � �3 � � � � `, � �� F� E�Ee „ PORr �-- r"" � � � �- � f,� ,J � i �� eee.i � � '' / � , �_ � \ F= � � �/ 5� ��4, �� �� �.� � � ,, � � SITE 1 ' � �, � � �i ATCI i'/-�Fo L ���� � ,� , � � � ISRCGK � �MAIL B0;(ES � 4� \ N � � J��( ✓ � � 1 5 I,�.) HOLSF � � I� .=� ' GP / �i WOi�DS I __S� � F,� ,� w00� ; O �i � I '�' ' � -: � � ' � � �� �IATERAL BASE DITCH � ENL '� t i y s� '� . . . . I / SEE DETAIL D ���..� � ��3CS °T`- �. " _� CAUSEWAY FaR� / EST.60 TONS � -L- � wi�7 �`-r� n- � i�� � CONSTRUCTION � EST.150 SY GEO BEGIN TlP PROJECT 8-48/l ���� � �� �4° �� _ � � �. oF PROPosEos � PRC Sto. 17+97.92 PT Sta. 20+67.0; � � .� '� O ;� s BRIDCE - w�oos -L- POT Sta.10+00.00 � '� � � �o��M�� � , `' � � � �� , ; �o � � ' �IGHT PGl E " � � � ' ' - � . �� � � - wiea>E ���}� � '� � i � �� �� � � i �-, �� TD CLAS 'I' RIP-RAP � � g e` - i � �, � i i TpE - / s� §i S f �_ ST. ��Y�GEO �' � � �' � �� ' � .� � S�✓% �i�' ��� F � � � F � -� � � � �;n V � �.'' � � � � BL�GPS-I F � �� - ��� '. � . - � � R .. TOE PROTECTION �, , _ � � � '-.�r . , _ � � ,,4 p ..._ 1 l5" w/ \ F � - - �� EST. IDSE TONSC F , ,, �PC Sto.1/+5593 � � � �� � � � � 00 `. �. de�?'� z e�sows --�—F— Es1.so sv cEo ._. �� ,-' � � , -L- o i- -r - .p -f � �-r -� - i . GRAU 350 � S- � K ' —L__ M (?� � �k — �—_ o- . � J� "�Yq . �..,, � f. 2Cil � o �_� �_2—� � i F - , �� ; v�' �, 2G ---r -�--s---L20+p �-35 , n � p - _ . r e ii , �.., -, r a . - - - - �� L-S , � o o M � � n i � - - ..: � �zn � �... � .. � � , � E� 1�`�� R N � \ r � � i N `c� eNo sec sra � � � � ��� � � q7-i �� - � . . � 17.50.00 IRT.I T Z— o 0 i,� i 'J' . 15• ftCP 1 \ ` __. . / F _ _ �_ _ = r — , � � Bsr ,s s = i : — R — -� ' N � � � � E . � ',...,✓ .\ . / �- F� ara_a a�_ � ,. �� .-. ' I 2G �-AUE� le"W� AUE N A C -i--/ . ..- _. . . . . / 1 F '��_���:� . �'-- 1 ELBOW .. �. �. BEGIN SBG $TA. � �P�E E -i Q�p 22 -.� � . . AUE UE16+75.69 �aT.� AUE AULLL��� -t--F7' � %� � e5� J � - �S 6 - . � E � SPECIAL LATERAL DITCH A�ISEY�AY FOR - ,; \ F � � s 4p � . � � �� -- . � SEE DETaiL E � DEMOLI ION OF ��' _ i' _ _ - � ` � �/ �� .�. . 7 .. r ', . ESL 50 TONS , EXISTING BRIDGE I .. \ -,. �, - -a�m- - - - � \F� . ,� . � �� i . � EST.50 SY GEO ' - �-� � ��. �'�I �" � ' SPECIAL LATERAL �� � � SPECIAL LATERAL CLASS 'P RIP-RAP � ' ���\ I '� � '�" � � � � ' � 'V' DITCH -` p ' � ° I , BASE DITCH EST. I TONS �` � � � y. � �\ � SEE DETAiL A � SEE OE7AIL 8 EST.5 SY GEO � o I� �m �� . - � . . � -. ��,� � � A � � � � . , ,� � � � � � � , �i � � � z \ � � � ib.� ' �1 . . � � SPECIAL LATERAL � . . . � `4, P . � i � � . .` - BASE DITCH ' , � � � i � SEE DETAIC B ,- 1 �� i �c.� � \ � � I�F � �_ ,1 � �Y �\ � �l.L I _ ` \(e _ � �� \ HIIF- ``\ ' � _ , \ , . � wo'Rnu r'- �� '' . �� � - ` Wu�Gs ��-_=y jj1 /FUL� /� �� � NA � k � � h 7 .. ,.� � FOi�, c9LUMN� j� �(� � I3 � \ �. ....� �UNC �' T� � E�F LIGHL POLC-�.P<? W WALK ` 2 �� � rW/BASE - a� \� - '4`� _� �. J/ �li�� COLl1MN " 1� � �T `\ F � � / �t., � \. / \\. 1 � � �7 NJ wf�� � r � � � �L / _ ,�^ / / /' _ � N I� \ X \ Q N \ � �� w� /.�J � -i..�. E ���L� \ t iy�f,4�TE \ C . . /i' Y i . � � � DETAIL C DETAIL A DETAIL B BRIDGE /ROADWAY RELATIONSHIP SKETCH ' SPECIAL LATERAL 'V' DITCH SPEQAL LP.TERAL BASE DITCN TOE PROTECTION . � Na� �a Scale� � Naf �a Scole� ( Nol �o Scole) Na,�.a� ,o�R —F�u /5+00 ,vPE-��� Ground Noiurol LFill NAiUMLJ �"� �� SLOPE iYPE-I11 SI p�e 7� .. D ti� Gound 7:/ D �PA sloae GuouNo d F� a '� - . J Min.D= 7,0 Ft. d= 1.0 F5. —GEotExTILE �� Min.0-7.0 Ft. B- 2.0 Ft. Max. d=1.0 Ft. ..., FR M L- STA. il+ T TA. 17+37.6 RT TYPe of Liner- Class'I' Rip-Rap ttrE-iii - p p S1 rraE-iii FROM -L- STA.10+00.0 TO STA.70-50.0 (RT) FROM -L- STA. 12+SS TO STA. 12+35.9 �RT) FROM -L- STA. 19+50.0 TO STA 20+25.0 DETAIL D DETAIL E LATERAL BASE DITCH LATERAL DITCH PERMIT DRAWING SHEET 2 OF 4 L • �� � `�� , � �, H �. � '\.. ' �_��,_:., I — /� � ��' Y' ��t,� � y l�-�� l �eS7__ `�J �'� 3 � � � � � i�ei IF� ��� _ �,E�� �"� _ _ F -rn-� \ I I �: F - _ _ — _ �-- _ �� S 74' 47' 25B' E o �-L � "' � x IiUS 64/74A 22�- � � � �F y�/ �> �`iMiiT.. E � s ; r � - " � wo eAn �. C.� " ��ix � � �%` _' �/ E. ,�- '; } Cj i L ` i�P � -" v� i -' � � � ei;o �} . �i ce� C3 `J i i i;t � Fr r_[v.= . t� 'r,, i y� . - c� wonn� . r' � � i i i 1 � i / I�\A B � i WII 1 � ' � �' a � _ �; � � , � 1 � 5 /� �P 1�� `i'� 6� { � i �4 I},�__�� �� - t I i � I � ; I � � � 1 I � �� � ! . �No,�o s�a�e� i��,�� s�o�e� BEGIN APPROACH SLAB BEGIN SBG SiA. � �- �--^ , �, STA. �3+88.0� 16+75.69 IRT.I 'I " I` G�ound a, ?'/ p � ,-h�. � `siope si p'e� d� z-j o ti` E'=^"°^— BEGIN BRIDGE END BRID E �EorE,r„E � STA. 14 + 00.00 + 0. 0 B Min.D= 1.0 F. GFo�E���E� Min.O= I.0 Ft. Mon.d= 5.0 Ft. d Max.= 2.0 Ft. wi,e„ e �. . a.o B= 10.0 k. 6= 3.0 Fr. Type of Liner- Class I RiN-Rop 6= 5.0 Ft. Type af Liner- Closs I Rip-Rap FROM -L- STA. 16+00 TO -L- STA, 16+50 (LT� FROM -L- STA. 13+00 TO -L- STA. 14+40 �RT� END SBG STA. 7+50.00 (RT.� 6 � PROIECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO. � B-48/l 4 � � � � RNJ HEET NO. i ROADwAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS � 3�-FEA ���ni�� �py r�rE i�������li�li,/!I i I/ i�';Ili 1 I,i ii��� � 11�il�lo��� �`""Xi� � � I' I i I i )��t`��t � I i� i i � �uE k1 L� oN� 6�JCReib '�i l i l l � I I I I � i�'�,j�� I i � ��' � � � I I I � 9�rs�a�vensrrn�� � ���� i�,� lli�l �il����il� �i� �II '� �III�I , � /� � � ��ll l� ,�1� �' �II� �� � � �i I i I �I� ��, �, �I ; � I i i ' � � i���� � h��, ��/���l�l. I�I��ill��i�l���l�ll����ml� ��� � � � ����`"���I�I i i�/y/,; yry �//%� %//,��1� �(h/ill���i�i�i��i�l�i JI��`!�`��Il�i'��I�� �I�I IQQ1� �� I '�����y������i� � . i '//�'/� // ;/�Y/ /��//I/� l�//l`1 o I � I% I i I I i I I I j.�., I�I I � II�i ��III I �� � I � I � I .�,�IIIIiI�11111�1 II Ilml I I � i �y�/�,� �// /�.,�/ /,/� �%ill//�m.v"ijl l�l��i' l'� ll � l l l � �/il�ol £3 ���I �� il��y.�1'ii l l pl I I m I i i ��iI�JN,I����ll � //i��/�/ �°'��/ ���/� � I' l�ll ��� II�IIQ�I� �.���14�i1 I�� I I I ; .���II��,I��III I� ` j//� /.-�j// i.� �� ' 1 i � � �, � � �i�,i� t`, . i ��i � i i i � h ���� .. Y \ NOTE: SEE SHEET 5 FOR PROFILE ENGINEER ENGINEER �� dNC��1P1L1E lE 1�1L.9\N� DO NOT I;SE FOR i W qCQU[SITION \ .` � - �llA�lLlliallllV dO�o ll'llallllV� � S �9v .g00 �� � NOT USE I�O CONSTRUCTION \�y�- Eg� / / \ �` ' d � -8 C q � �� / i / ; � � i i � I i � � . �� es� -� -Sa' � . /i // % / i / =;3 c�P � �-.i � � � I � � � II I � i �r / . � - - ��' �� *� t�'��,; �`; �' I I i' �i�i� e'��' C�% aB'a , ��s �� ���''�� ���,'' I ; , ; ; � � � �� ��, � BB ` PERMIT DRAWING � K.� � �� ' , �,� � i � �i i ��il i a � sa-se�s. --ti .�`'"' �,,.� �il �,i l I�� � i' I ilil , � ; � � -- � �-�" ,,��, � ��� , � , ,��� ��;� , ' "� , '';�'��', �`���; � � ��., � ���� �p � , -, e� - ---eeo =_ SHEET 2 OF 4 a�� � , i � i � c. -� � , , i - � � o �� � � � ' � �, ��, _ � �� ��/ / / �1 � �� �}., i � �, i 1 / i i � I, i� � � m � � � � � i . � I I � � g I � � �m i � � � A � � � - __ � _ - -' - _, . � i �,,,� � l i � � �� , °' � , , �� ,__ / / � /o° e � �i � . /o,� � � ��"' � i U�i�q����� �V�A ' V � �j _ _ � 5 �i r I i..� � � / � .,� � � I I ��� �"��� � �� ` \���� �� l� ��- L . � � � '� .i � � � � � g �. �.� .i'+,i "� � C�� � �� i � i ��, �I ii� I � ��, a b� '-�: �� 5 -�.. � �. ��•.����'� �' _`�- � s'` rni� � ----- � � • � � , � ��� � go.-� , A + . - � � v i i, z � / i � _ � � ,_ � � � � � .,_;� � J �1 � r � � l l .� i � �i a5 I �r�� � �� � ,� `� ��. � .. � � A - � °P� �5�� -_--- - � - �'�j , �� � � � ��,-i 4� � � , � i,� ;, , , , _ � , S � .�� � � � ,� � � �� �����c.�. i �� i�,lill� _ _ _-__ _�, . � . . . i. .. � �� ..�� �i �,� ��� i� .t 'KR "�'_ ��'�'���"✓� �'�;i�i .��, �, :�J'. i��ilii������ "'��� � i I �l i ill �n,�. �� � � . �' �� . � ,� FF E�Ed I' �_ .:� ._,.._ `-� ., �oai � ��i�li I'+,,i . � � �.;,: � i ����,� ��� �j'�� �. r, � � �� � � � ; � � . � � � �� � es_. F,C: � � _ - _�'' _� - ',,, '�,� ,:_--._� � �_ _ . , . ��1`'.� �; l i i � : i�, ; o , ; µ; r � T� �;' � - . � s% � �, �i �,� i � �i-�`� / i �; r�S'j � . � � " 1�I �i �._. ��_, � '.��\.A� . ,j H_ '_.- `,.�.- _ � � ��� '��' . �� ! ,� �� � ' '� � ' SITE 1 � ��� �� �, - �: `�.�� - �� I� 1.� • �IhSdo `y�'i�lli � �6�i, I�� .;,: . �,.I��kc�K� �nTr.� -n�AiL�Ao�Es � � �i I I I �,r �� � ase� � `.,. �n� ✓� .,�� � �,�. � � � � �, � � � " . ,__- ... . � � i � � � ����q�, ,- � , � , � N SITE 2 :�� � � ,� ;� � � 000� �,� � ' u-� � � , wbaes �' , � , , I� i i I �, '� 'I �" �� i . ,'I � �LATERAL BASE DITCH --- `�� s.• - � � �; � � � ,��4y ���� �� � ;,� ' ;' ;s, �,� .; � " � END TlP PROJECT 8-48N � , � , �� y., i �+. �� i Mni� ..�. `� � � .� % SEE DETAIL D � i �� I I � - f' �� ,. � i � v i � � i A' � . . '\ . �'� ��� � .��� -r� . �� . _ � � ,' 4 � _ - I �� � ,r� � � p� � CAUSEWAY FaR . ; ; EST. 60 TONS � : �� � -L- , fO. "1' . i > kD i �� � 'i il 1 � � 1 _r; k� � �' .. �CONSTRUCTION \ i - � EST.150 SY GEO .�`V - s,n.,�GIN Tl�' PROJECT 8-48/l � � , � � �i � FA0 ��'�''',� �' __ aea� � �'� oF PROPosEo% � �� _ PRC Sto. 17+97.92 �_� �3 , PT Sto. 20t67.02 � � � , c� � ,,,�' � , � r . �� ert�ocE ° woons � ,�� POT Sto. 22+67.0 ?_ - POT Sta.lO +00.00 � � % � , � � � � r s � � � � ��i � i �����A�r�� � � � - � � � , - � � � - , � ��%%�� � � ',�( � � .. y � � � I S " IP-RAP � - . _ � i CLA I R �� .� �� \ 1�� � �� I �� �� � � - TDE - � %%//�� �', s 5 r � TD ST. TOnLS � � � i �i � a C` � � 1 �' Ir ^v � i I � li � � ,�� � ��S% s ��?f�� � F� ST. SY GEO � � � Fr C�C �_ �s R e . , �, �. �� i _ ',� . , �' '' _ � _ = b _Q . r I� � � i J, ' { � � � _ TOE PROTECTION � �� .. l , . � F __ SEE DETAI� C . . � . V l �,� � � ".� j � � F � � �s � �� ✓�tt s��; �z E eOWS . . ---�- EST.SO�SY�GEO � ' r -,- �= , PC Sto. 11+5593 , � � _ �'r; ,: C�.' ✓1�' � � � � canuaso�� 5-,� -L � o -__i_ .____7_ - . � . .:� � � i C� -_ � ' _- '- . / ,S". �. x., -- �L_� � F � ,� i o ^ _ � J r?K. :�. 2GI o- �o . -L_-L-__i._____ T____7_ 20-l-Q - � „� r� ��- � � R � �` � � ��� � ` �� - -L _� . .�RA� o �� � � � � r � ^ �, .. - o n: _ � r t in c�� �i ,� ,�`� "':5 r a e., ,. - o ry _ - -� E � F I I- -��. � � � � � N � w � �/ � V � �-i z - � S 74' 47' 25B' E o -L - - �� � E��� R � � � �, eNo sec sra -r V p 0 I� r�� a,-r` �`°' � � n.so.00 iar � � i 1 0 o w _ Ilu s naa zz: .� ��' �/� � . - 2GI 15" R - � 15" ftCP 1 - � 18 W , � `. \\ �_ BECtN SBG STA/ / F - _ € _ -_�\� _ R r /F�E Gw. a o� o. �.F ��/ � ,. .�., ~1.-�.-I T.. � _ _ _ �`"".�/ ��� � . � -- „ �. � �,irR ��. E �---�-_-- IELBOW �. � �C `w/ / E� �M1. � -�.��2.ar85r . ► . _ �,�N in YP 16+75.691R7.) � � ��P� E - .. NL L.41{i+ . � 5 ; ��Pan � E , , . ,�:-. , ESTCS� 0 TONSRALE DITCH AUE T� A ^��.... EX STL GOBRI GEE AUE."����.... - -a UE - - - - - -AUE�-�-C9' / 1 �`'i i., �� � F� � �u{�,,�.�I / 2 Q" / i �. � F � � � � ; � � /. % �._ i E5T.50 SY GEO � .-i- � ��� I � � �P ,` � I � � � �� SPECIAL LATERAL �� � � I� �� �' SPECIAL LATERAL CLASS 'P RIP-RAP , ' � \ . I '1 � �" � \ � �� __ � ���I I �, �" 'V' DITCH �' , EST. I TONS " ' „�. p �'i BASE DITCH '�- � \ l i% �- � +i ' �, SEE DETAiL a �` .. . `�+`." , SEE DE7AiL 8 EST.5 Sv GEO � � � �' � . . `�m \\ :,f�' .. ` �1 G�u'= �"� � .:. - . i { � � � � � � �. � S `^.:. . ... �- . �'�' �7-�z \\� I 4„`0 . / y, \\\ \�\�� � � � � � `� ��`i` y�. 1I ,i �n �' ,CrF ;' i 1Fr y � � ���M�l Yinnfj�` � ? II� � �� ...-,� .s ,�G \ \ �n4� •,., SEEEDETAICTBRAL � .. � /-� � P ��I 11\� � �� � � ��?��,y'i' .. i`A\�r+\.�,� ��vi � '''I D; i' I li li �i��;',I��I'��. } ,�l -�t, �c, \ C. ,�G a��y: - ��S `>a� .._. i5F � 4 � �; ` � ��', h � , ��e �(r�;a� . . _._ ___ ' iP _ 'I�'� � i ,,�,. y _ . `� .� ,'- �.Fi�F� �. ti � ' : � \ I y� � �)�' �i � i', �aZs ,� wo�:aniL . \ � �� . � - � S e�j� i � 6P _ � '"5z._/ \ � i �� I -- � e�: ` . . r�-, � .�`'£. � �c, ;�.` . ,. I �o- I ,ii . - -- ' , i 'rl,l.. "2��, `.� r., `�.� �,� � "�`,1 � �,� Wcs�Gs � },�+�� �. . 1 � \\_\ °L-��t . '�..\� ���illl �.i 'g�; .� _ /G� i I i II�� /< `�"5�� �-x_ �3� J _ � a �i '< ;Kl� ., •;E :'tJ, � ��' ��. �, �� \4, '����."-7 �� . . e5o � 1�- ��� � . "\ '� 1��'nI ' - 6 �i,1 � � �I I� ��`: _ _ n' .^ L F n i "`s , e�.. � `.� ,�,. . ? � \ �. � ' '& � i I . \ . \ ,� . � ,y _ro'� � i.f s ss� ) � _ -_ �t 9e*a . � . s �i n i �,iC y„ \ . _ }. a ' � . ' . � ��: _ e.� � P ?, ` \ �"hl'i . P i i . p � 4 � . I�'�� �� __ s. :^a�.' :C "`, n,. .. .''�� � k_ " I�:��. \\•`� , y�A - .i � r �? l � i i 1�� , �,�. :: ,�..:.. ..``�� � . � � r.'�� �. , r'.. �CONC � °a \ m`: �i� � �. . . i � R .. .,; _ `�' . .. 'kC'��I �-il� � ' , ,i : -= ��^..,�;;: .,? i,.n\ r,�._ .,�.^ . �.b`T�`.. wn,��'` li � \ \ � �`,`.;\ °� �-���\ \\s.. �+�'�� / e�,�.. '�< ;�;bi::, `J' .___ ��' �7I �ili.. � . . . '� . •.<: �. � " i�{,'�, " � \e�s.`A ., � � �� sn� \ i � i -�ss; � I �;(�m'�, ' � S . �' / , � - :.FS.' \. ` .�. �. �.: . �.. ��Y�[ tF . K 'J".'I \ �'. � ��q' �'. I . Aqo � J . � .. `... . .`;�: \ � .:�,.. � il,,��� � � i�' ia... 'i �9�� .\, � / �� �\ �:�`� s�s� //����; ...� �i _ - . ft3_�� � �, � i �_' �'�'� � . - � �� \ ���`:� s a�' i� � li � �� m��:�. . ` .... ,,. `� � � �., � -- .�\�; .� �\� `x`r. IMi��'". �.�.:.. �..,. ,�a�.�� � ��.. .rs �_ - �_'`���_.� / � �\ `\ �\�r2�� �� ��6Ci /��r,��,il,�� ' i � � - x��.],;�' ;qll�' , . /` yy} 4 ;�. �_- ;.6ne'�a , �. . �, \ . . . \ � �.; i / ` � � � �� � • �`' \ _ - a �� --. � _ . . .,. . - . . . . �. � � . �� . � \ �::. � . � ���., i.. � (-�• '.\§_. , � . � asaJ - � �\ \ �i � \ se i�q �?:' �F n, � � i �lC?t�� � � � ' ��"' ,:�-. , , � . i . ,. _ , . ` � ��� ,:c � � ':,` \� r� ���% = -� .��\\� �0d, G^aa - b'� %�,; - _ .� < �?:/��: � � ".`.'�� � ..� � a � � ,. , - . ( ,- ;�,- . , ; , ., _ : . . . � _ r- �,, ,� �y -'^'- �,,, ' � � m �1 '� o���� . �` ' =5 �� - -- -- � � _. -,� , . . ; . , ., , . , � � � �_ \ ` � Y,; � � � _ a� � � � � � � ���` �r z= ;. � r";' : , _, , , , , - ` \ -��:, /�� <'�;6�� .f ,. no- ' \ � \ ,i �\ `.�`. ��\ .�.'k = _ ,.:e._ � ';,_y, .. , ,. � . ;� .. ` . i . c- � " � � �� � t= �: � .:�� ., '"": . \`. GJ `; :( �i1 \ . � 4,, � � a�'`�'- e� \ g - - �r` i i � �y' � ' _- , � • \ {� . . \ - \ . ;.. . ,: , � :,, �, ' , � � ' , . o �'', a � `a' s. ,>�` ai; , � � � � o-\�. `'`a..�'\ i � �.�. qy` �§� _ � \���� \•.'�.�\�.. \e� �d� �l' i "%�;r�., � �. � P :�F a1E��� ` 1 p , �"� � ��., .. \ \ \ ` ' �..`- P..� �,.¢�: ! `-f� �a:�, . � �.,���. 's`,�\�� � :\� � 1; .��' � c ��:umt ... � - _ � . \ . � _ � �.@S�a<i?�. � d�:\�\ �� .,� a„-B _ -- - -� , _`y�`-. i^_.+` �. �t' ��;,.n ���� . �.,.��.� � :. . . . � �' ���: _ . --�\�����{ ��, � � i �.\'�. . . ._ ., �a. `•L' g$;_.-' i " ss � ,;. . ,d .,A�� ��� � � .' � � �� �i: �. . - ' . ' ' . . . _ . �-� _ _ � . _ . . ._ - . .-' -_ ..-. _� � .�� ���� . / � i ' � / � i,y���:� _ . _ /. i�li ii � !,� ' � � � g � "il I � �i t' .-- DETAIL C -'f'� ��� /�i��lj:,���1 � `� oera,i� n, DETAIL B BRIDGE /ROADWAY RELATIONSHIP SKETCH i �' i,��,���, TOE PROTECTION � � �\�y�. : SPECIAL LATERAL'V' DRCH SPECIAL LP.TERAL BASE DITCH �No��o s�oie) �/ I I� I I I I��� ��.' INa��a scalel INof�a smlel � :' I I ,; I 1 I 1�,� ` �� � Na,�,a� ,�.°FR F�« /5+00 ,vPE-��� „�li �1'� �A�����. j.� Ground u�ol Q �- Fill NAiURAL -� �,C� SIOPE ttPE-I11 \. \ ,\�\�� \ �` SloPe d ..D �', �,ou�d 7:/ D JP sloae GxouNo d F _L_ .\ \�\ ��.. - G[OtE%tILE ���5,�\ � � � � B I Mi�. D- 1.0 F�. d= 1.0 F5. � � �'� �sJ`�� �� ��\� 1 Min. D� 1.0 FL B= 2.0 Ft. �.\g ,C��� i Max. d=1.0 Ft. b: \ y Type o4 Liner- Class 'I' Rip-Rap TYPE-III ttPE-i11 - FROM -L- STA.11+00 Tp STA.11+37 6 RT1 END SBG STA. � I I I� FROM -L- STA. 10+00.0 TO STA. 10-50.0 (RT) FROM -L- STA. 12+00 TO STA. 12+35.9 �RT) FROM -L STA. 19+50.0 TO STA 20+25.0 17+50.00 (Ri.� �� �,1` ��1 � ��� DETAIL D DETAIL E END APPROACH SLAB � I;,� � LATERAL BASE DITCH LATERP.L DITCH ' �� ���,,, �', i�ot�o s�o�e� i����o s�o�e� BEGIN APPROACH SLAB eeeiN sec srn. ' +�� � i� � b b STA. 13+88.00 i6+75.69 ieT.� i����,�.�' � � � C�� Hm��i � F�n F��u � � r.o o,ea _ - � � r�+ i � �� I �o��a 2, �,. + z� 1. E,�o�a�o� - �os � � BEGIN BRIDGE END BRID E ra1\ (� 1 ,1� ., d� D SIoPe SIoPe d D � S �i r� .i'�l'�I�� � i� � � �Eor�.� e �Eo.�nF� � ; � � _ STA.14+00.00 + 0. 0 � I� I�I utrl�l I �J r ��. M n D� 1.0 F. Min. D- I.0 F. ; �� I , ' �� Mvn.d= 5.0 Ft. d Max.= 2.0 Ft. - - �� � � f�� wi,e� e �. . a.o B= 10.0 Ft. 6= 3.0 F. Type of Liner- Class I RiN-Rap 6= 5.0 F. Type of Liner- Class I Rip-Rap FROM -L- STA. 16+00 TO -L- STA, 16+50 (LT) FROM -L- $TA. 13+00 TO -L- STA. 14+40 (RT) ............. .......... ............. ......... .�7.C:�:�7: C7a.�.C: :�:�7�.a.� :�.C:� �:■ ■�...■��� ��Y������ �...�_.��.�Y�� � ■����:� �• �i�o i�.'a�' ■.uo . :..:. ::...:.. ::�G:: :::�G ::�::�G:: :::::�G::� : :::::: : '� :� :�� :C C.a:�.C: :�:�:R:a.� '�'C"'� �..C� �.. . . . . . . �7�� � �� BEGIN GRADE -L- STA. 10+00.00 FI RR�, R7 ��������� CCC€� ii CCC � .CCZ� �» C:CC �C �i� COC 1� C�CCai� CCC€�ii C�C€�=i CCC��=i C�C€��i CCC€ C�ii C�C€ Ill��l�l�l�l�lll�lnlllnl�l���l�lll��lnlll�l�lllnl�lll�l�l���lnll�� e.. ... ..� ....... ....... ....... ..e....�...�.. .... .... ....� �i=. _- - - - - -�- � Pl - 10+75 00 � ' ii� ■ �'.��'.�.E_ �� � .. : ees i� a �» � » ��CC� �� C�CCC�� ::'� �i 1 GCCCa �i CCCCa=i C:I BR/DGE HYDRAULIC DATA DESIGN DISCHARGE = 30900 CFS DESIGN FREOUENCY = 50 YRS DESIGN HW ELEVAT/ON = 866.5 FT BASE DISCHARGE = 4/500 CFS BASE FREQUENCY = l00 YRS BASE HW ELEVATION = 87/.88 FT OVERTOPP/NG DISCHARGE = 4/500 CFS OVERTOPPING FREQUENCY= l00 YRS OVERTOPPING ELEVATION = 87/.64 FT DATE OF SURVEY = 03-25-14 WS.ELEVATION AT DATE OF SURVEY = 845.8 , EL = 88396' '� C I r� � ' VC = 90' Pl = 12+50.00 v � 890 K= 9/ EL = 877.77' - ��=26� SITE 2 ----- - �'�2 467% K= 97 ws E�. = aas.e• T r �' Pl = 20+lOAD _ �_13 . . �. �SL1RVEYED 03-25-14 � i �� � � � � E� = 87�.�,7, '4 � _ , ^5 %/% '-I �� = 200' 880 s8�i '.1g9-- _ _ ' -- — ,_,_ _ K=/72 � - ,2�6� '- 1.-� r� ' � �g � --_ f—J0.8553% Exisrwc � _ ,_ -._ _ EXIST. Q O `'., B/ ..---_ROADwAY BRIDGE]-- 870 � 9 � - - -- - - - f-XL8553% f+1p3053% � - ------------ ---- � �� •t�q � M � W � � I ti v tiC=.>* N¢I� � W /� I--- i --T--- I----� � ... .�..r tnT-tiN � � -i W �) � � � i, i 86� �� � Q� lO�l II �� J� J W ` 3�22j I I � � � m� II W W?a w�� •o �i� �� ¢ti �-'B�'�� �I TEMP.ROCK I j � �� � �U O � �'� ' A WAy tn oo U e,. U= ^� � C USE � * ti� . c� o I --- � v�i�+ ro v�i -� � �� . � Q � � � � (TYP�9 (MINJ 'I � �� �� � � � � '� � � � � \ O(nll II 2\�� �"l^ �I + h � •�J /I -.-_ ..--.- ___ ____ �i i i �:.i i i il iI - ' � . i.. H'rJO � WQ �� � 2¢� � W q WUOi ti ¢ \ I j - - - - - �� ��_ m W �, � � � � � T m � i � ��- Wm� W m¢�� W �QN n �ti r� �� �� �ti 4� - -'-__ I -/ � -- -_ _ --- ---- - — - Wal� W W� � �J U� �4 �i _ - - 84� - V1='�ro �iv�w � - -- - - - __ ____ ._._. � _ �-� - - - -- I - ----- '- m? �I W o\�I w IJJ_L�I_IJ �-��J11_I�_I�-'d_�I��_I�-'d�l L�YJ LI_LI I� I�_ -- I � _-_ --- --_- PROIECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO. B-48/l 5 ROADWAY OESIGN HYDRAULICS ENGINEER ENGINEER dlti��i�]ED]L�; 1L l�il,.a�N� DO NOT USE FOR A W ACQliISITION ����.d��N �� ��,.�N� DO NOT USF. FO GONSTRL�CTIOI: i i�. i i�. i i : i ' ' ' ' ' ' ' PERMIT DRAWING �; �; ; ' ' ' ' ' SHEET 3 OF 4 � � � � ; , ; ; �,; j ; � :������iiii� �.� �.� � � �:� �:� l: EL. 871.85 1 �u��o ���a���: uEa��� �i��i ■ im�■� ������u�ia�iiiiiii � ■ ��pi i��� h�O�h����■ �n�������� �����Y��oOn: ��0p���p��p������ �0�: � .a.�..: ..o..o........ ��u��iai��i�iiiii :11 � 890 $$0 870 860 850 840 830 820 _.�............�...........t............� ................�......�.t�.. _ __ — __ � �_ �.. . . . �- 810 m ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' " ' ' "' ' NOTE: SEE SHEET 4 FOR PLAN VIEW 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 WETLAND PERMIT IMPACT SUMMARY WETLAND IMPACTS SURFACE WATER IMPACTS Hand Existing Existing Permanent Temp. Excavation Mechanized Clearing Permanent Temp. Channel Channel Natural Site Station Structure Fillln Fillln in Clearing in SW SW Impacts Impacts Stream No. (From/To) Size / Type Wetlands Wetlands Wetlands in Wetlands Wetlands impacts impacts Permanent Temp. Design (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ft) (tt) (ft) 1 -L- 14+67 TO 16+05 Tem orar Causewa 0.10 140 2 -L- 16+08 TO 16+88 LT Roadwa Embankment 0.39 70 TOTALS': 0.39 0.10 70 140 0 `Rounded totals are sum of actual impacts NOTES: TOTAL IMPACT DUE TO DRILLED PIERS = 0.002 (95.4 SQ. FT.) � See Sheet �-A For I ndex of Sheets —L— STA 10 + 00.00 BEGIN TIP PROJECT B-4811 �������\�� �� � ����J��� J� ��������� � ��I ����II � �� �� ���� ���� LOCATI01�: BRIDGE 87 �VER THE BROAD RIVER 01� US 64 TYPE OF WORK: GRADII�G, DRAII�AGE, PA T�I1�G A1�D —L— STA 14 + 00.00 , � RFC�IN RRII�[�F i , . CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED' TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD II. THIS PROJECT IS NOT WITHIN ANY MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES. � —L— —L— STA END -----� U S 64�74A 16 + 50.00 BRIDGE STR UCTURE —L— STA 22 + 00.00 END TIP PROJECT 6-4811 \���__��\� �_—�s—�1 �� � 1\ �� j_ I � � � � � � �_� ---- ------------------ __TO RUTHERFORDTON � �Z ����,���N��� ��.�Ns �� ��� ��� �,�� ������������� GRAPHIC SCALES DESIGIV DATA PROJECT LE11tGTH Prepored in the Offlce of: HI'DRAULICS E1VGII�EER DI T�ISI01� OF HIGHWA YS 50 25 0 50 �oo ADT 2016 = 3030 LENGTH OF ROADWAY TIP PROJECT B-4811 = 0.180 MI. 1000 Birch Ridge Dr., Raleigh xc, 27610 ��� �►�r��� � ADT 2 03 6= 42 62 2012 STA11iDARD SPECIFICATIONS ��� ��� PLANS o LENGTH OF STRUCTURES TIP PROJECT B-4811 = 0.047 MI. � �� K = 11 /o P.E. � , SIGNATURE: � � 50 25 0 50 �oo D= 60 % TOTAL LENGTH TIP PROJECT B-4811 = 0.227 MI. RIGHT OF WAY DATE: KEVIN E. MOORE, PE �� � T = 7 % * MA RC H 3 �, 2 015 PROJECT ENGINEER R OAD WA Y DESIGIV �'�� ���� PROFILE (HORIZONTAL) E11tGI11tEER �� p���� V = 50 MPH l0 5 0 l0 20 * TTST =1% DUAL=6% LETTIIIIG DATE: MARK HUSSEY AP RI L 19, 2 O� 6 I'ROJECT DESIGN ENGINEER FUNC CLASS =ARTERIAL P.E. PROFILE (VERTICAL) REGIONAL TIER SIGNATURE: C_ � c � � � a c